Ep 552 ｜ ＂Big Fertility＂ & the Truth Behind The Surrogacy Industry ｜ Guest： Jennifer Lahl
Episode Stats
Words per minute
178.66193
Harmful content
Misogyny
34
sentences flagged
Hate speech
27
sentences flagged
Summary
Jennifer Lawl is the founder and president of the Center for Bioethics and Culture, a non-profit organization that focuses on the ethics of assisted reproduction and third-party conception. In this episode, Jennifer talks about the pros and cons of surrogacy, egg donation, and sperm donation.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Thursday. Today, we are talking to Jennifer Lal. She
00:00:17.300
is the founder and president of the Center for Bioethics and Culture. We're going to
00:00:21.040
be talking about a very controversial subject, which is surrogacy, egg donation, sperm donation.
00:00:28.940
We're also going to be talking about this movement or this big industry of transitioning
00:00:35.640
children using hormone blockers and all of that. As always, this episode is brought to you by Good
00:00:42.700
Ranchers. We had our Good Ranchers last night. We had an amazing ribeye steak with some butternut
00:00:48.900
squash and some green beans, and it was so, so good. Go to goodranchers.com slash Allie for an
00:00:55.440
amazing deal. All right. Super excited for you to hear this conversation with Jennifer. She's a very
0.57
00:01:03.900
insightful person on this controversial topic or on these controversial topics. I know even as
00:01:11.220
Christians and conservatives, we don't all agree on surrogacy, on IVF and things like that, but it's
00:01:16.460
so important for us to be asking these questions that no one really wants to ask because it's
00:01:22.020
politically incorrect in a lot of circles. We're going to run into the controversy and we're going
00:01:27.800
to talk about a tough topic, and hopefully you will gain both clarity and courage from it. So
00:01:34.560
without further ado, here is our new friend, Jennifer Lawl. Ms. Lawl, thank you so much for joining us.
00:01:43.540
Can you tell everyone who you are and what you do? Sure. Well, good morning from California.
00:01:48.940
I'm Jennifer Lawl, and I am the president of a nonprofit organization that's based in the San
00:01:54.060
Francisco Bay Area called the Center for Bioethics and Culture. And in a previous life, I was a
00:02:00.980
pediatric critical care nurse for many, many years, and then I went back to graduate school
00:02:05.080
to study bioethics. And tell me why you are focused on the subject of surrogacy. What got you interested
00:02:13.000
in this? Yeah, well, actually, it was really during the heyday of George Bush's presidency when we were
00:02:19.240
debating all the surplus human embryos that were going to be destroyed for possible research to
00:02:26.480
develop cures, cure people's diseases. And of course, as a nurse, I was very interested in the
00:02:32.300
ethics around that. And I started asking myself, how was it that we came to have what is now almost
00:02:38.900
over a million human embryos frozen in the United States. And that led me sort of down the rabbit
00:02:44.460
hole of looking into assisted reproduction. So making babies in the laboratory is all part of
00:02:50.960
assisted reproduction. And in my work, I expanded that to encompass third party reproduction. So
00:02:57.940
women being offered money to sell their eggs or men being offered money to donate, donate in
00:03:03.880
quotations firm, and of course, surrogate pregnancy. So I've written, traveled the world, spoken,
00:03:12.080
produced quite a few documentary films on the whole area of assisted reproduction, the ethics of it,
00:03:18.340
the good, the bad, the ugly of third party conception as well.
00:03:24.440
And tell us what is the problem with surrogacy? Because even though this is a Christian conservative
00:03:29.780
podcast, and you would think that a lot of people know, the fact is that many people don't know the
00:03:34.920
problems with it. As you've talked about, there's a lot of money behind it. But tell us some of the
00:03:42.720
Yeah, well, I think most people first just don't realize that a surrogate pregnancy is a much higher
00:03:47.120
risk pregnancy than a woman's own natural, spontaneously conceived pregnancy. So in fact, my colleague and I,
00:03:53.720
Callie Fell, both all of us, both of us are nurses, took it upon ourselves during COVID to interview 97
00:04:00.220
gestational surrogates in the United States. And we compared their own pregnancies with their surrogate
00:04:05.460
pregnancies. And it's already in the medical literature, but our research has sort of expanded
00:04:09.320
on that and underscored that these are high risk, high complicated pregnancies. And anybody who's been
00:04:15.360
pregnant, or anybody who knows somebody's been pregnant, we know that if the woman is in a high risk
00:04:20.000
pregnancy, the baby, or in the case of surrogacy, often they're carrying twins, babies are at risk
00:04:26.180
also. So that is right out of the gate, to me, just a deal breaker. We don't have any business asking
00:04:32.460
young women to put themselves in risky situations. And especially when we're paying them, we don't pay
1.00
00:04:39.640
organ donors. And we know that, you know, being an organ donor carries its own risk. You're undergoing a
00:04:45.160
major surgical procedure. And we're also putting these children at risk that are developing in the surrogate
00:04:51.220
mother's womb. And in California, we've had surrogates die. In Idaho, we've had surrogates die. We've had
00:04:57.380
several, I think, five or six women in the United States across the United States die. And women in the
00:05:02.940
global South have died. So these are risky pregnancies. So whether you're religious, you're not religious, whether
00:05:08.940
you're conservative, whether you're a liberal progressive, you know, I work right alongside with Gloria
00:05:13.960
Steinem in New York State to try to oppose then Governor Cuomo's legalization of commercial
00:05:20.340
surrogacy in that state. Wow. And tell us how this process works exactly, because a lot of people might
00:05:29.060
push back and say, well, sure, there are risks that come with everything there. This might be riskier
00:05:35.540
for the baby and for the mother, but there's consent and consent has kind of become the only standard of
00:05:41.880
morality and ethics that a lot of people say that they have these days. So if a woman is consenting
0.84
00:05:46.780
to it, and if this is how she is making money, then then what's the big deal? She's taking on the risks
1.00
00:05:53.380
voluntarily. Yeah, I think, again, it gets back to the proper role of medicine. I mean, when was a time
00:06:00.080
when a doctor asked you, even perhaps with money, incentivize you to take risk with your own body? And
00:06:06.860
you've seen the absolute pushback in the United States around vaccine mandates, you know, forcing
00:06:11.720
people to do things with their body. So, you know, doctors are not in the business of telling us to do
00:06:16.100
things that are harmful to us. And they're not in the business of offering money for us to do things
00:06:21.100
that are harmful to us. That's one of the main reasons why we do not allow organ donors to be paid.
00:06:26.880
We don't want money to be a coercive element in the whole area of informed consent. So, you know,
00:06:33.120
this, you know, this sort of argument of it's a very libertarian based on contracts. You know,
00:06:39.300
I want to get in a car, I want to go to the, you know, the car dealership, I want to buy a car,
00:06:43.160
I want to drive a car when I know that there's risk to driving a car, and that people die every
00:06:49.060
day from from being, you know, behind the wheel of a car or being a passenger being hit by a drunk
00:06:54.000
driver. We know that so we take those kind of risks. But that those kind of calculuses, if you will,
00:06:59.580
do not play a role or shouldn't play a role in medical decision making, we want people to have
00:07:06.060
as much decisions as they possibly can. And we have a lot of things that that medicine won't do.
00:07:12.340
You know, I can't just walk in today and say, you know, do X, Y, and Z, because I'm paying you. And I've
00:07:20.100
done my research on Google and the internet, and I want you to do X, Y, and Z. Now, we've seen the
00:07:25.000
corrosion of medicine where that is having an impact, you know, if you look at the transing of
1.00
00:07:30.000
children, the whole area of trans, transgender medicine, you know, chopping off reproductive
1.00
00:07:36.260
organs, chopping off, you know, healthy breasts. And we should be rightly appalled that there are
1.00
00:07:42.420
medical doctors who are willing to just do that kind of stuff. So our work is pushing back on that
00:07:47.440
and saying, that's not medicine. And medicine has never and should never be in the business of
00:07:52.460
allowing people to do things that are medically risky. And I want to tell you that they have no
00:07:57.740
medical need for us, right? You know, it's one thing if you have cancer, and the doctor saying
00:08:01.700
chemotherapy is very risky, you might die from the chemotherapy. But your option is to also die from
00:08:09.000
cancer. Yeah. But in the case of a surrogate, she has no medical need to do this. Right, right. And I don't
00:08:16.280
think that a lot of people are considering that. And they're certainly not considering that there is a
00:08:21.580
heightened risk, an even higher risk from a surrogacy pregnancy than there is from your regular
00:08:29.300
pregnancy. But I want to I want to hear before we get into so called gender reassignment surgery,
0.98
00:08:36.220
and your medical perspective on that, because I've seen you talk a lot about that subject as well.
00:08:41.860
I want to know what is the what's what's the process if two men decide that they want children of
00:08:49.080
their own. And they want to hire a surrogate to do that, because that would be one of the only ways
1.00
00:08:54.740
to have a child that has any of their DNA. How does that process work? Yeah, well, let's use Elton John
00:09:03.120
because he and his partner husband David Furnish came to California twice my state, and gay men almost
00:09:09.360
overwhelmingly buy eggs. We don't even talk about the women who are asked to sell their eggs. Yeah,
00:09:15.140
they all almost always buy eggs from another woman and rent the womb of another. Because that's by
1.00
00:09:20.580
definition, the gestational surrogate, the gestational surrogate is just the womb.
00:09:24.700
And is that for ethical reasons? And I use scare quotes like what's it what's the reason that they
00:09:30.960
separate the egg donor from the gestator? Overwhelmingly, they want to make sure that
00:09:38.340
neither one of these women can make a claim to being having any maternal rights. You just provided
1.00
00:09:45.220
the genetic material. You're just the womb, you have no right. So legally, and you know, we've had
0.85
00:09:51.300
in in, you know, US law, cases of disputed surrogacy, where the surrogate mother changes her mind,
00:09:57.900
and says, I cannot surrender the baby, even though I'm contractually bound to. So I think it's a it's a
00:10:03.960
legal maneuver to make sure that neither one of these women has a has a right to this child. She
1.00
00:10:09.440
has no legal standing to make the case that she is the birth mother, or the genetic mother. So you're,
00:10:15.840
you're, you know, you're explaining, if you will, and risking the health of two women. And again,
00:10:22.720
for money, so the corruption of this decision making, and this informed consent is corrupted.
00:10:28.720
To and in both of these women's health is put in jeopardy. So they both of these women have to take
0.52
00:10:35.380
high dose fertility drugs for different procedures. In the case of the egg donor, you know, she's being
0.93
00:10:40.780
put on high dose fertility drugs to produce lots and lots of eggs, and they will then surgically
00:10:45.100
remove from her. In the case of the surrogate, she is taking fertility drugs and hormones, if you will,
0.95
00:10:52.660
to prepare her uterus to then receive this embryo transfer, you know, the putting this embryo into
0.62
00:10:58.780
her body. And what we're seeing in the medical literature, the reason that this woman is having
00:11:03.560
high risk, things like preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, maternal diabetes is because her
00:11:11.220
body is recognizing this is foreign. Again, think of the organ donor, right? You know, we can't just put
00:11:16.500
my kidney in you because I want to help you and save your life, we have to make sure you're not going to
00:11:20.660
reject it. And so that mother, instantly her body says, this isn't my baby, this is foreign. And she
00:11:27.760
develops an immune response to that. So they're, you know, the medication and all the procedures
00:11:34.900
and stuff are putting them at risk. And then once the surrogate is pregnant, and that pregnancy is
00:11:40.160
confirmed, she still will stay on these hormones for a period of time till they think that the embryo
0.99
00:11:45.960
has really implanted, the uterine lining has done everything the uterine lining needs to do.
00:11:50.660
Um, and then we're not even talking about the psychological, um, uh, risks that these women
1.00
00:11:56.860
undergo and the, uh, the secondary consequences of the children. You know, do we want little girls
0.95
00:12:03.380
and little boys seeing mommies have babies that then they give away or they sell? Do we want our
00:12:09.300
little children to think, well, this is what mommies do. And, you know, little girls do when they grow
00:12:13.360
up. Um, the impact on marriage I've seen, this has been really negatively impacted on some marriages
00:12:19.020
that fall apart. You know, men feel like, wow, my wife has to sell her body. She has to carry another
1.00
00:12:24.080
man's child, um, because I can't financially provide. And so there's all these layers of
00:12:29.500
things. Um, in our particular research, we found that surrogate mothers have more postpartum
0.99
00:12:34.880
depression with their surrogate pregnancies. And we think, well, they go home with empty arms,
0.96
00:12:41.140
right. You know, they go home with breasts that are full of milk, um, meant to nurse a child and,
1.00
00:12:46.980
and that doesn't happen. Right. And tell us, um, going back to, you mentioned Elton John as an
00:12:54.720
example, when we started talking about this, um, tell us about his process to kind of shed some light
00:13:00.400
on how this works. Like, is it a catalog? How did they contact these women?
00:13:05.180
Yeah, there are, there really are catalogs, you know, we, you know, good old Mitt Romney got, um,
00:13:11.820
sort of, um, in trouble when he talked about binders of women, um, during his presidential
00:13:16.980
campaign and literally fertility agencies have binders of women. So, you know, you can, uh, shop
00:13:22.860
for, um, the whole genetic profile. You will have the egg donor, smart, pretty tall, speaks a foreign
00:13:28.800
language, high SATs, whatever. Um, the, the surrogate mothers are, uh, groomed. I, I, my word that they're
1.00
00:13:36.920
very much groomed. They're told they're going to be on a journey. And so you'll see, um, this, the
00:13:40.800
profile of the surrogate mother is much different in the United States. Uh, a majority of surrogate
00:13:46.240
mothers are military wives. And one on one guest on our podcast, um, actually was a military wife who
1.00
00:13:52.880
has done, I think two or three surrogacies now, and then went to work for the surrogate agency to
00:13:58.200
recruit other military wives. So the profile of the surrogate mother in these binders of women is
0.95
00:14:03.000
going to be much different, um, than the, this, the, um, the egg donor that Elton and perhaps David
00:14:09.020
furnished, uh, provided. And I believe if I'm remembering correctly, and this is also common
00:14:13.680
in same sex male, um, third party arrangements, oftentimes the surrogate is pregnant for with two
00:14:20.920
embryos and each man has a created, um, an embryo using his own sperm. So this gets to the sort of
00:14:28.080
designer element of it that, you know, Elton got a baby that was genetically related to him and David
00:14:33.240
got a baby that was genetically related, um, uh, to him. And the surrogate was basically carrying,
00:14:39.180
uh, you know, siblings from two different fathers. Cause it's kind of bizarre.
00:14:47.700
So I don't have a medical background, which is exactly why I brought you on. But as the mom of
00:14:53.960
two kids, a toddler and a baby, I am familiar with the process and something that you are told over
00:15:02.900
and over again, and you just kind of instinctively know, but the nurses and the doctors reiterate how
00:15:07.400
important skin to skin is as soon as that baby is born. Why is that important? Because you are the
00:15:12.660
only home that that baby has ever known. And there are psychological benefits as well as physical
00:15:18.260
benefits to your baby being close to you. And the seconds right after birth, this is scientifically
00:15:23.940
proven. And it's also just common sense. This is something that we have always known even before
00:15:29.380
the dawn of probably, you know, modern medical science. And yet you'll hear the same people who
00:15:35.600
claim to be very pro science and would probably agree with that. Or they would also, um, they would
00:15:44.420
also maybe advise a woman, Hey, make sure that you're doing skin to skin and starting to breastfeed
1.00
00:15:49.040
as soon as that baby is born. That's so important. But for whatever reason, they suspend that knowledge,
00:15:54.440
that scientific principle, when it comes to talking about gay couples, taking the child or children
0.83
00:16:01.320
from the surrogate mother, all of a sudden we have to pretend that that fact that we have known for
00:16:07.540
probably all of human history doesn't exist. And that it's not a big deal that that bonding that women
1.00
00:16:14.300
are preached about constantly or preached to about constantly, that it just doesn't exist, that
00:16:21.240
it's fine, that that baby is going to be okay, taken away, not just from his or her biological mother,
0.77
00:16:26.720
but then the only womb, the only home he or she has ever known for nine months, that the lack of
00:16:33.580
bonding to the mother or to the gestator, if you will, is not going to have any negative impact on that
00:16:41.940
child whatsoever, when we know for a fact and have always known for a fact that it has a negative
00:16:46.780
impact. I mean, there's that very famous book, Primal Wound, that talks about the internal wound
00:16:53.280
that children who are given up for adoption, even though adoption is a beautiful, redemptive,
00:16:58.720
wonderful thing, um, they still suffer from the detachment that happened at a young age from their
00:17:07.220
mother and from their father. Why are we pretending for the sake of, I guess, political correctness
00:17:13.580
that that, that, that, that initial bond between mother and child just doesn't matter when it comes
0.52
00:17:22.460
to surrogacy? Yeah. I mean, why? Um, because we want what we want. Um, since the beginning of time,
00:17:29.740
our natures are, are selfish. Um, we talk about now we have a right to a child when in fact,
00:17:35.080
we do not have a right to a child. We have a right to our own child. Uh, when I saw the pictures of
00:17:40.020
Pete Buttigieg and his, his husband with their new twins and you know, they've never disclosed
00:17:46.200
how they came about getting a twin boy and a girl. Um, I have my hunches, but you know, we saw them in
00:17:52.180
the hospital with those little babies on their chest. Those babies don't know them. Um, I've interviewed
00:17:56.580
surrogates that at least the intended parents, the intended parents are the parents that that child
00:18:02.320
is going to eventually go home to, to be raised by acknowledge that. So I've had surrogates, um,
00:18:07.840
that have been given, uh, teddy bears and blankets and things that they're just to sleep with every
00:18:13.040
night. So when that baby goes home, that baby goes home with those, those, um, blankets and,
00:18:17.280
and stuffed animals that have that mother smell on them. Um, you know, they've been told to record
00:18:22.520
themselves reading stories so that when that baby goes home with these strangers, they can play those,
00:18:27.380
uh, audio tapes of that. Um, which again is baloney. You know, I, I always joke and I use the example in
00:18:33.380
California and probably many States, you know, we have animal cruelty laws. When we, my husband and
00:18:38.080
I went and got our newborn puppy, we had to wait by law eight weeks, um, because it would be seen as
00:18:44.540
cruelty to that little puppy to remove him from his mother until that, that eight week, um, mark had
00:18:51.140
happened. And in the case of, um, you know, my years and years of working in hospitals as a
00:18:57.280
pediatric critical care nurse, we moved heaven on earth, um, to allow mothers to be, um, with that
0.98
00:19:05.520
newborn baby, if it was born severely premature and, and had to be in a, you know, on life support
00:19:12.340
and an incubator, um, you know, having them, you know, put their hands in the little, the little
00:19:17.380
peephole so they could touch their child and talk to their child and sing to their child. And I remember
00:19:22.100
as a nurse, you know, taking these babies that are hooked up to every single machine and out of the
00:19:27.000
isolate into the mother's arm, if only for just a few minutes, um, because that was so important
00:19:31.960
because that, you know, as Nancy Verrier, the author of Primal Wound, who happens to be my neighbor,
00:19:36.740
um, says that that, that trauma is real. It's real to the mother. Um, as evidenced in our research,
00:19:44.560
it shows these higher rates of postpartum depression and it's real to the child and to just
00:19:49.480
wish it away. Um, I think it's cruel. It's, it's cruelty to these little babies and it's cruelty to
00:19:55.300
these women. You know, the sexual revolution in the United States and in the West in general has
1.00
00:20:01.380
moved very quickly, especially since about 2015, since Obergefell, all of these things that,
00:20:08.400
you know, people were called conspiracy theorists and fear mongers for warning about have really come
00:20:15.660
to fruition in a lot of ways. The arbitrary redefinition of the family for the sake of the
00:20:23.100
sexual revolution, um, has been, uh, has been implemented at the expense of the most vulnerable
00:20:33.400
and probably the most marginalized group in the world, not as children. And the only reason that
00:20:39.000
is the case is because children can't consent because they don't have a voice because they
00:20:43.320
can't push back. They can't speak up and say, you know what? I have a right to a mother and a
00:20:47.660
father, which is of course what I believe that every child has a right to a mother and a father.
00:20:53.420
And because they can't articulate that because they can't speak that when they're babies, because
00:20:57.780
they can't say, Hey, I want to go back and bond with my mom because they might not be able to
00:21:03.340
be able to articulate the questions that they have when they're toddlers about where they come from
00:21:08.800
and how they miss their mother or father, this person that they have never met before. We think that
00:21:15.340
they're okay, or because they have happy lives or they are taken in by a rich couple. We think that,
00:21:22.380
well, look, they're fine. They get good education. They're taken care of. They're provided for,
00:21:27.140
but that is denying as we've talked about this, this innate characteristic in all of us to want to know
00:21:35.160
who we are, where we come from, to whom we belong. Can you talk a little bit more about the
00:21:42.000
psychological and potential psychological impact on children that this has to be separated from
00:21:49.040
their parents, even either if they're, if they come from a sperm donor, a dad that they never know,
00:21:55.380
or an egg donor donor, and then a surrogate. Yeah. And, you know, Hollywood likes to tell us
00:22:01.340
because they put out movies called the kids are all right, that this doesn't matter. And we're seeing,
00:22:06.300
you know, I often say that this whole area of assisted reproduction in general, as well as in
00:22:14.180
particular third-party conception is one of the largest human social experiments of our time,
00:22:19.700
just waiting for the train to crash. And, you know, nowhere is that more evident than in the
00:22:27.240
voices of those that are called donor conceived. You know, people that are on this planet because
00:22:32.340
somebody donated or sold their sperm and or eggs or rented their womb. And they, this group of now
00:22:41.200
young adults and even getting older, because, you know, especially sperm donation has been around
00:22:45.600
much longer than egg donation. You know, the first test tube baby was Louise Brown. And then five years
00:22:50.520
after Louise Brown, we had the first IV up baby donated through donor eggs. Whereas we had years and
00:22:56.180
years before that of sperm donation, you know, they're growing up and they're using the power of social
00:23:01.600
media. They're all doing their 23 and me testing. I just got a text the other day from a donor conceived
00:23:09.760
person who found another, another half sibling through DNA testing. What was sad is that when
00:23:17.260
they found this other half sibling, this half sibling at that point did not know that they were
00:23:22.520
donor conceived. So talk about sort of a bomb being dropped in your lap to all of a sudden find out that
00:23:27.080
the mom and dad that you were raised with your whole life, um, had, had lied to you and were in fact,
00:23:32.520
not your, your biological parents. Uh, they're lobbying for laws to be changed. Um, Australia in
0.84
00:23:38.260
particular, you know, has been able to be successful in, in passing legislation that doesn't allow
00:23:43.460
anonymity. Um, you know, some, some countries have laws that don't allow sperm donors to donate
00:23:49.660
more than six times. I think more than one time is too many, but, um, you know, so it's going to be
00:23:56.180
the, perhaps the children as they grow up, you know, just think about finding out that, you know,
00:24:01.980
somebody was paid $125 to masturbate. Um, and that's your conception story. Uh, you know, just,
00:24:08.940
you know, the fact that you might have 10, 15, 20 siblings out there, uh, the fact that your parents
00:24:15.140
lie to you, the fact that, um, nobody seems to care about your rights when, you know, everybody's
00:24:20.520
talking about my rights, my rights, my rights. And these people literally have, um, uh, a fake
00:24:26.580
birth certificate. It's, it's, it's a legal document. It should be a legal document. Therefore,
00:24:31.320
it shouldn't be fake. It shouldn't be full of false information. So I think it will be the casualties
00:24:37.520
that we'll see in the, in the young people. And, you know, we're also seeing a lot more research
00:24:42.300
because assisted reproduction is relatively new technology. A lot more research is showing
00:24:47.100
that children created through these technologies have their own set of unique health problems.
00:24:53.020
And we're just not understanding yet why that is. Is it because of the technology? Um, is it because
00:24:58.080
the, the, the man and the woman who were having difficulty conceiving that normally nature or
00:25:03.200
evolution or God wouldn't, didn't want that couple to pass on something. Um, we're, we're ignoring
00:25:09.260
that and we're forcing this couple to conceive through this new modern technology. Uh, but again,
1.00
00:25:14.520
it gets back to the point that this is one of the largest social human experiments of our time.
00:25:20.360
Yes, it is. And it just kind of goes back to that arbitrary redefinition of the family for the sake
00:25:27.620
of, um, a new era of accepted, um, definitions of marriage and family. And I like to say that
00:25:39.160
kids are always the unconsenting subjects of progressive social experiments. And we see,
00:25:46.380
I mean, obviously we see throughout human history, the natural definition of the family. And there's
00:25:52.200
so much hubris in saying that now, after all of this millennia of the family being one way that we
00:25:58.660
can redistruct it or reconstruct it, and we can redefine it without any consequences. It's kind of
00:26:05.820
like that. I think it was Chesterton that talked about the, um, the metaphor of a like wall in a
00:26:15.540
field and a liberal would go up to it and say, okay, there's no reason for this wall or for this
00:26:20.080
cage or for this fence to be here. Let's go ahead and take it down. Whereas the conservative would ask,
00:26:25.660
why is it there? And it seems like in this case, and in several cases, progressive simply tear down
00:26:31.160
what has always been institutions, the family, because they see no use in it. Instead of asking,
00:26:36.880
if science tells us that it's supposed to be one way, uh, won't there be sociological, psychological,
00:26:44.980
emotional, and physical repercussions to that? Um, it seems like not very many people are asking
00:26:51.260
those questions, I guess, because it's politically unpopular. No one wants to be called homophobic.
00:26:56.420
No one wants to be called a bigot. That's probably the biggest fear that a lot of people have. Um,
00:27:01.460
is that why so many doctors are unwilling to ask those questions are unwilling to, I think,
00:27:08.700
uphold their Hippocratic oath to these women and to these babies, kind of incentivizing them to take
0.99
00:27:14.500
risks that they shouldn't really be taking? Yeah, I think it gets back to some things I said at the
00:27:21.840
beginning is that this is a corruption of medicine. You know, when I left clinical nursing and I always
00:27:27.480
worked in, um, pretty large academic hospitals. So we would have a lot of medical students, we'd have
00:27:32.000
interns, we'd have residents as well as the seasoned, you know, career, um, uh, physicians that were,
00:27:37.400
were teaching all these students. And I used to ask them, you know, what did they see their role
00:27:43.140
as, um, a physician? Um, and, you know, I saw that shifting to when I finally left clinical nursing,
00:27:51.440
you know, they were being, you know, they were getting no ethics training in universities anymore
00:27:57.040
during their medical school training, or if they were offered ethics, it was, you know, uh, it was
00:28:01.920
an elective. So they didn't even have to have it. Um, but then again, ethics is like, well, what kind
00:28:07.420
of ethics are you teaching too? So that could be a whole problematic thing because ethics is kind of
00:28:11.300
eroded as well. But, you know, you know, one, one young resident told me, he said, I'm a service
00:28:17.880
provider, you know, and my, you know, my, my patients are my customers and my clients.
00:28:23.520
So I just offer them what they want. And I think, wow, that'd be like me taking my car in and saying,
00:28:29.780
well, here, this is what I want you to do. My car's not writing, writing correctly. And it's
00:28:34.100
making all these noises, but you know, I think you need to, you know, put in leather seats and tint my
00:28:39.740
windows and there'd be, okay, well, you're my client. That's what you want. I'll just give you what I
00:28:44.940
want. And also this area of medicine is very, very lucrative. Um, and we've seen that with the
00:28:50.560
whole trans debate, you know, this is a new field of medicine, assisted reproductive technology has
0.98
00:28:55.280
not been around that long. It's a new field of medicine. Um, and it, and it came about, um, uh,
00:29:01.300
you know, just sort of arrived under the scene as this miracle thing that was going to help people
00:29:06.500
have children that so desperately wanted children. And it's very expensive. Um, it has a high failure
00:29:12.220
rate. So it's not uncommon to hear women that go through many, many, many rounds of IVF,
00:29:16.360
never, ever get a baby. You know, the famous comedian, Gilda Radner went through six rounds
00:29:21.500
of IVF, never was able to conceive and then went on and died of ovarian cancer, wink, wink,
00:29:27.200
risk, fertility drugs, cancer, reproductive cancers. Um, New York, New York times had an article many
00:29:33.000
years ago that said, show that, you know, the fertility doctors at big university hospitals
00:29:38.040
like NYU and Columbia and Stanford, those, those are cash cows. They bring in the big bucks. They're
00:29:44.600
like the football team for the university. Um, so, you know, money changes everything, right?
00:29:50.260
Yeah. Um, and why are you going to stop doing something and why, why are you going to do research?
00:29:54.580
We don't have a lot of research in this field, one, because it's new. And two, why would they want
00:29:58.980
to do research to find out if there's problems? Because that stops the flow of money.
00:30:03.860
Yeah. And you know, there's no research and because they don't want the research and then
00:30:08.820
they pull this manipulative rhetorical trick that they say, there's no evidence showing they'll say
00:30:15.600
there's no evidence showing that kids who are taken away from their biological or mother or biological
00:30:22.260
mother or father through surrogacy and sperm donation have psychological damage. There's,
00:30:27.820
there's no evidence that shows that this is bad for individuals, bad for society.
00:30:32.820
And that's because, I mean, there is evidence, but that's because so many people are afraid to
00:30:38.820
study it. They're afraid to even find any kind of evidence. And if they did find evidence,
00:30:42.700
they probably wouldn't want to publish it because again, it's politically incorrect and no one wants
00:30:48.500
to go against the LGBTQ lobby. And look, there are people who are, you know, very pro LGBTQ, whatever,
00:30:55.520
who can still objectively say, look, you know, this is, this is not good. This is not good for women.
1.00
00:31:01.820
This is not good for men and fathers. This is not good for children who then grow up to be adults.
00:31:08.000
This is not a good situation that we have now manufactured in the name of acceptance, but
00:31:14.140
at the expense of the health of society. And so I, I guess I'm a little pessimistic. I mean,
00:31:22.700
I'm optimistic because people like you are fighting for this so hard and are trying to reveal really
00:31:28.560
what's behind it. But because this is big business, like you did a documentary, you did a movie in 2018
00:31:34.700
called Big Fertility, because there's so much behind this. And this is just such a behemoth
00:31:40.540
industry. It's hard to imagine how, how it's going to change. Like you said, money changes everything.
00:31:47.880
It can corrupt things. It can prevent the truth from being revealed. And so like, what are you
00:31:53.940
seeing on that front? Are people kind of waking up to the madness of this, or do you just kind of
00:31:58.760
seeing it more? Are you seeing it more shrouded in darkness than ever before?
00:32:04.400
Well, I'm the forever optimist. That's why I've been able to do this work for so long.
00:32:09.500
Um, and, and I do, I do hate the corruption of medicine and the injustice that keeps me going,
00:32:15.200
you know, egg donors are told there's no evidence that, you know, this is risky to your health. And
00:32:20.560
they're, they should be told we've never studied this. So we have no idea if this is risky.
00:32:24.800
Yeah. Um, but I get emails all the time, Allie, I got an email just, I think last month,
00:32:29.880
um, from a young woman. She said, I'm a single, you know, low income under the poverty level
00:32:35.960
mother in, um, I think it was like Vermont or New Hampshire or Maine, somewhere over there.
00:32:41.300
And she said, I just had signed up with an agency to do a surrogate pregnancy because I needed the
0.87
00:32:45.860
money. And I stumbled upon your, your films and your YouTube channel. And I'm so thankful for your
00:32:51.920
work. I get emails all the time from young women who said, I saw exploitation, exploitation is my film.
0.59
00:32:58.180
That's a feature film on egg donor, you know, that I won't sell my eggs now. Thank you for your work.
00:33:02.840
So I, I know that there's those stories. I, again, I don't have, you know, statistics to quote you that
00:33:08.200
this many people change their mind and no longer are in favor of this. Um, you know, I'm always trying
00:33:14.700
to reach the people, the purchasers, you know, if you're an, for a couple, please, please don't ask
00:33:22.740
another woman to have a baby for you. Please don't ask another young girl to sell her eggs to you. Um,
1.00
00:33:28.680
just stop it. You know, there, there's all kinds of other ways for you to fulfill your desires to
00:33:34.520
mother and father, um, children that don't have to risk another woman's life family. I mean, it
00:33:41.480
grieves me to know that we have surrogate mothers in the U S their husbands lost their wives. These
00:33:46.660
children lost their mothers in order to help you, please let's stop that. Um, you know, you have,
00:33:52.360
I would imagine a pretty large audience of people that go to church. When was the last time you ever
00:33:57.600
heard any of this talked about in church when we have in Genesis, the first story of infertility
00:34:02.180
and the barren womb, you know, please let's talk about this. We have all this new modern technology,
00:34:08.240
um, to address a problem that's been with us since the beginning of time.
00:34:12.720
And our, our, our people that are church going, um, God fearing people aren't talking about this.
00:34:19.160
And this is rampant in churches. I'm following so many surrogates on Instagram and in their profile
00:34:24.600
says, you know, I love Jesus. I love, I'm a Christian. I, you know, God, God called me to do
00:34:31.740
Why is it, why is it that a lot of Christian women don't seem to understand the exploitation
1.00
00:34:43.140
that is innate in this process and the ethical, and I would argue biblical issues with the surrogacy
00:34:51.800
industry? Why do you think that is? Um, bad theology. Yeah, I guess that's the easiest answer.
00:34:59.540
Um, and you know, even women who aren't perhaps, I mean, we see this in, uh, Catholic, you know,
00:35:06.560
cause I, I speak to so many groups, um, Mormons, Mormons are, and Catholics are big surrogate
00:35:13.640
people. Um, you know, you know, we love babies. Um, we love helping people, women by nature,
00:35:22.600
whether they be religious or not, we're just kind of, you know, we're, we're, we're maternal. Um,
00:35:28.500
we, we feel sad when people want children, we go, Oh, they'd be such great parents. Let me help
00:35:33.440
them. Um, so, and you know, and, and unfortunately a lot of people in churches are caught up in the
00:35:40.240
money stuff too. I mean, not that all surrogates are paid. Um, but you know, it's like, Hey,
00:35:45.600
it's win-win. I help her. I help them. They help me. And we're all just one big happy family. Um,
00:35:51.660
but yeah, I think it boils down to, um, uh, bad theology. Yeah. And you know, what is,
00:35:57.280
what, what is our body for and who is our body for? Um, so whether, you know, we don't have a
00:36:04.000
proper understanding from an anthropological standpoint or from a Christian worldview standpoint,
00:36:09.600
um, you know what, and, and again, you know, why, why aren't people able to understand that on their
00:36:16.560
own, even if they're not being taught it in their church, people say, well, surrogacy isn't in the
00:36:21.680
Bible. And I go, well, yeah, it kind of is, you know, read the story of Sarah and Abraham didn't
00:36:29.440
go too well. Yeah, that's very true. So many of the issues that we're discussing today, issues of
00:36:35.140
identity, issues of human nature, issues of origin, really go back to Genesis one through three. So many
00:36:42.720
of the social cultural conversations that we're having today are really rooted in what people
00:36:49.480
think about where we came from and what we are for and what the human body is and who says what the
00:36:55.940
human body is. Um, you mentioned what we are to do with our bodies and just the understanding of that.
00:37:03.800
I do find that a lot of professing Christians don't seem to understand, um, that the
00:37:12.640
body, um, is as scripture says, a dwelling place for the Holy Spirit. First Corinthians 619 talks
00:37:19.400
about glorifying God with our body because we were bought with a price, really kind of the secular
00:37:24.280
view of the body, um, sees it as secondary to who we say that we are or what we want to do kind of
00:37:31.200
our self identification, but really our body and our identity and what we do with our bodies and how
00:37:37.220
we feel on the inside. All of these are inextricably intertwined, which is exactly why,
00:37:41.620
at least in, in my amateur opinion, why you do see so much, um, even greater levels of postpartum
00:37:48.340
depression in the women who give up their babies. And of course the psychological issues that you see
00:37:53.860
with kids, not knowing, um, not knowing where they come from as well. Now, how do you see this
00:38:02.020
connected with what is happening in medicine among children who are quote unquote, transitioning
00:38:10.120
into the opposite gender? Are these things intertwined in any way?
00:38:18.360
Yeah, absolutely. I mean, it is just, um, again, not understanding of, of our bodies, how we were
00:38:24.920
created, how we were made, how we were designed, what is the purpose of our body. Um, so this notion
00:38:31.020
that I was born in the wrong body, you're not born in the wrong body. You're born in the body you were
00:38:35.840
born in. Um, you cannot change sex. You know, you can surgically remove things. You can put harmful
0.95
00:38:44.140
drugs inside your body to block puberty or to make a woman grow facial hair or to make a man,
00:38:50.140
you know, become less hairy. Um, but you're still genetically biologically male or female.
00:38:57.240
Um, you know, I, I love, you know, in our film, our most recent film transmission, what's the rush
00:39:03.080
to reassign gender? We, you know, we interviewed Colin Wright, an evolutionary biologist who talks
00:39:09.360
very, you know, poignantly and very forcefully on, you know, human biology is real and we can't wish
00:39:16.920
it away and we can't alter it. Um, you know, if there's a crime scene and there's blood evidence
00:39:22.000
left at the crime scene, they're getting the, you know, the police are going to know whether
00:39:25.920
they're looking for a male suspect or a female suspect, not somebody who identifies as a male
00:39:31.340
or not somebody who dresses like a male. Um, so it's level of absurdity that we can do all these
00:39:38.280
things. Um, and, and again, you know, medicine has just happily jumped onto this bandwagon because
00:39:44.680
it's another field of, well, I'm just a service provider. And if you want me to do this surgery
00:39:50.900
on you or prescribe these medications, fine by me. And you know, I'm happy because I can
00:39:56.180
laugh all the way to the bank. Um, but we will see a train wreck as we are seeing in the area
00:40:02.840
of assisted reproduction with, you know, shattered lives and broken bodies and people being harmed.
00:40:09.380
Just look around the world and the laws that are in place in countries that do not allow any of
1.00
00:40:15.760
this. And if you look at the basis of those laws, it's because people are harmed and people are
00:40:21.940
exploited. It's not because we're mean and we don't care about people. I don't want anything I'm saying
00:40:27.280
today to be misconstrued that I'm not sympathetic to people who want children and can't. I'm very
00:40:32.280
sympathetic, but I draw a very bright line that we cannot just, you know, wish our things away
00:40:38.140
and put our problems onto somebody else, um, and let them bear the burden of harm and exploitation.
00:40:43.720
And in the case of children being medically and surgically transitioned, it's unconscionable.
1.00
00:40:48.960
Um, in my mind, doctors need to lose their license. You know, people need to go to jail,
00:40:53.900
um, for doing the things that I read about. And I hear about that people are doing all in the name
00:40:59.020
of medicine. This is not medicine. This is butchery. This is butchery. I'm sorry.
00:41:03.880
It absolutely is. And I mean, when you think about that, the lady who transitioned and it's hard,
00:41:11.680
I don't even like using the language because it seems like I'm giving into the premise. I don't
00:41:16.400
believe no matter what kind of surgery or any amount of hormones that you have, that it's actually
00:41:20.740
possible to transition. You are still biologically male or female. But on the cover of the New Yorker,
00:41:27.200
there was this woman who transitioned into a man and it was so disturbing and just truly
00:41:35.360
heartbreaking to look at. I mean, you're looking at someone who has a beard, had her breasts cut off,
0.90
00:41:41.860
has kind of chest hair, and, um, you can tell has a little bit of broad shoulders, a female waist,
00:41:48.740
female hips, um, looks still like a woman is probably never going to fully look like a man. And of course,
1.00
00:41:56.200
that is especially true for a man who tries to look like a woman. And it's just really heartbreaking,
00:42:02.000
like the disassociative feelings and the dysphoric feelings that someone must feel to put themselves
00:42:09.480
through that. Um, but also the praise that they get from society for doing that, um, so that people
00:42:18.820
who do struggle with different kinds of mental disorders can kind of look at the attention and the
00:42:23.920
praise and the accolades that someone is getting for butchering their bodies as, as you put it. Um,
00:42:30.080
and they think, well, that's how I'm going to gain some kind of acceptance, um, as well. And I know that
00:42:36.200
might be a controversial to take a take, but I do think that is what is behind a lot of young people
00:42:42.000
in particular, who are all naturally looking, especially for belonging and affirmation,
00:42:47.720
why there is just this new, huge wave of self identity as something other than the gender that
00:42:57.520
they were born in. Of course, um, Abigail Schreier has written about the social contagion aspect to
00:43:03.240
all of this. But I think that thing, I think that it wouldn't have gone as far as it has,
00:43:09.800
and it would be able to stop in its tracks. If there were more doctors who simply stood up and said,
00:43:15.760
look, this is not medically right, they can maybe even leave their own personal moral views out of
00:43:20.360
it and just say, look, this isn't medically, ethically right for us to be pushing children,
00:43:27.220
especially into this. Here are the risks of it. But there just don't seem to be enough loud voices.
00:43:35.220
And I'm guessing the reasoning behind it is what money politics, the same thing, um, as the reasons
00:43:42.680
for pushing big fertility. Is that what it is? Yeah, I, I think, you know, I just have to say
00:43:49.660
something about that cover magazine that you brought up too, because I, I just want to say
00:43:53.800
woe to us, you know, that the culture has become so depraved that this is celebrated on the cover of
00:44:01.380
a magazine instead of people, you know, being moved to tears and being grieved by this kind of, um,
00:44:08.080
uh, again, abuse. But yeah, I think it's, it's fear. Um, where are, where are the, you know,
00:44:15.200
the old Testament prophets that are willing to be out there screaming in the streets? Um, it's,
00:44:20.760
it's fear. You know, I, I read the beautiful, um, article yesterday that Dr. Jordan Peterson posted
00:44:26.420
on why he's, you know, leaving his academic post in Toronto, where he was, you know, scolding
00:44:31.860
everybody from, you know, corporate America or big corporations, not just corporate America,
00:44:37.220
uh, Hollywood, the media. Um, is it because people just want to be popular? They want to be invited
00:44:42.740
to the big parties. Um, you know, I don't get invited on a lot of shows because even people that
00:44:48.200
are friendly to what I believe in don't want to talk about it because they, they get kind of, I don't
00:44:53.340
know what kind of, you know, coals will be heaped on you, Allie, for having me as a guest on your show.
00:44:57.460
So, um, but we're used to it. We're used to that. We run into the controversy. We don't care.
00:45:03.000
Yeah. Well, that's, that's good. But yeah, there's a few of us out there. We don't, I don't care. I
00:45:07.060
wake up every day and going, I don't care. Um, I, I can't get fired from my job. I mean,
00:45:11.780
I run my own organization. I'm sure my donors could stop funding our work, but I would still do it.
00:45:17.360
Right. I would just do, you know, I'd have to figure out creative ways, but I do again,
00:45:22.440
back to the fact that I am optimistic. Um, I think we'll win, you know, we know the end of the
00:45:27.420
story. Um, I think the more we're bold, you know, we will gather more and more people that will,
00:45:33.300
that will go with us. You've seen that with, you know, I just love watching what the parents were
00:45:37.960
able to do in the state of Virginia. And we see parents who are just in this whole transient of
00:45:43.400
kids. Uh, you know, we're getting ready to have an event in a few weeks in, in my office in the Bay
00:45:48.760
area on dealing with the transient of children. And we've already almost sold out in the events a month
00:45:55.380
away. Um, because so many people are hungry, uh, for the truth. Um, they're hungry for,
00:46:01.940
to find the like-minded people so that we don't live in our little, you know,
00:46:05.760
what do you believe? Do you agree like me? Yeah. So we'll smoke them out. Yeah. Um, we'll win.
00:46:16.220
I don't know. Are you familiar with Katie Faust and the organization them before us?
00:46:21.280
Oh yeah. I've known Katie for years. So yeah. Well, I just appreciate what both of you do and
00:46:28.120
talking about this stuff. I mean, we talk about the gender subject so much on this podcast. I'm
00:46:32.700
sure you also know Brandon Showalter. He is, yeah, he's a journalist and he's talked about,
00:46:38.380
it really is butchering, um, when you're talking about what's being done to adults, but also minors,
00:46:46.240
teenagers, sometimes in some States, um, without the consent of their parents. I mean, it's a huge
00:46:52.120
travesty, but I think honestly, the even more taboo subject is not the gender stuff, but is actually
00:47:00.180
the surrogacy, uh, surrogacy stuff. I honestly think that is more controversial to talk about
00:47:05.240
because as we mentioned, there are a lot of people, you know, on our side, people who are Christians
00:47:11.120
and, um, I'm not, I don't know if you are a conservative, but people who call themselves
00:47:16.280
Christian conservatives who don't realize that there are any problems with this, who, because
00:47:21.240
like you said, they like babies, they like families, they want everyone to experience the joy of
00:47:25.860
parenting, which I do too. Um, they don't want to talk about this and they certainly do not want to
00:47:31.780
talk about the ethical problems with IVF. And I know I'm kind of looping back to something that we
00:47:37.680
already talked about, but I, I do want to get your take on that. Is there an ethical way to do
00:47:43.040
in vitro fertilization? Oh, that, that, I wish you would have asked me that sooner. Cause that's a
00:47:49.680
whole nother talk. Um, it's, it's still risky. Um, you know, I raise all kinds of, um, predatory
00:47:57.200
arguments against assisted reproduction. It's very expensive. You know, is that, is that being a good
00:48:03.140
wise steward of your resources when you know that a take-home IVF baby is a six-figure baby?
00:48:09.380
Um, it's, you know, these are issues of poverty versus wealth, you know, low income women who,
1.00
00:48:15.420
um, have no insurance and can't conceive, don't have access to this very expensive technology that
00:48:20.840
overwhelmingly is covered very little by private insurance. And most of the time it's out of pocket.
00:48:25.580
You see a lot of GoFundMe accounts. Um, the, the same risks apply as far as the fertility drugs,
00:48:31.200
you know, I said, Gilda Radner early on, you know, went through six rounds of IVF to have her own
00:48:35.600
child with her then husband, Gilda Radner, and was not successful in conceiving and then went on and
00:48:40.520
died of, um, ovarian cancer. So it's well documented in the, in the medical literature that fertility drugs
00:48:46.520
do have links to various kinds of reproductive cancers and other cancers too, colon cancer and
00:48:52.480
such. Um, you know, there is this problem with a world full of children that needs homes. Um,
00:48:59.880
so perhaps, you know, you, if you can't conceive and you don't want to spend hundreds of thousands
00:49:06.000
of dollars on maybe a large failed technology that might cause you to have ill health, um,
00:49:12.480
maybe you want to welcome a child into your own home that needs a home. Um, and again,
00:49:17.880
the research coming out now on children that are conceived through these technologies is not,
00:49:22.160
you know, a rubber stamp seal of approval that these children are a-okay fine. You know,
00:49:26.600
we see problems with heart disease, obesity, um, various kinds of cancers, um, coming out in some
00:49:32.520
of these studies, whether these will bear out to be in fact true or not, because this is a social
00:49:37.920
experiment. You know, we're experimenting on these children and studying them as they get older and
00:49:42.040
grow up. So we're learning as we go. So all of those kinds of things come together to say,
00:49:47.520
hmm, do you really want to do this? Yeah. There are a lot of things to consider. And I think
00:49:53.100
the point that we kind of have to end on just because like you said, it's such a,
00:49:56.960
it's another huge topic is that not enough people are publicly asking those questions just because
00:50:02.640
something is possible. Doesn't mean that it is beneficial. Technology in itself doesn't have
00:50:09.620
a morality. It doesn't really have a limiting principle. If something can be done, it will be
00:50:13.940
done. So it's up to human beings. And it certainly is up to Christians to lead the charge of asking the
0.97
00:50:20.100
ethics and the morality and the impact of these different kinds of technologies. And I know a
00:50:26.700
lot of women who have conceived through IVF, they have wonderful, beautiful children who of course
00:50:30.900
are made in the image of God and are wonderful people. And these people are wonderful mothers.
00:50:38.100
They're simply are questions to ask about the ethics of it. And I have heard great discussions and
00:50:45.120
debates that I know local churches actually are having about, you know, is there an ethical way
00:50:50.840
to do IVF? There are some ways that are worse than others. And then there's embryo adoption. So many
00:50:56.660
questions when it comes to reproductive technology that I think more people should be having. And I'm,
00:51:01.960
I'm very thankful. I'm very thankful that you are, um, and that you took the time to come talk to us
00:51:08.880
about this today. A lot of people have these questions and, um, your courage will give other
00:51:13.940
people courage. So thank you for that. Where, where can they, where can they find you? How can
00:51:18.060
they follow you and watch the movies that you've produced? Yeah. Let me just, if I could just add
00:51:23.460
one more thing and then I'll, I'll give my commercial. Um, yeah. What I like to tell people
00:51:28.820
that are struggling with infertility is, you know, get yourself a really good diagnosis as your first
00:51:35.200
step. Um, I'm not Catholic, you know, I'm my Catholic brothers and sisters would love to talk
00:51:40.500
about NAPRO technology, um, and, and the ways that perhaps NAPRO technology can help couples conceive.
00:51:47.400
But the last thing you want is a doctor who pushes you straight to the IVF doctor. Um, get a good
00:51:53.040
diagnosis, find out what's going on. And there's all kinds of things that can be done, um, before you
00:51:59.060
even get on that IVF superhighway, um, that, that might be beneficial in helping a couple to
00:52:05.040
more naturally conceive. But that starts with just a good proper diagnosis of both the man
00:52:10.240
and the woman. Cause you know, we know that fertility affects men as well as women and
00:52:14.140
sometimes both of us. Um, now to my commercial, um, we do have a YouTube channel. Um, it's the
00:52:20.160
Center for Bioethics and Culture Network and all of the films that I've produced in many, many
00:52:25.620
different languages are all available for free as of this last summer on our YouTube channel,
00:52:30.120
as well as lots of contact, you know, contact, um, uh, you know, interviews that I've done with,
00:52:35.820
um, surrogates and donor conceived people and such follow our podcast, Venus Rising, Venus Rising.
00:52:42.960
It's on all the platforms, Spotify, iTunes, Podomatic, Amazon, everywhere. Um, and I am very
00:52:48.140
active on Twitter. So people can follow me on Twitter, just at Jennifer Law.
00:52:53.220
Awesome. Thank you so much, Jennifer. I really appreciate it.
00:52:55.860
Yeah, me too. I'm glad it finally worked out for us to chat together.