Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - Ep 494 ｜ Will the Real Right Please Stand Up？｜ Guest： Blake Masters

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Hope everyone is having a great day and week. Today we've

00:00:13.740 got a special guest for you. We've got Blake Masters, who is running for Senate in Arizona.

00:00:19.740 He's a really interesting guy. I remember seeing his campaign video a few months ago,

00:00:25.260 and it just struck me that, okay, this new crop of conservatives coming up and running for office,

00:00:30.340 they seem different than the conservatives of years past in a really good way. Their message

00:00:35.620 seems to really get to the heart of the working class and the concerns that average Americans have.

00:00:45.160 I'm really excited to see this new generation of conservatives, and I'm excited for you

00:00:49.780 to hear from him and hear his message and what his goals are in running for office. And then

00:00:56.540 when he gets there, what he promises to actually do for the people of Arizona. Before we start that

00:01:03.400 conversation, I want to ask you guys if you could please one, subscribe to YouTube. If you haven't

00:01:08.760 already, that would really help me out. Also, if you love this podcast, please leave a five-star

00:01:14.160 review on Apple. You don't even have to leave a long message or anything like that, but that

00:01:18.840 really helps us. It helps more people see the show and know what the show is about. So if you

00:01:25.040 love Relatable, if you could leave a five-star review, just tell us a little bit about why you

00:01:29.280 love the show. That would mean a whole lot to us. Thank you guys so much for listening. We're almost

00:01:34.140 to 500 episodes, which is super hard to believe that we have been here for this long. It'll almost

00:01:39.800 be four years. It'll be four years at the beginning of next year, and it's just been such a privilege to

00:01:44.700 be able to do Relatable. So if you could just let us know why you love the show, I would be so

00:01:50.480 grateful. All right. Without further ado, here is Blake Masters. Blake, thank you so much for joining

00:02:01.940 us. For those who may not be familiar with you and your campaign, can you tell us who you are and what

00:02:07.200 you do? Sure. Thank you, Ali, for having me on. My name is Blake Masters, and I'm running for the

00:02:12.900 United States Senate in Arizona. I grew up in Arizona, and I spent the first part of my career

00:02:19.560 after going to Stanford and Stanford Law School in Silicon Valley. And so I run Teal Capital. This

00:02:25.560 is Peter Teal's investment management company. And moved back to Arizona a few years ago. You know,

00:02:30.860 I had this front row view to watching Arizona lose two Senate seats, and I think that's just crazy.

00:02:36.880 So I'm tossing my hat in the ring, and I'm going to win this seat back.

00:02:40.520 And what made you decide to run? I know you said that you were frustrated with

00:02:44.600 Arizona losing two Senate seats, but a lot of people are probably frustrated and don't make

00:02:49.140 the decision to enter into the ring themselves. But you've made that decision. So why?

00:02:53.640 It just feels like the most important thing I could be doing right now. You know, I look around,

00:02:58.000 and to me, it's getting harder and harder to recognize this country. You know, and I grew up

00:03:03.380 right there in Tucson, Arizona, 30 years ago. And so much has changed and so quickly. And I worry

00:03:09.920 that if we don't get a new generation of leaders in there that actually know what to do, we're just

00:03:15.720 going to see this great country slip away. You know, I'm raising three boys, they're seven,

00:03:21.580 five, and one year old. And I think in some sense, they'll be fine. I've had a successful business

00:03:27.340 career. But they're on track to grow up in a country that just doesn't work. I think that's

00:03:33.060 alarming. And it feels like just super important to go in and try to right the ship.

00:03:38.780 It does seem like there is a new generation of conservatives coming up that maybe think a

00:03:44.300 little bit differently than their predecessors. I think one example of this has been the reaction to

00:03:51.600 Biden's vaccine mandates, or maybe just vaccine mandates in general. Whereas I think the typical

00:04:00.580 conservative response has been to say, you know, I am against these vaccine mandates, because I don't

00:04:07.320 think the government should be telling businesses what to do. But then there's been kind of a new,

00:04:13.100 a different conservative response that has said, actually, I'm going to tell businesses that they

00:04:18.140 cannot discriminate against people because of their vaccination status, and they can't mandate

00:04:22.700 vaccine. So where do you land on that? Yeah, I think the Biden mandate is crazy. And I think if

00:04:29.440 anything, we should be doing just the opposite, we should be prohibiting companies of any real size

00:04:34.420 from requiring vaccination. And I think conservatives, or at least the new generation here that we're

00:04:40.540 talking about, we are waking up to this. I like markets. But at a certain point, when businesses

00:04:47.020 become so big, they absolutely can threaten people's liberty, just like the government,

00:04:53.720 you know, at a certain point, Facebook has so much power, that it's more powerful than most

00:04:58.080 governments. And of course, at a certain point, they're not even private companies anymore.

00:05:09.780 If these big companies want to act like publishers instead of platforms, fine, we should treat them

00:05:15.700 like publishers. But I think that only goes like two or 3% as far as we need to go. I do think these

00:05:21.860 companies passed a certain point, but Facebook and Twitter and Google, they're there. They're common

00:05:26.540 carriers. And so they can't discriminate against you and I any more than the phone company can

00:05:32.060 discriminate against you or I, you know, they can't block certain content that they don't like.

00:05:37.220 And then I do think we probably need to use antitrust enforcement and break some of these

00:05:40.780 companies up. They're just too big and too powerful. When I see Hunter Biden story, you know,

00:05:46.320 getting ripped off the internet by Facebook the week before an election. It's like, how is that a

00:05:50.640 fair and free election? Right. That's just crazy. And they should not have the power to do that.

00:05:55.080 So if they're going to act like that, fine, maybe Facebook shouldn't be allowed to have Facebook and

00:05:59.820 WhatsApp and Instagram and this whole ecosystem, and efficiently sort of my data to use against to use

00:06:06.100 against American citizens. I think we've got to clean all that up. So you're arguing that they 0.91

00:06:10.460 right now are acting as publishers, but they're getting the immunity of a platform. But at the

00:06:16.560 same time, something, so something that I worry about, because I've really kind of looked at both

00:06:20.380 sides of this debate, they still need to have the power. These social media companies still need to

00:06:26.920 have the power to kick off content that is actually truly harmful. Like you want them to be able to kick

00:06:31.660 off pornography and especially like child exploitation and true abuse and doxing and things

00:06:38.220 like that. And so people on the other side of the debate would argue, well, if you repeal section 230

00:06:42.840 and you treat them just as publishers, they become liable for everything. And they're either going to

00:06:48.540 hyper censor because they don't want to be liable for everything. Or if you treat them as platforms,

00:06:53.820 then they're not going to be able to have the power to kick off actual, offensive, harmful,

00:06:59.520 violent content. So what is, what's the balance there? I think it's, if it's illegal content,

00:07:05.420 you know, if it's like child sex material or something horrible like that, or even just

00:07:09.120 actual incitement to violence, if it's illegal, you can, you can kick it off. But if it's someone

00:07:14.160 saying like, I support president Trump or, you know, I'm pro-life, I don't care what you say about

00:07:19.760 it. And you get kicked off for like that political content. I think that crosses a line. So where's the

00:07:24.100 line? It's hard to say, but these companies are so far from it right now. I think they just wantonly

00:07:28.620 sensitive conservatives who become too powerful. Yeah. And they don't like it.

00:07:32.840 Yeah. And obviously there have been attempts to try to kind of create competitors. There was

00:07:39.560 Parler and then they ended up getting taken down by... It's so disingenuous. It's like,

00:07:45.780 if you don't like it, go build your own Google, go build your own Facebook, which I think is 0.83

00:07:49.100 ridiculous. And it doesn't understand the sort of realistic monopoly network effects that these

00:07:54.100 companies have. But then it's like, okay, fine, I'll go build Parler. So some people go do that.

00:07:58.440 And then you see them get deplatformed by AWS and Apple, allegedly because of hate speech. But in

00:08:03.920 practice, I think we can feel that that's just partisan deplatforming. So you can't even build

00:08:08.220 your own alternatives. They won't let you. Right, right. I took this New York Times,

00:08:14.780 this New York Times quiz that everyone is taking, which I'm sure they were just mining our data in,

00:08:19.660 in all of that. But everyone was taking this quiz that was telling them, you know, where they land on

00:08:24.640 the different political quadrants. There's a lot of people in this upper right corner who are socially

00:08:32.080 conservative and who are also economically conservative. And then there's obviously some

00:08:37.580 in the other quadrants. But where there was the least amount of people is this quadrant that is

00:08:44.460 socially liberal and economically conservative. And yet that quadrant seems to represent the mindset

00:08:52.160 of a lot of people in Washington and certainly a lot of DC think tanks. And so it actually seems

00:08:58.200 like the majority of conservatives, even though they're very socially conservative, they're pretty

00:09:02.840 economically conservative. We don't have a whole lot of, you know, outright representation. We don't

00:09:08.500 have a lot of people that are out there fighting our culture wars in the same way that you've got

00:09:13.600 democratic politicians fighting the culture wars of the left. Why do you think that is? And do you

00:09:18.600 think that it can change? I think it just is because that's been the Republican Party. You know,

00:09:23.820 I think Ronald Reagan did his job in the 80s, but then no one updated. Everyone kept saying the same

00:09:28.640 stuff through the 90s, through the aughts. It was just Paul Ryanism. You know, Paul Ryan thought,

00:09:33.820 gee, what Americans really want is, you know, more immigration and less health care. And no,

00:09:39.440 it's just the opposite. People actually don't want, you know, mass immigration, but we do want a

00:09:44.240 health care system that works. And the Republicans have been failing to deliver that for the longest

00:09:49.280 time. I think the left has failed to deliver it. And Obamacare is a disaster and prices are really

00:09:53.140 high. But no, people are center center right on economics. And I think this country is still very

00:09:59.400 socially conservative. You know, we don't want drag queen story hour. We don't want critical race

00:10:05.060 theory in our schools. 60 or 70 percent of people rightly see this stuff and they think this is crazy.

00:10:10.020 And if we train a whole generation of people to think this way, we will just lose the country.

00:10:15.080 So I think it's just been too easy for Republicans like Paul Ryan, sort of chamber of commerce,

00:10:20.500 business interest types, to just focus only on economics. You focus only on tax cuts. It's like,

00:10:25.900 yeah, I like tax cuts. But if your whole political program for 20 years is nothing but tax cuts,

00:10:31.060 meanwhile, the left is just, you know, assaulting everything. They're just taking over all the

00:10:35.840 institutions. You're not going to have a country anymore. And I think that's what this new

00:10:38.920 generation of Republican leadership, you know, that I'm trying to be a part of. I think that's

00:10:42.280 what we see crystal clearly. And I think most people agree with us.

00:10:52.980 Something that we talk a lot about on this podcast is the threat of China, how it's much 1.00

00:10:57.400 bigger than a lot of people realize. And certainly we don't consider on a daily basis because it seems

00:11:02.560 too far off for us to really think about how it could be affecting our family. But if you look at

00:11:07.600 the policies of not just Democrats, but a lot of neoconservatives, but certainly the Biden

00:11:13.800 administration, they seem to be constantly playing into the hand of the CCP at the expense

00:11:19.240 of the United States. What's your take on that? And what would be your plan once you made it to

00:11:24.480 Congress to kind of push back on what we're seeing, the weakening of America to strengthen

00:11:29.020 the CCP?

00:11:30.280 Yeah, I think for 30 years, again, since the end of the Cold War, politicians left and right have

00:11:36.080 been asleep at the wheel on China. You know, I think as recently as 2014, Joe Biden was like,

00:11:41.080 come on, man, you know, China's never going to. What are you talking? He did more than anyone to 0.83

00:11:46.860 enable the rise of China. It was this naive life. We helped them industrialize. Oh, they'll just become 0.99

00:11:51.580 more like us, a sort of Western liberal democracy. Now we helped them industrialize and we actually

00:11:56.720 became more like them, you know, some ossified sort of centrally controlled oligarchy. And I think

00:12:04.200 that's horrible. Trump, when Trump won in 2016, he came along and he reset the entire conversation

00:12:09.620 on China, I think in a really healthy way. And we just have to pick up that torch and run with it

00:12:14.160 because China is the number one geopolitical threat. You know, the left still wants to just

00:12:19.540 talk about Russia, Russia, Russia and Putin. That's like, no, man, China is the threat. China's 0.98

00:12:25.220 playing the long game. They've been eating our lunch for a long time. I thought the Trump economic

00:12:29.300 policies were great. You know, slap China with tariffs because there's no free trade with China. 0.82

00:12:34.260 There's no level playing field. If we think we have a level playing field, it just means we're

00:12:37.460 getting totally owned. And so push back on China economically. Don't let them advance militarily. 0.97

00:12:43.700 You know, we're already in the soft cold war with China. But when they look at the weakness 0.79

00:12:47.480 in Biden's Afghanistan, you know, debacle, it's like they're just salivating over Taiwan.

00:12:53.540 They see this weak president. Why would they not move on Taiwan right now? This is really dangerous.

00:12:58.260 Yeah. And I think that, again, that the new generation of leadership just sees this so

00:13:02.260 clearly. Yeah. We're just giving the keys away to China. It is crazy. 0.94

00:13:06.800 Well, China actually said that after the whole Afghanistan disaster. They put a statement out

00:13:11.080 that said anyone in Taiwan who is thinking that America is going to save them, and I'm pretty

00:13:16.140 sure the statement said when there is a war, not even if there is a war, just realize the United

00:13:21.640 States is not going to come help you. And I think that's the signal, certainly, that we are

00:13:26.320 that we are giving to our allies, that the United States is not to be trusted. And I don't actually

00:13:32.580 think, I mean, not to ascribe the most nefarious motivations to this administration, but it's

00:13:37.220 getting harder and harder not to do that. I don't think that this administration really cares. I think

00:13:43.040 that it is, you know, a sequel of the Obama administration that really believed ideologically

00:13:48.120 that American strength is bad, that relying on American resources, that building up America in

00:13:54.380 any way socially, politically, or economically is actually bad for the world, and that America needs

00:13:59.480 to be taken down a notch in a variety of ways in order to even the playing field and whatever. I

00:14:04.660 don't even know what the ultimate goal is. But it just seems, it seems purposeful at this point. And

00:14:09.900 I hate to say the administration is malicious, but I don't know. It seems that way in some ways.

00:14:15.060 At a certain point, it's like, it's interesting. It's an interesting dinner table conversation to

00:14:19.280 say, is this intentional? Is this not? Is this a conspiracy? Is it? No, but it doesn't matter whether

00:14:23.620 it's whether they mean to do it, or whether it's just incompetence, or those can get into the same

00:14:28.980 thing, right? But when you believe in this globalist project, when you don't believe that your job as

00:14:33.320 commander in chief is to look up for Americans first, right, they get offended at this America

00:14:38.640 first tagline. Why would you? That's a tell right there. Because obviously, your job in the American 0.73

00:14:44.480 government is to look after Americans first. It doesn't mean like, you know, screw over the rest of

00:14:48.340 the world. But it means like, we've got a job to do, which is make our country great. And even

00:14:52.840 greater in the future. No, they don't believe that they believe in this globalist project where

00:14:56.680 everybody is, you know, the same thing. And everybody's equal. And you know, there's no

00:15:01.740 difference between a Bangladeshi citizen and an American citizen. And it's like, that's a really

00:15:06.020 dangerous perspective for your leaders to have. Yeah, you will have a solid out country. So whether it's

00:15:11.560 intentional or not, I don't know. But I agree that if you wanted to ruin America, you would basically

00:15:16.480 exactly implement all the Biden's policies. Open borders, cancel pipelines here, approve them in

00:15:23.020 Russia. You see the gas crisis, like we're not energy independent, weak on China, weak in Afghanistan.

00:15:28.780 It's crazy. It really is. You know, this is a, it's a Christian podcast. So most people listening

00:15:34.560 are Christians. And I've noticed that there is certainly something within evangelicalism that has

00:15:39.920 started to kind of rise up over the past few years. This idea that America first is bigoted,

00:15:45.180 that it's wrong, that we shouldn't make America a priority, because that somehow is saying that

00:15:51.860 Americans are better than the rest of the world when that's not true at all. But I kind of see the

00:15:57.940 lights turn on a little bit whenever I say, well, if you have a mayor, like, let's start small. If you

00:16:02.980 have a mayor of a city who says, you know what, Tulsa is my priority. I love the people of Tulsa. I think

00:16:08.200 this is the best city in the world. I'm going to prioritize the people of Tulsa before I'm going to

00:16:12.940 prioritize the people of Oklahoma City or the people of Phoenix or whatever it is. That would

00:16:18.200 make him, yes, that would make him a good leader, right? You wouldn't think you would not elect a

00:16:23.120 mayor who said, you know what, I hate Tulsa. I think Tulsa is awful. And actually, I'm going to 0.96

00:16:27.720 prioritize the people of Atlanta first, you would say, well, no, I'm not going to elect you. Well,

00:16:31.800 the same is true. If you're talking about a company, the same is true. If you're talking about a

00:16:35.620 state, if you're talking about a country, it's not, as you said, let's screw over the rest of the

00:16:40.800 world, everyone else is awful. And only our people are, are good, innately better than everyone

00:16:45.600 else. It's just saying, look, I've got a job as an elected official here. I'm going to put the

00:16:51.220 priorities of my country first, right? That's right. That's right. And when you make that analogy,

00:16:57.020 it just, it just highlights how crazy this Biden administration is. Yeah. Like it did. Anyway,

00:17:04.240 almost at a loss for words, right? Yeah. So yeah, but this is, but you just look at how they treated

00:17:08.900 President Trump. Like here's a guy who just actually really loved his country, you know,

00:17:13.040 for 50 years, median wages had stagnated for the first time in the Trump administration,

00:17:17.320 median wages for actual working class people are up and they hate that. They just hate that.

00:17:23.560 Yeah. So this is the future. It's like, do we want a globalist project where like nothing works?

00:17:27.820 Or do we want a country that actually works and we can govern in a commonsensical way? It really is

00:17:31.920 that stark. And so much of what's happening right now with draconian COVID policy,

00:17:36.280 with his foreign policy, even things like cutting the Keystone pipeline, it almost seems like the

00:17:41.240 intention is to hurt the middle class and to hurt the working class. Certainly. 0.99

00:17:55.320 Okay. One issue that we talked about a lot that I just want to get your thoughts on before we close

00:17:59.400 this out is abortion. I am very outspoken in the way of being pro-life. Most of the people I would

00:18:05.880 guess listening to this podcast are very pro-life. This is a very important issue for a lot of people.

00:18:09.820 I would guess for a lot of people that would be voting for you too. So what's your stance on

00:18:13.800 abortion and pro-life legislation? Kind of like the legislation that came out of Texas recently.

00:18:20.280 Yeah. I'm unapologetically pro-life. I think that's just obvious,

00:18:23.480 obviously the correct position. It's so important. I think Roe v. Wade needs to be repealed yesterday.

00:18:30.920 I think it's a horrible decision. It's horrible jurisprudentially. They just invented some right

00:18:36.680 to privacy out of thin air and then said somehow that covers abortion. So I think just on the legal

00:18:42.200 merits, horrible decision. Of course, horrible policy too, and just responsible for killing hundreds of

00:18:47.000 thousands of babies a year. So got to get rid of that. I think the federal government has a role to

00:18:52.840 play here. I think that Congress should have a debate and pick a certain point and say,

00:18:58.600 no, we're going to recognize right here, federal personhood. And past that, absolutely no abortions. 0.95

00:19:04.760 Maybe they leave some amount of states below that. I think that's a workable compromise we could get

00:19:10.440 to in the next two or three years if we get a Republican House and Senate and presidency in 2024.

00:19:16.920 But I'm in favor, basically, of Texas's law and states that want to protect life. I think that's

00:19:25.720 super important.

00:19:26.680 Yeah. Well, that's good. I know people.

00:19:29.880 It's ghastly. You see, Ali, how the abortion thing has turned into this religious totem for the left. 0.67

00:19:36.920 In the 90s, they promised they just wanted abortion to be safe, legal, and rare. And now,

00:19:41.960 it's like you have activists wearing their shirts with the tally marks on how many abortions they've

00:19:46.600 had. And this is the cultural thrust of it. It's a religious sacrifice to these people. I think it's

00:19:51.080 demonic. And I think we've got to put a stop to it. Yeah, it absolutely is, unfortunately. And

00:19:55.640 there's a lot of people who have been deluded into thinking no one's pro-abortion. It's really,

00:20:01.240 you know, you can be personally pro-life, politically pro-choice. At the end of the day,

00:20:05.080 you really do see that the pro-abortion lobby, there is, I agree, something demonic about it, 0.93

00:20:10.520 certainly. But it's also just at such a tangible cost of human life. And there are things that we

00:20:16.440 can do to, I think, promote a culture of life and to make America a better place to raise kids. But

00:20:22.920 that doesn't mean that we can't also try to save lives in the womb at the same time. It doesn't have

00:20:29.720 to be either or. And that's unfortunately the false choice people make. The left hits us with

00:20:35.480 this hypocrisy argument, right? They say, oh, Republicans only care about young life when it's

00:20:39.640 in the womb. And once the baby's born, they don't care. And it's like, no, I care about it before

00:20:44.040 birth and after. Right. So to your point, we do need to focus more on like, how do we make America

00:20:49.160 the best place to raise children? How do we help people in working class? And how do we help single

00:20:54.600 moms? How do we help them make it work? I think Republicans need to talk a lot more about that. 0.96

00:20:58.840 Yeah. But as you said, it goes together. It's like, we also need to support young mothers,

00:21:03.640 young children before they're born because they're still human beings.

00:21:07.080 And we can debate the different ways to do that. That doesn't always mean policy. I mean,

00:21:11.560 the pro-lifers that I know, they already spend all of their time and money and energy voluntarily

00:21:16.600 to helping families in crisis, but it could also be policy. I'm definitely not saying that it's not,

00:21:23.240 but like you said, it's both and, it's both and. All right. To close this out, you know,

00:21:30.120 a lot of people, I'm sure you are too. We are very disillusioned with politicians in general,

00:21:35.080 certainly over the past year and a half. But that includes Republicans. I'm very much a conservative.

00:21:39.720 I've never voted for a Democrat. I will probably vote for Republicans, at least for the foreseeable

00:21:45.640 future. And yet I have become a little bit cynical when it comes to any politician, Republican or

00:21:53.640 Democrat, that they're actually going to do what they say that they're going to do. And that when

00:21:57.800 they get to Washington, even though, you know, I know it's a whole big bureaucratic mess and one

00:22:02.280 person can't necessarily do everything. I understand that. But it does seem like, you know, when people

00:22:08.040 actually get into office, they kind of just say, okay, I have my, I have my power. That's what I wanted.

00:22:12.920 I don't really care about what I promised on the campaign trail. Make your pitch to us that you

00:22:18.520 aren't going to be like the conservative Republican politicians of the past, that you're going to at

00:22:22.800 least try to get the things done that you say that you are. Yep. That's a great question. And I've,

00:22:27.400 I've felt the same disillusionment that you do, right? That's kind of like why I'm running.

00:22:31.140 Yeah. To me, power is uninteresting unless you can actually do something with it. Right. And I see so

00:22:36.040 many problems in our country. Uh, the idea of doing all the hard work and it's crazy, it's grueling,

00:22:41.240 you know, I have to spend all this time away from my family, but the idea of going through this

00:22:44.460 just to win and then be in office and somehow coast and somehow then all of a sudden ignore

00:22:49.620 all the problems or not want to actually use that pulpit and use that power. That's crazy to me. Um,

00:22:54.820 you know, I do think, uh, yeah, one person can't just turn the ship around like that, but I think

00:22:59.340 one person can do a lot more than we think. And so I look forward to getting and yeah, taking that

00:23:04.940 proverbial machete and clearing a lot of brush out and anything that I try to do and can't do,

00:23:09.620 right? I will take that flashlight and shine it on all the reasons why the bureaucracy and the

00:23:14.680 stagnation and the corruption. Um, to me, the idea of just going and being in DC forever for 45 years

00:23:20.020 like Joe Biden, that's crazy. I want to go in, I want to spend a few years there and do as much as

00:23:24.500 I can. Cause if I don't do that, I think if other people don't do that, um, if we don't support the

00:23:29.020 people trying to do that, we're, we're literally going to lose this country to the far left progressive

00:23:34.140 wing and it's going to look a lot more like Brazil in 10 years than the America we know and love.

00:23:39.220 So that's what motivates me. Yeah. You have highlighted a big problem. My husband and I

00:23:43.260 talk about that a lot, a big problem with people in Washington and really just government around

00:23:47.280 the world, people who want power for the sake of power. And I think saying people don't under,

00:23:51.880 like, I don't understand that. I don't understand the appeal of just having power just to have it.

00:23:56.600 You're not going to actually do something good with it. But unfortunately you have a lot of

00:24:00.400 sociopathic people that run this country who really do just want power for the sake of power.

00:24:05.520 You get to go to the Met Gala and express your fashion choices and get in with the in crowd. 0.93

00:24:10.180 To me, that seems disgusting and just not worth it. Right. Right. Well, thank you so much.

00:24:15.540 How can they support you? Do you have a website they can go to, to learn more?

00:24:19.900 Absolutely. You can go to BlakeMasters.com, read about my platform, you know, donate if you can,

00:24:25.200 every dollar helps. And yeah, thank you so much for having me, Allie. This is fun.

00:24:29.320 Awesome. Thank you so much, Blake. Great. Thank you.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - September 23, 2021

Ep 494 ｜ Will the Real Right Please Stand Up？｜ Guest： Blake Masters

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - September 23, 2021

Ep 494 ｜ Will the Real Right Please Stand Up？ ｜ Guest： Blake Masters

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript

Ep 494 ｜ Will the Real Right Please Stand Up？｜ Guest： Blake Masters