EZRA LEVANT ｜ Tamara Lich and Chris Barber convicted of mischief
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
168.0957
Summary
Tamara Leach and Chris Barber were acquitted on most of the charges against them, including intimidation and obstructing police, but they were convicted on mischief in the case of Barber, who violated a court order that applied only to him.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Tonight, Tamara Leach's years-long trial finally comes to an end, and I'm here to report it to
00:00:21.920
you. It's April 3rd, and this is The Ezra LeVant Show.
00:00:39.740
Well, court is done for the day. Let me check the time. It's just about 4 p.m. We started
00:00:44.740
just after 10 a.m. The judge basically read through the meat of a 105-page ruling. There
00:00:51.560
were a number of counts, a number of charges against both Tamara Leach and Chris Barber.
00:00:56.880
They were acquitted on most of them, including intimidation, obstructing police, but they were
00:01:01.840
convicted on mischief, and in the case of Chris Barber, he violated a particular court order that
00:01:06.860
applied only to him. So I suppose from one point of view, as one fellow in the gallery said to me,
00:01:13.020
he said, that's a great outcome. Most of the cases were acquitted. I don't feel it's a great outcome
00:01:18.820
at all. It's like being shot at with six bullets and only one hitting you. That's a disaster.
00:01:24.120
I think this is a disaster for civil liberties. And some of the language used by Chris Barber,
00:01:30.620
Tamara Leach's co-accused on TikTok, the language was harsh, and I could imagine that it would hurt
00:01:36.000
a judge's ears to hear things like, we're shutting down this city, we wrecked this city, like very
00:01:41.740
boastful language about doing nuisance, committing a nuisance to the city. It would be hard to look
00:01:48.600
at that without getting a feeling that Chris Barber was meaning to commit mischief, as opposed to just
00:01:54.660
a peaceful protest. But what did Tamara Leach ever say? Literally, hold the line was the worst thing
00:02:00.940
that the prosecution could come up with. And the judge, bizarrely, said that hold the line can be
00:02:06.060
wonderful, like when police say it. And she quoted on several occasions where police said, hold the
00:02:11.680
line. And that was considered fun and playful and positive. But when Tamara Leach said, hold the line,
00:02:17.440
well, that's proof of her mental intentions to commit a crime. I found that unpersuasive and appalling.
00:02:23.600
And I really feel like there's two tiers of justice in Canada right now. If you are a Hamas supporter,
00:02:30.100
if you are even a foreign national in Canada supporting Hamas, you can walk down the streets
00:02:35.600
and chant Intifada Revolution, which means the violent pogrom against Jews. You can chant
00:02:40.520
from the river to the sea. You can do all that with complete impunity. And more than that,
00:02:45.780
you can block the streets. If you've looked at the pro-Hamas protests in places like Ottawa,
00:02:52.300
Toronto, and Montreal, they always block the streets. And sometimes they have a prayer in the
00:02:58.040
middle of the streets. Of course, there's 100 mosques in Toronto and Montreal. The prayer in the
00:03:02.400
streets is not a religious act. It's a political act of domination, of blocking the streets. And
00:03:08.000
that is never prosecuted. Have you once ever seen police even ticket people if they're pro-Hamas
00:03:14.480
extremists taking over the streets? And yet that is exactly what Tamara Leach and Chris Barber were
00:03:19.620
found guilty of. Like I say, two-tiered justice. And the problem with two-tiered justice is it erodes
00:03:26.280
public support for the system. And we have this grand compact, this grand agreement in Canada
00:03:32.420
that we all submit to the rules of the game, and we accept the outcomes because the rules are fair
00:03:37.880
enough, and we trust the people who implement them enough. But, you know, I was in the courts in
00:03:44.200
Lethbridge, Alberta. I was in the courts in Lethbridge when I saw the Coutts 3 convicted,
00:03:50.340
and the Coutts 4 were convicted, and Arthur Pavlovsky was convicted for giving a sermon
00:03:56.340
in support of the truckers. And again and again and again, our side of the equation is criminalized
00:04:04.340
and sentenced in some cases to long jail sentences, lengthy trials. But the other side isn't. They get a
00:04:12.820
police escort. If Tamara Leach, the gentlest grandma you'll ever meet, who the judge read some of her
00:04:21.480
comments full of love and spirituality, if that is a crime, then it's like Lavrenti Beria of the NKVD
00:04:29.580
said, show me the man and I'll find you a crime. If you can hang a crime around Tamara Leach's neck,
00:04:35.660
you can hang that crime around anybody. And I am demoralized by it. But you know what? I'm built
00:04:40.560
for fighting. It's called rebel news. It's not called establishment news. We get back up. And I
00:04:45.220
think I told you, I spoke to Tamara yesterday and today over lunch. I briefly spoke to the lawyer,
00:04:51.280
Lawrence Greenspan, and we agreed that we would crowdfund the costs of her appeal. We're not going
00:04:57.260
to let her face this by herself. It's an enormous uphill battle. I counted nine lawyers in the room.
00:05:02.640
That's an enormous battle force. And of course, the government spent $10 million between the policing
00:05:09.480
and the prosecution. The least we can do is help Tamara Leach. And I promised her that we would
00:05:14.740
crowdfund for her. And she accepted the help. And so did Lawrence Greenspan. So that's the thing.
00:05:21.320
You know what they say? Don't get mad. Get even. Get ahead. And what I want to do is help her get
00:05:25.640
ahead. I want to help cover the cost of her appeal. Remember, this was a serious judge who took the case
00:05:31.780
seriously. I won't deny it. But it is the lowest courts. And you can appeal this ruling to a higher
00:05:37.360
court. And that, too, can even be sought to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. So it's a loss.
00:05:43.740
Absolutely it's a loss. But the game is not over. Well, I'm about to go back to Toronto now.
00:05:49.880
It'll be interesting to me if any of the political candidates remark on this. I don't think they will.
00:05:55.200
But I think this is a very important case. This can be seen in part by the fact that there's so many
00:05:59.320
mainstream media here, as well as actually so many independent citizen journalists, too.
00:06:03.580
And that's my report from Ottawa. Keep watching Rebel News and keep fighting for freedom every day.
00:06:24.420
Better afternoon than morning, that's for sure.
00:06:30.340
Five out of six ain't bad. I can't comment on the mischief charge or any of the aspects of the
00:06:39.240
judge's decision while the matter is still pending for sentence. And that's about all I can tell you
00:06:46.020
Are you expecting a similar sentence to packing?
00:06:52.300
Fantastic, sir. Awesomely done. It was a master class.
00:06:57.040
Well, I mean, it's bittersweet. We were hoping for full acquittal. She was, of course, convicted.
00:07:05.460
Tamara Leach was convicted for mischief and counselling mischief. But the counselling mischief
00:07:09.720
was stayed at the behest of the Crown. So really, it's one for six when you take into account the fact
00:07:15.840
that she was not guilty for intimidation, counselling intimidation, obstructing police, and counselling
00:07:22.040
obstructions. So technically, it's about one for six, which some would say it's a pretty good result.
00:07:27.800
Obviously, we were hopeful for no convictions at all. Because she read her judgment, it's often difficult to
00:07:35.560
process or digest everything because it was about five hours of her reading and going through the dense case law.
00:07:43.000
She mentioned some court of appeal cases, some recent freedom protest convictions.
00:07:50.680
And so obviously, she's bound by precedent there. So we're going to have to go through
00:07:55.640
and look to see how that lines up with Tamara's case.
00:07:59.720
She did say that a couple of recent cases expanded the notion of a mischief to include not just people
00:08:10.280
who actively, physically block the road, but those who are around the event and are integrated with it
00:08:18.520
sufficiently. So that's how it seems that Ms. Leach was drawn into the conviction. But we're going to have
00:08:26.040
to review that and see whether or not, you know, the client wants to appeal and, you know, what her lawyers wants to do.
00:08:41.800
hold the line, it's had a big impact on the decision. Tell me, can you tell me more about this?
00:08:48.760
Sure. So that was a phrase that you heard throughout the Freedom Convoy and it was actually used by the police.
00:08:55.400
And Justice Perkins has made a point of saying that that's ambiguous, just as a plain phrase.
00:09:03.320
So you have to look at when it's said and in what context it's said.
00:09:08.840
And so for the mischief charge, she looked at that,
00:09:12.760
those words and said that contributed to the element of the offence, the mischief and the counselling
00:09:18.040
mischief. But when it came to intimidation, that phrase and obstructing police, that phrase was,
00:09:25.320
didn't have a single meaning such that she could attribute it to the element of the offence.
00:09:31.720
So it was ambiguous in that context, whereas in the context of the mischief, it wasn't ambiguous.
00:09:37.320
It allowed her to draw a conclusion that they were counselling
00:09:43.400
So that was a key phrase. And she did mention it several times. And both the defence and the Crown
00:09:50.120
had pointed to that to support their own case or the defence.
00:09:53.320
As Rob mentioned, we are ready to go to court of appeal. What do you think about this can be better?
00:10:07.880
Well, if you're asking me to speculate as to what the client's going to do and what the court might do,
00:10:15.000
I'm not going to do that. But I can tell you that both the defence counsel and the Crown will look at
00:10:21.560
that as they always do and determine whether or not they're going to appeal. They have to say
00:10:26.120
what their likelihood of success is, whether or not they feel that Justice Perkins may have got the
00:10:31.160
law correct, you know, what their chances are on success. And of course, it's going to eat up more
00:10:36.360
judicial resources either way. So yeah, we can only wait. They have 30 days. The Crown has 30 days to
00:10:42.440
make their decision. So we'll see. I'm disappointed, obviously. It's a lot to digest. It's not the outcome
00:10:49.720
we were hoping for. But I think the disturbing part about this more than anything else is the fact that
00:10:57.560
the standards that the general public are held to are exceptionally high. And the politicians down the
00:11:04.680
street, the standards for them are exceptionally low. I mean, how many scandals does the Liberals have
00:11:10.760
to be involved in? And not one of them have ever been accountable for the fact that thousands and
00:11:15.880
thousands of Canadians felt the need to leave their homes, to travel across Canada, to come here to push
00:11:21.400
back the actions of the government. And none of them have been held accountable. But Chris and Tamara, oh, the
00:11:26.600
standard is just so high for them, right? So this is what really is disturbing and frustrating about the
00:11:33.720
whole thing. But I'm not a lawyer. But you'd have to talk to a legal expert like Eva to understand that
00:11:40.200
more than I do. What do you feel about today? Well, I'm just going to echo what Tom had to say. And I
00:11:45.880
don't think that this should be something a lawyer has to say. But on behalf of Canadians, I think our
00:11:51.480
government needs to be held to account and not Canadians. Thank you.
00:12:02.040
Hey, it's April the first, otherwise known as April Fool's Day. And bizarrely, Canada's government
00:12:07.000
chooses this day every year, not only to raise our taxes, but to raise their own parliamentary
00:12:13.080
paycheck. It's, it's like they're making a fool of us. It's like they know what they're doing
00:12:19.320
is a joke, but they're doing it anyways. I find that the date astonishing. And I refuse to believe
00:12:24.040
it's a coincidence. But it's a happy coincidence that our friend, Franco Terrazzano, the Canadian
00:12:28.760
Taxpayers Federation, is making today the day he tells us about the details of his new book,
00:12:34.680
a book called Axing the Tax, the rise and fall of Canada's carbon tax. And Franco joins us now.
00:12:41.960
Franco, great to see you again. Congratulations on the new book.
00:12:44.680
Hey, thank you so much, Ezra. I really appreciate that.
00:12:47.800
April Fool's Day. Like it, it really is crazy that that's the one day a year that they choose
00:12:54.280
to raise so many of their taxes, including alcohol taxes, MP pay, senators pay is, I don't know,
00:13:02.760
I just can't get over the coincidence. Maybe it's just me, but it, it feels like an insult added to
00:13:08.520
injury. Tell me though about your book, because you guys are really the number one watchdogs in Canada
00:13:13.960
against tax hikes. Take it away. Tell me about your new book. You can get it on Amazon. Make the case
00:13:21.240
to our Rebel News viewers for why they should pick up a copy of Axing the Tax. Well, you know,
00:13:27.720
Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote a book hundreds of pages long praising the carbon tax. Here is the book
00:13:35.160
showing you why the carbon tax always was and always will be a scam for the ordinary Canadians who are
00:13:42.680
forced to pay the bill. And Ezra, as you know, as your listeners know, yes, Canadians force the
00:13:49.640
Liberal government to back down on their own consumer carbon tax. But look, folks, the fight
00:13:54.920
against carbon taxes is not over yet. And that's one of the main reasons why I wrote this book,
00:14:00.600
right? Because you can already see the carbon tax activists trying to spin this like, oh, well,
00:14:06.840
the carbon tax was a good idea. Trudeau just bungled the policy or he messed up the communications.
00:14:13.160
But you know, that couldn't be further from the truth. The carbon tax is always going to make your
00:14:18.360
life more expensive. And it won't work to reduce emissions, especially in a place like Canada,
00:14:23.880
where we are 1.4% of global emissions. So I wrote this book for two reasons. Number one,
00:14:30.120
to show you where the carbon taxers are going to fight in the future, they're going to relabel,
00:14:35.400
repackage and try to force hidden carbon taxes onto Canadians. But number two, Ezra,
00:14:41.560
I also wrote this book because this was really a David versus Goliath fight, right? For years,
00:14:47.480
you had the politicians, the bureaucrats, the taxpayer funded academics, the media talking heads,
00:14:53.320
even big businesses telling Canadians to sit down, be quiet and pay your carbon tax bill. But ordinary
00:14:59.960
Canadians fought back. They went to rallies, they signed petitions, they emailed politicians,
00:15:05.480
and they deserve to know that all their hard work paid off and that, you know what, if we keep
00:15:10.680
fighting, we are going to end all carbon taxes in Canada. Now, I want to point out that when Mark
00:15:17.960
Carney signed his fake executive order, like he sort of copied that Trump style of signing a document
00:15:24.440
in a lovely leather bound booklet. If you read what he actually signed, he said that he was rescinding
00:15:35.320
the consumer side carbon tax, not because he disagreed with it, not because it was wrong,
00:15:40.520
not because it was counterproductive. He, he simply said it was divisive, divisive, that it would,
00:15:45.720
that it divided us against each other, which is obviously true. Now, I think the division is like
00:15:50.120
80-20 people who are against it. But the reason I mentioned that, Franco, is that he's not
00:15:56.440
disavowing it. He's not saying this is a bad idea. He's just saying, I've got to get through an election.
00:16:02.760
An election, I need to, I need to get as many stones under my shoes as I can before I start this race.
00:16:11.160
Pierre Pauli has been working on the carbon tax for years. Let me take his issue away from him.
00:16:15.240
And I'm not going to say I'm against it. I'm just going to say for now, it's divisive. So I think
00:16:19.320
even the way he signed that fake order should chill us to the bone, because the moment he's not
00:16:26.280
worried about division anymore, I think he's going to spring it back in. And that's the thing,
00:16:30.440
he didn't repeal the underlying legislation. Parliament has not reconvened. He's just,
00:16:35.320
I don't even know if he has the power to do it. He's just said, I'm not going to collect it for a while.
00:16:38.680
Well, Ezra, you're very right to pick up on that and to keep an eye on it, right? So like, first of
00:16:44.440
all, up until what, six minutes ago, the liberal government was bragging about the carbon tax,
00:16:50.920
right? They're telling you, if you care about the environment, you got to pay the carbon tax.
00:16:54.360
The carbon tax will make you richer somehow. So all but six minutes ago, those same politicians
00:17:00.280
were praising the carbon tax. And Ezra, you are very right in your analysis, right? So what
00:17:06.920
Carney did is he set the consumer carbon tax rates to zero. But the legislation is still on the books,
00:17:15.400
which means that after the election, technically, politicians could come back to the House of
00:17:20.200
Commons and crank up that carbon tax again. And remember, folks, Carney, he's not scrapping carbon
00:17:28.760
taxes. He made it very clear during his liberal leadership campaign that he wants to change the
00:17:34.920
carbon tax, right? Relabel, repackage, hide the carbon tax. So what Carney wants to do is he wants
00:17:42.280
to hammer Canadian businesses with huge hidden carbon taxes. And he hopes you won't notice when
00:17:49.160
they pass those costs on to you through higher prices. And again, in this book, Axing the Tax,
00:17:55.560
the rise and fall of Canada's carbon tax, why I think your readers will like it so much,
00:18:00.120
it's not just about the history of the carbon tax or the politics of the carbon tax, but it shows your
00:18:06.600
viewers what they need to look out for as politicians try to relabel and hide carbon taxes, as academics
00:18:13.800
try to do the same thing, but also as international organizations try to force carbon taxes on the
00:18:20.760
global citizenry. Okay, all of that is in this book. You know, I'm so glad you mentioned international
00:18:26.760
organizations, because Mark Carney is the NGO VIP. He was on the board of the World Economic Forum.
00:18:36.280
He has not one, not two, but three passports. He calls himself European at a recent World Economic
00:18:43.000
Forum panel. Last year, he told the US Congress he lives in the UK. And I think he's being honest. I think
00:18:49.320
he thinks of himself as a man bigger than any one country, but not just that he's big,
00:18:54.360
that like Gulliver in Lilliput, you know, voters are those little pesky creatures trying to tie him
00:19:00.840
down. And he's bigger than that. So it's not just that he thinks of himself as bigger than Canada.
00:19:06.280
It's that he doesn't believe in the, you know, the little people, the peasants, being able to steer,
00:19:13.320
like he would rather listen to policy wonks at the World Economic Forum in Davos,
00:19:17.720
than to listen to what Joe Average has to say on the factory floor in any given town in Canada.
00:19:23.160
I think there's, I'm not going to call it snobbery, but it's sort of a vision of the elite
00:19:27.960
governing sort of like a council of high priests versus the populist conservative referendum style
00:19:34.840
of government that is popular, let's say in Alberta. Well, you know, I'm a couple of things.
00:19:41.160
Let me touch on. Okay. Because, you know, there's other media organizations, these big,
00:19:45.720
important people in the media who actually let the cat out of the bag, so to speak. Okay.
00:19:51.160
And we reference this right in the book where they say, well, maybe it is time to go to a hidden
00:19:56.440
carbon tax because then at least the rubes won't be all up and frustrated about the carbon tax that
00:20:03.000
they can see directly on their home heating bill, right? So look, they aren't for ending carbon
00:20:09.240
taxes. They just don't want you to know that you're paying carbon taxes, right folks. And it's,
00:20:15.480
and it's not just politicians or media in Canada. It's also the international media lead. You have
00:20:21.640
organizations like the WEF, the United Nations, the IMF pushing for these types of global carbon taxes.
00:20:29.400
And I think there's a lot of ammunition in this book to help you do two things. Number one,
00:20:34.280
fight back against any claim that the problem with the carbon tax was Trudeau. That is false. The
00:20:39.880
problem with the carbon tax is the carbon tax. It makes the necessities of life more expensive,
00:20:45.240
and it doesn't do anything to reduce global emissions. It just makes Canadians' lives more
00:20:50.920
expensive. But number two, it allows you to see where the next fight is going to be and how to be
00:20:57.000
prepared for it. We're talking about Axing the Tax, the new books by Franco Teresano of the Canadian
00:21:04.120
Taxpayers Federation. Now, you mentioned reducing emissions. And earlier, I think you said
00:21:11.080
combating climate change, or you might have said something to that effect. And that's really the big
00:21:16.760
rationale for the carbon tax, is it's designed to modify your behavior to get you to use less energy and
00:21:25.880
reduce carbon emissions. So turn down your thermostat in the winter, drive less, have a smaller house,
00:21:32.040
a lower carbon footprint. They're even trying to get cows to fart less because there's methane in there.
00:21:37.880
But that's all based on the theory that if we reduce man-made carbon emissions, that's going to change
00:21:45.400
the temperature of the world. Like, that's why they're doing it. So when they say, get your emissions
00:21:50.840
down, that's not actually the goal. That's the secondary thing. The primary goal is reduce the
00:21:57.560
world's temperature. But none of these taxes do that. In fact, if you listen to the United Nations,
00:22:04.840
if every single human in the world stopped emitting all carbon, if we just shut down and went back to a
00:22:10.520
stone age economy, even that would not cause the earth to cool. Because for more than 10,000 years,
00:22:16.920
the earth has slowly been emerging from the last ice age. And that's why I think the left uses words like
00:22:24.520
combating climate change, or climate action. They don't talk about an actual result. They just want
00:22:30.600
to see the busy work that justifies their tax. What do you make of that? Like, that's a
00:22:35.320
first principles of tax, saying, what are we even doing this for? You're saying we're doing this to
00:22:41.320
cool the earth, but it will not even do that if even we all did it. Well, Ezra, there's actually
00:22:48.600
another reason. And look, if these big-brained economists were honest with you, they would agree,
00:22:53.720
they would agree, or at least have to acknowledge this basic principle, and it's called inelastic demand.
00:22:59.800
Okay? Essentially, what that means is that you can't tax away people's necessities. Okay?
00:23:06.280
So when you tax their ability to get to work, when you tax their ability to heat their homes,
00:23:11.640
when you're taxed their ability to afford groceries, you're not reducing emissions,
00:23:16.680
you're reducing the amount of money that people have in their budgets. Okay? And look, look,
00:23:22.040
even if you just take them at their claims, right? The BC government, they brought in the first
00:23:28.600
economy-wide carbon tax all the way back in 2008. They said, look, we're going to reduce emissions
00:23:34.520
big time. In fact, they brought in legislation that the carbon tax would reduce emissions by a
00:23:41.560
third by 2020. Yet the BC government's own data shows that emissions have gone up. So even if you
00:23:49.000
take them at their words, it's very clear that the carbon tax makes people's lives more expensive,
00:23:54.840
and it doesn't work. But Ezra, let me just flip to one other element here, because we all know of
00:23:59.640
the consumer carbon tax. Now the issues around this hidden carbon tax on businesses, the industrial
00:24:05.480
carbon tax is coming to light. But you know, there's many of these environmental policies and
00:24:10.680
regulations that also use carbon taxes. Okay? The oil and gas cap, right? The production cap on the oil
00:24:17.880
and gas sector that uses the tool of a carbon tax. You've probably heard of the clean fuel regulations,
00:24:25.320
the so-called clean fuel regulations, Trudeau's term, that uses the carbon tax as its main tool.
00:24:32.200
So not only is it important to push back against the consumer carbon tax, the one we all know about,
00:24:37.560
but there's many of these different hidden carbon taxes and all these different environment or energy
00:24:43.400
regulations that governments are forcing on the people. You know, I was thinking about the United
00:24:49.480
Kingdom because I saw a crazy headline. Did you know that there's only one last steel mill in the
00:24:56.600
United Kingdom? It's owned by British Steel, but British Steel isn't even British anymore. It's owned
00:25:00.840
by a Chinese company. It's the last blast furnace in the UK that can create what they call virgin steel.
00:25:08.360
There's a few others that sort of melt down scrap and reform things, but it's the last, because to
00:25:15.480
make steel from scratch, you need a heat so hot only a coal-fired steel mill will work. You can't do it
00:25:23.080
through electricity. And now because of their obsession with what they call net zero over there,
00:25:30.280
the last steel mill in the UK may be shut down. Not that it's inefficient, not that it would fail on its
00:25:37.400
own, but because they just can't make a steel mill without coal. And it's sort of crazy to me,
00:25:45.080
Franco, that the birthplace of the industrial revolution is also the grave site of the industrial
00:25:50.120
revolution. Are you worried that this carbon tax could do the same to our steel industry and the
00:25:56.760
aluminum industry needs an enormous amount of energy? Also, are you worried about the last of the
00:26:04.200
hearty manufacturing in this country, moving probably to the United States where they have
00:26:08.760
cheaper power? Well, of course, I'm worried about the carbon taxes driving away jobs in
00:26:14.120
manufacturing in Canada. And I'm glad you brought this up because this really shows why Carney's
00:26:19.240
hidden carbon tax on business is the worst of all worlds, right? It'll mean higher prices for you
00:26:25.400
as refineries, utilities, fertilizer plants pass on costs to consumers at the end of the day.
00:26:31.240
But what it also means is this carbon tax on Canadian business will push businesses to cut
00:26:37.960
production in Canada and set up shops south of the border. Why is that? Well, number one,
00:26:44.840
it doesn't matter who occupies the White House, whether it's a Democrat administration or Republican
00:26:50.280
one, they're not imposing national carbon taxes in the United States. So like we've heard Trump say many
00:26:56.200
times, right? Let's get manufacturing into the United States, more American jobs, more investment
00:27:01.640
in the US. Well, guess what? Carney's carbon tax on Canadian businesses are going to help Trump do just
00:27:08.520
that, right? It punishes Canadian businesses. And of course, it'll lead to fewer production in Canada,
00:27:14.360
more production in the United States. And that means less job opportunities for Canadians right here at home.
00:27:20.040
The man is Franco Teresano. The book is called Axing the Tax, The Rise and Fall of Canada's Carbon Tax.
00:27:28.040
I wish you good luck. I am very worried as it stands right now. I mean, I feel like the carbon tax net zero
00:27:36.840
man himself might win. I'm talking about Mark Carney. I mean, he literally was the co-chair of a global net zero
00:27:43.720
alliance. I think your book is more urgent than ever. And I'd like to encourage our viewers to find it
00:27:48.680
at amazon.ca. Anywhere else they can get it? Can they get it at the Taxpayers Federation website too?
00:27:55.000
No, the best place to pick up this book, folks, Axing the Tax, The Rise and Fall of Canada's Carbon Tax
00:28:00.600
is at amazon.ca. You can order it, buy it right now. Well, we absolutely must. Franco, great to
00:28:07.240
spend some time with you. Thanks very much. Hey, I really appreciate this, Ezra. Thank you.
00:28:11.240
All right. There he is, the man who is fighting with his team. And what I like about them is they don't
00:28:16.120
take any money from the government. That's the only reason you can trust them. Because anyone else
00:28:21.080
who takes government money, well, they're just, you know, if you pay Peter, if Peter pays Paul,
00:28:35.400
Ezra Levant reporting for Rebel News. I'm standing outside the Ottawa courthouse.
00:28:39.160
I'm surprised. For months, I had thought that Tamara Leach would be acquitted. She, of course,
00:28:45.800
was the spiritual leader of the trucker convoy in January and February of 2022 that so gripped the
00:28:53.240
nation. Gripped the nation because how unique it was. A peaceful protest by ordinary working class
00:28:59.880
Canadians wasn't supported by any political party or any lobby group. It wasn't funded by anyone. In fact,
00:29:05.800
its crowdfunding was shut down twice. It was ordinary Canadians who said enough of the pandemic
00:29:11.880
lockdowns, enough of the bullying people who didn't want to be jabbed, enough of the no-fly list,
00:29:16.520
enough of the curfew, enough. And it caught not only the attention of Canadians, but around the world.
00:29:22.920
For one beautiful moment, the entire world looked at Canada and thought they are an inspiration for
00:29:28.200
freedom. And I can tell you, in my travels around the world, everyone refers to the trucker convoy
00:29:33.720
to this day. And one of the reasons it was so peaceful is because of Tamara Leach. She's not a
00:29:40.040
trucker herself, but she joined the truckers and she was in charge of logistics and she helped with
00:29:45.160
crowdfunding. But mainly she would make these beautiful statements in writing, in video, telling
00:29:51.960
people to keep their hopes up and their spirits up and insisting that they stay peaceful. And you know
00:29:56.760
what? They did. She was part of the Freedom Convoy Corporation. They actually incorporated a company,
00:30:03.560
I'm not sure why, but they dealt directly with the police and the city of Ottawa on a daily basis.
00:30:09.640
And what I mean by that is they would help move trucks around, move them out of residential areas
00:30:14.760
and into business areas where they wouldn't upset people who were living. There are a lot of people who
00:30:20.280
live in apartments in downtown Ottawa, typically bureaucrats who work in the civil service. They
00:30:26.680
worked with police in the city to move the trucks to Wellington Street, which is the big road next to
00:30:31.720
Parliament, where no one lives. And frankly, no one worked. Of course, civil servants in Ottawa still
00:30:36.680
haven't gone back to work. There's a lot of work from home, even though it's 2025. But my point is that
00:30:42.120
they had a daily collaboration with the police, not daily, hourly. And they, in fact, when truckers came
00:30:49.640
into Ottawa, they were given directions by the Ottawa police of where to go, what streets to go to and
00:30:55.480
which streets not. There was a honking issue, but there was a civil injunction issued by another judge and
00:31:02.280
it was obeyed immediately. It was not an illegal movement. From time to time, you hear critics saying
00:31:09.400
the illegal trucker convoy, it was never deemed illegal in any legal manner, other than by,
00:31:16.120
I don't know, politicians. It wasn't a riot. The Emergencies Act did not ban peaceful protests.
00:31:24.040
And the Emergencies Act itself, the invocation of it was deemed to be illegal and unconstitutional
00:31:29.960
by the federal court. So supporting people whose really only offense was parking infractions,
00:31:36.200
keeping it that peaceful was an astonishing achievement. And I saw the nearly 50-day trial.
00:31:46.040
I'm not going to call it a sham trial, but I suppose it was because Tamara Leach never took the stand.
00:31:52.440
You might recall that in criminal law, the burden is with the prosecution. They have to prove you're
00:31:57.080
guilty. You don't have to prove you're innocent. So Tamara Leach didn't take the stand because she was
00:32:01.880
confident that the government couldn't prove she didn't, she did anything. And indeed she didn't.
00:32:07.160
She didn't drive a truck. She didn't block anything with the truck. She didn't encourage violence.
00:32:11.560
The opposite. She encouraged peace. And her co-defendant helped organize the truckers to be more in,
00:32:19.160
to conform with what the police wanted. I'm just astonished that she was already jailed for 49 days.
00:32:26.680
And then the trial itself had almost 50 days worth of hearings. This whole thing's been going on for
00:32:32.520
three years. And I thought, surely the judge will see that this is not in the public interest,
00:32:37.320
that this is an abuse of the law, that this is turning the process into the punishment, that allowing
00:32:44.120
this endless series of witnesses who had no direct contact with Tamara Leach. What was astonishing to me
00:32:50.440
as I listened to the hearing in the days I attended was that the people the Crown called had never met
00:32:57.480
Tamara Leach, never seen her, never talked to her, never emailed back and forth with her. How are you
00:33:02.040
a witness in her trial if you never even met her before? Like, aren't witnesses supposed to give
00:33:08.360
evidence about what they saw or heard? Instead, it was witnesses giving evidence about how they felt.
00:33:13.400
There was this one civic official. I think his name was Mr. Ayotte. I watched him testify. He just would
00:33:20.280
talk about how he went for a walk and he would hear horn honking or see trucks. He didn't take notes.
00:33:25.640
He didn't take videos. He just sort of had a dear diary. Today I saw a big bad truck. And I listened
00:33:31.720
to almost a day of his testimony and I was astonished that this was even allowed. I thought to myself,
00:33:36.760
and I said, that the judge is only allowing this mockery of a trial so that the Crown doesn't have
00:33:44.760
grounds to appeal. The judge is deferring to the prosecution in every aspect so they can't later
00:33:52.200
complain that it was an unfair trial. But the joke's on me. The judge was with the prosecution.
00:33:59.240
Now, there's still about 30 pages left for the judge to read in her ruling today.
00:34:05.000
But we know that she's been convicted on the first count. She'll surely be convicted on others.
00:34:09.400
And it really doesn't matter. Convicted on any of them is a scandal. Last night I talked to Tamara Leach
00:34:14.840
about the possibility that she would be convicted. And she agreed to accept the help from the
00:34:20.200
Democracy Fund to help crowdfund her legal defense. As you may know, our partners at the Democracy Fund
00:34:26.360
who have been defending Tamara Leach at great expense. It's an enormous trial. There's Edward Greenspan,
00:34:35.160
the top lawyer in Ottawa, and two deputy lawyers. So there was three lawyers the Democracy Fund was
00:34:41.400
paying for. And by the way, there were nine lawyers in the court. It's been an astonishing waste of
00:34:46.120
resources. But look what the government can say. They can say Tamara Leach is a criminal. I know in my
00:34:51.080
bones that's not true. And I found the explanations of the judge astonishing, frankly. I just can't get over
00:34:58.920
that one thing the judge said. Because Tamara Leach was helping de-escalate the situation. That's what
00:35:05.400
the judge said. Because Tamara Leach was helping to put in a better plan for truckers that didn't
00:35:11.560
interfere so much with people. Because she was helping de-escalate. Said the judge, that proved that she
00:35:19.480
knew there was a crime afoot. That proved she knew there was mischief afoot. So even though she was
00:35:25.000
helping lower the temperature. Even though she was helping to fix the problem. Well, that just shows
00:35:29.640
she knew there was a problem. And thus she should be convicted of mischief. I am frankly astonished.
00:35:35.400
And I want to be really honest with you. I spend a lot of time in the courts,
00:35:38.920
both as a journalist reporting on what I see, and actually as someone in courtroom battles. As you know,
00:35:44.600
Rebel News goes to court quite often to fight for freedoms. And sometimes we're sued ourselves.
00:35:49.240
This is what a real dent in my belief of the administration of justice is fair and balanced
00:35:56.440
in this country. I now feel, and I have to be honest with you, I feel like there are two tiers
00:36:01.640
of justice in this country. I feel like if you're an actual criminal, say in my city of Toronto,
00:36:08.840
the police, their response to home invasion robberies is literally to tell citizens,
00:36:14.600
leave your keys near the front door so the home invasion robbers can find them more easily and
00:36:20.520
don't ransack your house. That's literally the advice that the Toronto Police Service gives to
00:36:26.200
homeowners in that city for violent criminals. I mentioned already, if you're a foreign national
00:36:32.840
promoting Hamas riots, the police will actually give you an escort. But if you're a peaceful Métis
00:36:39.560
grandma from Alberta who says, hold the line, police and the courts will interpret that as a call to
00:36:45.720
violence, or a call to law breaking at least, and you'll be convicted of mischief. I'm astonished today
00:36:53.400
and I'm worried. I'm worried about Canada's future as a place for free speech for certain people. It'll
00:36:59.880
remain a free place for criminals and for foreign nationals coming here as part of the anti-Semitic
00:37:05.800
crime wave. I don't know. I'm disappointed. But I do know this. We're going to keep fighting. Where
00:37:12.200
there's life, there's hope. If you want to help me crowdfund the appeal of her conviction to try and get
00:37:17.240
an acquittal in the appeal court, help us out at helptamara.com. As you know, all the money goes
00:37:22.120
to the democracy fund. You'll get a charitable tax receipt. That said, it's always an uphill battle
00:37:27.400
to appeal a court ruling. And this is a ruling of over a hundred pages long. It's quite likely that the
00:37:33.160
judge has written it in sort of a legally bulletproof way. So I don't want to, I don't want to mislead you.
00:37:39.400
Appealing this ruling will be an uphill battle. I think we have to do it though. If we won't, who will?
00:37:44.600
For Rebel News at the Ottawa Courthouse, I'm Ezra Levance with some bad news.