Rebel News Podcast - EZRA LEVANT ｜ That time Trudeau’s environment minister did a home invasion, terrorizing a woman home alone

00:00:00.000 Hello, my Rebels. Today, I tell you a second crime committed by Stephen Gilboa, the Environment

00:00:06.700 Minister, and I'm quite embarrassed to say this. I did not know about this second crime until today.

00:00:12.480 I was today years old when I learned that Stephen Gilboa participated in a kind of home invasion,

00:00:20.360 terrifying a woman in the house. I didn't know this, even though I lived not far away from the 1.00

00:00:24.980 house in that city where Gilboa committed this horrific offense. I'll tell you what I know,

00:00:30.740 and then you'll know it. Hey, by the way, I'd like you to subscribe to Rebel News Plus. What is that?

00:00:35.980 That's the video version of this podcast. I'd love you to see the images. I want you to see the picture

00:00:40.720 of this home invasion. We have a photo of it. And I want to let you know that the eight bucks a month

00:00:46.140 that it costs for the video version of this podcast, we really rely on that to pay the bills around here

00:00:50.900 because, you know, we're demonetized by YouTube. We get no money from the government. We would never

00:00:55.960 take it. So we really do rely on you. It's eight bucks a month. It might not sound like a lot to

00:01:00.860 you, but it really adds up for us. Please consider going to rebelnewsplus.com and clicking subscribe.

00:01:06.280 Thanks a million. Okay, here's today's show.

00:01:20.900 Tonight, that time Trudeau's environment minister did a home invasion terrorizing a woman home alone. 0.99

00:01:30.000 It's April 3rd, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.

00:01:32.500 You're fighting for freedom. Shame on you, you censorious bug.

00:01:38.800 I often mention that Stephen Gilboa, Trudeau's environment minister, 0.98

00:01:52.100 is a convicted criminal. And I describe the events for one of his most famous crimes. He went

00:01:59.220 into the CN Tower in Toronto. Actually, he climbed up it. He trespassed. He dangled himself from the CN

00:02:06.220 Tower. He put many people in danger, and he did so for money, to make money for his company, Greenpeace,

00:02:13.900 a multinational corporation that makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year by breaking the law

00:02:19.160 for profit. I'm not sure why they get away with it, but other criminal gangs like Hell's Angels don't.

00:02:27.400 Here's a story I often refer to when I mention this. This is the version from the Globe and Mail. I'll

00:02:32.120 read it. CN Tower climbers ordered to pay costs. Now, the story is from 2002. Two Greenpeace activists

00:02:40.600 who scaled the CN Tower last summer and unfurled a massive banner in a stunt that drew international

00:02:46.260 media coverage pleaded guilty yesterday to public mischief. Britain, Christopher Holden, 24, and

00:02:52.300 Montrealer Stephen Gilbeau, 32, received conditional discharges and agreed to pay $3,000 to the tower's

00:03:00.200 corporate owner as compensation for the security and staff costs it incurred. Although a prosecutor

00:03:06.220 told an Ontario court judge the two men were remorseful, both expressed jubilation outside court

00:03:14.400 about having drawn public attention to global climate change and the need to cut greenhouse gas

00:03:19.080 emissions. This was the climax of my efforts so far, said Mr. Holden, who has worked as an

00:03:25.200 industrial climber in England and who has used his skills to hoist a 15-meter-square banner proclaiming

00:03:30.900 Canada and Bush climate killers 350 meters into the air. Mr. Gilbeau told reporters that the climb

00:03:38.260 helped raise public awareness about climate change, and he believes it influenced Prime Minister

00:03:42.280 Jean Chrétien's decision to commit Canada to ratifying the Kyoto Accord on global warming.

00:03:46.740 The Canadian National Tower Corporation suffered $50,000 in losses from the stunt,

00:03:53.760 Crown Prosecutor Calvin Berry told the court. That estimate included $35,000 lost when it cut ticket

00:04:00.640 prices in half for six hours on July 16th because one side of the observation deck was sealed off by

00:04:06.680 security to allow police and firefighters to monitor the safety of the protesters. Mr. Gilbeau was placed

00:04:13.660 on one year's probation in order to perform 100 hours of community service in Montreal where he works

00:04:19.180 for Greenpeace and pay $1,000 of the $3,000 restitution. Mr. Holden will pay $2,000 was ordered

00:04:26.580 to report once to a probation officer before returning to Egypt where he now lives. So Gilbeau was 52 years

00:04:33.200 old now. You can see in the story that he committed this crime when he was 32. My point is he wasn't a child.

00:04:39.480 He wasn't a teenager. He wasn't a college kid. He was a professional fundraiser for the multinational

00:04:46.200 corporation called Greenpeace. He inflicted $50,000 damage on the CN Tower business. They've got nothing

00:04:53.520 to do with climate change or global warming. He doesn't care. And what a laugh that he only had to

00:04:58.020 pay $1,000 to them and spent no time in jail and was laughing outside the court even though the foolish 0.96

00:05:05.360 prosecutor said, oh, he's very remorseful. What's interesting is that normally Greenpeace uses

00:05:12.260 cannon fodder. By that, I mean college kids, dumb pawns on the chessboard. But Gilbeau was a boss. 1.00

00:05:21.200 He was 32 and he was an executive with Greenpeace. It's very unusual that he would commit a crime,

00:05:27.900 but why wouldn't he? He got off with a slap on the wrist. I tell that story a lot and I show the

00:05:34.940 picture of him in his orange guard because it looks like a prison outfit. He wore that for his

00:05:40.640 climb, but he really is a criminal in spirit. But here's a story for you and I'm embarrassed to say

00:05:48.140 I did not know about this and shame on me because I follow these subjects. I'm from Calgary originally.

00:05:54.680 I knew the late Premier Ralph Klein. In fact, I was a pole captain for him when I was very young,

00:06:01.040 knocking on doors and whatnot. I wouldn't say I was a close friend of his or anything,

00:06:05.900 but I was a friendly acquaintance. And I had met Mrs. Klein and I knew where their house was. It

00:06:12.500 wasn't far away from where I lived and it was just a sleepy bungalow. And, you know, especially back then,

00:06:22.320 Alberta was a safe place. I think there was a security guard who accompanied Premier Klein around,

00:06:28.560 but it was very easy peasy. But look at this story. And my embarrassment is that I didn't know

00:06:33.820 about this story until today, actually. This story was published in 2021 when Gilbo was made

00:06:46.440 environment minister. Now, it wasn't just about his CN tower crime. Let me read to you a story by Don

00:06:53.600 Braid in the Calgary Herald a couple of years ago when Gilbo was appointed by Trudeau to be the

00:06:59.060 environment minister. I'm going to read a chunk of the story. Okay. On April 11th, 2002, Greenpeace

00:07:06.640 pranksters climbed onto the roof of then Premier Ralph Klein's bungalow in Lakeview. From inside,

00:07:19.240 Klein's wife, Klein's wife, Colleen, saw vans arrive and people in orange uniforms take a ladder to the

00:07:28.240 house. I was terrified, she told an interviewer years later. She thought it was some kind of home

00:07:38.120 invasion. Well, it was. Greenpeace campaigner Gilbo said, we're offering Mr. and Mrs. Klein a gift

00:07:48.860 of solar panels, a gift of the future. That's what the energy of the future should be about. It will be

00:07:55.140 about solar and wind energy. Ralph Klein admitted some furious wind power of his own. Colleen was shook

00:08:04.500 up, he said. It was an invasion of privacy. Nobody's home ought to be public property.

00:08:11.800 Environmental activists thought it was hilarious. Hmm. Here's a picture, a close-up of the home

00:08:23.740 invasion. Imagine you're a woman at home by yourself. There's no security at your house.

00:08:30.140 Your husband's the premier. He's up at the legislature. You're home alone. Your husband is

00:08:34.240 out of town. And a group of thugs show up, start coming onto your property, climbing onto your house,

00:08:40.360 and you don't know what's going on. That is a private house.

00:08:46.520 Stephen Gilbo is a lawless clown. He is a serial criminal. He is abusive. He abused Colleen 1.00

00:09:00.280 Klein. He terrified her. Justin Trudeau knew this. He knows this. And yet he chose Stephen Gilbo

00:09:09.880 over what must have been an objection by the RCMP. See, cabinet ministers know national secrets,

00:09:17.240 high security secrets, foreign intelligence secrets, policing secrets. And you have a serial

00:09:24.480 criminal in your cabinet? There's no way the RCMP gave that a rubber stamp. Trudeau doesn't care

00:09:34.180 because Trudeau himself is a serial lawbreaker. How many times has he broken the Conflict of Interest

00:09:40.200 Act? Stephen Gilbo is a sociopath. He claims to be, oh, I'm just here to offer him a gift. 0.99

00:09:46.740 That's not a gift. That is a fundraising stunt. Stephen Gilbo broke the law to make millions of

00:09:54.580 dollars for a multinational corporation. Hell's Angels is a multinational corporation that breaks

00:10:00.760 the law for money too, but they're not treated with kid gloves. You would never have a Hell's

00:10:06.460 Angels criminal appointed to cabinet, but Stephen Gilbo was appointed to cabinet. He's a psychopath, 1.00

00:10:13.120 really, in a way, Stephen Gilbo. Imagine terrifying a woman who has nothing to do with anything, 0.99

00:10:19.920 terrorizing her and going onto her property so you can take some pictures and publish them and get rich.

00:10:26.800 That's a psychopath who doesn't think about others but only himself. You know, Jordan Peterson,

00:10:34.140 the great psychologist, talks about the appeal of psychopaths. He often talks about it in terms of

00:10:40.920 young women, naive young women, having trouble differentiating between confident, strong guys 0.99

00:10:48.040 and absolute sociopathic liars. They exude the same confidence and sometimes young women cannot 0.96

00:10:57.200 distinguish. It's an interesting observation he makes. Peterson talks about the trickery, how men can 0.73

00:11:04.580 trick themselves to win the hearts of women, or if not the hearts, at least their bodies for one night. 1.00

00:11:11.160 Male feminists, narcissists, sociopaths, psychopaths. I think that that is Justin Trudeau and Stephen 0.99

00:11:21.680 Gilbo and the other charlatans that surround them. I think a lot of people, when they first encounter

00:11:29.000 Justin Trudeau, like his suave. They like that he's, well, if not handsome, the least ugly politician.

00:11:35.520 It's not a tough competition to be the least ugly. They like that his name is the same as his father's.

00:11:44.060 They like that he has all the smooth buzzwords. And I think they're tricked, like naive young girls are, 0.90

00:11:50.760 to a narcissistic predator. If you look at the demographics of who supports Trudeau,

00:11:57.400 it's disproportionately women and very often young women. The same women who psychologically cannot 0.98

00:12:04.480 detect the difference between a narcissistic psychopath predator and a strong, confident, 0.57

00:12:10.200 ambitious young man. Justin Trudeau has a liar's eyes, and so does Stephen Gilbo. Look at the eyes of 1.00

00:12:17.640 him in that picture in the CN Tower arrest. These two men will literally do or say anything to profit

00:12:26.620 in the moment. Both of them completely remorseless. You heard the story in the Globe and Mail.

00:12:32.020 They were laughing outside the court, even as they tricked the prosecutor. Oh, they're remorseful.

00:12:38.880 It's harder to trick a prosecutor than to trick a teenage girl, although I guess maybe not in that

00:12:44.280 case. Do you really think, for example, that they meant to deliver solar panels to Ralph Klein's house,

00:12:51.400 or that that was just a fundraising stunt? This is a test of your own naivete. Do you really think

00:12:56.920 that Stephen Gilbo and Justin Trudeau plan to transition off of fossil fuels? Do you really

00:13:02.680 think so? Trudeau, who has flown more on government jets than any other prime minister in history? Do you

00:13:08.740 really think that they want to transition off oil and gas, or just for you to transition off it? Will

00:13:15.820 they transition off of meat? Off of cars? They will not. They'll transition off of oil jobs. Of course,

00:13:26.120 they'll do that, but not their own jobs. Don't trust them. Never trust them. Stay with us more ahead.

00:13:45.820 Well, the Emergencies Act was a diabolical bonfire of Canadian civil liberties, utterly unjustified. I

00:13:53.340 tell you, I'm watching the mass protests in the streets of France. Literally millions of people,

00:13:59.660 by the way, they are truly rioting, burning things. There's massive strikes, garbage piling up

00:14:05.080 everywhere. The infrastructure of the country is grinding to a halt, and yet they have not put the

00:14:10.260 country under martial law. I see Israel, where hundreds of thousands of people are having a kind

00:14:16.040 of peaceful color revolution against Benjamin Netanyahu, and they have not put the country under

00:14:21.980 martial law. Only Canada, or more to the point, Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act, something

00:14:27.680 not even done during 9-11, because there were some people honking their horns at him, and that was

00:14:34.760 causing him great embarrassment. Well, Justin Trudeau handpicked the judge to review him. That's a neat

00:14:41.120 trick, and surprise, surprise, the judge who oversaw the public inquiry said, well, maybe coulda,

00:14:48.960 shoulda, if you hold it just the right way and in the right light, maybe it was justified. It was a

00:14:54.100 disgraceful lack of independence by a judge, but that was a handpicked judge that Trudeau himself chose,

00:15:01.660 reviewing a mandate that Trudeau himself wrote. How about a regular judge, and instead of that judge

00:15:09.360 being given a limited mandate, what if someone went to court, to the federal court, in fact, and said

00:15:15.800 there was a legal error here, and we want a judicial review. We want the court to find that it was

00:15:24.080 illegal, not a touchy-feely commission. Well, what I've just described is happening today. And our friend

00:15:31.020 Ava Cipiuk, a lawyer who has worked with the Trucker Convoy, has been watching the trial all day.

00:15:37.580 She joins us now via Skype. Ava, great to see you again. Thanks for making the time. First of all,

00:15:43.000 correct any errors I have made. This is in federal court in Ottawa, and it is citizens who are applying

00:15:50.040 for, would you call it a judicial review? They're challenging the Emergencies Act

00:15:54.320 on its own basis. Tell me exactly, set the scene for us. Who are these people, and what are they

00:16:00.860 arguing? Yeah, so you've got that right, and it looks like there's four cases that have been

00:16:06.340 combined. Two are on behalf of actual citizens in Canada, and two are on Civil Liberties Association.

00:16:15.180 So two of those Civil Liberties Associations were involved in the Public Order Emergencies

00:16:20.260 Commission. And then you have regular Canadians that have applied to ask the court to determine 0.86

00:16:29.080 whether or not the Emergencies Act was justified. Got it. Now, I was reading your live tweeting of

00:16:35.820 the hearing, and it sounds like the government's lawyers are trying to head this off at the pass.

00:16:42.160 They're trying to make it so that this matter doesn't even proceed to trial. I understand they're

00:16:45.920 arguing two things. First of all, that it's moot, which is a lawyer's way of saying it's over.

00:16:52.220 There's no reason the court should consider it because it's done. Well, it would have been a

00:16:57.700 pretty fast judge who would have been able to meet, you know, in the nine days or so that martial law

00:17:03.200 was afoot. I don't know if that mootness argument will win. And then the second, and I'm just going by

00:17:08.080 your live tweets here, which I recommend that people check out for this real-time coverage,

00:17:12.280 which is that, which is standing, which is, if you go to court, you've got to have some connection

00:17:18.280 to the matters at issue. You can't just be a busybody. And it sounds like the government is

00:17:24.500 arguing that the people who are seeking a legal review of this are just busybodies that the court

00:17:29.960 shouldn't give any time to. Does that sum up what was happening today? The government was basically

00:17:35.340 saying, hey, judge, this is all over. This is old news. And these people don't have a right to be here.

00:17:41.000 Let's just all go home and have a beer. Was that what the government was saying?

00:17:44.560 Yeah, to some extent, exactly that. And, you know, I'm not involved in this

00:17:48.380 legal challenge. I'm just observing. And it was really hard to watch the crown, the federal lawyers

00:17:55.260 arguing that, especially on mootness. And it was good to see the judge challenge the lawyer there,

00:18:01.320 especially like you said, the court or the crown kind of suggested that this should have been

00:18:08.140 brought forward earlier. And while the emergencies act was invoked, and the judge was like, really,

00:18:14.800 you think they should have brought it within the nine days? Tell me what kind of evidence they would

00:18:19.280 have had in the nine days. And you're like, come on, crown, you have to be reasonable to a certain

00:18:24.480 extent. You can't expect regular Canadians to get all this in order in order to bring a sophisticated

00:18:32.880 challenge to court. And then if you don't bring a sophisticated challenge, then you're being booted

00:18:38.100 on that. So you can't have it both ways. And that's seems to be what the crown continues to argue in

00:18:44.440 these cases. And it's really disheartening to see Canadians should have their day in court. And why 1.00

00:18:50.100 is the crown so opposed to Canadians having their day in court? It's disturbing to see.

00:18:55.760 Yeah. Now, tell me about the lawyers arguing the case. You mentioned that you're not a lawyer in

00:19:02.220 the case you're observing it like the rest of us are. Can you tell us who the lawyers are? Can you

00:19:07.780 tell us a little bit more about the plaintiffs? I ask because sometimes it makes a real difference if

00:19:13.080 the lawyers are experienced, if they're making all the right arguments. You could have weak lawyers

00:19:20.320 that fumble it. I mean, it doesn't all turn on the lawyers, but the lawyers, the clients, the facts,

00:19:26.540 the arguments, these things obviously matter. And then in a minute, I'll ask you to tell us what

00:19:30.600 you can about the judge. So start off, who are the plaintiffs and who are their lawyer?

00:19:35.460 Yeah. So really good question. And I actually wish I had more on that, but I do know who the

00:19:40.320 applicants are. So it seems to be one nurse that has been very active, started an organization in

00:19:45.860 Ontario. And I don't have the name of the organization down packed, but it was like United

00:19:51.600 Nurses of Canada, something like that. I didn't mean to put you on the spot. I was just curious if

00:19:56.420 there was anyone famous, like a civil liberties advocate, although you and I could probably count

00:20:01.560 on one hand, the number of civil liberties lawyers in this country. Unfortunately, most of them went on

00:20:07.120 a holiday for the last year. And how about on the government side? How many lawyers are there on the

00:20:12.960 government side? Well, probably a whole team full, but we, I think you could see five or so on the

00:20:19.220 screen. And I'm assuming there's at least double or triple behind the scenes helping. That's how it

00:20:23.880 generally is. So a huge team on that end. And there are some, like I said, some of the civil liberties

00:20:30.240 associations that were involved in the public order emergencies inquiry, like just, just before

00:20:34.880 today's break, Eva Krajewska from the Canadian Constitutional Liberties Foundation was up. 0.69

00:20:42.240 And giving her arguments and doing a great job. Like, you know, some of these people have been

00:20:47.340 on this for a year, including her, when she was actively involved in the public order emergencies

00:20:52.400 inquiry. So you got, you have some good lawyers, definitely. Some really interesting arguments were

00:20:58.860 made today. And on the side of the Crown, it was, like I said earlier, a bit disappointing to see

00:21:05.520 that those were the arguments the Crown was making. And to be perfectly honest, I don't think they were

00:21:10.900 incredibly strong. And I don't think the advocacy was that incredible on the Crown side.

00:21:17.160 What can you tell me about the judge? I understand the judge's name is Judge Mosley.

00:21:21.860 You mentioned that the judge was pushing back on the mootness question, basically mocking the,

00:21:26.960 or challenging the prosecution and says, well, your honor, they should have brought it

00:21:31.260 when the martial law was afoot. Is there anything else you can tell us? I mean, judges are pretty good

00:21:35.940 keeping a poker face. And just because they're asking a question doesn't mean they necessarily

00:21:40.460 have that point of view. They like to poke and prod and get some responses, sometimes just out of sheer

00:21:46.080 curiosity, I think. Did the judge show any interest in an issue or an argument? Or was there anything

00:21:56.340 you can read from how the judge conducted themselves? Yeah, well, I was really positive and hopeful at the

00:22:04.060 start, again, probably because the Crown was being challenged quite a bit. And then we got into the

00:22:08.960 arguments of the various applicants. And the one thing of particular concern that the judge said,

00:22:15.680 and I do want to make a note of, is that he said that he was challenging an applicant talking about

00:22:26.140 the reasonableness of the invocation. And he said, well, you, on coercion, that was it. So

00:22:31.760 the argument was made by the Crown that, you know, people in Ottawa were basically coerced to join and

00:22:39.080 be part or get involved or let go of the protests because he said they occupied the streets and didn't

00:22:46.820 allow them to leave. And what's particularly concerning from what I heard is the judge said,

00:22:53.240 you saw the news articles that the Crown submitted as evidence. That's concerning. I know you would

00:23:02.500 understand because that's not evidence news articles. If the whole federal government couldn't find a

00:23:08.920 couple people in Ottawa to give actual evidence that they were blockaded in their house, that's very

00:23:17.080 telling, in my opinion. If they're relying on news articles to suggest that people couldn't leave their

00:23:24.260 house and the judge seems to have... You know, it's terrifying to me the amount of news media equals the

00:23:32.180 facts. I mean, I watched the public order inquiry and they were just, you know, politician after

00:23:38.880 politician or even police claimed certain things happened. And when they were pressed for a source,

00:23:43.920 they said, oh, I didn't actually witness it. I just read about it. It showed the power of gossip and

00:23:48.880 rumors. And it was said more than once that the number one source of misinformation and disinformation

00:23:55.240 was the federal government itself. Hey, let me ask you this question. I know you were not in the

00:24:01.140 physical courtroom itself, but do you get the sense that this hearing is being covered by other media?

00:24:08.360 I know you can't really see that, but did you notice even online were other reporters from other

00:24:14.800 agencies tweeting about it, for example? I suppose we'll see in the papers tomorrow and the TV tonight.

00:24:21.860 Do you think they're watching this or have they sort of written this off as too boring because they

00:24:27.360 already have their answer from the commission a month ago? Yeah, my guess has to be no, because

00:24:33.980 my feed just went crazy and I'm not even that incredibly popular on it, but it's been really

00:24:41.100 well received and people are sharing it. I got to the point that I can't even post any more tweets,

00:24:47.140 which is a bit frustrating. So I had the whole afternoon that hasn't even been made public,

00:24:52.020 but it looks to me that nobody else is really reporting on this. And I am concerned that it is

00:24:59.560 what you suggested, that people are relying on the Public Order Emergency Commission results.

00:25:04.840 And there was a lot of vagueness about what exactly is evidence. So in that case, you know,

00:25:11.920 fine, put up a news article, but that's not what evidence is in a court case. And I was very hopeful

00:25:17.760 that in federal court, that would not be sufficient to be evidence. So I really hope that at least

00:25:24.980 we get a real judge listening to real evidence and coming up with a real decision about whether or not

00:25:32.100 the Emergencies Act was invoked. And we'll see, like you said, tomorrow if anyone else is talking about

00:25:38.960 it. Yeah. Well, you know, I allowed my hopes to get too high with Justice Rolo and his commission.

00:25:44.920 And, um, you know, the old saying, fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. You

00:25:50.020 probably know that saying. And, and it means you can be forgiven once for being naive and gullible,

00:25:54.720 but if it happens a second time, you should have known better. And I'm not going to get my hopes

00:25:58.300 too high, Ava, because I, uh, they were high. I, I, I falsely hoped that the commission of inquiry

00:26:05.080 would say what was so painfully evident to me, but no, he found a way to exonerate Trudeau. Well,

00:26:09.780 listen, thank you for your coverage. I want to encourage people to follow you on Twitter.

00:26:13.820 Uh, Ava's, uh, Twitter account will have the link on the page, but it is forever Ava 79 F O R E V A E V A

00:26:22.980 79. And I really appreciate you live for you. And I see you got a lot of interactions, which tells me

00:26:28.660 that people are very curious about this. Thanks very much. Keep up the great work. Nice to see you

00:26:32.820 again. Likewise. Thanks for having me. Right on. There you have it. Ava Chipia covering the federal 1.00

00:26:37.500 court challenge, uh, the review of the emergencies act in court, uh, stay with us. Your letters to me

00:26:43.440 next. Hey, welcome back. Your letters to me. Wayne says, hi, Ezra. The last two to three years have

00:26:59.360 seen an exodus of the conscientious cops, such that the remainder are not much more than glorified

00:27:04.400 security for Antifa and black lives matter goons. When cops stand with folded arms while real social

00:27:10.460 crime goes unpunished, perhaps they should be defunded better to deal with only thugs than a

00:27:16.300 cabal of thugs and cops. You know what? We just put up a petition fire officer Bachman. Um, it's a crazy

00:27:25.000 case, uh, involving, uh, a man named billboard. Chris, that's obviously not his, uh, the name his mama

00:27:31.180 gave him, but that's how he's known online. And he goes and he stands quietly and peacefully at

00:27:36.140 transgender protests with simple signs. Um, you can see an image of it and he's always physically 1.00

00:27:43.740 attacked always. Um, but what makes me think of that in your letters case is that there was this

00:27:50.560 Vancouver cop, Frederick Rieke Bachman, who was standing there watching the assault, laughing at it

00:27:58.500 and saying, well, here, I'll, I'll let you watch the video yourself. Take a look.

00:28:02.880 Why, why do you think that they're getting that kind of representation? I mean, it's, uh, clearly was, uh,

00:28:08.560 aggressive violence. You suck. You suck. Fuck you. Fuck you. You're not wanted. Fuck you. You're, 1.00

00:28:14.740 you're a fucking idiot. You're a fucking idiot. I don't know what to say. I guess these police officers 1.00

00:28:18.820 are mostly indoctrinated as well. Everyone here, they're afraid of the mob.

00:28:23.200 Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Hey, get your fucking ass off. 1.00

00:28:30.540 Get your fucking ass off. Get your fucking ass off. Get your fucking ass off. 1.00

00:28:34.760 You son of a bitch. You son of a bitch. You're a bitch. You're a bitch. You're a bitch. 1.00

00:28:38.120 Oh my God. Listen, I, I love the police. My brother's a police officer. 1.00

00:28:43.560 I respect law and order. I respect our chart of rights and freedoms. And I'm not trying

00:28:50.040 to be a jerk to you earlier today. I don't think a lot of you understand what I'm actually 0.77

00:28:55.300 representing and the seriousness of this situation. But it is what it is, I guess. I just, this

00:29:04.980 is Canada and people shouldn't be allowed to assault people without consequence, you know?

00:29:09.300 I mean, Chris, but the thing is, right, um, when we get into people's faces and they

00:29:14.040 get into our faces, it doesn't really matter who does the first push. It's considered a

00:29:19.320 consensual fight. And maybe that's something you should...

00:29:22.040 I didn't, no, no, you, that's, I didn't get into people's faces. I was here for...

00:29:26.740 Chris, I saw you get very close to people.

00:29:28.700 You weren't here. You weren't even here. I was...

00:29:32.440 I came and walked...

00:29:34.440 I came out, I came over to your car...

00:29:36.440 Yes, that first time, but the second time...

00:29:38.440 The second time what?

00:29:40.440 When you were pushed on the ground...

00:29:41.440 Are you kidding me? I'd walked, we'd, I'd been walking away from them.

00:29:44.440 Yeah, and they surrounded you.

00:29:45.440 To do an interview with him. They came close. I walked away again to do the interview with him.

00:29:50.560 What I'm saying is, at this point, maybe you should ask your brother what a consensual fight it is, right?

00:29:54.700 Oh my gosh, this is unbelievable. I've walked away from them three times, they were surrounding me,

00:30:01.340 you all were doing nothing, a man yelled at my, a man yelled in my ear from inches away,

00:30:07.260 and I tried to get out of this situation where they're surrounding me while you guys do nothing,

00:30:12.060 and I immediately get punched in the face. And you're blaming me?

00:30:16.620 And whoever punched you should be charged.

00:30:19.020 Are you kidding me right now?

00:30:20.060 Oh my gosh, this is totally surreal. I cannot believe what I'm hearing.

00:30:28.940 Amazing.

00:30:33.020 Amazing.

00:30:35.500 Totally amazing.

00:30:38.540 Do you even know what, like, why are you behaving like this?

00:30:42.220 Do you think I'm evil or something for having this position? Like, what's your problem?

00:30:45.260 Yeah, you are female, and this should be an issue for you. 1.00

00:30:50.460 Excuse me, this has nothing to do with you, okay?

00:30:52.460 What happened?

00:30:53.020 I'm a female, it has nothing to do with me, this trans thing. No, no, nothing to do with women. 0.55

00:30:59.100 I'm talking to somebody else about something, okay?

00:31:02.060 It doesn't, these conversations are pointless right now. You're trying to, now you're trying to insinuate that that was a mutual thing.

00:31:07.820 Like, my gosh, mutual thing. I'd walked away from the crowd three times, they kept following me, then they surrounded me from all sides, started yelling in my ear from inches away, while you all did nothing.

00:31:19.900 And then when I can't even get out of that surrounding, and I get punched in the face, I get pulled.

00:31:27.420 You're telling me that's a mutual engagement?

00:31:30.700 Yes, it is.

00:31:35.260 Incredible.

00:31:35.660 You have the right not to be here either, right?

00:31:37.340 It's incredible. I have the right to be here.

00:31:40.220 Yes, you do.

00:31:41.820 Have you read this thing called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

00:31:43.900 Yes, I have.

00:31:44.380 Have you?

00:31:44.700 Yes, I have.

00:31:45.260 You should go home and read it again.

00:31:46.460 On whose orders are you guys acting on?

00:31:48.220 What an absolute disgrace to the force. Since then, the deputy police chief has come out in favor of the cop, not the victim of crime.

00:31:55.980 What an absolute disgrace. We have a petition at FireOfficerBachman.com.

00:32:02.300 Lynn writes,

00:32:03.020 Yes, I think you should think about the cops. Your show tonight talks about the cops and what they did in Ottawa to Alexa and others.

00:32:08.860 If they did that in Ottawa than they did in Coots, probably fits the same bill, and framing the four guys would be possible.

00:32:15.980 Remember, they were the ones that vandalized those three track hoes. 1.00

00:32:19.540 By the way, I never heard of any of them being charged for that. I still think you should give more attention to those four guys and the cops and the legal system that still has them in jail. Thanks for the great job you do.

00:32:29.940 Well, thanks for that friendly letter. We just did, the Democracy Fund, I believe, just finished paying for the legal representation of a man in the Lethbridge-Coutts area who was facing certain charges.

00:32:47.060 I don't have all the details in front of me. We are, between Rebel News and the Democracy Fund, defending over 30 truckers.

00:32:53.280 And I remain open to support for the four men who were accused of conspiracy to commit murder.

00:32:59.840 But I, you've heard me say this before, you can understand why I'm reluctant to take money that was crowdfunded by donors to support peaceful protesters to defend people who were charged with conspiracy to commit murder.

00:33:11.860 I do accept the premise of your point, which is there's a chance this whole thing is a fake, a frame-up, a stitch-up, a put-up, that this is just a PR stunt to demonize the truckers as violent.

00:33:24.540 I accept that that's a possibility. But until we know that that is what happened here, I cannot in good conscience take donations that came in in $50 and $100 increments from viewers for peaceful protesters and spend it on legal defense for those who may have been part of a conspiracy to commit murder.

00:33:42.840 I understand that they're innocent until proven guilty. I'm open to learning more about their case and I'm open to possibly defending them in the future.

00:33:53.520 But not until I have some more confidence that the accusation against them is false.

00:33:59.820 That's my point of view. If you disagree with it, I respect that.

00:34:03.080 But please try and see it from my point of view as a decider and as the recipient of the crowdfunding funds.

00:34:11.860 It's my duty to be careful with it.

00:34:15.520 Bob Quadruple X says,

00:34:17.740 James O'Keefe is investigating Act Blue. Seems that there may be a scandal about to break.

00:34:22.960 Yeah, I'm enjoying following James O'Keefe's new OMG, O'Keefe Media Group.

00:34:28.460 That's a great acronym, as you know.

00:34:31.720 I was very sad when he broke paths, imparted ways with Project Veritas, which he founded and ran for, what, 13 years or something.

00:34:42.540 I really wish that that would have been more harmonious and he would have stayed there.

00:34:47.540 I think he was in so many ways the leader of that, not just journalistically, but fundraising wise and in the media.

00:34:55.140 And he had the vision.

00:34:57.180 It's really a shame that didn't work.

00:34:58.920 But hopefully his new project will be a success.

00:35:01.080 And I don't know.

00:35:02.540 I don't know if the remains of Project Veritas will continue.

00:35:08.340 I don't know who could possibly fill those shoes.

00:35:10.560 But yeah, I am watching James O'Keefe with great interest.

00:35:13.580 Well, that's our show for today.

00:35:15.380 Until next time, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, to you and home, good night.

00:35:20.140 And keep fighting for freedom.

00:35:21.220 We'll see you next time.

Rebel News Podcast - April 03, 2023

EZRA LEVANT ｜ That time Trudeau’s environment minister did a home invasion, terrorizing a woman home alone

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript