Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - April 27, 2020


Ep 243 | Climate Idolatry & the Pope


Episode Stats


Length

28 minutes

Words per minute

180.02448

Word count

5,149

Sentence count

318

Harmful content

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In light of Earth Day on April 22nd, I thought it would be a good idea to talk about environmentalism and climate change from a Christian perspective. In this episode, I discuss the controversial case of environmental murderer Ira Einhorn, who was convicted of murdering his girlfriend and composting her body.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Monday. I hope everyone had a great, relaxing weekend.
00:00:07.400 Today we are going to talk about climate change from a Christian perspective.
00:00:11.500 In light of Earth Day, which was April 22nd, there were some things that were said that I
00:00:18.740 think Christians need to be able to think critically about and assess from the point
00:00:23.060 of view of Scripture. And the Pope said some things about Earth Day that I do not agree with
00:00:29.620 theologically, so we're going to break all of that down. I do want to talk to you guys about the
00:00:34.020 Out of Shadows documentary, and I might be able to today, and I'm sorry I keep putting it off. I
00:00:39.560 promise that I am not doing that on purpose. And what I mean by talk about it is just you guys have
00:00:46.240 asked me what I think about it, and so I want to give you my thoughts because I do have them, but
00:00:50.960 I don't need to take an entire episode to do it, so it keeps on getting tacked on to the end,
00:00:55.500 and then I don't have time once I talk about the main subject that I'm talking about to actually
00:01:00.940 get to that. So I'll talk about that. I'll also talk about the Chosen series, which so many of
00:01:05.380 you guys have asked me about. I haven't watched it. I will watch it, and maybe I'll do an entire
00:01:10.120 episode just telling you guys what I think about the Out of Shadows documentary that's on YouTube
00:01:14.780 and also the Chosen series if I get around to watching that anytime soon. So Earth Day was April 22nd.
00:01:20.960 Just a little background on the origins of Earth Day kind of gives us some context for the
00:01:27.420 environmentalist movement in general. There is some controversy surrounding how Earth Day started
00:01:34.180 or who actually started Earth Day. So if you just Google who founded Earth Day, the first name that
00:01:39.140 comes up is Gaylord Nelson. He was a senator and environmental activist who received the Presidential
00:01:45.180 Medal of Freedom in 1995 from Bill Clinton. He died in 2005, but he really
00:01:50.780 went down in history as the guy who started Earth Day and was a pioneer for the environmental
00:01:55.680 movement as we know it now. Rolling Stone and the New York Times report that it's actually not
00:02:02.440 Gaylord Nelson. It's actually a man by the name of Dennis Hayes, an environmental activist. A lot of
00:02:07.520 outlets interviewed him this year about climate change and all that good stuff. But in 2011, and here's
00:02:13.760 where even more of the controversy comes in with Earth Day, NBC wrote a piece saying that it was
00:02:18.440 Ira Einhorn. Maybe you already know that name. He is infamous. And really, that's who is reported to
00:02:25.380 have started Earth Day when it was written about in the 1970s. He was a hippie. He was an environmental
00:02:31.100 activist. But I repeat myself. Now, the interesting thing about Ira is that seven years after the first
00:02:37.940 Earth Day, he murdered his girlfriend and composted her body. And the authorities found the body in his
00:02:43.900 trunk. But he actually fled, strangely enough, and became kind of a nomad across Europe and then was
00:02:50.700 extradited, I think, a couple decades later to the U.S. and then put in prison. He actually just died
00:02:56.480 this month. ABC in 2006 also credited him with founding Earth Day. Salon.com, another left-wing
00:03:04.300 outlet, calls him the organizer of Earth Day, or they did back in the day, about 20 years ago. A 2001
00:03:11.120 article in the Washington Post said that he helped organize Earth Day. And yet, when you Google him
00:03:16.920 today or you Google who started Earth Day, you're not going to find this name. I couldn't find any
00:03:23.100 recent articles by any of these outlets stating that he helped found Earth Day. The most recent is the
00:03:29.140 2011 NBC article. Most articles about Earth Day don't even list him as any part of the day. And articles
00:03:36.120 about him don't even say that he was an environmentalist sometimes. A Time article actually says that it's all
00:03:42.520 a total myth that Ira had nothing to do with Earth Day at all. And maybe that's true. I don't know. I can't say 0.75
00:03:48.960 that I've been a big part of the environmentalist movement or that I am very familiar with the history of it.
00:03:55.120 It's just from what I've researched recently. It's also possible, though, that the media changed their tune once they
00:04:01.980 realized as liberal activist organizations. They need to fall in line with the totality of the left-wing
00:04:09.120 narrative. And how would it look if one of the core pieces of leftism, which is environmentalism,
00:04:14.840 was tied to a convicted murderer who ironically, adamantly, and publicly was anti-violence and
00:04:22.360 anti-war and all of that? And also, as an aside, why is that always the case with leftist activists?
00:04:28.180 Not always, but a lot of times, that they oppose so proudly and so boldly the things that they do
00:04:34.680 themselves or support the things that they don't do themselves. We talked about that on Friday,
00:04:38.700 promoting tolerance and peace while being very aggressive and very hateful of themselves.
00:04:43.160 Obviously, I'm not generalizing everyone on the left, but it seems that with so many
00:04:47.400 prominent liberal activists, the skeletons in their closet belie their purported values. And that was
00:04:53.620 certainly true of our friend Ira. Anyway, whoever started Earth Day, it is, whether it was Ira or
00:05:01.300 whether it was Gaylord or whether it was Dennis, whoever the media want us to believe started it,
00:05:05.860 it doesn't really matter. Whoever started Earth Day, it's supposed to be a day where people raise
00:05:10.480 awareness about the forces that are harming the earth to express gratitude for nature and to inspire
00:05:16.740 people to be environmentally conscious and to battle climate change. And as you guys probably know,
00:05:23.320 the climate has gone through seasons of climate change for millennia, literally forever. As far as
00:05:29.040 we know what the earth has done, we know that the earth has gone through cooling and has gone through
00:05:35.900 heating. It's gone through different stages of climate change that has had nothing to do with human
00:05:40.420 activity. Climate alarmists have been telling us for decades that the earth is a ticking time bomb
00:05:45.140 and that if we don't act now, the earth will be uninhabitable. In just a few years, you heard
00:05:49.740 AOC and Beto O'Rourke and a bunch of people on the left saying this is an existential crisis
00:05:54.780 and the world as we know it is going to come to an end in 12 years or less, unless we do all of
00:05:59.940 these radical things. The end date for the earth just keeps getting pushed back. This has been
00:06:06.500 happening for decades now. The goalposts keep moving. It used to be global warming. Now it's climate
00:06:12.820 change that includes global warming. And when people argue that, well, things don't seem to be
00:06:18.980 warming up progressively every year, climate activists say, well, climate isn't weather.
00:06:25.020 That's typically what they say. But at the same time, when there are especially hot days or hot
00:06:30.500 summers, hot seasons, or especially cold winters, or when there's a catastrophic weather event, you'll
00:06:36.060 see climate activists on Twitter saying, see, these are the effects of climate change. And so they
00:06:40.680 simultaneously say it has nothing to do with weather. And that also it has everything to do with weather
00:06:45.560 and weather events. The science on climate change, the bottom line is not settled. That's just a fact.
00:06:50.880 As we talked about on last Wednesday's podcast, science is not supreme. Because while it's really
00:06:57.360 important, and while we should study it and should be thankful for it, it's vulnerable, not just to human
00:07:03.500 error, but also to human bias. It's very often driven by ideology and politics.
00:07:10.540 It shouldn't be, but it is. And this becomes obvious when you see climate activists arguing
00:07:15.280 that climate policy shouldn't just focus on climate-focused solutions, but on things like
00:07:21.140 racial equity and economic inequality. If you remember AOC's Green New Deal and all the hubbub 0.93
00:07:28.240 that that caused, it was this all-encompassing, her plan was this all-encompassing takeover of the
00:07:34.500 government and society in general. I'll never forget when she released that initial FAQ that said
00:07:40.580 that her plan, the Green New Deal, aims to provide economic security for those who are unwilling to
00:07:46.980 work. Not unable to work, but unwilling to work. So for many, if not most climate activists, they drum
00:07:53.440 up climate fear to push for a socialist restructuring of society. They know if they can fill people with
00:08:00.460 enough existential dread, they can convince them to hand over freedom in exchange for the security
00:08:06.000 and protection the federal government promises. We're actually on that. We're watching that same
00:08:11.720 exchange in a way right now. And, uh, we are, we're seeing this happen with coronavirus and climate
00:08:18.640 activists attempt to do the same thing with climate change. Now that said, we can agree that climate fear
00:08:25.240 mongering is real climate change, at least the rhetoric surrounding climate change right now
00:08:30.560 is a little bit hyperbolic and that people use climate activism as a ploy to give the government
00:08:35.900 more power and restructure the entire economy and society. And we can still acknowledge while
00:08:41.600 acknowledging those things, we can still acknowledge that we should be responsible as stewards of the
00:08:48.020 earth that God has created and that God has given us. Uh, pollution is real. Waste is real.
00:08:54.040 Their toxins, their behavior is not good for the environment, not good for animals, therefore not
00:08:59.840 good for humans. My friend, uh, Benji Backer actually has an organization called the American
00:09:05.900 Conservation Coalition. And I really appreciate what they do in their perspective because they believe
00:09:11.020 in limited government environmentalism. So you should check them out. If this is something that
00:09:14.960 you're interested in, they want to harness the power of limited government and, uh, free enterprise to
00:09:21.600 make the earth a better place. And I think that's good. I think that's a good, uh, example of good
00:09:27.400 stewardship of our resources. They actually just came out with an alternative plan to the green new
00:09:31.680 deal. That's a lot more feasible and just makes a lot more sense. So all that said, all of that said,
00:09:37.140 we as Christians need to be able to find the truth in all things. And that includes this. So when we see
00:09:43.060 the world freaking out about anything, our first reaction should never be to join in the panic.
00:09:48.340 We should always take a step back, assess the situation, seek the truth, seek the facts,
00:09:53.760 and look to the word of God to inform our thoughts. This is true about coronavirus. This is true about
00:09:59.380 climate change. This is true about any issue on the left or the right that everyone seems to be
00:10:04.620 fretting over. Sometimes, uh, there are things to be concerned over, of course, but panic is never
00:10:11.280 justified for the Christian because unlike the secular world, we know that God is in control. We know that 0.63
00:10:17.040 God is sovereign. So God, the creator of the universe who tells us what will happen at the end
00:10:22.660 of the age, we can trust him. We can have faith that what he says is true. Now, depending on your
00:10:29.020 eschatological views, there are different perspectives that you have on what the Bible says, uh, will happen
00:10:34.820 with the tribulation and Jesus's return and the thousand year reign and all of that. But regardless of
00:10:41.080 our views on the quote end of the world, we, as Christ followers agree that according to scripture,
00:10:46.500 our authority and our source of wisdom and vision, climate change is not how the world is going to
00:10:52.480 come to an end. Okay. So it might be true that there are things that we need to fix, whether it comes to
00:10:59.100 our behavior, whether it comes to, uh, renewable energy or infrastructure, all of that stuff that
00:11:05.940 might be true, but it is not true that the world is going to end from climate change. It is not the
00:11:11.640 existential crisis that climate fear mongers want you to believe that it is of all the prophecies
00:11:17.900 that we see about the end times in scripture. We read about famine. We read about calamity. We read
00:11:23.060 about natural disasters and wars and persecution and martyrdom and all of that. And maybe, maybe there
00:11:29.200 could be an argument that famine and natural disaster are products of climate change. But if that's the
00:11:35.240 case, then there ain't nothing that you nor I are going to be able to do to stop that. But more
00:11:41.020 importantly, the argument that these precursors to Jesus's return are products of climate change
00:11:47.240 is undermined by God's promise in Genesis eight, 21 through 22. I, he says this, I will never again
00:11:54.880 curse the ground because of man. He is making this promise to Noah after the flood. I will never again
00:11:59.840 curse the ground because of man for the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I
00:12:04.920 ever strike down every living creature as I have done while the earth remains seed time and harvest
00:12:10.520 cold and heat summer and winter day and night shall not cease. So let me repeat that, that last line
00:12:18.160 while the earth remains seed time and harvest cold and heat summer and winter day and night
00:12:24.100 shall not cease. So seasons will remain. So as Christians, we believe that God keeps his promises.
00:12:35.500 We believe he means what he says. He is in control of the entire universe and we know how the end will
00:12:42.200 come about. And it's not through climate change. The sovereignty of power and power of God protects us
00:12:49.020 from climate panic. It protects us from all panic, but in relation to this topic, it protects us from
00:12:55.360 climate change panic. Now we also read in Genesis that God made the world and he saw that it was good
00:13:01.980 as he was creating it. God made the world with intentionality and care and creativity and purpose
00:13:07.420 and thoughtfulness. He created Adam and he placed Adam in the garden to quote, work it and to keep it.
00:13:13.700 God created the earth to glorify himself and to nourish and help us. And he didn't just make
00:13:19.360 things pragmatically for human sustenance and shelter and use. He made beautiful things. He made
00:13:26.040 creatures in the depths of the ocean that the human eye may never see. He made ecosystems. He made
00:13:31.280 colors and smells and textures and views. He didn't just make the world usable. He made the world beautiful.
00:13:37.620 This is what Christians call gifts of common grace, meaning gifts that even non-Christians get to 0.77
00:13:43.660 enjoy. He didn't have to do that, but he did for his glory and our good. And so knowing that it is
00:13:51.060 through gratitude and joy that the Christian should love, should appreciate and steward nature. There are
00:13:57.600 many ways that we do this and Christians in good faith can disagree on the proper methods of caring
00:14:03.360 for the earth. But I would say that, you know, just from my perspective, it's good to reduce waste.
00:14:08.580 It's good to plant trees to take in CO2. It's good to prevent pollution in our water and air as much
00:14:14.800 as we can anyway. It's good to care for animals. It's good to conserve the natural world. It's good
00:14:19.960 to use free market innovation to modernize our infrastructure and agriculture and harness renewable
00:14:26.820 energy and things like that. I don't think these things have to be the focus of our lives as Christians,
00:14:32.980 but we can take steps in our own lives, in our own circles to live within our means, to limit excess,
00:14:40.820 to care for the plot of the earth, the plot of, or the spot on eternity on which God has given us
00:14:47.820 to make sure that we are stewarding creation and stewarding our lives in gratitude in a way that
00:14:53.520 glorifies God. But what we cannot do if we want to abide by scripture and live in faith in Christ,
00:14:59.880 which of course all of us who follow Christ do, is panic and buy into the narrative that this is the
00:15:06.500 existential crisis of our age. God's word says that it's not an existential crisis because he's in
00:15:12.620 control of existence and he promises the seasons and harvest and cold and heat will continue through
00:15:17.800 the end of the age. We therefore cannot allow climate fear-mongering to lead us into a position
00:15:24.260 of believing the federal government needs to control our lives and private industry in order
00:15:30.040 to save us. The federal government does very few things well, very few things effectively and
00:15:36.160 efficiently. I don't understand why this is hard for people to get. We also lastly cannot buy into what
00:15:43.700 looks like quasi earth worship. We've talked about this on the podcast on the dangers of the new age.
00:15:49.760 If you haven't listened to my episode titled dangers of the new age and interview with Doreen virtue,
00:15:54.640 you have to, it is by far my most listened to episode. She is a very interesting person. It was
00:16:00.720 just an awesome interview. So go listen to that. But one of the characteristics of the new age is the
00:16:06.080 idea that everything is God, or at least there, there are parts of the new age that believe that
00:16:12.720 everything has components of the divine. So crystals, oils, rocks, sand, trees, wind, whatever
00:16:19.860 in nature has special divine power and or presence, including you, including me, including all people.
00:16:26.360 And we're not talking about the biblical truth that humans are made in God's image. I'm talking about
00:16:33.560 the belief that inside you, this new age belief that inside you is some untainted goddess, that if it
00:16:39.920 weren't for societal expectations, if it weren't for your insecurities, if it weren't for the
00:16:43.880 patriarchy or capitalism, whatever, it would be unleashed or manifested. That is an idea in the
00:16:49.160 world of self-love and self-help. Sometimes it's explicit. Sometimes it's implicit. That is a new age
00:16:55.380 concept that can generally be generally be described as pantheism. So the belief that God is, is, or is in
00:17:03.480 everything and anything. So you see this in a lot of ways, including when it comes to climate change
00:17:09.160 ideology, how leftism, the new age and the culture of self-love or Trinity narcissism, they're all
00:17:15.280 intertwined. They're all interconnected. So without knowing it, many environmentalists have become
00:17:20.600 pantheists. You notice that behind their constant insistence on the quote science behind climate change
00:17:27.300 is spiritualism. So if you follow Giselle, Tom, Tom Brady's wife, and obviously a model in her own
00:17:33.320 right, Leonardo DiCaprio, any of these environmental activists, and look at their rhetoric
00:17:38.680 about mother nature or mother earth. They talk about showing gratitude to the earth, showing
00:17:44.320 reverence for the earth, humbling ourselves before nature and thanking it for what it provides for us.
00:17:50.640 So they personify, and I would say even glorify, deify the earth. They elevate animals. A lot of
00:17:58.780 these activists do to the place of humans. They demand not just responsible stewardship of natural
00:18:04.300 resources, which I agree with, but what sounds like all out worship of the earth. And that's
00:18:10.180 what's interesting is that many climate scientists and climate activists identify as atheists. I'm sure
00:18:16.880 not all of them, but a lot of them do. They hold to this Darwinistic materialistic worldview, meaning
00:18:23.100 they only believe in what they see or what can be proven objectively by science. So not realizing that
00:18:29.440 for many of them, much of their so-called science is driven by things that are not objective,
00:18:34.720 things that are subjective. So personal opinion, political ideology, and I would say most ironically,
00:18:41.380 religious belief. Their religious belief is one that ascribes personhood and even divinity to the
00:18:48.200 inanimate earth. So the Pope released a statement, which I thought kind of echoed this secular religion.
00:18:54.900 It echoed this kind of pantheistic worldview. Part of his statement said this, and you can look it up
00:19:00.820 to read it in full. So you don't think that I'm just taking words out of his mouth or taking him out
00:19:05.300 of context. He said this, we have failed to care for the earth, our garden, our garden home. We have
00:19:11.340 failed to care for our brothers and sisters. We have sinned against the earth, against our neighbors,
00:19:15.660 and ultimately against the creator, the benevolent father who provides for everyone and desires us to
00:19:21.280 live in communion and flourish together. It is imperative that people restore a harmonious
00:19:25.780 relationship with the earth and with the rest of humanity. He said, the Pope said so many natural
00:19:32.460 tragedies are quote, the earth's response to our mistreatment. If I ask the Lord now what he thinks,
00:19:39.000 I don't think he will tell me something very good. We are the ones who have ruined the work of the
00:19:43.740 Lord, the Pope said. In today's celebration of Earth Day, we are called to renew our sense of sacred
00:19:49.340 respect for the earth, for it is not just our home, but also God's home. This should make us
00:19:54.120 all the more aware that we stand on holy ground, Pope Francis said. So the Pope from this statement,
00:20:01.180 to me, it sounds like he has been blue-pilled on really several things, but particularly on the
00:20:06.080 environment. Now listen, this is not an attack on Catholicism. I know many of you conservative
00:20:11.900 Catholics also have a problem with Pope Francis. Maybe a lot of you out there really love him.
00:20:15.900 Also keep in mind, I critique the bad theology of Protestants all the time. I know I'm going to get 1.00
00:20:22.320 at least one message or one or a few saying that I'm a Catholic hater, but it's okay. I think a podcast
00:20:29.100 that talks about theology and current events, I think that the Pope is probably fair game for that
00:20:34.180 intersection. Obviously, I have myriad issues with the Pope's theology, but we will zero in on this
00:20:40.720 particular statement about Earth Day. First of all, it's extremely general and accusatory without much
00:20:47.360 substance. It's what I would call a virtue signal. I don't know what he means when he says that we've
00:20:53.620 failed the earth. Maybe that's true in some ways, certainly. I'm willing to maybe concede on that,
00:20:58.980 but I'm not sure exactly what he means. He says that we have sinned against the earth. He asks us to
00:21:04.720 have a harmonious relationship with the earth. The earth is responding to our mistreatment through
00:21:09.480 natural disasters, he says. But these statements are not biblical. You cannot sin against the earth
00:21:15.760 according to God's word. You can sin against God. You can sin against your fellow man. You can sin
00:21:20.760 against God and man by, say, purposely polluting someone's only water source, but you cannot sin against
00:21:27.440 the earth. The earth is a wonderful gift, but it is inanimate. It cannot forgive. It does not have
00:21:33.240 emotions. Again, this is a pantheistic worldview. This is new age. This is mysticism. This is ancient
00:21:41.040 Native American paganism. And I don't think the Pope intends to purport this worldview, but his rhetoric
00:21:46.980 echoes it. I also take issue with the Pope saying that if he asks the Lord something, he will tell him
00:21:53.240 the Pope something in particular that isn't already told to all of us, all Christians in scripture. God
00:21:58.920 doesn't give the Pope any kind of special revelation, guys. I know that that might be scandalous to say.
00:22:04.240 That's just not biblical. The Holy Spirit is in all believers. The word of God is made available to
00:22:09.380 all believers. I take issue, obviously, when pastors, Protestant pastors, say the same kind of stuff, that
00:22:15.820 God gave them a special word that cannot particularly be found in God's word. Also, he says, we have ruined
00:22:22.220 the work of the word. That's not possible. God is sovereign. Again, can we sin? Yes. Can we mess up?
00:22:28.600 Can we do things that don't please God? Can we do things with our natural resources that don't please
00:22:33.560 God? Sure. But no work of the Lord can be ruined or thwarted by man. One of my favorite verses, Job 42.2,
00:22:41.120 God can do all things and no plan of his can be thwarted. He says the earth is, the Pope says the earth is
00:22:47.580 God's home. It is. That's not what the Bible says. The Bible says that God is seated on his throne in
00:22:53.340 heaven. Heaven is my throne and the earth is my footstool. What is the house that you would build
00:22:58.600 for me? And what is the place of my rest? Isaiah 66.1. I mean, this directly contradicts what the Pope
00:23:04.420 said. Psalm 11.4, the Lord is in his holy temple. The Lord's throne is in heaven. His eyes see, his eyelids
00:23:12.100 test the children of man. Now, two things, two ways that we could possibly, if we really wanted to
00:23:18.580 give the benefit of the doubt here, possibly interpret what the Pope said to be theologically
00:23:22.960 correct. Number one, we know that God is omnipresent. So Jeremiah 23.24 says that God
00:23:28.400 fills heaven and earth and nothing is hidden from him. Number two, the second way we could do that is
00:23:33.620 God's spirit. We know from the Bible is in us and his presence is with us. Romans 8.9 says,
00:23:39.020 you, however, are not in the flesh, but in the spirit. If in fact, the spirit of God dwells in
00:23:43.920 you, anyone who does not have the spirit of Christ does not belong to him. Isaiah 57.15 says,
00:23:50.080 I dwell in the high and holy place and also with him who is of a contrite and lowly spirit to revive
00:23:55.860 the spirit of the lonely and to revive the heart of the contrite. But the Bible does not say that the
00:24:02.560 earth is the Lord's home. So yes, he's omnipresent, but the Bible clearly says that God's
00:24:08.860 home is in heaven. He is on his throne in heaven. Uh, that is what scripture tells us. This sounds
00:24:14.860 like the Pope is saying that we are ruining, not just God's work, but the home that he built for
00:24:20.620 himself. We are tearing it down. It sounds like poor God, we need to put God's house back together
00:24:27.340 that we're tearing down. He calls the earth, God's home. And he's saying we are ruining God's home.
00:24:32.360 But again, Isaiah 66.1 heaven is my throne and the earth is my footstool. Uh, what is the house that
00:24:39.700 you would build for me? And what is the place of my rest? Acts 17, 24 through 25, the God who made the
00:24:46.960 world and everything in it being Lord of heaven and earth does not live in temples made by man,
00:24:52.000 nor is he served by human hands as though he needed anything since he himself gives to all mankind
00:24:58.080 life and breath and everything. So nor is he served by human hands as though he needed anything
00:25:04.400 since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything. And lastly, I would also
00:25:10.600 contend with the Pope's assertion, uh, that all earth is holy ground. So he says that we need to
00:25:16.320 realize that we are on holy ground. I just don't see the biblical basis for a statement like that,
00:25:21.560 that all the earth is holy ground. When I hear the term holy ground, I immediately think of Moses
00:25:26.820 in the burning bush. I think of, uh, Exodus three, five, when the Lord speaks to Moses from the
00:25:31.380 burning bush, the verse says, then he said, do not come near, take your sandals off your feet for the
00:25:35.900 place on which you are standing is holy ground. That would mean that the ground that Moses was
00:25:40.860 walking on earlier before that with his sandals on was not holy ground. Again, the Pope is using
00:25:46.740 unbiblical language here. Maybe you think I'm nitpicking, but I think that we could hold the Pope to a
00:25:51.300 high standard. He is asserting what I would call not pantheism, probably more accurately, it would be
00:25:57.960 panentheism, which is the idea that God is everything in the universe, but also that God is supreme over
00:26:05.320 the universe. Whatever it is, it is pagan. It is outside of proper biblical theology. Um, I don't think
00:26:12.280 that everything the Pope believes can be described in this way, but this particular rhetoric is. So the
00:26:18.920 Pope, at least through this statement is bolstering the secular religion of environmentalism and
00:26:24.700 environmentalism has become a religion, particularly for secularists who typically claim atheism. Uh,
00:26:31.600 the religion of environmentalism drives what can sometimes only be described accurately as hysteria
00:26:38.160 when it comes to what's happening in the environment and what's happening on the earth. I think poor
00:26:45.060 Greta Thunberg can accurately be described as hysterical. And I don't mean any disrespect by
00:26:50.680 that. She's young. I think that she is passionate. I think her passion is probably genuine, but I think
00:26:55.580 she's being exploited. So it's really her parents and the media who should be to blame for that.
00:27:00.340 Al Gore, hysterical. And this hysteria pushes people, not just to hatred, absolute hatred and silencing,
00:27:08.940 uh, of those who disagree with them, whom they consider blasphemers. If you
00:27:12.840 go along with the idea that environmentalism is a religion, but also a desire for control,
00:27:18.400 a drive for socialistic policies that control people's behavior to try to allegedly mitigate
00:27:24.820 the risks of climate change. It's telling that these activists though, hardly ever point fingers
00:27:30.020 at China, the biggest polluter on the planet who already control their citizens' lives. It's always 0.99
00:27:35.320 somehow the United States' fault, despite us, uh, not even being close to the biggest perpetrator of
00:27:41.080 environmental, uh, irresponsibility. So climate activism is a religion among many other religions
00:27:47.520 that secular secularists hold to. They either worship the cause itself or they worship the earth
00:27:53.200 or they worship the government. Uh, remember everyone worships something. There's no such thing truly as an
00:27:59.520 atheist. Everyone worships something, whether it's themselves, whether it's money, whether it is success,
00:28:06.460 whatever, everyone makes some kind of idol and the environment, unfortunately for some is just
00:28:13.740 another one of those idols that Christians need to be really careful to avoid. Now, there's a lot more 1.00
00:28:20.620 that we could talk about from a policy standpoint and from a scientific standpoint, but since this is
00:28:25.460 theology Monday, I wanted to make sure that we looked at this from the, uh, from a biblical perspective.
00:28:30.280 And I hope that it was helpful to you guys. I will see you guys back here on Wednesday.