Ep 379 | Texas Is Open, Cuomo Is a Creep, and Rand Paul Is Based
Episode Stats
Words per minute
165.77177
Harmful content
Misogyny
11
sentences flagged
Hate speech
11
sentences flagged
Summary
Today we talk about Texas opening up, Andrew Cuomo, and Rand Paul's exchange with a woman named Rachel Levine. We also talk about the new law allowing businesses in Texas to open 100% of the time, and why this is a good thing.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Wednesday. Today we're going to talk about a few stories.
00:00:14.700
We're going to talk about Texas opening up completely after the announcement of Governor
00:00:20.100
Greg Abbott. We're also going to talk about these Andrew Cuomo allegations and we're going to talk
00:00:25.460
a little bit about Rand Paul and his exchange with a person who is called Rachel Levine.
00:00:35.240
And the theme that we are going to tap into is the idea of the government being under the authority
00:00:42.980
and under the moral standard of God himself and why it is so important to view government as an
00:00:49.180
institution that is in submission to the God of the universe, to the ruler of the universe.
00:00:55.460
As we've said on this podcast before, actually, I think it was a guest who said this on the podcast
00:01:01.420
that Jesus is King is very much a political statement. So we're going to talk a little bit
00:01:07.300
about what that means. First, let's talk about Texas opening up. So Greg Abbott, the governor
00:01:13.200
of Texas, he's a Republican. He announced on Tuesday of this week yesterday that, quote,
00:01:19.520
effective next Wednesday. So I think that's March 10th. All businesses of any type are allowed to open
00:01:25.580
100 percent. The governor said this. This is according to The Blaze at a news conference announcing
00:01:32.540
an end to restrictions imposed to slow the spread of COVID-19. Abbott said declining hospitalization
00:01:39.080
rates across the state and increased distribution of virus vaccines were reasons to end the coronavirus
00:01:44.840
restrictions. So this is a very good thing. Now, obviously, most conservatives are very excited
00:01:51.020
about this. I would say there are probably some people who are moderate and even liberal who are
00:01:56.340
secretly excited about this. But because COVID and COVID restrictions have become so unnecessarily
00:02:02.340
partisan, there were some negative reactions. I would say a lot of negative reactions, in particular
00:02:08.920
on Twitter. And of course, CNN, the regular suspects coming out with fear mongering headlines saying
00:02:15.740
that this is so irresponsible. Gavin Newsom, the Democratic governor of of California, tweeting to
00:02:24.020
Greg Abbott that this is completely reckless. This is totally irresponsible. Now, mind you, Gavin Newsom
00:02:31.820
is the same governor of California who was caught maskless several months ago at this very elitist
00:02:38.900
restaurant, the French Laundry in California. And so he has been hypocritical. I think a few times
00:02:45.900
he's been caught doing something similar to that while he has locked down, shut down his state in a way that
00:02:52.060
doesn't actually correspond to any kind of science or data. Gavin Newsom does not have any kind of moral
00:03:00.560
standing, any kind of authority whatsoever to be criticizing any leader of any other state, particularly the
00:03:08.020
state that Californians are moving to, to try to flee his tyranny. So as I said on Twitter, when Texans start
0.99
00:03:15.580
moving in droves from Texas to California, then maybe Gavin Newsom would have a place to be able to
00:03:23.120
criticize Governor Abbott. Now, the reason why some conservatives aren't exactly jumping up and down
00:03:28.860
and saying thank you so much, Governor Abbott, is because of the belief that this should have always been a
00:03:34.720
choice, like the mask mandate, for example, or closing down your business. A lot of conservatives
00:03:41.040
assert should have always been a choice or it should have at least been made on the local level. Wearing a
00:03:47.760
mask should have been made, according to a lot of people, by businesses themselves, by local authorities,
00:03:54.760
or even just by individuals. A lot of people have argued that there really is no constitutional power
00:04:01.460
for the governor or for state authorities to be able to kind of enforce something like this. And so
00:04:09.020
there are a lot of people, a lot of conservatives who have been disappointed in Governor Abbott. And of
00:04:13.840
course, we know that he has been in a very difficult position because, of course, liberals are never going
00:04:19.400
to be OK with what a Republican governor does. And they are saying that, of course, he's killing people
00:04:24.840
that, like Gavin Newsom said, this is completely reckless and irresponsible. And I'm just going to let you
00:04:30.920
know, like I don't really understand that mentality after all of the data that has come out about how
00:04:37.880
economically this is harming people and consequently how this is harming people mentally and emotionally,
00:04:43.860
how this is putting a strain on children, being locked down in some places, how people can't
00:04:50.300
celebrate this at the same time that hospitalizations are going down and the vaccine rollout has been going
00:04:56.920
very smoothly in places like Texas and Florida and West Virginia, other red states. Why isn't this
00:05:03.760
something that is applauded? Did you think that we were just going to lock down indefinitely? Like at what
00:05:08.460
point did liberals think that we were going to open back up when the virus just went away completely?
00:05:14.520
Because what from what I've seen from scientists, from doctors, from the data is that we don't actually
00:05:19.880
know if coronavirus is ever going to go away completely. It might be something like the flu, which is
00:05:24.780
really unfortunate. But that means that we are going to have to figure out how to live life pretty
00:05:30.600
regularly and pretty normally at some point. And now seems as good a time as ever to do that. And so
00:05:38.160
I think it's, you know, it's good for Governor Abbott to make this decision. And look, if you still want
00:05:43.540
to wear a mask, if you still want to wear your cloth mask, plus your surgical mask, plus your face shield,
00:05:49.720
plus your gloves and your hand sanitizer on top of the gloves and your scrubs inside your house,
00:05:56.040
along with the hazmat suit, if you go out and check your mail, no one is stopping you from doing
00:06:01.240
that. You are totally free to continue wearing a mask. And of course, I understand that not everyone
00:06:07.120
fits that hyperbolic description. But if you are someone who is hyper wary about this, or maybe you live
00:06:13.040
with a vulnerable person, you can you can wear a mask or you can keep ordering your groceries or you don't
00:06:18.880
have to go out in public or go out in crowds or anything like that. You can make your own decisions.
00:06:24.580
And I guarantee you that most big businesses, most corporations are probably going to keep
00:06:30.400
some kind of mask mandate or at least strong suggestion in place. I have a hard time believing
00:06:36.520
Target or Kroger or any of these, you know, these big stores are going to allow the people inside
00:06:45.940
their stores to not wear masks. Probably hospitals are going to keep asking their patients to wear
00:06:52.960
masks. I'm guessing that this is going to be in place for a while, according to what the businesses
00:06:58.000
want to do, stores want to do, even, you know, communities want to do and districts want to do
00:07:04.980
something that I don't understand about the liberal mentality is the idea that anything that
00:07:10.280
is possibly good needs to be enforced from the top down. I don't understand the absolute resistance to
00:07:19.820
any kind of localization or any kind of choice. Even if you think wearing a mask is, you know,
00:07:27.440
a sign of virtue and a sign of loving and caring for your neighbor. Why can't you allow that to be a
00:07:35.640
choice among individuals or a choice among families, communities and businesses? Why do you believe
00:07:40.800
that has to come for them from the governor? Even more than that, why do you believe that it has to
00:07:44.500
come from the president? Like, why does all power and why do all decisions, according to so many
00:07:49.780
liberals, have to be centralized and come from the top down? Why can't people and areas be free to make
00:07:55.840
the choices that are best for them based on the information that they have? That's always kind of what
00:08:00.840
I've said. Not that the virus shouldn't be taken seriously, but that people, for the most part,
00:08:06.400
should be trusted to make the decisions that are best for them and best for their family.
00:08:12.340
Going back to what I said about conservatives, not exactly being, you know, jumping up and down
00:08:18.400
and clapping about this because they actually felt like Governor Abbott went too far in the restrictions
00:08:23.100
in the first place. The conservative mentality about all of this is kind of what I just described.
00:08:30.000
The freedom of choice, not that the virus doesn't matter, but individual freedom, the freedom of
00:08:36.440
businesses to do what they want to. And that is because we believe that rights come from God,
00:08:42.360
not from the government. And therefore, they can't be arbitrarily taken away by the government either.
00:08:48.640
And we believe the ability to provide for yourself and to provide for your family by keeping your
00:08:53.840
business open and continuing to serve people and make money so you can put food on the table
00:08:58.800
is a God-given right. And we see the infringements on that right as something that is and has been
00:09:07.980
disastrous for the past year. And so, of course, from the conservative perspective, we are very
00:09:13.300
disappointed in how, unfortunately, so many people's lives have been ruined by the government
00:09:18.760
because we don't think that that's the government's place. The government can only do so much to keep
00:09:23.640
you safe. I'm not against all government restrictions. I'm not against the government's
00:09:27.960
place in everything. I think the government has a very important role. And I think it's debatable
00:09:33.180
what the role of the government is in all kinds of things, including in pandemic response.
00:09:38.980
But I'm not going to be on the side of compromising our constitutional rights, especially or even or
00:09:47.300
especially when it comes to times of crisis. I just don't want to see people's lives and
00:09:53.820
livelihoods devastated by this kind of thing again. So good job, Texas. I'm sorry, I guess,
00:10:02.500
to the Texans who are disappointed in this. Move to New York. They seem to be doing great under the
00:10:08.220
leadership of Andrew Cuomo, which we're going to get to in just one second. All right, let's talk
00:10:19.020
about Governor Cuomo. I'm kind of tired of talking about Governor Cuomo. I've been talking about him
00:10:25.160
for the past year a lot because of how center stage he has been in the media coverage of the virus.
00:10:32.360
And I'll put a link in the description to this podcast from last to last Monday's episode where
00:10:40.660
I interviewed Fox chief meteorologist Janice Dean and her fight to try to raise awareness about the
00:10:50.240
corruption of Andrew Cuomo as the governor of New York and how his nursing home scandal led to the
00:10:55.760
unnecessary deaths of thousands and thousands of elderly New Yorkers. But it's not just
00:11:02.340
that scandal that we are now talking about. We're now talking about him embroiled in a Me Too
00:11:08.000
scandal. So there have been several former female staffers who have come out and said that they were
00:11:13.400
sexually harassed in some way by Governor Andrew Cuomo. The New York Times is reporting on this.
00:11:20.680
The title of the article is Cuomo must admit to his predatory behavior, accuser says. The Times says this.
00:11:27.920
In a series of interviews with the Times, Miss Bennett, 25, said that Mr. Cuomo had asked her
00:11:34.300
questions about her sex life, such as whether she was monogamous in her relationships and if she had
00:11:39.840
ever had sex with older men. Miss Bennett, who had served as an executive assistant and health policy
0.98
00:11:47.880
advisor before leaving state government last fall, said that the governor had also inquired if she
00:11:52.940
believed that age made a difference in romantic relationships and had said that he was open to
00:11:57.560
relationships with women in their 20s. Comments that she interpreted as clear overtures to a sexual
00:12:03.520
relationship. I am just like holding back my gag. I feel so bad for this girl. There was this picture
00:12:11.080
going around and we can put it up on the screen if you're watching on YouTube of his interaction,
00:12:19.320
of Andrew Cuomo, Andrew Cuomo's interaction with one of these accusers. He's got his hands like kind
00:12:25.200
of behind her head and he's looking at her and smiling and she just looks so uncomfortable. And of
00:12:31.460
course, we don't know the full context of the picture. We don't know exactly what was going on
00:12:36.600
there. But that in coordination with some of these accusations that have been made now by multiple
00:12:42.460
women, you just kind of get a sense of what kind of person Andrew Cuomo is. This in addition to former
00:12:50.400
staffers and state legislators who have said that he's a bully, like he just bosses people around.
00:12:56.700
The mayor of New York City, Bill de Blasio, hates Andrew Cuomo and loves to talk bad about Andrew
00:13:03.080
Cuomo and is very excited about this whole scandal. He has probably helped fan the flames of all of this
00:13:09.580
because they don't have a good relationship. Yes, they're both Democrats and they're both totally
00:13:14.500
incompetent, by the way. So they have a lot in common. And yet maybe because of that,
00:13:18.680
it's just too much incompetence for one state. They just don't get along very well. So Bill
00:13:24.040
de Blasio, I think, is probably loving this. This New York Times article goes on to say
00:13:29.580
that Bennett's lawyer said he was not acting as a mentor to her and his remarks were not misunderstood
00:13:36.600
by Miss Bennett, said Miss Katz, a Washington-based specialist in harassment and employment
00:13:41.520
discrimination. He was abusing his power over her for sex. This is textbook sexual harassment.
1.00
00:13:49.220
I understood that the governor wanted to sleep with me and felt horribly uncomfortable and scared,
00:13:53.920
Miss Bennett said, and was wondering how I was going to get out of it and assumed it was the end
00:13:59.100
of my job. After reporting her and her interactions, the New York Times says with Mr. Cuomo in early
00:14:05.980
June to his chief of staff, Miss Bennett was quickly transferred to another job in an office
1.00
00:14:10.720
on the opposite side of the Capitol from the governor. No disciplinary action was taken against
00:14:16.240
Mr. Cuomo, who has ruled New York for more than a decade. And so I agree with the lawyer's
00:14:23.540
assessment. I'm not a lawyer, but this does seem to be textbook sexual harassment if her account is
1.00
00:14:29.220
true. And of course, like all accounts and like all accusations, we don't know for sure what
00:14:35.200
happened. We don't necessarily have any reason to disbelieve this person. But just like I would
00:14:40.840
say to anyone who is accusing and anyone who is being accused, we have to look at the testimony. We
00:14:48.420
have to look at any witness testimony, any corroborating testimony, any kind of other factors,
00:14:56.000
any kind of consistency among other accusers. And I think that there is a lot of consistency among
00:15:02.080
other accusers, which means these these allegations are probably very credible. They're probably very
00:15:09.120
true. So I do think that we have to kind of sift through all the details to ensure that we're not
00:15:14.780
just latching on to some kind of witch hunt or some kind of gossip. But just like we would do for any
00:15:20.500
Republican politician, just like we would do for any other scandal. We listen to the testimony.
00:15:25.500
We kind of we we look at the details. We listen to the witnesses. We listen to what the lawyers have
00:15:33.040
to say. And then we make the best decision that we can. Now, Andrew Cuomo has already come out with
00:15:39.320
a statement saying that, oh, you know, I'm just kind of like a personal guy. I thought that I was just
00:15:45.420
having friendly interactions with these people. But now I see it it went too far. And of course,
00:15:51.200
Governor Cuomo has championed or says that he's a champion of women's rights. He says that he is,
00:15:57.680
you know, for women within the Me Too movement and all of that. And it's so interesting how male
00:16:05.720
feminists or men who describe themselves as feminists so often end up being these kinds of creepos.
1.00
00:16:12.520
And I think it goes back to what we talk about a lot, that people use liberal activism or their support
00:16:19.420
of liberal policies, liberal issues to try to insulate themselves from future criticism or
00:16:26.940
condemnation of things that they are guilty of. And so they kind of think that they can shield
00:16:33.100
themselves by being a faithful Democrat or being a loyal leftist. And really, it ends up never being
00:16:42.400
enough. Like you can't be you can't be woke enough when it comes to this kind of stuff. It's going to
00:16:49.480
end up fighting you out, finding you out. There was another accuser, Lindsay Boylan. She worked for
00:16:55.800
the State Economic Development Agency from 2015 to 2018. She published an essay on Medium.com talking
00:17:02.980
about many of her uncomfortable interactions with Governor Cuomo, that he would go out of his way to
00:17:09.400
touch her on her lower back, her arms, her legs, that he gave her an unsolicited kiss after a one-on-one
0.91
00:17:17.200
meeting in his Manhattan office, which is really crazy and disgusting. There is Anna Roosh. I don't
00:17:24.720
know if that's how you pronounce her last name. She said that she encountered Mr. Cuomo at a wedding
00:17:30.480
they attended in September 2019. They began talking about a toast the governor had given, but Mr. Cuomo put
00:17:36.560
his hand on her bare lower back, she said, that he seemed aggressive and that she was just made
00:17:44.160
uncomfortable in the midst of all of this. And like I said, Cuomo said, you know, I never intended
00:17:51.240
these interactions to be anything more than anything more than friendly. But you can certainly see how
00:17:58.260
these women would be made uncomfortable by a man in this kind of position of power, treating them in this
0.97
00:18:04.320
way, and then thinking that they can't say anything about it. And I know the question is always why
00:18:11.180
now? Why did these women wait so long to come forward? Well, the first lady that we talked about,
1.00
00:18:16.060
as she actually did report this, remember, to the chief of staff, and she was transferred somewhere
00:18:20.500
else. I think that's also a detail that is in her favor as far as credibility goes. I also think that
00:18:27.500
people are just scared. Like, we can't discount the fear that people have in coming forward and
00:18:32.020
reporting allegations. I really don't like when people dismiss accusations and allegations just
00:18:38.240
because a certain period of time has transpired. A lot of people, depending on their jobs, depending
00:18:46.100
on what position they're in, depending on the scenario that occurred, depending on what power
00:18:51.720
the accused still has in their life, depending on just a lot of personal factors, may be too fearful
00:18:58.160
to come forward. The same thing is true of the Ravi Zacharias stuff. Like, people were asking,
00:19:03.300
well, why didn't the women at the spa ever come forward? If this is really true, why wait until
00:19:08.520
after he's dead? Because they were probably scared. Like, I think that the accusers are probably very
00:19:15.360
often worried that something is going to happen to them. Maybe something's going to happen to their
00:19:19.620
family. Something's going to happen to their employment. And so they might not feel like they
00:19:25.000
actually have the cover to be able to come forward until they're the person that they're accusing is
00:19:31.620
embroiled in some kind of other scandal. And they know that they'll probably be protected in some way
00:19:36.240
if they do come forward. And when one person comes forward, I think it also gives protection and
00:19:41.500
empowerment to other people to come forward as well. So that could very well be what is happening
00:19:47.660
here. Now, there are also some cynical theories out there about why the media is just now choosing to
00:19:55.400
come out and criticize Governor Cuomo after, for the past year, flattering him, saying that, oh,
00:20:02.540
I think it was Molly Jong Fast of the Daily Beast saying that people are crushing on Cuomo. There was a CNN
00:20:09.360
article saying that Cuomo should run for president. There were all kinds of complimentary articles,
00:20:17.640
about Governor Cuomo. And it's because, like we talked about last Monday, he served as a foil to
00:20:25.280
President Trump, a foil, as you guys probably know, as a literary device to compare and contrast to
00:20:30.200
another character. And so the media liked to be able to hoist him up as the competent and the
00:20:36.880
confident alternative to the buffoon of Donald Trump. That's why they saw him as useful. But now he's not
00:20:43.340
useful anymore because President Trump is in an office. So they can put up this facade of
00:20:47.860
objectivity. They can put up this facade of impartiality and they can report on him as if
00:20:53.700
they're valiant and if they're as if they're brave and as if they are on the front lines of truth
00:20:59.120
telling. When in reality, I guarantee you, a lot of this stuff was known by people around Governor
00:21:07.320
Cuomo and was known by the media for a very long time. I guarantee you that people sat on it until
00:21:14.080
President Trump was out of office. I have a very hard time believing that if President Trump was
00:21:18.600
still in office, that all of this would be coming out. Now, that's just my opinion. That's just a
00:21:23.500
theory. But conservatives have been talking about this nursing home scandal for a very long time.
00:21:28.020
And we were told that we were just conspiracy theorists about it. We had an episode on all of this last
00:21:32.520
April when he was still denying it and the media was still in denial, too. Conservatives have been
00:21:37.480
talking about the nursing home scandal and his incompetence and his corruption for for months now.
00:21:44.520
And the media just ignored it and they continued to flatter him and they continued to point to him
00:21:50.120
as the example that all governors and even the president himself should follow. And so I think it's
00:21:55.860
perfectly justified for some of us to question the motives of the media. Now, here's another theory.
00:22:02.520
that I talked about last week that I again, I do not know if it's true. This is just my opinion.
00:22:09.540
This is a theory. I heard a political insider talk about this. And that is the idea that the
00:22:16.320
Democratic establishment, along with the media, are actually trying to take Cuomo down because they do
00:22:22.160
not want him to be a presidential hopeful for 2024. And apparently some of the same people again,
00:22:28.780
this is a theory, are behind the Recall Gavin Newsom movement that's happening in California.
00:22:35.660
And apparently the purpose of trying to get Cuomo out of the running, try to get Gavin Newsom out of
00:22:41.460
the running, is to ensure that Kamala Harris is the presidential pick for 2024 because she is going
1.00
00:22:49.460
to be the vessel for every single policy that the Obamas and their ilk want to push.
00:22:58.360
And so apparently she is what the Democratic establishment want. And so they're trying
00:23:03.020
to elbow out Andrew Cuomo. They're trying to elbow out Gavin Newsom, anyone else who might consider
00:23:08.880
running on the Democratic ticket in 2024 to make the way for Kamala Harris. I don't know if that's true
00:23:14.920
or not. I think it's an interesting theory. Also, the AG of New York, she probably has her eyes set
0.95
00:23:22.180
on being governor after Cuomo is out. And so there's probably some selfish motivation there
00:23:29.060
because she is conducting an investigation into all of this. That is, the New York Attorney General
00:23:35.780
Letitia James reports the Washington Post. She will name outside investigators to head the probe of
00:23:41.440
Cuomo's alleged misdeeds involving two women who worked in his administration. The letter signed by
00:23:46.660
Beth Garvey, special counsel and senior advisor to the governor, was disseminated in a news release
00:23:51.800
later in the day. And that was reported on Monday. And so there's some politics going on here. Like
00:24:01.660
within the Democratic Party, there is something going on here. There is a reason behind why they're
00:24:07.480
suddenly being honest. Is it just because Trump's out? Is it because they don't like Andrew Cuomo? Is it
00:24:11.860
some secret reason? We don't know. But I'm not believing that this is just a matter of integrity.
00:24:18.560
I'm just I'm just not. This would have happened a lot earlier if it was a matter of integrity.
00:24:23.740
This is a reason this whole this whole scandal is such a good reminder to us of why we do not put
00:24:31.700
our hope in the government, like why we do not idolize politicians, whether they're on the right or
00:24:38.180
the left, because they are going to fail us. They are going to be a disappointment to us at some
00:24:44.300
point. And this is also what happens, I think, when power gets to your head, when media flattery
00:24:50.280
gets to your head and you think that you are insulated from these kinds of accusations. It's kind of
00:24:55.180
amazing how many men in particular have thought for so long that they were going to get through this
00:25:02.560
whole, quote, Me Too movement completely unscathed and just moved forward in their predatory behavior.
00:25:09.320
I guess ego and pride and power just does that to people. It blinds them to reality. It prevents them
00:25:17.200
from being able to humble themselves and to resist hypocrisy. Unfortunately for Andrew Cuomo,
00:25:24.400
his pride has gotten the best of him in all of this. The kind of swagger that a lot of people were
00:25:29.980
attracted to a year ago is now turning out to just be plain old arrogance and it's ugly. Now, I wish
00:25:38.100
that we were a society who could remove partisanship from these kinds of accusations and that we could
00:25:46.600
just look at the standard of objective morality that God has placed before us and that we could have
00:25:52.640
been having this conversation several months ago when some of this stuff was known about. Nevertheless,
00:25:58.460
I am always glad when it's on the right or the left when the truth comes out and when justice is
00:26:04.120
served. I pray in this situation that justice is served. Remember, as Christians, we believe that
00:26:09.540
justice is impartial, it's truthful, it's direct, and it's proportional. That's what the Bible tells us
00:26:15.420
that God's justice is. And so I pray for all of those characteristics to describe the kind of justice
00:26:23.120
that is executed in this case. But this is what happens when we are tossed on the waves of
00:26:30.140
partisanship, when we have to wait for cultural moments like Me Too to do the right thing and to
00:26:36.940
hold certain leaders accountable. What happens is really sketchy timing. What happens is journalists
00:26:44.420
sitting on a story until it's politically expedient to them. What happens is people denying that their guy
00:26:51.580
is guilty of things that they say they abhor. So as Christians, what we have to do is we have to stand
00:26:57.440
in the gap of all of that. And we have to say, no matter if this is a Republican or a Democrat
00:27:02.160
politician, I want the truth and I want justice. That is our responsibility in all of this. And
00:27:08.020
unfortunately, we're just not in a day and age in America where we can expect most of our elected
00:27:13.040
officials to operate under that kind of godly impartiality. But that doesn't stop us Christians
00:27:18.860
from doing so. We believe, as Romans 13 tells us, that the government is instituted by God. That
00:27:26.880
chapter also says that we are to submit to the government. Christians understand that in light
00:27:31.780
of all of Scripture to mean insofar as the government does not cause us to sin or does not tempt us to sin.
00:27:39.660
Uh, so, uh, we are supposed to submit to the government, but in that, uh, context and in that
00:27:48.800
chapter, the government is also to submit itself to God. And we see what happens when an elected
00:27:55.840
official, when a governor, which this has happened a lot, especially over the past year, when their
00:28:00.340
power gets to their head, um, the bigger they are, the harder they fall. And I think that's what
00:28:05.640
we're seeing with Andrew Cuomo. All right. I want to get to, um, this next story, which we didn't get
00:28:12.200
to talk about last week when we were talking about the Equality Act, and it is going to tie into all
00:28:16.600
of this. And that is the exchange between Rand Paul and the HHS assistant secretary pick, Rachel Levine.
00:28:25.280
All right. So last week we didn't get to cover this, uh, exchange between Rand Paul and Biden's HHS,
00:28:36.660
uh, assistant secretary pick. We talked about Xavier Becerra last week with Lila Rose. We'll put the,
00:28:44.220
the link to that podcast episode in this description, who is the, um, HHS head pick by Joe Biden and is
00:28:54.700
very frightening how rabidly pro abortion and anti pro life he has been, uh, when he was AG of
00:29:02.800
California, for example, we talked all about that. You really need to know who Xavier Becerra is. So
00:29:08.380
go back and listen to that episode from last week. But another nominee that has been tapped by the
00:29:13.560
Biden administration is a person who goes by the name of Rachel Levin, Rachel Levin. Uh, I think
00:29:19.520
that's how you spell her last name, or maybe it's Levine, um, is transgender. So the phrase that is
00:29:26.060
used is trans woman. This is a biological man who dresses as a woman, uh, Rachel Levine. And I don't
0.93
00:29:34.820
know what the original name is. So I'm just going to go, I'm just going to say Rachel Levine. Rachel
00:29:39.900
Levine is Biden's pick to be assistant health secretary. Senator Rand Paul brought up the issue
00:29:45.540
of giving puberty blockers to minors. So I'm going to play you a little bit of that exchange.
00:29:51.620
American culture is now normalizing the idea that minors can be given hormones to prevent
00:29:57.340
their biological development of their secondary sexual characteristics. Dr. Levine, you have
00:30:03.140
supported both allowing minors to be given hormone blockers to prevent them from going through puberty,
00:30:08.160
as well as surgical destruction of a minor's genitalia. Dr. Levine, do you believe that minors are
00:30:13.940
capable of making such a life changing decision as changing one's sex? Well, Senator, thank you for
0.97
00:30:21.000
your interest in this question. Um, transgender medicine is a very complex and nuanced field,
00:30:27.180
um, with robust research and standards of care that have been developed. The specific question
00:30:33.120
was about minors. Let's be a little more specific since you evaded the question. Do you support the
00:30:37.940
government intervening to override the parents' consent to give a child puberty blockers,
00:30:43.560
cross-sex hormones, and or amputation surgery of breasts and genitalia? You have said that you're
00:30:50.560
willing to accelerate the protocols for street kids. I'm alarmed that poor kids with no parents
00:30:56.220
who are homeless and distraught, you would just go through this and allow that to happen to a minor.
00:31:03.080
What I'm alarmed at is that you're not willing to say absolutely minors shouldn't be making
00:31:07.680
decisions to amputate their breast or to amputate their genitalia. For most of our history, we believe
00:31:15.020
that minors don't have full rights and the parents need to be involved. So I'm alarmed that you won't
00:31:20.440
say with certainty that minors should not have the ability to make the decision to take hormones that
00:31:26.540
will affect them for the rest of their life. Will you make a more firm decision on whether or not
00:31:32.440
minors should be involved in these decisions? Senator, transgender medicine is a very complex
00:31:38.400
and nuanced field. And if confirmed to the position of Assistant Secretary of Health,
00:31:43.920
I would certainly be pleased to come to your office and talk with you and your staff
00:31:48.100
about the standards of care and the complexity of this field.
00:31:51.980
Let it go into the record that the witness refused to answer the question.
00:31:55.700
So Dr. Levine did not want to answer that question, which is really troubling. Rand Paul
00:32:02.220
asked a very easy question, a question that should have an obvious answer when he asked,
00:32:11.840
hey, do you think that doctors should be able to bypass parental consent to give puberty blockers
00:32:18.460
to kids? And when you're talking about puberty blockers, you're talking about kids that are
00:32:22.720
8 to 11 years old. So you're talking about kids that don't even know what they want for lunch and
00:32:30.280
they can't even make any kind of decision outside of what is right in front of them. Now, kids are very
00:32:35.460
smart and obviously they are valuable and they have their own inherent rights and everyone believes in
00:32:42.700
that. Of course, we believe in that, but we believe in protecting them. And conservatives believe that the
00:32:48.160
family is the best place for that child to be protected and that parents are the only people
00:32:55.720
who really have the best interest of that child at heart. Their teacher might really like them.
00:33:02.700
There might be, you know, friends, parents that like them, but I guarantee you soulless bureaucracy,
00:33:08.900
random doctors do not care about the best interest of a child. There's a really,
00:33:14.700
really troubling movement coming from the far left that I guarantee you will become more mainstream to
00:33:20.360
try to strip parents of any kind of parental rights and to say that children, quote, belong to
00:33:25.260
themselves, that they should be free even at this young of an age to be able to consent to life altering
00:33:33.180
hormone treatment that could end in sterilization, that could end in depression, that could end in
00:33:39.860
unnecessary anxiety. And it's not backed by science, by the way, as we've talked about on this podcast,
00:33:46.340
most kids who are actually gender confused, who actually feel uncomfortable in their bodies,
00:33:51.780
grow out of that discomfort by puberty. And so going ahead and trying to stop their puberty is only
00:34:00.160
going to cause irreparable harm to their bodies and also to their mental health. And there are also so
00:34:06.340
many contradictions to this. Nowadays, apparently a little boy who wants to play with his sister's
00:34:12.240
Barbies or who wants to dress up in his sister's, you know, princess dress and crown, apparently we're
00:34:19.260
supposed to tell that boy that he's a girl and that he was born in the wrong body. When I was little,
00:34:26.980
I never wanted to wear dresses. I didn't want to wear a bow in my hair. I wanted to wear jeans. I wanted
00:34:34.100
to wear a white t-shirt. I wanted to rent books out of the library about snakes. I wanted to play
00:34:39.140
with worms and bugs. And, um, I am so glad I'm so glad that I wasn't raised in this day and age
00:34:46.680
where I would have maybe been questioned by a teacher questioned by a pediatrician or a child
00:34:53.140
psychologist, whether or not I really was a girl. Of course, of course, I've always loved being a girl
00:34:59.280
at the same time that I was doing all of those things. I thought that I had met the man that I was
00:35:04.000
the boy that I was going to marry when I was, um, in preschool. I had a boyfriend from the time that
00:35:10.380
I was two years old. Um, and so we have to allow kids to be kids. And the fact that we may have a
00:35:18.040
person in authority in health and human services who believes that parental consent should be bypassed
00:35:26.380
to give kids, uh, cross sex hormones before they go through puberty is terrifying. It's terrifying
0.52
00:35:34.480
that we've gotten here. I mean, this is a person who thinks that they're the opposite sex anyway. So
00:35:39.100
of course we should be troubled by all of this. Why is it, as I say so often that children are the
00:35:46.700
subjects of these progressive social experiments? Actually, I know why it's because they're vulnerable.
00:35:51.680
It's because they can't consent because they are convenient lab rats for these progressives who
00:35:58.120
want to be able to prove their, their theory about something like gender identity. This goes back to
00:36:03.100
where gender identity came from, which we've thought we've also talked about on this podcast,
00:36:07.140
which I will include a link to the biblical telos of gender in the description to, uh, of this podcast
00:36:13.700
episode. John Money, the doctor in the 1960s, who performed a sexual experiment on,
00:36:19.560
on two twin boys, uh, to try to prove his, uh, gender identity theory, gender being something
00:36:26.300
opposite or, uh, being something separate from, from sex. And those twin boys ended up committing
00:36:31.420
suicide. Like his theory has been debunked this idea that gender and sex are these two separate
00:36:37.180
entities and that we should be able to change and mutilate our bodies according to what we feel and
00:36:41.920
think on the inside. Like there has never been any data, never been any science whatsoever to prove
00:36:46.980
that that's actually what human nature tells us. And yet we're pushing it on vulnerable children who
00:36:52.040
cannot consent. They cannot consent. Um, and I'm very troubled by this nomination of Levine. I'm very
00:36:59.540
troubled by the nomination of Becerra. I applaud Rand Paul, um, for infusing sanity into this situation. So
00:37:07.960
often Republicans don't want to have these conversations. Like they're willing to talk about
00:37:12.340
religious liberty and protecting institutions. They might even talk about protecting the privacy
00:37:16.820
of young girls or the, the competition of girls who run track in high school and college, but they're
00:37:21.840
unwilling to say, uh, they're, uh, they're unwilling to actually talk about, uh, the merits of the issue.
00:37:29.240
Like so many are just unwilling to say, sorry, a boy can't become a girl or a girl can't become a boy.
00:37:34.560
And so we shouldn't be even having a conversation about changing the hormones of a child. I mean,
00:37:40.800
we can have a conversation about adults making a decision to be able to dress the way that they
00:37:45.720
want to, or to even have the surgeries that they want to have. Of course, morally, I'm going to
00:37:50.580
disagree with that choice, but legally, that's not necessarily something that, um, affects me.
00:37:57.740
But when we're talking about children and when Christians especially believe that it is the
0.76
00:38:02.540
responsibility of other Christians to protect the least of these, that we have actually been
00:38:08.420
charged with that responsibility, we can't just stand by and say, yes, it's totally fine for the
00:38:13.900
state to bypass parental consent or for parents to consent to a child irreparably harming their body
00:38:21.160
a decade or more before their frontal lobe is even developed. I mean, it's insanity that we're even
00:38:28.280
having this conversation. It's insanity that this is a pick by Joe Biden. Once again, all the
00:38:33.960
evangelicals for Biden that thought that he was going to be a moderate pick, that he was somehow
00:38:37.980
going to be morally neutral, as if moral neutrality even exists. I just wonder what you're thinking,
00:38:44.220
or are you even paying attention? Are you even paying attention to any of this? Do you even,
00:38:48.880
have you considered what this means for your child? Have you considered what this means for parental
00:38:53.500
rights? What this means for your school, for your church, for your pastor? This Equality Act,
00:38:57.980
and these nominations, these picks by Joe Biden's administration. It's really troubling. It's
00:39:04.940
really troubling. And good for Rand Paul. Good for Rand Paul for infusing reality into this conversation,
00:39:10.760
for not being afraid to speak up about this. Of course, the media was very angry about all of this,
00:39:20.080
saying that it is so transphobic that he even asked these questions. Apparently, he compared it
00:39:27.800
to genital mutilation. And people were very angry about that. But I don't know, what else do you call
00:39:36.340
it when you chemically castrate a boy before he goes through puberty? Or when you have a minor who is
00:39:42.040
15, 16 years old, who decides that she wants to have a double mastectomy because she now identifies
00:39:47.140
as a boy. And she can sometimes do that without parental consent. That is genital mutilation. Like,
1.00
00:39:52.640
it's not just genital mutilation when Muslim countries do it. It's genital mutilation,
0.99
00:39:57.000
even when it is approved of by the state and by the Democratic Party. It's still genital mutilation.
00:40:03.220
So people were very angry about that. But that's because they're angry at reality. They're angry
00:40:07.760
at biology. They're angry at human nature. They're angry by the truth. Of course, the more that you
00:40:13.580
insist that two plus two equals four, the people who insist that two plus two can sometimes equal five
00:40:19.080
are going to be very mad at you. They're going to be very frustrated. They're going to gaslight you.
00:40:24.260
They're going to tell you that you're the crazy one for believing what humans of all cultures have
0.82
00:40:29.100
believed for thousands and thousands of years. And by the way, this is like a very Western American
00:40:34.500
problem that we're having. It's so interesting how the people who say that they're on the side of,
00:40:40.220
you know, they're anti-Western, anti-white, anti-privilege, anti-rich. Well, this is a very Western,
0.61
00:40:47.340
Western, white, academic, elitist, rich issue that we're having. You don't see this going on
00:40:55.440
in other countries. And to the extent that you do see this going on in non-Western countries,
00:41:00.760
it is because of the influence of Western countries coming into those countries and saying,
00:41:07.300
hey, by the way, did you know a boy could be a girl and a girl could be a boy? So talk about
00:41:11.540
colonization and imperialism by spreading these kinds of insane ideas to countries that want
00:41:18.260
nothing to do with them. It is absolutely disastrous. Parents have to push back on this.
00:41:23.680
More people than Rand Paul in the Republican Party have to push back on this and argue it on its merits.
00:41:29.620
Do not cede any ground. I saw some representatives that were mad at Marjorie Taylor Greene, who,
00:41:35.500
look, I have my own issues with Marjorie Taylor Greene, but she put up a sign outside of her
00:41:41.220
office saying there are only two genders, men and women. I even saw Republicans saying that that was
00:41:48.920
bigoted, that that was wrong, that was evil. Are you telling me that it is the official Republican
00:41:53.480
line that there are more than two genders? Tell me, conservatives, what do you think that you're
00:41:59.640
conserving? If it's not that? I mean, this is very, very disappointing. I am thankful for the people
00:42:09.680
who are willing to speak out about this very basic reality. I am even more thankful for the people who
00:42:16.240
are speaking out in protection of our children, who, like I have said, are always the unconsenting
00:42:22.820
subjects of all of these crazy, dangerous experiments on them. There was a representative
00:42:30.680
from Florida, Representative Greg Stubbe. He spoke out against the Equality Act, and he did exactly
0.98
00:42:38.160
what we have talked about, arguing this on its merits. He says, it's not clothing or personal style
00:42:44.880
that offends God, but rather the use of one's appearance to act out or take on a sexual identity
00:42:49.880
different from the one biologically assigned by God at birth. In his wisdom, God intentionally made
00:42:55.000
each individual uniquely either male or female. True. When men or women claim to be able to choose
0.99
00:43:01.460
their own sexual identity, they are making a statement that God did not know what he was doing
00:43:05.780
when he created them, which is absolutely right. Good job for him for invoking the name of God.
00:43:11.180
And this goes to the theme of this episode, that the government is an institution that was
00:43:17.460
instituted by God. God is the transcendent supreme moral lawgiver. He says what is right and what is
00:43:24.320
wrong, what's good and what's bad, what's true and what's false, what's male and what's female.
00:43:28.800
He is the one who dictates reality to us. He is the one who defines all of these things.
00:43:35.080
And so it is not theocratic, it is not Christian nationalist for people to acknowledge
00:43:40.480
what God has defined as good and right and true. The founders knew that politicians for the past few
00:43:46.980
centuries have known that. Remember, secularism is not a neutral ideology. To say that we shouldn't
00:43:53.980
invoke the name of God because Jerry Nadler, Rep. Jerry Nadler said in response to Stubbe's speech,
00:44:01.380
you know, God's will has nothing to do with what we're talking about here. God's will has everything
00:44:06.120
to do with what we're talking about here. Of course it does. And for people who roll their eyes and say,
00:44:10.800
oh, that's just theocratic nonsense. That's Christian nationalism. No, no, no. You believe that
1.00
00:44:16.700
your religion of atheism, agnosticism, progressivism, whatever it is, you believe that your secular
00:44:24.940
ideology, your so-called religion should be dominant. And so you are just as much of some
00:44:33.180
kind of religious zealot as you are accusing me of being. The fact of the matter is everyone has a
00:44:39.120
worldview. Every law speaks to a set of moral principles. People say you can't legislate morality.
00:44:45.320
Every single law has to do with morality. The question is who says what is morality? Who says
00:44:52.140
what is right and wrong? My argument is that God, the transcendent moral lawgiver, is the best person
00:44:58.780
to tell us what is good and what is bad. It's going to come from somewhere. Our ideas of right and wrong
00:45:05.800
or ideas of who is in charge and who is not, where our rights come from, all of those ideas are going to
00:45:11.440
come from somewhere. The people who tell you that it's dangerous to say that those things come from
00:45:15.680
God, they don't realize that they also have their own ideology, their own religion, their own faith,
00:45:21.620
their own value system competing against yours that is not neutral. I mean, as we've seen throughout
00:45:27.820
this episode, secularism isn't neutral. Secularism, according to the person who is called Rachel Levine,
00:45:35.000
means that parents don't have any authority over their child before their child decides to take
00:45:41.580
cross-sex hormones at the age of 10 years old. That is a secular idea and a secular ideology. That's
00:45:48.700
not neutral. That has tangible consequences on people's lives. And so good for Greg Stubbe, good for
00:45:55.560
Rand Paul, good for the people who are recognizing that there is an authority higher than them. That is
00:46:00.920
important in all of our individual lives, but that's so important for the government. If the government
00:46:05.640
is not tethered to something that is bigger than them, to a value system that is bigger and better
00:46:10.540
than them, then their own pride in their own authority, in their own elitism, in their own
00:46:18.320
self-righteousness, it ends to the kind of corruption and tyranny, the kind of infringing upon the rights
00:46:24.860
that we have seen so prevalently over the past year. And so we continue to pray for our leaders.
00:46:32.320
Let's pray for wisdom for the Biden administration and that they would be making better decisions
00:46:39.160
than their HHS picks and nominees. Let's pray for governors as they start to hopefully recognize
00:46:47.640
the constitutional rights of their citizens again. Let's pray for governors and leaders that are caught
00:46:55.000
in the same kinds of perverse temptations that we have seen Governor Cuomo fall into. And let us pray
00:47:05.920
that these leaders would start submitting to God and his authority and his moral definitions,
00:47:13.940
his scientific definitions, when it comes to things like gender, rather than inflating their own egos
00:47:20.680
and falling into a kind of corrupt leadership that unfortunately has negative repercussions for all
00:47:26.040
of us. All right, we will be back here tomorrow.