Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - Ep 124 ｜ YouTube Crackdown

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Wednesday. I hope everyone is having a wonderful week. For

00:00:06.620 those of you who are at YWLS this weekend, it was so wonderful to meet you. I love seeing you

00:00:13.780 guys in person and just hearing your stories and hearing how inspired you were by all of the

00:00:18.720 speakers. And those of you who do listen to my podcast, just hearing you say, you know,

00:00:24.080 what you get from this every week and what you appreciate about it. It just, I mean,

00:00:28.560 I've always loved my job. I've always loved doing this podcast. It's always meant a lot to me to hear

00:00:33.280 from you guys. But when I get to see you in person and hear these things in person, it just takes

00:00:38.680 everything to a whole other level of reminding me of why I do this. And everyone should have a why

00:00:44.820 behind what they do. Of course, the chief why is to, to glorify God and to obey him. But another huge

00:00:52.080 why behind what I do is you guys. And so just thank you for always being encouraging and for giving

00:00:57.520 feedback and for being such an engaging audience who is so smart, who always gives me really good

00:01:03.520 thoughts, really good ideas, really good critiques. And I just, I just love you guys. I think relatable

00:01:08.340 listeners are the best listeners in the entire world. Some listeners, I'm sure like super boring,

00:01:14.020 don't know that much. They just listen to a person and they don't even really think about the things

00:01:18.580 that they're listening. But that's not you guys. You guys are really thoughtful. And I don't know,

00:01:23.280 you're just, you're just my friends. And I just, I love the people that listen to this podcast. So

00:01:27.540 thank you for that. Okay. Today, what we're going to talk about is YouTube and this crackdown that's

00:01:33.280 been happening on more conservative viewpoints. Should we care about this? Should we be worried

00:01:39.360 about this? You probably know that censorship is something that we have been hearing about

00:01:44.540 nonstop, mostly from the conservative side. So we should ask ourselves, I mean, obviously you guys know

00:01:51.900 that I'm a conservative and you guys know that if this is the case, I probably would be a so-called

00:01:57.480 victim of this kind of censorship, but I want to be objective and stand back and say, okay,

00:02:02.380 is this being overblown? Is there really that much of a bias? And if there is a bias, does any of it

00:02:11.020 really matter? Well, I'm just going to go ahead and tell you my thoughts on it up front. I'm not going

00:02:17.120 to try to hide it from you. I would like to argue that yes, this matters very much. And I don't

00:02:21.520 actually think that it's overblown. Sometimes it is, but what we have seen devolve over the past

00:02:26.740 couple of weeks with YouTube and some conservative voices, I think should, uh, it should, it should

00:02:33.920 worry us and it should make us say, okay, this is not something that's being exaggerated. This is not

00:02:39.580 something that's overblown. This is something that we actually need to look out for really, no matter

00:02:44.360 what side of the aisle that you're on. Um, okay. So the thing that kind of spurred all of this,

00:02:49.860 that started yet another controversy between social media and conservative voices, it has to

00:02:56.600 do with Steven Crowder. Steven Crowder has an extremely, extremely popular podcast that is also

00:03:03.440 distributed by the blaze like minus or blaze TV. Um, and he has a huge following on YouTube. I think he

00:03:11.020 has almost 4 million subscribers. His videos get hundreds of thousands of views. Every time he has

00:03:16.740 a podcast episode go out, uh, some of them get millions of views. He's just a really popular voice

00:03:23.220 in the conservative world. He's very unique because he's also a comedian. And so he's always kind of

00:03:28.580 pushing the limits on the things that you're like, Oh, can you, can you say that is, is that really

00:03:33.280 okay to say? And he just kind of goes there, which is, you know, different than what we do on this

00:03:38.420 podcast. It's certainly, he certainly says things. And I would say this to him certainly says things

00:03:42.860 that I would not say that I would not approve of saying that I probably don't think are that great

00:03:47.680 to say. He says them. And that is who his audience is. That's what his show is. That's how he's always

00:03:52.320 been. He has been in this conservative world for a long time. And there are hundreds of thousands,

00:03:57.700 millions of people who respect his voice and who value the platform that he has diligently

00:04:04.660 built, uh, built for a long time. However, someone who takes issue, someone who takes issue with his

00:04:10.620 platform is a guy by the name of Carlos Maza. I think that's how you pronounce his name. He and

00:04:19.080 Steven Crowder haven't always gotten along. So Carlos Maza works for Vox. Vox is a left leaning out, uh,

00:04:24.780 outlet in, uh, Carlos makes videos for Vox on, you know, a variety of liberal topics. Well, Steven

00:04:33.340 Crowder has used his show or a segment of his show several times to refute the content of these

00:04:39.940 videos. Carlos Maza does not like this, or maybe it's Maza. I really don't know how to, I don't

00:04:46.080 know. I'll just go with Maza. Um, he doesn't like this, but that's, I, that's not totally fair to say

00:04:50.920 that he doesn't just like, or he doesn't just not like that Steven Crowder actually refutes the content

00:04:56.120 of his videos. He doesn't like how, uh, Steven Crowder actually refers to him. So he did this long

00:05:02.600 text thread or text, what tweet thread, um, that ended up going, I guess you would say semi-viral.

00:05:09.320 Now I'll just be totally honest with you. I wasn't able to read the tweet thread right away.

00:05:15.540 And so I've been kind of like out of the loop on this whole thing. And the reason why I wasn't able

00:05:20.840 to read the tweet thread that everyone on the conservative side, it seemed like was talking about

00:05:25.540 was because he apparently, he blocked me. I don't even know who this person is. Like,

00:05:29.460 I don't think that I've ever communicated with this person. I don't know. I don't remember ever

00:05:36.040 knowing his name, talking to him, interacting with him, but I was blocked. And so this tweet

00:05:40.660 thread that was going around, everyone was retweeting and commenting on. I was like,

00:05:44.540 well, I have, I have no idea what this is because this person, he goes by the,

00:05:48.260 the Twitter handle of gay wonk. He, uh, blocked me a long time ago for reasons completely unknown to

00:05:55.400 me. So I just kind of ignored it for a while. So, well, let me say what the tweet thread was.

00:05:59.740 So the tweet thread was him saying, Hey, Steven Crowder makes these videos about me. And you know,

00:06:06.560 I have thick skin, but look, he keeps on commenting on my sexuality. He, he, he keeps on commenting on

00:06:12.100 the fact that I'm gay and, uh, the fact that I am Latino and I don't like it. It's harassment.

00:06:18.320 His followers have harassed me. His followers have targeted me and even tried to, uh, even tried to

00:06:25.900 dox me. And so he posted this like video compilation, this like cut up video compilation of Crowder

00:06:31.440 referring to Maza in a variety of ways that do highlight Maza's homosexuality. Um, mostly just 0.86

00:06:38.640 like referring to him as gay, but he also called him a gay Mexican. Oh, let me just say, if you have

00:06:44.800 kids in your car, I always try to say this, there are some things that maybe you might not want them

00:06:49.360 to hear. So just FYI, um, called him a gay Sprite, called him a lispy queer. And again, these are not

00:06:56.700 phrases that we would use on this podcast or that I would use in my life, but stick with me as we talk

00:07:02.620 about the actual point of the story, which goes beyond what Crowder actually said. So he's calling

00:07:07.160 these names. Maza puts a compilation, uh, of the, of this name calling that Crowder did, uh, on

00:07:14.800 Twitter. The thread was really long, but in summary, he said, okay, this is harassment. Uh, and I have

00:07:22.060 been harassed by his followers. So why is YouTube allowing this person to have a platform? Doesn't

00:07:26.840 this go against, uh, their rules? Doesn't this violate their terms? Why are they allowing this

00:07:33.280 person to have such a growing channel on their platform? Who is homophobic? He would say, uh,

00:07:39.420 now Crowder responded to this by saying, okay, hang on just a second. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Okay. So I,

00:07:45.560 this is him talking basically. I'm totally paraphrasing and summarizing basically saying, okay,

00:07:50.340 so I, I use some off color jokes that offended you. Yes. I called you those names, but he's saying,

00:07:57.220 I never told my followers to harass you. I never encouraged doxing. Um, he said, I refuted the

00:08:02.420 content of your videos and sure. I might've said some things that offended you, but I never harassed

00:08:08.440 you. I never encouraged anyone else to harass you either. Um, so after all of this kind of back and

00:08:14.680 forth, and of course you had conservatives all over Twitter, uh, defending Steven Crowder because

00:08:18.980 they know that Steven Crowder is a comedian. Comedians often push the limits. They often pick

00:08:24.740 on people. They rib people. They even say things that are offensive to groups of people. And Steven

00:08:29.900 Crowder has been politically incorrect for a really long time. So you had a lot of conservatives

00:08:35.900 defending him. Um, YouTube responded to Maz's thread on Twitter saying this, uh, our team spent the last

00:08:43.100 few days conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged to us. So he had flagged the particular

00:08:48.060 videos, uh, that Steven Crowder, that Steven Crowder, uh, or what he would call harassed him in. Um,

00:08:55.200 and they said, and while we found language that was clearly hurtful, the videos as posted don't

00:09:01.100 violate our policies. We've included more info below to explain this decision as an open platform.

00:09:06.700 It's crucial for us to allow everyone from creators to journalists, to late night TV hosts

00:09:11.500 to express their opinions within the scope of our policies. Opinions can be deeply offensive,

00:09:16.420 but if they don't violate our policies, they'll remain on our site. Okay. So I was surprised by this,

00:09:21.820 honestly. And I think a lot of people were surprised by this on the left and the right.

00:09:26.780 Uh, to me, this is the correct stance to take. Uh, yes, he said some offensive things and they're

00:09:34.060 saying, okay, we understand that they were hurtful, but look, if, if we being YouTube, if we took down

00:09:39.620 every single opinion or every single comment that someone was offended by, we wouldn't have anyone on

00:09:44.420 our platform. There are people on the left and the right who say offensive things about groups.

00:09:48.960 And if they're not allowed to do that, are they even allowed to say anything of substance? Now,

00:09:53.900 of course you had people saying, well, why is homophobia an opinion? Why is that something

00:09:58.880 that should be protected? But you've got other people that say, okay, it was just gentle ribbing.

00:10:03.700 It was just making fun. You can't possibly say that that violates your terms. You can't possibly say

00:10:10.140 that that goes against our policies, but okay. I think I was pretty happy with this decision.

00:10:16.240 That's kind of a hands-off. We don't agree with what he said, but we're going to allow people

00:10:20.980 of different opinions to be on this platform because that's who we are. We are encouraging

00:10:24.880 an open dialogue as long as they're not targeting people, um, by calling for harassment or doxing

00:10:30.820 or violence or anything like that. I thought that it was a pretty good step for YouTube, but here's

00:10:35.880 the thing. The story does not end there. The story does not end there. So this completely sane,

00:10:41.980 I thought in common sense stance, uh, by YouTube solicited an absolute, absolutely outrageous

00:10:50.160 outrage mob. I mean, people were upset by this. They could not believe that this is the stance

00:10:56.320 that you, that YouTube, uh, that YouTube made, especially in light of pride month and all of 0.66

00:11:03.000 this. People were saying this is a direct attack on the LGBTQ community that YouTube clearly doesn't

00:11:08.680 stand with this community. They said, you're not going to police offensive language. You're not

00:11:14.180 going to police what they call hate speech. You're not going to censor inappropriate jokes. They said.

00:11:20.240 So as we would expect, as we would expect, and as we primarily expected, as we expected in the first

00:11:27.680 place, YouTube to do, they bowed down to the outrage, to the leftist outrage, by the way, they did

00:11:32.140 not bow down to conservative outrage. They bowed down to leftist outrage. They changed their minds.

00:11:37.000 They said, okay, you're right. You guys, you are right. We are sorry. We are going to completely,

00:11:42.980 we're going to completely demonetize Crowder's channel. Now, if you don't know what that means,

00:11:47.440 that means that we're not going to allow ads to play on any of his, uh, videos, which means he

00:11:52.240 will no longer get paid the money that he used to get paid from YouTube. Now, like I said, Crowder

00:11:57.420 has almost 4 million subscribers on YouTube. Uh, his videos get hundreds of thousands and usually,

00:12:02.360 uh, you know, over a million views. So that, that means he probably gets paid pretty well

00:12:07.200 from YouTube. I don't know for sure, but I would guess that the monetization of his videos,

00:12:12.280 um, helps him out a lot. Uh, that's no longer going to happen because YouTube decided to kowtow

00:12:19.100 to people like Mazza and all of the people that, uh, got really upset about their original decision.

00:12:24.600 But Mazza actually still isn't happy about this. I saw a tweet that was screenshot because,

00:12:29.180 you know, I can't see it because I'm blocked. Uh, he still isn't happy about this. He says that

00:12:33.040 demonetization doesn't actually work, that it doesn't go far enough. So he really wants,

00:12:38.160 he really wants Crowder and other people like him to be completely taken off the platform. Now,

00:12:43.320 it makes sense once you realize that Mazza used to work for media matters, which is literally in

00:12:49.060 the business of deplatforming and demonizing conservative voices. This is just who he is.

00:12:54.920 This is a guy who has also called, um, for violence and harassment in person against

00:13:00.900 conservatives. Other tweets that I have seen that you can look up if you are not blocked,

00:13:04.980 he has called for milkshaking conservatives, which is like this thing that apparently people do is

00:13:10.460 like throwing milkshakes on like conservatives in the public sphere, uh, that you see out in everyday

00:13:16.900 life. Really solid stuff, really, really mature, solid stuff that probably makes, you know,

00:13:22.900 a lot of people in the middle say, you know what, I'm going to become a liberal now.

00:13:26.000 Now that I see that these, that these guys are throwing milkshakes on conservatives, you know,

00:13:31.460 they must have some pretty good ideas, some pretty good ideas that are probably, probably worth joining.

00:13:37.880 So that's, that's who this guy is. He also said that he wants conservatives to be terrified

00:13:43.220 to gather in public. So that's good. Good guy here. So he is out here saying all of that,

00:13:49.320 that literally in public, literally calling for harassment against conservatives in the public

00:13:54.680 sphere, throwing milkshakes on them. I, I promise you, if I am with my daughter and you throw a

00:13:59.360 milkshake on me, that's not going to end well for you. One jokes on you. I love milkshakes too.

00:14:05.620 I promise you, I promise you, I promise you if you do anything to me when I am with my daughter,

00:14:11.960 I'm just saying, it's just not, it's not going to turn out well for you. It's not going to turn out

00:14:16.000 well for you. So that's who this guy is. He's a complete and total hypocrite. The bottom line is

00:14:20.400 that he just doesn't want conservative voices to have a platform. And this is a full-on assault.

00:14:25.320 I'm not saying that he shouldn't be offended by what Steven Crowder said. Look, if I were him,

00:14:29.600 if someone had a channel, a very popular channel, and they were talking badly about me on multiple

00:14:34.780 episodes, and they were calling me names that I didn't like, and their followers were coming to my

00:14:39.600 channel and harassing me and threatening to dox me, I would be really upset about that. I would.

00:14:44.600 So I do not blame this guy, even though I don't like him, even though I don't like his tactics,

00:14:49.120 even though I don't like his views, I don't blame this guy for being upset. I don't. I don't blame

00:14:54.080 this guy for not liking Crowder. I don't blame this guy for being, you know, maybe somewhat upset at

00:15:01.400 YouTube. Maybe I don't blame him for that. But if I were in his situation, would I be calling for the

00:15:08.020 systematic censorship of everyone who doesn't agree with me? Would I be calling for the complete

00:15:12.580 deplatforming and removal of someone who said, I don't know, something like, girls shouldn't have 1.00

00:15:18.220 podcasts? No, of course not. I would disagree with him. I wouldn't like it. I definitely would

00:15:24.280 report all of the users that tried to harass me or all of the users that tried to dox me. But if that

00:15:30.420 person weren't calling for direct harassment or calling for direct violence or calling for direct

00:15:36.400 for or calling directly for doxing, well, then that's not really that's that person's fault because

00:15:42.240 I'm in the public sphere. They can comment on my content if they want to. And that's just, you know,

00:15:47.440 that's part of the game. And again, I understand why this guy doesn't like Steven Crowder and the

00:15:52.180 things that he said. And I think that he's totally in his he has every right to be offended by this

00:15:58.060 totally justified. But that does not justify trying to shut someone down just because they said

00:16:04.420 something that offends you. So YouTube, I think I think I started to say something and then I went

00:16:12.500 away from it and now I'm coming back. So YouTube changed their mind and they said, yes, OK, I said

00:16:18.420 this. YouTube changed their mind. They're going to demonetize him. Carlos is upset that they're not

00:16:24.340 completely deplatforming them. But they did come out with a statement that said YouTube came out with

00:16:29.840 a statement that said, well, you know, we're actually going to crack down on this stuff. We

00:16:34.720 actually are going to crack down on this stuff. We're going to make sure extremist content doesn't

00:16:40.740 get seen as much. We're going to make sure that even the kinds of videos that could lead to so-called

00:16:46.560 extremist content don't show up as easily. So we're just going to make sure that that doesn't happen.

00:16:51.500 So, OK, here we go. Here we go. This is what happens when you try to give YouTube the power

00:16:56.840 and the authority to take down all content that offends you. When you say YouTube, you don't

00:17:02.800 believe in the LGBT community or you don't support us or you don't like us, you hate us unless you

00:17:09.740 completely deplatform the people that we don't like. When you give YouTube that kind of power,

00:17:13.820 you are implicitly or explicitly, depending on how you look at it, giving them the power to censor

00:17:19.680 all ideas, all ideas that could possibly be offensive. And we saw that with this statement that they made

00:17:25.500 after all of this saying we're going to crack down on it. We're going to make sure that videos that

00:17:29.600 even could possibly lead to so-called extremist views, that we're going to make sure that they

00:17:34.840 don't come up as suggested videos or anything like that. So here we go. Here's the problem with this.

00:17:43.060 We cannot trust Google and YouTube to decide what is extremist, what is actually harmful and what is

00:17:50.380 not. I mean, am I extremist? I've done multiple videos probably about biblical topics that people

00:17:56.180 are offended by. I've done podcast episodes about God's design for biblical marriage. Am I radical?

00:18:01.640 Am I offensive because of that? Am I hateful? Am I engaging in hate speech because I talk about the

00:18:05.920 Bible and I talk about things that non-Christians probably don't like? Am I radical? Am I one of those 0.81

00:18:11.400 people that they're going to have to demonetize, that they're going to have to deplatform to make sure

00:18:15.920 that they have a safe community? I mean, who's to say? Is Google to say whether or not a biblical

00:18:22.440 point of view is extremist? I guarantee you this does not stop with someone like Stephen Crowder

00:18:27.560 making off-color jokes that can be offensive to a group of people. This doesn't stop with that.

00:18:32.380 This stops with or this keeps going to people like me, to people who talk about Christianity, to people

00:18:38.560 who talk about, you know, liking Donald Trump or being a conservative, that talk about being pro-life,

00:18:46.080 that even just engage in these conversations. Maybe they don't even hold the views themselves, but

00:18:50.560 maybe they're just open-minded. We've already seen that big tech doesn't really like open-mindedness

00:18:57.160 in the censorship that we've seen of people like, or not even censorship, but just kind of demonization

00:19:02.060 and dislike of people like Joe Rogan and Dave Rubin, who themselves aren't particularly conservative,

00:19:08.860 but engage with people who are. They just don't like that. Which leads to an interesting article that

00:19:15.720 I read in the New York Times, and it was called The Making of a YouTube Radical. The Making of a

00:19:23.980 YouTube Radical. So this writer for New York Times thought that he just busted this like extremely,

00:19:30.580 extremely, extremely interesting case of this radicalized guy who was 26 years old. His name

00:19:36.340 is Caleb Kane. He recently, apparently, he says that he swore off the alt-right. So this article

00:19:43.780 looks at Caleb's journey. It's like this very intensive, interactive timeline of Caleb's journey

00:19:48.640 that YouTube took him on. Apparently he was on the left, or he didn't really know what he believed

00:19:54.480 politically, but then he started listening to conservative commentators, and then he got further and

00:19:59.440 further to the right to where he started listening to more alt-right commentators. And I agree. Some

00:20:04.420 of the commentators that he was listening to, they were alt-right. So he started going down these rabbit

00:20:11.720 holes, and he basically became this alt-right guy who bought into this. But then he started listening to

00:20:20.540 this leftist YouTube channel, and then he was saved, and he realized that, oh my gosh, all the stuff I was

00:20:26.900 listening to was bad. And so this article was basically saying that YouTube is set up in such

00:20:32.760 a way as to radicalize people. Because when you listen to, or you watch one video, it suggests other

00:20:38.660 videos that are similar. So you do go down these rabbit holes, and you can just get more and more

00:20:43.280 radicalized. Well, the reason why this was contentious is because the people that they included

00:20:49.460 in this kind of collage that they put up at the top of these alt-right views that the New York Times

00:20:56.820 seems, or says, radicalized people were people like Milton Friedman. Milton Friedman. So the

00:21:02.200 economist, okay? Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin. I think there were some other more mainstream people. So

00:21:09.660 this is the problem. And this is something that we have seen multiple times. Obviously, the entire

00:21:15.040 article was biased, basically saying that conservatism, any kind of mainstream conservatism

00:21:20.480 or open-mindedness to conservatism, like what Dave Rubin exemplifies on his show, that's going

00:21:28.380 to radicalize people. And it's subtle, but it's a way of making people worried or making people scared

00:21:34.660 of listening to mainstream conservatives, because they don't want to be seen as radicals. If you are

00:21:39.140 someone who is in the middle, or you're just trying to decide what you believe, the more you see

00:21:43.940 someone like Ben Shapiro associated with the name alt-right or associated with far-right people,

00:21:49.920 the more you are going to classify him in your mind, unless you know better, as some kind of

00:21:55.260 extremist, some kind of bigot, some kind of person that you don't want to associate yourself with.

00:22:00.720 This has happened multiple times. I think it happened with Washington Post recently. It's happened

00:22:05.360 multiple times with multiple outlets, this subtle association of very mainstream, thoughtful

00:22:12.200 conservatives with more far-right or alt-right figures that are not particularly thoughtful,

00:22:18.580 that are extremists, that do espouse views, that really don't have any similarities to conservatism

00:22:24.000 whatsoever, and just maybe like Donald Trump and aren't leftists themselves. But the media really

00:22:30.020 likes to clump all of these people together and say, if you buy into any of these ideologies or

00:22:36.160 philosophies or ideas, if you buy into any of these conversations, well, then you're going to be

00:22:41.560 radicalized too, and you don't want that because that's bad. That's immoral. And New York Times,

00:22:47.000 of course, they came out and they said, oh, I'm sorry. Like, we didn't mean to include some of

00:22:50.720 these people in the collage. We'll take, we'll take, like, I think they said, like Ben Shapiro out.

00:22:55.080 This happened a couple of weeks ago, and the same thing happened to Ben Shapiro when they

00:22:58.640 included him. I think it was with Milo Yiannopoulos or someone and called him alt-right. They had to

00:23:04.900 change the description of him there. So they do that a couple of days later and they apologize.

00:23:10.680 But this has happened too many times for me to think that it's accidental. It's totally deliberate.

00:23:16.540 They want people to be scared to listen to Ben Shapiro. They want people to be scared to listen

00:23:22.180 to Dave Rubin, even to be scared to listen to someone like Joe Rogan, who is not a conservative,

00:23:27.840 by the way. But he does have people of a variety of viewpoints on his show. And to the left,

00:23:33.360 that's not something that they want. They don't think that you should entertain any idea or any

00:23:38.660 thought or any kind of reasoning that disagrees with them. They think the same thing about someone

00:23:43.620 like Jordan Peterson, who himself, I would not call a conservative. Now, he's against political

00:23:48.880 correctness. He is against forced speech, of course. Those didn't used to be conservative values

00:23:54.540 exclusively. He is, but he's extremely thoughtful. There is nothing radical about what Jordan Peterson

00:24:01.940 teaches or talks about. And yet the media wants you to think that if you start entertaining any ideas

00:24:07.760 that are not far left, well, then you might become an extremist too. You might become a bigot too. You

00:24:13.480 might go down this dark and deep rabbit hole into the scary abyss of actually believing things that

00:24:19.400 MSNBC doesn't tell you. And that is why I think all of this is a problem. I do not. There are a lot of

00:24:26.800 voices, a lot of voices who consider themselves on the rights that I don't agree with, that I don't

00:24:32.780 like, that I actually think their ideas are really toxic to the public dialogue, that I wish that they

00:24:39.320 didn't try to espouse conservatism because what they're saying is harmful or it's not true or whatever

00:24:45.740 it is. And I think that the people that follow them and follow their ideas typically do end up in this

00:24:51.740 really weird and corrupt place. But what I don't want is for us to have these, uh, basically these online

00:25:00.120 police states where you have this leftist social justice group of elites saying what can be, uh, what can

00:25:07.840 be accepted as good speech and what can't based on completely biased views. That's what I don't want

00:25:14.380 because I am perceptive enough. And I think all of you are too perceptive enough to realize, uh, that it's not

00:25:21.560 going to stop with the absolutely crazy views. I would rather it be up to individuals. I'd rather

00:25:27.680 it be up to listeners and to viewers to know what is true. And I understand, I understand that there

00:25:33.760 are a lot of people out there that are susceptible to fake news. And I do think that there has to be

00:25:38.660 some sort of standard for truth, some sort of standard. Like it does get really scary when you think

00:25:47.380 about all the technology that's out there that you can literally make someone look like they're saying

00:25:52.460 something in a video that they're not, or you can manipulate something, um, manipulate some sort of

00:25:58.900 footage into, to, uh, implicate someone for something that they didn't do. And all of that is very scary. I'm

00:26:05.820 not saying that these social media platforms don't have any responsibility whatsoever, especially when it

00:26:11.460 comes to directly hurting someone's reputation. But the more you get into that, the more you start

00:26:18.260 censoring that and policing that, uh, the more biased you become. There was that whole thing with

00:26:24.160 Nancy Pelosi and this compilation, uh, going out of her, this guy who just lives and works in the Bronx.

00:26:32.000 I think that's where he lives. Uh, he made this like mashed up video of Nancy Pelosi at a press conference

00:26:37.540 and slowed it down a little bit, apparently. So it sounded like she was drunk. It was circulating

00:26:42.040 on social media. I'm sure a lot of people believe that it was true. The president and his

00:26:47.060 administration, I think that's the same video they ended up sharing. It could have been a different

00:26:51.280 video, but there were people in, in Trump's administration who ended up sharing it. And Nancy

00:26:56.040 Pelosi was very upset. Hillary Clinton was very upset. You had a lot of people on the left,

00:27:01.100 very upset by this. And what did the daily beast do? The daily beast went and found this guy,

00:27:06.360 found exactly where he works, found what his name is, uh, found his criminal history and they

00:27:11.820 exposed it. Why? Because they don't believe that he should be free to do something like that. And

00:27:17.200 of course they called on Facebook to help them find this guy's identity. Facebook did. And they

00:27:22.000 said, well, Facebook, why didn't you take this video down? Mark Zuckerberg apparently called Nancy

00:27:26.860 Pelosi to apologize, all this crazy stuff. And so when you start getting into things like that,

00:27:33.020 when you can't even tell jokes anymore. If you remember that AOC video that I did, the

00:27:38.440 mashed up interview that I did back in July. So almost a year ago, you had the Washington Post,

00:27:44.600 you had Buzzfeed, you had all of these outlets reaching out to me saying, why did you purposely

00:27:49.100 deceive people? And why hasn't Facebook taken this down? Why hasn't Twitter taken this down? They fully

00:27:54.480 believe that, uh, these social media platforms should step in when there is a video that they don't

00:28:00.340 like if it employs humor that they don't think is funny. I do think it's extremely dangerous when

00:28:05.320 social media platforms come in and they try to censor that. And so I don't know exactly where

00:28:11.540 the line is on these social media companies coming in and saying, okay, we don't allow blatantly false

00:28:18.180 material to be circulated on our platforms. Maybe that's not their job at all. Maybe it's not their job

00:28:23.160 at all. Maybe it's totally on us. Maybe it's completely on the individual, on the viewer to

00:28:29.260 know what's true and what's not. Maybe it's not on them at all. Because I do think that when they come

00:28:34.720 in and say, sorry, you can't do that. You can't do that interview with AOC because it makes her 1.00

00:28:39.940 look bad or whatever it is. I think that's extremely dangerous because you're not going to see them

00:28:45.980 doing the same thing to Stephen Colbert when he does it with the president. You're not going to see

00:28:49.800 them take down the videos of Jay Leno doing that. And we've already seen how their new round of

00:28:55.140 censorship when they said, oh, we're, we're going to make sure that we're cracking down on these

00:28:59.740 extremist extremist views. We've already seen how that has backfired because apparently even like

00:29:06.220 Holocaust educational videos are being taken off YouTube. Holocaust educational videos that like

00:29:12.440 teachers are using and professors are using in their classrooms to make sure that their kids know

00:29:17.160 what the Holocaust is. They're literally erasing history, which there are very few things that are

00:29:22.200 more Orwellian than that if you have read 1984, but that's exactly what's going on. And so again,

00:29:28.580 when we give the power to the social media companies to tell us what is true, what is not,

00:29:36.220 what is hate speech, what is not, it just becomes extremely dangerous. The information that we have

00:29:43.720 access to becomes extremely narrow, uh, especially ideologically. Again, I think that if you're

00:29:50.620 inciting violence or you're looking to dock someone or you are inciting some kind of harassment or you

00:29:57.400 are spreading possibly an outright lie, maybe there is a place, um, there is a place certainly in place

00:30:03.880 of, in the instance of violence, but maybe there's a place in those other instances for the social media

00:30:09.020 companies to come in and say something, but look, they're a platform at the very least. If they do

00:30:14.920 enforce rules like that, at the very least, they need to be ideologically neutral and they just aren't.

00:30:20.420 We know for a fact that Google isn't neutral. We saw the leaked video of them after the election,

00:30:25.100 crying their eyes out when Hillary Clinton lost. Like we know that they lean to the left. There is a reason

00:30:29.760 for conservatives to be worried. And in a free country where this is, uh, how we use our voices and this

00:30:35.800 is how we have public dialogue. I do think it's important for them to say, Hey, we're not politically

00:30:40.960 biased. Here are our rules. We're going to enforce them evenly across the board. That's all I ask.

00:30:45.740 They are private companies, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter. They can have the rules that they want

00:30:51.760 to use. And I don't want them to be regulated. I don't want them to be regulated by the government.

00:30:55.400 They can totally enforce the rules that they want to enforce, but as platforms, rather than

00:31:01.600 publishers, platforms who claim to be neutral, who claim to be making fair and even decisions,

00:31:06.200 they should absolutely, um, take their political bias out of it. 100%. I don't anticipate that's

00:31:13.920 going to happen. So this is just a plug and I'm, I never plug this thing, but I never plug really

00:31:21.300 at all, unless I'm talking about bolster sleeper express VPN, but I am going to say, I really do want

00:31:27.780 you guys to subscribe to blaze TV. It's really important because you don't know when I'm going

00:31:33.020 to be kicked off YouTube. Like you don't know when I'm going to be kicked off iTunes. We've already

00:31:36.320 had a problem with Spotify. Um, so subscribe to blaze TV. If you can, I know it's an extra expense

00:31:42.400 every month. You can use promo code alley. You can get $20 off, but that just assures that you're

00:31:48.180 going to be able to listen to the content that you want to listen to because they're not going to be

00:31:52.180 able to censor us on blaze TV. So you can go to blaze tv.com slash alley, and you can subscribe

00:31:57.680 there. And then you know that you're always going to get the content that you want to get,

00:32:01.740 no matter what it's protected that way. Um, probably as far as we know, uh, at least longer

00:32:07.500 than we will be on YouTube or these other platforms that we know have a bias. So yes,

00:32:14.140 all of this stuff matters. Yes. Censorship matters. Doesn't matter if you agree with the voice and what

00:32:18.740 they're saying. It all matters. And it is, it's not just a logical fallacy to say that it's a

00:32:23.940 slippery slope. We've already seen that it's a slippery slope and there is a, an ideological

00:32:27.760 motivation behind it to make sure that conservatives don't have a voice and that the only public dialogue

00:32:33.540 that exists is decidedly leftist. And I think that's something that we should care about.

00:32:37.880 Okay. We will be back here on Friday. I haven't decided what we're going to talk about. There's been

00:32:42.080 a lot that's gone on with the Southern Baptist convention over this past week. There's a lot,

00:32:46.740 there's a lot of contention. And so I might talk about that on Friday. I haven't decided,

00:32:51.160 but if you guys do have suggestions, always feel free. You can message me on Instagram.

00:32:55.240 You can email me, Allie at the conservative millennial blog.com. Of course, if you love

00:32:59.840 this podcast, I would love your five-star review on iTunes. It helps me out a lot. Plus I read them

00:33:04.380 and I love hearing your words. Okay. I will see you guys here on Friday.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - June 12, 2019

Ep 124 ｜ YouTube Crackdown

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript