Real Coffee with Scott Adams - pisode 1971 Scott Adams： Today I Will Separate The Liars From The Brainwashers And Regular Idiots

00:00:00.760 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:06.980 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a finer situation.

00:00:13.660 Yeah, and you either lucked into it, some of you,

00:00:17.680 others have been strategically planning for this moment for I don't know how long,

00:00:23.040 but thank goodness you made it.

00:00:25.320 And we're going to kick off the lesser swearing version of the live stream.

00:00:34.200 Everybody on board with that?

00:00:36.480 I might say fudge or frickin'.

00:00:41.200 That's as far as I'll go.

00:00:43.260 I'll go all the way to frickin', but then I'm pulling back, pulling back.

00:00:47.600 Well, if you'd like to take your experience up a notch, and I think you would, I think you would,

00:00:52.120 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen, a jug or a flask,

00:00:57.020 a vessel of any kind, filling with your favorite liquid.

00:01:01.720 I like coffee.

00:01:03.740 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,

00:01:08.980 the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:12.100 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:01:15.800 Go.

00:01:16.020 Go.

00:01:16.080 Well, which of the F-word substitutes do you like best?

00:01:27.560 Fudge, friggin', frickin', or frackin'?

00:01:31.320 We can throw a little frackin' in there.

00:01:37.480 Well, you've got lots of opinions on this one.

00:01:39.740 Wow.

00:01:39.960 Looks like, well, it's all over the place.

00:01:45.340 The Battlestar Galactica, frackin', seems to be doing well.

00:01:51.640 All right, well, maybe I'll, I might, you know, try some of those.

00:01:58.320 I'll take some of those for a spin today, okay?

00:02:02.760 Well, the first frickin' story, no, no.

00:02:07.340 I'll work on that.

00:02:10.040 All right, I have a, a media recommendation.

00:02:15.500 Have you all been wondering, Scott, can you please tell us what you would personally like

00:02:21.200 to watch on the television set, and then maybe I would like to watch it too?

00:02:27.020 Don't laugh.

00:02:28.720 Don't laugh.

00:02:31.280 Glass Onion on Netflix.

00:02:33.100 So, I guess it's a movie, Glass Onion.

00:02:37.940 Now, here's why I recommend it.

00:02:40.560 I've been railing for years about everything that's wrong with movies.

00:02:44.640 This one didn't do anything wrong.

00:02:46.780 No, hold on.

00:02:47.460 I've only watched the first third of it.

00:02:49.760 I've only watched the first third.

00:02:51.180 Already I recommend it.

00:02:53.000 Right, I'll watch the rest of it sometime.

00:02:55.400 But here's why I recommend it.

00:02:57.520 Number one, probably is not really the best show for the younger set.

00:03:04.060 I think maybe this would appeal to people who are used to a certain kind of movie.

00:03:08.800 Here's what I liked about it.

00:03:10.860 They took what was good about movies in the past, and then they just made one of those.

00:03:17.080 And I thought to myself, nobody thought of that before.

00:03:20.420 Just take all the things that were good about, you know, movies when we grew up,

00:03:24.840 and just make one of those.

00:03:26.240 So, here's what they don't do.

00:03:30.060 Nobody is tied to a chair to be tortured.

00:03:33.240 Nobody.

00:03:35.540 I know.

00:03:36.640 Is that weird?

00:03:37.780 I don't believe there's going to be a chase scene.

00:03:40.240 I've only seen a third of it.

00:03:41.980 I don't believe there'll be a chase scene.

00:03:44.700 The entire first part of the movie, where usually the first third of a movie is where

00:03:50.160 something terrible happens to the hero.

00:03:52.260 You know, the hero gets divorced, or his family is wiped out, or, you know, there's a hurricane

00:03:59.320 or something.

00:04:00.780 But this one's just fun.

00:04:02.780 And there's, like, some mystery, because it's about a little murder mystery.

00:04:07.400 And it's just fun.

00:04:08.640 And it's about characters and actors that you've seen.

00:04:12.520 And a lot of the actors are ones you're familiar with.

00:04:15.980 So, it's just sort of fun to see them all in the same place and stuff.

00:04:20.340 And it's sort of the perfect empty calories.

00:04:25.740 Now, here's what will never be true.

00:04:29.240 It's not going to win any awards.

00:04:32.060 No awards will be won.

00:04:33.620 All they did, all they did was make it incredibly consumer right.

00:04:43.640 They made something for the customer.

00:04:47.200 Therefore, it cannot win any awards.

00:04:49.620 Because the awards are won by people who make movies for other people in the movie industry.

00:04:54.280 So, people could say, my God, you're acting in that role that made me feel terrible the entire time I watched the movie.

00:05:02.800 But, wow, did you act well.

00:05:04.840 You acted so well that I had a stomach ache when I left.

00:05:08.420 I felt so bad for you.

00:05:10.700 But this movie just doesn't have any parts in it that I don't think.

00:05:15.360 You know, I haven't seen it.

00:05:16.180 But it looks like that's their theme.

00:05:17.900 There won't be any unpleasant parts.

00:05:20.740 Now, you're not going to remember it forever.

00:05:22.580 It's not going to be your favorite movie.

00:05:24.680 But it really is giving me hope that somebody paid attention and figured out how to make a movie, you know, finally.

00:05:33.700 So, give it a chance.

00:05:36.780 All right, here's something I learned today that apparently everybody knew but me.

00:05:41.480 Or at least everybody in the local subscription site.

00:05:46.220 So, Elon Musk tweeted today, or yesterday maybe,

00:05:50.320 almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH, National Institute of Health,

00:05:58.140 the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically,

00:06:02.740 is his wife.

00:06:05.160 Now, how many of you who didn't know that like me until today?

00:06:12.380 How many of you also didn't know that until today?

00:06:14.580 Now, it sounds like a joke, doesn't it?

00:06:23.000 It literally sounds like a joke.

00:06:24.880 I heard Elon Musk say the other day on some podcast or something.

00:06:30.440 He said that every conspiracy theory about Twitter turned out to be true.

00:06:35.480 And he laughed because he couldn't think of any conspiracy theories about Twitter

00:06:40.880 that weren't actually demonstrated to be true.

00:06:44.180 And this one is crazy.

00:06:48.680 It's crazy.

00:06:49.920 Now, I don't think it necessarily made any difference.

00:06:53.240 Like, I'm not going to say that, you know, if that had been different,

00:06:57.860 you know, we would have seen Fauci in a different light.

00:07:00.240 I doubt it.

00:07:01.440 But just the fact that that person, his wife, was in that job,

00:07:07.300 that's just too everything, isn't it?

00:07:11.080 That's just too much of everything.

00:07:13.540 How could that possibly be true?

00:07:15.200 I don't know how many times I've been saying this lately.

00:07:19.120 I'll just look at something that's definitely true,

00:07:21.820 and I'll just say, how could that possibly be true?

00:07:24.620 How could it possibly be true that the number one person

00:07:28.280 who's being questions on ethics, his wife is in charge of his ethics?

00:07:33.800 Like, you know, there are seven, what, eight billion people in the world?

00:07:39.380 The odds of that were low.

00:07:41.480 But maybe they were high, you know, given the way things work out.

00:07:46.200 All right.

00:07:47.220 And then Musk seems to be, no, it seems to be,

00:07:51.680 he's directly accusing Fauci of gain-of-function research,

00:07:57.680 which is another way, Elon Musk says,

00:07:59.640 is another way of saying bioweapon.

00:08:03.120 And then he notes that Fauci authored the 2012 paper

00:08:07.600 arguing for gain-of-function research,

00:08:10.740 and that, now this is all what Musk is tweeting.

00:08:13.680 I can't, I'm not saying all this is true.

00:08:18.460 I'm just going to say Musk is tweeting it, right?

00:08:20.400 And Musk said that Obama wisely put this on pause,

00:08:24.720 meaning the gain-of-function research.

00:08:26.680 But Fauci restarted it.

00:08:28.520 Now, again, I don't know if that's true.

00:08:30.980 Like, I think Fauci would argue it's not, yeah,

00:08:33.940 there's some indirect thing, but not a direct thing.

00:08:36.740 I don't know.

00:08:37.120 And despite these glaring issues, Twitter, nonetheless,

00:08:43.080 so at Twitter, there was an internal Slack channel

00:08:46.300 where they communicate with each other on this little channel,

00:08:50.320 unironically called the Fauci Fan Club.

00:08:52.980 So within Twitter, there was, quote, a Fauci Fan Club,

00:08:59.880 and they had their own Slack group.

00:09:03.280 And Elon Musk just basically thinks it's funny.

00:09:08.060 He just laughs at his own company that he bought.

00:09:11.560 All right.

00:09:12.060 In fact, I don't know if this is the favorite story of the day,

00:09:16.880 but you all know the Congressman Santos,

00:09:19.740 the Republican who got, who just got elected,

00:09:25.480 and then apparently we find out

00:09:27.960 that he didn't have the education, he said.

00:09:30.400 He didn't have a college degree.

00:09:32.460 I think he didn't have one.

00:09:34.040 He said he did.

00:09:35.380 Didn't work at two prestigious places that he said he did.

00:09:39.500 And I think there were a bunch of other lies.

00:09:41.040 So basically, he just totally lied and got elected anyway.

00:09:45.700 Now, there are a few ways to go on this story.

00:09:52.620 Number one, the question is,

00:09:55.580 should Republicans try to take the high road?

00:09:59.700 And even though the Democrats are full of liars,

00:10:02.880 should they say, no, we cannot have a liar in our midst,

00:10:07.180 so we've got to get rid of him?

00:10:09.140 Or do they say, no, things are so tight,

00:10:12.400 we need every vote we can get,

00:10:14.060 and everybody's a liar, so, you know, what's the difference?

00:10:18.100 And I have to admit, I was sort of going back and forth

00:10:20.720 this morning, trying to decide which one made sense.

00:10:23.720 So, like, I was thinking, well, I do like making a point of it,

00:10:30.420 because it would be a good way to establish Republicans

00:10:33.860 as at least trying to be more honest.

00:10:38.700 But on the other hand, I can certainly see the raw power argument,

00:10:42.380 and Congress is mostly a raw power situation.

00:10:45.520 So, you know, playing within the rules, everybody lies, he lied, no big deal.

00:10:51.800 But here's how I decided I made my final decision on this.

00:10:56.640 I think he should keep his job, as opposed to resigning,

00:11:01.220 and here's why.

00:11:03.560 Do you know how entertaining it would be

00:11:05.380 to hear the other members of Congress

00:11:07.480 argue that they just can't have a liar in their midst?

00:11:11.100 You tell me that wouldn't be funny every time.

00:11:16.380 I don't care who says it.

00:11:18.140 I don't care if the Republicans say it.

00:11:20.360 I don't care if the Democrats say it.

00:11:22.680 As long as they're members of Congress,

00:11:24.980 I want them on video

00:11:26.900 saying we have to get rid of the liars in Congress.

00:11:31.860 I just want to see that.

00:11:34.200 That's all.

00:11:35.440 I would personally find that very entertaining,

00:11:38.180 no matter how many times I saw it.

00:11:39.720 And I don't need to point out

00:11:41.700 the hypocrisy, right?

00:11:45.760 So we don't need to point that out.

00:11:51.440 I can always tell the people who believe

00:11:53.320 what they read on Reddit,

00:11:54.840 they come over here with some rumors about me

00:11:57.760 that are almost always out of context or untrue.

00:12:00.840 It's always the Reddit people.

00:12:02.780 I think anybody who actually

00:12:04.140 got their information anywhere else

00:12:06.980 doesn't have any...

00:12:09.080 so somebody's coming over here

00:12:12.660 just to say vaccine passports

00:12:14.560 because they actually believed

00:12:15.820 that I was in favor of them.

00:12:17.900 So we'll get rid of the dumb people,

00:12:19.640 the disinformed people,

00:12:21.800 but they like to keep me busy.

00:12:25.280 All right.

00:12:28.320 So I thought it was interesting

00:12:29.800 that Musk is directly accusing Fauci

00:12:32.100 of these things

00:12:32.860 because doesn't he have any defense to that?

00:12:38.600 He's got some defense, doesn't he?

00:12:41.380 I don't know who's telling the truth here.

00:12:44.460 But, oh, I guess we're talking about Santos.

00:12:47.000 And then the other thing that Santos said

00:12:49.060 in his not-quite-truthful way

00:12:51.680 was that he's a Catholic guy,

00:12:54.560 but at one point he said that

00:12:57.860 he wasn't Jewish,

00:12:59.920 but that he was Jew-ish.

00:13:03.780 So, you know, emphasis on the ish part.

00:13:06.500 So not really a Jewish person,

00:13:10.140 but he claimed that

00:13:11.140 because he had some family connection

00:13:13.320 to Judaism that's unclear,

00:13:15.700 that he was a Jew-ish-ish.

00:13:19.700 And then I saw that a number of people

00:13:21.300 that are criticizing him,

00:13:22.300 and I thought,

00:13:23.080 I'm a little uncomfortable with that.

00:13:27.040 Because while he's not Jewish,

00:13:29.100 he's only Jew-ish,

00:13:31.280 if you criticize him,

00:13:34.660 you wouldn't be anti-Semitic,

00:13:36.000 but wouldn't you be a little anti-Semitic-ish?

00:13:39.480 Just a little bit?

00:13:40.920 So I don't want to criticize him

00:13:42.560 because I don't know where that line is.

00:13:45.180 I don't want to be anti-Semitic-ish

00:13:48.700 about a guy who's not Jewish,

00:13:51.100 but he's Jew-ish.

00:13:54.700 So, I mean, it's dangerous out there.

00:13:59.120 There's a landmine everywhere.

00:14:01.460 Would you take that chance?

00:14:03.380 No.

00:14:04.220 No, don't take a chance.

00:14:06.320 So I'll just stay away from that.

00:14:09.300 Well, there's a new book out

00:14:11.000 called from somebody named Thompson.

00:14:15.980 Escape from Model Land.

00:14:18.000 In this case,

00:14:18.820 it's not Victoria's Secret models.

00:14:21.960 It is mathematical models.

00:14:26.140 And these models being used

00:14:27.960 to predict the future.

00:14:29.080 This will come as a big surprise to you.

00:14:33.440 But did you know

00:14:34.320 that complex models

00:14:37.300 that are used to predict the future?

00:14:39.900 I know.

00:14:40.600 This is going to be a real surprise.

00:14:43.240 Not reliable.

00:14:45.300 I know.

00:14:46.100 I know.

00:14:46.760 I was as shocked as you were.

00:14:48.680 Yeah.

00:14:49.160 So there's a book now

00:14:50.160 to teach people

00:14:51.320 that financial,

00:14:53.560 that complex mathematical models

00:14:57.300 don't actually predict the future.

00:15:00.840 Amazing.

00:15:02.020 Amazing.

00:15:03.460 Huh.

00:15:04.020 Well,

00:15:06.680 this brings me to my next topic,

00:15:08.600 which is,

00:15:09.840 I believe that doctors

00:15:11.680 are learning the hard way

00:15:13.520 how to analyze data.

00:15:17.320 And by that,

00:15:18.240 I mean,

00:15:18.720 they're learning by doing it wrong in public

00:15:21.060 and having people say,

00:15:22.820 that's not how you do that.

00:15:25.760 And I think that

00:15:27.140 I'm seeing,

00:15:28.480 at least in my Twitter feed,

00:15:29.740 a lot of doctors

00:15:30.680 who are clearly now

00:15:32.480 way more informed

00:15:33.860 about how to consume data.

00:15:37.420 And here's what I would suggest

00:15:39.500 for doctors

00:15:41.700 who didn't have any training

00:15:42.900 in this field.

00:15:44.120 I think you could simplify it

00:15:46.120 to simply a checklist quiz

00:15:50.540 to ask a doctor

00:15:52.220 which of these sources

00:15:53.440 are reliable

00:15:54.920 and maybe a little bit about why.

00:15:57.520 It'd be a really simple

00:15:58.640 one-page test.

00:15:59.920 For example,

00:16:01.500 if you ask doctors

00:16:03.040 to rate the credibility

00:16:04.600 of the following things,

00:16:05.780 I don't know what they would say.

00:16:07.120 But let's say you said,

00:16:08.960 a study is published.

00:16:13.040 There's one study.

00:16:15.240 It's not a randomized,

00:16:16.800 controlled trial,

00:16:18.160 but it's just one study

00:16:20.280 in a publication.

00:16:21.160 And it's published

00:16:21.880 and it's peer-reviewed.

00:16:24.200 What level of confidence

00:16:26.000 should you put on one study,

00:16:28.240 not a randomized,

00:16:29.340 controlled trial,

00:16:30.740 but it's peer-reviewed

00:16:32.380 and it's published?

00:16:34.140 Well, the right answer

00:16:35.320 is less than 50%,

00:16:37.020 because about half of them

00:16:38.500 get retracted.

00:16:40.020 But of the ones

00:16:41.200 that don't get retracted,

00:16:42.460 how many of those

00:16:43.020 are bullshit too?

00:16:43.820 Nobody knows

00:16:45.980 because they didn't

00:16:46.600 get retracted.

00:16:47.660 But it's not zero, right?

00:16:49.920 So it could be that

00:16:51.240 something in the order

00:16:52.200 of 25% to 50%

00:16:54.880 of studies that are

00:16:56.600 peer-reviewed and published

00:16:57.580 turn out to be true

00:16:58.860 or useful.

00:17:01.000 So would a doctor know that?

00:17:03.540 Well, some would,

00:17:04.800 of course.

00:17:05.700 But how many doctors

00:17:06.960 would know

00:17:07.560 that being published

00:17:09.820 means it's usually untrue?

00:17:13.320 I'll bet most would say,

00:17:14.720 well, it might be false,

00:17:16.620 but if it got published

00:17:17.760 and it's peer-reviewed,

00:17:19.340 it's probably true.

00:17:21.380 But actually,

00:17:22.220 it's the opposite.

00:17:22.800 It's probably untrue.

00:17:25.120 So would they even know

00:17:26.040 which way it goes?

00:17:27.500 Would they know

00:17:28.020 it's probably untrue?

00:17:29.960 Or would they just assume

00:17:31.520 it went through the steps

00:17:32.580 to validate it a little bit?

00:17:35.200 So it's probably true,

00:17:36.580 but maybe not.

00:17:37.340 It's a big difference

00:17:38.340 because that might be

00:17:39.560 the difference

00:17:40.040 between an off-label

00:17:42.540 treatment or not.

00:17:47.020 How about this?

00:17:49.400 How about a retrospective study?

00:17:52.480 A retrospective study.

00:17:54.540 Would somebody be able

00:17:55.960 to know the value

00:17:58.640 of a retrospective study?

00:18:01.080 Now, that's where you

00:18:01.900 didn't do a study in advance,

00:18:04.160 so you have to look at it

00:18:05.700 after the fact.

00:18:07.180 And so you say,

00:18:07.960 okay,

00:18:08.220 these people did take this

00:18:10.840 and they had these outcomes,

00:18:12.600 so it must have been

00:18:14.040 because they did the thing.

00:18:16.320 Now, that's different

00:18:17.460 than saying it in advance.

00:18:20.380 If you say in advance,

00:18:21.700 we're going to test this thing

00:18:23.380 and we think it's going to have

00:18:24.820 this outcome.

00:18:27.600 That's a far more reliable

00:18:28.960 way to go.

00:18:29.760 But if you only did it once

00:18:31.360 and nobody reproduced it,

00:18:34.020 you're still not

00:18:34.760 where you want to be.

00:18:36.860 Looking backwards

00:18:37.720 is going to be

00:18:38.900 less reliable.

00:18:40.820 Right?

00:18:41.160 Would you all agree?

00:18:42.720 Looking backwards

00:18:43.720 as opposed to

00:18:44.680 establishing a test

00:18:45.980 where you can look forward

00:18:47.480 and find out

00:18:48.320 if your guesses were right.

00:18:49.660 there's a big difference.

00:18:52.000 All right,

00:18:52.160 how about this one?

00:18:54.880 A 10-year projection

00:18:56.840 or even a 3-year

00:18:59.920 or a 5-year.

00:19:00.820 How about just projections

00:19:02.560 that are based on

00:19:03.360 good, solid data

00:19:04.440 and experts making...

00:19:07.120 Yeah,

00:19:07.420 projections are usually ridiculous.

00:19:10.280 Usually ridiculous.

00:19:11.360 How about the VAERS report?

00:19:14.200 If the VAERS report

00:19:16.740 is sending a really

00:19:17.560 strong signal,

00:19:19.360 what's that telling doctors?

00:19:23.960 Well,

00:19:24.460 I know that many of you

00:19:25.420 disagree.

00:19:26.280 Many of you would say,

00:19:27.380 whoa,

00:19:27.580 there's so many

00:19:28.440 on there

00:19:29.600 about COVID

00:19:30.280 in particular.

00:19:31.480 You would say,

00:19:32.080 well,

00:19:32.280 I realize it's anecdotal,

00:19:33.540 but there's just so many

00:19:34.520 on there

00:19:34.920 that that's telling you

00:19:36.500 something.

00:19:37.260 But not really.

00:19:38.940 It isn't.

00:19:40.200 It is telling you

00:19:41.080 you might want

00:19:41.500 to look into it.

00:19:42.260 So,

00:19:43.440 you know,

00:19:44.740 it's not to be ignored.

00:19:45.980 That's why it's there.

00:19:46.940 It's not there

00:19:47.580 to be ignored.

00:19:49.560 But you don't know

00:19:51.080 for sure

00:19:51.560 just from the VAERS report.

00:19:53.720 How about

00:19:54.320 a really good

00:19:56.340 randomized

00:19:56.840 controlled trial?

00:19:59.460 How much should you put...

00:20:00.700 How much should you

00:20:01.380 trust it?

00:20:02.580 A really good

00:20:03.660 randomized

00:20:04.280 controlled

00:20:05.500 blind trial.

00:20:10.800 Do you know

00:20:11.540 what's missing?

00:20:12.260 Who funded it?

00:20:15.400 Who funded it?

00:20:16.780 Right?

00:20:17.240 If the only thing

00:20:17.980 I told you

00:20:18.460 is there was

00:20:19.140 a randomized

00:20:19.580 controlled trial,

00:20:20.940 the amount

00:20:21.760 of credibility

00:20:22.380 you should put it

00:20:23.120 in is none.

00:20:24.620 Literally none.

00:20:26.640 Would you agree?

00:20:28.280 The gold standard

00:20:29.660 in science

00:20:30.420 is a randomized

00:20:31.720 controlled trial.

00:20:32.980 If the only thing

00:20:34.060 you know

00:20:34.460 is that one happened,

00:20:36.420 the credibility

00:20:37.040 should be zero.

00:20:38.940 Now,

00:20:39.300 that's not something

00:20:40.020 I don't think

00:20:40.940 doctors would agree with.

00:20:42.080 I think doctors

00:20:43.580 would say

00:20:43.940 that's actually

00:20:44.560 our best evidence.

00:20:45.960 We do everything

00:20:47.000 based on that.

00:20:48.460 That should be

00:20:49.140 the best evidence.

00:20:50.820 Now,

00:20:51.800 if you don't know

00:20:52.680 who funded the trial,

00:20:53.800 you don't know anything.

00:20:55.300 That's something

00:20:55.900 we learned,

00:20:56.620 right?

00:20:57.360 Now,

00:20:57.960 suppose you knew

00:20:58.720 that it wasn't funded

00:20:59.980 by the pharmaceutical companies.

00:21:02.860 What then?

00:21:04.900 You don't really know that.

00:21:07.440 See,

00:21:07.940 it's a trick.

00:21:09.320 I tried to trick you.

00:21:10.940 What if you don't,

00:21:12.000 what if you know

00:21:12.660 it was not funded

00:21:13.680 by the pharmaceutical companies?

00:21:15.400 You'll never know that.

00:21:17.040 It's unknowable

00:21:18.040 because they may have

00:21:19.120 gotten to the person

00:21:19.860 who ran the trial.

00:21:20.740 So they may not

00:21:22.320 have funded

00:21:22.800 the trial,

00:21:24.280 but they might

00:21:25.940 be the source

00:21:26.980 of lots of

00:21:27.620 speaking agreements

00:21:28.880 for the project manager.

00:21:32.520 You know what I mean?

00:21:34.240 Would your doctor

00:21:35.080 know that?

00:21:36.300 Would your doctor

00:21:37.240 know that,

00:21:38.060 yes,

00:21:38.320 it was funded by this,

00:21:39.660 maybe the government,

00:21:41.160 but would they know

00:21:41.960 that the project manager

00:21:43.180 makes 40% more

00:21:45.620 than his normal income

00:21:46.600 by doing speeches

00:21:47.440 for that pharmaceutical company?

00:21:50.080 You would have no way

00:21:51.140 of knowing that.

00:21:52.700 So what we used to think

00:21:54.580 was the gold standard

00:21:56.560 of science

00:21:57.640 is closer to a coin flip.

00:22:01.060 You don't really know

00:22:02.040 much of anything

00:22:02.620 unless you know

00:22:03.120 who funded it

00:22:03.820 or how everybody's

00:22:05.160 making the money.

00:22:07.440 And if you only have

00:22:08.400 one of them,

00:22:09.200 you wish you had two.

00:22:11.200 Right?

00:22:12.100 So if you only have one,

00:22:13.880 you're automatically shaky

00:22:15.440 compared to at least two.

00:22:17.440 How about any study

00:22:23.640 that the pharma,

00:22:24.880 big pharma does itself?

00:22:27.120 Should you believe it?

00:22:29.520 Because that would be

00:22:30.440 the basis of all vaccinations,

00:22:32.400 childhood vaccinations, right?

00:22:35.200 Aren't pretty much

00:22:36.120 all childhood vaccinations

00:22:37.460 based on big pharma's

00:22:39.380 own studies?

00:22:41.800 I'm just guessing.

00:22:42.960 I don't know if that's true.

00:22:44.140 Now, presumably,

00:22:45.080 there would also be

00:22:45.800 other studies by now.

00:22:47.440 But mostly,

00:22:48.260 they were approved

00:22:48.860 based on big pharma's

00:22:50.000 own studies, right?

00:22:53.940 I guess that's more

00:22:54.860 of a question

00:22:55.360 than a statement.

00:22:56.560 I mean,

00:22:56.900 I assume that's the case.

00:22:59.000 So,

00:23:00.700 and then what about

00:23:01.860 metadata studies

00:23:03.860 or meta studies?

00:23:04.680 What about a meta analysis?

00:23:08.420 Should doctors

00:23:09.240 trust them?

00:23:10.700 Because a meta analysis

00:23:12.060 looks at all the studies

00:23:13.300 or all the relevant studies.

00:23:16.020 So, yeah,

00:23:17.400 they could be the best

00:23:18.540 or they could be the worst,

00:23:19.900 but you don't know in advance.

00:23:23.720 So,

00:23:24.580 the weird thing about

00:23:25.760 a meta analysis

00:23:27.400 is it could be exactly right,

00:23:30.100 but you would have

00:23:31.100 no way of knowing

00:23:32.260 just because you did it

00:23:34.440 or you knew some details.

00:23:35.320 You wouldn't know,

00:23:36.620 but it could be.

00:23:38.560 So,

00:23:38.660 it doesn't matter

00:23:39.540 what it says.

00:23:40.340 You don't know

00:23:40.780 which one is the right one

00:23:41.880 and who cheated

00:23:43.540 on what's in the analysis

00:23:45.420 and what's not

00:23:46.180 in the analysis.

00:23:47.740 So,

00:23:48.400 meta analysis,

00:23:49.200 pretty low credibility.

00:23:51.820 All right.

00:23:53.060 Question.

00:23:53.540 How many young Americans

00:23:57.080 do you think

00:23:58.560 would beat the fitness

00:23:59.760 and health requirements

00:24:00.980 to join the American military?

00:24:03.380 What percentage?

00:24:04.960 What percentage of...

00:24:09.860 I wasn't even doing it this time

00:24:12.600 and you still got the right answer.

00:24:15.700 It's 23%.

00:24:17.260 About a quarter.

00:24:19.080 I always do the

00:24:20.420 asking people to guess

00:24:22.320 what the poll results are.

00:24:23.780 Because,

00:24:24.660 you know,

00:24:24.900 the running joke is that

00:24:26.240 25% of the public

00:24:28.120 will get every question wrong.

00:24:30.400 Every poll question.

00:24:31.820 The 25% will have

00:24:33.040 the dumb answer.

00:24:34.380 You know,

00:24:34.620 when there's one

00:24:35.160 that's like clearly

00:24:35.840 the dumb answer.

00:24:37.580 25%.

00:24:38.220 But this has nothing

00:24:40.260 to do with this.

00:24:40.960 This is health

00:24:42.100 and fitness.

00:24:43.660 But only 23%

00:24:45.020 of young Americans

00:24:45.820 meet the fitness requirement

00:24:47.220 of the military.

00:24:49.160 Now,

00:24:49.800 allow me to do

00:24:51.420 an old man thing.

00:24:52.580 I'm going to do

00:24:53.960 a grandpa thing.

00:24:56.220 In my day,

00:24:57.480 I feel like it would have

00:24:59.820 been 75%

00:25:00.920 of the kids

00:25:01.480 I went to school with.

00:25:03.420 Now I'm talking

00:25:04.180 about the boys.

00:25:07.660 Wouldn't you agree?

00:25:09.600 Things have...

00:25:10.340 Things have gone downhill

00:25:11.660 that much

00:25:12.500 that only 23%

00:25:14.440 could pass

00:25:15.300 the physical?

00:25:18.140 And maybe...

00:25:18.860 Do you think

00:25:19.420 I'm remembering wrong?

00:25:21.200 Could be false memory.

00:25:23.380 Because there weren't

00:25:23.900 that many kids

00:25:24.480 in my class,

00:25:25.180 so it wasn't a good...

00:25:27.140 But 23%?

00:25:28.880 Really?

00:25:29.400 That's all?

00:25:32.680 I'm going to shock you

00:25:33.700 a little bit more

00:25:34.340 in a minute here.

00:25:36.520 So obviously,

00:25:37.900 the military's

00:25:38.560 having trouble recruiting.

00:25:39.520 But one of the things

00:25:41.580 that the military

00:25:42.360 has decided to do

00:25:43.600 is to reduce

00:25:45.640 their standards

00:25:46.340 for mental health.

00:25:49.680 So before,

00:25:50.760 they were pretty tight.

00:25:52.240 You couldn't have any...

00:25:52.900 At least any recent

00:25:54.960 medical health problems.

00:25:57.500 But now,

00:25:58.320 they're going to

00:25:58.740 loosen that.

00:25:59.860 And I think

00:26:01.000 ADHD

00:26:03.000 is now going to be

00:26:04.440 considered

00:26:05.000 not a problem

00:26:06.040 if it hasn't been

00:26:08.360 a problem recently

00:26:09.220 and I guess

00:26:09.980 if you're

00:26:10.960 treating it medically.

00:26:13.860 I wonder

00:26:14.660 if there could be

00:26:15.600 any risks

00:26:16.620 to having

00:26:19.200 more...

00:26:20.080 more people

00:26:21.980 with mental problems

00:26:22.900 in the military.

00:26:24.280 What could go wrong?

00:26:25.920 What could go wrong?

00:26:28.080 All right.

00:26:30.440 Have you ever heard of...

00:26:32.340 There's a movement

00:26:33.360 called

00:26:33.880 Trad Wives.

00:26:36.040 I just read about this

00:26:38.540 on CNN

00:26:39.060 like a minute

00:26:39.680 before it went live.

00:26:41.900 Have you ever heard of

00:26:43.180 Trad Wives?

00:26:45.460 It's supposedly

00:26:46.200 a growing theme.

00:26:48.880 The Trad

00:26:49.600 is short for

00:26:50.440 traditional

00:26:51.000 and they're

00:26:52.480 modeling after

00:26:53.280 the 50s

00:26:54.340 stay-at-home

00:26:55.680 housewife

00:26:56.380 kind of thing.

00:26:57.560 And there's

00:26:58.280 some number of people

00:26:59.080 who like the aesthetic.

00:27:00.960 So they like

00:27:01.680 the way they dressed

00:27:02.500 and sort of

00:27:03.520 the way they

00:27:04.080 treated their husband

00:27:05.740 as the boss

00:27:06.740 of the house

00:27:07.120 I guess.

00:27:08.420 And so it's

00:27:09.660 some kind of

00:27:09.980 growing thing.

00:27:10.900 Now

00:27:11.080 related to that

00:27:12.980 but separate

00:27:13.480 I've told you

00:27:16.080 there's a whole bunch

00:27:16.740 of relationship

00:27:17.820 experts

00:27:18.520 talking about

00:27:19.620 what does

00:27:20.080 and doesn't work

00:27:20.860 these days.

00:27:22.020 but I've

00:27:24.020 watched

00:27:24.300 a number

00:27:24.860 of these

00:27:25.240 relationship

00:27:25.700 experts

00:27:26.220 who have

00:27:27.120 the same

00:27:27.680 line of thinking

00:27:29.180 and I don't

00:27:30.640 know what's

00:27:31.000 wrong with it

00:27:31.700 so I'm going to

00:27:32.960 test it on you

00:27:33.700 and it goes

00:27:35.120 like this

00:27:35.780 if you're a woman

00:27:37.620 and you're looking

00:27:38.620 for a guy

00:27:39.240 correct me

00:27:41.280 if I'm wrong

00:27:41.780 these are the

00:27:42.340 standard things

00:27:43.180 that women

00:27:43.580 are looking for

00:27:44.260 now

00:27:45.280 and these are

00:27:45.880 the things

00:27:46.160 that they say

00:27:46.680 most often

00:27:47.220 now every woman

00:27:47.900 is different

00:27:48.440 right

00:27:48.840 every man

00:27:49.340 is different

00:27:49.740 so this isn't

00:27:51.040 all people

00:27:51.620 it's just sort

00:27:52.720 of a

00:27:53.040 you know

00:27:53.820 generality

00:27:54.580 but here are

00:27:55.860 the things

00:27:56.240 alright

00:27:56.500 and this will

00:27:57.960 be a little

00:27:58.280 quiz for you

00:27:58.980 women usually

00:27:59.940 like taller

00:28:00.860 men

00:28:01.220 over 6 feet

00:28:02.140 tall

00:28:02.440 what percentage

00:28:03.860 of American

00:28:04.480 men are over

00:28:05.360 6 feet tall

00:28:06.200 go

00:28:06.540 what percentage

00:28:08.200 of American

00:28:08.760 men are over

00:28:09.420 6 feet tall

00:28:10.280 your guesses

00:28:15.260 are unusually

00:28:16.660 bad

00:28:17.120 unusually bad

00:28:18.660 if I average

00:28:20.360 your guesses

00:28:20.860 I think

00:28:21.260 they'd be

00:28:21.560 right

00:28:21.840 the answer

00:28:22.860 is

00:28:23.320 14.5%

00:28:25.100 right

00:28:26.260 so if you're

00:28:27.160 a woman

00:28:27.480 on your

00:28:28.920 first filter

00:28:30.000 your first

00:28:30.640 sort

00:28:30.980 you've

00:28:31.880 eliminated

00:28:32.400 85%

00:28:34.280 of all

00:28:35.500 men

00:28:35.780 because only

00:28:37.060 14.5%

00:28:38.360 or above

00:28:38.900 that height

00:28:39.300 alright

00:28:39.540 now if you

00:28:40.360 go up to

00:28:40.760 6 foot 1

00:28:42.240 do you know

00:28:43.880 how fast

00:28:44.400 that drops

00:28:44.960 you get

00:28:47.000 down to

00:28:47.340 1%

00:28:47.940 really quickly

00:28:48.860 you know

00:28:49.700 at around

00:28:50.320 6, 3

00:28:50.900 6, 4

00:28:51.480 it's down

00:28:52.180 to like

00:28:52.440 1%

00:28:53.040 right

00:28:53.940 but let's

00:28:55.140 start with

00:28:55.760 14.5%

00:28:57.100 so that's

00:28:57.480 your story

00:28:57.880 now most

00:28:59.040 women want

00:28:59.620 a guy who

00:29:00.160 can provide

00:29:01.180 right

00:29:02.360 no matter

00:29:03.060 how modern

00:29:03.620 the woman

00:29:03.980 is

00:29:04.240 they still

00:29:04.620 like the

00:29:04.920 guy to

00:29:05.180 have a

00:29:05.400 job

00:29:05.740 that's

00:29:06.680 serious

00:29:07.040 so how

00:29:07.940 many

00:29:08.160 men

00:29:08.960 of any

00:29:10.420 height

00:29:10.840 just men

00:29:11.720 in general

00:29:12.160 American men

00:29:13.780 how many

00:29:14.260 have an

00:29:15.100 income

00:29:15.560 over 100,000

00:29:16.940 a year

00:29:17.240 how many

00:29:19.020 men

00:29:19.340 this is

00:29:19.880 married

00:29:20.300 unmarried

00:29:20.900 just men

00:29:21.980 the answer

00:29:25.260 is 13%

00:29:26.560 13%

00:29:27.640 so if you

00:29:29.600 were just

00:29:29.940 simply going to

00:29:30.600 find somebody

00:29:31.260 who is

00:29:31.700 tall

00:29:32.560 and made

00:29:33.820 over 100k

00:29:34.620 a year

00:29:35.060 the math

00:29:36.580 of it is

00:29:36.980 you would

00:29:37.220 multiply the

00:29:37.860 two percentages

00:29:38.560 together

00:29:39.060 so if you

00:29:40.120 multiply 14.5%

00:29:42.120 times 13%

00:29:43.840 it starts

00:29:45.780 getting really

00:29:46.420 small

00:29:46.820 really fast

00:29:47.660 and that's

00:29:48.580 just two

00:29:48.920 filters

00:29:49.360 here's some

00:29:50.380 more

00:29:50.620 suppose you

00:29:52.200 wanted a

00:29:52.600 guy who

00:29:53.200 was going

00:29:53.780 to be

00:29:54.040 faithful

00:29:54.580 you know

00:29:55.600 basic

00:29:55.940 right

00:29:56.260 you want

00:29:56.920 a guy

00:29:57.180 who's not

00:29:57.560 going to

00:29:57.800 cheat on

00:29:58.160 you

00:29:58.400 but he's

00:29:59.800 also over

00:30:00.320 six feet

00:30:00.840 tall and

00:30:01.740 he has a

00:30:02.160 good income

00:30:02.680 what are the

00:30:04.080 odds of

00:30:04.620 somebody who

00:30:05.120 is tall

00:30:05.600 and has a

00:30:06.040 good income

00:30:06.600 meaning the

00:30:07.640 most desirable

00:30:08.480 man

00:30:08.940 what are the

00:30:10.720 odds that he

00:30:11.180 will be

00:30:11.440 faithful to

00:30:12.100 one woman

00:30:12.640 over a

00:30:13.980 relationship

00:30:14.400 let's say

00:30:16.460 let's say

00:30:16.960 charitably

00:30:17.520 50%

00:30:18.580 charitably

00:30:20.680 right

00:30:21.240 just so it

00:30:21.740 doesn't sound

00:30:22.260 too terrible

00:30:23.140 I'll say

00:30:23.660 50%

00:30:24.400 so that you

00:30:25.700 would also

00:30:26.080 multiply that

00:30:26.780 by the

00:30:27.120 percentages

00:30:27.580 how many

00:30:30.160 women

00:30:30.540 would prefer

00:30:32.020 a beta

00:30:32.800 male over

00:30:33.460 an alpha

00:30:33.880 male

00:30:34.200 almost none

00:30:35.840 right

00:30:36.120 so women

00:30:37.140 would also

00:30:37.580 want somebody

00:30:38.160 who's

00:30:38.540 projects

00:30:39.220 at least

00:30:39.600 an alpha

00:30:40.160 male

00:30:40.480 how many

00:30:41.520 men

00:30:41.920 project

00:30:43.640 an alpha

00:30:44.300 male

00:30:44.780 persona

00:30:46.280 percentage

00:30:47.520 wise

00:30:47.860 I'm going

00:30:49.720 to charitably

00:30:50.920 say half

00:30:51.880 would you

00:30:54.480 accept

00:30:54.820 charitably

00:30:55.580 half

00:30:56.020 most of

00:30:56.760 you think

00:30:57.060 way less

00:30:57.460 than half

00:30:57.780 but let's

00:30:58.380 say

00:30:58.520 charitably

00:30:59.040 half

00:30:59.500 right

00:31:00.360 so that

00:31:00.660 cuts in

00:31:01.040 half

00:31:01.240 again

00:31:01.580 the number

00:31:02.140 of

00:31:02.280 possibilities

00:31:02.700 for the

00:31:03.320 women

00:31:03.540 do you

00:31:05.180 think

00:31:05.320 the women

00:31:05.680 care

00:31:06.100 if the

00:31:06.640 man

00:31:07.500 is

00:31:07.980 has an

00:31:08.580 addiction

00:31:08.960 to drugs

00:31:10.240 or alcohol

00:31:10.800 or a

00:31:11.720 mental

00:31:12.000 illness

00:31:12.560 what percent

00:31:14.360 of men

00:31:14.820 don't have

00:31:15.580 an addiction

00:31:16.080 or a

00:31:16.640 mental

00:31:16.880 illness

00:31:17.380 again I

00:31:19.020 don't know

00:31:19.560 maybe half

00:31:21.040 would you

00:31:22.420 say half

00:31:22.980 just say

00:31:25.500 half

00:31:25.840 just so we

00:31:26.540 can do

00:31:26.780 the math

00:31:27.200 right

00:31:27.460 so again

00:31:28.260 you take

00:31:28.980 what you've

00:31:29.360 cut down

00:31:29.740 to already

00:31:30.220 and cut

00:31:30.660 that in

00:31:30.920 half

00:31:31.100 again

00:31:31.380 how about

00:31:33.640 would women

00:31:35.880 want a

00:31:36.560 guy who's

00:31:37.060 in reasonably

00:31:37.640 good shape

00:31:38.440 not necessarily

00:31:40.140 running marathons

00:31:41.220 but

00:31:41.560 somebody who's

00:31:42.820 in the

00:31:43.260 better

00:31:44.200 quadrant

00:31:45.960 so maybe

00:31:47.580 let's say

00:31:48.340 25% of men

00:31:49.580 would you

00:31:49.860 say

00:31:50.080 25% of men

00:31:52.580 are in

00:31:52.900 reasonably

00:31:53.540 good shape

00:31:54.120 they don't

00:31:55.200 have to run

00:31:55.600 marathons

00:31:56.140 let's say

00:31:56.620 25%

00:31:57.260 so now

00:31:57.940 take what

00:31:58.320 you're down

00:31:58.660 to and

00:31:59.180 you know

00:31:59.860 take 25%

00:32:00.920 how about

00:32:02.760 the right

00:32:03.180 religion

00:32:03.720 the right

00:32:04.260 age

00:32:04.780 a guy who

00:32:06.180 will treat

00:32:06.540 you right

00:32:07.060 he's also

00:32:07.860 available

00:32:08.420 so he has

00:32:09.460 to be

00:32:09.800 he has to

00:32:10.260 be available

00:32:10.760 otherwise

00:32:11.380 it's useless

00:32:12.040 and he has

00:32:14.240 to like you

00:32:14.880 and you have

00:32:15.240 to like him

00:32:15.920 so if you

00:32:18.780 do the math

00:32:19.460 the

00:32:21.300 the available

00:32:22.220 number of

00:32:22.780 people

00:32:23.080 that's right

00:32:24.180 if you

00:32:26.080 eliminate

00:32:26.480 all of the

00:32:27.300 people on

00:32:27.800 all of

00:32:28.240 those things

00:32:28.700 do you

00:32:28.940 know

00:32:29.040 what's

00:32:29.220 left

00:32:29.560 Andrew

00:32:32.660 Tate

00:32:33.060 Andrew

00:32:34.400 Tate

00:32:34.740 that's

00:32:36.700 all

00:32:36.920 and

00:32:38.400 I

00:32:39.820 don't

00:32:40.000 know

00:32:40.140 how many

00:32:40.480 bitches

00:32:40.800 he can

00:32:41.300 handle

00:32:41.740 according to

00:32:43.020 him

00:32:43.180 that's

00:32:43.420 his

00:32:43.580 word

00:32:43.780 I'm

00:32:44.220 using

00:32:44.420 his

00:32:44.660 word

00:32:44.880 I

00:32:45.440 would

00:32:45.620 never

00:32:45.880 call

00:32:46.160 women

00:32:46.440 that

00:32:46.740 never

00:32:47.380 but

00:32:48.380 Andrew

00:32:48.760 does

00:32:49.140 so let

00:32:49.840 me

00:32:49.920 tell

00:32:50.100 you

00:32:50.300 but

00:32:52.180 he

00:32:52.380 has

00:32:52.620 he

00:32:53.020 can

00:32:53.200 only

00:32:53.420 handle

00:32:53.860 I

00:32:54.660 don't

00:32:54.740 know

00:32:54.940 maybe

00:32:55.860 100

00:32:56.240 or 200

00:32:56.800 per year

00:32:57.320 like

00:32:58.740 maximum

00:32:59.900 because

00:33:00.860 he's

00:33:01.060 busy

00:33:01.320 he's

00:33:01.520 got

00:33:01.660 some

00:33:01.840 businesses

00:33:02.260 to run

00:33:02.840 he has

00:33:03.200 to

00:33:03.320 exercise

00:33:03.880 needs

00:33:05.220 to

00:33:05.460 needs

00:33:05.940 one

00:33:06.120 hand

00:33:06.340 to

00:33:06.500 smoke

00:33:06.760 his

00:33:06.920 cigar

00:33:07.260 so

00:33:08.180 like

00:33:08.380 he

00:33:08.500 can't

00:33:08.780 handle

00:33:09.040 thousands

00:33:09.600 of

00:33:09.820 women

00:33:10.040 now

00:33:10.920 he

00:33:11.020 does

00:33:11.180 have

00:33:11.340 a

00:33:11.460 brother

00:33:11.800 and

00:33:12.800 his

00:33:12.960 brother

00:33:13.220 can

00:33:13.460 handle

00:33:13.720 maybe

00:33:13.960 a few

00:33:14.280 hundred

00:33:14.460 extra

00:33:14.820 but

00:33:15.500 the

00:33:15.700 Tates

00:33:15.980 alone

00:33:16.420 can

00:33:17.500 only

00:33:17.820 handle

00:33:18.360 at

00:33:20.060 most

00:33:20.400 a

00:33:20.700 thousand

00:33:21.100 women

00:33:21.460 out of

00:33:21.820 all the

00:33:22.120 billions

00:33:22.660 in the

00:33:23.040 world

00:33:23.300 so

00:33:24.240 you

00:33:24.380 really

00:33:24.580 can't

00:33:25.280 depend

00:33:25.600 on

00:33:25.840 him

00:33:25.980 to

00:33:26.100 do

00:33:26.240 it

00:33:26.340 all

00:33:26.580 right

00:33:27.620 so

00:33:29.640 do you

00:33:32.180 know why

00:33:32.600 AI

00:33:33.040 is going

00:33:33.480 to be

00:33:33.660 a problem

00:33:34.100 seems like

00:33:35.380 I changed

00:33:35.780 the subject

00:33:36.240 but I

00:33:36.580 didn't

00:33:37.400 do you

00:33:37.940 know why

00:33:38.200 AI

00:33:38.480 is going

00:33:38.860 to be

00:33:39.020 a problem

00:33:39.460 because

00:33:41.280 it might

00:33:41.560 tell you

00:33:41.880 the truth

00:33:42.400 hey

00:33:43.880 AI

00:33:44.400 should

00:33:45.520 I get

00:33:45.840 married

00:33:46.240 what's

00:33:47.480 AI

00:33:47.700 going to

00:33:48.040 say

00:33:48.280 or if

00:33:49.640 you say

00:33:49.960 what are

00:33:50.260 my odds

00:33:50.700 of being

00:33:51.100 happily

00:33:51.460 married

00:33:51.860 or

00:33:52.520 finding

00:33:52.880 a man

00:33:53.260 that I

00:33:53.640 want to

00:33:53.900 be

00:33:54.020 married

00:33:54.260 to

00:33:54.520 and AI

00:33:55.580 will

00:33:55.840 say

00:33:56.040 well

00:33:56.360 what

00:33:57.640 is your

00:33:58.200 criterion

00:33:58.720 tell me

00:34:00.260 what you're

00:34:00.560 looking for

00:34:01.000 and you'd

00:34:01.660 say

00:34:01.780 well

00:34:02.120 he's

00:34:02.620 tall

00:34:02.980 and blah

00:34:03.360 blah

00:34:03.480 blah

00:34:03.620 and you

00:34:03.840 say

00:34:04.000 and then

00:34:04.760 AI

00:34:05.040 would

00:34:05.280 say

00:34:05.520 alright

00:34:06.080 your odds

00:34:06.800 of finding

00:34:07.180 what you

00:34:07.680 the minimum

00:34:08.680 that you

00:34:09.060 need

00:34:09.240 to be

00:34:09.480 happy

00:34:09.760 are

00:34:10.420 .0000001

00:34:14.900 and it

00:34:16.680 will be

00:34:17.080 correct

00:34:17.400 that will

00:34:18.240 be the

00:34:18.600 actual

00:34:19.000 right

00:34:19.340 calculation

00:34:20.160 who

00:34:21.260 would

00:34:21.400 get

00:34:21.540 married

00:34:21.900 it's

00:34:23.260 the end

00:34:23.880 of

00:34:24.020 civilization

00:34:24.660 you do

00:34:27.080 understand

00:34:27.800 that

00:34:28.840 civilization

00:34:29.420 absolutely

00:34:30.700 requires

00:34:31.480 us to

00:34:32.520 be

00:34:32.760 deluded

00:34:33.240 all the

00:34:33.640 time

00:34:33.980 because

00:34:34.980 the moment

00:34:35.380 you actually

00:34:35.800 understood

00:34:36.220 the odds

00:34:36.800 of things

00:34:37.300 you

00:34:38.320 change

00:34:39.380 your

00:34:39.560 behavior

00:34:39.900 and it

00:34:40.180 would

00:34:40.260 be

00:34:40.340 the

00:34:40.480 end

00:34:40.620 of

00:34:40.740 civilization

00:34:41.300 speaking

00:34:45.080 of Tate

00:34:45.660 he

00:34:46.280 tweeted

00:34:47.400 at

00:34:47.660 Greta

00:34:47.960 Thunberg

00:34:48.420 today

00:34:48.800 he's

00:34:49.460 very good

00:34:49.840 at

00:34:50.060 being

00:34:51.260 provocative

00:34:51.800 and

00:34:52.920 he

00:34:53.440 tweeted

00:34:53.780 hello

00:34:54.480 Greta

00:34:54.940 Thunberg

00:34:55.500 I have

00:34:56.340 33

00:34:56.840 cars

00:34:57.480 my

00:34:58.280 Bugatti

00:34:58.760 has a

00:34:59.520 big

00:35:00.220 quad

00:35:01.000 turbo

00:35:01.380 engine

00:35:01.760 my

00:35:02.360 two

00:35:02.660 Ferraris

00:35:03.240 have

00:35:03.540 giant

00:35:03.960 engines

00:35:04.500 and he

00:35:05.220 goes

00:35:05.420 this is

00:35:05.820 just

00:35:06.060 the

00:35:06.240 start

00:35:06.580 please

00:35:08.680 provide

00:35:09.120 your

00:35:09.300 email

00:35:09.560 address

00:35:10.000 so I

00:35:10.920 can

00:35:11.040 send

00:35:11.240 a

00:35:11.400 complete

00:35:11.700 list

00:35:12.000 of

00:35:12.160 my

00:35:12.360 car

00:35:12.580 collection

00:35:13.000 and

00:35:13.620 the

00:35:13.740 respective

00:35:14.180 enormous

00:35:14.760 emissions

00:35:15.200 so he

00:35:16.800 tweeted

00:35:17.000 that

00:35:17.220 at

00:35:17.400 Greta

00:35:17.780 Greta

00:35:19.380 answered

00:35:19.900 him

00:35:20.060 back

00:35:20.380 and she

00:35:20.760 said

00:35:21.020 yes

00:35:21.360 please

00:35:22.200 do

00:35:22.440 enlighten

00:35:22.840 me

00:35:23.000 you

00:35:23.520 can

00:35:23.700 email

00:35:24.000 me

00:35:24.260 at

00:35:24.540 small

00:35:25.580 dick

00:35:25.900 energy

00:35:26.380 at

00:35:26.960 get

00:35:27.340 a

00:35:27.480 life

00:35:27.720 dot

00:35:28.000 com

00:35:28.300 so

00:35:30.620 I'm

00:35:31.460 glad

00:35:31.620 the two

00:35:31.900 of them

00:35:32.160 are

00:35:32.280 getting

00:35:32.480 along

00:35:32.840 so

00:35:36.460 I don't

00:35:38.500 know

00:35:38.620 I don't

00:35:39.260 want to

00:35:39.660 like

00:35:39.960 Greta

00:35:40.460 because

00:35:42.480 I don't

00:35:43.120 agree

00:35:43.460 with her

00:35:43.880 climate

00:35:45.040 hysteria

00:35:46.660 but

00:35:47.700 I

00:35:50.780 realized

00:35:51.160 today

00:35:51.520 that

00:35:51.860 I

00:35:52.780 have

00:35:53.000 to

00:35:53.180 delete

00:35:53.500 my

00:35:53.880 Instagram

00:35:54.540 app

00:35:55.020 did

00:35:56.400 anybody

00:35:56.660 else

00:35:56.880 have

00:35:57.040 this

00:35:57.220 problem

00:35:57.580 I

00:35:58.460 made

00:35:58.740 the

00:35:58.900 mistake

00:35:59.200 of

00:35:59.380 looking

00:35:59.620 at

00:35:59.840 some

00:36:00.080 Andrew

00:36:00.520 Tate

00:36:00.880 videos

00:36:01.500 and

00:36:02.300 now

00:36:02.440 that's

00:36:02.680 all

00:36:02.900 it

00:36:03.060 feeds

00:36:03.300 me

00:36:03.580 it's

00:36:04.600 nothing

00:36:05.060 but

00:36:05.320 Andrew

00:36:05.660 Tate

00:36:05.880 videos

00:36:06.340 it's

00:36:06.900 like

00:36:07.060 80%

00:36:07.580 Andrew

00:36:07.920 Tate

00:36:08.140 videos

00:36:08.540 so

00:36:09.120 that

00:36:09.280 the

00:36:09.440 entire

00:36:09.800 thing

00:36:10.740 is

00:36:10.900 useless

00:36:11.240 now

00:36:11.580 like

00:36:12.660 I

00:36:12.840 have

00:36:13.040 to

00:36:13.160 delete

00:36:13.480 Instagram

00:36:13.960 because

00:36:14.940 he

00:36:15.200 actually

00:36:15.520 polluted

00:36:16.000 it

00:36:16.340 and

00:36:17.080 by

00:36:17.280 the

00:36:17.380 way

00:36:17.600 I

00:36:17.960 don't

00:36:18.100 have

00:36:18.280 I'm

00:36:18.540 not

00:36:19.260 complaining

00:36:19.700 about

00:36:19.960 his

00:36:20.100 content

00:36:20.580 I'm

00:36:21.740 not

00:36:21.960 I'm

00:36:22.220 not

00:36:22.380 saying

00:36:22.740 it

00:36:23.060 shouldn't

00:36:23.340 be

00:36:23.500 there

00:36:23.980 I'm

00:36:24.700 not

00:36:24.880 saying

00:36:25.120 it

00:36:25.220 has

00:36:25.380 no

00:36:25.600 value

00:36:26.040 I'm

00:36:26.700 just

00:36:26.840 saying

00:36:27.000 there's

00:36:27.180 so

00:36:27.340 much

00:36:27.600 of

00:36:27.780 it

00:36:27.980 that

00:36:29.360 you

00:36:29.540 can't

00:36:29.820 even

00:36:29.960 use

00:36:30.160 the

00:36:30.320 app

00:36:30.600 he

00:36:31.060 actually

00:36:31.340 overwhelmed

00:36:31.920 Instagram

00:36:32.720 has

00:36:33.500 anybody

00:36:33.700 else

00:36:33.900 had

00:36:34.040 that

00:36:34.260 experience

00:36:34.860 because

00:36:35.360 you only

00:36:35.600 have

00:36:35.780 to

00:36:35.880 look

00:36:36.060 at

00:36:36.140 a

00:36:36.260 few

00:36:36.460 of

00:36:36.640 them

00:36:36.800 and

00:36:37.560 the

00:36:37.860 algorithm

00:36:38.500 does

00:36:38.860 the

00:36:38.980 rest

00:36:39.260 so

00:36:43.720 I

00:36:44.000 have

00:36:44.160 to

00:36:44.300 search

00:36:44.600 for

00:36:44.820 other

00:36:45.120 things

00:36:45.480 until

00:36:45.760 it

00:36:45.960 overwhelms

00:36:46.500 them

00:36:46.640 right

00:36:46.840 yeah

00:36:48.140 all

00:36:50.900 right

00:36:51.120 look

00:36:51.740 at

00:36:51.840 more

00:36:51.960 pep

00:36:52.200 videos

00:36:52.600 yeah

00:36:53.500 I

00:36:53.620 think

00:36:53.740 he

00:36:53.860 overwhelmed

00:36:54.320 the

00:36:54.500 pep

00:36:54.680 videos

00:36:55.060 too

00:36:55.300 all

00:36:57.740 right

00:36:57.920 why

00:36:58.880 is it

00:36:59.240 that

00:36:59.560 why

00:37:02.080 is it

00:37:02.340 that we

00:37:02.560 never

00:37:02.820 blame

00:37:03.240 the

00:37:03.440 brainwashers

00:37:04.280 have

00:37:04.700 you

00:37:04.760 noticed

00:37:05.040 that

00:37:05.320 so

00:37:07.260 the

00:37:08.520 January

00:37:08.860 6

00:37:09.300 thing

00:37:09.600 we

00:37:11.040 I

00:37:11.440 guess

00:37:11.640 Trump

00:37:12.300 was

00:37:12.660 blamed

00:37:13.080 for

00:37:13.400 quote

00:37:13.780 inciting

00:37:14.460 violence

00:37:15.020 you know

00:37:16.240 arguably

00:37:16.740 that's

00:37:17.760 that's

00:37:18.020 a debatable

00:37:18.460 point

00:37:18.920 but

00:37:20.020 is

00:37:20.840 inciting

00:37:21.600 the same

00:37:22.040 as

00:37:22.200 brainwashing

00:37:22.860 not

00:37:24.580 really

00:37:24.920 we

00:37:25.240 use

00:37:25.440 them

00:37:25.560 differently

00:37:25.880 right

00:37:26.160 somebody

00:37:26.840 incited

00:37:27.640 to do

00:37:28.020 something

00:37:28.280 you think

00:37:28.740 has not

00:37:29.100 necessarily

00:37:29.540 been

00:37:29.820 brainwashed

00:37:30.640 maybe

00:37:31.760 they're

00:37:32.020 not

00:37:32.240 thinking

00:37:32.660 clearly

00:37:33.160 but

00:37:33.720 not

00:37:34.680 brainwashed

00:37:35.340 per se

00:37:35.860 was there

00:37:37.260 anybody

00:37:37.600 who did

00:37:38.200 brainwash

00:37:38.720 the

00:37:38.920 January

00:37:39.260 6

00:37:39.620 people

00:37:39.960 was there

00:37:41.540 any

00:37:41.840 actual

00:37:43.560 source

00:37:44.160 of

00:37:44.320 brainwashing

00:37:44.980 of

00:37:46.400 course

00:37:46.620 there

00:37:46.780 was

00:37:47.080 all

00:37:48.320 of

00:37:48.760 the

00:37:48.880 media

00:37:49.140 that

00:37:49.340 they

00:37:49.460 were

00:37:49.580 consuming

00:37:50.060 maybe

00:37:52.100 the

00:37:52.980 FBI

00:37:53.380 but

00:37:54.560 certainly

00:37:55.100 the

00:37:55.320 news

00:37:55.580 they

00:37:55.720 were

00:37:55.840 watching

00:37:56.260 brainwashed

00:37:57.920 them

00:37:58.140 to think

00:37:58.520 that

00:37:58.800 the

00:37:59.440 election

00:37:59.860 had

00:38:00.040 been

00:38:00.200 stolen

00:38:00.500 and

00:38:01.400 then

00:38:01.580 brainwashed

00:38:02.140 them

00:38:02.340 into

00:38:02.580 thinking

00:38:02.900 that

00:38:03.180 their

00:38:03.400 actions

00:38:03.880 would

00:38:04.120 be

00:38:04.280 productive

00:38:04.740 now

00:38:06.760 you

00:38:07.840 might

00:38:08.020 say

00:38:08.220 to me

00:38:08.500 but

00:38:08.760 Scott

00:38:09.100 they

00:38:09.680 had

00:38:09.860 free

00:38:10.140 will

00:38:10.420 to

00:38:11.460 which

00:38:11.640 I

00:38:11.820 say

00:38:12.140 well

00:38:13.080 they

00:38:13.280 had

00:38:13.440 free

00:38:13.660 will

00:38:13.900 as

00:38:14.100 long

00:38:14.360 as

00:38:14.680 physics

00:38:15.800 stopped

00:38:16.320 working

00:38:16.740 inside

00:38:17.080 their

00:38:17.300 skull

00:38:17.660 but

00:38:18.840 if

00:38:19.040 physics

00:38:19.400 actually

00:38:19.800 works

00:38:20.180 everywhere

00:38:20.580 like

00:38:20.940 inside

00:38:21.340 your

00:38:21.540 skull

00:38:21.860 outside

00:38:22.260 your

00:38:22.520 skull

00:38:22.720 then

00:38:23.380 it's

00:38:23.560 just

00:38:23.720 causing

00:38:24.020 the fact

00:38:24.400 that

00:38:24.520 they

00:38:24.620 were

00:38:24.720 going

00:38:24.840 to do

00:38:25.040 what

00:38:25.140 they

00:38:25.240 were

00:38:25.320 going

00:38:25.440 to do

00:38:25.700 but

00:38:26.680 the

00:38:26.840 brainwashers

00:38:27.520 caused

00:38:27.840 January 6

00:38:28.680 right

00:38:30.760 even

00:38:32.320 if you

00:38:33.100 imagine

00:38:33.540 that

00:38:33.840 Trump

00:38:34.180 did

00:38:35.160 something

00:38:35.560 extra

00:38:35.940 to get

00:38:36.400 them

00:38:36.620 whipped

00:38:36.880 up

00:38:37.260 that's

00:38:37.860 very

00:38:38.080 debatable

00:38:38.580 they

00:38:39.980 were

00:38:40.180 there

00:38:40.520 for

00:38:40.860 a

00:38:41.200 particular

00:38:41.580 reason

00:38:42.040 they

00:38:42.600 had

00:38:42.720 already

00:38:42.980 been

00:38:43.220 brainwashed

00:38:43.860 now

00:38:45.360 does

00:38:46.120 that

00:38:46.260 mean

00:38:46.420 that

00:38:46.580 they're

00:38:46.760 wrong

00:38:47.160 no

00:38:48.160 I'm

00:38:48.840 not

00:38:48.980 saying

00:38:49.180 they're

00:38:49.400 wrong

00:38:49.700 I'm

00:38:50.460 saying

00:38:50.720 that

00:38:51.020 they

00:38:51.300 were

00:38:51.420 not

00:38:51.640 there

00:38:51.860 based

00:38:52.180 on

00:38:52.440 reason

00:38:53.060 and

00:38:53.300 facts

00:38:53.780 and

00:38:54.020 logic

00:38:54.480 they

00:38:55.720 were

00:38:55.880 there

00:38:56.360 because

00:38:57.520 they

00:38:57.620 were

00:38:57.680 brainwashed

00:38:58.260 do

00:38:59.140 you

00:38:59.240 know

00:38:59.340 why

00:38:59.460 the

00:38:59.600 people

00:38:59.880 who

00:39:00.580 observed

00:39:02.260 it

00:39:02.680 believe

00:39:03.040 it

00:39:03.180 was

00:39:03.340 an

00:39:03.520 insurrection

00:39:04.040 instead

00:39:04.560 of

00:39:04.720 a

00:39:04.840 protest

00:39:05.260 why

00:39:06.720 did

00:39:07.080 the

00:39:07.200 Democrats

00:39:07.680 think

00:39:07.960 they

00:39:08.140 saw

00:39:08.580 insurrection

00:39:09.080 an

00:39:09.920 unarmed

00:39:10.400 insurrection

00:39:10.920 why

00:39:11.200 would

00:39:11.540 they

00:39:11.660 think

00:39:11.820 such

00:39:12.080 a

00:39:12.200 ridiculous

00:39:12.620 thing

00:39:12.960 because

00:39:13.820 they're

00:39:13.980 brainwashed

00:39:14.540 there's

00:39:16.700 no

00:39:16.960 critical

00:39:18.520 thinking

00:39:19.040 going on

00:39:19.500 there

00:39:19.700 it

00:39:21.100 would

00:39:21.240 take

00:39:21.440 this

00:39:21.960 much

00:39:22.280 critical

00:39:22.700 thinking

00:39:23.200 like

00:39:24.120 a

00:39:24.620 dollop

00:39:25.720 to

00:39:26.520 know

00:39:26.780 that

00:39:27.060 unarmed

00:39:28.360 Republicans

00:39:28.980 are not

00:39:29.420 trying to

00:39:29.780 take over

00:39:30.180 a country

00:39:30.600 you don't

00:39:31.680 have to

00:39:31.920 do

00:39:32.060 deep

00:39:32.380 thinking

00:39:32.760 to

00:39:32.960 figure

00:39:33.180 that

00:39:33.400 out

00:39:33.700 but

00:39:34.200 still

00:39:34.460 half

00:39:35.820 the

00:39:36.000 country

00:39:36.240 believes

00:39:36.560 it's

00:39:36.720 true

00:39:36.920 and

00:39:38.000 that

00:39:38.100 would

00:39:38.220 be

00:39:38.340 the

00:39:38.480 most

00:39:39.000 obviously

00:39:39.560 untrue

00:39:40.020 thing

00:39:40.340 of

00:39:40.820 all

00:39:41.320 time

00:39:41.640 so

00:39:44.020 but

00:39:45.700 you

00:39:45.900 know

00:39:46.060 why

00:39:46.320 we

00:39:46.680 can't

00:39:47.300 blame

00:39:47.560 the

00:39:47.760 brainwashers

00:39:48.420 right

00:39:48.640 there's

00:39:50.700 a reason

00:39:51.120 besides

00:39:52.020 just

00:39:52.300 political

00:39:52.760 it's

00:39:54.240 because

00:39:54.400 the

00:39:54.600 entire

00:39:54.860 justice

00:39:55.280 system

00:39:55.840 depends

00:39:56.340 on the

00:39:57.400 illusion

00:39:57.800 of

00:39:58.020 free

00:39:58.220 will

00:39:58.500 if

00:40:00.560 you

00:40:00.680 take

00:40:00.900 away

00:40:01.080 the

00:40:01.260 illusion

00:40:01.560 of

00:40:01.740 free

00:40:01.920 will

00:40:02.180 you

00:40:02.380 can't

00:40:02.620 punish

00:40:02.900 anybody

00:40:03.340 if

00:40:04.120 you

00:40:04.220 can't

00:40:05.120 punish

00:40:05.380 anybody

00:40:05.800 then

00:40:06.780 there's

00:40:07.000 no

00:40:07.180 legal

00:40:07.460 system

00:40:07.900 and

00:40:08.700 if

00:40:08.780 there's

00:40:08.920 no

00:40:09.080 legal

00:40:09.340 system

00:40:09.740 civilization

00:40:10.280 falls

00:40:10.840 apart

00:40:11.180 so

00:40:12.460 the

00:40:12.920 illusion

00:40:13.520 that

00:40:13.840 people

00:40:14.080 have

00:40:14.280 this

00:40:14.460 thing

00:40:14.700 called

00:40:14.940 free

00:40:15.220 will

00:40:15.540 as

00:40:16.440 opposed

00:40:16.760 to

00:40:17.180 being

00:40:17.580 hypnotized

00:40:18.240 by

00:40:18.460 obvious

00:40:18.960 brainwashers

00:40:20.800 you have

00:40:22.720 to put

00:40:23.040 the

00:40:23.280 responsibility

00:40:24.000 on the

00:40:24.440 person

00:40:24.640 who

00:40:24.800 does

00:40:25.000 the

00:40:25.160 act

00:40:25.520 because

00:40:26.260 it's

00:40:26.400 the

00:40:26.520 only

00:40:26.640 way

00:40:26.820 civilization

00:40:27.440 works

00:40:27.920 but

00:40:29.040 it's

00:40:29.180 not

00:40:29.380 rational

00:40:29.840 it's

00:40:31.140 completely

00:40:31.560 irrational

00:40:32.080 well

00:40:32.820 except

00:40:33.160 that

00:40:33.420 it

00:40:33.700 works

00:40:34.140 but

00:40:35.440 the

00:40:35.700 logic

00:40:36.400 of

00:40:36.620 it

00:40:36.700 doesn't

00:40:36.940 hold

00:40:37.140 up

00:40:37.400 I

00:40:40.740 know

00:40:41.040 it

00:40:41.140 makes

00:40:41.300 people

00:40:41.600 squirvy

00:40:42.240 when I

00:40:42.560 say

00:40:42.760 free

00:40:43.080 will

00:40:43.280 is

00:40:43.480 an

00:40:43.620 illusion

00:40:43.880 but

00:40:44.560 usually

00:40:44.840 it's

00:40:45.080 just

00:40:45.240 people

00:40:45.580 are

00:40:45.740 defining

00:40:46.100 it

00:40:46.280 differently

00:40:46.560 if

00:40:46.760 they

00:40:46.940 just

00:40:48.260 say

00:40:48.580 I

00:40:49.520 can

00:40:49.720 observe

00:40:50.140 that

00:40:50.380 somebody

00:40:50.700 could

00:40:50.920 choose

00:40:51.180 this

00:40:51.380 way

00:40:51.560 or

00:40:51.720 choose

00:40:51.960 this

00:40:52.160 way

00:40:52.440 so

00:40:53.400 therefore

00:40:53.740 they

00:40:53.960 had

00:40:54.080 free

00:40:54.400 will

00:40:54.660 to

00:40:55.480 which

00:40:55.640 I

00:40:55.800 say

00:40:56.000 you

00:40:56.200 can't

00:40:56.460 observe

00:40:56.740 that

00:40:57.040 you

00:40:58.220 can't

00:40:58.480 see

00:40:58.600 the

00:40:58.780 physics

00:40:59.200 happening

00:40:59.920 inside

00:41:00.280 their

00:41:00.500 brain

00:41:00.860 I

00:41:01.480 say

00:41:01.700 whatever

00:41:02.000 they

00:41:02.260 did

00:41:02.460 was

00:41:02.660 the

00:41:02.780 only

00:41:02.920 thing

00:41:03.100 they

00:41:03.240 could

00:41:03.400 have

00:41:03.500 done

00:41:03.740 because

00:41:04.520 physics

00:41:04.980 only

00:41:05.240 worked

00:41:05.520 one

00:41:05.720 way

00:41:05.900 in

00:41:06.020 that

00:41:06.180 case

00:41:06.460 all

00:41:08.500 right

00:41:08.700 what

00:41:12.600 percentage

00:41:13.080 this is a

00:41:13.640 Rasmussen poll

00:41:14.480 what

00:41:15.300 percentage

00:41:15.780 of the

00:41:16.120 country

00:41:16.460 in

00:41:17.580 June

00:41:18.060 of

00:41:18.260 this

00:41:18.460 year

00:41:18.720 believe

00:41:19.640 that

00:41:19.920 Russia

00:41:20.240 was

00:41:20.600 winning

00:41:20.880 the

00:41:21.120 war

00:41:21.340 in

00:41:21.600 June

00:41:21.880 25%

00:41:25.180 that's

00:41:26.400 right

00:41:26.620 pretty

00:41:27.420 close

00:41:27.800 25%

00:41:29.720 actually

00:41:30.320 24%

00:41:32.120 so

00:41:32.420 in

00:41:32.620 June

00:41:32.900 24%

00:41:33.760 of

00:41:33.860 the

00:41:33.940 country

00:41:34.160 thought

00:41:34.400 Russia

00:41:34.700 was

00:41:34.900 winning

00:41:35.160 now

00:41:37.080 it's

00:41:37.280 14%

00:41:38.400 14%

00:41:40.280 of

00:41:40.540 likely

00:41:40.860 voters

00:41:41.240 in

00:41:41.400 America

00:41:41.700 think

00:41:42.640 Russia

00:41:42.980 is

00:41:43.260 winning

00:41:43.540 now

00:41:44.360 about

00:41:44.760 I

00:41:45.080 think

00:41:45.220 about

00:41:45.400 half

00:41:45.680 of

00:41:45.800 the

00:41:45.880 people

00:41:46.160 think

00:41:46.560 that

00:41:46.780 it

00:41:46.880 looks

00:41:47.040 like

00:41:47.200 a

00:41:47.360 stalemate

00:41:47.880 and

00:41:48.820 the

00:41:49.160 rest

00:41:49.380 think

00:41:49.660 that

00:41:49.840 Ukraine

00:41:50.180 is

00:41:50.380 winning

00:41:50.620 now

00:41:52.180 how

00:41:53.340 many

00:41:53.540 of

00:41:53.680 you

00:41:53.780 think

00:41:54.040 Russia

00:41:54.340 is

00:41:54.520 winning

00:41:54.760 are

00:41:55.540 you

00:41:55.680 in

00:41:55.800 the

00:41:55.900 14%

00:41:57.260 how

00:41:59.240 many

00:41:59.480 of

00:41:59.680 you

00:41:59.800 think

00:42:00.080 Russia

00:42:00.400 is

00:42:00.660 winning

00:42:00.960 yeah

00:42:06.000 you know

00:42:06.400 it's hard

00:42:06.720 to

00:42:07.000 it's hard

00:42:07.540 to

00:42:07.720 separate

00:42:08.240 Russia

00:42:09.480 will

00:42:09.780 win

00:42:10.040 in the

00:42:10.400 long

00:42:10.580 run

00:42:10.820 from

00:42:11.160 Russia

00:42:11.560 is

00:42:11.840 winning

00:42:12.160 so

00:42:12.560 the

00:42:12.740 question

00:42:13.200 is

00:42:13.400 a little

00:42:13.620 unclear

00:42:14.020 I'll

00:42:14.380 give you

00:42:14.620 that

00:42:14.920 already

00:42:17.460 won

00:42:17.740 somebody

00:42:18.240 says

00:42:18.520 yeah

00:42:20.440 well

00:42:21.480 have

00:42:25.420 I

00:42:25.520 ever

00:42:25.720 mentioned

00:42:26.120 to

00:42:26.360 you

00:42:26.600 that

00:42:28.360 things

00:42:28.900 tend

00:42:29.180 to

00:42:29.320 go

00:42:29.480 my

00:42:29.700 way

00:42:29.960 and

00:42:31.720 you

00:42:32.400 remember

00:42:32.740 I

00:42:33.000 keep

00:42:33.420 reminding

00:42:33.860 you

00:42:34.180 that

00:42:34.940 although

00:42:35.240 I

00:42:35.560 was

00:42:35.720 100%

00:42:36.460 wrong

00:42:36.880 when

00:42:37.920 I

00:42:38.100 said

00:42:38.340 that

00:42:38.680 Putin

00:42:39.160 wouldn't

00:42:39.780 actually

00:42:40.440 invade

00:42:40.860 Ukraine

00:42:41.300 the

00:42:42.500 reason

00:42:42.860 I

00:42:43.080 said

00:42:43.260 it

00:42:43.360 was

00:42:43.460 wrong

00:42:43.800 is

00:42:44.180 because

00:42:44.360 he

00:42:44.560 couldn't

00:42:45.160 win

00:42:45.480 and

00:42:46.700 that

00:42:46.880 it

00:42:47.020 was

00:42:47.140 almost

00:42:47.400 immediately

00:42:47.880 obvious

00:42:48.400 he

00:42:48.680 was

00:42:48.840 going

00:42:49.000 to

00:42:49.080 get

00:42:49.300 waxed

00:42:51.080 his

00:42:52.060 army

00:42:52.300 was

00:42:52.640 now

00:42:53.660 when

00:42:54.700 I

00:42:54.840 said

00:42:55.100 that

00:42:55.360 at

00:42:55.620 the

00:42:55.760 time

00:42:56.000 that

00:42:56.180 he

00:42:56.300 invaded

00:42:56.680 would

00:42:57.720 you

00:42:57.880 say

00:42:58.180 that

00:42:58.680 close

00:42:59.180 to

00:42:59.800 90%

00:43:01.340 of

00:43:01.480 the

00:43:01.580 public

00:43:01.880 would

00:43:02.160 have

00:43:02.300 said

00:43:02.520 Russia

00:43:02.840 is

00:43:03.040 totally

00:43:03.360 winning

00:43:03.720 and

00:43:04.540 going

00:43:04.760 to

00:43:04.940 win

00:43:05.140 would

00:43:06.000 you

00:43:06.100 agree

00:43:06.380 that

00:43:07.500 at

00:43:08.020 the

00:43:08.160 point

00:43:08.420 that

00:43:08.580 I

00:43:08.720 was

00:43:08.860 saying

00:43:09.060 that

00:43:09.240 Russia

00:43:09.480 couldn't

00:43:09.920 win

00:43:10.220 90%

00:43:11.300 of

00:43:11.420 the

00:43:11.500 people

00:43:11.740 were

00:43:11.960 on

00:43:12.480 the

00:43:12.620 other

00:43:12.760 side

00:43:13.040 now

00:43:14.520 it's

00:43:17.020 completely

00:43:17.400 reversed

00:43:18.020 that

00:43:19.220 the

00:43:19.500 vast

00:43:19.920 majority

00:43:20.400 of

00:43:20.800 America

00:43:21.140 believes

00:43:21.720 what

00:43:22.160 I

00:43:22.340 believed

00:43:22.720 would

00:43:23.360 happen

00:43:23.660 from

00:43:23.980 the

00:43:24.300 start

00:43:24.620 that

00:43:25.260 Ukraine

00:43:25.620 would

00:43:25.880 surprise

00:43:26.260 everybody

00:43:26.720 with

00:43:26.980 better

00:43:28.320 performance

00:43:28.880 than

00:43:29.140 anybody

00:43:29.560 thought

00:43:29.860 so

00:43:32.240 I'm

00:43:33.260 only

00:43:33.480 going to

00:43:33.720 point

00:43:33.940 out

00:43:34.320 that

00:43:36.540 things

00:43:36.960 tend

00:43:37.480 to go

00:43:37.840 the way

00:43:38.300 I

00:43:39.840 want

00:43:40.080 them

00:43:40.240 to

00:43:40.420 and

00:43:42.620 I

00:43:42.740 don't

00:43:42.940 know

00:43:43.120 why

00:43:43.440 I

00:43:44.780 honestly

00:43:45.480 don't

00:43:45.880 know

00:43:46.060 why

00:43:46.360 to

00:43:46.980 me

00:43:47.140 it

00:43:47.260 feels

00:43:47.480 like

00:43:47.700 I'm

00:43:47.860 in

00:43:47.960 a

00:43:48.100 simulation

00:43:48.620 and

00:43:49.500 I'm

00:43:49.660 either

00:43:50.000 imagining

00:43:51.680 the things

00:43:52.220 are going

00:43:52.540 my way

00:43:53.060 or

00:43:54.060 I'm

00:43:55.280 influencing

00:43:55.840 it

00:43:56.240 somehow

00:43:56.960 or

00:43:58.500 I'm

00:43:58.700 the

00:43:58.840 world's

00:43:59.240 best

00:43:59.600 predictor

00:44:00.400 even

00:44:01.620 getting

00:44:02.000 notable

00:44:02.720 ones

00:44:03.020 wrong

00:44:03.280 I'd

00:44:03.500 still

00:44:03.660 be

00:44:03.780 the

00:44:03.940 world's

00:44:04.240 best

00:44:04.440 predictor

00:44:04.940 I

00:44:06.500 don't

00:44:06.920 understand

00:44:07.360 it

00:44:07.580 I

00:44:07.760 honestly

00:44:08.020 don't

00:44:08.300 but

00:44:08.620 it's

00:44:08.740 so

00:44:08.920 consistent

00:44:09.460 it's

00:44:11.620 hard to

00:44:11.900 find any

00:44:12.340 major

00:44:12.840 topic

00:44:13.260 that

00:44:13.520 isn't

00:44:13.760 going

00:44:14.000 the

00:44:14.180 direction

00:44:14.600 that I

00:44:16.340 thought it

00:44:16.680 would

00:44:16.900 publicly

00:44:17.480 I

00:44:18.380 don't

00:44:18.520 know

00:44:18.660 why

00:44:18.920 let's

00:44:25.420 see

00:44:25.620 there's

00:44:25.940 a

00:44:26.140 new

00:44:26.380 study

00:44:26.700 out

00:44:27.000 that

00:44:27.260 we

00:44:27.460 don't

00:44:27.680 believe

00:44:28.000 because

00:44:28.300 we

00:44:28.500 don't

00:44:28.640 believe

00:44:28.820 studies

00:44:29.240 but

00:44:29.820 it

00:44:29.920 says

00:44:30.120 that

00:44:30.380 metformin

00:44:31.300 I

00:44:31.800 think

00:44:31.940 it's

00:44:32.080 an

00:44:32.200 over

00:44:32.380 the

00:44:32.580 counter

00:44:32.940 diabetes

00:44:36.500 drug

00:44:36.920 that

00:44:37.600 lowers

00:44:37.940 your

00:44:38.280 blood

00:44:38.660 sugar

00:44:38.940 levels

00:44:39.480 and

00:44:40.580 it

00:44:40.800 allegedly

00:44:41.220 helps

00:44:41.580 with

00:44:41.800 long

00:44:42.120 COVID

00:44:42.580 with

00:44:44.120 long

00:44:44.420 COVID

00:44:44.860 like

00:44:46.780 fairly

00:44:47.260 substantially

00:44:47.880 first

00:44:48.940 question

00:44:49.400 how

00:44:50.100 many

00:44:50.320 of

00:44:50.500 you

00:44:50.620 believe

00:44:50.980 long

00:44:51.320 COVID

00:44:51.660 exists

00:44:52.300 because

00:44:57.940 I

00:44:58.260 had

00:44:58.700 to

00:44:59.020 do

00:45:00.220 a

00:45:00.380 Google

00:45:00.600 search

00:45:01.000 today

00:45:01.400 because

00:45:02.720 you know

00:45:03.100 in the

00:45:03.340 beginning

00:45:03.680 people

00:45:04.320 were saying

00:45:04.880 there'd

00:45:05.340 be this

00:45:05.660 long

00:45:05.980 COVID

00:45:06.340 and

00:45:07.300 then

00:45:07.520 there

00:45:07.720 was

00:45:07.920 a

00:45:08.080 period

00:45:08.400 where

00:45:08.720 we

00:45:08.960 weren't

00:45:09.240 sure

00:45:09.420 if

00:45:09.560 it

00:45:09.660 was

00:45:09.800 real

00:45:10.080 and

00:45:12.000 I

00:45:12.140 didn't

00:45:12.300 know

00:45:12.460 where

00:45:12.580 that

00:45:12.780 ended

00:45:13.040 up

00:45:13.380 so

00:45:14.100 if

00:45:14.240 you

00:45:14.360 do

00:45:14.860 a

00:45:15.060 Google

00:45:15.320 search

00:45:15.740 on

00:45:16.060 is

00:45:16.500 long

00:45:16.900 COVID

00:45:17.300 real

00:45:17.720 Google

00:45:19.140 will

00:45:19.580 I'll

00:45:20.200 only

00:45:20.380 just

00:45:20.560 tell you

00:45:20.840 what

00:45:20.960 the

00:45:21.100 search

00:45:21.360 reveals

00:45:21.720 I

00:45:21.960 don't

00:45:22.300 know

00:45:22.420 what's

00:45:22.640 true

00:45:22.900 but

00:45:23.520 the

00:45:23.700 search

00:45:24.000 reveals

00:45:24.500 that

00:45:25.960 most

00:45:26.660 of

00:45:27.520 the

00:45:27.840 media

00:45:28.800 is

00:45:29.200 saying

00:45:29.440 long

00:45:29.720 COVID

00:45:30.000 is

00:45:30.220 real

00:45:30.560 the

00:45:31.360 studies

00:45:31.660 say

00:45:31.920 it's

00:45:32.080 real

00:45:32.300 but

00:45:34.360 at

00:45:34.620 the

00:45:34.760 same

00:45:34.940 time

00:45:35.200 there

00:45:35.420 are

00:45:36.860 studies

00:45:37.200 saying

00:45:37.540 it's

00:45:37.720 not

00:45:37.940 real

00:45:38.200 in

00:45:38.960 the

00:45:39.280 same

00:45:39.560 time

00:45:40.220 period

00:45:41.020 in

00:45:41.360 April

00:45:41.820 May

00:45:42.100 of

00:45:42.260 this

00:45:42.420 year

00:45:42.600 so

00:45:43.880 there's

00:45:44.960 a little

00:45:45.260 bit of

00:45:45.560 a difference

00:45:46.060 but

00:45:46.760 overwhelmingly

00:45:47.800 Google

00:45:48.620 will say

00:45:49.080 it's

00:45:49.260 real

00:45:49.480 doesn't

00:45:50.480 mean

00:45:50.600 it's

00:45:50.760 real

00:45:50.980 just

00:45:51.700 Google

00:45:52.040 will

00:45:52.240 say

00:45:52.400 that

00:45:52.640 now

00:45:53.760 is it

00:45:56.420 interesting

00:45:56.840 that

00:45:57.140 metformin

00:45:57.660 lowers

00:45:58.020 blood

00:45:58.420 sugar

00:45:58.720 levels

00:45:59.240 because

00:45:59.940 we

00:46:00.140 knew

00:46:00.340 that

00:46:00.560 the

00:46:00.840 diabetics

00:46:01.460 were

00:46:01.660 having

00:46:01.900 the

00:46:02.100 worst

00:46:02.380 time

00:46:03.080 with

00:46:03.300 the

00:46:03.440 COVID

00:46:03.680 right

00:46:04.040 wasn't

00:46:05.180 diabetes

00:46:05.700 the number

00:46:06.260 one

00:46:06.620 comorbidity

00:46:07.480 sort of

00:46:08.900 co-comorbidity

00:46:09.940 with obesity

00:46:10.700 at the

00:46:11.040 same time

00:46:11.440 I imagine

00:46:11.900 so

00:46:13.680 is sugar

00:46:15.080 the villain

00:46:15.820 in everything

00:46:16.360 like I

00:46:18.500 saw some

00:46:19.240 experts

00:46:19.540 saying that

00:46:20.100 it wasn't

00:46:20.640 the lower

00:46:21.360 blood sugar

00:46:21.920 that makes

00:46:22.400 the metformin

00:46:23.080 work

00:46:23.420 if in fact

00:46:24.000 it works

00:46:24.400 there was

00:46:25.560 some other

00:46:25.920 mechanism

00:46:26.420 but I'm not

00:46:27.340 sure I believe

00:46:27.820 that

00:46:28.200 because the

00:46:29.900 thing that we

00:46:30.440 keep seeing

00:46:30.900 over and

00:46:31.260 over again

00:46:31.720 is that

00:46:32.720 having too

00:46:33.320 much sugar

00:46:33.860 in you

00:46:34.240 is just

00:46:35.080 always bad

00:46:35.800 for everything

00:46:36.460 am I

00:46:37.720 wrong about

00:46:38.160 that

00:46:38.500 there's like

00:46:40.060 almost no

00:46:40.640 exception

00:46:41.060 right

00:46:41.320 did you

00:46:42.200 put sugar

00:46:42.760 in your

00:46:43.080 body

00:46:43.400 yes

00:46:44.340 it's bad

00:46:45.440 for you

00:46:45.900 I mean

00:46:46.620 except for

00:46:47.140 normal carbs

00:46:47.920 and stuff

00:46:48.320 of course

00:46:48.840 so

00:46:50.680 I don't know

00:46:51.780 that would be

00:46:52.180 my guess

00:46:52.680 without any

00:46:53.200 medical training

00:46:53.980 that if

00:46:54.780 everything

00:46:55.260 that's

00:46:56.100 adds sugar

00:46:56.880 is bad

00:46:57.300 for you

00:46:57.680 in every

00:46:58.000 possible way

00:46:58.800 and everything

00:46:59.580 that decreases

00:47:00.260 sugar in your

00:47:00.880 body is good

00:47:01.460 for you

00:47:01.820 in every

00:47:02.460 possible way

00:47:03.220 I would

00:47:04.900 think

00:47:05.080 metformin

00:47:05.620 would work

00:47:06.180 so I

00:47:07.480 guess I'll

00:47:07.860 believe this

00:47:08.320 one because

00:47:08.820 it matches

00:47:09.780 my

00:47:10.280 presumption

00:47:11.640 that's as

00:47:13.020 good as

00:47:13.280 you can

00:47:13.540 do

00:47:14.020 so

00:47:18.900 I heard

00:47:20.180 Dr.

00:47:21.020 Robert

00:47:21.280 Malone

00:47:21.740 famous

00:47:23.180 co-inventor

00:47:24.640 of the

00:47:24.940 mRNA

00:47:25.400 technology

00:47:27.260 and a

00:47:28.320 famous

00:47:28.760 famous

00:47:29.320 critic

00:47:29.740 of the

00:47:30.420 lockdown

00:47:32.280 and vaccination

00:47:33.240 kind of

00:47:34.480 regimen

00:47:34.960 and he

00:47:36.840 told his

00:47:37.460 reasons for

00:47:38.260 getting

00:47:38.500 vaccinated

00:47:39.040 because if

00:47:40.740 you didn't

00:47:41.080 know he's

00:47:41.520 vaccinated

00:47:41.980 he gave

00:47:42.900 two reasons

00:47:43.540 one

00:47:44.140 concern

00:47:45.200 about

00:47:45.580 long

00:47:46.000 COVID

00:47:46.380 as opposed

00:47:48.060 to concern

00:47:48.720 about dying

00:47:49.340 and he

00:47:50.700 believed he

00:47:51.080 actually had

00:47:51.560 long COVID

00:47:52.120 and at the

00:47:53.840 time it

00:47:54.320 looked like

00:47:54.900 a vaccination

00:47:56.200 would reduce

00:47:57.760 your long

00:47:58.260 COVID

00:47:58.560 symptoms

00:47:59.040 even after

00:47:59.820 you had

00:48:00.340 the long

00:48:00.920 COVID

00:48:01.220 now he's

00:48:02.980 not so

00:48:03.320 sure that's

00:48:03.820 true anymore

00:48:04.360 but a

00:48:05.060 Google search

00:48:05.800 suggests that

00:48:07.540 Google is

00:48:08.460 telling you

00:48:09.160 it is still

00:48:09.840 true a

00:48:10.440 little bit

00:48:10.860 it's a

00:48:11.880 little unclear

00:48:12.440 but so

00:48:15.860 Dr.

00:48:16.240 Malone said

00:48:16.860 he got the

00:48:17.780 vaccination

00:48:18.420 because he

00:48:20.160 wanted to

00:48:20.560 do international

00:48:21.380 travel

00:48:21.940 it was the

00:48:22.800 only way he

00:48:23.220 could do

00:48:23.480 it

00:48:23.820 practically

00:48:24.720 and he

00:48:26.840 wanted to

00:48:27.400 reduce his

00:48:28.160 risk for

00:48:28.620 long COVID

00:48:29.300 does that

00:48:30.720 sound familiar

00:48:31.400 is there

00:48:32.940 anybody else

00:48:33.460 you know

00:48:33.920 who made

00:48:35.280 a decision

00:48:35.920 exactly the

00:48:37.920 same

00:48:38.360 exactly the

00:48:39.520 same

00:48:39.720 and about

00:48:40.060 the same

00:48:40.400 time

00:48:40.720 yeah I

00:48:42.200 did

00:48:42.540 I did

00:48:43.660 so

00:48:44.780 for those

00:48:46.120 of you

00:48:46.420 who are

00:48:46.880 here to

00:48:47.700 tell me I

00:48:48.720 made the

00:48:49.100 wrong decision

00:48:49.760 you could be

00:48:51.200 right

00:48:51.580 but I need

00:48:52.800 you to know

00:48:53.200 I made

00:48:53.620 exactly the

00:48:54.780 same decision

00:48:55.520 as the

00:48:56.580 world expert

00:48:57.440 critic of

00:48:58.440 the vaccinations

00:48:59.100 so the

00:49:00.860 smartest person

00:49:01.980 in the

00:49:02.460 whole world

00:49:03.760 on this

00:49:05.020 topic

00:49:05.480 made the

00:49:06.660 same decision

00:49:07.320 I did

00:49:07.880 because he

00:49:09.220 was working

00:49:09.680 with the

00:49:10.020 same data

00:49:10.540 as we

00:49:11.120 all were

00:49:11.560 so somebody

00:49:15.940 says copium

00:49:16.740 Kyle says

00:49:18.460 that agreeing

00:49:19.640 with the

00:49:20.020 person that

00:49:20.540 you believe

00:49:21.300 is the

00:49:22.280 best source

00:49:23.020 that agreeing

00:49:25.120 with your

00:49:25.680 expert

00:49:26.220 is a

00:49:27.280 bad

00:49:27.700 decision

00:49:28.160 that's

00:49:30.140 your point

00:49:30.480 of view

00:49:30.780 is it

00:49:36.340 a cope

00:49:36.840 is it a

00:49:38.140 cope or

00:49:38.540 is it just

00:49:38.960 a fact

00:49:39.480 that the

00:49:40.640 person you

00:49:41.320 believe is

00:49:42.160 the most

00:49:42.620 qualified

00:49:43.320 agrees with

00:49:44.880 me

00:49:45.180 is that a

00:49:46.800 problem

00:49:47.120 that your

00:49:48.200 expert agrees

00:49:48.880 with me

00:49:49.300 I'm just

00:49:51.660 rubbing it

00:49:52.140 in I

00:49:52.940 just like

00:49:53.320 feeling

00:49:53.580 right

00:49:53.960 so that's

00:49:56.540 just for

00:49:56.880 me

00:49:57.920 now

00:50:03.120 I'll tell

00:50:05.800 you my

00:50:06.120 current

00:50:06.440 opinion

00:50:06.840 my current

00:50:08.140 opinion is

00:50:08.760 I doubt

00:50:09.360 the vaccinations

00:50:10.120 help with

00:50:10.740 long COVID

00:50:11.400 I doubt

00:50:13.400 it

00:50:13.680 oh

00:50:14.500 did

00:50:15.340 did

00:50:16.140 Dr.

00:50:16.820 McAuliffe

00:50:17.520 get

00:50:17.860 vaccinated

00:50:18.640 does anybody

00:50:19.800 know

00:50:20.100 because I

00:50:23.480 was wondering

00:50:23.840 if Malone

00:50:24.560 was the

00:50:25.000 only

00:50:25.360 sort of

00:50:26.760 I don't

00:50:27.560 know if

00:50:27.780 I call

00:50:28.440 him

00:50:28.580 anti-vaccination

00:50:29.620 but a

00:50:30.480 vaccination

00:50:31.000 program

00:50:32.760 critic

00:50:33.240 anyway

00:50:33.640 I would

00:50:33.960 call

00:50:34.180 okay

00:50:40.240 so

00:50:41.160 McCullough

00:50:41.580 didn't

00:50:42.380 and did

00:50:42.980 he get

00:50:43.320 he got

00:50:44.000 COVID

00:50:44.340 though

00:50:44.580 right

00:50:44.800 did

00:50:45.700 McCullough

00:50:46.120 get

00:50:46.340 COVID

00:50:46.960 I assume

00:50:47.460 everybody

00:50:47.860 did

00:50:48.120 at this

00:50:49.160 point

00:50:49.420 don't

00:50:52.580 know

00:50:52.780 don't

00:50:53.000 care

00:50:53.260 all

00:50:54.740 right

00:50:54.920 we'll

00:50:55.780 look

00:50:55.920 into

00:50:56.080 that

00:50:56.340 or I

00:50:57.580 will

00:50:57.800 well

00:50:59.880 ladies and

00:51:00.340 gentlemen

00:51:00.600 we're still

00:51:01.120 in the

00:51:01.480 slow

00:51:02.140 week

00:51:02.760 of

00:51:02.940 news

00:51:03.360 somebody

00:51:05.800 says

00:51:06.120 yes

00:51:06.400 he's

00:51:06.640 vaccinated

00:51:07.140 but I

00:51:09.720 don't

00:51:09.840 know

00:51:10.100 Steve

00:51:12.940 Kirsch

00:51:13.500 is crushing

00:51:14.100 the

00:51:14.420 Provax

00:51:15.240 peeps

00:51:15.740 let me

00:51:19.240 ask you

00:51:19.540 this

00:51:19.840 are the

00:51:20.360 anti-vax

00:51:21.280 doctors

00:51:22.300 the

00:51:24.200 Malone's

00:51:24.820 and the

00:51:25.040 McAuliffe's

00:51:25.760 I don't

00:51:26.820 want to

00:51:27.020 call them

00:51:27.280 anti-vax

00:51:28.040 because that's

00:51:28.880 that's my

00:51:29.440 labeling

00:51:29.800 I shouldn't

00:51:30.300 do that

00:51:30.720 but are

00:51:31.700 those doctors

00:51:32.340 that are

00:51:32.840 prominent

00:51:33.500 critics of

00:51:34.440 at least

00:51:35.140 some parts

00:51:35.680 of the

00:51:35.960 vaccination

00:51:36.320 issue

00:51:37.160 do they

00:51:41.980 think that

00:51:42.500 the vaccinations

00:51:43.200 are still a

00:51:43.900 good idea

00:51:44.400 for older

00:51:45.720 Americans

00:51:46.360 does anybody

00:51:48.060 know that

00:51:48.560 is there

00:51:49.960 anybody who

00:51:50.620 says the

00:51:51.340 vaccinations

00:51:51.920 are a

00:51:53.200 mistake for

00:51:53.980 old people

00:51:54.920 well I asked

00:51:56.660 the question

00:51:57.060 wrong so now

00:51:57.680 I don't know

00:51:58.220 what your

00:51:58.440 answers mean

00:51:58.960 is there

00:52:02.480 general agreement

00:52:03.260 that over 65

00:52:04.280 is still

00:52:05.860 saves lives

00:52:06.560 or is even

00:52:07.460 that up

00:52:07.900 that's up in

00:52:08.760 the air as

00:52:09.100 well

00:52:09.400 so Malone

00:52:15.180 thinks older

00:52:15.740 people should

00:52:16.380 get it

00:52:16.920 oh even

00:52:20.980 Kildorf and

00:52:21.780 Badaqara

00:52:22.440 think it's

00:52:22.920 okay above

00:52:23.400 65

00:52:23.860 okay

00:52:24.380 so

00:52:25.360 so you're

00:52:28.440 saying that

00:52:28.960 even the

00:52:29.740 even the

00:52:30.240 biggest critics

00:52:31.060 would agree

00:52:32.200 that I should

00:52:32.800 have gotten

00:52:33.180 vaccinated

00:52:33.800 is that

00:52:35.440 true

00:52:35.720 is it

00:52:38.120 true that

00:52:38.480 the biggest

00:52:38.960 critics of

00:52:39.800 vaccinations

00:52:40.380 the most

00:52:41.420 expert people

00:52:42.360 believe I

00:52:43.700 made the

00:52:44.020 right choice

00:52:44.540 so the

00:52:47.840 only people

00:52:48.280 who don't

00:52:49.320 believe that I

00:52:50.920 made the right

00:52:51.400 choice for

00:52:52.020 myself

00:52:52.440 are the

00:52:53.660 people who

00:52:54.400 don't believe

00:52:55.660 their own

00:52:56.380 best experts

00:52:57.320 so the

00:52:59.180 people who

00:52:59.580 believe they're

00:53:00.180 experts

00:53:00.720 believe I

00:53:02.400 made the

00:53:02.700 right choice

00:53:03.200 but the

00:53:03.840 people who

00:53:04.380 believe that

00:53:05.400 the people

00:53:05.800 that they

00:53:06.200 trust the

00:53:06.760 most are

00:53:07.780 not credible

00:53:08.500 would think I

00:53:10.300 made a

00:53:10.560 mistake

00:53:10.980 and by the

00:53:13.800 way I

00:53:14.120 don't know if

00:53:14.480 I made a

00:53:14.840 mistake or

00:53:15.240 not

00:53:15.520 how would I

00:53:16.800 know

00:53:17.180 this guy has

00:53:23.400 other

00:53:23.620 comorbidities

00:53:24.440 not really

00:53:25.080 I thought I

00:53:26.480 had asthma

00:53:27.000 but it

00:53:27.340 turns out I

00:53:27.820 don't

00:53:28.220 yeah

00:53:33.620 all right

00:53:35.500 so as

00:53:37.900 long as

00:53:38.200 you all

00:53:38.440 agree that

00:53:39.100 I made

00:53:39.900 the smartest

00:53:40.680 decision

00:53:41.340 that anybody

00:53:42.840 could have

00:53:43.260 made in my

00:53:43.760 situation

00:53:44.300 and I think

00:53:45.980 now that you

00:53:46.400 all agree with

00:53:46.940 that

00:53:47.160 I remember

00:53:48.340 that a lot

00:53:48.840 of people

00:53:49.120 were mocking

00:53:49.620 me until

00:53:50.000 they found

00:53:50.420 out that

00:53:50.860 I made

00:53:51.240 the choice

00:53:53.280 that their

00:53:53.900 experts would

00:53:54.820 recommend

00:53:55.280 not me

00:53:56.400 I only

00:53:57.980 did what

00:53:58.460 my critics

00:53:59.460 godlike

00:54:01.180 experts

00:54:01.700 recommended

00:54:02.280 so

00:54:03.520 that's all

00:54:04.580 I did

00:54:04.980 yeah I

00:54:14.100 thought I

00:54:14.460 had asthma

00:54:14.940 at the time

00:54:15.480 and I was

00:54:15.900 concerned about

00:54:16.580 it

00:54:16.860 and that

00:54:17.920 you know

00:54:19.360 so under

00:54:20.220 my bad

00:54:21.340 information

00:54:22.240 from my

00:54:22.760 own

00:54:23.040 medical

00:54:23.940 people

00:54:24.620 I was

00:54:26.580 misinformed

00:54:27.180 I didn't

00:54:29.700 do it

00:54:29.940 just for

00:54:30.280 a vacation

00:54:30.780 but that

00:54:31.240 was

00:54:31.420 that was

00:54:32.320 the

00:54:32.540 the

00:54:33.140 vacation

00:54:33.720 was the

00:54:34.120 reason I

00:54:34.540 did it

00:54:34.800 when I

00:54:35.300 did it

00:54:35.700 but the

00:54:36.800 decision to

00:54:37.440 do it

00:54:37.860 was also

00:54:38.600 largely

00:54:39.140 because of

00:54:39.800 I didn't

00:54:41.400 want a

00:54:41.720 long

00:54:41.960 COVID

00:54:42.280 problem

00:54:42.740 but it

00:54:44.860 probably

00:54:45.100 you know

00:54:45.500 I'm not

00:54:45.880 sure it

00:54:46.100 makes any

00:54:46.380 difference

00:54:46.740 yeah

00:54:49.700 all right

00:54:50.380 you were

00:54:52.280 misinformed

00:54:52.820 on everything

00:54:53.340 COVID

00:54:53.780 was I

00:54:55.040 did you

00:54:57.320 just miss

00:54:58.000 the entire

00:54:58.460 last five

00:54:59.020 minutes

00:54:59.360 was I

00:55:01.240 misinformed

00:55:02.020 on everything

00:55:02.720 COVID

00:55:03.140 when we

00:55:04.180 all just

00:55:04.700 agreed that

00:55:05.340 all of the

00:55:05.900 experts

00:55:06.300 including the

00:55:06.960 critics

00:55:07.320 say people

00:55:08.520 in my

00:55:08.900 category

00:55:09.320 should have

00:55:09.720 been vaccinated

00:55:10.300 so

00:55:11.660 like some

00:55:15.020 of you

00:55:15.380 I have no

00:55:16.260 idea what

00:55:16.640 planet you're

00:55:17.200 coming from

00:55:17.680 it's like

00:55:19.340 it's like

00:55:20.380 I don't even

00:55:21.420 know

00:55:21.740 I don't

00:55:22.740 even understand

00:55:23.260 your comments

00:55:23.840 at some

00:55:24.200 point

00:55:24.440 it doesn't

00:55:25.380 make sense

00:55:25.780 at all

00:55:26.260 all right

00:55:29.260 you got a lot

00:55:31.920 quieter didn't

00:55:32.580 you you know

00:55:34.600 if you told

00:55:35.260 me that I

00:55:35.700 was gonna

00:55:36.040 that at the

00:55:37.080 end of this

00:55:37.500 year I

00:55:38.140 would be

00:55:38.420 arguing that

00:55:39.060 Dr Malone

00:55:41.860 should be

00:55:43.020 totally

00:55:43.520 totally

00:55:45.280 believed

00:55:45.740 because he

00:55:46.640 agrees

00:55:46.980 completely with

00:55:47.700 me

00:55:48.000 you didn't

00:55:50.440 see that

00:55:50.800 coming did

00:55:51.260 you I

00:55:52.000 didn't see

00:55:52.360 it coming

00:55:52.700 I thought

00:55:53.620 I was all

00:55:53.980 on my

00:55:54.260 own here

00:55:54.640 honestly I

00:55:55.800 thought I

00:55:56.080 was just

00:55:56.680 on my

00:55:57.020 own here

00:55:57.400 all right

00:55:59.420 there's nothing

00:56:00.400 else to talk

00:56:00.900 about in the

00:56:01.240 news unless

00:56:02.160 you know

00:56:02.440 something so

00:56:03.360 I'm gonna go

00:56:03.760 talk to the

00:56:04.280 locals people

00:56:05.060 so YouTube

00:56:07.880 I'll talk to

00:56:08.480 you later

00:56:08.800 thanks for

00:56:09.720 joining

00:56:09.920 me

00:56:12.580 I

00:56:13.580 I

00:56:13.700 I

00:56:15.620 I

00:56:15.720 I

00:56:15.880 I

00:56:17.760 I

00:56:17.920 I

00:56:17.960 I

00:56:19.760 I

00:56:21.840 I

00:56:22.740 I

00:56:23.200 I

00:56:24.680 I

00:56:24.800 I

00:56:27.940 I

00:56:29.880 I

00:56:30.220 I

00:56:31.200 I

00:56:31.900 I

00:56:34.420 I

00:56:37.960 I

00:56:38.020 I

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 28, 2022

pisode 1971 Scott Adams： Today I Will Separate The Liars From The Brainwashers And Regular Idiots

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript