Rebel News Podcast - EZRA LEVANT ｜ For Danielle Smith to succeed, she has to stand in her truth

00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. I'm on the road today in Edmonton. I'm out here because we had a great

00:00:04.040 premiere of our documentary, Ungovernable, last night in Edmonton. But I'm sticking around

00:00:08.580 because this weekend is the annual general meeting of the United Conservative Party.

00:00:13.080 That's the party that just elected a new premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith. 0.78

00:00:16.860 So I've got some thoughts on her first few days as premier. And then I've got an interview

00:00:21.420 with Drea Humphrey, who was just back from the World Health Organization summit meeting

00:00:26.860 in Berlin. That's very exciting. But before I get to the show, let me invite you to become a

00:00:31.860 subscriber to Rebel News Plus. Just go to rebelnewsplus.com. Click subscribe. It's eight

00:00:37.460 bucks a month. You get my show every weeknight. Plus, we have four weekly shows. Altogether,

00:00:43.000 that's 36 episodes a month just for eight smackers. And we need your help because that's how we pay

00:00:48.800 our bills. We don't get any help from Trudeau. We never take government money. We rely on you.

00:00:52.880 So please go to rebelnewsplus.com. All right, here's today's show.

00:00:58.200 Brand new Alberta premier, Danielle Smith, is already in choppy waters. Will she sink or float? 0.97

00:01:04.540 It's October 20th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.

00:01:07.880 You're fighting for freedom!

00:01:10.820 Shame on you, you censorious bug! 0.96

00:01:13.880 I am back in Edmonton. I was in Calgary not too long ago when Danielle Smith was selected the leader

00:01:28.640 of the United Conservative Party, taking over from Jason Kenney, who incredibly didn't even finish his

00:01:35.780 first term as premier, going from the leading conservative politician in Canada, one thrown out

00:01:41.320 by his own party. Danielle Smith squeaked out a majority. It was a ranked ballot system. In the end,

00:01:48.540 she got about 54% of the party's support and her closest successor, 46%. That's not an overwhelming win

00:01:57.520 like Pierre Polyev had federally, but then again, there were seven candidates. Danielle Smith was also

00:02:02.660 an outsider. She was not a sitting MLA, and it'll be tricky for her to negotiate being premier of a

00:02:10.900 caucus. It is not hers. Those MLAs were picked by Jason Kenney. The cabinet ministers were picked

00:02:16.960 by Jason Kenney. Many of the programs that Danielle Smith has railed against were implemented 1.00

00:02:22.520 by the very MLAs. And cabinet ministers, she now has to cobble together into her own party. It reminds

00:02:30.840 me a little bit of when Stockwell Day succeeded Preston Manning to lead the Reform Party of Canada.

00:02:36.600 Actually, then it was called the Canadian Alliance. Preston Manning never in a million years thought

00:02:41.380 he would lose, and he couldn't stomach the loss to Stockwell Day. Again, an outsider who was not part

00:02:46.520 of caucus, and soon there was a bit of a civil war against him. Danielle Smith has to keep that party 1.00

00:02:52.220 together as she gets ready to fight Rachel Notley, the NDP former premier who actually thinks she can

00:02:58.880 be returned to power. It has been a choppy time for Danielle Smith. Now, some of that is expected.

00:03:05.860 Of course, the media party hates her. Of course, the NDP war room and their proxies and the big labor 0.97

00:03:11.920 unions hate her. Of course, of course, of course. But it's the same way for Pierre Paglia federally.

00:03:17.340 Of course, the liberal party and the media party hate him. But he seems to be more ready for the battle

00:03:22.540 than Danielle Smith has been. Now, I like Danielle Smith. I have had some qualms with her over the 0.99

00:03:27.900 years. But of the seven candidates, I felt she was the strongest and the one who would be the most

00:03:33.620 caring and devoted to Alberta's interests. I think that was one of the reasons why Jason Kenney

00:03:39.240 failed as premier. Number one, of course, he enforced brutal lockdowns, including against

00:03:45.140 truckers and against Christian churches and business people like Chris Scott. But also,

00:03:50.500 he didn't stand up for the province of Alberta. I think Kenny was always looking for the next chance

00:03:55.220 where maybe he would run for prime minister in five years. And so he was always thinking,

00:03:58.920 what do I do now in Alberta? How will it look in five years when I'm trying to explain myself

00:04:04.020 to the CBC? I don't want to be too Alberta first. I don't want to be too critical of Canada.

00:04:10.180 So Danielle Smith, to me, met those two checkboxes. She was the most freedom-oriented of the seven 0.99

00:04:15.560 candidates and the most pro-Alberta. So how is she doing? Has either of those issues blown up on

00:04:22.780 her? Well, you'd be the judge. The first thing was Danielle Smith made a statement in a press 0.98

00:04:29.560 conference saying that unvaccinated people were subject to the worst discrimination that she has

00:04:34.820 observed in her lifetime. Here, I'll let you see her say it herself. It was quite a press conference.

00:04:39.120 Take a look. The community that faced the most restrictions on their freedoms in the last year

00:04:45.780 were those who made a choice not to be vaccinated. I don't think I've ever experienced a situation

00:04:51.500 in my lifetime where a person was fired from their job or not allowed to watch their kids play hockey

00:04:59.020 or not allowed to go visit a loved one in long-term care or hospital or not allowed to go get on a

00:05:04.920 plane to either go across the country to see family or even travel across the border. So they

00:05:10.720 have been the most discriminated against group that I've ever witnessed in my lifetime. That's a pretty 1.00

00:05:16.180 extreme level of discrimination that we have seen. I don't take away any of the discrimination that I've

00:05:22.060 seen in those other groups that you mentioned. But this has been an extraordinary time in the last

00:05:27.940 year in particular. And I want people to know that I find that unacceptable, that we are not going to

00:05:33.860 create a segregated society on the basis of a medical choice. Now, I happen to think that that's

00:05:40.100 exactly true. She didn't say the worst civil liberties bonfire in global history or even in

00:05:46.060 Canada's history. I mean, look at the Second World War and the Holocaust. If you look at atrocities

00:05:51.480 throughout history, of course, the lockdowns of the last two years don't stack up. But in her lifetime,

00:05:57.260 I mean, we've had civil rights in Canada. We've had gay rights in Canada for, what, 20 years or so.

00:06:03.220 We've had, in terms of equal marriage. I mean, what civil liberties, atrocities or discriminations

00:06:10.400 are there in Canada for women, for visible minorities, for gay people in her lifetime that

00:06:18.420 are comparable to unvaccinated people being fired from their work, banned from the public square,

00:06:25.400 banned from restaurants, told they can't get on airplanes and just the lockdowns themselves,

00:06:30.600 limiting weddings and funerals, closing churches. What Danielle Smith said was 100% right. 0.99

00:06:39.140 And her promise to add unvaccinated people to the list of protected grounds in the Human Rights 0.96

00:06:44.380 Code, I think is brilliant. The people who jumped on that are the same people who were the human rights

00:06:51.820 abusers. If you accuse lockdown extremists and public health extremists and hypochondriacs and

00:07:00.080 Munchausen by proxy public officers of being human rights violators, don't be surprised if they squawk at

00:07:08.300 you for it. Don't be surprised if for the first time anyone's pushed back at them in two years,

00:07:13.180 they're going to roar an outrage. It was expected that they would object to her categorizing their

00:07:21.180 public policy as discrimination. Of course they did. That is not surprising at all. What was surprising

00:07:27.440 and a little bit disappointing to me is that Danielle Smith bent the knee. She apologized and reached out 0.76

00:07:34.220 and said she rededicates herself to anti-racism and tolerance. Well, what's that got to do with the

00:07:40.100 fact that unvaccinated people were, as a matter of fact, banned from things that black people or

00:07:46.440 women or other minorities were not banned from. Now, black and other minorities who were unvaccinated 1.00

00:07:53.120 had the same bullying. You know, when I look back at the sweep of Canadian history, I think,

00:07:58.140 for example, the Japanese internment in British Columbia, which was atrocious, but it was more limited

00:08:03.060 than, and it was both in terms of geography and class. That was an abomination to human rights. 0.90

00:08:12.240 There were other abominations to human rights, but none of those were in our lifetime. That was almost

00:08:16.600 a hundred years ago. What Danielle Smith said was factually true, and it was a reasonable opinion.

00:08:24.500 More to the point, it's something that she essentially campaigned on. Of course the establishment 0.69

00:08:30.320 rejected it, but the fact that she apologized so quickly worries me, not just for the substance of

00:08:35.780 it, but can she stand up to these vested interests? I'm pleased to say that Danielle Smith sacked the 1.00

00:08:43.040 public health officer, Dina Hinshaw. Here's a clip of that. Good. So she's not afraid to take on the 0.99

00:08:49.140 public health officer. She said she'll take on Alberta Health Services. Great. But can you not take

00:08:54.420 on the commentariat who squawks because you point out the truth? The emperor has no clothes. It was a gross

00:09:00.100 violation of our human rights. Don't take my word for it. Take it from the deposed premier, Jason

00:09:05.200 Kenney, who when asked by Rebel News reporters about vaccine passports said those would violate

00:09:10.740 the law. Here is Jason Kenney saying it would be a civil rights violation before he went along

00:09:16.340 and violated those civil rights. Well, it happened once, but then it happened a second time. Danielle

00:09:23.820 Smith, when she was a journalist, gave her opinions on the war in Ukraine. Now, it's a very complicated

00:09:29.620 situation, and it's somewhat dangerous, I suppose, for lay people to give their opinions on the subject,

00:09:35.680 but she was a lay person. She was not premier. She was a journalist. It was in a call-in show.

00:09:41.000 And she said two things. She said, she thought, and she made these comments on TV, and she tweeted them.

00:09:48.380 She suggested that Ukraine perhaps ought to remain neutral, sort of like Finland. It's right next to Russia. 0.97

00:09:56.340 It doesn't want to be dominated by Russia, but it would be perhaps too provocative to join NATO.

00:10:01.980 Now, does that sound like an extreme opinion? Well, it could be, but that just happens to be the opinion

00:10:06.200 of Henry Kissinger, perhaps the wisest or most experienced, you don't have to call him wise, but the

00:10:12.620 most experienced diplomat still living, an advisor to various presidents. That's the view of many

00:10:19.440 UK former diplomats. That's probably how this war is going to end, some sort of military neutrality

00:10:27.540 for Ukraine. That's what Elon Musk is talking about. It's a legitimate point of view. To have Ukraine join

00:10:34.500 NATO right abutting Russia would probably cause Russia to continue its invasion. I'm not saying

00:10:41.260 that Danielle Smith is right, but I'm saying it's a legitimate point of view to have, especially for a

00:10:46.040 journalist. She also mused about the fact that certain parts of Ukraine, especially in the east,

00:10:52.120 there are ethnic Russians there, some of whom actually would prefer to be part of Russia.

00:10:58.240 Now, I'm not saying that the elections, the referendums in those parts were fair and free

00:11:05.640 elections. I mean, I don't have information about that, but even in referendums when Ukraine seceded

00:11:14.140 from the former Soviet Union, those parts of those territories had lots of ethnic Russians who

00:11:19.940 indicated they would rather be with Russia. Many of Ukraine's borders have changed over the years.

00:11:25.500 Many of the cities and towns have both Ukrainian names and Russian names and Polish names.

00:11:30.240 Borders have changed over the years. Again, I'm not saying that Danielle Smith's point is necessarily

00:11:34.620 right, but there's enough factual truth to it that it's a valid opinion to have. Now, that's

00:11:40.260 was her opinion as a private journalist. The premier of Alberta is not a foreign policy expert. Foreign

00:11:46.040 policy resides completely with the federal government. But here's my point again.

00:11:52.000 She was pounced on by gotcha journalists, including Justin Ling, an Ottawa freelancer who

00:11:59.060 makes up claims all the time. He, for example, famously wrote that the trucker convoy had weapons

00:12:06.340 in their vehicles. That was later proven to be disinformation. The police said he made it up.

00:12:11.960 He is a professional gotcha journalist based in Ottawa who writes a smear on an obscure blog

00:12:19.180 criticizing Danielle Smith. But that was enough to provoke a chain of outrage that, again, caused

00:12:25.080 Danielle Smith to issue a groveling apology that you can see here. Now, was Danielle Smith right or wrong

00:12:33.000 on both of these issues? Well, I'm sympathetic to her view on the unvaccinated question. I think it's

00:12:37.700 without a doubt that in the modern era, in our lifetimes, no one has been discriminated as much as

00:12:42.860 unvaccinated people. It's just a fact. Black people are not. Women are not. Gay people are not. Maybe in 1.00

00:12:48.220 centuries past, but not in our lifetimes. Danielle Smith was right. And as to the Ukraine question, I 0.56

00:12:54.180 simply think there must be some peaceful outcome. I do not want nuclear war. And we can't even have a

00:12:59.320 conventional war that goes on perpetually that grinds down the infrastructure and the people

00:13:04.180 of Ukraine. I know pundits want it and maybe arms dealers want it, but how many Ukrainians are going 1.00

00:13:09.740 to die for this Western proxy war? I am opposed to the invasion by Vladimir Putin. Obviously, I believe

00:13:16.080 in the territorial integrity of every country, including Ukraine. I think Vladimir Putin is a former KGB

00:13:22.400 agent. He's likely a murderer. He's an authoritarian quasi dictator, and he's an imperialist. I'm opposed to 1.00

00:13:29.020 his invasion of Ukraine full stop. But that doesn't mean that there should be total war until a total

00:13:36.640 unconditional surrender of the Russian Federation. I just don't think that's going to happen. And when

00:13:42.860 you're fighting against a conventional army, it's one thing. You can beat Russia's conventional army 0.80

00:13:47.960 with American weapons, but he's got nuclear bombs, and he's talked about using them. I think we need to 0.99

00:13:54.200 have some sort of diplomatic outcome to this unfortunate and outrageous war. I think that's

00:14:00.100 what Danielle Smith was trying to say. She may be right or she may be wrong, but for her to issue a

00:14:07.040 groveling apology as premier for something that she talked about as a private journalist is absurd.

00:14:14.820 And if she continues doing that, if she continues accepting the premise that her critics are operating

00:14:21.520 in good faith, that she as premier has to justify a decade worth of private journalism, she will not

00:14:28.660 succeed. If she continues to bend the knee and to give credit to every accusation against her, it's 0.75

00:14:35.500 simply she'll do nothing else. The vaccine enforcers, the media party, the NDP, the health establishment,

00:14:45.520 any establishment she criticizes, they're always going to object to her. She has to embrace

00:14:51.480 that and relish it and point to it as proof that she's over the target. If there's something she

00:14:57.320 wrote six months or six years or ten years ago in her journalism that looks like it's embarrassing

00:15:03.840 today, she should say, look, that's when I was a journalist in the private sector. Now I speak for

00:15:09.020 all Albertans as premier. I'm going to limit my comments to those things that have to do with my job

00:15:13.700 as premier, and I may have a different position as premier than I had as an independent journalist.

00:15:18.920 I think that's a believable answer. Many journalists go into politics, and it's absurd to go through

00:15:25.560 20 years of opinion columns and hold it around the neck of a premier, especially if it's frankly a

00:15:32.080 mainstream opinion. I think Danielle Smith has to change her approach to issues management. I think if 0.94

00:15:40.240 she allows herself to dance to the tune of any bad faith journalist or NDP critic, I think she's going

00:15:47.640 to be on the defense of so much, and she will project an aura of weakness so much that she might

00:15:54.200 actually do the unthinkable and for the second time give way to Rachel Notley as premier to put 1.00

00:16:01.600 Alberta back under the NDP. Look, I'm here in Edmonton in part because last night we had a great

00:16:07.540 unspooling of our documentary called Ungovernable. It's about Alberta independence, and I'm here to stay

00:16:14.900 for a few days because the United Conservative Party is having its annual general meeting, and I want to

00:16:20.220 take the temperature of that group and see what people have to say. I think it's important that

00:16:25.060 Alberta remain free and not succumb again to the NDP. I think it's important that Alberta take its proper

00:16:30.340 place in Confederation and not just be a punching bag for Justin Trudeau and his anti-Alberta crew.

00:16:35.900 To do that, Danielle Smith needs to toughen up, and by toughen up I mean sometimes when she's attacked it's proof that she's 0.68

00:16:44.200 doing the right thing. I think she should take a page out of Pierre Polyev's book and frankly not care what the

00:16:51.420 pundits say, and if anything lean in and criticize them. If she allows the left-wing media party and the activist groups to

00:16:59.520 define her agenda, I'm afraid she's going to lose. I'll keep you posted on this story in the weeks and

00:17:06.520 months ahead, and I'll let you know how the AGM goes. Stay with me. We've got news ahead from our

00:17:11.500 reporters who just came back from Berlin, Germany.

00:17:14.280 Well, I am in Edmonton on my ongoing journey, but that's no journey at all compared to the

00:17:30.640 global jaunt taken by three on-air rebel journalists and two support journalists. We had a team of five

00:17:37.760 people who went to the World Health Summit held in Berlin, Germany. What's the World Health Summit?

00:17:45.500 Well, it is the meeting co-sponsored by the United Nations World Health Organization with delegates from

00:17:52.620 around the world. These are the people who basically were behind the global pandemic response,

00:17:59.420 the vaccine mandates, the lockdowns, and none of them are elected by you. None of them are

00:18:07.360 accountable to you. It's part of that globalist, undemocratic, deep state, the permanent bureaucracy.

00:18:14.460 This is the group that China installed Tedros Adhanom as the head of. He's not a medical doctor,

00:18:21.700 but he calls himself doctor. And these are the folks who set the international agenda for the

00:18:27.660 lockdowns. They have not had this global health summit meeting in three years because of the pandemic.

00:18:33.920 This is their first get-together. And we thought this would be a very interesting event for Rebel News

00:18:40.320 to cover, even though it's halfway around the world. And in my mind, Drea Humphrey, Alexa Lavoie,

00:18:47.220 and Tamara Ugolini are the Rebel News reporters most passionately associated with this story. They're the

00:18:53.180 ones who have covered not only the lockdowns, but questions about the medical science, questions about

00:18:59.160 the vaccines themselves, questions that are very difficult to ask in an era of censorship. And I knew

00:19:05.160 that not only would these reporters show more skepticism and curiosity and have more knowledge

00:19:10.400 than anyone in what I call the media party, I also knew that if any journalist even attended this event,

00:19:17.260 they would just be stenographers, repeating press releases and not asking tough questions at all.

00:19:23.740 And you know what? I think I was right. Joining me now is Tamara Ugolini, our senior editor,

00:19:29.540 who just got back last night at 11 p.m. returning from Berlin, Germany, where she was with the rest of

00:19:37.020 the team. Tamara, great to see you again and welcome back to Canada. You look pretty refreshed given the

00:19:42.760 enormous journey you're on and the jet lag. Great to see you back here. First of all, before we get into

00:19:48.700 the details, tell me your impressions of the trip. If you're like me, you really weren't traveling,

00:19:54.280 well, because you were on Trudeau's no-fly list. So I'm guessing this was your first trip outside the

00:19:59.180 country in years. It was, yes, indeed. I was actually quite surprised at how smoothly the travel

00:20:06.620 went from Pearson and then we flew into Amsterdam. I flew anyway. We had all different flight paths,

00:20:14.300 but I flew into Amsterdam and even there that you heard a lot of rumblings and grumblings with

00:20:20.100 travelers that that hub was very congested and there was many time delays. I had some slight delay,

00:20:26.680 but I was very surprised at how seamless and smooth the travel seemed to go. But of course,

00:20:31.980 I wasn't traveling in midst of the chaos. And by the time I returned, all of the arrive can and travel

00:20:37.520 related restrictions have been scrapped. So I was pleasantly surprised at just how quickly I could

00:20:44.560 mosey on through, especially without any checked baggage. I think that made a huge difference there.

00:20:49.720 Well, I'm glad it was easy. I can tell you that, you know, with the masks and the arrive can app, which I

00:20:55.240 never used, I never filled out. You know, I'm just so glad that's removed. And Canada was really one of the 1.00

00:21:02.180 last countries to remove those things. One last question on your travels. On the plane, in Amsterdam, in

00:21:08.880 Germany, are they, are people still mask maniacs? Are people still crazy? Or was Canada really the last one 0.92

00:21:16.520 to wise up to that stuff?

00:21:18.840 So there's two parts to that. On the plane, barely anyone was masked. There were a few true believers and one person

00:21:24.800 with, it might have been a gas mask. I'm not even sure what sort of technical high-grade mask this one

00:21:32.100 individual was wearing, but for the most part, no one was wearing masks. And that includes in

00:21:36.800 Amsterdam and in Germany. However, in Germany itself on public transit, so not including flights for

00:21:44.200 whatever reason, but on the tram itself and, and, and supposed to be in taxis and Ubers as well,

00:21:50.660 you're supposed to wear masks. We did not. One, there was one incident where the police came on board to

00:21:57.980 enforce and check the mask mandate. And, you know, they just, they just passed around masks to the

00:22:03.240 five of us who weren't wearing masks. And, you know, they pulled out, they pulled five masks out

00:22:08.320 of their pockets and handled them and opened them up and then gave them to us as though this was supposed

00:22:12.900 to be, you know, hygienic and clean and scientific. And then we put them on and I, I have a mask exemption.

00:22:20.380 I didn't have it with me, but I do have a formal medical mask exemption.

00:22:24.260 So I just put the mask on underneath my nose and, you know, they were quick to, to move on. So you

00:22:29.840 can kind of see that there are still some restrictions that remain in place that some

00:22:35.480 people are really clinging to. And for whatever reason in Germany, it's this idea that on the

00:22:39.920 tram is when you have to mask up, but even there, um, they repeated over the loudspeaker, but I would

00:22:46.920 say only approximately 90, 80 to 90% of the people frequenting the train itself were wearing masks at any

00:22:53.600 given time. You know, it's very clearly a classes thing. I mean, uh, the working classes can wear 0.99

00:22:58.920 the masks and those in business class don't have to. All right. Well, it's good to chat with you

00:23:02.960 about the journey, but of course the journey was to serve a purpose. And that was to go

00:23:06.520 to this world health summit. Tell me a little bit about that. Uh, what I know about the world

00:23:12.380 health organization is the UN agency, China basically runs it through their, uh, boss, 0.97

00:23:18.500 Dr. Tedros. I call him doctor with little asterisk cause he's not a medical doctor. Imagine being the

00:23:23.620 boss, the world health organization and not actually being a medical doctor. Um, so basically

00:23:29.120 countries around the world have delegates there. So, and this was the first meeting of the delegates

00:23:33.740 and I presume the pandemic was on the forefront of their mind. That's all my guesses. You were

00:23:37.760 there. Tell me what it was actually like. That's right. I mean, the, the amount of, of topics

00:23:42.520 and information that they cover over three solid days of conferences. And then in addition to the

00:23:47.900 main program event, uh, which sees countless amounts of conferences happening every day, some,

00:23:54.220 many of them at the same time each day. So there's a big overlap there, but there's the keynote speakers.

00:24:00.720 Then there's the sort of side speeches that happen or side conferences. And then there's also an

00:24:06.080 additional number of side events. So for any one person to cover this conference in its

00:24:12.440 entirety would be next to impossible. I'm really glad that we had three journalists on the ground

00:24:17.980 there and two videographers, but even that you, you could never make it into each one of these

00:24:23.340 conferences and each one are about an hour and a half in length. And that's to say, if they don't

00:24:27.620 go over, which I find that typically they do. So the, the basis of, um, this particular summit,

00:24:35.080 and I have the booklet here that they were handing out, which, I mean, if we want to talk about

00:24:40.020 climate change and saving the trees, uh, they had hundreds of these books on the tables that they

00:24:47.320 were giving away has all the program outline, the speakers and the various topics, huge components

00:24:53.940 here, of course, are the digitization of health, um, the food security, energy, and a future pandemic

00:25:02.560 response. So that pandemic preparedness plan. But one thing that I noticed that was really interesting,

00:25:07.140 and this is another separate printout that they had again, hundreds of these, um, is this little

00:25:11.880 magazine here. So it's called health, a political choice. And it's also about investing in health for

00:25:18.100 all. So there was a huge financial component in this particular summit research and development,

00:25:24.080 big pharma, Moderna, Pfizer, they played a key role in many of these conferences. And again,

00:25:30.440 as you've mentioned before, Ezra, a vast majority of the speakers are unelected random bureaucrats or

00:25:38.340 lobbyists or sales representatives that come together. And it's really an opportunity for

00:25:46.120 them to rub shoulders with one another. So this isn't so much necessarily about the conferences

00:25:51.000 themselves that take place with the delegated and designated speakers, but rather the mingling

00:25:55.480 opportunities that happen in between. And so when we first arrived, we recognized that the security

00:26:03.280 was very, um, intense, but there was some wiggle room there. So there were several protests that took place

00:26:09.500 throughout the duration of the three days. Um, prior to the kickoff of the events, there was some

00:26:14.020 individuals protesting Tedros specifically, and some claims against him, um, in, in regards to some

00:26:21.840 ethnic genocide and ethnic cleansing that he's being accused of by the Tigre people. And then there was

00:26:30.640 just other individuals protesting the World Health Organization as a whole. And those protests took

00:26:35.680 place very small numbers every day. But on the first day, the kickoff of the World Health Summit,

00:26:41.700 there was a far left radical group that infiltrated the front of the, of Hotel Berlin. And they protested,

00:26:50.460 I would say there was approximately 30, 30 to 40, maybe 50 at the very most individuals. And so they glued

00:26:58.620 themselves to both the windows of the entrance and the pavement out front. They swiftly, uh, glued posters

00:27:06.460 and various, um, information posters onto also the windows of the hotel. And at least one protester

00:27:16.820 infiltrated the building and pulled the fire alarm on three separate occasions until they were finally

00:27:21.460 able to locate this individual. And a bunch of them were subsequently arrested. Uh, so after that took

00:27:28.820 place, the security became much more tightened up and, uh, there was a heavy police presence, German police,

00:27:36.260 and a lot more strict monitoring of the building itself.

00:27:39.460 So we knew that it would be difficult to get into the summit, but we didn't want to just watch from

00:27:47.060 the sidelines. You know, previously I'd covered, um, the World Health Assembly that took place in the

00:27:52.100 spring of this year. And all I could do was watch the live streams digitally from afar. And, you know,

00:27:58.500 they say some, some very outlandish things that are were noteworthy to report on. However, being in

00:28:06.740 there, so we were finally able to get inside the building and, and be very stealth in our presence

00:28:12.260 there. And that was only made possible by booking a room at this swanky Hotel Berlin for hundreds of

00:28:18.500 dollars just for the one night. And because of that reservation, we were able to come into the

00:28:25.460 building and, and truly be and mingle in like the top 1%. It was an extremely exhilarating experience

00:28:34.740 and no one was any wiser to our presence there. You've said so many interesting things. The first

00:28:41.060 thing is that when you said there were protesters for one second, I thought, oh, maybe it's people

00:28:46.180 who were protesting the lockdowns. Maybe it's people who were protesting the forced vaccines, but no,

00:28:51.300 it was just some rent a mob climate change activists. Is that what you're saying? Like

00:28:55.940 it wasn't even on point with the, that's crazy. Although there were, as you say, that those

00:29:00.820 ethnic people who claimed that Tedros committed racial atrocities in his home country. That's 0.98

00:29:07.140 very interesting that they were there too. And one thing it's that I think it's important to note

00:29:11.540 about these protesters is that they basically stated that the World Health Organization and this global,

00:29:17.780 this World Health Summit was not discussing climate change and that if they had access to the program,

00:29:24.900 which anyone can access online through the World Health Summit website, they do discuss climate

00:29:29.300 change quite in depth. And there are many conferences that, that are centered around the topic of climate

00:29:34.580 change. And one thing that they don't discuss, however, which is where I started to ask some questions

00:29:40.500 to both some of the attendees and some people outside when, before we were kicked off the property on the

00:29:44.980 third day, is why they aren't discussing the harms that the policies that the World Health Organization

00:29:51.780 has instituted and put the hammer down onto their member states with, why those failed policy pandemic

00:29:59.620 response plans aren't being discussed at all. No one seems to be discussing the harms caused by lockdowns,

00:30:06.100 the harms done to children by masking them indiscriminately, and the increasingly alarming

00:30:12.980 scale of excess deaths we're seeing on a global scale.

00:30:18.740 I just want to get back to, you mentioned pharma salesmen. I can only imagine, I mean, I'm here in

00:30:23.540 Edmonton because I'm going to a political get-together, an annual general meeting of a political party.

00:30:28.740 And it's been a little while since I've been to those, but there's always hospitality suites where

00:30:34.100 this campaign or that lobby group spends thousands of dollars basically giving free hors d'oeuvres and

00:30:39.700 liquor to any political people just to bend their ears and get some influence and win friends. And, you

00:30:46.180 know, you really feel the salesmanship at these conferences. And to your point, there's the formal

00:30:53.220 events, but then there's the mingling and the parties. I want to ask you, because you made me think

00:30:58.420 about political parties and how everyone's trying to schmooze and lobby them. Pfizer, Moderna, the

00:31:05.220 other vaccine companies that have made tens of billions of dollars. Did they sponsor things? Did

00:31:10.580 they have hospitality suites? Were they giving away gift bags and swag? Or were they actually even

00:31:17.140 embedded in the conference itself with formal speeches? What was the role of big pharma at this

00:31:22.500 gathering? So it appears to be all of the above. We have a nice photo and some generic

00:31:28.340 video capture of all of the sponsors of the event itself. And I believe on the last page of this

00:31:35.140 booklet as well, which I can send later, it outlines all of the sponsors, which includes,

00:31:40.580 as I already mentioned, heavy big pharma presence there. Some of the more high level attendees were

00:31:46.580 kept very secret. So it was funny to see actually in the event itself, there was also two classes of

00:31:51.620 citizens there. There was sort of these general attendees that could rub shoulders and schmooze and

00:31:57.220 mingle. And then there was also the high level attendees, which were kept more behind closed doors,

00:32:02.660 very secured in the far corner of the hotel in this restaurant that had been reserved out for the entire

00:32:10.260 duration of the summit that no one was able to gain access to. All of the windows were papered up,

00:32:17.140 the doors were locked, and you couldn't see who was coming or going from that space specifically.

00:32:23.140 We tried to see what that was about and perhaps get some dessert. And we were told very quickly

00:32:28.500 that this was for high level attendees only, and it was strictly closed to anyone else. So you saw the

00:32:33.780 two class of citizens there, but also there was people who I saw, you know, there was Moderna,

00:32:39.540 Pfizer, there was the Abbott, PanBO, many representatives from that testing kit company,

00:32:44.980 the test developers. There was lawyers, there was general doctors, very heavy German presence,

00:32:53.300 of course, being in Berlin. A lot of the attendees were from the German bureaucracy, German hospitals.

00:33:01.380 There was over 3,000 attendees. So it was a lot of people to take in. And again, there was some divide

00:33:10.420 there between who the general attendees were, who are still high level, but then there was the high,

00:33:15.380 high level, like Tedros and Bill Gates and Olaf Scholz, who's the chancellor.

00:33:20.340 Oh, really? Bill Gates, of course he's in.

00:33:22.420 So Bill Gates, we didn't see him directly. He was a speaker at the keynote ceremony,

00:33:28.500 the opening ceremony on the first day. And he attended via Zoom or Skype. He was digitally prepared.

00:33:36.420 So I'm not sure if he was in another room somewhere in the hotel or if he didn't end up attending at all.

00:33:42.100 But, yeah, those key players, and you can see that if you check out the opening ceremony on the very first day,

00:33:48.420 you know, those individuals up on that stage there that night, those are the ones who are pulling the strings

00:33:53.460 for the health of you and I.

00:33:56.500 Let me ask you about the interviews you did, because you say you sort of got into the room by booking.

00:34:05.300 I mean, we put you guys in an Airbnb for reasons of economy, but you guys managed to get into the hotel itself

00:34:14.420 by booking a room and then getting to mingle amongst the delegates. I can imagine that if you came across

00:34:22.500 as any reporter, they might be a little more shy to talk. And if you came across as a skeptical reporter,

00:34:28.820 they would be even more shy. Without giving too much away, because I know you've got some special

00:34:33.700 videos that we're going to be rolling out in the weeks ahead, tell me a little bit about what it

00:34:37.620 was like being a reporter at a place designed not to have public scrutiny, designed to basically be

00:34:45.860 an insider's club. And then, as you say, even within the insiders, there's sort of the inner insiders.

00:34:51.940 But what was it like just trying to ask skeptical questions of people who really have never been

00:34:58.820 asked a tough question in their life?

00:35:01.620 So it's funny because we actually took it from the lens that we were in full belief that all of these

00:35:09.060 policy responses were the best approach to use and that they saved lives and didn't cause any harms.

00:35:17.620 And so we undercover and we had two teams working undercover. So I can only speak for

00:35:24.340 what I saw myself. But we saw that feigning ignorance led to many of the people that we spoke to

00:35:34.180 really being shocked that we were ignorant or at least pretending to be ignorant to the fact that

00:35:41.380 these responses, so the lockdowns, the masking, the vaccines, were causing such great harms.

00:35:48.260 And we were pretending to be surprised when the individuals that we were speaking to

00:35:55.060 were telling us information. You know, we knew from the beginning that the lockdowns were harmful.

00:36:00.100 We're seeing the devastation to the development of children from this prolonged and indiscriminate

00:36:05.460 masking. And of course, we're seeing that the advice to never vaccinate during a pandemic was based on

00:36:12.740 science and evidence. And we don't know why that was ever disregarded. So there's a lot here. We have

00:36:18.900 three full days of coverage undercover with various conversations, with various people from

00:36:26.980 different walks of life and different expertise. And so we're basically just compiling at this point

00:36:32.980 and reviewing and seeing the easiest way to get this out to the public in the public interest in a way

00:36:38.900 that's easy to digest and concise for publishing.

00:36:44.500 Well, that's incredible. Congratulations to you. I look forward to those undercover vids. Folks,

00:36:50.580 if you want to see all the work that our Dream Team did, go to rebelwho.com. We'll still have videos

00:36:56.820 being uploaded there for the next week at least. Tamara, wrap up our segment here by

00:37:02.900 throwing to a video of your choice. Is there a video that you or your colleagues did from Berlin

00:37:08.580 already that you're particularly proud of or that you think sums up what the conference was all about

00:37:14.020 that you'd like to show our viewers? Well, it's hard to choose just one. I, of course,

00:37:19.300 will have a three days worth of a general overview coming out. So day one, day two, day three. I got the

00:37:26.820 opportunity to point a lockdown-specific question to the Director General Tedros Adaman Ghebreyesus. So

00:37:34.100 everyone should check out that really quick 25-second clip. You have to speak so quickly and on your toes

00:37:40.180 and be ready at a moment's notice. Literally, I turned around and he was there. So check out that clip.

00:37:46.420 And also, Drea, my colleague from British Columbia, Drea Humphrey, did a wonderful segment asking the

00:37:53.060 bureaucrats out front of the Berlin Hotel what they thought about Pfizer and its admittance that they

00:38:00.580 never actually tested their vaccine and its capability to reduce transmission. So that video is doing

00:38:06.900 really well and was really well done by Drea. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. So yes, as Ezra said,

00:38:12.500 please stay tuned at rebelwho.com because we have so much more to share.

00:38:17.620 Well, you've done an amazing job. Thank you for going on such a long journey. And I know you have a

00:38:21.860 wonderful family at home. I'm grateful to them for letting you leave them and go across the world

00:38:27.460 for a week. But I think you did great stuff. We will leave you with those two videos that Tamara

00:38:32.180 just described, her first brief encounter with Dr. Tedros and then the Drea video in question. And then

00:38:38.900 I'll come back with some final thoughts. Great to see you safe and sound back in Canada, Tamara. Thanks very much.

00:38:47.220 Tamara Ugolini here with Rebel News. And I'm in Germany at the swanky Berlin Hotel in Central

00:38:53.700 District, where the World Health Summit 2022 is taking place in partnership with the World Health

00:39:00.260 Organization. I've just asked the Director General of the WHO, that's the controversially appointed

00:39:06.980 bureaucrat Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a question regarding the global lockdown policies his

00:39:13.300 organization implemented at his direction. The risk of returning to lockdown remains very real if

00:39:20.980 countries do not manage the transition. The only way I was able to bring you this report was by

00:39:28.740 reserving one night at this posh hotel because our media accreditation was rejected by the World Health

00:39:35.940 Summit controllers. And none of this trip, including this fancy one night stay, would be possible

00:39:42.500 without your generous donations to rebelwho.com. If you think that it is crucial to hold these

00:39:50.180 bureaucrats to account for their failed and devastating policies, then head on over to that website and 0.97

00:39:56.500 help offset our costs again at rebelwho.com. Now, after arriving at the hotel, I was able to get a feel for

00:40:03.940 the crowd after what looked like some sort of cozy setting of high tea and refreshments. I turned

00:40:10.740 around and there was Tedros. Have a look at how that went.

00:40:14.420 Okay, Mr. Tedros, how are you? How are you, Mr. Tedros? If you could do lockdowns again, would you

00:40:20.180 do them? If you could do lockdowns again, would you support them? I'm sorry, please. Mr. Tedros,

00:40:26.980 if you could do lockdowns again, would you support them?

00:40:32.260 That's what you get for unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats heading in there to the WHO conference,

00:40:38.580 the World Health Summit. Tedros was nervously laughing behind his medical mask. As you can see,

00:40:43.460 his handler quickly got in the way once she realized that I was skeptical of his failed

00:40:49.060 lockdown mandates. He obviously had no idea how to respond. What do you think at home? Should these

00:40:56.260 bureaucrats be held responsible for their failed policies that have resulted in grotesque harm of

00:41:02.420 people all across the globe with looming economic devastation, loss of liberty, and loss of freedom?

00:41:08.820 And if no one is here to ask the hard questions, then how will the public ever know? Follow our

00:41:15.780 reports as we try to show you how the top 1% wines and dines while you're told to shutter your business,

00:41:24.740 stay home endlessly, all for the alleged greater good. For Rebel News, I'm Tamara Ugolini.

00:41:31.940 In case you haven't gotten familiar with our special site called rebelwho.com, which is going

00:41:40.980 to keep you up to date on what we're doing in Germany, which is getting to the bottom of the

00:41:45.140 agendas being pushed by big pharma globalists across the world. We've come all the way here to

00:41:52.820 cover the World Health Summit for you guys so that you don't have to play catch up with what's coming

00:41:58.260 next like we've done over the next two years. And thank you for those who have started to chip in

00:42:02.980 to help us recoup the costs. Again, the special site we have where you can do that as well is

00:42:07.620 called rebelwho.com. And we really appreciate you guys supporting our journalism so we can bring you

00:42:13.540 stories like what we're about to talk about today. We are going to see who we can interview on their way

00:42:19.060 into this fancy schmancy award ceremony before the kickoff of the World Health Summit. I want to ask

00:42:25.860 them a couple of questions. If they're coming here to support and be a part of this World Health

00:42:30.740 Organization event, what do they think about none of the events that are being in place having

00:42:36.260 anything to do with harms of lockdowns that millions if not billions of people have been experiencing

00:42:42.980 over the last two years? Also, Mr. Bill Gates is going to be here. We all saw his face on every screen.

00:42:51.460 So many news telling us that the only way to beat COVID-19 would be for everyone to get vaccinated

00:42:58.420 as well as to have some sort of digital certificate kind of thing. Take a look at this.

00:43:04.820 And so until you're widely vaccinated, those may not come back at all. Eventually, what we'll have to

00:43:13.620 have is certificates of who's a recovered person, who's a vaccinated person, because you don't want

00:43:20.180 people moving around the world. So eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity

00:43:27.620 proof that, you know, will help facilitate the global reopening up.

00:43:33.540 Now, you and I saw that come to fruition. We saw vaccines that had no long-term studies be rolled out

00:43:41.300 and mandates at that where people lost their jobs and turned against each other about who had the

00:43:48.340 injection and who didn't. But another thing that has come out in news through Europe, actually,

00:43:54.900 is that part of those vaccines, at least from Pfizer, their mRNA shot, there wasn't even any testing done

00:44:02.020 to show whether or not those vaccines that were rolled out to millions, if not billions of people,

00:44:08.020 were in fact able to stop transmission.

00:44:10.740 In a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me,

00:44:18.100 at the time of introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the

00:44:23.700 virus. This removes the entire legal basis for the COVID passport, the COVID passport that led to

00:44:31.220 massive institutional discrimination as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to

00:44:38.260 be shocking. What I didn't see looked at is perhaps maybe the things over the last two years that we

00:44:44.020 maybe could have learned from, like the lockdowns and the other side of it, maybe some of the harms that

00:44:48.260 it caused to business, economies and things like that. What's your guys' thoughts on that?

00:44:53.060 I think that it depends on how you look at it from the perspective you're coming from. Definitely no one likes

00:44:57.860 lockdowns, but in the events where there was a pandemic where we didn't have knowledge about it, there was no,

00:45:03.540 nothing. It was just new to us. Everyone went into a panic mood. We were looking for the best option and

00:45:08.500 it was just to contain people. So at that moment, that seemed like the best option. Later on, when we

00:45:13.860 reflect on it, probably we should have done things better. But at that moment, I think that it was

00:45:17.860 probably fit for Pairfoot. So, yeah. In Italy, you know, we were the first entering into the lockdown.

00:45:23.780 So there is a discussion of how to deal in the future. But I think preparedness is the most important.

00:45:30.420 So, you know, companies and, you know, governments now should be more prepared in the future.

00:45:38.340 But preparedness means also that you have to be prepared for pathogens that you don't know yet,

00:45:44.900 but will appear in the future. So this requires a lot of, you know, collaboration between politicians

00:45:53.300 and, you know, health systems.

00:45:55.700 There wasn't anything about sort of the other side to lockdowns, like losing jobs and businesses.

00:46:01.620 Do you think that that should be represented in this event?

00:46:04.420 No, you've got to focus on one thing. I think we're focusing on solutions,

00:46:09.060 not on the victims and on the disadvantages we brought.

00:46:12.420 And so what solutions do you think are most important to focus on?

00:46:15.620 Vaccination and developing of new products.

00:46:19.460 The cost of the measures, counter measures of COVID, that is a very good question.

00:46:25.780 I think that as time goes by, when we're no longer so afraid, we will see the cost of,

00:46:30.900 for instance, closing down schools and be more reluctant in closing so much,

00:46:37.380 so quickly and so long in the next time it hits us.

00:46:40.340 Recently, we found out through Pfizer in Europe, it came out that before the vaccines were rolled out,

00:46:46.500 they never did any testing to see that if it stopped transmission or not.

00:46:51.140 And that brings up the concerns of maybe informed consent. What's your thoughts on that?

00:46:55.620 I wouldn't say that I'm going to expect in the intricacies of clinical trials and all that,

00:46:59.860 and what really happened in COVID. But what I know, because we work with in terms of clinical development

00:47:05.940 and research is that before a product comes, definitely there's some due diligence that it's done.

00:47:10.820 So it might be erroneous to think that that wasn't done. I don't know the details of where you're coming from.

00:47:16.820 But I think that a lot of things were sped up. Probably if we took our time, we'd see something more.

00:47:24.260 We don't know, but a lot of things were sped up. And they were from institutions that we have trusted for so long.

00:47:29.540 So I think that sometimes you should give them the due diligence and think that they did the right thing.

00:47:33.060 I mean, but at the end of the day, when we sit down, post recovery, we need to look at, assess the things that we did.

00:47:38.100 If there's anything we did, which we did, which wasn't good and we need to do it better. Why not?

00:47:42.100 Yeah, exactly. I know Bill Gates is expected to be here. I think maybe he's involved with the opening ceremonies and things like that.

00:47:48.820 He was a big voice at the beginning of the rollout with COVID-19. And he told the world that to get through it,

00:47:54.980 we needed to get a vaccine and also a digital certificate. And then we saw things like vaccine mandates go about.

00:48:02.660 So given that perhaps there was no proof that these stopped transmission and they rolled out mandates

00:48:09.700 that some people lost their jobs from and things like that. What are your thoughts on that issue?

00:48:14.740 Briefly, I'll say that as much as possible, when it's a pandemic, we are looking for solutions.

00:48:20.180 We also think that we are dealing with people. So we should never forget that human aspect of it.

00:48:24.740 And that's all I can say.

00:48:25.860 And then if you think about the time it took to develop a vaccine in one year, it's unheard of.

00:48:33.540 And of course, there's always room for better.

00:48:36.260 Yeah. So you're right. It was unheard of, which I think some people found it uneasy that they were

00:48:41.540 supposed to take it to maybe save their job. Do you guys support that?

00:48:45.700 That's a hard, that's a difficult thing. I think developing a vaccine and making it available is one thing.

00:48:50.900 And forcing people, that's iffy. I mean, but again, it's a case by case situation.

00:48:57.140 Now that two years has passed with living with COVID-19, what is your guys' opinions on sort of

00:49:03.620 the human rights side of things when it comes to vaccine mandates?

00:49:07.540 For me, I would say, let's increase the knowledge and acknowledgement that technology is advancing

00:49:16.660 very fast. Not only technology, but also the linkage to legalization of things, testing and

00:49:22.580 everything else. We already know what viruses look like. We already know how to genotype them.

00:49:29.060 We already know how to test them in the laboratory to see if they are safe or not.

00:49:33.220 And therefore, the point of human rights, you should also check. Is this saving lives?

00:49:39.860 Is any delay going to kill more people? Which one would you rather save?

00:49:45.300 I think there is no doubt that the vaccine is effective in reducing the severity of the disease,

00:49:51.460 not in catching it, but in reducing the severity. And as for the human rights question,

00:49:57.220 I think that all vaccinations should be voluntary. At least in Norway, that has been really essential 0.99

00:50:05.460 for the trust that you can choose to take a vaccine or not. And you do it for your own good.

00:50:13.460 All right. Anything else you wanted to add?

00:50:16.980 Yes. First of all, I answered that not because I am in a certain role. I answered as just a human.

00:50:23.060 So this is not a voice of the country I represent here.

00:50:29.940 Well, we didn't get here in fancy black Mercedes. We hustled through public transit and walked to get

00:50:36.500 here and we flew in economy class and we're living in an Airbnb. I'm thankful for the roof over my head,

00:50:43.380 but there may or may not have been quite the leak the other night. But all of that is so we can bring you

00:50:50.980 the news and we hope that you will support us in doing so by going to rebelwho.com and donating

00:50:57.460 what you can to make sure we can bring you reports just like the one you just saw.

00:51:02.180 Drea Humphrey for Rebel News. See you guys in the next report at rebelwho.com.

00:51:20.980 Well, I'm on the road here in Edmonton. As you can see, it's not perfectly ideal. I don't have the

00:51:28.020 studio behind me, but I hope you appreciate my comments on Danielle Smith. Look, obviously,

00:51:32.660 I do not support the war on Ukraine. I think it's imperialism on the behalf of Putin. And it's very

00:51:37.860 telling that Putin only invaded Ukraine when Trump was on an office. He invaded Ukraine in 2014 when Obama

00:51:45.860 was around. Then he invaded Ukraine in 2022 when Biden was there. And Biden, of course, is up to

00:51:51.220 his eyeballs in corruption with Ukraine, including his son, Hunter. I won't get into that right now.

00:51:56.420 I'm against that war, but neither do I want nuclear war to come from it. And I think it's thoughtful to

00:52:01.540 think how can this end without total surrender or total war when you have a cornered authoritarian

00:52:09.860 bully, as Vladimir Putin is, who has nuclear weapons. If his conventional weapons aren't working

00:52:16.740 and he is rattling his saber about nuclear weapons, I think it's wise to say, how might this finish

00:52:22.740 other than in a puff of smoke? And for Danielle Smith to muse about that in her private capacity

00:52:28.100 as a journalist, I don't think is disqualifying at all. I think for her to treat these accusations

00:52:34.020 as serious good faith accusations, well, if she does that, she's going to be very, very busy

00:52:40.020 dancing to the drum of her opponents. Those are my thoughts for today. Thanks for joining us from

00:52:44.580 our Western Outpost in a hotel in Edmonton to you at home. Good night and keep fighting for freedom.

00:52:51.700 Why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

00:52:55.140 All right, have a good day, sir. I'm on my way to an event. Do you agree, yes or no, that China is

00:53:06.580 operating communist police stations in our sovereign country of Canada? Do you agree?

00:53:19.460 All right, I'll take that as a yes. So is the reason why you do support it because

00:53:22.740 your boss, Justin Trudeau, has a deep admiration for China's basic dictatorship.

00:53:35.780 Hey everyone, William Diaz here with Rebel News. Chinese Communist Party, not the best party, right?

00:53:41.380 Well, we recently learned that the Chinese Communist Party has installed three police stations that are

00:53:47.700 operating here in Canada in the Grand Toronto area. Unbelievable. That's really not good for Canadian sovereignty.

00:53:53.780 So I went to Parliament Hill yesterday and I asked Liberal MPs, why are they allowing China 1.00

00:54:01.300 to operate police stations here in our country, in Canada? Could it be because Justin Trudeau has stated

00:54:07.460 his admiration for China's basic dictatorship? Take a look at what he said.

00:54:11.620 There's a level of admiration I actually have for China, because their, you know, basic dictatorship

00:54:21.860 is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime.

00:54:25.860 In addition to that, I wanted to know whether or not Liberal MPs would push for Justin Trudeau's

00:54:30.180 resignation if it is found in the Emergencies Act inquiry that he invoked the Never Seen Before

00:54:36.500 Emergencies Act unjustifiably and unnecessarily. So let's go see how all of them respond.

00:54:42.820 Mr. Algebra, how are you doing?

00:54:46.340 Can you explain to Canadians why the Chinese Communist Party is operating police stations here in Canada?

00:54:56.340 You're a little bit less spicy than last time.

00:55:01.540 Can you explain why the Chinese Communist Party is operating police stations in Canada?

00:55:06.500 Mr. Algebra?

00:55:09.540 Could it be because Justin Trudeau has an admiration for the Chinese Communist Party?

00:55:18.740 Do you think that's it?

00:55:25.380 Why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada, Mr. Algebra? 0.91

00:55:31.140 Do you think that's it?

00:55:32.100 Do you think that's it?

00:55:36.180 All right, last thing, if Justin, if it's found by the Emergencies Act inquiry that Justin Trudeau

00:55:40.420 invoked the Emergencies Act unjustified in an unjustified manner and unnecessarily,

00:55:46.660 will you push for his resignation?

00:55:52.740 Will you?

00:55:53.140 All right. Have a nice day.

00:55:55.860 Mr. Mendocino, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

00:56:04.420 Why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

00:56:11.060 Have a good day, sir.

00:56:11.860 What steps will you take to make sure the police stations in Canada will go back to China?

00:56:34.020 Or do you agree with the fact that they're here because your leader has a deep admiration for

00:56:37.780 the communism in China?

00:56:45.460 Can you answer?

00:56:50.260 I'm on my way to an event.

00:56:52.580 Do you agree, yes or no, that China is operating communist police stations in our sovereign country of Canada?

00:57:04.820 Do you agree?

00:57:07.780 I'm on my way to an event.

00:57:12.500 Perfect. Have a good day.

00:57:13.780 Oh, you're screwing here. 0.98

00:57:15.060 Do you agree, yes or no? 0.94

00:57:22.900 Will you push for Justin Trudeau's resignation if it is found that he used the Emergencies Act unnecessarily?

00:57:34.180 Will you push for his resignation?

00:57:37.780 Will you push for him?

00:57:48.580 All right, have a good day, ma'am.

00:57:49.620 Get rid of the scene.

00:57:51.220 There are three police stations from China and Canada. Do you care about Canadian sovereignty?

00:57:55.940 Who are you?

00:57:56.660 Who are you?

00:57:57.300 I'm with Rebel News.

00:57:58.260 Of course I care about Canadian sovereignty and I'm unaware of any information that suggests what

00:58:03.940 you're talking about.

00:58:04.900 There are multiple reports of mainstream media here in Canada saying that we have three police

00:58:10.020 stations operating in Canada. David Menzies did a little investigation himself. Take a look.

00:58:14.500 It has made the news in several media outlets that there are actually Chinese police stations operating

00:58:22.900 on Canadian soil. Two in Markham and one in Scarborough that we know of. And one of the overseas Chinese police

00:58:32.660 stations is based here at the Canada Toronto Fooking Business Association. Why don't we just go and make

00:58:42.020 another house call and see if anyone's home? As you can see the door is locked. I see a monitor on

00:58:58.740 but so far nothing.

00:59:00.020 Mr. Lloyd, what are your thoughts on the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

00:59:05.700 Oh, it's absolutely unacceptable.

00:59:08.740 What actions can the Conservative Party take to remedy the situation?

00:59:12.820 Well, I think we're doing everything we can to call on the government to

00:59:16.740 use its governmental authority to take action on this issue and protect Canadian sovereignty.

00:59:21.140 Sir, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

00:59:30.660 Does the Liberal Party agree about the fact and think it's okay that the Communist Party in China is

00:59:38.180 operating police stations, three of them, here in Canada?

00:59:48.980 Do you think it's good?

00:59:54.500 Do you care about the Canadian sovereignty?

01:00:00.020 You were more talkative last time that I saw you, but I guess because you already had an answer.

01:00:04.740 So I'll ask you again. Do you agree and are you proud of having the Chinese Communist Party

01:00:10.660 operating police stations here in Canada?

01:00:12.660 I'll take that as a yes. So is the reason why you are okay with that because your boss has a deep

01:00:29.860 admiration for the basic dictatorship in China?

01:00:38.820 Is that why the Liberal Party is fine with it?

01:00:48.820 Is that why?

01:00:49.380 Is that why?

01:00:53.300 All right, have a good day, sir.

01:00:56.820 Only question answered.

01:00:57.860 Miss Thompson, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

01:01:03.060 Can you answer?

01:01:13.700 Why is the Communist Party in China putting Canadian sovereignty at risk and operating police stations in Canada? 0.64

01:01:21.780 Do you agree with what they're doing?

01:01:35.300 Do you support the fact that China is operating communist police stations in Canada?

01:01:39.700 I'll take that as a yes. So is the reason why you do support it because

01:01:54.260 your boss, Justin Trudeau, has a deep admiration for China's basic dictatorship?

01:02:01.140 Is that why?

01:02:15.460 All right, have a good day, man.

01:02:16.740 Sir, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?

01:02:24.660 Mr. Gerritsen, why did you spend more time on Twitter than working for your constituents?

01:02:29.060 If you think that's the case, you're spending too much time on Twitter.

01:02:33.060 So there you have it, folks. Here's what Liberal MPs had to say about the situation,

01:02:36.820 but as we saw, as we expected, they're not the most talkative.

01:02:40.100 Dane Lloyd also spoke to us about what the Conservative Party is trying to do to make sure

01:02:45.060 that this situation is resolved as soon as possible.

01:02:48.340 Thank you for watching. This was William Diaz here with Rebel News.

01:02:53.620 If you want to stay up to date with everything that is taking place in

01:02:56.180 relations to the Trucker Commission to the Emergencies Act Inquiry,

01:03:00.020 please sign on to truckercommission.com and there you can see all of our great content

01:03:04.740 straight from Ottawa.

Rebel News Podcast - October 20, 2022

EZRA LEVANT ｜ For Danielle Smith to succeed, she has to stand in her truth

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript