Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - February 08, 2021


Ep 365 | Best of the Super Bowl & the Worst of Progressivism


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per minute

178.61281

Word count

11,202

Sentence count

618

Harmful content

Misogyny

16

sentences flagged

Toxicity

10

sentences flagged

Hate speech

14

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of Relatable, I talk about the Super Bowl, some highlights, some lowlights, and some good tweets. I also talk about a recent article I read about children being the subject of progressive social experiments, and what we should make of it.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Monday. Hope everyone had a wonderful Super Bowl Sunday
00:00:15.440 and a great weekend. We are going to talk a little bit about the Super Bowl, some highlights,
00:00:21.380 some lowlights, some good tweets. That's just going to take up the first part of the episode
00:00:27.040 and then we're going to transition into stuff that's a little bit more serious. I want to talk
00:00:32.360 about this idea that I've been thinking about and unfortunately that I've been seeing
00:00:36.540 of children being the subject of progressive social experiments, how I've seen that play out
00:00:42.660 in the past few months and then what we as Christians should make of all of that.
00:00:47.360 First, I want to start with some of my favorites from the Super Bowl. So there were a few good
00:00:53.440 commercials. I know that conservative Twitter was very cynical about the Super Bowl commercials
00:00:58.420 that were being played for the most part. And of course, not all of them are good. And there are
00:01:02.980 many, many virtue signaling ones that are just ridiculous. But a lot of them were actually, 0.84
00:01:09.800 I thought, really funny or really clever. There was one that wasn't like, you know,
00:01:14.700 slappy or any funny, but I thought it was clever. And that was the Bud Light
00:01:17.740 Seltzer lemon commercial. And so I'm going to play a little bit of that now.
00:01:22.720 When did Bud Light Seltzer start making lemonade? Probably when 2020 handed us all those lemons.
00:01:28.320 2020 was a lemon of a year.
00:01:29.720 So I just thought it was cute. I mean, videos of people being hit in the face with things.
00:01:57.820 It's one of those things that never fails to make you laugh. I think the perfect balance of a good
00:02:04.880 Super Bowl commercial is just a little bit clever and just a little bit humorous, but not trying too
00:02:11.820 hard. When you try too hard and when you have people in it that are trying to be funny but aren't
00:02:17.720 funny, it just fails. I don't know if you guys saw the poor Oatly commercial. So Oatly, it makes oat milk
00:02:24.520 and we have Oatly oat milk in our refrigerator. And we watched the commercial and we were like,
00:02:29.700 I think we need to throw our oat milk out because it was so bad. I saw someone say, and I feel bad
00:02:37.260 for the guy. I feel bad. Everyone makes mistakes. But it was the CEO. He was playing on a keyboard,
00:02:43.560 which, you know, he didn't have a terrible voice, but he didn't have like, hey, you need to sing
00:02:47.880 in a Super Bowl commercial voice either. And he was singing this kind of like, I don't know,
00:02:52.820 theme song about his Oatly oat milk. And it was pretty strange. I'm pretty sure it actually said
00:02:58.900 like, it's milk except made from humans. And I'm like, well, it's not that kind of milk. Not that
00:03:05.220 kind of milk. That's different. It's oat milk. So it's made from oats. Maybe I remember that wrong,
00:03:10.900 but I remember thinking as I was watching it, okay, this is kind of strange. I saw someone say on Twitter,
00:03:15.600 like, this is what happens when people are too scared to tell the CEO that he has a bad idea.
00:03:20.540 Poor guy. So that was one of the worst commercials, I would say, but at least it wasn't virtue
00:03:26.240 signaling. Those are my least favorite kinds. There was one very virtue signaling one, and that was the
00:03:32.700 Bruce Springsteen. And this is a different kind of virtue signaling, okay? So typically virtue signaling
00:03:37.760 goes to the left. It is trying to signal that you as a company or you as an individual
00:03:43.040 are a performative activist, that you're going to say the right things. You're going to throw
00:03:46.920 the right images up on screen, and you're going to act like you are all for the social justice cause,
00:03:53.600 even as you are, for example, profiting from China like Amazon or Apple. I hate those kinds of
00:03:59.980 commercials. This was a different kind of virtue signal. And I'll talk about why I'm going to play
00:04:05.220 you a few seconds of this Bruce Springsteen Jeep commercial.
00:04:08.420 There's a chapel in Kansas, standing on the exact center of the lower 48. It never closes.
00:04:18.380 All are more than welcome to come meet here in the middle. It's not the property of just the
00:04:27.220 fortunate few. It belongs to us all. Whoever you are, wherever you're from, it's what connects us.
00:04:38.420 And we need that connection. We need the middle. We just have to remember the very soil we stand on
00:04:48.380 is common ground.
00:04:50.380 All right. So I liked it. When I was watching the commercial, I'm always skeptical whenever I see
00:04:56.600 any kind of patriotic seeming message come from a major company, because it seems like so much of
00:05:02.960 corporate America is just against any kind of patriotism. I'm going to be perfectly honest.
00:05:09.200 I didn't know who this guy was in the commercial. I had no idea. I thought this was just a random
00:05:16.600 actor that they had picked. And then people were saying, oh, it's Bruce Springsteen. I just didn't
00:05:22.880 know. I had no idea what the guy looked like. I know obviously who Bruce Springsteen is, but I just
00:05:28.420 didn't know what he looked like. And OK, I thought this was a pretty unifying message. I was surprised
00:05:34.960 by the Christian imagery in it that you guys saw. If you're watching this on YouTube, there was a
00:05:41.420 chapel which represents like the middle of the country. And inside it, there is, you know, the
00:05:46.640 shape of the United States with an American flag. And then it had a cross in front of it. And as soon
00:05:51.400 as I saw that, I said, oh, woke Twitter, woke Christian Twitter is going to be so mad. They're 0.99
00:05:57.480 going to say this is Christian nationalism. And so I typed in Christian nationalism on Twitter,
00:06:03.020 Christian nationalism Jeep, just to see. And I was not disappointed. Immediately, there were hundreds,
00:06:09.960 if not thousands of tweets saying Jeep just put up a Christian nationalist commercial. And I am so mad
00:06:16.560 as if you're not allowed to put up a cross in the United States of America. And so Twitter is very
00:06:23.300 predictable. Segments of Twitter, including conservative Twitter, are very predictable in
00:06:28.300 their takes on things. And I just knew that the mixing of the American flag and Christian symbolism
00:06:35.300 was going to make a lot of people mad. And indeed, it did. That's not what bothered me about this
00:06:40.980 commercial. And it wasn't the message that we need to come together and find common ground. I think
00:06:46.200 that's all well and good. I will say I was actually surprised. There's a portion of the commercial
00:06:51.600 where he picks up dirt and he says, we're all on common ground. And I was like, oh, we're on common
00:06:56.900 ground instead of stolen ground now. Okay. That's a new message that we're not typically hearing from
00:07:02.480 the mainstream. That's better, I would say. But here's the whole weird thing about it is that Bruce
00:07:09.960 Springsteen is an outspoken progressive, which is fine. Everyone has a right to their opinions,
00:07:15.320 even as a singer, you're allowed to say what you think about politics. But here's what he had to
00:07:20.700 say on October 29th, according to USA Today, quote, a good portion of our fine country to my eye has
00:07:27.200 been thoroughly hypnotized, brainwashed by a con man from Queens, said Springsteen on the Wednesday
00:07:33.020 episode of his serious XM East Street radio show from my home to yours. Didn't know that existed
00:07:39.160 either. You mix in some jingoism, some phony patriotism, fear of a black planet. I've never 0.95
00:07:45.260 heard that phrase in my life. Vanity, narcissism, paranoia, conspiracy theories, and a portion of
00:07:51.920 our nation undergoing mass delusions and teetering on violence. And you're left with the greatest threat
00:07:56.660 to democracy in my lifetime. How did he do it? So that is how he categorizes the tens of millions of
00:08:04.700 people who voted for Donald Trump. We're all hypnotized. We're all conned. We have all been
00:08:09.640 duped by this guy who just pretends to be a patriot and, of course, is some kind of vicious 0.99
00:08:15.580 racist. It's not because our values just don't align with Joe Biden. It's not because we have
00:08:20.520 policy disagreements. It's not because we don't like some of the things that we've already seen
00:08:25.340 Joe Biden execute. We knew he was going to execute in the first few days of his presidency.
00:08:29.460 It's because, of course, we have been hoodwinked. We have been tricked. And so that person who then
00:08:37.100 later in his show says that we need an exorcism from the White House. So, of course, comparing
00:08:43.180 Donald Trump to some kind of demon, some kind of demonic force, that person who said that in late
00:08:49.560 October is now doing a commercial with Jeep saying that we need to come together and find common
00:08:55.940 grounds. I mean, as we've been saying for the past few months or, yeah, I guess it's been a few
00:09:00.720 months. It's crazy that it's been that long since the election. The people who supported Biden have
00:09:05.720 been saying, let's come together. Let's come together. Meanwhile, constantly chastising us and
00:09:11.500 categorizing us, everyone who voted for Trump, the tens of millions of us, as racist, white supremacist, 0.95
00:09:18.440 uh, domestic terrorist enablers, uh, people who have been conned and tricked. And so how are we 0.83
00:09:25.660 supposed to, how are we supposed to unite with people who think of half the country in that way
00:09:31.360 and who feel some sense of moral superiority and have since the 2016 election toward people who voted
00:09:37.280 differently? There hasn't, it doesn't seem to be, there doesn't seem to be even a slight willingness
00:09:43.620 by a lot of people, especially in the media class to say, okay, how is it that so many people could
00:09:48.960 vote for someone who is so scandalous in a lot of ways? Why is it that so many evangelicals voted for
00:09:54.880 someone who ostensibly is against a lot of our values, at least in his personal life? It's not
00:10:01.260 just because we pretend that he didn't have moral issues. It's not because we pretend like he's some
00:10:07.240 perfect person. Maybe you could seek some understanding and understand the issues, the policies that we
00:10:12.760 actually care about and what we just can't bring ourselves to vote for in a democratic candidate.
00:10:17.780 But there's been none of that. There's been no attempt at reconciliation. There's been no attempt
00:10:22.700 at understanding. It's just, oh, yep, they're all racist. Let's, uh, reprogram them. I think that was 0.98
00:10:29.420 AOC's words. Um, and, uh, let us, let's kind of re-educate and let us make sure, or deprogram them
00:10:38.460 rather. Um, and let us make sure that they're no longer believing in Trump's tricks, not understanding
00:10:44.780 that we are human beings with agency and with plenty of understanding of what's going on. But
00:10:50.120 Bruce Springsteen represents that kind of people who thinks that he can call half of the country, 0.53
00:10:56.580 terrible, awful bigots who have been tricked. And then a couple months later say that we need to come
00:11:01.500 together and try to use middle America and Christianity in the American flag to do the very 0.60
00:11:08.460 thing that he was accusing Donald Trump of doing, which is showing phony patriotism and using, uh,
00:11:16.020 what he thinks is going to attract conservative America to come to the middle, which is some
00:11:21.660 superficial form of Christianity. I mean, he is actually doing the very thing that he accused
00:11:28.700 Republicans and Donald Trump of doing to attract the conservative and the evangelical vote. So
00:11:33.820 that was my problem with the commercial. It was a good commercial. Other than that,
00:11:37.960 why did they pick this guy who literally said that the white house needed to be exercised
00:11:43.260 just a couple of months ago? Um, okay. Now to another, uh, another commercial that I did like.
00:11:50.260 So the Bud Light Seltzer commercial I thought was cute and I liked it. The Bruce Springsteen commercial
00:11:55.120 wanted to like it, didn't end up liking it for the reasons I listed. And then
00:11:58.540 this commercial was probably my favorite commercial. And I'll tell you why, after I play a snippet of
00:12:04.140 it, it is the Toyota Olympic commercial.
00:12:17.740 Mrs. Long? Yes?
00:12:19.740 We found a baby girl for your adoption, but there's some things you need to know.
00:12:25.780 She's in Siberia and she was born with a rare condition.
00:12:28.740 Her legs will need to be amputated. I know this is difficult to hear. Her life, it won't be easy.
00:12:41.660 So I thought that this just sent a very good pro-life message, pro-adoption message. Now I'm sure
00:12:48.920 that that is not the message that the Olympics nor Toyota, uh, were trying to convey. But, um,
00:12:56.300 this woman who didn't have, uh, didn't have full legs, she was adopted by this family and then turned 1.00
00:13:04.000 out to be a very successful swimmer. I mean, that represents what the pro-life, what the anti-abortion,
00:13:10.900 if you want to call it that side believes about human life. Uh, not just that we all have the
00:13:17.800 potential to be Olympic swimmers, because that's not where we derive human value from. We don't derive
00:13:23.440 human value from how successful they're going to be. We derive human value from this idea that we
00:13:30.200 all have inherent worth as individuals from the moment of conception. We are not just, um, clumps
00:13:36.600 of cells. We're not just matter. We're not just potential humans, but we are humans and we are
00:13:41.220 people at that time. And we are made in the image of God. We have purpose, but this commercial does show
00:13:48.120 what happens when you choose not to waste a life, when a life is redeemed, when it's pulled up from
00:13:54.160 what seems like a despairing, desperate situation. And someone has given love, someone has given
00:13:59.740 acceptance, someone has given a chance who knows what that person can accomplish. And again, I'm not
00:14:05.060 saying that accomplishment is the reason that we are pro-life and against abortion, but it, it does make
00:14:10.520 you wonder how many babies have been aborted who could have grown up to do something like that,
00:14:16.780 who would have grown up to be an incredible doctor or an incredible researcher or an incredible
00:14:22.760 statesman or Congresswoman or amazing mom or amazing teacher or incredible loyal friend. Who knows
00:14:30.960 how many lives and how many people we have taken out and placed on the altar of convenience. And this is
00:14:37.220 just such a good reminder of what happens when we take a chance on people, when we love people,
00:14:42.920 when we accept people. And, um, when we decide to choose love instead of, instead of fear and man,
00:14:51.720 all of you parents out there who have adopted kids, whether it's here or abroad, whether it's kids with
00:14:57.500 special needs or just a child who needed a home. Thank you so much. Thank you for the example that you
00:15:04.880 set. Thank you for the love that you give. Um, of course, you know, and I hope everyone knows that
00:15:10.760 adopted parents are every bit of a parent is a, as a biological parent is. And there are some people
00:15:16.400 that only have adopted children and some people that have biological and adopted children. There
00:15:20.660 are some parents who are incredible foster parents. And I think that the parent child relationship
00:15:27.360 obviously is such a wonderful depiction of the gospel. When you have a child, for example,
00:15:33.520 like me, like a biological child, you realize the moment they lay that child on your chest,
00:15:39.740 what it means to have sacrificial love in a way that you didn't really understand just when you
00:15:44.960 got married. I mean, yes, you love your spouse so much and you lay your life down for your spouse in
00:15:49.980 a metaphorical sense and for the husband in a spiritual sense. But when they lay that baby on your chest,
00:15:55.360 you feel this tidal wave of overwhelming love. And you realize all in a moment that you
00:16:01.760 would die a thousand deaths if it just meant the wellbeing of that child, all the hopes and the
00:16:08.960 fears that you had for your own life are then transferred onto your child and their happiness
00:16:14.400 and their success and their wellbeing becomes your highest hope and their failure becomes your biggest
00:16:22.360 fear. And it is that amazing, just a rush of sacrificial selfless love, this heartbreaking,
00:16:29.520 gut-wrenching love that you feel for your child that gives you just a snippet into just a small
00:16:36.980 glance into the father's love for us. And also what it must have been like for God to send his only
00:16:45.980 son, the son that he loved so much, his only begotten son, as John 3, 16 says, to die a gruesome
00:16:53.020 death that he didn't have to die on our behalf. Like how hurtful, how hard must that have been for
00:17:00.000 the father? But also how much did he love us, his children, that he would do that, that he would
00:17:05.820 allow that kind of sacrifice. So of course, the parent-child relationship, the biological parent-child
00:17:12.100 relationship is a depiction of the gospel, but so is the adopted child-parent relationship,
00:17:18.480 because we are told that God adopted us as Gentiles, those of us who aren't a part of
00:17:24.380 Israel, who aren't a part of the Jewish people, the original chosen people, we Gentiles have been
00:17:30.900 grafted in. We have been adopted through Jesus Christ to become part of God's family. That is the
00:17:39.020 gospel, that God took us from a place that was far off. He took us from a place of despair when we were
00:17:45.180 dead in our sin, according to Ephesians 2. It made us alive together with Christ. By grace,
00:17:50.440 we have been saved, that chapter says. And that is what adoption looks like. We are now a part of his
00:17:55.720 family. We are now heirs with him. We get to enjoy all of the pleasures and all of the mercies and all
00:18:02.720 of the blessings of being in his home, not because of anything we did, not because we earned it, but
00:18:08.980 because God loves us so much as our father. And for us Gentiles, as our adopted father, we are
00:18:16.440 adoptees. And so every kind of parenthood is such a beautiful depiction of the gospel and God's love
00:18:24.320 for us. And I know that is certainly not what Toyota was after when they were creating this
00:18:29.820 commercial, but it's just a reminder to me the beauty of adoption, the beauty of family, the beauty
00:18:34.940 of parenthood, which we're actually going to talk about in just a little bit too when we get to the next.
00:18:38.980 segment of our podcast. But good job, Toyota. Good job on that commercial. I hope that it resonated
00:18:47.460 with a lot of people. And I hope it just reminds us of the, not just the gospel, but also the
00:18:54.460 importance of our cause, of the pro-life cause, of the anti-abortion cause, to remind people, to show
00:19:00.180 people that adoption is an option and that all life matters because it does, even the smallest life.
00:19:07.560 All right. Into a little bit less serious. Unpopular opinion of mine. I like, I liked the weekend
00:19:17.160 performance. Okay. I know that it wasn't as good as Beyonce. There wasn't as much dancing. It wasn't
00:19:24.380 as good as, uh, what's his name? Bruno Mars. Probably better than Maroon 5, in my opinion. But I, I mean,
00:19:32.920 I'm not like the, the biggest, I don't want to say I'm not a fan of music, but you know, back in the
00:19:38.920 day, back in high school and college, I actually cared about, um, I actually cared about like the
00:19:44.380 latest music and, and things like that. I actually invested time in thinking about what music I wanted
00:19:49.120 to listen to and like curating podcasts and burning CDs back in the day. Um, but I, I obviously don't do
00:19:56.580 any of that anymore. I just listened to Christian music and then whatever comes on, but I actually
00:20:01.900 like the weekend. Like, I think that he has a lot of really good songs. They're just catchy and they're
00:20:08.480 not just catchy. They're, I don't know. They're unique. They're different. I was trying to explain
00:20:12.120 it to my husband last night and, um, I, I couldn't really put into words why I like the weekend and why
00:20:17.620 I think he's so talented because I really do. The bottom line is, is he's not an amazing dynamic
00:20:22.740 performer because he can't dance and that's a problem, but he did a really good job singing
00:20:28.380 live. I mean, in that kind of situation, I think that's very difficult. I thought it was a pretty
00:20:32.720 good show. Um, like I said, I liked the weekend and so I was like glued to the TV during that time
00:20:38.240 and I was actually looking forward to it. I might be some of like one of the only people who thinks
00:20:42.800 that because apparently Twitter didn't like it. I liked it. I thought it was good. Um, I don't really
00:20:48.460 have any comments about the football game itself. You guys don't come to me for football
00:20:52.100 commentary and man, that's good. If the blaze came to me and was like, Allie, we got, we need
00:20:56.840 you to put out some, some more football content. That would be a huge problem because guys, I
00:21:02.820 don't understand football and I'm not just trying to be typical girl. I really wish I did. It's
00:21:10.040 one of those things for me that I, my brain just is like, nope, I don't want to know that. I don't
00:21:17.060 want to know that I've, I get it generally. Obviously I know what's going on generally,
00:21:22.080 generally, I get what they're trying to do. But every time I ask a question to my husband
00:21:26.880 of like, okay, what is this? What does it mean when they say this? What are they trying
00:21:30.520 to do here? Why is that good? My brain, it's just like, nope, I know you just asked this
00:21:35.140 question, but I'm not going to take in the answer. I don't know why my brain does that.
00:21:38.340 It's the same thing with, it's the same thing with certain, certain aspects of math, not all
00:21:43.140 math, but math was just not my subject of expertise growing up. And my parents would always
00:21:47.820 say, stop saying you're bad at math. You're just, you're just saying that and it's coming
00:21:52.720 true. And I'm like, I don't know how to explain this to you, but my brain shuts off when I try to
00:21:59.000 do a math problem, like a word problem, something beyond like algebra two, because leading up to
00:22:04.640 that is okay. But anything more complicated than that, my brain just shuts off. And it's the same
00:22:10.000 thing with football. So I'm not going to give you any commentary whatsoever on the football game.
00:22:15.280 Thank goodness you guys don't come to me for that. But I mean, I just think about Tom Brady
00:22:20.440 and I know this is not original commentary. I know, but how, like, I don't think that he's an
00:22:26.960 arrogant person, but how arrogant do you have to be to say, okay, I was with this team for a very long
00:22:32.600 period of time. The Patriots, who didn't even make the playoffs this time now that I don't play with 0.93
00:22:37.480 them. And then this team, the, the Buccaneers, I, or do people just call them the Bucs? I don't
00:22:42.680 know who were kind of mediocre. Like they weren't that good. Now I'm on this team and now they won
00:22:49.520 the Superbowl. It really is just me. Like maybe before when he was playing for the Patriots, he
00:22:54.340 could just say, okay, you know, it's not just me as the franchise is the whole team in general,
00:22:58.260 but then he leaves and they do bad. And he goes to another team that was doing bad and they're doing
00:23:02.160 good. Like, it'd be really hard not to just like go home and be like, yeah, you know what? I am
00:23:06.240 the greatest of all time. It'd be really hard. I think for him to keep his humility, but you know,
00:23:12.220 I like Tom Brady. I know people love to hate Tom Brady. I think people love to hate excellence,
00:23:17.820 but being 43 years old and working as hard as he does, he also seems like a genuinely good person.
00:23:23.120 Like the stories that I hear about him of how he really treats his fellow team members, like their
00:23:28.760 family and how he really takes them in and seems to love them well and encourage people. Well,
00:23:34.340 I think that speaks to a level of confidence that a lot of really good athletes, it seems
00:23:38.920 like just, they just don't have. And I think it's not just that he's a good player. It seems
00:23:43.480 like, and this is what I've talked about with my husband because I asked my husband about this
00:23:47.280 kind of stuff. And he said, it's also just his leadership abilities. Like some people are
00:23:51.740 just really good leaders. They know how to make a team work together toward a goal. And we should
00:23:56.740 all aspire to that. We should all want to be that kind of leader that people want to follow
00:24:00.880 that kind of person that people are like, you know what? I, I trust you. And it's not necessarily,
00:24:06.400 I know that he's also a really good football player. I understand that, but I don't think
00:24:10.080 it's necessarily be just because of that. I think that there is something else that maybe can't even
00:24:15.980 be taught that he has that makes him such an important leader on a team. Um, speaking of leaders
00:24:24.700 leaders and bad leaders, um, and people who are very different than Tom Brady, uh, people were
00:24:32.440 also talking about Colin Kaepernick on Twitter, Mariah Carey, her tweet went viral. She said that
00:24:37.980 it's, I guess the day after the Superbowl today, or I don't know, maybe she tweeted it yesterday that
00:24:42.920 it's Colin Kaepernick appreciation day. I don't really understand why, again, not a football expert,
00:24:50.460 but from what a lot of you guys tell me, from what I've heard from people who do understand football
00:24:55.300 is that he wasn't very good. Like I, I, maybe he, I'm sure he was good. And I know that there's some
00:25:02.280 like debate over that, but apparently he wasn't very good. And there are a lot of people on the
00:25:07.320 left who hail him as a hero for kneeling for the national anthem. And I will credit him with saying
00:25:12.100 that he did kind of start a movement that people weren't really kneeling or doing the kind of what I
00:25:18.300 call performative activism that he was doing, uh, before that. And apparently he does actual
00:25:23.940 substantive activism too, with the causes that he believes in. But I don't, I still don't understand
00:25:29.540 why he is hailed as a hero. I mean, he wore socks with cops depicted as pigs on them. He, um, 0.95
00:25:39.540 you know, acts like he has been victimized. Like he has, um, been wronged by these different
00:25:46.260 organizations, including the NFL. Like he has just had such a rough go of it because of,
00:25:51.400 you know, deciding to, to speak out when in fact, he's made millions and millions of dollars as a
00:25:58.400 spokesperson for Nike. Like when it comes down to it, he really hasn't sacrificed. Like I guarantee you,
00:26:03.900 he makes more money doing what he does now than he would have probably being a third string
00:26:09.520 quarterback. Again, you can correct me if I'm wrong. Those of you who know more about football than I do,
00:26:13.460 but, um, I mean, he's probably has more notoriety and is more famous and has more of a platform and
00:26:22.100 more influence and more money now than he ever would have if he had just, you know, stood for
00:26:28.220 the national anthem and continued to play football or if the NFL had tolerated what he was doing and
00:26:33.980 continue to give him a spot. But I mean, he, I, you probably remember that whole like tryout thing
00:26:39.960 from a couple of years ago, or maybe it was last year where he had like his own camera crew come
00:26:45.800 and like film him try out for certain teams and he didn't make the cut. I don't really know,
00:26:52.100 but the fascination and the idolatry surrounding this person, um, because of, because of things that
00:27:00.920 I just don't fully understand. Again, I'm not, I'm not saying that he didn't do anything. I understand
00:27:05.620 that he kneeled when no one else was kneeling. He raised awareness about a subject that of course,
00:27:09.900 a lot of people care about, but the way he went about it and how he has reacted since then and
00:27:15.460 how he has been rewarded since then, it just doesn't speak to this guy who has been so victimized that
00:27:21.280 we need to put on a pedestal and say that this is calling Kaepernick Appreciation Day. And he doesn't
00:27:26.040 have the same kind of characteristics of leadership. I don't think it doesn't seem like at all is some
00:27:31.080 of the most successful players do. Um, let's not pretend like he would have ever reached the level
00:27:37.720 of success of someone like Tom Brady talent wise, or just leadership wise. That's fine. You can
00:27:43.000 appreciate him. You like his politics. You like what he stands for. I just think the level of worship
00:27:48.480 of calling Kaepernick is very strange. It's a, it's, it's very, very strange. Okay. A couple more
00:27:54.480 things. There were some tweets that I thought were, uh, were kind of funny. And then we'll get into,
00:28:00.480 uh, the last 15 or so minutes of, of the podcast. Uh, probably, probably longer than that. We'll see.
00:28:07.680 Um, all right. So here's some funny tweets. This is a little, it's a little inappropriate,
00:28:13.420 but as I was saying, like the Superbowl commercials today are like, they can be so
00:28:18.660 virtue signally and like, no one's allowed to laugh at some of these commercials and they're just
00:28:23.200 so insufferable. Some of them. Um, and this person, I don't even know who he is. Mark, a G
00:28:30.240 someone on my timeline retweeted him. It said Superbowl commercial in 2021. Racism is a disease
00:28:36.540 of the soul. We at Arby's can do better. Superbowl commercial 1990s. Twins are hot because there's 0.97
00:28:42.280 two of them. I thought that was so funny and such, such a true contrast to where we used to be just
00:28:50.200 like not having to take everything seriously and to where we are now. These companies that we really
00:28:56.620 don't care what they think about these social justice issues. Like we don't care what Arby's
00:29:01.040 or Cheez-Its or whatever, what they think about politics. We've just want them to tell us about
00:29:06.740 like what food they offer. And we want them to make us laugh because they're not supposed to be a
00:29:11.220 serious, a serious company. Now they're taking these activist stances and it just seems so silly 0.90
00:29:17.400 in contrast with the, with the brand that they have. Um, and SNL actually parody, parody this as
00:29:25.220 well in a video. And I thought that it was funny. Um, there was this also, there was a Washington
00:29:30.620 post article that said the Buccaneers embody Tampa's love of pirates. Is that a problem?
00:29:36.820 And then it goes on to say how it's like politically incorrect to, I don't know, glorify piracy.
00:29:42.160 I'm not really sure the argument, but I thought Matt Walsh's response to it was funny. This is a
00:29:46.900 good point. I know many people who spent years swashbuckling on the high seas because of the way
00:29:52.380 piracy was normalized by professional sports teams. Very true. We all, we all know a swashbuckler who
00:29:58.960 said, you know what, if, if Tom Brady is going to normalize and glorify pirates, I'm going to go out
00:30:05.720 and get an eye patch. And I also am going to become a pirate on the high seas of the, of the coast of
00:30:13.720 Florida. Um, Dan rather posted this. He didn't mean for this to be funny, but I had a good chuckle.
00:30:19.180 Um, is it responsible having commercials showing people gathering in large groups without masks?
00:30:24.960 Well, I, I don't know, Dan rather, was it responsible for Doritos to imply that they could
00:30:29.380 take Matthew McConaughey from being 2d to 3d just by eating their chips? Was that responsible?
00:30:34.520 People might actually think that they are able to make flat Stanley into a real person. If they just
00:30:41.120 feed their flat Stanley 3d, uh, Doritos chips. Yes. I think it's highly responsible because it's a
00:30:48.900 fictional depiction. And by the way, at one point, like we're not going to wear masks anymore. That's,
00:30:56.220 I think that it would drive so many people insane. If even their forms of escapism,
00:31:02.620 like commercials and TV shows, if they all showed the dystopian reality that we're living in with
00:31:09.740 everyone wearing six masks and face shields while they're walking their dog, as Jill Biden recommended
00:31:15.920 that we do on Twitter. She said that we need to wear a mask even when we're outside walking or talk,
00:31:20.660 but this is the fall of the science administration. But Dan rather, because he cannot have fun. He's
00:31:27.760 actually allergic to fun and he's allergic to laughing and he's allergic to entertainment.
00:31:33.740 He has said that it is irresponsible for commercials, which are fiction, by the way. I don't know if you
00:31:40.620 guys see that. It's actually, it's not real. It's not, it's not happening. That it's irresponsible for
00:31:44.900 people to, um, to show large gatherings without masks. Oh goodness gracious. This virus has become a
00:31:53.080 disease of the mind for some people, a disease of the mind. All right. That's all of my, um,
00:31:59.980 very profound commentary on the, on the Superbowl. We kind of went, we kind of went a lot of different
00:32:06.720 places in those, in those past 30 minutes. I mean, we talked gospel, we talked adoption,
00:32:11.580 we talked anti-abortion, we talked Doritos. We went a lot of different places. Um, and now we're
00:32:18.860 going to switch gears entirely for the last portion of the podcast. All right. I want to
00:32:28.840 talk about this idea that I've been thinking about recently, and we might not be able to spend as much
00:32:33.360 time on it as I, as I want to, so that this podcast isn't an hour and a half long, but something I was
00:32:39.080 thinking about, and this kind of relates back to what we were talking about, about the importance of
00:32:43.480 the family, but just scrolling through Twitter over the weekend. And I saw a few different threads
00:32:49.300 about how children are suffering, um, through the COVID restrictions, not through COVID because most
00:32:56.580 children aren't suffering from COVID. Most young people aren't suffering from COVID. And if they do
00:33:01.100 get COVID, most young people, um, it's, it's a cold to them. Yes, there have been children who die.
00:33:07.460 Yes, there have, um, been rare instances of serious illness and hospitalization. I'm not discounting
00:33:13.060 that. I'm not minimizing that, but the vast majority of young people, um, are very minimally
00:33:19.140 affected by the virus. And so when I say that they've been affected by COVID, what I mean by that
00:33:23.820 is they've been really affected by the lockdowns. They've been really affected by the school closures
00:33:28.420 or the remote learning, or even just the lack of normalcy in their everyday lives. It's affected
00:33:33.360 the young minds and the psychological state of a lot of young people. And I started to think about
00:33:40.360 how children really the most vulnerable in general, but I would say in particular, children
00:33:45.560 are, are always the subject of progressive social experiments. And the reason why I say progressive
00:33:53.600 social experiments is because I would say conservatives just by nature, by definition,
00:33:57.840 don't experiment with, um, you know, social engineering, because, uh, we tend to believe that
00:34:06.400 we have like a teleological view of nature. Christians do that nature tells us something 0.99
00:34:11.740 about how society should be formed and how society should function. And we believe that when you go
00:34:17.280 out of that original teleological design of nature, that things tend to devolve and get worse.
00:34:23.320 Whereas progressives think something different. They think that's in the nature versus nurture
00:34:27.660 debate when it comes to how human beings are and how we should function, that it is almost all
00:34:34.220 nurture that there can be this kind of third party social engineer that, um, creates societies,
00:34:41.440 how they, how they want them to be created. So they think that human beings are able to adapt
00:34:47.280 to everything. Now, I would say the 20th century, when you look at communism and socialism and fascism,
00:34:53.040 trying to take root and then failing to be able to create any kind of surviving or thriving society,
00:34:59.560 and instead, uh, producing lots of suffering. I think that it goes against this kind of progressive,
00:35:06.140 uh, leftist notion of being able to construct society however you want to. And, uh, human
00:35:14.060 beings are just going to adapt to that. It just doesn't happen. Communism and socialism are outside
00:35:18.120 of human nature. They, they cause suffering because of that. This idea of personal and private property,
00:35:24.320 it's a part of human nature, this idea of earning a profit to be able to provide for yourself and to
00:35:29.700 provide for your family. It's part of human nature. You know how I know that not just because I, I think
00:35:35.160 that the Bible speaks to that because, uh, the laws that God created for Israel speak to that and speak
00:35:41.220 to human nature, the moral laws anyway, but also I've talked about this before. If you look at a place
00:35:46.680 like North Korea where capitalism is so adamantly propagandized against and communism is seen as,
00:35:54.380 um, as not just the picture of perfection, but the savior of North Korea and the savior of all
00:35:59.380 people, even while they're starving, what people resort to and have resorted to, it's been reported
00:36:04.580 in North Korea are these black markets, these capitalist markets where they buy and sell, they,
00:36:11.440 they trade food, they smuggle the food from China and then they trade it in these markets. And so
00:36:16.900 without having any knowledge at all of supply and demand, without having any training in
00:36:21.080 entrepreneurship, without having any affection whatsoever, uh, towards capitalism, people
00:36:27.780 naturally understand what it means, what supply and demand means, what it means to provide for your
00:36:33.440 family, what it means to make a profit, what it means to buy something, this kind of top-down
00:36:37.620 approach of the government is going to take care of you. It just goes against human nature.
00:36:41.440 And of course it goes against human nature in another way in that power corrupts and absolute
00:36:45.800 power corrupts. Absolutely. The more centralized and the bigger government power is, the more
00:36:51.000 corrupt it becomes. And we elect these bureaucrats on the basis of them taking care of people. But
00:36:56.640 then once they centralize and once they expand all of the power, they never, ever, ever deliver
00:37:03.340 the promises, uh, deliver on the promises that, um, got them elected. So that is, in my opinion,
00:37:10.660 I mean, that's a huge reason why I'm a conservative because this kind of progressive idea of, uh,
00:37:17.900 bureaucrats know better and they're able to kind of engineer society, how they see fit in a way that
00:37:24.040 fits their definitions of equity and fairness. It just doesn't work. It leads to corruption. It leads
00:37:28.740 to human suffering. Um, and I would say socialism and communism, all forms of totalitarianism,
00:37:36.800 collectivism, I would say fascism is included in that for the past 100 years shows that that social
00:37:42.700 experiment has failed. And yet we see over and over again, Marx is trying to revive those failed
00:37:49.220 philosophies, but it's not just in socialism and communism that we see these failed progressive
00:37:54.560 social experiments that I think predominantly end up affecting children who just can't defend
00:38:00.280 themselves, who are in so many of these cases, when these totalitarian regimes take over, they're
00:38:05.940 taken out of their homes. They're brainwashed. We see this of course, in 1984, we saw this in
00:38:11.640 Pol Pot's Cambodia. We saw this in Nazi Germany. We saw this in Mao's China, these children taken out 0.73
00:38:16.540 of their homes. They're indoctrinated to hate their parents, to hate the certain parts of the culture,
00:38:21.900 society, or history that the government wants them to hate. Um, they start thinking in the way that
00:38:28.260 the government wants them to think and they become these little spies. They become these little
00:38:31.940 soldiers, these little ideologues that are vessels for whatever government propaganda and government
00:38:37.600 purposes that these totalitarians want them to have. We've seen that throughout the 20th century.
00:38:42.820 So once again, I think children in those cases, um, and of course the elderly, the disabled,
00:38:48.460 those that society deems not as valuable, they always are the main victims of that.
00:38:53.240 But it's not just in that great sense of socialism and communism and progressivism in general.
00:38:58.980 It's also in the smaller, uh, the smaller ways that I think that even as conservatives, we kind of,
00:39:05.620 we kind of ignore because we see these as social issues. And I think even as conservatives,
00:39:11.360 we don't think about how social experiments, progressive social experiments affect kids. So we've already
00:39:18.120 talked about COVID and how the COVID restrictions are unfortunately, um, affecting children, how kids
00:39:25.080 are struggling with mental health. The hospitalization rate for kids as young as five, uh, with suicidal
00:39:31.520 thoughts and mental health issues has risen over the past year. Uh, kids, uh, their rates of depression,
00:39:38.060 their rates of anxiety, their rates of suicidal thoughts are all up. Um, unfortunately, this is
00:39:45.440 something that is going to be very difficult for parents to rectify when a child slides into depression
00:39:51.200 or when they, they, um, start to be tempted with those suicidal thoughts. It can be very difficult
00:39:56.360 to take a child out of that. I mean, we're talking about irreversible in some cases, irrevocable
00:40:01.300 damage that we are doing to children because they aren't allowed to have friendships like they're used
00:40:07.840 to having friendships. They're not used to being in a classroom and, and, um, having the kind of
00:40:13.800 social life that they're used to or having the kind of organization and predictability in their day
00:40:18.620 that they're used to, especially kids with special needs are suffering from that kind of thing. Um,
00:40:23.800 just to the normalcy and the routine of everyday life is gone for most of these kids and they are
00:40:30.120 suffering mentally. They're suffering psychologically. We are seeing kids killing themselves at almost
00:40:35.160 unprecedented rates in the past year because their normal way of life has just been swept
00:40:40.120 out from under them. And not for a second are these teachers unions who are refusing to teach
00:40:44.520 their classes, thinking about that. Because as I've talked about many times, teachers unions don't
00:40:48.760 care. They don't care about the students. They care about power and, uh, they don't even care about
00:40:54.560 their teachers. They care about power and all of the leaders that are kowtowing to the teachers
00:40:59.000 unions, refusing to allow the schools to open. They are exacerbating and they are,
00:41:05.160 uh, worsening this issue of children. We're talking little children suffering from suicidal
00:41:11.800 thoughts and mental health issues, not to mention all the education that's going to have been lost,
00:41:17.640 all the progress that's going to have been lost. And not to mention the kids who are already dealing
00:41:22.480 with domestic abuse situations now being made vulnerable for multiple hours, hours on end in a day,
00:41:29.000 um, to further abuse at the hands of either their parent or their uncle or their brother,
00:41:35.000 or whatever it is. We've also unfortunately seen the rates of child abuse and hospitalization
00:41:40.280 from child abuse, uh, go up in this past year. So children, once again, because they don't have the
00:41:47.380 power and they don't have the choice, they don't have the physical ability. They don't have the
00:41:51.480 mental ability to be independent and to, uh, you know, make some of their own choices. They are
00:41:57.080 at the mercy of the state. They are at the mercy, unfortunately, of these restrictions and regulations,
00:42:04.040 and they just don't have the ability to be able to process all of it. And I'm just afraid we're losing
00:42:09.480 an entire generation of kids. So this is yet another way that progressive social experiments,
00:42:15.000 that progressivism, in my opinion, just gets human nature wrong because it says, you know, people are
00:42:20.120 going to be able to adapt. And it's also this, it's also this misunderstanding of the human person
00:42:26.120 that in general, progressivism, because whether you identify as a Christian progressive or not,
00:42:31.480 what you may not understand is that progressivism is a secular worldview. It's a secular ideology.
00:42:36.560 It's a materialist ideology that sees human beings as just clumps of matter that again,
00:42:42.120 can be molded and are made malleable. However, uh, the people in charge want them to be made.
00:42:47.120 The reality is what we know as Christians, uh, is that we are whole people, that we are souls,
00:42:52.800 that we are hearts, that we are minds, um, that we have needs other than the physical.
00:42:57.940 So it's not always most important to just protect kids from a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.
00:43:04.960 That's not your highest priority when you're raising kids or you're thinking about education
00:43:09.160 or when you're thinking about the wellbeing of an entire generation, you have to think about their
00:43:13.280 mind. You have to think about their hearts. You have to think about their souls.
00:43:15.920 You have to think about all of the other needs that human beings need as people made in the image 0.93
00:43:21.800 of God. We are whole people and we are not meeting the needs of an entire generation. Now look,
00:43:26.820 as a conservative and someone who is generally against the public school system, because I don't
00:43:32.460 think that, I don't think that it's good. I'm not saying that all private schools are good. I'm not
00:43:37.580 saying that all charter schools are good. I just think that parents should be able to have a choice
00:43:41.620 if the public school in your area isn't working for you. I think it's better for Christian parents
00:43:45.960 to pull your kids out of public school, uh, to send them to a place where you at least have a
00:43:50.280 little bit more control and more say, uh, over the curriculum that they're learning. Unfortunately,
00:43:55.420 I think a lot of public education wants to make kids mindless activists rather than critical thinkers
00:44:00.700 with, um, a wide breadth of knowledge and understanding of, of a variety of subjects.
00:44:06.160 And so I of course think it's better for parents to homeschool for parents to send their kids to
00:44:11.160 some kind of classical Christian education, um, or to, uh, even a charter school, you have a little
00:44:17.460 more say in kind of how your child learns and what your child's, um, the kind of environment that your
00:44:24.820 child is, is in and what they are being indoctrinated with. But at the same time, I understand that's not
00:44:30.060 an option for everyone. And for the people that it's not an option for, I want them to be able to
00:44:34.180 go to school for all the reasons that we just listed. So this is another example, I think of
00:44:39.660 kids being the unfortunate, the unwilling subjects of progressive social experiments and suffering the
00:44:46.180 costs of it. Um, the other one that, uh, is very scandalous. I would say that even conservatives or
00:44:55.920 just people who, you know, identify as Republicans don't want to talk about. And I understand why,
00:45:01.220 because it is, um, very controversial, but I think the redefinition of the family is another way that
00:45:08.100 we are just saying, eh, kids are just going to be the subject of our social experiment. And we're
00:45:12.720 just going to kind of hope for the best. I mean, for all of human history, for all of human history,
00:45:18.200 uh, we have had a mom and a dad and a kid. So like the natural family has been the family that it was
00:45:26.820 supposed to be this way. It wasn't even a question. The idea of men and women being arbitrary categories
00:45:32.720 without any definition or without any implication of what their responsibilities would be was totally
00:45:38.400 foreign as a means of survival. Uh, men did what men's bodies do best, which is hunt and fight. Women 1.00
00:45:44.380 did what women, women's bodies do best, which is birth babies, raise children, create, nurture, 1.00
00:45:50.100 nourish, and beautify. Um, and yes, we don't have those exact survival needs in the United States.
00:45:56.540 Of course, uh, today we don't have the same demands as hunter-gatherers, but that doesn't mean that men
00:46:02.840 and women, um, are, are interchangeable. That doesn't mean that we're arbitrary. We are still different 1.00
00:46:09.300 down to our DNA. Our bodies are still different. Our physiology is still different. Our psychology is still
00:46:15.000 different. Our, our minds are different. How we function, how we think, what we want is
00:46:19.860 different. That doesn't mean that all men fit into one neat category or one neat stereotype and neither
00:46:25.520 do women, but physiologically, biologically, we are still men and women with certain functions. We offer
00:46:32.740 different things to society. We offer different things to family. And for us to say over just the
00:46:38.700 past few years that, Oh, actually those things don't matter that the natural family, which again,
00:46:44.680 for all of human existence for millennia has been, has been necessarily been a mom and a dad and kids,
00:46:52.600 we're just going to rearrange that because we've become too progressive for human nature. We've
00:46:57.640 become too progressive for science. We're going to rearrange that. We're not even going to ask the
00:47:02.520 question whether or not this has a consequence on kids. Like we're not even going to let ourselves
00:47:07.840 wonder, is there some purpose outside of biology or in addition to biology that kids would need a mom 0.99
00:47:14.500 and a dad? Like, is there something unique that moms offer? Is there something unique that fathers
00:47:21.680 offer that when we take at least one of those things away, there may be unintended bad consequences
00:47:28.100 on kids? Like we didn't even ask that. We just blew right past, Hey, how would this affect kids?
00:47:34.200 Like, are we even asking the question what happens when, for example, um, we have a child
00:47:40.960 whose biological mother, like the egg that that child came from is one woman. And then another 1.00
00:47:48.400 woman actually gestates the child has the child grow in her womb. And then that child is taken from 0.99
00:47:55.820 the mother whose womb he has been a part of for the last nine months and then given to two other 0.89
00:48:01.560 people. Like, are we even going to ask if there's any effect on that child whatsoever for that to be
00:48:09.160 how he or she was created? Like we haven't even asked that question. We've just thought, well, it's
00:48:14.000 possible. It's scientifically possible for us to manipulate the natural order this way. And so let's
00:48:20.140 just do it. Why not? Without even wondering, without even asking, Hey, is it better for kids to have a mom
00:48:28.700 and a dad? Does science tell us anything? Like does human history tell us anything? The hubris
00:48:33.820 that human beings have in the 21st century to say, you know what human history, how human beings
00:48:40.420 naturally function, that doesn't have any effect whatsoever on what is actually good and right and
00:48:47.260 true. And what is actually beneficial for kids who, by the way, are future adults, which means they
00:48:51.780 make up society. Like, I don't even think that we wondered about that because we didn't want to
00:48:56.640 because we want to quote social progress because science and technology allowed us to do something
00:49:02.300 to manipulate nature in a way that fit into what we saw as human progress, progressive social
00:49:09.000 experiments. So we just said, whatever, whatever, like we're not even going to think about how
00:49:15.460 fatherlessness has an effect on kids. I mean, we know that to be true. We know that, uh, when kids
00:49:23.340 don't have a dad, there are higher rates of, uh, there are higher rates of depression. There are
00:49:28.640 higher rates of suicide. There are higher rates of teen delinquency, teen pregnancy. There are higher
00:49:33.840 rates of eating disorders in girls when they don't have a dad. Um, we know that they are higher rates
00:49:39.800 or higher chance of poverty, a lower rate of high school graduation when you don't have a dad. And this
00:49:46.340 is particularly true. Um, not when, for example, the dad dies, but say the dad walks out to that kind
00:49:54.600 of rejection or never having known your dad that has a serious psychological wellbeing effect on a
00:50:02.600 child. And we also know that the mother is the biggest influence on a child's life. Like that
00:50:08.240 nurturer, that giver of life, whether you're an adoptive parent or a biological parent, like that
00:50:14.160 has a real effect on how that child is raised, their self-confidence, what they think about
00:50:20.260 their themselves and what they're actually able to do. But we just throw all that out the window
00:50:26.380 for progressive social experiments. And I don't even think conservatives are willing to take a step
00:50:30.640 back and ask, hang on, is this right? Remember human beings or, um, Christians, we believe that human
00:50:38.280 beings, uh, are teleological. Like I've talked about this before. Christians, the Christian ethic,
00:50:44.040 has a teleological view of nature. So we believe that everything created has a particular purpose.
00:50:48.700 We believe as most people do that a wing on a bird has a purpose. Its purpose is to fly in most cases,
00:50:55.640 not all birds can fly, but in most cases, um, it is, that's, that is its purpose. It serves a
00:51:02.200 particular function. And in it goes, if it goes out of that function, if it tries to do something that
00:51:07.060 is not in alignment with what it has been purposed to do, it doesn't function well. Um, now most people
00:51:13.140 agree with that. Most people see that, but they don't want to apply that to human beings because
00:51:16.940 they want, quote, social progress. So if I say, okay, a bird has a particular function, it can't do the
00:51:22.760 same thing that an elephant can. It can't do the same thing that an ant can. Well, human beings are the
00:51:27.600 same way. Like our bodies and every single part of our bodies have a particular function. And when they're
00:51:32.660 taken out of that biological function, and when they're taken out of what they are naturally made to do,
00:51:37.720 then we are going to suffer. Then society is going to suffer. People don't like that teleological view
00:51:44.080 of nature that includes human nature, that includes human beings, because it gets in the way of how we
00:51:51.080 want to view the world is constantly evolving according to these arbitrary progressive social
00:51:56.720 standards. But the people who are suffering from that are always going to be the people who don't have
00:52:01.020 a say. And that is kids. And I just think that we should care about that. I think that we should at
00:52:06.580 least be asking the questions about that. I think that we should be wondering. The same thing goes with
00:52:12.260 this whole gender identity movement with young girls. How we are basically saying, even the American
00:52:19.800 Academy of Pediatrics is saying, oh yeah, you know, if a girl wants to transition into a boy, which of
00:52:29.240 course we know that is something that can't actually happen, then she should be given cross-sex 1.00
00:52:34.060 hormones. When she's 11, 12 years old, and when she's 15 years old or however old, she should be 1.00
00:52:40.360 able to get a double mastectomy, where healthy breasts are removed because it is supposedly causing 0.56
00:52:49.480 some kind of gender dysphoria. The reality is that gender dysphoria is a real disorder, but it is very
00:52:55.260 rare. It is far more rare than the rate that we are seeing among young girls. You should read
00:52:59.540 Abigail Schreier's Irreversible Damage. I've had her on before. She talks about how it's become this
00:53:10.060 social contagion among young girls in the same way that anorexia is sometimes a social contagion,
00:53:15.640 sometimes cutting is a social contagion. Now this idea of wanting to identify as a different
00:53:20.840 group to kind of co-suffer and co-otherize with other girls is just another form of that. 0.69
00:53:28.200 And that also is very scandalous to say, and that is the exact reason that the American Academy of
00:53:33.500 Pediatrics and most psychologists won't actually, again, ask questions of how is this affecting this
00:53:39.160 girl long-term? What happens if she regrets it? What happens if she's sterile for the rest of her life? 1.00
00:53:43.840 What happens if this discomfort that she says that she's suddenly feeling actually abates,
00:53:49.700 and then she realizes that, oh my gosh, I have completely changed my body for the sake of something
00:53:55.680 that I felt when I was 13, 12 years before my frontal lobe had even fully developed. And now
00:54:00.900 I don't know what to do with myself. That dysphoria is not actually going to be satisfied. It's not 0.96
00:54:06.300 actually going to be satiated by surgery in those cases, in most of these cases. And we're not asking
00:54:14.200 ourselves, what does it do to a child when we say to a little girl who says, you know what, I really like
00:54:19.440 cars, I like dirt, and I don't want to wear dresses. What does that do to her when we say, well, 0.99
00:54:24.320 that means that your body is wrong. That means that you're actually a boy. Like, what are we doing
00:54:30.220 to our kids in the name of progress? How is that progress? That's abuse. That's abuse. The fact of
00:54:36.120 the matter is, is that most people who care about, um, most people who want to, without even thinking,
00:54:44.460 push these progressive causes, do not care whatsoever about how this may negatively affect kids.
00:54:50.980 Because again, they have a different view of human nature. They think everyone and everything
00:54:55.800 should just be able to adapt according to what the progressive social engineers think they should
00:55:01.560 be adapting to. The fact of the matter is, is that we do have a human nature, that God did create us a
00:55:06.700 particular way, that we, our bodies are made how they are supposed to be made. And yes, there is a very
00:55:12.500 rare disorder in which someone's brain makes them very uncomfortable in the body they were born with,
00:55:17.920 but it is rare. And it is not the reason for us to wholesale accept this ridiculous idea that men
00:55:26.120 and women and families are just arbitrary, that we're all interchangeable. Again, the people who 1.00
00:55:31.340 suffer most from this are these kids who are going to be gender confused, who are going to be 0.97
00:55:36.740 psychologically tortured, who are going to be sexually messed up by such a young age. Another
00:55:41.920 social experiment that we see is this radical K through 12 sexual education that we're seeing in
00:55:48.300 schools that teach young kids, young kids about things like masturbation and gender fluidity and
00:55:53.980 two spirit and all of these things that kids are just not able at a young age to be able to learn and
00:56:00.640 understand. And even if they were, it is not the state's job. It's not the job of the public school
00:56:06.240 to teach kids this. It's not the job of the private school to teach kids this. And I saw a quote by
00:56:11.260 Thomas Sowell the other day is that it does not take 12 to 13 years to teach a child how sex works.
00:56:18.400 Like that biological function has been around for a very long time without sex education. Now,
00:56:24.380 I understand that trying to create a healthy culture and a healthy mentality around sex and consent
00:56:31.500 and all of that is very important. I still think that the person with that job is the parent. I
00:56:38.280 understand that sometimes parents are absent. And so you want to teach good things to kids about sex
00:56:44.020 and about their bodies, but that's not what they're learning from progressive sexual education. It's 0.70
00:56:48.780 actually that your body is very arbitrary, that you can do whatever you want with your body as long as
00:56:54.700 you have autonomy, as long as you have control, as long as you give consent, whatever you do, however you
00:57:00.460 want to identify whatever sex you want to have at whatever age is totally fine. That's not healthy. 0.95
00:57:06.820 That's not going to create a healthy generation of functioning adults that cares about family and
00:57:13.420 that cares about all the things that make society survive and thrive. No way. No way. But it's not
00:57:19.980 about that. It's not about that. The reason why there is radical sex education being pushed on kids 1.00
00:57:25.940 ages, ages, kindergarten, grades, kindergarten through 12th grade is because it's about a holistic
00:57:31.500 ideology. It's about an ideology. It's about progressivism that is actually very regressive
00:57:38.380 in every sense of the word. And you as a parent, you as a parent have the responsibility not to shield
00:57:46.580 your kid from everything. I don't think that that's our responsibility, but it is to be the filter
00:57:52.780 through which these ideas come through. Um, or I, I used one too many prepositions there. You are the
00:58:00.540 filter through which these ideas come. You are the one that teaches your child about the body that God
00:58:08.700 gave them. Um, and you help them rejoice in that and thank God for that. And you remind them that God
00:58:14.980 made the male and female. And he said, it was very good that their body is very good, that it was made
00:58:20.220 with a particular purpose that God loves them, loves their body, cares about their body. The
00:58:24.580 Christian ethic doesn't just throw away. The body is something that it's not important. No,
00:58:28.680 it says that our bodies as Christians are dwelling places for the Holy Spirit that were made in God's
00:58:33.060 image. As Christians, we believe that the body matters. We believe also that the whole person
00:58:37.340 matters. That's why the Christian worldview is so beautiful. In addition to, of course,
00:58:42.600 sin and salvation and, and reconciliation and redemption and ultimate victory by, by Christ.
00:58:48.180 Christ. Also, it has a beautiful understanding of a holistic human nature, a teleological human
00:58:55.080 nature that has a purpose that is cared for, um, in all its different aspects by the God who created
00:59:02.400 that includes our bodies, that includes our minds, that includes our souls, that includes our hearts.
00:59:07.340 And that is what we have the responsibility to teach our children. It is not to say, Hey, you just decide
00:59:13.320 whatever you want to decide in these areas, figure it out. You identify however you want to identify
00:59:19.220 when you're five years old and you don't even know if you want a hamburger or a hot dog, and you don't
00:59:25.560 even know how to tie your own shoes. Like that is a form of abuse. Our, our job, our responsibility is
00:59:33.420 to steward the gift that God gave us in children, to train them up in the way that they should go,
00:59:39.720 to love them well, to help them rejoice over who they are and how God created them to create,
00:59:45.480 um, an environment in which they can survive and thrive. And for us to think about kids when we're
00:59:50.580 thinking about the policies that we care about, when we think about the issues at hand, when we think
00:59:56.600 about human nature and the purpose and the care with which God created all of us. Uh, Psalm 127,
01:00:03.000 three through five, behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of a womb of the womb,
01:00:06.980 a reward, like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one's youth. Blessed is the man
01:00:11.520 who fills his quiver with them. That is the kind of language you see surrounding children in the Bible,
01:00:17.700 that they are fearfully and wonderfully made. Christ in Luke 18 invites the infants, invites the children
01:00:24.240 to come to him. Proverbs 22, 6 tells that we train up the child in the way that we should go.
01:00:29.080 Every single depiction of children in the Bible views them as blessings, as gifts to steward,
01:00:34.940 as people to protect, as children to discipline and train in a loving way that is godly, that is
01:00:42.100 compassionate, that is kind, that shows them the goodness of the God who created them. They're not
01:00:47.900 just social experiments because people aren't just material objects. Vulnerable people aren't just,
01:00:53.560 uh, at the mercy of society to do with what we will. That's why we're against abortion. That's why
01:00:59.000 we're against, uh, euthanasia for the elderly or even for the terminally ill. We are for the
01:01:04.600 preservation of life and we are for the care of children. Children are never in the Bible depicted
01:01:10.800 as an inconvenience. They're never depicted as these, uh, things that we should put off until
01:01:15.980 we've traveled enough or until we have accomplished all that we want to in our career. They are people
01:01:22.180 to love, to take care of, to steward, to send as arrows into the future. As Psalm 127 says,
01:01:29.820 uh, the arrows I'm afraid that we are sending into the future in the form of children are very confused
01:01:37.300 and are very fragile and are unable to, um, understand themselves or under understand the
01:01:46.960 family, understand the world, understand morality in a way that makes sense because a lot of parents
01:01:53.420 and teachers have abdicated that responsibility and have accepted this postmodern progressive
01:01:58.140 nonsense, which says truth and biology and all of these things are completely arbitrary and young
01:02:03.500 children can just decide whatever they want to. They're the victims of these progressive social
01:02:08.600 experiments. And we just need to be very aware of that and very careful of that. And as Christians,
01:02:13.040 we parent our kids in a way that is different, that is so much more compassionate and so much
01:02:17.660 more loving and so much kinder and so much more gracious and truthful than, uh, the secular world
01:02:23.900 tells us to. That is how we set ourselves apart as we are parenting our kids, especially when it comes
01:02:29.400 to all these social experiments. It is not scandalous for you to say no to those things that which God
01:02:34.660 has not said are good. Um, all right, long episode. That's all I got for today. I will see you
01:02:41.560 back here tomorrow.