00:10:30.700We're gonna connect you to life-affirming resources.
00:10:33.580okay so when people say oh republicans and democrats are the same they're equally evil
00:10:39.900they're both pro-life in their own ways no one is pro-death like one is pro-murder of your babies
00:10:46.700and one is trying uh imperfectly by the way but one is trying to make it is make it more possible
00:10:55.560and make it more plausible for women to be able to choose life in 2022 you might remember that
00:11:02.200After the leak of the Dobbs decision, the Roe v. Wade reversal decision, pro-abortion activists attacked more than 100 pregnancy centers across the country, including firebombings, arson, vandalism.
00:11:23.600They're a terrorist organization that tried to ruin these pregnancy centers, could have killed people if people had been inside.
00:11:31.120And just as a reminder, the Biden administration sentenced these perpetrators of Jane's revenge to an average of 12 months in prison, while peaceful pro-lifers like Joan Bell, 74-year-old grandmother, she and others like her were sentenced to two-plus years in prison.
00:11:49.720And so, of course, unequal weights and measures there. You get rewarded if you are pro-abortion by Democrats, and you get punished if you are pro-life by Democrats.
00:12:00.700So again, I just want to say that both sides are not the same.
00:12:04.800Moms.gov also highlights the pregnancy care centers and the specific work they are providing,
00:12:11.760like free ultrasounds, like parenting classes.
00:12:14.900They connect you to adoption resources.
00:12:17.360They'll help you with Medicaid if that's something that you need.
00:12:23.700I have told many, many stories of the incredible testimonies of women who have walked into these pregnancy centers and their lives have been changed by the love and the help that they have received there.
00:12:39.440And so really the hate and the terrorism that pregnancy centers have received from the left, the lies that have been told about them in the media, you've got people like Elizabeth Warren.
00:12:51.040We did like a satirical video several years ago about Elizabeth Warren because Elizabeth Warren said she was going to go into these pregnancy centers and she was going to show what's really going on.
00:13:00.760And so I put my Elizabeth Warren wig on and I went into a local pregnancy center to show you what's really going on.
00:13:06.560And oh, no, they give free baby clothes away.
00:13:10.020Oh, no, they're offering free ultrasounds.
00:13:12.560Oh, no, they offer free pregnancy tests and prenatal vitamins.
00:26:19.600I actually think that it's very evil that we are using our tax dollars to support motherless and fatherless children, forced motherless and fatherless children, and to pay for additional excess deaths of embryos via IVF.
00:26:37.320And so I'm very happy on the one hand about what Trump is supporting when it comes to pregnancy centers.
00:26:43.600But I am very disappointed on the other hand when it comes to the support of IVF and Katie Britt, who is standing behind him, their Republican senator from Alabama.
00:26:54.060Like, I think that she should know better.
00:26:57.160I don't really expect Trump to understand the moral intricacies of this issue, but I do expect a smart woman to know better.
00:27:04.620And it's not a lack of compassion for people who can't have children.
00:27:08.440It is a compassion for these small children who don't have a voice and who don't have any capital.
00:27:15.940They don't have people sticking up for them because people don't think you're a person unless you look like a fully developed baby.
00:27:21.740That's the battle we've been fighting when it comes to abortion.
00:27:24.120It's the battle we've got to fight when it comes to IVF too.
00:27:27.260And I know that hurts feelings and I don't want to hurt feelings.
00:27:30.520I'm not trying to be vitriolic or divisive or whatever, but all of those names that someone
00:27:36.060could call me, it's worth it for the sake of the babies on ice. It just is. All right, let me pause
00:27:42.380and tell you about our next sponsor for the day, and that is Legacy Box. Okay, all of those pictures,
00:27:48.760all of those VHS tapes, those home videos that you have or your mom has or your grandmother has
00:27:53.080in their attic, you've got to take care of that. You can't just let them collect us forever. You
00:27:58.940don't even know if you're going to be able to maintain their quality and you don't want to lose
00:28:02.420all of those precious memories that you have from decades ago let legacy box help you they'll send
00:28:07.180you an empty cardboard box and you can fill it with all of these pictures with all of these vhs
00:28:13.000tapes even your home video dvds and they can digitize them and then make sure that you have
00:28:18.120them forever then you truly can pass down these memories and hang on to them and you don't have
00:28:23.640to worry about what's going to happen when you move or a flood in the basement or any of that
00:28:28.620they just make it as simple as possible. Go to LegacyBox.com slash Allie, get 50% off. That's0.85
00:28:33.680an incredible deal they've got going on right now with my link. That's LegacyBox.com slash Allie.
00:28:43.480Just another thing about IVF is that it doesn't actually help the fertility crisis. Katie Faust,
00:28:50.200she founded Them Before Us, which is a child's rights organization. She said the places that
00:28:57.760have subsidized IVF don't actually see an increase in birth rates. It simply means women further0.98
00:29:04.080postpone childbearing rather than prioritizing it. This is not a solution to the fertility crisis,0.54
00:29:09.260but it does result in massive loss of human life. She's absolutely right about that. If you look at0.97
00:29:16.560Singapore, they've had a 40-year push of subsidized IVF. They subsidize up to 75% of reproductive
00:29:24.000technology costs. However, Singapore's fertility rate dropped to 0.87 children per woman in 2025.
00:29:31.200If you look at that chart, it's actually gone down since they started subsidizing IVF. Because
00:29:37.740a lot of people, I'm not saying everyone, but a lot of people are going through IVF because they
00:29:42.860have waited, sometimes by choice, when they're in their 40s to have children. And that is past the
00:29:49.540window of your prime that is past the window of when it is most likely to be able to have children
00:29:55.800and that makes it difficult that again is not solving the fertility crisis there are root cause
00:30:01.260problems to the fertility crisis that we have been talking about for a long time on the show you can
00:30:05.680go back and listen to some of those episodes again ivf doesn't treat that it doesn't solve that
00:30:10.240we've got moral spiritual issues going on a lot of it is because men and women just aren't getting
00:30:16.220married. The vast majority of people are not getting married even by the time they're 30.
00:30:22.840So again, that fertility window just gets smaller and smaller. And the reason that they're not
00:30:28.520getting married, I think for a lot of people, maybe they don't find the right person. But I
00:30:33.100also think it's just a lack of desire for commitment. Of course, as Christianity fades,0.65
00:30:37.580which has been the driver of monogamy and fruitfulness in having children, primarily for0.93
00:30:43.000a very long time. As that influence wanes, people's desire to sacrifice of themselves and
00:30:48.980get married and have children is going to wane. I know for a lot of you, you are not child-free
00:30:53.420by choice. You would love to have children. You are not marriage-free by choice. You would love
00:30:57.440to get married. But I don't think that is true for a lot of the people who are not getting married
00:31:02.780and not having kids. And then when you turn 38, you finally decide you want to do these things,
00:31:07.800then it gets a lot harder. That is contributing to our fertility crisis. I think it has a lot
00:31:12.680to do with a matter of priorities and choices and morals than it has to do with some of these other
00:31:18.180factors. And it's certainly not going to be solved by IVF. Of course, we know what the Bible says
00:31:23.220about the value of life inside the womb. The same verses that we use to speak out against abortion0.89
00:31:28.660as believers, as Christians, they're the same verses that we use to be against IVF. Jeremiah
00:31:35.4001.5, before I formed you in the womb, I knew you. Before you were born, I consecrated you.
00:31:39.420I appointed you a prophet to the nations.
00:31:41.680He is talking to the prophet Jeremiah there, but it shows us a principle that God knows
00:31:46.360us when we are in the womb, that our lives matter then.
00:31:50.720Psalm 139, 13 through 14, for you formed my inward parts.
00:31:54.080You knitted me together in my mother's womb.
00:31:56.400I praise you for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
00:33:56.720So, unfortunately, the state of abortion in America is not good.
00:34:02.560Abortion has only increased since the Dobbs decision, the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
00:34:07.720The vast majority of the abortions that are occurring are happening in those first few weeks of pregnancy.
00:34:14.740And that is because of the rise in the prevalence of the abortion pill.
00:34:19.180Under the Biden administration a few years ago, they removed the rule that said that you had to see a doctor or abortion provider in person before you could take the abortion pill.
00:34:29.600It's a two-part abortion pill, misopristol and mifepristone.
00:34:34.040And you would go home after confirming how far along you were and take these pills to abort your child, which, of course, is awful.
00:34:43.340But at least when you see a doctor, there is a safeguard in place to know actually how far along you are and if it's going to be safe.
00:34:49.540Well, the Biden administration, after the Dobbs decision allowed states to pass more pro-life laws, wanted to make it as easy as possible for women in Texas and these more pro-life states to be able to skirt those laws and to still be able to murder their babies no matter how far along they were.
00:35:06.740And so now you go online and you order these abortion pills and you can kill your child, and it's very detrimental as well to the woman.
00:35:15.320And unfortunately, the Trump administration has not reversed that rule.
00:35:19.220The Trump administration is over the FDA, and they have decided to actually push back against the states like Louisiana, like Texas, like Florida,
00:35:26.780who are trying very hard to ensure that that rule that the FDA has in place is reversed
00:35:34.820so that these women have to see a doctor and have to confirm how far along they are in
00:35:41.400their pregnancy before they can get the abortion pill.1.00
00:35:46.080And of course, we want the abortion pill off the market.
00:35:48.800We don't want it to be sold at all, but you definitely should not be able to sell it online.
00:35:55.760And unfortunately, because of this, because of the prevalence of the abortion pill, we have seen, we have this according to the Guttmacher Institute, that's Planned Parenthood's research arm. You can see that over the past couple of years, this chart shows that abortion actually has risen.
00:36:12.220Now, it was rising before that. It looks like it was rising about 2015, started rising, rising, rising.
00:36:19.380And then it's just continued to rise. It's actually plateaued over the past year or so.
00:36:25.960And so lots of reasons for that. But certainly the circulation of the abortion pill and now the mail order abortions made possible first by the Biden administration,
00:36:35.060but continued to be allowed by the Trump administration for reasons we do not fully
00:36:41.100understand, that is probably the reason for that increase there. Today, we are talking to Dr.
00:36:49.780Christina Francis, and she is an OBGYN of, I think, almost 20 years now. She is awesome. I've known
00:36:57.800her for a while. She is the head of APLOG, and that is the American Association of Pro-Life
00:37:02.940obstetricians and gynecologists. She's going to tell us about, unfortunately, where the Trump
00:37:08.520administration has failed when it comes to this, but also what she did to go undercover to show us0.93
00:37:16.600just how easy it is to legally get abortion pills sent to your house without parental consent,0.99
00:37:23.060even if you are as young as 13. So she's going to fill us in on exactly what all of this means,
00:37:30.000why this matters, and what we can do as pro-lifers to push this administration in the right
00:37:35.380direction. That is one silver lining. I do think this administration can be pushed in the right
00:37:40.100direction, unlike the Kamala Harris administration. So we've got to do what we can to raise a
00:37:45.180respectful ruckus for the things that matter. All right, without further ado, here is Dr. Francis.
00:37:54.820Dr. Francis, thanks so much for taking the time to join us. Okay, tell us about this ruling by
00:37:59.760the Fifth Circuit of Appeals that has to do with mifepristone. Yes. Well, Allie, thank you for
00:38:05.340having me back on again. It's so great to be with you. Yeah. On May 1st, we were really excited to
00:38:11.100hear the ruling from the Fifth Circuit that while this case out of Louisiana over mifepristone is
00:38:18.560working its way through the court, that the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone,
00:38:24.040the abortion drug should be put back into place immediately because of the harm of it not being
00:38:30.120there because of the harm that that's causing to states like Louisiana and also to women like0.99
00:38:35.880Rosalie Marquezich, who's one of the co-plaintiffs in this case, who was coerced into a chemical
00:38:41.600abortion by her boyfriend who was able to order these drugs online, get a mail to him and then
00:38:48.020sat in the car with her and really, it sounds like verbally threatened her. She was afraid of
00:38:55.520physical harm if she didn't take these drugs and so was forced into an abortion that ended the life0.79
00:39:00.600of her child. And so thankfully the Fifth Circuit recognized that this is a real active danger to
00:39:09.100state pro-life laws, but also to individual women who are being harmed and of course pre-born
00:39:14.120children who are being harmed by these drugs. And so the Fifth Circuit said, while this case is
00:39:19.020making its way through the court, we need that in-person dispensing requirement back immediately.
00:39:24.020Right, right. But then what happened at the Supreme Court?
00:39:28.120Yes. Well, so keeping in mind, I am not an attorney, but I have lots of friends who are,
00:39:32.300and they have given me the wording to recap this. So what happened was then that Fifth Circuit
00:39:38.580decision was immediately appealed to the Supreme Court by the abortion drug manufacturer.
00:39:44.120So Danco and Jen Biopro, whose sole financial product, I know for Danco, but I believe for Jen Biopro as well, is the abortion drug Bifepristone.
00:39:53.960So they immediately appealed to the Supreme Court.
00:39:56.820And then earlier this week, Justice Alito, because he makes decisions on any appeals that come through the Fifth Circuit,
00:40:04.900Justice Alito just said, we're going to put a pause for a few days on what the Fifth Circuit said.
00:40:11.080and we want to hear from all of the parties involved.
00:40:14.340We want to get briefs from all of the parties involved.
00:40:17.260And then it seems like because the Supreme Court's stay
00:40:40.900Obviously, we don't want any babies to be killed with the abortion pill at all, but this in-person visit requirement is a really important, not only deterrent possibly, but also just to preserve the safety of the women who are seeking to use this abortion pill, right?
00:41:02.600So we know at its baseline, this abortion drug, mifepristone, is inherently dangerous.
00:41:07.620It's four times more dangerous than surgical abortions.
00:41:10.900But that's when it's being dispensed in person, when a woman has an in-person evaluation by a medical professional who ensures they know how far along she is in her pregnancy, ensures that she does not have an ectopic pregnancy, which is life-threatening to her, and ensures that she is actually the one who wants the abortion, that it's not someone forcing her into that.
00:41:31.280You know, if we take sort of a 30,000 foot view, one of the reasons that this in-person dispensing requirement is important is because without it, abortion is essentially legal in all 50 states right now.
00:41:43.460This is a federal mandate that is overriding all state pro-life laws right now.
00:41:48.340In fact, the state of Louisiana, the main plaintiff in this case, has documented that they, even though abortion is illegal, a thousand abortions a month are happening in just the state of Louisiana because of these drugs.
00:42:00.320So on a macro level, in order to respect state pro-life laws, this in-person dispensing requirement needs to be put back into place.
00:42:08.520But on an individual level, as you said, women getting these drugs through the mail is extremely dangerous.
00:42:15.440Without that evaluation, we know that for every week beyond really about eight weeks of pregnancy that a woman takes these drugs,
00:42:22.420her risks increase exponentially of hemorrhage or massive bleeding, infection, the need for
00:42:29.060emergency surgery, and even just a few weeks can make a huge difference. So at 10 weeks of pregnancy,0.60
00:42:35.260her risk of needing a surgical completion of her abortion is about one in 10. If she takes them0.98
00:42:41.480just three weeks later at 13 weeks of pregnancy, that jumps to one in three. So that's a really
00:42:47.260significant difference in her risk. And we know even the American College of OBGYNs, who's very
00:42:52.820pro-abortion, and by the way, filed an amicus brief in this case, going, siding with the abortion
00:42:58.880industry. But even they say that up to 50% of women will be wrong about how far along they are
00:43:05.400in their pregnancy, just based on, you know, going off of their last period without an ultrasound,
00:43:10.500without an in-person exam. And of course, Rosalie's story and many others like hers
00:43:15.940highlight the fact that abusers are getting these drugs online, men are getting these drugs who
00:43:23.200obviously are not pregnant, and they're forcing them on their wives, on their girlfriends.0.53
00:43:28.240And so I think even somebody who may say that they support a woman's quote unquote right to0.94
00:43:33.760an abortion should certainly be opposed to abortion being forced on a woman that doesn't
00:43:38.860want them or doesn't want an abortion. And then finally, as you said, we know that the
00:43:44.860reinstatement of this in-person dispensing requirement would also lead to saving more
00:43:49.480lives of pre-born children. We would see the abortion numbers go down, which we have seen go up
00:43:54.980significantly since the Dobbs decision, in particular because of the lack of an in-person
00:44:00.760dispensing requirement. Quick pause from that conversation to tell you about Good Ranchers.
00:44:11.260Y'all, Good Ranchers will make your meal prepping journey so much easier because you'll always have a freezer full of a wide variety of all-American meats that you can access at any time.
00:46:30.380that also is very dangerous for women, right? It is. It is. And this is not something new.
00:46:36.240It's something that the abortion industry has done internationally for many, many years is
00:46:42.100mesoprostol-only abortions. One of the reasons why mifepristone was developed was because
00:46:47.800of the incomplete abortion rate or where all of the baby and all of the pregnancy tissues don't
00:46:54.980pass out of the woman's uterus, that rate for mesoprostol alone abortions is significantly0.92
00:47:00.820higher than when you add mifepristone. So it is more dangerous to women. It will lead to more
00:47:06.320complications. And I think the fact that the abortion industry is already pivoting to that
00:47:11.680shows that all they care about are more abortions. They couldn't care less about women's health and
00:47:17.680women's safety. They obviously don't care about the health and safety of pre-born children.0.97
00:47:21.980And I think this, they really have shown their hand in this, in that they care about their profits, they don't care about patients, which is exactly the opposite of what healthcare is meant to be and to do.
00:47:33.920And Allie, if I can just return real quickly to something that you mentioned right before that, in that, you know, we think a little less when we go on Amazon, for instance, to buy something online.
00:47:44.080I want to highlight the fact, because I think that there's a lot of people, even on the pro-life side, that don't fully understand this, that when women or whomever is going online to buy these pills to be shipped through the mail to them, it truly is like an Amazon experience.
00:47:59.160So oftentimes they're called telehealth or telemedicine abortions, but telehealth or telemedicine means a patient is talking to a medical professional through like a Zoom call.
00:48:09.860That is not what's happening on these websites. And in fact, Applog put out an expose video recently where I got online onto one of these sites and I put in every medical reason why someone should not be given these pills, things that make them very much life threatening.
00:48:27.180In the end, I was a 13-year-old with three previous C-sections and IUD in place on blood thinners in the state of Indiana where abortion is illegal.
00:48:37.020And after I submitted my request, which they said would be reviewed by a health care professional, before I received the payment link, within a minute and a half, I got the payment link.
00:48:45.820So obviously, no medical professional is reviewing this.
00:48:49.240And in two days, they were in my mailbox in the state of Indiana.
00:48:53.320And it should be noted that the pills came from or the pills were were pills that were made by Jen Biopro, who is one of the abortion drug companies involved in this lawsuit.
00:49:03.460And they came from a random address in Los Angeles, California.
00:49:06.800So I legitimately as a 13 year old could have died had I taken those pills and actually been pregnant.
00:49:13.820So I think it's really, really important.
00:49:16.160One of my big things that I'm trying to convince people of is don't call these telehealth or telemedicine abortions.
00:49:21.800They are not. There is no health care whatsoever involved. There's no medical oversight. These truly are mail order abortions like a shopping online shopping experience. That is all that's happening. Women are not getting informed consent and they're having no medical oversight whatsoever.
00:49:38.440Would it be accurate to say that abortion is more accessible than ever because of this?0.99
00:49:51.040They started laying the groundwork for this all the way back in 2000 when this drug was originally approved in the U.S.
00:49:57.680Their goal was to always make it accessible like this and ultimately to make it over the counter, which is their next move.
00:50:04.360Now, I would argue it's essentially over the counter right now the way it's available online.
00:50:08.800But there are already studies coming out in major medical journals from abortionists about why it would be safe for this to be dispensed over the counter.
00:50:16.880That is ultimately their goal, that every person who wants to get their hands on abortion drugs will be able to do so with no medical evaluation, no follow-up, and just abandoning women to their local emergency rooms and obviously ending the lives of hundreds of thousands of pre-born children in this country every year.
00:50:36.060And by the way, no parental knowledge. I mean, forget about consent. You were a 13 year old in your undercover operation and the parents didn't have to sign off or say anything. And so like your little girl, I mean, your teenage daughter could walk into their plan is to walk into a CVS, potentially die, not to mention her child die gruesomely because of this.
00:51:01.900Now, we know that this comes from a Biden-era FDA rule that said you don't have to have this in-person requirement, but the Trump administration, FDA, has not done what we need them to do, correct, in reversing this rule.