Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 25, 2020


Episode 996 Scott Adams: Freedom Breaking Out Everywhere, China Behaving Badly, Hydroxychloroquine Fake News


Episode Stats

Length

35 minutes

Words per Minute

147.1157

Word Count

5,274

Sentence Count

1

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

In this episode, we talk about the coronavirus pandemic, china's grip on Hong Kong, and why we should stop calling it a cold war because we're in a hot war. We also talk about John Krasinski selling out and how he sold out.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 all right here's a quick question what's the best part of the day i'm waiting i'm waiting
00:00:21.660 that's right it's now it's now and you don't need much
00:00:28.120 to enjoy the best part of the day no not much at all all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of
00:00:35.300 tanker chalice or stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite
00:00:40.240 liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the
00:00:47.280 day the thing that makes everything better including the damn pandemic it's called the
00:00:53.480 simultaneous sip and it happens now go
00:00:55.180 i can taste the infection rates decreasing yep yep it's working
00:01:06.600 well let's talk about all the things are you ready for all the things
00:01:13.540 well let's start with china there's talk about a cold war breaking out with china
00:01:20.480 over their increasingly strong grip on hong kong as they're as they're closing the vice on hong kong
00:01:30.400 to which i say we're not already in a cold war what is a cold war if we're not already in one
00:01:39.620 is it because we're in a hot war i mean how many americans have they killed this year
00:01:45.440 at what point has china killed so many americans with both fentanyl and and viruses that we have
00:01:56.360 to stop calling it a cold war because it's kind of hot over here maybe it's not a hot over there
00:02:02.860 but uh here's what i would suggest so i don't know what it means to be in a cold war
00:02:10.420 i guess it means whatever you want it to mean but given the fact that there's squeezing hong kong
00:02:17.420 which would be violating a business agreement a political agreement but it's kind of a business
00:02:23.420 agreement as well and they're shipping fentanyl and their their phone equipment is spying and they're
00:02:31.120 taking ip and they're doing you know unfair trade deals and blah blah blah i've said this before
00:02:38.580 but it's time to say it again rather than a cold war we should do an international rating of china
00:02:46.720 and other countries and we should simply rate them not suitable for business
00:02:53.920 and i would think that would matter if you've rated all the countries as for their suitability
00:03:01.400 to actually do business with them because the problem with china is not so much that we think
00:03:06.840 they're going to attack us militarily it's that we think their business will get so strong that it
00:03:13.740 will just you know eat up the you know civilization with uh chinese money and influence if that's what
00:03:21.440 we're worried about let's just call it what it is china is not safe for business it's just not a safe
00:03:30.260 place to do business with them it's not a safe place to put a company it's not a safe place to
00:03:36.200 even accept their mail i'm not even sure we should accept their mail because it's full of fentanyl
00:03:42.740 all right so uh actor john krasinski i don't know if he knew this but during the pandemic he was doing
00:03:50.260 a little uh web show i guess he was doing it himself called some good news so unbeknownst to me he was
00:03:58.060 doing kind of the same thing i was doing except not as well obviously and it got picked up by cbs news
00:04:07.200 cbs all access not cbs news um so they're going to pick it up and turn it into a show except the show
00:04:17.120 will not involve john krasinski now there was one good thing about the john krasinski show
00:04:24.940 which was john krasinski so somehow he managed to sell cbs on a concept that only had one good
00:04:35.640 element and he said but well there's just one thing i'm going to sell you this great idea
00:04:42.620 but there's just one little change i'm going to take out the only thing that made it work
00:04:49.600 which was that it was john krasinski who was hosting it during a coronavirus pandemic you take
00:04:57.820 that part out and what exactly did he sell but of course in a world full of stupid people how did
00:05:03.780 people take it his fans rebelled that's right john krasinski's probably you know probably one of the
00:05:12.460 nicest guys in the nicest guys in the world you know if if you can you know base it on what we see
00:05:17.560 on tv you know even not just his roles but when he's just talking uh in interviews and stuff he looks
00:05:24.480 like a nice guy but his fans are very angry that he gave his time for nothing during the coronavirus
00:05:31.800 and entertained them and millions of others like them for free for free and then he sells
00:05:40.600 the concept to cbs he's not even involved in it he's not as an actor he's not even going to be in it
00:05:47.500 he sells the concept and then his audience is all mad at him for selling out and i thought
00:05:53.340 selling out selling out cbs bought from him something that probably has no value whatsoever
00:06:02.640 i personally i would have sold i would have sold that um somebody says they didn't like his show
00:06:12.280 all right well he sold it anyway uh so i was having a good laugh at cnn coverage today because i wanted
00:06:21.120 to see how they'd handle freedom breaking out in america uh you know over the memorial day so lots
00:06:28.100 of people were crowding together and ignoring the medical guidelines and not wearing masks and
00:06:32.900 doing everything that the experts say they're not supposed to be doing and but on the plus side
00:06:40.400 it was outdoors and they tended to be the younger people there wasn't a lot of senior citizens were out
00:06:48.800 running around on memorial day so how dangerous was it well we don't know that's what we're going to
00:06:55.280 find out probably in about 10 days but cnn's coverage was hilarious uh here's here's the first one this
00:07:03.160 is the headline one of cnn's headline it says a 17 year old dies in georgia now why is it important
00:07:13.200 that a 17 year old died in georgia does that feel like national news let's read on in georgia one of
00:07:22.500 the first states to begin reopening officials reported this about the state's youngest coronavirus
00:07:28.180 death and then there's a 17 year old boy who died and i'm thinking to myself is the only thing that made
00:07:35.620 this a story that a republican state opened early and they had to find some bad news one 17 year old
00:07:46.040 died and that became the headline what about let's read further the headline where it says that georgia
00:07:53.120 overall is doing great uh reading reading oh i don't think they mentioned that they found one tragedy
00:08:01.780 in the state that is by by any measure a huge success story and they reported the one tragedy
00:08:10.000 all right okay here's another one brian stelter uh the headline on one of his articles says
00:08:19.020 twitter remains silent about trump's appalling attacks against joe scarborough so it says twitter
00:08:25.740 remains silent about it and then you read the article and it shows the quotes from people like brett
00:08:31.500 brett hume etc doing exactly the opposite of staying silent just you know excoriating the president
00:08:40.840 for for doing it and thinking if your if your title says twitter remains silent maybe the body of the
00:08:48.780 article should not have all the examples in which it isn't the case just a suggestion did anybody see
00:08:56.340 the twitter remaining silent about that has twitter remain silent on anything twitter doesn't know how
00:09:03.840 to remain silent it was the opposite and by the way does anybody think that there are any does anybody
00:09:12.660 think that there's one republican or a conservative who thinks that the president's trump about murderous
00:09:19.840 alleged murderer joe scarborough there's no evidence he murdered anybody but the president's blaming him
00:09:26.780 and i would say the conservatives have basically one opinion which is number one scarborough had it coming
00:09:36.380 because he's been lying about the president for years and and certainly worse lies than that
00:09:43.100 because the president's lie was just sort of silly i don't think anybody took it too seriously
00:09:48.020 except you know maybe some nuts but but scarborough has been calling the president a traitor to the
00:09:54.660 country and a and a russian puppet for years isn't that way worse because that was that was sold as a real
00:10:02.840 news that's way worse than the president doing this offhand tweet before he goes golfing that nobody really
00:10:09.240 took too seriously um so that's the first thing is that i don't think there are any conservatives who
00:10:16.500 think it was unfair to go hard at joe scarborough with some fake allegations because it just feels like it's
00:10:24.920 a political season and you know it's going both ways and yeah everybody's just defcon ten at this point
00:10:32.340 but i also don't think there are any conservatives who think thought it was uh kind to the you know the
00:10:40.040 family members of the deceased so i haven't heard anybody say oh you know that's no problem
00:10:46.100 pretty much everybody has the same opinion oh that's kind of bad for the family members
00:10:51.520 at the same time nobody cares how hard he went at scarborough so i don't know there's much to that story
00:11:00.580 um alan dershowitz found a new way to cause trouble by writing an opinion that mandatory vaccinations
00:11:10.480 would be constitutional now what happened to alan dershowitz when he gave a legal opinion about the
00:11:20.080 constitution uh he was called many anti-semitic things to which i think to myself how in the world
00:11:30.100 do you get from a constitutional opinion from a constitutional scholar all the way to
00:11:36.660 an anti-semitic attack like i don't even connect those things
00:11:41.700 you've got to try pretty hard to to make it an alan dershowitz problem so when i saw the pushback on
00:11:50.120 that i thought oh it's people who don't understand how lawyers work lawyers will get a guilty person off
00:11:58.340 if it's their lawyer job lawyers will if they're doing their job they'll argue what is or is not
00:12:04.600 constitutional independent of what they would like it to be that's the job they're not talking about
00:12:11.940 their own opinion that's the job they're talking about what the law is and i even saw that uh
00:12:19.480 stick sax and hammer 666 you all know him um replied back to alan and on the topic of the
00:12:31.220 constitutionality of vaccinations and he said to alan uh you're rich alan why not why not just have a
00:12:37.720 luxury bunker built and stay in there since the world scares you so badly and i thought to myself
00:12:43.100 i didn't see anywhere in his opinion where he was scared of the world or scared of anything
00:12:49.380 it just wasn't there he wasn't he wasn't not a scared he wasn't not afraid he wasn't afraid it just
00:12:55.720 wasn't even there he simply talked about what the constitution does and does not allow with some context
00:13:03.000 historically i you know is that is that something you should attack alan dershowitz for it is it is it
00:13:14.660 personally alan dershowitz problem that he interprets the constitution to be you know objectively allowing
00:13:22.400 this now i'm not giving you my opinion because i know i'm going to get attacked next somebody's going
00:13:28.680 to hear this and say the cartoonist he wants to line us up and give us these unproven vaccinations
00:13:35.560 no you also have not heard my opinion have you you know that i'm going to be accused of having an
00:13:46.360 opinion that people don't like but i have not expressed my opinion have i i have expressed no opinion on
00:13:52.320 that i will talk about it and it goes like this the as i understand that president trump's reservations
00:14:01.880 about vaccinations in general have to do with the fact that they're given to very young kids
00:14:08.500 and that they're combined so it's not one vaccination it's a it's a bunch of vaccinations put into one shot
00:14:15.520 and there's some question about that because it has never been tested um as a totality individual
00:14:23.860 things have been tested but hasn't been tested if you give it to a kid all at once so there are
00:14:30.380 reasonable adults who say hey is that good enough is it good enough that we've tested them individually
00:14:37.160 because i got some questions now i don't know the answer i'm not i don't have any insight into that
00:14:43.000 so i don't have an opinion of how safe or unsafe that is it's certainly a question i'd like to know
00:14:49.100 the answer to you know how how safe are there we'd all like to know that but this shot would be for
00:14:57.280 adults primarily i don't know that young kids would get it probably not right but it's going to be
00:15:06.320 voluntary it would be for adults and it would not be combined with other shots now if you're
00:15:12.740 primary concerns are children and combining it with other shots neither of those apply
00:15:21.500 so it would be more safe at least we don't know it's more safe let me say it more i'll be more
00:15:32.360 technically accurate we don't know how safe it would be but the two concerns children and combining it
00:15:40.980 with other stuff don't exist for this one just saying so if you're assessing your personal risk
00:15:46.740 just take into consideration that this is not like other vaccines because the two biggest risk factors
00:15:53.040 are not present with this one it might have its own risks so i'm not telling you you should or should
00:15:58.400 not take it that's different uh bill gates said everyone should get it well the whole point of it
00:16:05.140 is that you should try to get as many people to take it right there wouldn't be much point in having
00:16:11.200 it if you didn't try to get a lot of people to take it so i get that um single vaccines often use
00:16:20.160 multiple adjuvants make a single vaccine problematic for everyone so the question would be um so i'll i'll
00:16:29.440 accept the general statement that every vaccine has risk but would you also accept the general
00:16:37.520 statement that the more things you were you combine that with the more your risk goes up that's all so
00:16:44.460 even an individual vaccine is a combination of things and you can't really drive the risk to zero
00:16:49.580 but it's less than if you combine it with even more stuff i would think that would be common sense
00:16:55.580 all right um so enough on that
00:17:00.360 so uh the rachel maddow
00:17:06.220 court case came out in a in the funniest possible way which we wish that it would
00:17:12.980 uh so i forget which what the claim was but rachel maddow was
00:17:17.520 accused of saying something but their defense was that uh that rachel maddow was full of shit
00:17:23.680 so the defense was that the show is opinion and rhetorical hyperbole and that maddow engages in
00:17:33.020 quote exaggeration of the facts so as long as long as she has a show which by its nature
00:17:40.700 does not tell you the truth it's okay that she didn't tell the truth that time
00:17:46.100 because the context of the show is not the truth now how would you like to be
00:17:54.980 a person who's been believing msnbc all the time you've been watching it and you thought that when
00:18:02.060 you're watching rachel maddow that it was something like the news and then you find out in an actual
00:18:09.120 court case where people are under oath that that the rachel maddow team said um no we're not really
00:18:18.160 even we're not attempting to tell you the truth because if you think about it by branding themselves
00:18:25.360 as opinion and rhetorical hyperbole and exaggeration exaggeration of the facts they're saying directly
00:18:32.880 it is not our intention to give you the truth think about that they're not saying that we made a
00:18:39.760 mistake sometimes that would just be normal i i wouldn't hold it against any news organization to
00:18:45.760 make a mistake that's got to be just routine if they corrected it well i'm okay with that probably
00:18:51.400 but imagine telling your audience we don't intend to tell you the truth because that's what it says
00:18:57.860 right they're not saying we used to be an opinion and hyperbole show but we're not going to do that
00:19:03.520 anymore they're saying directly that's who we are and therefore presumably it means we'll keep doing it
00:19:10.540 and people will still watch it and they'll still interpret it as true it's a funny world
00:19:16.160 all right let's talk about uh how would you like to be joe biden and watching the the discussions on
00:19:26.280 social media and in the news uh they seem to be focusing on how he will be removed have you noticed
00:19:34.260 that i always tell you about making making you think past the sale the sale in this case is will
00:19:41.040 joe biden be removed or confirmed as the uh nominee that's the question but people are no longer asking
00:19:49.800 that question have you noticed that people are asking the question past that which is how is it going
00:19:55.720 to be done will it be done before the convention will it be done during the convention will it happen
00:20:03.920 after the convention and then the vice president can kind of slip in there more easily if you're
00:20:10.240 talking about how it will be done and you've already accepted that oh it's going to be done we don't know
00:20:17.580 when that's going to be done uh that's not a good place to be is it it's not a good place to be at all
00:20:26.500 so let's talk about uh hydroxychloroquine now i'm interested in hydroxychloroquine
00:20:35.700 um 80 of it is because of the psychological political part which i find fascinating 20 of my interest is
00:20:45.400 because hey it might work but you know there there are a bunch of other things that also
00:20:50.740 hey those might work too so i don't have a you know a special obsession with hydroxychloroquine in fact
00:20:59.040 my estimate is there's no more than a you know 30 40 chance that it makes a difference we don't know
00:21:05.960 you but some interesting things the first interesting thing is that it's clear in the comments as i'm
00:21:14.300 reading through twitter that the people who only watch the news on the right believe it's a fact
00:21:21.240 that the drug doesn't work and that it's dangerous on top of it so people watch cnn msnbc
00:21:28.940 reading new york times they think that's actually a fact but they're having trouble understanding the
00:21:36.920 news if that's a fact because in my world it's simply not a fact it's something we're still trying
00:21:45.240 to figure out so my world makes sense because if we're still trying to figure it out what would
00:21:52.300 that predict you would see in the world what would predict you'd see that trials are still underway
00:21:57.540 and indeed there's a story uh scott uh gottlieb md was uh tweeting about this it's something called
00:22:05.880 the recovery trial i think that's the name of the trial recovery uh like a brand name and or you know
00:22:12.420 just the name for the project i guess and they they thought that they would take a look at it before
00:22:19.360 they were done to see if there was any danger and if they'd had anybody die because they'd seen the
00:22:26.140 other the other warnings and the lancet etc so they looked at their data and they found that there
00:22:31.340 were no particular side effects that were deadly so they decided to continue on with the trial
00:22:37.140 so how do the people who believe it's a fact that it doesn't work and we know it's dangerous that's a
00:22:46.440 fact they believe how do they understand their world when they see a professional medical organization
00:22:52.980 that has all the information they have they have all the same access to information have looked at it
00:22:58.700 all and decided it's not a fact how do they explain their world my world doesn't need any explaining
00:23:05.860 because everything's playing out exactly the way i expect oh we don't know therefore it makes sense
00:23:12.080 we are still testing if your world is not compatible meaning that you have a belief that doesn't explain
00:23:19.600 what you're seeing maybe rethink your beliefs maybe rethink them let's talk some more about hydroxychloroquine
00:23:29.380 one of the reasons that it's so hard to figure out what's going on with this thing is that first of all
00:23:35.980 they have tests of only people who are near death that doesn't tell you as much as it should
00:23:40.100 they also have the test without using the zinc that doesn't tell you if it works with the zinc
00:23:45.880 because they didn't test it now we're hearing that azithromycin might be the dangerous part
00:23:51.020 so maybe you should leave out the azithromycin i just read that today for the first time
00:23:55.160 i don't know if it's true just read it today so so nothing is apples to apples but people are if you if
00:24:02.960 you read it quickly it sounds like it is so people are acting like it's apples to apples but all of our
00:24:08.740 other information is just a different set of information with different variables that doesn't
00:24:14.580 compare it to the other information so we have lots of it it just doesn't work for making decisions
00:24:21.220 yet one of those is costa rica so there's a there's an account online uh that is promoting all the good
00:24:31.840 news about hydroxychloroquine i don't know if it's just a citizen who's trying to help i don't know
00:24:39.300 if it if there's any kind of sponsorship behind it or anything so i don't know anything about the
00:24:43.360 account but i follow it because it has lots of information but i don't i don't assume that it's
00:24:49.540 all true or accurate so one of the things that was tweeted is that costa rica apparently is doing
00:24:55.260 an amazingly good job at controlling their virus and their deaths amazingly good it's also true that
00:25:03.920 in the beginning of the crisis they called china and said what do we do china told them several things
00:25:10.800 to do including hydroxychloroquine and give it to people early on first symptoms and so they started
00:25:16.500 doing that turns out that costa rica is a producer of hydroxychloroquine so they they make it in country
00:25:25.240 so they had enough so they had enough they decided to use it and the result is one of the lowest curves i
00:25:32.640 mean it basically wasn't it didn't even curve up they they flattened it before it was even up
00:25:38.160 basically they flattened it on the ground you know just where just this total flat line when everybody
00:25:45.700 else was going up now does that mean hydroxychloroquine works well our little brains make us think that
00:25:53.200 right because well here's the situation they used it they got the best result boom done no unfortunately
00:26:01.660 not you want it to be true i'm seeing in the comments somebody saying it's also an island
00:26:08.940 costa rica is not an island people it's not an island it's connected to you know a landmass it's not
00:26:18.500 an island i've been to costa rica and i promise you i drove there no i didn't i didn't drive all the
00:26:26.600 way but it was there was uh there was no need for going across water all right um so here's the thing
00:26:37.400 costa rica is also in a warm place right yeah costa rica is central america um costa rica is warm
00:26:47.060 what is the other country that's also warm that's having terrible problems
00:26:53.880 it feels like the warm countries are doing better right africa not so bad as we thought it would be
00:27:02.120 and somebody said mexico wasn't so bad i don't know if that's true i'd have to do a fact check on that
00:27:09.200 but here's the problem if the only countries that are doing well are also the warm ones and we know
00:27:15.700 that the weather probably has a big big impact can't really tell it's just there's just too much
00:27:22.960 that's different so you got that going on um and so i asked this question
00:27:31.800 uh i tweeted it i said are there any countries that are routinely using hydroxychloroquine for
00:27:39.700 first symptoms the way the way costa rica is is there anybody else who's doing it just as much as
00:27:46.220 they're doing it but getting a bad result so i was looking for the counter example i'm looking for any
00:27:52.640 country ideally in a in a not so warm climate um and not an island island doesn't count uh brazil just
00:28:04.360 started using it i believe brazil only just started hydroxychloroquine so they're not an example
00:28:10.060 uh and but i don't want to do the uh the warm countries so forget about central america
00:28:17.860 give give me something above central america that doesn't have the warmth that use hydroxychloroquine
00:28:25.440 early now it wasn't brazil brazil did not use it early um and and and is doing poorly all right so the test
00:28:34.840 is give me this on twitter the test is they used it early it's not one of these hot countries toward
00:28:43.340 the equator and they did not get a good result and did not get a good result so give me that example
00:28:52.240 um so there's of course big news about the president wearing not wearing a mask to golf
00:29:01.200 and then of course great britain is all buzzing about dominique cummins aide to the prime minister
00:29:09.140 who apparently did some traveling and saw his i don't know his parents or his kid or something
00:29:14.960 and i have the same feeling about all of these leaders who are not doing what the
00:29:20.820 under what they're telling the underlings to do i don't really care do you do you really care if
00:29:29.480 uh dominique cummins took a drive and cheated a little bit i mean i don't know if he did cheat but
00:29:36.820 do you care do you care i don't care do you care that the president didn't wear a mask while golfing
00:29:44.460 i don't care i don't care i don't care at all because i assume that every person who was with him
00:29:52.160 had had a test that day and they weren't that close i mean it's outdoors it's warm i don't care at all
00:29:59.900 so i think all of these uh looking for the hypocrite stories are not landing because frankly well
00:30:08.000 well let me ask you uh let me ask you this question because you will not be arrested for your answer
00:30:15.140 how many of you have violated the guidelines since since you knew what the guidelines were
00:30:21.660 so from the moment they said all right don't do this kind of socializing stay six feet away
00:30:27.880 etc tell me in the comments how many of you have cheated at least once
00:30:34.820 how many of you have cheated in the comments while we're waiting for those comments to come
00:30:40.080 here's my assumption i think most people have cheated not everybody i'm gonna say 75 percent maybe
00:30:51.280 i think 75 percent have cheated at least once and and here's my my feeling
00:31:00.540 if people only cheat when nobody's watching that's probably fine because if you cheat in a way that
00:31:11.380 you had let's say 100 people over to your house and you had a house party everybody would know so
00:31:17.120 people are not cheating in these like big group ways without getting caught i mean that's a whole
00:31:22.140 different story but if somebody saw one person you know somebody snuck away to be with their
00:31:29.080 girlfriend or girlfriend or boyfriend i don't know i don't know i'm just not going to worry about
00:31:35.440 that and this goes back to my theory about friction there was never any thought that uh yeah i'm looking
00:31:44.100 at all the comments are coming in now uh there have been a number of people who say not once
00:31:49.200 i'm looking at the ratio let's say so we've got about 50 50
00:31:55.420 uh
00:31:57.560 not bad a lot of you have not cheated even once
00:32:02.400 very impressive those of you have not cheated do you have kids because if you had kids and you
00:32:10.660 didn't let them play with a friend i would be surprised but i'd be impressed
00:32:15.580 uh i won't admit it somebody says at my doctor's office no one wore masks
00:32:24.100 uh
00:32:26.360 yeah
00:32:28.880 well it looks like you've all not all of you but many of you have uh have cheated but i'm surprised
00:32:36.180 how many of you have not somebody got a massage wow that's that's a little bit of taking a chance
00:32:43.500 or maybe not i suppose if the massage therapist uh wore a mask and washed his or her hands you'd be
00:32:52.300 fine all right um i guess my only point is that i don't expect my leaders to be any more perfect
00:32:59.960 than the citizens that they lead that whole hypocrisy thing i i never get on board with the hypocrisy
00:33:07.020 thing but you know i agree that maybe it's better if they do a little role modeling but aren't we way
00:33:14.320 past that with president trump is there anybody left right or center who looks at the president and
00:33:21.900 says i'll be more like that i don't think so i think i think we all realize that he's such a unique
00:33:28.480 character that we look at him as he's just doing his thing and we make our own decisions i just don't
00:33:36.720 see people saying i'm going to be like him and you know i just don't see it
00:33:43.200 so joda joda goldberg uh somebody is prompting me in the comments to comment about that so i guess uh
00:33:52.960 joda goldberg is not too happy about uh kaylee mckenanny and her job as a spokesperson thinks
00:33:59.600 she's thinks she's a little too uh i don't know maybe maybe aggressive or combat or combative
00:34:08.000 um but the funniest thing about that is that uh joda goldberg he looks like a werewolf now
00:34:14.400 he said uh because uh you know he hasn't cut his hair it looks like he's letting his beard get a
00:34:19.920 little scruffy and uh he just turned full werewolf and the whole time i was looking at the interview
00:34:26.000 that's all i could think is i think you're a werewolf now well i think a lot of us are going
00:34:31.200 to turn into werewolves if we can't get haircuts um
00:34:37.120 if you've not cheated you're a karen okay
00:34:40.560 all right that's all for now um i will be doing a few more of the evening periscopes um as the
00:34:52.320 country is opening up and i'm feeling that our spirits are lifting and things are getting back to
00:34:59.680 normal and i'm going to declare that this weekend is victory victory and what that means is that
00:35:10.560 if we get let's say several days from now and there's not a gigantic spike in infections
00:35:17.120 not so large that it crashes the hospitals we're back we're back i think that's where we're at
00:35:26.240 so as we get back the evening the evening periscopes were really to you know fill a need
00:35:33.520 and uh i may open up my evenings at some point not tonight tonight i'll be back and i'll talk
00:35:40.400 to you tonight see you there