Red Ice TV - March 26, 2022


How Jewish Activism Transformed The West, Who Benefits From Ukraine-Russia War? - Kevin MacDonald


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per Minute

178.83118

Word Count

11,524

Sentence Count

9

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

In this episode of the show, we talk about a recent paper that was published in the journal Philosophia that failed to explain the role of jewish influence in American immigration policy in the US, and the controversy surrounding it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 welcome ladies and gentlemen thank you for tuning in red eyes tv i'm henrik always a pleasure seeing
00:00:29.160 you thank you for spending some of your time with us today our guest today is kevin mcdonald we are
00:00:33.840 going to talk about well at least initially about a recent paper that was published this back in
00:00:39.020 january actually but it was by an israeli-based academic journal called filosofia if i pronounced
00:00:44.760 that correct and the title of the paper was the default hypothesis fails to explain jewish
00:00:51.260 influence and of course if you're not familiar with kevin's work i think most of you are but if
00:00:54.280 you're not uh he's behind the occidental observer author of culture of critique and many other titles
00:00:59.340 as well uh kevin welcome back to the show good to see you hey it's great to be here henry always a
00:01:05.440 pleasure kevin thank you for taking some time uh so let's begin with this then we we talked about this
00:01:09.660 offline a little bit and just the kind of absurd nature to this you know and you know this as well
00:01:15.520 as anybody when it comes to this topic that the problem is to actually manage to address something
00:01:20.420 both in a serious but also like in an academic way that people take seriously because otherwise it
00:01:25.440 just goes down the the name calling route uh it goes off into tangents which is irrelevant
00:01:30.940 to the academic study that you've made of this topic and of course it is taboo right we we recognize
00:01:36.840 that and that is for a specific reason but let me begin with this kevin let me read the abstract
00:01:41.700 to the paper here real quick the role of jewish activism in the transformative changes that have
00:01:47.700 occurred in the west in recent decades continue to be controversial here i respond to several
00:01:52.720 issues putatively related to jewish influence particularly the default hypothesis that jewish
00:01:58.920 iq and urban residency explain jewish influence and the role of the jewish community in enacting
00:02:04.680 the 1965 immigration law in the united states other issues include jewish ethnocentrism and intermarriage
00:02:12.420 and whether diaspora jews are hypocritical in their attitudes on immigration to israel
00:02:17.020 versus the united states and it continues the post-world war ii era saw the emergence of a new
00:02:23.040 substantially jewish elite in america that exerted influence on a wide range of issues that formed a
00:02:29.720 virtual consensus among jewish activists and the organized jewish community including immigration
00:02:35.200 civil rights and the secularization of american culture jewish activism in the pro-immigration
00:02:40.860 movement involved intellectual movements denying the importance of race in human affairs
00:02:45.960 establishing staffing and funding anti-restrictionist organizations recruiting prominent non-jews to
00:02:52.940 anti-restrictionist organizations rejecting the ethnic status quo as a goal because of fear of a
00:02:59.240 relatively homogenous white majority and leadership in congress and the executive branch so take us
00:03:06.440 through this a little bit kevin here of uh the paper came about of course as a reply uh to uh to uh
00:03:12.980 kofnas right uh the the other guy i know you guys have been going back and forth on twitter and
00:03:16.820 there's been uh debates there uh but he published a paper called the anti-jewish narrative and then you
00:03:21.800 did this as a reply to that and it did not be published as i said by this um israeli-based uh academic
00:03:27.900 journal philosophia so tell us how that came about and and do you know why they accepted it at least at
00:03:32.400 first right and then it was some back and forth yeah yeah kofnas's uh paper came out in like about a
00:03:39.280 year ago maybe a little more than a year ago and you know my first thought was because you know the
00:03:45.160 first time this happened when he published an article in 2018 and i made these long replies but i
00:03:51.760 couldn't get them published anywhere in in the uh the journal that published his article wouldn't
00:03:57.140 consider any reply from me um he had an article in colette saying the same stuff this was in 2018
00:04:05.580 and again they wouldn't accept a reply from me there was another one like that and um but this time i
00:04:13.520 just decided well i'll just ask uh and so i sent an email to philosophia or heavy and pronounce it
00:04:20.300 and um they said okay yeah submit submit a reply uh so i worked on this thing and uh it went through
00:04:30.180 two rounds of of review it means an academic paper and the common thing for academic papers to send
00:04:35.640 them out to so-called peer review or they send them out to other professors and they they give their
00:04:41.680 opinions on it and thanks so i went through that they had some criticisms and i answered them and lo and
00:04:47.640 behold the editor accepted it uh and so then it got published um on january 1st of this year
00:04:55.940 and immediately there was a big controversy that came out and they were going after the editor saying
00:05:01.820 how could anybody ever publish this thing and they said they went crazy about it and so right now on the
00:05:08.560 website there's this sort of warning label saying that this paper is gotten very controversial and so
00:05:16.140 we're going to send it out for further review so they did send that out and i got the reviews
00:05:22.800 about two weeks ago and they were extremely hostile all three of them three reviews big surprise
00:05:30.780 and they gave me one week to reply and i i begged for a for one more week so i get a little time on this
00:05:37.580 uh and so i i sent in my reply uh last week about a week ago and i haven't heard back from them on that
00:05:45.100 but uh they were extremely hostile i mean just calling me all kinds of names and i didn't think
00:05:52.400 they have substantive criticism i mean i mean the part the problem with the second round of reviews was
00:05:57.840 they basically didn't have any sums of objections what they would do is simply rephrase my ideas in a
00:06:07.120 very invidious you know negative crazy sounding way of conspiracy theory you know yeah yeah i saw
00:06:13.480 how they rephrase it like this is what kevin means or this is what he talks about you know yeah
00:06:17.900 and uh and so that i don't know we'll see what they do with it uh yeah but um the jury's out on
00:06:26.400 that but anyway they had the paper itself uh koftas has this idea that iq uh jews are smarter than the
00:06:33.500 average and so you expect them to be more common among intellectuals and that explains why jews are
00:06:38.640 so influential um and i deny that i don't know um first of all uh as i say there that if you look
00:06:48.800 at the activism uh in in the in the uh the main issue really in the paper is the 1965 immigration law
00:06:56.740 showing because that's the only issue that really would you know defeat the cultural critique it
00:07:03.340 would it would really be a problem for me if they could get over that but the other thing is just
00:07:10.220 just looking at iq isn't enough because you jews are smart so i have a little section uh on it uh
00:07:17.300 beginning oh where is it uh yeah it's like uh the section the first section i guess
00:07:24.700 where i talk about uh the default hypothesis and um point out that that jewish iq simply not enough
00:07:34.080 that that the for any level of iq they're going to be made they're going to be more white non-jews
00:07:39.120 than jews so you take 120 you know even though they're more jews percentage-wise at that jews only
00:07:45.740 two and a half three percent of the population so for any given level of iq they're going to be
00:07:51.500 more white people at that at that i at that level of iq or you take 130 140 whatever it is
00:07:58.800 and you're going to be more white people at that level so you can't explain jewish influence
00:08:03.260 simply say the jews are smarter because they're they're not really we we you know they're they're
00:08:08.240 as many they're they're more white european americans who uh have equally high iq for any level
00:08:17.560 you want to take for iq so that just doesn't explain it um and uh yeah i've got another other
00:08:27.040 other points there that that oftentimes that this really angered a lot of the reviewers especially
00:08:33.140 in the second round there that i would say that that the jewish movements will recruit non-jews
00:08:38.160 as a sort of window dressing you know i use the term window dressing actually in cultural critique in
00:08:44.460 chapter three and i have specific examples of that and i was actually an example of that back
00:08:50.180 when i was a student they had a big anti-war rally i was on the left i knew all these jewish guys
00:08:55.000 roommates and the whole thing uh and they asked me to give a talk on how this guy from a small town
00:09:01.360 in wisconsin came to be you know involved in the anti-war movement and i was there to be sort of the goy
00:09:09.660 who had his head screwed on right right let's uh become a leftist so anyway um yeah because usually
00:09:22.060 i hear this kevin that is like well you know if uh if jews were you know influential and stuff we
00:09:27.820 they would be you know the president or you know like kind of topical things like that you know
00:09:32.920 but as an example you just break down and then because in our day and age right we're
00:09:39.000 we're super obsessed or not us but like the culture in general unfortunately uh about percentages and
00:09:45.780 like how many people are represented based on the numbers and stuff like i mean now we're getting an
00:09:50.320 overdrive because we're living in an anti-white age so for example despite the fact that uh blacks are
00:09:55.220 only about 12 percent of the u.s population in tv media advertisements and stuff they're like way
00:10:00.100 overrepresented right but like look at something like biden's cabinet for example right uh jews uh
00:10:06.020 severely overrepresented in biden's cabinet one percent of the population but about 50 percent
00:10:10.660 uh of the cabinet i think wanted to have have quit but there's some new ones that come come in and
00:10:15.100 stuff right that's still like okay well why is there such an overrepresentation then if everything
00:10:20.040 is supposed to be uh you know according to how the number pars out the percentages right how do you how
00:10:25.880 do you explain just because yeah you don't have a president doesn't mean you don't have
00:10:29.220 influential and powerful people in positions of power uh that can uh advocate whether that be for
00:10:34.460 uh themselves as a group or whether there's for a specific you know political objective right
00:10:39.560 that's right yeah the uh the fact is jews are widely represented in pretty much any position of
00:10:47.860 real power in this country um if you look at the media massive overrepresentation you look at the
00:10:54.260 academic world and i have another paper on that which i actually referenced in this paper um and
00:11:01.100 and what what i argue there is that that jews are uh were especially in the 1960s came to the fore in
00:11:07.960 the academic world and they were much to the left of the of the average professor at that time
00:11:13.340 but that's exactly the time when uh with the rise of jews in the academic world especially in the
00:11:20.460 in the most elite colleges like the ivy league universities harvard yale princeton all of them
00:11:25.440 you go the academic world's a top-down institution you know the the the professors at harvard had much
00:11:33.440 more influence than professors down the line in fact the so the professors at harvard and other ivy league
00:11:40.700 schools they train you know graduate students in these other areas their their phd students go to
00:11:46.360 berkeley or university of wisconsin or university of michigan or something like that and then at the
00:11:51.840 university of wisconsin those those graduate students go down to the lower level the wisconsin state
00:11:57.480 university or california state or whatever and and so it trickles down like that and so academic
00:12:05.620 was very hierarchical and so you when you take over the top the top level you sort of got it under
00:12:12.000 control and of course that during the 1960s was the time when you established all these ethnic studies
00:12:18.740 departments uh when when uh sociology became you know it was liberal but then it became radical
00:12:25.960 you know and it started being really influenced by marx uh i was in philosophy you could see the
00:12:32.360 the transition at the time i i was an undergraduate in philosophy and i went to graduate school in
00:12:37.460 philosophy and um i actually talk about uh well i talked about that in an article i wrote that that
00:12:44.080 you know you could see the transformation of the department that almost all the the hires of the
00:12:51.500 the young professors that were hired were jews in the term of the department of jewish and um it was uh
00:12:59.680 really an interesting sociological thing and then i'll just never forget watching one of these older
00:13:06.020 you know non-jewish guys who just retired you know and he's at the medical center and probably
00:13:11.360 you know not in good health and everything and i just sort of felt sorry but they did was like the
00:13:16.940 the changing of the guard right yeah now you had these young jews and they were all on the left and
00:13:23.060 they were radical and they were you know they came from from the best institutions just like i was
00:13:28.420 saying you know if you're an oxford phd you go to the university of wisconsin uh you know as you
00:13:35.020 could be a professor or harvard you know and that kind of thing yeah exactly so so if you can
00:13:42.720 summarize for us how you think what what you think is possible how how does that how does that work
00:13:49.300 right what happened there if you can you boil that down for newcomers to your work and stuff like
00:13:54.120 that like that would just i i guess get to the essence both of your paper of course but also
00:13:58.100 kind of your the main study that you've done over the years right so how do we how do we explain it
00:14:01.840 kevin how do you explain sorry basically how do we explain that so many jews ended up in the position
00:14:08.800 that they did right they it's it's obviously uh down to the thing of of ethnic interest right that
00:14:13.940 they have a group interest here which is about advancing their own group and their own interest of
00:14:18.600 the group right that's right i mean and the the whole thesis of culture critique is that you know
00:14:23.440 iq is important and they they are smarter you know on average but only on average and again if you look
00:14:29.820 at the numbers um they're far more non-jews than jews and an iq save over 140 i came up like seven to
00:14:38.080 one so you can't explain this to jewish uh by by iq but you can certainly start to explain it with
00:14:44.960 ethnic networking and um that what that means is that you you promote other jews and you you cite
00:14:53.440 them you you view them as leaders and gurus uh so one of my the ideas in a culture critique is is
00:15:00.180 what i call the the uh guru phenomenon where you have a guru like freud or franz boas or horkheimer
00:15:09.340 or the frankfurt school um these people were were you know central figures that were looked up to
00:15:16.500 and idolized trotsky's a good example and and they were um uh you know then seen as by by by other
00:15:26.380 jewish intellectuals or political activists as they would sort of gather around and and soak up his
00:15:32.380 wisdom uh and so there was a all this mutual um reinforcement mutual ethnic networking mutual
00:15:41.020 uh patting on the back right yeah and uh mutual hiring you know so you could see that in wisconsin
00:15:49.780 you know once once the jews got in there they started hiring their own people and uh pretty soon
00:15:55.460 the whole department's transformed and um that that that sort of writ large is what happened i think
00:16:03.500 to the merit the academic establishment but then when it comes to media it's a little different because
00:16:08.120 there so much of it is involves ownership but even even in 1930s jews had a very disproportionate
00:16:15.660 ownership of ownership of the media you know the uh new york times uh the uh nbc uh broadcasting and
00:16:24.380 uh cbs then became jewish and all the big networks so the abc all you know so that by the 1950s i
00:16:32.060 mentioned this in the paper by the 1950s all the the big all the television networks when i grew up
00:16:39.160 where three networks exactly we didn't have cable or any of that stuff all three were owned by jews
00:16:44.760 and there was a big uh push after world war ii uh by frankfurt school people there's a great paper
00:16:52.580 by andrew joyce about this i mean something i overlooked pretty much but uh he got into how
00:16:58.860 these these jewish activists that were associated with the frankfurt school i you know definitely
00:17:04.180 recognize their names but they what they got into was really influencing the media and the basic
00:17:10.600 message was you know race does not exist it was the whole boss in anthropology that race does not
00:17:17.960 exist that the worst thing in the world is white people who are ethnocentric and if you are ethnocentric
00:17:23.720 it's a sign of some kind of pathology you know you had bad parent-child relationships you are
00:17:29.420 inadequate personality personality wise you're envious of other people or there are all kinds of
00:17:37.080 explanations that these people came up with uh and they're all nonsense they're not based on any kind
00:17:42.760 of data really um but they you know they satisfy jewish interests and the entire jewish community was much
00:17:51.480 to the left and even you know what whatever occupation you know jewish businessmen tend not to be
00:17:57.560 as radical as jewish sociology professors or something but they are to the left of non-jewish business
00:18:05.560 people and there's a big push now for for your sort of social responsibility in business and these
00:18:13.320 you know people like um uh the guy you know i guess named larry fink from blackstone black rock yeah
00:18:22.440 and and and um mark benioff salesforce they're like big big push for social responsibility
00:18:31.240 uh in business and so you know the the fact is now i mean when i was growing up businesses tend to be
00:18:37.720 conservative to the right of of the people as a whole but business has really been another area
00:18:45.240 that's been taken over by the left and uh so your big corporations coca-cola all is but all the big
00:18:53.080 internet companies social media uh all on the left um you know walt disney was when i was growing up
00:19:01.720 was uh was run by walt disney and he was very conservative he was probably an anti-semite
00:19:08.040 because because the jews tried to take away his his company many times right yeah but after he died
00:19:14.520 but guess what they ended up with it uh and it's been run by jews for a long time
00:19:18.840 and you know it's very liberal and now you look at you at the movies and stuff that disney puts out
00:19:27.160 they've you know they have some for children and some for adults and and all that but even even the
00:19:32.920 the uh the child the movie the cartoons directed at children are very much on the left when it comes to
00:19:38.600 race and white privilege and you know centering black people and all that kind of stuff so uh yeah our
00:19:46.840 world's been transformed and we have to understand that and and uh and what really gets me is that
00:19:52.680 some of my confidence comes along and oh it's like you you know and and and and that sort of explains it
00:19:58.040 i heard other people say oh it's modernism it's modernism oh yeah right i mean the world's been
00:20:05.160 into a modernist state where we have industrial cars you know pretty advanced technology even by say say
00:20:12.360 1940 when when uh you you had fascism in europe and and you had a very different culture in america
00:20:21.320 and very different uh attitudes i mean you have to remember america did pass the 1924 immigration law
00:20:29.320 that was very much biased towards northwestern europe was supposed to reflect the population the
00:20:36.040 percentage of the population as they existed in 1920 at first and then went down to 1890 so you know
00:20:44.920 when you think about the population united states in 1890 it was overwhelmingly northern european yeah
00:20:50.280 they did not want you know they certainly there was some concern about italian immigrants because they
00:20:56.920 were different they tended to come from the south of italy and that's where you see the the mafia and all
00:21:02.040 this sort of familism you know that that that uh really is not good and it's very different from northern european
00:21:09.800 that's a big thesis in my book on on on western family structure and everything um but the big problem
00:21:17.880 really was was eastern european jews they came from poland and other areas in eastern europe and uh they
00:21:24.920 were they were they were radicals they they were either especially you know marxists you know when the
00:21:31.320 soviet union was established in 1917 they were entirely on board you know i mean almost the entire american
00:21:41.160 jewish community was entirely on board with the with the balsamic revolution i mean it's no no surprise that
00:21:49.400 the atrocities the horrible the mass murders and torture and everything else that happened in the
00:21:55.880 first decades of the soviet union was completely covered up in the american media these people had
00:22:01.560 never heard about it it was it was uh covered up and and and the far left continued with the jewish
00:22:10.440 community uh if you look at the 1950s you know i grew up in the 1950s and you know you think of it as
00:22:16.360 this sort of golden age and it sort of was for me growing up because it was a really nice um peaceful
00:22:22.840 it seemed but under the surface there was this massive cultural battle going on and uh you know
00:22:29.640 joel mccarthy uh famously you know holding these hearings in washington uh he was a senator from wisconsin
00:22:37.640 20 miles down the road from where i live and uh he had these hearings to expose uh the communists
00:22:45.560 in the state department and other areas of government and a high percentage of the people
00:22:51.160 he brought before his committee were jews and the american jewish community was very uptight about it
00:22:57.960 because they were so overrepresented uh and so there was you know at that time the american jewish
00:23:03.960 community was all in favor of free speech well things have changed since then um and now the american
00:23:11.640 jewish community is entirely on on the board with censorship uh anything they don't like which
00:23:18.680 means anything like sorts of things that we would look yeah it's completely changed the the uh attitudes
00:23:26.440 in the environment and again it was just you know free speech and all that it was just juices used as
00:23:30.920 long as they could take control and dominate then it's like ah it's not democracy is not so great anymore
00:23:35.800 we have to do all these things you know there are no principles here no it's just interest it's
00:23:41.480 because it's about it's about winning it's not about being principled no it's about their interests
00:23:46.680 and nothing more and people don't get that i think a lot of white people really are principled
00:23:51.800 and you see these conservatives they're principled to a fault yeah you know they they have principles of
00:23:59.720 you know uh democracy here all these things that they modeled all the time and they don't seem to
00:24:05.960 care uh about the the consequences you know in the real world like immigration they don't seem to care
00:24:14.040 or be aware that this is going to submerge the republican party so there could be no hope for
00:24:19.800 real conservatism in the future anything like it was you know 50 years ago uh with this immigration
00:24:27.160 and uh but they don't care it's like a principle uh and and they uh or or else it's just prophets
00:24:35.640 but yeah these jewish organizations have no principles and it's really if you look at jewish
00:24:41.160 ethics it's it's the same sort of thing it's whatever's good for jews there are no general
00:24:46.600 principles that apply both to jews and non-jews despite what you read on wikipedia by the way they have a
00:24:53.080 they have a page on jewish ethics and it's like fantasy land if you look at actual jewish writing
00:24:59.080 on ethics over the centuries there's a big difference if you killed if a jew killed a goy
00:25:06.920 or a non-jew versus killing a jew or stole from a non-jew versus a jew a slave who was a jew
00:25:13.960 versus a not anything like that yeah so kevin before we continue there i want to sneak in this real
00:25:18.200 quick because it was it's a perfect uh actually the perfect timing uh the fact that you brought
00:25:23.720 up black rock and i want to play a clip actually with larry fink here isn't uh now too but you
00:25:28.440 talked basically about the neoliberal capitalist world right how they've joined forces with all the
00:25:33.080 you know this this this um what do you call it again social justice right that's the boiled down
00:25:39.240 term they use for it social justice we could call it anti-white we you know we know what's going on but
00:25:44.200 you know it's a black rock right what it's it's literally they're passing the mark now they're
00:25:49.000 they're the first company in the history of the world that's going to oversee or manage i think
00:25:53.080 about 10 trillion dollars right they're like an asset management company they they're holding
00:25:58.840 company right they handle other people's but i saw an interesting clip the other day too by the way
00:26:02.440 apparently the government hires them for for regulation they have insight into specific information
00:26:09.240 that other banks and financial services don't have their they they came out of nowhere and it
00:26:14.760 used to be goldman sachs but black rock just kind of surpassed them all of a sudden like they came out
00:26:19.320 of nowhere at least as far as i'm concerned right but showing a screenshot here right 10 black rock
00:26:24.200 10 million dollars to support the black lives matter movement right of course amazon did the same
00:26:28.760 goldman sachs right and you have uh much more of some of the other companies as well but this is so this is
00:26:33.640 not strange right here's even a a screenshot from what black rock had on their website i believe
00:26:40.520 right social impact this is just what you mentioned here in february we established the black rock
00:26:45.240 foundation to augment our efforts to promote a more inclusive and sustainable economy through our focus
00:26:53.000 on financial security for vulnerable communities we aim to bring visibility and increased resources to
00:27:00.040 support the upward mobility of black and latinx communities uh our 10 million dollar plan include
00:27:07.160 and then they went on from there right but isn't this fascinating how this capitalist corporation all of
00:27:13.240 a sudden joins forces with the likes of not only the world economic forum but the united nations
00:27:18.680 sustainable development goals right some people call this agenda 2030 but there's a number of names right
00:27:24.280 but something have you heard of esg uh equity social no sorry environment social and governance it's
00:27:30.440 this new kind of stakeholder capitalist system and it looks like heaven that doesn't matter what big
00:27:36.200 company you go to they're all the board on this and and and it seems even at some points they're
00:27:42.120 perfectly willing to put the aspect of profit to the side to start inflicting change in a direction uh
00:27:50.040 which i i think a lot of people wouldn't agree to but again keep in mind these are unelected people
00:27:54.040 right they're just they're they're taking their massive wealth and power and influence and just
00:27:58.760 steamrolling over if you will the democratic process right yeah yeah and you know besides
00:28:04.760 donating money they can punish companies that don't go along you can imagine a company holds out
00:28:11.320 pretty soon you know blackrock uh divests from some of their they got all these uh investment funds
00:28:18.040 loans and um you know they they might have a harder time on wall street getting loans and uh stock
00:28:25.400 offerings and all kinds of things there's supply lines uh people might stop using them you know i mean
00:28:33.800 because i think that's what's happened here is that you've had a critical mass and now it's moving
00:28:39.800 fast forward um that uh getting putting incredible amounts of money and so much corruption i mean
00:28:48.680 they've exposed a number of these uh black lives matter people uh taking money and just nobody knows
00:28:55.320 where the money went you know it's like six millions and millions of dollars four or five houses right in
00:29:01.240 white neighborhoods of course they're buying houses right they're just squandering the money or you
00:29:07.320 know running with it or whatever right but listen to this listen to this clip here here's uh here's
00:29:11.080 larry fink behaviors are going to have to change and this is one thing we're going to we're asking
00:29:14.840 companies you have to force behaviors and at blackrock we are forcing behaviors there you go forcing
00:29:22.760 be we have to force behavior wonder what that means and i mean they're buying they're gobbling up
00:29:27.880 everything if you look at basically any major corporation today there's two uh i think they're
00:29:33.400 just called holding companies right it's blackrock is usually number one on that list and it doesn't
00:29:38.120 matter if it's pepsi or coca-cola or whether it's pfizer or moderna right they're up there and then it's uh
00:29:44.040 uh vanguard number two and then usually number three might be state street uh or you get uh what's his
00:29:51.000 name again war is a warren buffett's um uh i forget what his uh firm is called now but it's usually those
00:29:57.720 four right but they my point is here they just have massive influence over the the whole business
00:30:04.360 sector and the whole capitalist neoliberal system you know what they do is they buy up uh large blocks
00:30:10.520 of stock in a particular company then they have voting rights and then they can go to the shareholders
00:30:16.280 meeting and and they can put pressure any any activist investor that has a significant uh stake in
00:30:23.560 a company can be heard i mean you don't have to have 50 percent even a few percent is enough
00:30:30.840 to to make you heard i mean carl icon for example uh famously is an activist investor you'll you'll buy
00:30:38.440 a whole lot of stock and say and then you'll say like we got to get rid of this management team or we
00:30:42.680 have you know you have a lot of power and blackrock has huge resources they can do this and um you know so
00:30:51.080 if a company is not on board with this stuff they better get on board and you know this is as uh
00:30:58.600 fink was saying you know they don't have any problems with coercion uh you know it's almost
00:31:04.520 like they would the really ideal model is a chinese model where you have top-down total government
00:31:11.320 control surveillance everywhere uh and and you but you do have a wealthy oligarchic elite and i really
00:31:19.720 think that's what they're aiming for uh an oligarchic globalist elite that um is able to uh establish
00:31:28.200 a surveillance state and uh just radically curtail the freedoms of ordinary people yes absolutely it's
00:31:37.080 the the esg thing and again it's like it's kind of interchangeable you know you have the bank of
00:31:41.640 international settlements to a certain degree pushing this you have the world economic forum
00:31:45.800 uh and then of course you have um other you know united nations as i mentioned the sustainable
00:31:50.680 development goals or agenda 2030 right but it's kind of like a it's like a social credit scores
00:31:56.360 for the business world and you know what i think the root of this is i think the root of it is that
00:32:01.880 as they previously chose the democratic you know method or whatever you want to call that that strategy
00:32:07.160 right because i think they had they to a certain extent they had control of information they could
00:32:11.400 manipulate i mean what does it matter if you have a democracy if everyone is just let around the nose
00:32:15.480 by you know television or whatever it doesn't it doesn't matter right but i think the reality is
00:32:20.360 they kind of lost this control at some point and things started moving and happening and trump was
00:32:24.920 a big you know indicator of this but you had salvin in italy you had orban in hungary you had uh
00:32:29.320 you know there's a couple of parties like this in germany in holland in uh netherlands in sweden of
00:32:33.720 course right and i think they slowly began to realize we can't count on these people to do our bidding
00:32:39.800 we we we have to start going to the business world we have to start getting these massive you know ceos aboard
00:32:45.800 and we have to build like a again the the klar schwab the world economic forum guy talks about
00:32:50.600 stakeholder capitalism and it's this kind of integrated system where basically every company
00:32:55.320 is interdependent on each other and they're and they're signed up to this right through the
00:32:59.320 un-sustained sustainable development goals or the esgs under the same kind of globalist institution
00:33:04.600 they're saying if you don't have you know if you don't have enough uh non-white people working for
00:33:09.880 you you're going to get a lower score and you're going to you're not going to be part of that uh
00:33:13.560 grid grid work of all the other corporations you can go to them and you know for services or from
00:33:19.080 materials so it's like the same they're freezing out those who are refusing to comply that's what i
00:33:25.160 think that's what's going to be yeah absolutely esg environmental social and governments right
00:33:31.160 or governance um under environment we know where that's going climate change strategy biodiversity
00:33:37.720 uh carbon intensity which of course is the carbon kind of the carbon has become an enemy now all of
00:33:43.240 a sudden they're going to use that as a kind of a value point or or a currency it seems like in the
00:33:47.640 future and then on the social it says equal opportunities uh freedom of association yeah i wish
00:33:54.120 health and safety human rights customers production blah blah child labor but under that
00:33:58.040 boundaries also like diversity equity what are you doing to make sure that there's not too many
00:34:03.320 white people in your corporation and things like that so it's like a whole neoliberal capitalist way
00:34:08.920 of enforcing these very very radical um you know left-wing ideas that you've been talking about
00:34:14.360 for such a long time but but utilizing this in the business world it's a completely new strategy
00:34:18.360 in a way isn't it yeah and i i i certainly resonate with what you said before that the trump and the
00:34:24.600 populist uh parties is like in in hungary um just scared the hell out of these people they just
00:34:33.480 that was a total wake-up call uh because trump was very popular i mean i might trump screwed up in a lot
00:34:40.120 of ways but he was also under attack his entire presidency like nowhere the president has ever been
00:34:46.840 and and and there's never been such a incredible wall-to-wall full court press assault on a
00:34:54.760 president as they did they tried to impeach him repeatedly and and uh you know one one scandal
00:35:02.760 hoax actually after another it was an amazing phenomenon so yeah they they are terror they want
00:35:09.400 they want to seal the deal and i think code was the best thing that ever happened to them because they
00:35:14.200 managed to change all the voting laws and everything else and um get fear into the hearts of everyone
00:35:22.280 and now you know the war in ukraine is one crisis after another yeah we'll see yeah exactly i guess we
00:35:29.320 can segue over to that a little bit it's pretty crazy but it's like putin have actually given these
00:35:33.320 people everything they want in a way they've they've managed to i mean nato has a new purpose now they're
00:35:38.920 kind of like for 70 years what would they sure they were expanding but it's like what do you need them
00:35:42.680 for what are they doing right even look trump right didn't he say we need not to pay so much money to
00:35:48.360 nato and he i guess forced other countries to pay you know unfortunately european ones which is you
00:35:53.320 know whatever but you know the point the point stands right what what are we doing here and even
00:35:57.480 here's a here's a globalist from sweden here called built you might remember him who was the head of
00:36:01.880 the moderate moderate party right our conservatives for a while he's been hanging around on the
00:36:05.720 bilderberg meetings he's going to all these big globalist meetings and stuff and he said
00:36:09.640 this on twitter yesterday actually this earlier today then it's going to be a unique summit of
00:36:15.080 summits in brussel today and that's where biden is currently right now he's speaking there and
00:36:19.720 many other people right it says it's it's a nato summit an eu summit and a g7 summit i think that's
00:36:26.120 a first when it comes to these things president putin here's the kicker right has managed to bring
00:36:31.320 the democratic world together in a unique way with his aggression in other words putin is giving them
00:36:37.960 exactly what they want kevin isn't that fascinating now they're they've never um putin has justified
00:36:44.760 their existence all these groups in a way right the fact is that the the nato was was an anachronism
00:36:51.400 after 1991 they really didn't need it anymore and i just tweeted this saying there's uh an article that
00:36:58.040 that putin gave interviews in in 2000 the end of 2000 2000 early 2001 saying uh that he would like to
00:37:05.720 to join nato uh and and he he said that russia's part of the west and all that well that was rebuffed
00:37:13.160 and and you could see what that this american foreign policy established who never gave up
00:37:18.920 that hostility and uh you know when putin came in and got rid of those oligarchs um that uh that was and
00:37:28.680 uh he he took over real control whereas yeltsin was completely under the thumb of these oligarchs who
00:37:37.320 ran the media and really ran russia and just stole all the wealth and became billionaires and all that
00:37:46.120 it was uh it was horrible and then you know they invited ukraine to be part that they kept expanding and
00:37:53.480 expanding every time it happened russia would object and then they said that ukraine could be
00:37:59.320 part of all right on the border big country and uh 2014 with the meidan uh uprising totally cia
00:38:11.960 operation neocons the national endowment for democracy which is a neocon organization victorian
00:38:19.400 newland famously and and uh of course they're they're freaked out about that yeah change the
00:38:26.120 government you had a government that was de facto was de facto neutral it wasn't hostile to the west
00:38:32.280 wasn't hostile to russia and they were doing the right thing but then this so it's just horrible what's
00:38:41.000 happening here and they're giving him uh this this is it fits perfectly you know into the bigger picture
00:38:47.080 and we'll we'll talk more a little bit later here but like what some of the consequences is
00:38:50.840 is here and of course now you know uh again so-called conspiracy theorists to whatever you
00:38:55.960 say this is talked about this a while ago even even as a result of the covet measures right but now
00:39:01.480 uh the upper elites are beginning to address these issues openly as well even biden today in fact talked
00:39:06.440 about food shortages as a consequence of the ukraine russia war it's of course very convenient as i said
00:39:11.720 because the ball has on this have been rolling for a long time but there are there is an exacerbated
00:39:16.440 problem as something i think will come down the pipes but before we get in there you tweeted out
00:39:22.040 an article as well and i want to try to get to this because a lot of people are going back and forth and
00:39:26.360 i'm not sure what what's going on in russia i'm not sure what's going on with putin is he is he controlled
00:39:31.800 by some of the ex some of the some of the oligarchs that wasn't kicked out is he uh is he critical
00:39:38.520 overall of uh of these oligarchs of jewish influence what's going i'm i'm reading both things at the
00:39:43.880 the same time and we can show a couple of things that shows it but you tweeted out this one from
00:39:47.480 tablet magazine the fate of putin's jewish oligarchs right because back in as you said
00:39:52.120 when he took initially took control there was a number of them that were kicked out right we're
00:39:56.440 talking about boris berzovsky he ended up dying in london right but he was like you know going between
00:40:00.760 tel aviv and and london and basically spent most of his fortune and the rest of his life trying to
00:40:05.560 undermine uh putin they've he together with people like alex goldfarb they sponsored the orange
00:40:11.480 revolution in ukraine right coup coup attempt after coup attempt all these things um you had
00:40:17.560 other people too abrahamovich you had what is it kordorovsky i think he was in jail for for some time
00:40:23.160 right uh are there some are there some others um kevin as well that you're aware of that are still there
00:40:30.120 now that um there are there are this um michael fridman for one uh he's jewish but i think what
00:40:39.160 happened here is that when putin came in he wanted to consolidate power he didn't want to be controlled
00:40:45.640 by these oligarchs and there's a big difference there so he got rid of uh kordorovsky because he was big
00:40:52.840 time involved in politics got rid of uh guzinski who was had a big uh position in in russian media
00:41:01.160 and was very pro yeltsin and all that and you know resist these billionaires were not apolitical they
00:41:07.160 were totally involved in russian politics and you know it was heady it was very much like what we have
00:41:13.960 in this country where the media is on one side and pushing certain things and we can call it a democracy
00:41:20.040 but they're giving us some messages and and filtering it and everything uh and i i really
00:41:25.160 do believe that that putin uh consolidated power and that the tablet article is quite right it fits
00:41:31.320 right well also with an article we posted on oxford observer simultaneously almost by this guy uh rollo
00:41:40.040 slavsky who lives in eastern europe and is a new writer for us but he said the same thing that that putin
00:41:47.160 is in control in russia and it's quite the opposite of what's going on in ukraine where zelinski is
00:41:53.320 bought and paid for by this jewish oligarch kolomoisky uh and he's you know zelinski's got millions of
00:42:01.960 dollars from this guy zelinski was a tv actor he was a comedian and he was nothing and so then all of
00:42:09.160 a sudden this kolomoisky guy and there he is um he uh puts him in a tv show where he's a president
00:42:18.280 and servant of the people that was the title of the show yeah and he run and he runs for uh for
00:42:24.840 president again an anti-corruption campaign if you can believe it yeah kolomoisky is so corrupt it's
00:42:31.800 unreal he was involved he was involved in the same gas company that hunter biden got all his money for
00:42:39.240 him he's got uh operations in miami and all this stuff uh offshore accounts uh complete sleazeball
00:42:47.560 and of course he's jewish um and uh yes so so president zelinski just bought and paid for he's
00:42:56.600 his boy you can never say that about putin putin runs russia and anybody uh including an oligarch
00:43:04.520 who gets on the wrong side of him better watch out he he runs the place and uh you can say well it's not
00:43:11.640 a democracy yeah it's not but neither is ukraine really you know it's it's a it's an oligarchy
00:43:18.200 and it's run by uh by these oligarchs and and ukraine has a reputation as being the most corrupt
00:43:26.520 country in europe yeah and it still is and uh thanks to the people meddling in it too right
00:43:33.800 yeah and democracy yes let's just abolish all political parties that are opposed to him
00:43:39.480 consolidated the media into one one big media that they have one message yep that's democracy yep
00:43:47.240 freedom they're fighting for over there they're fighting for their freedom right and then they've
00:43:51.880 had like some of the most uh i think even now these are you know kind of maybe not side issues
00:43:56.760 but i just saw the other here in passing that it's like the covet thing have been crazy too in ukraine
00:44:01.960 it's almost like the u.s is using the ukraine as a as a playground as a testing ground right
00:44:06.520 the whole thing with the biolabs right there is a in-depth research on that alone but those are mostly
00:44:11.640 you know there were pentagon uh funded at least some of some of them were even operated they were operated
00:44:16.280 by u.s diplomats and stuff they did the same thing in georgia right all this crazy stuff but it's been
00:44:21.320 so corrupt there and and there's so many american you know that that have nestled their way in there
00:44:27.640 and they're using it as kind of like a slush fund i guess for the lack of a better term right look at
00:44:31.560 hunter biden right he's he gets in there he gets on the board of burisma right he's like 85 000 a
00:44:36.760 month or whatever the hell it was for literally doing nothing and and it's it gets worse right all these
00:44:42.200 companies are in there and they're meddling uh and they're and they're ensuring kind of that ukraine
00:44:47.880 never really gets up on its feet and and sorts things out do you see what i'm saying yeah and so
00:44:53.800 but then joe biden goes over to ukraine and says that that if if they don't get to stop this
00:44:59.640 prosecution this investigation investigation of this uh gas company uh he'll double withhold a billion
00:45:08.680 dollars in aid you know so biden is up to his eyeballs in this corruption and it's a it's a
00:45:15.960 possibility that the fact that that the new york times finally publicized this that that those emails
00:45:22.280 and the the stuff on that laptop are is authentic you know you wonder what what's going on here maybe
00:45:29.320 they understand that that you know biden isn't working he's very unpopular but i don't know i don't
00:45:34.840 know what we're going to do about kamala harris or something the weakest vice president in history
00:45:40.200 and everybody says she's just doing a horrible job but there was an article we had on occidental
00:45:45.480 observer right around the same time that article from tablet by by robert slovsky and he said he
00:45:51.080 points out this recent bloomberg article which is jewish oligarch but mikhail fridman lamenting the
00:45:57.320 fact that sanctions were imposed on him and his friends and you know with the biden sanctions that's
00:46:02.120 one of the recent things they did and monitor him pleading for washington to relent arguing that
00:46:07.720 neither he nor his friends had any real polar power over putin without information including indicating
00:46:13.640 anything to the anything to the contrary we may as well take his words at face value i believe that
00:46:19.560 yeah the position is strong and consolidated and uh nobody can get really get in his way and if you do
00:46:26.440 you know you're gonna be um you know you're gonna be in trouble and he'll probably confiscate your
00:46:32.280 assets he doesn't mind jews being rich i'll you know be pretty wealthy but he doesn't want to be
00:46:38.120 messing in politics beyond unless they agree with him yeah that's what i've heard too right and and
00:46:43.240 again that's why i'm getting like conflicting information and maybe it's uh again maybe we're
00:46:49.000 looking at this from a different view than he does obviously he's a politician he knows how to play
00:46:53.160 politics to a certain extent he's at times despite the westwood denies of course but he's he's diplomatic
00:46:58.600 to a certain extent and as you said it's not that he's like i you know out to get jews or something
00:47:04.280 like i mean obviously not right i mean there's people in there and again let's show let's show a couple
00:47:08.200 of headlines as a way to kind of um like get that point of view of like kind of contradiction right
00:47:14.520 uh he said things like this right this is article a while ago right putin first soviet government was
00:47:19.000 mostly jewish uh you know kind of whoops what what is that right there's other articles like this
00:47:24.120 where and of course the west would say well let's look at how anti-semitic putin is he's literally
00:47:27.400 hitler at putin putin jokes about jews and money during visit to crimea he said um he cracked a joke
00:47:34.920 about jews and money visiting to crimea i said oh so the so the jews have uh problems with finances
00:47:41.240 he answered to laughter such a thing could only happen in crimea right there's things like that
00:47:45.240 which is kind of it's more funny right but the the west takes this very seriously and this is a
00:47:49.880 you know kind of a big problem and big issue but then at the same time people are like maybe looking
00:47:54.120 to putin or something for like oh he's uh you know he's he's ensuring that there's no um
00:48:00.360 jewish ethnic interest in the country that's obviously not you know correct either here is
00:48:04.280 another compilation of some headlines that people had right uh how he's targeting actually he's
00:48:09.560 targeting nationalist groups he's going after you know the so-called far right in russia right they're
00:48:13.960 a very multicultural country i mean they have they have a lot of different ethnic groups they're a
00:48:17.960 federation they're very proud of that fact right uh here's al jazeera the death of the russian far
00:48:23.480 right uh the jerusalem post putin uh not remotely anti-semitics as russia's chief rabbi uh the
00:48:29.880 jewish jailer forged at holocaust deniers uh in deniers in russia now face five years in prison
00:48:34.520 jerusalem post at putin's side an army of jewish billionaires and that's from uh 2012 so not that long
00:48:42.280 ago 10 years ago uh and then lauder of course russia's fight against anti-semitism isn't just
00:48:46.600 good for jews it's good for russia as well and then world net day looks as the day putin prayed
00:48:51.480 for rebuilding the temple right so it's not it's not as uh squared away and as easily like just say oh
00:48:58.840 it's this or that as you said but it seems to be and i guess i'm trying to be as as just charitable and
00:49:06.360 genuine as like a accurate i guess that's the best term as possible and it's like he's as i said he's
00:49:12.360 seem to be very proud of his multicultural you know federation of sorts i've heard him mention
00:49:16.920 that many times in talks and you know we're so any and he thinks he's you know fighting you know
00:49:21.240 nazism in ukraine and of course you have you have ass of that so you know i'm not trying to look down
00:49:25.480 on that but it's obviously not the biggest problem if you have washington sponsoring everything right
00:49:29.800 the liberal world order of the west sponsoring you that your problem is not nazis they hunt nazis in
00:49:35.400 the west so they're not nazis uh taking over everything and running the show in ukraine but uh
00:49:40.920 no but but my point is he's generally seems like unless as long as you don't like are engaging in
00:49:46.920 like criminal behavior that undermines the russian federation he seems to be somewhat okay
00:49:52.040 doesn't care what ethnic group it is that's what i'm getting to what do you think of this kevin
00:49:55.960 well um again i think it's hard to really get an inside view of all that um again this writer
00:50:03.640 rollo slavsky uh wrote has written now well i've posted already six articles of his he's got one
00:50:10.600 called the state of opposition nationalist politics in russia and basically what he says is that things
00:50:15.640 have been changing recently and that and that um putin that really the the uh nationalist right
00:50:23.720 doesn't really you know have much of a conflict now with putin that putin has changed in their
00:50:30.040 direction enough to uh to status to mollify them um so i thought this is very interesting i i can't
00:50:39.000 really you know i vouch that this is absolute truth but this guy really seems to uh uh understand
00:50:49.080 what's going on on the ground in russia i understand that in the past these russian nationalists said they
00:50:54.360 have a big problem with putin but um that uh that is not so much uh the case anymore if at all
00:51:03.400 no um exactly i'm trying to find that article as well but it's it's a very interesting dynamic and
00:51:08.120 of course there's big fights in the west over this do you take the ukrainian side you take the russian
00:51:12.920 side and some people say oh putin is great russia is going to fix everything and i don't believe in
00:51:17.080 that and then at the same time it's like i i don't want anything bad to happen to ukraine or ukrainians
00:51:22.760 obviously not but but it's clear to me at this point that they're being used as a uh as cannon
00:51:28.680 fodder in this in this battle and i mean even liam panetta the other day the former i think he's
00:51:32.360 ex-cia right he just literally said like whatever people say this is a proxy war you have massive
00:51:37.640 amounts of funds biden gave them uh 15 billion the other day one billion on that was arms weapons all
00:51:44.440 kinds of things right you have foreign mercenaries coming to the country encouraged to come to the
00:51:49.800 country and just as massive hypnosis campaign essentially mind control campaign in the west
00:51:55.800 um to to just no matter what like ukraine number one that's it you know like every every liberal and
00:52:02.840 left-wing lunatic in the west now is like super gung-ho about like you know our people in ukraine
00:52:08.760 the people in ukraine and their borders and their freedom and their nationalism it's quite something
00:52:13.400 isn't it it's pathetic yeah i really do that's why i i really hope russia uh wins this at least gets a
00:52:22.440 good salmon uh where they uh are able to uh insist that ukraine not be part of nato that and and at
00:52:30.760 least get to donbass and crimea formalized um because i i really do think that this is the the globalist
00:52:38.840 elites on one side uh and pushing for for ukraine and uh against really russia and china together now
00:52:49.000 uh you know russia's been i mean china's been backing russia and uh i think it's a interesting sign that
00:52:56.840 they see they don't want to you know that this western hegemony that that has been going on since world
00:53:03.400 war ii um as well and really long before that but um i think that they have decided that you know they
00:53:13.000 they want you know a bipolar world here at least where you have other sort of centers of power and
00:53:21.320 i think that's why the west is putting up such a strong fight they see this as as armageddon here
00:53:26.200 they don't want to lose this because if they do you know you're not it's going to be a huge setback
00:53:32.200 for globalism people some people have already said that it's a huge setback for globalism anyway
00:53:36.680 but i i think if if uh putin really comes out of this uh looking good and he may well uh if he gets
00:53:45.640 what he wants i do think that that globalism would take a huge hit that this that this was uh this is
00:53:52.680 an expression of russian nationalism it's an it's a rejection of of the west and it's uh really a
00:53:59.720 a wake-up call that this is not going to be a unipolar world anymore i mean that's what happened
00:54:05.400 in 1991 when the soviet union uh died basically immediately these neocons united said said look
00:54:13.720 unipolar world we are the boss we can run things so what'd you have war after war in the middle east and
00:54:21.240 everywhere else um the russian the russian embassies in the uk and ukraine everywhere else they were
00:54:28.760 tweeting this stuff today where uh you had uh um the pictures of american presidents like clinton
00:54:37.880 the bush senior bush bush jr uh and and all that and then not trump by the way but obama was in there
00:54:46.200 and then saying you know five wars and six million dead and all that and and all in the name of
00:54:53.800 democracy and non-interventionism uh it's a joke uh so uh that's the russian point of view that that
00:55:02.680 america has been a great in you know intervening all over the place yeah having havoc and death and
00:55:11.160 destruction think what happened to iraq i mean forget about american casualties which were you
00:55:17.240 know large thousands but iraqis lost hundreds of thousands of that millions of people here yeah
00:55:24.440 madeline albright who just passed away right the former u.s secretary of state said uh remember that
00:55:28.200 clip from uh 60 minutes it's worth it 500 500 000 iraqi kids and and look at the waves of migration
00:55:35.880 that's come in the wake of these conflicts in the middle east and north africa too yeah a good example
00:55:41.800 is is um qaddafi with libya yeah hillary clinton is cackling about how wonderful that was and uh we
00:55:50.200 came he died that kind of thing yeah well when when you know the result is is total political chaos in
00:55:56.760 libya you have these warring factions i don't think they've solved it yet and then you've got migration
00:56:01.800 coming up from africa that libya used to stop they don't want to do it anymore so they got slave
00:56:06.680 markets and the whole crazy thing uh qaddafi was was good in a lot of ways and and uh it was crazy
00:56:13.960 for nato at the behest of hillary clinton was really the prime mover that uh but that's it that's it you
00:56:22.200 know these these liberals are you know you think of liberals all not not anti-war people they're not
00:56:28.440 anti-war people they're no no no they want wars that that serve their interests exactly and again
00:56:34.600 i mean it's like biden said right this is a you know after the uh in his speech there is that after
00:56:39.640 the second world war there was a formulation of a liberal world order and all these countries are
00:56:44.680 beginning to kind of you know homogenize under this banner and stuff and now they're saying they're
00:56:49.160 kind of losing control of this and and look i'm not i'm not saying and i personally don't think that
00:56:54.920 it will be anywhere better for white people if russia teams up with china and india and a bunch
00:57:01.080 of asian countries and exerts more dominance than the you look it's been bad enough under u.s
00:57:05.640 control but we have no idea what's going to happen if we truly go into like the abyss in terms of
00:57:10.920 economic collapse and let's assume that they make it somehow over there right uh russian uh alliance
00:57:17.560 you have the belt and road initiative of course with israel trying to kind of right now israel
00:57:21.000 trying to play this uh in between game there they haven't been quite outspoken about pro being pro
00:57:26.200 ukraine or pro russia they've been asked to mediate many many many times right but but the point is
00:57:31.960 it's like a new uh alignment or new i guess a new cold war i guess that's the best term a new cold
00:57:37.240 war of sorts produce that that's right and i think if if the west you see i just can't
00:57:44.760 want the west to win because what we're about is multiculturalism we're massive immigration anti-white
00:57:51.800 politics um i i i just can't get behind it and i know the nationalists in ukraine i i love them and
00:58:01.800 they i see what they're why they do what they do but i see it from our point of view in you know
00:58:08.760 is someone who lives in the west and if the west wins this they're just going to clamp down all the
00:58:14.280 harder and so the whole anti-white revolution is going to go faster and faster and um yeah i cannot
00:58:22.760 say we need to we need to have uh we need to take control rational normal sensible people need to take
00:58:29.560 control of the west again and we and we need to be in a position where we're still influential but on good
00:58:35.800 term to we should trade with russia look and this you know we'll get into this in the second party
00:58:40.920 we're gonna take a break here now but again like this absolute lunacy from from from biden and from
00:58:46.440 these european leaders who are like shooting themselves in the foot you're cutting yourself
00:58:49.560 off from oil and gas and hydrocarbons what are you going to do fertilizer now all the grains like
00:58:54.520 this will be a disaster and again i think it's i think it's by design but we'll we'll talk more
00:58:59.240 about that in a second kevin we're gonna take a there's a quick break here you can follow kevin
00:59:03.000 mcdonald on twitter to edit right for editor and that's of course the occidental observer check
00:59:09.320 that out that's a great publication and then of course uh you have the occidental quarterly as well
00:59:14.600 uh still printing that uh uh kevin can be is there a digital version of that or is it uh just a hard
00:59:19.880 hard copy version it's hard copy and it's online and a hard copy subscription is sixty dollars a year
00:59:25.640 online is thirty dollars so anybody can afford it really and we just put out the the spring issue
00:59:31.160 just put it in the just completed it awesome the occidental quarterly of course check that out
00:59:36.920 there's links from uh occidental observer and again the website for that is the occidental observer
00:59:42.040 dot net definitely check it out make sure you follow make sure you support kevin's work
00:59:45.720 uh we'll take just a quick break here uh ladies and gentlemen stay with us we'll be right back with uh with
00:59:51.080 kevin join us in the second part ladies and gentlemen as we continue with kevin mcdonald at
00:59:56.920 redicemembers.com for a very fascinating part two we're going to go deeper into the major consequences
01:00:03.240 of some of these policies now that we're seeing because of sanctions because of import export
01:00:08.280 restrictions and these kinds of things and the deeper crisis right these are very important topics
01:00:13.720 because they're right at the forefront and they might drastically change how we live not only the
01:00:19.640 within the scope of six months we don't know a year two years out maybe longer we we do not know how
01:00:25.800 these things are going to be resolved we don't know if we have the means and capability in many
01:00:30.040 western nations to kind of uh make up for the things that might be lost as a consequence of
01:00:35.080 the poor decision making that led to this schism between uh well essentially russia and the west
01:00:41.320 but in the continuation you have a increasing uh you know side on the on the east uh being formed with
01:00:47.080 with india and china of course kind of aligning with russia iran you know some of these other
01:00:52.120 countries a new alliance a kind of a new cold war of sorts is rising up out of this and again the
01:00:56.680 consequence of this high gas prices uh food shortages fertilizer shortage and again these could have
01:01:02.200 massive consequences uh in in a span of very short times we're going to talk more about that with
01:01:07.240 kevin mcdonald we have some other topics lined up as well we'll talk a little bit more some about the
01:01:11.320 crazy anti-whiteness that's still you know under as all of this is ongoing in the west and as we're
01:01:16.440 collapsing the anti-white nonsense is still continuing to this day there's a rising crime
01:01:22.360 of course uh these things are are never going away and we're seeing a west in decline and we kind of
01:01:28.680 ask the question well is is this is this what they want right isn't that one of the goals of the
01:01:33.080 frankfurt school is to make the west so corrupt that it stinks so the question is people are rooting
01:01:38.200 for the west collapse so they're just abiding by these um you know by this old uh agenda essentially
01:01:44.520 as opposed to advocating maybe for for a change in the west i'm not saying solely political but at
01:01:49.480 some point sane rational sensible people will have to step up and take responsibility and try to
01:01:55.640 restore our nations to some kind of balance again or uh or that'll be it at least in the current
01:02:00.280 configuration but anyway that's some of the things we're going to get into with kevin in the second
01:02:04.120 part so join us over at red ice members.com you can sign up over at subscribestar.com slash red ice as well
01:02:10.120 uh support us over there it's only 10 bucks a month if you sign up for a longer subscription we have
01:02:13.880 those as well all the way up to two years it gets cheaper per month i think it's six dollars 20 cents
01:02:18.840 or so per month if you get a two-year subscription this helps to support us we need your support we
01:02:24.520 need your help to still continue to be here we need fuel in the tank so we can keep going without
01:02:29.000 your support there will be no red ice uh don't leave it up to anyone else it's up to you to step up
01:02:34.040 and ensure that we can continue so if you like what we do consider either signing up for a membership or
01:02:39.720 donating you can find more about that on red ice dot tv forward slash donate it's only with your help
01:02:45.080 that red ice can continue all right guys thank you so much again we'll be back with more soon but
01:02:49.160 check out the second hour right now then with kevin mcdonald check out all the different methods
01:02:53.400 that we have to sign up subscribe star entropy stream we have the cash app we have an e-check
01:02:57.480 option we have crypto and we have a mailing address uh as well keep in mind guys that we are banned from
01:03:03.800 several financial services that normal individuals and uh corporations out there uh do have access
01:03:10.520 to so we've been denied access why because of course we are over the target that's why that
01:03:15.560 happens so we don't have any big sponsors or angel investors actually in fact we should if you feel
01:03:20.280 inclined definitely step up to the plate but we appreciate your support share the links share the
01:03:25.800 show share the videos that we do because that helps to get the word out as well thank you guys part
01:03:29.720 two with kevin mcdonald is coming up so we'll see you on the other side
01:03:59.720 uh