Ep 1181 | Silent Lunches & Stolen Childhoods: The Truth About School Shutdowns | Guest: David Zweig
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 5 minutes
Words per Minute
177.68895
Summary
Investigative journalist David Zweig published an article in New York Magazine in 2021 debunking the myth that widespread masking at schools is preventing the spread of covid. And he is here today, talking about his incredible new book, An Abundance of Caution, about how our public health apparatus, how our media, and our politicians worked together to hide the truth about covid and its spread.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
investigative journalist david zweig published an article in new york magazine in 2021
00:00:07.840
debunking the myth that widespread masking at schools is preventing the spread of covid and
00:00:15.640
he is here today talking about his incredible new book called an abundance of caution and
00:00:23.740
he gives us a behind the scenes look at how our public health apparatus how our media how our
00:00:32.380
politicians worked together to hide the truth about covid and covid policies oh my goodness
00:00:41.600
this is an incredible conversation i learned so much i know that you are going to appreciate his
00:00:48.260
clarity and his courage and this is a very timely conversation with everything that is going on so
00:00:55.800
buckle up you are going to learn so much this episode is brought to you by our friends at
00:01:00.760
go to ranchers go to go to ranchers.com use code ally at checkout that's go to ranchers.com code ally
00:01:06.680
david thanks so much for taking the time to join us uh for those who may not know can you tell us
00:01:20.880
who you are and what you do sure my name is david zweig i'm an investigative journalist and author
00:01:26.820
and i'm here to speak with you about my new book an abundance of caution american schools the virus
00:01:33.780
and a story of bad decisions yes when you reached out to me i recognized your name immediately because
00:01:40.120
i remember using your articles when i was talking about masks in was it 2021 or 2022 probably 2021 i
00:01:49.320
think yes and the reason why they were so instrumental is because suddenly we had a voice in the mainstream
00:01:56.660
in new york magazine the atlantic and elsewhere saying uh our masking policy our school shutdown policy
00:02:03.760
it doesn't seem to be working so can we back up to then how did all of that come about for you
00:02:09.560
yeah um i live in the new york area so like most people in my area when kind of things first shut down
00:02:17.040
i was fully on board and compliant with everything um i'm a little embarrassed to admit maybe there was
00:02:23.740
even some wiping down of groceries in the in the first few days me too okay right because i was listening
00:02:29.860
to the experts yeah and we were going along um and as your audience probably knows and remembers
00:02:36.420
we were given uh 15 days to slow the spread remember that slogan and it was also flatten the curve
00:02:43.100
and you might remember they showed basically a graph where if there's if everyone listened to their
00:02:49.820
instructions and followed orders then it would be this gentle slope of cases but if you didn't listen
00:02:54.880
there'd be this big spike and it would overwhelm the hospitals well by the end of april um i was
00:03:03.700
walking with a friend of mine and we were just recounting how miserable and absurd remote learning
00:03:10.360
was it was just it was an abject failure basically from day one it was obvious this wasn't going to
00:03:15.660
work long term but it was explained to us this was a trade-off to keep people safe to prevent the
00:03:21.020
hospitals from being overwhelmed so even though it was bad you know we went along so something
00:03:27.840
interesting happened though by the end of april cases in new york had fallen by something like 50
00:03:33.940
since like a peak in early april and i said to my friend we did it man we flattened the curve um i
00:03:42.140
guess what do you think they're gonna like open schools like next week or something what's going on
00:03:46.060
yeah and he was like dave they're not going back and that's when i realized something was really
00:03:53.140
wrong um because we were told to do something we all followed the instructions and we achieved the
00:03:59.620
goal and then they just you know move the proverbial goalpost at that point and that's when for me as as
00:04:07.000
someone who's an investigator and i've spent a lot of time before the pandemic um i'm very familiar
00:04:13.080
with talking with academics and scientists reading um journals um about scientific articles i was
00:04:20.520
had this sense i'm like i better start looking into this because something strange here because
00:04:25.200
they basically lied and i'm not seeing anyone really much noise about this this is kind of strange
00:04:32.400
yeah so that set me on the path to trying to investigate things myself because i wasn't seeing
00:04:38.820
any real questioning of what was going on within the media and eventually i was like well i'm in
00:04:45.120
the media i guess i'll have to do this and did you consider yourself progressive or like democrat is
00:04:53.220
that how you've politically identified in the past i would say most of my adult life i've been left
00:04:58.440
leaning yeah um i've always identified as an independent yeah um although in new york you can't vote in a
00:05:04.580
primary unless you're with a party so i from time to time i would you know just have an affiliation
00:05:09.700
but um i've always leaned left politically and we can get into this if you want but um and but still
00:05:17.420
been an independent thinker i'm not like just kind of like a no matter what democratic yeah clearly
00:05:22.220
yeah so i always had a little bit of this independent or more than a little streak but
00:05:26.300
nevertheless that's where i leaned um after my experience during the pandemic with the research i did
00:05:32.020
it's i have to say it's my political leaning is completely shattered at this point i don't lean
00:05:38.700
toward the right either um but the my faith and when people read this book i mean perhaps your audience
00:05:45.720
already is has cynical uh viewpoint on some of public health and larger institutions it will be impossible
00:05:52.220
for someone to read this and not and and not have their faith completely shaken in in our expert
00:05:59.260
class the book really is about the failure of the expert class i'm so interested in that time for
00:06:06.120
you when you looked around and you said okay something doesn't seem right this doesn't seem to
00:06:11.600
change it doesn't seem to be corresponding with the data we see a lot of people in the media
00:06:17.500
at that moment said well you know what i think i'm gonna shut up about it because i don't want
00:06:23.280
to be accused of killing grandma or killing kids and they must know what they're talking about but
00:06:29.560
there was something in you maybe it was that independent streak maybe it's just because you
00:06:33.360
love digging for truth that said you know i'm not going to be quiet about this and this really
00:06:39.460
bothers me and i'm going to do something about that where do you think that came from yeah it's a
00:06:45.160
really good question because initially i just wanted to find out what was going on i was in the
00:06:50.420
middle of writing a book i was under contract totally different topic obviously and i just
00:06:55.140
needed to know what was happening um because the information we were being given didn't match again
00:07:01.040
that moment where it was like we flattened the curve cases have dropped 50 what's going on why
00:07:07.480
aren't the kids going back to school um so for me i just needed to satisfy my own curiosity
00:07:13.020
but then that shifted toward a sort of a professional goal when it was clear that no one else was covering
00:07:21.080
this and um i guess i think there's just you know if you're curious about like my psychology or
00:07:27.180
something yeah i guess maybe part of me has always felt a little alienated and and that degree of
00:07:33.040
alienation um i think has some downside but it also has enabled me to be really tolerant of being in
00:07:41.440
an out group um whereas most people naturally don't want to be cast out they want their peers
00:07:47.300
to like them i'd prefer if people liked me i prefer to be in a group but i'm willing to to not be in
00:07:52.960
the group i don't care i think also part of it may be and we can get into this like most of the people
00:07:58.580
in the media are from a particular background they went to fancy schools i went to a state school i
00:08:04.320
wasn't you know a straight a student i didn't kind of like follow this particular trajectory that so many
00:08:09.980
of those people um followed so i think that also sort of set me apart and it's one of the things
00:08:15.580
that um i think is so important about if we want to talk about how to restore trust in some of our
00:08:23.440
institutions in particular health institutions but others as well that to me what you really need is
00:08:29.700
you know there's so much talk about dei but there needs to be diversity of ideology of political
00:08:36.380
views and other types of diversity um that's what really matters in my in in my view is how people
00:08:42.340
think differently and unfortunately and what i talk a lot about in the book and i explain through lots of
00:08:48.380
i think really interesting examples throughout time is how group think when people are within like a
00:08:56.580
certain tribe is extraordinarily powerful and unfortunately people within the public health
00:09:02.780
establishment almost everyone there leans left almost everyone within the legacy media leans to
00:09:10.000
the left so when you have these two really influential institutions that were working basically
00:09:15.360
together um during the pandemic most of those people again going back to what i was saying how did
00:09:22.120
they get there how do you get to the new york times well you probably got straight a's in school
00:09:26.440
then you went to yale or brown then maybe you went to columbia journalism school
00:09:30.720
then you you know wind up there all these people not all most of them followed a similar path
00:09:37.460
um to get to where they are and that path involved not being a rabble rouser not being an iconoclast
00:09:43.940
and that's within medicine as well you know medicine self-selects for people who are really smart usually
00:09:49.660
who work really hard those are good traits that's really important for a doctor but it also selects for
00:09:55.500
rule followers you know when you are in when you're a resident you can't just ignore the attending you
00:10:01.560
know you have to follow you're not just going to go against all of your peers um if they're saying
00:10:05.900
something so you have these institutions composed of a certain type of person with a certain type of
00:10:11.660
political leaning and a way that they're they all kind of got to where they are the success they had by
00:10:17.020
kind of staying within the group um and that's ultimately i think what i show in the book is that's
00:10:22.860
really dangerous when you have this one type of personality type again i'm i'm generalizing here
00:10:28.940
but that's more or less what happened and ultimately it took a small number of people who are outside
00:10:35.900
um or who or who could tolerate being outside that that group to push back against um some of the things
00:10:43.140
that they were doing and saying because unfortunately our public health institutions um really misled the
00:10:50.120
american public on a variety of things within the pandemic but what i was particularly focused on
00:10:55.040
is on children in schools and the and the misleading information from those authorities was not questioned
00:11:02.360
by the the most prestigious uh media institutions in our country um so those that's much of my book
00:11:09.180
talks about the sort of dynamic like how do the gears of our society turn when your audience is
00:11:17.040
thinking about oh there's some narrative going on now you know in the media or just in the country
00:11:21.860
how does that happen how does that create that's what my book shows it's it takes place during the
00:11:27.200
pandemic but that's really just the backdrop to understand decision making and narrative formation
00:11:33.780
quick pause to tell you about our first sponsor for the day and that is carly jean los angeles i love
00:11:44.160
cjla y'all know how much i love cjla i love their denim their denim is so flattering it fits so well
00:11:51.320
it's stretchy and comfortable without losing its shape and they've got all different kinds of styles
00:11:56.780
i love their basics line because everything in their basics line is made in the u.s and they have a new
00:12:03.060
athletic line out so if you're looking for leggings and tanks and all that kind of stuff and you want to
00:12:08.980
buy that from a christian family owned company then get that from cjla they've got all kinds of good
00:12:15.400
stuff great dresses for summer no matter what season of life you're in whether you are pregnant
00:12:20.940
or postpartum or neither of those things they've got clothes that will make you feel really good in
00:12:27.160
your skin i love cjla and what they stand for that they are not only offering awesome products for
00:12:34.120
women but they are also trying to glorify god in everything they do so it's just a win all around
00:12:38.680
go to carlyjeanlosangeles.com use code ally b for 20 off your next order that's carlyjeanlosangeles.com
00:12:47.620
code ally b what was the first disturbing finding if you can remember when you started to dig into this
00:12:59.980
in 2020 at that point you kind of just had a suspicion that something was wrong but obviously
00:13:05.300
as you dug into it that suspicion was confirmed so what was the first thing that you found that set
00:13:11.100
you off on oh i gotta keep going i would say um very early it was obvious that children were not at
00:13:19.280
at any great risk from the virus um it was well established um in the beginning and so i just kept
00:13:25.640
collecting more and more um data to support that idea i started talking with scientists mostly in
00:13:32.680
europe because they weren't doing this in america um but speaking with experts in europe and then the
00:13:39.920
next question was well kids can be quote unquote super spreaders so the the beginning um sort of
00:13:46.300
narrative was kids are in grave danger you know or they might be we can't open schools um then that
00:13:52.280
shifted toward well maybe kids are okay but they're going to kill their grandmother they're
00:13:57.000
going to kill teachers right so one of the main pivot points for me was toward the end of april in
00:14:03.560
the beginning of may millions of children started going back to school in europe 22 countries ali
00:14:10.880
reopened in europe started reopening their schools 22 countries okay and in may there was a meeting at
00:14:18.240
the eu of education ministers and in that meeting they said we have not observed any negative
00:14:24.520
consequences of schools reopening we're not seeing anything with case rates or stuff like that they met
00:14:30.040
a second time in june they had the same determination we haven't observed anything now just like pause for
00:14:36.940
a moment on this this is not like a weird like a tiny schoolhouse in the middle of mongolia you know
00:14:43.400
with 10 kids we're talking about millions of kids in school in developed countries not dissimilar from
00:14:50.240
america and this was virtually non-existent um in the media this this meeting and i couldn't believe
00:14:59.620
it i watched this video over and over because i'm like how is it possible that this isn't a headline
00:15:05.160
in every newspaper in the country why isn't this on every single tv station there's this is it the main
00:15:11.860
argument was kids are going to be putting other people in danger well here it is we have this
00:15:17.260
real world experiment you don't even need to do a contrived experiment we have millions of kids
00:15:21.760
and this was ignored ali it was ignored by the media by and large and it was ignored by our experts the
00:15:28.380
health officials how could that be so i ultimately wrote about um the meetings myself but i was just one
00:15:34.920
voice within this but that was one of the main points where i was where i was like something is
00:15:41.720
extraordinarily wrong that what we would call empirical evidence which means evidence that you
00:15:49.240
can see and experience yourself that empirical evidence was being ignored and instead the officials
00:15:57.320
were following theory they made up all sorts of contrived reasons oh it's because that's europe that
00:16:02.760
doesn't count they're doing that we need to wear masks we need to have a hepa filter we need to
00:16:07.700
have six feet of distancing none of these things by the way ali were were um done across the board in
00:16:14.500
europe they did not follow six feet of distancing there across the board many of the schools there
00:16:19.000
were doing three feet or one meter or nothing at all kids there the ecdc that's europe's version of
00:16:25.500
the cdc they recommended against kids in primary school wearing masks so forget about us saying two-year-olds
00:16:32.340
had to wear masks they didn't even want them doing it there they weren't following there was a whole
00:16:36.620
thing i have a long section in my book about hepa filters because it drove me crazy that schools in
00:16:41.420
america some of them literally were not opened because teachers unions or others were demanding
00:16:47.140
that they have a hepa filter that's like a special filter on like air conditioning i remember the
00:16:50.980
teachers unions make it a huge deal of that they don't use those in europe by and large that would be
00:16:56.520
very very rare schools didn't have hepa filters so again none of these things that we were told
00:17:02.900
were critical to make school safe to open none of them were were being used across the board in europe
00:17:09.540
and cases there this is what happened to cases after they opened schools they went down like this now i'm
00:17:16.200
not suggesting that opening schools causes cases to go down but what that does suggest of course is that
00:17:21.520
children were not super spreaders schools were not driving the pandemic and we can get into why that
00:17:26.480
is but the point is the evidence was there that this wasn't dangerous this wasn't increasing cases
00:17:32.680
and it was ignored and it was dismissed with these contrived reasons and for me as a dad and as
00:17:40.940
an investigator and a journalist it was unacceptable
00:17:44.080
i remember there was a study maybe it was around 2021 maybe 2022 that it was a cdc study and everyone
00:17:54.100
was pointing to it saying see these schools over here that wear masks they're having fewer deaths in
00:17:59.680
their community in these schools over here and i remember you debunked that you pointed out that
00:18:04.280
journalists were kind of just looking at the abstract decontextualizing it and reporting on that
00:18:10.000
and not digging into the study right yeah there's actually more than one study unfortunately by the
00:18:16.400
cdc that purported that mask mandates were reducing community transmission or school transmission and the
00:18:23.880
evidence i can't emphasize this enough like i approach this topic apolitically like i don't have an agenda
00:18:30.220
and you know i'm not coming at it from one side or another the reality is the cdc's science that they
00:18:38.520
conducted or that they used to support their positions was incredibly poor and was incredibly
00:18:45.160
misleading it's it's i know that's hard for some people to believe maybe not your audience i don't
00:18:50.920
know right but there are a lot of people who you know including me my faith was you know these were
00:18:56.740
the good guys these are public health experts why would they lie to us why would they you know
00:19:00.820
manipulate something one way or another so just very briefly this masking study that i had written about
00:19:07.720
there was a study done in in arizona and i won't get into all the details but at one point i got um
00:19:15.880
official data from the state of arizona and from the counties that they were looking at these were
00:19:21.620
official numbers from you know the source from from the government there in arizona and the numbers
00:19:27.800
differed from what was in the study um that the cdc published and i and and these difference
00:19:34.640
mattered a lot um regarding you know how how they um came up with their findings there were many many
00:19:40.060
things wrong with the study but this was one thing where it wasn't my opinion it wasn't my
00:19:44.080
interpretation because someone could argue about that well who are you to say that the you know
00:19:48.100
analysis is wrong this was just these are the data and they're different so i reached out to the cdc
00:19:54.160
and i said hey you know i have this data from from this is from the state of arizona this is the
00:19:58.880
official numbers and it's different from what's in your study you know how can that be what do you
00:20:03.020
have to say about this and they wrote back to me we've looked at the study and there are no errors
00:20:09.100
and like that's something that you don't recover from or at least for me and so when you're asking
00:20:17.860
about these like moments it's the european schools opening this was yet another moment where after that
00:20:24.440
i mean you you can't go back i mean it was an extraordinary moment i mean they were lying through
00:20:30.260
their teeth when they said that to me or if they weren't then they are so incompetent that they
00:20:35.240
should not be in that field at all yeah to have that response it's it was quite stunning and and
00:20:41.500
yet you know as you point as we're sort of touching on much of my book is about the media a lot of it's
00:20:47.760
about evidence and about understanding how things work but media even for people who don't like the
00:20:53.580
new york times or who don't want to watch cbs or whatever it may be that still is influencing the
00:20:58.520
culture that still has an enormous impact and then maybe even even if you don't like it then part of
00:21:03.700
your effort then has to become how do we counter these messages so yeah again one of the things that
00:21:09.080
i think is so important about the book is i hope it will arm readers with information and an
00:21:15.240
understanding about what i would call like the anatomy of how this thing looks and how it works and
00:21:22.380
as a writer i was occupying this really strange rare lane where i was still writing within some of
00:21:31.100
these sort of legacy media publications but i was the lone voice in pushing back against what was an
00:21:37.740
accepted view yeah it was rare and that's exactly what i was about to ask you about new york magazine i
00:21:44.800
think that was the first article i saw but you had written you know you wrote for wired and i was
00:21:51.000
surprised that new york magazine was publishing something like this i don't know what else they
00:21:55.720
had published on covid but other mainstream outlets like the new york times and the washington post
00:22:00.160
had been purveyors of a lot of the information that you're talking about kind of uncritically just
00:22:05.040
saying this is what the cdc says and so it must be true that informs policy as you said were you
00:22:11.100
surprised when you started getting published by these mainstream outlets as the lone critical voice
00:22:15.840
well i was more surprised in the beginning when i had pitched a bunch of places and look as a
00:22:21.480
freelance writer um no one owes me a response no one owes me you know a guarantee it's not easy
00:22:27.960
but i had written for them i had contacts um shortly before i started i wrote my first piece and wired
00:22:34.840
um i had what i believe was the most read piece in the entire new york times for at least a day if not
00:22:41.000
a couple days it was about a newlywed who got stranded newlywed couple who got stranded in
00:22:45.380
the maldives once like the world shut down it was very so these people knew who i was and the way
00:22:52.180
that i was able to sort of break that that kind of wall if you will in a few publications was that
00:23:01.040
i tend to not write things that are based on anecdote a lot of the way journalism works you have
00:23:06.980
one person or maybe a few there's a profile it's personal it's a it's very effective and then you
00:23:11.980
use that to build your broader argument you may bring in some statistics or studies i don't do
00:23:16.840
that generally i just try to pound you with here's the information and i just have a bullet list you
00:23:22.620
know when i'm pitching an editor here's what i've got and thank god there were at least a few editors
00:23:28.240
at these places who had the courage and the ability internally to to push back against kind of an
00:23:34.660
accepted viewpoint and and because they read my pitch and they're like this is kind of irrefutable
00:23:41.660
what this guy is showing us so that i think that's the way that i was able to break through because
00:23:46.780
other writers who i'm friendly with who are writing for more sort of right-leaning publications or for
00:23:51.960
sub-stacks they're like how are you pulling this off and um and that that's even now with with my book
00:23:57.820
which is published by mit press you know this is very very much within that's about as you know
00:24:03.280
within academia and the left as you can get but i think they respect that my journalism is grounded
00:24:11.620
in research it doesn't mean i don't make mistakes but but by and large i support everything i say i
00:24:18.920
have hundreds of end notes in my book because i don't ever want to make a claim where someone's
00:24:23.500
going to read and be like where did he get that from because that's my main criticism of what the
00:24:28.180
media did instead of there's this thing in philosophy they call it an argument from authority
00:24:32.940
which i see you nodding right which is it's a logical fallacy it means you shouldn't believe
00:24:38.920
someone just because of their credentials just because someone you know and unfortunately that's
00:24:44.620
what the media did by and large throughout the pandemic that they simply quoted oh anthony fauci
00:24:50.440
says this or they sometimes wouldn't even um quote someone who would just say experts say
00:24:55.140
and then they had a list of things but there was no evidence to support this the journalists weren't
00:25:00.300
doing their most basic job which is to be skeptical of claims by people in power and to either force
00:25:06.400
them to provide evidence or to investigate it yourself but they didn't so we had essentially a
00:25:12.680
country where the people in charge were like this kind of infantilizing the public where this
00:25:19.020
finger wagging sort of mom you need to listen to us and do what we say it's almost like a mom
00:25:24.200
because i said so that's essentially what we were told it was the because i said so do this because
00:25:30.640
they weren't providing any evidence and when they did provide evidence it was very very poorly uh
00:25:36.260
supported oh man there's so much that i could analyze in that i i think that progressives suffer
00:25:42.140
from misplaced mothering in a lot of ways they actually take up social justice causes as a way to
00:25:48.200
channel the instinct of mothering and it leads to a lot of i think misleading or actually dangerous
00:25:55.740
policies but one of the formulas i think that's a fair hypothesis and my book would be strong support
00:26:02.640
for that hypothesis yes and even though we don't i'm sure that there are plenty of things that we don't
00:26:08.600
agree with culturally politically the formula that you articulated about journalists kind of taking an
00:26:15.120
anecdote that supports the conclusion that they already have that pulls at the heartstrings the
00:26:20.700
story pulls at the heartstrings so when it comes to covid maybe it's a grandma who died because her
00:26:27.020
child came home from school and had covid and then they go within and they sprinkle in the supporting
00:26:33.160
facts and i talk about that not to promote my book but in toxic empathy when it comes to abortion when
00:26:39.480
it comes to so many other subjects that is how a lot of these outlets will write their stories it's not
00:26:45.860
just peppering you with facts it's starting with a story that is triggering your empathy and then
00:26:51.920
they've already got you really and then all of the like the supporting facts are just it's kind of icing
00:26:56.960
on the cake that makes you feel justified and righteous in your empathy and then that leads you to vote a
00:27:03.920
certain way and to support certain policies that may not actually be rooted in truth and i saw that a
00:27:09.740
lot with covid it was emotional extortion do you want my grandma to die what about this one six-year-old
00:27:17.360
who also has asthma and is on a ventilator you not wearing a mask is causing them to die and most people
00:27:23.960
cannot withstand that to the point of digging into the facts because it's too uncomfortable and it's
00:27:30.640
like the payoff for digging into the facts and creating that relational tension with the people
00:27:36.620
who are blaming them for like the potential death of thousands of people it's not enough it's not
00:27:41.840
enough so most people just buckle under the pressure and say well i want to keep the peace as much as i
00:27:47.140
can but if everyone does that we're in a really dangerous place right which is exactly what happened
00:27:51.540
that's such a wonderful phrase by the way toxic empathy it's great i mean it's so not not not everyone
00:27:57.000
thinks so well progressives definitely don't i think it it very accurately describes a sort of
00:28:03.100
emotional manipulation um and then people feel virtual i'm good you're bad i'm so good you're bad
00:28:12.320
and when so to have an anecdote that triggers someone emotionally then they and the problem is
00:28:19.240
this began with at the early part of the pandemic where we were told certain things about certain risks
00:28:25.880
and there's a thing called the primacy effect where when you're told something initially that tends to
00:28:30.820
calcify for people and it's very very hard even when people are presented with new information
00:28:37.000
to unwind um what you've already kind of that feeling you've already established in your mind or in your
00:28:43.540
heart so even though there was tons of information and i was trying my darndest to get it out there and
00:28:49.340
other people were as well it didn't matter um that's one part of it is the toxic empathy as you're
00:28:55.060
describing the other part simply is that um that opening schools and then you know more broadly
00:29:01.420
opening things up but in particular when i'm you know was was so damaging with schools um was that
00:29:08.700
this became very quickly coded as right wing and once something got again with this calcification once
00:29:15.860
it was coded as right wing again these themes that i'm talking about with tribalism and group think
00:29:21.200
people it was radioactive trump tweeted in july of 2020 something to the effect of open the schools
00:29:30.000
in the fall it was all caps with a bunch of exclamation points once he did that he ensured
00:29:35.620
that schools in half the country would remain closed because this was what i call like newtonian
00:29:41.840
physics it's every action has the equal and opposite reaction they had to react against it
00:29:47.200
especially in an election year exactly so he and the american academy of pediatrics put out guidance
00:29:53.260
that was very aggressive is not the right word but very very strenuously said kids need to be in school
00:29:59.840
don't even worry about six feet of distancing if you do three feet that's fine it's not worth it
00:30:04.640
um to keep them out of school just for three versus six they said get them in there after trump's tweet
00:30:10.620
almost immediately after the aap reversed its guidance gone was this idea of don't worry about
00:30:16.940
the six feet of distancing gone was the idea of no matter what get them in instead they said listen to the
00:30:22.640
experts and they said schools need a lot of money we're going to need an enormous amount of resources
00:30:29.780
to open the schools and then the third piece of that is who authored this new statement with them
00:30:34.680
it was co-authored by the two largest teachers unions in the country so it was and i have many
00:30:41.300
examples predominantly our democrat and wanted joe biden to win oh yeah i mean uh jill jill biden's
00:30:48.420
like first meeting in the white house was with the the heads of the two largest teachers unions there's
00:30:53.340
no wine garden and randy wine garden and at the time becky pringle um there's no ambiguity about the
00:30:59.180
political leanings and i have lots of stats in my book about you know donations and money there's no
00:31:04.500
there's no ambiguity of where of where their political allegiance lies and they say that
00:31:09.780
themselves um so this was the response in america was completely politicized and to me one of one of
00:31:18.720
the ironies is that the left generally views itself as a champion of the underprivileged um this is how
00:31:26.720
they position themselves but yet the policies that the left advocated for harmed the very
00:31:34.380
people that they ostensibly cared about the most poor people black kids brown kids those are the
00:31:41.520
kids who got harmed the most because of lengthy school closures in america and to a lesser degree
00:31:47.960
some a lot of these other policies the mask mandates the hybrid schedules and all this other nonsense
00:31:53.760
that harmed those kids the most and it's one of the most tragic ironies of of the pandemic and i think
00:32:01.660
something that people on the left have not reckoned with
00:32:04.820
all right want to remind y'all about share the arrows share the arrows 2025 brought to you by our
00:32:15.800
friends at carly jean los angeles and it is going to be such an amazing event this year we've got
00:32:23.240
elisa childers we've got ginger duggar vuolo shauna holman and taylor dukes that will be on a really
00:32:28.960
unique and compelling health panel we've got katie faust we will be led in worship by the incredible
00:32:35.900
francesca battistelli grammy award winning artist i don't know of another christian women's conference
00:32:42.480
like this one i'm sure there are some other great ones out there but this level of apologetics of
00:32:49.180
theology of challenging teaching equipping teaching for women no matter what life stage you are in whether
00:32:55.360
you are a mom a grandmother whether you are single it is just going to be such an edifying equipping day
00:33:03.800
you will walk out of there having so much clarity and feeling so much courage go to share the arrows
00:33:09.740
dot com we've got vip tickets we've got regular tickets bring your small group bring your mother-in-law
00:33:15.640
your sisters your friends it's going to be amazing october 11th dallas texas share the arrows dot com
00:33:21.420
tell us more about what you found out about the mechanics of public health you said it kind of
00:33:32.680
shattered your faith in our public health apparatus what do you mean by that well something like that
00:33:38.540
experience with emailing with the cdc and they're just you know the term gaslighting gets used a lot
00:33:43.700
but i mean they were full of it and and they knew it i don't know if i try not to curse on your
00:33:48.800
program you've done good you've done good making an effort um something like that you don't recover
00:33:55.260
from and it was very clear that these people within these institutions were afraid it most of them
00:34:03.660
people just go along most physicians don't read studies they might look at an abstract and that's it
00:34:10.680
and instead but if you had gotten to a debate with someone or an argument they would say well i'm gonna
00:34:16.820
listen to my doctor i'm not listening to you well it's like sorry your suburban pediatrician actually
00:34:21.680
doesn't know anything about mask mandates they also don't know anything about studies on viral
00:34:27.540
mitigation they just don't and that doesn't mean they're not a good pediatrician taking care of the
00:34:32.360
you know various things that you do in that practice but the idea that like regular doctors had a
00:34:38.780
clue about any of this stuff was farcical but this was the sort of like a mic drop that you couldn't argue
00:34:44.700
with them that there was this sort of um almost like this insular idea about who were the experts
00:34:51.160
we were supposed to listen to and no one else could be listened to and you know two points on that one
00:34:58.480
of them is that touching on this idea that when i mentioned about how the american academy of
00:35:03.300
pediatrics reversed its guidance after the trump thing i also talk about in my book that once i started
00:35:08.760
writing a bunch of these articles that were in these kind of legacy media outlets but that very much were
00:35:14.000
against the the established view i started having people emailing me and contacting me from around
00:35:19.500
the country and included in that list of people were a lot of doctors and even former cdc officials
00:35:25.640
and many of them the emails would start out with thank you so much for writing this i agree with what
00:35:32.640
you're saying this is i don't think this is right the school should be open this is harming kids i don't
00:35:38.100
think there's any benefit the mask mandates are crazy whatever it may be and they said but all of this
00:35:43.500
is off the record can't talk about it um and the reason was obvious is because they didn't want to
00:35:50.240
be cast out of their group and i'm sympathetic to it to some degree look if you spend all these years
00:35:55.980
as a physician you know going to medical school this is how you pay your mortgage not everyone has
00:36:01.200
the type of either professionally or socially the type of personality to tolerate yeah being cast out but
00:36:07.320
i'll tell you something else a number of them also were explicitly told by administrators and these
00:36:13.500
are people by the way at top university hospitals in the country at some of our most prestigious
00:36:17.920
institutions and their boss or the administrator said do not speak publicly against the cdc or anthony
00:36:26.040
fauci or deborah burks you are not allowed to do it full stop so what our country was experiencing
00:36:32.740
was essentially a manufactured consensus because we were repeatedly told well this is what the experts
00:36:39.760
say but we weren't being shown the public by and large what experts in europe were saying and doing
00:36:45.380
because they came to a very different conclusion about how to respond with schools and kids and we
00:36:50.980
also weren't hearing from these voices within the u.s who either were silencing themselves or were told
00:36:56.900
by their administrators you are not allowed to talk about this so when you talk when we think about
00:37:03.280
the mechanics of how things work that's one of the important things for people to understand
00:37:07.720
is the degree of of sort of tribalism and self-censorship that goes on within these institutions
00:37:15.120
and i show how through kind of what are basically a series of case studies of how there was this
00:37:22.920
essentially a divorce from what's called evidence-based medicine which is which is a specific
00:37:29.600
scientific process to follow and instead we were following intuition um and if that i would say that's
00:37:37.220
a charitable reading yes i try to be chat well here's the thing i try to sort of steel man the other
00:37:43.900
side as much as i can which is good so i try to imagine once if someone i loved worked at the cdc or was
00:37:50.580
saying some of the stuff how it what's the most charitable way i can think about it because here's
00:37:56.400
the thing like i understand that some people might say intuitively it makes sense if you close schools
00:38:01.220
that's probably going to reduce transmission or if i have something in front of my face maybe that'll
00:38:05.440
reduce it a little bit maybe it's not perfect i recognize some people that made intuitive sense
00:38:10.340
it did to a lot of people actually but what i talk about in the book is that our intuitions are
00:38:15.960
often wrong um and that's especially so in medicine and i give lots of like fascinating
00:38:21.140
examples through history about things that seem totally obvious actually weren't true once they
00:38:28.320
were tested and again another irony is there were all these people with lawn signs around where i live
00:38:33.620
in this house we believe in science yeah i still see some of those signs people didn't know jack
00:38:40.720
about the science they had no clue and it's just an exquisitely frustrating thing to see that and
00:38:48.500
those are the people who by the way i mean i was called a murderer you know and a trumper and a lunatic
00:38:54.900
and all this stuff for following science for following evidence right so how much of this do you think
00:39:02.560
was just an anti-trump reflex i know we already talked about that a little bit but i'm trying to
00:39:09.820
understand the motivations not just of the everyday person who maybe sincerely believed that they were
00:39:14.200
saving grandma but the people who knew better because if you as a freelance journalist were able
00:39:19.320
to dig into the studies and understand it there were certainly people in public health who were able to
00:39:23.860
dig into the studies and understand it and once they knew they still didn't say anything to me it seems
00:39:29.860
like just naked political motivations to have continue to have cuomo as the foil for trump
00:39:36.980
yeah and cuomo really was the sort of like hero for for them in many ways um i think a lot of it
00:39:45.140
also has to do with you know i can't get into the mind of these people and knowing what they actually
00:39:50.600
believed but it seems quite obvious and i think i give a lot of evidence for this that people did
00:39:56.900
what's known as the noble lie they knew they were full of bs but they did it anyway because they felt
00:40:03.260
like what they were doing needed to be done whether they felt like that children and people actually
00:40:09.700
were in great danger and i believe that many of them thought that you're saying oh people at the cdc
00:40:13.680
surely they read what you were talking about i'm not so sure ali i gotta tell you motivated reasoning
00:40:19.340
is really powerful and when people are motivated to think in a certain way to support their view
00:40:25.380
you're the mind does all sorts of acrobatics to kind of wall things out i mean i got into an
00:40:31.100
argument with this person who is a big covid pundit she's an emergency medicine physician
00:40:36.160
but she somehow fashioned herself an expert on disease uh mitigation and she kept saying there's
00:40:42.860
no harm from masks and even the american academy of pediatrics was tweeting stuff out saying like
00:40:48.140
masks aren't harmful and i said what is harm who are you to decide that she said well they're an
00:40:53.520
inconvenience maybe they're annoying but i said really are you three years old forced to wear a mask
00:40:59.080
for eight hours a day i think it's fair that some people might interpret that as harm who are you
00:41:04.020
to decide that and that's kind of one of the big things is like so much of what happened was based on
00:41:11.720
values not based on science yet we were again gaslit we were told and speaking of cuomo he repeatedly
00:41:19.480
said you follow the science you follow the data it's that simple and it was it was very smug and very
00:41:27.960
confident and that was appealing to a lot of people on left this is our hero trump is an unserious
00:41:34.440
person he's dangerous this guy he's serious he follows the science but science doesn't tell you
00:41:40.400
what to do science is a process science brings you information and the values of the people who made the
00:41:48.780
decisions and this is really important the values of the people who got to decide what happened
00:41:55.360
and what i think could be argued was basically a tyranny um on much of the public that these people
00:42:03.860
come from a certain class a certain political leaning with certain values and certain preferences in their
00:42:09.920
own lives and also a certain economic class generally that these people might call the laptop class
00:42:16.200
where they are generally upper middle class people making six-figure salaries or better um working at places
00:42:23.280
like the nih the cdc working as physicians working in you know at prestigious media outlets so their
00:42:31.740
viewpoint about staying home they could be virtuous i'm just going to stay home and order netflix
00:42:37.700
well yes but a huge portion of our country was out there bringing them their food out there working in the
00:42:44.320
warehouses the slaughterhouses keeping the electricity on and so on all of those people this was one of the
00:42:51.760
most class based policies like imaginable in in a generation the way that there was one class who was
00:43:02.220
meant to just wait on the the upper class and not only wait on them but the upper class fashion themselves
00:43:09.120
as virtuous we're staying home and we're good we're good people for doing that you dirty person i don't
00:43:15.760
want to get too religious about it but they're the metaphorical value of the lower classes who are
00:43:20.940
out there dirty working on you know the infrastructure of our country taking care of the
00:43:26.220
clean people at home was quite extraordinary so it's one of the things that it matters and there's lots of
00:43:33.980
stuff in my book about modeling which is like these projections about which were incredibly poorly done
00:43:40.960
but the the same thing the people who create the models that that show well if everyone stays home
00:43:46.660
and does this this and this um those are the people who fared very well because they get to choose
00:43:52.680
what goes in the model right so and you know you and i chatted about this before we started recording
00:44:00.020
i wrote an article on a church in california um that fought back against limits that gavin newsom and then
00:44:09.180
more centrally within their county santa clara county what church was it do you remember um calvary
00:44:14.640
church okay yeah and they they were they along with all the other churches in the area were barred from
00:44:20.240
having gatherings above some arbitrary number of people and they said we're doing it anyway this is
00:44:26.780
what we believe and the county sued them um they sent out spies which i get into all this stuff who
00:44:33.420
spied on them behind like a fence and they used geo tracking with like digital stuff to monitor
00:44:38.760
people's cell phone data it's insane it's wild what happened and again when you think about the
00:44:46.080
sort of like tyranny of what of this type of thing going on but all this comes back to values right
00:44:51.060
because while that was going on the malls were open you could go to a casino you could go to a liquor
00:44:57.780
store strip club and this is the same thing by the way in new york city there were little kids when
00:45:03.640
they opened the schools and by the way open is like kids were there one or two days a week if they
00:45:08.140
were lucky but they called it open when biden came into office we have you know x percent of the
00:45:13.060
schools are open well yeah if the kids going in one day a week if you actually call that open
00:45:17.420
but setting that aside when the kids were there in the new york city winter there were children
00:45:23.240
sitting on the concrete eating lunch outside because they thought it was too dangerous and many
00:45:28.700
of them weren't allowed to speak i have my sub stack is called silent lunch which i've named as an
00:45:34.660
homage to all these school children who were barred from talking that is heartbreaking it's it's
00:45:40.900
extraordinarily heartbreaking imagine little kids told you're not allowed to talk during lunch you
00:45:46.820
have to sit outside on the concrete and eat your lunch while at the same time right down the block
00:45:51.920
two adults are having a glass of wine in a restaurant that's fine so when we think about
00:45:57.140
the values of how much that impacts policy that we were told over and over policy was based on science
00:46:05.520
that was a lie the policies were based on values of a particular socioeconomic group and a particular
00:46:13.020
political group quite honestly who had their values and they inflicted them on the rest of society
00:46:19.200
i don't attend church but i understand and respect where if someone that's meaningful to them
00:46:24.800
going every sunday that's someone's group that they needed maybe they needed that more than the mall
00:46:30.680
maybe a grandmother who's 78 years old maybe she wanted to see her family and she said you know what
00:46:37.000
i've got a one out of a hundred chance of something going wrong but 99 out of 100 i'm going to be okay
00:46:41.720
i'm going to take those odds i don't know how many years i have left i want to see my family but we were
00:46:47.160
told we weren't allowed to do that again so that's like such an important theme in my book is showing how
00:46:52.920
the values of those in charge were inflicted on the public and yet we were told that it was almost
00:47:00.020
orwellian yet they were telling us that it wasn't values oh this is all science
00:47:04.180
next sponsor is good ranchers last night we had breakfast for dinner that's always a win it's easy
00:47:15.440
everyone likes it and that included of course our bacon from good ranchers it is one of the staples
00:47:21.360
in our home because we have bacon and multiple meals a day we love it we love knowing that just
00:47:27.720
like all of our good ranchers meet it's from an american farm the american farming industry is the
00:47:34.420
backbone of our country and unfortunately it's been decimated over the past 10 to 20 years because of
00:47:42.140
over regulation because people have decided that having cheaper meat that is imported from
00:47:48.380
foreign farms is better than buying here at home but the great thing about all american meat from
00:47:54.740
good ranchers is that it is tariff proof you don't have to worry about increased prices on this meat
00:48:01.340
because you don't have to worry about tariffs when things are grown raised packaged right here in the
00:48:07.120
u.s did you know that the meat that you are seeing in the grocery store that says made in the usa it's
00:48:12.320
probably just packaged in the usa who knows actually where it's from if you want to know for sure where
00:48:17.240
your meat is coming from get your meat from good ranchers they've got seed oil free chicken nuggets
00:48:22.520
for the kids or for you they've got seafood they've got beef they've got chicken they've got it all and
00:48:29.240
it's all truly so good it's what we eat in our home go to good ranchers.com use code ally for 40
00:48:34.880
off your order that's good ranchers.com code ally
00:48:38.440
you know you might not be religious and you might not realize it is a religious instinct i think that you
00:48:50.720
realize that there is something disordered in asking kids to sacrifice on behalf of adults that there is
00:48:57.340
something inherently unjust about that and so i want to talk a little bit more about the social harms because
00:49:04.640
some people are listening to this and a ton of people started listening to this show in 2020 because
00:49:09.800
people were just like oh my gosh what is true i feel insane is someone on my same page and a lot of
00:49:16.800
people would say that when they were in the midst of 2020 they were maybe some of the people that you're
00:49:23.240
talking about that they were the ones who were zealously telling other people to mask to shut down the
00:49:29.680
schools and they might be thinking well i did it in the best interest of the people around me and
00:49:36.260
what did it really harm and i'm not trying to shame those people now who maybe realize their mistakes
00:49:41.920
but for those who don't realize like what was the harm in people acting in that way and in you know
00:49:50.180
putting those regulations on the schools was it really i mean objectively harmful for those kids
00:49:56.640
so one of the things that you know we keep is the lens through which we all see and experience the
00:50:02.920
world and for many people their families maybe it was just kind of an inconvenience this was horrible
00:50:09.680
for plenty of kids from well-off backgrounds make no mistake however by and large they fared far better
00:50:17.340
than kids from underprivileged backgrounds so or if there are some people in your audience who for them
00:50:22.580
they're saying yeah i think most people admit now they would say yeah the pandemic that kind of sucked
00:50:27.700
that was really hard but it wasn't that bad or is that what they aren't understanding perhaps is the
00:50:34.480
incredible harm on so many children millions of kids and you have to think about what kind of society
00:50:41.700
as you said you know what kind of society does this to children and an argument at least theoretically
00:50:49.520
could be made you might disagree with it but that well we need to have these trade-offs or sacrifice
00:50:55.600
some of these things for children in order to save people but the shame of it is because of these lies
00:51:01.800
that i'm talking about from the public health establishment there were no trade-offs it was only harm
00:51:07.860
no one was saved by long-term school closures no one was saved from masking two-year-olds
00:51:13.360
no one was saved by barriers on desks and all this other nonsense this was only harm no trade-off no
00:51:21.820
benefit and you know early on this was known this is going to be hard for people to hear but early on
00:51:30.620
the reporting of child abuse went down and that sounds oh this is wonderful wow that that's interesting
00:51:37.840
this is great but it's not the case what happened is teachers and educators are the most important
00:51:44.520
people in a child's life for a child who is in harm's way they're there that is the child's first
00:51:51.480
place to go where they either a child can speak to them or teachers see that something's wrong
00:51:57.220
they're mandatory reporters they have that's right and when they closed schools so everyone talks about
00:52:02.840
the long-term school closures let's pause for a moment closing schools for the entirety of the
00:52:08.800
spring of 2020 that alone caused enormous damage and people don't talk about that enough that even that
00:52:15.820
was unnecessary and incredibly harmful so these kids were left alone these kids who were suffering from
00:52:23.380
from abuse didn't have a resource and they were left at home with a monster many of them and what they
00:52:29.400
found was that the incidence of actual abuse had skyrocketed and i want to be clear about something
00:52:34.980
this was observed as early as april of 2020 public health establishment knew about this and didn't
00:52:42.580
care they kept the schools closed anyway they knew a certain number of kids were going to get the crap
00:52:49.140
beat out of them or something else horrible and they kept the schools closed anyway so it's really
00:52:55.320
important that's why i wrote this book ali is one of the reasons and beyond those kids and we can talk
00:53:00.520
about the other examples is that there needs to be a historical record a document that says this
00:53:06.840
happened that we can't allow a sort of revisionist history something that's convenient and exculpatory
00:53:13.400
to the people who made the rules and i understand i'm glad you pointed it out this may be hard you
00:53:18.200
don't want to shame people maybe you know even the people who didn't make rules but maybe they thought
00:53:22.100
this was a good idea they were persuaded i don't want people to feel shame i don't want anyone to
00:53:26.940
go to prison but i want a document to exist it's really important that people read the book talk
00:53:33.440
about it and know about this so we can make sure that something like this doesn't happen again
00:53:38.180
because even beyond um the horrors of child abuse i mean we could just run down the list ali from
00:53:45.240
um eating disorders where the bmi in children went up but then on the flip side there were plenty of
00:53:51.180
kids who became anorexic and bulimic there were children um screen time skyrocketed during the
00:53:57.040
pandemic and never kind of went back down um anxiety depression i talked with a lot of mental health
00:54:04.540
professionals for children their practices were exploding during the pandemic and it wasn't because
00:54:11.660
of people dying let me be very clear about that it was directly correlated with kids being kept out of
00:54:18.220
school we know about learning loss which rightfully so has gotten a lot of attention that's directly
00:54:24.180
correlated with the time that's out of school with worse test scores and worse learning loss that we
00:54:29.740
still haven't recovered but i want to touch on one other thing which is as much as these sort of
00:54:35.820
statistics are important and we can get into it by the way kids weren't taken to the hospital when
00:54:40.820
they had appendicitis until the last minute it was too late parents were scared that's exactly right
00:54:45.640
and and adults also didn't get cancer treatments on right on down the line the amount of harm that
00:54:51.480
was done this was not just oh we're just trying to help people cuomo had said if i can save just one
00:54:57.600
life well sure but you're taking one or more lives to ostensibly try to save that one life it was
00:55:05.440
extraordinarily foolish but one of the things that's the toxic empathy it blinds you to reality and
00:55:13.620
morality and you ignore the victim on the other side of the moral equation so just one life one
00:55:19.740
story you know one person that you're saving and then you've got a thousand people on the other side
00:55:25.000
that they're bidding you ignore so to explain what in economics they would call that second order effects
00:55:30.700
what you're describing there's the first order thing that you're aiming for but then you can just
00:55:35.120
picture a cascade or dominoes there's all these second order effects happen that's the toxic empathy
00:55:41.320
that you're describing the harm that comes from going for that first thing without thinking about
00:55:46.100
these other things that's what people in public health are supposed to do but instead they had this
00:55:50.860
just extraordinarily myopic vision about one thing they wanted to achieve and disregarded everything
00:55:57.660
else but one of the things that's not covered in the statistics is when you think about a kid who
00:56:05.340
was in the bronx who was playing football and maybe he's the first kid in his family to potentially go
00:56:12.660
to college what do you think happened to that kid when the football season was terminated and and i've
00:56:17.720
mentioned this example a lot because i interviewed um a gentleman who runs a program for kids who are at
00:56:23.500
at risk um in the bronx and areas nearby with football because this is a place it's a thing for kids to do to
00:56:30.700
help keep them on track help keep them out of trouble and for a few of them it was even a ticket
00:56:35.380
out of there to get into college those kids lives their life is permanently altered and that doesn't show
00:56:42.900
up in the statistics so when people are thinking about the harms some of these harms do leave lasting
00:56:48.880
scars but many of them it's something that's ineffable you can't even articulate it or know what it is
00:56:54.940
but it's there we harmed a generation of kids for nothing
00:56:59.760
next sponsor is patriot mobile patriot mobile is america's christian conservative wireless provider
00:57:10.760
they have a 100 u.s based customer service team that can activate your plan in minutes they can take
00:57:17.620
care of whatever issue you have and it can be such a hassle to switch phones or to switch networks to
00:57:24.920
switch cell providers but you don't have to worry about it being a hassle when you work with patriot mobile
00:57:30.400
because their u.s based customer service team is truly top notch this is just another way for you to vote
00:57:36.560
with your dollar you don't have to wait for an election year to make sure that your voice is heard by
00:57:42.160
switching to a company that actually supports our values like the first and second amendment like the
00:57:47.120
sanctity of life our veterans and first responders you are communicating that you care about these things
00:57:53.300
and that you're not going to support the companies that are diametrically opposed to all the values that
00:57:58.860
we hold dear so make the switch to patriot mobile you will not regret it you won't have to compromise
00:58:04.200
on service and you get to stand firm in your values go to patriot mobile.com slash ally to make the switch
00:58:11.000
that's patriot mobile.com slash ally code ally for a free month of service
00:58:23.360
inquantifiable things that were affected i i think about for example my oldest was
00:58:31.960
gosh she was about six months when covid started and you know obviously the regulations and the
00:58:38.940
restrictions surrounding it lasted for a long time and so after it was required for
00:58:45.100
her to wear a mask on a plane we just stopped traveling with her and you know my husband's
00:58:52.000
family lives in another state and so for however long that was i don't even remember how long it was
00:58:57.980
from the time she turned to to the time that it ended that regulation ended we just didn't travel to see
00:59:05.540
my husband's family and we've seen them a lot since then and it's all good now but just think about
00:59:11.020
the memories that were lost the quality time that was not spent because i wouldn't put my two-year-old
00:59:16.320
in a mask i saw those viral videos that you know the flight attendant would force the child with autism
00:59:23.720
to wear the mask and then the mom is breaking down and i'm like i do not want to force that onto my
00:59:30.360
toddler that is cruel and so think about how many people didn't go do those things didn't spend time
00:59:36.380
with family you will never know we'll never know the full impact of that i love that you're touching
00:59:42.280
on this so this is at the very end of my book one of the things i talk about is you know there are so
00:59:48.080
many lasting harms you know unfortunately physical and also economic when you think about education loss
00:59:55.040
but so many of these harms are what i described just as you're talking about this idea of things that
01:00:01.340
you only get to do third grade once right you only have one senior prom right you only have one you
01:00:08.260
know senior year football season these kids are and some of them they're fine you know they will be
01:00:13.660
fine many of them but when childhood is achingly brief and when you think we are each now as adults
01:00:20.340
we have like that highlight reel in our head you know a montage of different scenes these kids have
01:00:26.040
a large blank space where there should be memories and instead they were just alone in a bedroom in
01:00:32.620
front of a chromebook some of them and they missed that experience we took something from them it was
01:00:39.540
essentially stolen in many regards so it's it's so um it's just so meaningful to hear you talk about
01:00:46.920
that with with your with your child and missing seeing grandparents it's the same thing what this is
01:00:53.260
not benign the idea of just like oh well they did okay they learned at home that was fine again maybe
01:00:59.280
that was okay for some kids we must not only see things through a certain lens and understand the
01:01:05.820
vast harm that was inflicted unnecessarily um and again to me i touch on all of these harms and i know
01:01:13.240
we talked about them that's not what my book is focused on it's just i don't seek to manipulate
01:01:18.120
people emotionally over and over it's in there it's woven through it to me what's far more
01:01:22.840
important is for people to gain an understanding of how things actually work i'm someone who i've
01:01:28.880
written for the new york times i give an insider's look for what actually was going on behind the
01:01:34.860
scenes i talk about what was going on in public health i had people from the cdc i had others at
01:01:41.060
top institutions talking with me where i want to pull the curtain back so your audience can read this
01:01:47.860
and and have information to understand because it doesn't have to be a pandemic it's any crisis
01:01:53.760
it's anything the same playbook comes out on how these large powerful institutions um interact with
01:02:01.760
each other and people need to be armed with with critical thinking and understanding of oh i saw this
01:02:08.580
i understand now i read about this yeah now i know how to respond whether it's politically they want to
01:02:14.380
get involved or whether the response is just simply in their own mind and understanding the reality
01:02:19.140
of what's going on because sometimes the most powerful thing you can do is refuse to say that
01:02:24.140
two plus two is five that's right even if that is in your own mind and we do learn that from 1984
01:02:28.760
you mentioned the orwellian nature of all of this sometimes the most powerful thing that you can
01:02:33.520
do is tell the truth and that's what you do in this book and so for people who are thinking okay
01:02:37.900
i'm going to be prepared next time a crisis hits this book is perfect for them not only because
01:02:43.420
it's revelatory of all the things that we're talking about the mechanisms that go on but it
01:02:48.080
arms them with the facts and also the courage to say okay maybe in my small way or maybe in some huge
01:02:53.940
way i'm not going to let this happen again and so i'm just so grateful to you i really am whether
01:02:59.820
it's just your innate personality or whether it is god-inspired courage whatever it is i'm grateful for
01:03:06.560
you for telling the truth and for coming on the show today this was a very interesting conversation
01:03:11.520
everyone go out and get this book you got to get it it is called an abundance of caution
01:03:16.540
american schools the virus and a story of bad decisions david thank you so much
01:03:23.100
all right guys hope you loved that conversation with david after after i was done talking to him i was
01:03:33.920
like this guy is amazing he is so courageous he is so clear and articulate i learned a lot in that
01:03:41.760
conversation even as someone who was following covid closely and all the masking regulations and
01:03:48.060
his book it's just incredible it reveals so much so make sure you go out and get it um i want to remind
01:03:54.960
you guys speaking of just telling the truth and ensuring that people are informed and holding our public
01:04:01.700
officials accountable you have to subscribe to nicole shanahan's new show you can go to youtube.com
01:04:08.720
slash nicole dash shanahan make sure that you go to my channel and you watch the interview i did with
01:04:16.340
nicole it will if you don't know who she is it will introduce you fully to her and show you just how
01:04:22.120
much she cares about the truth and empowering people especially moms and families so excited that she has
01:04:29.600
joined blaze tv as a blaze tv host it is awesome also subscribe to blaze tv go to blaze tv.com
01:04:36.620
slash ali subscribe you'll get all of our exclusive behind the paywall content it also ensures that you
01:04:43.920
will never be separated from us by the censors because we never know what's going to happen on
01:04:48.720
youtube and spotify but blaze tv that's where we build our community and that's where we give you
01:04:54.480
content that you can't find anywhere else so go to blaze tv.com slash ali to subscribe all right that's
01:05:00.840
all we've got time for today we will be back here tomorrow