EZRA LEVANT ｜ Telegram CEO arrested. Will globalist censors target Elon Musk next？
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
168.99843
Summary
After the arrest of Pavel Durov, the CEO of the messaging app Telegram, in France, the question is: Is Elon Musk next? Ezra talks to Alan Bokhari, founder of the Foundation for Freedom Online, to ask that question.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello my friends, one of my favorite guests. We used to talk to him more often, but wow,
00:00:04.100
we reconnected today. I'm talking about Alam Bokhari. He used to be the senior tech editor
00:00:09.520
at Breitbart.com. Total Silicon Valley insider in terms of his connections, but he fights for
00:00:15.720
freedom and we're going to have a great rollicking talk today about Elon Musk, about Pavel Durov,
00:00:21.340
the president of the app called Telegram, who was arrested in France. Lots of stuff,
00:00:27.800
a feature interview. Sit back and enjoy. Do me a favor and why don't you get a subscription to
00:00:33.480
the video version of this podcast. It's called Rebel News Plus. That's what we call our subscription
00:00:38.580
service. It's eight bucks a month, which might not be a lot of money to you, but it really adds up for
00:00:43.280
us because we don't take any money from the government. We're completely demonetized by
00:00:47.200
big tech. So really it's just you. If you can help us, we'll stay strong. Go to rebelnewsplus.com.
00:00:57.800
Tonight, they arrested the head of a social media company called Telegram.
00:01:03.440
Are they coming for Elon Musk next? It's August 30th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:14.480
Well, as you know, when I was in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum, two names kept coming
00:01:27.780
up, the two names they were most afraid of. Not afraid in a personal sense, but afraid that
00:01:32.980
these people would stop their agenda, this globalist, rootless, stateless, socialist agenda,
00:01:39.300
technocratic, the kind of thing that would cause Keir Starmer, the prime minister of the UK,
00:01:45.400
to say he preferred Davos to the Westminster Parliament. Remember when Starmer said that?
00:01:50.820
Let's ask you quickly. You have to choose now between Davos or Westminster.
00:01:56.480
Well, the enemy of Davos, according to the Davosians, these are the World Economic Forum people,
00:02:01.740
was number one, most obviously, Donald Trump. He would stop so many of their schemes and stop some
00:02:07.760
of their wars too, which they love. But the number two name, and it was a very close second, was Elon
00:02:12.740
Musk. Now, Elon Musk is a great industrialist, a great entrepreneur, a dreamer, a visionary, a futurist.
00:02:20.080
I mean, my gosh, the man wants to colonize Mars. That's the kind of sort of crazy utopian schemes
00:02:26.380
that they normally love at the World Economic Forum. But the fact that Elon Musk believes,
00:02:31.920
or he says he believes, and it seems to be true, in freedom, and using Twitter to free
00:02:37.520
once-censored people, that irritated them in a very deep way. And there was a link between the two.
00:02:44.060
You felt that when they talked about Trump, that Elon Musk was rehabilitating him
00:02:49.020
and his supporters. It was very interesting. And so when I saw the other day that a billionaire
00:02:55.980
tech tycoon, Pavel Durov, born in Russia, the founder of various social networks, and now the
00:03:04.380
CEO of a messaging app called Telegram, when I saw that Durov, when he flew into France purportedly at
00:03:12.320
the invitation of the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who said, hey, come to Paris, let's have
00:03:16.680
dinner. When Durov landed at the airport, he was arrested and charged with a whole roster of
00:03:24.660
crimes allegedly being perpetrated by his social media app called Telegram. And all I could think
00:03:33.600
of was that is what they, that is a test drive, that is a dress rehearsal for the big game. They
00:03:41.640
would, if they could, and they might, do that to Elon Musk himself. Joining us now to talk about this
00:03:48.540
and so many other social media things, is a man who probably knows more about economic, sorry,
00:03:53.620
about internet freedom, rather, than anyone else I've ever met. Someone who's been studying
00:03:58.440
internet freedom and the loss of it at the hands of government and by woke entries in those corporations
00:04:04.620
themselves. You know who I'm talking about. His name is Alan Bokhari. He's the managing director
00:04:09.320
of the Foundation for Freedom Online, and we're just so happy to have him back as a guest today.
00:04:17.940
Do you agree with the World Economic Forum delegates that I met with, that after Donald Trump, a close
00:04:25.400
second in terms of jamming their plans, is Elon Musk? Do you agree with them? Should they be worried
00:04:33.140
about Elon Musk? I can certainly see why they said that, and it seems very accurate. What's really
00:04:41.340
frustrating to them about Elon Musk, I think, because the delegates at the World Economic Forum
00:04:47.480
have a vested interest in the thing that global internet censorship is trying to protect, which is
00:04:55.200
this global system of narrative control and corresponding political control. They worry that internet freedom
00:05:02.600
is going to eventually undermine their political power because it will undermine their control over narratives
00:05:08.500
and over what the public of Western countries and countries around the world believe.
00:05:14.560
And Elon Musk really epitomized that, and his takeover of Twitter really epitomized that.
00:05:19.800
It really broke down this system of censorship that they've been able to build up
00:05:26.420
over the preceding half decade or more. And what's really frustrating to them about Elon Musk is that
00:05:34.220
he's a little bit different to someone like Pavel Dura, because you mentioned Pavel Dura. Dura founded
00:05:40.580
the Russian version of Facebook. He founded Telegram. These are the most big, big platforms
00:05:44.860
with massive influence. But Elon Musk has many, many other companies, and he's kind of essential
00:05:52.200
to Western governments. They can't just, you know, arrest him or bankrupt him or get rid of him in
00:05:59.700
some other way, because, you know, just look recently at this story with the stranded astronauts.
00:06:06.900
So NASA had to request help from SpaceX because they have a couple of astronauts stranded on the
00:06:14.100
International Space Station because the Boeing-built spacecraft that took them there malfunctioned and
00:06:19.860
can't bring them back home to Earth. So SpaceX has to come into the rescue.
00:06:24.100
The government's increasingly dependent on SpaceX rockets.
00:06:27.520
You go to Ukraine. Ukraine uses Starlink for a lot of their operations.
00:06:35.020
So, you know, Musk is kind of essential to the Western, the Western aero, becoming essential to the Western
00:06:41.000
aerospace, to Western internet infrastructure, to Western militaries.
00:06:46.060
And so even though the deep states and the governments of the West hate him for bringing
00:06:51.080
free speech back to the people and threatening the basis of their political power, they also
00:06:56.000
need him because he's shoring up their military power and he's succeeding where, you know,
00:07:05.000
So, you know, on the one hand, he's this massive threat to them. On the other hand,
00:07:09.720
That is such a good point. I hadn't heard it expressed until you said it here.
00:07:13.740
I mean, Durov is an interesting personality. He's sort of a brooding guy, but he's an innovator,
00:07:19.540
of course. But he feels like sort of almost like a lone ranger. Whereas, God forbid, if
00:07:26.740
Elon Musk were arrested, I could just imagine what would happen to the price of Tesla. It
00:07:31.680
would plummet. SpaceX, Neuralink, all of his projects. He's responsible. His company alone
00:07:38.280
sends more than 90 percent of all payloads from planet Earth into space. So SpaceX, the company he
00:07:45.840
runs, does more space work than NASA, China, the Russian cosmonauts, all combined times 10.
00:07:55.280
And he has, Starlink is the name of his civilian system, but he has a military system and he's
00:08:01.260
putting up there just as quickly. I forget the name of it right now, but it's military. So you
00:08:06.960
can't take him out. He really is an essential man. You know, they say the graveyards are full
00:08:15.020
of irreplaceable men, but I think that Elon Musk might be the closest thing we have to that. You
00:08:23.860
would see the New York Stock Exchange tank. You would see, and he has a lot of friends that he's
00:08:28.720
made very wealthy along the way. I don't think there's actually another person in history who has
00:08:33.140
created more wealth for others than he has. That's a very good point. So in that, I'm not going to say
00:08:39.720
he's untouchable, but I don't know. Why do you think they went after Durov this way? It said,
00:08:47.100
you know, if you look at the official rap sheet, they say, well, you're allowing drug trafficking,
00:08:51.180
you're allowing human trafficking, you're allowing other crimes, you're not disclosing all that.
00:08:57.300
I suppose in a technical sense, that's probably true. Just like cell phone companies are letting
00:09:01.960
people commit crimes on the phone. And, you know, just like the post office lets you commit crimes if
00:09:08.780
you write mean letters. I mean, I suppose any platform allows crimes to happen on it. You don't
00:09:14.240
generally charge the owner of Apple with a crime for what's done on their phones. Am I right?
00:09:22.720
That's correct. And this is what liability exemptions for social media platforms and
00:09:27.720
online websites are supposed to protect them from. It's obviously ridiculous to say that,
00:09:33.500
you know, a phone line is responsible for someone using the phone to commit a crime.
00:09:37.040
But this really epitomizes the new relationship between governments and tech platforms. After
00:09:45.420
2016, and right up to say 2021, 2022, there was this extraordinary pressure that Silicon Valley
00:09:52.620
really succumbed to from the deep state, from their allies and the NGO media complex, you know,
00:09:58.980
the advertising industry, which Silicon Valley is quite dependent on, to force them to censor their
00:10:04.100
platforms and in particular to censor the 2020 presidential election. Now, Musk taking over
00:10:11.600
Twitter was, you know, the first big crack in that system that they've developed. But now we're seeing
00:10:19.200
more and more people in Silicon Valley coming out and saying, you know, we don't support, you know,
00:10:24.360
these government demands for censorship. We were even tricked by the government. You had
00:10:28.000
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg telling the Judiciary Committee recently that the FBI told him that
00:10:36.000
the Hunter Biden laptop story was going to be a Russian hoax. And that was obviously a complete
00:10:40.780
lie. So I think many in Silicon Valley feel that they were hoodwinked by the deep state and its allies,
00:10:47.440
that they were unduly pressured by it, as well as the media and advertisers and so on, that they were
00:10:53.500
forced to do things they really didn't want to do. But with the entire industry acting as one,
00:10:58.220
it was very easy for every company to do the same thing and engage in the same kind of censorship.
00:11:03.580
And I think Elon Musk, you know, was a real sign to those people in Silicon Valley, those other people
00:11:09.740
who had misgivings about what had gone on with censorship over the previous half decade that,
00:11:15.020
you know, it was time to roll back the censorship to come out and say they didn't support it,
00:11:20.460
to come out and say they were pressured. So it's really, really been a massive, massively positive
00:11:26.620
development. And I think this coming presidential election is going to be far less censored than the
00:11:33.420
2020 election, although there are still holdouts like Microsoft and Google, which still have their
00:11:38.460
censorship regimes in place. I saw that letter from Mark Zuckerberg and it was interesting that he
00:11:45.420
conceded so much, he admitted so much. He admitted that some of that we knew before because of lawsuits
00:11:53.020
that caused the disclosure of internal records of how the deep state, the FBI and other government
00:11:58.940
agencies basically had direct backdoor access into various social media companies. And they had
00:12:06.540
sort of direct back channels to senior executives who would just give them whatever they wanted.
00:12:11.580
it. So some of that came out through litigation. When Zuckerberg basically admits, and I would say
00:12:20.700
even slightly apologizes for it, my first reaction is they're still censoring us today, for example.
00:12:30.060
One of our former reporters, Tommy Robinson, he's quite a controversial character. I'm aware of that.
00:12:36.380
But if you put anything on Facebook with his image or voice, that post will be suspended,
00:12:43.100
and you could risk your entire account being taken down. I don't want to emphasize that one example,
00:12:47.740
but I'm just saying, I'm not sure if I accept his apology at face value when he is continuing his woke
00:12:55.260
censorship on a daily basis. Maybe not so much on Trump versus Kamala Harris, but on so many other
00:13:02.460
woke things. I think Facebook is just as censorious today as it was a month ago and a year ago. What do
00:13:07.740
you think? Like, I just don't believe it's decided suddenly to change its corporate culture and no longer
00:13:17.580
Yeah, or if it has, it's in a way that's, you know, not really noticeable to the people who are actually
00:13:24.140
engaged in dissident political conversations. I remember, I think it was 2022 when I was still a reporter for
00:13:30.460
Breitbart. I got a hold of Facebook's massive list of so-called hate agents, you know, prominent
00:13:37.340
social media, prominent figures on Facebook that they were monitoring and potentially going to ban.
00:13:44.860
And there were all sorts of mainstream, you know, big right wing names on there. I believe Tommy
00:13:49.020
Robinson was one of them. There was also Laura Loomer and many, many other, many other people were on that
00:13:54.460
list. So, you know, they had, they had a literal blacklist of political figures that they didn't
00:13:59.580
like. There were politicians on that list as well, if I remember correctly.
00:14:02.940
Yeah, I bet Nigel Horowitz has just continued to hold Facebook's feet to the fire and understand what,
00:14:08.780
if they're actually, if they're actually, like you said, rolling back any of their censorship policies.
00:14:13.100
I know they reinstated Donald Trump, but you know, that's, that's, you know, the bare minimum,
00:14:18.780
I would say. And it's also interesting to see in Brazil, we see the Brazilian Supreme Court going,
00:14:26.380
electoral court going after Elon Musk and X so strongly, but they haven't really said anything
00:14:31.100
about Facebook. And I think there'd be much more up in arms if Facebook were moving in an
00:14:36.220
anti-censorship direction, especially because in Brazil, they're so concerned with WhatsApp,
00:14:41.580
which is a Facebook company and so-called misinformation spreading on WhatsApp. WhatsApp was
00:14:46.220
seen as this critical factor in helping Bolsonaro win and get around media, media censorship in when
00:14:53.980
he won the election there. So the fact that Brazil is, you know, going so hard after Musk, but saying
00:15:00.620
nothing about Facebook suggests to me that Facebook is still in compliance largely with this global system
00:15:08.620
of censorship. Mm hmm. I find it terrifying that billions of people in the world are at the mercy of
00:15:15.660
individual men in terms of how we perceive things and what we say. I mean, I remember that famous quote,
00:15:23.180
I'm sure you know it off by heart, at Twitter, before Elon Musk took it over, I think, was it Parag, I forget his name,
00:15:32.380
a senior executive there who said, we don't believe in freedom, we believe in freedom of speech, but not
00:15:37.900
freedom of reach, I think was his phrase, which is, oh yeah, come on Twitter, say what you like,
00:15:44.780
fill your boots. We just won't show your words to anybody. So you'll have the simulation of free speech,
00:15:53.020
and you'll feel really good as some therapeutic exercise. But we're not going to let anyone hear
00:15:59.260
you. And that's so terrifying, because how do you know? You know, in the internet world, when
00:16:05.660
everything is filtered through these social media apps and their algorithms, how do you know? How do
00:16:10.460
you know if what you're saying gets out? And even more terrifying, how do you know that your perception
00:16:16.380
of the world is accurate, or what is being kept from your knowledge? I feel like I've eaten from
00:16:23.180
the tree of knowledge when I'm on Twitter, and I see, for example, the recent riots in the United
00:16:29.260
Kingdom. But for people who aren't on Twitter, who are on more censored apps, they don't even know about
00:16:34.860
that. If they know something about it, they probably believe the debunked government narrative.
00:16:42.060
And, and God forbid, Twitter were to fall or must be were to be jailed. I honestly don't know how I
00:16:49.340
would be able to know what the world is like, other than what's immediately in front of me,
00:16:53.500
because I can't trust things going through the out through any algorithm through any company.
00:16:56.780
And it feels like five oligarchs controlling my entire information flow. Well, I don't know,
00:17:01.740
is there a solution? It is, it is very precarious to have so much of our free speech infrastructure,
00:17:10.700
as you said, kind of dependent on one guy. The, you know, the fact that the rest of Silicon Valley,
00:17:16.460
you see venture capitalists like David Sachs being increasingly vocal, you see, you know,
00:17:22.940
other figures, Mark Andreessen, Balaji Srinivasan, you know, all these are fairly big Silicon Valley
00:17:29.980
figures. And there are much more vocal in their support of free speech today than they were in 2020,
00:17:36.060
some were completely silent in 2020. So it's more than just Elon Musk. I think Silicon Valley as a
00:17:42.780
whole has, you know, outside of the really, some of the really big tech companies like Microsoft and
00:17:48.940
Google has on the whole distance itself from the system of government control. But, you know,
00:17:54.380
I've always supported pro free speech regulation of tech companies. I'll be clear, I don't support this
00:18:01.900
sort of very strange sort of DC populist idea that you have to regulate the tech companies at any
00:18:08.940
chance you get. You know, to me, that's just handing weapons to the government that, you know,
00:18:14.860
that, you know, the government that wants new weapons to punish platforms like X and to punish
00:18:19.340
people like Elon Musk. But I do support these bills that have been passed in some of the states.
00:18:24.140
I think Texas passed a law that says, you know, if you're a user of a social media platform,
00:18:29.580
you should have a private right of action against social media platforms and other tech platforms.
00:18:34.940
If they ban your account, if they deny you service, you should be able to take them to court
00:18:39.820
and get your account reinstated if they suspended it unfairly or unjustly, which in many cases,
00:18:45.980
they do. It's preposterous to me that you have more due process if you own a physical business
00:18:54.380
with a physical location from being evicted than you do from being banned from your social media
00:19:00.380
account or your Amazon account or your e-commerce accounts or even your PayPal account. These are,
00:19:04.700
you know, these online accounts are arguably much more important today to having a livelihood
00:19:11.020
than a physical business. And yet you have due process in one, but not the other. So I support
00:19:17.740
regulations like that, which sort of go beyond any individual or any oligarch in guaranteeing
00:19:25.580
free speech on social media. You know, it's interesting. I think of my own Twitter account,
00:19:31.180
which I've been tripping away at for 15 years, more than 100,000 little comments I've made,
00:19:37.740
a huge waste of time, I guess. But looked at from another point of view,
00:19:40.540
I've built up a big audience there through my own input. I mean, yes, I was a, you know,
00:19:47.100
they are the vendor or I'm the customer and there was a system of rules, but I have put a lot of work
00:19:53.820
into it. And I, we built the same with YouTube, same with all these other apps. We built our
00:19:58.620
companies around them based on a certain bundle of promises. And then they suddenly wake up one day
00:20:04.620
and say, well, it's a fireable offense if you're politically incorrect in this way or that way.
00:20:10.540
If you, you know, misgender someone to just to give a certain example, I don't know what I,
00:20:19.500
one of the things that I think about quite often, I'm going to shift gears here for a second about
00:20:24.940
Elon Musk and Twitter. And I thought of it again when he was called on to bail out NASA,
00:20:30.460
NASA, which is just so gorgeous, just so beautiful. NASA is all about DEI, diversity,
00:20:35.980
equity, inclusion. And that's not my opinion. That's what they boast about. I mean, they just
00:20:40.680
won't stop talking about DEI. They sort of forgot about the going into space part. So we have to
00:20:45.740
send Musk to the rescue. I remember, do you remember, Alan, right around the time that,
00:20:50.860
that Elon Musk was about to take over Twitter, there was all these, a day in the life of a Twitter
00:20:57.760
worker videos that all these, they were almost always young women in their twenties, millennial
00:21:04.980
or not Gen Z, but young women in their twenties, typically in HR or some other ethereal subjective
00:21:11.840
department that, that I don't even know if they could explain what they did. And they would do,
00:21:17.260
here's what my day at Twitter was like. I stopped in at the massage room. I went for a coffee. I got
00:21:22.780
a free cocktail. I had lunch. I was on the, and I mean, take a look here. I'll show you an example of
00:21:28.660
it. And I think Elon Musk finally saw one of these and he just flipped his wig. Here, take a look.
00:21:34.560
Welcome to a day in my life as a Twitter employee. So this past week went to SF for the first time
00:21:41.320
at a Twitter office, badged in, honestly took a moment to just soak everything in. What a blessing.
00:21:48.540
Also started my morning off with an iced matcha from the perch. Then I had a meeting. So quickly
00:21:54.520
scheduled one of these little pod rooms, which were so cool. They're literally noise canceling.
00:21:59.740
Took my meeting, got ready for a bunch. Look how delicious this food looks. Oh my goodness. I was so
00:22:05.900
overwhelmed. Then made my way down to this log cabin area. I don't know what this is, but it was really
00:22:12.680
cool. Played some foosball with my friends to kind of unwind a bit. Also found this really cool
00:22:20.020
meditation room that I thought was super neat. I didn't do any yoga, but they have this yoga room
00:22:27.520
if you were a yogi. So also thought that was really cool. Um, had a couple more meetings
00:22:32.960
in the afternoon, had a ton of projects that we needed to knock out. Say hi to my teammates.
00:22:37.740
Um, went to the, went to the library to kind of get some more work done. Obviously had to have
00:22:44.200
our afternoon coffee. So made some espresso. And then before leaving for the day, had some red wine,
00:22:50.340
um, that's on tap, went up to the rooftop and just honestly enjoyed the beautiful weather.
00:22:58.280
I mean, that looks like who wouldn't want to go to work there. But the thing is Elon Musk,
00:23:03.060
if you ask him what he is, essentially he'll say he's an engineer and he looks at Twitter as an
00:23:09.980
engineering product. He looks at SpaceX as an engineering product. I don't know much about
00:23:14.440
the boring company, but it's an engineering product. That's the tunneling company he has.
00:23:19.040
He's the flamethrower guy. He's the neural link guy. All of this is about hard sciences.
00:23:25.300
And so when he took over Twitter and fired 80% of the people there, probably every single gal
00:23:30.320
who did one of these day in the life videos, a lot of people said, Oh, you've wrecked it.
00:23:34.900
He didn't wreck it. He just cleaned the barnacles off the ship. And he's actually rolled out more
00:23:41.300
product functionality on Twitter in the last year than they did five years previously.
00:23:46.260
I think if you put Elon Musk in government, as I think Trump has been suggesting he might,
00:23:52.800
you put Elon Musk in charge of any government department, I don't think it would ever really
00:23:57.180
happen. But I think he could cut 80% of any bureaucracy and increase the output. I know that
00:24:03.000
sounds absurd, but the guy just did it on a $40 billion purchase he just made. What do you make of
00:24:08.100
that? I can see that happening. I think he would absolutely do that. He really runs his companies
00:24:15.300
very efficiently. And yeah, Twitter is still functioning perfectly well today, despite losing
00:24:23.440
80% of its workforce, as you said. And it's interesting that one of the things that global
00:24:31.080
internet censors really hope, and they say this in their public statements, they hope that regulations
00:24:36.700
like the EU's Digital Services Act will force platforms like X to rehire some of the people
00:24:42.940
they let go from the content moderation departments, the trust and safety departments, the censorship
00:24:47.920
squads, basically. They hope that regulation will force those to come back. But yeah, talking about
00:24:54.860
efficiency in government and what a Musk-like figure could do for that, it's not just the
00:25:02.380
government itself, but also the people they favor and the companies they favor in the private sector.
00:25:08.780
So much of this is because of contracts. So the spacecraft that failed to bring those astronauts
00:25:14.220
back to Earth, and now NASA has to turn to SpaceX, was a Boeing spacecraft, the same company whose
00:25:20.380
planes are malfunctioning everywhere because of engineering failures, because Boeing became a
00:25:26.620
sort of financialized company that forgot about that deprioritized engineering versus just making
00:25:33.660
profits and having a good balance sheet. So that's one example of a company that the government tends to
00:25:40.860
favor. We've also found out recent research found that the government funds the architects of censorship
00:25:46.220
through government contracts, over $10 billion collectively going to the same advertising
00:25:51.420
agencies that were members of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, that same ad cartel that was
00:25:59.100
boycotting platforms like X, that was boycotting news companies for presenting dissident viewpoints or
00:26:06.220
allowing too much free speech. Government funds those companies over $10 billion, like I said, in things like
00:26:11.860
army recruitment ads and public service announcements. So what I hope happens is that a lot of these
00:26:18.900
contracts which go to entities that support the restriction of free speech and the restriction of
00:26:27.220
viewpoints online get really looked at by the public, that more people are aware that the US government
00:26:34.260
and taxpayers are funding this global network of speech censorship.
00:26:38.900
Yeah. You know, we've been censored by a number of these groups. I'll mention one of them,
00:26:43.380
NewsGuard, which is a self-appointed fact checker censor. And they don't actually check our facts,
00:26:49.860
they check our opinions. We've gone through the process several times, it's a waste of time.
00:26:54.180
They have their answer in advance, they just go through the motions. But they never,
00:26:58.020
I don't think we've ever been caught with a factual error by them. We correct errors when we make them.
00:27:03.140
And it's not, we're not, we love corrections. It sort of proves that everything else we got right.
00:27:07.940
I don't mind making a correction any day of the week. But what NewsGuard does is it says,
00:27:11.620
well, why did you interview this person? He has a point of view that's wrong. So, well,
00:27:16.500
but we accurately reported what this person in a contentious debate said. NewsGuard says you
00:27:22.580
shouldn't platform him at all because he's wrong. Well, he's part of the debate and we're just
00:27:27.860
showing both sides of the story. That is not a fact check. But NewsGuard is funded in part
00:27:33.300
by government contracts. I saved the story for another day. I bumped in to our sense.
00:27:38.500
Another thing NewsGuard does is it'll take blacklists of media companies like yours,
00:27:43.860
you're no doubt on the NewsGuard blacklist. It'll take those blacklists, it'll take them to the
00:27:48.420
advertising industry. The advertising industry will then use those blacklists to say, okay,
00:27:52.900
they don't get any ad revenue. We're going to financially throttle them because NewsGuard says they're bad.
00:27:57.860
They're also working with the European Union on their own, their vast online censorship apparatus.
00:28:03.380
This is like really a far reaching censorship organization that stretches across the Atlantic
00:28:08.420
in its influence. You're so right. And the NewsGuard browser extension blocks access to our site.
00:28:16.340
So they're atrocious. I'll save the story for another day, but I actually bumped in to our sensor
00:28:21.380
at an airport once. He didn't recognize me. I recognized him. I said, hello, I was being very
00:28:25.700
pleasant. And he said, who are you again? And I said, oh, I'm Ezra Levant with Rebel News.
00:28:30.580
You oversaw the censorship of us. And he was sort of startled by that. We spoke for about an hour.
00:28:35.860
He's not going to change. He gets paid too much and he doesn't give a care. And I'll tell that
00:28:41.220
story another day. Just briefly before we move on, it's actually quite relevant because if you keep
00:28:49.060
an eye on the Foundation for Freedom online website, foundationforfreedomonline.com,
00:28:53.780
we'll actually have a report up either today or tomorrow on NewsGuard's work in Europe.
00:28:58.100
Really? What a coincidence. I was just mentioning that because I bumped into this guy very recently.
00:29:03.460
I'll check that out for sure. They're awful. Hey, let me just, I wanted to show you one more
00:29:08.100
Elon Musk thing before I move on from him because he's great. There's this famous biographer, Walter
00:29:14.660
Isaacson, who's done some very, he's a great bestselling biographer. The guy can really write.
00:29:20.180
I think he did Steve Jobs biography too. And I saw this little video of him online talking about
00:29:26.580
the get it done, no BS, roll up your sleeves attitude of Elon Musk. And I just want to share
00:29:32.100
it. It's not really apropos of censorship. It's not really apropos of anything other than
00:29:37.780
what an interesting guy he is. And I know this is turning in sort of an Elon Musk fan club here,
00:29:42.340
but there's a lot to admire. And here's the story that Walter Isaacson tells of very early in the
00:29:49.860
days when Twitter was acquired by Musk, and they had to go to some server farm and unlock some and
00:29:56.740
take some servers out. And he asked his staff, how long will it take? This many months? Well,
00:30:01.460
you can do it in this many weeks. Like he was pushing them. No, no, it doesn't take months.
00:30:05.140
And in the end, they just flew there themselves. And Musk and his little team just did the work
00:30:12.340
themselves like that day that they had been told would take months to do. I didn't tell the story
00:30:17.380
great here. Look at Walter Isaacson to tell this fascinating little anecdote about the quintessence of
00:30:25.540
a no BS, get it done attitude that is so rare. Take a look.
00:30:30.260
He was at Twitter headquarters and he looks at all the engineering things and they have three server
00:30:37.780
farms for one in Portland, one in Sacramento, and one, I think in Atlanta. And he does the calculus
00:30:45.140
in his head. And he said, we don't really need three different redundant server farms. And the
00:30:50.260
engineers say, well, yes, we do, because we need backups and we need caching or whatever. And he says,
00:30:54.660
no, you're not going back to first principles linking. If you look at this. Anyway, he decides
00:31:01.300
they should get rid of the servers in Sacramento. Well, they say fine, but that'll take six months
00:31:06.340
because, and he said, no, you can do it in six weeks. And the engineer, and I'm sitting there in
00:31:12.820
the meeting and he's getting really dark and they don't know how to deal with him because it is like
00:31:16.980
a month after he took over Twitter. So they don't know this dude. And they say, well, no, I'm sorry,
00:31:21.460
Elon, we can't do it. And that, and he'd say, you can do it in six weeks. And by the end of the
00:31:25.540
meeting, he said, you can do it in six days. He gets really dark and he decides he's going to fire
00:31:31.460
them, but it's December 23rd. So it's like two days before Christmas. He does fire them. But
00:31:38.820
the next day, Christmas Eve, he's flying from San Francisco to Austin, Texas to go home for Christmas.
00:31:44.580
He's with two young cousins on the plane who are engineers. And one of them says,
00:31:49.780
why don't we just take those servers out ourselves? Elon Musk makes a U-turn in his
00:31:54.660
airplane, tells the pilot to go to Sacramento. They were already over Nevada. They land. He
00:32:01.300
rents, there are like four of them on the plane. They rent a truck, a sort of what we call a U-Haul
00:32:07.620
truck, a rental truck. And they go to the server facility and they, the guard there is like flummoxed.
00:32:14.900
It's Christmas Eve and they're forcing their way in and they're looking at the servers. And
00:32:20.580
one of the engineers says, well, you know, we can't take them out because we need engineers to
00:32:25.620
take off these elevated floors, you know, those floor tiles where people say. And Musk turns to his
00:32:32.580
bodyguard and says, do you got a pocket knife? The guy goes, yeah. And he takes a pocket knife and
00:32:38.100
pulls up one of the vents, rips up the floor thing, goes underneath the floor panel with a
00:32:43.300
set of wire cutters that he got from Home Depot and cuts the cable to the servers. And they start
00:32:49.700
moving them out and put them in the U-Haul truck. Just amazing. And how many CEOs would actually roll
00:32:56.580
up their sleeves and do something down and dirty like that, let alone one of the richest men in the
00:33:00.820
world? Go ahead, Alan. What's your reflection on that little clip? Yeah. And I think there is a
00:33:05.780
somewhat relationship to censorship here because this idea that competence should be prioritized
00:33:11.060
is actually pretty horrifying to the deep state and the supporters of censorship. The idea that you
00:33:15.940
should prioritize, you know, working space rockets and working airplanes and working satellites over
00:33:24.580
DEI quotas or, you know, getting another big contract for your buddies, you know, for the company that
00:33:30.980
you've been buddies with for the last five decades. You know, this is all very, very horrifying to the
00:33:36.660
permanent governing class in Washington and other places. And, you know, protecting themselves from
00:33:42.580
calls for competent governance and calls for competence in general, you know, calls for police to arrest
00:33:49.300
criminals and not innocent people who are expressing their political viewpoints. You know, just calls for
00:33:55.700
results that everyone wants is somehow an alien concept to the permanent governing class. And I
00:34:02.420
think that's a big part of why they're so desperate to control what people can say online because
00:34:08.260
they'll just, otherwise they'll just drown under a wave of criticism and organizing from
00:34:13.140
people who have had it with, frankly, their lack of competence.
00:34:16.580
Yeah. Hey, I want to ask you one last question about Elon Musk. We've seen a lot of people take
00:34:23.060
swipes at them all around the world. You mentioned a very senior judge in Brazil who's been issuing
00:34:32.420
astonishing demands against Twitter. Nicolas Maduro, the dictator of Venezuela,
00:34:40.180
has gone absolutely kooky. Like, I think he hallucinates that Elon Musk is breaking into his house or
00:34:46.100
something. France, we've seen condemnations of Elon Musk verbally and the symbolic, you know,
00:34:54.900
precedent setting arrest of Pavel Durov. The UK, Keir Starmer, I should say it with a German accent,
00:35:02.580
Herr Starmer has essentially blamed Elon Musk, not only for allowing Twitter to show race riots,
00:35:12.100
but says that Musk himself, his comments are themselves inciting hate.
00:35:19.700
You've seen European Union bureaucrats, one fellow, I want to get his name right, Thierry Breton,
00:35:26.020
if I'm saying it right, basically said on the eve of Elon Musk interviewing Donald Trump,
00:35:32.500
he sent off a letter saying, you better be careful what you ask him. You better be careful because you
00:35:37.700
could break European Union law. The idea of one American interviewing another American on an
00:35:42.340
American app being the subject of censorship of a European unelected bureaucrat is just off the
00:35:48.420
charts, French audacity. What I'm saying is all these world governments are basically saying,
00:35:55.620
I hate Elon Musk. He's safe in America. There's less than 70 days till the election. Do you think
00:36:02.820
there's going to be some September surprise, October surprise? We've already had such astonishing
00:36:08.740
things happen. The attempted assassination of Donald Trump, the coup replacing Joe Biden.
00:36:13.940
There's still plenty of time for more tricks up the sleeve of the supervillains. What do you think
00:36:19.460
might happen? Well, you know, this network of global censorship is, and there's pressure from
00:36:26.580
foreign governments. A lot of people in America, pro-censorship voices in America, really see the
00:36:32.900
European Union and its Digital Services Act, which is what the vast system of online internet regulation
00:36:40.820
that the EU passed into law this year, they see that as, which they pushed for, by the way, as essential
00:36:49.540
to controlling American speech. So they think the European Union, by pressuring American companies,
00:36:56.180
will force them to censor not just people in Europe, but also people in America. And with
00:37:01.620
Terry Breton's letter, that's sort of exactly what he's doing. He was using a, you know, Elon Musk
00:37:08.020
interviewing Donald Trump, an American interviewing another American in an American presidential election.
00:37:14.100
Terry Breton, a European bureaucrat, somehow had a problem with that. It's really none of his
00:37:17.860
business. And another thing to remember is, you know, European Union, Britain, Brazil, these are
00:37:24.340
all nominally US allies. The US has a lot of influence there. And what the State Department
00:37:29.540
is supposed to do in situations like this is stand up for American companies. They haven't. They've done
00:37:34.900
more than that. In fact, they actively supported and encouraged the Digital Services Act, this online
00:37:41.940
regulation regime that Terry Breton is relying on. And what's even more interesting to me is that,
00:37:49.220
you know, Republicans supposedly, you know, mostly, I would say, a very pro-free speech party. Jim
00:37:54.740
Jordan's done great work at the Judiciary Committee. But, you know, not apparently entirely pro-free speech
00:38:02.420
because, you know, and there are some, you know, pro-free speech Democrats as well. RFK until recently,
00:38:08.420
a Democrat, Tulsi Gabbard until a couple of years ago, a Democrat. But interesting that the House
00:38:14.900
Foreign Affairs Committee, which has jurisdiction over these areas, over, you know, US, what the US
00:38:21.060
ambassadors and what the US State Department is doing in places like the UK and the European Union
00:38:25.140
and Brazil hasn't actually said anything about Musk being forced out of Brazil and the EU threatening
00:38:33.220
his company. It's, you know, very, very interesting to me that that committee has said nothing when
00:38:37.780
it's in their jurisdiction. So it's important not to see these things in the European Union and Brazil
00:38:44.420
and the UK as isolated because they are, you know, America does have some influence, their influence,
00:38:48.900
which it's not using. Yeah. You know, I see censorship being bills and laws popping up around
00:38:57.620
the world in the United Kingdom, in Ireland, in Scotland, in Canada. In fact, they're often called
00:39:04.660
the same thing, the Online Harms Act. That's the name of it here. But I think that's actually what
00:39:09.540
it's called in the UK. One of the laws, correct me if I'm wrong. So I do see it popping up. It's sort
00:39:14.820
of surrounding America and America isn't pushing back. I want to close by showing one of your scoops
00:39:23.300
from years ago. This is the emergency town hall meeting after Donald Trump won. This was in the
00:39:33.300
Google headquarters, right? Why don't you set up the clip? I want to, there's a couple of clips. You
00:39:38.900
know, the one where the staff were shell shocked. They thought, like every New York Times reading
00:39:44.980
liberal, that there was like a 5% chance Trump would win, a 90 plus percent chance Hillary Clinton
00:39:50.660
would win. And then they thought, oh my God, not only did Trump win, he won because of social media.
00:39:57.220
Set up this town hall meeting and then we'll play a couple of clips from it. And then I got a question
00:40:02.740
for you about the 2024 election. Remind our viewers, what was this clip and where did you get it from?
00:40:08.740
And we'll play a little bit of it. Yeah. So this clip is, was Google's reaction to the 2016 election.
00:40:15.620
It was recorded just a couple of days after the election in 2016. And I managed to obtain it in 2018
00:40:23.380
from an entirely, I was receiving a lot of leaks at the time from employees at Google. Google had just
00:40:29.780
shifted in a massively pro-censorship direction that fired James Damore, who was speaking out
00:40:34.660
against ideological conformity inside the company. So I had all these Google employees reaching out to me
00:40:39.940
with their stories about what was going on inside the company. And someone, I still don't know who,
00:40:44.340
it was an anonymous email, sent me a Dropbox link containing this video. And it's fascinating because
00:40:50.660
it shows Google's entire executive team expressing their horror, not just their regular employees,
00:40:56.340
but their co-founders, their CEO, their C-suite expressing their horror at the Trump election.
00:41:01.780
And not just that, but also plotting what they would do to make sure similar things
00:41:06.020
didn't happen in the future. They talk about all the things we saw in the
00:41:09.700
following years, controlling disinformation, controlling fake news,
00:41:14.020
dealing with so-called low information voters. So it's not just a despair session. It's also a plotting
00:41:21.620
session. You know, it shows where Silicon Valley is going. Speaking to white men, there's an
00:41:26.740
opportunity for you right now to understand your privilege in the society. Take the opportunity to
00:41:31.860
go through the bias-busting training, read about privilege, read about the real history of oppression
00:41:36.500
in our country, and tomorrow night, watch 13th, the movie that is here. If you can't watch it here,
00:41:41.860
watch it on Netflix. Discuss the issues you are passionate about during Thanksgiving dinner,
00:41:46.660
and don't back down and laugh it off when you hear the voice of oppression speak through metaphors.
00:41:55.220
Google, I think, hasn't changed much at all. I think Google, along with Microsoft, which is a
00:42:00.580
partner of News Guard still, that organization we were just talking about, the media blacklisting
00:42:05.460
company, those two big tech companies, there's no signs of change at all. There's a little bit of,
00:42:10.340
we see some signs of change from Mark Zuckerberg. Like he said, he hasn't unbanned a lot of people,
00:42:14.180
but he has expressed at least some remorse at what he did in 2020. Obviously, X is now a mostly
00:42:20.500
free speech platform. But Google and Microsoft have shown no signs of changing, no signs that
00:42:26.580
they're going to change their search blacklists, which again, we were able to obtain them. They
00:42:31.380
were published at Breitbart News in 2019, YouTube political search blacklist, just search for it if
00:42:37.780
you can. So a lot of the big tech companies are still very much in the tank for censorship.
00:42:44.340
And despite the changing attitudes in Silicon Valley, more broadly, those are still two
00:42:49.620
giant companies that are very much tied to the regime and the global censorship complex.
00:42:55.140
8.30pm on Tuesday night, I was at home with friends and family watching the election returns.
00:43:01.300
And as we started to see the direction of the voting, I reached out to someone close to me who was at
00:43:08.980
the Javits Center where the big celebration was supposed to occur in New York City. Somebody had
00:43:15.060
been working on the campaign. And I just sent him a note and said, you know, are you okay? It looks
00:43:20.980
like it's going the wrong way. And I got back a very sad short text that read, people are leaving,
00:43:37.780
That was the first moment I really felt like we were going to lose. And it was this massive like
00:43:43.940
kick in the gut that we were going to lose. And it was really painful. It did feel like a ton of bricks
00:43:49.620
dropped on my chest. And I've had a chance to talk to a lot of fellow Googlers and people have said
00:43:54.980
different words, similar concept this, how painful is it? How painful this is?
00:43:59.620
Well, that's what they were like in 2016. Just they were shocked. They've had eight years to,
00:44:07.620
like you say, plot. If you had to predict what's going to happen in 2024, you said that
00:44:14.100
it'll be less censored than the 2020 election. I think some people are awake. People are alert to
00:44:21.460
some of the tricks. Zuckerberg himself said, I was tricked by the FBI or whoever.
00:44:29.140
How do you think the election is going to go? I mean, when it was Trump versus Biden,
00:44:34.980
I think people were feeling pretty good there for a while. Trump versus Harris,
00:44:38.020
it's got a lot of energy into the Democrats. What's your prediction? Like me, you're not an
00:44:42.500
American by birth. You're a keen observer and a friend of America. What do you think is going to happen?
00:44:48.020
I mean, it's interesting. I think Trump's chances are quite a bit better than they were in 2020.
00:44:55.860
In 2020, you had this combination of so many things. You had the very peak of Silicon Valley
00:45:01.380
censorship. Every single platform was controlled very, very tightly. Trump's most vocal supporters
00:45:09.540
were banned. He himself was censored on many occasions during the election and lost his account
00:45:14.020
on every major platform just after the election. That was all encouraged, by the way, by the US deep
00:45:21.140
state, by the agency within DHS, the Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency. There's a lot
00:45:30.980
of material there you can see about how they encouraged this since 2020 election. In addition to that,
00:45:36.820
the Democrats and their supporters just had a lot of energy going into that election. They were coming off the
00:45:43.700
the George Floyd riots and the mass mobilization there. They had an advantage because they had a
00:45:49.540
political turnout machine focused on mail-in ballots. Everyone was locked down under COVID.
00:45:54.340
So they had all these advantages, which I don't think they'll have this time around.
00:45:57.860
And also, if you look at the polling, it's true Kamala Harris had a bit of a bump
00:46:02.020
after she replaced Joe Biden, simply because she's not senile. But if you look at the polling averages,
00:46:10.740
Trump today is way better than where he was in 2020, and even way better than where he was in 2016,
00:46:17.940
at the same point in the race. So polling-wise, it's actually looking quite good for Trump, I would
00:46:23.700
say. It's still a very tight race. So it's really hard to say what the outcome is going to be
00:46:28.900
with any certainty. But certainly, there is less censorship. There's a genuine free speech
00:46:34.340
platform in X that people have access to. Trump's been unbanned on X. He's been unbanned on Facebook
00:46:39.940
as well. So we're dealing with a much less censored election than we were in 2020, which is great to
00:46:45.780
see. Yeah, I sure hope so. Well, I'm nervous about it. I'm also excited about it. Alma, it's great to
00:46:51.620
reconnect with you. Thanks for spending so much time with us and letting me talk so much. This is one of my
00:46:56.660
favorite subjects. I find Elon Musk, the leading citizen of our day. And he continues to impress
00:47:04.100
and perplex and challenge and innovate. And we are the beneficiaries of some of that because we are in
00:47:11.220
the free speech business too. By the way, I look forward to your NewsGuard story. What's your website
00:47:16.100
that we can find that at? Yeah, it'll be up on the foundationforfreedomonline.com. You'll find
00:47:22.100
plenty of other material there about NewsGuard. If you just tap the little search button,
00:47:26.500
you'll find a good rundown on NewsGuard on their work pushing global censorship.
00:47:31.620
Great. Nice to see you again. Keep fighting for freedom.