Rebel News Podcast - June 17, 2020


Trudeau’s UN obsession faces a test tomorrow in a key vote. Here’s why I think Trudeau — and China — will win


Episode Stats

Length

32 minutes

Words per Minute

170.0003

Word Count

5,516

Sentence Count

468

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

Justin Trudeau's obsession with the United Nation faces a test tomorrow, when he must decide whether or not Canada will be granted a temporary visitor's pass to join the UN Security Council. I predict that China will win, and here's why.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, my rebels. Today, I make a prediction. Oh, I don't make it happily, but sometimes predictions,
00:00:05.440 you know, it's different from what you hope to happen, right? I predict, well, I won't give it
00:00:10.260 away now, but I make a prediction about what will happen at the United Nations vote tomorrow
00:00:16.700 on whether or not Canada will be given a temporary visitor's pass to join the UN Security Council.
00:00:24.940 Justin Trudeau has put all his eggs in that basket. Oh, he's betting big. I'll give you
00:00:30.140 my prediction. Before I do, let me invite you to become a premium subscriber. We got this
00:00:35.600 thing called Rebel News Plus. It's basically the video version of this podcast, plus shows
00:00:39.920 from Sheila Gunn-Reed and David Menzies. It's eight bucks a month, 80 bucks for the whole
00:00:43.900 year. Not a lot of dough, I might say, if you compare it to the other streaming services,
00:00:48.880 but it's the only place you're going to hear the other side of the story in politics in
00:00:52.620 Canada. Please go to rebelnews.com and click on subscribe. It would be a great favor to
00:00:58.000 me because we use that money to pay our bills. Okay, here's the podcast.
00:01:06.960 Tonight, Justin Trudeau's obsession with the United Nations faces a test tomorrow and a
00:01:22.440 key UN vote. Here's why I think Trudeau and China will win. It's June 16th, and this is
00:01:29.200 the Ezra Levant Show.
00:01:32.320 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:35.820 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:40.140 The only thing I have to say to the government about why I'm publishing it is because it's my
00:01:44.700 bloody right to do so.
00:01:50.840 The United Nations is one of the worst things in the world. I know it didn't mean to be that
00:01:55.160 way. I don't think it started out that way, but it has been captured and corrupted and gamed
00:02:03.960 and bought and sold and absolutely hijacked. It embodies two of Robert Conquest's laws. You
00:02:10.040 know him. He's the late historian. One of his laws was any organization not explicitly right-wing
00:02:16.920 sooner or later becomes left-wing. I mean, that's so obvious it almost goes without saying,
00:02:21.700 especially for a government institution, especially something that fancies itself as a sort of
00:02:25.920 world government. And another one of Conquest's rules, the simplest way to explain the behavior
00:02:32.000 of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that it's controlled by a cabal of its enemies,
00:02:37.600 as in, it's not about peace. It's not about freedom. It's not about human rights. It's not
00:02:42.680 about democracy. It's about the opposition to all of those things, the opposite of all of those
00:02:49.240 things. The World Health Organization, as we've just learned, isn't about sharing information about
00:02:54.240 health and pandemics. It's about covering up that information, weaponizing that information,
00:02:59.360 hiding things. That's why the countries that trusted the WHO the most were the hardest hit,
00:03:04.600 and the countries that were the most skeptical, like Taiwan, which is actually banned from the
00:03:09.240 UN, they got through the pandemic the best because they didn't believe the lie. So I think that's all
00:03:13.620 obvious. I think that it's much worse than we even know. UN peacekeepers are amongst the world's most
00:03:20.960 predatory child rapists, for example. Just horrific stuff. I'm just giving you one of a thousand
00:03:26.040 examples. Continuous to this day. I mean, if that doesn't tell you the nature of the UN, nothing will.
00:03:31.180 How about this? The UN just decided it's going to investigate racism. Of course, they don't need
00:03:36.400 racism in, I don't know, places like China, but the Uyghurs. They mean in places like America,
00:03:41.320 Canada, the UK, and Israel. But as Hillel Neuer of UN Watch points out, the world's most racist and
00:03:48.980 brutal regimes are the judges. UN human rights members include Mauritania, with 500,000 black slaves to this
00:03:57.660 day. Venezuela, with Maduro's tyranny, and Qatar, which enslaves migrants. Libya, same thing. They
00:04:03.880 have slave auctions. They have open-air slave markets in Libya. This inquiry will be a farce.
00:04:09.680 Of course it will. So why does Justin Trudeau so desperately want to be a part of it? Of course,
00:04:15.280 every country is a part of the UN, except Taiwan, that was kicked out to appease communist China,
00:04:20.060 which is an outrage. But why does Justin Trudeau so desperately want a temporary seat on the UN
00:04:26.100 Security Council? Just to refresh your memory, there are all sorts of UN agencies, right? There's
00:04:31.320 the Human Rights Council I just mentioned. There's the World Health Organization. Countries can be
00:04:35.760 member of all those little committees, except Taiwan. By the way, China runs five UN agencies more than any
00:04:42.440 other country does. They're taking over the UN and its purposes. And all countries are part of something
00:04:47.620 called the General Assembly. It's just a giant, really, international parliament of sorts.
00:04:54.020 193 countries in it. And every country is equal, really. Tiny Nauru. Population 13,000. I challenge
00:05:01.280 you to find Nauru on a map. That's equal to, say, Germany. Population 83 million. Each have one seat on
00:05:09.700 the General Assembly. Each have the same vote. So obviously it's just a talk shop, just a way for people
00:05:14.700 from Nauru to get a free trip to New York City. It's an amazing city. And they get to hobnob with
00:05:21.280 fancy people from, you know, bigger countries. I tell you, if you ever go to the UN building in New
00:05:26.420 York City, you can see it's surrounded by gorgeous hotels and restaurants. It's such a pleasure for
00:05:31.680 anyone just to be there. I suppose that's most of Manhattan. But it's nothing, really, the General
00:05:37.360 Assembly, because the US and Russia and China and the UK and France, those countries do whatever they
00:05:42.620 want. They don't wait for permission from Burkina Faso. There are absolutely two tiers of countries
00:05:50.600 at the UN. There's the permanent members of the Security Council, those five countries I just listed,
00:05:58.900 Russia, the United States, France, the UK, and Britain. It was, those five were chosen after World
00:06:10.160 War II. How else can you explain France being there but not India, for example? There are many quirks
00:06:16.340 about the UN. You've got those top tier members, and then you've got everybody else.
00:06:23.900 My point is mainly who even cares, right? Name for me a war that the UN averted. Name for me a famine
00:06:31.140 that they ended. Name a terrorist attack they stopped. Name for me any impasse they resolved.
00:06:36.400 Did they fix the Syrian Civil War? Did they stop? Oh, just to pick something. Slavery in
00:06:42.840 Mauritania? I don't mean slavery way back in ancient days. I mean slavery right now. Millions of modern
00:06:47.500 day slaves. Has the UN solved the problem of North Korea? You tell me. Who defeated ISIS and killed
00:06:54.520 their terrorist boss? Not the UN. Problems are solved by nation states themselves. And since the fall of the
00:07:01.320 Berlin Wall, that's almost always meant the United States, the last remaining hyperpower.
00:07:07.980 Who's there for disaster relief? It's the U.S. Navy. That's who. But China is rising. They want to be
00:07:14.140 a rival. Iran is a regional problem. Russia, it's a shadow of its former self, but it's still a factor,
00:07:19.440 especially in places like Syria. It has nuclear arms and oil. The UN, in many ways, has a united nothing.
00:07:25.980 It used to be a meeting place for the world's diplomats, and now it has its agenda of its own
00:07:29.980 and its own enrichment and perpetuation, such as the annual feast and festival thrown for the global
00:07:36.780 warming partiers. I mean, who wouldn't want to jet to Paris for that big global warming meeting?
00:07:44.560 That Paris meeting was right after Trudeau was elected prime minister. He went there. He brought
00:07:49.060 the world's largest delegation. Going by memory, I think he had over 300 people with him.
00:07:54.080 Catherine McKenna literally hired a fashion photographer for $6,000 to attend to make sure
00:07:59.700 she looked great. Global warming was not solved, but boy, did they have a party. And that's what
00:08:04.960 Trudeau wants. He wants the party. He wants to be an insider, a player. So he wants a seat on the UN
00:08:11.160 Security Council. Obviously not one of the permanent seats. US, UK, Russia, France, and China.
00:08:18.540 But he wants the UN's member countries to vote for Canada to be one of the temporary members on the
00:08:28.280 Security Council. Now, temporary members, unlike the five permanent members, don't have a veto over
00:08:33.840 things. But they get to hang out with the cool kids for a couple of years, go to some of the same
00:08:39.520 meetings, get some of the same photo ops. That's what Trudeau craves. Travel, photo ops, huge expense
00:08:46.400 accounts, getting away from small Canada and our small problems. He's being checked out of his job
00:08:52.000 as prime minister for months mentally. He's self-hiding at home. He's got his vacation beard. He's
00:08:56.480 obviously demotivated. He's just phoning it in. He's just at home phoning it in. But this UN thing
00:09:02.340 really seems to motivate him because it's his escape plan. Get on the UN Security Council. Be a good boy
00:09:08.780 for the main voting blocs of the UN, which are China and China's colonies. And the OIC, which stands for
00:09:16.480 the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. 57 Muslim countries led by the Saudis. So if Trudeau can get
00:09:23.340 on the UN Security Council with a vote of all the little countries, he can party in New York all the
00:09:29.560 time. Hang out with his old friend Gerald Butts down there. He can live his Canadian problems to others
00:09:35.260 like Chrystia Freeland. And after a term on the Security Council, he can make his big personal
00:09:41.120 play to be the first Canadian Secretary General of the United Nations. And he could be a shill for
00:09:48.100 China and the OIC just as he has been as Canada's prime minister. And it's precisely for that reason,
00:09:54.880 if you look at his voting bloc, China and Arabia, precisely for that reason that unlike most of Canada's
00:10:02.420 pundits, I think Justin Trudeau will actually win the vote tomorrow. Now, just to be clear,
00:10:10.080 different countries from different regions run against each other. So right now, Canada is not
00:10:14.780 running against 193 countries. It's running just against Ireland and Norway for this one seat.
00:10:21.420 Here's Canada's official campaign page. Look at the issues Trudeau's running on. Peace.
00:10:27.380 That's code for anti-Americanism, anti-NATO-ism. Rolling back the war on terror. That's what that
00:10:33.700 means. Climate change. Same thing. Rejecting Trump's embrace of fossil fuels. OPEC loves this
00:10:39.560 because it means Canada will take ourselves and the oil sands out of the world business, leaving it to
00:10:43.940 them. Promote economic security together. Now, you might think that means, oh, growing the economy,
00:10:49.320 free trade, cutting taxes, that sort of thing. And you're probably thinking, well, Canada doesn't do that
00:10:54.040 too well. But if you click on the link, you'll see it means the opposite. It means Canada giving
00:11:00.060 more of your tax dollars and foreign aid to countries to vote for it. It's ideologically
00:11:04.720 globalist and it's just a bribe, really. Advance gender equality together. That's not a shot at
00:11:11.860 Saudi Arabia or Iran or places like that. Trudeau doesn't mean that. It's just his standard message
00:11:17.320 as a male feminist. He says it constantly as a preemptive defense against his own groping
00:11:23.640 history. And finally, strengthening multilateralism is just another way of saying he's anti-Trump.
00:11:29.220 Trump rejects globalism. Trump withdrew from the Paris global warming thing. Trump believes in
00:11:34.780 America first, whether it's military or economics or trade or energy. Trudeau is telegraphing in
00:11:40.100 actually every single one of these points that he wants to get on the UN Security Council
00:11:44.420 to be the leader of the opposition to America and to Trump in particular. Normally, that job falls
00:11:50.820 to the third world, to the old Soviet Union, to China. And the first world, the allies, NATO,
00:11:57.540 the Western democratic countries stick together. And by that, I mean, stick with our principles of
00:12:02.080 freedom, trade, democracy, security, not Trudeau. Trudeau wants to undermine the world's leading
00:12:08.820 democracy within the UN, just as he has done for the last five years from Canada. Look at this.
00:12:14.980 This is a headline in Reuters. Canada sees tight UN Security Council race, says coronavirus response
00:12:23.020 could help. Oh, really? What was our coronavirus response? It was terrible from a national interest
00:12:29.740 point of view. We didn't ever stop flights coming in from China. They continued the whole time. We
00:12:34.980 didn't screen at airports. But we gave billions of dollars to the China-run WHO. We gave billions
00:12:42.520 of dollars in foreign aid to any country that would take it. It was, we never doubted China and the
00:12:48.060 propaganda. We never criticized China. In fact, Trudeau obeyed China. Trudeau refused to even
00:12:53.820 acknowledge Taiwan. Remember this terrible moment. This question is directed to the Minister of Foreign
00:13:00.420 Affairs. On March 28th, he personally tweeted out a thank you to the People's Republic of China for
00:13:08.400 donating PPEs to Canada. This tweet happened within three hours of China announcing that gift. Now,
00:13:15.920 as it turned out, many of these PPEs were defective and could not be used. More recently, Taiwan donated
00:13:22.540 half a million surgical masks to Canada. And yet, here we are, two weeks later, and the Minister has yet
00:13:29.400 to personally thank Taiwan for its generosity. Will the Minister now thank this free and democratic
00:13:36.080 country for its generous gift to Canadians? The Honourable Minister. Mr. Speaker, I'd like to thank
00:13:44.380 my colleague for the question. Indeed, we are very grateful to every nation for helping Canada. This is
00:13:49.660 a global pandemic which knows no border. We have been expressing our thanks to many nations who have
00:13:55.360 contributed. We will continue to do so. It is important at the time of pandemic, Mr. Speaker,
00:14:00.300 that we don't play politics, that humanity comes together. I can say to my COVID foreign minister's
00:14:06.440 call, the world community has come together to make sure that we would make sure that supply chain would
00:14:12.760 remain intact, that we would have transit hub, that we would have air bridges. And we will continue,
00:14:17.380 Mr. Speaker, to work with every nation when it comes to health. This is a public good that we want
00:14:22.880 to work together. We will go back to... That is the coronavirus response that Trudeau thinks is going
00:14:28.020 to win it for him. Our foreign minister literally owes the Chinese government $1.2 million in a bizarre
00:14:35.800 loan. He won't say a crossword about China despite them having two Canadian hostages now coming up on
00:14:42.820 two years. We literally gave all of Canada's emergency masks to China during the pandemic. So do you see my
00:14:48.660 point? Why wouldn't China vote for Canada and tell all of China's African colonies to do the same?
00:14:55.160 Why wouldn't the OIC Muslim countries do the same? Trudeau quit the war on terror. Trudeau gave millions
00:15:00.880 of dollars in a public apology to a terrorist named El Mercado. Trudeau met with this bizarre man
00:15:05.580 who went to Afghanistan to hang out with the Taliban. Trudeau, literally the first thing he did
00:15:10.540 after being elected in 2015, before he was even sworn in, he removed our CF-18 jets from the war on ISIS.
00:15:17.800 Why wouldn't every one of the 57 Muslim countries in the OIC vote for Trudeau too? Not to vote for
00:15:25.700 Canada. I mean, Canadians are democratic. Canadians believe in freedom. Canadians are, you and me are,
00:15:31.580 more hostile to China according to public opinion polls than any other people in the world other
00:15:35.780 than the Swedes. No, the OIC and China don't like Canada very much. They don't like Canadians very much.
00:15:41.960 China takes us hostage. But boy, do they sure love Trudeau. And I guess fair's fair because
00:15:49.940 the feeling is mutual, isn't it? Yeah, I'm going to go out on a bit of a limb here.
00:15:56.860 Unlike a lot of people, I think Justin Trudeau is going to win the vote tomorrow. Which means I think
00:16:05.140 that freedom and democracy and accountability and Canada's national interest is going to lose.
00:16:11.000 But China and the Muslim countries, well, they're about to do a victory lap.
00:16:15.520 In your face, Donald Trump. Stay with us for more.
00:16:18.940 Hey, welcome back. I've done a couple of episodes on this before. You know, the CBC has a kids
00:16:36.020 propaganda unit. It's written by adults, of course, but it's designed to propagate political ideas
00:16:42.580 to minor children, including children of tender years. I find it very creepy and very bizarre,
00:16:47.960 but it's a project given great importance under Justin Trudeau. Well, they took a subject that
00:16:53.480 is definitely for grownups, that's of transgenderism, and they weaponized it in a bizarre attack
00:17:00.820 against children's author J.K. Rowling. Here, watch about 45 seconds of the CBC's Kids News
00:17:08.420 propaganda department. All right, well, let's get into it. Veena, what has you fired up this week?
00:17:14.940 Well, I've been following this J.K. Rowling controversy, and it all started with a tweet she made.
00:17:20.580 Actually, it started with this headline, creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who
00:17:26.080 menstruate. J.K. took issue with the word people being used. Maybe she was trying to be funny, but
00:17:31.980 she hinted that the publication should have stuck with using the word women. Some fans pointed out
00:17:37.160 that there are lots of those who menstruate who don't identify as women. And then things got a little
00:17:41.940 messy. Lots of tweets back and forth, and at one point, J.K. fired back with, my life has been shaped
00:17:47.640 by being female, and I don't think it's hateful to say so. It's 2020. Releasing these kind of statements
00:17:53.880 online is not a good look. Oh, and it went on from there. These teens reading perfectly scripted
00:18:00.360 pro-trans attacks on J.K. Rowling for daring to say women are women. I like how they let the young man
00:18:07.300 there man-splained to J.K. Rowling that it's not a good look in 2020 to say you're a female. It went
00:18:13.800 on. Every word of it written by an adult handed to those child actors to read. All of it inappropriate
00:18:21.760 for children of tender years. Joining us now via Skype to talk about it is our friend Andrew Lawton,
00:18:27.760 who discovered this. Andrew, I keep an eye on CBC Kids News, but it's not actually something I
00:18:34.720 regularly go to. But this is stuff being pumped out to children. This is radical politics. I don't
00:18:42.600 even think these are kid-friendly discussions at all, let alone weaponizing it and saying J.K.
00:18:49.180 Rowling is a bad woman. This is so awful. Tell me your thoughts on this and how you came across it.
00:18:54.920 Yeah, I'm not one of these pearl-clutching, won't somebody please think of the children types. I
00:18:59.860 realized that kids can handle difficult conversations. I fully understand that. But
00:19:04.660 when I was a kid, kids shows were things like Arthur and the Magic School Bus. I wasn't watching
00:19:09.980 the TV to hear about, you know, transgender politics or any sort of politics. The show itself is called
00:19:16.480 Recap, which is pitched as a news show. And it's the irony is it wouldn't even pass the muster as
00:19:23.360 being an adult news show because it's all opinion, but it's pitched as a news show. And on the CBC
00:19:28.000 website, it says that it's for kids age six and up. So as young as six years old is the target audience
00:19:34.720 in CBC's eyes of this show called Recap. So the problem that I have with this is that they've used
00:19:40.580 very strong language. They've referred to J.K. Rowling, the beloved author, as, quote, transphobic,
00:19:46.300 a direct quote from the young man on the panel here. They've told her she should read the room.
00:19:51.400 They've said that those of us who menstruate aren't always female and they're passing it off as fact.
00:19:56.860 So a six-year-old who's watching this, who might not even know what menstruation is,
00:20:01.120 is being told that menstruation is not about whether you're female or not, that anyone can.
00:20:06.040 So there's a lot packed into what was only really a two-minute clip here. And what I find most
00:20:11.440 troubling about it is that this is pitched as news. It's pitched towards children. And more
00:20:17.000 importantly, it is mocking those who do what J.K. Rowling did, which is talk about something from
00:20:23.060 a biological perspective. J.K. Rowling wasn't being anti-trans. She wasn't being bigoted. She was
00:20:28.940 saying, listen, woman means something. Womanhood means something. And when I saw this, I was actually
00:20:35.240 in disbelief, despite not holding CBC by and large up in the highest esteem, for all the reasons I just
00:20:41.680 mentioned. And what was interesting, just on one note here, and I don't know if it was in the clip that
00:20:46.860 was just played. At one point, they say Daniel Radcliffe, the Harry Potter film star who actually
00:20:52.780 reputed what, or refuted rather, what J.K. Rowling said, they called him inspiring for advocating for
00:20:59.980 what he believes in. But she's supposed to just shut up. Yeah, it's incredible. You know, Sean Tran,
00:21:05.600 the guy in the bottom right corner there, lecturing J.K. Rowling on what a good look is for women. I mean,
00:21:12.840 in any other context, that would be called mansplaining. Imagine a man. But the thing is,
00:21:19.020 Sean Tran is a child actor. All these people are child actors. They're just very young people who can
00:21:24.860 read lines with energy given to them by grown-ups. We don't actually know who wrote this.
00:21:31.680 One thing we do know is it wasn't written by these three kids. So to have some young kid,
00:21:37.580 an early teen, say to J.K. Rowling, you know, why don't you shut up telling us who a woman is or
00:21:45.060 isn't? On the woke-o-meter, that's supposedly very low wokeness, a man saying to a woman, shut up,
00:21:54.140 talking about being a woman. But the CBC, I guess, has gone full trans agenda. But I say again,
00:22:01.360 these are not political thinkers. These are not even grown-ups. They are a trick. It's like a hand
00:22:09.980 puppet. We don't even know who's behind it. I find this whole thing extremely troubling. The only,
00:22:16.180 you know, saving grace, Andrew, is that the viewership of these videos, if the public view
00:22:22.780 counts on YouTube or anything to go by, are minuscule. Almost no one's watching this crap.
00:22:28.380 I think maybe the audience in mind is only an audience of one. Justin Trudeau, for him to see
00:22:34.960 this and pat the CBC on the head. I actually don't know any young person who would voluntarily
00:22:40.280 watch this crap. No, and certainly the YouTube view count, you're right, is dismally low. So
00:22:46.680 there's a fiscal argument against these as much as there's a content-based one. But at the same time,
00:22:52.640 they're putting them on TV. There are a lot of parents that might be saying to their kids,
00:22:56.100 listen, I'm doing dishes. Why don't you just watch what's on TV? And the kid thinks that,
00:23:00.540 or the parent thinks that the kid is going to be watching Arthur. And then they blink and it's
00:23:04.480 JK Rowling is a transphobe. And that's what's passing for children's entertainment. And you're
00:23:09.920 right. I mean, children's personalities used to be about crafts and fun and jokes, not shoving a
00:23:15.180 political agenda. And in what I wrote and what I said about this on my show, I was very careful to not
00:23:20.600 go after the host because I think they're symptoms of the problem here and not themselves
00:23:25.500 the problem. You're right that they are parroting whatever the grownups pulling the strings of this
00:23:31.260 are trying to push on them. You know, I would say that a lot of parents need to say, yes, we're not
00:23:37.660 going to watch this, but it needs to go beyond that because, you know, this was an opinion show.
00:23:42.040 So even based on news and journalistic standards alone, I don't think they could get away with this
00:23:47.720 as easily on power and politics or something like that, despite bias you might see on other CBC
00:23:53.300 programs. They were parroting opinions. They were doing them ineloquently. And they're telling kids
00:23:59.040 that something that is very complex is simple and factual, when in actuality, it was neither of
00:24:04.120 those things. Well, that's a good point. At least the state broadcaster, when it has a partisan panel,
00:24:09.680 they pretend to have the full spectrum of opinion from A to B. I mean, I noticed that last weekend,
00:24:16.060 they didn't even have any conservative MPs on their political panels, which was quite something.
00:24:21.660 But yeah, I mean, in this, all three voices are pre-scripted. There is no difference of opinion.
00:24:28.940 I take your point about you can't be too tough on these kids because they're just child actors.
00:24:33.520 They would literally say the opposite thing if that was the words put in front of them. But there's a
00:24:39.280 message being sent out by the CBC, which is the largest employer of media in the country, larger
00:24:46.700 than all other private employers combined, in fact, that this is how you have to talk. This is how you
00:24:53.280 have to think if you want to get ahead. So it's not even that it's persuasive on the marriage. It's
00:24:57.920 just, oh, so that's how the CBC is. Yeah. And they'll even try and cancel the mighty feminist
00:25:06.240 success story. J.K. Rowling, single mom who works her way off welfare, becomes a billionaire through
00:25:11.800 her talent. They're not afraid to cancel her for saying trans women are not women. So imagine what
00:25:21.120 they would do to you. I think this is about the CBC telegraphing to the world what is or isn't
00:25:26.840 acceptable to the government. Yeah. And CBC kids is particularly insidious in that regard. There
00:25:33.820 was a story a few years ago, I think you might have covered it as well, where they had posted a
00:25:38.560 listing for a host they were hiring. And they said the exact words were any race except Caucasian. So
00:25:44.860 they were doing identity politics in their lineup. At another point, I think it was about a year ago,
00:25:49.640 there was controversy when CBC kids was glamorizing children who are drag performers. And they had
00:25:56.460 children who are dressed up in drag performing in an area which has very much been a sexualized area,
00:26:03.040 drag performance. And for adults, that's fine. Do what you want. But they were not only promoting
00:26:07.800 drag children, but glamorizing it and talking about how they were going to be slaying on the stage. And
00:26:13.960 anyone who criticized it, of course, was a bigot and a homophobe. So they are pushing an agenda here,
00:26:19.560 whether you want to admit it or not. They are.
00:26:21.880 Yeah, you know what we've learned from another state broadcaster, the BBC, that their kids
00:26:28.400 presenter, Jimmy Savile, was a serial child abuser who molested kids for decades, hundreds and
00:26:35.460 hundreds of kids. And the BBC covered it up. We also know that Hollywood is notorious for abusing
00:26:41.440 child actors, Harvey Weinstein himself. But just drugs and sex with minor children. So whenever young
00:26:49.740 kids are involved in some showbiz thing, I get nervous because I think, who is the predator here?
00:26:56.520 Who's taking advantage? Now, we don't know if these kids are being taken advantage of in other ways
00:27:01.220 besides just being turned into political puppets. But what we do know is that the audience, in a way,
00:27:08.000 is being sexually groomed. Children, as you say, as young as six years old, are being spoken to
00:27:14.200 in a friendly, energetic way about sexual things that shouldn't be treated by kids till much later.
00:27:21.820 So in a way, young children are being taught by the producers of this channel, talk about sex,
00:27:29.260 talk about various sexual acts, talk about transgenderism, talk about all these sexual things.
00:27:35.860 That's a form of grooming too, Andrew, because it's the state saying, hey kids, what used to be a
00:27:41.580 private discussion or an adult discussion is totally cool for you at age six. And you know it's cool
00:27:48.100 because these child actors say so. Maybe these child actors themselves are not being abused,
00:27:53.560 but in a way, they're abusing their viewers.
00:27:56.140 Yeah, and I don't want to, in my view anyway, go beyond what was in that clip alone. Because, you know,
00:28:05.100 even if you accept everything at face value and you remove other contexts and possibilities there,
00:28:10.620 you're left with what is very easily and aptly described as indoctrination. And it's so dangerous.
00:28:17.980 Parents need to have a much more prominent role than many think in kind of understanding what their kids
00:28:23.840 are watching. Because it's a standard assumption. If you're not a political parent, if you're not
00:28:28.020 someone who's really immersed in the culture wars like you and I are, to think, oh yeah, I can just
00:28:32.280 flip on CBC and my kids will watch it and they'll be watching all these fun shows and laughing and
00:28:37.400 that's that. I mean, we've joked in the past about people that have tried to say, you know, you've got to
00:28:42.080 ban Paw Patrol because it's patriarchal and, you know, fascistic and all of these things. But there are a lot of
00:28:48.400 people that have these political agendas that are managing to exact control over television
00:28:53.720 programming for kids. And in CBC's case, they're doing it incredibly brazenly.
00:28:58.160 What a great point. You can't watch Paw Patrol because it's too friendly and happy.
00:29:02.600 And you know all those puppies. But let's have you listen to some Marxist critique of transgender
00:29:07.840 versus feminist battles. Unbelievable. Andrew Lawton, great to see you again.
00:29:12.540 Give us a quick reminder. What's the best website to listen to your show, The Andrew Lawton Show?
00:29:19.160 What's the best URL for that?
00:29:20.600 If anyone goes to andrewlawtonshow.com, it'll bring you right to the podcast page and do subscribe
00:29:26.320 on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, YouTube, wherever you want. You can find us.
00:29:30.820 Yeah. And there's not even a fee for that, is there?
00:29:33.520 No, it's a completely free show.
00:29:35.580 Well, then there's no excuse not to subscribe.
00:29:39.040 Andrewlawtonshow.com. Absolutely free. You can get it on the website or, as you say,
00:29:43.540 any other place you get your podcasts, Apple and whatnot. And you are part of the team of talent
00:29:49.200 at True North. And we just had your friend Candice Malcolm on the other day. And all your stuff
00:29:54.660 is at tnc.news. Am I right?
00:29:58.920 Yes, indeed.
00:29:59.700 All right. Well, I know our viewers naturally like you and Candice and your whole team.
00:30:04.380 So hopefully they'll go to your stuff directly, too. Great to see you, my friend. Keep up the fight.
00:30:08.800 Yeah, thanks to you, too.
00:30:09.740 All right. There you have it. Andrew Lawton talking to us about this bizarre...
00:30:13.200 It's a propaganda unit. That's all it is. It's not entertainment. It's propaganda.
00:30:19.540 Stay with us. More ahead.
00:30:28.420 Hey, hello. Welcome back on my monologue last night. Wendy writes,
00:30:32.420 The National Post will fold without Rex Murphy. Without the folks that read Rex Murphy,
00:30:36.000 the National Post doesn't have much left for readership.
00:30:38.020 Attacking Rex Murphy for being white in 73 is not only racism, it is also ageism.
00:30:46.140 You know, that would be true in the olden days. And by olden days, I mean when people paid for
00:30:51.480 newspapers, when newspapers made money through advertising subscriptions.
00:30:57.240 But the fastest growing line item in Post Media's financials, and I've read them,
00:31:02.920 is Justin Trudeau.
00:31:03.960 He's giving them between $8 and $10 million this year alone. That's all they care about. They would
00:31:10.580 fire Rex Murphy 10 times to keep Justin Trudeau. That's the only one reader they need.
00:31:17.060 Vladimir writes, Rex Murphy is one of the few whose comments are worthwhile to follow.
00:31:22.620 I agree. I think he's the only name brand writer there. I mean, there are also some other good
00:31:26.480 writers there, but can you even name one?
00:31:28.400 On my interview with Randy Hillier on opening the economy, Bruce writes,
00:31:32.940 I'm glad the province of Ontario has Randy Hillier who can speak truth to the powerful.
00:31:36.920 We've been locked down far too long. The next time the government sends a panic order,
00:31:40.760 will people be so compliant? Oh, I regret they will. You know, I was just looking at different
00:31:45.160 jurisdictions. You know how many people are in hospital in all of Saskatchewan? 1.2 million people.
00:31:51.040 Two people in the hospital. You know how many people are in the hospital in Newfoundland?
00:31:59.700 Zero. There is a single case of the virus in Newfoundland, and he's not even, he's staying at home.
00:32:09.200 But the province is locked down. Where's the protests? There aren't none. Are we missing a freedom
00:32:16.820 gene in our DNA or something? That's our show for today. Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here
00:32:23.340 at Rubber World Headquarters, you at home, good night, and keep fighting for freedom.