Ezra Levant is back in the chair to talk about the latest trade war between the United States and Canada, and why it s actually not as bad as you think it is. He's joined by Drea Humphrey, Dheera Hindrey, and David Menzies to discuss it.
00:00:00.000Hopefully you're having a good time with this podcast, but I guarantee a better time would be
00:00:05.020coming to Alaska with me, Drea Humphrey, and my other Rebel colleagues. You've got to find out
00:00:12.280more at our special website, rebelnewscruise.com, but it's taking place June 18th to June 25th,
00:00:21.080a vacation trip of a lifetime. Again, that's rebelnewscruise.com. I'll see you there.
00:00:27.420Well, hi, everybody. It's Ezra Levant from Rebel News. Great to see you. You know,
00:00:32.680from time to time, I do these live streams. Most of the time, it's my colleagues, Sheila Gunn-Reed
00:00:36.340and David Menzies, but there's so much going on, and Sheila's super busy, and David's actually
00:00:42.000taking a well-deserved break, so perfect opportunity for me to hop back in the chair. There's so much
00:00:46.400going on in the world. Like every other Canadian, I've been riveted by the trade war that never
00:00:52.720needed to be. You know, I remember, Claire Isabel, when Donald Trump tweeted to both Mexico and Canada
00:01:01.180saying, and this was shortly after his election victory in November, he said, by the time I take
00:01:06.380office on January 20th, I want both borders sealed to drugs and to illegal migrants. And I always
00:01:12.540thought, boy, we're such a small percentage of the problem in terms of open border migration to Mexico.
00:01:18.700He probably just put Canada in there because, you know, he didn't want to be seen to be obsessing
00:01:25.220over Mexico. That's what I thought. Because just the raw numbers, Canada is so much smaller.
00:01:31.120I since learned that actually the number of suspected terrorists apprehended at the border
00:01:37.900on the Canadian side is larger than on the Mexican side. I didn't know that. But I assumed that this
00:01:44.660was Trump just signaling, I'd like to get things started really quickly. I don't want to wait till
00:01:51.380inauguration on January 20th before I start signaling what I want to do. So it was his way of giving Canada
00:01:59.060and Mexico a chance to get a head start so everyone could be in harmony on Jan 20th. It was kind of a
00:02:06.220transition move, buying himself a couple extra months. Now, the president of Mexico, Claudia Scheinbaum,
00:02:13.720if I'm saying her name right, immediately phoned Trump and immediately agreed. Mexico is so
00:02:23.380dependent on the United States in a number of obvious ways, but other ways, for example,
00:02:27.820the number of remittances from Mexican workers in the United States sending money back home is an
00:02:33.440enormous source of capital for Mexico in a way that doesn't really apply to Canada. And I think
00:02:40.720Claudia Scheinbaum, and I think maybe it's a language issue, they speak Spanish, America in the
00:02:45.740whole speaks English. So they're not in the same sort of media, mean girls about Trump world.
00:02:53.460I think Mexico has its own sort of inferiority complex and its own psychological issues dealing
00:02:59.600with mighty America. But I think she basically said, all right, we're going to seal the border.
00:03:04.880It really wasn't on them. It was on Biden, wasn't it? But in the case of Canada, as you know,
00:03:13.380the liberal leader, the lame duck liberal leader, who's only here until March 9th, Justin Trudeau,
00:03:20.900immediately skipped over what Trump actually wanted and went straight to the trade war. Oh,
00:03:26.380we'll fight back. And it was so obvious of what insurance companies call a moral hazard. Have you ever
00:03:32.760heard that phrase? A moral hazard is when the risk of you doing a bad thing becomes so large that you
00:03:40.700actually choose to do the bad thing for rational reasons. In insurance, it would be if you don't
00:03:49.540have a deductible on your car, like if you don't have to pay the first $500 or $1,000 of a fender
00:03:57.640bender, then you're probably going to drive a little more recklessly because you know there's
00:04:02.840no deterrent to doing it. The reason insurance companies have a deductible is so that you feel
00:04:08.880the pain. So you're going to be driving for the first amount of money. So you're going to drive a
00:04:14.240little better. And if there's something catastrophic that happens, sure, they'll cover it, but they want
00:04:18.420you on your good behavior. I think you can just sort of think of all the moral hazards we have in
00:04:24.960Canada because consequences are removed from responsibility. So for example, our healthcare
00:04:29.800system, we never actually see the real cost of it. So we think it's free. And so there's probably a
00:04:37.100lot of decisions that Canadians make that they wouldn't make if they even just knew what the
00:04:41.680costs were. Anyway, moral hazard, the moral hazard that Justin Trudeau, Melanie Jolie, and now Mark Carney
00:04:47.760and Christia Freeland have is that in the case of Trudeau, this is his swan song. He's out of here
00:04:53.360in almost exactly a month. This is his way to end on a nicer note than being driven out by his own
00:05:00.940party and humiliated by Christia Freeland. So he wants to go out as Captain Canada. And by the way,
00:05:07.580I think it's quite likely he's going to move on on March 9th, but I wouldn't say it's 100% likelihood.
00:05:12.200I'd say it's more like 90%. And as to his successors, Mark Carney and Christia Freeland, again, who would
00:05:19.820they rather meet in the next election? Pierre Polyev, strong, commanding lead, very solid on issues
00:05:27.040like carbon tax? Or would they rather fight against Donald Trump, the outside marauder, who is less
00:05:33.340popular in Canada than Polyev? And again, they can paint themselves as Captain Canada. And as I've always
00:05:39.520said, when you campaign against Donald Trump, and here's the moral hazard, I mean, tariffs would be
00:05:47.280a bad thing for Canada. If they slapped import duties on stuff we sell Americans, that will cause
00:05:53.060Americans to choose other sources for those things, or make Canadian factories actually relocate into the
00:05:59.700US. That's a bad thing for us. But if it allows Christia Freeland or Mark Carney to say, look at Donald
00:06:06.020Trump, he's devastated our economy to sort of cover over the fact that the liberals, in fact, have
00:06:11.140devastated our economy for almost 10 years. That's the moral hazard, I mean. So it's been fascinating to
00:06:17.860watch. And Trump gave both Canada and Mexico a reprieve a couple days ago. And now he said in both
00:06:27.460cases, he's going to watch how things go for 30 days. To tell you the truth, I think it is fair to say
00:06:33.340that Justin Trudeau didn't particularly concede a lot. To say that, you know, these terror, these drug
00:06:43.520cartels are terror groups, what does Trudeau really care? To say there'll be 10,000 people on border
00:06:50.440patrol? Well, Bill Blair, I don't know if you saw this, Olivia, Bill Blair immediately clarified that
00:06:54.920none of those will be soldiers, and that'll include off-site staff. That's just bureaucrats.
00:07:00.180So I actually don't think Trudeau made concessions, because I don't think Trudeau wanted to make
00:07:05.780concessions. I think he wanted to fight. We'll see how that goes. In fact, the most convincing
00:07:13.060argument to Donald Trump, do you have that Michigan senator that we used the other day, Olivia?
00:07:20.080The most convincing argument, I think, that protected Canada was certainly not from Justin Trudeau,
00:07:26.000who wanted a trade war. Certainly not from Chrystia Freeland. And I'll show you, I'll show this video
00:07:31.000later, Olivia, the video of one of several times when Chrystia Freeland boasted to liberal supporters
00:07:38.160that Trump hates her, and that's why they should support her. Talk about a moral hazard. Like,
00:07:43.140normally you want to succeed, you want to win-win with the other party of a negotiation. When you're
00:07:48.340bragging that the person on the other side of the table hates you, that's your way of saying,
00:07:53.080I value the fight more than the resolution of the fight. Anyways, let me know when you have
00:07:58.860the clip of the Michigan senator. I think it was Howard Lutnick was the witness before
00:08:06.500the Senate. Lutnick is the Commerce Secretary for Donald Trump. And a senator from Michigan,
00:08:17.140who I think is Democrat, I'd have to double check, was explaining why import tariffs would hurt
00:08:24.340American automakers. And go ahead and play a clip if I think you have it on the screen there.
00:08:31.880You know, I know that tariffs are certainly a powerful and a positive tool that can be used,
00:08:39.060but they need to be used strategically. They need to be used thoughtfully. And that's why I called for
00:08:45.280100% tariffs on Chinese vehicles last year. And why I'm going to continue to fight for aggressive
00:08:51.720trade policy when it comes to our relations with China. As a senator from Michigan, I'm particularly
00:08:58.880focused on manufacturing. We know how to make things in Michigan. And I don't think you can be a great
00:09:04.040country if you don't actually make things. And that's what we do in my state. And I want to work
00:09:08.220with the administration to make sure we're growing that sector, as well as creating good paying
00:09:12.700jobs that result from manufacturing. However, I am concerned that President Trump's plan to impose
00:09:20.320tariffs on Canada and Mexico for the rest of the world. In fact, it could be in a matter of days,
00:09:26.860is what we are hearing, could hurt our manufacturers who do considerable trade back and forth,
00:09:34.720as we discussed in the office. Michigan is the home of the top three border crossings in North
00:09:41.340America. We're two of them. And a lot of that are auto parts that go back and forth. It's a highly
00:09:46.240integrated industry. And our auto companies are very concerned about what those tariffs might mean
00:09:53.220to cost, particularly to the cost of vehicles. Already, something we discussed, I'm concerned about
00:09:59.520the high cost of vehicles. Many families can't afford them now. And if tariffs are put in place that deal
00:10:05.900with that seamless trade that goes on with Canada, that that in the short run could definitely have
00:10:12.460an impact on prices and make cars even more unaffordable. I don't think that's something
00:10:17.460the American people want to see. And I'm afraid it would hurt consumers, as well as also hurt those
00:10:23.620workers. So my question for you, sir, is talk me through how those tariffs would be implemented,
00:10:30.080what you're thinking. And then Lutnik responds that the tariff is the penalty for not fixing the
00:10:38.180border. He has some interesting thoughts. But wouldn't you say that's a Democrat senator's name
00:10:42.200is Gary Peters. He's from Michigan. Did you hear his case? He's he is a sanctions and tariffs guy.
00:10:50.360He wants a 100 percent tariff on China. Why? Because China is a competitor to Michigan and to America
00:10:58.600when it comes to cars. But did you hear what he said about how a tariff on auto parts would really
00:11:03.540hurt American automakers? Because if you know anything about the Ambassador Bridge and Michigan
00:11:09.140and Ontario, Windsor and Detroit, there really are. It's sort of like that town in Alberta called
00:11:15.680Lloydminster that's half on the Alberta side, half on the Saskatchewan side. It's an interesting
00:11:21.380by jurisdictional place. And I think that's what Senator Peters was saying there is the same car
00:11:29.280is made partly in Canada and partly in the States. If you smack the Canadian side with tariffs, it's
00:11:34.860going to hurt the whole product. I thought that was the most convincing speech I heard coming from
00:11:39.440America against tariffs on Canada. The second most convincing person, of course, is Alberta Premier
00:11:44.760Danielle Smith, who's probably had 100 meetings in Washington, D.C. and other places in the last
00:11:51.880couple of months. There's an America first case for putting tariffs on products that could or should
00:12:01.440be made in America. But with the oil sands, you can't move them to America. They stay where they are.
00:12:07.900On the auto sector, you could move factories into America. But really, Windsor is like a satellite
00:12:15.020of America. They have had free trade for decades. It's called the Auto Pact.
00:12:21.220Anyways, my point is, these were the people likely who were more effective. That's Senator Peters,
00:12:29.040who I thought he came across very well. And in fact, I had to Google to check that he was a Democrat.
00:12:34.460He was so respectful of Lutnik and even Trump. I guess the Senate is slightly less partisan because
00:12:41.580they have six-year terms. They're more collegial. There's only 100 of them.
00:12:46.600The reason we do not have tariffs on our country right now is not because of Trudeau, Carney, or
00:12:52.700Freeland. They all want them. Understand, they want them for their political career. Same with Doug Ford.
00:12:58.120The reason we don't have tariffs in Canada right now is because Danielle Smith convinced the
00:13:03.700administration that it would be nutty to tax Canadian oil, which just goes to U.S. refineries
00:13:08.540and then on to gas stations. You're not going to move the oil sands to America, and 100% of that
00:13:13.720cost is going to be borne by those American refineries. And people like Senator Peters are saying,
00:13:19.140listen, if you understand the auto industry like I do, you understand it is integrated across the
00:13:23.780border. And that's not, you can't change it like that. That's why we don't have tariffs in Canada
00:13:29.800today. Now, Trump says he's going to revisit this in 30 days, and he might. And I think there's a list
00:13:35.680of issues that Trump has other than immigration and drugs. He mentioned that why are there no American
00:13:45.580banks allowed in Canada? Don't you think that's a good question? While we're at it, why are no
00:13:51.480American airlines really allowed? Well, I guess they do fly in and out, but there's a lot. Here's a
00:13:57.500better example, cell phones. You know, have you ever Googled what cell phone prices like data are in
00:14:03.580other countries? Canada has literally like the first or the second most expensive cell phone costs in the
00:14:10.620world. It's because they're protected from competition from the U.S. How much do you love
00:14:16.260Rogers or Bell or Telus? I have, over the course of my life, had cell phones with each of those companies.
00:14:23.140They are all terrible people. And they're terrible people because they don't have to be good.
00:14:29.300In a normal market, everyone's jostling for the clients and they're trying to be friendly. I mean,
00:14:35.280think of how competitive, say, the restaurant industry is, the service, the hospitality industry,
00:14:40.520they're called these nice things because they're trying to love you and woo you and win your heart.
00:14:45.920When was the last time a cell phone company treated you with love and respect and hospitality? Why
00:14:52.460aren't they called hospitality or service industries? Because they don't have to be. Again, there's a kind
00:14:57.060of a moral hazard there too when you think about it because you can't escape the monopoly or the
00:15:02.080oligopoly. You can't escape Bell, Shaw, and Rogers because there's, where's T-Mobile? Where's Vodafor? I don't
00:15:08.960even know what they're called in America or, and I know T-Mobile and AT&T. I don't know all the names
00:15:15.040of the different cell phone companies. Why can't I choose one of them? I don't have to. Why can't
00:15:20.780I choose an American bank? I'm not going to be forced to, but why can't I choose to? And that's
00:15:25.080one of the reasons we have the worst banks and the worst cell phone companies in the world. It's a
00:15:28.820moral hazard. And by the way, I think once we deal with the border thing, Donald Trump might come for
00:15:34.320those others. And you might say, well, that's not fair. That's not friendly. That's not nice. What
00:15:38.760happened to be being best friends? Well, why, why should Canadian banks have access to America?
00:15:47.000There's a lot of TD bank. Have you ever traveled through the United States? There's a ton of Canadian
00:15:50.520banks in there. Why, why isn't, isn't it reciprocal? And Trump will talk about how we lie down on the job
00:15:59.120when it comes to our military. This podcast is brought to you by
00:16:02.980Rebel News. That's right. So if you want to support us, why not do it in a win-win fashion
00:16:09.840by shopping for yourself? One of my favorite things to do, head to rebelnewsstore.com to pick the
00:16:16.460patriotic gear that pleases your heart. And while you're there, use coupon code DREA10 to save while you
00:16:23.920do. Can you pull up Andrew Coyne's tweet where he, he's gone bonkers. He says Canada should consider
00:16:34.620pulling out of the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance. I don't know if you know what the Five Eyes is. You
00:16:40.840know, there's all these international groups. There's the G7. Those are seven countries that have
00:16:46.220amongst the largest economies in the world. It doesn't quite, but Canada's in the G7. It actually
00:16:52.160generally shouldn't be. There's the G20, which is a larger group. There's NATO, which is a North
00:16:59.860American treaty organization. But there's something called the Five Eyes, and I sort of call it the
00:17:04.320super friends. They're the five best friends. Can you guess who's in them if you don't know?
00:17:09.840Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. So those are like the
00:17:15.240League of Democracies. Italy's not in there. France is not in there. Israel's not in there.
00:17:21.260These are the five closest buddies. You could call them the Anglosphere.
00:17:26.720And they have something called the Five Eyes, because it has to do with spying.
00:17:31.780If you're looking for it, Olivia, I replied to, I retweeted him. So maybe it's faster to find it on
00:17:37.420my Twitter account. So the Five Eyes is basically how the CIA shares information with CSIS, shares
00:17:44.780information with MI6 and whatever it's called in Australia and New Zealand. It's really extra
00:17:55.360secret secrets that we share with each other. And obviously, the little guys are the chief
00:18:02.080beneficiaries of that. I mean, I have a lot of concerns about CSIS and their focus on truckers and
00:18:10.460right-wingers and crazy stuff like that. I'm sure CSIS does some good work. But just in terms of
00:18:18.260resources and people and budgets, the CIA and even MI6 are vastly superior. So Canada obviously gets the
00:18:26.500best out of that deal. It's information sharing. I'm sure for every tip that we give the Yanks that
00:18:36.700they don't already know in the CIA, there's 100 tips they give us. I mean, it's sort of a joke
00:18:41.520that we're in the Five Eyes and it's equal. Here, blow that up and show what Coyne said. And I'll
00:18:46.740show you my reply. Andrew Coyne wrote, he's responding to Trump offering the CIA buyouts and the FBI.
00:18:58.280And Coyne says, this is just utterly dismaying. The CIA will no longer be defending America
00:19:05.620and the free world from hostile dictatorships. It will be defending the hostile Trump dictatorship
00:19:11.720from the free world. Another reason to keep U.S. out of Five Eyes loop? There's so many little
00:19:20.180nuggets in there. Andrew Coyne, with whom I used to be friendly about 20 years ago, I think it's gone
00:19:25.320positively mad. The Trump dictatorship. But my favorite part there from General Coyne is he's
00:19:33.400going to pull Canada out of the Five Eyes. That'll show the CIA. They'll no longer have it. Here's
00:19:39.980what I tweeted in reply. I said, General Coyne says, keep U.S. out of the Five Eyes. Absolutely.
00:19:49.160The CIA and NSA, that's their electronic spy agency, will come crawling back to us. We have
00:19:55.760expertise spying on truckers. We should also tell Trump our 1980s era CF-18s will no longer defend
00:20:02.960them. We're tired of doing all the work in this relationship. Can you imagine being a writer for
00:20:09.060the Globe and Mail, which I think is Canada's most prestigious newspaper. It's owned by Canada's
00:20:15.140richest oligarch, David Thompson. And you're calling Trump a dictatorship. And even if that's
00:20:21.380just florid language, you're seriously recommending we pull out of the Five Guys security alliance,
00:20:30.140the spy sharing info alliance, to get back at Trump. Because we'll show them. Oh my God. That's
00:20:41.040my point about, it would be a disaster for Canada to pull out of the Five Eyes. I mean, every month
00:20:48.180there's another news story that says U.S. officials tipped off the RCMP. I mean, the last several
00:20:56.780terrorists that were apprehended in Canada were not found by, they were let in by Canada. Canada didn't
00:21:04.300vet them. It was Americans that tipped off Canadian officials to it. So not only is that another way
00:21:12.960we benefit from our relationship with the United States, but it's, you saw the moral hazard there
00:21:18.040of, of imagine saying, we're going to leave the Five Eyes alliance to punish Trump because we hate
00:21:24.940him. Just absolute madness. I should stop focusing on Andrew Quinn because I, I think his descent into
00:21:32.100madness is precisely because he's losing relevance. 15 years ago, before Twitter was a big thing,
00:21:39.180people sort of, I don't, I wouldn't say they looked up to pundits, but they thought, wow, he's,
00:21:44.500he writes a column for the Globe and Mail. He's on TV panel for the CBC. He writes with the Toronto Star.
00:21:53.760Wow, they are above us. Even if they're not great, they have those positions and we can't get there.
00:21:58.860There's such a barrier to entry. You have to be part of an exclusive club. Today, talk is cheap.
00:22:05.740Opinions are cheap. Anyone can be a dramatic blowhard on Twitter and the prestige and the
00:22:13.420restriction on competition to be a blowhard, a pundit, someone with hot takes, there's zero barriers,
00:22:20.340zero barriers to entry. And so unless you're really interesting or really smart or have some really
00:22:26.740unique ideas, you're competing with countless other regular amateurs on, on Twitter, just
00:22:35.240pontificating. I mean, I, I, I follow some, I try and follow a range of people. I probably follow
00:22:41.200about 2000 people on Twitter. I don't know. And I'll give you an example of someone who I find very
00:22:47.440interesting. His name is Mike Cernovich. Don't agree with everything he says, but he's got a knack
00:22:53.780for thinking unconventionally, sort of oblique thinking. And I just, I follow him again, not
00:23:01.820because I agree with everything he says, but he, he's got a way of thinking that I think,
00:23:06.480wow, he's sort of unusual that way. Yeah, there he is. He's, I met him a couple of times in,
00:23:11.640in California. He's a good egg. And he's got about a 1.3 million followers, vastly larger than
00:23:18.940Andrew Coyne. He has a vastly larger impact. His ideas have a vastly larger audience. And again,
00:23:26.860you can disagree with him. I mean, he, he's a provocateur sometimes. I'm, it takes one to know
00:23:32.440one. My point is a guy like Mike Cernovich would not have a position of influence and power 15 years
00:23:40.960ago. He just wouldn't. He wouldn't have been a nepo baby, a nepotistic hire. He wouldn't have
00:23:45.860been part of the insiders club. Whereas a guy, and I would, I'm just picking him as an example,
00:23:51.160because I find him very interesting. You know, there's another guy, Stephen Miller, I follow.
00:23:58.440I'm not talking about the deputy chief of staff of the Trump administration, just a pundit. And he's
00:24:02.940just, he's got, he really boils things down and comes up with like a punchline. That's, yeah,
00:24:09.900the Stephen Miller you had there was, was the Trump deputy chief of staff. I'm talking about
00:24:15.520the pundit. Maybe he goes by Steve Miller. Anyways, he just has a way of summing things up with
00:24:21.340like finding the humor in it. Yeah, I think that's, maybe that's not the guy.
00:24:28.200I can't tell. Yeah, that is the guy. Yeah, that guy.
00:24:41.640He's just funny. And he sums up, you scroll down a bit. Let's see if we can find one.
00:24:46.680Thanks for tuning into this podcast. And thanks for hearing. Yeah. Thanks for tuning into this
00:24:55.520podcast. If you appreciate the news that rebel brings you consider being a part of what makes
00:25:01.740it possible. You can do so by subscribing to our exclusive content at rebel news plus.com. That means
00:25:09.920get exclusive shows, documentary behind the scenes and more. And it's for a cheap price as low as $8
00:25:17.780to start. We appreciate your support. Yeah. Like, I mean, I'm just picking at random here. President
00:25:25.780Trump will sign an executive order Wednesday designed to prevent people who were biologically
00:25:30.720assigned male at birth. And he just, okay, it's not a particularly witty tweet, but he just says
00:25:36.840in quotes, biologically assigned male. And he says, it's a very easy scientific process of simply
00:25:45.420pointing and looking. Okay. That's, that's not his best work there. But anyway, my point is, who's this
00:25:50.180guy? His, his handle is red steez. I don't even know what that means. He's just some guy. I don't know
00:25:56.640where he lives. I have no idea really who he is, but just from the sheer talent, he's funny. He makes
00:26:03.100observations. I think this is a hobby for him. I don't know if he does it for a living. Why am I
00:26:08.420going on? I'm saying in 2025, you have this existential angst by a class of opinion arbiters,
00:26:19.060tastemakers who no longer arbitrate opinion or make taste. No one sets their cover. Some boomers and
00:26:27.760seniors who are still operating on a habit might do. But the decline of newspaper subscriptions
00:26:34.780tells the whole story. I mean, how many people actually, how many people under the age of 40
00:26:40.500actually get a paper newspaper anymore? Do you, do you, do you know anyone? I don't think I've got a
00:26:48.980paper. I, I subscribed to the Epoch Times, but I did that more out of love than out of actually
00:26:55.220way. I mean, and by the way, it's beautifully done, but other than my subscription to the Epoch
00:26:59.960Times, which I do just out of solidarity, I don't subscribe to a paper newspaper. Why would I? It's
00:27:06.900going to be 24 hours older than all the news I've found on Twitter. So the rage that the Andrew Coins
00:27:14.220have, that they are no longer the tastemakers, the arbiters is palpable. And I love it. And it's the
00:27:20.740democratization of the media. It's a form of citizen journalism. Granted, it's an easier form
00:27:28.580of citizen journalism than actually going out there and reporting. We just got back a couple
00:27:32.400of weeks ago, as you know, from Davos, Switzerland, and being on the scene reporting the news with a
00:27:37.600video camera, I think it's a higher form of journalism. It's more work, I'll tell you that.
00:27:41.180But people who are witty and have interesting insights can do great opinion journalism from
00:27:50.360the bathtub. Hey, did you guys, when I was away, did you guys ever show any of the insect
00:27:57.420energy bar video? Hey, I want to show you a video. I was in Davos with our team. And
00:28:06.320every year we go to Davos, it's the World Economic Forum annual meeting in the Swiss Alps. It's this
00:28:13.220town called Davos. It's sort of like Banff. It's small. There's really one, actually, it's about
00:28:19.400the same size as Banff, I guess. And it's hard to get to. And every year, the World Economic Forum
00:28:25.700buys up every single hotel room for a week and every single store or restaurant on the main street.
00:28:33.100And they sort of put up almost like a movie set. They transform the main street. If it's a coffee
00:28:39.600shop or a store, they actually gut it and put up, like, they turn it into the Facebook headquarters
00:28:47.040or the Black Rock Pavilion. Like, they transform it. It's like Disneyland. It's a series of false fronts.
00:28:56.720And they turn it into like a theme park. And then when they're done, all this cladding comes down
00:29:03.580and those regular stores are back. They pay an enormous amount of money to those stores to give
00:29:08.020up their spot for a week. I understand that there's a church. We did a report on it. I understand the
00:29:14.920church rents itself out for a million dollars for that one week, which sounds crazy. But look at it from
00:29:22.740the church's point of view. If you can get a million dollars by vacating for one week, and that's
00:29:28.360enough to pay for the church all year, maybe that's a smart thing to do. Anyways, they transform
00:29:33.740this main street. Very hard to get to. We go there every year. We don't get accreditation to go into
00:29:39.440the inner sanctum. So we sort of hang out outside. And it's pretty cold. And there's other people outside
00:29:45.820two. I want to show you an interaction I had. I didn't know this guy would be there. I just,
00:29:51.780I see a guy handing out samples. There's a number of people handing out samples of things
00:29:55.580all along the street. Normally they're just giving out free hot chocolate or hot tea to let people keep
00:30:01.220warm. And it's sort of a gift from, for example, Qatar had a pavilion and they gave away a hot tea
00:30:09.140and dates. Okay. And Facebook has a hot chocolate stand. Anyway, so this guy, I hadn't seen him before
00:30:16.560and he was giving away energy bars. Now this is an 18 minute video. Obviously I'm not going to play
00:30:22.120the whole thing, but let me play a little bit. And then I'm going to ask you, Olivia, to fast forward
00:30:26.340to when the Sikh guy comes in to have, have a bite. Cause I thought that was a bit of a laugh here.
00:30:32.560Watch with me for a minute. If I want you to have a split screen, I might sort of pipe in. Although I think
00:30:38.220really every thought I had, I said to the fella, here's me in Davos talking to a guy handing out
00:30:44.220energy bars. And I want to ask you, can you see the brand name of this energy bar? And if you're a
00:30:52.840dad or anyone who's watched Disney movie with your kids, do you recognize the name? I'll tell you the
00:30:59.620name right now. Pumbaa. Olivia, do you know what Pumbaa is?
00:31:03.300She says that she's not familiar with Lion King. For anyone who's a, who has little kids,
00:31:11.360you've probably watched the Lion King. It's such a great movie. Pumbaa is the wild boar who convinces
00:31:19.520Simba, the lion, not to eat him. And he convinces the lion, don't eat meat, eat bugs instead.
00:31:29.300It's a character in a Disney movie called Pumbaa. He's also notorious for farting, which is sort of
00:31:36.680the kid's joke in the movie. But his name is Pumbaa. Let me show you the guy I met on the streets of
00:31:42.400Davos who was handing out Pumbaa branded energy bars. Take a look.
00:31:48.940Hi, I'm doing a promotion tour for a recently funded company that is doing these bars. It's Pumbaa food. And we are producing upcycled food. And well, this is our energy bar, which uses insect protein as a protein source.
00:32:06.940Now, I want to be very fair to you because you've invited me to talk to you. When I hear you say that these are insect bars, I have a natural reflex to gag. I think there's a human evolutionary reaction to things that are, that historically have caused us sickness. That's why when we see maggots, we almost throw up. It's nature's way of saying, don't eat that. That's bad.
00:32:34.720Why would you want people to eat insects? I just make your best case for what I think is an astonishing proposition.
00:32:45.880Well, the thing is, I don't know if it is really an instinct or if it's just a learned behavior that we have an aversion against these insects or against spiders or anything.
00:32:55.540Because in other parts of the world, especially in Africa and Asia, many people eat many kinds of insects. And so maybe we just need to get used to it.
00:33:05.780Now, you said the word should. Maybe we should get used to it. Why wouldn't we eat beef and chicken and fish and vegetables? Why should we? Should is sort of a moral word. It is something we ought to do.
00:33:22.500So, if we can eat chicken and beef and fish and vegetables, why are you saying we should eat insects?
00:33:30.080Well, it's not in every occasion that we can have beef and cattle and pigs and chicken.
00:33:37.060For example, if there are a few resources in water or the food distribution for hay and stuff that these animals that we mentioned before need, then it can be challenging.
00:33:49.360And then it can be easier to just feed the worms or the insects with some things that are very easy to store.
00:33:57.040Or if you want to take the example that we will go to other planets and we will conquer Mars, for example.
00:34:04.900If you want to take pigs and cows with us to Mars, it will be difficult because of the space and because they need a lot of room.
00:34:31.700And it would terrify me if you had to eat bugs.
00:34:34.420But while I was standing there talking to this guy, people came up for the free things.
00:34:39.960That's the kind of place it is in Davos.
00:34:41.880There's gift bags and free stuff and it was cold out.
00:34:44.300So, anyway, one fellow came up and I tell you, well, you can see for yourself that the very friendly insect bar dealer, he would say it's made with insect protein.
00:35:43.060And I would say this is the right place to offer this because here when you walk so much, you get into the meetings, you have so much of muscle exercise, brain exercise.
00:35:52.820At the time you're offering such an energy kind of a chocolate, it's a great gesture.
00:35:56.780You will very quickly get rid of your muscle pain because it's a big energy resource.
00:53:32.340Well, isn't he making the case for more border patrols?
00:53:36.140And, yeah, there are a lot of bad things that come up from the U.S. into Canada.
00:53:40.660Isn't that on us as much as it's on them?
00:53:44.080I mean, we could take a Trump-like approach and say we demand America seal their northern border, but we've put nothing into our own border.
00:53:51.720I mean, worse than nothing, we at Roxham Road sent the RCMP there to act as concierges.
00:54:00.620The Americans didn't mind that because, of course, most of the people leaving America through Roxham Road into Canada were people who were about to be deported
00:54:10.520or people who were convicted of crimes, and they were more scared of Donald Trump than they were of Justin Trudeau.
00:54:17.480So, I mean, people think the idea that people will self-deport is absurd and ridiculous.
00:54:23.320It sort of is, but it happened for almost 10 years under Trudeau
00:54:27.260because Trudeau positively welcomed illegal crossings into Canada.
00:54:33.280Well, who do you think wanted to cross illegally?
00:54:36.140People who had a criminal record, people who were on the run from police, people who were going to be deported, lost a battle.
00:54:46.580But I agree with Doug Ford in that we need a stronger border.
00:54:50.620But he's done next to nothing on that.
00:54:55.560So I think he's sucking and blowing at the same time.
00:54:57.780But nothing beats the Premier of Quebec, Francois Legault, who, like the others, was calling for a Team Canada approach,
00:55:07.180namely shut off that Alberta oil to punish Donald Trump.
00:55:13.880Of course, if Canada had other export markets for our oil, we wouldn't be so reliant on America.
00:55:20.900I would rather sell our ethical oil to America than to China, of course.
00:55:26.460But who was it who blocked the pipelines from Alberta to blue water oceans?
00:55:32.400It was the Liberals of Canada, and it was provincial premiers and provincial governments, including in BC.
00:55:38.760And Francois Legault was one of the worst.
00:55:40.180He blocked something called the Energy East Pipeline,
00:55:42.660which would have taken about a million barrels of oil a day from Alberta to New Brunswick,
00:55:49.500where Canada's largest refinery is, currently being filled with American and OPEC oil.
00:55:55.220So all this Team Canada, come on, Daniel Smith, stop trying to defend your oil patch
00:55:59.260and be the sacrifice industry for the rest of us as we fight with Donald Trump.
00:56:03.460As soon as the tariffs are dropped, listen to Francois Legault.
00:56:08.720So, yeah, that whole Team Canada thing, that's over now.
00:56:12.900We have gone back to hating Alberta oil.