Rebel News Podcast - “Welcome to the year 2030”： More questions about Justin Trudeau’s Great Reset

00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. Today, I take you through a crazy World Economic Forum essay about what the

00:00:05.500 future is like. I really get deep into it. We talked before about a world without property,

00:00:10.840 but this is a world without privacy. They even talk about having your thoughts

00:00:16.960 registered. Registered with whom? They never quite say,

00:00:21.380 this is crazy. I want to invite you to become a Rebel News Plus subscriber. Get the video version

00:00:26.080 of this podcast. It's $8 a month. It's not much. Subscribe for the whole year in advance. It's

00:00:31.180 $80. That's a bargain. You know, I think that's like half of Netflix, but I promise you, you'll

00:00:36.380 never hear these things on Netflix. Go to rebelnews.com, click subscribe. It would be a real

00:00:41.060 favor to me because, you know, we don't get any money from Justin Trudeau. We rely on our viewers.

00:00:45.280 It's the only way to stay independent. Just go to rebelnews.com and click subscribe. All right,

00:00:51.100 here's today's show. Thanks.

00:00:56.080 Tonight, more questions about Justin Trudeau's Great Reset. It's November 17th,

00:01:13.260 and this is The Answer LeVance Show.

00:01:16.740 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?

00:01:20.200 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.

00:01:24.520 The only thing I have to say to the government about why I'm publishing it is because it's my

00:01:29.120 bloody right to do so.

00:01:35.100 Over the past week, we've talked about The Great Reset. I showed you that bizarre video that the

00:01:40.860 World Economic Forum published four years ago, but then took off Twitter just last week for some

00:01:45.920 reason, where they talked about a world without property ownership, a world without meat, weirdly,

00:01:52.800 a world where really you would be a bit less of a person and a bit more of an ant in an ant colony.

00:01:59.560 That's how it felt like to me. And then this video of Justin Trudeau just blew up. It even made

00:02:06.340 international news. It was even picked up on Tucker Carlson's show on Fox.

00:02:10.500 Building back better means getting support to the most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum

00:02:16.500 on reaching the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs. Canada is here to

00:02:23.140 listen and to help. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to

00:02:30.100 accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global

00:02:35.900 challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.

00:02:40.520 Yeah. Now, I see that although the World Economic Forum took down the one video link that I had

00:02:45.680 discussed last week, there are plenty of other places where they continue to promote that same

00:02:50.780 bizarre dystopian future. This website, published by the World Economic Forum back in 2016,

00:02:58.140 it's still up, and it adds another layer. You'll have no privacy now, too. No property, but now no privacy.

00:03:07.600 Let me read a bit. Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.

00:03:17.700 How can that possibly be? How can you possibly be happier than ever if you own nothing and you have

00:03:25.100 no privacy? No sane person would say that. No real person would say that. No one human would say that.

00:03:32.260 Property isn't some capitalist theory. It's an expression of our interaction with the world.

00:03:38.860 Crazy example, if you take a tree stump and carve it into a marvelous sculpture, that piece of property,

00:03:45.780 that thing, it's now an expression of your mind and your heart and your hands of your time and your effort.

00:03:52.720 You mixed your labor with the world, and look what you made. It's not property in a capitalist sense,

00:04:00.960 though it might be worth quite a bit. It might be enough to make a living. But if you have mixed 1.00

00:04:06.560 yourself into that tree stump, it's part of you now. A working definition of slavery is that you do not

00:04:14.760 own the fruits of your labor. Someone else just takes it. Isn't that really what being a slave is?

00:04:20.740 If someone owns everything you do, everything you make, isn't that tantamount to them actually owning you?

00:04:26.600 And the right to privacy, that is an ancient right, actually. We use the term more expansively now than in

00:04:33.640 history, the idea of vast government or corporate databases. That's pretty new. Tracking your online activities

00:04:40.780 is pretty new. But the idea of privacy, of having a place where others can't be with you, can't look

00:04:46.160 at you, can't bother you, can't track you, that is ancient. One of the ancient sources is the castle

00:04:52.660 doctrine. A man's home is his castle. Not even the king or queen can enter a man's house without cause 0.94

00:05:00.100 or without warning. So the idea of no-knock raids by police, that's been illegal for centuries.

00:05:05.840 Here's how the British court put it in 1604. The house of everyone is to him as his castle and

00:05:13.600 fortress, as well for his defense against injury and violence, as for his repose. So you can hide in

00:05:21.200 your house. You can be safe in your house. Or you can just sit around in your house. It is your castle.

00:05:27.080 Even the king himself cannot come in without justification. That's privacy, physical privacy.

00:05:32.980 But you also have the right to privacy about your life. You have the right to keep certain

00:05:37.140 confidences. That's ancient, too. You can even say it's connected to the law against

00:05:41.760 self-crimination, as in you can't be compelled to testify against yourself. You're allowed that

00:05:46.400 form of privacy. You have a common law form of privacy with your employees, if you're a boss.

00:05:53.720 Historically, husbands and wives can't be pitted against each other for reasons of privacy.

00:05:58.220 In a company, you owe each other a duty of privacy not to run out and tell the world your trade

00:06:04.520 secrets. These are ancient customs that have hardened into rights and laws over centuries,

00:06:11.060 over millennia even. Let me prove it to you. Here's a publication of the Statute of Westminster

00:06:17.860 of the Year 1275. You heard me right. It's almost a hundred years ago. This outlines what the king

00:06:27.900 himself has to do if he wants to enter another man's house, even to recover stolen property. I'm

00:06:35.460 going to read a bit. I love the language. Now, it wasn't actually even written in English in 1275. It

00:06:42.120 was written in Norman French. In this version we're looking at, you can see the French on the opposite

00:06:47.360 side of the page. I'm going to read the English, of course. It's still pretty old-timey. I'm just

00:06:52.540 going to read a little bit, just one line, because I want to tell you how ancient our rights of property

00:06:57.380 and privacy are. I'm quoting from chapter 17 of this ancient law. Let me just read this beautiful

00:07:03.540 old language for one minute, okay? Stay with me. The remedy, if the distress is impounded in a castle

00:07:09.640 or fortress. All right, bear with me. It is provided also that if any from henceforth take the beasts of

00:07:17.440 another and cause them to be driven into a castle or fortress, and there within the clothes of such 0.95

00:07:22.900 castle or fortress do withhold them against gage and pledges, whereupon the beasts be solemnly demanded

00:07:28.780 by the sheriff or by some other bailiff or the kings, at the suit of the plaintiff, the sheriff or bailiff

00:07:35.240 taking within the power of the shire or bailiwick, do assay to make replicant of the beasts that from 0.92

00:07:41.740 him that took them or from his lord or from other... I'm going to stop there, because that old-timey

00:07:46.720 English is a little bit hard to understand, but this is a chapter in that ancient law about how to deal

00:07:54.220 with cattle rustlers. Did you pick that up? If the beasts are taken into some other castle or people

00:08:00.220 who steal grain, that's what this chapter is about. You have to sue them, the word plaintiff, and then you

00:08:07.360 have to get the sheriff or the bailiff to go to the thief's castle to ask for them back. You can't just

00:08:13.960 break into his castle yourself, and the cops can't, the sheriff, they can't just break in either. They have

00:08:20.560 to ask first, and they have to have some rights to do so. I won't read the whole thing, because it's

00:08:26.980 really tough English, but it's sort of wonderful, and it's almost a millennium old. And of course,

00:08:32.640 it's based on much older laws and much older customs still, probably going back to Romans.

00:08:40.560 Property and privacy, the two things being balanced here in this ancient law.

00:08:45.380 They're essential to civilization, especially Western civilization, especially to Anglo and 1.00

00:08:53.740 Christian civilization. We are not slaves in the West. We are not serfs. England has had a king for

00:09:00.420 many centuries, but the king's power was limited. Imagine that the lowliest peasant had the legal

00:09:06.300 right to stop even the king himself from just walking into his hut. And the king himself proclaimed

00:09:12.220 this law limiting himself. How different from other more terrifying places to live. Name me any other

00:09:18.000 place you would rather have lived if you were alive a thousand years ago. Maybe you'd prefer to be a

00:09:24.340 peasant in an Aztec tyranny. Really? Maybe you'd prefer China, where Genghis Khan mowed down the population 0.94

00:09:31.580 in North China from 50 million in the census of the year 1195 to 8.5 million in the census 40 years later.

00:09:40.700 Can you imagine that? What? Perhaps you prefer the slavery of Arabia. You tell me a better place 1.00

00:09:45.920 to live than England a thousand years ago. It wasn't the natural wealth of England that made

00:09:50.820 it great. I suppose it was lucky to have been built on an island of coal, but coal's value was not known

00:09:55.460 until centuries later in the Industrial Revolution. But there's coal in a hundred countries. There's timber

00:10:01.120 and fish and oil and gold in a hundred countries. The reason England and the United Kingdom and the

00:10:05.860 British Empire ruled the world wasn't luck and it wasn't cruelty. It was the very rule of law that

00:10:12.680 lived for centuries before it was even written down. Property and privacy and the rule of law

00:10:20.620 and limited government and freedom. And now look at these crazy world economic form globalists

00:10:27.080 who hate the UK, obviously, even though its days as an empire are over. There are no more colonies.

00:10:34.000 You know, it's funny. Barack Obama particularly hated the British and sent the bust of Winston

00:10:38.600 Churchill back to the UK because Obama's father, Barack Obama Sr., was a communist from Kenya who

00:10:46.000 resented their colonial history. But so much of the world that benefits from those British gifts

00:10:52.780 resents it. I think the British are the tops. I say that statute of Westminster of 1275, it's a long

00:11:00.120 time ago, it sounds very ancient, and it was written in Norman French and I could barely speak it in

00:11:05.400 middle English. But I think that statute of Westminster from 1275, I think it would be the height of progress

00:11:12.660 for it to be applied as the law today in Afghanistan or Somalia, or even in terms of property rights and privacy,

00:11:22.600 in China. Don't you think? It's an improvement to those three places. So that's the ancient rights

00:11:31.900 that the World Economic Forum's global reset wants to destroy. I showed you the video just the other

00:11:37.740 day. Here's a refresher on their kooky video.

00:11:52.600 Thank you.

00:11:53.900 Thank you.

00:11:55.900 Thank you.

00:11:57.900 Thank you.

00:12:01.900 Thank you.

00:12:07.200 Thank you.

00:12:11.200 Thank you.

00:12:41.200 Thank you.

00:13:11.200 It's written by Ida Aukin, a World Economic Forum thinker and politician.

00:13:17.460 I'm going to read it to you.

00:13:18.280 Welcome to the year 2030.

00:13:21.440 Welcome to my city, or should I say, our city.

00:13:25.160 I don't own anything.

00:13:26.740 I don't own a car.

00:13:27.940 I don't own a house.

00:13:29.260 I don't own any appliances or any clothes.

00:13:34.040 Hang on. 0.99

00:13:34.400 Are you a slave, a naked slave? 0.99

00:13:37.820 You don't own your clothes. 0.92

00:13:39.260 Who owns your clothes? 0.91

00:13:41.000 Your clothes are not an expression of you.

00:13:43.500 You don't feel a connection to your clothes.

00:13:45.520 You don't see your clothes as part of you.

00:13:47.920 That's how you show the world who you are.

00:13:50.440 You don't own your clothes.

00:13:51.180 It might seem odd to you.

00:13:54.740 Yeah, it does, sister.

00:13:56.440 But it makes perfect sense for us in this city.

00:13:59.540 Everything you considered a product has now become a service.

00:14:03.500 We have access to transportation, accommodation, food, and all the things we need in our daily lives.

00:14:08.360 One by one, all these things became free.

00:14:10.620 So it ended up not making sense for us to own much.

00:14:16.560 What? 0.99

00:14:18.020 Nothing is free, you wicked liar. 1.00

00:14:21.420 Someone pays for everything. 0.99

00:14:22.900 Someone had to make everything.

00:14:24.660 Someone has to own everything.

00:14:26.060 It's the fruits of their labor.

00:14:27.480 That's a physical fact.

00:14:28.540 That's a legal fact.

00:14:29.260 That's a fact rooted in our very human nature.

00:14:31.440 If you don't own your clothes, can someone come up to you and theoretically just take them?

00:14:37.140 I just read to you how someone takes things back if you don't own them.

00:14:43.200 I read to you from the Statue of Westminster, 1275.

00:14:45.720 If you're saying you rent your clothes, what a bizarre idea.

00:14:51.020 Okay, if you're saying you just rent them, say so.

00:14:53.260 I suppose people do rent tuxedos or other unusual clothing that we wear once in the blue moon.

00:14:59.500 They're so expensive it doesn't make any sense to buy them.

00:15:01.580 All right.

00:15:02.240 But that's the exception that proves the rule.

00:15:04.100 And if you've ever rented a tux, and I don't think I've worn one in 25 years,

00:15:08.560 you know that the rental company absolutely owns them.

00:15:11.120 As you'll find out, if you fail to return them, you'll get a big charge on your credit card.

00:15:14.800 This is kooky stuff, but I want to read more because this is what Justin Trudeau is talking about.

00:15:19.520 This is his club, the World Economic Forum.

00:15:23.020 First, communication became digitized and free to everyone.

00:15:28.600 Huh?

00:15:29.700 You think it's free?

00:15:32.160 Sure, it's free.

00:15:33.100 Like, Facebook is free.

00:15:35.260 But how can Facebook be worth close to a trillion dollars in market capitalization if it's free?

00:15:42.460 How can Gmail be free if Google is worth more than a trillion dollars?

00:15:47.520 Well, because when you use free Facebook and free Twitter and free YouTube and free email,

00:15:52.960 don't you know that that's because you are what is being bought and sold?

00:15:58.880 You, your eyes, your ears, what you've seen and heard, what will be shown to you, what will be told to you.

00:16:06.280 And more valuable than any of that, everything about you, your likes and dislikes, your history,

00:16:11.160 your emotions and your moods, all of that will be owned by someone. 0.80

00:16:14.980 You may be foolish enough to think that no one owns anything, but that's just you who thinks that.

00:16:21.800 Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, they've never been worth more. 0.98

00:16:26.380 They've never owned more.

00:16:27.920 I'll read some more from this kook.

00:16:30.000 Then, when clean energy became free, things started to move quickly.

00:16:36.040 Transportation dropped dramatically in price.

00:16:38.840 It made no sense for us to own cars anymore, because we could call a driverless vehicle

00:16:43.400 or a flying car for longer journeys within minutes.

00:16:48.320 We started transporting ourselves in a much more organized and coordinated way

00:16:52.480 when public transport became easier, quicker and more convenient than the car.

00:16:56.540 When energy became free, how does that work?

00:17:01.480 Who pays for it then, to get it, to mine it?

00:17:06.560 You can't make wind turbines or solar panels without coal.

00:17:10.940 You know that, right?

00:17:12.080 You can't make steel without coal.

00:17:13.960 You need coal to get the iron ore hot enough.

00:17:18.400 There are not wind turbine factories that are powered by wind turbines.

00:17:22.660 You can't.

00:17:23.720 And the rare earth elements necessary for so much clean energy,

00:17:28.820 they're not really that clean, are they?

00:17:30.920 They have to be mined in horrific conditions, mainly, in China.

00:17:34.900 But forget about that statement.

00:17:36.660 Look at this.

00:17:38.000 We started transporting ourselves in a much more organized and coordinated way.

00:17:42.940 That's the thing, isn't it?

00:17:44.520 You will be organized.

00:17:46.360 You will be coordinated.

00:17:48.100 You will be directed.

00:17:49.400 You will be scheduled.

00:17:50.080 You will be told where you can and can't go, and when, and how, and most importantly, if at all.

00:17:56.180 Look at this dystopian blather.

00:17:57.660 No more homes.

00:17:58.660 No more families.

00:17:59.680 No more property.

00:18:00.760 Just ants in a colony.

00:18:03.500 In our city, we don't pay any rent.

00:18:06.260 Because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.

00:18:10.700 My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there.

00:18:18.800 What?

00:18:21.220 Someone's going to come into your living room and use it for a business meeting and maybe take your stuff since you don't own it.

00:18:27.180 Obviously, you don't have any kids.

00:18:28.960 You obviously don't value time just to be alone with your family.

00:18:32.160 I guess you have no right to exclude anyone.

00:18:35.620 Forget about that man's home is his castle business.

00:18:39.040 Imagine strangers coming into your very home because it's all free.

00:18:44.680 I'll read some more.

00:18:46.880 Once in a while, I will choose to cook for myself.

00:18:51.540 It is easy.

00:18:52.900 The necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door within minutes.

00:18:56.420 Since transport became free, we stopped having all those things stuffed into our home.

00:19:02.540 Why keep a pasta maker and a crepe cooker crammed into our cupboards?

00:19:06.860 We can just order them when we need them.

00:19:10.060 Really?

00:19:11.540 So you don't even want a pot or a pan because someone else will provide them.

00:19:16.320 Someone else will own them, I guess.

00:19:19.160 Someone else has never quite said who or where these things come from and on what terms you might be permitted to access it.

00:19:25.820 Do you think anything is free?

00:19:28.480 Maybe the things that are free are the things that cost the most.

00:19:32.340 And what if, I don't know, what are the odds that you just might be, what's the word again?

00:19:41.180 Deplatformed or canceled, what then?

00:19:44.500 Hey, I got a question.

00:19:45.900 Would Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, would they live this way too?

00:19:52.240 I'll read some more.

00:19:53.240 When AI, that's artificial intelligence, and robots took over so much of our work,

00:20:00.240 we suddenly had time to eat well, sleep well, and spend time with other people.

00:20:06.560 The concept of rush hour makes no sense anymore since the work that we do can be done at any time.

00:20:12.440 I don't really know if I would call it work anymore.

00:20:15.240 It's more like thinking time, creation time, and development time.

00:20:19.980 Really?

00:20:20.780 Really?

00:20:22.360 So who would deliver the pasta maker again?

00:20:25.440 Who would deliver that crepe cooker again?

00:20:28.260 Who would build anything?

00:20:29.360 Who would make anything?

00:20:31.480 We're all just sitting around using free stuff provided by some godlike patron.

00:20:36.820 Who?

00:20:37.340 And in return for what?

00:20:38.680 You know, I was in an amazing speech in the before times given by Peter Thiel, and he's

00:20:47.040 a tech giant.

00:20:48.060 He's the inventor of PayPal.

00:20:49.700 He's the first outside investor of Facebook.

00:20:51.880 Probably the closest thing to a freedom lover in Silicon Valley.

00:20:55.160 In fact, he left Silicon Valley because he's just trying to do politically stifling.

00:20:58.780 He literally moved cities.

00:20:59.740 Anyways, Peter Thiel said, what scientific breakthroughs have we actually had in the past 50 years?

00:21:05.800 We haven't been on the moon in 50 years.

00:21:07.580 Where's the breakthrough?

00:21:08.300 Where's the cured cancer yet?

00:21:09.900 Where are the flying cars?

00:21:11.600 I paraphrase.

00:21:12.760 And as to tech and smartphones, which is his area of excellence, he said smartphones are basically

00:21:18.900 a little distracting video game we play as we ride through the New York subway system

00:21:23.960 that was built 100 years ago.

00:21:25.920 That's what he said.

00:21:26.560 I was stunned to hear him say that.

00:21:27.880 We're entertaining ourselves.

00:21:29.860 We're numbing ourselves.

00:21:31.600 We're messaging each other.

00:21:34.720 That's what tech has done.

00:21:36.820 Where are the great builders?

00:21:38.120 Where are the great industrialists?

00:21:39.620 The people who gave us the modern world.

00:21:42.580 Well, the World Economic Forum has some thoughts on that.

00:21:46.560 For a while, everything was turned into entertainment, and people did not want to bother themselves with

00:21:53.160 difficult issues.

00:21:54.060 It was only at the last minute that we found out how to use all these new technologies for

00:22:01.380 better purposes than just killing time.

00:22:04.920 Really, but the World Economic Forum doesn't actually tell us what those purposes are, or

00:22:10.040 how they will work, or what was necessary.

00:22:12.580 Maybe they're talking about this bizarre ant colony life.

00:22:17.680 Maybe they're talking about, I don't know, just going to throw it out there.

00:22:22.220 Communism?

00:22:22.740 That's, I think, the closest thing we've heard described so far.

00:22:25.880 But let me show you the dark side here.

00:22:28.740 And this is the World Economic Forum.

00:22:30.640 Near the end, they say this.

00:22:32.240 Once, once in a while, I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy.

00:22:40.160 Nowhere I can go and not be registered.

00:22:44.520 I know that somewhere, everything I do, think, and dream of is recorded.

00:22:52.280 I just hope that nobody will use it against me.

00:22:57.680 All in all, it's a good life.

00:23:01.400 I swear that is their definition of the good life.

00:23:04.280 I swear I'm not making this up.

00:23:05.800 Google it for yourself.

00:23:06.860 Let me read the ending.

00:23:09.200 All in all, it's a good life, much better than the path we were on.

00:23:14.280 Really.

00:23:15.680 Where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.

00:23:19.420 We had all these terrible things happening.

00:23:22.220 Lifestyle diseases, climate change, refugee crisis, environmental degradation, 1.00

00:23:27.740 completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment.

00:23:33.500 We lost way too many people before we realized that we could do things differently.

00:23:38.440 What do you mean we lost people?

00:23:40.020 Is this some after the revolution talk now?

00:23:43.560 What are you talking about?

00:23:44.760 They never quite come out and say what they're doing differently or what their new way is.

00:23:50.800 Other than no property, no privacy.

00:23:53.740 Pretty clear on that, aren't they?

00:23:54.880 No property, no privacy.

00:23:56.260 No property, no privacy.

00:23:57.740 No jobs, no homes.

00:23:59.320 Everything is owned by someone else.

00:24:02.900 This is their best life they're offering you.

00:24:07.300 Listen again to Justin Trudeau.

00:24:08.860 And he tells you what the alternative is they're talking about.

00:24:13.460 Building back better means getting support to the most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum on reaching the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs.

00:24:24.460 Canada is here to listen and to help.

00:24:27.400 This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset.

00:24:30.840 This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change.

00:24:42.540 Yeah, I think that combination of big government control and big government spending matched with no local democracy and no capitalism.

00:24:49.700 I think that's called high-tech communism and globalism.

00:24:53.740 And I think that's Justin Trudeau's plan.

00:24:59.560 Stay with us for more on this.

00:25:12.680 Welcome back.

00:25:13.700 Well, this whole great reset using the pandemic as an opportunistic crisis, that sounds shocking.

00:25:22.220 That sounds like something of an internet conspiracy theory.

00:25:26.540 Oh, that can't be true.

00:25:28.280 But when you actually see Justin Trudeau say it himself, in his role as prime minister, on behalf of our country, that clip was actually from a United Nations press conference,

00:25:40.380 you realize maybe the inmates are running the asylum.

00:25:43.560 And that's the madness here.

00:25:45.860 A conspiracy theory is often hidden.

00:25:48.320 You don't know the facts.

00:25:49.540 You're speculating.

00:25:50.420 Did Jeffrey Epstein kill himself or was he killed?

00:25:54.560 We don't actually know for 100% sure what the truth is.

00:25:59.200 So speculation fills the void.

00:26:00.780 But here, there's no guessing.

00:26:03.620 Trudeau himself said it.

00:26:05.880 Joining us now via Skype from Winnipeg is our friend Spencer Fernando from SpencerFernando.com,

00:26:11.120 a great critic who saw this videotape and did an excellent commentary on it.

00:26:16.340 Spencer, great to see you again.

00:26:17.280 Welcome back to the show.

00:26:18.820 Yeah, good to talk to you.

00:26:19.620 Hey, Spencer, I've always said to people who indulge in actual conspiracy theories, I've said, listen, I understand your skepticism, your hyper skepticism.

00:26:29.560 Even a little bit of paranoia these days is probably wise.

00:26:33.620 But the real scandals are just lying right out there in public.

00:26:37.320 This was not a secret recording.

00:26:40.500 This was not a hidden camera on Trudeau.

00:26:42.840 He was saying this at a public press conference involving the UN.

00:26:46.900 That's what's so crazy about it, don't you think?

00:26:50.980 Yeah, it's interesting.

00:26:52.020 You know, I think, you know, I'm sure there's a lot of people not too happy with the fact that he got so much attention for talking about that.

00:26:59.200 That's probably not what they're wanting.

00:27:01.080 But again, you know, to the the brazenness with which he's basically admitting, you know, I mean, this has been terrible for everybody in the country.

00:27:07.620 You know, tens of thousands of deaths in Canada, of course, many more deaths around the world, the economy being absolutely devastated.

00:27:14.060 People can't see their families.

00:27:15.660 But you know what?

00:27:16.220 It's a great opportunity for us to do some things we really wanted to do but couldn't get away with before.

00:27:20.500 And it's just it's tone deaf and it's arrogant and it really shows somebody who really, you know, seems to think that he's totally above accountability.

00:27:28.780 Spencer, what what I find interesting about Trudeau is that going back even to right after he became prime minister in 2015, one of his first interviews was with The New York Times.

00:27:42.500 And that's where he laid out his globalist philosophy.

00:27:46.880 He said there's no core identity for Canadians.

00:27:49.900 We don't really have a distinct identity, which is quite odd.

00:27:53.860 I mean, that's the opposite of what his father would say.

00:27:56.200 I have a theory, Spencer, that when Justin Trudeau is speaking to a global audience, he sort of forgets that he's supposed to be the Canadian prime minister and he's like trying out for globalist mascot or something.

00:28:10.580 It's often when he's talking to the foreign press that he gets the the weirdest.

00:28:15.660 I think he might have even forgotten that Canadians were watching him as he talked about this global reset.

00:28:22.780 I don't know. He seems to do it the most when he's talking to foreign outlets.

00:28:27.580 Yeah, I think it's two things. It's one that's foreign outlets, but it's also when he seems comfortable, which is when he seems to reveal what he actually believes.

00:28:35.300 So, I mean, with the comments, you know, we saw recently, you know, I've said before and not even as a criticism, but just I think Trudeau should go work for the United Nations.

00:28:44.000 I think he'd be much happier there. I think Canada would be better off. It would be a win win for everybody.

00:28:48.540 He can stop being prime minister and go do the job. It seems he really wants.

00:28:51.860 But also, you know, if you look at, you know, the comments he's made when he's comfortable to come to mind first, the one where he talked about admiring China's basic dictatorship.

00:29:02.160 That was at a liberal fundraiser. And right when he said it, you could tell that he knew he made a mistake because he said, you know, it's the country he most admires.

00:29:10.180 But then Stephen Harper would love to have that kind of power. Right. He tried to throw back on Harper.

00:29:16.040 And then you had, I think, was it maybe a year or so ago where there were some indigenous activists there talking about mercury poisoning?

00:29:23.300 And that was also a liberal fundraiser. And he just arrogantly dismissed them and said, thank you for your donation.

00:29:28.160 So when he's when he's really comfortable, I think that's when we see the real Trudeau, not not the kind of mask he puts on with his his drama skills.

00:29:36.000 That's a great point. I think he does it when he's comfortable. He does it when he's trying to impress people, impress, like you say, the U.N.

00:29:46.580 Maybe he sees himself as a future secretary general. I think he'd love it, by the way.

00:29:51.440 You know, accountability, lots of travel, lots of schmoozing, not no accountability.

00:29:57.540 I think he'd love it. I think he was actually quite hurt when he didn't get the U.N. Security Council seat.

00:30:03.280 He spent countless Canadian tax dollars lobbying for.

00:30:07.060 But the one thing you said at the beginning of our interview that maybe the liberals weren't thrilled that this video went viral.

00:30:13.200 I'm not so sure about that, because I think if you press Trudeau, Catherine McKenna, Stephen Gilbeau, Bill Morneau, if you he's out of there now.

00:30:24.260 But look what he wants to go to some global global governance.

00:30:26.980 If you look at, I guess, what I would call the brain trust of the liberal party, I put Chrystia Freeland in there.

00:30:33.260 They all share this view that we've got to be chummier with China, that the U.N. is the center of the action. 0.91

00:30:39.960 We have to obey the Paris global warming scheme, which, you know, Paris, obviously a foreign city in a foreign country.

00:30:47.000 I think they're all actually sort of down for it.

00:30:49.940 They're all for open borders immigration. 0.85

00:30:51.640 They're all for submitting to what the U.N. says about global warming.

00:30:55.720 I think it was sort of shocking to hear it said so concisely.

00:30:59.180 But I actually don't think they're shy about it.

00:31:01.540 I mean, they just don't usually say it so bluntly.

00:31:03.760 But I can't think of a single senior liberal who would say, no, no, no, no, no, we're not for that.

00:31:08.900 I think that's sort of what they are for.

00:31:10.760 Yeah, I think one of the big problems is, you know, they're looking to all these institutions outside the country, but most of those institutions don't have much credibility.

00:31:20.840 I mean, for example, I was actually glad to see Bob Ray a few days ago say that China should be investigated for genocide by the United Nations.

00:31:29.460 But then you look and say, OK, well, who's on the U.N. Human Rights Council?

00:31:34.480 And it's China and it's a bunch of other dictatorships, you know, non-democratic countries.

00:31:39.120 Basically, the U.N. Human Rights Council right now is the group of countries with the worst human rights record in the world.

00:31:45.320 So if you're constantly looking to foreign institutions that have no credibility, then the question is, you know, what's the end game?

00:31:52.020 What's the real point?

00:31:52.760 And I think, you know, I wrote yesterday for the Post Millennial how it's you can't really have global governance and a democracy.

00:32:00.120 It's really not compatible.

00:32:01.360 A democracy depends on you being able to vote.

00:32:04.040 And then, you know, even if you don't win the election, someone in your country wins.

00:32:07.420 And then that person implements policy and that party implements policy based on what Canadians voted for and what Canadians want.

00:32:15.120 So if you have global governance, then democracy kind of becomes a sham because, oh, you're voting and parties are switching and you've got a new leader.

00:32:21.140 But the decisions aren't really being made at the local level or even the national level.

00:32:25.360 It's being made somewhere far away by people you don't control and people you didn't vote for.

00:32:29.520 And I think that's really the deeper issue here is that you have a government claiming to be democratic, but then wants to kind of submit all our power to foreign institutions that Canadians don't get to vote for.

00:32:40.520 Yeah.

00:32:40.840 I think that's one of the reasons the Brits voted for a Brexit, which still hasn't happened 100%.

00:32:46.840 They're deep states against it.

00:32:48.040 Hey, let me ask you a question.

00:32:49.300 I was poking around yesterday to look at, I mean, the Great Reset is one phraseology, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030.

00:32:57.020 There's all these big names.

00:32:59.480 And as I pointed out on the show yesterday, Stephen Harper signed on to Agenda 2030 in his final months as prime minister.

00:33:10.940 And I guess what I'm saying is, I'm frustrated and I want to put this on Justin Trudeau because it was his comments we just were all fascinated by.

00:33:20.780 But I don't see a lot of anti-globalist, anti-world government talk from conservatives.

00:33:26.760 And I'm not looking for someone to sound like Alex Jones.

00:33:29.720 I'm just looking for someone to be a skeptic that our policy should be drafted in Switzerland or New York City by non-Canadians. 0.99

00:33:38.740 They don't even have to be rough about it.

00:33:41.120 They don't even have to be pizzazzy like Nigel Farage.

00:33:44.320 I'm just talking about someone who's saying, you know what, we can solve our own problems.

00:33:48.380 I don't, Stephen Harper was a bit of a globalist himself.

00:33:52.100 And Aaron O'Toole, I think so.

00:33:55.020 And I'm looking for a champion.

00:33:56.800 I mean, Maxime Bernier's hard line on this stuff.

00:33:58.940 And I like Maxime Bernier.

00:34:00.380 But his party has no seats in parliament and it's in single digits in the polls.

00:34:06.400 Where are the conservative senators, MPs?

00:34:09.240 Where's Aaron O'Toole on this stuff?

00:34:11.700 Yeah, you know, I think we also remember, too, when I think Stephen Harper announced changes to, I think it was the eligibility for old age security in Canada.

00:34:21.660 And he did that in Switzerland, right?

00:34:23.640 He went to Davos and announced that there.

00:34:25.600 So, again, Trudeau is not the first Canadian prime minister to seemingly go to international audiences and talk about things that should be handled within Canada.

00:34:34.220 So that's a bit of an issue.

00:34:35.680 I think I would, and this is just guessing, but I would suspect a lot of backbench MPs in the Conservative Party have a lot of concerns about this.

00:34:42.520 And I'm sure right now they're hearing from their base about it.

00:34:45.740 I mean, I did a video a few days ago.

00:34:47.700 That's more, you know, more views I've ever gotten on any video I've done before.

00:34:51.600 So there's a lot of people who are concerned about this and a lot of people in the Conservative base who are concerned.

00:34:58.440 But I think you have a bit of a problem in the Conservatives as much as they may talk about, you know, supporting independent media.

00:35:04.820 I think they're still relatively concerned about what the establishment press thinks about them.

00:35:09.500 And I think they're worried that if they go against, you know, any of this stuff, or even if, as you say, they're just mild skeptics of it, they're going to get called conspiracy theorists.

00:35:17.380 So I think they need to be smart. They need to figure out a way to talk about it that's not going to, you know, turn off, you know, the average voter.

00:35:24.080 But I think they do need to start representing concerns, because I think if you polled Canadians, you'd find a lot of people are not happy about this.

00:35:30.020 And in a democratic country, you know, those people are supposed to have representation as well.

00:35:33.800 You know, I think one of the revelations from this little video where Trudeau was talking about the Great Reset is that he said the pandemic is the opportunity to seize.

00:35:48.800 And I think that that showed a little bit of bad faith, because that implied when we're talking about these restrictions because of the pandemic,

00:35:56.900 when we're talking about the lockdowns, when we're talking about debt and spending and new government programs,

00:36:03.100 there was an assumption, a good faith assumption that, OK, Trudeau, he may be misguided, but he's doing this to fix the pandemic problem.

00:36:10.600 But when Trudeau admitted in that video that he was using the crisis as an opportunity for his big spending globalist socialist schemes,

00:36:19.140 I think that was like an admission that when he looks into the camera and does his best dramatic act or voice and says,

00:36:26.840 hey, guys, we have to stay locked down, that it's a trick that I feel like he gave the game away there.

00:36:33.360 And he confirmed our worst suspicions that Trudeau didn't really mean his blather about the pandemic.

00:36:40.420 He was just using it as an easy way to get other things done that we would have rejected.

00:36:45.940 I think that's why that video was so powerful.

00:36:47.800 Trudeau sort of admitted that all his talk about the pandemic has a collateral purpose.

00:36:53.080 I'm sure he does care about the pandemic, but he's not willing to let a crisis go by.

00:36:58.940 He wants to seize the crisis.

00:37:00.900 I think that's what was shocking about the video is Trudeau said, yeah, we're going to use the pandemic to build back better

00:37:07.180 and do things we couldn't have done otherwise.

00:37:09.200 That, I think, is what's shocking.

00:37:10.540 What do you think?

00:37:11.860 Yeah, he seemed a little too happy and excited about it.

00:37:14.360 I think it's the tone, really, not just the words, but the tone that put off a lot of people.

00:37:18.420 He seemed like, man, this is great.

00:37:19.700 This is a great chance for us to do all these great things.

00:37:22.200 Meanwhile, I mean, it's tons of health damage to the country and economic damage.

00:37:26.320 I mean, it's terrible for people.

00:37:28.000 But, you know, it's also, it's kind of felt a bit like the twilight zone, really.

00:37:30.920 I mean, I did my video criticizing Trudeau's comments.

00:37:33.260 And then I had people calling me a COVID denier, which is very interesting because I was one of the most, I would actually say, hardline people when this was first happening.

00:37:42.020 When I saw what was happening in China, when I saw what could be happening in Canada, I said, look, we need to shut things down. 0.98

00:37:48.060 You know, we need to lock down at the beginning.

00:37:49.900 This is right at the beginning.

00:37:51.560 We need to shut the borders down. 0.58

00:37:53.160 We need to get control of this.

00:37:54.300 Can't be letting a bunch of flights into the country.

00:37:56.120 We need to be screening people when they come in.

00:37:58.440 And as I was saying that, most people were like, no, it's not a big deal.

00:38:01.000 It's not a big problem at all.

00:38:02.820 The health officials and experts and politicians said, no, it's all about stigma.

00:38:06.420 We don't want to stigmatize people.

00:38:07.740 We're not going to do anything at the border.

00:38:09.400 You know, Patty Heide said border controls would cause harm.

00:38:12.460 So when a lot of people in the government were taking it, were not taking it seriously, I was saying this is going to be a big problem.

00:38:18.060 We need to nip it in the bud, which is what the successful countries did.

00:38:20.940 They, you know, Taiwan didn't have to do many lockdowns at home because they got it before we really got into the country.

00:38:27.160 But now all of a sudden, now that I'm saying things like, you know, maybe we shouldn't be letting the government tell us which holidays we're allowed to have.

00:38:33.120 Maybe we shouldn't have politicians locking us down and controlling everything we do.

00:38:37.260 People say, oh, you're a COVID denier.

00:38:38.920 Oh, you don't believe it's a real threat.

00:38:40.360 So it's been very odd.

00:38:41.720 And, you know, I think it's, you know, not to talk about conspiracies, but it seems like when the government's had an opportunity to stop it, they didn't.

00:38:49.800 And they chose to be politically correct.

00:38:51.980 And now it's become such a big problem.

00:38:53.860 And now they're able to use it to justify things that, to be honest, a year ago, we would never have considered any of this acceptable from the government.

00:39:02.700 So, you know, I'm not saying I don't at all think they planned it.

00:39:06.300 I don't think they purposely let it in.

00:39:07.900 But I think they're certainly, as you say, seizing an opportunity to do things that we would not have put up with before.

00:39:13.440 And it kind of shows you that's really what they wanted to get away with all along.

00:39:16.500 Yeah, I mean, as Barack Obama's former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, says, never let a crisis go to waste.

00:39:23.020 I think that's Trudeau's motto, too.

00:39:24.980 Hey, great to see you, Spencer Fernando.

00:39:26.780 Before we say goodbye, give us a look ahead.

00:39:30.400 Are you working on any projects now?

00:39:32.200 Is there something we should look forward to at spencerfernando.com?

00:39:36.220 Yeah, I'll probably be writing about Andrew Scheer hiring his sister-in-law.

00:39:41.040 Again, you know, I tell people, you know, I call it like it is.

00:39:44.820 And I'm going to I would totally criticize Justin Trudeau if he did it.

00:39:48.540 And I'm going to criticize the conservatives when they do it.

00:39:51.180 You know, it's not about criticizing Trudeau because he's Justin Trudeau.

00:39:53.900 It's about criticizing him because of his actions.

00:39:56.380 So if the conservatives do similar things, then they need to be criticized, I think, as well.

00:40:00.560 You are exactly right.

00:40:01.780 And that's why you are a trustworthy, independent journalist.

00:40:05.960 You're not in the tank for any party or another.

00:40:08.360 And I really respect that about you.

00:40:09.800 I know you're a member of the Independent Press Gallery, too.

00:40:12.280 And I think it shows.

00:40:13.280 So congratulations on your outstanding video about this great reset.

00:40:17.420 Look forward to your piece on Andrew Scheer hiring his sister-in-law.

00:40:21.000 And keep up the fight out there.

00:40:22.520 We love we love to see it.

00:40:24.100 I get your emails all the time.

00:40:25.760 Folks, if you're not already subscribing, you got to do it.

00:40:28.940 Spencer is one of a handful of independent journalists.

00:40:31.140 Go to spencerfernando.com.

00:40:33.660 I really admire how fast you are on the news, too.

00:40:37.380 I can't even believe it.

00:40:39.300 You've got an eye on the news 24 hours, it seems.

00:40:43.260 I don't even know how you do it, but I congratulate you.

00:40:45.080 Thanks for being with us here today.

00:40:46.900 All right.

00:40:47.200 Take care.

00:40:47.720 All right.

00:40:48.020 There you have it.

00:40:48.420 Spencer Fernand.

00:40:49.760 Stay with us.

00:40:50.480 More hours.

00:40:50.800 Hey, welcome back on my show last night.

00:41:03.980 Gabriel writes, keep shining a light on this stuff.

00:41:06.660 People will wake up.

00:41:07.540 Well, you know, the media, what's crazy about this is, as I was saying that, Spencer, this

00:41:14.640 is out there in the open.

00:41:15.380 This was not a hidden camera.

00:41:17.200 This was true to a press conference.

00:41:19.040 Why didn't the media party cover it?

00:41:20.520 Is it too weird?

00:41:21.760 They agree with it?

00:41:22.820 I don't know.

00:41:25.120 Maybe they say, Justin, don't say the quiet part out loud.

00:41:30.200 Mike writes, I'm very thankful for Rebel News.

00:41:32.580 People I know in real life say you're full of nothing but hate.

00:41:35.760 You are not.

00:41:36.460 You are filled with love for this country and are willing to fight for it.

00:41:40.020 Well, listen, I don't know about who says we're full of hate, but I look at our YouTube

00:41:43.280 videos and on our average YouTube video, the like to dislike ratio, it's about 99%.

00:41:49.620 I'm not saying there aren't people who hate us.

00:41:52.020 I know there are.

00:41:53.440 But we have 1.4 million subscribers.

00:41:56.960 And I think it's because people want to hear the other side of the story and they want

00:42:01.160 to protect what they love about Canada.

00:42:02.760 And we're interested in the world too.

00:42:04.520 So yeah, thanks for watching.

00:42:09.000 On our newest Rebel, John writes, welcome, Kim Clay.

00:42:13.280 Kim Kay, sorry, that's Kimberly Klasick.

00:42:15.520 Delighted to see you here.

00:42:16.540 Keep up the good work.

00:42:17.260 I was so excited when she joined our team.

00:42:20.460 And she's so busy.

00:42:22.600 So I don't know exactly how many videos she's going to do, but I hope it's at least a couple

00:42:25.960 a week.

00:42:28.640 What do you think of that bizarre essay by that Danish politician for World Economic Forum?

00:42:35.020 I just can't get over that.

00:42:36.860 That's what they are proposing.

00:42:39.280 That's really who they say they are.

00:42:44.400 I think we should take them seriously, don't you?

00:42:46.680 All right, folks, that's the end of today's show.

00:42:48.740 Until tomorrow.

00:42:50.180 On behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night.

00:42:54.020 Keep fighting for freedom.

00:42:54.960 Keep fighting for freedom.

Rebel News Podcast - November 18, 2020

“Welcome to the year 2030”： More questions about Justin Trudeau’s Great Reset

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript