EZRA LEVANT ｜ Danielle Smith challenges Ottawa as immigration tensions reach boiling point
Episode Stats
Words per minute
160.60435
Harmful content
Misogyny
7
sentences flagged
Hate speech
21
sentences flagged
Summary
Danielle Smith sets a new standard for immigration reform with her five powerful questions that she s going to put to a referendum of Albertans in October. Then we ll ask Michelle Rempel-Garner, the federal Conservative immigration critic, what she thinks about it.
Transcript
00:00:00.200
Huge show today. Danielle Smith sets a new standard for immigration reform with her five
0.99
00:00:04.940
powerful questions that she's going to put to a referendum of Albertans in October.
00:00:09.840
Then we'll ask Michelle Rempel-Garner, the federal conservative immigration critic,
00:00:14.400
what she thinks about it. Huge show today. Thank you for tuning in. But first, I want you to
00:00:19.240
get the video version of this podcast by going to rebelnewsplus.com. It's eight bucks a month,
00:00:25.500
which may not sound like a lot to you, but it sure adds up for us. It's how we pay our bills
00:00:29.100
because we don't take a dime from the government, and it shows.
00:00:47.900
Tonight, Danielle Smith sets a new standard for immigration reform, and Michelle Rempel-Garner
00:00:54.220
gives us her view on it. It's February 23rd, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:14.440
Well, for decades, immigration was something you weren't really allowed to talk about,
00:01:19.060
other than to nod along and say everything was fine. I remember even the Conservative Party of Canada
00:01:24.220
in, I think it was the 2021 election, the leader, when grilled by Rosemary Barton, said,
00:01:29.980
oh, he just agrees with everything Justin Trudeau says. Can we please move on? It was terrifying.
00:01:36.920
There was this political consensus that you couldn't challenge mass immigration, but I think that's
0.99
00:01:42.020
falling apart. And last night, I think we heard one of the most bracing challenges to the immigration
00:01:49.140
status quo, ever, by someone in a position of power. Without further ado, let me play for you
00:01:55.300
an excerpt from Danielle Smith's address to the province last night, where she said there's going
00:02:01.940
to be referendum questions on immigration. And don't go away, because after I play those,
00:02:07.980
I'm going to bring on Michelle Rempel-Garner, the Conservative Party of Canada's immigration critic,
00:02:13.600
to get her reaction to the declarations. Actually, not really declarations, because it's putting it
00:02:19.380
to the people, to the referendum questions of Alberta. Here, take a look.
00:02:23.520
The changes we need to make to immigration are a significant departure from the status quo,
00:02:28.320
and therefore, I am seeking a referendum mandate from Albertans to implement them.
00:02:32.200
On October 19th, 2026, we will hold a provincial referendum primarily focused on how Albertans
00:02:38.400
want our government to deal with the issue of immigration, as well as steps we can take as a
00:02:42.940
province to strengthen our constitutional and fiscal position within a united Canada.
00:02:47.840
These were, far and away, the issues most strongly identified by Albertans during last year's
00:02:53.240
Alberta Next panel town halls and online submissions. And in my view, it is time to act on them.
00:02:58.660
The fact is, Alberta taxpayers can no longer be asked to continue to subsidize the entire country
00:03:04.040
through equalization and federal transfers, permit the federal government to flood our borders with
00:03:08.620
new arrivals, and then give free access to our most generous in the country social programs to
00:03:13.220
anyone who moves here. This is not only grossly unfair to Alberta taxpayers, but also financially
00:03:18.820
crippling, and undercuts the quality of our health care, education, and other social services.
1.00
00:03:23.760
The October 19th referendum will therefore include the following questions.
00:03:27.540
Number one, do you support the government of Alberta taking increased control over immigration
00:03:33.320
for the purpose of decreasing immigration to more sustainable levels, prioritizing economic
00:03:38.780
migration, and ensuring Albertans have first priority to new employment opportunities?
00:03:44.120
Number two, do you support the government of Alberta introducing a law mandating only Canadian
00:03:49.800
citizens, permanent residents, and individuals with an Alberta-approved immigration status will be
00:03:55.060
eligible for provincially funded programs such as health, education, and other social services?
00:04:00.840
Number three, assuming that all citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for social
00:04:06.400
support programs as they do now, do you support the government of Alberta introducing a law requiring
00:04:12.120
all individuals with a non-permanent legal immigration status to be resident in Alberta for at least 12 months
00:04:18.780
before qualifying for any provincially funded social support programs?
00:04:23.320
Number four, assuming that all citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for public health care and
00:04:28.860
education as they do now, do you support the government of Alberta charging a reasonable fee or premium to
00:04:34.540
individuals with a non-permanent immigration status living in Alberta for their and their families' use of the
00:04:41.840
Number five, do you support the government of Alberta introducing a law requiring individuals to provide proof of
00:04:48.920
citizenship, such as a passport, birth certificate, or citizenship card, to be eligible to vote in a provincial election?
00:04:55.960
There you have it. Now, just to clarify, I sort of misspoke when I said that was her manifesto. No, those are the
00:05:01.720
questions that are going to be put to Albertans in a vote. But if any poll over the last 10 years is accurate, I think each of
00:05:09.540
those questions will be resoundingly approved by the people of Alberta. That's my
00:05:14.020
prognostication. Joining us now via Skype is the official opposition critic for
00:05:20.420
immigration, also known as the shadow cabinet minister. Michelle Rempel-Garner joins us now.
00:05:25.360
Thank you so much for taking the time. You're so busy. I appreciate it.
00:05:31.140
Very interesting comments by Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta. And to put it to the people is quite a dramatic move,
00:05:38.360
because I think that lets the people be the bad guy for challenging the consensus, not Danielle Smith herself.
00:05:47.040
Well, like, look, I'll just speak from the federal perspective.
00:05:52.040
It's been incredibly frustrating to watch the liberals completely ruin Canada's immigration system for
00:05:59.820
everybody, for Canadians, for people who want to come to Canada to build a better life and play by the rules.
00:06:05.380
And, you know, they've brought too many people in too fast for housing, health care and jobs to keep up.
00:06:12.600
That's just the reality. And I it's not just Premier Smith that is expressing concerns about that fact.
00:06:20.060
It's premiers of all different political stripes across the country.
00:06:23.200
And I think what you're seeing now, and not just in Alberta, is provincial governments challenging the lack of federal leadership
00:06:31.580
in fixing the situation that they created. Right.
00:06:35.220
We have an extremely weak immigration minister right now.
00:06:38.460
And that's why the federal conservatives we've been putting forward.
00:06:42.580
There are a lot of really bold and common sense proposals to restore order to Canada's immigration system,
0.94
00:06:50.500
because, yeah, like we haven't seen any action or even acknowledgement from the liberal government
00:07:00.200
And now, of course, you see provincial governments, advocacy groups and, of course,
00:07:04.320
the official opposition saying, look, there needs to be there needs to be action.
00:07:08.240
And now it's kind of like over to you, Mark Carney.
00:07:11.700
You know, constitutional immigration is a federal matter, obviously, has to do with our borders.
00:07:17.600
So for a province to wade into it is interesting.
00:07:21.280
But she's not saying that she can stop immigration.
00:07:24.840
What she can say is the things that are within the provincial jurisdiction, health and education and provincial voting,
00:07:33.840
Do you support her proposed use of those provincial powers to alter how mass immigration affects Alberta?
00:07:43.020
Well, you know, again, I'd point to other provinces as well, too.
00:07:46.300
Actually, municipalities, you know, Olivia Chow, partly a conservative,
00:07:51.300
proposed having to raise property taxes in response to the number of bogus asylum claimants
0.99
00:07:57.440
that were flooding into the greater Toronto area over the last several years
00:08:00.820
under the federal liberal government's, you know, abysmal immigration policies.
00:08:06.180
Then you had, you know, we famously had the immigration minister in front of committee this year,
00:08:11.700
and she said, well, I don't consider health care when setting immigration levels.
00:08:19.480
And, of course, health care is a provincial responsibility.
00:08:22.700
So when you have a federal government taking policy that's within their jurisdiction,
00:08:28.320
but that massively impacts provincial jurisdiction, like health care, for example,
00:08:33.160
or to a certain extent housing, you are going to see people push back.
00:08:38.060
And so, again, I would just say how I've tried to address this issue in my role as shadow minister
00:08:45.040
is come up with concrete solutions to see the federal government reverse some of these policies
00:08:53.120
Like, you know, we talked about birthright citizenship.
00:08:56.020
We've talked about major reforms to the asylum system so that people who are abusing the asylum system
00:09:01.900
can't get better health care benefits than Canadians do, for example.
0.99
00:09:05.800
I could literally spend two hours talking to you about the proposals that we've put forward.
00:09:09.920
But I think that you are going to see not just like, you know, I know that Premier Smith
00:09:14.880
is going to get a lot of attention because she's a conservative premier talking about immigration.
0.99
00:09:19.400
But frankly, it's been liberal premiers as well, too.
00:09:22.220
And it's incumbent upon the liberal government and Mark Carney to take some of the suggestions
00:09:26.360
that conservatives have put forward at the federal level to reform the system,
00:09:30.240
but also, Ezra, massively bring down immigration levels, come up with a plan to remove
00:09:34.940
the nearly three million people who have expired or expiring visas this year.
00:09:44.220
But we will continue as a federal conservative party to push for reforms to bring back order
00:09:51.220
You know, I saw an interesting debate online the other day between Candace Malcolm, the boss
1.00
00:09:56.280
of Juno News, and Jason Kenney, the former premier of Alberta and former federal immigration
00:10:02.600
And I think he was fairly well regarded as an immigration minister.
00:10:05.900
He cracked down on some fraud, even though I would say the gross numbers were large.
00:10:10.200
And they were quarreling over a debate that Candace Malcolm had had with someone from the
00:10:15.840
Dominion Society, which is, I don't know if it's all right.
00:10:19.900
It's sort of one degree of separation from some racist guys in Diagolons.
00:10:26.020
So I think that Jason Kenney was chiding her for that.
00:10:29.320
But she said, look, the idea of sending home millions of people whose right to be here has
0.97
00:10:37.380
There's nothing racial about your visa running out and you having to go home.
00:10:43.020
And there was a real argue-bargue between the two of them.
00:10:48.660
You could be an outstanding, loyal, patriotic Canadian of any color, of any religion.
00:10:56.680
But the idea of sending home three million people whose visas have expired will naturally
1.00
00:11:08.820
Do you have the stamina and the tenacity to call for the deportation of three million souls,
00:11:16.400
many of whom will be visible minorities, even if you're called racist like we saw in that
00:11:24.480
So I don't know, and I didn't follow any of the discourse that you talked about, but I'll
00:11:29.620
just talk to the federal conservatives' position on the issue of 2.9 million visas, either expired
00:11:38.660
or expiring, on top of at least 500,000 undocumented persons in Canada.
00:11:43.520
So the principles that we've been putting forward is this.
00:11:47.120
If you are in Canada on a temporary visa, temporary means temporary under our law, and at the end
00:11:55.160
And the reality is, is the federal liberal government brought in way too many people without a plan
00:12:03.060
to ensure that they leave at the end of their visas to the point where they've even said
00:12:12.200
So of course, conservatives, as we always do, are going to call for the law to be upheld.
00:12:17.620
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Ezra, states that when somebody's visa expires,
00:12:26.240
And conservatives, I've been calling for this since I was reappointed as shadow minister for
00:12:32.920
And it was one of the first questions I actually asked Lena Diab in the House of Commons last
00:12:37.040
May, was, do you have a plan to remove these people?
00:12:42.780
And so, of course, we're going to continue to push for that.
00:12:46.640
And frankly, I think that if the liberals don't deal with that, we're going to have a massive
00:12:54.180
Everything from, you know, we see AI disrupting the workforce.
00:13:00.940
You know, how are they setting, why are they issuing hundreds of thousands of more temporary
00:13:04.860
permits when they don't have a plan to have millions of people with expired visas to leave?
00:13:10.260
And the other thing I'd say is this, Ezra, you've seen people from across the country who
00:13:16.180
are on expired visas, you know, going to different rallies and whatnot, asking to stay.
00:13:23.840
The liberals said, well, they kind of winked in a nod.
00:13:28.400
And it just goes to show what a crisis of humanity this is.
00:13:33.820
But the Conservative Party's position that we are continuing to maintain is the law says
00:13:38.540
that if you are here on a temporary visa, you need to leave.
00:13:41.720
And now it is incumbent upon the liberal government to come up with a plan to get people to do so.
00:13:47.920
It's what the law says, and it's what Canadians expect.
0.67
00:13:53.880
I think some of these folks who came over were lied to by immigration.
00:13:57.520
Consultants, frankly, were lied to by some of these diploma mills who said, come here
1.00
00:14:03.940
And there's all sorts of tricksters showing them tricks to get around the system.
00:14:08.420
Here's what I keep trying to wrap my head around.
00:14:10.700
In the United States under Joe Biden, the number I keep hearing that came in was 13 million.
00:14:15.360
Now, they came in illegally, unlike the legal entry of students and temporary workers here.
0.58
00:14:28.640
We're dealing with a number twice as big as the Americans.
0.99
00:14:34.420
I mean, look at ICE going to try and find individual people.
00:14:41.320
Do you think Canadians have the stomach for that?
1.00
00:14:45.780
Or do you think it's the way Danielle Smith is suggesting, don't use muscle, just turn
00:14:55.980
Like ICE is a heavy handed way you could say compared to just no more free stuff, which
00:15:03.040
Well, I guess I'd just look at our own context, but maybe start, if you'll indulge me, with
00:15:11.540
You know, a stat that really woke me up last year was there's a lot of debate in the United
00:15:25.180
But there's actually more per capita and absolute asylum claim numbers or asylum claims made in
00:15:31.740
Canada over the same period that there were in the United Kingdom.
00:15:36.320
And look at how big the debate is there, right?
00:15:40.180
Like, I think the Canadians, you know, we had a consensus on immigration that it was durable
00:15:47.020
across different levels or across different political stripes for many years, up until
00:15:55.640
And then what happened was the Liberals brought in too many people too fast for housing, health
00:16:02.420
So, you know, for me, I think that the average Canadian, average permanent resident look around
00:16:08.220
and go, well, wait, we have a youth jobs crisis.
00:16:11.640
Why are we still bringing in massive levels of temporary foreign workers or foreign students
00:16:19.600
Why are we allowing bogus asylum claimants to stay in Canada for years?
1.00
00:16:23.520
Why are we allowing non-citizens who've been convicted of serious crimes in Canada to avoid
0.99
00:16:29.540
deportation because they're getting more lenient sentences by judges by virtue of their immigration
00:16:35.680
These are all questions that Canadians have that I've tried to respond to with private members'
00:16:42.720
But we've seen the Liberals just completely ignore this.
00:16:46.500
And I will say this, public opinion polling has shown that immigration is the number one
00:16:55.260
And it's because they've refused to listen to common sense Canadians across a political
00:16:59.260
stripe that are like, yeah, we will be open and welcoming to immigrants, but not in these
1.00
00:17:06.400
And so restoring order through common sense proposals, I think, is something that everybody's
00:17:12.540
expecting us to do and everybody's expecting Mark Carney to do.
00:17:16.620
So, you know, I don't think that anybody who's saying, we don't have the housing, health care
00:17:22.540
and jobs to keep up with the numbers that the Liberals are allowing are unreasonable.
00:17:28.920
And restoring that principle is something that, of course, conservatives stand behind at the
00:17:35.260
I got two really quick snappers and then I'll let you go.
00:17:37.480
I really appreciate you spending so much time with me.
00:17:39.300
So here's the first one, which came out of left field to me, is the Liberal government
00:17:44.920
proposing that we bring in foreign nationals to be our soldiers.
00:17:50.400
And I just thought the word mercenary jumped into my head.
00:17:53.620
I mean, they say there would be background checks and security checks.
00:17:56.720
What do you think of the idea of bringing in foreigners because we're not able to recruit
00:18:02.400
Well, I think that serving in Canada's armed forces is a wonderful opportunity for any Canadian
00:18:08.580
but I think that where the Liberal government should first be asking is why more Canadians,
00:18:14.460
that we have a youth jobs crisis in Canada, aren't choosing the armed service or being
00:18:19.360
processed into the armed service or armed forces as an option.
00:18:26.900
I don't think that they have good answers on that.
00:18:29.700
Just as a sort of stay tuned, spoiler alert on this, I do have questions for the government
00:18:38.580
But I mean, you know, our Conservative leader, Pierre Polyev, has been very blunt about the
00:18:47.140
fact that Canada needs to restore a warrior culture within the armed forces as opposed to
00:18:55.480
But let's start with Canadians who want to serve and then I have questions on the other
0.98
00:19:08.180
You know, I agree with you that immigration is the number one issue.
00:19:11.000
And by the way, I think it impacts many other issues from housing to crime.
00:19:15.940
And by the way, crime within immigrant communities as we see out there in Surrey, for example.
1.00
00:19:20.620
Now, the Liberals are smart and if they believe in anything, they believe in winning.
00:19:24.200
And Mark Carney, who was the, you know, zero emissions guy for the longest year, he shocked
00:19:31.560
everyone, including the Conservatives, by scrapping the carbon tax.
00:19:35.640
The one thing you wouldn't have expected, he did to win.
00:19:40.120
And I think that was a major reason that he won.
00:19:44.660
Do you think the Liberals, if they're staring at the kind of public opinion that you've referenced
00:19:50.940
that I agree in, do you think they would ever adopt your ideas?
00:19:56.980
Or do you think they're just too beholden to, you know, machine politics based on ethnic
00:20:06.120
Do you think this is something they could flip?
00:20:15.560
They're going to have an opportunity to answer your question in just a few short weeks.
00:20:19.540
So I have a private member's bill in front of the House of Commons.
00:20:22.600
It's a very simple one-line amendment to the criminal code that would prohibit judges from
00:20:29.700
using somebody's immigration status to give them a more lenient sentence if they've been
00:20:35.300
convicted of a serious crime to avoid deportation, which is a very standard practice right now.
00:20:40.500
So there is a bill in front of the House of Commons.
00:20:43.880
There'll be a vote on that in just like a couple of weeks, basically.
00:20:47.360
So they're going to have an opportunity to answer your question with their feet, whether
00:20:54.820
When we debated this bill in the House a couple of weeks ago, or sorry, last month, one of
00:21:01.720
the senior liberals, they got up and said, well, it's not like any judge is giving special
00:21:09.320
And then I got up in the House of Commons the next day and talked about how a judge gave
00:21:13.800
special consideration to somebody, a non-citizen who had raped and impregnated a 13-year-old
00:21:23.540
And I would just say, in answer to your question, let's look and see what the liberals do in
00:21:30.540
response to my common sense bill, which I think Canadians of any political stripe agree
00:21:36.140
Are they going to listen to very far left special interest groups or lawyers who profit off of
00:21:43.360
Or are they going to uphold the rule of law and the spirit of Canada's immigration law?
00:21:49.300
I would love to be on your show again after that vote happens.
00:21:52.780
And I would encourage liberals who are watching this to be like, look, if you actually care
00:21:56.400
about this country, or even as Ezra said, if you care about winning, this is a no-brainer
00:22:05.900
Thanks again for spending so much time with us.
00:22:09.320
This is the number one issue, even if it's not always on the front page, and even if it's
00:22:14.000
sort of hidden or downplayed by the regime media, I think this is the number one subject
00:22:19.300
of the under-news, as Mickey Kaus would say, the news that people talk about, even if they're
00:22:25.400
Michelle Garner-Remple, thanks so much for spending time with us.
00:22:40.580
The former Chilliwack school trustee and staunch critic of gender ideology in school, Barry
00:22:46.640
Newfield in British Columbia, was just slapped with by the province's Human Rights Tribunal.
00:22:53.880
He has to pay $750,000 to the Chilliwack Teachers Association, in short, for not believing in
00:23:13.500
And I'll link that in the written article for this report, which you can find in the description
00:23:17.980
But for now, hear my interview with Mr. Newfield himself about his reaction to such a massive
00:23:27.800
Well, I was pretty sure I was going to lose because the BC Human Rights Tribunal is not
00:23:35.700
And I knew that the teachers were asking for $750,000.
00:23:40.160
I was a little surprised that the tribunal went along with it.
00:23:46.660
If they had only fined me $75,000, nobody would have been interested.
00:23:53.380
And all those protesters outside wouldn't have been yelling at me as much.
00:23:58.200
But $750,000 really made a lot of people sit up and take notice.
00:24:10.780
I've come to the attention of some major movers and shakers in the United States.
00:24:19.440
And of course, I talked to my lawyer this morning.
00:24:25.680
This is my first public statement after it happened.
00:24:28.700
We are filing an application for a judicial review.
00:24:36.480
But, you know, when I was desperate and I didn't have any lawyer at all, my first day in front
00:24:43.200
of the tribunal, the only representative I had was Carrie Simpson.
1.00
00:24:49.160
And now all sorts of law firms are willing to represent me and take me on.
00:24:58.440
But, you know, when one thing I was down and out, James Kitchen believed in me and I'm sticking with him.
00:25:05.520
But there are others that are going to jump in and help.
00:25:08.560
Lisa Bildy, who represented Amy Hamm with the Nurses Professional Association, is going to help out.
00:25:18.080
Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms may be an intervener.
00:25:27.540
So we're going to have quite a team when we head in there.
00:25:31.840
But, of course, the BC Teachers Federation will also have their buddies in there.
00:25:36.240
And in the past, they've been joined by EGAL and probably the Attorney General of British Columbia.
00:25:58.100
So normally a judicial review of a human rights tribunal takes only about half a day in court.
00:26:03.620
But this file is so massive, there's so much material, that my lawyer thinks it could be up to three days.
00:26:18.620
The second day, the BC Human Rights Tribunal will argue their side of it.
00:26:23.060
And the third day will be a chance for each of the interveners to put in their views on the matter.
00:26:33.680
The only thing that the court looks at is if there was any errors in law.
00:26:40.420
And I was an officer of the court for 25 years.
00:26:44.560
I could not believe the legal shoddiness that the tribunal used.
00:27:01.460
They made arbitrary decisions that had no basis in law or there was no rule book or precedent set.
00:27:12.600
And we could tell that they had already made up their mind what they were going to decide.
00:27:19.140
Now, I want to circle back to some of what seemed outrageous as part of how they came to their decision.
00:27:29.460
The BC Human Rights Tribunal says that if a person elects not to believe that gender identity is separate from sex assigned at birth,
00:27:40.500
then they do not believe in trans people and that this is a form of existential denialism.
00:27:55.380
I said very clearly, there are only two sexes, male and female.
0.99
00:28:02.120
And they said, well, then you are denying the existence of the many other genders and the non-binary people who are neither gender.
00:28:11.420
And I said, no, I believe they exist, but I think they're deluded.
00:28:25.040
Now, what's interesting is it's exactly what the President of the United States believes and has said publicly.
00:28:35.860
And I would say that 90% of all ordinary Canadians would believe the same.
00:28:45.060
They are on the cutting edge of a new social justice movement.
00:28:52.320
And they are putting people's feelings as more important than physical safety or physical well-being.
00:29:04.060
Keeping people's feelings safe is the most important thing for them.
00:29:13.840
That's because there's a protest happening outside of an event that's different.
00:29:21.400
When I asked the protesters, why are they protesting this Action for Canada event?
00:29:30.240
Well, you said you were here kind of in part because you wanted me to talk to Mr. Neufeld.
00:29:36.680
I wanted to ask him how is he going to pay the $750,000 ruling?
00:29:41.200
Well, I'll have to wait until the end of the month when my ship comes in.
00:30:00.280
Like 11 years ago when someone said, hey, what's your gender?
00:30:07.100
And now the ruling is saying, you know, if you believe that identity is attached to biological sex, you're denying trans people.
00:30:23.280
How I feel is that it's a fair judgment because the actual fine is only a portion of that $750.
00:30:31.060
He cost the court in time and money and dragged it out.
00:30:37.700
He could have come out of this a lot less under in debt than he will be.
00:30:42.820
Do you believe we should have the right to go through courts and things like that or to have free speech?
00:30:50.740
But I also believe in showing up when you're supposed to and not dragging things out.
00:30:56.040
And I think when you hold, when you are an elected official, you have a responsibility to your constituents.
00:31:04.660
And that's, as an average citizen, say what you want.
00:31:07.680
When you're an elected official, you're serving somebody else.
00:31:11.140
She was basically saying you deserve to pay every cent of that penalty because you've dragged things through the process.
00:31:22.620
They'd have one hearing and then we'd have to wait a year and a half for them to get back to it.
00:31:27.520
Frankly, since this diversity, inclusion and equity thing has happened in all the human resources offices,
00:31:37.860
the Human Rights Tribunal is absolutely swamped with the most crazy and bizarre complaints.
00:31:46.840
I'm sure you're familiar with Jessica Yanov or Jessica Simpson and the crazy complaints that they accepted.
00:32:03.780
Two of those complaints are actually against Rebel News.
00:32:06.920
Jessica Serenity Simpson, also known formally as Jonathan Yaniv,
00:32:13.280
had already had the attempt to say that what we reported on this individual, a very violent individual,
00:32:21.880
a criminal, convicted many times but slap on the wrist, assaulted our reporters, threatened my family.
00:32:32.700
And in a real court, the court said, no, there's nothing defamatory here.
00:32:40.600
So now this individual is getting to go through this court that's giving you this huge penalty
00:32:49.560
And what's so crazy about that is Section 7 of BC's Human Rights Code,
00:32:54.660
for which Simpson is coming at us for, doesn't say whether or not we're getting the facts right.
00:33:00.960
It's about whether or not anything we report on an individual who's been, for example,
00:33:05.620
sexually inappropriate and text message with minors.
00:33:09.180
If we report on something that could cause, you know, people to be hateful or have contempt,
00:33:19.820
What do you think is the main issue over and above the massive penalty,
00:33:25.220
but the fact that you could get hit so hard from simply having a belief that was very mainstream,
00:33:39.040
There's no way I can, in my lifetime, ever come up with three quarters of a million dollars.
00:33:46.520
And there are a lot of people that believe the same as me, that own a house, have a good job.
00:33:52.400
And since the precedent has already been set, you get nailed with three quarters of a million dollars.
00:33:58.080
That will scare a lot of people into shutting up and not speaking out against this gender ideology.
1.00
00:34:04.680
I feel like I've sort of been called to do this.
00:34:08.960
I could have shortened the process by settling out of court.
00:34:12.260
But what I would have to do would be to lie, to say that I was wrong.
00:34:20.300
Initially, the complaint was a little different, you know.
00:34:23.280
Initially, the complaint was that I was creating a toxic work environment for their workers.
00:34:28.080
Well, anybody who knows anything about how school districts work, trustees don't go into classrooms and tell teachers what to do and criticize them for their gender behavior or whatever.
00:34:45.040
And once the policy is done, we hand it to the superintendent and he makes sure that it happens in the classroom.
00:34:57.340
And so there's no way I could have contributed to a toxic environment in the classroom.
00:35:02.380
And then about three years in, they decided to amend their complaint that I was guilty of hate speech.
00:35:11.400
And of course, the hate speech, the only way they can define that is by me saying there's only male and female.
00:35:19.820
So they've done a very good job of scaring a lot of people into silence.
00:35:24.480
But on the other hand, they've stirred up a lot of people to agree with me.
00:35:29.240
I have never heard so many people publicly say that they agree with me and publicly make statements on social media and meetings with opinions that agree with me.
00:35:46.240
It's important that I appeal the decision and make every effort to overturn it because there are going to be a lot of people after coming after me.
00:36:02.440
It's not just, I'm not doing it just for Barry Neufeld.
00:36:09.440
One of the reasons they feel so strongly about this is that many adult people who have transitioned,
00:36:20.380
they think that I was always intended to be a girl, but I was born with male sex parts.
00:36:31.480
And what they need to do is find children that will say earlier and earlier, I was born in the wrong body.
00:36:39.640
And that's why they keep pushing this gender ideology on younger and younger children.
1.00
00:36:45.200
It's to make themselves feel better about themselves that, you know, it wasn't the trauma or all the other things that happened to me in my life.
00:36:57.460
And so I need to find some little kids that, that also think that they were born this way.
00:37:03.840
I do not believe that we, anybody is born in the wrong body.
00:37:08.740
I believe in a creator and I believe that God doesn't make mistakes.
00:37:13.700
And if you're born with boys parts, you're always going to be a boy.
00:37:17.880
If you're born with girls parts, you're always going to be a girl.
1.00
00:37:22.720
And would you have done anything differently now after receiving this penalty?
00:37:27.960
I've made a few mistakes along the way, but they minor and they're off the topic.
00:37:32.880
When I first heard about this in the summer of 2017, I knew I could not abide it.
00:37:40.660
I knew I had to speak out and I knew I could never back down.
00:37:45.140
Um, I was, uh, offered, uh, um, a settlement and I was covered by indemnity insurance.
00:37:55.240
All I would had to do is say publicly, uh, an apology and say that I was wrong.
00:38:03.040
I just couldn't feel that I couldn't live with myself.
00:38:07.220
If I told a public lie like that, I talked to, um, my lawyer, James Kitchen this morning.
00:38:12.620
Uh, it's the first time we had a chance to talk since the decision came down and, uh, we're
00:38:18.800
both very determined that we're going to apply for a judicial review.
00:38:22.720
That's kind of like an appeal and it may take as long as three days.
00:38:28.440
Um, uh, James will, um, argue on my behalf, but also there's some, um, freedom organizations
00:38:38.540
Uh, one of them is the free speech union represented by Elisa Bildi and, um, also the justice center
00:38:48.540
I've worked with them in the past near the beginning of my troubles and the democracy fund.
00:38:55.580
And we're hoping we can, uh, um, interest some other, um, organizations that stand up for
00:39:07.720
You said it's very important that you try and appeal this and you just had a talk with
00:39:13.900
You said, this is your first statement that you're going to make.
00:39:19.820
Well, um, you were there the day that I turned myself into a court on another matter.
00:39:28.560
Uh, and that stirred up so much interest that, uh, donations started to come in and my lawyer
00:39:35.420
is completely paid off for everything he's done so far.
00:39:38.840
And we have a few thousand dollars extra for this appeal.
00:39:42.680
Um, I've been very humbled by, uh, billboard Chris.
00:39:47.580
He's been tweeting out the, uh, uh, how to support me.
00:39:51.460
Uh, there's a link on my webpage, which is Barry Neufeld, all one word, B-A-R-R-Y-N-E-U-F-E-L-D.com.
00:40:00.620
And on there, you'll find a link to the Rights and Freedoms Fundraising Society.
00:40:06.880
And, uh, uh, you can, um, you can e-transfer money.
00:40:18.940
Or, uh, I don't really want the money passing through my hands because I'm not doing this
00:40:25.840
I'm doing this to try and protect future generations from this toxic ideology.
00:40:36.180
And also, if you have it in you and you want to protect our journalism in the same area with