Rebel News Podcast - April 08, 2025


EZRA LEVANT ｜ Stephen Harper endorses Poilievre at mammoth Edmonton rally


Episode Stats


Length

32 minutes

Words per minute

128.09286

Word count

4,164

Sentence count

314

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Stephen Harper came out and gave an old fashioned campaign speech last night. I ll take you through it and give you my thoughts on it and what I think he would do if he were running. That s ahead.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello, my friend. Stephen Harper came out and gave an old-fashioned campaign speech last night.
00:00:05.520 First time in about a decade. I'll take you through it and I'll give you my thoughts on it
00:00:09.740 and what I think he would do if he were running. That's ahead. But first, let me invite you to
00:00:14.820 become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus. That's the video version of this podcast. I want you to see
00:00:19.560 what Harper's speech looked like, not just hear it. I want you to see what 10 or 12 or 15,000
00:00:25.540 conservatives at a rally look like. Go to rebelnewsplus.com. Click subscribe. It's eight
00:00:31.280 bucks a month and not only do you get the video, you get the satisfaction of keeping Rebel News
00:00:36.800 strong and independent because we take no government money and it shows.
00:00:55.540 Tonight, Stephen Harper gives a campaign speech for the first time in 10 years.
00:01:00.980 It's April 8th and this is The Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:03.860 Shame on you, you censorious bug.
00:01:18.080 Last night, Pierre Polyev's conservatives had one of the largest political rallies in recent memory
00:01:23.500 in Edmonton, Alberta. I've seen estimates ranging from 10,000 to 15,000 people there.
00:01:30.580 Our Sheila Gunn-Reed and Angelica Toy were on the scene to cover it and you can find their videos
00:01:35.200 elsewhere on rebelnews.com. Even if that's on the lower end of the estimate, even if it was only
00:01:42.120 10,000 people, that's an enormous number of people. Now, it's Edmonton, which is in Alberta,
00:01:47.900 and Edmonton always goes conservative. Sometimes it goes 100% conservative, that town.
00:01:53.500 The trick, don't you think, is to get that level of support in places like the greater Vancouver
00:01:58.880 area and in Ontario, at least outside of Toronto. That's the trick and we'll see how that goes.
00:02:06.680 I have a little bit of hope, but here's the latest poll by Abacus Research. You know,
00:02:12.580 I like Abacus because it's run by David Coletto, who I think is amongst the best pollsters in Canada.
00:02:18.480 And because he's a tiny bit liberal, when he has news that's encouraging for the Conservatives,
00:02:23.820 I believe him. Here's his latest headline, liberals and Conservatives remain deadlocked at 39% each.
00:02:30.360 Now, that's not particularly good news, is it? But it tells you something. First of all,
00:02:36.860 the Conservative vote hasn't particularly fallen. Think about it. The absolute highest peak
00:02:44.380 the Conservatives ever registered was when the Liberals were in total disarray, total mutiny
00:02:50.860 in very early January, remember? And the Conservatives briefly, just once, if my research is right,
00:02:57.900 touched 47%. And that took a total cataclysm for that to happen. It wasn't that the Conservatives
00:03:04.920 were doing anything particularly great. It's that the Liberals were absolutely imploding.
00:03:10.260 So 47% is probably the highest possible for the Conservatives. My point is 39% of the Conservatives
00:03:17.600 today is pretty much the Conservatives doing their best with Justin Trudeau out of the picture.
00:03:25.820 I mean, he was detested by the end of his term. Abacus suggests that, Abacus, that's David Coletto's
00:03:32.260 polling company, that Conservatives are the most motivated group of voters out there. The group of voters
00:03:39.080 most likely to actually turn up on election day. I find that encouraging, don't you? And that seems
00:03:46.680 to make sense. If you look at the huge rallies, that shows motivation. But of course, the Liberals
00:03:52.900 are doing better with Trudeau gone. You take Trudeau out, the level of hatred and disgust for the Liberals
00:03:58.440 is going to subside immediately. It'd be like taking your hand off a hot stove. It will immediately feel
00:04:04.280 less awful. Isn't it interesting that literally no one cares what Justin Trudeau thinks, what he's up
00:04:09.780 to? Just nothing. It's as if he just evaporated like the morning fog after the sun comes up. Justin Trudeau was
00:04:17.240 an empty man in so many ways. It's like that old joke, an empty cab pulled up and Justin Trudeau got out.
00:04:24.840 I mean, have you seen any? No one cares what he's up to. Isn't that telling? I think the real story
00:04:31.280 here is that the NDP has just collapsed. They've fallen in half. They were in the 20 percent range
00:04:37.980 before. Now Abacus says that they're at 11 percent and it's all gone to Trudeau.
00:04:44.960 Anyways, what I thought was interesting last night was that Stephen Harper showed up
00:04:48.940 at Polyam's rally. Harper doesn't do that a lot. He doesn't make public statements a lot. He
00:04:53.800 does the odd podcast, but it's generally on a, you know, thematic thing. It's not, you know,
00:04:59.700 breaking news politics. And he speaks on the occasional panel at a conference, but it's really
00:05:04.900 never partisan, I don't think. He spoke for about 10 minutes last night and I found some versions of
00:05:11.300 his speech on Twitter. Let me play for you some excerpts from Harper's speech and then my comments
00:05:16.380 after. As someone who had the honor of serving as your prime minister, I know,
00:05:24.460 I know that being prime minister is a trust. It is a trust to take this incredible country
00:05:39.260 that our ancestors bequeathed us and to leave it stronger, more united, more compassionate,
00:05:47.080 and more confident than we found it. That's what we did, my friends. But that is not the story
00:06:00.180 of the past decade. And that has got to change for Canada.
00:06:05.780 Now that's true. Tell me one thing about Canada that is stronger or wealthier or happier today
00:06:12.060 than a decade ago. I'll wait. You know, friends, I am in a unique position in this federal election.
00:06:21.860 I am the only person who can say that both of the men running to be prime minister once worked for me.
00:06:30.980 And in that regard, my choice, without hesitation, without equivocation, without a shadow of a doubt,
00:06:43.720 is Pierre Poilievre.
00:06:44.780 I have known Pierre Poilievre for a quarter of a century. Since he was a very young man,
00:07:05.460 the first time I met him, I could see that he was smart, articulate, possessing, tremendous passion
00:07:14.420 for our country, and strong convictions about sound public policy.
00:07:19.160 In 2004, during the time of my leadership, Pierre's parliamentary career began.
00:07:26.160 He went, progressively, from a backbench MP to a parliamentary secretary, to a junior cabinet minister,
00:07:35.780 to a senior cabinet minister, and, of course, to party leader.
00:07:41.160 And, and in all of those roles, he worked, he fought, and he learned.
00:07:54.280 Because it is not just that Pierre excelled in all of those roles.
00:07:59.280 In all of them, he grew. He got better and better.
00:08:03.440 Friends, don't let anyone tell you that he was born to be prime minister or that he can just somehow
00:08:19.520 parachute into the job fully prepared. Political experience, elected, accountable political experience,
00:08:29.840 and the capacity for growth with that political experience, that is what Pierre has demonstrated
00:08:36.340 for two decades, and that is the single most important characteristic a prime minister needs.
00:08:41.780 And, by the way, I say that as the guy who actually did lead Canada through the global financial crisis.
00:09:03.160 I hear there's someone else claiming it was him.
00:09:17.980 It was, of course, our government. The late, great Jim Flaherty.
00:09:29.820 And our conservative team who were responsible for the day-to-day macroeconomic management during that challenging time.
00:09:42.500 There are some zingers aimed at Mark Carney in there. To say that Carney ran our economy, which is what the liberals are trying to say these days,
00:09:50.480 it's just not the truth. It's an attempt at resume inflation by the liberals,
00:09:54.920 and it hides the fact that their own decision as a cabinet, their decisions over the last decade under Trudeau have been disastrous.
00:10:03.200 Everything from printing money to spending and taxing and shutting down the oil and gas industry. Here's some more.
00:10:09.340 And, friends, it's no secret that our country faces today another historically challenging time in the form of the Trump administration.
00:10:20.780 There is no sugarcoating that. But the bulk of the problems that afflict our country, falling living standards, declining employment and housing opportunities,
00:10:34.760 rising crime, the growing divisions between our regions and our people, these were not created by Donald Trump.
00:10:42.780 They were created by the policies of three liberal terms, policies that the present prime minister supported and wants a fourth liberal term to continue.
00:11:04.780 This is why the liberals love fighting with Donald Trump so badly. They desperately want to trade war.
00:11:10.560 The worse, the better, because they want to obscure their own disastrous decisions over the past 10 years with some of Trump's tariff uncertainty these past weeks.
00:11:19.300 They have what's called a moral hazard. They want Trump to do damage to us, so it hides the damage they themselves did.
00:11:26.920 They, Trudeau, but also the rest of their team, and Carney as Trudeau's advisor, they're the ones who made the mess.
00:11:33.960 They need someone else to blame. And, of course, it's not just economics.
00:11:37.700 Pierre has consistently opposed those policies.
00:11:42.420 Policies that have put costs up, accelerated crime, left our wealth in the ground, and made our economy vulnerable and under America's thumb.
00:11:57.400 And Pierre has, just as importantly, long advocated the positive alternatives for change, to axe those taxes, build homes, bring back jobs, get our resources to the whole world.
00:12:16.520 And stand up to Washington from a position of strength.
00:12:26.140 I think Harper would be leading from a position of strength, but I think Harper was a grown-up enough to have a constant, professional, friendly relationship with the U.S. president, such that things would never have spun out of control like this.
00:12:39.820 And I say that based on Harper's relationship with Barack Obama.
00:12:43.600 I don't know if the two men hated each other, but let's just say they disagreed on every possible thing you could disagree on.
00:12:49.960 But they kept it together. They did not bicker, at least not in public.
00:12:53.360 They had a kind of working respect for each other.
00:12:55.720 Trudeau either avoided Trump or antagonized Trump.
00:13:00.060 He preferred playing to his Trump derangement syndrome base than actually fixing a problem.
00:13:06.320 Here's more of Harper.
00:13:07.740 Friends, I believe that the challenge this country faces today from the United States, as real and serious as it is, should not be another excuse for liberal failure.
00:13:24.500 Instead, it should be a historic opportunity.
00:13:28.560 That's how we've got to see it.
00:13:30.920 An opportunity to make Canada what it should be.
00:13:33.840 Internally united, internationally connected, a truly independent economy with the highest living standards in the world.
00:13:47.840 And with those benefits, enjoyed not just by protected elites, but by all the people of this country in every region of this country.
00:14:07.400 And do bring it home, friends, because that goal...
00:14:29.400 That goal does not depend on Donald Trump, it depends on us.
00:14:35.400 But we will only get there with leadership.
00:14:43.400 From a person who has been right on all the big issues for a decade, and a person who has the energy, and yes, the youth, to take us forward into a better, stronger, and more united future.
00:15:05.240 That person, that person, that person, that person has been my colleague, he is my friend, he is our leader, and he is the next Prime Minister of Canada, Pierre Paulyevre and Anna.
00:15:17.520 I think that if Stephen Harper were running again today, he would thump Mark Carney.
00:15:23.200 Harper's only 65 years old, but the one thing Harper has is people know he's serious.
00:15:28.880 They know he's an economist who's a master of the economics file.
00:15:33.260 They know it was him who guided Canada through the 2008 crisis better than almost any other country did, and they know he's serious.
00:15:39.600 They don't quite know that yet about Pierre Paulyev, because Paulyev, while he's been a cabinet minister and a leader of the opposition, he has never been tested as a kind of CEO.
00:15:50.260 I think that's all people see in Carney.
00:15:52.080 He's not Trudeau.
00:15:53.680 He's got some gray hair and a resume, and he seems to know money things.
00:15:58.400 And that's enough for many Canadians, those who hated Trudeau for personal reasons, and now find it easy to come back to the liberals.
00:16:04.200 Those who used to be for the NDP for virtue signaling reasons, but really just want to stop the conservatives, and those, especially baby boomers and seniors, who just want someone who looks and sounds like Carney, as opposed to a younger, more aggressive politician like Pierre Paulyev.
00:16:22.140 We'll see what happens.
00:16:24.040 I mean, Doug Ford is backing Mark Carney.
00:16:27.200 Stephen Harper is backing Pierre Paulyev.
00:16:30.040 We'll know in less than three weeks who the people back.
00:16:34.200 Stay with us for more.
00:16:47.380 Let me reach you an interesting post on X, formerly known as Twitter.
00:16:52.440 Canada, your crisis isn't U.S. tariffs.
00:16:56.320 It's Mark Carney.
00:16:57.840 He's lying.
00:16:59.480 He will never grow your economy.
00:17:00.660 Carney is a managerial elitist pushing the Davos agenda, net zero, central bank, digital currency, DEI, and many other strangleholds on growth and freedom.
00:17:12.200 I know because I was one of them.
00:17:15.580 I traveled in Carney's WEF circles for years.
00:17:19.940 These folks don't care about ordinary people.
00:17:21.660 They're only driven by autocratic power and money. 0.93
00:17:24.340 Free your country from this authoritarian heist.
00:17:27.340 Unleash drilling, restore meritocracy, and take back your prosperity.
00:17:33.720 Dump him.
00:17:35.480 And the author of that tweet is Desiree Fixler, who joins us now via Skype from France.
00:17:41.200 Desiree, what a pleasure to meet you.
00:17:42.380 Thanks for taking the time to be with us.
00:17:44.860 Thank you for this invitation.
00:17:45.920 Well, tell me what you mean by you were in the World Economic Forum circles.
00:17:52.440 Rebel News goes to Davos every January, and we're definitely not in the circles.
00:17:57.040 We're sort of outside the moat.
00:17:59.340 They don't let us over the drawbridge into the inner sanctum.
00:18:03.180 Tell us a little bit about who you are and what you know about people like Mark Carney.
00:18:09.560 Sure.
00:18:10.120 So, first of all, I'm a bit of a rebel myself.
00:18:14.140 I was in the corporate world.
00:18:17.120 I was a true believer in the whole Davos agenda, the ESG movement.
00:18:23.740 In 2020, I had my dream job.
00:18:26.640 I was a chief sustainability officer.
00:18:29.220 Like Mark Carney at Brookfield, I was head of ESG.
00:18:34.140 And that's when I read Pills, and I realized, holy shit, this is a huge marketing scam.
00:18:44.240 This is a multi-trillion-dollar marketing scam that seeks to tell the public, we're saving the planet and the people, we're doing good, and you guys can do well by investing in us, in these investment products, ESG.
00:19:01.420 When all the while, it was a scheme to overcharge and under-deliver.
00:19:07.840 So, I was part of the GFANS movement.
00:19:11.800 Mark Carney was head of that, the Global Financial Alliance on net zero.
00:19:17.200 And not only did Mark Carney issue false statements, it actually led to tremendous societal harm.
00:19:29.780 So, you're talking about the effect, like net zero, and this whole ESG agenda has contributed to the affordability crisis.
00:19:39.360 I would even say it's one of the driving factors for the Ukrainian war. 0.78
00:19:45.100 And then its subcomponent, DEI, has led to tremendous censorship and a cancel culture.
00:19:53.180 Wow. Well, let's break that down, because you've said a lot of things in a short period of time.
00:19:59.460 When you say false statements, do you mean false political statements or false financial statements?
00:20:05.340 I want to understand what you mean.
00:20:08.880 Both.
00:20:10.000 So, first of all, you know, after Mark Carney left as, you know, governor of Bank of England, he, of course, you know, took his position at Brookfield.
00:20:19.840 He also led GFANS and made claims that net zero, the drive for the race to zero, like net zero, was going to lead to tremendous productivity increases and GDP growth,
00:20:38.080 as well as transitioning economies globally, leading to more jobs and lower energy costs.
00:20:49.140 Just the opposite happened.
00:20:51.400 And in fact, he made claims that 130 trillion, over 130 trillion dollars was committed to climate action,
00:20:59.480 that the corporate world was unified in believing that there was a climate emergency and all this money was going to rebuild growth economies.
00:21:12.380 That wasn't true.
00:21:13.880 The 130 trillion dollars was just the members' aggregate assets under management.
00:21:22.740 It wasn't a commitment to climate action.
00:21:25.480 False statement.
00:21:26.380 So that would be assets that BlackRock and State Street and Brookfield had under management, is that what you're saying?
00:21:34.340 Correct.
00:21:34.820 But didn't those companies implement ESG?
00:21:38.000 In a way, wasn't that what Carney was doing, is pressuring those fund managers to green the companies in which they invested,
00:21:47.320 to say, you know, to force ESG into their bloodstream?
00:21:50.400 So, in a way, wasn't it true?
00:21:52.780 Like, he was actually trying to convert those huge asset managers into green champions.
00:21:59.360 I'm just trying to use his language of the left.
00:22:01.740 Sure.
00:22:02.900 I would use, you know, the language of Milton Friedman and say, you know, it's very dangerous to judge policies on intentions.
00:22:11.140 Right.
00:22:11.460 You have to judge policies on results.
00:22:13.800 You're right.
00:22:14.100 I'm paraphrasing it.
00:22:15.260 Yeah.
00:22:15.560 No, I don't disagree with you.
00:22:17.180 I'm just saying, sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt.
00:22:19.120 You keep going.
00:22:20.540 So, yes, Mark Carney maybe had the right intentions.
00:22:24.400 Oh, I'm not saying he did.
00:22:26.000 Yeah.
00:22:26.580 Sure, go ahead.
00:22:27.140 Maybe had the right aspirations.
00:22:29.100 But the results are in.
00:22:30.460 And by 2021 and, you know, 2022, you knew ESG was a marketing scam, and you knew that net zero was leading to higher energy costs and actually a degrowth, like the shrinking of the economy.
00:22:53.640 You know, economies need to grow with access to affordable energy.
00:22:58.100 The other point I'm going to make is this.
00:23:02.080 These are existential policies.
00:23:07.600 People have to vote on them.
00:23:10.320 You know, not some unelected official, you know, at a Davos, you know, committee, in a committee room, like at a conference.
00:23:17.980 Right.
00:23:18.260 You know, misleading the public, not presenting the true cost-benefit analysis.
00:23:26.540 Right.
00:23:26.720 People have to decide what, you know, urgent or key issues are.
00:23:32.360 And they have to decide what to do with their own country's natural resources.
00:23:39.960 Unelected officials should not be driving important policy.
00:23:44.660 Right.
00:23:45.240 And that's what happened.
00:23:46.700 And you knew.
00:23:47.780 You had economic data and market data coming in.
00:23:51.420 You knew that there was tremendous greenwashing.
00:23:54.120 It was pervasive on Wall Street.
00:23:55.660 You knew that ESG was largely, the trillions that were mobilized into ESG investments were actually investments in, like, U.S. tech stocks.
00:24:08.640 They were investments into Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA.
00:24:14.220 That's not going to save the planet or the people.
00:24:16.720 It might make you money.
00:24:18.640 But, like, these aren't net zero investments.
00:24:22.700 It's obvious it's a carbon light industry.
00:24:25.660 So, those, you know, you knew that, you know, the Black Rocks, you know, the other, you know, banks and asset managers were overcharging for regular way investments that were actually underperforming the main index, the S&P 500.
00:24:44.440 In addition, right, renewable energy is more expensive than fossil fuel energy.
00:24:52.060 And it was driving up costs.
00:24:53.900 It's also leading to, just look at Europe.
00:24:56.680 Look at Germany. 0.71
00:24:57.880 Productivity decline.
00:24:59.660 GDP shrinkage per capita.
00:25:01.980 And that's the issue I have with Mark Carney.
00:25:05.480 Maybe he had good intentions.
00:25:07.060 But when the results came in, he denied them, dismissed them, couldn't care less about ordinary, the strife, the issues, right, the, you know, the crisis among ordinary people, right?
00:25:21.700 They're just, like, too little.
00:25:23.060 And that is the hypocrisy, the duplicity.
00:25:29.920 Because if you fear monger, if you create crises, you get to stay in power, right?
00:25:38.920 You get to control the population.
00:25:43.000 You get to regulate more.
00:25:44.240 People don't have a choice about, like, what they're going to drive, how they're going to heat their house, what their access to, you know, the country's natural resources are.
00:25:55.860 You also move from, let's also look at the social agenda.
00:25:59.480 You also look at controlling the demographics of your country, who you're letting in, how many, who's in the workforce.
00:26:11.500 You know, society becomes less of a meritocracy.
00:26:15.640 And just look at, you know, Carney's response to the truckers' rebellion, tremendous censorship and financial control.
00:26:23.440 Hey, let me ask you a question about China, because Brookfield, and Mark Carney in particular, seem to have strong connections to China's Xi Jinping and the Communist Party.
00:26:36.820 They lent him a quarter of a billion dollars to Brookfield.
00:26:39.680 He's met with them.
00:26:41.280 And I don't know how this squares with Carney's professed dedication to net zero, because China is by far the largest emitter of greenhouse gases.
00:26:51.820 And, you know, Brookfield invests in fossil fuel projects in other countries, but Carney says he's against them in Canada.
00:27:00.640 He would support C-69, a bill that really regulates pipelines and tankers and things of that sort.
00:27:08.280 Tell me a little bit about your thoughts on Carney's relationship with China.
00:27:12.900 What are you worried about, if anything?
00:27:15.200 What should we be looking for?
00:27:16.500 No, look, I don't.
00:27:20.960 The truth is, I don't have insights into that.
00:27:23.200 I can just say it would be dangerous to be in the hands of China, to be dependent on the offtake of China or the financing from China. 0.94
00:27:39.900 I can say this, that China offers, you know, a lot of investment opportunity that can be lucrative for an asset manager.
00:27:52.420 I can say that, look, I have no problem in somebody's, you know, access or ability to earn a lot of money.
00:28:03.500 I have no problem with Mark Carney taking a position at Brookfield that both plays the fossil fuel industry as well as renewable energy.
00:28:15.960 The problem I have with Carney is when he states that the policies he's pushing and everything he stands for is to help people, right?
00:28:30.120 That's not the case.
00:28:31.300 You don't take on, you know, and support and promote net zero policy and take on advisory, you know, positions at Brookfield, Bloomberg, Stripe.
00:28:45.700 He was in charge of defense, the UN, PIMCO, academics, you know, board seats at, you know, Harvard, Oxford, you know, World Economic Forum and other think tanks.
00:28:58.540 The other, you know, thing is, like, remember, you know, he is, you know, on the global stage, you know, pretty much at so many seminal financial conferences, earning, you know, I believe, six-digit speaking fees.
00:29:17.940 Some, of course, he does pro bono, right, to enhance his, you know, presence on the global stage.
00:29:23.500 And, you know, others, you know, he's getting a sizable, you know, speaking fee.
00:29:29.740 He is there promoting, you know, his own power and his, you know, own money-generating ability, but cloaking it in moral superiority.
00:29:41.060 You know, this is somebody who, you know, hasn't been elected.
00:29:44.800 He's been appointed, and he's had, you know, corporate seats.
00:29:51.120 You know, you know, where can you point to, you know, where he's helped ordinary people?
00:29:57.280 As a governor of the Bank of England, priming the pump for tremendous inflation, and more focused on climate risk and DEI than financial stability?
00:30:06.460 Like, what happened, you know, look at the UK, lackluster growth.
00:30:12.840 So I just, I believe he should be championing democratic values and giving the people of Canada the choice on what they want to do with their own policy and their natural resources.
00:30:36.460 Hey, welcome back to Your Letters to Me.
00:30:39.180 I was on Tim Poole's broadcast last night.
00:30:41.960 I actually zipped down to Washington and back overnight so fast you didn't even miss me.
00:30:49.500 And I talked about a lot of things.
00:30:50.940 I mean, it was a two-and-a-half-hour broadcast.
00:30:53.420 I Am Going said, this was a great show last night.
00:30:57.300 Everyone performed amazingly.
00:30:58.680 I was really grateful to be on it, and he's got a really smart team, Tim Poole does.
00:31:04.020 Sam Hyen says, this exact situation happened at a Tucker Carlson event, talking about the government trying to block an event.
00:31:13.040 Live Nation ended up pulling the venue away 24 hours before the contract closed.
00:31:17.800 This was in the USA.
00:31:19.360 If we didn't have an alternative venue, the entire event would have been canceled.
00:31:23.360 Well, that's interesting because in our case here in Canada, we had a great contract with the venue operator who was fairly brave, I guess.
00:31:32.640 He just didn't know that he would be fighting against the government.
00:31:35.640 He thought he would be fighting against some Antifa threateners or something.
00:31:40.940 Yeah, but we had a rock-solid contract that the government tried to induce a breach of.
00:31:47.680 Mary Petit says, Sue Demestra, how does someone like Yara Sachs get elected? 1.00
00:31:51.800 Are the people in her riding out to lunch?
00:31:53.800 Well, believe it or not, I live in her riding.
00:31:56.220 And I don't know.
00:31:58.440 I mean, it's a really close election in this whole country.
00:32:00.960 I think the riding of York Center, where I live, it's going to be close.
00:32:04.460 But if I had to bet, I would bet on the conservative Roman Baber. 0.64
00:32:07.420 Boy, I sure hope so.
00:32:09.160 Well, that's our show for the day.
00:32:10.980 Until next time, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night.
00:32:15.740 And keep fighting for freedom.
00:32:16.880 We'll see you next time.
00:32:28.460 You