What if the data the federal government has been relying on to shove climate policies down your throat has been corrupted from the very beginning? Well, today, we have proof. What if the government knew that it was broken, because analysts inside the Bank of Canada told the government it was? This is something we all intuitively knew, but it s in black and white. Today, Tom Harris from the International Climate Science Coalition joins me to break it down.
00:00:00.000What if the data the federal government has been relying on to shove climate policies down your throat has been corrupted from the very beginning?
00:00:25.000Well, today, I think we have proof. I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed, and you're watching The Gunn Show.
00:00:31.220For years, Canadians have been told, repeatedly, that our country is warming at twice the global average,
00:00:37.080and that claim underpins carbon taxes, energy bans, bank stress tests, and hundreds of billions of dollars in so-called climate action to liberal-linked insiders.
00:00:46.260But what if the data behind it all was completely broken?
00:00:50.140And worse, what if the federal government knew that it was broken because analysts inside the Bank of Canada told the government that it was?
00:01:02.780This is something I think we all sort of intuitively knew, but it's true.
00:01:20.140So joining me now is a good friend of Rebel News and good friend of reality everywhere, Tom Harris from the International Climate Science Coalition Canada.
00:01:33.880I haven't talked to Tom since I got back from, I was going to say beautiful Blem, but the people were beautiful.
00:01:42.580The people were lovely. Let's just leave it there.
00:01:44.660At the United Nations Climate Change Conference.
00:01:48.100And Tom, to cap off 2025, you wrote an article.
00:03:17.220It's got a complicated title, but it's not that hard once I explain it.
00:03:20.840The title is Artificial Stepwise Increases in Homogenized Surface Air Temperature Data Invalidate Published Climate Warming Claims for Canada.
00:03:32.220He said point blank that it's actually a data artifact that is responsible for most of Canada's supposed warming.
00:03:40.100And what he found was that in 1998, at most stations across Canada, there was a stepwise increase.
00:03:46.660OK, temperatures sort of going up gradually, which has been happening since the end of the last glacial.
00:03:51.420In fact, it's been happening since the end of the Little Ice Age, of course.
00:03:54.900And that's been a good thing, generally speaking, because I don't know about you, but I don't really want another Little Ice Age.
00:04:00.440But regardless, then suddenly in 1998, when they brought in 70 some odd new temperature sensors, the temperature suddenly jumped up one degree C.
00:04:10.900And from there on, it stayed at this one degree C greater.
00:04:14.560And so what he found is that that is a data artifact.
00:04:18.540In other words, it's not caused by nature changing at one degree suddenly in one year.
00:04:23.560It's caused by the fact that some of the data appears to be corrupted, corrupted partly because of these new temperature sensors.
00:04:33.280For example, the vegetation grows up around temperature sensing stations.
00:04:37.100And sometimes it can be a social thing, too, because there is a different incentive for scientists to find a certain temperature.
00:04:45.120And I want to tell you a funny story that shows how data is actually affected by social things, too.
00:04:51.180You know, in the Soviet Union, the scientists who were in the far north were given a bonus when the temperature was below a certain level because it was miserable to live up there.
00:05:04.280And so you can imagine what they would do.
00:05:06.540They could push the temperatures down, of course, so they get their bonus.
00:05:10.180Well, when the Soviet Union collapsed, it was no longer possible for them to get these bonuses.
00:05:14.960So they started reporting the temperature honestly.
00:05:17.180So it appeared that the whole of the north of the Soviet Union and then Russia suddenly jumped up in temperature because there was no longer a financial incentive to say, oh, man, it's cold outside.
00:05:28.740So there can be lots and lots of things that affect data.
00:05:31.640And it's interesting because over the years, there have been various reports and studies done which say that if you see a sudden stepwise change of as great as it, well, they're saying anything greater than about 0.6 degrees.
00:05:44.740But certainly if you see a sudden change in one year of a temperature that you're measuring, you know, especially across a big area like Canada, if you see that change by a whole degree, then you know there's something wrong.
00:05:57.260OK, there's something wrong with the data, right?
00:06:00.380But Environment Canada and actually what they call climate change in Environment Canada, they accepted that data.
00:06:06.960They apparently didn't examine it very closely.
00:06:09.600And suddenly the headlines are blaring.
00:06:12.520Canada is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world.
00:06:15.940Well, as Dr. Hickey points out, if you take out that anomaly, that one degree sudden rise, almost all of the warming disappears.
00:06:23.940And I have a look at the temperature for Ottawa, for example, and it's something like 1.8 degrees.
00:06:28.760So suddenly it drops down to 0.8 degrees, you know, over a period of about seven decades in that neighborhood.
00:06:35.340And so it's interesting because he actually found this back in 2021 when he was a data scientist for the Bank of Canada.
00:06:42.960So it's wonderful that somebody within the government, in this case, the Bank of Canada, was actually checking the data.
00:06:50.760OK, and he was and he wrote to Environment Canada and they sort of brushed it off.
00:06:55.520They said, oh, well, we had a quick look at the metadata.
00:06:58.560Metadata is the data before adjustment.
00:07:03.380This is a real temperature change, you know.
00:07:05.760And but they said it's probably a real temperature change.
00:07:09.100So here you have the scientist who was most responsible for, you know, putting together the data on which the government based billion dollar policy decisions.
00:07:20.800And all she could say was, oh, it's probably real temperature change.
00:07:28.000And there's another instance here I'll give in a second where this where another scientist, another economist, actually, at the Bank of Canada also found mistakes.
00:07:36.120But, you know, Sheila, this is very reminiscent of other studies which have later proven to be false.
00:07:41.820If the data and the methodology and the whole papers and everything that's published, if it supports the climate scare and it gives the government a bigger hammer to hit us with to say, oh, my God, Canada is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world, then it doesn't seem like anybody really checks the data.
00:07:58.600Right. And it's funny that you talked about the Soviet scientists or the Russian scientists who were making it colder for a financial incentive for themselves.
00:08:09.640We actually have the opposite happening right now where they make the warming faster and, of course, thus more catastrophic.
00:08:17.520Although don't ask me after a cold snap if I think warming is catastrophic and we're just coming out of one today.
00:08:31.100Now, as I alluded to the Green Slush Fund, a scandal here in Canada where liberal insiders were basically giving themselves money for their little green projects and one would leave the room to avoid a conflict of interest while everybody else voted on their little funding announcement.
00:08:50.140And then that then somebody else would leave the room and then all their friends would vote.
00:08:54.560So it was sort of, you know, a perpetual motion machine with other people's money.
00:09:00.420And it's predicated on the fact that it is warming catastrophically and super, super fast.
00:09:05.320And a lot of money dries up if we're not in Canada, according to former Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, warming at a rate faster than the rest of the world.
00:09:16.260It's so funny. These people, no matter where they're from, their country is warming at a rate faster than the rest of the world.
00:09:29.660But, you know, he prepared a very nice graph or not a graph, but a figure of Canada.
00:09:34.940And what he did is he and in fact, I sent it to you.
00:09:37.700It actually shows where it's cooling over this period and where it's warming, you know.
00:09:43.460And it's really quite interesting because if you actually look at the graph, you can see that by far the majority of places between 1998 and 2018.
00:10:29.280OK, not related to Kibo, thank goodness.
00:10:31.560But he found that the maximum temperature of the day for over 10,000 stations looking at daily temperatures, T max, T min and average, he found that the minimum was higher than the maximum for over 10,000 different instances of daily temperatures.
00:10:50.460And I just got to read you one quote here from Dr. Hickey, one quote from Dr. Hickey's article here.
00:11:42.340We, in other words, Environment and Climate Change Canada, were quite surprised by the frequency of the issue you reported and have taken some time to go through the data carefully.
00:11:55.380I mean, why aren't they going through the data carefully before they before they release it and get, you know, all these multi-billion dollar policies based on it?
00:12:03.640And, you know, now they've had the time to go through it.
00:12:07.660Well, that's hardly, you know, very consoling.
00:12:11.220I mean, the bottom line is they shouldn't be surprised by their own data.
00:12:15.260So it turns out Environment and Climate Change Canada have not yet answered because the Hickey put out this report just, as I say, just before Christmas.
00:12:23.000He's now publicizing and he didn't access the information so he could do it legitimately.
00:12:28.960He shows his questions to Environment Canada and it shows their answers.
00:12:57.480And this, I mean, maybe five years ago, do you remember the scandal of Environment and Climate Change Canada deleting like 100 years of weather data?
00:13:08.900Because they don't want us to know that weather is cyclical, that is not cooking us alive as quickly as they promise us it will.
00:13:18.620And as you say, there's a lot of money predicated on it.
00:13:29.680It says in April 2019, Environment and Climate Change Canada released Canada's Changing Climate Report stating that Canada is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world and that the warming will intensify, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:13:41.720And the city of Toronto has the same thing.
00:13:44.040And, of course, the federal government, I mean, Environment and Climate Change Canada, is doing the same thing.
00:13:48.580So, you know, it turns out and it's going to be very interesting to see Environment Canada's answer to this because it makes them look like they're pushing their thumb on the scale, you know.
00:13:59.500And when the data, you know, doesn't or when it does give results they like, nobody checks it until somebody holds them to account.
00:14:06.060So the point that Dr. Hickey makes, and as I say, we're going to be interviewing him, it'll be broadcast 7 p.m. this Saturday and Sunday night on the AmericaOutloud.news network.
00:14:17.400So if people go there, AmericaOutloud.news, you can hear from the author.
00:14:21.160And so it's really great, Sheila, that he left the Bank of Canada because he can now tell us all, you know.
00:14:26.880So he gave us a really great Christmas present.
00:14:29.680I got to tell you, though, about another study, too, which is also costing us money.
00:14:34.860And that is what's called the Potsdam Institute study.
00:14:38.700And this one similarly gave us incredible results that were just accepted.
00:14:48.900OK, well, Potsdam is in Germany, of course, and they found that the change in GDP for the world by the year 2100 because of temperature change from climate change was forecast to be 62 percent.
00:15:04.220There was going to be a 62 percent change in, you know, drop in GDP because of temperature.
00:15:25.180Anyway, they took that study and they incorporated it into all of their climate scenarios.
00:15:30.940Now, in Canada, we have different bodies, which are official government bodies, which actually tell the banks you must use the NGFS scenarios for your climate stress tests.
00:15:44.140Now, banks do all kinds of stress tests.
00:15:45.960You know, they they look at what happens if there's massive inflation or what happens.
00:15:49.900And but they also do something since 2021.
00:15:52.120They've been doing something called a climate stress test, which examines, OK, what's going to be the impact on the bank if we have a climate emergency?
00:16:01.400You know, what's going to happen to the loans that are out there?
00:16:05.620They also look at whether or not their different branches will be affected by, you know, massive extreme weather and blackouts and all sorts of things.
00:16:12.920So that particular group, NGFS, they actually tell the banks, well, actually, it's the regulators that use the NGFS climate scenarios to tell the banks,
00:16:29.160when you do a stress test, you must use this information from the NGFS and it turned out that the the this financial system actually used that one study.
00:16:41.360They didn't take a whole lot of studies and take sort of an average.
00:16:44.500They took that one study that showed 62 percent drop in GDP because of climate change.
00:16:51.480OK, and so all across Canada, these poor banks were being forced to use this extreme scenario for determining, you know, all sorts of things like loan rates.
00:17:01.800And here's what happened, Sheila, because they use this.
00:17:04.220And by the way, it was triple the expected, you know, change in GDP because of other studies.
00:17:10.340So banks were not loaning money as easily to fossil fuel companies.
00:17:16.060OK, and when they did, they were charging higher interest rates and but they were preferentially giving money to so-called green energy because, my God, this change in GDP was going to be catastrophic.
00:17:27.960So those climate stress tests were carried out over a period of about eight months.
00:17:32.660So during that period last, let's see, in 2024, they were actually influencing the the loans of banks.
00:17:40.800OK, and they thought the whole economy was going to be quite fragile.
00:17:44.800But a little later, they started noticing some real problems with this.
00:17:48.820First of all, a bit of a red flag went up because, as I say, it turned out that their estimate of change in GDP was triple the other estimates.
00:17:57.300And they had only used that one study, just one study on which they based all of the bank climate stress tests across Canada.
00:18:06.080And so they started looking at it and it turned out there was some data in there that was completely wild.
00:18:25.140Yeah, it turned out they found that Uzbekistan's GDP was going wild, crazy all over the place.
00:18:31.920And they attributed that to climate change.
00:18:34.260Now, you have to ask yourself, well, how could one small country influence the whole global average?
00:18:41.800And I'll give you an example to illustrate how if data is really wild in one particular instance, you can actually affect the global average.
00:18:51.020Let's say you were trying to encourage your family to go on a diet.
00:18:55.500So you wanted to take the average weight of everybody in your family and you got 120 pounds, 160, 180, 200 and 850 pounds.
00:19:08.120But if you average those five numbers and you don't take out the anomaly, the impossible 850 pounds, you get an average of something like 300 pounds.
00:19:18.360So you can go to your family and you can say, hey, family, we've got an average weight here of 300 pounds.
00:19:25.000We've got to start reducing our food consumption.
00:19:27.740But of course, it's all driven by this one outlier, you know, and that's the point.
00:19:32.640That's an illustration of how one piece of data that is miles off reality can affect the average.
00:19:40.140And, you know, normally when they look at GDP changes because of climate change at a particular country, they also look at the nearby countries.
00:19:48.480OK, and they determine if it's kind of consistent with the nearby countries, because, of course, the climate change would be similar for, you know, nearby countries.
00:19:59.020They just took the Uzbekistan data and they stuffed it in their model and they got this massive 62 percent change in GDP because of global warming.
00:20:08.140And of course, it was politically correct because, wow, they can now push the banks to do even more extreme climate scenarios in their stress testing.
00:20:17.060But then they realized, oh, there's a mistake here.
00:20:21.620And so by the end of last year, they actually withdrew the paper completely.
00:20:26.280OK, but in the meantime, the banks were being told they had to increase lending rates.
00:20:32.040Essentially, they were being told it indirectly that they had to increase lending rates to fossil fuel companies and give really preferential terms to, you know, green energy, which isn't really green.
00:20:42.160Because this huge GDP change was occurring or going to occur because of climate change.
00:20:47.460So, you know, once again, Sheila, this is another great example of how if you produce data that supports the narrative, it can easily slip through and be used to impose really serious consequences.
00:21:01.300I mean, Canada, Canada, for example, has spent two hundred billion dollars since 20 since Trudeau came in in 2015 on climate change.
00:21:11.060So I'm sure they were thrilled to see that in the case of the first study, we're warming at twice the rate of the world.
00:21:17.240Well, it turns out that may be totally bogus and we still haven't heard back from Environment Canada as to what they're going to do now.
00:21:23.000Are they going to announce, oh, actually, we're almost not warming at all?
00:21:26.940Yeah. I mean, Canadians, do you feel warmer?
00:21:33.440Do you feel like you're warming faster than the rest of the face of the earth?
00:21:38.120Yeah. When you were talking there, I Googled the population of Uzbekistan and it is roughly the same size as Canada, about 38 million.
00:21:48.780But that can show you how a country as inconsequentially population sized as Canada or Uzbekistan can be used to be the cudgel by which this climate change nonsense is just completely rammed down the throats of the entire world.
00:22:09.800Yeah, exactly. And in the case of the first study, Canada is a huge area.
00:22:15.220So if we're wrong and most of the warming that supposedly occurred in Canada is not real.
00:22:21.220I mean, it's an artifact. It's because of the data collection methods or whatever.
00:22:25.260That affects the global supposed warming as well. I haven't seen the calculation for that, but I wouldn't be surprised if we're finding now that the actual 1.2 degree warming since 1880, perhaps it's only 0.2 or I don't imagine the Canadian data would affect it that much.
00:22:41.860But, you know, the point we have to understand, Sheila, is Canada is one of the most developed and advanced countries in the world.
00:22:49.740OK. And yet we had this huge mistake that, as I say, Environment Canada hasn't officially commented on it.
00:22:55.940So we don't know for sure that there isn't some sort of excuse.
00:22:59.700You know, it'd be interesting to hear what their excuse is.
00:23:01.620But if we made such a big mistake, a developed nation, imagine what, you know, Tanzania or Malaysia.
00:23:10.380I mean, can we rely on their temperatures either?
00:23:12.720I mean, maybe it hasn't warmed at all in the last half century.
00:23:15.880Who knows? I mean, if Canada is that far off where most of our warming just disappears because of a data artifact, then maybe there's no global warming anywhere.
00:23:27.380A lot of people are going to be out of work.
00:23:29.120Yeah. $200 billion will buy you a lot of jobs. That's for sure.
00:23:36.860Hey, I know this isn't on our agenda of things to talk about, but I just I want to pick your brain a little bit about what's happening in Venezuela.
00:23:46.100Because I think right now Trump has this incredible way of making people side with outlandish and evil things just to spite him.
00:23:57.920I mean, it's really something to watch.
00:24:00.020You know, he did it when he came out and advised pregnant mothers not to take Tylenol if they if they can avoid it.
00:24:07.900And so I saw endless videos of women taking pregnant women, taking Tylenol, potentially damaging their children to spite Trump for some reason.
00:24:17.120And now I see people side, people who have spoken out against Maduro siding with Maduro just to spite Trump.
00:25:12.720Of course, some of them were on the gravy train, I'm sure, with the current government or the previous government.
00:25:17.360But you had the average people who were thrilled.
00:25:20.960They were so happy to get rid of this guy.
00:25:22.960But then all the political leaders around the world outside of the United States were saying, oh, my God, you know, this is awful.
00:25:29.360Because, you know, you think, OK, so you're saying it's a good thing that Venezuela is being ruled by a dictator who wouldn't respect the results of the previous election?
00:25:39.260You know, like, when was that a good thing to support?
00:25:43.780I think a lot of people are against it, you know, certainly in the Western world and in the developed world and the politicians because Trump did it.
00:26:50.860I've given you numbers in the past, but this is the updated number for how much the climate policy initiative says is being spent across the world on climate finance.
00:27:07.440Yeah. And so you have to say, oh, my goodness.
00:27:09.680Besides not taxing us so much in the first place, think what you could do with five billion U.S. dollars a day to help build hospitals in the developing world or any number of things.
00:27:20.580You know, we would have the best roads, the best hospitals everywhere.
00:27:24.620So, I mean, the consequences of what Trump has done are very, very good.
00:27:30.880OK, because countries are now backing off, not Canada, unfortunately, but eventually Canada will sort of have to follow.
00:27:38.720They keep saying we're going to be a global energy superpower and lead the world on green energy.
00:27:43.440But you say, but the world's not going more and more to green energy.
00:27:47.240We're half snow covered half the year.
00:27:58.160But the rest of the half of the year, we're covered in snow and have four hours of usable daylight.
00:28:02.960And they're telling me we're going to be an energy superpower and just to ignore the coal, uranium and oil we have under our feet and natural gas.
00:28:11.400Well, you know, Sterling Burnett, Dr. Sterling Burnett, who works with the Heartland Institute, he said something really, really quite funny.
00:28:18.060But at the same time, I think it was very revealing.
00:28:20.520He said, you know, people are objecting.
00:28:55.780If you actually look at countries that have gone hog wild on renewable energy, Denmark, for example,
00:29:00.820you can walk from one side of Denmark to the other and never lose sight of one of these massive wind turbines taller than the peace tower in Ottawa.
00:29:11.740And you look at these countries, you know, Germany, the Netherlands, their electricity rates are huge.
00:29:18.140They're massively high because, of course, they've converted more and more to this supposed green energy.
00:29:23.600And then they have their natural gas stations in the background backing it up for when it's not windy and it's not sunny.
00:29:30.580And so those stations, instead of running at a consistent rate where they get high efficiency,
00:29:34.700they're going up and down and up and down to compensate for the variation in wind and solar.
00:29:40.940So, yeah, they're paying hugely more than the rest of the world because they've supposedly tried to lead the world on green energy.
00:29:48.000So, yeah, let China take it if they want to.
00:29:50.800And by the way, China boosts everything.
00:29:53.480OK, I mean, it's a massive economy, of course.
00:30:28.860I just want to share some good news on the coal front.
00:30:31.940I don't know if I told you last time I talked to you, but at the United Conservative Party annual general meeting at their convention last month,
00:30:41.040the membership voted to bring back, I quote, clean burning Alberta coal as a means of electricity production.
00:30:51.140And that has been my fantasy football political policy for a very long time.
00:30:56.480When we have 800 years of some of the world's cleanest burning coal under our feet, yet experiencing rolling brownouts because we don't have enough capacity.
00:31:07.580And I'm very excited that the membership of the UCP party have brought that back as a policy item.
00:31:16.640And now it's for the party to implement and adopt.
00:31:19.480And since the party holds government, I'm looking at you, Danielle Smith, do what the party members asked you.
00:31:26.080Well, I hope so, because, you know, coal has gotten a bad name.
00:31:29.040It really is a wonderful energy source.
00:31:31.980I mean, the fact is you pile up coal at a coal station and you now have secure power for as long as that pile lasts, which is typically a year or so.
00:31:41.480You know, you're not reliant on gas pipelines coming in and oil tankers and things.
00:31:45.660You actually have, just like nuclear power, all of your power source on site for perhaps a whole year.
00:31:53.120You know, a friend of mine was a director general in Egypt's energy ministry, and he went on a tour of Sweden and they took him to a coal-fired power plant, which was right beside a daycare.
00:32:06.580And he said to them, what, you've got a coal-fired power plant?
00:32:09.720And they said, yes, of course, it's clean coal.
00:33:31.240And just like you pointed out, we've got an incredible supply of coal that can burn and, you know, produce clean electricity for as long as you and me and our children are around.
00:33:41.880So, I mean, of course we should use it.
00:33:46.420Yeah, I mean, I used to, back when Alberta had coal-fired electricity, you used to be, and you still can look at the weather stations near the coal sites.
00:33:57.080But I would routinely check at Wabaman, that's the Genesee power station in Hanna, Alberta.
00:34:06.700By the way, beautiful resort lakes right there because they use the lakes as cooling.
00:34:11.860And so there's plenty of fish there and nice beaches.
00:34:14.260It was sort of a symbiotic relationship between these little resort communities and the coal-fired electricity station.
00:34:20.580But you could routinely check the air quality there on the air quality monitors.
00:34:24.380And they were always, always consistently better than, I don't know, the places that block our oil and gas, like Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal.
00:34:36.820Well, in Ottawa, or actually, excuse me, in Ontario, back around the early 2000s, we were getting about 25% of our power from coal.
00:34:48.260And consequently, our electricity rates were very low.
00:34:51.900And Dalton McGinty called a press conference and he had a big pile of coal on a table.
00:35:18.380But we had a tripling in electricity rates largely because we got rid of our cheapest form of power.
00:35:24.580And so, of course, China and these other countries, they say, look, if we want to pull our people out of poverty, we have to expand coal use.
00:35:33.480And I don't blame them because, of course, it's a great way to pull your people out of poverty.
00:35:37.900Yeah, we didn't get off coal-fired electricity here in Alberta.
00:35:42.100We just got off coal-fired electricity jobs.
00:35:44.600Because every time we have a rolling brownout, we come hat in hand to our friends in Saskatchewan who are still using coal and they supply us with reliable electricity.
00:35:52.980Or our friends in Wyoming and Montana who just fire up their generating stations, sell us some electricity at a premium because we're short.
00:36:16.740Tom, before I let you go, because we've been going here for about 35 minutes, tell people how they can find the work that you do on behalf of hardworking Canadians who are sick of paying so much for the climate scare.
00:37:25.780So we've been bringing on all kinds of really cool people into that show.
00:37:30.160And America Out Loud News, I really say to people, if you have some time to kill, go there and scroll around because it's got lots of good stuff.
00:37:38.080It's very much like Rebel News, but in a print format primarily.
00:38:52.080If you want to send me an email about today's show with Tom Harris, you can send it to me at Sheila at rebelnews.com.
00:38:57.780Put gun show letters in the subject line so I know why you're emailing me.
00:39:01.140But I also read the comment section over on YouTube, over on Rumble, and not just on clips of the show, but on, you know, the other work that we're doing around here,
00:39:09.680including my video on Chrystia Freeland deserving to be fired for taking a job as an economics advisor to a foreign government,
00:39:24.560which appears to be the single largest recipient of Canadian foreign aid.
00:39:29.060So, I did a video on it, and if you would like to throw your name on the list of Canadians demanding Chrystia Freeland to resign now from her seat in the Canadian Parliament,
00:39:40.240although she says she's going to do it in the coming weeks, whatever that means.
00:39:43.560But also, she should be taking the five-year cooling-off period before she starts lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.
00:39:50.760You can go to firefreeland.com to do that.
00:39:55.080Now, I thought I would take a looky-loo at your viewer feedback on that video.