00:40:10.920Dr. Muller, thanks so much for joining us again.
00:40:13.620You know, one of the questions that I've gotten is we've talked about your truth and unity amendment, even from people who agree with us about this role of pastors being exclusive to men, as outlined so clearly in scripture, is what exactly the word function means in this constitutional amendment.
00:40:33.920Yes to office, but some people seem to be worried that the word function will be too all encompassing.
00:40:43.200And so can you clarify, like, what is meant by that?
00:40:46.280What would qualify as a woman occupying the function of pastor in a way that is unbiblical?
00:40:54.000Well, you know, when the language is seen in what the SPC has taken the first step to adopt,
00:41:00.420it says function specifically preaching to the gathered assembly.
00:41:06.240So this goes back, Allie Beth, and it's so good to be with you.
00:41:09.900It goes back to historic Baptist confessions, and in particular, it goes back to 1689.
00:41:15.300So, of course, you know, I want it to be the most classic Baptist language,
00:41:19.500biblical language that Baptists can muster.
00:41:23.480And that confession makes very clear that the pastoral role is both an office and a function.0.93
00:42:09.900does that make sense? Yes, it totally makes sense. And if you don't put function in,
00:42:16.040then you could have people who say, well, she's not called a pastor. She's not called an elder.
00:42:21.120She's not called an overseer. But if she's preaching to the gathered assembly, that's
00:42:25.800what the pastor is to do. You know, this conversation kind of got lumped in with
00:42:33.840a, an answer that you gave on your podcast to a woman who had written in asking, what about a
00:42:41.300woman in our church who doesn't occupy the office of the pastor, but she is answering questions
00:42:47.840about the sermon on a church podcast. I remember I got some messages about this from some people
00:42:54.880saying, oh my goodness, can you believe this podcast? And I listened to it and I was like,
00:42:59.220that's it. That's what people are worried about. Your answer to that seemed very clear and very
00:43:04.620limited to the situation that this woman had asked about. But could you talk about that a little bit
00:43:09.380more? Maybe expound upon that. Why in this situation is a woman that's a member of a church
00:43:14.280expounding upon a sermon for the church? Why would that be considered something that is outside of a0.89
00:43:22.200woman's authority in the local body? Well, let me say, first of all, I really appreciate you
00:43:26.960bringing this up, and I can also say that you can teach an old dog new tricks. I did not see
00:43:33.480the timing coming between that particular question and the SVC action. There was no premeditation
00:43:40.000there. But the bottom line is that the woman who wrote the question, it was a woman who sent in
00:43:45.320the question. She was troubled because this was presented as an explicit extension of the preaching
00:43:52.140ministry of the church. So in other words, it was an incredibly specific context. And so I just
00:43:57.820wanted to answer, if you set the context as the continuation of the sermon, more or less,
00:44:03.900well, then you, I'm just going to say, obviously, I wasn't speaking to Christian women doing
00:44:08.900podcasting. Otherwise, I wouldn't be so glad to be with you today and so thankful for you.
00:44:13.260That's not at all what I was talking about. It was a specific situation. And yeah, I stand by
00:44:20.780my answer. Because if you're going to say to me, this is a continuation of the church's preaching
00:44:25.640ministry, that's what it's presented as, well, you just answered your own question. I don't think
00:44:30.600that's what's taking place in most podcasts. And by the way, I don't think there's anything wrong
00:44:35.200with a woman in particular, you know, responding to a sermon. But it was clearly in what was0.99
00:44:42.420understood to be something of an official teaching role. So, you know, usually when you have a
00:44:48.440question like that, the answer is implicit in the question. So I hope I have clarified and not
00:44:56.060further confused the situation. If you're going to say that what we're doing on this podcast is
00:45:01.320continuing the preaching ministry of the church, you just answered your own question. I'm clearly
00:45:05.480not talking about women on Christian podcasts. That was not even in my imagination when that's
00:45:13.300how the question came. It was very clear in the context of the question, in the context of your
00:45:19.000answer, that you were talking specifically about this woman's question. And to me, it was very
00:45:25.720clear that you didn't go beyond that in that answer. And if that was something that you
00:45:29.760believed about podcasts in general or about Christian women in general, I don't think that0.99
00:45:33.780you would be afraid to say it. But you were very specific in your answer. But as things go, things
00:45:38.580change and morph on social media, all different kinds of things end up happening. And yeah,
00:45:43.200the timing, the timing was interesting. It got kind of lumped into the whole conversation about
00:45:48.660women preaching and pastors and about this specific constitutional amendment. Reiterate to us again,
00:45:57.440why it is important that it's not just what we read in the Baptist faith and message,
00:46:02.940which is very clear from 2000, that only women are supposed to be pastors,
00:46:06.760but that this actually becomes a constitutional amendment.
00:46:10.940Well, the Baptist faith and message statement is very clear that the office of pastor is limited
00:46:15.780to men as qualified by scripture. So again, it's not all men. What the New Testament reveals is
00:46:20.160those particular men called to fulfill these roles, but not women. And that's in the sovereignty of
00:46:25.880God. I think the vast, and I do mean capital letters, vast majority of Southern Baptists
00:46:33.220are absolutely clear on this, and their churches are clear, and in right order, and in right
00:46:37.720doctrine. The issue, though, is that the Southern Baptist Convention is an assembly, and you have
00:46:44.220people from thousands and thousands of churches. And honestly, in any large group, you've got to
00:46:50.100be clear about how this is applied. And so, you know, Allie Beth, 30 plus years ago, the Southern
00:46:56.240Baptist Convention was confronted with the real challenge of the LGBTQ revolution. And so the
00:47:02.160Southern Baptist Convention more than 30 years ago just put in the Constitution a definition of
00:47:07.280a church in friendly cooperation with the SBC as one that takes no step to affirm or to legitimize
00:47:14.800or in any way make a positive statement about LGBTQ issues, behaviors, relationships, etc.
00:47:21.560I just want to tell you that that was not only right, it was necessary, and it has been incredibly
00:47:26.920efficient for the SBC. There has not been a debate on the floor over these issues at the Southern
00:47:32.500Baptist Convention for more than 30 years, and I think that's a tremendous achievement. That is
00:47:38.060exactly the achievement I want through this constitutional amendment so that the issue
00:47:42.260on the role of pastors and in men serving as pastors, that that is a constitutional issue
00:47:49.980so that it should free the SBC from having to deal with this on the floor every year.
00:47:56.920next sponsor is alliance defending freedom y'all i love adf that's why i have them as guests
00:48:05.380on this show so often because they are doing such great work i am always looking to partner
00:48:11.820with them in any way i can they are serving on the front lines not just in the u.s but around
00:48:16.920the world protecting christians rights to speak up to live out our faith in our business whether
00:48:22.780There were an elected official mom trying to adopt kids from the foster care system,
00:48:29.720but we are unwilling to compromise on our faith.
00:48:34.440ADF wants to make sure that we have our rights fully protected under the Constitution.
00:48:39.300So they take these cases all the way up to the Supreme Court and every case that is fought
00:48:44.360for and won by Alliance Tiffany Freedom that has a positive effect on you and me.
00:48:48.380It has an effect on my ability to do this show freely without fear of punishment.
00:48:52.600has your ability to adopt and foster as a Christian parent who won't go along with the0.80
00:48:57.020LGBTQ agenda. And so if you can, if you've got the resources to support them, you're not only0.92
00:49:03.200supporting ADF and all of their clients, you're supporting you. You're supporting the next
00:49:07.560generation, the future of our country, which depends upon protecting the constitution.
00:49:13.080That's what ADF is doing, especially for Christians, for women and girls, exercising
00:49:18.060our first amendment rights, our rights to our own private spaces and fairness and competition.
00:49:23.080They're at a deadline for fundraising this year, and they need all the support they can get. What
00:49:28.920a great cause. Go to join ADF.com slash Allie. Every dollar you give will be doubled thanks to1.00
00:49:34.820a special matching grant. That's join ADF.com slash Allie. One thing that has surprised me
00:49:46.300And some of the pushback that I've seen is that it doesn't just come from progressives, those who deny the reality of gender altogether.
00:49:56.460I've seen some people that are politically conservative, even in some ways, theologically conservative, really push back against this, push back against the entire idea that women can't be pastors.
00:50:08.180and they'll appeal to some form of scripture and they'll say that these commands against women
00:50:14.700preaching in the church that they had to do with something extremely culturally specific at the
00:50:20.380time that it's not a general principle or a general regulation for the local body and these
00:50:27.300are people like i said who are conservative in many ways but when it comes to this have a very
00:50:32.760progressive interpretation of scripture you know don't end up following the rest of the verse
00:50:38.040which actually goes all the way back to creation for the reasoning why women should be exercising
00:50:42.820authority over men in the church. I'm sure you've seen lots and lots of arguments like this
00:50:47.440for decades. They're not really new. But what is your response for pastors even who say,
00:50:53.500you know what, that's just because women were yelling at the time. It was specific
00:50:58.460disorderly context in that culture has nothing to do with today.
00:51:01.980Allie, Beth, I so appreciate the question and the two dimensions of it you ask. And so let me go
00:51:08.460first to the explicit biblical text. And here's where we have both a positive and a negative.
00:51:17.940So we have in Scripture very clear setting out of the office of pastor. So think of 1 Timothy
00:51:26.220chapter 3, Titus chapters 1 and 2, and look at this, and you'll see that there's the positive
00:51:31.260statement, the objectively, just absolutely crystal clear statement of the men who are
00:51:38.500qualified for these posts, and with extended biblical text. But you also have very clear
00:51:43.200text, and you make reference to it. You know, for instance, the Apostle Paul, he doesn't just
00:51:47.240ground this in a local church problem. As you rightly said, and this is so key, he grounds it
00:51:52.520in creation order. So in other words, he makes the point this is not an episodic, particular,
00:51:58.420eccentric local church issue. This is a creation order issue, which is to be reflected in the
00:52:05.000order of the church. There's a second dimension in this I want to mention, and I've been at this
00:52:10.160for a very long time, and I will just tell you, and I will stake my reputation on this.
00:52:16.660The way of interpreting the Scripture that is necessary in order to get around those very0.76
00:52:22.080clear texts limiting the teaching office to men. There are all kinds of, I would say,0.73
00:52:29.960liberal mechanisms to try to get out of that problem. They're the same mechanisms that
00:52:35.380authorize LGBTQ issues in direct violation of Scripture. And so I'll just tell you, you look0.86
00:52:40.940historically at the denominations that have moved to affirm the ordination of women.
00:52:44.900And I overwhelmingly, they're the dominations that one generation later approves the LGBTQ
00:52:51.540agenda and the rainbow flags out front.
00:52:53.860And it is because the pattern of biblical interpretation of getting around the text
00:52:58.200in order to meet a cultural end, that is a parallel process.
00:53:02.800And I know it infuriates some people for me to say that, but I'm sorry, we've got decades
00:53:07.960of experience to know that that's exactly what has happened.
00:53:10.820And I think there are some people who just don't like saying no. And so I'm just being blunt here.
00:53:17.360They just don't like saying no. But I think we need to recognize the scripture often just says
00:53:24.400no. Even in the Ten Commandments, you shall and you shall not. Obedience includes the shall nots
00:53:31.480as well as the thou shalls. Yeah. Gosh, that's absolutely true. And it all comes down also
00:53:37.780to how we read scripture. Do you read scripture thinking, what can I get away with? How can I
00:53:43.160finagle this in a way that is going to allow me to ultimately do what I want to do? You could do
00:53:48.600that for a very long time and find all kinds of seeming permission slips if your goal in life is
00:53:55.400just to follow what you want to follow. If that's the case, then Christianity isn't for you. It's
00:54:00.840not for any of us who want to do that. But if we read scripture, which it's a process,
00:54:05.860sanctification is a process of reading scripture like this as much as we possibly can, but asking
00:54:10.740the question, how can I glorify God the most? How can I do the holiest thing? Not just what is God
00:54:16.120telling me not to do, but what is God telling me to do? Then that actually, you know, some people
00:54:21.120see that as restrictive. It's actually the most freeing thing that you can do. And I think it's
00:54:24.920the best and the safest way to regard scripture. Otherwise we play a game of trying to figure out
00:54:31.260how we can sin but make excuses for it.
00:54:34.500No, Allie, Beth, I think that's exactly right, and I appreciate the very gracious but clear