Rebel News Podcast - March 12, 2021


Cancel culture returns — Conservative Party demands the Epoch Times be banned any government funding


Episode Stats


Length

33 minutes

Words per minute

156.33833

Word count

5,181

Sentence count

340

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

8

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Aaron O'Toole's MP in Quebec is calling for a newspaper to be defunded, banned, really, because it's too conservative. I'm not even kidding. I'll read you the story from French to English.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello, my rebels. Today, I tell you a terrible story out of Quebec.
00:00:03.460 I translate it from French to English.
00:00:06.100 It's about Aaron O'Toole's MP out there, his heritage critic, as he's called,
00:00:12.000 calling for a newspaper to be defunded, banned, really, canceled culture,
00:00:17.960 for being too conservative.
00:00:21.340 Aaron O'Toole's guy is trying to cancel a newspaper. I'm not even kidding.
00:00:25.440 I'll read you the story.
00:00:26.520 Before I do, let me invite you to become a Rebel News Plus subscriber.
00:00:31.260 You get the video version of this podcast, so we'll show you things.
00:00:35.200 We'll show you the article, en France, show you the individuals involved.
00:00:41.700 You also get access to other video programs, weekly shows from Sheila Gunn-Reed,
00:00:46.100 David Menzies, and Andrew Chapados.
00:00:48.540 It's only $8 a month. If you go to rebelnews.com and click subscribe, $8 a month,
00:00:52.560 or you can buy a whole year in advance for only $80,
00:00:54.700 which, as you can see, is a discount.
00:00:57.660 And another reason to do it, besides all this great video you get,
00:01:01.120 is it supports Rebel News, keeps us strong, and we're independent,
00:01:04.260 so we don't take any of these government bailouts,
00:01:06.860 which is the subject of the conversation today.
00:01:09.520 So thanks for your support. Go to rebelnews.com for that.
00:01:11.980 And here's the podcast.
00:01:13.180 Tonight, cancel culture returns. 0.83
00:01:31.220 The Conservative Party demands that the Epoch Times be banned from government funding.
00:01:37.220 It's March 11th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:39.640 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:45.480 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:49.560 The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it
00:01:53.040 is because it's my bloody right to do so.
00:02:00.160 I don't really know what Aaron O'Toole stands for.
00:02:02.640 He claims he's against the carbon tax,
00:02:04.400 but he says he's for net zero emissions.
00:02:07.560 He says he's critical of Communist China,
00:02:10.040 but he just hired the former vice president of Huawei Canada,
00:02:14.100 a position that is effectively a Chinese intelligence asset.
00:02:17.880 What does Aaron O'Toole actually believe?
00:02:20.920 Well, I think the answer is cancel culture.
00:02:24.520 It's the only thing he truly seems to commit to with passion.
00:02:28.420 It's the thing he acts on most dramatically.
00:02:32.000 He had Jim Karahelios kicked out of the Conservative Party leadership campaign.
00:02:37.160 He accused Derek Sloan of racism and kicked him out of the party.
00:02:40.900 Derek Sloan is no racist, and neither are his visible minority wife and kids.
00:02:45.980 And then O'Toole sacked Pierre Poliev,
00:02:48.760 widely regarded as the most effective Conservative MP in Parliament,
00:02:52.480 which is probably why he sacked him.
00:02:54.540 Aaron O'Toole needs to be the brightest star in the sky.
00:02:58.600 Justin Trudeau himself couldn't help but notice.
00:03:01.500 What was that?
00:03:03.040 Is he really going to expect us to believe that when I ask him about having the worst vaccination rates,
00:03:09.380 the worst jobless rate, among the highest misery rate during COVID,
00:03:13.140 the best he can do is stand up and read some talking points that were written for him by his bureaucrats?
00:03:19.460 Why can't he show a little bit of contrition for his failures?
00:03:23.600 This Prime Minister has cost the most to achieve the worst results,
00:03:30.120 and what he expects us now to do is to just continue down this failed path.
00:03:36.440 If the Prime Minister wants the confidence of Canadians,
00:03:40.340 will he tell them what will he change to reverse the failures that he has delivered thus far?
00:03:45.840 I think he even tried to cancel us.
00:03:58.300 You might recall that I did an exclusive interview with Aaron O'Toole about my big China scoop a few months back,
00:04:04.000 where I revealed that Canada was actually training Chinese People's Liberation Army troops in cold-weather warfare.
00:04:12.160 O'Toole did an email interview with me, and I thought he came across pretty well in it,
00:04:17.040 but as soon as we published it, the mean girls of Twitter just sputtered, 1.00
00:04:21.620 and then O'Toole immediately capitulated to them.
00:04:24.960 Here's Andrew Coyne, not particularly articulate, just what in the absolute F?
00:04:33.040 Like just sputtering, and that was enough to make Aaron O'Toole panic and cower
00:04:39.900 and try to throw us under the bus and say he would never do another interview with us again.
00:04:44.600 I don't know exactly what was wrong with that.
00:04:47.920 I'll be honest, losing Aaron O'Toole as an interview subject isn't a particularly grievous loss.
00:04:54.340 O'Toole really doesn't have a lot to say,
00:04:58.040 but his willingness to panic and join any outrage mob of the left does say a lot about him.
00:05:05.640 I think it's the one thing he truly believes in.
00:05:08.620 It's the one thing he's good at, throwing people away, casting people out, culling the herd.
00:05:15.740 I'm just not sure how that's going to grow the coalition to win this year's federal election.
00:05:21.180 But what do I know? I don't know.
00:05:22.640 According to the CBC's poll aggregator, which simply blends every public opinion poll out there,
00:05:29.000 if an election were held today, O'Toole would lose more than a dozen MPs.
00:05:34.400 And the liberals would pick up more than a dozen MPs.
00:05:37.960 So I'm not sure if O'Toole's strategy is working.
00:05:41.680 But look at this. It's in French.
00:05:43.960 I came across this by accident.
00:05:45.700 It's in La Presse, which is a left-wing newspaper in Montreal.
00:05:49.120 It takes massive handouts from Trudeau, by the way.
00:05:52.580 It's a leader in that.
00:05:54.340 Here's the story in French, but I'm going to show you the Google Translate version of it,
00:05:58.720 which is pretty good.
00:05:59.940 So I'll read it to you in English.
00:06:03.200 Grant of $455,000, a helping hand from Ottawa for newspaper font of conspiracy theories.
00:06:11.000 Now, what conspiracy theories are they talking about?
00:06:14.680 Is it the grand conspiracy theory unanimously promoted by the Canadian mainstream media for
00:06:19.600 years that Donald Trump didn't actually win the 2016 election and that he was actually a Russian
00:06:24.960 agent? Because that was quite a doozy.
00:06:27.500 And pretty much every Canadian journalist promoted it, and many still do, even though it's been
00:06:32.420 categorically refuted by a team of Democrats led by Robert Mueller after their massive inquiry.
00:06:38.840 Maybe they're talking about a conspiracy theory that came true.
00:06:43.340 I guess there wasn't a conspiracy theory, but a conspiracy fact.
00:06:47.720 Here's a story from October from Trudeau's CBC state broadcaster, saying not to believe
00:06:52.060 reports that Trudeau was setting up mandatory quarantine detention facilities and hotels.
00:06:57.180 That was all disinformation, they said.
00:06:59.300 No truth to it, they said.
00:07:01.260 Yeah, no, it was true.
00:07:02.820 But incredibly, that CBC conspiracy theory story is still online.
00:07:06.940 So is this the press story about the government funding those conspiracy theories?
00:07:15.400 Is that what they're talking about?
00:07:17.580 No.
00:07:18.360 I'll tell you what it's about.
00:07:19.340 Let me read.
00:07:20.440 The Department of Canadian Heritage last March awarded a grant of $455,000 to the Epoch Times,
00:07:26.640 a publication which, according to the majority of experts, has been promoting conspiracy theories
00:07:32.500 for several years, and which has become a forum for the movements of the far right.
00:07:37.780 Well, the Epoch Times, one of the few media outlets that is actually skeptical of communist
00:07:43.460 China, for example.
00:07:44.920 They're the conspiracy theorists.
00:07:47.060 And I love that phrase.
00:07:48.280 The majority of experts say it's been promoting conspiracy theories.
00:07:52.580 Can I see that list of experts?
00:07:55.080 An expert in what?
00:07:56.440 An expert in what's right and wrong, what's reasonable or what's not, there's no expert
00:08:02.500 in charge of that.
00:08:03.380 That's each of us using our own judgment.
00:08:05.980 Who is this list of experts?
00:08:07.940 How many are on it?
00:08:09.020 And how do we know it's a majority?
00:08:10.580 And who is not part of the majority?
00:08:12.780 Who thinks, like, isn't that just a lazy way of a newspaper saying, we know better than
00:08:18.660 you, just trust us.
00:08:19.800 And since you don't trust us, we'll say experts say.
00:08:22.760 But it's really just us couching our own opinions that way.
00:08:27.160 That's called an appeal to authority.
00:08:29.700 You have to believe us because we're important and we're experts.
00:08:33.260 It's a logical fallacy.
00:08:35.880 Let me read some more.
00:08:36.620 The newspaper, which publishes an edition in 36 countries and in 22 languages, received
00:08:41.400 a financial boost from Ottawa through the Canada Periodical Fund on 1st of April 2020,
00:08:46.500 reveals the federal site.
00:08:47.780 Again, I'm just reading from the Google translation here.
00:08:51.040 The grant, which was awarded under a special component to support media affected by the crisis
00:08:55.560 caused by the pandemic, ends March 31st.
00:08:58.780 The newspaper's owner, the Epoch Times Media, also got a second financial boost from Ottawa
00:09:03.200 through the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, according to the Canada Revenue Agency website.
00:09:08.000 But it was impossible to know the extent of this financial assistance, the amount not being
00:09:12.600 disclosed by the CRA.
00:09:14.680 Okay, I got it.
00:09:16.420 Suddenly, La Presse is against media bailouts.
00:09:20.480 Yeah, no, they're not.
00:09:21.400 They were actually amongst the most aggressive in lobbying for media bailouts and special tax
00:09:27.920 treatment from the government.
00:09:28.780 They just don't want people to disagree with them to get the same bailouts.
00:09:34.840 That's all this is.
00:09:35.780 I'll read some more.
00:09:37.140 In the United States, the Epoch Times openly supported former United States President Donald
00:09:41.140 Trump during his years in office, even receiving praise from a former close aide to Mr. Trump,
00:09:46.480 Stephen K.
00:09:47.260 Bannon, who claimed to be impressed by the newspaper's growing influence with right-wingers.
00:09:51.760 Whoa! 0.71
00:09:53.000 They openly supported the president?
00:09:56.120 That's shocking.
00:09:57.000 They should be ashamed to have a political point of view that's different from La Presse,
00:10:02.620 a left-wing newspaper in a left-wing city, in a left-wing province, in the French language,
00:10:07.940 in Canada.
00:10:09.400 I mean, how dare the Epoch Times' American edition support the American president?
00:10:15.540 That's all you got?
00:10:17.800 Founded in 2000 in the United States by Chinese Americans, affiliated with the spiritual movement
00:10:22.900 Falun Gong, or Falun Dafa, the newspaper has been very critical to Chinese people.
00:10:27.000 Communist Party since its inception.
00:10:29.240 Among other things, he accuses her, or it accuses her, this is the translation again,
00:10:33.960 of persecuting members of the spiritual movement in China.
00:10:37.380 Are we still calling the persecution of the Falun Gong just an accusation?
00:10:45.000 La Presse won't acknowledge it?
00:10:47.340 What's going on here?
00:10:48.540 I can't quite tell.
00:10:50.000 Is La Presse saying that the Falun Gong people are not to be trusted, or that they really are
00:10:56.860 not being persecuted by China?
00:10:59.720 This isn't religious bigotry from La Presse, is it?
00:11:02.520 This isn't just Chinese Communist Party talking points from La Presse, is it?
00:11:06.620 Oh, this is my favorite.
00:11:08.740 Last October, the New York Times ran a lengthy report above the newspaper's management,
00:11:13.340 noting that it was one of the promoters of Spygate, a baseless conspiracy theory that
00:11:18.540 Obama administration officials illegally spied on Mr. Trump's campaign in 2016.
00:11:22.700 Yeah, no, that is not a conspiracy theory.
00:11:27.340 That has been incontrovertibly proven true through not only declassified documents, but
00:11:33.960 also by disciplinary measures taken against Obama officials who were involved in the illegal
00:11:40.300 surveillance.
00:11:41.520 That's not a conspiracy theory.
00:11:44.260 Let me read some more.
00:11:45.280 The Epoch Times also relayed other QAnon conspiracy theories on voter fraud and the Black Lives 0.99
00:11:53.920 Matter movement, and during the pandemic, the newspaper focused on the unfounded theory
00:11:58.980 that the coronavirus was engineered in a Chinese military laboratory at the instigation of the 0.97
00:12:03.700 Communist Party of China.
00:12:06.260 Well, there was voter fraud.
00:12:09.420 How much there was is in dispute.
00:12:11.620 I'll grant you that.
00:12:12.500 I'm not sure about a conspiracy theory with the Black Lives Matter movement.
00:12:17.140 I don't know what that is.
00:12:18.840 LaPresse never tells us.
00:12:20.180 I don't know if they know.
00:12:21.500 I've never heard that as part of the QAnon belief system.
00:12:25.180 And I read that Epoch Times story that they mentioned about the theory that the coronavirus
00:12:30.020 came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:12:33.640 It absolutely was a theory that the Epoch Times investigated.
00:12:37.360 LaPresse should investigate it too. 0.99
00:12:39.600 Epoch Times was never conclusive about it.
00:12:41.500 There are more questions than answers.
00:12:44.040 But they talked about it like, I guess, LaPresse is doing.
00:12:47.580 So where's the scandal here?
00:12:49.100 I'm still waiting for it.
00:12:51.840 But my point is, instead of trying to defend Epoch Times point by point on these subjects,
00:12:56.380 which is not really my job, I would say to all these questions by LaPresse, so what?
00:13:02.900 So what if the Epoch Times is wrong or right on all these issues?
00:13:07.500 So what?
00:13:08.820 Is the rule now that no newspaper is allowed in Canada if it deviates from the mushy left-wing
00:13:15.820 pro-Trudeau, pro-China crud?
00:13:18.440 The talking points that has reduced Canadian trust in media to an all-time low?
00:13:23.220 Let's say the Epoch Times was wrong on every one of those things I just mentioned.
00:13:27.060 So what?
00:13:29.240 Isn't part of freedom of the press the right to be wrong?
00:13:33.440 Isn't that part of a national discussion, figuring these things out together?
00:13:37.000 Now, I'm not going to read this whole thing in LaPresse.
00:13:39.420 It's pretty embarrassing for LaPresse, to be frank.
00:13:42.320 But look at this comment from Stephen Gilbeau, the heritage minister in charge of the media
00:13:46.640 bailout.
00:13:47.080 The minister of Canadian heritage, Stephen Gilbeau, indicated that, quote,
00:13:52.080 It is undeniable that the past publications of the Epoch Times have conveyed prejudices
00:13:57.560 and reproduced stereotypes against Asian communities, particularly on the Internet.
00:14:02.700 I strongly denounce it.
00:14:04.340 The pandemic has exacerbated the effect of racism and hatred online on racialized communities.
00:14:09.980 We are currently working on a bill that will specifically target hate speech on online platforms.
00:14:14.820 However, he insisted that is not his role as minister, quote,
00:14:19.420 to determine for Canadians what news content and opinions to read or avoid.
00:14:23.280 As a government, our role is to act upstream to prevent, raise awareness, and educate about
00:14:27.880 disinformation.
00:14:30.720 What?
00:14:32.120 This is a picture of Cindy Gu.
00:14:35.360 She's the publisher of the Epoch Times in Canada.
00:14:38.540 You may note, she is ethnically Chinese.
00:14:42.200 I know Cindy a little bit.
00:14:43.300 She speaks with a Chinese accent, so I presume she was born there and is a refugee from there
00:14:49.500 for religious reasons.
00:14:51.500 This is a picture of Stephen Gilbeau.
00:14:54.000 He has white privilege.
00:14:56.020 He was convicted of a crime.
00:14:58.040 And yet he sits in cabinet and calls Cindy Gu and other Chinese Canadians who work for the
00:15:04.240 Epoch Times, he calls them anti-Asian?
00:15:08.680 You can't make this stuff up.
00:15:10.480 That's a conspiracy theory.
00:15:11.940 But at least while he calls Cindy Gu and other Chinese Canadians who work at Epoch Times,
00:15:19.140 while he calls them racist, this mansplaining, whitesplaining, liberal defames her.
00:15:26.400 At least he's not calling for her to be cut off from the government teat.
00:15:29.560 Enter Aaron O'Toole's Conservative MP.
00:15:34.960 Let me read.
00:15:35.920 Conservative MP Alain Reyes said he was outraged that aid was being given to this newspaper when
00:15:43.300 community newspapers were closing their doors.
00:15:45.920 How can the Minister of Canadian Heritage justify giving $455,000 to such a controversial newspaper?
00:15:51.560 I am not questioning the existence of the newspaper, but the fact that the federal government is
00:15:56.040 giving it money.
00:15:56.780 While our community media are dying out is completely, totally unacceptable.
00:16:02.580 So the Liberal Cabinet Minister says he hates the Epoch Times.
00:16:06.340 He calls them names.
00:16:08.260 He mansplains to a woman and whitesplains to an Asian Canadian. 0.65
00:16:13.460 But at the end of the day, he says he will not censor them or shut them down.
00:16:16.540 And the Conservative critic, well, hold my beer, he says.
00:16:23.700 He'll be the censor if the Liberals won't.
00:16:26.420 You heard him.
00:16:27.500 He's outraged that they're receiving any funds like other media are.
00:16:31.460 He wants to punish them, cut them off, demand that the feds cut them off.
00:16:35.640 It's the only newspaper or media outlet Alain Reyes has ever ordered or demanded be cut off
00:16:41.520 from money.
00:16:41.880 Have you ever heard Alain Reyes say that about the CBC, about the press, about the Toronto
00:16:48.360 Star, the National Post, anything that they've been cut off?
00:16:50.460 I spent some time searching online, his Twitter feed, his parliamentary speeches.
00:16:54.960 I couldn't find such a statement in English or French.
00:16:58.200 I have never heard Alain Reyes say that he would cut off the newspaper bailout to all the
00:17:04.720 Liberal media.
00:17:05.700 Have you?
00:17:06.360 I'm open to correction here.
00:17:07.700 If you can dig something up, let me know.
00:17:09.340 I'll read it online.
00:17:10.060 But I cannot find any such thing.
00:17:13.340 The only newspaper in the entire country, the only media company in the entire country
00:17:18.760 that Aaron O'Toole's heritage critic hates so viciously that he wants them cut off and
00:17:25.560 he's furious about it is the Epoch Times because they're controversial.
00:17:31.660 It's totally unacceptable.
00:17:33.500 Even that crackpot convicted criminal Stephen Gilboa won't say that, but Aaron O'Toole's
00:17:40.980 guy will.
00:17:41.540 So yeah, if you were to ask me today to be as honest as I can be, as fair as I can be,
00:17:46.520 and tell you what I really think the core beliefs of Aaron O'Toole's Conservative Party
00:17:51.040 are, I would have to say the thing they are most vocal about, most passionate about, most
00:17:56.580 consistent about, most angry about, most motivated about, is silencing.
00:18:03.240 Silencing people, cancelling people, banning people, deplatforming people, especially it
00:18:09.940 seems, people on the right.
00:18:25.720 Welcome back.
00:18:26.900 Well, it has been well over two years since the two Michaels, Michael Kovrig and Michael
00:18:33.180 Spavor, Canadian citizens in China, were snatched off the street in a retaliation to Canada's
00:18:40.180 arrest of Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Huawei.
00:18:44.440 And now comes news on a Chinese propaganda website that the two men are headed to trial.
00:18:51.000 Let me quote to you from the editor of Global Times, which of course, like all media in China,
00:18:57.120 is controlled by the Communist Party.
00:18:58.460 The editor says, Canadian nationals Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor were prosecuted by
00:19:04.740 the procuratorates in China for suspected crimes undermining China's national security in June
00:19:11.960 2020.
00:19:13.500 Source told me China's judicial department will conduct the first trial over these two cases
00:19:19.300 soon.
00:19:20.560 So it sounds like there was a preliminary trial last summer, and now comes the main event,
00:19:26.740 of course, the Chinese judicial system is not independent.
00:19:30.260 The result is known in advance.
00:19:32.680 Joining us now via Skype to talk about this is perhaps North America's leading expert on
00:19:37.480 China, democracy, and North America-China relations, our friend Gordon G. Chang, who you can follow
00:19:43.440 on Twitter at Gordon G. Chang.
00:19:46.580 Gordon, great to see you again.
00:19:48.200 What do you make of this statement by Hu Xijin?
00:19:51.080 Obviously, it's just information the Chinese Communist Party wants to deliver to the West. 0.70
00:19:58.020 Yes, and I think this is basically China's regime trying to put more pressure on your
00:20:03.220 prime minister, Justin Trudeau.
00:20:05.920 The thing the Chinese are doing is dragging this out, because they know that if they actually were 1.00
00:20:11.260 to sentence both of these guys, that that would sort of remove some of their leverage over Canada.
00:20:17.980 So they're just drawing it out, hoping that they can use this to free Meng Wanzhou, the
00:20:23.160 Huawei Technologies chief financial officer, who is now under house arrest in Vancouver.
00:20:29.140 Right.
00:20:29.940 Well, there was a point in time where the Chinese truly thought Xi would be released from prison.
00:20:35.220 I understand they actually chartered a jet and were ready to go into celebration mode.
00:20:40.280 Perhaps they thought that our judiciary in Canada was also under the thumb of politicians or bureaucrats
00:20:47.760 or diplomats.
00:20:48.840 The fact that they sent a plane, they must have been stunned that it didn't go their way.
00:20:55.620 I agree with your analysis, though.
00:20:57.900 It's like a hostage.
00:20:59.460 I hate to use that metaphor, but the moment, God forbid, you kill a hostage, you've lost your
00:21:04.740 leverage.
00:21:05.100 That's sort of what dragging this out is, right?
00:21:07.560 It keeps things in play.
00:21:10.980 Is that your point?
00:21:12.820 Yes.
00:21:13.440 And we've also got to remember that a government grabbing innocent people and holding them as
00:21:19.120 hostages is pretty much a crime against humanity.
00:21:23.040 So we've got to understand the gravity of what China is doing.
00:21:27.080 Now, China commits all sorts of human rights abuses.
00:21:29.920 And what it's really saying in this case is that it believes that Canada doesn't have free
00:21:35.400 will, that it can push Canada around by grabbing the two Michaels.
00:21:39.820 And Justin Trudeau, unfortunately, hasn't done very much to disabuse the guys in Beijing of
00:21:45.320 that notion.
00:21:46.360 Yeah.
00:21:46.720 Well, recently, there was a vote in Canada's parliament as to whether or not China's treatment
00:21:52.400 of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang province was a genocide.
00:21:56.400 And the entire cabinet just simply did not show up to vote.
00:22:02.800 One single cabinet minister showed up and voted to abstain.
00:22:07.380 Justin Trudeau, the foreign minister, they just didn't show their faces.
00:22:11.860 So it passed by every non-cabinet minister.
00:22:15.760 I found that perplexing.
00:22:17.360 Either Trudeau thinks it's a genocide or doesn't, but he wouldn't even show up.
00:22:22.420 That seemed like a sign of weakness and indecisiveness to me.
00:22:27.800 I don't know how that would be read by Beijing.
00:22:30.440 Maybe it was read as a great victory by Beijing since they saw that Trudeau wasn't willing to
00:22:36.280 speak plainly on the subject.
00:22:39.080 Yes, this was a test of political will.
00:22:41.500 And Justin Trudeau obviously failed it.
00:22:44.180 And I'm sure that's the way Beijing saw this, that they've got a lot of people in parliament
00:22:49.980 who don't like them, but they don't really care because they believe that when push comes
00:22:54.320 to shove, that they can get Justin Trudeau to do what they want.
00:22:58.560 And I think that what we're seeing right now is Canada is going to go through some very
00:23:03.780 difficult times because Beijing is just generally arrogant.
00:23:07.760 But it's especially arrogant when it comes to your government.
00:23:10.820 Let me ask you about the United States, because over the years, you and I have talked a lot
00:23:15.940 about Donald Trump's China policy, which was very forceful and had a strong point of view.
00:23:22.460 And, you know, we could have quarreled with different aspects or the speed of it or, but
00:23:27.140 generally, I think Trump was the first president to really take on China in decades.
00:23:32.540 Can you give us a 50-day report?
00:23:36.120 I think Joe Biden's been president for about 50 days, long enough that we can see the contours
00:23:42.780 of his China policy.
00:23:44.580 Can you give us a quick review of the first 50 days?
00:23:48.760 Well, that would be a quick review of his slew of executive orders, because many of them
00:23:53.400 either propagated China's narratives, like his one on January 26th on xenophobia, or more
00:24:00.140 important, they also took down protections that President Trump put in place.
00:24:04.900 The one that I think that is just indefensible in the part of President Biden was that on
00:24:10.600 January 20th, just a few hours after taking the oath of office, he repealed President Trump's
00:24:16.280 May 2020 executive order.
00:24:18.860 And President Trump's order prohibited utilities and grid operators from purchasing equipment
00:24:24.680 from China, which could be compromised and sabotaged.
00:24:27.980 And we know from what happened in Texas during the winter storm, what happens when a grid is
00:24:33.060 not resilient.
00:24:33.640 Also, there's been reporting that China turned off the lights in India's Mumbai in October
00:24:39.940 of last year, which means that President Trump was thinking about things which were not just
00:24:45.700 theoretical, that China was actually doing this stuff.
00:24:49.520 So we've got to be concerned that Biden's instincts on China are all wrong.
00:24:54.120 And of course, by the way, his national security advisor, Jake Sullivan, his secretary of state,
00:24:59.580 Tony Blinken, are going to meet their Chinese counterparts in Alaska on the 18th of this
00:25:05.280 month.
00:25:05.880 We'll know a lot more after that meeting.
00:25:07.640 Hmm.
00:25:08.140 You know, I recall Susan Rice, who was Barack Obama's security advisor.
00:25:14.680 She did an interview with Canadian media where she warned against Huawei.
00:25:20.120 I was in quite firm language.
00:25:22.120 Here, we'll play a quick clip of that.
00:25:23.800 What is the security risk to Canada if it does business with Huawei while the United States
00:25:29.700 does not?
00:25:30.700 It's hard for me to emphasize adequately, without getting into classified terrain, how serious
00:25:43.140 it is, particularly for countries that are part of the Five Eyes intelligence sharing network
00:25:49.320 with the United States, so the U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.S., for those countries
00:25:56.340 in particular to be reliant on Huawei technology.
00:26:00.560 It gives the Chinese the ability, if they choose to use it, to access all kinds of information,
00:26:10.820 civilian intelligence, military, that could be very, very compromising.
00:26:15.740 So I, much as I disagree with the Trump administration on a number of things, on this, their concern
00:26:21.420 about Huawei, I believe they're right.
00:26:24.080 And I believe they've handled it badly.
00:26:26.260 There's all kinds of ways that they're doing things around this issue which are unhelpful.
00:26:32.260 But on the very specific concern about Huawei, I think it's frankly quite justified.
00:26:37.140 In terms of the relationship between Canada and the United States and the rest of the Five
00:26:40.620 Eyes, if Canada does business with Huawei in the future, as a matter of protection, would
00:26:47.660 the United States have to have a slightly different security relationship with Canada?
00:26:51.140 Yes.
00:26:52.140 And that will throw the Five Eyes collaboration, which serves the security interests of every
00:26:58.580 Canadian and every American, into jeopardy. 0.89
00:27:03.300 We just, it can't be done.
00:27:05.620 Can't share.
00:27:06.620 I don't see how we can share in the way we have.
00:27:09.260 It's not a joke.
00:27:10.900 It's truly serious.
00:27:11.900 So that's a leading Democrat thinking about security and foreign affairs.
00:27:17.860 I thought, I was a little bit startled by that, frankly, Gordon, because, you know, Barack
00:27:22.500 Obama was not known for a hardline foreign policy, but there it was.
00:27:26.300 Do you think, where do, which is the new Joe Biden?
00:27:30.620 Because she was the national security boss when Biden was VP.
00:27:35.540 Has Biden changed from when he was VP?
00:27:38.120 Is he more pro-China?
00:27:40.080 Can we expect a change from the Obama years?
00:27:43.620 I think we'll see a change, Ezra.
00:27:46.060 And the reason is that it's not so much that Biden has changed.
00:27:49.680 I actually don't think that he has.
00:27:51.320 But it's the Chinese that have changed. 1.00
00:27:53.320 They've become much more obviously hostile and provocative.
00:27:56.820 And that means, as a political matter, Biden's going to have to respond to that.
00:28:01.520 We got a very sort of disturbing view into Biden's state of mind on China in that CNN
00:28:07.520 town hall with Anderson Cooper when Anderson Cooper just asked him about China's human rights
00:28:14.080 abuses.
00:28:14.560 And what we got from Biden was, this was just after the oath of office, what we got from
00:28:22.320 Biden was essentially, oh, well, you know, these crimes against humanity, this genocide,
00:28:26.860 it's just a result of China's different cultural norms.
00:28:30.860 We've got a clip of that here.
00:28:31.980 Let's just play that really quickly to refresh our viewers' memory.
00:28:35.020 It was quite startling.
00:28:35.780 Take a look.
00:28:36.180 You know, Chinese leaders, if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been the
00:28:42.260 time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven't been unified
00:28:48.300 at home.
00:28:49.600 So the central, to vastly overstate it, the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be
00:28:57.360 a united, tightly controlled China.
00:29:00.060 And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.
00:29:03.960 I point out to him, no American president can be sustained as a president if he doesn't
00:29:09.040 reflect the values of the United States.
00:29:11.460 And so the idea, I'm not going to speak out against what he's doing in Hong Kong, what
00:29:17.120 he's doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan trying to end the one China 1.00
00:29:24.840 policy by making it forceful.
00:29:27.420 I said, and by the way, he said he gets it.
00:29:30.880 And culturally, there are different norms in each country, and their leaders are expected
00:29:36.820 to follow.
00:29:37.740 That was quite a startling statement.
00:29:39.100 And I noticed that the CNN didn't follow up on it.
00:29:41.520 I really wish they had.
00:29:43.500 Last question for you, and I really appreciate your time.
00:29:45.720 I know you've got so many things on your day, so we're grateful to grab you for a few
00:29:49.640 minutes.
00:29:49.900 One thing about Donald Trump, like him or hate him, the guy had an energy.
00:29:55.860 He liked to use that phrase, high energy.
00:29:57.960 He was very engaged.
00:29:59.220 He would sometimes do a press conference for more than an hour.
00:30:02.540 Joe Biden seems more frail.
00:30:04.900 He hasn't done a press conference since becoming president.
00:30:07.660 Some people wonder about his stamina and even, frankly, his mental state.
00:30:10.980 Um, I sometimes wonder if Joe Biden is the key decider on these things.
00:30:18.140 And, you know, I don't know any unknown details about his health.
00:30:23.240 It's just what I see.
00:30:24.500 Who do you think, other than Joe Biden, is the center of the action when it comes to foreign
00:30:30.560 affairs?
00:30:31.020 Do you think it's the chief of staff?
00:30:32.860 Do you think it's the secretary of state?
00:30:35.000 I frankly doubt it's Joe Biden.
00:30:37.880 Who would it be if it's not him?
00:30:40.980 I don't know, Ezra, but if I had to take a guess, I'd say Jill Biden, his wife.
00:30:46.700 She seems to me to be like a Nancy Reagan.
00:30:49.940 And so, um, I was looked for, I'd look to her to basically being the, um, an important
00:30:56.780 influencer.
00:30:57.720 Also, she's the protector of him.
00:30:59.540 Um, because as you point out, uh, there are questions about his mental, um, acuity and
00:31:05.600 other things.
00:31:06.060 And I think she's probably the one who could very well be influential in getting,
00:31:10.700 uh, her husband to do or not do things.
00:31:13.840 You know, that is a very keen observation.
00:31:15.540 And we see that she accompanies him sometimes into journalistic interviews.
00:31:20.160 And I think you're, I think you've nailed it.
00:31:22.780 I think that's spot on.
00:31:23.780 Well, listen, Gordon, it's great to catch up with you again.
00:31:25.760 Once again, folks, if you are not following Gordon on Twitter, you're doing it wrong.
00:31:29.480 You got to go there right now.
00:31:30.860 Go to Gordon G Chang, follow him on Twitter.
00:31:34.260 You will learn more about China and China-Canada relations, China-America relations than from
00:31:39.800 any other source.
00:31:41.160 And as you can see, he's a great communicator and a great friend of ours.
00:31:44.100 Thanks, my friend.
00:31:44.780 Good luck out there.
00:31:45.380 Talk to you again soon.
00:31:47.180 Thanks, Ezra.
00:31:47.800 All right.
00:31:48.120 There you have it.
00:31:48.580 Gordon Chang.
00:31:49.320 Stay with us.
00:31:49.920 More ahead.
00:31:50.320 Well, it's great to be back.
00:32:03.280 Thank you to my friends, Kian and David, for holding the fort while I was away.
00:32:08.180 I'll be back here for a while.
00:32:09.520 I just had to go out to Edmonton for, believe it or not, an old legal matter hanging over
00:32:14.900 from the Sun News Network seven years ago.
00:32:17.700 So I was out of town for a few days.
00:32:19.340 It's good to be back.
00:32:20.640 And thanks for watching.
00:32:22.360 Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home,
00:32:26.280 good night and keep fighting for freedom.
00:32:28.140 We'll see you next time.
00:32:28.500 What a good start.
00:32:30.560 We'll see you next time.
00:32:33.520 Thank you.
00:32:34.240 We'll see you next time.
00:32:34.620 We'll see you next time.
00:32:36.100 We'll see you next time.
00:32:36.600 We'll see you next time.
00:32:38.100 We'll see you next time.
00:32:38.400 We'll be right back.