Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 990 Scott Adams： Biden and Charlamagne Tha God, More Bad HCQ Studies, Scary Orange Man Complaints, Masks

00:00:00.700 Bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum hmm

00:00:11.740 Hey everybody, come on in! You found it. Yeah, it's the best place in the world to be right now.

00:00:22.760 And it's because there's a little thing coming up, and I think some of you know what it is.

00:00:27.420 Hey Omar. Some of you know what it is. It's coming. It's coming real soon and it's called

00:00:33.140 The Simultaneous Sip and all you need is... Do you know what you need? Yeah. A cup or

00:00:39.000 mug or a glass or a tank or a challenge or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel

00:00:43.120 of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled

00:00:50.800 pleasure of the dopamine here of the day, the thing that makes everything better, including

00:00:54.960 the damn pandemic. It's called The Simultaneous Sip and it happens now. Go.

00:01:03.740 Hmm. I can feel my ACE2 inhibitors restricting, keeping the coronavirus out. You know, I had

00:01:12.500 this weird feeling yesterday. My town, as far as I know, we've had basically zero coronavirus

00:01:19.440 in my town, which means that I and everyone in my town have been just sort of play acting

00:01:28.180 at the plague. And we're all walking around with our little masks and everything. Now, I

00:01:34.200 get the idea that if we don't all do it, you never know who has it and who doesn't. And

00:01:39.380 you have to all act like, at least act like you have it or it's, or it's everywhere. But

00:01:46.920 it's sort of this weird, absurd realization that I've been living in a reality that doesn't

00:01:52.800 exist. In other words, I've been, I've been existing in at least mentally in a reality in

00:01:59.840 which there's coronavirus on every surface. And the reality might be in my specific town.

00:02:07.280 Maybe none, maybe none, but we're not going to take the chance. So keep your masks on. I

00:02:14.520 say there's a, here's a, here's a, here's a question for you. And this was suggested to

00:02:21.200 be on locals. And I want to see if anybody's had this experience. If you go in and you get

00:02:25.800 a test for coronavirus and it's positive, they'll often tell you to come back in two

00:02:31.420 weeks to test again, to see if you're, if you're no longer positive. If you test positive

00:02:38.320 the second time, do they count that as one person who tested positive or two? You know

00:02:46.700 the answer to that, right? It just feels to me, there's probably not the same people testing

00:02:52.820 each time. And probably every time they get a positive test result, they check it off,

00:02:58.140 check positive. So that might be at least one source of inaccurate counting. But on the

00:03:06.380 other side, there was a, I think it was a Yale researcher who said that based on the unexplained

00:03:12.640 extra deaths before we knew there was a coronavirus, meaning that probably the coronavirus was killing

00:03:18.880 people before we knew it, that he estimates that the number of actual coronavirus deaths

00:03:25.840 might be one to one and a half more than what's reported. Now let's say that's true in the United

00:03:33.360 States. I don't, I don't have a reason to think that's true, but let's say it is. He's a, he was a

00:03:39.780 Yale guy, seemed to know what he was talking about. One and a half times more than we have,

00:03:45.900 we're pushing a hundred thousand. So that'd be like close to a quarter million people have

00:03:51.720 already died. Already? Quarter million people? I feel like we would know that. That doesn't

00:03:59.740 quite, doesn't quite pass the sniff test. All right. Have you seen the, probably you have

00:04:09.020 the viral video of, it's got to be viral by now of Joe Biden, uh, doing a interview with, uh,

00:04:16.880 Charlamagne the God. Uh, now if you don't know who Charlamagne the God, it is important to the

00:04:23.040 story to know that he is black because, uh, the quote from Joe Biden is, and I'll read it,

00:04:32.700 but keep in mind that you're going to be hearing it so out of context, which will be the second part

00:04:40.020 of my story. So what, so what Joe Biden said as he was sort of closing up the interview with

00:04:45.680 Charlamagne the God, he goes, quote, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or

00:04:51.020 Trump, then you ain't black. And then Charlamagne quickly said, quote, it don't have nothing to do

00:05:01.180 with Trump has to do with the fact that I want something for my community. Now I have to tell

00:05:07.060 you that, uh, several people sent me this clip this morning and the context that people sent it to me

00:05:15.300 was Biden has gaffed again. He's gaffed again. Well, you know how we always talk about how the, uh,

00:05:23.840 the left is always taken in by these selective video edits. You know, they, they got taken in by the,

00:05:30.360 the Charlottesville hoax. I got taken in by, and other people by the Covington kids hoax.

00:05:36.520 So we know the video is misleading, right? Like we know video is misleading. Uh, this is one of them.

00:05:45.600 So there, I saw two clips. There's a short one. That's the one I just mentioned where really you

00:05:51.020 just, you mostly just see Biden saying what sounds like an awkward thing to say. If you have a problem

00:05:57.200 figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black. You know, he says it jokingly.

00:06:02.360 Now, if you saw that by itself, it just looks like a gaffe. It just looks like what? Why would you say

00:06:11.660 it that way? It's just weird. It looks awkward. But if you see just a little bit more of it,

00:06:18.460 it completely changes it. So, so watch out for this video. It's, it's pretty misleading. So here's

00:06:26.900 what, here's the context that you're missing. Yeah, it's not a gaffe at all. In fact, I give him an A

00:06:32.940 plus. So you've seen me savage Biden, right? I mean, uh, there aren't too many people who've been

00:06:40.580 tougher on it than I have. So if I give him a good grade on something, I think you should take that as

00:06:45.420 credible because I'm, I'm quite biased in the other direction. And here's what I saw. If you saw the

00:06:51.200 slightly larger, uh, clip, the two of them have serious chemistry. That's the part you miss. If you

00:06:59.640 don't see how good their chemistry is, and you see Charlemagne talking very warmly to Biden and inviting

00:07:06.160 him over and stuff, and it seems very genuine. Once you understand that the two of them have a genuine

00:07:12.860 chemistry, then suddenly the context completely changes. And yeah, Biden can say absolutely

00:07:19.840 anything because once you see that they're, you know, they're, they're just so friendly and so

00:07:25.100 comfortable with each other, then it just is obviously just, uh, Biden joking around. And by the way,

00:07:32.640 he did it really well, really well. And here's what I mean by that. By, by his,

00:07:40.400 by his ability to just put it out there so comfortably,

00:07:43.860 it, it kind of tells the story that he's very, very comfortable with Charlemagne, the God. And by

00:07:51.960 extension, you say to yourself, he likes black people. Joe Biden likes black people. That's what I

00:07:59.040 got out of it. If you got anything else, like it was awkward or whatever, you probably saw the short

00:08:04.140 clip, just see a little bit more. And you're going to tell yourself, if black people watch that clip,

00:08:12.140 they are going to like Joe Biden because it is unmistakable that he likes them.

00:08:19.980 It's really strong. It's really strong, strong enough that Trump has to be careful of that.

00:08:25.440 Meaning, you know, I think I may have underestimated Biden's appeal because he's sell, he sells a

00:08:33.260 genuine, a genuine chemistry that I don't think you can fake. Honestly, I don't think you can fake

00:08:41.140 that. Well, he's just not that good that you can fake that. That looks real to me. And if it registers

00:08:47.020 as real to the black community, he's going to get a lot of votes. Well, we know we will anyway,

00:08:53.220 both. So I'm going to be a contrarian on that one. That's not a gaffe. That was a home run.

00:08:58.960 If you see the whole clip. Let's see what else we got going on here. So it's starting to look like

00:09:07.600 at least Obama and Biden won't have to worry about any legal repercussions for so-called Obamagate.

00:09:16.260 The hypothesis that we're sort of coming to understand is that Obama probably

00:09:23.160 got the, not probably, Obama got the ball rolling, but probably was not in on the details

00:09:30.160 of whatever they did. And maybe they did a little more than they were supposed to, meaning Comey.

00:09:35.900 So it's probably going to turn out to maybe the underlings did more than they should. That

00:09:41.020 could be a problem, but probably not for Obama. All right. So Jack Murphy over on Twitter

00:09:53.760 was tweeting that a good friend of his was automatically unfollowed from Jack's account.

00:10:02.020 And his friend noted that he also had been unfollowed from me and from Mike Cernovich at different

00:10:07.900 times. And Jack was asking us, you know, what's up with that? And I'll give you my latest. I mean,

00:10:15.500 I still don't know the real answer, but my hypothesis still is that it's third-party apps,

00:10:21.580 meaning that if you have TikTok, for example, when you sign up, it might ask you to have access to

00:10:27.660 your Twitter account so it can post your TikToks. But it might give you more access than you want.

00:10:33.780 Because once some foreign intelligence agency, or domestic, could be our domestic agency,

00:10:41.000 has access through a third-party app to your Twitter account, I think they can unfollow you.

00:10:47.420 And I don't think there would be any record of it that you would ever see.

00:10:51.860 So my hypothesis, because I've actually talked to Jack Dorsey about it, and unless I'm the world's

00:11:00.160 worst judge of character, and I don't think I am, unless I'm the world's worst judge of character,

00:11:06.280 Jack has no idea why this is happening. And he's looked into it. So I think that, I don't think

00:11:13.680 that it's coming from Twitter management. If it's coming from, you know, somebody who works there,

00:11:20.540 that's a possibility. But it feels like third-party influence to me. That's just my guess.

00:11:27.280 I'll call that a working hypothesis. Wouldn't bet my life on it. But that's where it feels like it's

00:11:34.580 heading. All right. Have you noticed that the complaints about Trump tend to be so generic

00:11:44.300 that they sound like a cry for help from the person who is doing it? Here is one of the memes I saw

00:11:50.560 today. It was a picture of Trump, and the meme said, doesn't listen, doesn't understand,

00:11:56.600 doesn't tell the truth, doesn't obey the rules, doesn't care about anyone. Now, of course,

00:12:03.440 part of it is just crazy mind reading at a distance. I don't think you can see in his brain

00:12:08.740 to see what he cares about. But it's so generic that it just feels like a mental problem on the

00:12:16.300 part of the person saying it, doesn't it? Yeah, he doesn't obey the rules, which is an interesting

00:12:21.240 way to put it. And I'm trying to think, if you were to just criticize the president on things

00:12:28.100 that you could measure, how would that look? Why do they have to resort to things that can't be

00:12:35.760 measured? Couldn't they say, blah, blah, the economy, blah, blah, this, blah, blah, the debt? They can't

00:12:42.660 use anything with a number on it? There's nothing that could be objectively looked at that says he's

00:12:48.980 doing poorly, because I'm sure there are. There must be some statistic that he's doing poorly in.

00:12:57.400 Now, obviously, the economy is in the toilet, but everybody knows what the problem with that is.

00:13:02.720 Just a question. So I have a new policy for blocking, in addition to my normal blocks,

00:13:11.840 just for being trolls, I've started blocking people who mischaracterize my opinion in public

00:13:17.900 and then criticize it. Now, you're probably thinking to yourself, Scott, that's a little harsh.

00:13:25.460 If somebody mischaracterizes you on Twitter, why don't you just tell them what your actual opinion

00:13:31.060 is? Wouldn't that be better than blocking them? I thought that for decades, not decades on Twitter,

00:13:38.220 but forever, I've thought to myself, if I can just tell this troll, this critic, what my actual opinion

00:13:46.660 is, I can get them to stop imagining I have some other opinion and then attacking me for their

00:13:53.520 imagined opinion. In all of my life, I've never succeeded at that. And finally, I said to myself,

00:14:01.380 oh, I get it. It's intentional. Or it's something they can't help. Meaning that if they've misinterpreted

00:14:09.420 you once and you correct them, they don't go to the correction, they go to a new misinterpretation.

00:14:16.200 You've seen it, right? You've seen it a million times in your own life. They will just keep moving

00:14:20.640 from one misinterpretation to another, but they will never accept your own opinion as you tell it to

00:14:29.480 them. In fact, they'll tell you that you've changed your opinion, as if you don't know what

00:14:34.480 your opinion is. So I've stopped completely debating with people who, as soon as at the very first moment

00:14:44.040 they mischaracterize, I just block them. And I find that my life is so much better because they always

00:14:50.940 turn into these extended fights where they imagine that they're arguing with me, but they're only

00:14:56.580 arguing with their misinterpretation of my point. Let me give you the specific example.

00:15:02.400 So this particular troll yesterday was saying that, claiming that I said that all of the states and

00:15:09.060 all of the countries were having roughly the same outcomes. Now, if you hear that out of context,

00:15:16.440 you say to yourself, uh, that's not true. They all have all kinds of different curves and stuff.

00:15:22.100 So of course I didn't say that, right? Here's what I did say. They are within a range and that range

00:15:33.300 is big enough. In other words, there's, there's no country where everybody died and there's no country

00:15:39.260 that has an infection rate where nobody died. You know, so there's sort of a range and they're all

00:15:44.740 in that range. And when they're not in that range, it's usually some, something we know about,

00:15:49.860 such as elderly and Italy, et cetera. But here, here's my real point. There are so many variables

00:15:57.520 from vitamin D to, you know, the sun, the humidity, the density, et cetera, that I don't think you can

00:16:07.780 tell what the leaders have done that made a difference. So that was my point that got turned

00:16:13.800 into this other point by the critic who got blocked. So my point is that if you were trying to sort out

00:16:19.140 which governors were doing a good job and which ones did a bad job, unless you had a really specific

00:16:25.880 question, like the nursing homes things, that's pretty specific. But in general, you wouldn't be

00:16:31.040 able to sort out what went well or what didn't go well because of what they did. Because there's also

00:16:37.880 the vitamin D that they use. Some of them use hydroxychloroquine. There's different rates of old

00:16:42.980 people, you know, the distance. They have, you know, they have subways or they don't. So my only point is

00:16:49.500 that we'll never be able to sort out the mistakes. But let's talk about this nursing home stuff.

00:16:56.420 So the, here's what I think happened with New York and Cuomo. And there's some other states, I think,

00:17:04.740 to send people back to nursing homes. So apparently the, the initial guidance from New York was that

00:17:12.540 any nursing home has to take these people back. But then a month later, they modified it to say,

00:17:19.380 no, no, no, you only have to take these people back if you can meet the requirements of doing it

00:17:25.520 safely. And if you tell us you can't, then you don't have to. Now, in the real world, you know,

00:17:32.020 people can't tell. You should assume that these nursing homes are going to say to themselves,

00:17:37.220 well, you know, we, we think we can, but they're not, they're not really medical facilities. So

00:17:43.260 are they right? So you could see that this was a gigantic problem, but here's what I want to add

00:17:50.320 to this. Do you think the experts told Cuomo to do something different than what he did?

00:17:58.100 Think about it. Do you think that Cuomo's experts in the state of New York or whoever he was talking

00:18:05.080 to, when the, when the, you know, the question came up of where do you put the old people who

00:18:10.720 have tested positive? And there was obviously a trade-off and they said, well, we could put them

00:18:17.900 in the hospitals, but hospitals might be impacted, might not have enough room, or we could try to get

00:18:23.640 him back in the nursing homes under these certain conditions that we hope will be safe.

00:18:29.160 Do you think Cuomo made the decision or did he listen to his experts?

00:18:37.080 Somebody says the experts told him not to. Is that, is that reported?

00:18:43.580 If you have a, if you have a link for something that would suggest the experts told him not to,

00:18:49.000 let me know. But I'm going to guess that the experts told him that that would work out. Okay.

00:18:56.720 How much do you blame Mario Cuomo? Not Mario. Sorry, wrong generation. How much do you blame,

00:19:05.340 uh, Andrew Cuomo? If, and this is the, if we need to fact check on this, if he followed the experts'

00:19:14.340 opinions, right? Because what are all the experts doing? As far as I know, every governor and every

00:19:26.200 president of the United States followed all of the experts' recommendations until the one that I know

00:19:34.080 of, and there may be others, but this is the only one I know of, the one and only time I know of

00:19:39.840 that one of these leaders directly violated the suggestion from the experts was when Trump closed

00:19:48.800 the travel from China. So we have one example of leadership. Correct me if I'm wrong. Leadership

00:19:57.760 was when Trump said, you know, the experts say, don't do this. I'm going to do this anyway because

00:20:04.880 I like the, I like the risk management of it. If it's wrong, it's just two weeks. It's no big deal.

00:20:09.840 If it's right, you know, I've saved tens of thousands of lives and that may actually be

00:20:15.100 what happened. So we have exactly one example that I know of, and I'm open to more examples

00:20:22.360 because surely there must be other ones. But I know of one example of any of these leaders

00:20:27.920 doing something that the experts did not advise and it was right. And it was Trump. Give me an

00:20:35.460 example where any of the governors did that. There might be examples. I don't know. Oh, Georgia.

00:20:39.820 Somebody says Georgia. I don't know the details of Georgia, but I think what you're getting

00:20:44.660 at is that Georgia opened up earlier than the experts suggested. And so far, do we know

00:20:51.140 if that's worked or not? I don't know. But yeah, that would be, if that one proves out,

00:20:56.800 that would be a good example. So my point is this. When you're looking at Cuomo and you're

00:21:01.920 saying to yourself, he made this huge mistake, you can definitely say it was a huge mistake because

00:21:08.080 the outcome was bad. But can you say it was a leadership mistake if he took the advice

00:21:15.260 of experts? And I don't know if he did. So let's check on that. And by the way, why are

00:21:19.460 we even talking about it if we don't know that? Right? Why are we even talking about whether

00:21:25.980 Cuomo made the right or wrong decision about nursing homes? Obviously it's wrong in the end

00:21:31.320 without knowing if he was advised to do it or who advised him. Were these qualified advisors?

00:21:38.640 I'd like to know that. Then we could have an opinion. So let me put it this way. If his advisors

00:21:46.040 told him not to do it, or even if they were mixed, and then he did it, then I'd say, well, okay,

00:21:52.740 that's on him. If the advisor said, yeah, all things considered, there's no good choice. We don't want the

00:21:58.900 hospitals to be overrun either. Let's try this. If the experts advised it. I think he's got an

00:22:06.100 out. All right. Apparently my local hospitals, Walnut Creek Hospital in particular, says they have a

00:22:15.280 sharp uptick in suicides that coincides pretty much with the shelter in place stuff. And they don't say

00:22:23.120 the number, but they say the figure of recent suicides just in my area right here is, quote,

00:22:31.720 unprecedented. So that's bad. Now, if those of you remember, my first predictions here was that if

00:22:42.120 the shutdown was a short one, you know, if it's a month or six weeks, probably it would reduce suicides

00:22:48.520 because everything just pauses when you have a big change, but that the longer it goes, of course,

00:22:54.660 of course, that increases the risk every day that you go on. So we're well into the point where it

00:23:00.920 would, it would be reasonable to assume that there's, there's more suicide coming. I looked before I got

00:23:08.780 on, I was trying to look for excess deaths over the baseline just to get an update. I couldn't find it.

00:23:15.520 Can anybody tweet at me? It updated, you know, all the way through today, a list of deaths by month

00:23:26.220 on the baseline so that we can see how 2020 is looking compared to the baseline. So do we have

00:23:33.140 more total deaths with all causes, you know, this April and May than we did in prior years? I couldn't

00:23:40.420 find that for some reason. There's a, there was a little study about drumming of all things in

00:23:50.140 which that the people studying have found that if you had people drum to the same beat and the end

00:23:56.660 they stayed together and synchronized, that their heartbeats would actually start to synchronize

00:24:01.240 and that when you had them do shared activities, the next thing that you had them do, they could

00:24:08.340 coordinate with each other better. So it's actually been demonstrated scientifically that, you know,

00:24:14.540 of course, subject to peer review and, you know, studies that back it up, etc. But initially it's

00:24:21.280 looking like creating some kind of a rhythm does in fact connect people and that that connection

00:24:27.320 becomes productive, meaning that they'll work together better. Now this is, of course, the ultimate

00:24:33.480 extension of what the hypnotists know, which is that if you match somebody, you pace them,

00:24:40.140 you can then later lead them. So it's the same concept and you'll see it in a whole bunch of

00:24:45.060 different ways. And once you learn that matching somebody is the first thing you need to do before

00:24:50.780 you can lead them or work with them or coordinate with them well, it's one of the most important

00:24:56.580 lessons in life. So there's a lot of talk about church openings and people saying things such as

00:25:07.520 why can my gym reopen but not my church, etc. And I've been just sort of monitoring that

00:25:16.860 because since I'm not personally religious, yeah, I've been sort of just watching it. It's not really my

00:25:24.660 business. But the longer it goes on, the more I feel like I have to comment on it. So I'll start

00:25:31.540 with this overarching comment. I'm not a believer, but I'm very pro-religion. I've told you this before.

00:25:39.000 So although I don't personally believe, I witness and observe that people who have belief seem to have

00:25:46.860 better lives, just in general, you know, statistically and observationally, and I think the science backs it up

00:25:53.060 too. So I'm entirely pro-religion, because as far as I can tell, it works. Makes people happier. If

00:26:00.720 there's an afterlife, well, bonus. But it seems to make people happier while they're here. So I'm pro-religion.

00:26:06.140 Let's start with that. Right? So if anything I say sounds biased against religion, just remember the

00:26:13.300 first part. I'm not. I'm pro-religion. That said, why do churches want to open? I'm a little confused.

00:26:26.440 I know you like going to church, and I know that there's benefit of going to church, of course.

00:26:31.140 That's my whole point. But do you have a kind of special God who doesn't do takeout?

00:26:37.960 will your religion suffer if you take a few months off? If you simply do something else on Sunday

00:26:46.380 morning for a few months, will your God abandon you? Will you abandon your God? Will he not hear

00:26:52.540 your prayers? What exactly do you lose if you're just waiting a few months? Now, if I told you you

00:27:02.180 could never go back to church, well, of course. You know, then you've got to do what you've got to do

00:27:06.940 to get your rights back. But nobody's telling you you can never go back to church. We're literally

00:27:12.100 just saying, hey, take a little pause here. I don't think your faith is going to suffer.

00:27:18.480 So I watch this, and I think, of all the things you could fight about, there are a million things

00:27:26.300 that you could find to have some conflict about and disagreement about. But really, do you want to

00:27:32.020 fight for being in close quarters with other people when it's just not necessary at the moment?

00:27:41.060 I mean, arguably, it is necessary in the long run for your soul and your well-being, etc.

00:27:47.600 But does anybody think it's necessary in the short run, given that nobody's faith is going to be shaken

00:27:54.100 by any of this? Somebody says a need for a community. There is a need for a community, but again,

00:28:01.880 in the short run. It just feels like it's a fight that's not worth having, right? Now, I get that

00:28:10.980 people want their freedom and everything, but again, it's the short run. I feel as though somebody

00:28:17.160 says, please stop, Scott. I'm going to have to block you for that. So that's my opinion. Obviously,

00:28:33.000 since, as I said, I'm not a believer and I don't go to church, I don't have any stake in it. I have no

00:28:39.940 stake in it whatsoever. But I would just suggest to you that whatever you think is the upside potential

00:28:46.440 of it, probably no real upside potential in the short run. A month or two, do a little zooming,

00:28:54.280 I think you'll be fine. Anyway, I don't think it's a fight worth having, but it is your fight to have,

00:28:59.560 not mine. So if you want to have it, that's fine with me. Amazingly, CNN, even today, is still running

00:29:09.020 an article about how dangerous hydroxychloroquine is. And yet again, they don't mention

00:29:16.020 they don't mention zinc. It's another entire article about hydroxychloroquine not working.

00:29:24.940 And again, today, as of today, it's still running on their website and it doesn't even mention zinc,

00:29:32.740 the active part. What would it be like to be a CNN news consumer and not know anything about what's

00:29:42.480 going on? I mean, that's a lot of context to be missing. All right. There's a story, and I think

00:29:49.920 it was Gateway Pundit, that Klobuchar is saying that her husband took hydroxychloroquine when he had

00:29:57.680 coronavirus, apparently. And Klobuchar sheepishly admitted that, you know, maybe, you know, things can

00:30:07.200 make sense if you talk to your doctor. But then she tried to say it was dangerous, and she just

00:30:12.820 couldn't sell it. She just could not sell it. So I think Klobuchar did not cover herself in glory.

00:30:26.640 Is anybody concerned about this story about Trump wearing a mask or not wearing a mask to the Ford

00:30:34.120 plant? I don't know if I've ever heard a less important story. Because the whole point of the

00:30:41.220 masks, correct me if I'm wrong, is that you don't want to be the one who's exhaling the coronavirus.

00:30:50.360 It's not so much about catching it. It's more about you giving it to somebody. And the president

00:30:55.820 is the most special of special cases. Doesn't he get tested every day? Now, not only does he get

00:31:03.600 tested every day, but the other people talking to him will have masks on. So you won't have any

00:31:09.240 situation where there are two unmasked people. It looked like he was keeping his distance even

00:31:14.580 without the mask. When he was in one part of the building, he did put the mask on. I don't know if

00:31:21.000 I've ever seen less of a story. It seems like literally the smallest story in the world that,

00:31:27.920 yeah, he seems to be setting an example. But what exactly is the example? The example that I got out

00:31:37.800 of this was, if you're the president of the United States, if you have a personal physician,

00:31:43.780 if you get tested for the coronavirus every day, and if you visit the Ford plant, maybe you should

00:31:50.400 wear your mask in certain places but not others? I mean, who exactly is going to go out and follow

00:31:55.740 that model? Well, I was going to visit the Ford plant and I wasn't going to wear my mask.

00:32:01.180 And now that the president didn't wear his, when I tour the Ford plant, I'm not going to wear a mask

00:32:05.900 either. How many people are going to look at the president wearing a mask sometimes in the Ford

00:32:11.900 plant, but when he was talking to reporters with the cameras on, not? How many people are going to

00:32:16.800 look at that and say, therefore, I'm not going to wear a mask to my gym? I don't know that that's

00:32:23.960 going to happen. I don't know that the president's setting that kind of an example. Now, of course,

00:32:31.840 the famous example where a president did set a standard was when Kennedy stopped wearing hats,

00:32:37.560 and then hats became not a thing for men. But that was just a style thing. Who in the world is going

00:32:43.720 to be taking their face mask medical advice by watching what the president does when we all know

00:32:51.500 he's a special case? I don't see any story here. It's the smallest, the smallest news of all time.

00:33:00.040 All right. That is what we know. Now, the president has promised us that there will be more good

00:33:11.200 news coming down the pike, more therapeutics, more vaccine news. And the latest news out of Canada,

00:33:21.860 the Canadians, doing us a solid, I think, studied a bunch of marijuana plants and found that 13 of

00:33:31.400 them, but not most of them, because there are lots of different marijuana strains, but 13 of them had

00:33:36.760 just the right chemical composition that it looks like it influences your ACE2 inhibitors to resist

00:33:45.920 coronavirus. That's right. There might be, needs verification, but there might be a marijuana

00:33:53.980 treatment for coronavirus. Now, I don't know which of those 13 strains they're using, but I'm going to

00:34:01.380 smoke as much as I can, just in case. Somebody says, you are wrong. What am I wrong about? Am I wrong

00:34:11.380 that you're getting blocked for saying you were wrong? Probably not. That's for the new people who

00:34:18.360 don't know that when you say you were wrong, instant block. Yes. Why is there not a MAGA mask?

00:34:25.640 When, when the president was wearing his mask, I noticed it looked like it was sort of an official

00:34:30.760 blue looking mask with a little, maybe it was a seal of the president over there or something.

00:34:35.980 And I thought that's pretty cool. But wouldn't you expect to see American flag

00:34:41.500 masks be fairly common? I'll tell you the masks that look really ugly to me, the, the, the monocolor

00:34:50.080 masks that are either white or black, or sometimes they have some kind of weird skin tones that are

00:34:55.860 sometimes African-American skin tones and sometimes lighter skin tones. And I don't like any of them.

00:35:02.500 I, I hate that. I hate to treat it like a fashion statement, but all of the plain colored ones,

00:35:09.580 I think look bad. Uh, I'd rather see one with a little character. So let's get some, let's get some

00:35:16.140 good masks. I think I've actually reached a point in the mask acceptance that I'm starting to see them

00:35:24.440 as fashion. And also, Oh, uh, I have an interesting observation for you.

00:35:32.500 Just something to watch. Uh, I don't know if this is true, but I feel as if there's a certain

00:35:40.120 segment of the female population who is going to feel more comfortable in masks. And I would be very

00:35:47.360 interested in the opinion of any women who are watching this to, to see if you would agree. Um,

00:35:53.600 if you're a woman and you go out in public where there are men, you're pretty much always being

00:35:59.620 stared at and judged and you just feel like you're, you know, you're prey now that everybody's mileage

00:36:07.380 will differ, right? So there's no two people have the same experience, but it's very common if you're

00:36:12.380 a woman to feel like you're just sort of, uh, you know, walking around being looked at, judged, stared at,

00:36:21.540 you know, people having, uh, you know, sexual thoughts, et cetera. And my observation is that I saw more

00:36:28.120 women in this, in the grocery store than I'm used to. It actually looked like women were leaving the house

00:36:35.500 more because the mask made them comfortable or something. And it was, it was sort of striking

00:36:41.480 when I went to the store. It's like, wow, there are a lot of, you know, women in a certain age group

00:36:46.300 wearing masks. And I thought, I wonder if it's actually more comfortable to go some places with

00:36:52.560 a mask on. So that's just a question. No one thinks Scott Adams is smarter than Scott Adams does.

00:37:00.740 Well, you're right, but you're also blocked. Uh, he got blocked for being right. That's a, that's a first,

00:37:11.500 uh, somebody says, challenge yourself. It's better than smoking dope. You know, people who don't know

00:37:23.740 much about marijuana have different opinions than people who know a lot about it. I'll just leave it

00:37:30.580 there. You can decide what category you're in. All right. Uh, not me. Don't like restrictions to

00:37:39.680 breathing. You know, uh, let me tell you a little experience I had driving the other day.

00:37:45.200 You've probably had this too. You'll see somebody driving the car with a mask on and they're by

00:37:50.180 themselves. And you say to themselves, uh, you say to yourself, uh, I don't think you understand the

00:37:55.760 mask idea. If you're by yourself in your own car, you don't need a mask. The other day I got in my

00:38:04.800 car after I'd been in the grocery store and I still had my mask on and I started to drive and it was

00:38:11.680 still on. And I thought to myself, well, I'm just going from here to, you know, home. It's not very far.

00:38:18.860 I'll just leave my mask on because I got so used to it that the, the effort of taking it off. And

00:38:27.140 when I take it off, it hooks on my glasses and then my glasses come off and then I'm like, ah,

00:38:31.420 so I, I very, very quickly got to the point where leaving it on just for convenience was fine because

00:38:40.620 it wasn't bothering me that much. Has anybody, has anybody got to that point where you've worn it so

00:38:46.260 much that you almost, you've acclimated and you can't even tell it's on anymore? Has anybody got

00:38:51.460 to that point? Um, am I sponsoring Rasmussen this week? Yes. The Rasmussen poll is listing me as their

00:39:02.900 sponsor for this week for their polls. Now being a sponsor just means that you're, you know, you're,

00:39:09.680 uh, you're associating with each other. It's not a money, there's no money involved.

00:39:16.260 Um, can we build a startup together? You have an awesome e-learning project. Well, I probably

00:39:25.180 can't get involved in a new startup. I've got a lot going on, but there's going to be a lot

00:39:30.420 of the learning startups. I'll tell you. Um, if it's a short journey, you don't have to take it off.

00:39:39.920 Yeah. I mean, you know, I used to rip it off as quickly as I could because I hated it, but I kind

00:39:46.220 of got used to it. It would be real easy to imagine that in the future we'll have some kind of mouth,

00:39:52.980 mouth, nose covering that maybe cleans the air that maybe acts as your, your phone. I've always

00:40:01.580 thought that the future would be some kind of a, uh, a comfortable mask that goes over your face and

00:40:07.180 nose that you have on all the time and you can talk so that you can make a phone call without

00:40:13.440 anybody hearing it because the mask is, is muffling it. Somebody says the mask triggers

00:40:20.220 your claustrophobia. Oh, that would be a problem. I haven't had that sensation, but I can imagine

00:40:25.800 some people would. Yeah. Some, so other people are saying, yeah, stays on until you're home.

00:40:32.240 Uh, and other people say they panic with the mask. Yeah, that's going to be really, it fogs

00:40:39.760 up your glasses. Somebody needs to invent a mask that doesn't fog up your glasses because

00:40:44.880 I have that problem too. Uh, pull it down and step out of it. All right, here's the mask

00:40:52.920 I want. I want a turtleneck that just lifts up. Do they make that? Like it's just on all the

00:41:00.120 time on your turtleneck and you just go, whoop. I think I saw that somebody makes that. All right,

00:41:05.120 that's enough for me. I'll talk to you tonight.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 22, 2020

Episode 990 Scott Adams： Biden and Charlamagne Tha God, More Bad HCQ Studies, Scary Orange Man Complaints, Masks

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript