ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey
- April 28, 2021
Ep 411 | Understanding Biden's Foreign Policy | Guest: Rebeccah Heinrichs
Episode Stats
Length
43 minutes
Words per Minute
184.02368
Word Count
8,000
Sentence Count
375
Misogynist Sentences
4
Hate Speech Sentences
22
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable.
00:00:11.260
Today I am talking to Rebecca Heinrichs about foreign policy and in particular foreign policy
00:00:17.680
as it relates to China, what we need to be thinking about, what we need to know, what
00:00:22.140
we need to be concerned about.
00:00:23.700
And we're going to kind of look at the strategy of the Trump administration versus the projected
00:00:31.620
strategy of the Biden administration, kind of compare and contrast those two things, why
00:00:37.380
we have reason for optimism, why we also have some reasons for concern.
00:00:41.440
And then she also gives some practical advice of what we can be doing as people and as families
00:00:45.760
to protect ourselves and to ensure that American values, which we believe are good, are perpetuated
00:00:53.680
and are propelled into the next generation.
00:00:56.340
So really excited for you to listen to this very informative conversation with Rebecca.
00:01:01.840
Here she is.
00:01:07.260
Rebecca, thank you so much for joining me.
00:01:09.980
Can you tell everyone who may not know who you are and what you do?
00:01:13.660
Sure.
00:01:14.160
My name is Rebecca Heinrichs.
00:01:15.600
I'm a senior fellow at Hudson Institute, which is a think tank in Washington, D.C.
00:01:20.320
And I specialize in international relations, national security.
00:01:25.800
And so I do all kinds of research and writing on those subjects.
00:01:29.120
And I'm a mom and a wife and I have five children.
00:01:32.620
Yes.
00:01:32.880
And I love following you on Instagram.
00:01:34.640
You're literally one of my favorite people to follow on Instagram because your family is
00:01:39.300
so precious.
00:01:41.060
Each of your each of your children is just beautiful.
00:01:44.380
And I just love following along in your life and all of the adventures that you guys are
00:01:49.960
on.
00:01:50.260
Can you tell us how you got into what you do now and how you how you balance that your
00:01:57.660
work plus being a mom of five awesome kids?
00:02:01.520
Sure.
00:02:01.780
Well, you know, I I studied history and political science at the Ashbrook Center.
00:02:07.400
It's a political science program at Ashland University in Ohio from a small town in Ohio.
00:02:11.660
And I I'd always been interested in politics generally and started to gravitate towards
00:02:17.460
national security issues.
00:02:18.920
But then I was a freshman in college when 9-11 happened.
00:02:22.320
And like a lot of people my age at that time, it was formative.
00:02:28.120
And, you know, I I I was studying.
00:02:30.920
I grew up in a patriotic home.
00:02:33.640
Parents very interested in current events.
00:02:35.680
And and but I think it was, you know, at Ashbrook, whenever I was really learning about
00:02:40.120
the meaning of America and what the American founding meant, what it what it what our country
00:02:44.320
really is and why it is so worthy of our love and affection.
00:02:47.980
And then at the same time, September 11th happened.
00:02:51.400
It was those two things that were especially formative for me.
00:02:54.600
And I decided to pursue a career in rather I don't even like the word career, but decided
00:02:59.640
to pursue just continue to work in the field of national security.
00:03:03.120
And, you know, one thing led to another.
00:03:04.280
I didn't really plan on being exactly here then.
00:03:06.780
I just took one opportunity as as they came before me.
00:03:10.120
Met my husband working on Capitol Hill.
00:03:12.480
He works in national security policy, too, and then had our first child in 2009.
00:03:19.020
And then it was at that time that I decided, you know, I was working for a congressman on
00:03:23.640
Capitol Hill and decided it was taking too much of my time and away from my new baby who
00:03:29.600
crazy about.
00:03:30.640
And so I decided to file an LLC and then see if I can continue writing and researching
00:03:37.020
from my home and from different think tanks and continue my scholarly work while having
00:03:42.660
more control over my schedule and my calendar.
00:03:44.600
And so I had my first little baby, little girl, and then five babies later, we've got three
00:03:49.920
daughters and two sons.
00:03:51.620
Yeah.
00:03:52.020
Yeah.
00:03:52.440
That's amazing.
00:03:53.380
Well, I really appreciate the work that you do.
00:03:55.340
Even just following you on Twitter, you always add clarity to the conversation of what can be
00:03:59.760
a very confusing and overwhelming conversation for a lot of people.
00:04:03.460
I think we all wish that we knew more about foreign policy and national security for obvious
00:04:08.240
reasons, very big subjects and important subjects.
00:04:11.820
But a lot of us just don't.
00:04:13.540
And so I'm wondering if you can break down for us, if you can compare and contrast in just,
00:04:18.700
you know, simple terms, the foreign policy goals and actual accomplishments from the Trump
00:04:24.140
administration versus what you think that we can probably expect from the foreign policy
00:04:29.620
and national security goals of the Biden administration.
00:04:32.220
Great question.
00:04:34.420
So first of all, I think that one of the reasons people have a hard time staying, you know,
00:04:39.700
up to speed on everything going on in foreign policy, international relations is because
00:04:42.840
we're consumed with all the things that directly impact us on a day to day.
00:04:46.780
And so, you know, that's why moms and dads are busy.
00:04:49.400
You know, they turn on the evening news.
00:04:50.660
It's kind of, you know, they try to keep track of what the biggest threats are, and then
00:04:53.920
they have to go along with, you know, the things that are impacting their kids and what's
00:04:56.900
going on with work and all that kind of stuff.
00:04:59.200
So it's understandable, but we should know that, you know, the Trump administration, I
00:05:05.140
would say one of their best accomplishments, biggest accomplishments, was shepherding the
00:05:09.860
United States through this major change, seismic change in our relationship with China, which is
00:05:16.820
governed by the Chinese Communist Party.
00:05:19.400
Xi Jinping is their leader.
00:05:20.440
And establishing that they are an adversary of the United States.
00:05:25.860
They're not just this economic partner, even, where we just conduct trade with, that they
00:05:31.180
actually pose the greatest threat to Americans and the American way of life over all the different
00:05:37.960
adversaries.
00:05:38.760
And the reason for that is really twofold.
00:05:41.540
And this is why, this is how you rack and stack.
00:05:43.940
What are the biggest and most important threats facing the United States is their ability to do
00:05:50.340
harm and their willingness to do harm.
00:05:52.920
Right.
00:05:52.980
So you can have a country that's really doggedly willing to do harm, but they might not have the
00:05:56.600
Like North Korea, maybe.
00:05:57.720
Exactly.
00:05:58.340
Or even just the terrorist threat.
00:06:00.340
Really bad stuff, but can they do the, can they propose a existential, you know, threat to the
00:06:06.820
United States and their way of life?
00:06:07.980
And the country that stands out above all the other countries, even Russia, which Russia is
00:06:12.180
another very serious threat to the United States and can do great harm, but even above the Russian
00:06:17.380
Federation is the Chinese Communist Party.
00:06:19.280
It's because of their enormous economy and then how they've used that economy to pour into their
00:06:23.460
military and then all the other bad, nefarious stuff that they're doing across multiple fronts
00:06:28.200
to undermine Americans and our security.
00:06:31.440
Yeah.
00:06:32.040
And can you talk about why is that?
00:06:34.520
What some of those threats are?
00:06:35.820
I mean, we know that they're, um, a very large economic power and we know that America
00:06:42.360
has really kind of aided and abetted their economic growth for at least a, I mean, a few
00:06:48.480
decades now.
00:06:50.020
Um, but can you talk about, you know, tangibly what some of those threats are just for people
00:06:54.880
who don't know?
00:06:57.080
So, um, yes.
00:06:59.100
And this has been really the, the, the, the, the fault of, or who deserves the blame for
00:07:04.260
how we got to this mess, um, from the American side.
00:07:07.200
It's really a, a bipartisan problem of government and private sector that have sleepily kind of
00:07:14.180
allowed China's rise over the last multiple decades, ever since Bill Clinton kind of ushered
00:07:20.480
in China's ability to join the WTO to normalize economic relations.
00:07:25.500
And, and this idea was the idea at the time was, and both Republicans and Democrats thought
00:07:30.620
this and obviously big business thought this too, that that as China became richer, that
00:07:36.740
China would liberalize politically their human rights, their business practices, and they
00:07:42.300
wouldn't be, you know, uh, communists.
00:07:45.660
They wouldn't be communists.
00:07:46.580
Yeah.
00:07:46.780
And, and they, and for a while they kind of hid, hid, hid what they were doing, kind
00:07:50.560
of, they, they hid their hand, they bid their time is what they say.
00:07:53.200
And, and as they became stronger, I think they, I think it was like every, every eight years
00:07:57.500
or so, like doubled their economy since 1979 or something just enormous.
00:08:02.280
And so now what they're doing across multiple fronts, they just have all kinds of spies, um,
00:08:08.240
in our academic institutions.
00:08:10.340
I think, uh, FBI director Ray said that, I think it was trying to get the fact exactly right.
00:08:15.160
Um, every 10 hours, the, uh, there's a new China related counterintelligence case that's
00:08:22.440
being opened by the FBI.
00:08:24.080
So right now, I mean, it's just constantly by, um, that that's our biggest, um, espionage
00:08:30.340
economic, what are they doing?
00:08:31.760
Like, what is the spine entail?
00:08:34.160
So they're, so they, they do it in a variety of ways.
00:08:36.700
One of the things that they do is they get buried into these academic institutions or labs.
00:08:40.700
Um, and they just, they, they pretend as though, and because of our generosity and
00:08:45.020
openness, you know, we don't, we don't look sideways at people who are of Chinese ethnicity
00:08:49.600
and think that there's some sort of dual loyalty at all.
00:08:52.500
And so they come here and they work.
00:08:54.360
Um, but the, but the, but the hard truth of the matter is many of these Chinese nationalists
00:08:58.640
have ties to the Chinese communist party.
00:09:00.060
So they're taking scientific research, medical research, and, and, and then they just, um,
00:09:06.660
uh, business, they just take it right back over to the Chinese communist party.
00:09:10.540
Um, and it's not even just that kind of stuff too.
00:09:13.520
It's businesses, our poor businesses.
00:09:14.980
They come in and they do these work with, um, uh, you know, those who still have ties
00:09:20.040
to the Chinese communist party.
00:09:21.280
And then those, those spies go back to, to China and then they patent the, the manufacturing
00:09:27.340
ability over there.
00:09:28.540
And then they just steal all of this intellectual property that are, that belongs to the hard
00:09:33.980
work, blood, sweat, and tears, you know, poured into by, by American companies.
00:09:37.620
And they've done this for years and it's really just the Trump administration that's just kind
00:09:43.420
of ripped the top off of this to expose all the different ways they're spying and stealing
00:09:48.520
through our technology and, and, um, and direct espionage like that.
00:09:53.740
Yeah.
00:09:54.360
And how did the Trump administration do that?
00:09:57.940
Does that have anything to do with the so-called trade war or the tariffs?
00:10:03.460
Um, I mean, that was a huge point of discussion, even just between conservatives, whether or
00:10:08.800
not it was the right thing to do to engage in that kind of, um, adversarial behavior, some
00:10:15.000
would say with China.
00:10:17.140
So I think that the best way to answer this too, cause I got pressed on this all the time
00:10:21.100
whenever I would say, look, look what Donald Trump is doing at these, these great things.
00:10:25.240
I mean, rapid, rapid change towards China.
00:10:28.160
And it's stuff that Democrats, Republicans didn't want to do because of all the money
00:10:31.220
lost and all of the access to, um, the Chinese economy that, that American businesses still
00:10:36.460
wanted.
00:10:37.460
But what it was about Donald Trump that made all of his national security people across,
00:10:44.060
I mean, Secretary Pompeo, his different secretaries of defense, national security advisors, FBI
00:10:48.940
directors, they were all able to make serious changes on all these fronts because of President
00:10:55.640
Trump's kind of populist nationalist team USA Jersey that he wore.
00:11:01.680
And so there, it just, it didn't, it was the trade war.
00:11:04.440
That's, that's kind of the tip of the spear.
00:11:06.500
That's what started saying, you know, you know, started pushing this and saying, I don't
00:11:11.540
believe that the United States should continue to take it on the chin for some sort of greater
00:11:15.700
ideal for, for globalism or, or, you know, we're all just, yeah, it's going to harm
00:11:20.340
American businesses, but in the end, it's going to help the Chinese people.
00:11:23.280
And it's going to help all these other companies and tech companies that benefit from cheap
00:11:27.740
labor in China and all the other disadvantages that the United States has versus China.
00:11:31.800
So it was that brash personality of Donald Trump pushing back and really saying, this
00:11:37.520
isn't good for America on trade.
00:11:40.240
And that kind of broke all these other barriers on all these other issues.
00:11:44.900
And then once the coronavirus pandemic happened, I mean, and, and, and Trump realized how much
00:11:51.580
China was to blame for this, they tabled the trade stuff and then it was game on.
00:11:56.880
I mean, it was sanctions and constant rebukes on all these different fronts and arresting
00:12:01.920
spies much more publicly.
00:12:03.740
And so the rapid fire changes really happened in the last year, building up to the last year.
00:12:10.300
And then it was just a crash of all of this good stuff.
00:12:12.400
I think that makes it very difficult for the Biden administration to completely undo.
00:12:16.560
Well, that's a good thing.
00:12:17.980
Secretary Pompeo was always very clear about the threat of China and the Chinese Communist
00:12:23.920
Party.
00:12:24.380
I think just the other day, we're recording this in January, but just the other day called
00:12:28.320
him like a fear mongering clown or something exaggerating about, or he, they said that he was
00:12:35.460
exaggerating about the Uyghur Muslim treatment that's happening in China.
00:12:40.480
That's something that Secretary Pompeo has talked a lot about that.
00:12:44.100
Unfortunately, it seems like some people in Washington and just large swaths of Americans
00:12:49.240
kind of look away from, of course, I think every decent person would say, yeah, we're
00:12:53.200
against internment camps.
00:12:54.300
We're against slavery.
00:12:55.260
We're against torture.
00:12:56.400
But even so, some people are very slow to criticize the CCP and their practices, either
00:13:03.220
because of money reasons, like you said, we want access to the Chinese economy, or even
00:13:08.060
just, I think, some political correctness is at play there with people thinking that if
00:13:12.660
you criticize the Chinese Communist Party and any practices of the regime, then you're
00:13:17.720
being racist or something like that.
00:13:20.600
And all of that, both of those mentalities inhibit us from taking proper action to kind
00:13:27.360
of to remove our dependence on such a hostile regime and their economy, correct?
00:13:33.220
I think that's exactly right.
00:13:34.680
I think that the more the more Republicans and there's some Democrats that are willing
00:13:39.620
to do it to talk about the underlying ideology that motivates the Chinese Communist Party,
00:13:45.680
this communism, Marxist Leninism.
00:13:47.600
This is something that Secretary Pompeo, as you said, was very eloquent about trying to
00:13:51.600
explain because all countries, there is no there is no amoral void that exists.
00:13:58.100
You know, we all have ideas about what is right and good and in our interests, and it is what
00:14:02.840
animates us.
00:14:03.680
It's what motivates us.
00:14:04.600
Countries are the same way, and regimes, and so the ideology that motivates, animates
00:14:09.180
the regime matters.
00:14:11.140
And that's why these internment camps are, it's so important for us to understand and
00:14:15.420
know what's going on, not just because these poor people, we want to make sure that we're
00:14:19.640
using our, any ability that we have to, to not exasperate the problem and to help, but
00:14:26.280
also because it tells us about the nature of the Chinese Communist Party.
00:14:30.640
And it should not surprise us then when a country that has such disregard for human dignity and
00:14:36.720
the way they treat their own people, of course, they're going to have terribly unfair trade
00:14:40.520
practices.
00:14:41.600
Of course, they're going to steal intellectual property.
00:14:43.880
Of course, they're going to do all of these things.
00:14:45.620
They're going to have social credit scores.
00:14:47.020
They don't have some kind of limiting principle.
00:14:49.660
There's no limiting principle, and it's exactly right.
00:14:53.380
And then the world that they want to shape, they want to take the leadership reins from
00:14:56.720
the United States, and then they want to shape the world according to what they believe is
00:15:00.260
right and good.
00:15:00.880
And all of that is to empower Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party.
00:15:05.220
It's not for all of the reasons that the United States and the other allies and partners
00:15:09.260
that we have in the free world believe that are right and good.
00:15:12.600
And so that's the difference.
00:15:13.460
And so the Democrats, many of them do not like to talk about the ideology.
00:15:17.980
And then as soon as you start talking about those Uyghur camps, those internment camps,
00:15:21.140
then the next question is, well, then why are these American companies investing in the
00:15:25.860
Chinese economy?
00:15:27.180
And if there's no separation between the private sector, if there is no private sector, and
00:15:31.760
there's no separation between civilian work and military work, their civ-mil fusion doctrine,
00:15:37.940
you know, what we really need to have a gut check about how much we are actually responsible
00:15:43.640
and culpable, these American companies, for these massive internment camps.
00:15:48.560
And it's really stunning how quickly some of these corporations and sports organizations
00:15:54.080
are willing to sell out their own fellow Americans in order to work with China.
00:15:59.840
Even through some of the political messaging of these organizations, they are more than willing
00:16:04.280
to take a knee, literally and figuratively, to social justice causes here and say that
00:16:09.060
people who voted for Donald Trump are terrible and, you know, they believe they're on the
00:16:14.040
right side of history for being on the side of Black Lives Matter and things like that here.
00:16:18.820
At the same time, actively profiting off of a regime whose economy is built on slave labor
00:16:27.400
in large part.
00:16:29.020
And they can say, you know, I don't have a right to criticize that country.
00:16:33.320
I don't live there.
00:16:34.960
I'm, you know, have to criticize my own country because I live in America.
00:16:39.320
But if you're purposely and actively partnering with that regime, well, that becomes part of
00:16:45.780
your moral jurisdiction now.
00:16:47.920
And you are responsible for it.
00:16:49.600
And I think most Americans, they don't know.
00:16:52.360
They don't care.
00:16:53.340
We see it as something that is far off, not really a threat to us.
00:16:58.400
And I think that's I think that's a mistake, don't you?
00:17:02.580
It's definitely a mistake.
00:17:03.780
And I think it's it's even more than a mistake in terms of the moral problems that you just
00:17:08.700
raised, which are legion.
00:17:10.260
I mean, you do not have the moral authority to talk about, you know, certain issues of social
00:17:16.720
injustice when you are blatantly, flagrantly willing to choose not to, for instance, condemn
00:17:24.540
the Uyghur internment camps.
00:17:26.820
You know, there has been any time there is like somebody who works for one of these big
00:17:31.720
professional sports teams, makes a comment about that, and they're immediately asked to
00:17:36.300
apologize or to no longer discuss that you think of LeBron James or whoever the high profile
00:17:41.180
person is, and they're willing to look away.
00:17:43.220
I mean, they're doing that because the Chinese Communist Party has directed that, and then
00:17:47.800
the company then puts pressure on those Americans.
00:17:51.260
And so or even like a censorship in higher education, where they take all of this money
00:17:55.920
from the Chinese Communist Party with only, you know, they're on the condition that they're
00:18:02.240
not allowed talking about Tiananmen Square.
00:18:04.020
They're not allowed talking about the Tibetans.
00:18:05.960
They're not allowed to talk about all these other horrible crimes.
00:18:08.720
Yeah.
00:18:08.840
They're not allowed to talk about Hong Kong and how the Chinese Communist Party is just
00:18:12.840
overrunning these freedom-loving people in Hong Kong.
00:18:16.580
And so it really kind of strikes to the heart of what China is up to.
00:18:22.300
And then they're not satisfied with merely oppressing their own people.
00:18:27.100
They really are trying to shape the world in ways that are conducive to helping them gain
00:18:33.540
prestige and influence.
00:18:35.660
And so if Americans are willing to be censored, I mean, that's why I get worried even just
00:18:42.060
on small things.
00:18:42.940
You know, somebody on Facebook or Twitter or some other social media thing, you know,
00:18:48.380
says something.
00:18:49.120
We should all be very pro-free speech and freedom of expression because I call it our
00:18:54.320
soft middle.
00:18:55.440
The more tolerant we are of censorship at home, the more susceptible we are to the kinds of
00:19:01.680
censorship that the Chinese Communist Party wants to enforce on the United States to harm
00:19:07.200
us and to help them.
00:19:08.640
Yep.
00:19:08.960
And especially when it's done in the name of public safety.
00:19:13.260
I mean, we believe that Twitter and Facebook should have enforceable rules, but we want them
00:19:18.960
to be fair.
00:19:19.820
We don't want them to be politically biased.
00:19:21.600
We want them to be non-arbitrarily applied.
00:19:24.880
And we also want there to be a narrow definition of what incitement of violence looks like and
00:19:31.260
the things that they are actually able to enforce.
00:19:36.480
Because when we see so much bias in the censorship process on social media, that's when things get
00:19:42.080
really scary for a lot of people.
00:19:44.320
But you see people, in particular on the left, defending it by saying, well, this is for public
00:19:48.860
safety.
00:19:49.720
This is, you know, that was fascist propaganda that that conservative was spreading.
00:19:53.720
So it was good that it was taken down.
00:19:55.400
It just reminds me, and the cancel culture that's also involved in all of that, it reminds
00:20:00.380
me very much of the cultural revolution in China several decades ago of these shaming,
00:20:08.500
or what was it called?
00:20:09.700
Shaming or struggle sessions is what it was called, where publicly they would bring someone
00:20:14.080
into the public arena, into the street, publicly shame them, torture them, murder them, or
00:20:18.880
just yell at them.
00:20:19.680
There's pictures of, you know, their fellow countrymen pointing in their face and yelling
00:20:24.560
at them.
00:20:24.940
And this was all under the guise of public safety.
00:20:27.020
This was all under the guise of making sure that they got rid of this person committing
00:20:31.740
wrong think in Orwellian terms.
00:20:34.440
And you see the same kind of thing happening here.
00:20:39.440
And for those people who say, well, you know, the First Amendment is still intact.
00:20:42.400
You know, politically, you're still free.
00:20:44.740
But all of these communist regimes rose to power, not on political revolutions first, but
00:20:49.600
on cultural revolutions.
00:20:51.260
So to your point, if people are able to just in our private lives call for the cancellation
00:20:56.900
and the life ruining of people and the censorship of people that we just disagree with, you are
00:21:02.280
creating an environment here that is ripe for the same kind of totalitarian takeover that
00:21:09.380
we've seen, not just in China, but around the world.
00:21:11.860
Do you agree with that?
00:21:12.840
Or am I being dramatic?
00:21:14.520
No, I think that that's right.
00:21:15.880
And again, you know, it's a takeover.
00:21:18.240
It allows for greater control.
00:21:21.160
And it doesn't have to be government control.
00:21:22.920
This is something that conservatives have been talking about now for the last several
00:21:25.700
years during the Trump administration.
00:21:27.120
It can be big tech.
00:21:28.060
Who has the ability to control information, the flow of information, and then with that
00:21:35.000
information, control what people are seeing, what they're not seeing, and then shaming
00:21:39.320
people or stigmatizing people who have, as you said, wrong think.
00:21:44.440
Right now we're seeing it with conservatives.
00:21:46.400
How quickly we went from, you know, some of these, the rioters on January 6th who went from
00:21:52.400
protesters to rioters to insurrectionists to terrorists, and now it's people who voted
00:21:58.160
for Donald Trump might also have terrorist sympathies or extremist sympathies.
00:22:01.820
And so you can see that this is a very, very slippery slope.
00:22:05.000
Well, if this is how you stigmatize people and then the people who are able to harm those
00:22:10.040
people doesn't have to be the government.
00:22:11.300
Again, like I said, it can be big tech.
00:22:12.720
And if big tech is actually working with and sympathetic towards or wants that access
00:22:17.820
to the Chinese market, you know, how much is the Chinese Communist Party the one that
00:22:23.840
is influencing the flow of information in the United States?
00:22:27.540
Totally.
00:22:27.820
And the second point I think is really critical, especially for your young listeners too, is,
00:22:34.440
you know, China also, you think about all these apps that we use, you know, TikTok became
00:22:39.040
something that was really talked about a lot during the Trump administration because they
00:22:42.780
were really looking at ending TikTok in the United States.
00:22:45.800
And it's because China will also, if we don't care about our own, you know, information
00:22:52.380
being stolen, our day-to-day life, you know, Americans used to care about that stuff.
00:22:56.020
It would just kind of, just even the don't tread on me and me, or, you know, would just
00:22:59.240
say, I don't want my data stolen.
00:23:00.860
I don't want my information about where I go and all my facial recognition taken by our
00:23:06.220
government, but certainly not by an enemy government, by the Chinese Communist Party.
00:23:10.640
But that's what they do.
00:23:11.780
The Chinese Communist Party will take all of that data.
00:23:13.880
It goes directly into, you know, their algorithms, and they use it for artificial intelligence,
00:23:20.420
and they can compile dossiers.
00:23:22.860
You might be 19 years old and think that what you're doing isn't going to affect you or
00:23:26.600
embarrass you in 10, 15, 20 years when you're looking for a job.
00:23:30.460
But just think about that the Chinese Communist Party can have all that and is keeping a dossier
00:23:34.960
on you, just like what they do for their own people, and how that can impact other things
00:23:39.440
in the future.
00:23:39.980
So it is very troubling, and we need to have not just Republicans, but Democrats, too,
00:23:46.980
over many, many years talking about this because it's going to require changes on the part of
00:23:51.680
the American people, not just the government, to do what we need to do to protect the United
00:23:56.580
States and our way of life against China in particular.
00:23:59.180
I think one thing that's going to make that difficult is that when you kind of hear some
00:24:05.380
of the things coming from academia and then repeated by, in particular, I would say, some
00:24:11.780
leftists in America, it sounds so similar to the propaganda that we've heard really from
00:24:18.640
the past 100 years in Soviet Russia about America and American imperialists and the selfishness
00:24:25.060
of capitalism and the evils of the United States.
00:24:27.720
I read a book about North Korea about a year ago now, where you read the propaganda that these
00:24:35.540
young children were learning in school about America and about Japan, too.
00:24:41.020
The evil imperialists, the selfishness of capitalism, really saying that all oppression and all poverty,
00:24:47.720
not just in North Korea, but in the world, is because of the selfishness of Americans.
00:24:52.060
And these eventual dissidents realized after they left North Korea that America
00:24:56.800
had been sending foreign aid to North Korea for a very long time and it never got to the
00:25:02.240
people.
00:25:02.620
So these are lies.
00:25:04.280
This is propaganda that I don't know if it's directly through the Chinese Communist Party,
00:25:09.060
but has absolutely infiltrated our public school system, has infiltrated academia, has
00:25:14.300
infiltrated diversity and inclusion trainings, corporate trainings, has infiltrated just our
00:25:20.300
public dialogue.
00:25:21.300
And if China and these foreign regimes can make us hate ourselves, as so many unfortunately
00:25:27.900
seem to in America, then that means we're ripe for the taking, right?
00:25:32.820
It does.
00:25:33.500
Well, it doesn't even have to come from China in terms of influencing this.
00:25:38.680
It can just be these liberal intellectuals who have gotten to the point where they're teaching,
00:25:44.520
you know, you've talked a lot about on your show, the 1619 Project, that really the American
00:25:49.280
founding wasn't 76, the, you know, where the meaning and the ideology, the underpinnings
00:25:54.440
of the American regime is the belief that we're all created equal before God and that we all
00:26:01.080
have inherent dignity.
00:26:02.500
And it's in that, you know, we give government, our rights come from God and we give government
00:26:08.660
the ability to protect us and they're supposed to defend those rights.
00:26:11.780
And that's how Americans think, and that's how we used to teach it in schools.
00:26:15.800
And now it's this new thinking pushed by this, you know, the intellectuals from the
00:26:23.000
left, from higher education, that actually our founding was inherently flawed, it was
00:26:26.880
inherently racist, and it was terrible.
00:26:30.020
And so really, the United States doesn't really have any moral standing.
00:26:32.960
We need to completely remake ourselves because the founding was flawed and it was terrible
00:26:37.180
and bad.
00:26:37.580
And if you have enough Americans who believe that and who don't understand all of these
00:26:43.960
things that make America unique and exceptional, then whenever I go to them or people go to
00:26:48.560
them and they say, listen, you know, the Chinese Communist Party wants to replace all these great
00:26:52.960
things about America with this, these things that, that, that, that communism values.
00:26:57.480
But then you have all of these college students who are like, but I like those things that
00:27:00.320
the communists value.
00:27:01.440
Communism is great.
00:27:02.300
What's wrong with that?
00:27:03.480
How do you, we don't have any antibodies.
00:27:04.960
We don't have any national antibodies to push this stuff back.
00:27:08.420
And so, um, that's why, you know, I spend a lot of time talking about the external threat
00:27:12.500
coming from China, but then the internal threat where we, we need to make sure that we have
00:27:16.780
a revival of truly good American patriotism that is, um, is, is a bulwark against racism.
00:27:26.100
And it's a bulwark against the kinds of things that the left accuses, um, many conservatives
00:27:31.540
of, and you, you need to have that in order to, to withstand kind of the onslaught that
00:27:36.560
that's going to happen.
00:27:38.100
And that doesn't mean looking, you know, looking back over history and pretending like everything's
00:27:42.280
been perfect or that at our founding America was perfect.
00:27:45.440
But I think that, you know, the mistake, the 1619 project makes, um, and a lot of the
00:27:51.140
critical race theory makes is this idea that America has always been endemically, um, racist.
00:27:57.100
And it just, it is just as much today as it was in 1619.
00:28:01.540
We've just gotten better at hiding it.
00:28:04.180
And therefore something like, um, the founding and this idea of liberty and justice for all
00:28:09.300
and everyone being equal in the eyes of God, because, uh, we still had racism then, and
00:28:14.120
there were some founders that owned slaves while it's all just moot, but really it's not
00:28:18.920
either the constitution was moot or our country was perfect at our founding.
00:28:22.400
It's okay.
00:28:23.440
That seed of liberty and justice for all, it was a seed and it's grown.
00:28:27.960
I mean, Frederick Douglass thought that the constitution was a glorious liberty document
00:28:32.200
because that idea of liberty and justice for all of everyone being equal in the eyes of
00:28:36.600
God has grown over time.
00:28:38.640
It wasn't perfect.
00:28:39.640
It wasn't at, it wasn't flourishing in 1776, but it's gotten better and better.
00:28:45.760
We've righted our wrongs and we've extended that promise that the founders, I think, were
00:28:51.500
inspired to write then.
00:28:53.740
And so I think we can have a very accurate view of the injustices in America and still
00:28:59.340
be patriotic and say, wow, the ideas and ideals upon which we were founded are really good.
00:29:04.380
And when we let those flourish, America is really good.
00:29:08.220
But unfortunately, like you said, we've got a lot of people who just want to throw out
00:29:12.240
those ideals.
00:29:13.660
And I think that just allows fertile soil for someone like the CCP to come in and say, yeah,
00:29:18.240
we've got new values now.
00:29:19.720
Well, they do.
00:29:20.980
And actually, a lot of those on the left will look back, though, and they'll actually look
00:29:25.340
at the history of the United States and they'll disagree with your conclusion.
00:29:29.000
And my conclusion is that on the whole, though, the United States on net has done so much good,
00:29:34.560
has so much has done so much good because of those founding principles in our own country,
00:29:38.420
but has done so much good since the end of World War Two.
00:29:41.960
And then after George H.W. Bush, George H.W. Bush was the last president to kind of sit
00:29:47.540
at the top of the American apex of military power and economic power where the American
00:29:52.580
led world really that's what we're thinking about when there really wasn't any other power
00:29:57.020
that could come near touching us at the close of the Cold War.
00:29:59.640
And he handed that baton over to Bill Clinton.
00:30:02.240
And then that's whenever you saw you saw China, China's rise.
00:30:05.840
And then American preeminence getting chipped away, chipped away, chipped away to the point
00:30:09.460
where now we're much closer to peers than we were preeminent power or where the United
00:30:13.580
States was a preeminent power.
00:30:15.100
But that because of the United States having so much military strength, economic strength
00:30:20.060
and a greater sense of cultural confidence in what America was and the good that we were
00:30:24.940
doing, yes, always bad because we're made up of human beings and human beings because
00:30:28.900
of the fall.
00:30:29.420
And our we are we are we do do bad things, but we also do great good.
00:30:34.920
But these these American principles allowed us to do great good.
00:30:38.260
And as the United States was and has been the leader of the free world, more good has
00:30:44.760
been done.
00:30:45.200
But many liberals look back and they say, actually, no, if you look at everything that we do,
00:30:49.420
everything the United States touches, it goes bad.
00:30:52.860
And the United States actually does more bad than good.
00:30:54.980
And they really believe that.
00:30:56.020
I would just point out the New York Times wrote this ridiculous article recently about
00:31:02.040
how, you know, just how confused so many liberals are trying to urge readers to to look at how
00:31:08.400
China during the coronavirus pandemic actually was showing us their new version of freedom,
00:31:13.940
that even though they don't have civil liberties in China, I mean, even though they don't even
00:31:21.300
though they had to literally weld their citizens or, you know, into their homes.
00:31:26.660
Until they died of starvation.
00:31:27.900
Yeah.
00:31:28.480
Died of starvation.
00:31:29.660
Or I mean, there is all kinds of horrible things that I have not corroborated, so I won't
00:31:33.560
repeat them here.
00:31:34.080
But terrible, terrible, inhumane things that to me highlight how the Chinese Communist Party
00:31:38.380
does not does not value the intrinsic dignity of their people.
00:31:42.140
But they say yes.
00:31:43.280
But now because of the way they crack down, people can walk around and go to go to school and
00:31:48.060
go to work.
00:31:49.080
And so they have their new version of freedom, which is trading all of these liberties that
00:31:53.020
Americans value for the sake of, you know, whatever there exists, you know, their ability
00:31:56.980
to move around today, even though they're in this massive surveillance state.
00:32:00.080
And so it's a confusion about what freedom is and about the purpose of government and what
00:32:06.200
is actually good for human beings and what actually gives us the most ability to have maximum
00:32:12.020
human flourishing.
00:32:18.060
OK, last question that I have for you.
00:32:25.060
What do you anticipate from the Biden administration?
00:32:27.140
You talked about how the Trump administration was really strong against China and how it will
00:32:31.880
be hard for the Biden administration to undo some of those things.
00:32:35.080
But I mean, we saw at the Biden inauguration, state-affiliated media in China was celebrating
00:32:41.980
the exit of Trump, the entrance of Biden.
00:32:46.440
That really worries me.
00:32:47.780
That really worries me.
00:32:49.380
And I just it seems like Democrats aren't quite as strong in taking a stance against China.
00:32:54.620
Do you think those concerns are valid or do you have some hope for this administration
00:32:59.180
and continuing to take a strong stance against the CCP?
00:33:01.940
So I always try to have a realistic picture, not a rosy picture of what I think is going
00:33:07.820
to happen with just a little bit of constant Midwestern American hope thrown in there.
00:33:13.160
Yeah, please.
00:33:13.840
So so I think that there are there are some individuals who've been nominated by the Biden
00:33:21.300
administration who do see the China threat more clearly.
00:33:24.040
You saw Anthony Blinken.
00:33:25.160
I've debated him on PBS before on China's handling of the coronavirus, and he I definitely was
00:33:31.360
taking a much stronger stance at blaming and putting the onus for the pandemic on the Chinese
00:33:35.800
government where they're hiding it.
00:33:37.160
They're lying about it, which they constantly do today about the origins of the virus and
00:33:41.180
what they knew and when.
00:33:42.820
And he really didn't though he thought that the Chinese government messed up.
00:33:46.240
He still put a much more of the blame, I think, on the handling of the United States
00:33:50.960
government.
00:33:51.320
And so you see some kind of soft peddling rhetoric over the course of the of the many
00:33:58.340
months whenever they were attacking Donald Trump, the Trump administration.
00:34:02.240
But during the nomination hearing, some of the rhetoric changed and it was a little bit
00:34:05.540
tougher.
00:34:06.180
I mean, he did condemn.
00:34:07.240
He did agree with the designation of the the the what was the official designation of the
00:34:15.600
human rights violations of China against the Uyghurs, et cetera.
00:34:18.420
And he agreed with that.
00:34:19.680
All of that is good.
00:34:20.480
So we're seeing some good signaling from some of the senior officials coming out.
00:34:25.040
But let's be realistic.
00:34:27.260
Joe Biden has been in government for decades, decades.
00:34:31.200
And so he has a trail of evidence of what he will do.
00:34:34.700
And he has never stuck his neck out in any serious way to lead or to push back on China.
00:34:40.180
And in fact, whenever he was asked about China all through leading up to the to the election,
00:34:44.520
he did not.
00:34:45.580
He downplayed the threat and he said it wasn't a threat.
00:34:47.960
So they're not folks, folks, they're not bad folks and all kinds of business dealings with
00:34:54.200
individuals in the administration who continue to work with who worked with China.
00:34:58.780
And so I don't know if we you know, I'm not confident that they fully understand the ideological
00:35:04.500
motivation of the Chinese Communist Party and why it's a threat.
00:35:08.680
And so, you know, my hope is they get in there and get all these intel briefings and see how
00:35:13.020
how bad it is and see what the Trump administration did.
00:35:16.300
But a lot of these policies that the Trump administration put in place, we can thank Pompeo for that.
00:35:20.700
We can thank the National Security Council for that.
00:35:23.340
Really great stuff.
00:35:25.400
It's going to be almost impossible to overturn some of it.
00:35:29.020
And some of that, I think, does the Biden administration a lot of good.
00:35:33.400
You know, Joe Biden can go in there and be the congenial Joe Biden and not this, you know,
00:35:37.000
really tough guy like Donald Trump was.
00:35:39.180
And he can still build on the progress that the Trump administration already established.
00:35:45.160
But I do think that they they will undo quite a bit of it.
00:35:48.260
They're always looking for a conciliatory relationship with with countries like that.
00:35:52.380
They do that with other adversaries.
00:35:54.220
So I am concerned.
00:35:55.900
But I think our biggest threat is going to be going to do good stuff on the military.
00:35:58.960
I think that they're still going to try to work with our partners and allies in in the
00:36:02.900
Pacific to deter China.
00:36:04.280
That's all going to be good with Australia and Japan.
00:36:07.800
There's good statements about defending Taiwan.
00:36:10.320
All of that's critical.
00:36:11.500
Where the weakest part is going to be the Biden administration is all the stuff you and I just
00:36:15.420
talked about domestically.
00:36:16.520
If they continue pushing this critical race theory stuff, they continue this identity politics
00:36:20.880
that pits Americans against one another.
00:36:22.740
That goes back to that soft middle.
00:36:24.960
And we need to have a much harder middle as a people and as diverse as we are as a people,
00:36:31.600
which is wonderful.
00:36:32.340
This great, you know, just, you know, different different ethnicities and different religions
00:36:39.640
and all these things that make Americans great.
00:36:41.340
We have to have some kind of unifying cord that keeps us all together that acts again
00:36:46.600
as that, you know, that bulwark against what the Chinese Communist Party is going to continue
00:36:52.120
to try to do over the next many decades on multiple fronts.
00:36:55.720
Yeah.
00:36:55.980
And critical race theory, identity politics, which we talked a lot about on this podcast,
00:37:00.040
it works directly against that because it purposely categorizes people.
00:37:05.120
It splits people apart by their race, by their sexuality, by their religion, and not just
00:37:11.980
splits people apart, but pits people against each other based on an allocation of oppression
00:37:16.820
points.
00:37:17.260
So when Biden and his inauguration talked about unity, there were a lot of beautiful words
00:37:22.040
that I agreed with.
00:37:23.060
But you can't peddle identity politics and talk about unity because the purpose of all of
00:37:28.600
that is disintegration.
00:37:30.380
The purpose of all of that is splitting Americans apart.
00:37:35.260
And at one point, I think, you know, we at least had, okay, yes, we're different in a variety
00:37:41.300
of ways, but we all believe in liberty and justice for all.
00:37:44.860
But even greater than that, we all believe in some kind of great moral lawgiver that gives us
00:37:49.740
our rights.
00:37:50.900
The less we believe that, that we're all human beings made in the image of God and therefore
00:37:55.700
have inherent value, which is what is supposed to set America apart from someone like China.
00:38:01.220
Then it gets tougher and tougher, I think, to make the case for personal liberty, personal
00:38:07.600
privacy, personal autonomy, because human beings are just viewed as these material objects.
00:38:13.760
Why can't they be controlled by a tyrannical state?
00:38:17.480
So it really does start at the heart.
00:38:18.920
And I think it starts at the home.
00:38:20.220
And I think it starts in schools.
00:38:21.500
These values, that's really the enemy, I think, of the CCP is an ideological enemy,
00:38:27.620
a philosophical, a religious enemy, not as much of, you know, a military power, although
00:38:33.200
that's important too.
00:38:34.620
Do you think that's correct?
00:38:36.300
I think it's both.
00:38:37.500
I think that Americans can wrap their mind around, okay, what is the Chinese Communist Party
00:38:42.000
going to do militarily?
00:38:43.640
You know, can they close us off from the Indo-Pacific region?
00:38:47.640
Yes, I think that they would try to do that.
00:38:49.200
They're going to try to do to Taiwan or they would like to do to Taiwan what they did to
00:38:52.160
Hong Kong.
00:38:53.000
And then if they did that, then they could close out the United States from being able
00:38:57.460
to, you know, maintain free and open seas, you know, to make good on our security commitments,
00:39:04.020
those great democratic countries that we not only we help, but they help us in Japan and
00:39:09.160
Australia and South Korea and these other countries.
00:39:12.960
That is definitely a threat because if China is able to close us out of that region, then
00:39:17.700
that is effectively the end of the American-led order.
00:39:20.800
That means that it's now a Sino-led, it's Chinese-led.
00:39:24.180
That's a problem.
00:39:25.360
But on the point that you just made, I think it's just absolutely fundamental and critical.
00:39:30.960
So whenever people, you know, just everyday Americans say, well, what can I do?
00:39:34.500
One of the best things you can do is bone up on what it means to be an American and make
00:39:39.600
sure that you're instilling those things in your children.
00:39:42.440
Make sure that they understand why it shouldn't be acceptable to censor speech and why that's
00:39:47.020
so critical, why religious liberty is so important at home and why we're not going to accept some
00:39:51.440
of these overbearing restrictions that are irrational because of the coronavirus from
00:39:55.700
some of these politicians.
00:39:58.260
These things are dear to Americans.
00:40:00.040
They're very dear to Americans.
00:40:01.180
And we have to have this sense of, again, what it means to be an American, regardless
00:40:07.100
of, you know, ethnicity or race, something that the Democrats are always trying to blame
00:40:12.320
on Republicans for not caring about.
00:40:15.120
But, you know, conservatives do care about those things.
00:40:17.720
And you have to have enough Americans that have great, deep patriotism and appreciation for
00:40:24.140
our rights and also, you know, strong desires to freely worship and care for our families
00:40:31.700
and not having the government, the state come in and tell you how to raise your children,
00:40:36.020
what to do and how you can and cannot worship.
00:40:37.920
All of that is going to be critical if we are going to remain, you know, the greatest,
00:40:42.700
most exceptional nation on earth and be the leader of the free world, which I think is
00:40:46.920
certainly a noble purpose worth pursuing.
00:40:49.480
And it's important that we are.
00:40:51.960
And don't let anyone tell you that patriotism is wrong or bigoted or that America seeking
00:40:58.020
to be the world power is somehow wrong, because there's always going to, I think people forget,
00:41:02.480
there's always going to be a world power.
00:41:04.400
There will be.
00:41:05.340
China is not OK with just being equal, like on equal playing field and everyone just getting
00:41:10.020
along.
00:41:10.980
They want power.
00:41:12.440
And if the country who believes in liberty and justice for all and has upheld that in so
00:41:18.080
many ways for so long is not the preeminent power, the country who believes in putting
00:41:23.420
people in internment camps for believing something different will be the preeminent power.
00:41:27.480
And that has an effect on the entire world.
00:41:30.280
So like you said, is it an it is a noble and worthy endeavor to make sure that the United
00:41:35.700
States stays in the place that we should be as the leader of the free world.
00:41:40.640
Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to us.
00:41:43.960
Can you tell everyone where they can find you, where they can follow your work?
00:41:48.640
Sure.
00:41:49.080
You can follow me on Twitter.
00:41:50.200
My handle is RL Heinrichs, H-E-I-N-R-I-C-H-S.
00:41:55.140
Or you can go to Hudson Institute and all of my work is posted there, my articles and essays.
00:42:00.280
And one of the things that I've been tracking, too, which, Ali, you just mentioned a few minutes
00:42:05.180
ago, too, about how we can be sort of deceived and whether or not things are true, whether
00:42:09.940
or not it's Chinese communist propaganda, one of the things that I've been tracking and
00:42:13.800
I've been written several articles about, too, is how American media, if it doesn't,
00:42:18.920
if these journalists don't have sort of a pro-America bent, but they don't and they
00:42:22.840
don't know how to tell the difference between Chinese communist propaganda and what isn't,
00:42:26.560
they've been just repeating what comes out of the CCP.
00:42:30.320
And we've seen I have been tracking a lot of that, especially during the coronavirus pandemic.
00:42:34.480
And so we need to make sure that we understand, you know, what is just Chinese communist propaganda
00:42:39.460
being perpetuated by even American media company, you know, reporters, et cetera, and what is
00:42:45.120
actually true.
00:42:45.840
We need to be very discerning, very, very careful.
00:42:48.620
And also just, you know, the other thing I would just encourage your viewers, too, this
00:42:51.480
is not anything to be panicked about or being, you know, something that we should have great
00:42:55.220
anxiety over.
00:42:56.280
Um, we can have, uh, confidence in knowing, um, that, um, as, as you mentioned, too, that
00:43:03.580
we have this great creator who is just and good and, um, and we can move forward though
00:43:10.180
and just pray for our leaders and for the, for greater discernment and not just have great
00:43:14.880
anxiety over it, but we need to do our part in all the small little ways that we can in
00:43:18.980
our various vocations to uphold these principles that we know are right and good.
00:43:23.120
Yes.
00:43:23.600
Amen.
00:43:24.040
Thank you so much, Rebecca.
00:43:25.260
I really appreciate you coming on.
00:43:27.740
Thanks, Allie.
Link copied!