We are now in a Cold War with China
Episode Stats
Words per minute
180.65698
Harmful content
Misogyny
10
sentences flagged
Hate speech
30
sentences flagged
Summary
In an attempt to find an analogy for how to deal with China, I talk more about the apartheid demonization, marginalization, and demonization approach to dealing with China. And I bring out a few facts you might not have heard before.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, my Rebels. Today, I go a little bit deeper in my attempt to find an analogy for how to treat
00:00:05.520
China. I talk more, do we use the apartheid demonization marginalization approach? Do we
00:00:11.980
use the Cold War approach? Do we use the how we fought Nazi Germany approach? I come up with some
00:00:17.400
more ideas on that, and I bring out a few facts you might not have heard before. I hope you enjoy
00:00:23.580
the podcast, but before I get out of the way, may I invite you to become a premium subscriber. Go
00:00:27.640
to rebelnews.com. It's eight bucks a month. You get the video version of the podcast,
00:00:32.380
Sheila Gunn-Reed's show, David Menzies' show, and it helps us pay the bills. Okay, here's the podcast.
00:00:42.260
Tonight, I make the case that we're now in a Cold War with China. It's April 23rd,
0.93
00:01:00.740
Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:04.380
There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer. The only thing I have to say to the
00:01:10.020
government about why I'm publishing it is because it's my bloody right to do so.
00:01:19.480
A couple of weeks ago, I talked about what approaches the right one for democracies
00:01:23.720
in dealing with China in the future. How do you handle a belligerent dictatorship,
00:01:28.080
one that's always been at war with its own people and now is increasingly at war with other people
00:01:33.720
like us? After turning a blind eye to it for years, the Allies finally went to war against Nazi Germany,
00:01:40.040
but only after every possible attempt to stay out of war. Hitler annexed part of Czechoslovakia,
00:01:45.460
and the Allies just shrugged. It was only after the shocking outright ground invasion of Poland
00:01:51.880
that the West finally acted. And probably for good reason, what would the West have done?
00:01:57.020
Invaded Germany itself, probably the leading military power of the day. It took years for
0.72
00:02:02.460
the Allies to build up their military to compete, and the war itself lasted five years,
00:02:08.100
costing countless treasure and millions of lives. So that's out.
00:02:12.140
It's the same reason we simply didn't go to war against the Soviet Union during the Cold War,
00:02:18.260
and add in the fact that like the USSR, China is a nuclear power. Another analogy I used the other
0.57
00:02:24.760
day was apartheid South Africa, and there's a lot to say for that approach. There was a boycott of
00:02:29.360
South African goods, and I'm sure that had some bite. Tourism suffered. Some South African exports
00:02:35.440
suffered, like South African wines were banned from Canada. But really, the damage there,
00:02:41.780
it seemed to me, was more moral than financial. It was the denormalization of South Africa,
0.52
00:02:49.220
its political and social marginalization, turning it into a pariah state. It couldn't participate in
00:02:54.260
international meetings, like the Commonwealth or the Olympics. Again, that's not really devastating
00:03:00.140
in an objective way. That's the diplomatic equivalent of not being invited to someone's birthday party.
00:03:05.020
But it surely stung the elite class who valued those things and felt shunned.
00:03:10.340
Such an approach to China would work, I think. They crave international respect and legitimacy.
00:03:16.840
Hosting the Olympics in 2008 was a huge breakthrough for China when it flipped from being a curious rogue to
00:03:24.240
being the absolute establishment, complete normalization. Pay no attention to those secret
00:03:29.340
police. Pay no attention to the crushing of Tibet or the Uyghur province of Xinjiang. Just look at all
00:03:34.160
those construction cranes and high-tech startups. And look, they can pull off a great party at the
00:03:39.200
Olympics. And these communists sure understand capitalism. Wow, that wasn't just a vindication
00:03:44.560
of them in the eyes of their own subjects. But in the eyes of the world, from professional sports
00:03:50.020
leagues like the NBA to Hollywood, China is really first on their mind. And obviously,
00:03:54.560
for tech companies, too. Companies like Google refuse to do work with the U.S. Pentagon for moral
00:04:00.620
reasons, but they're only happy to do similar work for China. They're testing their bad ideas there,
00:04:05.880
like social credit, total surveillance. And they propose to bring those ideas here, I fear.
00:04:12.420
Hey, did you know that Beijing is getting the Olympics again in 2022, just two years from now?
00:04:18.260
How do you feel about that? So yeah, I think that treating China like an apartheid state pariah
00:04:23.220
would actually be powerful, but mainly because it would be so difficult to do. Look at LeBron James,
00:04:28.020
famous NBA player, very political, very woke. Look at him try to justify not only taking big cash from
00:04:34.940
China, but telling others in the league to shut up with the criticism of China's pogroms, including
00:04:40.260
in Hong Kong. Remember this? We all talk about this freedom of speech. Yes, we all do have freedom of
00:04:45.040
speech. But at times, there are ramifications for the negative that can happen when you're not
00:04:51.220
thinking about others and you're only thinking about yourself. So I don't believe, I don't want
00:04:56.180
to get into a word or sentence feud with Daryl, with Daryl Morey, but I believe he wasn't educated
00:05:04.240
on the situation at hand. And he spoke. And so many people could have been harmed, not only financially,
00:05:13.840
but physically, emotionally, spiritually. So just be careful what we tweet and we say and what we do,
00:05:20.860
even though, yes, we do have freedom of speech, but there can be a lot of negative that comes with
00:05:25.460
that too. Yeah. So you'll be fighting against the LeBrons of the world, the Hollywood studios of the
1.00
00:05:31.460
world. You didn't have billions of dollars of investments by the NBA or Hollywood in apartheid
0.80
00:05:37.280
South Africa. So it was easy for them to denounce. This won't be. It's amazing, the sports leagues
00:05:43.260
that took a knee to protest racism in America, racism in a country that had a black president,
00:05:49.180
in sports leagues where black men are disproportionately represented compared to their 11% of the U.S.
00:05:54.820
population, where every one of the protesters is a black millionaire. The wave of self-serving
0.95
00:06:01.540
statements, they literally monetized the protest into an endorsement deal. That same woke,
00:06:06.460
woke culture. Well, it's totally silent now, even as China actually rounds up black people,
1.00
00:06:13.420
thinking that they're carriers of the virus. I'm not picking on the NBA. I'm just giving you
00:06:17.360
them as an example. You can substitute any woke team, feminism, transgenderism, environmentalism,
00:06:25.840
whatever. China is a bad country for any of those things if you're woke. Yesterday, we showed you the
0.92
00:06:30.860
obvious. They're one of the least free countries when it comes to press freedom, and yet the
00:06:34.820
wokeer ratty won't say a word against them. Greta Thunberg was literally invited to the United
00:06:41.240
States, to the United Nations, where she was allowed to scowl at Donald Trump, or I don't know,
0.89
00:06:46.000
maybe that was her smiling face. It's hard to tell. But she won't say a word about Xi Jinping,
00:06:50.980
even though China is by far the biggest greenhouse gas meter in the world. Not a word from the Green
0.73
00:06:55.280
Pieces or Extinction Rebellion types about that, which is odd since China is currently building,
00:06:59.740
what, 1,400, 1,500, 1,600 coal-fired power plants in its own country and around the world.
00:07:07.460
1,600, that's the number. That's according to the left-wing New York Times, but still the Times
00:07:12.640
gives the story, the headline, as Beijing joins climate fights, Chinese companies build coal
00:07:17.900
plants, even as they demonstrate the opposite. They just can't help themselves. Hey, Beijing's joining
0.89
00:07:22.800
the climate fight. Yeah, on the other side, guys. You know the New York Times is owned by a Mexican
1.00
00:07:28.100
billionaire, right? His name is Carlos Slim. I think he made his money through cell phones.
00:07:33.420
Why not? Why shouldn't he own the New York Times, even though he's not a New Yorker?
00:07:36.680
He's one of the world's richest men, and he surely has all the usual trinkets that billionaires have,
00:07:41.140
a yacht, a fancy jet, private homes, around exclusive places around the world. But owning
00:07:46.200
the New York Times makes him classy, important, influential. It gives him a seat at the table of
00:07:51.100
global conversations, and it launders his own opinions, which might be crudely expressed
00:07:55.140
by hiring the finest writers in the world to pursue his political agenda. So Carlos Slim owns
00:08:01.060
the Times. And Jeff Bezos, another one of the world's richest men, the owner of Amazon, well,
00:08:06.240
he owned the Washington Post. He owns the Washington Post. Same thing. Like all internet tycoons,
00:08:10.440
the only thing he really fears is government regulation. So why not pick up the most influential
00:08:15.280
newspaper in the U.S. capital city to protect yourself? Oh, hi, Congressman. I hear you want to
00:08:21.080
investigate Silicon Valley for political bias or for acting in an anti-competitive manner. Well,
00:08:26.680
it would be a shame if the Washington Post started digging into your expense accounts or a Me Too
00:08:32.000
accusation and put it on the front page. Yeah, the Washington Post is a political tool. And I'm only
00:08:37.440
surprised that some Chinese billionaire hasn't bought up American newspapers, especially given
00:08:41.500
how bankrupt some of them are. I mean, there's a newspaper closing every week. Remember that in Canada,
00:08:45.880
the most prominent newspaper, the Globe and Mail, it's a massive money loser, but it's owned by the
00:08:51.820
Thompson family. They're actually Canada's richest billionaire. So yeah, it loses millions of dollars
00:08:56.600
a month, but so why? It serves the same purpose for the family. It's an in-house organ for that family
00:09:01.960
and its worldview and generally for the establishment. Why would it be surprising if some billionaire
00:09:07.200
bought, I don't know, the LA Times or the Vancouver Sun? In fact, maybe they already did. The Vancouver
00:09:12.700
Sun is owned by Post Media, which in turn is owned by a US hedge fund. Who knows who invests in that?
00:09:19.580
My point is denormalization and marginalization is hard with China, much harder than for South
0.90
00:09:25.680
Africa. But I think we need to start going there. We need to treat China, like I said the other day,
1.00
00:09:30.740
we need to treat it a bit like we treated the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Don't declare a hot war on
00:09:35.640
it, but don't declare peace either. Realize that they lie to us. And if they treat their own people so
0.75
00:09:40.320
abusively, imagine what they would do to us. It's hard because in the 1980s, when the West
0.81
00:09:45.520
really started to marginalize the Soviet Union, when Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher and Pope
00:09:50.200
John Paul II started to call the Soviet Union out, that was before the era of ubiquitous telecommunications,
00:09:56.440
before the internet, before we were so integrated, before mass cheap global travel. There weren't
00:10:02.960
100,000 Soviet students in Canadian universities as there are 100,000 Chinese sons and daughters of the
00:10:10.260
Communist Party bosses here. So Soviets were contained. It was geographical. We weren't as
00:10:15.120
integrated as we are. So it was easy for Reagan to speak plainly. And he wasn't called racist for
00:10:20.240
it because the Russians couldn't play that card. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.
00:10:28.860
Where's our leaders to say that now to China? Well, Trump, maybe. But the media is at war with him.
00:10:34.920
Look at this story about Michael Bloomberg. This story is about how Michael Bloomberg's company,
00:10:40.040
called Bloomberg, it's a huge media company. It's so deep into China. And this was written a few
00:10:45.000
months ago. They worried what would happen if he became president? It would be a huge conflict of
00:10:48.640
interest because China made him rich. Well, Michael Bloomberg's not going to become president, but he's
00:10:53.340
still influential in the Democratic Party and in the media. And that underlying problem remains. His media
00:10:58.920
company has bet huge on China. So you can imagine he won't tolerate criticisms of China. He'll defend
00:11:05.380
China. No need to imagine. Actually, look at this story by a journalist named Lita Hong Fincher. She
00:11:11.900
said, I am one of the many women Mike Bloomberg's company tried to silence through non-disclosure
00:11:16.060
agreements. The funny thing is, I never even worked for Bloomberg, but my story shows the lengths the
00:11:20.220
Bloomberg machine will go to in order to avoid offending Beijing. Bloomberg's company, Bloomberg LP,
00:11:25.340
is so dependent on the vast China market for its business that its lawyers threatened to devastate
00:11:29.920
my family financially if I didn't sign an NDA non-disclosure agreement, silencing the news about
00:11:35.560
how Bloomberg News killed a story critical of its Chinese Communist Party leaders. Yeah. So I guess
00:11:40.060
China already does have its billionaire owner of a media company, except it's a five foot zero Jewish
1.00
00:11:50.180
Xi Jinping is not a dictator. He has to satisfy his constituents or he's not going to survive.
00:11:57.160
No, he has to. He has a constituency to answer to.
00:12:04.260
He doesn't have a vote. He doesn't have a democracy. He's not held accountable by voters.
00:12:13.700
You're not going to have a revolution. No government survives without the will of the
00:12:19.840
Yikes. Yeah. We have a bit of a reset job to do, don't you think? And we won't just be fighting
00:12:25.540
culturally square diplomats from Beijing. We'll be fighting culturally savvy Hollywood and Manhattan
00:12:31.440
types right here at home. Oh, and Canada is worse in every measure, of course, because it goes
0.58
00:12:35.620
straight to Trudeau himself. I follow a lot of interesting people on Twitter, not just people
00:12:39.900
I agree with, but also people I disagree with to see what they're up to and occasionally once in a
00:12:44.760
while to change my mind on something. I also follow some people who are good at looking at problems from
00:12:49.060
new angles and breaking groupthink. By the way, this pandemic has been awful for groupthink and for
00:12:54.860
deferring to authority because someone says, I'm a doctor, so we have to believe them when they say
00:12:59.560
we're all going to die if we don't put everyone under house arrest for a year. Anyways, one fellow I
00:13:04.420
follow is Jeff Giese, who I've met a few times. Let me show you a string of comments he made just this
00:13:09.280
morning that I thought were very interesting. He says, perhaps because I like China, my first instinct
00:13:15.160
was to dismiss the hawks for being alarmist. They're just trying to recreate the Cold War or deflect from
00:13:20.860
our own flaws, I thought. The more I follow this, the more they appear right. China is on the offensive.
1.00
00:13:27.440
Follow it closely. And then he lists about 10 little proof points. China's on the offensive in Hong Kong.
00:13:33.760
Over the weekend, 15 prominent Hong Kong citizens were put under political arrest for their role in
00:13:38.500
last year's protest movement. China's on the offensive in the South China Sea. They're building
0.85
00:13:44.160
military islands, obviously depressed Japan, Taiwan, other regional democracies. China's on the offensive
00:13:51.040
in the information space. That's a fancy way of saying they're everywhere on your phone, on your
00:13:55.400
internet, on the websites and news on Facebook. China's on the offensive in food supply. Now that's
00:14:01.540
terrifying to me. You'd be shocked how much food in your grocery store comes from China. I'm guessing
00:14:06.120
half the fish you eat is Chinese. Imagine if they got into the beef business or the dairy business.
1.00
00:14:12.360
Would you buy raw ground beef or cheese made in China? And would you even know if it was?
00:14:18.300
China's been on a public diplomacy offensive with its face mask diplomacy and medical aid to countries.
00:14:23.940
Exactly. Just like Vladimir Putin uses energy. He turns off the taps of the gas pipelines to his enemies.
00:14:30.160
He did that to Ukraine several times. Same with China and face masks.
0.99
00:14:34.860
Chinese diplomats and embassies are increasingly engaging in wolf warrior diplomacy, posting
00:14:39.860
accusations, boasts, and name calling directed at governments and individuals they feel have
00:14:44.900
insulted China. That's so true. It's off the hook. I've never seen such bellicosity from diplomats.
00:14:51.200
They truly sound like they want war. I don't know if that's just to please their masters back in Beijing
00:14:55.360
or if it's meant to intimidate us or what the goal exactly is.
00:14:58.920
But it's pretty undiplomatic. And in the meantime, we've never been more pitiful in our own replies.
00:15:06.560
The Chinese version of hybrid 4G warfare, fourth generation warfare, is unrestricted warfare,
0.92
00:15:12.060
which involves the full spectrum of the instruments of power. That's what we're seeing.
00:15:17.260
That's the thing. They don't want nuclear war either. So they want asymmetrical warfare.
00:15:21.000
They don't want an attack. And why would they attack us with weapons when they can simply win
00:15:26.420
a Cold War asymmetrically, a war they know they're fighting, but many of us don't know we're fighting.
00:15:31.340
And frankly, a war that many important institutions in North America, well, they had to choose sides.
00:15:35.980
They'd choose China's side because they get paid by China. Look at your cell phone companies
00:15:40.000
looking to install Huawei. So I think all this starts by speaking truth to power,
00:15:45.180
by calling out China like Reagan called out Gorbachev. Like this. Look at this.
00:15:51.640
Shocked to learn that my longtime friend Martin Li, founder of the Hong Kong Democratic Party,
00:15:55.360
was arrested today together with many of Hong Kong's most prominent citizens.
00:15:59.300
Martin is the elder statesman of Hong Kong democracy. I hope for his immediate release.
00:16:04.080
I think Alberta's handling of the virus has embarrassed Trudeau,
00:16:07.660
who continues to sulk around the house all day long,
00:16:09.960
while Trudeau's medical equipment, cargo jets, return home empty from China.
00:16:13.820
Did you see that the other day? Kenny has so much health equipment,
00:16:17.160
he's sending his surplus to Quebec. But this tweet by Kenny about Hong Kong
00:16:22.640
will enrage Trudeau the most because it's the truth that Trudeau can't or won't say.
00:16:29.820
Yeah, good. It's about time. Stay with us for more.
00:16:43.820
Kinds of things that that have to be done. You know, there's a during World War Two, you know,
00:16:52.640
where Roosevelt came up with a thing that, you know, was totally different than a than the
00:16:59.680
it's called he called the, you know, the World War Two. He had the world, the war production board.
00:17:05.720
Oh, boy, that's Joe Biden talking to a panel on CNN, Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta.
00:17:12.940
It was hard to hide their feelings. Their faces show that they were cringing for Joe Biden,
00:17:19.280
struggling to get a coherent sentence together. Very basic thoughts, forgetting himself, looking down at notes.
00:17:27.700
If this happened once in a while, you could say, oh, well, it was a long day, stressful day.
00:17:31.900
It's a gaffe. He accidentally misspoke. We all do it, especially politicians who talk nonstop,
00:17:38.320
except Joe Biden isn't particularly working hard. He's not campaigning. He's not running a country
00:17:44.980
like Donald Trump is, who has, you know, maestro performances, bravura performances in front of
00:17:53.140
hostile questioners at the White House press conference. This is Joe Biden struggling to get
00:17:57.620
through an interview via Skype with notes in front of him with the friendliest of interviewees.
00:18:04.360
Just today, that was from a week or so ago. Let me watch just today. He did another conversation
00:18:09.700
with Al Gore that had about 10 of these strange, bumbling moments in it. And again, the look on
00:18:17.020
Al Gore's face, the pained look. Everyone who comes into Joe Biden is coming to the conclusion,
00:18:23.100
this fella is past his prime. Take a look. So the, one of the things that I think is happening now,
00:18:30.960
you pointed out that American business is realizing they've, they've got a, they got a price in the
00:18:37.260
car. They have to price in the price of carbon and the way they're done. They want, they are looking
00:18:43.300
at their bottom line and reduce car. Oh my gosh. Is he actually in decline? I suppose we all are in
00:18:51.180
decline from the moment. You know, there's a certain point in time. We all head towards our
00:18:56.760
final doom, but is Joe Biden up to the job of being president? Perhaps the most stressful job
00:19:03.180
in the world, the most energetic job in the world. Joining us now by Skype from the Los Angeles area
00:19:07.940
is our friend Joel Pollack, senior editor at large of Breitbart.com. Joel, I just wanted to show those
00:19:12.780
two samples. I swear I could find 20 of them and it's not one goofy comment. It's worrying enough.
00:19:19.740
You could see the look on the faces of those reporters. I'm not a doctor, neither are you.
00:19:24.880
We're not doing diagnoses, but is there something wrong with Joe Biden?
00:19:29.740
I think there is. I'm not sure if we can really tell if it's that much worse than it was 10 years
00:19:38.300
ago. And we just didn't have an opportunity to see him in action as much as we could have. Remember
00:19:44.720
that when he was nominated as the vice president and Sarah Palin was nominated to be John McCain's
00:19:49.980
running mate, the Obama campaign abruptly pulled Biden out of the public eye for three or four
00:19:57.220
weeks. They kept him under wraps. That didn't happen to Sarah Palin. She was immediately thrust
00:20:02.000
into the public eye. She had to answer questions, do interviews, and Republicans never would have gotten
0.93
00:20:06.960
away with something like that. But the Obama campaign kept Biden under wraps for quite a while.
00:20:10.580
Now, perhaps his memory lapses are a little worse now, and perhaps some of his other habits and
00:20:16.440
little ticks on stage are worse and more noticeable, but he's never exactly been smooth in public.
00:20:23.020
Ninety-eight percent of the time, he's okay. And sometimes he's very strong. He sometimes has
00:20:28.760
facts and figures at his disposal. Sometimes he has a very clear presentation of ideas and even makes
00:20:34.920
fine ideological points. And then he falls apart the other two percent of the time. The question
00:20:40.500
facing voters isn't necessarily, where is Joe Biden's mental capacity today? It's, where is it
00:20:47.180
going to be a year from now, two years from now? Can he actually function across four years of a
00:20:53.300
presidency in which he's going to cross the threshold into 80 years old, into his ninth decade
00:20:59.220
on the planet? He's been active in politics since the 1960s. And that is a very, very long time.
00:21:06.380
Occasionally, it catches up with him. There was one debate where he was referring to a record player,
00:21:12.940
a device nobody under the age of 30 has ever seen, unless it's in a vintage vinyl store and one of those
00:21:21.200
newly fashionable devices you might pick up. Or in the days of retail, when you might have picked up
00:21:27.000
at Best Buy or something like that as a novelty item. But nobody's really used one. No one has
00:21:33.260
a record collection. So he really is not entirely there. The question is for Democrats, can they do
00:21:40.480
anything about it? It becomes very difficult to do something about it now because it's so soon after
00:21:45.740
Bernie Sanders was still a viable candidate for the nomination. And anything the party would do to get
00:21:50.620
rid of Biden would be seen as unfair by the Sanders people because they, after all, felt that their guy
00:21:56.660
should have been the nominee and is at least in second place. If they wait too long, it becomes
00:22:02.760
much harder to pull off a switch because they're going to have the convention, presumably in August.
00:22:08.880
There's going to be a nomination process. Procedurally, it gets more difficult to replace
00:22:13.100
a candidate after that process if he is, in fact, ratified as a nominee. So they've got a window of time,
00:22:19.160
perhaps in the summer between, let's say, July 4th and the convention in mid-August, when they can
00:22:26.800
conceivably switch him with whoever his vice presidential candidate is going to be. I think
00:22:33.000
on May 1st next week, he is going to announce a committee to choose his running mate. That could
00:22:39.200
begin the process of moving him out of the race. It depends how loyal the party establishment is to
00:22:46.880
Biden. It depends what the alternatives are. This is going to be something that the leadership of
00:22:52.080
the Democratic Party has to finesse very carefully. I do not put anything beyond them. I don't think
00:22:55.840
the rules matter. We've seen before that they're willing to rig the primary against a candidate they
00:22:59.940
don't want. It did it against Bernie Sanders in 2016. They united legally, perhaps, against Bernie
00:23:05.540
Sanders in 2020. They will do whatever it takes to be competitive in November. If you're a Republican,
00:23:10.060
you can watch this and be entertained somewhat, but I wouldn't find it reassuring at all.
00:23:13.380
Joe Biden cannot beat Donald Trump in the state he's in, and therefore, he will either be bolstered
00:23:20.500
by a very strong vice presidential candidate, or he will be replaced.
00:23:24.620
Huh. You know, I see more and more that Biden, who's doing these Skype interviews,
00:23:30.260
not unlike you and I are talking here, he has notes in front of him. He looks down at them. I mean,
00:23:35.820
it's not details, facts, figures, statistics, technical things that one might need a refresher.
00:23:41.960
Very basic points. He stumbles, he forgets his train of thought, he looks down. In some of these
00:23:47.980
interviews, his wife, Jill Biden, sits right next to him, and it has the feel of not a, I'm his loyal
00:23:56.040
wife, I'm fighting with him. It has the feel almost of a nurse or someone there to calm him. And I'm not
00:24:03.860
trying to be mean here. And I acknowledge that sometimes politicians have mannerisms or quirks or
00:24:11.640
even gaffes that we all do. And I don't feel like I'm piling on unfairly. I can't see him get through
00:24:20.620
a single Skype interview, and he does them every day now, without screwing up a simple, simple
00:24:27.740
conversation. You talk about, he mentioned a record player. And he did it in a way, he was trying to
00:24:33.440
have a cultural reference everyone could connect to. And he went back to something when his life was
00:24:41.360
at its prime, record players. I've seen him do that. I've seen him refer to himself as a candidate for
00:24:46.660
Senate, because that's imprinted in his mind for 40 years. I've seen him refer to politicians by the name
00:24:54.020
of a prominent politician 40, 50 years ago. He falsely called someone the name, I think, of a
00:25:00.380
very old governor from the 60s. So it's almost like those Alzheimer's patients who are losing their
00:25:07.180
memories of today and reminiscing sentimentally about the memories they have as a young man.
00:25:13.840
I am not a doctor, and I might be dead wrong, but my God, it reminds me of someone losing their
00:25:19.360
cognitive ability. It's hard not to draw that conclusion. And once you start thinking about
00:25:25.820
that, everything he does, even ordinary forgetfulness, reinforces that conclusion. So for
00:25:30.880
example, this week, he had an interview where he held up a picture of his granddaughters, and he
00:25:37.160
misstated the number of granddaughters he had before quickly correcting himself. Now that's the sort of
00:25:42.140
error anyone can make. I was trying to explain to someone earlier this week, the number of siblings
00:25:48.080
I have, and I left somebody out. So that sort of happens. But once you start seeing the pattern,
00:25:53.380
as you mentioned, substituting the wrong name of a politician 30 or 40 years ago for someone who's
00:25:59.200
active today, mixing up the office he's running for, having to be prompted by his wife. Once you
00:26:05.540
start seeing that pattern, and you take into account how old he is, it really does seem to just look at
00:26:12.240
me now, struggling for the right word in a live interview, seems like there's something wrong. And
00:26:17.300
it's got to be troubling. Remember also that Democrats made John McCain's age a very important
00:26:25.180
issue in 2008. They said that he had had skin cancer, they had wartime injuries, which was a bit
00:26:30.920
of a low blow, but they went there. And they said he could not be trusted to serve out four years or eight
00:26:36.920
years if that were the case, if you were reelected. Now, he did actually survive the eight years of
00:26:42.300
Obama's presidency and passed away a short time thereafter. But he would have made it through the
00:26:47.220
eight years. The point is Democrats made age a legitimate issue to discuss. And it's once again
00:26:54.260
legitimate. There's a lot of discussion now. I saw on 538.com about a week ago, there was an article
00:26:59.400
about what it would take to remove a party nominee. Now, they didn't just limit it to Biden. They also
00:27:04.440
considered Trump because although when he ran for president, he was in his late 60s, he's now in his
00:27:08.780
early 70s, considerably younger than Biden and sharper than Biden. But they wanted to give the
00:27:14.720
inquiry kind of a bipartisan sheer or sheen. And look, it's pretty easy in the Republican case.
00:27:22.240
You've got Mike Pence as the vice president. So if Donald Trump can't serve, Mike Pence steps up.
00:27:26.940
There's nobody who would vote for Trump who wouldn't vote for Pence. So it's not going to take
00:27:33.060
anything away. With Biden, it's more of a basket of unknowns. You don't know who he's going to
00:27:37.040
choose. You just know he's committed to choosing a woman. Stacey Abrams has said it's got to be a
00:27:41.360
black woman. He's already committed to appointing a black woman to the Supreme Court. But Stacey
0.99
00:27:44.840
Abrams has said black women correctly. She said black women are the most loyal voting bloc in the
0.81
00:27:50.720
Democratic Party, and they need to be rewarded for their loyalty. The problem with that argument is the
00:27:54.640
more loyal you are, the less you need to be rewarded to retain your loyalty. But that's another story.
00:27:59.280
We have to see who he's going to pick. The likeliest pick is Kamala Harris. They seem to
1.00
00:28:03.320
get along. She is very left wing on policy, which will please the Bernie Sanders people. But she's
00:28:07.900
also a former prosecutor, which at least ties her into the Democratic establishment. And that will win
1.00
00:28:14.340
her some points with people who like Biden. She's well tapped into the Clinton fundraising network.
00:28:19.300
The Clintons like her. The Obamas like her. Everybody in a position of power in the party likes her.
00:28:23.580
So she's the likeliest choice. And it then becomes a question of who would she choose? Suppose Biden
00:28:30.160
is asked to step off the ticket. Kamala Harris moves into the top spot. Who does the party
00:28:34.960
put in place as number two? And the answer is really not going to be satisfactory to anybody.
00:28:40.660
The party has moved so far left that it almost doesn't matter at this point who the candidate is.
00:28:47.700
We're going to see people voting on parties this time in a way we haven't in a very long time.
00:28:51.320
There was an evangelical leader earlier this week whose name escapes me for the moment. I'm having
00:28:55.560
a Biden moment. But he was a never Trumper back in 2016. And he said that he was going to support
00:29:01.200
Trump in 2020. And that one of the reasons he was going to do so was it had just become clear to him
00:29:06.740
that the elections are really about parties right now rather than about candidates. And Donald Trump
00:29:11.800
has been very faithful to the policies of his party. He's been a conservative. He's been a pro-life
00:29:15.960
conservative, a pro-religious liberty conservative, and so forth. And Biden is essentially an empty
00:29:20.700
shell. And his party has become so left wing that he has moved along with it. So the choice is now
00:29:26.360
very stark. And for a voter who cares about exemplary leadership, which President Trump hasn't always
00:29:33.920
shown in his personal life, at least before he came to Washington, it's not as big a deal as it
00:29:41.600
might have been once upon a time when the parties were closer. When the Republicans and Democrats had
00:29:46.400
essentially very similar pro-market, pro-free trade, pro-globalization policies in the 1990s,
00:29:52.020
the difference between Bob Dole and Bill Clinton was basically age, if you were a Democrat, and
00:29:57.420
trustworthiness, if you were a Republican. I think one of the Republican slogans was trust Dole. It
00:30:01.680
really came down to personal characteristics. That's definitely not the case anymore. It's almost the
00:30:05.880
case that if the Republicans nominated a cardboard box, and the Democrats nominated a worn out tire,
00:30:11.320
that people would still vote for their respective candidates based on the parties, because they just
00:30:16.200
are so different. And they're so opposed to one another.
00:30:20.380
I read in the New York Post, which is a scrappy tabloid. It's like our Toronto Sun chain of
00:30:25.760
newspapers in Canada. It's got a sense of humor and a reverence to it. I like it. They had, I forget who
00:30:31.660
the author was, but they brooded a scenario where, and I'm just going to run it by you, I think you
00:30:37.660
probably know the one I mean, where Joe Biden shows Michelle Obama, Barack Obama's wife, as his
00:30:46.160
running mate. And then after the inauguration, Biden steps down, and you got yourself a President
00:30:53.180
Obama. And I read through it, and I thought, first of all, that would bring all the fond memories of
00:31:00.780
the Obama years back for a lot of Democrats. It would give sort of the centrist, you know,
00:31:06.860
continuation vibe. First woman candidate, another black candidate. The media loved Michelle Obama.
0.99
00:31:16.860
I don't think she's half as graceful or charming as her husband, but good enough. And I know this was
00:31:22.600
like a flight of fancy, but I read that and I thought, yikes, that's a silver bullet. What do you
00:31:28.360
think of that fantasy theory? Well, I don't think it can work. First of all, she's not going to leave
00:31:35.900
behind all the riches that she's been able to enjoy. She's probably got a net worth of hundreds
00:31:41.380
of millions of dollars at the moment. She's running a film production company with her husband,
00:31:46.000
enjoying life on Martha's Vineyard near a beach that will be flooded if they say what they mean or
00:31:53.760
mean what they say about global warming. I mean, why would she give all that up? She's going to be
00:31:58.140
influential regardless. She doesn't need to be a candidate. She actually loses some credibility
1.00
00:32:01.580
as a candidate. She can certainly campaign for him, and I'm sure she'll be a featured speaker at
00:32:05.460
the convention. But like it or not, regardless of who the candidate is, we are going to see
00:32:10.260
something of an Obama third term if any of the Democrats become president right now. Biden has
00:32:18.780
already revealed some of his potential cabinet picks. And aside from some of the people who ran
00:32:24.240
against him, like Beto O'Rourke and Pete Buttigieg, who would certainly get important posts,
00:32:28.800
it's basically going to be a rehash of the Obama administration. Add that to the fact that the
00:32:33.120
D.C. metro area, which staffs most of the federal government agencies, is vehemently anti-Trump.
00:32:40.240
And you have a situation where if Biden wins, the Obamas are going to control everything anyway.
00:32:45.080
They're basically tied in to the apparatus of government. The Clintons will also have a similar kind
0.63
00:32:51.980
of influence. So why would any of these people go into the race when they can be super influential
00:32:56.400
from afar without any of the costs or drawbacks, without losing any money, without losing any
00:33:01.320
image, street credibility, whatever, without losing any friendships? I mean, the Obamas are in a prime
00:33:07.100
position, and they don't need to run for anything. I think they also probably believe that if Biden
00:33:13.200
can't win on his own, they can't save him. And from where they sit, it's okay to wait four years.
00:33:19.600
They don't feel the same sense of urgency, I think, that people who are still in the arena
00:33:24.020
might tend to feel. And I think they think their chances will be a lot better in four years
00:33:28.440
than they are with Biden. The Democratic Party is building up a bench. They'll have good candidates
00:33:32.940
in four years' time. They've got a couple of governors who are showing some potential.
00:33:36.940
They've got young leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and so forth. So I think the
00:33:42.720
smart move for the Obamas is to offer moral support to Joe Biden and campaign for him.
00:33:50.580
Hope he wins, because winning is better than losing, but bet on a stronger candidate for the
00:34:01.060
Last question for you. Sometimes people who are candidates, they want it, but the people around
00:34:09.680
them want it more. You talked about the permanent political class. I suppose you could call it the
00:34:14.120
deep state if you want. But if someone's been a donor to Joe Biden for 20 years, if someone's been a
00:34:21.280
staffer who's hitched their career to his for 20 years, they might want Biden to run for president
00:34:27.120
even more than he does. Maybe Biden's family, including his son, Hunter Biden, who seemed to
00:34:34.300
enrich himself from China through his dad's political connections. Do you think it's possible
00:34:40.880
that in his heart of hearts, Biden feels like this isn't right, like it's not a good fit? Do you think
00:34:49.400
maybe even his own wife says, oh, Joe's not really up to it? Do you think there's just so much pressure
00:34:56.080
that they must continue, but that really they're doing the bidding of supporters and he's not
00:35:02.840
burning with fire for this and he'd rather just be a grandpa enjoying his senior years?
00:35:08.760
I applaud to that. I'm not sure that the donors around Biden need him to win. I do think that the
00:35:16.740
donor class in the Democratic Party needed Bernie Sanders not to win. And in early 2019, when I went to
00:35:25.160
my first one of my first events of the campaign, when the campaign was just getting started and
00:35:29.900
Bernie Sanders had just announced he was running, I went to one of his speeches here in LA. And I
00:35:34.700
remember texting someone or maybe I wrote it up in the article, my coverage of the event, that Biden's
00:35:40.980
donors have to be beating down his door, asking him to run, because Sanders is so radical and his
00:35:47.960
policies are so out there that Democrats had to be afraid that he would have tanked the entire party.
00:35:57.040
And I imagine that even some Republicans would have been happier to see Biden run, because in the
00:36:01.920
event that Trump loses, you'd want the alternative to be not so terrible. I think that whole is out of
00:36:08.680
the barn already, because I think the party has moved so far left that it almost doesn't matter
00:36:12.600
that Biden's the candidate. But there definitely was a desperation to have someone who could beat
00:36:18.540
Sanders. And it looked like only Biden had the institutional heft to do it. I don't know that
00:36:23.560
they're so loyal now. This is the process that the Democratic Party has to manage. It's going to
00:36:28.320
require a lot of political finesse, but they have to have those donors on board if they're going to
00:36:31.860
switch someone else in for the presidential slot. And they have to assure the Biden donors that
00:36:38.740
they're going to have what they want from another candidate. Now, they can never promise 100% of
00:36:44.040
what they want. But I agree with you that that tends to be a problem in politics, that the donors
00:36:49.300
often want something more than the politicians do and the politicians have to run. In this case,
00:36:54.400
partly because there was a four-year interim when Biden didn't run in 2016 anyway, I don't know that
00:36:59.300
there's as much tying the donors to Biden personally as there was motivating the donors to bring him in
00:37:05.860
as a foil to Sanders. So it's a very interesting question, and we'll have to see how they manage it.
00:37:10.880
Well, Joel, thank you so much for taking so much time. I know you're at home like so many of us are
00:37:15.240
trying to run the household and homeschooling and all that. So thanks for taking the time and for your
00:37:20.360
wisdom as always. I look forward to a return to normalcy. But it's been great to have you join us a
00:37:27.020
couple times in a row from home. So nice to see you again. Thank you. I hope to be back soon.
00:37:31.480
Right on. There you have it. Joel Pollack, the senior editor-at-large at Breitbart.com. He joined
00:37:36.680
us via Skype from his home in the Los Angeles area. Stay with us. More ahead on The Rebel.
00:37:50.420
Hey, welcome back on my monologue yesterday about Earth Day and the annual press freedom rankings.
00:37:54.760
Paul writes, they gave China a low rating to give the rankings more credibility.
00:37:58.720
Really? This survey seems to be really about who has embraced globalism the best that year.
00:38:03.560
Well, I just will not accept anyone saying America is what ranked, was it 45 or 55? And Canada is what,
00:38:10.180
16? I'm saying that's just not true. Whatever you think about Donald Trump, America is the freest place
00:38:15.600
in the world to be a journalist. The First Amendment is rock solid. I mean, I'm not tearing down Norway,
00:38:21.520
which they put as number one, but they put it as number one because it's an inoffensive,
00:38:24.820
tiny European social welfare democracy. America is the living, beating heart of free press around
00:38:32.300
the world. And I say that with some jealousy because of their First Amendment. Bruce writes,
00:38:37.820
Ezra's comment on Earth Day is spot on. As Mark Levin said a few years ago, the old reds are the new
1.00
00:38:42.780
greens. I think so. There is a deep state in science, in environmentalism. You can ban things in the
00:38:51.660
name of the environment that you couldn't ban elsewise. And I think we've discovered that public
00:38:55.500
health warriors like Teresa Tam, like so many others, they're part of the deep state too. And
00:39:01.440
they're absolutely plugged into the UN. The World Health Organization is a UN agency. They don't
00:39:06.480
believe in local sovereignty. They don't believe in freedom. By definition, a public health doctor is
00:39:12.040
about control, whereas a regular doctor that meets patients is about making the patient better,
00:39:16.360
very different. On my interview with Manning Montenegrino, Karen writes, the whole point of
00:39:21.880
these restrictions were to save the elderly. Foreign workers bringing in COVID-19 is counterproductive.
1.00
00:39:27.220
You know what? It's a false economy. When you look back through the sweep of time, you see slave labor.
00:39:33.240
There's been slavery on every single continent in the world other than Antarctica. There really has been.
00:39:37.700
And it's such a blight on humanity. And, you know, look at not just the damage that was done morally
00:39:43.580
at the time by slavery. But to this day, the wounds of American slavery, even though it was 150 years
00:39:48.900
ago, the Emancipation Proclamation, the wounds of slavery are still hurting today. You can't deny that.
00:39:56.400
And what we are doing with temporary foreign workers is a form of wage slavery. And what we were doing by
0.99
00:40:02.960
outsourcing our factories to China to save a few bucks an hour on labor is a form of slavery. Now,
00:40:10.460
they're not utter slaves, but in some ways they are. We pay them less than the law would allow for a Canadian.
1.00
00:40:16.500
A lot of illegal aliens picking fruit or whatever they do in California, they, because they're sort of in the
1.00
00:40:23.240
shadows, they can't avail themselves of laws, legal protection. So they're vulnerable to all sorts of things.
00:40:28.840
And why? I say again, if you have a cheap indentured worker, which is really what a temporary foreign
1.00
00:40:36.680
worker is, like at the cargo plant in Alberta, it's not like your steak is going to be half price.
00:40:42.540
It might be 5% cheaper because the cost of your steak, you know, that laborer cutting it up is such a
00:40:51.140
small part of the cost. It's not like your food is in any substantial way cheaper because we use foreign
00:40:58.000
slave labor. But we brought all these problems here. And you know what? How about pay people
00:41:02.780
a decent wage, a prevailing wage? And you know what? If you can't find someone willing to work
00:41:07.260
for peanuts at a restaurant drive-thru, well, pay what you need to pay or shut it down.
00:41:14.020
There's no constitutional right to have a cheap coffee donut or burger. And if you have to pay an
00:41:20.040
extra 50 cents because you're paying a living wage to the people inside, that is not only morally
00:41:24.780
better than bringing in cheap subsidized de facto slave labor. It's going to, in the long run,
00:41:33.240
I mean, what is the price of having close to a thousand COVID-19 cases in those two slaughterhouses
00:41:40.580
in Alberta? So we saved a few bucks that all went in the pocket of those multinationals. And now the
00:41:46.260
province is saddled with a billion dollars in healthcare. Where's the savings there? I just don't
00:41:50.300
get it. I want to get away from the slave labor approach. If something's worth doing, pay the guy
00:41:56.160
to do it. And if it's a few extra bucks, get over it. I think we have to get out of that globalist
00:42:00.720
thing. And this comes from a guy who is a Fraser Institute alumni, alumnus. I've been, when I was 22,
00:42:08.380
I interned with the Koch Foundation in Washington, DC. There's nothing more open borders than that.
00:42:13.740
But I see now that that simply doesn't work on its own. You can't just have a race to the bottom
00:42:19.740
in terms of wages. When you do that, you wind up giving your entire industry to China,
0.97
00:42:25.800
including not a single N95 mask manufacturer in Canada. 90% plus of our pharmaceuticals are made
00:42:33.700
in China. We're hooped because of that globalization. Oh, you tell me if you disagree with me. All right,
00:42:39.360
folks, that's my show for today. Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World
00:42:43.360
Headquarters, to you at home, good night. And keep fighting for freedom.