Rebel News Podcast - October 20, 2022


EZRA LEVANT | For Danielle Smith to succeed, she has to stand in her truth


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 3 minutes

Words per minute

159.67647

Word count

10,075

Sentence count

583

Harmful content

Misogyny

18

sentences flagged

Hate speech

19

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A new Alberta premier, Danielle Smith, is already in choppy waters. Will she sink or float? Ezra takes a look at her first few days in office, and talks with Andrea Humphrey, who was just back from the World Health Organization summit in Berlin.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. I'm on the road today in Edmonton. I'm out here because we had a great
00:00:04.040 premiere of our documentary, Ungovernable, last night in Edmonton. But I'm sticking around
00:00:08.580 because this weekend is the annual general meeting of the United Conservative Party.
00:00:13.080 That's the party that just elected a new premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith. 0.78
00:00:16.860 So I've got some thoughts on her first few days as premier. And then I've got an interview
00:00:21.420 with Drea Humphrey, who was just back from the World Health Organization summit meeting
00:00:26.860 in Berlin. That's very exciting. But before I get to the show, let me invite you to become a
00:00:31.860 subscriber to Rebel News Plus. Just go to rebelnewsplus.com. Click subscribe. It's eight
00:00:37.460 bucks a month. You get my show every weeknight. Plus, we have four weekly shows. Altogether,
00:00:43.000 that's 36 episodes a month just for eight smackers. And we need your help because that's how we pay
00:00:48.800 our bills. We don't get any help from Trudeau. We never take government money. We rely on you.
00:00:52.880 So please go to rebelnewsplus.com. All right, here's today's show.
00:00:58.200 Brand new Alberta premier, Danielle Smith, is already in choppy waters. Will she sink or float? 0.97
00:01:04.540 It's October 20th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:07.880 You're fighting for freedom!
00:01:10.820 Shame on you, you censorious bug!
00:01:13.880 I am back in Edmonton. I was in Calgary not too long ago when Danielle Smith was selected the leader
00:01:28.640 of the United Conservative Party, taking over from Jason Kenney, who incredibly didn't even finish his
00:01:35.780 first term as premier, going from the leading conservative politician in Canada, one thrown out
00:01:41.320 by his own party. Danielle Smith squeaked out a majority. It was a ranked ballot system. In the end,
00:01:48.540 she got about 54% of the party's support and her closest successor, 46%. That's not an overwhelming win
00:01:57.520 like Pierre Polyev had federally, but then again, there were seven candidates. Danielle Smith was also
00:02:02.660 an outsider. She was not a sitting MLA, and it'll be tricky for her to negotiate being premier of a
00:02:10.900 caucus. It is not hers. Those MLAs were picked by Jason Kenney. The cabinet ministers were picked
00:02:16.960 by Jason Kenney. Many of the programs that Danielle Smith has railed against were implemented 1.00
00:02:22.520 by the very MLAs. And cabinet ministers, she now has to cobble together into her own party. It reminds
00:02:30.840 me a little bit of when Stockwell Day succeeded Preston Manning to lead the Reform Party of Canada.
00:02:36.600 Actually, then it was called the Canadian Alliance. Preston Manning never in a million years thought
00:02:41.380 he would lose, and he couldn't stomach the loss to Stockwell Day. Again, an outsider who was not part
00:02:46.520 of caucus, and soon there was a bit of a civil war against him. Danielle Smith has to keep that party 1.00
00:02:52.220 together as she gets ready to fight Rachel Notley, the NDP former premier who actually thinks she can
00:02:58.880 be returned to power. It has been a choppy time for Danielle Smith. Now, some of that is expected.
00:03:05.860 Of course, the media party hates her. Of course, the NDP war room and their proxies and the big labor 0.97
00:03:11.920 unions hate her. Of course, of course, of course. But it's the same way for Pierre Paglia federally.
00:03:17.340 Of course, the liberal party and the media party hate him. But he seems to be more ready for the battle
00:03:22.540 than Danielle Smith has been. Now, I like Danielle Smith. I have had some qualms with her over the 0.99
00:03:27.900 years. But of the seven candidates, I felt she was the strongest and the one who would be the most
00:03:33.620 caring and devoted to Alberta's interests. I think that was one of the reasons why Jason Kenney
00:03:39.240 failed as premier. Number one, of course, he enforced brutal lockdowns, including against
00:03:45.140 truckers and against Christian churches and business people like Chris Scott. But also,
00:03:50.500 he didn't stand up for the province of Alberta. I think Kenny was always looking for the next chance
00:03:55.220 where maybe he would run for prime minister in five years. And so he was always thinking,
00:03:58.920 what do I do now in Alberta? How will it look in five years when I'm trying to explain myself
00:04:04.020 to the CBC? I don't want to be too Alberta first. I don't want to be too critical of Canada.
00:04:10.180 So Danielle Smith, to me, met those two checkboxes. She was the most freedom-oriented of the seven 0.99
00:04:15.560 candidates and the most pro-Alberta. So how is she doing? Has either of those issues blown up on
00:04:22.780 her? Well, you'd be the judge. The first thing was Danielle Smith made a statement in a press 0.98
00:04:29.560 conference saying that unvaccinated people were subject to the worst discrimination that she has
00:04:34.820 observed in her lifetime. Here, I'll let you see her say it herself. It was quite a press conference.
00:04:39.120 Take a look. The community that faced the most restrictions on their freedoms in the last year
00:04:45.780 were those who made a choice not to be vaccinated. I don't think I've ever experienced a situation
00:04:51.500 in my lifetime where a person was fired from their job or not allowed to watch their kids play hockey
00:04:59.020 or not allowed to go visit a loved one in long-term care or hospital or not allowed to go get on a
00:05:04.920 plane to either go across the country to see family or even travel across the border. So they
00:05:10.720 have been the most discriminated against group that I've ever witnessed in my lifetime. That's a pretty 1.00
00:05:16.180 extreme level of discrimination that we have seen. I don't take away any of the discrimination that I've
00:05:22.060 seen in those other groups that you mentioned. But this has been an extraordinary time in the last
00:05:27.940 year in particular. And I want people to know that I find that unacceptable, that we are not going to
00:05:33.860 create a segregated society on the basis of a medical choice. Now, I happen to think that that's
00:05:40.100 exactly true. She didn't say the worst civil liberties bonfire in global history or even in
00:05:46.060 Canada's history. I mean, look at the Second World War and the Holocaust. If you look at atrocities
00:05:51.480 throughout history, of course, the lockdowns of the last two years don't stack up. But in her lifetime,
00:05:57.260 I mean, we've had civil rights in Canada. We've had gay rights in Canada for, what, 20 years or so.
00:06:03.220 We've had, in terms of equal marriage. I mean, what civil liberties, atrocities or discriminations
00:06:10.400 are there in Canada for women, for visible minorities, for gay people in her lifetime that
00:06:18.420 are comparable to unvaccinated people being fired from their work, banned from the public square,
00:06:25.400 banned from restaurants, told they can't get on airplanes and just the lockdowns themselves,
00:06:30.600 limiting weddings and funerals, closing churches. What Danielle Smith said was 100% right. 0.99
00:06:39.140 And her promise to add unvaccinated people to the list of protected grounds in the Human Rights 0.96
00:06:44.380 Code, I think is brilliant. The people who jumped on that are the same people who were the human rights
00:06:51.820 abusers. If you accuse lockdown extremists and public health extremists and hypochondriacs and
00:07:00.080 Munchausen by proxy public officers of being human rights violators, don't be surprised if they squawk at
00:07:08.300 you for it. Don't be surprised if for the first time anyone's pushed back at them in two years,
00:07:13.180 they're going to roar an outrage. It was expected that they would object to her categorizing their
00:07:21.180 public policy as discrimination. Of course they did. That is not surprising at all. What was surprising
00:07:27.440 and a little bit disappointing to me is that Danielle Smith bent the knee. She apologized and reached out 0.76
00:07:34.220 and said she rededicates herself to anti-racism and tolerance. Well, what's that got to do with the
00:07:40.100 fact that unvaccinated people were, as a matter of fact, banned from things that black people or
00:07:46.440 women or other minorities were not banned from. Now, black and other minorities who were unvaccinated 1.00
00:07:53.120 had the same bullying. You know, when I look back at the sweep of Canadian history, I think,
00:07:58.140 for example, the Japanese internment in British Columbia, which was atrocious, but it was more limited
00:08:03.060 than, and it was both in terms of geography and class. That was an abomination to human rights. 0.90
00:08:12.240 There were other abominations to human rights, but none of those were in our lifetime. That was almost
00:08:16.600 a hundred years ago. What Danielle Smith said was factually true, and it was a reasonable opinion.
00:08:24.500 More to the point, it's something that she essentially campaigned on. Of course the establishment 0.69
00:08:30.320 rejected it, but the fact that she apologized so quickly worries me, not just for the substance of
00:08:35.780 it, but can she stand up to these vested interests? I'm pleased to say that Danielle Smith sacked the 1.00
00:08:43.040 public health officer, Dina Hinshaw. Here's a clip of that. Good. So she's not afraid to take on the 0.99
00:08:49.140 public health officer. She said she'll take on Alberta Health Services. Great. But can you not take
00:08:54.420 on the commentariat who squawks because you point out the truth? The emperor has no clothes. It was a gross
00:09:00.100 violation of our human rights. Don't take my word for it. Take it from the deposed premier, Jason
00:09:05.200 Kenney, who when asked by Rebel News reporters about vaccine passports said those would violate
00:09:10.740 the law. Here is Jason Kenney saying it would be a civil rights violation before he went along
00:09:16.340 and violated those civil rights. Well, it happened once, but then it happened a second time. Danielle
00:09:23.820 Smith, when she was a journalist, gave her opinions on the war in Ukraine. Now, it's a very complicated
00:09:29.620 situation, and it's somewhat dangerous, I suppose, for lay people to give their opinions on the subject,
00:09:35.680 but she was a lay person. She was not premier. She was a journalist. It was in a call-in show.
00:09:41.000 And she said two things. She said, she thought, and she made these comments on TV, and she tweeted them.
00:09:48.380 She suggested that Ukraine perhaps ought to remain neutral, sort of like Finland. It's right next to Russia. 0.97
00:09:56.340 It doesn't want to be dominated by Russia, but it would be perhaps too provocative to join NATO.
00:10:01.980 Now, does that sound like an extreme opinion? Well, it could be, but that just happens to be the opinion
00:10:06.200 of Henry Kissinger, perhaps the wisest or most experienced, you don't have to call him wise, but the
00:10:12.620 most experienced diplomat still living, an advisor to various presidents. That's the view of many
00:10:19.440 UK former diplomats. That's probably how this war is going to end, some sort of military neutrality
00:10:27.540 for Ukraine. That's what Elon Musk is talking about. It's a legitimate point of view. To have Ukraine join
00:10:34.500 NATO right abutting Russia would probably cause Russia to continue its invasion. I'm not saying
00:10:41.260 that Danielle Smith is right, but I'm saying it's a legitimate point of view to have, especially for a
00:10:46.040 journalist. She also mused about the fact that certain parts of Ukraine, especially in the east,
00:10:52.120 there are ethnic Russians there, some of whom actually would prefer to be part of Russia.
00:10:58.240 Now, I'm not saying that the elections, the referendums in those parts were fair and free
00:11:05.640 elections. I mean, I don't have information about that, but even in referendums when Ukraine seceded
00:11:14.140 from the former Soviet Union, those parts of those territories had lots of ethnic Russians who
00:11:19.940 indicated they would rather be with Russia. Many of Ukraine's borders have changed over the years.
00:11:25.500 Many of the cities and towns have both Ukrainian names and Russian names and Polish names.
00:11:30.240 Borders have changed over the years. Again, I'm not saying that Danielle Smith's point is necessarily
00:11:34.620 right, but there's enough factual truth to it that it's a valid opinion to have. Now, that's
00:11:40.260 was her opinion as a private journalist. The premier of Alberta is not a foreign policy expert. Foreign
00:11:46.040 policy resides completely with the federal government. But here's my point again.
00:11:52.000 She was pounced on by gotcha journalists, including Justin Ling, an Ottawa freelancer who
00:11:59.060 makes up claims all the time. He, for example, famously wrote that the trucker convoy had weapons
00:12:06.340 in their vehicles. That was later proven to be disinformation. The police said he made it up.
00:12:11.960 He is a professional gotcha journalist based in Ottawa who writes a smear on an obscure blog
00:12:19.180 criticizing Danielle Smith. But that was enough to provoke a chain of outrage that, again, caused
00:12:25.080 Danielle Smith to issue a groveling apology that you can see here. Now, was Danielle Smith right or wrong
00:12:33.000 on both of these issues? Well, I'm sympathetic to her view on the unvaccinated question. I think it's
00:12:37.700 without a doubt that in the modern era, in our lifetimes, no one has been discriminated as much as
00:12:42.860 unvaccinated people. It's just a fact. Black people are not. Women are not. Gay people are not. Maybe in 1.00
00:12:48.220 centuries past, but not in our lifetimes. Danielle Smith was right. And as to the Ukraine question, I 0.56
00:12:54.180 simply think there must be some peaceful outcome. I do not want nuclear war. And we can't even have a
00:12:59.320 conventional war that goes on perpetually that grinds down the infrastructure and the people
00:13:04.180 of Ukraine. I know pundits want it and maybe arms dealers want it, but how many Ukrainians are going 1.00
00:13:09.740 to die for this Western proxy war? I am opposed to the invasion by Vladimir Putin. Obviously, I believe
00:13:16.080 in the territorial integrity of every country, including Ukraine. I think Vladimir Putin is a former KGB
00:13:22.400 agent. He's likely a murderer. He's an authoritarian quasi dictator, and he's an imperialist. I'm opposed to
00:13:29.020 his invasion of Ukraine full stop. But that doesn't mean that there should be total war until a total
00:13:36.640 unconditional surrender of the Russian Federation. I just don't think that's going to happen. And when
00:13:42.860 you're fighting against a conventional army, it's one thing. You can beat Russia's conventional army 0.80
00:13:47.960 with American weapons, but he's got nuclear bombs, and he's talked about using them. I think we need to 0.99
00:13:54.200 have some sort of diplomatic outcome to this unfortunate and outrageous war. I think that's
00:14:00.100 what Danielle Smith was trying to say. She may be right or she may be wrong, but for her to issue a
00:14:07.040 groveling apology as premier for something that she talked about as a private journalist is absurd.
00:14:14.820 And if she continues doing that, if she continues accepting the premise that her critics are operating
00:14:21.520 in good faith, that she as premier has to justify a decade worth of private journalism, she will not
00:14:28.660 succeed. If she continues to bend the knee and to give credit to every accusation against her, it's 0.75
00:14:35.500 simply she'll do nothing else. The vaccine enforcers, the media party, the NDP, the health establishment,
00:14:45.520 any establishment she criticizes, they're always going to object to her. She has to embrace
00:14:51.480 that and relish it and point to it as proof that she's over the target. If there's something she
00:14:57.320 wrote six months or six years or ten years ago in her journalism that looks like it's embarrassing
00:15:03.840 today, she should say, look, that's when I was a journalist in the private sector. Now I speak for
00:15:09.020 all Albertans as premier. I'm going to limit my comments to those things that have to do with my job
00:15:13.700 as premier, and I may have a different position as premier than I had as an independent journalist.
00:15:18.920 I think that's a believable answer. Many journalists go into politics, and it's absurd to go through
00:15:25.560 20 years of opinion columns and hold it around the neck of a premier, especially if it's frankly a
00:15:32.080 mainstream opinion. I think Danielle Smith has to change her approach to issues management. I think if 0.94
00:15:40.240 she allows herself to dance to the tune of any bad faith journalist or NDP critic, I think she's going
00:15:47.640 to be on the defense of so much, and she will project an aura of weakness so much that she might
00:15:54.200 actually do the unthinkable and for the second time give way to Rachel Notley as premier to put 1.00
00:16:01.600 Alberta back under the NDP. Look, I'm here in Edmonton in part because last night we had a great
00:16:07.540 unspooling of our documentary called Ungovernable. It's about Alberta independence, and I'm here to stay
00:16:14.900 for a few days because the United Conservative Party is having its annual general meeting, and I want to
00:16:20.220 take the temperature of that group and see what people have to say. I think it's important that
00:16:25.060 Alberta remain free and not succumb again to the NDP. I think it's important that Alberta take its proper
00:16:30.340 place in Confederation and not just be a punching bag for Justin Trudeau and his anti-Alberta crew.
00:16:35.900 To do that, Danielle Smith needs to toughen up, and by toughen up I mean sometimes when she's attacked it's proof that she's 0.68
00:16:44.200 doing the right thing. I think she should take a page out of Pierre Polyev's book and frankly not care what the
00:16:51.420 pundits say, and if anything lean in and criticize them. If she allows the left-wing media party and the activist groups to
00:16:59.520 define her agenda, I'm afraid she's going to lose. I'll keep you posted on this story in the weeks and
00:17:06.520 months ahead, and I'll let you know how the AGM goes. Stay with me. We've got news ahead from our
00:17:11.500 reporters who just came back from Berlin, Germany.
00:17:14.280 Well, I am in Edmonton on my ongoing journey, but that's no journey at all compared to the
00:17:30.640 global jaunt taken by three on-air rebel journalists and two support journalists. We had a team of five
00:17:37.760 people who went to the World Health Summit held in Berlin, Germany. What's the World Health Summit?
00:17:45.500 Well, it is the meeting co-sponsored by the United Nations World Health Organization with delegates from
00:17:52.620 around the world. These are the people who basically were behind the global pandemic response,
00:17:59.420 the vaccine mandates, the lockdowns, and none of them are elected by you. None of them are
00:18:07.360 accountable to you. It's part of that globalist, undemocratic, deep state, the permanent bureaucracy.
00:18:14.460 This is the group that China installed Tedros Adhanom as the head of. He's not a medical doctor,
00:18:21.700 but he calls himself doctor. And these are the folks who set the international agenda for the
00:18:27.660 lockdowns. They have not had this global health summit meeting in three years because of the pandemic.
00:18:33.920 This is their first get-together. And we thought this would be a very interesting event for Rebel News
00:18:40.320 to cover, even though it's halfway around the world. And in my mind, Drea Humphrey, Alexa Lavoie,
00:18:47.220 and Tamara Ugolini are the Rebel News reporters most passionately associated with this story. They're the
00:18:53.180 ones who have covered not only the lockdowns, but questions about the medical science, questions about
00:18:59.160 the vaccines themselves, questions that are very difficult to ask in an era of censorship. And I knew
00:19:05.160 that not only would these reporters show more skepticism and curiosity and have more knowledge
00:19:10.400 than anyone in what I call the media party, I also knew that if any journalist even attended this event,
00:19:17.260 they would just be stenographers, repeating press releases and not asking tough questions at all.
00:19:23.740 And you know what? I think I was right. Joining me now is Tamara Ugolini, our senior editor,
00:19:29.540 who just got back last night at 11 p.m. returning from Berlin, Germany, where she was with the rest of
00:19:37.020 the team. Tamara, great to see you again and welcome back to Canada. You look pretty refreshed given the
00:19:42.760 enormous journey you're on and the jet lag. Great to see you back here. First of all, before we get into
00:19:48.700 the details, tell me your impressions of the trip. If you're like me, you really weren't traveling,
00:19:54.280 well, because you were on Trudeau's no-fly list. So I'm guessing this was your first trip outside the
00:19:59.180 country in years. It was, yes, indeed. I was actually quite surprised at how smoothly the travel
00:20:06.620 went from Pearson and then we flew into Amsterdam. I flew anyway. We had all different flight paths,
00:20:14.300 but I flew into Amsterdam and even there that you heard a lot of rumblings and grumblings with
00:20:20.100 travelers that that hub was very congested and there was many time delays. I had some slight delay,
00:20:26.680 but I was very surprised at how seamless and smooth the travel seemed to go. But of course,
00:20:31.980 I wasn't traveling in midst of the chaos. And by the time I returned, all of the arrive can and travel
00:20:37.520 related restrictions have been scrapped. So I was pleasantly surprised at just how quickly I could
00:20:44.560 mosey on through, especially without any checked baggage. I think that made a huge difference there.
00:20:49.720 Well, I'm glad it was easy. I can tell you that, you know, with the masks and the arrive can app, which I
00:20:55.240 never used, I never filled out. You know, I'm just so glad that's removed. And Canada was really one of the 1.00
00:21:02.180 last countries to remove those things. One last question on your travels. On the plane, in Amsterdam, in
00:21:08.880 Germany, are they, are people still mask maniacs? Are people still crazy? Or was Canada really the last one
00:21:16.520 to wise up to that stuff?
00:21:18.840 So there's two parts to that. On the plane, barely anyone was masked. There were a few true believers and one person
00:21:24.800 with, it might have been a gas mask. I'm not even sure what sort of technical high-grade mask this one
00:21:32.100 individual was wearing, but for the most part, no one was wearing masks. And that includes in
00:21:36.800 Amsterdam and in Germany. However, in Germany itself on public transit, so not including flights for
00:21:44.200 whatever reason, but on the tram itself and, and, and supposed to be in taxis and Ubers as well,
00:21:50.660 you're supposed to wear masks. We did not. One, there was one incident where the police came on board to
00:21:57.980 enforce and check the mask mandate. And, you know, they just, they just passed around masks to the
00:22:03.240 five of us who weren't wearing masks. And, you know, they pulled out, they pulled five masks out
00:22:08.320 of their pockets and handled them and opened them up and then gave them to us as though this was supposed
00:22:12.900 to be, you know, hygienic and clean and scientific. And then we put them on and I, I have a mask exemption.
00:22:20.380 I didn't have it with me, but I do have a formal medical mask exemption.
00:22:24.260 So I just put the mask on underneath my nose and, you know, they were quick to, to move on. So you
00:22:29.840 can kind of see that there are still some restrictions that remain in place that some
00:22:35.480 people are really clinging to. And for whatever reason in Germany, it's this idea that on the
00:22:39.920 tram is when you have to mask up, but even there, um, they repeated over the loudspeaker, but I would
00:22:46.920 say only approximately 90, 80 to 90% of the people frequenting the train itself were wearing masks at any
00:22:53.600 given time. You know, it's very clearly a classes thing. I mean, uh, the working classes can wear 0.99
00:22:58.920 the masks and those in business class don't have to. All right. Well, it's good to chat with you
00:23:02.960 about the journey, but of course the journey was to serve a purpose. And that was to go
00:23:06.520 to this world health summit. Tell me a little bit about that. Uh, what I know about the world
00:23:12.380 health organization is the UN agency, China basically runs it through their, uh, boss, 0.97
00:23:18.500 Dr. Tedros. I call him doctor with little asterisk cause he's not a medical doctor. Imagine being the
00:23:23.620 boss, the world health organization and not actually being a medical doctor. Um, so basically
00:23:29.120 countries around the world have delegates there. So, and this was the first meeting of the delegates
00:23:33.740 and I presume the pandemic was on the forefront of their mind. That's all my guesses. You were
00:23:37.760 there. Tell me what it was actually like. That's right. I mean, the, the amount of, of topics
00:23:42.520 and information that they cover over three solid days of conferences. And then in addition to the
00:23:47.900 main program event, uh, which sees countless amounts of conferences happening every day, some,
00:23:54.220 many of them at the same time each day. So there's a big overlap there, but there's the keynote speakers.
00:24:00.720 Then there's the sort of side speeches that happen or side conferences. And then there's also an
00:24:06.080 additional number of side events. So for any one person to cover this conference in its
00:24:12.440 entirety would be next to impossible. I'm really glad that we had three journalists on the ground
00:24:17.980 there and two videographers, but even that you, you could never make it into each one of these
00:24:23.340 conferences and each one are about an hour and a half in length. And that's to say, if they don't
00:24:27.620 go over, which I find that typically they do. So the, the basis of, um, this particular summit,
00:24:35.080 and I have the booklet here that they were handing out, which, I mean, if we want to talk about
00:24:40.020 climate change and saving the trees, uh, they had hundreds of these books on the tables that they
00:24:47.320 were giving away has all the program outline, the speakers and the various topics, huge components
00:24:53.940 here, of course, are the digitization of health, um, the food security, energy, and a future pandemic
00:25:02.560 response. So that pandemic preparedness plan. But one thing that I noticed that was really interesting,
00:25:07.140 and this is another separate printout that they had again, hundreds of these, um, is this little
00:25:11.880 magazine here. So it's called health, a political choice. And it's also about investing in health for
00:25:18.100 all. So there was a huge financial component in this particular summit research and development,
00:25:24.080 big pharma, Moderna, Pfizer, they played a key role in many of these conferences. And again,
00:25:30.440 as you've mentioned before, Ezra, a vast majority of the speakers are unelected random bureaucrats or
00:25:38.340 lobbyists or sales representatives that come together. And it's really an opportunity for
00:25:46.120 them to rub shoulders with one another. So this isn't so much necessarily about the conferences
00:25:51.000 themselves that take place with the delegated and designated speakers, but rather the mingling
00:25:55.480 opportunities that happen in between. And so when we first arrived, we recognized that the security
00:26:03.280 was very, um, intense, but there was some wiggle room there. So there were several protests that took place
00:26:09.500 throughout the duration of the three days. Um, prior to the kickoff of the events, there was some
00:26:14.020 individuals protesting Tedros specifically, and some claims against him, um, in, in regards to some
00:26:21.840 ethnic genocide and ethnic cleansing that he's being accused of by the Tigre people. And then there was
00:26:30.640 just other individuals protesting the World Health Organization as a whole. And those protests took
00:26:35.680 place very small numbers every day. But on the first day, the kickoff of the World Health Summit,
00:26:41.700 there was a far left radical group that infiltrated the front of the, of Hotel Berlin. And they protested,
00:26:50.460 I would say there was approximately 30, 30 to 40, maybe 50 at the very most individuals. And so they glued
00:26:58.620 themselves to both the windows of the entrance and the pavement out front. They swiftly, uh, glued posters
00:27:06.460 and various, um, information posters onto also the windows of the hotel. And at least one protester
00:27:16.820 infiltrated the building and pulled the fire alarm on three separate occasions until they were finally
00:27:21.460 able to locate this individual. And a bunch of them were subsequently arrested. Uh, so after that took
00:27:28.820 place, the security became much more tightened up and, uh, there was a heavy police presence, German police,
00:27:36.260 and a lot more strict monitoring of the building itself.
00:27:39.460 So we knew that it would be difficult to get into the summit, but we didn't want to just watch from
00:27:47.060 the sidelines. You know, previously I'd covered, um, the World Health Assembly that took place in the
00:27:52.100 spring of this year. And all I could do was watch the live streams digitally from afar. And, you know,
00:27:58.500 they say some, some very outlandish things that are were noteworthy to report on. However, being in
00:28:06.740 there, so we were finally able to get inside the building and, and be very stealth in our presence
00:28:12.260 there. And that was only made possible by booking a room at this swanky Hotel Berlin for hundreds of
00:28:18.500 dollars just for the one night. And because of that reservation, we were able to come into the
00:28:25.460 building and, and truly be and mingle in like the top 1%. It was an extremely exhilarating experience
00:28:34.740 and no one was any wiser to our presence there. You've said so many interesting things. The first
00:28:41.060 thing is that when you said there were protesters for one second, I thought, oh, maybe it's people
00:28:46.180 who were protesting the lockdowns. Maybe it's people who were protesting the forced vaccines, but no,
00:28:51.300 it was just some rent a mob climate change activists. Is that what you're saying? Like
00:28:55.940 it wasn't even on point with the, that's crazy. Although there were, as you say, that those
00:29:00.820 ethnic people who claimed that Tedros committed racial atrocities in his home country. That's 0.98
00:29:07.140 very interesting that they were there too. And one thing it's that I think it's important to note
00:29:11.540 about these protesters is that they basically stated that the World Health Organization and this global,
00:29:17.780 this World Health Summit was not discussing climate change and that if they had access to the program,
00:29:24.900 which anyone can access online through the World Health Summit website, they do discuss climate
00:29:29.300 change quite in depth. And there are many conferences that, that are centered around the topic of climate
00:29:34.580 change. And one thing that they don't discuss, however, which is where I started to ask some questions
00:29:40.500 to both some of the attendees and some people outside when, before we were kicked off the property on the
00:29:44.980 third day, is why they aren't discussing the harms that the policies that the World Health Organization
00:29:51.780 has instituted and put the hammer down onto their member states with, why those failed policy pandemic
00:29:59.620 response plans aren't being discussed at all. No one seems to be discussing the harms caused by lockdowns,
00:30:06.100 the harms done to children by masking them indiscriminately, and the increasingly alarming
00:30:12.980 scale of excess deaths we're seeing on a global scale.
00:30:18.740 I just want to get back to, you mentioned pharma salesmen. I can only imagine, I mean, I'm here in
00:30:23.540 Edmonton because I'm going to a political get-together, an annual general meeting of a political party.
00:30:28.740 And it's been a little while since I've been to those, but there's always hospitality suites where
00:30:34.100 this campaign or that lobby group spends thousands of dollars basically giving free hors d'oeuvres and
00:30:39.700 liquor to any political people just to bend their ears and get some influence and win friends. And, you
00:30:46.180 know, you really feel the salesmanship at these conferences. And to your point, there's the formal
00:30:53.220 events, but then there's the mingling and the parties. I want to ask you, because you made me think
00:30:58.420 about political parties and how everyone's trying to schmooze and lobby them. Pfizer, Moderna, the
00:31:05.220 other vaccine companies that have made tens of billions of dollars. Did they sponsor things? Did
00:31:10.580 they have hospitality suites? Were they giving away gift bags and swag? Or were they actually even
00:31:17.140 embedded in the conference itself with formal speeches? What was the role of big pharma at this
00:31:22.500 gathering? So it appears to be all of the above. We have a nice photo and some generic
00:31:28.340 video capture of all of the sponsors of the event itself. And I believe on the last page of this
00:31:35.140 booklet as well, which I can send later, it outlines all of the sponsors, which includes,
00:31:40.580 as I already mentioned, heavy big pharma presence there. Some of the more high level attendees were
00:31:46.580 kept very secret. So it was funny to see actually in the event itself, there was also two classes of
00:31:51.620 citizens there. There was sort of these general attendees that could rub shoulders and schmooze and
00:31:57.220 mingle. And then there was also the high level attendees, which were kept more behind closed doors,
00:32:02.660 very secured in the far corner of the hotel in this restaurant that had been reserved out for the entire
00:32:10.260 duration of the summit that no one was able to gain access to. All of the windows were papered up,
00:32:17.140 the doors were locked, and you couldn't see who was coming or going from that space specifically.
00:32:23.140 We tried to see what that was about and perhaps get some dessert. And we were told very quickly
00:32:28.500 that this was for high level attendees only, and it was strictly closed to anyone else. So you saw the
00:32:33.780 two class of citizens there, but also there was people who I saw, you know, there was Moderna,
00:32:39.540 Pfizer, there was the Abbott, PanBO, many representatives from that testing kit company,
00:32:44.980 the test developers. There was lawyers, there was general doctors, very heavy German presence,
00:32:53.300 of course, being in Berlin. A lot of the attendees were from the German bureaucracy, German hospitals.
00:33:01.380 There was over 3,000 attendees. So it was a lot of people to take in. And again, there was some divide
00:33:10.420 there between who the general attendees were, who are still high level, but then there was the high,
00:33:15.380 high level, like Tedros and Bill Gates and Olaf Scholz, who's the chancellor.
00:33:20.340 Oh, really? Bill Gates, of course he's in.
00:33:22.420 So Bill Gates, we didn't see him directly. He was a speaker at the keynote ceremony,
00:33:28.500 the opening ceremony on the first day. And he attended via Zoom or Skype. He was digitally prepared.
00:33:36.420 So I'm not sure if he was in another room somewhere in the hotel or if he didn't end up attending at all.
00:33:42.100 But, yeah, those key players, and you can see that if you check out the opening ceremony on the very first day,
00:33:48.420 you know, those individuals up on that stage there that night, those are the ones who are pulling the strings
00:33:53.460 for the health of you and I.
00:33:56.500 Let me ask you about the interviews you did, because you say you sort of got into the room by booking.
00:34:05.300 I mean, we put you guys in an Airbnb for reasons of economy, but you guys managed to get into the hotel itself
00:34:14.420 by booking a room and then getting to mingle amongst the delegates. I can imagine that if you came across
00:34:22.500 as any reporter, they might be a little more shy to talk. And if you came across as a skeptical reporter,
00:34:28.820 they would be even more shy. Without giving too much away, because I know you've got some special
00:34:33.700 videos that we're going to be rolling out in the weeks ahead, tell me a little bit about what it
00:34:37.620 was like being a reporter at a place designed not to have public scrutiny, designed to basically be
00:34:45.860 an insider's club. And then, as you say, even within the insiders, there's sort of the inner insiders.
00:34:51.940 But what was it like just trying to ask skeptical questions of people who really have never been
00:34:58.820 asked a tough question in their life?
00:35:01.620 So it's funny because we actually took it from the lens that we were in full belief that all of these
00:35:09.060 policy responses were the best approach to use and that they saved lives and didn't cause any harms.
00:35:17.620 And so we undercover and we had two teams working undercover. So I can only speak for
00:35:24.340 what I saw myself. But we saw that feigning ignorance led to many of the people that we spoke to
00:35:34.180 really being shocked that we were ignorant or at least pretending to be ignorant to the fact that
00:35:41.380 these responses, so the lockdowns, the masking, the vaccines, were causing such great harms.
00:35:48.260 And we were pretending to be surprised when the individuals that we were speaking to
00:35:55.060 were telling us information. You know, we knew from the beginning that the lockdowns were harmful.
00:36:00.100 We're seeing the devastation to the development of children from this prolonged and indiscriminate
00:36:05.460 masking. And of course, we're seeing that the advice to never vaccinate during a pandemic was based on
00:36:12.740 science and evidence. And we don't know why that was ever disregarded. So there's a lot here. We have
00:36:18.900 three full days of coverage undercover with various conversations, with various people from
00:36:26.980 different walks of life and different expertise. And so we're basically just compiling at this point
00:36:32.980 and reviewing and seeing the easiest way to get this out to the public in the public interest in a way
00:36:38.900 that's easy to digest and concise for publishing.
00:36:44.500 Well, that's incredible. Congratulations to you. I look forward to those undercover vids. Folks,
00:36:50.580 if you want to see all the work that our Dream Team did, go to rebelwho.com. We'll still have videos
00:36:56.820 being uploaded there for the next week at least. Tamara, wrap up our segment here by
00:37:02.900 throwing to a video of your choice. Is there a video that you or your colleagues did from Berlin
00:37:08.580 already that you're particularly proud of or that you think sums up what the conference was all about
00:37:14.020 that you'd like to show our viewers? Well, it's hard to choose just one. I, of course,
00:37:19.300 will have a three days worth of a general overview coming out. So day one, day two, day three. I got the
00:37:26.820 opportunity to point a lockdown-specific question to the Director General Tedros Adaman Ghebreyesus. So
00:37:34.100 everyone should check out that really quick 25-second clip. You have to speak so quickly and on your toes
00:37:40.180 and be ready at a moment's notice. Literally, I turned around and he was there. So check out that clip.
00:37:46.420 And also, Drea, my colleague from British Columbia, Drea Humphrey, did a wonderful segment asking the
00:37:53.060 bureaucrats out front of the Berlin Hotel what they thought about Pfizer and its admittance that they
00:38:00.580 never actually tested their vaccine and its capability to reduce transmission. So that video is doing
00:38:06.900 really well and was really well done by Drea. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. So yes, as Ezra said,
00:38:12.500 please stay tuned at rebelwho.com because we have so much more to share.
00:38:17.620 Well, you've done an amazing job. Thank you for going on such a long journey. And I know you have a
00:38:21.860 wonderful family at home. I'm grateful to them for letting you leave them and go across the world
00:38:27.460 for a week. But I think you did great stuff. We will leave you with those two videos that Tamara
00:38:32.180 just described, her first brief encounter with Dr. Tedros and then the Drea video in question. And then
00:38:38.900 I'll come back with some final thoughts. Great to see you safe and sound back in Canada, Tamara. Thanks very much.
00:38:47.220 Tamara Ugolini here with Rebel News. And I'm in Germany at the swanky Berlin Hotel in Central
00:38:53.700 District, where the World Health Summit 2022 is taking place in partnership with the World Health
00:39:00.260 Organization. I've just asked the Director General of the WHO, that's the controversially appointed
00:39:06.980 bureaucrat Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a question regarding the global lockdown policies his
00:39:13.300 organization implemented at his direction. The risk of returning to lockdown remains very real if
00:39:20.980 countries do not manage the transition. The only way I was able to bring you this report was by
00:39:28.740 reserving one night at this posh hotel because our media accreditation was rejected by the World Health
00:39:35.940 Summit controllers. And none of this trip, including this fancy one night stay, would be possible
00:39:42.500 without your generous donations to rebelwho.com. If you think that it is crucial to hold these
00:39:50.180 bureaucrats to account for their failed and devastating policies, then head on over to that website and 0.97
00:39:56.500 help offset our costs again at rebelwho.com. Now, after arriving at the hotel, I was able to get a feel for
00:40:03.940 the crowd after what looked like some sort of cozy setting of high tea and refreshments. I turned
00:40:10.740 around and there was Tedros. Have a look at how that went.
00:40:14.420 Okay, Mr. Tedros, how are you? How are you, Mr. Tedros? If you could do lockdowns again, would you
00:40:20.180 do them? If you could do lockdowns again, would you support them? I'm sorry, please. Mr. Tedros,
00:40:26.980 if you could do lockdowns again, would you support them?
00:40:32.260 That's what you get for unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats heading in there to the WHO conference,
00:40:38.580 the World Health Summit. Tedros was nervously laughing behind his medical mask. As you can see,
00:40:43.460 his handler quickly got in the way once she realized that I was skeptical of his failed
00:40:49.060 lockdown mandates. He obviously had no idea how to respond. What do you think at home? Should these
00:40:56.260 bureaucrats be held responsible for their failed policies that have resulted in grotesque harm of
00:41:02.420 people all across the globe with looming economic devastation, loss of liberty, and loss of freedom?
00:41:08.820 And if no one is here to ask the hard questions, then how will the public ever know? Follow our
00:41:15.780 reports as we try to show you how the top 1% wines and dines while you're told to shutter your business,
00:41:24.740 stay home endlessly, all for the alleged greater good. For Rebel News, I'm Tamara Ugolini.
00:41:31.940 In case you haven't gotten familiar with our special site called rebelwho.com, which is going
00:41:40.980 to keep you up to date on what we're doing in Germany, which is getting to the bottom of the
00:41:45.140 agendas being pushed by big pharma globalists across the world. We've come all the way here to
00:41:52.820 cover the World Health Summit for you guys so that you don't have to play catch up with what's coming
00:41:58.260 next like we've done over the next two years. And thank you for those who have started to chip in
00:42:02.980 to help us recoup the costs. Again, the special site we have where you can do that as well is
00:42:07.620 called rebelwho.com. And we really appreciate you guys supporting our journalism so we can bring you
00:42:13.540 stories like what we're about to talk about today. We are going to see who we can interview on their way
00:42:19.060 into this fancy schmancy award ceremony before the kickoff of the World Health Summit. I want to ask
00:42:25.860 them a couple of questions. If they're coming here to support and be a part of this World Health
00:42:30.740 Organization event, what do they think about none of the events that are being in place having
00:42:36.260 anything to do with harms of lockdowns that millions if not billions of people have been experiencing
00:42:42.980 over the last two years? Also, Mr. Bill Gates is going to be here. We all saw his face on every screen.
00:42:51.460 So many news telling us that the only way to beat COVID-19 would be for everyone to get vaccinated
00:42:58.420 as well as to have some sort of digital certificate kind of thing. Take a look at this.
00:43:04.820 And so until you're widely vaccinated, those may not come back at all. Eventually, what we'll have to
00:43:13.620 have is certificates of who's a recovered person, who's a vaccinated person, because you don't want
00:43:20.180 people moving around the world. So eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity
00:43:27.620 proof that, you know, will help facilitate the global reopening up.
00:43:33.540 Now, you and I saw that come to fruition. We saw vaccines that had no long-term studies be rolled out
00:43:41.300 and mandates at that where people lost their jobs and turned against each other about who had the
00:43:48.340 injection and who didn't. But another thing that has come out in news through Europe, actually,
00:43:54.900 is that part of those vaccines, at least from Pfizer, their mRNA shot, there wasn't even any testing done
00:44:02.020 to show whether or not those vaccines that were rolled out to millions, if not billions of people,
00:44:08.020 were in fact able to stop transmission.
00:44:10.740 In a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me,
00:44:18.100 at the time of introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the
00:44:23.700 virus. This removes the entire legal basis for the COVID passport, the COVID passport that led to
00:44:31.220 massive institutional discrimination as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to
00:44:38.260 be shocking. What I didn't see looked at is perhaps maybe the things over the last two years that we
00:44:44.020 maybe could have learned from, like the lockdowns and the other side of it, maybe some of the harms that
00:44:48.260 it caused to business, economies and things like that. What's your guys' thoughts on that?
00:44:53.060 I think that it depends on how you look at it from the perspective you're coming from. Definitely no one likes
00:44:57.860 lockdowns, but in the events where there was a pandemic where we didn't have knowledge about it, there was no,
00:45:03.540 nothing. It was just new to us. Everyone went into a panic mood. We were looking for the best option and
00:45:08.500 it was just to contain people. So at that moment, that seemed like the best option. Later on, when we
00:45:13.860 reflect on it, probably we should have done things better. But at that moment, I think that it was
00:45:17.860 probably fit for Pairfoot. So, yeah. In Italy, you know, we were the first entering into the lockdown.
00:45:23.780 So there is a discussion of how to deal in the future. But I think preparedness is the most important.
00:45:30.420 So, you know, companies and, you know, governments now should be more prepared in the future.
00:45:38.340 But preparedness means also that you have to be prepared for pathogens that you don't know yet,
00:45:44.900 but will appear in the future. So this requires a lot of, you know, collaboration between politicians
00:45:53.300 and, you know, health systems.
00:45:55.700 There wasn't anything about sort of the other side to lockdowns, like losing jobs and businesses.
00:46:01.620 Do you think that that should be represented in this event?
00:46:04.420 No, you've got to focus on one thing. I think we're focusing on solutions,
00:46:09.060 not on the victims and on the disadvantages we brought.
00:46:12.420 And so what solutions do you think are most important to focus on?
00:46:15.620 Vaccination and developing of new products.
00:46:19.460 The cost of the measures, counter measures of COVID, that is a very good question.
00:46:25.780 I think that as time goes by, when we're no longer so afraid, we will see the cost of,
00:46:30.900 for instance, closing down schools and be more reluctant in closing so much,
00:46:37.380 so quickly and so long in the next time it hits us.
00:46:40.340 Recently, we found out through Pfizer in Europe, it came out that before the vaccines were rolled out,
00:46:46.500 they never did any testing to see that if it stopped transmission or not.
00:46:51.140 And that brings up the concerns of maybe informed consent. What's your thoughts on that?
00:46:55.620 I wouldn't say that I'm going to expect in the intricacies of clinical trials and all that,
00:46:59.860 and what really happened in COVID. But what I know, because we work with in terms of clinical development
00:47:05.940 and research is that before a product comes, definitely there's some due diligence that it's done.
00:47:10.820 So it might be erroneous to think that that wasn't done. I don't know the details of where you're coming from.
00:47:16.820 But I think that a lot of things were sped up. Probably if we took our time, we'd see something more.
00:47:24.260 We don't know, but a lot of things were sped up. And they were from institutions that we have trusted for so long.
00:47:29.540 So I think that sometimes you should give them the due diligence and think that they did the right thing.
00:47:33.060 I mean, but at the end of the day, when we sit down, post recovery, we need to look at, assess the things that we did.
00:47:38.100 If there's anything we did, which we did, which wasn't good and we need to do it better. Why not?
00:47:42.100 Yeah, exactly. I know Bill Gates is expected to be here. I think maybe he's involved with the opening ceremonies and things like that.
00:47:48.820 He was a big voice at the beginning of the rollout with COVID-19. And he told the world that to get through it,
00:47:54.980 we needed to get a vaccine and also a digital certificate. And then we saw things like vaccine mandates go about.
00:48:02.660 So given that perhaps there was no proof that these stopped transmission and they rolled out mandates
00:48:09.700 that some people lost their jobs from and things like that. What are your thoughts on that issue?
00:48:14.740 Briefly, I'll say that as much as possible, when it's a pandemic, we are looking for solutions.
00:48:20.180 We also think that we are dealing with people. So we should never forget that human aspect of it.
00:48:24.740 And that's all I can say.
00:48:25.860 And then if you think about the time it took to develop a vaccine in one year, it's unheard of.
00:48:33.540 And of course, there's always room for better.
00:48:36.260 Yeah. So you're right. It was unheard of, which I think some people found it uneasy that they were
00:48:41.540 supposed to take it to maybe save their job. Do you guys support that?
00:48:45.700 That's a hard, that's a difficult thing. I think developing a vaccine and making it available is one thing.
00:48:50.900 And forcing people, that's iffy. I mean, but again, it's a case by case situation.
00:48:57.140 Now that two years has passed with living with COVID-19, what is your guys' opinions on sort of
00:49:03.620 the human rights side of things when it comes to vaccine mandates?
00:49:07.540 For me, I would say, let's increase the knowledge and acknowledgement that technology is advancing
00:49:16.660 very fast. Not only technology, but also the linkage to legalization of things, testing and
00:49:22.580 everything else. We already know what viruses look like. We already know how to genotype them.
00:49:29.060 We already know how to test them in the laboratory to see if they are safe or not.
00:49:33.220 And therefore, the point of human rights, you should also check. Is this saving lives?
00:49:39.860 Is any delay going to kill more people? Which one would you rather save?
00:49:45.300 I think there is no doubt that the vaccine is effective in reducing the severity of the disease,
00:49:51.460 not in catching it, but in reducing the severity. And as for the human rights question,
00:49:57.220 I think that all vaccinations should be voluntary. At least in Norway, that has been really essential 0.99
00:50:05.460 for the trust that you can choose to take a vaccine or not. And you do it for your own good.
00:50:13.460 All right. Anything else you wanted to add?
00:50:16.980 Yes. First of all, I answered that not because I am in a certain role. I answered as just a human.
00:50:23.060 So this is not a voice of the country I represent here.
00:50:29.940 Well, we didn't get here in fancy black Mercedes. We hustled through public transit and walked to get
00:50:36.500 here and we flew in economy class and we're living in an Airbnb. I'm thankful for the roof over my head,
00:50:43.380 but there may or may not have been quite the leak the other night. But all of that is so we can bring you
00:50:50.980 the news and we hope that you will support us in doing so by going to rebelwho.com and donating
00:50:57.460 what you can to make sure we can bring you reports just like the one you just saw.
00:51:02.180 Drea Humphrey for Rebel News. See you guys in the next report at rebelwho.com.
00:51:20.980 Well, I'm on the road here in Edmonton. As you can see, it's not perfectly ideal. I don't have the
00:51:28.020 studio behind me, but I hope you appreciate my comments on Danielle Smith. Look, obviously,
00:51:32.660 I do not support the war on Ukraine. I think it's imperialism on the behalf of Putin. And it's very
00:51:37.860 telling that Putin only invaded Ukraine when Trump was on an office. He invaded Ukraine in 2014 when Obama
00:51:45.860 was around. Then he invaded Ukraine in 2022 when Biden was there. And Biden, of course, is up to
00:51:51.220 his eyeballs in corruption with Ukraine, including his son, Hunter. I won't get into that right now.
00:51:56.420 I'm against that war, but neither do I want nuclear war to come from it. And I think it's thoughtful to
00:52:01.540 think how can this end without total surrender or total war when you have a cornered authoritarian
00:52:09.860 bully, as Vladimir Putin is, who has nuclear weapons. If his conventional weapons aren't working
00:52:16.740 and he is rattling his saber about nuclear weapons, I think it's wise to say, how might this finish
00:52:22.740 other than in a puff of smoke? And for Danielle Smith to muse about that in her private capacity
00:52:28.100 as a journalist, I don't think is disqualifying at all. I think for her to treat these accusations
00:52:34.020 as serious good faith accusations, well, if she does that, she's going to be very, very busy
00:52:40.020 dancing to the drum of her opponents. Those are my thoughts for today. Thanks for joining us from
00:52:44.580 our Western Outpost in a hotel in Edmonton to you at home. Good night and keep fighting for freedom.
00:52:51.700 Why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
00:52:55.140 All right, have a good day, sir. I'm on my way to an event. Do you agree, yes or no, that China is
00:53:06.580 operating communist police stations in our sovereign country of Canada? Do you agree?
00:53:19.460 All right, I'll take that as a yes. So is the reason why you do support it because
00:53:22.740 your boss, Justin Trudeau, has a deep admiration for China's basic dictatorship.
00:53:35.780 Hey everyone, William Diaz here with Rebel News. Chinese Communist Party, not the best party, right?
00:53:41.380 Well, we recently learned that the Chinese Communist Party has installed three police stations that are
00:53:47.700 operating here in Canada in the Grand Toronto area. Unbelievable. That's really not good for Canadian sovereignty.
00:53:53.780 So I went to Parliament Hill yesterday and I asked Liberal MPs, why are they allowing China 1.00
00:54:01.300 to operate police stations here in our country, in Canada? Could it be because Justin Trudeau has stated
00:54:07.460 his admiration for China's basic dictatorship? Take a look at what he said.
00:54:11.620 There's a level of admiration I actually have for China, because their, you know, basic dictatorship
00:54:21.860 is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime.
00:54:25.860 In addition to that, I wanted to know whether or not Liberal MPs would push for Justin Trudeau's
00:54:30.180 resignation if it is found in the Emergencies Act inquiry that he invoked the Never Seen Before
00:54:36.500 Emergencies Act unjustifiably and unnecessarily. So let's go see how all of them respond.
00:54:42.820 Mr. Algebra, how are you doing?
00:54:46.340 Can you explain to Canadians why the Chinese Communist Party is operating police stations here in Canada?
00:54:56.340 You're a little bit less spicy than last time.
00:55:01.540 Can you explain why the Chinese Communist Party is operating police stations in Canada?
00:55:06.500 Mr. Algebra?
00:55:09.540 Could it be because Justin Trudeau has an admiration for the Chinese Communist Party?
00:55:18.740 Do you think that's it?
00:55:25.380 Why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada, Mr. Algebra? 0.91
00:55:31.140 Do you think that's it?
00:55:32.100 Do you think that's it?
00:55:36.180 All right, last thing, if Justin, if it's found by the Emergencies Act inquiry that Justin Trudeau
00:55:40.420 invoked the Emergencies Act unjustified in an unjustified manner and unnecessarily,
00:55:46.660 will you push for his resignation?
00:55:52.740 Will you?
00:55:53.140 All right. Have a nice day.
00:55:55.860 Mr. Mendocino, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
00:56:04.420 Why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
00:56:11.060 Have a good day, sir.
00:56:11.860 What steps will you take to make sure the police stations in Canada will go back to China?
00:56:34.020 Or do you agree with the fact that they're here because your leader has a deep admiration for
00:56:37.780 the communism in China?
00:56:45.460 Can you answer?
00:56:50.260 I'm on my way to an event.
00:56:52.580 Do you agree, yes or no, that China is operating communist police stations in our sovereign country of Canada?
00:57:04.820 Do you agree?
00:57:07.780 I'm on my way to an event.
00:57:12.500 Perfect. Have a good day.
00:57:13.780 Oh, you're screwing here.
00:57:15.060 Do you agree, yes or no?
00:57:22.900 Will you push for Justin Trudeau's resignation if it is found that he used the Emergencies Act unnecessarily?
00:57:34.180 Will you push for his resignation?
00:57:37.780 Will you push for him?
00:57:48.580 All right, have a good day, ma'am.
00:57:49.620 Get rid of the scene.
00:57:51.220 There are three police stations from China and Canada. Do you care about Canadian sovereignty?
00:57:55.940 Who are you?
00:57:56.660 Who are you?
00:57:57.300 I'm with Rebel News.
00:57:58.260 Of course I care about Canadian sovereignty and I'm unaware of any information that suggests what
00:58:03.940 you're talking about.
00:58:04.900 There are multiple reports of mainstream media here in Canada saying that we have three police
00:58:10.020 stations operating in Canada. David Menzies did a little investigation himself. Take a look.
00:58:14.500 It has made the news in several media outlets that there are actually Chinese police stations operating
00:58:22.900 on Canadian soil. Two in Markham and one in Scarborough that we know of. And one of the overseas Chinese police
00:58:32.660 stations is based here at the Canada Toronto Fooking Business Association. Why don't we just go and make
00:58:42.020 another house call and see if anyone's home? As you can see the door is locked. I see a monitor on
00:58:58.740 but so far nothing.
00:59:00.020 Mr. Lloyd, what are your thoughts on the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
00:59:05.700 Oh, it's absolutely unacceptable.
00:59:08.740 What actions can the Conservative Party take to remedy the situation?
00:59:12.820 Well, I think we're doing everything we can to call on the government to
00:59:16.740 use its governmental authority to take action on this issue and protect Canadian sovereignty.
00:59:21.140 Sir, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
00:59:30.660 Does the Liberal Party agree about the fact and think it's okay that the Communist Party in China is
00:59:38.180 operating police stations, three of them, here in Canada?
00:59:48.980 Do you think it's good?
00:59:54.500 Do you care about the Canadian sovereignty?
01:00:00.020 You were more talkative last time that I saw you, but I guess because you already had an answer.
01:00:04.740 So I'll ask you again. Do you agree and are you proud of having the Chinese Communist Party
01:00:10.660 operating police stations here in Canada?
01:00:12.660 I'll take that as a yes. So is the reason why you are okay with that because your boss has a deep
01:00:29.860 admiration for the basic dictatorship in China?
01:00:38.820 Is that why the Liberal Party is fine with it?
01:00:48.820 Is that why?
01:00:49.380 Is that why?
01:00:53.300 All right, have a good day, sir.
01:00:56.820 Only question answered.
01:00:57.860 Miss Thompson, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
01:01:03.060 Can you answer?
01:01:13.700 Why is the Communist Party in China putting Canadian sovereignty at risk and operating police stations in Canada? 0.64
01:01:21.780 Do you agree with what they're doing?
01:01:35.300 Do you support the fact that China is operating communist police stations in Canada?
01:01:39.700 I'll take that as a yes. So is the reason why you do support it because
01:01:54.260 your boss, Justin Trudeau, has a deep admiration for China's basic dictatorship?
01:02:01.140 Is that why?
01:02:15.460 All right, have a good day, man.
01:02:16.740 Sir, why is the Chinese Communist Party operating police stations in Canada?
01:02:24.660 Mr. Gerritsen, why did you spend more time on Twitter than working for your constituents?
01:02:29.060 If you think that's the case, you're spending too much time on Twitter.
01:02:33.060 So there you have it, folks. Here's what Liberal MPs had to say about the situation,
01:02:36.820 but as we saw, as we expected, they're not the most talkative.
01:02:40.100 Dane Lloyd also spoke to us about what the Conservative Party is trying to do to make sure
01:02:45.060 that this situation is resolved as soon as possible.
01:02:48.340 Thank you for watching. This was William Diaz here with Rebel News.
01:02:53.620 If you want to stay up to date with everything that is taking place in
01:02:56.180 relations to the Trucker Commission to the Emergencies Act Inquiry,
01:03:00.020 please sign on to truckercommission.com and there you can see all of our great content
01:03:04.740 straight from Ottawa.