Rebel News Podcast - EZRA LEVANT ｜ A British political violence group comes to Canada — but they’re left wing, so the media loves them!

00:00:00.000 Hello, my Rebels. I want to talk to you about a bizarre little incident in Victoria,

00:00:05.000 the capital of British Columbia, where a foreign-funded group of eco-radicals using

00:00:11.040 foreign-written propaganda as a little bit of a mischief campaign. I'll tell you about the 0.58

00:00:15.940 campaign. I'll tell you how I detected that they were foreign-funded. It was actually pretty easy.

00:00:20.840 I'll compare their treatment to the treatment of, say, our friend Tamara Leach. That's a habit.

00:00:26.780 But first, take a second to go to rebelnewsplus.com if you don't mind. Rebel News Plus is what we call

00:00:32.160 the video version of this podcast. We put a lot of effort into the video side of things. We show

00:00:37.240 clips. We show pictures. Today's show needs the video version to be fully experienced, I think.

00:00:43.780 I know you're listening on a podcast, but please consider rebelnewsplus.com. Eight bucks a month to

00:00:49.240 subscribe. My daily show and video. Plus, weekly shows by four of my colleagues. It's 36 episodes

00:00:54.680 a month. Just eight bucks. And, you know, we do need the dough because we don't take any from

00:00:59.200 Trudeau. So, we rely on you. Please go to rebelnewsplus.com. All right, here's today's show.

00:01:04.560 Tonight, a British political violence group comes to Canada, but they're left-wing, so the media loves

00:01:26.380 them. It's August 2nd, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.

00:01:32.700 Shame on you, you censorious bug.

00:01:44.120 I saw this tweet by a British Columbia journalist over the long weekend. It's a tweet and a picture.

00:01:50.700 The words say, Environmental Activist Group says it flattened the tires on 34 SUVs in Victoria

00:01:59.080 and Oak Bay, warning, this is just the beginning. It claims direct action works. This is not going

00:02:06.660 to end well if one of these activists is caught in the act. So, that's in British Columbia. But can

00:02:12.760 you find something odd about the piece of paper in that photograph? I'll read it.

00:02:17.820 Attention! Your gas guzzler kills. We have deflated one or more of your tires. 0.99

00:02:28.120 Do you see it yet? Tires, spelt with a Y. That's not how you spell tires, I don't think. Don't we spell

00:02:36.200 it T-I-R-E? That Y spelling, that's British. That's how they spell it in the UK. I mean, they have some

00:02:44.940 quirks. They say lorry instead of truck. They say torch instead of flashlight. It's one of those

00:02:52.780 countless, tiny, wonderful differences between us and the mother country. You know, they don't say

00:02:57.960 stop on a dime. They don't have dimes over there. This was written in London. London, England, not

00:03:04.280 London, Ontario, and certainly not British Columbia. I'll read a bit more from the flyer.

00:03:10.520 You'll be angry, but don't take it personally. It's not you. It's your car. We did this because

00:03:17.220 driving around urban areas in your massive vehicle has huge consequences for others. And it goes on

00:03:23.800 with a bunch of junk science claiming that your SUV kills people. Of course, a modern SUV has lower 0.91

00:03:29.820 emissions than an older, even smaller car. Modern cars are so much more efficient and emit so much

00:03:35.860 less than previous generations of cars do. And by the way, the car's already built. You're not going

00:03:40.500 to turn your car back in because someone deflated your tires. But seriously, to go after SUVs of any

00:03:46.960 size, rather than the source of real pollution in the world, China and India, Brazil, really all of

00:03:54.280 Asia and OPEC and Russia, I guess you could add the US, although they have one of the lowest emissions

00:04:00.040 per dollar GDP. It's absurd to talk about your car in British Columbia causing more emissions than

00:04:07.180 the hundreds of coal-fired power plants that China is building right now. Give me a break.

00:04:14.200 But look at how it ends, this pamphlet. The tire extinguishers, and that's their website too,

00:04:21.900 tire extinguishers.com. They literally couldn't be bothered to buy a spelled-correct version,

00:04:31.640 tire extinguishers with an I. That version was bought by someone who isn't using it, as you can

00:04:39.500 see. And this afternoon, just for fun, I bought tire extinguishers.ca, T-I-R-E extinguishers.ca.

00:04:47.300 And I have that website pointed to this video because I'm a Canadian, not a foreign meddler like 0.99

00:04:53.320 these folks. Now, I don't know what they actually did in Victoria. I don't know if they did anything

00:04:59.220 or if they just said they did. I suppose deflating a tire is different from slashing a tire where you

00:05:06.280 destroy it, but it's not much different. Both immobilize a vehicle. And if you didn't notice

00:05:13.100 notice when you got in your car and you wouldn't notice right away, would you? And you could start

00:05:19.300 to drive and you would notice it soon, but maybe you would have an accident first. What if you drove

00:05:26.860 and you didn't quickly realize what was wrong and you merged into a busy road and you had an accident

00:05:34.020 or your car swerved or you wore quickly down to your rims in traffic? I can think of a whole bunch

00:05:41.040 of things that could go wrong if you start to drive with your tire deflated and you didn't know.

00:05:46.720 If you ran it down on the rims, your tire would indeed be ruined.

00:05:51.120 This is exactly what the criminal code catches by the crime of mischief. Mischief is sort of a general

00:05:59.160 catch-all for minor crimes that are nuisances that aren't the kind of thing you typically go to prison

00:06:05.160 over. That's for sure. But things that actually ruin your community really make it awful. Vandalism,

00:06:10.740 petty thefts, just generally being an antisocial abuser of your neighbors. This is classic mischief

00:06:19.080 that could actually lead to harm, God forbid. And it's confessed to, and it's bragged about.

00:06:26.760 Hey, didn't Tamara Leach, the peaceful grandma who inspired the truckers, didn't she get charged with 0.99

00:06:34.920 mischief? Actually, I'm not sure if she did. If I recall, I think she was charged with inciting

00:06:40.200 mischief, which is a degree weaker, isn't it? And what? She got 48 days in prison so far, 0.85

00:06:46.440 she hasn't been convicted of anything. And she's subject to bizarre and abusive infringements on what

00:06:51.880 she can say and do in public. Banned from even criticizing the government. Thrown in prison again 0.85

00:06:58.120 for having a selfie photo with another trucker. That's what happened. So that's what a peaceful

00:07:04.400 grandma did, who apparently encouraged some horn honking. She was charged with inciting mischief and 1.00

00:07:11.200 thrown in jail. But deflating tires, T-I-R-E-S, well, that's just dandy. Now, I went on their website, 0.59

00:07:18.860 T-Y-R-E, extinguishers.com. And they have some pretty bizarre opinions, as you could probably

00:07:25.500 guess. They say, hybrids and electric cars are fair game. We cannot electrify our way out of the

00:07:32.560 climate crisis. There are not enough rare earth metals to replace everyone's car. And the mining

00:07:38.160 of these metals causes suffering. Okay, got it. So they're not really mad at SUVs. They're against

00:07:44.140 all cars. At least ones with brakes on them. That's one of the things they're mad about. They're mad

00:07:51.300 about brakes, apparently. Plus the danger to other road users stands, they say, as does the air

00:08:01.300 pollution. PM 2.5 pollution is still produced from tires and brake pads. So they don't like anything with

00:08:08.920 brake pads or tires, I guess. Then again, bicycles are made from metal, too, and they have brakes on

00:08:15.420 them, too. And the thing about bicycles is they don't really work well in Canada in the winter or

00:08:19.900 say for, I don't know, a family or a school bus or an ambulance or a firetruck. This is pure,

00:08:25.580 stupid, malevolent mischief. And gee whiz, 1.00

00:08:29.080 not a peep from any politician or police force. But my main point is this is going on. This is up on

00:08:41.240 the internet right now. They have an instructional video on how to deflate tires. That's up on YouTube

00:08:47.480 right now. YouTube will deplatform you if you question any fundamental narrative about the pandemic,

00:08:53.820 about the vaccines, about the lockdowns, or even if Donald Trump won or lost. But they will let these

00:08:57.880 criminals propagandize just how to deflate tires. That's no problem. These Brits are excited about 1.00

00:09:04.740 their Canadian action. You got to read this. Look at this. This is a press release. First action in

00:09:10.920 Western Canada, 34 SUVs disarmed in Victoria, British Columbia. But look at this. The state

00:09:17.700 capital of British Columbia was hit last night by the new tire extinguishers of Victoria who deflated

00:09:24.160 34 U.S. SUVs. Hey, did you know that British Columbia is a state and Victoria is its state

00:09:32.120 capital? I learned so much about our country from foreign-funded eco-activists, don't you?

00:09:38.520 They talk about one simple tactic, deflating the tires of these massive, unnecessary vehicles,

00:09:45.960 causing inconvenience for their owners without endangering any lives in the process.

00:09:50.900 That's dictionary definition mischief. But it absolutely does endanger lives.

00:09:58.260 Tampering with a car's tires. I don't think that endangers lives. So where's the police response?

00:10:05.260 Now, I'm not looking for riot police. I'm not looking for people to be shot like Trudeau's police shot

00:10:10.520 our reporter, Alexa Levois. I'm not looking for a suspension of civil liberties. I'm not even looking

00:10:14.540 for jail time unless some injury or death does arise from this mischief. But I am looking for a

00:10:21.480 denunciation of this by police and by politicians. Maybe for crime stoppers to launch a campaign

00:10:28.180 to catch the criminals. For a condemnation of it from, I don't know, the environment minister?

00:10:34.740 Yeah, about that. Alas, Stephen Gilboa, the environment minister, he himself is a convicted criminal

00:10:44.240 in the cause of environmentalist stunts. He would love these guys. For all we know, he funds

00:10:51.920 these guys. Stephen Gilboa is not going to criticize these guys, is he? Stay with us for more.

00:11:01.600 Well, I don't usually spend my time poring through health statistics, but I don't think any of us

00:11:14.720 expected to until the last two years. What you see on the screen right now are the leading causes of

00:11:21.640 death for the last 20 years in the province of Alberta, population four and a half million.

00:11:28.280 And I went through all 20 years, by the way, and you can find this too online pretty quickly.

00:11:33.380 And the top causes of death, they move around a little bit, but basically for the last 20 years,

00:11:39.540 it won't surprise you to know that coronary heart disease, cancer, and dementia have been the top

00:11:48.080 causes of death in Alberta for about the last 20 years. And even at its height,

00:11:54.560 deaths from COVID in the year 2020 was in number six position. And in 2021, it was in the number three

00:12:04.840 position. Of course, that's high, but it was never the leading cause of death in Alberta. But look at

00:12:10.560 this. Isn't this unusual? Unknown. Unknown is now the number one cause of death in the province of Alberta.

00:12:20.700 Number one, more than cancer, more than coronary heart disease, more than dementia,

00:12:26.140 more than all those other things. Unknown. Is it really unknown? Or is it more they're not allowed

00:12:33.960 to say, do you really believe with all the public health experts and the epidemiologists and all the

00:12:39.440 studies that they just don't know why people are dying? Well, here's a viral video that our next guest

00:12:47.620 put together that is full of that same sense of wonderment and curiosity and bafflement.

00:12:54.260 Why are all these young, healthy people, people who are, you know, in the elite athlete stratum of

00:13:00.540 health, why are they all dying? Take a look at this video. You'll see why it went viral immediately.

00:13:05.780 It was brought to you by Pfizer. CBS Health Watch sponsored by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper 360.

00:13:13.820 Brought to you by Pfizer. ABC News Nightline. Brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference.

00:13:21.160 Brought to you by Pfizer. CNN Tonight. Brought to you by Pfizer. Early start. Brought to you by Pfizer.

00:13:29.120 Friday night on Aaron Burnett Out Front. Brought to you by Pfizer. This week with George Stephanopoulos

00:13:35.920 is brought to you by Pfizer. This letter report brought to you by Pfizer. Today's countdown to

00:13:41.100 the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer. And now a CBS Sports update brought to you by Pfizer.

00:13:46.940 Meet the Press. Data download. Brought to you by Pfizer. This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by

00:13:53.380 Pfizer. On how to find the hidden sugars in the American family diet. Sponsored by Pfizer.

00:13:59.120 Pfizer. You know, as I told you the other day, Pfizer paid the largest fine in American history

00:14:09.160 until that point, $2.3 billion for misleading the public about their products. They've had a variety

00:14:15.880 of fines. Would you rather pay $2.3 billion in fines or would you rather, as you heard in the audio

00:14:22.020 track there, sponsor every journalist, every public affairs show in America?

00:14:27.220 So it was a bit of a juxtaposition. The news brought to you by Pfizer and all these deaths

00:14:33.340 of young athletes. And boy, we just can't figure out, we just don't know why the death toll in Alberta

00:14:40.380 this year, the year after the COVID has receded, why it's just so darn high for those unknowns.

00:14:46.820 Joining us now via Skype from San Diego, California is the brainchild between that viral video. And he's got

00:14:53.100 an amazing story to tell behind it. I'm talking about Pearson Sharp. He's an author, journalist,

00:14:57.380 traveler, and he's the host of One America News Network. Pearson, it's great to meet you and good

00:15:03.420 work on that video. How many views has that thing got?

00:15:07.160 Right now, it's got about 21,000 likes anyways. But I wanted to make it clear, I didn't put together

00:15:15.100 that video. That was a compilation that someone else put together. And I shared it because I had

00:15:21.200 done the story back in April that used a lot of those same videos and pointed out how many athletes

00:15:26.280 were dying. And so as I commented in the post, you know, Reuters and actually Lead Stories, not AP,

00:15:33.320 Lead Stories emailed me and tried to fact check me. And they said, hey, where'd you get this information?

00:15:38.280 We want to, we're writing a fact check story about this right now. And we've came across your report.

00:15:43.820 And so we wanted to investigate and see if you could share your sources with us. So I emailed

00:15:49.060 them back. And I said, well, there's over 800 links at this point, I don't have time to send them all

00:15:55.020 to you. And so I sent them like 20 or 30 links. And I said, you know, basically, the stats for these

00:16:01.940 almost 800 athletes, healthy athletes, the average age was 23 years old, they were dying. The stats came

00:16:10.540 from headlines, just straight from headlines, someone would die and a local news station

00:16:15.380 would report it. And so we went through and collected all those headlines. And they're just,

00:16:20.160 how do you argue with that? So when I sent them that their story disappeared, they never published

00:16:25.660 it. Yesterday, I reached out to Reuters, I reached out to Reuters, and I asked them, I said, hey,

00:16:29.780 did you guys ever do your story? They never responded.

00:16:32.000 You know, I'm a little bit older than you, Pearson. And I remember when I was young,

00:16:37.660 the shocking death of an NBA athlete named Len Bias. And it was shocking because he had a heart

00:16:44.340 attack. And, and like people in their late teens, early 20s, or professional athletes are really the

00:16:50.580 healthiest people amongst us. They're training, they're genetically probably a fine species to begin

00:16:57.580 with a fine specimen. Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no. You're, you're wrong about that. They're actually

00:17:02.000 very vulnerable. It's very common for them to just die. I mean, these are the finest specimen. I mean,

00:17:07.080 these people, they walk in the room, they have an energy about them. They're, they're, and the reason

00:17:12.120 this, I remember this sudden death of Len Bias, no one could understand. It's because he tried cocaine

00:17:17.300 and had allergic reaction. That's how rare it was. Like if, if a young athlete died of a heart attack,

00:17:24.440 it was so rare that everyone in the whole world want to know how did that happen? Because it's so

00:17:29.820 unusual as you say, hundreds and hundreds of cases. And, um, I appreciate your correction that

00:17:37.800 you just publicized that video and you wrote an accompanying news story. The fact that Reuters

00:17:43.100 called you up, that's not even a real fact check. That's their way of saying, we're watching you

00:17:48.560 and how dare you, and you better be careful because we'll defame you. That's what that is. 0.70

00:17:53.020 Right. Well, it's, it's interesting. They didn't end up publishing it. And what that tells you is

00:17:57.080 they weren't interested in fact checking. They were interested in discrediting because you'd think

00:18:02.300 the point of a fact check was, Hey, is this true or not? Oh, it looks like it's true. We're sharing

00:18:06.300 that. Nope. It's true. We're not going to report that. Yeah. It's, it's incredible. Um, I've had some

00:18:12.160 experience with these fact checkers. They seldom fact check powerful people. They don't hold governments to

00:18:19.820 account. They hold critics of governments to account. They don't speak truth to power,

00:18:24.460 which is the conceit of journalists. We're the official opposition. We hold power to account.

00:18:30.780 The fact that they're fact checking real journalists who do hold power to account

00:18:35.560 tells you everything they know. And I have it all. Yeah. Go ahead.

00:18:39.580 When the last time she was fact checked, I mean, he just came out and admitted that he was wrong

00:18:46.880 about some of these things that, well, we knew that it didn't provide that much for protection

00:18:50.300 against infection. He says that now no one's fact checking. No one came back and said, well,

00:18:55.040 that's not what you said before. He came out and said, well, I was never for lockdowns. I never

00:18:59.980 recommended that we do lockdowns after he repeatedly tried to lock down the whole world. Yeah.

00:19:05.600 No one, you know, where's Reuters contacting him? Where's AP contacting him? They don't,

00:19:10.500 they don't care. That's not part of the narrative. Yeah. You know, it's not just that I, um, I happen

00:19:15.880 to know, and I think you know this too, that, that the laughing, it's such a laughable conflict of

00:19:22.700 interest that a senior executive of Pfizer is on the board of Reuters. I mean, the, the fusion of those

00:19:31.620 two companies, it's an enormous conflict of interest. It would be like, I don't know. I mean,

00:19:35.840 I can just only imagine if there was a senior Exxon executive on a fact check that, that would

00:19:42.820 try to discredit environmentalists. Um, the journalistic world would not accept that. They'd

00:19:49.240 say you're run by an Exxon executive. If there was a senior tobacco executive that would debunk

00:19:55.340 criticisms of cigarettes, people would say, well, that's laughable. He's a conflict of interest.

00:19:59.480 Even if you happen to agree with tobacco and oil, here you have the big pharmacy, not even hiding

00:20:06.720 their links to these fact checkers. And by the way, most of the fact checks are on the Pfizer big

00:20:13.860 pharma narrative. It's just so weird of all the things in the world to check. They're obsessed with

00:20:18.920 anyone who dares criticize. Yeah. It's so odd to me. What do you think of these facts? Go ahead.

00:20:27.380 Well, I don't know. It's, it's absurd that we've gotten to a point that people are trusting this

00:20:36.060 blindly. You mentioned earlier that, um, that Pfizer was the recipient of the largest lawsuit

00:20:42.400 medical fraud in history. And that's not only because they were misleading people, but they were

00:20:48.580 actually bribing doctors to prescribe their medication. That's part of the lawsuit. They were,

00:20:55.060 they were fined for that. And now we're supposed to trust this company. And I understand,

00:21:00.540 I can understand why the politicians push it. You know, they're all in bed together. I get that.

00:21:06.060 But why do the average, the average person, I guess they're just misinformed, gullible, naive. They,

00:21:12.740 they want to believe it's easier to believe that the government is actually looking out for you

00:21:17.100 than it is to believe that, that they're conspiring against you. And we've had the last few years,

00:21:23.340 the most monumental example that we've ever could have asked for that. Our governments,

00:21:29.380 Canada's especially, Oh my God, I feel so bad for you guys up there that they hate the people. 0.96

00:21:34.740 They hate us and they don't care how many of us they kill. They really don't. It's all about the 0.98

00:21:39.360 profit. And if you want to go even darker, it might not even be just for the profit. They might

00:21:43.780 actually be trying to depopulate us. So it's, it's the most sinister situation you can imagine.

00:21:49.540 And we're in the middle of it and I don't know how to get out. Yeah. You know what, what you said

00:21:54.140 there about depopulation, it sounds conspiratorial, but let me play for you a clip of Bill Gates

00:22:00.860 at a Ted talk where he says, he comes up with this, uh, pseudo scientific formula. How do you

00:22:08.400 save the world? Well, he, he comes up with a mathematical formula where he talks about the number

00:22:13.480 of people multiplied by the amount of services per person and the carbon per service. And he says,

00:22:19.280 you've got to get one of these factors in my human formula down to zero and listen to him say it.

00:22:26.920 He says that we need to reduce population. If I mean, I'll let you listen to him directly.

00:22:31.760 He says by 10 to 15%, that would mean by about a billion people. And really weirdly he says,

00:22:39.200 and I don't understand this. He says vaccines are part of that. Take a listen.

00:22:43.940 It's an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow we have to make changes

00:22:49.760 that will bring that down to zero. It's been constantly going up. It's only various economic

00:22:57.680 changes that have even flattened it at all. So we have to go from rapidly rising to falling and

00:23:03.900 falling all the way to zero. This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication.

00:23:09.980 So you've got a thing on the left, CO2 that you want to get to zero. And that's going to be based

00:23:14.860 on the number of people, the services each person's using on average, the energy on average for each

00:23:22.640 service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let's look at each one of these and see

00:23:30.380 how we can get this down to zero. Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty

00:23:35.500 near to zero. That's back from high school algebra. But let's take a look. First, we've got population.

00:23:44.180 The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really

00:23:50.180 great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10

00:23:57.420 or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3. I mean, I don't know how a guy who says

00:24:05.860 we have to get a billion fewer people in the world can also be the same guy who's the chief funder of

00:24:12.740 vaccines and the chief protagonist of vaccines. I don't know if other people like Anthony Fauci share

00:24:19.420 Bill Gates' explicit goal of reducing population by literally a billion people or more. But it is pretty

00:24:25.760 creepy. Last word to you. Do you think these fact checks are here to stay? Do you think it was just

00:24:30.500 a pandemic thing? Or do you think it's part of the whole denormalize and defame your opposition

00:24:35.620 between the Joe Biden's proposed disinformation board and these, you know, pharmacy backed fact

00:24:42.920 checkers? Really, I think it's a way of canceling anyone who has a different opinion. What do you think?

00:24:50.040 Well, absolutely. I mean, that's obvious. This is it's not going away. It's here to stay. And I think

00:24:54.360 it's going to get a lot worse. This is the only way they can keep us in line is by controlling the

00:24:59.620 information. They know that if we figured out what they were doing, the game would be up. So

00:25:04.460 this is going to be a lot like, you know, Soviet Russia, what's happening in China. They're going 0.92

00:25:09.760 to control completely information. And soon enough, they're going to push through their social credit

00:25:14.280 score. And not only are people going to get fact checked for posting wrong information, people are

00:25:20.720 going to lose the ability to go shopping. They won't be able to buy a house. Their bank will close

00:25:24.580 down their accounts. They won't be able to eat. So people are going to be too afraid of thinking the

00:25:29.580 wrong thing or sharing the wrong post or meaning about something to even question what's being told

00:25:35.420 to them. So we're getting into something really dark and sinister right now.

00:25:40.240 Well, there is Pearson Sharp, author, a journalist and broadcaster with One American Network. Thanks so

00:25:45.860 much for joining us today. Absolutely. Thank you very much. Good luck. Thanks. You two keep up the

00:25:50.660 fight. Stay with us. More ahead. Hey, welcome back. Well, listen, it was interesting talking to

00:26:02.200 Pearson Sharp. I was thinking about what he said at the end there, and I don't think I would go as far

00:26:07.440 as him. He implies that a lot of the people pushing vaccines literally want to kill a vast swath of the

00:26:14.340 population. I don't think that's a widespread belief at all. I think there are some people who

00:26:19.500 positively talk about reducing the world's population, and it's terrifying that Bill Gates

00:26:24.800 is one of them. I mean, that is absolutely true. And there are people who deeply believe in depopulation.

00:26:31.140 That's true. But I think in most cases, people are just misguided or they just think it's so

00:26:36.740 important we vaccinate people. We cannot risk any dissenters. I just think that Pearson overstates it when

00:26:43.160 he describes a significant number of people who want to kill. I just have to believe that's not

00:26:52.300 widespread at all. And I have to believe that Pfizer is not motivated by that either. They're

00:26:58.560 just motivated by making money. I think Pfizer's motives are pretty clear. They just want to cash in

00:27:04.960 on the biggest public health scare in history. I do not think that Pfizer wants to kill people.

00:27:09.620 But that weirdo Bill Gates? Yeah, he's pretty plain about his desires, isn't he? Here's some

00:27:15.880 letters. My Quill Black, if I'm saying that right, says Smith is wrong regarding global warming.

00:27:21.180 And I just cannot support that. I assume you're talking about Danielle Smith, the candidate for

00:27:26.700 the UCP party in Alberta. I think that anyone who in 2022 thinks that you can convince your way

00:27:39.260 past the green pieces of the world to get their permission for you to pump boiler gas, 0.94

00:27:45.680 I think is a fool's errand. They will never be appeased. As you saw by the tire extinguishers, 0.93

00:27:51.880 they don't even believe in electric cars anymore. They don't even believe in cars with brakes anymore.

00:27:56.520 You will never reason with these unreasonable people. So stop buying their junk science. Stop saying 0.99

00:28:03.500 you believe in the theory of man-made global warming unless you truly do. And why would you believe in that

00:28:08.560 except for based on sheer faith? Carol Brinton says we should have 30% less Trudeau, Schwab,

00:28:16.240 World Economic Forum, etc. In other words, less foolish and suicidal ideas. Yeah, there's something 0.98

00:28:22.560 very demoralizing about a society that is devouring itself morally, physically, that undermines good

00:28:30.160 things and pumps up bad things. There's something deeply wrong with our education and our culture

00:28:36.020 that's doing that. I don't understand it fully. Doug Gary says Alberta will never get a fair deal

00:28:42.100 from Canada. Separation is the only answer. Well, let me put to you the case of Quebec. Quebec is not

00:28:48.900 separated. In fact, they sort of run the show in a number of ways. They have another prime minister from

00:28:56.340 Quebec right now, don't they? They have three out of the nine seats on the Supreme Court guaranteed to them.

00:29:01.740 They have mandatory bilingualism across the country, including, say, Vancouver's International Airport,

00:29:07.260 though, of course, Chinese is the second language there, not French. Quebec has a say over their

00:29:14.700 policing, over their immigration, over their pension fund. They collect their taxes. All of that done

00:29:20.560 without separating, but it was done with the threat of separatism, with the or else. One thing I think you

00:29:28.000 could learn from great negotiators, Donald Trump being an example of that, is you have to be

00:29:32.800 prepared to walk away from the deal to get a good deal. If people know you won't walk away, they'll

00:29:39.040 just hold the line and they'll know you'll come to them. I think that Alberta has lacked that or else.

00:29:45.360 Some people say it's time. That's our show for today. Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here

00:29:50.720 at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night and keep fighting for freedom.

00:29:54.480 Tamara Ugolini here with Rebel News. Now, some of you may recall the interview that I did last week

00:29:59.840 with professional engineer Ken Drysdale. He has compiled an 89-page forensic report titled

00:30:06.400 Investigation into Criminal Allegations Concerning the COVID-19 Response. In that interview, we discuss

00:30:12.880 his initiative to present this report to police stations across Canada, urging them to initiate

00:30:18.080 a criminal investigation into the COVID-19 response. In that interview, Ken also made an astonishing

00:30:24.160 finding when he looked specifically into the risk of COVID to pregnant women and balanced it with the

00:30:30.240 unknowns of the COVID injectables rolled out to that demographic by our government and medical officials

00:30:37.360 as safe and effective. The effects that this injection is having on women's reproductive health

00:30:43.040 is a phenomenon that is becoming increasingly difficult for even the mainstream media to ignore,

00:30:48.640 as evidenced by this particular headline that validated the literally bloody suffering faced by an

00:30:55.120 astronomical 42% of those with regular menstrual cycles. It's not new to me. I've discussed women's 1.00

00:31:02.880 reproductive health several times before on the Rebel platform, twice with biochemist, microbiologist,

00:31:10.240 and immunologist, Dr. Jessica Rose, and in other written pieces showing the evolution of science around the COVID

00:31:18.080 injectables that began rolling out in December of 2020. Most recently, I interviewed Dr. Shoemaker, who made an

00:31:25.760 alarming discovery that out of 29 documented pregnancy outcomes from Pfizer's own data, 28 of those

00:31:33.040 pregnancies resulted in fetal death. Immunologist and virologist Dr. Byron Bridle, who I've also interviewed on the dangers of these injections, published a sub-stack paper that confirms this astounding 97%

00:31:45.360 baby death rate. And Ken Drysdale takes an extremely pragmatic approach in that he doesn't question any of the data, he simply interprets it exactly as it is, and tries to hone in on the risk versus benefit profile for pregnant women.

00:32:01.040 And here is what he found.

00:32:05.040 One of the things that really, really upset me when I saw it, and I just stumbled upon doing it because we had friends of ours who were pregnant at the time, and the gynecologist was constantly telling the lady, you've got to get shot, got to get the shot, and the husband didn't want them to because there were so many unknowns.

00:32:23.040 So we looked at a bunch of statistics as to how many women in the childbearing years died of COVID. We looked at how many died of all kinds of other things. We also looked at exactly what Pfizer was saying about their own drugs.

00:32:41.040 So we got the monograph. And the monograph, for those of you who don't know, is a little piece of paper that's inside the drug vial. When you leave the pharmacy, most people throw it away. It's a big document. We reproduced that in our report verbatim. We didn't change it.

00:32:55.040 We didn't change it. And what we were after there was, you know, everything you do in life has risk associated with it.

00:33:03.040 So we wanted to see what Pfizer knew or didn't know and what they told the government about their drug concerning pregnancies.

00:33:11.040 And we wanted to examine what the risk to a pregnant woman was of actually contracting the disease and dying of it. And again, it was shocking to us what we found.

00:33:21.040 You know, I'm old enough to remember the thalidomide crisis and what that did to people and what we should have learned about that.

00:33:30.040 And so the first thing we did, again, we looked at the monograph and what Pfizer said in their monograph.

00:33:37.040 And again, it's reproduced on page 41 of our report. Fertility. It is unknown whether comertity, comertity is Pfizer's name for their vaccine, has an impact on fertility.

00:33:49.040 Pregnant women. The safety and efficacy of comertity in pregnant women has not been established.

00:33:55.040 It is unknown whether comertity is excreted in human milk. Pediatrics. The safety and efficacy of comertity in children under five has not been established.

00:34:04.040 They didn't look at toxicity. The carcinogenity. In other words, can it cause cancer? Carcinogenic potential was not assessed.

00:34:12.040 This is what Pfizer said. And then if you looked at what the province of Manitoba were telling pregnant women, they were saying it was safe.

00:34:21.040 They were monitoring it. The vaccines have been used for 50 years and they were one of the greatest things ever that ever occurred in medicine.

00:34:28.040 And and don't be worried. We've done the greatest bit of science on this and it's safe and we're monitoring.

00:34:33.040 We've got you. We've got your back is what they said. Keep in mind, this is what Pfizer said about their own drug.

00:34:39.040 But then so we looked at that. There's a lot of unknowns there. What effect does it have on pregnant women? 0.79

00:34:44.040 We don't know. What effect does it have on pregnant fertility? We don't know.

00:34:48.040 So we looked at the odds of what were the odds of a woman who was pregnant, dying, getting COVID and dying.

00:34:56.040 So we defined childbearing years as between 20 and 39.

00:35:01.040 And Statistics Canada said the average was 31.2.

00:35:04.040 And there were five million, almost 5.1 million women in Canada between the ages 20 and 39. 0.99

00:35:11.040 Of that, in 2020, 2800 women died for whatever reason in that age group.

00:35:18.040 That meant your chance of dying just because was about one in 1800.

00:35:23.040 Now, Statistics Canada also reported that in that age group, 20 women contracted and died of COVID.

00:35:29.040 That means your chance of contracting and dying of COVID was one in a quarter of a million.

00:35:35.040 Your chance of just dying from murder, suicide, cancer, one in 1800. 0.99

00:35:40.040 Your chance of dying from COVID, one in a quarter of a million.

00:35:44.040 Now, to put that in perspective a little bit, we also looked at what the chances were of a woman dying just from being pregnant.

00:35:52.040 And there were 24 of those in Canada that year.

00:35:55.040 And when you looked at how many women had gotten pregnant and how many women died, the chances of you dying from just getting pregnant were one in 15,000.

00:36:04.040 So, I just want to repeat that because it's important.

00:36:08.040 Your chance of contracting COVID and dying was one in a quarter of a million.

00:36:13.040 Your chance of dying from simply being pregnant was one in 15,000.

00:36:17.040 So, there were 20 COVID deaths.

00:36:20.040 There were 29 influenza deaths.

00:36:24.040 There were 855 accidents, 341 suicides, and 39 murders.

00:36:30.040 341 suicides compared to 20 COVID deaths.

00:36:35.040 Can you imagine how many lives we could have saved if we would have spent those billions and billions of dollars on suicide prevention rather than COVID death prevention, which was questionable anyway?

00:36:46.040 So, what that analysis told us was, I can only speak for myself, but I have a 50-50 chance of dying from something.

00:36:55.040 And I have a 25% chance of dying from the solution.

00:36:59.040 I'm going to take the solution.

00:37:01.040 But when the risk of you dying from this is one and a quarter of a million, and you have no idea whether or not it's going to affect your baby, whether it's carcinogenic, whether you're going to breastfeed it into the baby, what effects it has on your fertility, who in the world would go ahead and take that?

00:37:18.040 So, the question becomes, how did the gynecologists and pediatric doctors recommend this when they had this information long before I did?

00:37:27.040 Sadly, as more information continues to trickle out, it appears that the cure, if we can even call it that, since it doesn't prevent infection or transmission and has questionable effects on severe outcomes, is far worse than the disease.

00:37:44.040 A risk versus benefit calculation is crucial to informed consent, and yet Canadians have arguably been robbed of that fundamental component of medical ethics throughout the rollout of these injections on the entire population.

00:38:01.040 For Rebel News, I'm Tamara Ugolini.

Rebel News Podcast - August 03, 2022

EZRA LEVANT ｜ A British political violence group comes to Canada — but they’re left wing, so the media loves them!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript