Ep 360 | Scientism, COVID & the Vaccine
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
188.92413
Summary
In this episode of Relatable, I talk about how important it is to pay attention to the news and the issues that affect us and the people we care about. I also talk a little bit about the COVID vaccine and why I believe it should be legalized.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Thursday. So I regret to inform you that I actually will
00:00:15.440
not be talking to Alex Brinson today. And I'm super, super sad about that because I was really
00:00:21.020
looking forward to that conversation, but we had some technical difficulties and some
00:00:24.640
miscommunication and unfortunately it just fell through and we're having to reschedule.
00:00:30.360
So I'm really sorry because I know that you guys were looking forward to that and I was excited
00:00:34.340
about it too, but I am going to still talk about the vaccine, the COVID vaccine and some of the
00:00:41.160
things that are going on surrounding COVID, but I won't just be talking about that. I'll be talking
00:00:45.360
about a couple more stories that I want to bring to your attention as well. And look, I know you
00:00:51.640
guys, a lot of you have told me, look, I'm so tired of the news and I get it. I get tired of
00:00:57.120
the news too. And I don't want to talk about stuff sometimes, but, um, and, and, you know,
00:01:02.340
I, I don't think that you should make the news in idle. I don't think that you should be spending all
00:01:07.180
of your time on Twitter or Instagram or any of that. But remember, this is not the time to look
00:01:12.240
away. This is when Biden is signing 30 plus executive orders, the highest number of executive
00:01:18.400
orders that a president has signed in this short period of time that are not in line at all with
00:01:24.980
the expectation of moderation and normalcy that people thought they were going to get by voting
00:01:29.840
for Biden. This is not the time to not pay attention. It's not the time to not pay attention
00:01:34.360
to the curriculum that is, uh, being implemented in your child's school. This is not the time to look
00:01:41.040
away from what's going on in the news. And while you can't make everything that's going on in the news
00:01:45.540
and idle and your hope and your rest and your peace, of course, does not rest upon what's going
00:01:50.500
on in American politics. And we understand that God is completely sovereign and totally on his throne.
00:01:55.900
Uh, we are still in this world. We still do have to pay attention to the problems that we're facing.
00:02:01.300
And like I always say, politics matter because policies matter because people matter. And so in order
00:02:08.800
to care about people, there are many ways that we can care about people. And I certainly don't think
00:02:12.960
the primary vehicle to caring about people is politics. Certainly. I don't believe that.
00:02:18.580
And I would say many people on the left believe that. I don't believe that politics and voting
00:02:23.460
for politicians is our primary vehicle, uh, to care for people certainly, but it is one of the ways
00:02:28.720
that we care for people because the policies that are implemented by politicians, uh, that we hear about
00:02:34.260
through the realm of politics and that we know about through the realm of politics and that have
00:02:38.460
influenced through the realm of politics. They affect the most vulnerable people. Um, they affect
00:02:44.500
children. They affect poor people. They affect our neighbors. And so if we care about the future
00:02:49.020
generations, if we care about the most vulnerable, if we care about our neighbor, one of the things we
00:02:53.940
have to care about is politics. And that means paying attention to the news. A lot of you guys ask me,
00:02:59.380
how do I make sure I'm getting accurate information? And unfortunately that's really hard.
00:03:02.660
One of the things I always encourage you to do on, um, on this podcast is to not just listen to me.
00:03:08.960
I do not pretend to be the arbiter of truth. I always strive to be as truthful as possible and
00:03:13.600
to tell as much of the story as I can. But I also tell you that I'm coming from a particular
00:03:18.280
perspective. Everyone is by the way, but I'm honest about it. I say I'm a conservative. I'm a
00:03:23.180
Christian. That's the worldview that I've got. Those are the, that's going to color the conclusions
00:03:27.440
that I come to and the moral implications that I draw out of particular stories.
00:03:31.780
You guys know where I stand on stuff. If you want to hear a different view,
00:03:35.180
sometimes I have opposing views on my podcast. A lot of times I do. Um, but also you can listen to,
00:03:41.000
uh, the other side. When I'm looking at one story, I read the Washington post. I read the New York
00:03:46.180
times. I read CNN. I read a national review. I read the blaze. I read the daily wire. I read Fox news.
00:03:53.420
And you almost have to look at every angle of just one particular story to know really what's going on.
00:03:58.960
I follow a variety of commentators, uh, for that reason. So that if something sounds really bad,
00:04:04.400
because one side is saying it's really bad, or one side is saying that something's really good.
00:04:08.840
Uh, my question is always, well, what's the counter to this? What's the argument? Why are other people
00:04:13.400
mad about this? Is one side misinformed? Either the side that's saying it's good or bad, or is it just
00:04:19.120
partisanship? Like what's going on? We just kind of have to ask discerning questions. We have to dig
00:04:23.780
beyond the headline, which is something that I try to do from a conservative Christian perspective.
00:04:28.560
But look, you got to fact check me. You got to look to the original documents. If it's a bill
00:04:33.040
that's being passed, if it's a court decision that's been decided, you can always read the
00:04:36.900
original text online and you can look at what different experts are saying who typically have
00:04:41.840
their own biases on it. But, um, you got to do your research yourself. And, uh, understandably,
00:04:48.240
that's, that's hard for people to do. And we're tired and we're busy and we don't want to do it.
00:04:51.960
But my point is that this is not the time to be apathetic. This is not the time to be ignorant.
00:04:56.100
This is not the time to look away. That's exactly what this administration and the Democrats in
00:05:00.560
Congress would like you to do. Because a lot of you voted for this administration based on what
00:05:05.080
you thought would be normal and decent and equitable and, you know, all those, all those buzzwords.
00:05:10.420
And you may be realizing, maybe not, but you may be realizing that some of the executive orders
00:05:15.020
that have been signed and the policy proposals that have been put forth in the past few days
00:05:19.700
do not align with all at all with any of your purported values. And so it's time to pay
00:05:25.240
attention, care about your kids, care about your neighbors. We got to pay attention. One thing that
00:05:30.020
we're also not supposed to pay attention to is COVID. We're not supposed to pay attention to the
00:05:34.440
fact that CNN took down their death ticker, um, after president Biden became inaugurated. We're not
00:05:41.020
supposed to pay attention to the fact that, uh, per day, California has more cases and more deaths,
00:05:46.620
uh, than they did, uh, when they originally closed down, uh, restaurants and outdoor dining. And yet
00:05:52.320
now they're opening up outdoor dining. The same thing is happening in other democratic states,
00:05:57.180
uh, like Michigan. We're not supposed to pay attention to that. Uh, we're not supposed to pay
00:06:02.480
attention to the fact that the New York times, the CDC has been saying president Trump, uh, has been
00:06:08.040
saying for a long time, pediatricians who came on MSNBC, uh, has been saying for a long time that,
00:06:13.600
hey, it's, it's safe to open schools. And yet the teachers unions and the public education system
00:06:18.220
said, no, we're, we're not going to open our schools. We don't want to, we don't want to
00:06:21.900
infect the teachers. We don't want the teachers to die. They had, um, all of these demonstrations
00:06:26.360
and these protests and all of these demands, the teachers unions to make sure the teachers
00:06:31.000
didn't actually have to, um, didn't actually have to go to school, even as private school
00:06:36.000
educators were, many charter school educators were, um, many public unions and, and some public
00:06:42.660
school teachers, uh, decided that they didn't want to do their jobs in person for fear of the virus.
00:06:48.420
Even though we have heard thousands of times that that's not where the virus is spreading,
00:06:53.320
that it's actually very difficult to transmit the virus between children and also between, uh,
00:06:58.880
children and teachers. It's just not happening very much. And there's actually a very low risk,
00:07:03.640
but there's a very high risk for kids not to go to school. The suicide rate has skyrocketed among
00:07:09.680
kids. The mental health problems, even for kids as young as five has skyrocketed hospital visits
00:07:15.360
for mental health problems for young kids has skyrocketed in the past year because kids aren't
00:07:19.900
supposed to be isolated because they can't learn in front of a screen. So kids are falling behind.
00:07:24.140
Not every parent has been able to stay home and to quit work and to teach their kids while their
00:07:30.880
kids are remote learning. The kids need their friends. They need their teachers. And while I wish
00:07:35.260
everyone would homeschool instead of sending their kids to public school, that's just not the reality
00:07:39.680
for some people. And so we're just creating more inequality. We're just creating more injustice and
00:07:45.060
more kids falling behind, but we're not supposed to pay attention to any of that because we were told
00:07:49.240
while president Trump was president, that if you wanted to open the economy at all, that you were a
00:07:53.280
grandma killer. Even while we had people in, for example, in New Jersey and Pennsylvania and governor
00:08:00.420
Cuomo, who sent COVID positive patients back into nursing homes, even though we have heard physicians
00:08:06.920
who speak to the New York Times saying, oh, well, we don't need to prioritize people over 65 more than
00:08:12.780
other Americans because people over 65 are predominantly white. But everyone who wants to
00:08:20.020
open up the economy, we're the grandma killers, even though elderly people in some cases in some states
00:08:26.760
for the sake of, quote, equity, that word that we talked about yesterday, are being passed over.
00:08:43.580
We're not supposed to pay attention to the fact that Amazon, this is a story that just came out,
00:08:49.140
may have purposely delayed their announcement of being able to deliver vaccines,
00:08:56.760
for the government until Biden became president. We're not supposed to think or we're not supposed
00:09:06.140
to know that so much of this virus, the lockdowns, the policies that were enacted, the news surrounding
00:09:15.380
the vaccine distribution, that so much of it was politicized and so much of it had to do with
00:09:22.220
making sure that Trump didn't become president, to make sure the employment rate was high,
00:09:26.320
to make sure the economy was crashing, to make sure that people were disgruntled, to make sure that
00:09:31.260
people were isolated and sad and wanted to change and to make sure that normalcy was presented in
00:09:38.980
President Biden. I mean, you were gambling with people's lives for the sake of the election. I mean,
00:09:45.180
we're not supposed to know any of that or we're not supposed to say it and we're not supposed to pay
00:09:49.160
attention to the ever-changing narrative on vaccines. So obviously, in the beginning, we knew 15 days to
00:09:56.300
slow the spread. That's how this whole thing started. And President Trump, being the positive
00:10:00.900
and optimistic person that he is, being the salesperson that he is, said that we were just
00:10:05.860
going to have a few cases and then it was going to go away. Well, unfortunately, that's not what happened.
00:10:12.440
And then we were told that, okay, it's not just 15 days to slow the spread. It's not just three
00:10:19.360
months to slow the spread. We're just going to have to wait until we have a vaccine and we don't
00:10:24.220
know when the vaccine is going to happen. President Trump said, we're going to have a vaccine by the
00:10:28.380
end of the year. We're going to do Operation Warp Speed and we're going to incentivize these vaccine
00:10:32.540
manufacturers to make a really good, effective vaccine in the quickest timeline possible.
00:10:39.780
And that happened. We were told it wasn't going to happen. Trump's critics said that he was lying.
00:10:45.680
There's no way that it was going to happen. And then it happened. And then Pfizer said,
00:10:49.020
oh, this had nothing to do with President Trump. This had nothing to do with Operation Warp Speed.
00:10:54.360
But it absolutely did. They were guaranteed, I think it was a billion dollars if they were able to
00:10:59.240
produce this vaccine. So of course it has to do with Operation Warp Speed. But again, not supposed to
00:11:04.280
pay attention to any of that. President Trump, we were supposed to blame every single COVID death
00:11:09.120
on President Trump while Joe Biden was tweeting, oh, I'm going to stop the virus. And because the
00:11:15.920
narrative had to shift away from, okay, once we have a vaccine, things will go back to normal
00:11:20.040
because then we started to have a vaccine. It was given credit to President Trump. And then we had
00:11:24.180
to hear what we're hearing now is that even if we have a vaccine, we're still going to have to wear
00:11:28.280
masks. We're still going to have to stay inside. We're still going to have to socially distance.
00:11:32.680
And we're also seeing from Joe Biden, he tweeted that, you know, I never said that I was going to,
00:11:39.020
I can't do anything about the virus continuing to spread for a few months. Hang on. That's exactly
00:11:43.660
what you campaigned on. That's what you campaigned on. You campaigned on stopping the virus. You said,
00:11:48.880
I'm not going to shut down the economy. I'm not going to shut down the world, but I am going to
00:11:51.960
shut down the virus through what? Distributing the vaccine that President Trump helped develop or his
00:11:57.460
administration incentivize to develop quickly and had already distributed. It was like a million
00:12:02.560
doses a day. And then Biden takes office and he says, oh, we have, we don't have any plan for
00:12:09.360
distribution because the past administration wasn't doing anything. That's not true. Millions of doses
00:12:14.460
a day were being distributed under President Trump's leadership. But once again, you're not supposed to
00:12:21.740
pay attention to that. What you're supposed to pay attention to is that President Trump was just
00:12:25.700
incompetent, that he killed tons and tons of people, and that he lied. And the economic problems
00:12:31.960
and the public health problems were all because of President Trump. And the more pro-lockdown you were,
00:12:37.380
the more you stayed inside, the more masks that you wore over your face, and the more you chastise
00:12:43.880
people for not wearing masks and for not staying inside and for sending their kids to school,
00:12:48.200
the more righteous you were. And finally, we have this savior in Joe Biden, and he's going to make
00:12:54.140
things normal. And eventually, he's going to take the virus away because he's going to take this
00:12:58.000
seriously, because he's going to force you inside your house, and he's going to force you to wear
00:13:01.480
masks. And this is exactly what we need. And he's going to be the one that's actually going to herald
00:13:06.240
the vaccine. We're just going to ignore the fact that it had anything to do with President Trump.
00:13:10.100
It's going to be his administration and his solid leadership that is going to make sure that we
00:13:14.880
finally end this virus, even while it's weird because we're getting the conflicting narratives,
00:13:20.960
even while we're being told, okay, yes, this is very, very serious. We don't know when things are
00:13:28.140
going to end. We don't know when things are going to go back to normal. We're going to get a worse
00:13:31.160
strain coming from the UK in March. Simultaneously, we have states like California reopening things back
00:13:37.720
up, opening their economy. Again, not due to fewer numbers, because the numbers are getting better in
00:13:43.260
places like California and other places that are opening up, like DC. But apparently, they're opening up
00:13:49.160
because they want the economy to be better. They want to play into this narrative that Joe Biden
00:13:53.360
is here and saving the day and everything is better. So things are kind of conflicting.
00:13:57.180
If you look at this political scene, when it comes to when it comes to COVID and in particular,
00:14:02.980
when it comes to this vaccine. So we're simultaneously hearing that it's very trustworthy and that if you
00:14:09.100
don't want to get the vaccine, or if you don't get the vaccine, then you are crazy anti-vaxxer.
00:14:14.080
If you have any questions at all, you shouldn't even be wondering about the trustworthiness of it.
00:14:18.280
You shouldn't even be doubting it at all, despite the fact that Kamala Harris, just a few months ago,
00:14:24.120
before she was elected, said that if this was developed under President Trump,
00:14:29.880
then she might have a problem with taking it. She said that just a few months ago.
00:14:34.720
But now, people who still have hesitation, who are still wondering,
00:14:38.320
hey, you know, we've never had this kind of RNA vaccine before, or
00:14:41.980
hey, you know, this happened really fast, who just have questions, who aren't anti-vaxxers,
00:14:47.340
who might get every other vaccine, but may have a question or may have hesitation about
00:14:51.780
this vaccine. We are being told, wow, you're so stupid, you backwoods person who gets your
00:14:57.340
information from molliesantivaxhouse.com. You are being castigated, you're being chastised,
00:15:05.820
you are being thrown to the side for having any questions about it whatsoever, because it's
00:15:09.960
totally trustworthy, and you're supposed to trust science, and you're supposed to trust medicine,
00:15:14.220
and does White House trust science? But also, we're hearing at the same time from the WHO,
00:15:20.220
on the one hand, we heard from the CDC, pregnant women should actually, they use this stupid phrase,
00:15:25.240
pregnant people should get vaccinated. If you look at the CDC website, pregnant women should get
00:15:29.880
vaccinated, people or women who are breastfeeding should get vaccinated, even though they say there's
00:15:37.040
been no long, there's been no studies on pregnant women who have gotten the vaccine,
00:15:41.520
or breastfeeding women who have gotten the vaccine, and the long-term effects of that. There's been
00:15:45.560
no actual study of that, but they are using deductive reasoning to say it's probably fine,
00:15:50.640
but then the WHO, if you go to their website, they are actually recommending that pregnant women
00:15:56.500
not get the vaccine, which I think is interesting, and so we're seeing another conflict there.
00:16:01.440
So the WHO website says this, while pregnancy puts women at a higher risk of severe COVID-19,
00:16:08.500
the use of this vaccine in pregnant women is currently not recommended unless they're at risk
00:16:13.360
of high exposure, which is weird, because if it poses a risk to pregnant women, then does it not pose
00:16:20.440
a risk to pregnant healthcare workers as well, or are you just saying that the benefits outweigh
00:16:25.880
the risks? So it's a little bit odd, kind of the conflicting information that we're hearing
00:16:32.560
about pregnant women when it comes to the coronavirus, and also we're seeing some weird
00:16:36.260
things around the world when it comes to the vaccine. So over 2 million Israelis have had their
00:16:41.520
first vaccine shot, but their COVID numbers keep climbing. The Guardian said this single COVID vaccine
00:16:48.160
dose in Israel less effective than we thought. So according to CNN, Merck also announced
00:16:54.100
this past week that it's discontinuing the development of its COVID-19 vaccine candidates
00:16:59.860
after early studies showed immune responses were inferior to natural infection and other COVID-19
00:17:06.360
vaccines. Merck said it plans to submit results from phase one trials of its vaccine candidates
00:17:10.420
known as V590 and V591 for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Two COVID-19 vaccines from
00:17:17.600
Pfizer and Moderna have already been authorized for emergency use in the United States by U.S. Food and
00:17:21.080
Drug Administration. Both are about 95% effective after two doses. But I thought it was interesting
00:17:25.920
that Merck said, and they admitted, which honestly, this should give you more confidence in vaccines
00:17:30.780
in general, that they said, look, we're not even going to keep going with this because it's not as
00:17:35.340
effective as someone actually getting the virus. Now, that apparently is different than Moderna and
00:17:41.740
Pfizer's vaccine. But a lot of people were saying that in the beginning. A lot of people were saying
00:17:48.660
that, well, couldn't it be better just to get natural infection for people who are at low risk of getting
00:17:54.420
a very severe, severe reaction to COVID-19. And again, people were told, no, no, no, no, no. Now, I
00:18:02.920
understand. I don't think it's better for everyone to just get sick and to chance it rather than to get the
00:18:08.900
vaccine and not get it. But again, people were kind of bringing this up, what Merck is saying, and they were
00:18:15.700
shut down and told not to talk about it. But again, going back to Israel, so surge in infections
00:18:21.820
dampens optimism over a country's advanced immunization program, says The Guardian. Israel's
00:18:27.720
coronavirus czar has warned the single dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may be providing less
00:18:35.600
protection than originally hoped, as the country reported a record 10,000 new COVID infections on
00:18:42.180
Monday. And similar things are also happening in the UK that the vaccine is being distributed. And
00:18:49.220
then people are taking a second look and wondering really how effective it is. The New York Times
00:18:54.040
wrote that why vaccines alone will not end the pandemic. The arrival of highly effective vaccines
00:19:00.520
in December lifted hopes that they would eventually slow or stop the spread of the disease through the
00:19:05.340
rest of the population. But vaccines alone are not enough, the model shows. And if precautions like
00:19:10.020
working remotely, limiting travel and wearing masks are relaxed too soon, it could mean millions more
00:19:17.300
infections and thousands more deaths. I would love to see the science behind that because you guys know
00:19:23.980
I'm not some anti-masker. I wear a mask everywhere that's required of me to wear a mask. I'm not going
00:19:29.260
to put up a fight about that. I'm voluntarily going into a business. If they require me to wear a mask,
00:19:34.020
I'm voluntarily riding on an airplane. If they require me to wear a mask, then I am voluntarily
00:19:39.760
choosing to meet their particular guidelines. So I'm not an anti-masker, but I also have not seen the
00:19:46.380
science that shows that COVID cases go down at the time of mask mandates or that COVID cases are decreased at
00:19:55.340
all by mask mandates. People have been wearing masks pretty pervasively in this country since June.
00:20:03.200
And apparently, according to the numbers, it hasn't really helped. Remember, in March of last year,
00:20:09.060
crazy that that's almost a year ago now, Dr. Fauci said, please don't wear masks. The Surgeon General
00:20:14.340
said, please don't wear masks. And we were made to feel so stupid for going out and getting a mask.
00:20:18.840
Now, I secretly, we kept our masks because we had some surgical masks because I'm even, you know,
00:20:25.660
I'm worried about the flu and I didn't want to get the flu while traveling and all of that. I don't
00:20:30.480
even know if the mask protects you from the flu, but we had masks. And I remember thinking, well,
00:20:34.720
I don't want to give up these masks because it kind of seems like maybe it could possibly help if this
00:20:39.460
is like a respiratory thing and it's, it passes through large droplets. Wouldn't it maybe help if
00:20:44.580
we were wearing masks and they basically made us feel guilty for even thinking about wearing a mask?
00:20:49.760
I remember I had to travel during this time, like right before everything got shut down.
00:20:54.800
And I wanted to wear a mask on the plane after hearing about all of this. And I didn't because
00:21:00.180
I felt bullied by people like Dr. Fauci and the Surgeon General last March. And I didn't,
00:21:05.540
I was embarrassed to wear a mask. And now, of course, people have been saying since June,
00:21:10.100
wear your dang mask and you're a grandma killer if you don't. And now just the other day,
00:21:15.980
Dr. Fauci came up and came out and said, it's just common sense. Just two masks is better than one
00:21:22.400
mask. What? And I saw on CNBC, I thought it was hilarious. They said three masks, of course,
00:21:28.940
is going to give you, is going to be even more effective. Show me the study. Like show me the study.
00:21:35.820
If this really does pass through large droplets, okay, sure. Maybe I could see how three masks is
00:21:41.860
going to be more effective if you're trying to spit into someone's face than one mask. But show me the
00:21:48.660
data that says if people wear three masks, the COVID cases are going to go down. Is that common sense?
00:21:54.060
I don't think that's common sense at all. I mean, it wasn't common sense back in March when Dr.
00:21:58.300
Fauci said, basically, you're an idiot if you even wear a mask. But now we're being told to layer
00:22:05.620
up on masks. I am excited for when they say that we need to sleep in masks or when we need to wear
00:22:11.900
a plastic bag over our heads before we step outside and just breathe deeply. That's probably
00:22:16.080
going to be the next step in all of this, just to make sure we don't spread the virus. We have lost
00:22:21.580
all attachment to reality, all attachment to science, all attachment to data in all of this.
00:22:27.780
Everything has just become a political symbol. I'm not saying masks have no effect. There was a
00:22:33.520
big, I think it was a Danish study that was looking at the effectiveness of masks. And they basically
00:22:42.980
said, look, it's not going to protect you to wear a mask and it might not slow the spread that much,
00:22:47.420
but it might protect you if you have it from giving it to someone else. And so that's kind of what we've
00:22:52.420
known for a long time, that if you have it, maybe even asymptomatically, if that's another thing we
00:22:57.580
don't know, how really pervasive is asymptomatic spread, that's another thing everyone's gone back
00:23:04.180
and forth on and we don't really know. But if you do have it, and if you can spread asymptomatically,
00:23:09.980
then wearing a mask could possibly stop you from spreading the virus. That's the extent scientifically
00:23:17.560
of the protection that masks wear. So people who are wearing masks when they're in their car
00:23:24.340
are wearing masks when they're walking by themselves. Now, if you're wearing a mask in
00:23:28.120
your car because you're trying to be extra precautious or extra cautious because you are
00:23:33.180
delivering someone's food or something, I appreciate that. And I understand. But people who are just
00:23:37.660
wearing masks in their car are wearing masks when they're on a walk, wearing masks when they're outside
00:23:42.340
by themselves, wearing masks when you are a far distance away from everyone. That has no scientific
00:23:48.480
grounding at all. And so I'm so tired of people saying that we're following the science,
00:23:53.020
that we're following the facts. No, we're not. We're not. Not on any of this stuff. I am very
00:23:59.440
happy for the development of the vaccine and how quickly it came about. Obviously, there was a lot of
00:24:05.380
science and a lot of innovation, a lot of capitalism that played into that, that I think is a testament to
00:24:12.840
the power of the modern mind and modern technology that I'm very thankful for. And apparently,
00:24:20.840
it does work in making people who get asymptomatic, but they're saying it doesn't
00:24:27.220
actually necessarily stop the spread of anything. And so a lot of people are like, well, then why are
00:24:33.020
we even, why are we even doing any of this? If that's not the thing that's going to end all of
00:24:38.840
our social distancing and end all of our remote learning and end all of our mask wearing, then what
00:24:44.220
is? Because viruses are going to virus like the flu evolves. It changes into different strains every
00:24:51.420
year and we have to deal with it every year. People die from the flu every year. People die
00:24:56.680
from a variety of viruses every year. So what's going to stop it? Are we just going to have to live
00:25:02.240
with it? If that's the case, if we're just going to have to eventually live with it and understand that
00:25:06.520
not everyone's going to get the vaccine, some people are going to get the vaccine, but even if people
00:25:10.600
do get the vaccine, that it's still going to spread. We're not going to wear masks forever.
00:25:14.920
Like, I know that people do that in some Asian countries, but we're not some Asian countries.
00:25:19.580
Like, we're not going to do that forever. Kids can't remote learn forever. We can't be isolated
00:25:23.880
forever. You can't go to church virtually forever. Once again, progressivism and progressive policies
00:25:30.000
get human nature wrong. You are a whole person. That's what I've said from the beginning. You are an
00:25:34.500
entire person. You're not just a body. While I do want to protect people from getting sick as far as
00:25:39.920
we can, I know people who have gotten COVID. It's been very serious that they've almost died. They've
00:25:46.000
been on the verge of death. They've had to go to the hospital. They've been hooked up to, or actually,
00:25:50.080
I don't know anyone personally that's been hooked up to a ventilator, but they've gone to the ICU.
00:25:54.480
They have been released and they've gotten worse and they are on bed rest and all of the stuff.
00:25:59.680
I know people who have gotten it really, really bad. I know people who have had really mild cases
00:26:04.520
as well, but I'm aware of how severe it can be. And I want to protect people from that.
00:26:08.480
I don't want old people to get it. I don't want immunocompromised people to get it. I don't
00:26:12.160
want anyone to die from this. And of course, I'm going to be as respectful and as loving and as
00:26:16.560
sympathetic as I possibly can and take any reasonable and data-driven scientific precautions
00:26:21.780
that I can to protect other people from that. But people aren't just a body. There's a reason why
00:26:26.940
suicides are so far up, why overdoses are so high up. There is a reason why kids are struggling
00:26:35.700
mentally and emotionally right now. There's a reason why people are struggling spiritually and
00:26:40.120
mentally right now. Because we're not just bodies. We're not just these materialist beings as secular
00:26:45.780
humanism thinks. We have souls. We have hearts. We have minds. We have a million different needs
00:26:51.400
that we have to cater to that are only found sometimes through in-person fellowship and community
00:26:57.500
and time that's spent with family and friends and church and counseling and school and all of these
00:27:02.100
things that make society survive and thrive. We can't survive like this, especially not in America.
00:27:07.580
We're not the same as Asian countries. We're not the same as other cultures. We have our own culture.
00:27:11.760
And part of that is community. And people will take the precautions that they need to take to protect
00:27:16.520
the vulnerable people around them. But when we are constantly seeing competing narratives about
00:27:22.020
lockdowns and school closures and wearing masks and the effectiveness of vaccines, and when things are
00:27:28.660
so politicized and they're not driven by science, from the White House to the media to Dr. Fauci,
00:27:34.320
of course, you're going to get a lot of frustrated people. You're going to get a lot of conspiracy
00:27:38.580
theories, unfortunately. And it's going to be very counterproductive if our goal is actually to keep
00:27:44.520
people healthy and to keep society going. Now, I want to talk a little bit more about this question
00:27:52.280
of vaccines. Because I've been getting a lot of questions from you guys. When am I going to talk about
00:27:57.580
this? When am I going to talk about the, when am I going to talk about whether or not Christians
00:28:03.680
should get this vaccine? And here's the problem. Well, here's why people are asking that. It's not
00:28:07.880
just because of vaccines in general, okay? So people who are listening to this, I'm not talking about
00:28:12.980
anti-vaxxers, people who are against vaccines in general, who think all vaccine manufacturers are
00:28:18.920
out to get them and are filling their bodies with poison and are causing all kinds of mental
00:28:24.900
disabilities and fetal, you know, deformities and things like that. I'm not talking about those
00:28:30.820
people. The people who are asking me if Christians should take the vaccine are okay in general with
00:28:36.540
vaccines. They're okay with modern medicine. They're not non-medical interventionists, but they're
00:28:42.380
looking at some of the stuff and they're asking some questions, which I think is good. Like, isn't that
00:28:48.700
part of being pro-science is asking questions? Like, can we honestly say that the medical community has
00:28:54.540
always gotten things right? No, of course, of course not. I mean, we know that for a fact that
00:29:00.240
some vaccines we thought that would work and then they caused adverse reactions that were really bad
00:29:05.340
and it was pulled off market. There have been several vaccines in the past 30 years, or I would
00:29:09.820
say a couple that I can think of off the top of my head, three that I can think of that off the top of
00:29:14.520
my head where it had to be taken off market after it was realized that people were having very adverse
00:29:19.600
reactions. There was the original rotavirus vaccine, which was really not that long ago,
00:29:26.340
about 20 years ago, it was causing problems like intestinal blockage in the infants that were taking
00:29:35.180
this vaccine. And so they had to reformulate it. They had to take it off the market. The same thing
00:29:40.000
with a certain kind of DTaP vaccine. I think it was in the 80s and 90s and then before that in the 60s and
00:29:46.260
70s, it was, I think, a kind of flu vaccine that was causing a lot of Bell's palsy that had to be
00:29:52.900
taken off the market. And so it's okay for people to ask questions, like to just look throughout
00:29:58.540
history and say, okay, there's been some problems. There was one point that people were saying that
00:30:02.620
it was fine for women who were pregnant to drink alcohol and to smoke cigarettes. Like there was a
00:30:08.680
time that, you know, we didn't have sunscreen because we didn't know that UV rays could be damaging
00:30:14.420
to your skin. There have been times, and if you know anything about the history of birth in the
00:30:21.000
United States, you know how many times people have been wrong. The medical community has been wrong.
00:30:27.040
For example, women who had VBACs in the late 90s, so that is vaginal birth after cesarean, in order to
00:30:34.080
induce their labor, they were given something called side attack. Well, side attack, you're not, now we know,
00:30:39.740
you should not be given if you are trying to have a vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery because
00:30:45.560
it increases your risk a lot of having a uterine rupture during birth. That was happening in the
00:30:53.460
late 90s. That's not even that long ago. And so the medical community had to realize, okay, we were wrong
00:30:59.540
on that. We didn't test that correctly. We had a false hypothesis or whatever it is, and now we
00:31:04.660
changed it. So the advancements in modern medicine have not been hindered by curious people, have not
00:31:12.860
been hindered by people's skepticism or curiosity about what the medical community has said or even
00:31:17.960
about vaccines. It's actually been advanced that way. That's good. Like, we should be asking questions,
00:31:22.860
so please don't shut down questions, real legitimate questions about things like vaccines. That's why I
00:31:29.140
talked to two people. I talked to Paul Offit a couple years ago, and I also talked to Dr. Bob Sears,
00:31:35.700
and I asked them about both sides of the vaccine debate, not from a Christian perspective, but
00:31:40.960
just in general about the efficacy and the safety of vaccines. And they had two different approaches,
00:31:46.200
and I wouldn't say Dr. Sears is an anti-vaccine guy, but he's more vaccine hesitant and is more
00:31:52.180
sympathetic to people who are anti-vaccines. And of course, Paul Offit is very pro-vaccine,
00:31:56.360
has helped in the manufacturing of, or in the, not the manufacturing, but the research and the
00:32:02.260
development of vaccines. So I wanted to give two different sides to that because I think there are
00:32:07.380
quite a few sides to it. And I just hate that this is, yet again, one of those conversations that we
00:32:12.260
are being told in so many circles not to pay attention to, that we shouldn't ask questions,
00:32:16.620
that we shouldn't talk about it at all, that we should just nod our heads and accept whatever Big
00:32:20.920
Brother says in regards to COVID, in regards to the lockdowns, in regards to what the politicians say,
00:32:27.300
in regards to the vaccine, in regards to what Biden says. And I'm just saying, I think it's okay
00:32:32.400
for us to approach things critically. And I don't like conspiracy theories. I really don't. And I try
00:32:37.940
my hardest on this show to stop conspiracy theories before they grow wild, or while I still can,
00:32:46.560
I don't have all the power in the world to do that. But so I'm not talking about conspiracy theories.
00:32:51.180
I'm not talking about going off the deep end. I'm just talking about thinking and speaking
00:32:53.840
critically about this kind of stuff. So from a Christian perspective, the COVID vaccine. Now,
00:33:00.360
the reason why people are talking about the ethics of this and the biblical morality of this is because
00:33:07.560
the vaccine structure relied upon the cell line of HEK-293, which originated with an aborted baby.
00:33:17.500
Now, this was an aborted, a baby that was aborted back in the 1960s, I believe, in the Netherlands.
00:33:27.780
And so there are Christians who are saying, yes, it's totally fine to get the vaccine. And there are
00:33:33.540
Christians who are not. So I want to read you two different sides of this argument from two people
00:33:37.360
that I really, really respect, two Christians that I respect. So Albert Moeller, he argues in his
00:33:45.440
podcast, The Briefing, he argues that, yes, it is okay for Christians to get this particular vaccine.
00:33:53.280
This is not the only vaccine that was derived from fetal cell lines. So he says on his podcast,
00:34:00.200
a horrifying wrong was done in using, obviously, the fetal cells for the development of vaccine.
00:34:06.060
But he says that does not mean that good cannot come from harm, even as it is a good tainted by
00:34:12.740
the realities of a sinful world. This idea is expressed for Christians as the doctrine of
00:34:16.920
double effect. Some actions have more than one effect. For Christians, the primary intention
00:34:21.560
must aim at virtue and good. The intention behind an act must never seek harm or evil or any moral
00:34:27.100
reality and outcome against God's will. We must never be complicit in intending sin. And certainly,
00:34:31.900
this applies to every dimension of abortion. But Albert Moeller says, the Christian also
00:34:37.360
acknowledges a potential double effect for every moral act can lead to consequences not intended,
00:34:42.360
but unavoidable. If the abortion of even a single human baby was required for this vaccine,
00:34:47.320
or if abortion derived materials were included in the vaccine, Christians would be rightly outraged.
00:34:51.880
But this is not the case with the COVID-19 vaccine. He says the vaccine can be taken by pro-life
00:34:56.980
Christians with legitimacy. So he says Christians need to understand that no step in producing these
00:35:02.200
vaccines had any direct involvement in an abortion of a single child. There is also the issue of
00:35:08.120
proximity. The further you go in history, the harder it is to keep a clear line of culpability
00:35:12.800
and morally significant events. That said, the good news about the COVID-19 vaccines is that even these
00:35:18.580
cells, most importantly from HEK-293, were used to create the basic shape of the vaccine.
00:35:24.120
No fetal tissue was actually used. So he's saying that, yes, it uses this line from the 1960s in
00:35:33.120
the Netherlands. And yes, we oppose abortion, but there was no actual fetal tissue that was used in
00:35:39.540
this particular vaccine. And I think he also goes on to argue that while the act of an abortion was wrong
00:35:46.900
and using the cells from this aborted baby was wrong, there is good that is now able to come
00:35:54.540
out of this several decades later and that Christians are able to take the vaccine with
00:36:01.200
integrity because of that. And the farther and farther we are removed from the original act of
00:36:06.760
abortion, the more difficult it is to make the case that someone is actually morally responsible for
00:36:12.400
actually taking the vaccine. I don't know if he would also argue, but it sounds like this is where
00:36:17.780
he could possibly go, that there is something redemptive and there is actually something good
00:36:25.560
that is coming and something life-saving that is coming from an act, abortion, that we see as
00:36:30.780
egregious, that we know to be murder. And so that, I think, is what he is saying in double effect.
00:36:36.920
Now, John Piper, someone else I very much respect, would disagree with this. He says that we should
00:36:43.540
not take the vaccine that was derived from those fetal cell lines because, number one, we should
00:36:50.680
never do evil that good may come. He cites Romans 3.8, some of Paul's adversaries accused him of doing
00:36:56.780
evil that good may come. Paul responded to this that it was a slanderous charge. So it's bad to do evil
00:37:02.180
just that good may come. Now, I think Albert Moeller would probably say that someone is not actually
00:37:09.400
doing evil by taking this vaccine, but actually that God is making something good out of something
00:37:16.680
that was originally sinful. John Piper goes on to say, we value Christ and his kingdom more than
00:37:24.240
security or health. And he says, we testify to the sanctity of life. He also says, God blesses
00:37:30.640
principled action in his name. So he says, look, people aren't going to understand why you're not
00:37:35.880
taking the vaccine, but we can have no part in what Ephesians calls the unfruitful works of darkness.
00:37:40.800
Like we can have no part in any kind of industry or any kind of process that props up the abortion
00:37:47.040
industry or seems to sanction abortion or seems to justify abortion or say that abortion was a necessary
00:37:54.660
evil for the good consequences that came. That is John Piper's argument. Both of these are solid
00:38:00.280
Christian men. They're solid Christian intellectuals. They've thought a lot about
00:38:04.140
this subject, but they land in different places. Whereas John Piper would say that it doesn't matter
00:38:10.020
the effect of something like the vaccine. If it was derived from fetal cell lines, then Christians
00:38:16.060
shouldn't have any part of that because we shouldn't have any part of evil. Whereas Albert
00:38:19.840
Moeller, I think, I hope these are accurate summaries of their arguments. He would say, look, I mean,
00:38:25.900
it's a gracious blessing that something good is coming out of something that was derived from a
00:38:32.520
baby that was evilly and tragically aborted. I understand both arguments very well. And I know
00:38:40.180
you guys are dying for my opinion. You guys ask me about my personal opinion on this all the time.
00:38:44.900
I will refrain from giving it. And I would, I'll put these two articles in the description of this
00:38:52.560
episode because I do think that it's something that you need to think through yourself. And just
00:38:57.000
one thing I would encourage you once again is to, um, it's to not feel bad for asking and not feel bad
00:39:03.340
for, for thinking and not feel bad for using your brain and doing your research. Now, again, we have
00:39:09.460
to be careful. Don't go down the, don't go to either extreme, one of conspiracy theory and the other side,
00:39:15.820
which just refuses to ask questions or even open the hood, uh, to look beyond what we see.
00:39:22.360
Again, uh, there is a temptation in all of this crazy time to not pay attention to things,
00:39:27.840
to just look away, to not ask questions, to not know what's going on. But for the sake of our
00:39:34.740
neighbors, for the sake of our kids, for the sake of ourselves, we have to pay attention and we have
00:39:39.740
to ask questions. And I know that I barely scratched the surface of what's going on in this
00:39:44.580
podcast. And, um, that's why I don't think, uh, I should be your sole source of information that you
00:39:50.500
should go beyond this podcast and you should think for yourself. That's what I hope that I empower and
00:39:55.140
encourage you to do is to think and to ask good questions and for us all to critically think and
00:40:00.260
for us to help each other as we navigate through this crazy post-truth, contradictory, chaotic
00:40:05.980
world. Thankfully, Christ is our anchor and his truth is our anchor in all of this. Um, okay.
00:40:11.680
Thank you guys so much for listening. We will be back here on Monday.