Ep 351 | The Fall of Free Speech & the Rise of Tyranny
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
179.99196
Summary
In this episode of Relatable, Allie talks about tech censorship and why a culture of free speech is so important. She also talks about the recent ban on Trump's personal account, TikTok, and more.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Wednesday. Hope everyone has had a great week so far.
00:00:15.000
Today we are finally going to get to the subject that I have said that we were going to talk about
00:00:19.820
since Monday, and that is big tech censorship. You guys have probably been hearing that
00:00:25.140
censorship is not that big of a deal. It's not a First Amendment issue. It's just private
00:00:30.060
companies doing what they want to do. I thought you conservatives, you know, you allowed freedom
00:00:35.320
when it comes to companies making their own choices. I thought y'all were fine with the free
00:00:39.780
market and all of that good stuff. Well, we're going to break down some of the misunderstandings
00:00:44.780
with a claim like that. We're going to talk about what happened as far as censorship goes and why
00:00:50.200
actually a culture of free speech is really important. I do want to ask you guys a favor.
00:00:57.820
If you love this podcast, if you could leave me a five-star review on Apple Podcasts or wherever
00:01:03.820
you listen, you don't even have to say, you know, why you like the podcast if you don't have time to
00:01:09.120
do that. But that would really mean a lot to me. It really does help, especially with what we're
00:01:13.500
talking about today and with everything that's going on. It helps out the show a lot. Also,
00:01:19.040
if you can subscribe to Blaze TV. So they do have this really good deal going on because they
00:01:25.040
understand people are worried about censorship and their favorite shows and content getting kicked
00:01:29.700
off. So they're offering a $30 discount on annual subscriptions for a limited time. So you can go to
00:01:36.940
blazetv.com slash Allie or blazetv.com. You can subscribe year-long subscription, $30 discount,
00:01:45.080
which is a really big deal. I think you can probably use promo code Allie, but I don't even
00:01:49.500
know if that's necessary. They do have this discount going on for a limited time, blazetv.com. So if
00:01:55.560
you're worried, a lot of you have asked me, okay, are you going to be able to stay on Instagram? Are
00:01:59.520
you going to be able to, you know, am I going to still be able to listen to your podcast? Well,
00:02:04.140
there would have been one time when I would have said, oh, you don't need to worry about that.
00:02:07.760
Um, and hopefully we don't have to worry about that, but you just never know the idea or the,
00:02:13.220
the things that have gone on for the past week have kind of, uh, kind of made us, um,
00:02:19.660
realize that things can happen very quickly. So make sure you subscribe to blaze TV, $30 off.
00:02:25.920
It's a really good time to do that. If you love this podcast, leaving a five-star review would mean
00:02:31.600
a lot to me. Okay. Let's go ahead and get started. If you don't know what's been going on over the past
00:02:37.100
week, hopefully you've listened to the other episodes this week where we've talked about,
00:02:41.080
you know, the storm into the Capitol and all the craziness and all of the illegality,
00:02:46.180
the criminality that went on last week and kind of how we've been wrestling through that. There
00:02:51.200
has been a backlash, not just in the reaction of people, not just a political backlash, but there's
00:02:57.960
also been a big tech backlash. So after all of this happened, Trump's personal Twitter account
00:03:03.980
got suspended. Twitter deleted tweets written by Trump from the POTUS account. So the POTUS account
00:03:08.940
is used by every president. It, uh, so they didn't take down the POTUS account, but he can't access it
00:03:15.400
anymore. And all of the tweets that he did send from that official POTUS account, president of the
00:03:20.680
United States, if you didn't know, uh, were taken down Facebook permanently banned Trump. Uh, so Reddit,
00:03:28.260
Twitch, Shopify, Twitter, Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, I don't know if it would be
00:03:33.660
hilarious if Snapchat didn't ban Donald Trump. And that was how he was communicating with the
00:03:40.080
American people and used all the filters and all that great stuff. That would have been
00:03:44.000
really 2021, but that's not what happened. He was also banned from TikTok. That would have also been
00:03:49.840
a hilarious way for the president to continue to communicate with the American people. If he was
00:03:55.760
like doing the dances and, and popping up and trying to send his messages through TikTok dances again,
00:04:00.960
unfortunately we do not, uh, we don't get to enjoy that. Banned from Apple, banned from discord,
00:04:07.480
Pinterest, Stripe, Amazon cloud hosting. Um, now you would think that everyone on the left is
00:04:12.580
applauding this. And a lot of people on the left are applauding this. Even, uh, the so-called champions
00:04:17.080
of free speech and the media class are applauding this saying that this is a great and wonderful thing.
00:04:21.780
Even some people on the right are saying this is a good thing. Now, uh, the ACLU actually came out
00:04:27.960
against banning Trump from Twitter, which is surprising because the ACLU has been on the liberal
00:04:35.320
side of most issues for the past, at least 30 years. Now, not every single issue. I'm not saying
00:04:42.060
they have been wrong in my opinion on everything, but they are a liberal organization who stands for
00:04:47.740
liberal values and who promote liberal causes, even at the expense of civil liberties, in my
00:04:53.860
opinion. But in this case, here's what they said. The civil rights organization, which often fights
00:04:59.480
against conservative, uh, this is actually the blaze reporting this, the civil rights organization,
00:05:04.260
uh, which often fights against conservative causes released a statement Friday expressing concern that
00:05:09.120
the movement to de-platform Trump could be a slippery slope with eventual unintended consequences,
00:05:13.860
especially for minority groups. ACLU senior legislative council, Kate Ruane said in a
00:05:19.880
statement for months, president Trump has been using social media platforms to see doubt about
00:05:24.040
the results of the election and to undermine the will of the voters. We understand the desire to
00:05:28.520
permanently suspend him now, but it should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter
00:05:33.500
wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech
00:05:39.520
of billions, especially when political realities make those decisions easier. President Trump can
00:05:45.440
turn to his press team or Fox news to communicate with the public, but others like the many black,
00:05:50.680
brown and LGBTQ activists who have been censored by social media companies will not have that luxury.
00:05:56.740
It is our hope that these companies will apply their rules transparently to everyone. And that's really
00:06:01.900
all conservatives have been asking for. It's not that we don't think that Twitter should be able to
00:06:07.220
have enforceable rules or Facebook or or YouTube, but that they apply the rules evenly and that they don't
00:06:13.480
use political bias to make those rules, as we've talked about, or to enforce those rules. And as we've talked
00:06:20.200
about for the past week or so, there have been Democratic politicians, people on the left who have said
00:06:25.800
things equivalent to what Donald Trump has said that you could argue have incited violence. And that's where the
00:06:32.860
slippery slope comes in. That's what you worry about. That if we say that any political rhetoric that we
00:06:38.200
don't like, even the kind that may or may not rile people up is inciting violence and therefore can be
00:06:43.780
censored. You're looking at at least a culture of repression, even if the First Amendment is still
00:06:51.080
intact. If you have these what are truly corporate oligarchies making the rules for people and silencing
00:06:58.860
their voices based on political bias and politically tense situations, you could see how that power could
00:07:05.700
be wielded towards the other side, too. And that's what I want people on the left to realize. Do you
00:07:09.980
not see how this also could possibly, depending on where the power lies in a few years, could negatively
00:07:17.740
affect the voices that you think are important? Now, I have been a steady critic against Donald Trump's
00:07:23.760
rhetoric in some cases, especially his rhetoric on Twitter. And a lot of people disagree with me on this.
00:07:28.420
I think that if he would have showed more restraint, especially in his social media behavior,
00:07:35.060
that he could have won in a landslide. I think people wanted stability. People wanted normalcy.
00:07:40.540
People did want decency and decorum, especially with the craziness of the past year. A lot of good
00:07:45.980
policies by by Donald Trump. But I think that his lack of decorum, his lack of restraint, his bombastic
00:07:53.860
and dogmatic nature, especially on social media, really hurt him. So I have been a big critic of
00:07:59.220
Donald Trump's tweets. And I agree that some of his rhetoric has been very irresponsible. I think
00:08:03.880
some of the rhetoric at the Capitol was very irresponsible. But I think that we just have to
00:08:08.740
be fair in applying that standard to everyone and to not take the leap of saying, yes, this speech
00:08:14.580
definitely incited violence if it didn't explicitly do that, because then you're looking at the justified
00:08:20.500
censorship of all kinds of different voices on the right or the left. And then we don't have a
00:08:26.260
society of free speech anymore. Again, even if the First Amendment is technically intact. Even
00:08:32.120
Germany's Angela Merkel has spoken out against Twitter's ban on Trump. And she is not a fan of
00:08:38.340
Trump. I would say that she might not even be a fan of the United States. But she is actually coming
00:08:44.100
out and saying free speech is important. And this is a place where I wouldn't say free speech really
00:08:48.680
thrives. So Angela Merkel says German or this is what this is the the statement that her
00:08:55.660
spokesperson said the chancellor sees the complete closing down of the account of an elected president
00:09:01.760
as problematic. He said at a news conference in Berlin, rights like the freedom of speech
00:09:08.240
can be interfered with, but by law and within the framework defined by the legislature, not according
00:09:15.200
to a corporate decision. So I disagree with that, obviously. And that's what I'm talking about is
00:09:20.060
that Germany is not some is not some bulwark of free speech that we should be looking to. Like he
00:09:25.940
thinks that free speech should be limited and it should be limited by law. His real contention with
00:09:30.700
it is that a corporation did it. And I don't think that's right. But they are speaking out against it.
00:09:36.340
They do think that it's problematic because they at least can see and the ACL at least can see how
00:09:41.580
this could negatively affect them as well. And that's all I'm asking for. Just see what this
00:09:47.460
precedent sets for other people. And, you know, I hear people say, well, I'm never going to spread
00:09:51.240
fascist propaganda. I'm never going to incite violence. I'm always going to follow the rules.
00:09:55.220
So it's not going to affect me. That's very naive as extremely naive. Like, don't you see how the
00:10:00.140
standards are so subjective and it depends on the people who are in charge and if someone who disagrees
00:10:05.520
with you and might even find your leftist or progressive ideology dangerous as propaganda
00:10:12.300
that they could censor you, would you think that's fair? No, I don't think that you would.
00:10:16.720
So that's not all. They also these big tech companies, Google, Apple, Amazon band together
00:10:23.060
to take down Parler, which was a Twitter like company. And I'll get into that story and how
00:10:30.200
scary and problematic that is in just one second. All right, let's talk about Parler. So Google took
00:10:41.980
Parler off of its app store. Apple took Parler off of its app store. Amazon cut Parler off of its web
00:10:49.300
hosting service, forcing it to find a new host or to shut down. And right now it's not available.
00:10:55.340
And so what we hear so often is, oh, you don't like Twitter? Just go to a different platform or
00:11:00.720
you don't like this social media site and how they run their site. Well, you should just
00:11:04.460
build your own. Okay. Well, that's exactly what, that's exactly what Parler did. But now like a
00:11:10.080
cartel, these, these huge big tech companies, they come together and they basically say, sorry,
00:11:16.440
like you can't play on our court. You're going to have to build yourself another court. And oh,
00:11:20.940
by the way, that's going to be very difficult and expensive to do. And we understand that. And so
00:11:25.800
what they're saying, the reason why these companies say that they're taking them down is because of
00:11:30.640
course, they're spreading disinformation, they're spreading misinformation, they're spreading
00:11:35.740
dangerous rhetoric that is leading to violence and things like, and things like that. Parler is a
00:11:41.620
small company. And so even though they have rules against illegal conduct or illegal,
00:11:47.180
illegal content being spread on their platform, even though they have rules against incitement of
00:11:53.800
violence, they do not have the manpower yet to moderate all of this content. And so Apple is
00:12:00.600
saying, look, you got to moderate all this content. You got to take this content down on a regular basis
00:12:05.860
or else we're not going to host you on our Apple or on our app store. Google said the same thing.
00:12:11.820
Amazon basically said the same thing. And Parler even said, look, we've got a team of volunteers.
00:12:18.000
We'll do it. We'll figure it out. We can't afford to pay these people right now, but we'll get
00:12:22.780
volunteers to moderate. And they said, oh, no, sorry. We just don't think that's going to be
00:12:27.580
enough. So yeah, we're basically going to shut you down. See the hypocrisy in this, you might be
00:12:33.240
listening and say, well, you know, that's whatever Google and Amazon and Apple want to do. They're just
00:12:38.240
they're just a private company working in their best interest and the interest of the people and
00:12:42.420
public safety. No, no, no. That's hypocrisy. Because if they really cared about public safety,
00:12:48.760
like if they really cared about abiding by those rules and having regular and consistent moderation
00:12:55.120
of, you know, what's illegal content or dangerous content, then they would also be threatening Facebook
00:13:02.260
and Twitter in the same way. But they're not. There's loads of misinformation and disinformation
00:13:07.160
on Facebook. You think there aren't violent threats on Facebook. You think people haven't
00:13:11.100
been doxxed on Facebook. You think people aren't sharing criminal activity and pornography on
00:13:16.060
Facebook. Of course they are. Same goes with Twitter. All of that content can be found on
00:13:20.460
Twitter. All of that content can be found on YouTube and Instagram as well. And a lot of that
00:13:26.980
content is never moderated. It's reported, but it's never blocked. It's never taken down. And so the
00:13:32.920
real reason why these companies are coming after Parler is because they don't want the competition.
00:13:38.460
They don't want the competition. And that is when they start, they seem to be acting like some kind
00:13:42.920
of cartel or acting like some kind of monopoly against the little guy. So you can't simultaneously
00:13:48.300
say that, oh, this is fine. This is just the free market. Why don't you create some competition?
00:13:53.440
Oh, by the way, these big giants that you can't possibly win against because they have so much of
00:13:58.860
the market share. Google has 90% of the market share. They're going to come and they're going
00:14:03.420
to take down the competition. That's not the free market. The market is no longer free. And look,
00:14:08.660
I used to be, I used to be very recently a conservative who said, you know what? I might
00:14:15.040
not like the censorship that happens in these companies. I might not like a lot of things that
00:14:19.280
they do, but they are private companies. They can de-platform the people that they want to
00:14:23.620
de-platform, not realizing the very basic principle that a culture of free speech is also important,
00:14:30.820
not just the first amendment, because you can have the first amendment, which I do think is so
00:14:34.840
important. It's so important for the government not to stifle speech. It's so important for us to
00:14:38.960
have that protection. But if you don't have a culture of free speech, and if you have these
00:14:42.940
corporations that have so much unprecedented, that is such an overused buzzword right now, but it truly
00:14:48.760
is in history, unprecedented power. We have this corporate oligarchy who makes a lot of decisions
00:14:54.500
for our lives, who really influences how freely we can move. Like if you're talking about what
00:15:01.420
airlines allow you to do, how freely we can speak and share information, the things that we can
00:15:06.260
know and say, they're basically an oligarchy. And when they are making the rules that are actually
00:15:14.200
against the first amendment and do not promote a culture of free speech, when they are trying to
00:15:20.340
drown out competition in a way that is not fairly applied to, to other companies like Twitter and
00:15:29.200
Facebook, then you're no longer really living in a free society. A culture of free speech is just as
00:15:36.700
important as having legal free speech is having the first amendment because laws actually follow
00:15:43.060
culture. So if our culture starts to believe that all political opposition and all unpopular opinions
00:15:50.640
is inciting violence, even if it's not explicitly inciting violence, if you see all forms of dissent or
00:15:59.540
disagreement as dangerous misinformation, as harmful rhetoric that could lead to bad things, then you're
00:16:08.480
only going to allow for a very small minority of voices. And then you do have a culture of tyranny.
00:16:16.180
You do. So people are saying that this is not a free speech issue. Don't understand that it's a lot
00:16:21.180
more complex than just saying, well, the first amendment still exists. And so you don't, you don't even need
00:16:28.200
to make a constitutional argument. First of all, I am not taking constitutional lessons from people
00:16:34.220
who think that the first amendment doesn't matter when it comes to a Christian cake baker. Like these
00:16:40.820
are the same people who think that a Christian cake baker in Colorado should be forced to bake a cake
00:16:46.340
for a gay wedding or a florist should be forced to provide her services for a gay wedding. These are
00:16:51.200
the same people who believe that nuns should be forced to provide insurance for birth control,
00:16:56.640
no matter what the first amendment says. So I'm not going to be taking lessons on the constitution
00:17:00.620
from people who think that the second amendment only includes muskets. So spare me. Now, for those
00:17:06.600
of you who are conservatives, who actually care about the first amendment, and not just conservatives,
00:17:11.780
there are people on the other side who care about the first amendment. But if you're someone who truly
00:17:15.700
does care about free speech, if you truly do care about our first amendment rights, and you were all,
00:17:20.720
you're on the side that I was, that genuinely just believe this is not a first amendment issue. This is
00:17:24.680
not a free speech issue. This might be, you know, a corporate policy issue. This might be an unfairness
00:17:31.780
issue, but this has nothing to do with free speech. If you're on the side that I was, let me explain why
00:17:36.700
I think this is a little, it's just more complicated. I already explained the whole culture of free speech
00:17:42.340
thing, but there's also a legal part of this. This is not just private companies. These are not just
00:17:48.720
cultural issues. There's also a political and legal part of this, and it has to do with Section 230. So
00:17:56.440
Rachel Bovard, she's a policy expert out of DC. I've had her on the podcast before. Go back and listen
00:18:03.320
to the episode I did with her a few weeks ago. She talks a lot about big tech, and she talks a lot
00:18:08.640
about big corporations, and how much power they have, and how this does have political freedom
00:18:14.380
issue or implications on our lives. So she wrote in USA Today about Section 230, which kind of outlines
00:18:24.260
the rules for these internet platforms. Let me read you some quotes from her article. Quote,
00:18:32.220
internet platforms would receive a liability shield so they could voluntarily screen out harmful content
00:18:37.960
accessible to children, and in return, they would provide a forum for true diversity of political
00:18:42.360
discourse and myriad avenues for intellectual activity. So that is why Section 230 was originally
00:18:48.180
set up. So they could kind of function as both a platform and a publisher. So that means that they
00:18:55.020
could be a platform in the sense that people could share their opinions and that these platforms were
00:18:59.800
not liable for the content that was shared. So I would be able to post on some internet forum. I'd be
00:19:06.640
able to post on Yelp. I'd be able to post on Twitter, and Twitter would not be liable for something that I
00:19:11.280
said. They couldn't be sued for something that I said. But it also gave them the ability to be a publisher
00:19:16.520
in that they could have rules and take down the content that they wanted to take down. But the exchange
00:19:23.440
was supposed to be, okay, we're going to give you these protections in Section 230, but these companies
00:19:29.320
are supposed to provide a forum for, quote, true diversity of political discourse and myriad avenues for
00:19:35.240
intellectual activity. And that's where we are now. It is very questionable and arguable whether
00:19:40.740
or not these companies are holding up their end of the bargain. She goes on to say, but what was
00:19:46.560
originally understood to be a privilege granted for reasonable content moderation has become
00:19:51.120
judicially contorted, stretched into a bulletproof immunity that protects these companies from all manner
00:19:56.720
of misdeeds. Critically, in protecting these companies from costly damages and lawsuits, Section 230 has
00:20:02.860
also fueled the growth of the big tech platforms, which now engage in viewpoint discrimination at an
00:20:08.080
unprecedented scale and scope. International megacorporations determining what news information
00:20:14.180
and perspectives Americans are allowed to read here in Access. A handful of big tech companies are now
00:20:20.240
controlling the flow of most information in a free society, and they are doing so aided and abetted by
00:20:26.520
government policy. See, so it's not as simple as just these companies, private companies doing what they
00:20:31.260
want to do. That these are merely private companies exercising their First Amendment rights is a
00:20:37.040
reductive framing, which ignores that they do so in a manner that is privileged. They are immune to the
00:20:43.120
liabilities to which other First Amendment actors like newspapers are subject. And also that these content
00:20:48.600
moderation decisions occur at an extraordinary and unparalleled scale. When Google decides to suppress or
00:20:55.400
amplify content, it does so for 90% of the global marketplace, Rachel Bovard says. Twitter's choices
00:21:02.320
to cut off circulation of certain content, as they did when they banned circulation of a story critical
00:21:07.120
to the Biden family a month before the November election, do you remember that, very much shapes the
00:21:14.520
national news narrative. Facebook, by its own omission, has the power to swing elections, which is troubling as
00:21:20.340
some of the platform's fact checkers are partially bankrolled by a Chinese company. I think it is
00:21:26.540
ByteDance. The downstream impact these companies have on shaping independent thought, market access,
00:21:34.980
consumer behavior, election integrity, and speech are undeniable. In a very real way, these platforms are
00:21:40.740
transforming the nature of what it means to be free in a free society. That policymakers have a role here
00:21:47.520
is obvious. While private companies have the right to set the rules for their own platforms and online
00:21:52.200
communities, they do not have a right to do it with the privilege of Section 230 protections. And the more
00:21:57.380
these companies engage in behavior that ranges away from the original goal of ensuring a true diversity
00:22:02.580
of political discourse and toward gatekeeping independent thought in America, the more they prove
00:22:08.080
themselves undeserving of special government treatment. And so she makes a really good point about that,
00:22:14.180
is that there is a legal aspect to it. There is a part of this that also has to do with the law,
00:22:22.960
that really does have to do with the First Amendment. Now, I'm going to talk to you also about the other side
00:22:27.360
of this, about the benefits to Section 230. A lot of conservatives, Trump himself, Josh Hawley has talked
00:22:32.580
about repealing Section 230 and how important that is. Now, why there was really no meaningful legislation
00:22:37.880
when Republicans were in control is the perpetual question that conservatives and Republicans have
00:22:43.760
been asking our lawmakers for years and years and years. They use these big issues like defunding
00:22:50.680
Planned Parenthood and, you know, border security and all of this stuff to win elections and they get in
00:22:55.980
power and then it doesn't happen. And then the cycle just goes over and over again. But conservatives
00:23:01.620
talk about repealing Section 230. I think it's a little bit more complicated than that. And David French
00:23:07.280
makes a pretty good argument for keeping Section 230 that I'll read to you in just one second.
00:23:16.540
All right. So people say we should just repeal Section 230, but I don't, I really don't think
00:23:21.940
it's that simple. I have really tried to look at both sides of the argument here. And there are people
00:23:26.240
on the left and the right, by the way, who want to repeal Section 230 for different, for different
00:23:30.480
reasons. I think that the right wants it to be to where these companies basically can't discriminate
00:23:37.360
at all against, against content. That's, I would say, a crude way to describe what a lot of people
00:23:44.340
on the right would say that they want. The left wants them to be more like a publisher so that they
00:23:49.000
have more regulation. So the government can impose more of what they want these big tech companies
00:23:55.740
to do. And Section 230 could theoretically accomplish either one of those things. But David French,
00:24:03.700
he argues that Section 230 actually prevents censorship, like political censorship, by giving
00:24:09.560
social media companies the benefits of being both a platform and a publisher. So again, they're a
00:24:14.400
platform in the sense that they're not liable for what you say, but they're a publisher in the sense that
00:24:17.700
they can remove bad content like porn or threats or doxing. He argues in Time Magazine that if you take this
00:24:25.420
away, then the websites, then the websites, these sites become publishers, then they're liable for
00:24:31.840
everything that you put on their site, which means that they are going to go wild on censorship because
00:24:36.520
they're certainly not going to allow anything on their site that they cannot personally verify or
00:24:41.680
vouch for, which will actually give even more power to these big tech companies because they're the only
00:24:47.500
ones with their resources to moderate and filter out a lot of that content that they don't want to be
00:24:53.060
liable for. So a company like Parler couldn't exist if it had to become a publisher if it didn't have
00:25:00.560
230 protection. Now, of course, like the irony here is that the 230 protection is supposed to also protect
00:25:07.320
them from the rules that are being slapped on them by these companies like Amazon and Google and Apple.
00:25:15.220
I'll say if you don't follow our rules, if you don't moderate all this content, we're going to take you off.
00:25:19.080
Section 230 is actually supposed to protect companies like Parler by saying, you know,
00:25:24.480
you're not liable for all of the content that is on your site. So that, again, is where we have
00:25:32.760
these companies acting with more power than the government is kind of subverting the rules of
00:25:38.920
Section 230 by saying we're a private company and we can do what we want to do and applying those rules
00:25:44.180
arbitrarily. So my question is to someone out there who knows more about this than I do,
00:25:49.820
who has done more research, who is an expert in all of this, like what is the answer? Because
00:25:54.260
I don't think it can keep going how it's going. Like we can't have Twitter and Facebook who control so
00:26:00.420
much of our information and who really can sway elections, who do a terrible job of moderating the
00:26:05.460
content on their site to make sure that there's no doxing and no abuse and no threats and no illicit
00:26:12.620
content and also are, for example, stopping the circulation of a New York Post article about the
00:26:21.900
Biden family that is just as legitimate as any story that the New York Times has written about
00:26:26.580
Donald Trump. Like we can't keep going like that. There has to be some kind of harness. At the same
00:26:32.120
time, I see the importance of Section 230 that they have to be able to have enforceable rules
00:26:37.680
without being liable for everything that is on its website or else these competitors like Parler,
00:26:45.060
even though it doesn't exist right now, it wouldn't be able to exist because it wouldn't have
00:26:49.480
the protection that's needed to be able to not be, again, liable for the content that is on its site.
00:26:58.960
And so I think it's a complicated issue, but that's really my point. My point isn't that I have all the
00:27:05.300
answers. My point is that it's much more complex than saying, well, this has nothing to do with
00:27:10.200
the First Amendment. This has nothing to do with free speech. This has nothing to do with anything
00:27:14.520
like that. It's just private companies doing what they want to do. No, this does have, it has legal
00:27:19.020
implications, but more importantly and mainly right now at least, it also has cultural implications and
00:27:26.680
the law does follow culture. And if you do not have a culture of free speech, then it doesn't really
00:27:32.960
matter that much if you have the First Amendment. This is the analogy that I came up with the other
00:27:36.700
day. If you are, and I hate when people pick apart analogies and metaphors to say, so like,
00:27:42.560
are you calling me a child? Who are you calling a child in this situation? It's a metaphor.
00:27:48.020
So please take it as that. So if you are a little kid, if you've got a little kid who wants a cookie,
00:27:53.860
asks his mom, who is the government in our metaphor, that asks his mom if he can have a cookie.
00:28:00.140
The mom says, yes, you can have a cookie. But Big Brother, pun intended, comes along and says and
00:28:06.860
takes away the cookie jar and makes sure that he doesn't have access to cookies. Make sure he doesn't
00:28:11.080
have access to the oven so he can't make his own cookies. Make sure that he doesn't have access to
00:28:14.580
the ingredients or is able to go to the store for his own cookies. If Big Brother, who in our metaphor
00:28:20.840
are these big corporations, takes away the little brother's ability to get his own cookies,
00:28:29.040
it really doesn't matter if mom says yes. Technically, he is free to have a cookie. But is
00:28:34.100
he really free to have a cookie? No, he still lives in this repressive environment where Big Brother
00:28:39.080
comes along and makes sure that he can't have the cookie that he wants. So you can't just stand there
00:28:43.580
as a bystander to this family situation and say, well, yeah, that little kid is totally free to have
00:28:48.960
a cookie. Well, not really. Is he really free to have a cookie if Big Brother is making sure that he
00:28:54.000
can't have a cookie? And cookie in this case is free speech, saying the things that you want to
00:28:57.920
say. So it's a lot more complicated than what people are saying, that this is not a First Amendment
00:29:02.780
issue. And once again, do not take constitutional lessons from people who don't actually believe in
00:29:09.920
free speech and religious liberty, who want to limit it at every turn, and who do not value the
00:29:14.860
Second Amendment either. And you really see the Constitution as a hindrance to their progressive
00:29:18.300
values. They have no leg to stand on when it comes to schooling us on what the Constitution means
00:29:24.780
and its importance. Now, here's something that I think is interesting in all of this. So as these
00:29:30.740
companies are cracking down on the president, they're cracking down on, it seems like, conservative
00:29:37.060
voices in general, or at least we see that is on the horizon, if not right in front of us. We've got
00:29:45.000
Biden filling his White House staff with people who have worked in Facebook. So this is according
00:29:51.380
to the New York Post, or worked in Facebook and Twitter and all of these places. And by the way,
00:29:55.960
it's so funny because the left and Democrats always say, oh, we're against big corporate power. We're for
00:30:00.580
the little guy. They're very for big corporate power. And by the way, Republicans have also given tax
00:30:06.300
breaks to these companies at the expense of the working class. And so neither party is really innocent
00:30:12.560
in all of this. But Democrats have always said that they're not for a big business, that they're not
00:30:17.580
for these big corporations. But at every turn, they also give them breaks. And they also contribute
00:30:24.780
to the elitism and oligarchy that exists in corporate America. It's at the expense of the little
00:30:31.400
guy. Whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, you need to realize that most of the people in Washington
00:30:36.260
are not for you. They're not. And Democrats, I think, especially get won over by this social
00:30:44.220
justice rhetoric that Democrats use to win them over and to win elections, not realizing these
00:30:50.800
Democrats are not fighting for you. They're not. They're feeding into these big corporate power
00:30:57.420
structures that then turn around and control your life. And this is especially true for conservatives
00:31:03.300
because Republicans, by giving tax breaks to these big corporations, by giving immunity in some cases
00:31:08.980
to these corporations, along with a lot of the Democrats in Washington, are giving more power to
00:31:14.680
these corporations who not only control our lives, but also hate our values as conservatives.
00:31:20.600
And so, you know, I'm not a populist. I wouldn't consider myself a populist. But there's an argument
00:31:27.520
to be made for there's an argument to be made for not giving so much power and so many cuts and so many
00:31:37.400
shortcuts and so many breaks to these big corporations and using that political capital and using that
00:31:44.900
and using whatever power and funding you have to help the people who actually who help the people who
00:31:53.440
actually need it. Now, speaking of all of that, that I went on a tangent because I was talking about
00:32:02.500
how Democrats always say that they're for the little guy. They really are for big tech. They really are
00:32:07.500
for these major corporations and the people that Biden is putting in positions of power in the White
00:32:13.060
House reveal that. So we've got from The New York Post, Jessica Hertz. She'll serve as Biden's White
00:32:19.260
House staff secretary, vetting correspondent. She was a former Facebook lawyer. We've got Emily
00:32:24.000
Horn. She worked at Twitter from 2017 to 2018. She will broker the White House National Security
00:32:29.120
Council's communications with the media. Mark Schwartz, formerly worked at Amazon Web Services,
00:32:35.000
now helping vet appointments to the White House Office of Management and Budget. Dionne Scott,
00:32:41.100
Google Global Program Manager, is reviewing applicants to the Department of Homeland Security.
00:32:46.380
Zaid Zaid. Is that really this person's name? Facebook's strategic response aide is on the
00:32:54.100
Biden vetting team for State Department jobs. Christopher Upperman, Facebook Associate General
00:33:00.020
Counsel, is working on the Small Business Administration. Rachel Lieber, Facebook Director
00:33:04.980
of Strategic Responses, vetting spy agency staff Tom Sullivan. Amazon International Tax Director is
00:33:10.700
vetting State Department appointments. Cynthia Hogan led Apple's lobbying as Vice President for Public
00:33:16.240
for Public Policy and Government Affairs, previously helped with Biden's VP selection vetting. So Biden
00:33:23.780
loves big tech. Big tech embed in so many ways with the Chinese Communist Party. If D.C. is the swamp,
00:33:32.360
then Silicon Valley is the swamp number two. And these swamps colliding on the coast of our country are
00:33:39.380
going to envelop the rest of the country in their swampiness. That is what we will get from a Biden
00:33:45.240
presidency. We will see more corporate power. We will see more big tech power. And they will be
00:33:51.040
aided and abetted by now, the Democratic controlled company. And it's going to be at the expense of all
00:33:56.260
of us, Republican or Democrat. OK, it's not going to be, oh, this is going to help the little guy. This
00:34:02.460
is going to help the least of these. It's it's going to definitely wreck the working class. But this is
00:34:07.860
what it is. I mean, this is how it is now. We are run by a lot of elites who know how to win
00:34:12.060
elections and do not care about our lives and for conservatives completely run counter
00:34:17.600
to the things that we believe in and the things that we hold dear. Also, according to CNBC,
00:34:24.400
there's Austin Lynn, a former program manager at Facebook. He's on an agency review team for the
00:34:28.880
executive office of the president, Erskine Bowles. A former Facebook board member is advising the
00:34:34.940
transition team. Jeff Zients, a former Facebook board member, picked to become Biden's COVID-19
00:34:42.240
czar, which what a weird word to talk to, like associate with COVID-19. You know, it's just funny
00:34:50.320
that Biden on his transition team and his White House staff have all these people from Facebook,
00:34:56.060
from Google, from Amazon. These happen to be the companies that are silencing voices the most,
00:35:03.700
certainly deplatforming the president. So don't tell me this has nothing to do, that big tech has
00:35:08.880
nothing to do with the government. Yes, they're in bed with the government. They're also in some ways
00:35:14.540
catering to foreign regimes that hate us. Don't you understand that so many in Washington, D.C.,
00:35:20.400
I would say Republicans and Democrats, but especially on the Democratic side, truly hate you.
00:35:25.680
They hate you and they hate your way of life and they don't care about you. And the government
00:35:30.460
can't save you, left or right. That's what I want you to know. It's the title of John MacArthur's
00:35:35.420
book a long time ago. And even though I don't agree with everything in the book, like the
00:35:39.140
Revolutionary War was a sin and all of that, I still agree with the premise. The government can't
00:35:45.700
save you. It's not going to save you. It doesn't love you. It doesn't know you. It doesn't know your
00:35:49.960
name. It doesn't know your kid's name. It doesn't know your kid's favorite food. People who allow the
00:35:54.380
government to educate their children, to take care of their children. People who are convinced that the
00:35:58.700
government actually cares about poor people, that actually cares about the disenfranchised, they
00:36:03.660
don't. They don't. They don't. Okay. That's why it's up to you, church. It's up to you, Christian.
00:36:09.520
It's up to you, individual. It's up to you, mom, dad, employee. If you want to make change, if you want
00:36:15.480
to take care of people, do it yourself. Do it yourself. Do not trust a bureaucrat to take care of the
00:36:21.640
things that cannot be taken care of. There is a function of the government. I'm not a libertarian. Okay.
00:36:25.700
I am not some, I'm certainly not an anarchist. I think there is a role of the government. I think
00:36:31.280
the military is important. I think that we are to pay taxes. That's a biblical idea. I'm also not
00:36:37.440
a theocrat. There is no biblical precedent for imposing a theocracy on people who don't hold
00:36:44.040
to that belief. Certainly not in the New Testament. There is no biblical precedent for a theocracy.
00:36:48.900
Of course, I do believe that the government should be a moral institution looking to the Judeo-Christian
00:36:57.180
ethic of right and wrong and good and bad and lawmaking. And I know some people don't like
00:37:03.200
that, but there is a depiction of Moses at our state's capital for that reason. He's the first
00:37:07.980
human lawgiver that those are the values that America was founded upon. But I'm not for theocracy.
00:37:14.760
I'm not a libertarian. I'm not an anarchist. I do think there's an important role of the government
00:37:20.060
to protect us and to protect our freedoms. But don't put your hope there. My goodness. And especially
00:37:26.780
anyone who claims that they are going to do things for you to advance your life and to make your life
00:37:33.940
better. The best thing that the government can do for you is leave you the heck alone. Leave you
00:37:39.700
alone. Protect your freedoms. Protect your safety from enemies, foreign and domestic, and allow you
00:37:47.240
to pursue your happiness and your life and your liberty. That's what the government is good at.
00:37:55.400
And that is why its power is so important to be reined in. But we're going to see the government
00:37:59.920
grow. Its power grow exponentially over the next few years, right alongside the growth of the power of
00:38:07.240
big corporations and big tech. I also think that there is probably not a coincidence that Josh
00:38:14.940
Hawley and Ted Cruz are being attacked so viciously, not just for saying, hey, we're going to push back
00:38:23.100
against the electoral outcome of the election, but also because these have been the two guys that have
00:38:29.820
actually tried to push back against big tech. I don't think it's a coincidence that, for example,
00:38:34.380
people are talking about putting them on the no-fly list. You can disagree with what they were
00:38:38.420
going to do, like I do, by the way. I didn't think that what they were going to do was right
00:38:43.540
on January 6th. However, them being on the no-fly list and being told to resign because they were going
00:38:51.840
to peacefully and rhetorically lay out their case of election front, that's crazy. Again, you're setting
00:38:56.600
up such a slippery slope that I think it's so important for you to see how it could affect the other
00:39:02.560
side as well. Also, there is this whole, I mean, there's this whole virtue signaling aspect to all
00:39:08.240
of this, the Apple, Google, and Amazon pretending that they're virtuous for taking down Trump,
00:39:12.760
pretending that they're virtuous for shutting down Parler when they are catering to the CCP,
00:39:21.120
the most racist, xenophobic, oppressive, repressive regime that exists, colonizing Africa,
00:39:29.140
this regime, the CCP, colonizing Africa, colonizing South America, preying upon the poor and the
00:39:36.160
oppressed. And so these companies cater to them at every corner. They're pretending like they're
00:39:43.580
virtuous for shutting down speech here. Remember, Twitter still allows the dictators of Iran and
00:39:49.600
Saudi Arabia and the propagandists in China to have Twitter accounts and to spread their propaganda
00:39:54.740
freely. But they think they're virtuous for taking the account down of the president of the United
00:39:59.360
States. I mean, it's just crazy. It's the same thing that they do as they, you know, support social
00:40:05.380
justice here. They support Black Lives Matter here. And yet, just like the NF or the NBA, they turn
00:40:12.280
around and they also support the most racist and repressive and suppressive and oppressive regime
00:40:17.960
that exists, the CCP. It's all a big virtue signal. These are not virtuous companies. The motto of Google,
00:40:24.680
used to be, don't be evil. Apparently, they've dropped the first word of that motto. Frederick
00:40:34.640
Douglass says something that I think applies here. He says, liberty is meaningless where the right to
00:40:39.460
utter one's thought and opinions has ceased to exist. That of all rights is the dread of tyrants. Let me
00:40:45.820
read you that again from Frederick Douglass. Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one's thought
00:40:52.040
and opinions has ceased to exist. That of all rights is the dread of tyrants. Frederick Douglass
00:40:59.660
is a must-read American. Last year, you probably remember Fourth of July, there were leftists like
00:41:05.760
Kaepernick who were putting out videos with Frederick Douglass' What to the Slave is the Fourth of July,
00:41:14.120
which, by the way, is a really good work that everyone should read. But the fact of the matter is,
00:41:18.860
is that most of the left doesn't align politically at all with Frederick Douglass, who said that the
00:41:23.800
Constitution is a glorious liberty document. That's a quote. He was very much in favor of the Republic.
00:41:30.020
He understood that the Constitution planted a seed of liberty that was meant to grow. It wasn't meant to be
00:41:35.860
perfect from the start. And so the fact that the founders didn't live up to their ideals by saying that
00:41:42.680
all men were created equal and doubted certain inalienable rights because they still owned and allowed
00:41:47.380
slaves in slavery. That doesn't mean that the Constitution is a moot document, that it's not a
00:41:52.820
good document. Frederick Douglass understood that. Leftists today don't understand that. So they quote
00:41:56.920
what to a slave is the Fourth of July. They forget his defense of free speech, his defense of the
00:42:03.040
Constitution. Thomas Sowell, another great American, says, in a sense, the political left's attempts to
00:42:08.820
silence ideas they cannot or will not debate are a confession of intellectual bankruptcy. And that's
00:42:15.060
absolutely true. You see a lot of people on social media say, you know, they're going after people's
00:42:20.900
sponsors. Any conservative commentator, they can say, oh, it's just the ones that spread conspiracy
00:42:25.220
theories or it's just the it's just the ones who support violence. No, no, no. You honestly think
00:42:31.120
they're going to be discerning and distinguished between just a regular conservative like me and the
00:42:35.160
people who spread conspiracy theories? No, of course they're not. So they're going after people's
00:42:39.420
sponsors. They're doxing people online and they're saying this is not cancel culture. This is just
00:42:43.740
holding people accountable. That really sounds like something a fascist would say. It really,
00:42:48.620
really does. And speaking of speaking of fascism, I just want to play you this clip from Portland. So
00:42:54.940
Antifa, which stands apparently for anti-fascist in the irony of all ironies, is outside of a bookstore
00:43:02.660
trying to get the bookstore named Powell's to take to stop distributing Andy Ngo's book called
00:43:12.000
Unmasked. So Andy Ngo is a reporter. He reports on Antifa uprising and riots, Black Lives Matter
00:43:18.400
riots throughout the country. He posts footage from those things and he writes about them and talks
00:43:23.380
about them. And he wrote a book called Unmasked. And they're really mad that this bookstore in
00:43:28.880
Portland is distributing it. And so here's Antifa telling them to stop distributing Andy Ngo's book.
00:43:36.420
Stop selling Andy Ngo's book. So if you're on the side, if you're on the side of silencing your
00:43:58.320
opponents, if you're on the side of basically burning books, taking books out. And by the way,
00:44:03.940
this bookstore said, okay, we'll take it off our shelves. We're still going to keep it online,
00:44:08.600
but we'll take it off our shelves. Cowards. Like what I want corporations, businesses to just stop
00:44:15.220
doing is kowtowing to people who have no real power. They have no real power. Corporations,
00:44:21.920
churches, organizations start saying, no, no, no. Stop giving into the toddler temper tantrums.
00:44:29.760
You know what happens if you always give in to your toddler? If you do everything that your toddler
00:44:34.640
wants you to do and you kowtow to every single temper tantrum, they grow up to be brats and they
00:44:39.820
grow up to be really powerful brats. And then they rule over you. Is that really what you want
00:44:46.120
with these grown toddlers? Start to say, no, this is ridiculous. You do not have to agree with the book
00:44:52.560
to distribute it. You don't have to like its content. You don't have to like the author. You don't have to
00:44:57.000
agree with everything the author has said, but in a society that actually values diversity of thought,
00:45:02.320
which leftists, true leftists do not, by the way. It's what James and I talked about yesterday,
00:45:07.220
this idea of repressive tolerance and trying to hold back what they see as intolerant in the name
00:45:14.080
of tolerance. It's just this very, it's this form of cognitive dissonance that they have justified in
00:45:21.240
themselves. If you are on the side of banning books, if you are on the side of silencing voices
00:45:28.620
that you don't like, if you are on the side of calling everything that you disagree with harmful
00:45:35.140
or inciting violence or something that should be taken down, you are the fascist. You are the fascist.
00:45:42.800
And a lot of leftists, again, they say that they're for the little guy. They're against these
00:45:47.380
big corporations. They're against Amazon. That's not true because they're really for all of these
00:45:53.240
companies, these big companies, when they virtue signal, when they say their social justice lines
00:45:59.040
and when they silence the voices that these leftists don't like. Benito Mussolini, the famous
00:46:07.500
fascist, said this. Fascism should more properly be called corporatism since it is the merger of state
00:46:14.620
and corporate power. It's so funny that leftists think that it's actually conservatives who want
00:46:20.100
this. When if you look at Biden's cabinet, I'm not even calling Biden a fascist, but if you look at
00:46:25.020
the people that Biden are putting in place and you look at which side these corporations are on
00:46:30.620
and who they're coming down upon, and you realize as a leftist, you are also on the side of these
00:46:36.460
corporations and you're on the side of banning books and censoring voices that you don't like,
00:46:40.700
maybe you should look in the mirror and realize that you are the fascist. Not everything that you
00:46:47.900
don't like is hate speech, and by the way, the First Amendment does cover what you consider hate
00:46:53.640
speech, what I would consider hate speech too. Guess what? I, as a conservative Christian,
00:46:59.040
think you, as some far-left progressive, I think that your ideology is dangerous. Like, I think it's
00:47:05.040
really harmful. I think some things that you say could be labeled as hate speech. I think a lot of what you
00:47:10.120
say is misinformation and is complete propaganda is totally untrue. I think most things that
00:47:16.840
critical race theories say are conspiracy theories, basically. They're not reality when it comes to
00:47:22.040
history, and I do think that that kind of stuff can gin up violence. And guess what? I don't want
00:47:26.860
to silence you. I don't want you to be deplatformed. I don't want you to be taken off Twitter. I don't
00:47:31.480
want you to be cracked down upon. I don't want you to not feel like you can't protest peacefully or that
00:47:38.000
you can't speak out about what you believe in. I don't want to silence you. I don't want you to go
00:47:43.540
off into obscurity. I want you to feel like you are totally free to write the books you want to
00:47:47.280
write, to believe the things that you want to believe, to worship or not worship, how you want
00:47:50.940
to worship or not worship, to say the things that you want to say. But I understand the feeling is not
00:47:55.020
mutual. You don't feel that way about me because you think, well, you're really harmful. And so it's so
00:48:00.780
funny how you become this moral absolutist, and you become this person who believes in absolute and
00:48:05.880
dogmatic and autocratic truth, even though you believe that you're on the side of tolerance.
00:48:09.900
Again, you might be the fascist. Now, I want to end with some encouragement, as I like to do,
00:48:19.500
because I know that you listen to this and you get worked up because there's a lot going on and it
00:48:25.620
worries you. And there's reason for concern. I'm not going to pretend like there's not. I'm not going
00:48:29.900
to pretend like there's nothing scary going on and we don't have a reason to be worried. I am worried
00:48:35.120
about conservative and Christian voices being drowned out. I am very worried about that, even
00:48:39.780
though I know God doesn't need the First Amendment to advance his kingdom and advance his gospel,
00:48:43.700
that he doesn't need American freedom for those things. These are also gifts of grace that I think
00:48:47.940
that we should steward well and that we should fight for. And we should realize that people of all
00:48:51.860
faiths and all backgrounds, all socioeconomic classes, have found refuge in these unique,
00:48:57.700
exceptional American freedoms that are recognized in the Constitution and given to us,
00:49:04.440
we believe, by God. And so I do want to leave you with just a bit of encouragement. So I talked
00:49:13.560
about yesterday in my interview with James Lindsay, definitely go listen to that if you have not.
00:49:19.520
It's relevant no matter, you know, it's not strictly news. We're analyzing things that are going on. So
00:49:25.060
even if, you know, you already know what happened in the news yesterday, it's still a relevant interview
00:49:30.600
to listen to. And I talked about, I paraphrased something that I read in C.S. Lewis's Abolition
00:49:35.880
of Man. And that's really what I want to end on. And I want to end with this question is,
00:49:41.760
are we creating an environment for the society that we want to exist? Are we creating a society
00:49:48.820
for the virtues that we want to exist? And so there's a lot of people who say that we want
00:49:54.180
tolerance, that we want love, that we want unity, that we want healing, that we want within the church
00:50:00.460
racial reconciliation. There's a lot of evangelicals that use that terminology. We want progress. We want
00:50:07.740
things to get better. We want people to, you know, be enlightened and love each other and all of these
00:50:13.500
things. Are we actually, are we providing young people, are we providing each other with the tools
00:50:20.180
to make those things happen? Are we really doing that? Or are we just repressing the voices that
00:50:26.760
we don't like? Are we actually creating a very intolerant society? And that's, that's what I
00:50:31.860
argue is that racial reconciliation will never be accomplished through critical race theory because
00:50:36.520
critical race theory as an ideology admittedly divides, it splits people up. We are never going
00:50:43.000
to become a tolerant, more loving and accepting society through repressive, what is called repressive
00:50:49.200
tolerance, what we talked about yesterday. We're never going to become a more forgiving and gracious
00:50:54.360
society through doxing and cancellation, what you're using in very dystopian terms, accountability.
00:51:00.980
Like that is not going, you're not going to punish people into being more loving. You're not going to
00:51:06.280
chastise people and wag your finger in the face of people and make them your version of accepting or
00:51:13.780
tolerant. It's just not going to happen. The only way those things are going to happen is if we create an
00:51:18.460
environment where people are free to debate and to discuss ideas, where people are not afraid to be
00:51:24.400
honest, where people are not afraid to say what they believe and for us to go into the public square
00:51:28.980
and for us to figure out which idea is actually better. And we have to be able to detach disagreement
00:51:35.940
from hate in order to do that. That is the only way that we can make us make a society that actually
00:51:42.120
achieves these virtues that we all say that we want. Love, intolerance, and some kind of
00:51:47.800
togetherness. And we're going to have to have those debates so that we can have a foundation
00:51:54.000
that we actually agree upon. We're not, we're never going to agree on everything as Americans,
00:51:58.800
but can we have some foundational things that we agree on? I'm afraid that we don't. And I don't,
00:52:04.480
I honestly don't know how or when we're going to get there because I don't, it's hard to see a way
00:52:10.520
forward with people who don't believe in the same definition of truth that I do, who don't believe
00:52:15.300
that America is a good country at all, who don't believe that the constitution is a worthy document,
00:52:19.580
who don't actually believe in free speech or freedom of religion, who don't actually believe
00:52:23.760
that I should be able to have the freedom to say what I want to say, who don't believe that a man
00:52:28.740
is a man and a woman is a woman, that the family actually matters at all, or that parental rights
00:52:33.380
are even a legitimate thing, who don't believe in the freedom to homeschool or private school your
00:52:37.800
children. I mean, there are people on the left who are against everything I believe in foundationally,
00:52:44.380
not just these policy issues. Like we can disagree on immigration policy and welfare policy,
00:52:49.780
but unless we have these basic truths that we can all come together on, then I, it's hard for me to
00:52:56.180
see how we can achieve the virtues that we say that we want to virtue or the, the, the virtues that we
00:53:01.320
say that we want to preserve and have. Um, and so I think that the only path to that is through debate
00:53:07.100
is through discourse. But if we have one side who actually thinks the discourse and debate is
00:53:11.200
dangerous and that you should just oppress opposing voices, we're never going to get there. And you're
00:53:15.700
not going to create an environment, a society of love and tolerance by being hateful and intolerant.
00:53:21.980
Like you're just, you're just not going to, it's not going to be accomplished. And so let me read you.
00:53:27.120
I mean, C.S. Lewis felt that he had this same problem, um, in his era, in his country, in a
00:53:33.500
different way. And here's what, here's how he describes this issue. Uh, we continue to clamor
00:53:39.520
for those very qualities we are rendering impossible. You can hardly open a periodical without coming
00:53:45.140
across the statement that what our civilization needs is more drive or dynamism or self-sacrifice or
00:53:52.560
creativity. In a sort of ghastly simplicity, we remove the organ and demand the function.
00:53:58.400
We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh and honor and are
00:54:04.540
shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful. And it seems like
00:54:11.160
that's what we're doing today. We are supplying tools to our kids of hatefulness and inability to
00:54:19.140
disagree intellectually, inability to tolerate opposing views, inability to actually have some
00:54:25.440
kind of thoughtful discussion, inability to be able to critically think about things. And then we
00:54:31.860
are saying, Oh, be independent thinkers that love people that can reconcile and unite and heal. It's
00:54:38.780
just, it's not going to happen. And so what does this look like in our own lives? What does this look
00:54:44.020
like as Christians to create the society that upholds the virtues that we actually want? Well, one, it is
00:54:51.100
living out those virtues for ourselves. And of course, I don't believe that tolerance means compromising
00:54:57.300
on the truth. I think that you can tolerate people who have other views, while still standing up for
00:55:02.580
what you for what you believe in. And I do think that that is the responsibility that we have right now
00:55:08.900
that in our private and public life, that we once again, as I've said so many times that we live not
00:55:14.540
by lies, it means refusing to tell lies, it means refusing to accept lies, and to believe lies
00:55:20.660
ourselves. It means refusing as far as we can to not allow lies to flourish. And so that means if you've
00:55:27.360
got a child that is in school, and they are being shoved critical race theory nonsense about how America is
00:55:34.520
this awful and oppressive place without condition, that you know, isn't true, they're learning virtues,
00:55:40.640
they're learning about biology, that in a way that is not true, it's time for you to stand up to the
00:55:45.660
school board, or to the teacher in a kind way. If you know that your pastor is preaching something
00:55:49.940
that is not in accordance with scripture, whether it comes to justice or any other issue, then it is
00:55:56.780
your responsibility along with your spouse, if you're married to set up a meeting and have that
00:56:00.780
conversation that is based on scripture, if you see some kind of training going on in your work
00:56:05.820
that you know is actually going to just create more implicit bias and division and hate, it is your
00:56:12.400
responsibility to be equipped to have the conversation of why this particular kind of training is actually
00:56:17.580
going to be counterproductive rather than productive. If you are sitting in your class and
00:56:21.460
your professor is teaching something about history that you know isn't true, or morality or virtue that
00:56:26.460
you know isn't true, that it is your responsibility to raise your hand or to set up a meeting and to
00:56:32.840
say something. These things are vital at this point. I don't think we have time to be quiet anymore. We have
00:56:40.000
to fight for the virtues that we actually want society to exist. That is not going to happen unless you
00:56:45.820
speak up and you are willing to represent your views in a way that is thoughtful and intelligent. And I have a list of
00:56:52.100
resources on my website, allibethstucky.com slash blog slash recommended dash resources. You can, it's a
00:57:00.960
highlight bubble on my Instagram too. I think reading all those books that I have on those lists will, on that
00:57:06.000
list will be very helpful to you. Okay. I hope that was helpful. We will be back here tomorrow. Happy Wednesday.