Ep 141 | Abortion
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
172.71747
Summary
In this episode, we discuss abortion and the common lies and arguments that pro-choice supporters use in order to justify their position on the issue of abortion. We also discuss the difference between abortion and birth control and how to counter them.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Today we are discussing abortion. Now we have discussed
00:00:06.360
abortion many times on this show. I encourage you to go back and listen to previous episodes.
00:00:13.900
Episode 113 talks about the spiritual battle that we face. Those of us who are on the pro-life side
00:00:20.360
when we are talking about abortion or when we are talking to people who advocate for abortion,
00:00:26.480
there was an episode called Calling Evil Good, I believe, that was about the New York legislation.
00:00:34.040
Specifically, we've talked about the Georgia legislation, the Alabama legislation. We have
00:00:38.720
talked about abortion a lot. Today, this is going to be just like all of the other episodes that you
00:00:45.460
guys have heard this summer. This is going to be a basic kind of introduction into what abortion is
00:00:52.260
and how to combat some of the most common lies or common arguments that you hear for abortion.
00:01:00.280
So I don't have to pretend that I don't already have my mind made up on this. You guys know this
00:01:05.140
is something that I am extremely passionate about, that I have been arguing for the sanctity of unborn
00:01:11.600
life for a very long time. I do it in speeches. I do it on my podcast. I do it on television. I do it
00:01:18.060
in articles. It is something that is so clear to me that it's very hard for me sometimes to wrap my
00:01:24.880
mind around how the other side thinks until, as we discussed on episode 113, when we discussed
00:01:32.240
spiritual warfare, until you realize this is not a flesh and blood battle. This is truly a spiritual
00:01:38.320
battle and you just have to understand that people are being deceived. That's the bottom line. And if you
00:01:43.220
don't believe me, hopefully you will agree with me, uh, by the end of this episode, there is truly,
00:01:50.040
truly not a single logical argument, not a single good argument that I have heard for abortion. Now
00:01:57.160
there could be some very sophisticated academic arguments out there that I haven't heard. I
00:02:02.940
obviously would not find them persuasive, but maybe I would find them somewhat logical. I just
00:02:10.520
have not found that. And look, I look for good arguments for the other side of things. I really
00:02:16.400
do because I want to know how to respond to them. So I don't just pick out stupid arguments and say,
00:02:21.960
well, this is what the other side thinks. No, I see it as beneficial to myself and to my side of an
00:02:28.800
issue to really fully and accurately understand what the best arguments are for the other side of the
00:02:35.540
issue. Because I think it makes me stronger in my position. It makes me better at having a dialogue
00:02:40.740
about these things. It makes me more thoughtful. And I think all of those things are good. So
00:02:44.780
just understand if you are a pro-choicer listening to this, or if you are a pro-lifer listening to this,
00:02:50.520
it doesn't matter. And you think that I'm someone who just hyperbolizes the other side or who doesn't
00:02:57.100
understand the other side, who hasn't really thought about the other side. Know that that is an
00:03:02.440
incorrect assessment. I think that it is not beneficial to me at all to misrepresent the
00:03:08.020
other side of any issue, including abortion. So while I am passionate about my position and I'm
00:03:13.540
passionate about the rightness of my position on this issue, my desire is not to mischaracterize
00:03:21.300
the pro-choice position. It's not to exaggerate it and it's not to lie about it. I promise you that.
00:03:28.760
I don't see that as positive in any way for either side of this. So as I'm going through these things,
00:03:34.940
know that I am trying to be as accurate and as exact as possible in what the pro-choice side says
00:03:41.580
and believes. That doesn't mean I'm not going to offer my opinion. This whole thing is going to be
00:03:45.960
what I think about abortion. But I don't have any desire to, like I said, lie or deceive you in any way
00:03:54.480
about what the other side thinks. Even though you already know my position on this, just know that
00:04:02.580
I am giving as much deference as possible to the other side. I don't even need, honestly, to
00:04:11.940
exaggerate the other arguments because I find them so easy to refute. So just understand that as we're
00:04:21.260
going into this. So let's talk about what is abortion. So I just decided to take the definition
00:04:27.800
given to me by Google. So if I just type in on the search bar, what is abortion to Google? Here is
00:04:34.420
what it gives me. The deliberate termination of a human pregnancy most often performed during the first
00:04:40.020
28 weeks of pregnancy. Well, that's just amazing for many reasons. And we'll talk about one of the
00:04:45.960
reasons in a little bit. But the first 28 weeks of pregnancy, like that is really far along. By 27
00:04:53.680
weeks, you've been feeling your child move for at least seven weeks. So there's no denying at that
00:05:00.240
point what this is inside your room. But again, we're getting a little ahead of ourselves. If you go
00:05:05.660
to PlannedParenthood.com, and so they're the largest abortion provider, obviously, in the country. And if
00:05:11.260
you look for what happens during an abortion, here is what their website will tell you. So it says
00:05:16.540
suction abortion is the most common kind of abortion procedure. A nurse or doctor may give you
00:05:21.440
medication to help open your cervix before abortion. Sometimes they also put small dilator sticks called
00:05:27.940
laminaria into the opening of your cervix a day or a few hours before your procedure. The laminaria
00:05:33.260
absorbs absorb fluid from your body. It's amniotic fluid, by the way, and get bigger, which slowly
00:05:40.600
stretches your cervix open. Then they examine your uterus. They put a speculum in to see your vagina,
00:05:47.900
inject a numbing medication into or near your cervix, stretch the opening of your cervix with a
00:05:53.880
series of dilating rods if you haven't had them put in earlier, insert a thin tube through your cervix
00:05:59.400
into your uterus, use a small handheld suction device or suction machine to gently take the pregnancy
00:06:06.600
tissue out of your uterus. They may also use a small surgical tool called a curette to remove any
00:06:13.900
tissue that's left in your uterus or check to make sure your uterus is totally empty. So if you will
00:06:21.300
notice what is missing from these definitions is any mention of what or who is actually being removed
00:06:29.780
here. Google defines abortion as the termination of a pregnancy. Planned Parenthood defines abortion
00:06:35.880
as gently taking the pregnancy tissue out of your uterus. So it should at least make you curious
00:06:43.420
if you are a pro-choice person right away when you observe that our greatest source and purveyor of
00:06:51.160
information, Google, and the largest abortion provider in the country, Planned Parenthood, are obscuring
00:06:56.900
what abortion actually is. Even if you are pro-choice, even if you are this on the side that advocates
00:07:02.480
for abortion, you should wonder if this really isn't so bad. If abortion really isn't that big of a deal,
00:07:08.780
then why can't we say what it actually is? You understand, no matter what side you're on,
00:07:15.740
what an abortion does. It doesn't just end a pregnancy, though technically it does that, but
00:07:20.800
what is the ending of a pregnancy. Planned Parenthood describes it as removing pregnancy tissue or
00:07:29.740
removing remaining tissue out of the uterus. It takes a human being, this is what abortion does,
00:07:36.520
you know what it does, it takes a human being that was alive and growing, whether it is at six weeks
00:07:42.820
gestation or 20 weeks gestation, and kills him or her. I mean, that's it. That's not an exaggeration,
00:07:49.520
that's not unscientific language, that's as scientific and as exact as it gets. If what is
00:07:57.140
inside a pregnant woman is not alive, then that's not an abortion, that's a miscarriage. If what is
00:08:03.060
inside a pregnant woman is not a human being, then she is not pregnant, and there is no need for an
00:08:08.140
abortion, okay? So we know that it is an alive human being if a woman is pregnant and she is getting an
00:08:16.820
abortion. If a woman is pregnant, then scientifically, medically, exactly speaking, she is pregnant with
00:08:25.780
a living human being, okay? That's just basic logic. It's really amazing that in 2019 we are going over
00:08:31.660
this. So it does not matter if you are pro-choice. That is the unmistakable reality that you have to
00:08:37.380
accept. If you can't accept that, then you should ask yourself as a logically thinking person,
00:08:43.020
then why do I find myself unable to come to terms with a scientific reality? If taking the life of a
00:08:50.320
human being in any way makes your stomach turn or makes you feel defensive or angry or makes you
00:08:56.900
emotional, if you find yourself ignoring the scientific reality in exchange for emotional
00:09:02.360
arguments like my body, my choice, you should ask yourself, really, why? You should also be asking
00:09:09.400
yourself why if abortion really isn't that big of a deal. If abortion is just a choice that some women
00:09:15.700
make and then get on with their lives. If it's nothing more than a trip to the dentist, why can't
00:09:22.460
Planned Parenthood or Google say what it is? Why do they have to use euphemisms? Why can't they be more
00:09:27.900
clear about it? Why do they ignore in both of their definitions the existence of a fetus? If the fetus
00:09:34.740
doesn't exist, again, this is not an abortion. They say it ends a pregnancy. True, but how?
00:09:41.700
Planned Parenthood tells you what the procedure is like for you, but any curious person, no matter
00:09:47.420
their political leanings, should wonder what does it do to the fetus? How does the fetus die so that
00:09:55.400
you're no longer pregnant? And this is not just Google and Planned Parenthood. This is the entirety of
00:10:02.340
the pro-choice side, the use of euphemisms in an effort to obscure what actually happens in an
00:10:09.200
abortion. There's not just one person involved. There's not even just two people involved, not just
00:10:14.440
the woman and the doctor. Having an abortion by definition is the ending of a pregnancy. Pregnancy
00:10:20.880
by definition means that you have a human being inside of you if you are a human being. That is just
00:10:28.320
basic biology. Choice, reproductive rights, own body, autonomy, freedom, health care. All of these
00:10:38.900
terms in regards to abortion do the same thing. They obscure that another human being is involved.
00:10:44.860
Yes, you do have a choice. You do have reproductive rights. You do have autonomy over your own body. You do
00:10:53.040
have freedom to do with your body what you will. You can have access to health care, but all of that
00:10:59.940
is redefined. All of that looks very different when it is no longer just your body involved, but someone
00:11:06.920
else's too. And from the point of conception onward, there is another body inside you, whether you like
00:11:13.840
it or not, whether you acknowledge it as another body or not. Again, that is a scientific reality. That is
00:11:20.520
not a religious perspective. That is not a moral position. That is a fact. From the moment of
00:11:27.420
conception, there's a human being with distinct DNA who, unless aborted or miscarried, will grow
00:11:35.340
into a fully formed baby and Lord willing, a toddler, a teenager, an adult, etc. Every single one of us,
00:11:44.020
all of you listening to this podcast, me, everyone in the entire world was once a zygote.
00:11:50.140
Okay. That is simply a stage of development. That is not a degree of humanity. We don't become
00:11:56.100
more human the older that we get. We often hear from the pro-choice side that an unborn child is
00:12:02.180
not a human. Well, that is unscientific nonsense. No doctor or scientist, no matter how pro-choice they
00:12:11.220
are, will tell you that when a woman is pregnant, she may or may not be pregnant with a human.
00:12:17.200
Never in all of history has a woman ever been pregnant with anything except a human being.
00:12:25.800
Any member of the homo sapien species from the point of conception to the point of death is a
00:12:33.040
human being. And even after death, they're still a human being. It does not make sense to arbitrarily
00:12:39.440
assign humanity to someone whenever we see fit. Again, that is emotional. That is illogical. That
00:12:47.200
is unscientific hogwash. Every adult living today was once a human zygote. It is just an early stage
00:12:56.080
of development. Unless you are willing to say that a newborn is less human than a toddler, simply because
00:13:02.800
the newborn isn't as developed as the toddler, which of course would be illogical. There is no reason for
00:13:08.460
you to say that a newborn is more human than a zygote. Same thing if you said that a 25-year-old is more
00:13:15.640
human than a 17-year-old because their frontal lobe is more developed. Or they're, yeah, they're more
00:13:22.080
human. That doesn't make any sense. Now, what pro-choice people really mean, what they actually mean when
00:13:31.680
they say that a fetus is not a human is that a fetus is not a person. Human is a scientific term
00:13:38.180
that cannot be refuted. Person is a philosophical term that ascribes value and in America guarantees
00:13:45.880
you basic rights. That is why abortion legislation, whether it's New York's pro-abortion legislation or
00:13:53.560
Georgia or Alabama's anti-abortion legislation defines a person, not a human, because any sane
00:14:02.100
person knows what a human being is from the point of conception, but a person. New York defines a person
00:14:08.380
as a human being outside the womb. Georgia defines a person as a human being with a heartbeat, which
00:14:14.380
typically starts at six weeks gestation. Now, states do have a right to define personhood. So the question
00:14:22.780
we should ask ourselves, when does a human being become a person and why? Well, here's the plain
00:14:31.840
truth. I don't know any other way logically to think about this. Defining a human as a person any point
00:14:38.760
after conception is arbitrary and therefore doesn't make any sense and therefore is immoral. So if you say
00:14:47.500
that a human zygote isn't a person, okay, why? When does a zygote turn into a person? When they have
00:14:54.800
a heartbeat? Okay, well, why does a heartbeat define personhood? The zygote is still alive if the woman
00:15:01.520
has a miscarried. Like we've already noted, we all start out as zygotes. So why logically does a zygote
00:15:09.560
magically become a person when they have a beating heart? And who says that? You? Do you say that?
00:15:16.860
Most pro-choicers are okay with abortion, though, after the heartbeat, far after the heartbeat has
00:15:22.160
already been detected. So if it's not when the heartbeat starts that a human being becomes a
00:15:26.680
person, when is it? When the baby can feel pain? So like 16 weeks or a little after that? Okay,
00:15:34.220
why? Is an adult that is under anesthesia, are they any less of a person? Is it viability
00:15:45.020
when a baby can live outside the womb? So around 24 weeks, is that when they become a person?
00:15:51.400
Why then? There are plenty of adults with special needs who are dependent on machines and their parents
00:15:56.180
to survive. Are they not people? Is it when the baby exits the birth canal? Is that when they become a
00:16:01.540
person? So they weren't a person five seconds before that? So it would have been okay to kill
00:16:08.120
them five seconds before they were born? They're not people? They're not people then? Who says?
00:16:13.460
You? Do you determine that? Why? So as you can probably see, assigning personhood to a human being
00:16:21.980
at any point after the point of conception becomes really arbitrary. It becomes subjective. And even what I
00:16:31.080
would call superstitious, it's based on nothing but your own feelings. And when we're talking about a
00:16:37.520
human life, it probably makes the most sense that we should be exact about it, that we shouldn't be
00:16:44.100
playing the game of determining what innocent, helpless humans get to live and die based on our
00:16:48.860
own subjective feelings. That just makes the most sense. Because if you carry that reasoning out to its
00:16:54.260
logical conclusion, you see that people determining who gets to live and die based on their own subjective
00:16:59.580
standards of personhood hasn't turned out very well throughout history. Any human rights atrocity
00:17:04.840
that you can think of from slavery to the Holocaust has been justified by people who decided that a
00:17:10.020
certain type of human was not a person by their standards and therefore didn't have value and
00:17:14.980
therefore was okay to kill. So if you are pro-choice and you find yourself doing the same thing,
00:17:21.160
ask yourself why you feel the need to deny reality to make yourself feel better.
00:17:26.500
Why do you feel the need to either deny that abortion into life and revert to the anti-intellectual
00:17:32.640
my body, my choice thing? Why? It's not just your body. Therefore, it's not just about your choice.
00:17:41.560
And say you are a pro-choicer who is honest with yourself. You acknowledge that a zygote,
00:17:46.560
a fetus, an unborn child is in fact a human being. Okay, good. So you've entered into the realm of
00:17:52.000
scientific reality. Now, will you come to terms with the fact that a human is a person? And this
00:18:00.920
isn't just based on how you feel. It is what makes sense. Because remember, any reasoning that you give
00:18:06.340
for why a human in the womb is not a person can probably be applied to human beings outside of the
00:18:12.100
womb. So age, size, location, dependency, sentience, self-consciousness. These are all characteristics that
00:18:18.560
describe many humans outside the womb too, particularly babies or people with special
00:18:22.740
needs. So if you're willing to say that an unborn human is not a person because they are at an early
00:18:28.580
stage of development, then ask yourself if logically you would say that, as we've already said, a teenager
00:18:35.780
is less of a person than a 25-year-old. If not, then why? If you are willing to say that an unborn human
00:18:41.840
is not a person because they are small, because they're in their mom's body, they're dependent on the
00:18:46.920
mother, they're not sentient, they're not self-conscious, ask yourself why logically, logically, a human
00:18:52.260
being, size, location, level of dependency, and intellectual capacity makes them any less of a
00:18:57.860
person. Because again, these are all characteristics of people outside the womb too. Are you okay with
00:19:03.660
killing them for these reasons? If not, why? Your answer is probably because they're not in their mom's
00:19:10.480
body. Well, you've just gone back to your faulty, illogical definition of personhood. Why does someone's
00:19:15.480
location or level of dependency determine their personhood, their value, or whether or not they
00:19:19.880
live or die? Where does that end? And who decides that? Is it you? So if any of these factors do make
00:19:27.340
someone any less of a person in your mind, then I would say congratulations. You now share the mindset
00:19:33.100
of every eugenicist that has ever lived. A eugenicist is someone who believes in impurifying society by
00:19:38.580
killing certain members who are not adding enough value. It typically includes mentally disabled, the elderly,
00:19:44.340
the poor, and of course in the case of the Holocaust, some religions and races too. So
00:19:48.240
that's something that you should maybe consider. And I just want you to be really honest with
00:19:53.840
yourself. Could it be, could it be, just have a moment of frankness, could it be that you've been
00:19:59.960
lied to? Could it be that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the country,
00:20:04.780
aborting more than 300,000 babies a year, a donator of millions of dollars to the Democratic,
00:20:09.640
to Democratic campaigns, an organization founded by Margaret Sanger, who was an out, who was outspoken
00:20:16.280
about abortion being the solution to eliminating, quote, Negroes, is publishing propaganda and calling
00:20:22.360
it PR? Could that be? Could it be that they're pushing eugenics in the name of empowerment?
00:20:29.580
Considering that the vast majority of babies being aborted are black and brown babies,
00:20:33.200
that doesn't feel like that much of a leap. And that they're pushing maybe misinformation in order
00:20:40.020
to stay afloat, in order to make more money, in order to keep funding the Democratic Party. You think
00:20:45.760
that's possible? I do. Now, typically at this point, a pro-choice person gets very defensive and
00:20:53.400
frustrated. You've probably noticed that if you spent any amount of time engaging with a pro-choice
00:20:59.080
person, they move the goalposts a lot. First, they might say that a fetus isn't a human. You
00:21:05.060
disprove that. Then they say a fetus isn't a person. You push back on that. Then they say even
00:21:09.760
if the fetus is a person, they still don't have the same rights as a mother. And you say, sure,
00:21:14.220
they might not have the right to vote. They might not have the right to bear arms, for example, but
00:21:18.700
they are a person. And so at the very least, they should have a right not to be killed, right? Like
00:21:24.520
you would agree that all innocent people are entitled to not be dismembered or poisoned.
00:21:29.340
Right? Like at the very least, they won't answer you. But they may say, well, okay, I'm not for it.
00:21:37.480
I'm for the choice. I wouldn't have one myself, but women should have the right to choose, they would
00:21:42.080
say. Then you ask, why? Do you apply that reasoning to rape or any other form of murder? Should people
00:21:49.580
legally have the right to choose to murder? Should they legally have the right to choose to rape someone?
00:21:54.980
They might say, well, that's different. The government shouldn't have a say in what we do
00:22:00.200
with our bodies. Okay. Well, almost every law that exists dictates what you can do with your body.
00:22:06.780
Uh, you are free to use your body how you want until you use your body to harm someone else or
00:22:12.660
someone else's property. Uh, rape laws are restriction on your body. Uh, theft laws are
00:22:18.120
restriction on your body. Murder laws are restriction on your body, telling you what you cannot do to your
00:22:24.380
body or with your body. Uh, no one is free to do what they want with their bodies when they are harming
00:22:29.320
someone else with it. Okay. They'll say, uh, but banning abortion doesn't stop abortion. It just
00:22:36.240
makes it more dangerous coat hangers and all of that. Uh, one first, you should ask them where they
00:22:41.920
got that information because I haven't seen the data that actually backs that up. Uh, the number of
00:22:46.160
women who were dying from illegal abortions was about the same before Roe as it was after Roe. And
00:22:51.840
two, even if that were true, does that mean that there shouldn't be a law against it? Murder laws don't
00:22:57.220
stop all murders. Rape laws don't stop all rape. So should these things just be legal? No law stops
00:23:03.300
all crime. Uh, but we have laws anyway. Why? Because we value human life and therefore we believe that
00:23:11.320
there should be a punishment for abusing or killing it because that is justice. Uh, so if you're going to
00:23:17.660
argue that we shouldn't have abortion restrictions because it's not going to help much anyway, uh, then I'd
00:23:23.120
like to see you make that same argument for other restrictions and other laws. Uh, then they'll
00:23:28.860
probably just ignore you and they'll say, okay, well, what about rape and incest? To which you say,
00:23:34.120
I think racists are the most, or racist, rapists and racists are the most, uh, vile human beings to
00:23:41.340
ever walk the earth and they should go to prison for the rest of their lives and should be punished as
00:23:46.140
harshly as humanly possible for their disgusting crime. And family members who do the same, who,
00:23:52.580
who rape should possibly be given even harsher punishments. Um, yes, the dad who rapes his
00:23:59.920
13 year old daughter and gets her pregnant should go to prison for the rest of his life
00:24:03.340
in solid and solitary confinement. If I had in my way, and unless he repents and knows Jesus,
00:24:08.520
he is going to spend the rest of all of eternity rotting in hell. He is disgusting and the scum of
00:24:14.760
the earth. So you would say, I feel your anger, uh, towards these people. And I feel your sadness
00:24:20.800
for these victims. However, rape and incest account for less than 1% of all abortions. So it would not
00:24:26.940
make any sense to create an entire law based on a small exception to the rule, which is what most
00:24:34.000
abortions, uh, which is that, uh, most abortions are done for convenience. And the solution, by the way,
00:24:39.800
to rape and incest is not murder. Uh, there are right now thousands of families, thousands of families
00:24:46.740
waiting to adopt. Am I saying that I am happy for someone to carry a child's term after she has been
00:24:52.640
raped? Absolutely not. Absolutely not. I wish that that had never happened to her, but we have to be
00:24:58.580
able to separate the atrocity of rape from the reality of unborn life, no matter how that life
00:25:04.320
is conceived. Uh, it's still a life because again, there is no logical reason to deem an unborn life,
00:25:10.180
no matter their conception, anything other than a human. And if a human, then a person. And if a person
00:25:16.320
then a value, um, and then they say, well, what about the cases where a mother's life is at risk?
00:25:22.020
Well, any pro-life law is going to have an exception for the life of the mother when it is a physical
00:25:27.860
life versus a physical life, not the physical life of the baby versus the emotional trauma of the
00:25:32.480
mother, not the physical life of the baby versus the convenience of the mother, but truly a physical
00:25:37.000
life versus a physical life. And we believe that these lives are equal in personhood. Then yes, a choice
00:25:42.480
must be made. Now, many mothers will choose if they can to risk their own lives for the sake of the
00:25:48.600
child. And that's fine. But the law is always going to allow for that choice. It should be noted.
00:25:55.140
However, that there is no reason, there's no reason to abort a viable feed, a fetus to save the mother.
00:26:02.680
So past 24 weeks, the safest thing for the mother and the child is to deliver the child. At 24 weeks,
00:26:08.400
the child is viable, meaning they can live outside the womb. At 27 weeks, the child has a 99% chance
00:26:13.260
of survival. So there is never any reason at this child or at this point that this child should die
00:26:20.200
to save the mother. None. It doesn't even make any medical sense whatsoever. So that is important to
00:26:25.460
note. Uh, then they say, well, what are you going to do with these babies in the adoption system and the
00:26:31.160
foster care system? They say you're pro birth. You're not pro life. Well, they say this because they think
00:26:37.160
that in order to care about people, you have to believe in big government programs that take care
00:26:41.460
of people. Uh, of course that's not true. Pro lifers are the ones at pregnancy centers, helping
00:26:47.260
these women find shelter, uh, parenting classes, even helping with the citizenship process, the
00:26:53.000
adoption process. It is pro life Christians who are doing the majority of the adoption and the
00:26:58.280
fostering, by the way. So if you are a pro choice person, ask yourself what you are doing, because if you
00:27:04.000
are talking to a pro lifer, chances are they are doing a lot more than you are to help people who
00:27:09.000
are already born. That's just true. I mean, the statistics show time and again, that it is
00:27:14.060
conservatives and particularly conservative Christians that are paying them, that are giving
00:27:18.280
the majority of charity in this country that are donating their time, their energy, their money,
00:27:24.600
doing the most volunteer work. These are people who are pro life, particularly pro life Christians who
00:27:30.000
are doing, uh, the bulk of this work. They don't just believe that we, uh, vote for a politician
00:27:35.600
to be compassionate on our behalf. They are actually out there on the ground doing it. So if
00:27:41.140
you are a pro choicer who is going to launch that kind of question as a, at a pro lifer, know that
00:27:46.320
you're actually going to get a tangible answer for what they do to help the born. And if you don't
00:27:50.620
have an answer for that, I would just go ahead and not ask it. Uh, Planned Parenthood, by the way,
00:27:55.580
does not help victims of rape and abuse. Uh, people who don't have homes or shelter or who
00:28:02.040
need help with citizenship or parenthood classes, they don't do anything for them. They kill their
00:28:05.820
baby. That is the extent of their so-called compassion. Um, then a pro choicer might bring
00:28:12.980
up war or the death penalty. While if you think that joining the military voluntarily or executing,
00:28:19.220
uh, a violent murder is the same as dismembering and unsuspecting, helpless, moving, living child
00:28:24.460
inside the womb, then I don't know what to tell you. Uh, anyone using a quarter of their brain
00:28:29.080
can see the difference in that. Uh, in both the death penalty in a war, the people being killed had
00:28:33.940
a choice, uh, in war, the choice, uh, they made to join the military as a valiant choice for the
00:28:40.340
murder. It's a cowardly choice that they made. And in both cases, though, it is a choice. The
00:28:44.660
unborn child who's killed does not have a choice. Now I have also talked about the death penalty on a
00:28:49.740
previous podcast and I'm trying to remember which podcast it was probably back in May at the beginning
00:28:56.500
of May. I don't remember the episode, but I have talked about the Christian perspective of the death
00:29:00.780
penalty before. Um, if they try to give you, if a pro choicer tries to give you this, the whole,
00:29:06.360
okay, you're in a room and you can only choose between the five-year-old and a thousand, uh,
00:29:13.460
embryos that are being frozen for, uh, IVF or something like that. Uh, and they say, okay,
00:29:20.780
you have to choose. And they say, if you choose the five-year-old, that obviously means that you
00:29:25.640
don't believe that unborn life is really valuable and that's why abortion is okay. Well, that's
00:29:30.440
stupid because that situation doesn't actually parallel what happens in an abortion. You're not
00:29:35.460
choosing between a thousand embryos and a five-year-old, or you're not choosing if you want to try to
00:29:40.960
parallel to abortion. The mom and the child, it's not a life and a life. This is not a life and death
00:29:47.160
situation that you're talking about here. You're talking about the convenience or the, uh, emotional
00:29:53.420
health or whatever of the mother and the physical life of the child. So it's not the same thing at
00:30:00.480
all. And just because you ascribe more value to one person doesn't mean that the people that you
00:30:06.480
don't choose aren't actually people. I would choose to save my daughter over a thousand other people,
00:30:15.600
but that doesn't mean that those people aren't valuable. And that certainly doesn't mean that
00:30:20.040
those people aren't people, but yes, of course I value my daughter over the lives of other people,
00:30:25.160
but that doesn't take away the personhood or the objective value of everyone else. So this is just,
00:30:30.640
uh, it's very stupid. It's very stupid. Uh, in everything, in every argument, they want to
00:30:38.060
obscure the fact that there is actually a life inside the woman's body. They want you to focus
00:30:42.860
on just the woman, on her convenience, on her future, on her mental, emotional health, whatever it is.
00:30:51.280
Uh, they will tell you that someone or that this child is going to be poor, that this child
00:30:56.520
is not wanted. But again, are you saying that because someone is poor, because someone, uh,
00:31:02.580
goes into the adoption system, because someone is unwanted, that they're not worthy of life,
00:31:08.260
they shouldn't be given a chance at life. Okay. Then why don't you apply that to people outside of
00:31:14.020
the womb? Why don't you believe in killing orphans now? Why don't you believe in killing homeless
00:31:19.080
people now? If being poor or being in the foster care system is really, uh, worse than being
00:31:26.020
dead, then you must also believe that the most compassionate thing to do is to kill orphans
00:31:32.040
and homeless people. But of course, you're not going to say that most pro-choice people will go
00:31:36.680
back again on the faulty premise that, oh, well, a child is still in the mom's womb. Okay. So what?
00:31:42.800
That's location. Are you going to kill someone based on their location? Again, based on their stage
00:31:48.980
of development? Why? It just becomes very illogical. You might also hear them say, well, this is just
00:31:55.540
men controlling women's bodies. This is the patriarchy. Again, that's not true. It is majority
00:32:02.840
of women in the pro-life movement. It is women who lead pro-life organizations. It is mostly
00:32:09.120
women who run the pro-life clinics. That doesn't make any sense at all. I do not care what you do
00:32:15.420
with your body. Uh, you do have the freedom to have as much sex as you want to have unprotected sex.
00:32:20.860
I'm not going to say, you know, anything about that from any kind of legal perspective. I don't
00:32:26.760
care what you do with your body, but when there is another body involved, when there's another
00:32:31.040
human being involved, yeah, I believe that you shouldn't kill that human being. Of course,
00:32:36.120
just like you believe that I shouldn't kill, uh, another human being. Of course. Um, the thing is
00:32:42.360
everyone in the pro-choice movement is fighting for themselves. Everyone in the pro-life movement
00:32:50.540
is fighting for someone else. It's not about control. It has nothing to do with bodily autonomy.
00:32:57.260
It has to do with what is right. It has to do with stopping violence against helpless individuals
00:33:03.320
who happen to be inside the womb. And there are so many resources headed up by pro-lifers,
00:33:11.800
particularly pro-life Christians that help not just children inside the womb, but children
00:33:16.500
outside of the womb and the mothers who find themselves in crisis. Um, from a Christian
00:33:22.160
perspective, we understand, we understand why there is no logic to the pro-abortion movement
00:33:28.460
because they have been completely deceived. They are darkened in their understanding. As Ephesians
00:33:34.700
four says, they are callous. They are hardened in their hearts. Again, I would go back to episode
00:33:40.120
113 and, uh, listen to that in some previous episodes where I talk about the pro-abortion
00:33:45.760
position from a Christian perspective. Uh, we understand that this is exactly what happens.
00:33:51.120
The glorification of abortion is exactly what happens when you exchange the God of scripture
00:33:55.920
for the God of self. Uh, when doing what you want becomes more important than doing what is right,
00:34:02.060
convenience becomes a sacrament. Uh, if something stands in the way of your happiness,
00:34:06.720
you remove it or you abort it. That's what happens in this self-centered culture. And we're all
00:34:12.020
supposed to bow down and say, okay, um, as Christians, there is never a reason for us to be
00:34:17.620
for abortion. Psalm 139 is clear. And we have talked through that before God values unborn life
00:34:24.840
from the point of conception, uh, onward. And we are supposed to reflect that love and reflect
00:34:32.480
that care. And so when you are confronted with these kinds of illogical arguments in regards to
00:34:38.800
abortion, it's important that you do have an answer, but more than anything, it's important
00:34:42.840
that we share the gospel. It's important that we, uh, put, uh, actions to our words, that we are
00:34:48.360
helping these women who are in crisis, that we are showing them the love of Christ and that we are
00:34:54.820
active in our faith and active in these beliefs, not just debating people on Twitter, which is really
00:35:01.760
fun and actually can be useful if done in the right way and done in a wise way. But also, uh, we are
00:35:08.100
being the hands and the feet of Jesus. But just remember there is not a single, there's not a
00:35:14.160
single abortion argument that you're going to come across that makes any sense. There's just not,
00:35:19.020
you might hear some emotional anecdotes, um, but the plural of anecdote is not data. So just remember
00:35:28.280
that. And it's certainly not the synonym of anecdote is also not truth. Um, so I hope that this was at
00:35:37.460
least a little bit helpful. And if you want to go back and listen to those episodes, you can,
00:35:42.280
and please subscribe on YouTube. If you'd like, follow me on social media, and I will see you guys again soon.