00:02:51.200We'll put it up on our homepage at icsc-canada.com.
00:02:54.880But you can go to heartland.org and watch the whole conference, which I really recommend, because there's some pretty inspirational things.
00:03:03.260And before I get to my own topic, I just wanted to mention they had a youth panel.
00:03:07.140And these were, you know, in most cases, they were youths that actually were on the climate change side.
00:03:13.520Lucy Biggers, I don't know if you've heard of her, but Lucy Biggers, she actually worked with the Greta Thunberg and AOC.
00:03:20.580and there's pictures of her on the internet big smile you know she's with all these climate
00:03:25.640alarmists but she now has woken up chris martz who we interviewed on america out loud and he's
00:03:31.380yeah yeah lots of these people are in fact um moved over to climate realism you know and they're
00:03:39.680angry because they were constantly propagandized you know annika sweetland for example she's she
00:03:45.340did an excellent presentation. She got a degree at the University of West Australia in climate
00:03:50.800change. And in fact, she was being primed to be a climate activist speaker. And she's a very good
00:03:56.820speaker. She could win a Toastmasters award, that's for sure. But it's really inspirational
00:04:02.440to see, especially with so many of the old climate scientists dying off, real heroes like Tim Ball
00:04:08.240and Bob Carter from Australia. I mean, so many of them are passed away that we got a new
00:04:14.660generation that are opening up their eyes, and they're really wakening up to this. So that was,
00:04:20.900to me, in some ways, the most encouraging part of the whole conference. But again, people can
00:04:26.280check it out, heartland.org. And my presentation was on the second day, and I was looking at two
00:04:32.480things. One, is Canada really warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world? And two, is it
00:04:39.160caused by greenhouse gases. Now, in the case of the first one, the first thing I said to people,
00:04:45.380and this is what Will Happer, the physicist from Princeton, said to me, he said,
00:04:50.080wouldn't it really matter if Canada was warming faster than the world? It's a cold country,
00:04:54.880you know? And I mean, that's a really good point because most of the warming is supposed to occur
00:05:00.220in the winter in the Arctic, okay? And that's supposed to be a problem. So it's going to be
00:05:05.700minus 55 instead of minus 60. I mean, how many animals, yeah, how many animals or plants or
00:05:11.640people would really care if that were true? So, I mean, you know, that was how I started and
00:05:16.280everybody laughed. They thought, yeah, Canada, we're worried about global warming, especially
00:05:21.080at night in the Arctic in the winter. But, you know, the second thing is just what you were
00:05:26.720saying is that, is there a global temperature? Is there a Canada wide temperature? And the answer
00:05:32.700is no there isn't really because temperature is not something that you can be uh that you can
00:05:38.440average like height or weight okay you can take 10 people's heights and you add them all up and
00:05:43.920you divide by the number of people and you get an average height but weight is actually it's kind of
00:05:49.280like a quality of something i the analogy i like is it's a little bit like a phone number okay you
00:05:55.520could take all the phone numbers in one of those old telephone books and you could average them
00:05:59.540and you get a phone number and if you call them would you get the average person you know I mean
00:06:05.080yeah it's a silly idea and you know it's interesting because uh Ross McKittrick and
00:06:10.020Chris Essex and Bjorn Anderson they gave examples in a paper in which they pointed out that you can
00:06:16.620show that a system is both warming and cooling at the same time with the same data and and the
00:06:24.220reason is this. If you have two things, two sort of temperature fields, like the temperature field
00:06:29.600for Canada over one year, and then the temperature field over a later year, those two fields almost
00:06:36.080completely overlap. There can be a small change, perhaps a tenth of a degree in this so-called
00:06:41.580average. But if you average it in different ways, you can actually show that it's cooling or warming.
00:06:47.920And, you know, Ross McKittrick and Essex, they actually point this out, and they say the only
00:06:52.660time you can say that a temperature field is hotter or colder than another one is if the ranges
00:06:58.400don't overlap. In other words, in January in Toronto, it might be minus 5 to plus 10. But in
00:07:06.060Miami, it's not even within that range. It might be plus 15 to plus 25. So those two temperature
00:07:12.960ranges don't overlap. So you can definitely say that Miami is warmer than Toronto in January.
00:07:18.720But for temperature fields that overlap a great deal, and in this case, almost completely from year to year, you can't really say easily if, in fact, it's warming.
00:07:29.820And then, of course, the other thing that I always laugh about is they have almost no temperature sensing stations.
00:07:37.920You might have noticed that they use the year 1948.
00:07:41.000They say from 1948 to the present, the temperature is warm twice as fast as the world and the Arctic three times as fast as the world.
00:07:48.720Well, I was kind of suspicious. So along with Joseph Hickey, who's a PhD in physics,
00:07:54.900he looked into the data back in 2021. It was kind of interesting. But I asked, huh, 1948,
00:08:01.260is that a special year? Yes, it is. Because if you go back a little further, you find it in the early
00:08:06.5801940s and 1930s, especially when we were in the Dust Bowl, it was warmer almost everywhere in
00:08:13.340the Arctic. In fact, we know that from looking at the northern record. But even that is very
00:08:19.840uncertain. I mean, it appears to have been warmer in that period. So you say, well, they say that
00:08:25.260they only picked 1948 because before that, they didn't have good data. Well, I would say they
00:08:29.840don't have good data even now. Because you take an area like the Northwest Territories,
00:08:35.900that's twice the size of Texas. And they have, oh, something like 13 temperature sensing stations
00:08:42.320in that region. But a lot of those stopped recording a decade or more ago. And if you
00:08:48.480look at the record, Sheila, you'll notice they don't give just temperature. They call it the
00:08:53.500adjusted homogenized temperature. Because in many cases, these temperature stations have been moved.
00:09:00.160They've started to sense them at different times of the day. They've changed their instrumentation.
00:09:05.760There's been all kinds of changes. And of course, there's big gaps at times. So what they've done
00:09:12.240is they've adjusted them and they've homogenized them and done all sorts of fancy mathematical
00:09:16.880techniques to try to figure out what the temperature trend has been. But the interesting
00:09:23.660thing is that the Americans realized, oh, back in the late 1990s, that this approach was not good
00:09:29.180enough. So starting in the year 2000, they started a completely new temperature sensing network
00:09:35.320across the United States. In the continental part of the United States, the contiguous states,
00:09:40.360They have 114 temperature sensing stations and these are pristine. They're a long way from urban heat islands. They have triple redundancy in the instrumentation. In other words, if one temperature sensor conks out, they still have two others, you know, and this kind of pristine network, they concluded, was necessary to determine climate trends.
00:10:01.500so you know i always find it funny when can't when canada the environment and climate change
00:10:06.860canada they say they have very high confidence those are the words they use that we've had
00:10:11.860double the warming since 1948 in the in canada as a whole and triple in the arctic and yet if
00:10:19.060you look at the arctic i just read sorry i just read a report that says it's warming four times
00:10:24.340faster in the arctic now yeah so yeah well i don't think they really know and i think the americans
00:10:30.820Yeah, the Americans obviously don't have any confidence in this kind of temperature record that is very inconsistent. As I say, if you're moving the temperature station around, it's going to make big changes. And because, as I say, if they didn't think if they did think, I should say, that the temperature record like Environment Canada has for the north.
00:10:50.060And remember, the north of Canada is 40 percent of Canada.
00:10:54.020OK, so we don't know what's going on there.
00:10:56.140We don't have any confidence in the actual global average.
00:11:01.240And so I think that, you know, if they thought that you could take this kind of a crappy record and just do mathematical tricks, they would never have built this pristine climate reference network.
00:11:11.940Now, they have the measurements since 2000, and they show that for the continental United States, the contiguous states, there's no warming since the year 2000.
00:11:22.120So Joseph Hickey, actually, he was a data scientist at the Bank of Canada.
00:11:27.600And in 2001, he noticed something really interesting.
00:11:30.160He was given the job, I believe, of figuring out economic impact of climate change.
00:11:34.640So they expected him to use all the Environment Canada data.
00:11:38.180It was Environment Canada in those days.
00:11:39.960And he noticed that you had almost constant temperature for 50 years, from 1948 to 1998, and then there was a one-degree jump, and then we've had constant temperature ever since.
00:11:53.600If you believe that it mattered, that Canada warmed, if you believe there was a Canada temperature, and if you believe their data, you still got this weird one-degree jump.
00:12:04.420Now, if it was caused by greenhouse gas and environment and climate change Canada, you know, they're very confident about all this. They're saying it's by far the majority of it is caused by greenhouse gas warming. But greenhouse gas warming, since it's been increasing, you know, greenhouse gases have been increasing gradually would cause a gradual temperature rise.
00:12:24.600you wouldn't see 50 years of constant temperature, a one degree jump, and then 26 years of constant
00:12:32.120temperature. It just wouldn't do that. So Joseph Hickey has actually written a very good report
00:12:37.340where he analyzes, you know, what's going on. And you find in places like Moncton, for example,
00:12:42.780it's so distinct. You have two plateaus with a jump in between. And greenhouse gases just don't
00:12:49.420do that but what does do that is something like el nino okay that's yeah that's the ocean
00:12:56.360oscillation and in 1998 there was a very extreme el nino and you could see it all over the northern
00:13:01.780hemisphere and it's interesting because the satellite record for canada friends of science
00:13:07.300prepared a very nice graph friends of science they made this graph i included it in the slides i
00:13:11.740showed you you can see the jump in 1998 so it appears that the jump is caused by el nino
00:13:18.100Now, the next question then becomes, why has it stayed at that high level? Why didn't it fall back to the previous slope after El Nino was over? Well, it turns out the North Atlantic is in a warm phase of what you call the AMO. AMO stands for Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. And that warm phase will probably end actually over the next few years.
00:13:41.680So the higher temperature is probably being held at that higher temperature by the AMO.
00:13:47.700And when it goes away, which it will, will enter into a cold phase fairly soon, it'll
00:13:52.480be really interesting to see if the temperature drops back.
00:13:55.560So they say they're highly confident about their temperature measurements, which is silly.0.67
00:14:02.020And they say that it's mostly caused by greenhouse gases, which is ridiculous.
00:14:06.640us well and before we came on air i was talking about this little experiment that our friends
00:14:14.680at friends of science did michelle sterling just to show people how bizarre it is to even refer to
00:14:23.540something as the global average temperature tried to take the global average temperature in her
00:14:29.240backyard and so she put out these uh thermometers and marked them with little stuffed animals one
00:14:37.300was you know a polar bear because that's the symbol of climate change and one was the sasquatch
00:14:42.600whatever and she just said you know you she showed like the wild variations in her own backyard
00:14:51.620depending on where she took the temperature and that's in her backyard imagine trying to do that
00:14:56.740across the entire Arctic when some of it is governed by proximity to, you know, the Hudson
00:15:05.340Bay or the Beaufort Sea or whatever, that causes wild temperature changes versus inland in the
00:15:14.040Arctic. And so it's just really an impossibility to even figure out what the average temperature
00:15:19.360is, let alone say how far you're deviating from it. And then to attribute those deviations
00:15:25.600to my SUV. There are some real leaps in logic happening. Well, right. And in fact,
00:15:32.360the average temperature, it's really just a statistic. It really doesn't mean anything.
00:15:37.120I mean, nobody lives in the average Canada. You know, there's no super being sort of straddling
00:15:42.040Canada saying, oh, I feel hotter today. I feel colder. No, the only thing that matters is what
00:15:47.340the temperatures do where you live. Okay. And, you know, I always find it intriguing that people
00:15:53.000get so wrapped up in this average because michelle is completely right the average is silly
00:15:57.080you can have i'll give you an example of how averages can completely blow blow you away
00:16:02.160let's say you wanted your family to go on a diet so you took everybody's weight you got 120 pounds
00:16:07.980160 180 200 and 800 800 like that's silly and yet if you took the average you'd end up with
00:16:17.120something like 400 pounds and you say oh my god our family is 400 pounds heavy you know which is
00:16:23.020silly no what happened is you had one outlier which completely it completely messed up the
00:16:28.300average so the average doesn't mean anything so when you look at the arctic if you have just a0.87
00:16:33.880few outliers when they have such a sparse temperature network it can completely blow away
00:16:39.440all of your averaging meaningfulness okay the other point is this let's say half the earth
00:16:45.380or half of Canada, since they're dealing with Canada, let's say half of Canada got 10 degrees
00:16:49.940warmer and half of Canada got 10 degrees colder. Well, that would cause massive pressure gradients.
00:16:56.620You'd have incredible storms. It would be an absolute disaster. And yet the average temperature
00:17:02.000would stay the same. So average temperatures just simply don't mean anything. And so we're
00:17:08.860arguing about angels on the head of a pin, and then they're attributing it to some sort of magical
00:17:14.560greenhouse gas that causes a one degree jump in one year and then constant the rest of the time.0.85
00:17:20.500So the whole thing is ludicrous. Now, the interesting thing is that Joseph Hickey discovered
00:17:25.220this jump in 2021 when he worked for the Bank of Canada and Environment Canada never satisfactorily
00:17:32.240addressed that. So you laugh, Sheila, this is such poetic justice. Joseph wouldn't get the COVID
00:17:38.900vaccine and so they fired him so suddenly he had the freedom to tell everybody what he had been
00:17:45.500discussing with environment and climate change canada inside the government because before that
00:17:49.880he couldn't tell anybody he worked for the government um so he published a report in
00:17:54.160december just passed in which he showed this boom boom you know and that's not caused by
00:18:00.060greenhouse gas emissions so you know i really direct people to have a look at that on our
00:18:04.720homepage we have you know climate data fraud or something like that i can't remember exactly it's
00:18:10.100a box and you can click on it and read some of the articles that we've written about this thing
00:18:14.740and um yeah so i think joseph you know as i say it's quite ironic that they would fire him the
00:18:22.040last thing they should have done is fired the guy who knew that their data was bogus poetic poetic
00:18:28.600justice and yet they still haven't answered yeah and and yet so many expensive job killing
00:18:38.980policies are based around this flawed data including the phase out of coal and again before
00:18:45.960we came on air we were talking about my interview with my friend Robbie Picard from a couple of
00:18:49.560weeks ago where we were talking about the war on coal and he said uh sheepishly that he wished he
00:18:56.600had come out swinging when the NDP were colluding with the federal government under Justin Trudeau
00:19:03.120in Alberta to phase out our coal-fired generation early because now in retrospect all those same
00:19:11.040arguments that were used against coal and continue to be used against coal are the same ones
00:19:15.740attacking the oil sands and all the good Canadian jobs that come with it and hopefully things are
00:19:23.600changing here in Alberta because our United Conservative Party adopted a policy resolution
00:19:29.200to bring coal back online. In fact, they called it clean Alberta coal back online because it
00:19:35.620really is. And we have the technology to make it even cleaner here, thanks to oil sands emissions
00:19:41.060development. Yeah. Yeah. Coal is a wonderful technology. You know, one of the things that
00:19:46.260people don't seem to realize is that it's also very, very secure. Okay. If you have a grid,
00:19:51.520And if you have a grid that is based on coal, where you pile up a year's supply of coal right on the power plant site, all you have to do is shovel the coal into your boiler and make steam and make electricity.
00:20:03.440You can do it. It doesn't matter if the rest of the world, you know, just falls to pieces.
00:20:08.100If you don't have any pipelines, you still have coal.
00:20:10.840OK, coal is a solid, dependable energy source, and we can actually pull out of the pollution, the emissions, all the serious pollutants.
00:20:19.640OK, taking carbon, taking carbon dioxide. That's another story. I mean, first of all, you don't need to because there's no climate crisis.
00:20:29.400CO2 is plant food. One of the few things that we've noticed for sure as CO2 rises, we've had a massive increase in crop yield, you know, plant productivity.
00:20:39.940Deserts are shrinking. You know, it's a good thing that CO2 is rising.
00:20:43.200And in fact, it's interesting that people that specialize in agriculture are saying, yeah, bring us more CO2.
00:20:49.640Why do you think they pump it into greenhouses?
00:20:53.740They evolved at a time when CO2 was much higher.
00:20:56.480So coal is a really wonderful energy source.
00:20:59.840And, you know, I've been on some of the reclamation sites where they do strip mining.
00:21:03.860And I'll tell you, the reclamation sites, after they've finished with that region, they're better environmentally than the previous.
00:21:12.520Yeah, they're better than all the surrounding landscape.
00:21:14.500So the idea and, you know, an example of what happens when you totally get rid of coal is Ontario.
00:21:20.760Ontario, back in 2002, when Dalton McGinty was premier, they had 25 percent of their energy from coal.
00:21:29.720And we had among the cheapest electricity rates in the world.
00:21:33.280Dalton McGinty held a press conference and he had a big pile of coal on a table and he said, this is an old technology.
00:21:39.360We're going to get rid of it and leave the world in climate change, you know, stopping climate change.
00:21:44.500But of course, he's wrong. It's not a technology. Coal is a resource. And how you burn it is what
00:21:49.720is the technology. And generally speaking, in Canada, we burn it very cleanly in comparison
00:21:54.740with China, let's say, who, by the way, are building two coal stations a week. So, but yeah,
00:22:01.480we should keep coal. It's a very dependable energy source. Like nuclear, it keeps its energy
00:22:06.980supply, the actual resource, it keeps it on site. And I love natural gas. I love petroleum,
00:22:13.360that sort of thing. But those have to have some sort of input on a regular basis, either
00:22:18.080types or trucks or whatever. But the beauty of coal, and you should use coal as a baseline energy
00:22:24.280source, giving the predominant energy, and then you can top it up with gas and other things.
00:22:30.020But coal is a baseline energy source. It's secure, it's solid, it's inexpensive, we have
00:22:35.260enough for centuries. So the whole idea that we should get rid of coal is ludicrous. If you thought
00:22:41.440that it was a problem for its greenhouse gas emissions and china's opening all these stations
00:22:46.700and what we do doesn't matter anyway yeah i mean alberta has seven to eight hundred years of some
00:22:53.280of the world's cleanest burning coal under our feet easily accessible if you were in the developing
00:22:58.380world you would think we were out of our minds to leave it there well i know the head of the head0.81
00:23:03.740of indonesia he said point blank he said no he said we're not stupid we're going to continue to
00:23:09.920use coal we're going to continue to develop pull our people out of poverty you know the developing
00:23:14.800world which is now putting out more emissions than the rest of the developed world um they actually0.63
00:23:20.680they recognize the value of coal and they're booming you know china they constantly have
00:23:25.100china leads the world in wind and solar power well yeah but they also lead the world in coal
00:23:29.780by far and they make a lot of the renewable energy using coal right so yeah that's like saying the0.79
00:23:38.740americans lead the world in wearing nikes there's a lot of people in china so naturally they will
00:23:44.780lead the world in consumption of a lot of things that's right so so you're right the they're using0.98
00:23:50.420this silly double the rate of the rest of the world the arctic triple they're using that argument
00:23:54.980and the greenhouse gas blaming both of which don't make any sense they're using it to get
00:24:00.680rid of some of our best and most reliable energy sources i put coal right at the top of the list
00:24:05.900Same. Yeah. Same. I mean, there's no excuse for a place like Alberta having rolling brownouts when it gets really cold because we don't have a baseline reliable power supply.
00:24:20.100And when the NDP got us off coal, they sure as hell didn't get us off coal.
00:28:26.720Well, as you know, friends, the last portion of the show belongs to you at home because without you, there's no rebel news. If you want to give me some viewer feedback about my interview with my friend Tom Harris from the International Climate Science Coalition, you can send it to me directly. My email is Sheila at rebelnews.com. Put gun show letters in the subject line so I know exactly why you're emailing me.
00:28:47.400But if you see free clips of the show over on YouTube or Rumble, please leave a comment there. I do go looking there. But do that for all of our work for a couple of different reasons. First of all, I care about what you think about the work that we do here at Rebel News.
00:29:01.480but also when you interact with clips of the show or with our free video content, it puts us higher
00:29:11.060up in the algorithm on YouTube or on Rumble. If our content is engaged with, they sort of
00:29:17.280recommend it to more people. So that's a great free way to help us. And today's viewer feedback
00:29:23.440actually doesn't come from any of the clips of the show or to my email inbox directly. I wanted
00:29:29.940to know what you thought about my testimony at the House of Commons Heritage Committee. I was
00:29:36.780invited by the Conservatives on Committee to give an overview of the state of independent journalism
00:29:45.860in Mark Carney's Canada. And I was on a panel, I guess, not really a panel. I mean,
00:29:53.680we're all separate witnesses with four other committee witnesses from the independent sphere
00:30:03.460they aren't um because how are you independent if you take money from the government and so
00:30:10.960the other four members of the committee were there asking for money and i was there pleading
00:30:18.960with the government in the nicest possible way, to stop giving failing media organizations
00:30:24.640our money, and to stop censoring independent journalists in unique and creative ways,
00:30:34.600either through pieces of legislation like the Online News Act, the Streaming Act,
00:30:40.200by using the tax code to provide subsidies specifically to outlets that are approved
00:30:53.840by the government through the QCJO, that's the Qualified Canadian Journalism Organization
00:30:58.780status, and to quit siccing security and police on independent journalists when they're just
00:31:10.020trying to do their jobs in the streets because they are not allowed to go into certain venues
00:31:16.200and to take away the power of the Parliamentary Press Gallery to block independent journalists
00:31:23.880from working on Parliament Hill. In fact, let me be quiet. I'll show you a clip of that right here.
00:31:29.120Journalism, I believe, encompasses opinions, but firsthand news gathering, analysis, investigation,
00:32:05.980So that's a little bit of my five minute opening statement. They only give you five minutes and then they ask you questions afterwards. Now I should tell you the liberals in the NDP didn't bother to ask me any questions. I don't think they would have wanted to pitch something right over the plate and have me hit it outside the park and embarrass them in that way.
00:32:30.140the Conservatives were very concerned about the Parliamentary Press Gallery, a cabal of our
00:32:35.780competitors who are funded by the taxpayer, blocking us from doing work on Parliament Hill.
00:32:41.640And it's not just the Parliamentary Press Gallery, it is legislature press galleries all across this
00:32:45.680country, except for Alberta. Now, that is not to say that the Legislature Press Gallery hasn't
00:32:51.860had a witch trial for us and prevented us from joining, but we are accredited through the
00:32:57.240Speaker's office around the Legislature Press Gallery. So they tried to block us and the
00:33:03.260Speaker of the House said, that's not remotely fair. And if you want to work here, you can work
00:33:11.720here. These people don't get to keep you out. So I don't need to sit in the Legislature Press
00:33:16.280Gallery office with a bunch of people who don't like me anyway. Well, I would like to because it
00:33:20.300would make them uncomfortable, but it doesn't stop me from doing my job. So I wanted to know
00:33:26.500what you guys thought about my testimony. So I went looking on the YouTubes. And this is what
00:33:32.440you guys had to say. Much Joy says you were outstanding, Sheila. Outstanding. Anthony
00:33:39.520Fusciarelli says, Ezra, you must be so proud of your team. I know I am. Sheila is a rock star.
00:33:45.660Well, thank you. I didn't tell anybody that I was going until I went because I was worried
00:33:50.820that if the lefty lunatics on the internet found out that I was going, they would put pressure on
00:33:58.900conservatives to cancel my committee appearance. So I sort of kept a lid on it. I worked and then
00:34:05.660reworked and then re-reworked my opening statement because you only have five minutes and man,
00:34:11.220it's bad out there for independent journalists. So I had to make sure that I was concise as
00:34:16.160possible. And it's hard because there's a lot of things to talk about. We only get like this much
00:34:21.600time. And thanks to the conservatives for inviting me. JLWY1PQ says, way to go, Sheila, hold them to
00:34:30.980account. Yeah, I also knew that because of the liberal majority that they stole, that the1.00
00:34:43.100conservatives would lose the influence they have on these committees and the heritage committee
00:34:48.260makeup will quickly be changing. And so I thought it's going to be a long time before they invite
00:34:54.100somebody like me back around to these parts. So leave it all on the dance floor, as they say.
00:34:59.500and i think i did i tried my best anyway user lc8 s z 2 l w 8 o says i enjoyed this report
00:35:14.700wonderful to she's to see sheila at committee and sounding so strong well done well you know i i
00:35:21.100talk about this stuff all the time and it's also not just my job here at rebel news to care about
00:35:26.200the advancement of press freedom, but I am the president of the Independent Press Gallery of
00:35:31.720Canada. And it is my mission to advance the rights of independent journalists in this country and to
00:35:38.980make sure as best I can, that the government knows these concerns and to push back at any
00:35:47.500at any place where I see that the government is impeding into press freedom. And as I said,
00:35:54.020in my committee testimony press freedom in this country has fallen incredibly over the last 11
00:36:05.060years guess what also happened in the last 11 years the liberals very petite t7k says thank
00:36:14.240you sheila and rebel news well you're welcome bubbinski lord 5618 says sheila is amazing and
00:36:20.920the whole rebel team I just want to say thank you and I appreciate the hard work you guys do
00:36:24.080I sincerely mean that well um I appreciate your kind words but really I'm only able to do this
00:36:31.300work because of you guys at home people watching this people subscribing to our work donating to
00:36:37.100our causes um you guys are cheering for us to succeed and I think we must do everything we can
00:36:46.380And because you are putting your hard-earned dollars toward us advancing causes that you care about.
00:36:53.080And so while I appreciate you thanking me for this, I mean, thank you for making it possible to advocate for causes that I care about too.
00:37:03.560I mean, I couldn't even imagine working in a normal newsroom talking about stuff I don't care about.
00:37:40.860I'll give you a little bit, something that I know for sure, is that the American administration is watching what's happening in Canada very closely when it comes to the attacks on press freedom here.
00:38:00.040and the censorship of american platforms like youtube and meta are trade issues for them
00:38:10.980so if canada does become a more free place for independent journalists it won't be thanks to
00:38:19.500the liberals it'll be thanks to pressure from the american administration okay well everybody
00:38:26.200That's the show for today. Thank you so much for tuning in. I'll see everybody back here in the
00:38:29.520same time in the same place next week. And as always, don't let the government tell you that