Rebel News Podcast - EZRA LEVANT ｜ It's the second day of the Leaders' Debates, and we'll be there!

00:00:00.000 Hello, my rebels. Today is the second leaders debate, or at least the second official one

00:00:06.260 in Canada. It's the only English language debate. How pitiful is that? I think that these debates

00:00:12.080 are engineered to be as awful as possible because it suits the government's interests that way.

00:00:19.080 They're designed to have no conflict, no differences of opinion, and to really mute

00:00:24.720 journalists. But nonetheless, we've been able to get 11 journalists accredited by going to

00:00:29.780 the federal court, and we'll do our best to talk about that and to ask the good questions tonight.

00:00:34.920 Anyways, here's tonight's show where I review last night's debate and have some thoughts about

00:00:39.900 tonight's. Before I do that, let me just invite you to become a Rebel News Plus subscriber. That's

00:00:44.940 the video version of this. Just go to rebelnewsplus.com. If you want it for free for a month,

00:00:49.860 put in the promo code elections. Elections, singular. All right, here's today's podcast.

00:00:59.780 Tonight, it's the second day of the political debates, and we will be there. It's September

00:01:16.700 9th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.

00:01:18.420 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?

00:01:24.380 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.

00:01:28.460 The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it is because it's my bloody

00:01:33.340 right to do so.

00:01:39.120 I'm recording this video a few hours before we publish it online. By the time this is online,

00:01:45.740 tonight's debates, the second round of debates under the auspices of the Debates Commission

00:01:51.980 will be underway, or almost underway. We'll be having our own live stream here at Rebel News

00:01:57.260 with a pre-game show where we talk to different people, and then obviously we'll watch the debate

00:02:02.520 together. Sheila will be out west. I'll be here in Toronto, and then we'll have our commentary

00:02:07.140 afterwards. As you know, part of the excitement was that we had 11 reporters apply to be accredited.

00:02:14.100 They were all rejected by the Debates Commission. We went to the federal court like we did two years

00:02:19.060 ago, and we won like we did two years ago. So all 11 are accredited, like our two were accredited

00:02:26.020 two years ago. Now, the difference is, using COVID as an excuse, we only have one inside the other

00:02:33.440 10 on the phones for a special media access phone call. But as you may have seen last night,

00:02:39.200 we actually got six questions in throughout the night, which I thought was pretty good.

00:02:42.780 But just the first, here's what I want to do. I want to talk a little bit about the debate last

00:02:46.700 night, our questions, and the follow-up. But then I want to cut it off because we're going to have

00:02:52.620 the big show tonight live. So if you are watching this show in real time, when you're done, go onto

00:02:59.480 our page, rebelnews.com, and we're going to be live streaming tonight's debate on all four platforms,

00:03:06.380 YouTube, Rumble, SuperU.net, and Odyssey.com. Here's my quick thoughts on last night's debate.

00:03:12.580 The first was, it was simply awful. And I think that was because the government wants it that way.

00:03:18.640 They didn't want to have any diversity of opinion. They want the bandwidth of ideas you're allowed to

00:03:24.000 hold to be very narrow. You have to agree that global warming is the lead crisis. You have to be woke

00:03:29.880 and to tear down structures of patriarchy. You know, they didn't call it tear down statues section, 1.00

00:03:36.500 but they had a special reconciliation section. I'm all for reconciliation with First Nations. You bet I

00:03:41.740 am. But is that really a larger issue than the lockdowns and vaccine passports? I just don't think

00:03:46.680 that you could make the case that the choices of topics last night accurately reflect the issues in

00:03:54.280 the election. But then again, neither did the exclusion of Maxime Bernier. By the way, a native

00:04:00.400 Quebecer and native French speaker, he was excluded. But you had, obviously, the Bloc Québécois was

00:04:07.820 there as a French language debate. And you had this accidental tourist named Annamie Paul, the new 0.99

00:04:14.240 leader of the Green Party, who's been hobbled by her own party. I understand this was actually her first

00:04:19.620 trip outside of Toronto in the whole campaign. She's just simply not campaigning anywhere other

00:04:25.100 than her own district. She's trying to get that position as an MP. I sort of get it. But why would 1.00

00:04:30.840 you even pretend that that is a national party? Here's the latest ECOS poll. You can say that

00:04:36.960 the Green Party's at 3%. Margin of error in this poll is 2.8%. So they actually might be one-tenth of

00:04:43.720 where it shows there. Maxime Bernier at 10% not allowed in. So this was a scientifically

00:04:49.060 engineered debate to have irrelevant things that the government likes to talk about. No risk to the

00:04:57.440 official consensus, the manufactured consent on the issue. Certainly no anti-lockdowner like Maxime

00:05:04.760 Bernier. And put in Annamie Paul for the illusion of diversity of opinion. She was terrible, by the way. 1.00

00:05:12.360 Other things that irked me about the debate last night, if you tuned in, you heard me say this,

00:05:15.880 is that Quebec has had half of the official debates, one out of two, and they had an unofficial debate.

00:05:23.360 So two out of three debates in this whole campaign have been in French and in Quebec. The pandering

00:05:28.960 and catering to that province, I suppose it's nice if you're there, but if you're anywhere else,

00:05:32.600 it's outrageous. And it was really who could outdo each other in promises to spend in Quebec

00:05:38.820 and promises to demonize Alberta. It's almost like they had a whole section on let us bash Alberta

00:05:45.100 en français in Quebec. Now they called it climate change and fossil fuels, and they brought in a

00:05:51.200 French language child actor, sort of like a mini-me version of Greta Thunberg. And all the politicians

00:05:58.480 were treating this child actor as if he had devised this very careful thought on his own. He's just a

00:06:04.380 child actor just reading a script that someone put in front of him, and they were trying to outdo

00:06:08.320 each other for who would be more anti-oil sentence than the next. It was actually quite pitiful.

00:06:15.540 Then the politicians came out, and of course, Rebel News was there, and we had some questions,

00:06:20.980 and I'll show you those in a moment. If they made an important change from 2019, 2019,

00:06:26.260 every reporter had a question and then a quick follow-up. So if the politician evaded or avoided or

00:06:32.420 said something unfair or off point, the journalist could say, hang on, you didn't answer my question.

00:06:36.420 Can I ask you this? This time they didn't. So the journalist could ask a question, and the politician

00:06:42.060 could answer anything or nothing or on a totally different subject, and then just sort of sit and

00:06:46.600 smile and laugh because you had no recourse. It was literally the worst debate you could have

00:06:53.140 confected, which is why it was that way. Because remember, this debate was arranged by the government.

00:06:59.280 That's why we were kicked out, and that's why we sued and got to get back in. In the scrum,

00:07:06.140 that's when the leaders came out. They had 10 minutes per candidate with the journalists,

00:07:10.060 and we managed to get a question into each of them. And I'm going to show you these six questions

00:07:14.280 in the order they came. The first was from Mocha Bezergin. You know Mocha. He's got that big head

00:07:19.280 of hair. And his question was to Aaron O'Toole. Take a look.

00:07:22.140 This is Mocha Bezergin with Rebel News, and my question is to Mr. O'Toole. Do you think that

00:07:29.060 natural immunity from having COVID and recovering from it should be an exemption under vaccine rules?

00:07:35.140 Are there any other exemptions would you support, like for religious reasons?

00:07:39.120 I couldn't hear all of the questions, but we've been very clear on our approach on vaccines. Vaccines

00:07:45.960 are critically important. They're safe and effective for use. I encourage everyone to get vaccinated.

00:07:51.640 I've been very public in that. We do respect people making their own decisions about their

00:07:57.300 health care, and that's going to be our approach. We must inform and encourage and respect people

00:08:03.400 as we use all tools to fight COVID-19, everything from masks to rapid testing, in addition to getting

00:08:11.880 vaccine levels up as high as possible. I think that's a pretty good question.

00:08:15.840 Why don't we recognize natural immunity, that is you recovered from COVID,

00:08:20.540 on these vaccine passports? Millions of Canadians have got the COVID and recovered from it, 0.56

00:08:25.760 and that is a stronger, according to Israeli studies, a stronger resistance to the virus

00:08:31.100 and an artificial injection of the vaccine. Why don't we recognize that? No answer on point.

00:08:35.800 Then our friend Alexa Lavoie, who was there in person, put a question to O'Toole.

00:08:40.780 Great question. Again, a weak non-answer from O'Toole, and that was designed that way

00:08:46.100 because there's no follow-up allowed. Take a look.

00:08:47.880 Bonjour, Monsieur O'Toole. Je vous ai parlé à vous et à plusieurs de vos candidats cette élection.

00:08:53.280 Je vous ai posé des questions et vous m'avez répondu. Mais quand votre personnel a découvert

00:08:58.020 que j'ai été avec Rebelle News, ils m'ont interdit d'entrer, et également certains de vos candidats

00:09:03.520 se sont enfuis de moi, dont Gérard Deltel. Ne pensez-vous pas que c'est votre travail

00:09:08.200 de parler à tous les Canadiens, et pas seulement à ceux qui sont en accord avec vous,

00:09:14.220 et que les personnes que vous aimez.

00:09:15.640 We have a plan to have a positive campaign. I expect that approach across the country,

00:09:24.940 and that's why every day that I have a press conference after my announcement, that's why

00:09:30.940 at the beginning of the campaign, we launched our platform, and we've just received the report

00:09:38.180 from the parliamentary budget officer. We have a transparent approach when it comes to our plan,

00:09:45.360 and that's important for me as a leader, and it's important for me to answer questions like I'm doing tonight.

00:09:50.100 One of my most exciting moments for me of the night was when Tamara Ugolini, you know her, 0.98

00:09:55.720 she started out as a Fight the Fines client, and she was so great, we hire her. She's a busy mom,

00:10:01.220 so she only works about half time for us these days because she's got a new baby. 1.00

00:10:04.600 But she was on the line, and she put a good question to Trudeau.

00:10:09.200 Well, of course, he didn't answer it. He just teed off on her. Here's the question,

00:10:12.760 and here's the answer.

00:10:14.300 I have a question from Tamara Ugolini from Rebel News.

00:10:19.680 Thank you, Mr. Trudeau. The only reason that I'm allowed to ask you this question

00:10:24.860 is because today the federal court ruled that the government doesn't have the right

00:10:29.100 to determine who is or is not a journalist. This is the second election in a row

00:10:34.120 that the court had to overturn your government. Do you still insist on being able

00:10:39.040 to make that decision, and why?

00:10:42.540 First of all, questions around accreditation were handled by the Press Gallery

00:10:47.420 and the Consortium of Networks, who have strong perspectives on quality journalism

00:10:54.100 and the important information that is shared with Canadians. The reality is organizations like yours

00:11:05.520 that continue to spread misinformation and disinformation on the science around vaccines,

00:11:13.920 around how we're going to actually get through this pandemic and be there for each other

00:11:19.360 and keep our kids safe is part of why we're seeing such unfortunate anger and lack of understanding

00:11:29.480 of basic science. And quite frankly, your, I won't call it a media organization,

00:11:35.280 your group of individuals need to take accountability for some of the polarization

00:11:43.800 that we're seeing in this country. And I think Canadians are cluing into the fact that there is

00:11:50.460 a really important decision we take about the kind of country we want to see. And I salute

00:11:55.580 all extraordinary, hardworking journalists that put science and facts at the heart of what they do

00:12:02.500 and ask me tough questions every day, but make sure that they are educating and informing Canadians

00:12:10.260 from a broad range of perspectives, which is the last thing that you guys do.

00:12:14.980 You know, a lot of people saw that and their reaction was 180 degrees different from,

00:12:20.740 I said, whoa, Trudeau, you put Rebel News in their place. I saw a lot of cheering on the left,

00:12:26.400 but I saw just as much cheering on the right. People saying, whoa, Rebel, you put Trudeau in his place

00:12:31.860 and look, he made him sweat and lose his cool. It's like Scott Adams says, two people were watching

00:12:37.100 the same thing, but it was like they were seeing two different movies. And I think both saw something

00:12:43.080 in that exchange that got their blood boiling. I thought we got, I thought Tamara just nailed him, 1.00

00:12:49.360 but people who don't like the Rebel and like Trudeau thought he nailed us. I don't know,

00:12:52.600 you be the judge. Annamie Paul, the accidental leader of the Green Party was up next. And then

00:12:58.920 Adam Sosa of Calgary had a question. And just the faces on Annamie Paul when she answered were

00:13:04.120 were very childish, but it's a childish party. It's, it's a joke of a party and she's a joke of

00:13:09.000 a leader. So I'm not surprised with her response, but after she made the faces, she said something

00:13:16.060 that was close to thoughtful. Now it wasn't on point for Adam's question, but you know what?

00:13:20.800 I have to give her credit. She was better than nothing. Take a look.

00:13:23.760 Question is from Evan Seuss, Rebel News.

00:13:27.600 Hello. This debate is an insider's club for the political establishment. It banned Maxine 0.87

00:13:34.100 Bernier and the People's Party, even though he's ahead of you and the bloc combined in the polls.

00:13:39.360 It also banned myself and Rebel News from even reporting until the federal court interjected

00:13:44.600 and said that was illegal. You haven't spoke out against this exclusion. Do you think that all

00:13:49.860 voices should be heard in Canada? I didn't fully hear the question. The sound isn't fantastic.

00:13:56.980 I believe you asked if voices should be heard. I certainly believe that there is space and should

00:14:03.000 be space for differences of opinion. I believe that our democracy is healthier when we have a

00:14:09.040 diversity of opinions. I think that actually what has gone on within my party has demonstrated that

00:14:13.920 there are many healthy debates going on within politics, some of them difficult. So if that was

00:14:19.800 your question, then certainly. I certainly am not looking for people just to agree with everything

00:14:24.900 that I have to say. I think that Parliament is a place where we should be able to have robust

00:14:30.240 exchanges, but still find the common ground. And there is a difference between having legitimate

00:14:36.280 differences on policy and hyper-partisanship. We need to change the culture of politics.

00:14:41.880 Speaking of better than nothing, that's how I described Adamie Paul's answer. Here's Alexa Lavoie

00:14:46.620 talking to an empty suit, a clothes horse. You know, Jagmeet Singh is very stylish. He loves fancy

00:14:55.160 jewelry, fancy vehicles, luxury vacations. He's given some of that up to pretend he's a candidate

00:15:00.780 for the working man. I sort of like his look and his style, but I don't think you can be a serious

00:15:07.780 observer and come to the conclusion that Jagmeet Singh is an intellectual lightweight. I mean,

00:15:13.080 he's just sort of dumb. I mean, again, we're talking a class that includes Justin Trudeau, 1.00

00:15:18.440 so perhaps I shouldn't be so superlative. But I don't think he answers questions very well. He was

00:15:25.040 asked questions about foreign policy, about Chad and the Congo. I don't even think he knows. I don't

00:15:30.540 know if he even knows Chad as a country. He probably thinks Chad is his assistant or something. But here's

00:15:35.660 Alexa Lavoie putting a very thoughtful question to the NDP. And Jagmeet Singh just saying, no,

00:15:42.280 I'm just not going to answer you. Again, I don't know if that's an appropriate thing for a

00:15:47.920 politician who, in his mind, thinks he can be a prime minister for the whole country. He just

00:15:52.980 isn't going to talk to the people he doesn't like. Take a look.

00:15:55.080 Alexandra, pour Rebel News. Historiquement, le NPD s'est opposé aux grandes sociétés

00:16:01.040 pharmaceutiques et aux sociétés milliardaires qui se sont enrichies grâce aux blocages comme

00:16:05.840 Amazon et Walmart. Et le NPD était très attentif aux libertés civiles, y compris en étant pro-choix

00:16:13.260 sous son propre corps. Pourquoi avez-vous embrassé les milliardaires de Big Pharma et abandonné

00:16:19.220 votre philosophie de pro-choix? Merci, mais je ne réponds pas aux questions de Rebel

00:16:24.860 News. Merci. Well, as luck would have it, the very next question was also from a rebel,

00:16:31.120 one of our newer rebels, Catherine Krasnowski. And boy, did she give her. Take a listen to

00:16:37.240 this. The question is from Rebel News. Good evening. Before you tell me that you're not

00:16:44.280 going to answer my question, I just want to say that I'm not here representing myself or

00:16:48.680 my company. I'm here representing millions of Canadians who have real questions for you,

00:16:52.960 like the one my colleague Alexa just asked, people who you would marginalize. Is your

00:16:57.860 message to them that they are second-class citizens? Not at all. Sorry. I thought that

00:17:03.280 was just absolutely perfect and on point. So Rebel News had a good night. I want to tell you,

00:17:08.500 there were some shenanigans, as I said yesterday. The Debates Commission tried to keep out Alexa 0.86

00:17:13.140 Lavoie by making her jump through a bunch of hoops to get this test and that test. We managed to jump 1.00

00:17:17.940 through all the hoops and we had a special case management conference with the judge of the federal

00:17:22.260 court. I wanted to get that judge to smash the Debates Commission again, but they surrendered

00:17:27.700 pretty quick and let Alexa in. But the judge said that they had to have no interference with our 0.99

00:17:33.800 reporters on the phone. There was some interference. In fact, three times last night, you could hear the

00:17:40.400 emcee say, is there anyone on the phone? There's no one on the phone. Let's move on. There were people

00:17:46.180 on the phone. Every one of our 10 reporters was on the phone the whole time. Sheila Gunn-Reed was on the

00:17:51.460 phone the whole time, other reporters, and yet the debate operator claimed no one was on the phone. So we've

00:17:57.060 sent a scorching letter over the Debates Commission today. Let's see if they play that game. We had six

00:18:02.300 questions yesterday, as you saw. If they would have actually taken our calls on the line, we would have had

00:18:07.020 nine questions. Now, it's not the end of the world, but we have gone to great lengths to be there and the judge

00:18:12.420 told them they had to be fair. But it's Trudeau's commission. They're not fair. They're not honest.

00:18:19.380 I want to show you, I mentioned earlier that Trudeau's rebuttal to us is, you know, causing his team to

00:18:25.140 cheer. Just a moment ago, I saw this tweet by Ahmed Hassan. That's one of Trudeau's cabinet ministers.

00:18:33.620 You can see the tweet here, and let me just play it for you in its entirety. It's about a two-minute

00:18:40.160 clip of me talking to Aaron O'Toole a couple years back. I don't even think this is from last year. I

00:18:46.120 think this is from like three years ago or something. What do you think? Do you think this

00:18:51.340 is deeply embarrassing? Who do you think should be embarrassed here, me or Aaron O'Toole? Here,

00:18:57.920 watch the whole clip, and I'll come right back. I think a lot of our viewers want to know where

00:19:06.280 the candidates are on the spectrum of social liberalism and social conservatism. I'm touching

00:19:13.120 on issues ranging from abortion, transgender issues. Some candidates have sought to distinguish

00:19:22.240 themselves on this as being libertarian. Others are more Christian or socially conservative. Where would

00:19:26.980 you put yourself on that spectrum? You know, I think kind of in the middle with respect for

00:19:33.400 both sides. You know, I voted against euthanasia, for example, and actually made it very public.

00:19:39.880 It wrote a blog on the subject, both from a moral and a legal viewpoint on that subject. And I thought

00:19:46.040 we had a very good debate in the House on that. And in fact, the liberals use closure on a matter of

00:19:51.140 that when they used to howl if we use closure on a tax bill, for example. On other things,

00:19:56.140 I do not agree with bringing the abortion debate back as a government bill to the House. But I

00:20:02.640 certainly respect the ability for MPs to bring their faith, their passion, and their viewpoints.

00:20:09.920 I like to say, Ezra, that Justin Trudeau talks about diversity a lot, except if it's a diversity 0.93

00:20:16.560 of opinion on moral or religious issues or faith issues in general. And I think the House of Commons

00:20:22.660 is better if the men and women in it bring their experience, their perspectives, and their faith

00:20:29.180 views. And we have real debates on issues. So I'm fortunate to have support of people in our caucus

00:20:34.640 that would identify as social conservatives, that would on the other end of the spectrum identify as

00:20:40.000 red Tories, for example. I like to say I look at each issue as a father, as a Catholic, but as an MP

00:20:47.200 as a lawyer. And my voting record is sort of accordingly. So that's it. That's the entire

00:20:52.480 clip that Ahmed Hassan in the Liberal War Room published. Was my question embarrassing? Hey,

00:20:58.880 Aaron O'Toole, tell me what kind of conservative are you? Are you libertarian? Are you Christian?

00:21:03.700 Are you socially conservative? Where are you on the spectrum? Is that an embarrassing question?

00:21:08.520 And O'Toole gave his answer. He said, well, I'm not going to go for pro-life. I'm sort of in the

00:21:14.200 middle. I'm not sure exactly what the embarrassing part of that was supposed to be, other than I once

00:21:21.080 talked to Aaron O'Toole. I think it's sort of interesting that the Liberal Party thinks that

00:21:25.780 attacking rebel news is their most successful way out of the pickle they're in. I don't know if that's

00:21:30.820 true, but I found it very interesting. I thought it was also pitiful in a way and somewhat dark and

00:21:38.440 disturbing that when Tamera Ugolini called out Trudeau for twice breaking the law in censoring

00:21:47.240 us, he didn't show any contrition or any mediation or moderation. He said, yeah, you guys are junk. 0.99

00:21:54.860 You're fake news and I have no time for you. And although that was a stylish flourish, it was also 1.00

00:22:01.920 substantive. It was Trudeau's way of saying, yeah, I do believe I can regulate you and I don't believe

00:22:10.040 you should have a place. That's the closest thing to him saying, if I'm reelected, I will crush media

00:22:16.980 I don't like. I don't care what the federal court says. I've done it twice. I will do it again. And you

00:22:22.180 can keep going to court because I'm going to, like, basically he said, I don't care. Tamera said twice you've

00:22:29.460 lost now. Twice we've had to fight here. And Trudeau basically said, yeah, yeah, that's right.

00:22:35.820 I think that's a very dark premonition. You know, what was interesting is very, very few journalists

00:22:41.820 had anything to say about the fact we had to go to court. And some of those who had those things to

00:22:47.960 say were just full of such rage and frustration that we were even allowed in. Here's one by a guy

00:22:56.460 named David Revely. Here's his tweet. He was just furious that we were allowed in and that we dared

00:23:04.940 to ask a question about the fact we had to sue it again. And he thought that was narcissistic of us

00:23:10.140 for asking Trudeau about the fact that twice now Trudeau has violated our charter rights. How dare we

00:23:16.140 talk about that? That's so navel-gazing. No, I don't think it is. I think it's actually a pretty

00:23:20.380 important issue. We happened to go through that ring of fire. But if anyone else had to go through

00:23:26.700 that ring of fire, it would be newsworthy too. But let me show you, I think, proof of my entire thesis

00:23:32.760 here. That Revely character, he works for a website called The Logic. It's just some website news source

00:23:40.620 like we are, and good luck to them. And they started, and like we did, they said we will never take

00:23:45.860 any money from the government. They said that if you're not financially independent, you're not

00:23:51.220 editorially independent. I thought, wow, not only do I agree with that, I'm impressed that he would,

00:23:57.780 you know, the founder of The Logic, take that approach. Well, he took that approach for a few

00:24:01.600 months, but he didn't have any talent, I suppose, or he didn't, or he had a lot of talent, but he didn't

00:24:07.500 have any customers that wanted his talent. Whatever went wrong, something went wrong. Because The Logic,

00:24:12.760 after swearing on a stack of Bibles that would never take government money, it took government

00:24:18.520 money. After saying you can't be independent if you take cash from Trudeau, they took cash from

00:24:24.640 Trudeau. And when our friends at BlackLocks.ca asked him about it, he refused comment. I think it would

00:24:31.040 have been more appropriate for David Revely, who was mocking us and our presence there last night.

00:24:37.480 Don't you think he should have disclosed that he's on Trudeau's payroll? 0.93

00:24:42.760 All the journalists howling ass for going there last night. Don't you think they ought to disclose 0.67

00:24:49.040 that they're being paid by Trudeau? You know, when Donald Trump would say some mean things to Jim

00:24:55.220 Acosta of CNN, now Jim Acosta loved it, you know, turned him into a star. He was the foil to Donald

00:25:01.160 Trump. Donald Trump was the best thing that ever happened to Jim Acosta. People said, oh, Donald Trump

00:25:07.860 is shredding the First Amendment. He's a danger to press freedom. No, he didn't. He just had some

00:25:12.580 mean tweets. But here we have Justin Trudeau banning journalists who have to run the court to get in.

00:25:18.500 And when asked about it, he says, yeah, I don't even think you're real reporters.

00:25:21.700 And the media party is silent and the press advocates are silent. What do you think he's going to do if he wins?

00:25:31.000 Well, listen, that's our show for today. Normally we have another segment. I talk to a guest, but we've got so

00:25:37.180 much for you tonight. So if you're watching this on election night, thank you. But now go to rebelnews.com

00:25:43.440 and watch our very lengthy, in-depth coverage of the second leaders debate. That's our show for now.

00:25:50.000 Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night

00:25:54.400 and keep fighting for freedom.

Rebel News Podcast - September 10, 2021

EZRA LEVANT ｜ It's the second day of the Leaders' Debates, and we'll be there!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript