Rebel News Podcast - Do you actually know who Dr. Anthony Fauci is？

00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. I'm going to take you through a few of those emails that were released from

00:00:05.300 Anthony Fauci. He's the public health guru in the United States. Very curious, and especially

00:00:11.040 about this concept called gain of function. Have you ever heard that phrase before? It's very new

00:00:15.620 to me. It means to weaponize viruses on purpose. And I want to talk about that and use these

00:00:22.800 emails as a backdrop for that. Before I do, let me invite you to become a subscriber to

00:00:27.640 Rebel News Plus. That's the video version of these podcasts. It's eight bucks a month, but in addition

00:00:32.320 to my daily video, you get shows from Sheila Gunn-Reed and David Menzies. Andrew Chappos,

00:00:37.200 this week he interviews Zuby, which is amazing. And the eight bucks a month, hopefully it's not too

00:00:43.940 much, too big a pill to swallow for you, but it actually really adds up for us. If enough people

00:00:48.600 get together and chip in eight bucks, that's how we pay the bills around here. So please do go to

00:00:53.020 rebelnews.com and click subscribe. Okay, here's today's podcast.

00:01:08.980 Tonight, do you actually know who Anthony Fauci is? I wonder if any of us do. It's June 2nd,

00:01:19.180 and this is the Ezra Levant Show. Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon

00:01:25.760 consumer I know? There's 8,500 customers here and you won't give them an answer. The only thing I

00:01:31.560 have to say to the government, the wire publisher, is because it's my bloody right to do so.

00:01:41.640 You know who Dr. Anthony Fauci is, right? Well, you can't really avoid him. A year and a half ago,

00:01:48.420 he was an obscure bureaucrat like most of the medical, industrial complex, the public health

00:01:55.740 side of things. But he became famous because of the virus. He would host press conferences

00:02:01.460 alongside Donald Trump, sometimes even spar with Trump. He was so friendly, though. He had a friendly

00:02:07.980 accent, a little bit of a garden gnome. He became a real media hound, so the press loved him, especially

00:02:13.940 when he disagreed with Trump. Here he is on the cover of InStyle magazine. Oh, he's a celebrity,

00:02:20.580 really. In fact, he just rolled out a new book about himself and the wonderful year he's had,

00:02:27.840 although surprisingly today, it looks like Amazon took that book down. I wonder why he's being

00:02:33.560 canceled. That's strange. To me, Anthony Fauci is perfectly summed up in this. When the celebrity

00:02:41.640 was asked to throw a pitch, it was probably one of the worst pitches ever thrown, but he wore his mask

00:02:48.600 until he thought the cameras weren't looking. That's how so many politicians do it, and Fauci is

00:02:55.820 nothing but a politician. He was doing five media hits a day, and he managed to survive the transition

00:03:03.760 from Donald Trump to Joe Biden so far. But like Canada's version of Anthony Fauci, Teresa Tam,

00:03:12.400 Fauci lied. Here's an example of him changing his viewpoint with the political winds.

00:03:19.060 Stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that it evolved in nature and then jumped species.

00:03:26.220 One of the issues of saying, could that virus that was in, first of all, if you accept the premise,

00:03:37.720 which is very strongly supported by scientific evidence, that it was not deliberately mutated

00:03:45.760 and deliberately changed. And you say, if it was in the wild and evolving, the likelihood it jumped

00:03:54.620 species naturally, someone will say, well, maybe somebody took it from the wild, put it in the lab,

00:04:02.160 and then it escaped from the lab. But that means it was in the wild to begin with.

00:04:07.720 There's a lot of cloudiness around the origins of COVID-19 still. So I wanted to ask,

00:04:12.720 are you still confident that it developed naturally? Oh, I'm not convinced about that. I

00:04:18.200 think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we find out to the best of

00:04:24.300 our ability, exactly what happened. Now, Teresa Tam does that too. She uses the phrase,

00:04:30.060 the science is evolving. I think Fauci says that too, from time to time, but he's more candid other

00:04:36.840 times. He says, yeah, I lied. I lied because I want to control people. Listen to this.

00:04:42.200 Okay. At the time, three things were going on. We were told very clearly at the coronavirus task

00:04:50.560 force, including by the surgeon general, who's a good person all the way, that there was a clear

00:04:56.480 shortage of masks. And if we went around recommending masks, the healthcare providers who were putting

00:05:03.020 themselves in harm's way every single day would not have enough. Point number one. Point number two,

00:05:09.720 there was no evidence at the time that masks outside of the setting of the hospital worked.

00:05:17.080 There were no data to show that. Number three, we did not know that at least 50% of the infections

00:05:24.380 were being spread asymptomatically, namely by people that had no symptoms. That's the reason why at that

00:05:32.000 time we, I and others made that statement. That's him saying he lied to control you because you can't

00:05:40.220 handle the truth. Is that a good thing for a public health Caesar to do? Well, now hundreds of emails

00:05:49.540 from his government position have been released under American freedom of information laws. And over the

00:05:55.480 last, I don't know, 18 hours, the media has had a frenzy going through them. Now it's sort of a

00:06:01.700 Rorschach test, an inkblot test. You know what those are. What does this inkblot look like? It really

00:06:07.900 is about you, not the inkblot. So for example, here's the mainstream media. If you Google

00:06:13.300 Fauci emails, you'll get dozens of stories like this. This is People magazine about what a celebrity

00:06:20.620 he is. Here's People magazine. One of his emails was sending around a story that he was one of

00:06:27.020 America's sexiest men. And he said, people are so nutty and Trump is so mean. Yeah, it's a Rorschach 0.98

00:06:36.340 test. That's what the mainstream media focused on in these hundreds of emails. But is that really

00:06:41.420 the most telling thing? I've been learning in recent days about a phrase I'd never heard before,

00:06:47.160 gain of function. Gain of function. Have you ever heard those words before? It means weaponizing

00:06:55.200 a virus, taking a naturally occurring virus and making it function differently by engineering it.

00:07:04.640 Let me show you three videos in a row from, well, two of them, a recent one is older,

00:07:10.980 of Dr. Anthony Fauci talking about gain of function. And the reason why gain of function,

00:07:16.400 and it's a strange phrase, is important, is because there are two competing theories about

00:07:22.240 where this virus came from. One was, it was from nature, and it made the leap from a bat to a person.

00:07:28.660 Maybe someone was eating bat soup. The other theory is, no, no, this was engineered in a lab 0.98

00:07:36.100 at the Wuhan Virology Institute. Well, one of the doctors, sorry, one of the senators in the U.S.

00:07:43.820 senator, happens to be a doctor, Rand Paul. And here he is asking Anthony Fauci about gain of function

00:07:51.360 research. And specifically, if Fauci's public health office in the United States was taking

00:07:58.760 American tax dollars to give to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, to have them do gain of function work,

00:08:07.600 weaponizing virus work. I'm going to play four minutes of this clip, and I think it's very

00:08:13.080 important. Dr. Rand Paul explains it pretty well. Take a look. Senator Paul.

00:08:20.340 Dr. Fauci, we don't know whether the pandemic started in a lab in Wuhan or evolved naturally,

00:08:26.660 but we should want to know. Three million people have died from this pandemic, and that should cause

00:08:31.440 us to explore all possibilities. Instead, government authorities, self-interested in continuing gain

00:08:37.860 of function research, say there's nothing to see here. Gain of function research, as you know,

00:08:43.720 is juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses to infect humans. To arrive at the truth,

00:08:50.260 the U.S. government should admit that the Wuhan Virology Institute was experimenting to enhance

00:08:55.540 the coronavirus' ability to infect humans. Juicing up super viruses is not new. Scientists in the U.S.

00:09:02.820 have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans. For years, Dr. Ralph Barak, a virologist

00:09:09.800 in the U.S., has been collaborating with Dr. Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Virology Institute, sharing his

00:09:17.040 discoveries about how to create super viruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the

00:09:22.980 NIH. The collaboration between the U.S. and the Wuhan Virology Institute continues. Doctors Barak and

00:09:31.100 Shi worked together to insert bat virus spike protein into the backbone of the deadly SARS virus and then 1.00

00:09:39.200 used this man-made super virus to infect human airway cells. Think about that for a moment. The SARS virus

00:09:47.560 had a 15 percent mortality. We're fighting a pandemic that has about a one percent mortality. Can you

00:09:54.540 imagine if a SARS virus that's been juiced up and had viral proteins added to it, to the spike protein,

00:10:01.800 if that were released accidentally? Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of

00:10:09.800 the lab in Wuhan? Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect

00:10:18.080 that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund

00:10:23.960 gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Do they fund Dr. Barak?

00:10:33.340 We do not fund... Do you fund Dr. Barak's gain-of-function research? Dr. Barak does not

00:10:40.180 doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it's according to the guidelines, and it is being

00:10:45.900 conducted in North Carolina, not in China. You don't think inserting a bat virus spike protein that he got

00:10:52.040 from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus is gain-of-function? That is not... You would be in the

00:10:56.620 minority because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group

00:11:02.000 saying that it is gain-of-function. Well, it is not, and if you look at the grant and you look at the

00:11:08.060 progress reports, it is not gain-of-function, despite the fact that people tweet that.

00:11:15.160 So do you still support sending money to the Wuhan Virology Institute? We do not send money now to the

00:11:20.840 Wuhan Virology Institute. Do you support sending money? We did, under your tutelage. We were sending it

00:11:25.760 through EcoHealth. It was a sub-agency and a sub-grant. Do you support the money from NIH that

00:11:34.820 was going to the Wuhan Institute? Let me explain to you why that was done. The SARS-CoV-1

00:11:43.380 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate

00:11:52.920 the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected in China. Or perhaps it would be

00:11:59.220 irresponsible to send it to the Chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this knowledge

00:12:04.580 and with this incredibly dangerous viruses. Rand Paul is one of my favorite senators. He's just great.

00:12:11.740 There's another senator with the name John Kennedy. And of course, don't be confused with the other

00:12:16.740 candidates. This is John Kennedy. You'll detect immediately from his accent. He's from Louisiana.

00:12:21.800 And he asks questions of Anthony Fauci. Do you actually trust the scientists at the Wuhan Institute

00:12:31.340 of Virology? And the answer is incredible. Take a listen. Dr. Fauci, I believe you have testified

00:12:39.080 that you didn't give any money to the Wuhan lab to conduct gain-of-function research. Is that right?

00:12:50.740 That is correct. How do you know they didn't lie to you? Excuse me, sir? How do you know they didn't

00:12:58.240 lie to you and use the money for gain-of-function research anyway? Well, we've seen the results of

00:13:04.500 the experiments that were done and that were published and that the viruses that they studied

00:13:12.480 are on public databases now. So none of that was gain-of-function. So how do you know they didn't

00:13:18.700 do the research and not put it on their website? There's no way of guaranteeing that. But in our

00:13:27.920 experience with grantees, including Chinese grantees, which we've had interactions with for a very

00:13:34.200 long period of time, they're very competent, trustworthy scientists. I'm not talking about

00:13:39.400 anything else in China. I'm talking about the scientists that you would expect that they would

00:13:43.900 abide by the conditions of the grant, which they've done for the years that we've had interactions with.

00:13:49.380 So you don't think the Chinese would lie to you? Well, when you say the Chinese, the Chinese are a 1.00

00:13:54.760 rather broad group. I know the scientists that we've dealt with have been trustworthy.

00:13:58.980 Mm-hmm. You think all the scientists have told the truth in terms of the origin of the Wuhan virus and

00:14:06.960 not been influenced by the Communist Party of China, do you? I don't have enough insight into the

00:14:12.880 Communist Party in China to know the interactions between them and the scientists, sir.

00:14:17.000 Right. All right. I want to show you one more video about gain of function. You're probably saying,

00:14:21.900 what's this got to do with the emails? I just want you to see this, the different answers that Anthony

00:14:26.720 Fauci gives. Here he is saying, if you want to do research on viruses, you've got to go to where the

00:14:35.600 action is. He says that. And the action is in Wuhan. Take a look at this.

00:14:42.500 We had a big scare with SARS-CoV-1 back in 2002, 2003, where that particular virus unquestionably

00:14:52.780 went from a bat to an intermediate host to start an epidemic and a pandemic that resulted in 8,000

00:14:58.840 cases and close to 800 deaths. It would have been almost a dereliction of our duty if we didn't study

00:15:05.220 this. And the only way you can study these things is you've got to go where the action is.

00:15:10.460 So I often say somewhat tongue in cheek, you don't want to study bats in Fairfax County, Virginia,

00:15:16.400 to find out what the animal-human interface is that might lead to a jumping of species.

00:15:22.820 So we had a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who are world experts on

00:15:30.900 coronavirus. And we did that through a sub-grant from a larger grant to EcoHealth. The sub-grant was

00:15:37.800 about $600,000 over a period of five years. So it was a modest amount. And the purpose of it

00:15:44.680 was to study the animal-human interface to do surveillance and to determine if these bat viruses

00:15:50.940 were even capable of transing infection to humans. That's pretty incredible. Even those three videos,

00:15:57.740 he changes his story. Well, after the release of the emails, Rand Paul tweeted simply this. He told us,

00:16:07.080 I'm just going to show you three emails. And I want to start with one from a virologist called

00:16:12.240 Christian Anderson. And it was very early in the pandemic. It was February 1st, 2020. So like a week

00:16:21.420 into the emergency. And this was a letter, it actually started with an article in the magazine

00:16:28.980 Science called Mining Coronavirus Genomes for Clues to the Outbreak's Origin. So where did this virus

00:16:39.660 come from? And Anthony Fauci wrote a letter to Christian Anderson saying, this just came out today.

00:16:47.840 You may have seen it. If not, it is of interest to the current discussion. Best, Tony. Oh, really?

00:16:54.760 Were they having a discussion about the origins of the virus? Well, yes, they certainly were.

00:17:01.540 And this virologist, Christian Anderson, wrote back, hi, Tony. And I'm going to skip ahead.

00:17:09.840 The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome. So one has to look really

00:17:16.260 closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features potentially look engineered. Look

00:17:26.020 engineered? Well, Fauci writes back to Anderson and says, thanks, Christian. Talk soon on the call.

00:17:36.220 So they had a phone call about the fact that Science Magazine was saying the virus might look

00:17:43.420 engineered. What did they say? Was it true? I don't know. It's not disclosed in the emails,

00:17:50.260 was it? I want to take you to a second email. And this is an exchange between Anthony Fauci and Peter

00:17:56.760 Daszak. He was the middleman that Rand Paul asked about sending American tax dollars to the Wuhan

00:18:04.100 Institute of Virology purportedly or allegedly to do gain of function research. And I want to read a

00:18:11.240 little bit from this email from Daszak to Fauci. The subject is, thank you for your public comments

00:18:17.740 for COVID-19's origins. I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and

00:18:23.800 collaborators for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural

00:18:29.040 origin for COVID-19 from a bat to human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of

00:18:35.440 Virology. And then as you can see, an entire paragraph is deleted. Are you just a tiny bit

00:18:43.580 curious of what's deleted? And then it says, from my perspective, your comments are brave. And coming

00:18:49.880 from your trusted voice will help dispel the myths being spun around the virus's origins.

00:18:56.460 And as you can see, the top of the email, Fauci writes back, Peter, many thanks for your kind

00:19:01.520 note. Best regards. What was redacted? Was Dr. Senator Rand Paul right? Was America actually

00:19:11.440 funding military research on the gain of function weaponization of these viruses? And then there's

00:19:20.020 one more email I'd like to read to you. It's this one between George Gao. He's the head of China's

00:19:29.840 version of the Centers for Disease Control. He's China's guy. And apparently he was on very friendly

00:19:35.400 terms with Anthony Fauci. And Gao writes to Fauci, and Fauci writes back, very friendly,

00:19:41.320 let's work together to get the virus out of the earth. Okay. And Fauci writes back, George,

00:19:51.080 thanks for the note. I understand completely. No problem. We will get through this together. Best

00:19:56.980 regards, Tony. Okay, so you've got the absolute boss for disease control in China writing you a personal

00:20:06.060 note. And you don't have any questions for him. Where did it come from? Can we talk? You're not

00:20:13.040 curious at all. And we're going to get through this together. We're on your side. Really? I don't think

00:20:21.300 Fauci's even that deferential to American presidents. Now, look, a lot of this is not secret. I mean,

00:20:29.900 those videos of him talking about gain of function, they weren't released just last night.

00:20:36.060 But Fauci's been on our TV sets for almost a year and a half. Did you know about the fact that money

00:20:42.900 was flowing from the U.S. government through Fauci, through this DASH Act to the Wuhan Institute of

00:20:49.000 Virology? Did you know that Fauci said China is where all the action is if you want to study the

00:20:55.980 weaponization of viruses? Did you know about that? Again, those weren't hidden. Did you know about the

00:21:04.360 connection between Fauci as he was standing by Trump of Fauci's connections to China, both the lab

00:21:12.700 itself and their public health industrial complex? Do you know who Anthony Fauci is actually working

00:21:22.300 for? And every question I've just put about Fauci, could it not be put to Teresa Tam, Justin Trudeau,

00:21:33.680 and Bill Gates too? I don't know why Fauci's book was kicked off Amazon today. Maybe there were too many

00:21:41.200 stories that were just proved false by this release of emails. I don't know. Just a theory. Just speculation.

00:21:47.720 I don't know what the truth is, but I don't trust Fauci, Tam, Biden, or Trudeau to tell us either.

00:21:58.320 I'm just worried saying so will get me deleted from the internet. Stay with us for more.

00:22:04.940 Well, as you know, last week we released our latest book, this one written by Coach Linda

00:22:21.900 Blade and Barbara Kay. It's called Unsporting, How Trans Activism and Science Denial Are Destroying 1.00

00:22:27.520 Sport. It's part of a trend of stories since transgenderism has really taken the world by storm 1.00

00:22:34.080 in the last five years. And by world, I mean, I think the decadent West. I mean, whether it's

00:22:38.520 Caitlyn Jenner or Jonathan Yaniv, a male to female transgender who has literally harassed so many 0.94

00:22:47.360 immigrant women to Vancouver demanding that they wax his private parts and then taking them to the 1.00

00:22:52.820 human rights tribunal when they won't touch him. So many crazy stories. And one of the themes is 0.96

00:22:58.220 you're not allowed to talk about it. You're not allowed to dispute it. You're not even,

00:23:03.320 in some cases, allowed to know about it. And that's the subject of our interview today because

00:23:08.620 there is a case in British Columbia dealing with a father and his own born female daughter

00:23:16.860 who has trans-zitioned to calling herself a boy. And we can't even tell you the name of

00:23:25.740 the man. The name of the case is A, B, and C, D. That's all the courts will say. The father

00:23:31.540 himself is not allowed to even call his daughter a daughter. And here's the crazy part. The rest of

00:23:39.140 us have been banned from talking about it under pain of contempt of court. Now, this just isn't

00:23:46.720 right. We believe in open courts in a free country. I think other journalists might have been miffed by

00:23:52.060 it, but only Rebel News did something about it. Our reporter on the ground, Drea Humphrey, joins us now.

00:23:58.800 Well, coming home from the court there, Drea, we challenged the nature of the publication bans. There

00:24:06.380 were many of them. Can you explain for our viewers a little bit of the background? First of all, did I

00:24:10.440 get my facts right when I explained A, B, C, D, and what was going on there? Yeah. The only thing I would

00:24:16.560 add is that I believe the order that did prohibit him from, you know, misgendering his own child and

00:24:24.720 referring to his own child as a daughter is no longer an order that's in stand date. Got it. So

00:24:31.540 that was an order, but you, am I correct? So, I mean, to me, that's just nutty, nutty, shows how crazy 0.80

00:24:38.380 things are. Now we went to court, we hired a lawyer in Vancouver because we were just trying to talk

00:24:45.220 about this and we couldn't even find out about the publication bans. The publication bans themselves

00:24:51.960 were secret. Isn't that crazy? They were secret. There was way too many of them. You know, it was

00:25:00.220 quite a tangled mess. You have this case that is of international interest. Everybody and their dog

00:25:07.040 is reporting the facts across, you know, whether it be in the U.S. all the way to Japan, then you have

00:25:14.480 me right here, boots on the ground, getting the last interview with the father just before he's

00:25:19.940 arrested in courts. And I have to tiptoe and walk on eggshells on how much of the other side I can even

00:25:26.740 give to you guys. Otherwise, I'm going to end up, I could end up in bars, behind bars myself.

00:25:32.280 So that was the reality of just how stringent these secret bans have made it to be able to

00:25:40.040 bring you guys the other side of the story. So we had to do something about it, even though,

00:25:44.780 as you mentioned, with the Yaniv case and other reports that I've done, it seems like these bans

00:25:50.680 conveniently get used in cases where transgender people, in this case, a child's transitioning without 0.76

00:25:59.280 the consent of their parent. Whenever there's activist lawyers involved and things like that,

00:26:04.720 these bans tend to get used and it's harder to get the story out for sure.

00:26:08.320 Yeah. Now, other reporters have talked about this case. I think in other cases, media companies much

00:26:15.180 bigger than ours, much richer than ours, in many cases owned by billion-dollar companies or getting

00:26:20.440 huge payouts by the Trudeau government, they go to court to fight publication bans when it's something

00:26:27.700 that their liberal worldview demands. We were the only media company in all Vancouver, and there's a

00:26:34.580 lot of media out there. There's radio, there's TV, there's newspapers, there's magazines, there's

00:26:39.100 websites. Vancouver is a very healthy media. Is it true that we were the only news outlet that went to

00:26:45.980 court and said, Your Honor, this doesn't make sense. You've got to figure this out. You've got to clear

00:26:50.860 this up. You've got to make sense of this. You can't have secret publication bans. Were we the only

00:26:55.720 people in court asking for this? Absolutely. And you might be shocked to hear it, but Justice

00:27:03.640 Taman actually thanked us for bringing this matter to the court. So that's what Rebel News did on behalf

00:27:12.620 of all media, the media that you mentioned that, you know, gets funded, or I should say funds from

00:27:19.000 the government didn't take the stand, but we did. So you're saying the judge who heard our request

00:27:24.900 actually thanked us for bringing, he wasn't aware, this was a judge, I presume, who wasn't aware of all

00:27:31.840 the problems? Is that what you're saying? No, Justice Taman has been involved, you know, heavily involved

00:27:38.740 in the railings, and I have seen him be asked by CD's former counsel to make things more understandable for

00:27:48.020 the media. So I don't think it's that he's necessarily was unaware of this. But he was basically

00:27:54.920 thanking us for going ahead and trying to do something about it, because it was problematic.

00:28:00.080 And he did acknowledge how important this issue was for both the public, as well as for the media.

00:28:07.420 Well, that's great. You know what, there's certain kinds of praise I don't want from the government.

00:28:12.220 I don't want the government saying, you're a good boy, you're asking the kind of questions I like to hear.

00:28:18.140 Like, I don't want to be a pet of the government. I don't want the government to give us money.

00:28:22.800 But if there's a judge who says, there was a problem here, you brought it to my attention,

00:28:29.120 your lawyer had some suggestions, and we fixed it, and now there's more freedom of the press,

00:28:35.440 there's more transparency in the courts.

00:28:37.620 That's one of the few kinds of praise that I will accept from a judge, and I'm glad he said it.

00:28:43.980 I understand also that the government of British Columbia was represented in this court battle

00:28:49.440 by the attorney general, and that they filed a brief that sort of said the same thing,

00:28:55.360 that they thought there was a mess here. And I understand that they filed a brief saying that

00:28:59.700 they agreed with us. We had to fix the problem. Again, I would not expect a new Democrat government

00:29:06.600 in B.C. to like Rebel News, but they had to admit there was a problem here, too. Did I get that right?

00:29:12.360 Absolutely. There was so much back and forth in this case. Like I said, it was so tangled.

00:29:17.020 There was many negotiations. And the AG took no position on our application to vary the publication bans.

00:29:25.940 But the AG did, in fact, acknowledge that there is an issue here and stated that to the courts as well.

00:29:32.140 And in fact, the child's lawyer, A.B., also acknowledged how important this was, which is just, I mean, this is insane, really.

00:29:41.640 Yeah. Now, just to be clear, and people can see we're still using A, B, C, D.

00:29:45.980 It is a tradition in court, and I think you can see there's some wisdom to it, that when there's a minor child involved

00:29:53.700 to protect the identity of the child, that child is often referred to by their initials.

00:29:59.680 So that has not been varied. That part of the rule has not been changed.

00:30:03.800 But it's like it was the double secret, the publication ban, but you're not even allowed to know what the publication ban is.

00:30:11.100 It's like a double, triple, top secret. I mean, it just made no sense.

00:30:16.180 And our lawyer had trouble even finding out what the truth was, let alone how could a regular journalist or a regular citizen.

00:30:23.120 I think this is a good first step. I don't think the problem is fixed yet.

00:30:27.680 I think that especially when it comes to trans activists, they work the system to reduce scrutiny on what they're doing,

00:30:35.680 especially when children are transitioning.

00:30:38.100 I think there's a real, and I see that, by the way, with vaccines, that the government is saying to children,

00:30:43.880 oh, you can consent as young as 12.

00:30:47.160 I think that we're going to have more problems like this, where the government and courts and politicians

00:30:52.680 are going to try and stop scrutiny of what they're doing with kids.

00:30:57.140 But I'm really proud, Drea, that you were the only journalist and Rebel was the only company fighting against just,

00:31:03.740 I mean, we didn't have a total victory, but we did have a win, and even the judge said we did a good job.

00:31:11.000 That's enough for us.

00:31:13.280 Yeah, and, you know, maybe this is going to set a huge precedent for the cases that you just mentioned in the future.

00:31:21.020 Well, Drea, we're so proud of the work you're doing, and I think this is a moment where Rebel News can hold our head high

00:31:27.380 and look at all the other media and say, you did not defend freedom of the press.

00:31:32.700 We did it for our own viewers, but also for the public good.

00:31:37.880 I'm proud of what you did, and I'm very grateful to our lawyer.

00:31:40.560 Drea, keep it up out there. 1.00

00:31:42.800 Thank you.

00:31:43.580 All right, there you have it.

00:31:44.820 Drea Humphrey on the beat.

00:31:47.540 Out there, before you go, what's the website people can go to

00:31:50.720 to get all your reports on this publication ban?

00:31:54.200 Yes, please go to LetUsReport.com.

00:31:57.480 We didn't quite meet our donor goal there, so if you could go and help us out to recoup.

00:32:02.800 Some of these costs, like I said, the negotiations went on more than we anticipated,

00:32:07.480 and these bans were buried, essentially, and it cost a lot to have our lawyer, Kyle Bienvenu, get them out.

00:32:14.580 He did a good job.

00:32:16.020 I remember when I was talking to Kyle, and he said, this is an uphill battle you're probably going to lose.

00:32:20.000 I mean, that's basically what he said right at the beginning.

00:32:22.340 I said, well, we've got to try.

00:32:23.960 We've got to try, and look at that.

00:32:25.240 We've got to win out of it.

00:32:26.020 So that's LetUsReport.com, and we did this for our viewers.

00:32:30.480 There's no two ways about it.

00:32:31.760 That's why we did it, but the benefit redounds to all Canadians and all media,

00:32:38.380 not that they'd ever thank us for it.

00:32:39.820 Drea, I thank you.

00:32:40.840 Take care, my friend.

00:32:42.340 Thank you.

00:32:42.840 All right, there you have it.

00:32:43.880 Drea Humphrey.

00:32:44.580 Go to LetUsReport.com to get all the details on this story.

00:32:47.520 Stay with us more ahead.

00:32:50.000 Hey, welcome back.

00:33:01.040 On the show last night, Dan writes, if the vaccines work,

00:33:05.100 then why do these people still have to wear masks and social distance?

00:33:08.760 Yeah, exactly.

00:33:09.540 I mean, I saw that there are nine new pharmaceutical billionaires because of the pandemic.

00:33:17.740 All right, well, congratulations, guys.

00:33:19.560 You really did a great job.

00:33:20.840 But it's interesting how now the deaths are plunging and cases are plunging and things

00:33:25.780 are normal, especially in America.

00:33:27.100 The Canadian test for, are you free, isn't, is anyone sick?

00:33:32.780 Is this thing still spreading?

00:33:33.840 It's, are you getting your jab?

00:33:36.420 And who's making these decisions and what are their deals?

00:33:39.920 I wonder if we'll ever get the kind of transparency for the emails from Canada's health bosses the

00:33:44.820 way we just did with Fauci's emails.

00:33:47.160 Kimberly writes, frontline essential workers get a break from TikTok videos to go watch hockey.

00:33:53.420 Aren't they lucky?

00:33:54.660 Yeah, listen, I appreciate people working in hospitals.

00:33:57.900 I also appreciate people working at grocery stores and any other place that stayed open

00:34:02.260 the past year.

00:34:03.000 I also know that there was no mass death from grocery store workers.

00:34:08.180 And if they got the virus, they most likely recover from it.

00:34:11.520 This virus is deadly to people over 80 with pre-existing comorbidities.

00:34:16.700 That's a fancy way of saying they were very sick to begin with.

00:34:19.880 It simply isn't a risk for young, healthy people, or at least not any more risky than the annual flu.

00:34:25.880 That's statistics.

00:34:27.880 DJ writes, there's no more left to right, conservative liberal.

00:34:31.460 Now there is only political elites versus the rest of us.

00:34:34.920 I think that's true.

00:34:35.940 And it's very strange.

00:34:37.220 I think it's partly true because the conservative parties of Canada have just stopped being conservative.

00:34:42.000 The conservative governments have been just as bad as the liberal governments.

00:34:45.780 And the conservative opposition has been too timid to oppose.

00:34:49.660 I don't know.

00:34:50.600 Maybe that's why we're so busy.

00:34:53.080 It's our show for today.

00:34:54.460 Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us, to you at home, good night.

00:34:57.480 Keep fighting for freedom.

00:35:01.460 You're welcome.

00:35:08.460 You're welcome.

00:35:11.220 You're welcome.

00:35:17.320 You're welcome.

Rebel News Podcast - June 03, 2021

Do you actually know who Dr. Anthony Fauci is？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript