00:15:25.800I mean, how about you find out like, oh, wait, mine is different than yours? Uh-oh.
00:15:29.880And you find out like people have found out about whole other families and like that their dad or mom had an affair and there's like this whole other set of people.
00:18:53.880And this is Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Ro Khanna.
00:18:57.560this is the the group that is trying to coalesce power and create for themselves a system whereby
00:19:04.640they have greater influence greater control over aspects of the economy they want to seize the
00:19:08.880means of production they want to control education they want to control media and anytime there's an
00:19:14.360effort by an individual enterprise or an individual themselves to go out and build a business and
00:19:20.100succeed and do something that's outside of their scope and their span of control they lose their0.88
00:19:24.660f***ing minds over it. And that's what we're seeing. So I react to their tweeting and their0.89
00:19:29.360bulls*** where they're basically trying to contort things about inequality and fairness and justice0.97
00:19:34.860when the truth is they are the rising empire, the evil empire in Star Wars. They are the folks who0.89
00:19:42.540want to take from all of us what we were endowed with when this nation was started and what many
00:19:47.640people came to this country for, which is individual freedom and liberty, the ability to build a
00:19:51.640business in peace, the ability to make decisions, to do what you want with your own assets, and to
00:19:56.360have functionally private property. And they're taking it all away. And they're trying to take
00:20:00.220it all away. And we're watching piece by piece, step by step. So they are forming a Politburo
00:20:03.980where they can effectively control the economy, control education, control the media, and tell us
00:20:09.280all what we can and can't do and say. And it's frustrating to me to watch it because it's
00:20:12.960masqueraded as bullshit virtue, as justice, as equity. It's a bunch of nonsense words that they0.99
00:20:19.720use to try and make themselves seem virtuous, when in the end of the day, they are fundamentally evil.
00:20:26.140And he does not normally get heated like that. So you could just feel his passion in that. And I
00:20:31.240think that's why J. Cal was like, hmm, you know, like he was like, shook. Owen, I mean, Marcella,
00:20:36.780we both agree fully with what he's saying. Marcella, why don't you give me your take on that?
00:20:42.380I just love the fact that he expresses this very well. I agree with him 100%. But
00:20:53.640when we are finished with this, can we talk about the Supreme Court just came out with one of the
00:21:00.260major cases? We'll get there, Marcella. We'll get there. That's what I was focused on. Sorry.
00:21:07.600Okay, no, go ahead, Owen, take your take.
00:21:10.320Well, I agree with him, and I think we need to fight all the communist and socialist things that are taking root here.
00:21:16.960I think it is something that is contrary to American values and contrary to American culture and just really important to what makes America great.
00:21:25.500And I think we've gone way too far already with socialism, with all the welfare and social programs.
00:21:33.020And I don't necessarily think we need to go to zero, but I think we need to at least stop where we are and say, you know, let's not do more because government, the more they get involved in things, the worse things get and the more they mismanage the assets that they have and that they take from everyone.
00:21:49.660and uh i'd certainly like to see a lot less spending and a lot less control especially at
00:21:56.020the federal government level but even at the state levels um it's it's already too much and i think
00:22:01.260um you know the the democrat party is just getting more and more radical with their views
00:22:06.340on these things where they're you know they used to hide these things they used to try to sort of
00:22:10.580slip them through without people noticing now they're right out there saying we want to do all
00:22:14.040these blatantly communist and socialist things. We want to freeze rents. We want to have government
00:22:19.800grocery stores. I mean, it's like, let's become Cuba is kind of the message. It's like just so
00:22:24.820ridiculous, but at the same time, scary. And I think we should be fighting it everywhere we can.0.96
00:22:31.000I agree. I think it is scary. And you're right. It is so blatant now. So AOC used to seem scary.
00:22:37.580now she's like moderate um mandami is like mom donnie is uh as everybody's saying he's the
00:22:46.680talent i mean aoc you know yeah she had talent but now he's like leveling up big time and
00:22:54.040the people love him they love him i mean look at the people he endorsed that got in in new york now
00:23:00.880that are full-blown Marxist. Oh my God. I don't even want to know this one woman's name, but she
00:23:08.760basically wants to dismantle America. She just got in, in office. She wants to dismantle America,1.00
00:23:15.960our way of life. And she says she uses the American flag as a napkin. How is this allowed?1.00
00:23:24.240How is this allowed? I think that's why I keep harping on things, you guys, like Islam and socialism and blah, blah, blah, because as you can see, it's kind of all over the news now. These things that we've been talking about have really been pushed to the forefront because it started as a slow moving disaster for most people.
00:23:48.960I've been watching it since nine 11 and watching it build and build and build and build. And the
00:23:54.060train has left the station so long ago where we're, we now have a takeover happening. And
00:24:00.300because you don't see it in your town or your city does not mean it's not happening. And I'm
00:24:05.260going to really encourage you guys, please follow Amy Mech, M E K Amy Mech on X. Okay. I've been
00:24:15.260following her for years. Just scroll her timeline for 10 minutes and just, you know, get involved
00:24:22.340with that. So please, please check her out. So that being said, Marcella, you're going to have
00:24:28.220five more minutes to check out what's going on with the Supreme Court, because I want to just
00:24:31.580get through this whole thing first, and then we'll come to you at the Supreme Court. But when I first
00:24:36.700found Bridget Gabriel, it was from this clip that I'm going to play for you. Gosh, this must,
00:24:42.740This was like, I think Obama might've been president when I saw this. So I just want you
00:24:48.340guys, what the mech? I just want you guys to see, um, just how succinctly she gives you this
00:24:57.000information. Okay. This is about five minutes. And then I'm going to show you one other thing
00:25:01.100after, and then we're going to get to Iran and the Supreme court. Okay. Let's take a listen
00:25:06.420To you all, my name is Saba Ahmed. I'm a law student at American University. I am here to ask you a simple question. I know that we portray Islam and all Muslims as that, but there is 1.8 billion Muslim followers of Islam.
00:25:25.000We have 8 million-plus Muslim Americans in this country, and I don't see them represented here.
00:25:31.860But my question is, how can we fight an ideological war with weapons?
00:25:38.360The jihadist ideology that you talk about, it's an ideology.0.96
00:25:42.160How can you ever win this thing if you don't address it ideologically?0.98
00:25:47.080Great question. I am so glad you're here, and I am so glad you brought that up
00:25:51.240because it gives us an opportunity to answer.
00:25:53.660What I find so amazing is since the beginning of this panel, which we are here about Benghazi attack against our people, not one person mentioned Muslims.0.69
00:26:03.540We are here against Islam or we're launching war against Muslims.
00:26:06.960We are here to discuss how four Americans died and what our government is doing.0.96
00:26:13.160You were the one who brought up the issue about most Muslims, not us.
00:26:17.380And since you brought it up, allow me to elaborate with my answer.
00:26:20.480There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world today. Of course not all of them are radicals. The majority of them are peaceful people. The radicals are estimated to be between 15 to 25 percent according to all intelligence services around the world.
00:26:37.520That leaves 75% of them peaceful people.0.99
00:26:42.120But when you look at 15% to 25% of the world Muslim population,0.98
00:26:46.320you're looking at 180 million to 300 million people1.00
00:26:50.320dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization.
00:26:56.780So why should we worry about the radicals, 15% to 25%?
00:27:01.240Because it is the radicals that kill.0.93
00:27:03.760Because it is the radicals that behead and massacre.0.68
00:27:06.320When you look throughout history, when you look at all the lessons of history, most Germans were peaceful, yet the Nazis drove the agenda.
00:27:15.840And as a result, 60 million people died, almost 14 million in concentration camps, 6 million were Jews.0.60
00:27:23.980The peaceful majority were irrelevant.0.97
00:27:26.800When you look at Russia, most Russians were peaceful as well.0.84
00:27:30.180Yet the Russians were able to kill 20 million people.0.97
00:27:33.640The peaceful majority were irrelevant.0.89
00:27:36.320When you look at China, for example, most Chinese were peaceful as well.0.99
00:27:40.320Yet the Chinese were able to kill 70 million people.1.00
00:27:44.140The peaceful majority were irrelevant.1.00
00:27:46.500When you look at Japan prior to World War II, most Japanese were peaceful as well.0.99
00:27:51.280Yet Japan was able to butcher its way across Southeast Asia,0.90
00:27:55.640killing 12 million people, mostly killed with bayonets and shovels.0.99
00:27:59.680The peaceful majority were irrelevant.0.99
00:28:01.680On September 11th in the United States, we had 2.3 million Arab Muslims living in the United States.
00:28:10.140It took 19 hijackers, 19 radicals to bring America down to its knees, destroy the World Trade Center, attack the Pentagon, and kill almost 3,000 Americans that day.0.93
00:28:22.200The peaceful majority were irrelevant.0.99
00:28:24.960So for all our powers of reasons and us talking about moderate and peaceful Muslims, I'm glad you're here.1.00
00:28:30.620But where are the others speaking out?
00:28:33.000And since you are the only Muslim representative...1.00
00:40:46.340and then i heard like a couple people saying if i had to choose now from going on my vacation
00:40:54.180to europe or to america it's america 100 every time all day i'm like let's go
00:40:59.460they were like i can't believe this place is real
00:41:03.300i love it it starts to repeat a little bit now
00:41:12.340oh i just love it okay i needed that break i needed that break okay marcella if i had a drum
00:41:22.160roll i'd be playing it for you what do we know from scotus so the first thing is they didn't
00:41:29.120come out with trumpy barbara which was the birthright citizenship so they're gonna
00:41:33.920announce when that will be they always leave the most controversial case to the very end
00:41:40.160um so they have probably their airplanes ready to go and be off term before you know it it gets out
00:41:47.440i i don't know why they do that um but i remember with dov uh when they overturned roe v wade they
00:41:56.720um or the roby wait type of cases they had it released well it got released a little bit before
00:42:03.680that uh leaked but they released it at the end so they did come out with like interesting um
00:42:12.480cases uh today it's watson v rnc was one of the big ones was regarding the ballot
00:42:19.360uh the voting day whether you can count ballots uh if you receive them within five days that was
00:42:26.640mississippi uh law i believe and basically they ruled for mississippi they ruled that you can
00:42:36.240count ballots after five days and how that comes about is they didn't rule on the actual state
00:42:44.000law they ruled that the federal election day statutes federal election uh law does not preempt
00:42:52.240state law which is you know it is what it is that's what the ruling says um allowing mail-in
00:42:59.920ballots postmark by election day and received within five days to be counted this is a win for
00:43:04.400the left a win for uh you know questionable voting uh practices by california by every other state
00:43:14.880that does it um and so um who went against the conservative sort of uh federalist idea uh was
00:43:26.640justice uh justice barrett was the was the one that wrote the opinion and justice chief justice
00:43:34.320roberts was also on the side of the your three the three uh amigas um and basically they ruled
00:43:44.480for the left there was also another ruling trump b cook which um if you remembered he tried to fire
00:43:51.920the um the federal um somebody on the on the federal um how do you say it lisa cook was on
00:44:04.080the federal reserve and he tried to fire her i don't know if you remember that and then she said
00:44:08.640no you can't fire me and so she never left um so the supreme court sides with her says that you
00:44:15.000can't do that um that if you do do that you have to have cause he thought he had cause because he
00:44:23.140uh was pointing by he i mean president trump was pointing to the um the mortgage fraud that i think
00:44:32.280bill pulled to try to find on her but the thing is with that you have to actually what they say is
00:44:38.880that if there is cause just like fraud is there has to be a judicial review it can't just be you
00:44:46.160think there's fraud and that's enough um there has to actually be a review and the reason why is that
00:44:52.140the federal reserve they see it as its own independent um quasi-government quasi-private
00:44:59.760institution. That's what they claim. And then because the next one, um, is Trumpy Slaughter,
00:45:08.160um, which is indicating that Trump can fire anyone in the, in the executive branch,
00:45:15.160which in this case was the FTC. He can fire anyone without cause. And then you think, okay,
00:45:21.480he can't fire Lisa Cook with, without cause. And so what they, what they differentiate is that
00:45:28.660they see the Federal Reserve as different than all the other agencies that are created under
00:45:37.840the executive branch. So the other agencies that are created under executive branch that have
00:45:43.640executive theory that they are fully controlled by the president, then he doesn't need to have
00:45:53.080any cause, which is great because he's great for Trump because he has fired many, many,
00:46:00.260many federal employees in the executive branch.
00:46:05.420Marcela, the group has a question about the ballots.
00:46:08.980They can be counted five days after, but do they need to be postmarked election day?
00:46:14.960So the Supreme Court did not make a ruling on the actual specific laws in each state.
00:46:21.540What it actually is worse than you think, because the law that they were dealing with is Mississippi. Right. And in Mississippi, their law says you can count a ballot five days after.
00:46:34.720But what they're saying is, the Supreme Court saying is, any law that is statewide in California, New Jersey, wherever it is, we're going to let it, whatever it says, we're going to okay it because federal law does not preempt that law, the federal election law.
00:46:55.920So it kind of makes it really bad because it means any state can create a law which can say, I can count ballots 30 days later, and as long as all of the state votes on it, then under this ruling, that's okay.
00:47:12.240because what what the what the ruling was is federal election day um doesn't preempt
00:47:22.080any state law so you could have new jersey create a new law that says yes 40 200 years later we can
00:47:31.680this is crazy um yeah it's very crazy but i'm not surprised chief justice rovers is on
00:47:38.720in this side of the aisle um he's always been very controversial he's the one that voted for
00:47:45.120voted and wrote the opinion on obamacare um as a tax and but it was never a tax but anyways i can go
00:47:55.200i can go on but basically it's kind of worse than you think because the mississippi law at least has
00:48:01.200five days which is low amount of days but other states could have quite a more days than that
00:48:09.760they can do whatever they want apparently yeah um montreal galaxy wanted me to ask you about
00:48:15.280alito's descent so alito dissented on and in which one watson v rnc i'm guessing yeah
00:48:24.880um so watson he he said in today's decision creates a serious risk this is alito speaking
00:48:32.800in his dissent um of further undermining public confidence in our election and our system of
00:48:38.600self-government um it is undeniable the provision prohibition on counting late arriving ballots
00:48:45.460would provide an additional hurdle for bad actors seeking to stuff ballot boxes when early election
00:48:51.400results suggest a tight race. The majority incorrectly removes the safeguard from federal
00:48:56.580law. Today's decision is inconsistent with the terms of the election day statutes, contemporary
00:49:02.540election law, principles, two centuries of historical practice, and the case law and the
00:49:08.520question presented. So basically, he respectfully dissents, but this is a huge issue. Now,
00:49:16.600I have to say that if that's another thing to win midterms for, is that you can actually create
00:49:24.660another law in the federal government regarding elections.
00:49:30.320Just to clarify, this is all elections or just state elections?
00:49:38.460That's what I thought. Amazing. Great.
00:49:42.280I mean, the question was regarding elections where, like, for November, we have federal, we're electing federal Congress midterms, you know, we're electing senators, congressmen, and then you have your state candidates for governor, for mayor, whatever it is.
00:50:04.020But what it was saying in the Mississippi law was like, oh, we can, when we have those type of quasi federal elections, we can still make our own law saying that we can count these votes five days after.
00:50:18.500And then what the RNC was saying is you can't do that because the federal election law, the federal election day statute says you can't count beyond that.
00:50:29.620And they cited somehow with, I mean, I would have to read the entire,
00:50:36.280but to me, it doesn't make legal sense.
00:50:39.220And I think that's why a legal is talking about 200 years of the law
00:50:44.500being the opposite, I always, you know, one of the things that you learn when
00:50:49.220you're a law student, one of the first things is that you're always told
00:50:55.400And in this case, it doesn't. So I would like to see what it is.
00:51:00.220Well, I can understand some argument about state law preempting federal law in this case, just because the constitution specifically says the election procedures are to be decided by the state legislatures. So it seems like a power that was specifically given to the state. So I can understand that part of it. However, I think the constitution also says we are going to have an election day, not an election month.
00:51:25.480like like it doesn't make sense that you can say well we're going to pay attention to that part of
00:51:30.040the law in the constitution but not this other part because it seems like you'd have to be able
00:51:35.040to you'd have to say that one part of the constitution conflicts or contradicts the other
00:51:40.620i mean if you have an election day and it's supposed to be you know the first tuesday or
00:51:46.040whatever you know in november like that's what it should be and and you can't say that states can
00:51:52.920just ignore that part of the constitution. This is really a shame. I don't understand
00:52:01.620why we wouldn't all have the same way to vote. Make it a universal thing. You vote on election
00:52:11.500day. All the calendars I've ever had my entire life say election day. Everybody knows it's
00:52:19.780coming you have 364 days to prepare for that one day uh so this is um this is really a shame this
00:52:28.860is a this is bad i feel like this is bad it's sad um it's irresponsible and it does not make
00:52:35.780anybody feel better at all about how we vote and is i mean is california still counting votes i
00:52:42.180no idea but maybe it's sick the other bad um situation that happened this it's sort of good
00:52:50.020for trumpy slaughter is really good for trump and for any i guess any chief executive that comes in
00:52:56.820because he won't be the last president um because he can you know take care of business and figure
00:53:03.140out who to remove but the the but it's sort of a bad day for him because the supreme court declined
00:53:09.700to hear an appeal for his jury verdict uh with uh writer the famed writer eg e gene carold so
00:53:20.900he has that five million dollar judgment against him and i guess they're you know this was the last
00:53:27.060appeal so now he owes her those five million dollars oh my god i am just not excited
00:53:33.780i am but you know what i have to say um owen kind of look looked at the law in the right way
00:53:43.780under watson v rnc it does allow you know the constitution does allow the states to kind of
00:53:50.440figure it out on their own it doesn't mean that in your state you can't vote for laws that don't
00:53:56.660allow for this you know so um i agree with you mark 716 under that premise early voting should
00:54:04.620not be allowed counting after would be admissible if the item was postmarked but the whole mail-in
00:54:09.540is the problem the federal government should require a chain of custody yeah i mean what are
00:54:15.320we doing this is i this is um i don't know i mean can this be no you can't appeal to the
00:54:22.260The election system just seems to keep eroding. It gets less and less secure, less and less
00:54:29.760trustworthy. You've got all these voting machines that are full of vulnerabilities. You've got all
00:54:37.100this universal mail-in balloting that clearly has major weaknesses to it. And I don't know why
00:54:44.500anyone should trust our elections when it's like this and when you have a Supreme Court that won't
00:54:48.280even stand up for election integrity. It's just sad. I mean, you need to have elections people
00:54:55.500trust. You need to have elections people actually believe, yes, that's the person who won. And
00:55:00.200this decision, but also a lot of other changes that have happened, many of which were illegal
00:55:05.520when they were done, they just make it so that nobody can really trust what's going on. And it
00:55:12.240makes it super easy to cheat at scale. And whether or not it's happening in any specific instance is
00:55:18.640another question, but it's about being able to actually trust and believe in the elections and
00:55:24.660that we actually are represented by the people we chose. And at this point, it's kind of hard to
00:55:29.400really put a lot of trust into that. Well, this is a bummer.
00:55:34.600um you know what in a way it's a great thing that this happened because it does give a lot of state
00:55:42.960rights to states compared to the federal government and sometimes that's better than
00:55:48.840yes there has to be like i agree with owen 100 there has to be integrity in the voting system
00:55:55.220and all that but that's for congress and the senate uh the senate and the house to decide that
00:56:01.800and also our states to decide that, to create laws.
00:56:06.240Because the Supreme Court's not there to create laws.
01:04:07.620It happened just like that. I'm going to divert a little bit.
01:04:12.400Years ago when I was single, I lived in San Francisco, had no social life whatsoever, no game.
01:04:19.900It was before online dating. I mean, meeting somebody was really, really hard, pre-internet.
01:04:27.040And I joined a group called the Spinsters.
01:04:30.900Well, I didn't join them. I went to an event that they had.
01:04:33.420And Spencers were young women who were single, and they had an ironic name.
01:04:39.520And they would have these big parties, and they would invite men.
01:04:43.280And it was just basically a way to meet people.
01:04:47.680So I went to one of these events with my friend, Josh.
01:04:53.120And we walked in, and we looked around, and we said to ourselves,
01:04:56.960Hmm, not exactly the most attractive room.
01:05:00.680I don't want to be unkind, but it wasn't exactly what we were hoping for, with one exception.
01:05:09.400Across the room, there was one unusually attractive woman, and she sort of stood out as the most attractive woman in the entire place.
01:05:20.420And so I said to my friend, well, this is a disaster. We wasted our night. I'm just going to go over to the most attractive woman in the room.
01:05:29.700I'll flame out in about a second and a half, and then we'll be done.