Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - January 20, 2025


Ep 1125 | God Bless 47! Here’s What’s Next | Guest: Kevin Roberts


Episode Stats

Length

43 minutes

Words per Minute

170.8855

Word Count

7,516

Sentence Count

381

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation joins us to celebrate President Trump's Inauguration Day and talk about his vision for the future of the United States under Donald Trump and the conservative agenda he has in store for it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 It is President Trump's Inauguration Day, and we are so excited. We're celebrating here on Relatable.
00:00:07.940 We are talking to Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation. We are going to take an exciting look
00:00:13.840 into how Trump is going to overhaul America's most corrupt institutions and turn them back
00:00:22.060 institutions that serve the American people, truly, hopefully, by the grace of God,
00:00:27.640 making America great again. This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers.
00:00:33.400 Go to GoodRanchers.com, use code Allie at checkout. That's GoodRanchers.com, code Allie.
00:00:47.020 Hey, guys. Welcome to Relatable. Happy Monday. Hope everyone had a wonderful weekend. Well,
00:00:52.040 it is a great day, not just because it's Monday. And I guess every day is a great day. This is the
00:00:58.740 day that the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it so we can always rejoice every day that
00:01:03.440 we are alive. But today is an especially great day because it is Inauguration Day, the day that many of
00:01:11.060 us thought would not happen, not because Trump couldn't win, but because there is so much against
00:01:18.980 him. And he did. He won handily. And this is a day that we have been anticipating for so long that
00:01:25.940 finally we get a change in power and we're hoping for more peace and more stability and more prosperity
00:01:33.860 for America to be the best, safest, healthiest, most prosperous place to raise a family. He's only
00:01:42.780 got four years, but I think because he only has four years, he is going to be especially effective.
00:01:50.480 And I think J.D. Vance is going to be an especially effective vice president. We will be talking about
00:01:56.460 the highlights of the inauguration later this week. Today, we are talking to Kevin Roberts. He is the head
00:02:02.760 of the Heritage Foundation, a huge conservative think tank, and you know them as the authors of
00:02:10.700 Project 2025 or the organization that organized Project 2025, the center of so much media ire during
00:02:19.860 the campaign. We're going to talk about that today. And if that ire was justified, what is Project 2025?
00:02:26.980 Is it actually going to play a role in setting President Trump's agenda? We will talk about
00:02:32.680 Trump's agenda. We will also talk about how to retake now corrupt and ineffective, counterproductive
00:02:40.160 institutions like the FBI and the CIA, like our universities. And so it's a really, really good
00:02:48.780 substantive conversation, and it will just get you excited about Trump's presidency if you're not
00:02:54.120 already. And this is just a great mercy, just as a reminder, a great mercy of God. It's not something
00:02:59.640 that we deserved to get rid of the inept and the, I would say, evil administration that we just had
00:03:09.400 when we looked at the policies that they promoted, both here and abroad, and to give us a better
00:03:14.780 leader. And yet that is what God has given us. And I think we can be really thankful for that. And
00:03:21.420 there are some of you listening or watching who actually did not vote for President Trump,
00:03:26.160 maybe only in the past few weeks, you've started to question some of your progressive ideals. And
00:03:32.060 if that is you, then welcome. Or maybe you're just now getting into politics. You're only now realizing
00:03:37.380 that politics matter because policy matters because people matter. Someone recommended the show to you
00:03:41.900 and you are tuning in. Well, I am grateful that you are here and it is time for us to pray for
00:03:49.760 President Trump and for this administration. Just as we prayed for Biden and his administration,
00:03:55.720 we are called in scripture to pray for all of our leaders, whether we voted for them or not.
00:04:01.080 And so I will be praying for President Trump, that God would give him humility, that God would give him
00:04:06.700 wisdom, that God would give him vision and foresight and discernment, that God would be close to this
00:04:14.140 administration, that they would make the right choices when it comes to filling all of the
00:04:19.800 positions that need to be filled. I think they've made some great choices so far. There's still
00:04:24.820 a ways to go. And I pray that God's righteousness would prevail. And I just want to remind all of you
00:04:30.680 that now that we are in this broad coalition on the right, we've got the Make America Healthy Again,
00:04:35.700 we've got the Make America Great Again, we've got the Christian conservatives like you and me,
00:04:39.420 we've got people who are center-right moderates, even some people on the left, some people who are
00:04:44.120 very socially liberal, economically conservative. We've got a mosaic of people here on the conservative
00:04:50.960 side, on the right side, if you want to call it that, the non-leftist side. It is not our time,
00:04:58.820 Christian conservatives, to compromise. It is not our time to say, well, let's just let the moderates
00:05:05.380 get their way. I mean, Trump is moderate compared to us on a lot of issues. That doesn't mean that
00:05:11.700 we have to be. We can support him. We can be glad. We can be thankful that he won this presidency.
00:05:19.380 And we can also be an anchor on the right and say, no, I am not going to compromise on the definition
00:05:26.320 of marriage. I am not going to compromise on the sanctity of life. I am not going to compromise when it
00:05:33.680 comes to the reality of male and female, not just for children, but for all people. I am going to be
00:05:40.380 an anchor over here in defense of the family, in defense of life. Yes, in defense of children,
00:05:49.240 but also in defense of reality, in defense of truth. Do not buy the lie. And this is just as pertinent now
00:05:56.460 as it was during the election. Do not buy the lie, Christian conservative, that you and you alone have to
00:06:02.240 check your worldview, your beliefs, your faith at the door before you engage politically. Everyone
00:06:09.080 is bringing the fullness of their beliefs into the political sphere to have these debates and
00:06:15.340 discussions about policy, about culture, and may the best idea win. But you should unapologetically
00:06:24.340 bring persuasively the fullness of your biblical worldview into the public sphere and be
00:06:32.080 able to make a case for why God's definition of marriage and the family and gender and all of
00:06:38.840 these wonderful things, God's definition of justice, why they are superior. Do not believe that you have
00:06:47.100 to check your faith at the door or else you're some kind of so-called Christian nationalism. That's an
00:06:52.880 intimidation tactic that is used against you to silence you. Don't buy into it. If God created the
00:07:01.280 heavens and the earth and he did, then he is the authority over all of it. If he is the authority
00:07:06.240 over all of it, then he alone gets to say what's right, what's wrong, what's good, what's bad, what's
00:07:12.280 true, what's false, what a woman is, what she's not, and when life begins. And almost all of these things
00:07:19.540 are answered in the first few chapters of the Bible. But specifically in Genesis 127, we see right there
00:07:26.620 that God made us in his image male and female definition of the sanctity of life, the value of
00:07:32.240 life that we're made in his image, the definition of male and female, and the definition of marriage
00:07:36.700 right there. Christians don't have to read very far into the Bible to see what God very clearly thinks
00:07:41.860 about those things. And that reality cannot be compartmentalized from the rest of life. In fact,
00:07:48.260 the rest of life flows from what you believe about who created the earth, who is in charge
00:07:54.740 of it all, what humans are, why we are here, what the family is, what our purpose, our calling is, all of
00:08:04.020 these things. They all come from what you think about God. So do not believe in the next four years as we
00:08:12.840 kind of have this conflict and struggle even amongst ourselves on the right about how far we go with
00:08:21.120 social policy and how far we can push our conservative values. Just don't be fooled into thinking that
00:08:28.240 you're the one that needs to take a seat. God's ways are better. And if we love our neighbor, we will
00:08:33.660 unapologetically advocate for God's ways in all things. All right. God's eternal plan of redemption is
00:08:41.320 always going off without a hitch. And today is a great day in that eternal plan of redemption. Jesus
00:08:47.380 Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Hebrews 13, 8, no matter who is in charge. And yet
00:08:54.380 we are very glad that President Trump is about to be in charge, at least in some way, starting today.
00:09:00.380 And to kick off, unrelatable, this new administration, we've got Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation
00:09:08.540 with a really fascinating conversation about what is about to go down when Trump steps into the White House.
00:09:16.040 So without further ado, here is Kevin Roberts.
00:09:22.900 Kevin, thanks so much for taking the time to join us. I'm so glad you're here.
00:09:28.280 Lots to talk to you about. I am wondering what your feelings are on today, Inauguration Day.
00:09:35.420 Well, Ali, it's a pleasure to be with you. You know, my family and I are big fans of yours and
00:09:40.900 we have been for many years. And to your question about, of course, and to your question about
00:09:45.680 Inauguration Day, this is the beginning of taking back this country, not just in terms of politics
00:09:51.100 and policy. But if you think about what Donald Trump and J.D. Vance personify, which is that they
00:09:57.180 love this country more than I think any other Americans, perhaps ever in history,
00:10:02.540 the rest of us have something to learn, which is that beyond elections, beyond policy,
00:10:07.320 let us be very serious as we go about our family lives, building our businesses,
00:10:12.300 going to church, maybe going back to church this year, that those are all things that are far more
00:10:17.660 important than Washington, D.C. In other words, ironically, on Inauguration Day, when all of our
00:10:23.480 eyes are cast upon events in the nation's capital, as they should be, starting tomorrow,
00:10:28.320 we really need to get about rebuilding our communities and being the kinds of Americans
00:10:33.840 who deserve to be a self-governing people. I think that's going to be the legacy of this day.
00:10:39.580 Heritage was at the center of a lot of media contrived controversy, as you very well know,
00:10:45.520 during the campaign with Project 2025. Can you talk about that a little bit? Were you surprised,
00:10:52.000 first of all, that Project 2025 became like the rallying cry of Democrats during the election?
00:10:59.520 Boy, media contrived is the best explanation I have heard about that. I was not surprised that
00:11:05.760 the radical left overreacted because that's what they do. You know, their performance theater about
00:11:11.180 anything that conservatives do that might actually be conservative is guaranteed.
00:11:16.300 What did surprise me to be completely candid with you, Ali, is the scale and scope of their
00:11:22.940 overreaction. And clearly they thought, particularly at one point in the summer, that this was going to
00:11:29.440 be the Achilles heel for President Trump and a lot of conservative campaigns. And once we started
00:11:36.680 correcting the record, I think my comms colleagues at Heritage secured nearly 100 fact checks from
00:11:43.280 really conservative outlets like CNN and USA Today, we realized that we were going to turn
00:11:50.180 the corner. And of course, as it turns out, I think it was a net positive for conservative candidates
00:11:55.500 because what people were telling me across the country for a couple of years was that it wasn't
00:12:01.080 enough for conservatives to win, that they also needed to have a plan. It's obviously up to the
00:12:06.540 president and vice president how much of that plan they want to use. But I think it was a real sense of
00:12:11.300 security that in addition to winning elections, they would have conservative candidates, elected
00:12:16.020 officials who actually knew what they were going to do, that they were going to have a blueprint. So
00:12:19.840 it ultimately backfired. It was great to see. And we just can't get can't wait to get started
00:12:25.400 on the next version of that in the 2028 presidential cycle.
00:12:29.340 You know, it really just didn't stick the way that they thought that it was going to.
00:12:33.860 There are still people out there, I realize, even in my audience who have friends maybe across the
00:12:39.500 aisle who are still scared of Project 2025. They think that that is what is going into place
00:12:44.400 tomorrow. And they believe that what is in Project 2025 is that you personally are going to go to
00:12:49.700 their house, open their drawer, steal their birth control and run away. That seems to be like this
00:12:56.040 crazy fear that has been stirred up in a lot of people on the left. Can you just tell us for those who
00:13:03.600 still haven't heard, like, what is Project 2025? And does it actually have a role to play in Trump's
00:13:11.320 agenda? Thanks for that question. Most succinctly, Project 2025 is this election cycle's version of
00:13:19.400 something that Heritage has done since 1980 for President Reagan. And it is just a menu of
00:13:26.360 conservative policies. It's actually on one level, Ali, really boring. It's what think tanks and
00:13:32.340 public policy organizations do. But perhaps because it covers every policy area from international
00:13:39.420 policy to education policy, and we are unabashedly conservatives, the Democratic Party and its
00:13:46.660 affiliated institutions thought that they could turn it into something that would scare people.
00:13:51.660 And so the advice that I would give, and I really do intend this to be friendly for people who are in
00:13:56.600 the political center or maybe on the political left, is that whatever you've heard about Project 2025,
00:14:02.320 is unlikely to be true. And so I would encourage you to go read about it, read the substance. What
00:14:09.000 almost every person who's taken that advice from me has said, is that they may not agree with
00:14:14.200 everything, but they have found nothing in it that would cause someone to be worried about continuing
00:14:19.520 to do whatever it is that Americans are doing behind closed doors. Let's get on with conservative
00:14:24.980 policy, with governing this country. We can have policy differences, but the lying and dishonesty,
00:14:30.440 which is purposeful and behind which $75 million was spent really is pretty ridiculous.
00:14:37.120 Yes. When I read it, because we did a deep dive on this show, I was looking for something. Okay,
00:14:43.020 let me look for some things that are truly kind of scandalous that maybe I agree with, but I
00:14:48.140 understand why this would make the left mad. And while, of course, I do understand that there are policy
00:14:54.080 proposals in it that people on the left would not like. As you said, it was kind of boring. Like,
00:15:01.060 there just wasn't anything in there that I was like, whoa, I can't believe they went all the way
00:15:06.760 there. I mean, a lot of it is very typical. And I don't say this in a bad way at all, but typical
00:15:11.360 Republican stuff that a lot of conservatives have been saying for decades. And so how they somehow
00:15:17.900 created really this boogeyman of Project 2025. It was kind of interesting to watch, very dark to
00:15:25.900 watch. But as you said, it showed me also that they had very little to run on if they had to lie
00:15:31.680 about this kind of like boring bulk of policy prescriptions by a conservative think tank.
00:15:38.840 It shows you how little the political left had run on this year. And look, in my lifetime,
00:15:44.980 it may go all the way back to when I was a little boy in the 1970s and early 80s,
00:15:49.660 while conservatives disagreed with the political left, the political left had a real viable and
00:15:55.580 popular policy agenda. That isn't the case anymore. It really is based on, unfortunately,
00:16:02.100 creating in a dishonest way, a complete mischaracterization of what the right wants to do.
00:16:07.140 And if there's a silver lining to this whole story, Ali, it isn't just that this effort backfired on
00:16:13.000 the left, but for a lesson that maybe all Americans, regardless of their political background, would
00:16:18.520 agree on, is that it shows that in this era, when a lot of money can be spent to create in a dishonest
00:16:25.100 way, a completely different picture of what reality is, that when you just stay the course, which is
00:16:31.820 what my colleagues and I at Heritage did, and you continue to tell the truth, and you continue to
00:16:37.340 correct the record, and you have friends like you in the media who are willing objectively, as you did,
00:16:42.500 to go into that and say, look, I'm going to look for something that's really objectionable here.
00:16:47.060 And when you realize that that's not the case, and you tell the truth, a majority of Americans still
00:16:52.040 will respond to that. And I think we ought to all take that as real encouragement that our political
00:16:57.400 discourse can still be saved.
00:17:03.460 Quick pause for the first sponsor for the day, and that is America's Christian Credit Union.
00:17:08.040 America's Christian Credit Union, since 1958, has been dedicated to their vision of Christians
00:17:13.320 financially equipped to serve God's world by providing lending and banking services to churches,
00:17:18.720 ministries, and the individuals they employ and service across the U.S.
00:17:22.980 ACCU is an amazing financial institution. You never have to worry about being debanked or being
00:17:28.520 deprioritized or mistreated in any way because of your beliefs. Unfortunately, we've seen that
00:17:34.000 debanking happen to certain individuals across the United States because of the values that
00:17:39.940 they support. You don't have to worry about that with ACCU. Plus, right now, they are partnering with
00:17:46.280 EveryLife, the pro-life diaper company, to donate a box of diapers to a Christian
00:17:52.680 Pregnancy Resource Center for every new member who opens a checking account at ACCU before
00:17:57.780 January 31st. Plus, when you use my code Allie to sign up, they will pay you a $100 bonus to your
00:18:04.640 new account. Go to americaschristianco.com slash Allie, code Allie. America's Christian Credit Union
00:18:10.860 is federally insured by the NCUA.
00:18:12.980 You and I are Christian conservative, Christians first, conservatives. And we, because of that,
00:18:25.620 also have what are considered socially conservative views, culturally conservative views. Not everyone
00:18:32.560 who votes Republican shares our views about the definition of marriage, family, things like that.
00:18:38.300 And now that we kind of have the Make America Healthy Again movement with the MAGA movement,
00:18:44.360 we've got lots of different kinds of people over on the right, which is great. We needed everyone to
00:18:49.820 win this election. It's a good thing. But we've got some pretty big disagreements. How do you see those
00:18:56.700 disagreements? I don't want to call them factions because there's so much that we agree on as well.
00:19:01.760 But the different segments, I would say, of the Republican Party, how do you see that playing
00:19:07.780 out in the Trump administration over the next few years?
00:19:12.040 Boy, historically, it's always difficult to take a diverse political coalition and harness that
00:19:18.680 political power into governing policy power. But that's certainly what Heritage and I are committed
00:19:25.620 to doing. Obviously, we have some differences of opinion with some people, not just new adherents to
00:19:31.440 this coalition, but gosh, longstanding friends. And you know what? That's okay. What we try to do at
00:19:36.020 Heritage, and it's the first part of answering your question, is just be part of the conversation.
00:19:41.420 That is, in other words, as my colleagues, I think, personify every day, is don't just disallow a
00:19:47.180 conversation from happening because we think we disagree with someone. The second example that I will
00:19:52.500 use is to riff off your comment about Make America Healthy Again. That's something that really has
00:19:58.780 animated a lot of people for whom political ideology may be important, but really what we're all
00:20:04.760 realizing, whether we're liberals or conservatives or somewhere in between, is that we've been sold
00:20:09.860 a bill of goods from big pharma, from big government, from local pharmacists, local doctors, and it's time
00:20:16.180 to correct that. And the beauty of the Maha movement is that it is apolitical. I mean, the motivation of
00:20:21.440 RFK is not some political ideology. And so let me just take that one level deeper, if I may, but for
00:20:29.540 you and for me and your audience who are social conservatives, and let's talk about the issue of
00:20:34.600 abortion in life. RFK is not nearly as committed to the pro-life cause as you and I are, although I've
00:20:41.180 learned that he's more so than maybe he was in the past. If we look at lifestyle, if we look at quality
00:20:48.240 of life, if we look at the health of mothers, if we look at the health of expectant mothers, and you
00:20:54.540 start to sort of impose or implement the Make America Healthy Again agenda on that in public policy, all of
00:21:01.780 us, whether someone's an expectant mother or like me, a middle-aged dad, we all can benefit from that. That's
00:21:07.840 so far upstream specific policy proposals regarding what we want to do with abortion. Our operating theory here at
00:21:16.140 Heritage, where we're all pro-life, is that we can gain some momentum, some muscle memory, if you will, of
00:21:21.860 working together such that at some point down the road, I don't know what year that will be, both in
00:21:27.620 state policy and federal policy, we might be able to develop an emerging consensus on what the right
00:21:33.440 federal policy regarding abortion is. I know that that sounds fantastical because almost everyone on the
00:21:40.060 left and in the center wants us to say that there's nothing that we can do regarding abortion. I just think
00:21:45.480 we need to take things in the proper order, the proper chronology. We need to be magnanimous. That doesn't mean
00:21:51.000 that we're going to betray our principles, but it does mean that we're willing, as I think our Lord would want us to
00:21:55.860 do, to have conversations with everyone. And I think that's going to help American society.
00:22:00.740 A lot of people are freaking out about the possibility of the dissolution of the Department of Education. I've even got
00:22:07.320 some conservatives in my audience saying, hang on a second, my friends are saying that this is going to be
00:22:12.020 terrible for American education. Am I supposed to be supportive of this? So what do you think about getting rid of
00:22:19.380 the Department of Education altogether? And what do you think realistically will happen while Trump is in office?
00:22:26.860 I understand why that might sound scary to anyone, even some conservatives. But the first point is the reason that
00:22:34.120 we want to eliminate the Department of Education. And make no mistake, if you gave me a magic wand to do one thing in
00:22:40.060 public policy, that's what I would do. The reason that we want to do that is to improve education. And so
00:22:45.860 for people who are skeptics of that, just bear with me for one moment. I am a fifth generation teacher.
00:22:51.340 I only went to public schools. I'm an unabashed conservative. I think one of the greatest
00:22:56.420 achievements in American society is our public school system. But since 1979, when the Department of
00:23:03.020 Education was created, all that's happened after spending trillions of dollars and centralizing power in
00:23:09.260 Washington, is that education has deteriorated. I'm not saying that President Carter, who had this
00:23:15.560 idea, or other people who support the Department of Education are ill-intentioned. I'm just saying that
00:23:21.160 they're not looking at the data. And so here at Heritage, and certainly for me as a social science guy,
00:23:27.060 I want to look at the data. And I want to do something different on behalf of America's school
00:23:30.840 children and teachers. And what we need to do that's different, Ali, is to eliminate this
00:23:35.480 over-centralization of power in Washington. Give that back to the states, give that back to local
00:23:41.220 entities, and very importantly, give it back to parents and families. And let's have a block grant
00:23:47.040 system in which states compete for dollars and the money that they get is reflected on the achievement
00:23:54.740 that they're able to secure on behalf of America's school children. That system will be far more natural
00:24:01.080 for America, far more natural for America's families, and also think it's going to be a lot
00:24:06.300 more appropriate, if you will, for the 21st century. What we're doing is outdated. And for us to say that
00:24:12.080 is not to call into question fellow Americans who are a little skeptical about this big change. We get
00:24:17.100 it. But at Heritage, and frankly, at Project 2025, we're so transparent. We've laid out step by step how
00:24:24.280 this can be done. And I think it's very important to sum up here that President Trump and the Secretary of
00:24:29.680 Education and other leaders be in constant communication with the American people about
00:24:34.840 why they're taking each one of those steps, because it is a very legitimate skepticism to have
00:24:40.540 about making such a big change.
00:24:44.160 It's hard for us to even imagine it, because obviously, for most of us, our entire lives,
00:24:51.100 we've had a Department of Education. And we've also been told that that is the foundation of all good
00:24:56.600 education in the United States. And there's been really no reason for a lot of people to question
00:25:01.760 it. But over the past, I mean, 20 years, but especially in the past five years, as people have
00:25:07.680 asked themselves, not only, okay, is my child even getting a good education? Can they read? Can they do
00:25:14.040 the same math problems that I could do at their age 20 plus years ago? But also, what are the values
00:25:20.940 that they're learning? And are the teachers or the administrators at this particular school actually
00:25:26.800 in direct opposition to what I am teaching them at home? And it's just made a lot of people over the
00:25:32.400 past few years who would have said they're huge supporters of public education in America,
00:25:38.100 ask, okay, who is behind this? How much power do the teachers unions have? What is actually going on
00:25:44.420 at the Department of Education that these changes, unnecessary and counterproductive changes,
00:25:49.100 have been happening over the past few years? Speaking of parents and parental rights, you
00:25:53.680 mentioned, what is this parental bill of rights that I hear talked about so much?
00:26:00.080 Another revolutionary idea, which is a reminder that it isn't bureaucrats in Washington, even if
00:26:07.000 they're well-intentioned, it isn't politicians, even politicians we agree with in Washington, who are in
00:26:12.680 charge of this society. It is parents. And of course, the overall lockdowns under COVID really
00:26:20.040 amplified this already existing move for state legislatures and for Congress to issue this
00:26:26.760 parental bill of rights. That is, they of course are in charge of their kids' education. They also need
00:26:32.160 to know to speak about the issue that's particularly timely as we have this conversation. If their child
00:26:38.580 is in conversations with teachers or school officials about going through a so-called gender
00:26:43.440 transition, they are also need to be, parents need to be notified about anything that might be a mental
00:26:49.380 health concern. In other words, what's happening, and frankly, it's related to the previous conversation
00:26:54.660 thread we had about the Department of Education, is that as we have centralized power in the Department
00:27:00.060 of Education, that that centralized power has crowded out, it's actively pushed out the role of parents,
00:27:06.540 the right of parents to be obviously not just involved, but leading such conversations.
00:27:11.980 One of the great successes that has happened because of conservative public policy advocates
00:27:16.620 is the parental bill of rights. It's passed in a number of states, obviously a big issue in front
00:27:21.760 of Congress. We think that restoring that, that amplifying this call for a parental bill of rights
00:27:27.640 is not only common sense, it's apolitical, it transcends a lot of the political divide. And we think
00:27:33.380 looking at public policy through the perspective of parents is one way that we can develop some
00:27:39.620 momentum in Washington and in state capitals around the country toward good education policy,
00:27:45.340 also policy in other arenas, such as reminding people that boys are boys and girls are girls,
00:27:50.740 and that at the very least, parents should have 100% of the say regarding that.
00:27:55.320 Absolutely. I've had parents on this podcast who would not describe themselves as conservatives,
00:27:59.880 as Christians, as Republicans, who have had their children taken out of their custody
00:28:04.940 because their child declared themselves a particular gender that does not align with their sex.
00:28:11.560 The parent didn't go along with it. And the child was taken to a home that affirmed this newfound
00:28:16.820 so-called identity. They were able to butcher their bodies and immutably or irreversibly change
00:28:24.220 their bodies through a hormone regimen. And these parents, the people who have the only people
00:28:30.880 really who have the best interest of their child at heart are completely excised out of the child's
00:28:38.500 life. And so I think you're right that this is an issue, not just the parental rights issue when it
00:28:44.120 comes to that, but this issue of boys declaring themselves girls and vice versa, especially boys and men
00:28:50.880 entering into girls and women's spaces, is one that has woken a lot of people up, I think moved a lot
00:28:57.640 of people over to the right and voting for President Trump. I think a lot of people in the Make America
00:29:02.800 Healthy Again movement, whether or not they are with us on the definition of marriage, when life begins,
00:29:07.640 things like that, they realize not only the absurdity of this issue, but the danger of this issue.
00:29:14.140 And while Trump wasn't as strong on some things during the campaign as I wanted him to,
00:29:18.560 like abortion, on this one, he has been pretty steadfast. So what are you anticipating when it
00:29:24.840 comes to this transgender issue policy-wise in this next administration?
00:29:32.400 I think by the end of this calendar year, the scourge, the tragedy, the evil of properly trained
00:29:40.720 physicians butchering the bodies of young Americans will come to an end. And it will come to an end
00:29:47.480 because of stalwarts like you in the media, stalwarts who are governors of states. And one of the most
00:29:55.640 important stalwarts on this issue has been President Trump. And so there's certainly a role for federal
00:30:01.000 action on this that I think we will see continue here in Washington. And if we do that, that is, if we end
00:30:08.500 this terrible practice, then the United States will simply be catching up with none other than the
00:30:14.840 European Union, which, of course, in most parts of the European Union, most European countries
00:30:19.900 have disallowed this practice. And that, of course, is going to be just in time before this really
00:30:27.200 catches fire. Unfortunately, as we do every January at Heritage, in our gender ideology conference,
00:30:35.240 we have a few people who've gone through transition surgeries. It will not have prevented the terrible
00:30:40.980 tragedy that's been inflicted upon other Americans, but at least there won't be any others. The key
00:30:47.280 thing here, Ali, is that we learn our lesson. And the lesson is that when you take a handful of
00:30:53.520 physicians, a handful of medical schools who are able to get this practice approved by their different
00:31:00.200 licensure boards in various states, we have to understand there is a role for common sense and for
00:31:06.760 those of us who are social conservatives to say, on behalf of American kids, on behalf of biology,
00:31:12.720 on behalf of parents, we have to prevent these kinds of practices. I'm hopeful that not only we
00:31:17.680 secure that victory, but that it becomes a lasting lesson for us across the board in decades to come.
00:31:24.800 The House just passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. I mean, this seems to be just the
00:31:31.440 most common sense piece of legislation. Unfortunately, only two Democrats, but good for these Democrats.
00:31:37.940 Two Democrats from Texas voted for it. The rest of the Democrats voted against it. HR 28 says to amend
00:31:44.240 the Education Amendments of 1972 to provide that for purposes of determining compliance with Title IX
00:31:49.780 of such act of athletic sex shall be recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and
00:31:55.700 genetics at birth. I mean, in a way, it's kind of sad that we even need to spell that out.
00:32:01.440 But I do think even before Trump is president, that it's good that Congress is all already making
00:32:07.740 this clear and moving in that direction. I do think that congressmen, congresswomen are realizing
00:32:14.240 this is whether you like it or not. This is the direction that the country is moving. And I actually
00:32:21.760 hope to see more Democrats realize that. And even if it's just because it's politically advantageous to
00:32:28.100 them, start speaking out about fairness in sports, at the very least, when it comes to women.
00:32:34.800 It's ridiculous that there aren't more Democrats who are willing to do that, to your point on the
00:32:39.360 substance of the matter. But just speaking to the politics of this, this is an 80-20 issue,
00:32:44.540 at least. In fact, one recent poll I saw showed that 85 percent of Americans support the legislation
00:32:49.820 that you just mentioned. And so, yes, hats off to those two Democrats. But almost every other
00:32:55.380 Democrat, every Democrat really should be supporting this because of the common sense.
00:32:59.760 Well, this is, but this sort of conveys a lesson about politics. Rank and file Democrats, pick your
00:33:07.240 state. You know, whether it's a blue state like New York or a red state like Texas, a rank and file
00:33:12.120 Democrat is supportive of this legislation. But the problem is when they become elected officials and
00:33:17.780 they're here in Washington, the institutional part of the Democrat Party prevents them from going along
00:33:23.900 with their populace, with their constituents. And that's really going to cause a reckoning for the
00:33:29.580 political left in this country. As a lifelong conservative, on the political level of this,
00:33:35.160 I relish that they have to go through this kind of controversy that they themselves have created.
00:33:40.120 But obviously, what's far more important than the politics is the human side of this. And it would be
00:33:44.480 great if we just bring this terrible practice to a close right now with their help.
00:33:49.420 Absolutely. Absolutely. I'm praying for that.
00:33:55.940 Second sponsor is Cozy Earth. Y'all, I love our Cozy Earth sheets. I'm about to get another sheet set
00:34:02.440 from Cozy Earth because I just love them so much. And I can't stand when I have any other kind of sheets
00:34:07.540 on my bed. They are so breathable, so soft, so luxurious. I feel the same way about their loungewear.
00:34:13.880 I am always wearing my Cozy Earth quarter zip. Their pajamas are amazing. Just really high quality.
00:34:19.860 And this is a company that you can feel really good about supporting. Plus, they have an awesome
00:34:25.280 deal if you use my code. I typed in my code just to see how much of a discount it would be if I were
00:34:34.040 to buy sheets. And it is so significant. If you go to CozyEarth.com slash relatable and use my code
00:34:39.600 relatable, you get to up to 40% off. That's incredible. CozyEarth.com slash relatable, code
00:34:45.800 relatable.
00:34:50.560 Tell me about your new book, Dawn's Early Light, Taking Back Washington to Save America.
00:34:56.120 Well, there are a lot of public policy leaders who write these books and nothing against them
00:35:02.300 or their books. And, you know, my book is not perfect. I was trying to write a book as the head
00:35:06.860 of the largest conservative policy organization in the world that caused people to think, that caused
00:35:12.640 them to be a little surprised. And so what I do with a little bit of edgy rhetoric is explain what's
00:35:18.580 at stake. And I will say that in a couple of things that I wrote about in the book well before
00:35:23.520 the conclusion of 2024, I sort of predicted the Trump victory and the man who wrote the forward,
00:35:30.300 J.D. Vance, is now the vice president of the United States. I also talked about the mismanagement
00:35:34.760 of California potentially leading to a massive wildfire in the southern part of the state. And I use that
00:35:41.640 concept of forest mismanagement, the lack of controlled burns in a literal sense in forests that
00:35:48.520 of course led to this tragedy in California, and apply that to what we need to do in politics and
00:35:54.320 policy. In other words, I name names, Allie. I talk about the New York Times and what used to be
00:35:59.920 called the Boy Scouts of America as entities that no longer are worthy of existence. Nothing against
00:36:06.100 the people who are in them, but they as institutions no longer deserve to call themselves American
00:36:12.200 institutions. And figuratively speaking, I argue in the book, we need to apply this concept of a
00:36:17.700 controlled burn and eliminate those organizations, those schools, those universities that simply are
00:36:23.720 doing no good, but actually doing a lot of harm. And I inject a personal story like a lot of people
00:36:28.800 and the vice president who was inaugurated today had some challenges in my family life as a child.
00:36:34.680 And I try to appeal to the quintessential American story of living the American dream,
00:36:40.000 which I dare say, based on what happened today in Washington, is still alive and well.
00:36:44.820 Yeah. You know, Christians built the many of the universities that now are the worst perpetrators
00:36:51.640 of this progressive activism that are turning out those who are out there in the streets,
00:36:56.880 anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian, anti-American protesters. Many of them are products of these
00:37:05.240 Ivy League schools that actually have like a Christian pro-America foundation. What does it look like?
00:37:12.320 Can you give me an example of how America loving people can take back these institutions for the
00:37:19.380 good of the country? I'll give you two examples, both in education, because you know, that's my
00:37:24.340 first love, having founded a school and run a college. And the first would be what any parent
00:37:29.360 can do. And whether your child's in public schools, or whether they're in private schools,
00:37:33.640 or whether you're homeschooling, in all of those cases, you are using a curriculum. And you need to
00:37:39.860 have some skepticism about the curriculum that you're using. And so it doesn't matter if you're
00:37:45.080 not someone who says, I have enough formal education to do this. You're an American. Of course you do.
00:37:50.760 It doesn't matter if you're a business person or a liberal arts person or a physics person. Go ask
00:37:56.600 questions about the curriculum that your child is using. And I'm just here to tell you that if by simply
00:38:02.500 taking that simple act, you are going to learn more and you might discover something in some of those
00:38:08.080 cases where it's really bad. And if you discover that it's bad, then you need to take action. You
00:38:12.600 need to be more involved in your child's education. The second example is also in education, but it's
00:38:18.040 in universities and it involves public policy. I think that universities that take federal funds
00:38:24.860 for student loans and grants, for research, which is almost all of them, that if they have large
00:38:30.980 endowments and they are teaching things that are anti-American and they have students to whom they are
00:38:36.020 promising a great education and they're not delivering it, that their endowments ought to
00:38:40.520 be taxed by the federal government. I think that they need to lose some of the privileges they have
00:38:45.120 because frankly, they're living off the trough of the generosity of the American people,
00:38:50.300 but doing everything in their power to undermine the American dream. And what's particularly sadistic
00:38:56.640 about this, Ali, to your point, is that in so many of these cases, particularly all of the Ivy League
00:39:02.220 colleges, these are entities that have Christian roots. And there was a time when they offered the
00:39:08.960 finest education in the history of the world, and now they're at embarrassment. Federal policy ought to
00:39:14.960 treat them as such, rather than holding them up on pedestals.
00:39:19.080 What about our security apparatus in the United States? A lot of people are concerned about that,
00:39:25.280 especially in light of recent terror attacks. And you've got people asking, rightly so,
00:39:30.600 okay, how did these people get in? I mean, as far as we know, the person who committed the atrocity
00:39:37.020 in Louisiana was an American citizen, but how did they become radicalized? And how did this happen?
00:39:45.440 Were they already known to law enforcement? Could something have been prevented? And we just wonder,
00:39:54.340 are our intelligence agencies, are they effective? Are they operating in integrity? I think,
00:40:00.400 a lot of people would say no, in many cases, and people want to see an overhaul. I mean,
00:40:06.600 it's a national security issue, of course, and people don't like instability. That's one reason
00:40:12.460 why President Trump got elected. We don't like instability. We want him to bring back stability
00:40:17.280 and strength and protection. So tell us about that. Like, can there be some kind of overhaul?
00:40:23.180 The corruption runs so deep, sometimes it feels kind of hopeless.
00:40:28.460 It does feel hopeless. I'm more hopeful today than I was yesterday. Thank goodness President Trump won.
00:40:34.720 But boy, do some of his appointees have a big job ahead of them. John Ratcliffe at the CIA,
00:40:40.600 Kash Patel at the FBI, which I think is the most rotten of the rotten agencies, not just intelligence
00:40:45.860 agencies, but federal agencies, period. And we have to get them fixed for the American people.
00:40:51.000 Take, for example, the perpetrator in Louisiana. He is a native-born American. He is someone who
00:40:58.060 was radicalized, it seems, fairly recently before the attack. But think about the FBI's response
00:41:04.380 to that. On three or four different major questions in the first days following that tragedy,
00:41:11.740 they gave completely opposite answers to questions. And at the very least, that's incompetent and doesn't
00:41:19.080 breed any kind of confidence in their assessment. But what I've happened to come to know firsthand
00:41:25.100 because of the work that we do at Heritage involving some retired FBI agents is that the FBI
00:41:30.580 is rotten to the core. That in fact, someone like you or someone like me, maybe many people in the
00:41:36.160 audience, merely by being conservative is more of a target of FBI analysis and assessment than are people
00:41:43.340 who are real perpetrators like this man. And so this is precisely the kind of thing that has to be fixed.
00:41:49.360 I will say, Ali, that I am cautiously optimistic that it will. I'm only cautiously optimistic
00:41:55.520 because there is something that is very real and it's the deep state. And until and unless Trump's
00:42:01.240 excellent appointees to these intelligence agencies in leading them will just completely, in a figurative
00:42:07.280 sense, lop off the heads of the deep state, we're going to continue to have this problem. It is a
00:42:13.560 huge priority, not just for the American people, but for free societies around the world.
00:42:18.820 Yes. I mean, you mentioned in your book some of the other non-governmental institutions, BlackRock,
00:42:23.640 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. I mean, these organizations, George Soros' Open Society,
00:42:29.220 they've also got a lot of power. Now, not as much power as I thought they did because I thought there
00:42:34.680 was no way they were going to allow Donald Trump to win, whatever it means, legal or whatever,
00:42:42.000 that they could employ to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. I certainly thought that they
00:42:46.820 would pull out all the stops. And so, as you said, there's already more hope than I thought,
00:42:53.280 but it sounds like people need to read your book to understand the specifics of how these people can be
00:42:59.840 stopped and how the institutions that used to exist for America's good can go back to serving
00:43:07.100 that purpose. So, I'm guessing they can get it wherever books are sold. Is that correct?
00:43:12.300 That's correct. They can get it anywhere. And to your point just now, just very briefly, I try to use
00:43:16.820 stories of regular Americans, people who would say that they're not special in the same way that
00:43:22.340 I would say that I'm not special. My heritage colleagues are not special, just ordinary Americans who
00:43:26.880 work behind enemy lines here in Washington, D.C. on everyone's behalf. But I used stories of those
00:43:32.440 ordinary Americans in the book to encourage others who are reading the book to understand
00:43:37.220 they, too, can play a really small part that has a big consequence in taking back the country. And yes,
00:43:44.520 you can find the book anywhere good books are sold. That's Dawn's Early Light,
00:43:49.260 Taking Back Washington to Save America. Thank you so much. I really appreciate you taking the time to come on.
00:43:55.000 Allie, you're a great American. It was a pleasure. Likewise. Thank you.