Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - November 25, 2019


Ep 190 | We're Too Obsessed with Our Pets


Episode Stats

Length

32 minutes

Words per Minute

192.84557

Word Count

6,302

Sentence Count

432

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the obsession with dogs and pets that Christians have with them, and what the Bible has to say about it. We also talk about why it is not biblical to have an obsession with animals, and how Christians should view them from a biblical perspective.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relene. Well, happy Monday. Did everyone have a great weekend? I hope so.
00:00:06.000 And you're looking forward to Thanksgiving. Maybe you're not looking forward to Thanksgiving.
00:00:09.480 Maybe you hate Thanksgiving. Maybe you don't have a good relationship with your family.
00:00:14.280 And if so, I am thinking about you this holiday because I do know the holidays can be stressful,
00:00:19.420 especially if you're going through a hard time. Maybe you lost someone that you love and this is,
00:00:23.940 these are the first holidays that you are going through and you are not looking forward to it.
00:00:28.800 And I'm with you. I don't want to pretend like holidays are always this easy, fun thing for
00:00:33.500 everyone because that's not always the case. There could be conflict. There could be sadness.
00:00:37.620 There could be all kinds of things going on. But I want you to know that I'm thinking about you
00:00:42.100 and that I really will be. I don't just say this in kind of like a trite way, just to say,
00:00:46.380 I really will be praying for you. I'll be praying for all the people that are dealing with any kind
00:00:49.540 of conflict or chaos or sadness or loss or anything like that this Thanksgiving. I hope that all of you
00:00:55.580 are looking forward to it. I hope that all of you are excited about it and all of you are going
00:00:58.720 to enjoy it. But for any of you, even the one person out there who is not looking forward to it,
00:01:03.580 I am thinking about you and I'm sorry. Know that it's over quickly. All of this stuff is difficult
00:01:11.320 as it may be this year. It's all over quickly. And then you've got a new year. And that's the
00:01:15.880 beautiful thing about seasons, about time that God has graciously given us is that when difficult
00:01:21.380 things happen, there can be joy in the morning. There can be joy in the new season. There can be a
00:01:26.100 renewal and we should all be very thankful for that. I do hope that we can all find at least
00:01:30.880 one thing that we are thankful for this Thanksgiving. Even if you don't have any physical
00:01:34.940 things to be thankful for, we can all thank the Lord for sending his son Jesus to die for us. So
00:01:39.280 that's the ultimate, that's the ultimate thing that we can be thankful for. Okay. That's not what
00:01:44.520 we're going to talk about today. We are going to talk about a touchy subject, but you know,
00:01:49.280 that's what we do on this podcast. We talk about touchy subjects. We talk about things that make
00:01:54.060 people mad. There's probably been at least one episode in the history of Relatable that has made
00:01:58.640 you angry at one point. And that's okay. That's what we do. We talk about the controversial stuff
00:02:03.680 because not enough people talk about it, especially from a biblical perspective. There are too many
00:02:08.200 people that are scared to talk about the controversial things. And so Christians end up
00:02:13.400 making their decisions on what to think about these things by listening to celebrities that have no
00:02:18.540 biblical worldview at all. And so we try to tackle the stuff that I know that all of us are curious
00:02:23.560 about, and all of us are wondering what the Bible has to say about them. And today it's animals and
00:02:28.180 the obsession that we have with dogs and pets and all of that. And we are going to talk about what the
00:02:34.640 Bible has to say about it. I am going to try my best to build a case biblically that it is not
00:02:40.140 biblical, that biblically mighty Christians should not be overly obsessed with animals. And we will talk
00:02:46.280 about what that looks like, why we have that obsession and how we should view animals from a biblical
00:02:50.740 perspective. Um, I do want to give a little bit of a premise before we get into this, because like I
00:02:55.860 said, this is a touchy episode, but we talk about touchy topics on relatable. That's part of why it's
00:03:01.600 called relatable because I try to answer the questions that a lot of us have, but maybe are
00:03:06.460 afraid to ask, or we just don't even know how to address. That's why I take your guys's suggestions
00:03:11.520 so much because I care about the things that you're thinking, the things that you're concerned about,
00:03:16.040 the things that you see in the world. And you're like, I just don't know how to fit this into a
00:03:19.100 biblical worldview. I try my best from God's perspective, from a biblical perspective to do that.
00:03:24.320 Do I get it wrong? Absolutely. Are there things that I don't know about a million bajillion things
00:03:29.580 that I don't know, but we are learning together and we try our best to fit everything, um, that's
00:03:36.040 going on in the world that we have to make sense of into, uh, God's word, or we let God's word inform
00:03:41.660 the things that we think. Um, now there are going to be things in all of this, in the vast, in the vast
00:03:47.160 plethora of things that there are to talk about. There are going to be things that you disagree with
00:03:51.940 me on. Like I said, uh, I've probably said something or many things that you disagree,
00:03:57.300 uh, on with me and that's okay. Every podcast that I love or commentator that I listened to
00:04:02.580 has said at least one thing that I don't like that I, I, maybe I didn't like how they said it.
00:04:07.240 Maybe I didn't like what they said. Maybe I vehemently disagree. I can think of people in my head
00:04:11.980 right now that I love that I'm a huge fan of that. I look to for insight in their perspective
00:04:16.880 for wisdom, knowledge, all of that, who have said things that actually really offend me that
00:04:22.060 legitimately offend me. And then I don't like, but that's okay. I have learned to sift through those
00:04:27.140 things and to say, okay, I didn't like that. They said that one thing I didn't like that. They, um,
00:04:31.940 that they disagree with me there. They said something that I don't agree with, but that's okay. I take the
00:04:36.200 insight where I can. Here's what we need to be careful about, especially with something like this. And the
00:04:40.740 reason why I'm saying this is because I got this reaction when I talked about, uh, this perspective
00:04:45.860 on animals on Instagram the other day, we have to be careful that when someone says something that
00:04:50.740 you disagree with to not characterize that disagreement as an attack on what you believe.
00:04:56.160 It seems to me like in this day and age, there is a glorification of agnosticism. There is a glorification
00:05:02.680 of not knowing. So people want other people to be content with moral relativism. They want other
00:05:10.020 people to be content with saying, you know, I don't really know about this XYZ controversial
00:05:16.420 subject, whatever makes you happy. You do you. That's what we're supposed to think. Unless we're of course
00:05:22.020 on the progressive side of the aisle, unless we're liberals, then we're allowed to be very outspoken
00:05:26.020 and very dogmatic about what we believe. But if it's anything outside of that, we're supposed to just
00:05:30.220 pretend like we don't really know, like we don't really care, whatever makes people feel good. And that's
00:05:35.100 fine. But when someone speaks up and says, actually, absolute truth exists, actually God has something
00:05:40.300 to say about that. Actually God cares about this. And here's what the Bible says. Then all heck breaks
00:05:46.260 loose. And we hear people saying that you're a bigot, you're self-righteous, you're a legalist,
00:05:51.680 you are a Pharisee. You're trying to push your views on me. I get that a lot. People who come to my
00:05:57.100 Instagram page, they take the time to listen to one of my five minute IGTV videos. And they say,
00:06:03.420 why are you pushing your views on me? Well, okay, you came to my page. I have the right to say what
00:06:09.760 I want to say. You have the right to not listen. But it seems to me, so I get this a lot, not just
00:06:15.140 in relation to this animal topic, which I have learned in the past few days is insanely controversial.
00:06:21.040 I've learned that you will do better saying you will get less pushback saying it's totally fine to
00:06:27.400 kick toddlers in the head whenever you want to than saying, hey, humans are actually more important
00:06:32.640 than animals, which is the case that we're going to make today. People will freak out. They will lose
00:06:38.640 their minds. And what I've learned, not just in accordance to this, not just in relation to this,
00:06:43.540 but just in general, is that there seems to be, especially it seems among teenagers, teens,
00:06:49.900 teen girls who come to my page and say like, I don't like what you have to say. There's also this
00:06:55.280 other mentality, this other layer of that, that I see so often in these comments from these
00:06:59.380 young women coming to my page. You don't like what I have to say is it's not right that you're
00:07:04.080 saying this. You don't have a right to say this. You're indoctrinating people. You shouldn't be
00:07:08.360 allowed to say this. You shouldn't be allowed to force your views on people. To me, that is another
00:07:14.020 level of intolerance that we're seeing from young people, that they have it backwards. They think that
00:07:19.880 the First Amendment protects their right not to be offended rather than my right or anyone's right to
00:07:25.620 free speech or religious exercise. There is definitely a mentality among young people that
00:07:31.240 their feelings take priority above anything else. Someone actually commented, a young woman,
00:07:36.460 teenager, by the looks of it, commented on my hearing testimony about abortion that I posted
00:07:44.060 last week and started out her long diatribe by saying, I am honestly so offended by this speech.
00:07:50.520 You should go back and listen to my speech. It's only offensive if you don't agree with what I have to
00:07:54.960 say. There's nothing that is ad hominem about it. There are no personal attacks. There's really not
00:08:00.240 an opinion in it either. It is really just, okay, here are the facts of what an abortion is. Here is
00:08:06.040 the logic behind why abortion is wrong. And you, of course, can disagree with that. But she starts out
00:08:10.460 by saying that I am highly offended by the speech and then goes on to give her argument for why abortion
00:08:15.740 is okay, which is that embryos aren't human, that fetuses aren't human, which, of course,
00:08:20.700 is completely nonsensical. So we cannot have conversations about controversial topics,
00:08:26.300 which we should have conversations about controversial topics, but we're not going to
00:08:30.140 be able to do that if society, if we are unable as individuals to resist hysteria when someone says
00:08:39.040 something that we don't agree with. It's just not going to work. We're not going to be able to live
00:08:43.360 in a free republic if we can't discuss issues without one side growing truly hysterical and so
00:08:50.340 emotional to the point to where they're not making logical or scientific sense anymore.
00:08:55.100 We can't have conversations. We can't get anything done. And that leads to tyranny. Well, first,
00:08:59.640 it leads to anarchy and anarchy then leads to tyranny, which, of course, we believe is the direction that
00:09:04.700 the left is going. So when I talk about something, this is not an agnostic podcast. Okay, I'm just
00:09:11.780 telling you right now. It's not an agnostic podcast. We don't believe in moral relativism on this
00:09:15.740 podcast. We believe that there is absolute truth in every single episode that we do is in pursuit
00:09:19.860 of that truth. Like I said, we get it wrong. We definitely get it wrong. Even though my effort
00:09:24.260 and my aim is to bring everything back to God's word and to have God's word inform everything I do,
00:09:28.660 I make mistakes. I am totally fallible. And when I do get it wrong, my hope is that I can be humble,
00:09:35.300 correct my wrongs, correct my mistakes, and take correction and instruction from you guys.
00:09:39.380 But we have to be able to hear something that we disagree with or that we don't like
00:09:44.760 without accusing the other side or accusing me in this case of attacking you or attacking your
00:09:50.880 position. There are all kinds of people who listen to this podcast who reach out to me on a regular
00:09:56.180 basis and say, I don't have the same view as you, but I appreciate your podcast. I appreciate your
00:10:01.100 views. I have atheists that listen to this podcast. I have liberals that listen to this podcast. I've got
00:10:04.920 Catholics. I'm a Protestant. I've got Catholics that listen to this podcast. I've got Mormons that listen to
00:10:08.880 this podcast. I have Muslims, Jewish people that listen to this podcast. And I have had people from
00:10:13.300 all of those groups reach out to me and say, I disagree with you on XYZ, but I like hearing your
00:10:17.760 perspective. I appreciate you guys so much. What I do not appreciate is when I say something and
00:10:24.020 someone leaves a review that says, because you said what you believe as a Protestant or whatever,
00:10:29.960 you're attacking Catholicism. Or because you said what you believe as a conservative,
00:10:33.040 you're attacking progressivism, which yes, I have attacked progressivism, not progressives,
00:10:37.960 but progressivism. But you cannot just say just because someone is building a case that you don't
00:10:42.560 like, they are attacking you. You can be offended by all that you want to, but please allow yourself
00:10:49.420 to, I do the same thing, open yourself up to valuable perspectives, discard the things that you
00:10:54.800 don't. But I actually had someone leave a review the other day that said, I think I'm too sensitive
00:10:59.180 for this podcast. That might be true. This is, like I said, it's not an agnostic podcast. It's
00:11:04.060 not a morally relative podcast. It's not a podcast that's going to, on most things, on the important
00:11:08.880 things, say, oh, it doesn't matter. You do, you think whatever you want to. On some things, yes,
00:11:13.280 there's room for subjectivism. And I think Christians in good faith can discuss and debate almost all of
00:11:18.240 the issues that we talk about. But we are in pursuit of truth. We believe absolute truth exists. And we
00:11:23.280 believe that God is the transcendent moral lawgiver from which we get morality and truth.
00:11:28.340 Okay, we're going to talk about animals. Let's go ahead and get into all of that. Since I have
00:11:33.740 given you a large premise, because I know, I have learned, apparently, that this is a very
00:11:39.480 controversial topic. You can email me and tell me all you want about what you don't like about this
00:11:45.500 episode. But I think, I think that you are going to appreciate at least some of the perspective that
00:11:51.560 I give, or at least what God's word gives. Because if we are Christians, that is where we land. So
00:11:56.600 let me first say, I love animals. I do. I love animals. I love my pets. I love other people's
00:12:03.800 pets. I love your pets, probably, unless you have an iguana. I don't know. I might like your iguana.
00:12:09.000 I'm not sure I'm going to love your iguana, just to be honest. I love dogs. I love cats. I love
00:12:14.340 bunnies. I love horses. I love dolphins. I like gorillas. I like elephants. I love elephants.
00:12:20.020 I love animal videos. I love animal pictures. I love we rate dogs. I like doggos doing things.
00:12:28.500 I like all the Instagram dog accounts. I follow the kitten lady. I like all of that kind of stuff.
00:12:33.820 Okay. I like stories about animals. I want to hear about your animal. I want you to send me pictures
00:12:38.000 of your animal. I love animals. Okay. So let me just tell you that straight up. But I know,
00:12:45.320 and have always known that animals are not people. And therefore, because they're not people,
00:12:51.620 they are not as valuable as people are. We love our pets. But when our daughter was born,
00:12:56.700 they were relegated to second fiddle. They still get plenty of care. They still get plenty of
00:13:01.760 affection and attention. They kind of keep each other company. But they don't occupy our affection
00:13:06.820 and time the way that we used to. And that's okay. That is how it is supposed to be. That's a good
00:13:11.800 thing. Our love for them doesn't even come within light years of our love for our daughter. And that
00:13:17.420 is exactly how God means it to be. And yet culture seems to be headed in the opposite direction and
00:13:24.940 instead prioritizes animals, not just the same as people, but even higher than people in some cases.
00:13:30.620 And that's just, that's not just me saying this. A vice ran an article last year titled why millennials
00:13:36.040 are so obsessed with dogs. I mean, that's just true. We are obsessed with dogs. I mean,
00:13:40.380 you can look at social media. There's a dog park on every corner. Millennials are obsessed with dogs
00:13:44.520 and we're getting married and having kids later and later. The article discusses how we have taken
00:13:48.640 animal obsession to the next level. I mean, man's best friend has been around for a long time,
00:13:52.800 but millennials, we just, we have turned up the notch of animal obsession. So the article says this,
00:13:58.980 none of my friends in their late twenties talk openly about the hopes of having a baby. Rather,
00:14:04.140 we flinch when we see a child walking around out in public on its hind legs. I mean,
00:14:08.640 this is just terrible. Um, it's a fluffy friend. We want one that'll love us, not drain our minimum
00:14:14.340 finances and not get in the way too much. Oh, that's just that alone just makes my blood boil,
00:14:20.540 but we won't get into that right this second. We'll get into that in a second. Um, so anthropomorphism,
00:14:25.200 the attribution of human characteristics to animals has become the new norm. Our dogs and cats are,
00:14:32.360 are so-called babies. There are two States, Illinois and Alaska. They are the first to consider
00:14:36.780 the wellbeing of animals and custody battles. So that gives them rights as individuals. That's
00:14:42.640 what they're called individuals rather than property. Uh, Tony Ellison is a senior staff
00:14:47.060 attorney at the animal legal defense fund. And he told the journal, the new Republic that
00:14:52.040 recognizing animals as persons entitled to rights has graduated from quote, a very fringe area of the
00:14:57.680 law to very mainstream. Just in the last five years, hasn't everything become crazy in the last
00:15:02.240 five years. Um, in her 2018 book, fellow creatures, there is a Harvard or Harvard philosophy professor,
00:15:09.460 Christine course guard, who says, uh, the animals are just as important as people. Therefore they
00:15:14.180 are worthy of many of the same protections under the laws that we have. Uh, this theory has actually
00:15:19.880 become a full fledged reality for at least one animal, Sandra, the orangutan, who was given the
00:15:26.160 status of a non-human person by Argentinian judge Alina Liberatore in 2015. That is true. You can look
00:15:33.580 it up and she now resides in Florida and 2013, uh, the peer review journal Anthro Zeus published a
00:15:40.180 study by Richard Topolsky. You guys have probably seen this question. It's been posed by PragerU plenty
00:15:45.480 of times. Um, he is a professor at Georgia Regents university. He asked about 500 respondents to
00:15:51.520 question. If a bus were bearing down on a dog and a person, and you could only save one, who would you
00:15:56.460 save? A full 40% of respondents, 40% said that depending on how well they knew the person, they
00:16:04.020 would save the dog. So if it was a stranger, they would definitely save the dog. I think it was, I
00:16:08.940 don't know if it was their dog or a dog, but 40% of respondents said that depending on how well they
00:16:13.400 knew the person, they would save the dog. That was 2013. So that was six years ago. My guess is that
00:16:19.960 number would be a lot higher today. I would say that that number is well over half today.
00:16:24.080 Um, the animals have become the center of people's lives. Social media accounts galore. Some of them
00:16:28.720 I named and follow myself, um, are dedicated to videos of our pets. Google, if you Google the phrase,
00:16:34.780 uh, humans don't deserve dogs, you will find a dozen articles and YouTube videos explaining why
00:16:40.020 our animals, why our pets are better than we are and more important than we are. Uh, we have seen laws
00:16:45.560 in the United States reflect this in 2019, New York passed a law that criminalized the declawing
00:16:51.060 of kittens, which I don't think we should declaw cats, but just let me finish. Um, and legalized
00:16:56.780 abortion through nine months. So the same year that they passed a law declawing kittens, they also
00:17:02.100 passed a law legalizing abortion through nine months. Um, in the same year, the United States or this
00:17:08.840 year, the United States made animal cruelty, a federal crime, uh, yet failed to pass a bill to protect
00:17:14.740 babies who survive abortions. We're not even talking about babies inside the womb. Uh, let's first think
00:17:20.260 of this from a practical perspective. We'll talk about the moral and the biblical perspective.
00:17:25.280 Let's look at this from a practical perspective before we get into, uh, the other part of the
00:17:30.100 analysis of what I consider this, uh, degeneracy. Uh, if humans are considered as important or more
00:17:37.200 important as humans to the point of granting them personhood under the law, to the point of referring to
00:17:43.320 them or thinking of them as individuals, thereby granting them the legal rights applicable to
00:17:48.580 people, what is stopping someone from marrying their dog? And people will say, Oh, that's a slippery
00:17:54.460 slope. Ha ha ha. But can you tell them, can you give me a logical basis for why, if we consider
00:17:59.620 animals, people under the law, why someone wouldn't be able to marry their dog? Certainly you're not going
00:18:06.140 to hear any arguments from the people who believe that there are really no sexual ethics at all.
00:18:10.420 Um, if humans are just animals, as animal rights activists say, there are a lot of people who make
00:18:16.240 that statement and vegans often say that too. Uh, what really is your logical argument for saying
00:18:21.960 that people can't have a romantic relationship with their animal? Uh, because there's also the
00:18:26.780 argument from the same group that animals basically have all of the same abilities and capabilities and
00:18:31.540 functions that humans do. They're just nicer than humans. If all of this is truly the case,
00:18:36.560 what is going to logically or legally stop people from entering into unholy matrimony with their
00:18:42.640 gerbil? That's what I want to know. Um, I posed this question to someone who was messaging me on
00:18:47.340 Instagram. They were offended by me saying that people are more important than animals on Instagram,
00:18:51.740 which I did last week. And they were saying that this is wrong and the animals are people are people
00:18:57.600 or animals rather. And I said, okay, why can't an animal and a person get married? Why can't they be in a
00:19:04.200 romantic relationship? They didn't have a response to that. They said, that's just weird. That's not
00:19:08.900 normal. Well, that's not, that's not actually an argument. There are lots of things that weren't
00:19:13.300 normal 10 years ago. We weren't even talking about transgenderism two years ago. And there are things
00:19:18.300 that are considered normal now. So it's not normal really doesn't argue against the logic that inevitably
00:19:25.560 seems to be coming together from considering animals as persons or as individuals. There's a kitten
00:19:32.680 rescuer that I follow. She sells t-shirts that say love knows no species. And I know she doesn't mean
00:19:37.980 it in a weird way, but it did strike me as soon as I saw it as strange. I thought, is this the new
00:19:43.480 love is love? Actually, this is why love is love has always been such a stupid phrase. Love is not
00:19:49.800 love. There are lots of different kinds of love that should not be considered love. This should be
00:19:53.820 considered perversion. A 50 year old and a 10 year old who say that they're in love, that shouldn't be
00:19:59.440 considered love. That should be considered wrong. Love has a definition. And as we Christians believe,
00:20:05.880 it is best defined by the embodiment of love, the creator of love, the arbiter of what love is and
00:20:10.340 what love isn't, which is God himself. And we'll get into more of that in a second. So that's one
00:20:15.400 practical outcome of elevating animals to the point of personhood. Another is how it affects humans.
00:20:20.780 If animals are individuals and even legally people, hunting is considered murder. Is someone going to get
00:20:26.980 the death penalty or go to life in prison for killing an animal, for hunting an elk? Milking cows would
00:20:32.320 be considered an assault. Are we going to have to get consent from our animals to be able to scratch
00:20:38.140 their belly? I mean, I wouldn't want someone to come up to me and scratch my belly because I'm a human
00:20:42.080 being. If we consider them people, what's our what's our legal relationship with them now? Honestly, a lot of
00:20:49.280 animal rights activists would be totally fine with seeing eating animals or killing animals as assault
00:20:54.440 and murder. But it has serious implications for how we live and what we eat. And these are serious
00:21:00.500 negative implications because people around the world actually need meat to survive no matter what
00:21:05.140 a vegan activist tells you. Also, we have to kill animals in order to feed certain animals like cats
00:21:10.500 and dogs. So my question is, how would all of that work out? There are a lot of questions that come
00:21:15.740 with ascribing personhood and individuality to animals. And on a practical level, regarding animals as
00:21:24.280 people is completely nonsensical. It doesn't make any sense. There are too many conundrums. There are
00:21:30.980 too many contradictions. There is there are too many problems with that. There is a reason why the
00:21:36.500 species have been separate and why we care for them. And while you're why you're never going to
00:21:40.780 listen to a podcast of a dog talking to you about whether or not we ascribe personhood to people
00:21:47.080 like or to humans, there's a reason for that. There's a difference. Now, let's talk about this on a
00:21:52.700 biblical level. The way we obsess over animals today is a symptom of godlessness, is a symptom
00:21:59.400 of godlessness. Let me explain. Christians know something that the secular world does not, that
00:22:05.900 human beings and human beings alone, according to Genesis, are made in God's image. That means humans
00:22:12.760 alone have a soul. That means humans alone live forever. That means always in all cases, a human is
00:22:19.020 more valuable than an animal because they are an image bearer of God. Even a person with physical
00:22:24.600 disabilities, mental disabilities, or a human in a coma, or a human seconds after conception has more
00:22:30.900 inherent worth than the winningest racehorse in the world, strictly because they were made in the image
00:22:38.620 of God. God gave Adam the responsibility of naming the animals, stewarding the earth. Animals were made
00:22:44.800 by God for us, not the other way around. So as Christians, we can discuss and debate the virtue
00:22:52.260 of veganism. We can talk about how to best care for the earth and how to care for animals, which is
00:22:56.720 something that we should be doing. We can talk about the just punishment for those who abuse animals,
00:23:02.320 but we cannot make the mistake of elevating non-humans to the place of image bearers. Jesus uses animals as a
00:23:09.660 parallel to humans and multiple parallels or multiple parables to emphasize the higher value
00:23:15.880 that people have than animals. Matthew 12, 11 through 12 says this. He said to them, which one of you who
00:23:21.820 has a sheep, if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not take hold of it and lift it out? Of how much
00:23:27.660 more value is a man than a sheep? Now, that's not the point of this. He's actually talking about the
00:23:32.940 Sabbath and what we can do on the Sabbath. But he makes the point of how much more value is a man
00:23:40.160 than sheep. This is the God of the universe, the God who created us, Jesus himself saying this.
00:23:45.520 In Matthew 6, 26, he says, look at the birds of the air. They neither sow nor reap nor gather into
00:23:50.820 barns. And yet your heavenly father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? Are you not
00:23:58.720 human being of more value than they? Humans have more value to God than animals do? This is clear
00:24:07.000 throughout the biblical narrative. God made us in his image. God's plan of redemption through Christ
00:24:12.200 saves us, not animals. The fact that so many people, Christians included, get this wrong,
00:24:18.720 shows how important it is to ensure that every aspect of our worldview is based on God,
00:24:24.460 the giver of truth, the creator of the universe, the maker of order. It shows how important it is
00:24:31.620 for us to make sure that we are getting our wisdom, our knowledge in how we view every subject from the
00:24:37.340 word of God. If there is one word that describes our current age, it is this, disordered. It is
00:24:46.560 disordered. People's view of sex is disordered. People's view of sexuality is disordered. People's view of
00:24:52.800 gender is disordered. People's view of life in the womb is disordered. People's view of animals is
00:24:58.160 disordered. People's view of the family and children is disordered. How the majority of people view the
00:25:03.640 world today is disordered. It is chaos. It is backwards. It doesn't make any illogical sense.
00:25:09.320 And everything, every single thing that we see wrong in our society today is a symptom of ignoring the
00:25:15.480 fact that God created the world. The most cataclysmic worldview-defining verse in the Bible is
00:25:22.580 this. Genesis 1.1. God created the heavens and the earth. Because if God created the heavens and the
00:25:31.020 earth, then he alone has the authority to say what is and what isn't. He alone has the authority to
00:25:37.860 assign value, to give roles to humans as a whole, to give roles to men and women specifically, to animals,
00:25:44.460 to plants, to the sky, to all of creation. He is also then the author of salvation. He is over all of it,
00:25:52.400 all of it is his jurisdiction. He created all of it. He is in charge. He sustains all of it with the
00:25:59.380 power of his word. Nothing exists without God's active permission. God is in charge of it all.
00:26:06.680 He defines and assigns and we are to fulfill and obey. When we're talking about the definition of
00:26:13.260 marriage, we're talking about the definition of gender, the differences between men and women,
00:26:17.780 how government should function, how human beings relate to one another, how we should treat children,
00:26:22.840 the role of the family and of parents. We look to God because he created these things.
00:26:28.300 Our over-obsession with animals is another symptom of a disordered worldview that is based not on the
00:26:34.960 will of the God of scripture, but of the feelings of the God of self. Our fixation on pets,
00:26:41.860 especially involuntary replacement of human relationships, is selfish. Saving your dog
00:26:49.200 over a human stranger is a self-serving choice, not a compassionate one. The death of that stranger
00:26:55.960 likely affects hundreds of people. So her husband, her children, her parents, her co-workers,
00:27:01.260 her siblings, her church, her friends. The death of your dog affects you and maybe a few other people.
00:27:07.560 While sad, it is sad. I will cry when my dog dies. While that is sad, you'll be able to get another
00:27:15.120 dog. Her kids, that stranger's kids, will not get their mom back. It is not a coincidence, in my
00:27:21.840 opinion, that our infatuation, over-infatuation with animals seems to have grown at the same time
00:27:27.680 that this whole self-love epidemic has taken center stage. This big reason why we choose pets over
00:27:34.240 people is because pets are easier, both physically and emotionally, than people are. Anyone who says
00:27:39.420 that they're not has not had children. Yes, they require a certain level of responsibility, a certain
00:27:44.720 level of money and care, of course, and it's okay to be responsible for them, but not nearly as much
00:27:51.980 as a child or even a friend or a significant other. We don't have to worry about betrayal or rejection
00:27:58.920 or judgment or being pressured to go out when we want to stay in. In exchange for just a tiny bit of effort
00:28:05.180 and commitment on our end to our pets, they give us unindeed loyalty, unindeed love, a friend to watch
00:28:11.260 Netflix next to. We get the good end of the deal. We will never have to give up any bad habits for our
00:28:18.080 dogs. We will never have to examine our vices for our cats. We can be almost as self-centered as we want
00:28:24.820 to be and our pets will love us just the same. Why? Because they don't know how not to. They love
00:28:30.240 the person who feeds them. They love the person who pets them. They're not interested in our
00:28:34.420 personalities or our hobbies or our dreams or our deepest desires. They know us only instinctively.
00:28:40.760 In this is both their charm, the reason why we love them and why they're so awesome, but it's also
00:28:46.800 their inherent inability to satisfy us like other humans do. Let me be clear about this. God does care
00:28:54.600 for animals. Of course he does. We read in the passages in Matthew that God meets the needs of
00:28:59.760 animals. He sees them and he hears them. Job 38, 41 says this, who provides for the raven its prey
00:29:06.620 when its young ones cry out to God for help and wander about for lack of food? That is a rhetorical
00:29:11.800 question, but the answer is God. He also has something to say about how we treat animals. Proverbs 12, 10 says
00:29:19.660 the righteous care for the needs of their animals, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel.
00:29:24.220 The righteous care for the needs of their animals. We know that people who abuse animals are very
00:29:30.580 likely to end up being murderers. There is something wrong and again, disordered if we view animals
00:29:36.580 strictly as people, as people, well, yes, but as also if we view animals as things to be abused
00:29:45.960 and really just used or exploited, we can talk about better conditions for dairy and beef cows. I'm open
00:29:56.500 to having that conversation. That stuff actually does break my heart. We can talk about problems
00:30:00.820 with factory farming. I do believe that cruelty goes on at these farms, that it's reprehensible. I believe
00:30:06.240 that God actually cares about that. Our kindness should absolutely include animals, but animals are
00:30:12.100 still subjugated to our rule. It should be a compassionate rule, but it is a rule nonetheless.
00:30:18.520 They are ours to use and to care for, and because they are less valuable than we are in God's eyes,
00:30:24.120 yes, we are permitted to eat them. There is certainly no biblical mandate against eating animals in the
00:30:30.800 Bible. The Bible does not speak to the virtues of veganism. That's just not an argument that you're
00:30:39.380 going to be able to make that our compassion for animals has to extend to not eating them. God is
00:30:44.780 clear. Human beings are more important, more inherently valuable than animals are, and that
00:30:51.300 needs to be reflected in our life. If we are putting off children strictly for animals, if we are denying
00:31:00.460 obligations and responsibilities to people in exchange for animals, there's a problem for that. Abortion should
00:31:07.140 break our heart a lot more than animal cruelty. Our time would be better spent at homeless shelters than
00:31:12.840 animal shelters. And again, I'm not saying that you shouldn't volunteer at all. I'm not saying that you
00:31:18.560 shouldn't spend any money or spend any time helping animals, but it should not replace, supersede,
00:31:25.540 or come even close to the tangible, monetary, time-wise, compassion, and help and service that you are
00:31:32.980 giving to people that does not reflect God's heart. If God's heart is more for people than it is for
00:31:37.900 animals, then our hearts should be too. That means the things that we care about, the things that we
00:31:42.500 cry about, the things that we donate to, the time that we spend, the thoughts that we have, the
00:31:46.440 responsibilities that we are given, we are obligated to our fellow man a lot more and a lot more seriously
00:31:54.140 than we are to our animals. I hope all of that made sense. Again, I know a little controversial,
00:32:00.280 and I'll probably get some pushback on that. Feel free to let me know. This is what I believe
00:32:05.420 to be a very clear and easy subject, honestly, for us to approach from a biblical perspective. I don't
00:32:13.120 really see how you can make a biblical argument to elevate animals to the same place as human beings,
00:32:21.120 but I am, of course, open to your perspective. I've had conversations, got tongue-tied conversations
00:32:26.980 about this with other people recently, and I am happy. I'm happy to converse with you.
00:32:33.740 Thanks for listening. Love you guys. I will be back here on Wednesday, and then it's Thanksgiving.