Justin Trudeau and the ‘Thinkfluencers’ fail to deliver on $1.5 billion promise
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
162.95677
Summary
Thinkfluencer and deliverology are two words that describe Justin Trudeau's worldview. Do you think I'm making them up? Or do you think they're at the heart of his worldview? I'm going to show you why.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, my Rebels. Today, I want to go deep in two made-up words, thinkfluencer and deliverology.
00:00:09.960
Do you think I'm making these words up? Do you really think I'm making them up?
00:00:15.260
Or do you think they're at the heart of Justin Trudeau's worldview? I'm going to show you. I'm
00:00:21.440
going to show you. That's what today's podcast is about. I really wish you would buy a subscription
00:00:25.640
to Rebel News Plus, though, because I got to show you some video. That's really what Rebel News Plus
00:00:31.100
is. It's the podcast, but with the video part. And you also get David Menzies' weekly show and
00:00:35.980
Sheila Gunn-Reed's weekly show. So you get a lot for $8 a month. That's all it is, or $80 for the
00:00:40.920
whole year. Just go to rebelnews.com and click subscribe. Plus, we need the dough to pay our
00:00:45.540
bills. That's how we do it. Okay, here's today's podcast.
00:00:55.640
Tonight, remember when Justin Trudeau said he was a believer in deliverology? Yeah, about
00:01:09.280
that? It's October 8th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:14.580
Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:18.340
There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:21.980
The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it is because it's my
00:01:33.480
There are some words out there that I just don't ever want to say. I don't want to be
00:01:38.580
the kind of guy who uses those words. I don't want to say the word thinkfluencer. That's
00:01:47.380
a word people are using. Thinkfluencer. Justin Trudeau's cabinet is full of thinkfluencers.
00:01:53.920
Those are people who go to shallow, non-expert, buzzwordy TED Talks where they outdo each other
00:02:00.980
with the jargon, and you instantly forget everything that was said, but you know you were in the
00:02:05.560
presence of a great thinker. If only you could have understood what the thoughts were. It's
00:02:10.720
places like the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland. I mean, look at this CBC story.
00:02:17.380
Bono, Spacey, and DiCaprio. Trudeau chats with celebrities at Davos reception. Let me read
00:02:25.440
World Economic Forum attracts not only political and business leaders, but actors and rock
00:02:30.620
stars. That was from right after Trudeau was first elected. The CBC loved it. Lots of pop
00:02:37.060
stars. Trudeau got to show everyone his fancy socks. He gave shallow speeches about being
00:02:43.740
great feminists. The people listening to those speeches consider themselves thinkfluencers.
00:02:51.200
It's so hilarious, so ridiculous, but when everyone's talking that way and doing that,
00:02:55.720
no one notices it's crazy, I guess. It's like when Sheila Gunn-Reed went to the United Nations
00:03:01.640
Climate Convention in Marrakesh, Morocco a few years back, and when she leaned on one of those
00:03:06.540
electric car chargers and it tipped over, it wasn't real. It was just for the feeling of being
00:03:11.620
real and relevant and thinkfluencing people into using electric cars. I'll move on to the news in
00:03:16.960
a second. Trudeau's foreign aid promises compared to the realities, but give me another moment on this
00:03:22.220
whole thinkfluencer thing because it's absolutely spot on what the government, Trudeau's liberal
00:03:28.420
government is. In his cabinet, there are no business success stories. There are no people who
00:03:34.000
achieved things in life, no real leaders. You have lots of thinkfluencers, people who talk about
00:03:39.200
talking about things, but none of them actually ever accomplished anything, and what they do and say
00:03:44.880
will change in a moment if it suits them. I mean, Catherine McKenna, Stephen Gilbeau, Seamus O'Regan,
00:03:50.680
there's no there there. It's just empty all the way down. It's like if you drop a coin into a well
00:03:56.920
and you just never hear the splash, they are empty all the way down. Give me a moment because it's
00:04:03.680
hard to tell the difference between a Trudeau speech and a parody account about these sorts of
00:04:09.940
things like this. My predecessor wanted you to know Canada for its resources. Well, I want you to know
00:04:18.940
Canadians for our resourcefulness. So he really said that. That's a little couplet of words that sound
00:04:26.040
like each other. Resources, resourcefulness. But in fact, Canada has the world's, I don't know,
00:04:31.200
second or third largest oil reserves, huge natural gas reserves, huge mining resources,
00:04:37.840
forestry, fresh water, agriculture. Those are all resources, right? The world wants them. We need them
00:04:45.060
too, to say, stop thinking about resources and just call us resourceful. That's not actually deep
00:04:51.860
or smart. That's actually very stupid. Resourceful actually means to make the best out of what
00:04:57.220
resources you have. And we've got a lot. But Trudeau was saying we're done with oil and gas and mining
00:05:03.060
and forestry and pipelines. He really is that stupid. He wants to talk about how feminist he is instead.
00:05:08.960
That's his message to the world. Incredibly proud to have a partner in my wife, Sophie, who is
00:05:14.380
extremely committed to women and girls issues. But she took me aside a few months ago and said,
00:05:19.580
okay, it's great that you're engaged and modeling to your daughter that you want her empower and
00:05:25.100
everything. But you need to take as much effort to talk to your sons, my eight-year-old boy and my
00:05:31.460
two-year-old, so a little young still, about how he treats women and how he is going to be grown up to
00:05:37.600
be a feminist just like dad. And by the way, we shouldn't be afraid of the word feminist. Men and
00:05:42.540
women should use it to describe themselves anytime they want. Yeah, I'm not sure if Trudeau is teaching
00:05:48.260
his boys the right lessons. Again, I feel I am confident that I did not act inappropriately.
00:05:58.900
But part of this awakening that we're having as a society, a long-awaited realization,
00:06:06.100
is that it's not just one side of the story that matters. That the same interactions could be
00:06:17.560
The worst of his cabinets is actually Chrystia Freeland, who really did do the shallow talk show
00:06:23.700
circuit for a living as a think-fluencer for years. She just went from TED Talk to TED Talk. She went on
00:06:30.280
late-night comedy shows in the U.S. as the Deep Flinker. But she never really said anything other
00:06:36.320
than buzzwords. I once saw her in a short interview use the phrase tipping point four times in about five
00:06:42.040
minutes in a single interview. I guess she had just read that pop bestseller tipping point. The one
00:06:48.580
company she ever ran as a businesswoman called Reuters Next, she destroyed it. It literally never
00:06:55.060
recovered from her disastrous leadership. They didn't even try to save it. They shut it down after
00:06:59.180
she wrecked it. Well, let me show you some fake think-fluencers online. These are sort of comedy
00:07:05.420
accounts. But you tell me if Trudeau or Freeland or McKennell could have said any of these. So this is a
00:07:10.140
parody account, I think. 40 self-promoters under 40. Yeah, that's actually where the Liberal Party
00:07:18.260
recruits its candidates from, right? Here's a comment about the recent debates. This is from
00:07:24.560
Professor Jeff Jarvis. It's a parody account. Mr. Vice President, Senator Harris, we are introducing a
00:07:30.280
new format. You each now have 60 seconds to record a TikTok about COVID, including the choice of
00:07:35.720
soundtrack. You see what I mean about using jargon and buzzwords and just seeming cool but being sort
00:07:40.760
of stupid? That's very Trudeau-ish. Here's another parody account called Davos Man. I think Justin
00:07:47.120
Trudeau may actually be the model for this parody account. Trudeau loves going to Davos. Thread.
00:07:53.400
Small ideas feel big when I'm in my Gulfstream. So here it goes. We have to innovate on innovation.
00:07:59.320
The seventh industrial revolution disrupts and displaces. Artificial intelligence and blockchain
00:08:05.220
can only solve resurgent populism with compassion. Hashtag. Is this real or is this Trudeau or is this a
00:08:12.240
parody? We elites are critical to making this debate glocalized. That's another one of those words.
00:08:19.860
Thought leadership also involves thought stewardship. Communities from the core of our economies form the
00:08:26.320
core. Blue-collar workers must be reconceived as new-collar workers. Code is key. Is that Trudeau?
00:08:33.760
Is that Freeland? Is that McKenna? Is that Gilboa? Glocalized. I bet you a dollar Trudeau has used that
00:08:40.540
fake word. I'm sure he has. This actually might just be plagiarized from Trudeau's actual statements.
00:08:47.720
I've made hashtag women a top priority for three years. As an advocate, I'm proud to say that since then,
00:08:53.960
hashtag women have made great strides. Today there are more women at Davos than ever. To celebrate,
00:09:01.240
snowmobiles will bring all Davos women to my chalet for an intimate talk on climate change.
00:09:06.840
I think that's Trudeau. Am I right? Okay, last one. Let me just read you one more.
00:09:11.880
Our current crises aren't data problems, but people problems. Data must become a great equalizer
00:09:18.440
if we give corporate stakeholders the opportunity and trust to mine the intimate details of our
00:09:24.080
lives. Data will become more human. That's Trudeau. That's Gilboa. Thinkfluencer is glocalized.
00:09:32.840
Code is key. Just all that BS. You know what's another word like that? Deliverology. Deliverology.
00:09:42.820
Do you think I'm kidding? Now this one, I'm not going to show you any parody accounts. I wish.
00:09:46.940
I wish. Look at this news story from the same CBC reporter, Aaron Wary, who wrote about Trudeau's
00:09:52.660
socks at Davos, about Bono, about that accused sex predator, Kevin Spacey at Davos.
00:09:58.320
How Justin Trudeau plans to deliver on Deliverology. I swear to God, this is not a parody. This is a real
00:10:06.620
story in the CBC. PM, a devotee of Michael Barber's result-oriented management theories.
00:10:13.100
Oh, is Justin Trudeau a devotee of certain management theories? He can engage in discussions
00:10:23.600
From early on, Trudeau's government, laden with myriad promises, has been taking guidance
00:10:29.260
from the teachings of Michael Barber, a British political advisor whose theories of result-oriented
00:10:34.520
management have come to be known as Deliverology. Okay, so some foreign guru is fleecing Canadian
00:10:45.000
taxpayers by using buzzwords with Trudeau, and Trudeau's fallen in love. Why not just read
00:10:50.460
him fake Twitter tweets from Davos Guy or Jeff Jarvis like I just did? Save some money. How
00:10:55.440
come we're hiring foreigners at what, six, seven, eight figures for Deliverology? Why not just
00:10:59.580
read the parody stuff I was doing? They really went big with this cult. Take a look at this.
00:11:04.500
How Deliverology can help Canada's public sector pragmatists. For some time now, it's been
00:11:10.020
acknowledged that more data in the right hands means more insights, but the unprecedented opportunity
00:11:15.160
for our governments to use those insights to improve the lives of citizens has yet to materialize
00:11:19.420
in any significant way. Didn't I just read that to you from Davos, man? I'm going to skip to the last
00:11:27.560
sentence in this article. I swear this is real. This is from the Hill Times, which is an Ottawa
00:11:33.480
newspaper. This is not a parody account, I swear. Thankfully, more pragmatic public sector minds
00:11:40.460
could live by a more data-driven definition of the concept. The feedback loop enabled by the
00:11:46.100
internet and big data has created an opportunity for a data-fed virtuous cycle between government and
00:11:51.380
citizens. Tapped into, we could create a system based on facts and solid measurements that lets the
00:11:56.420
promises keep themselves. Promises keep themselves. It's like budgets balancing themselves. If
00:12:01.900
Deliverology gets us that far, perhaps Sir Michael Barber's knighthood was well-earned after all.
00:12:07.340
I swear to God, that's real. Do you know what any of that means? No, you don't. It doesn't mean
00:12:14.620
anything. George Orwell called that duck speaking. Oh, he's a good duck speaker. It's like that art
00:12:20.940
installation taxpayers bought years ago. Remember that? Voice of fire. Those three lines. I'm sorry,
00:12:28.360
it's like someone talking for 10 minutes about the deep meaning of voice of fire and why it's worth
00:12:32.680
millions. And you're nodding along. They're just making it all up. They're just seeing how far they
00:12:37.100
can go. And you continue nodding. They'll just see how far they can go. Here's an article in 2016
00:12:42.560
in a very smart think tank propped up by Canadian taxpayers. It's called, will Deliverology work for
00:12:50.620
the Canadian government? Here's the same think tank three years later. Whatever happened to
00:12:57.540
Deliverology? Yeah, a lot of people made a lot of money off gullible Canadian taxpayers. That's what
00:13:03.920
happened. Here's the Globe and Mail more recently. Trudeau government's Deliverology experiment ends with
00:13:10.540
the whimper. You don't say. You don't say. Here's another from the National Post. Public servant
00:13:16.700
tasked with monitoring how liberal government was keeping promises leaves role. Michael Mandelson is
00:13:22.900
returning to academia after four years from the Privy Council office, the bureaucratic operation that
00:13:27.400
supports the prime minister. How much money did he make off this whole scam? We will probably never
00:13:31.960
know. Which brings me finally to the news today. Look at this story in the Globe and Mail.
00:13:37.460
Ottawa's $1.5 billion foreign aid initiative has spent only $120,000 so far. Oh, foreign aid,
00:13:48.440
that's the kind of thing that think-fluencers normally like. And look there, there's Bono. He's
00:13:54.880
really a top dog think-fluencer. And look at the caption. Irish pop star Bono, founder of the
00:14:02.080
Anti-Poverty Advocacy Group, known as the One Campaign, seen here with Justin Trudeau in Montreal,
00:14:07.420
had praised the 2018 Trudeau budget as smart, women-centered policy and leadership in action.
00:14:14.400
Oh my God. Here, let me read. Nearly three years after announcing $1.5 billion in new financing
00:14:22.380
programs for foreign aid, Ottawa has dispersed only a tiny fraction of the promised money,
00:14:26.400
just $120,000 so far. The Trudeau government won praise from aid agencies in February 2018 when it
00:14:33.760
announced $1.5 billion for two new financing tools, an International Assistance Innovation
00:14:40.940
Program, IAIP, and a Sovereign Loan Program. I love that last part, International Assistance
00:14:49.420
Innovation Program, IAIP. Because really, who knows more about innovation in international assistance
00:14:55.460
than the government, especially Justin Trudeau's government. Let me read more buzzwords. This is
00:15:00.940
really in the newspaper. Ottawa touted the new programs as groundbreaking approaches to development
00:15:07.960
assistance, allowing the use of private sector methods such as equity investments, guarantees,
00:15:12.880
and conditionally repayable contributions to bring new funding, developing... Groundbreaking.
00:15:17.480
You've got to use the word groundbreaking innovation when you have an international development
00:15:22.260
assistance program. You've just got to. That's what the parody Twitter accounts would say. You've
00:15:26.680
just got to add the word women-centric and coding, and you're set. You know, I wanted to tell you that
00:15:32.440
because in these bleak times, in these dark days, this is a little glimmer of hope, a little bit of good
00:15:40.220
news. The buffoon-in-chief, the blackface boss, the groping guy, the serial lawbreaker under the
00:15:47.040
conflict of interest act. He tried to spend 1.5 billion dollars, and he just couldn't do it. He only
00:15:54.380
managed to spend 120 grand only. That, my friends, is a little miracle. May all of Trudeau's projects
00:16:06.760
I want to move on. Well, I'd love to respond. Look, lost the trade war with China. Joe Biden never
00:16:22.020
fought it. Joe Biden has been a cheerleader for communist China through over the last several
00:16:27.360
decades. And again, Senator Harris, you're entitled to your opinion. You're not entitled to your own
00:16:33.120
facts. When Joe Biden was vice president, we lost 200,000 manufacturing jobs. And President Obama
00:16:39.520
said they were never coming back. He said we needed a magic wand to bring them back. In our first three
00:16:44.340
years after we cut taxes, rollback regulation, unleashed American energy, this administration
00:16:49.340
saw 500,000 manufacturing jobs created. And that's exactly the kind of growth we're going to continue
00:16:55.480
to see as we bring our nation through this pandemic. With a Green New Deal, your massive new
00:17:00.920
mandate, your Paris climate accord, it's going to kill jobs this time, just like it killed jobs.
00:17:05.740
Well, that's a clip from last night's vice presidential debate, the only one of its kind
00:17:10.040
scheduled for this election season. Vice President Mike Pence grilling Kamala Harris on Joe Biden's
00:17:15.760
record of rolling over for communist China on economics. It wasn't an argument about morality
00:17:21.920
or freedom or cyber security. It was all about jobs. But I think it made a strong point. That's my
00:17:30.620
view. Joining us now is one of North America's top experts on U.S.-China relations, our friend Gordon
00:17:35.740
G. Chang. You can follow him at Gordon G. Chang on Twitter. Gordon, what did you make of how the vice
00:17:41.460
president and Kamala Harris sparred over China yesterday? Was there any movement? Was there anything
00:17:49.380
clarified by it? I don't know if anything was clarified by it. But I think this was one of
00:17:55.520
the vice president's strongest moments of the night. And I think is actually Kamala Harris's weakest point
00:18:00.980
of the evening. Because the Obama administration, they had a view that climate change was absolutely
00:18:07.620
critical. And they were going to ignore all sorts of things in order to get Beijing to sign on to the
00:18:13.940
Paris Accord. So clearly, the vice president was right. Now, people can say that's a good thing.
00:18:20.000
But the point is, it's a fact. Do you think that the Trump-Pence campaign has focused enough on China?
00:18:29.080
And do you think they focused on it in the right way? Some of the arguments about China seem a little
00:18:34.240
bit abstract. I mean, I deeply believe in human rights. And I know you do, too. I also worry about
00:18:40.180
the region that China's trying to dominate, you know, whether it's Japan or India. I don't know
00:18:47.600
if that resonates in places like Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan, but I know the job stuff does.
00:18:52.920
Do you think the Republican campaign has been strong enough? Do you think they've
00:18:56.520
had the right focus on China? I'm worried it hasn't been talked about enough.
00:19:01.100
Yeah, I think the administration could make a much stronger case on its China policy.
00:19:05.540
So, for instance, last night, I would have liked to have heard the vice president say,
00:19:11.240
look, those tariffs that Kamala Harris complained about, those are imposed as a remedy for the theft
00:19:17.320
of U.S. intellectual property. And he should have asked her, well, what are you going to do about it?
00:19:22.280
Because when Biden was vice president for eight years, the administration just ignored it. Or when
00:19:28.040
they actually did something which was rare, they took actions that they knew were ineffective.
00:19:32.760
So, for instance, they indicted Chinese military officers in the western district of Pennsylvania,
00:19:38.160
Pittsburgh. But, you know, that was symbolic. And so I think that essentially, the administration
00:19:43.300
has a much stronger argument, but it has not been making it during this campaign.
00:19:48.560
If I recall from the presidential debate, Trump talked about Hunter Biden and China. That felt more
00:19:55.060
like a corruption issue or a scandal issue than a national interest issue. I mean, I think it
00:20:01.480
irritated Joe Biden, but I'm not sure if it moved votes. I think it really is the largest piece of
00:20:08.900
the puzzle that'll be, the largest thing that'll be different if Trump or Biden, if one of them wins
00:20:13.800
and the other doesn't. I mean, there'll be climate issues that are different, those tax issues.
00:20:18.460
There might be some racial justice issues that are different. But I think the number one difference
00:20:23.340
between a Trump re-election or a Biden election will be on China's role in the world. That's,
00:20:28.720
I think it's that critical an issue. What do you think? I mean, I know this is your area of
00:20:35.560
expertise. Let me throw one more thing at you before you answer. Nathan Vanderklip, who is a
00:20:42.360
Canadian journalist in China, was watching the debate on Chinese TV. And when Mike Pence referred
00:20:49.180
to China, take a look at this, the screen was blacked out. And on Chinese TV, it said no signal. So they
00:20:56.360
literally were censoring Mike Pence in real time. That tells me China thinks this is a critical
00:21:03.480
election and they've made their choice. Well, they certainly have, because the trend of Communist
00:21:09.180
Party and state propaganda has been to unseat President Trump. Also, when we start to look at
00:21:16.240
their troll and bot operations, those have been directed against the president as well.
00:21:21.040
And when state media or party media has talked about the candidates, it said nice things about Biden
00:21:28.900
and horrible things about President Trump. So clearly, Beijing has picked its choice in this
00:21:35.680
election. And it's doing a lot to try to unseat President Trump. You know, President Trump was headed,
00:21:42.080
cruising to re-election victory before the coronavirus hit. And since that time,
00:21:48.520
he's now far behind in the polls, it's really disrupted the campaign.
00:21:52.860
I'm not saying that Beijing released the coronavirus to unseat Trump. But we do know that Xi Jinping,
00:21:58.600
the Chinese ruler, took steps that he knew or had to know would spread the disease beyond China's
00:22:03.780
borders. So there is a direct causal relationship in all of this.
00:22:10.160
Yeah. If I recall, he shut down flights from Wuhan to Beijing, from Wuhan to Shanghai,
00:22:17.740
Yeah, there's two things. First of all, Xi Jinping knew the coronavirus was highly contagious,
00:22:22.540
but he told the world that it was not. And at the same time, he was pressuring countries not to
00:22:28.120
impose those travel restrictions and quarantines on arrivals from China when he was imposing similar
00:22:33.900
measures inside China itself. So he knew those measures were effective. And he knew that by leaning
00:22:39.420
on other countries, he was taking a step to spread the disease. So, you know, Ezra, this, you know,
00:22:45.560
the fact that we have all these infections around the world, all these deaths, a million deaths,
00:22:50.880
seven million infections, that's because China took steps to make sure that happened.
00:22:57.560
I thought it was interesting when Trump himself caught the virus and had to go to the hospital.
00:23:03.600
Uh, I follow a number of Chinese propaganda accounts. One of them's called Global Times and
00:23:09.700
their editor, um, Hu Xijin, if I'm going from memory is his name, he made a shocking tweet,
00:23:17.000
basically mocking Trump and saying, ha ha, it, it serves you right. I think he later deleted it,
00:23:22.740
but there was a jubilation there. And normally I wouldn't care. I mean, a pundit, what do I care?
00:23:27.680
There's a gazillion pundits in America who say rude things all the time. But the thing is,
00:23:32.600
a pundit in communist China isn't a lone ranger. He is expressing the views of the communist party.
00:23:39.600
I think he had to delete that tweet later, but it certainly showed the thinking in the
00:23:44.480
communist party. Do you think, I mean, why do you think they would have pulled them back?
00:23:47.580
Because it was just too far? Or what do you think was going on there?
00:23:51.160
I think they pulled them back because people around the world were condemning who and the Global
00:23:57.280
Times for this. Got to remember, um, Hu Xijin is the editor of Global Times. Global Times is
00:24:03.680
controlled by People's Daily. People's Daily is the most authoritative source in China. Now,
00:24:10.280
Global Times is not technically official, but we know that Beijing uses the Global Times to sort of
00:24:16.620
propagate themes, sort of sometimes on a trial basis, sometimes because they want deniability.
00:24:22.100
So this is, um, yes, you say, it's not just some jerk in China. Um, this is, uh, pretty close to
00:24:30.200
official. And I think Beijing understood that, uh, it was losing friends because of that tweet. People
00:24:35.960
may not like President Trump, but they certainly didn't like that tweet.
00:24:39.920
Incredible. Well, listen, I, I think this is going to be a momentous month. And I think so much turns
00:24:47.600
on this. I think it's, uh, going to be incredible to watch. And I hope for all the world's sake,
00:24:53.380
uh, that the election goes the way it ought to. I think that whether or not Biden or Trump wins the
00:24:59.080
American election will actually have a greater impact on Canada, on the United Kingdom, on Taiwan,
00:25:06.180
certainly on Japan, than most domestic decisions in the countries I've just looked at. It's so
00:25:12.040
important. And, uh, we're going to be watching every step of the way. And we're going to be
00:25:15.700
following your Twitter account, Gordon. I encourage every one of my followers who's not following yet
00:25:20.220
do so at Gordon G Chang. It's educational. It's patriotic, great arguments, great facts. I can't
00:25:27.780
believe how many things you stay abreast of all the time. You're like your own, uh, research bureau.
00:25:32.700
So thank you for sharing the wisdom with us. I know you're busy, so we'll say goodbye now. But
00:25:36.400
Gordon, thanks for joining us as you always do. No, thank you so much, Ezra. All right. There
00:25:41.080
you have it, Gordon G Chang. Got to follow him on Twitter. Stay with us. More ahead.
00:25:47.440
Hey folks, you know, we got some exciting things cooking. We got so many reporters doing so many
00:26:01.880
things. And I just want to give you a little update about Kian Bextie's update. He's been on
00:26:06.120
the West Coast for a few days. He's gone. I don't know if you saw this, but he went to an environmental
00:26:11.920
blockade, an illegal encampment. But it was so far in the woods, they didn't have Wi-Fi. So when he
00:26:17.500
showed up, they couldn't Google who he was. So they didn't know he was a rebel. So they actually let him
00:26:21.640
in and he filmed all sorts of stuff. And he's been doing all sorts of stories about illegal blockades
00:26:26.420
there. We're going to have an amazing little documentary for you next week about that.
00:26:30.680
Here, here's a sneak preview from Kian himself.
00:26:34.160
Right now, we are in the Fraser River on a tugboat. This happened virtually overnight after
00:26:40.040
my cameraman and I were embedded in an eco-radical blockade on the west end of Vancouver Island.
00:26:47.040
They welcomed us in after we said we were good buddies with Fred and Tunberg. Not really a lie,
00:26:51.140
we're on first name basis. But after that, we wanted to hear the other side of the story because they
00:26:55.660
were actually quite compelling people. They made some arguments. And I wanted to hear from folks
00:27:00.880
in industry and someone on a tugboat carrying logs from Haida Gwai all the way down to Vancouver
00:27:06.680
to the Fraser River is the perfect place to do that, the perfect people to talk to. So we're on the
00:27:13.740
boat right now. They invited us on and we're hearing the other side of the story. And it's all thanks to
00:27:17.480
folks who contributed at bcblockade.com. You can still go there if you want to contribute to this
00:27:23.340
documentary that we're creating. This documentary is going to cover everything from how the industry
00:27:28.400
operates to who is hurting it. We found some very interesting things out about some of the
00:27:33.680
eco-radicals behind these blockades. And a spoiler, they're closely connected to the very same people
00:27:39.960
blockading the coastal gasoline pipeline in northern BC that I was at earlier this year.
00:27:45.680
It's a crazy story and I'm excited to tell it to you. You can check it out at bcblockade.com.
00:27:50.640
Well, I can hardly wait to get that whole thing put together. Kian's still working on that. I just
00:27:55.300
talked to him a couple hours ago. So hopefully we'll have that next week. If you want to see
00:27:59.760
more about it, if you want to help us cover the cost, can we spend a few bucks on this?
00:28:03.100
Flying folks to BC, hotels, flights, meals, even. Go to bcblockade.com and we need to put together a few
00:28:13.340
thousand bucks if you're interested. All right. That's our show for today. Until tomorrow,
00:28:18.500
on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Highquarters, see you at home. Good night.