Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - April 14, 2022


Ep 600 | Debate: Is Death Row Inmate Melissa Lucio Innocent? | Guest: Rep. Jeff Leach


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

196.72931

Word Count

9,279

Sentence Count

540

Misogynist Sentences

55

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

Melissa Lucio was convicted in 2008 of murdering her 2-year-old daughter, Mariah. Her defense attorney, the Innocence Project, and other state representatives are all saying that she is innocent and that she should never have been put on death row.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable.
00:00:01.860 Happy Thursday.
00:00:03.180 This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers.
00:00:05.800 American meat delivered right to your front door.
00:00:08.020 Go to goodranchers.com slash Allie.
00:00:09.780 That's goodranchers.com slash Allie.
00:00:21.000 All right, guys.
00:00:22.260 Today, I've got a fiery episode for you.
00:00:25.160 A heated exchange, but a respectful exchange
00:00:28.080 between me and a Republican state legislator.
00:00:31.480 His name is Representative Jeff Leach.
00:00:33.940 And we are talking about the case of Melissa Lucio.
00:00:38.140 She is a Texas woman who is on death row.
00:00:41.560 She was convicted in 2008 of murdering
00:00:44.020 her two-year-old daughter, Mariah.
00:00:46.460 Representative Jeff Leach, 82 other state representatives
00:00:50.460 who are both Republican and Democrat,
00:00:53.440 including The Innocence Project, Kim Kardashian,
00:00:55.980 and a Hulu documentary are all saying,
00:00:58.360 whoa, whoa, whoa, we think this woman is innocent.
00:01:01.040 We don't think that she had a fair trial.
00:01:03.400 We need to at least place a pause on her execution.
00:01:08.460 She is set to be executed in 13 days.
00:01:11.700 Here's why we're having this discussion.
00:01:14.200 Representative Leach believes her to be innocent.
00:01:16.820 He at least believes that she didn't have a fair trial.
00:01:19.820 I believe that the evidence is stacked against her.
00:01:22.280 Really, my biggest contention isn't whether or not
00:01:25.800 she should be executed in 13 days.
00:01:27.760 Maybe there should be a pause.
00:01:29.100 Maybe you do have some contention about how the case went.
00:01:32.340 I believe that everyone should have a fair trial.
00:01:34.760 I believe that everyone has a right to not just a defense,
00:01:37.300 but also a good legitimate defense.
00:01:39.680 That's fine.
00:01:40.700 What I contend with here,
00:01:42.980 and you'll hear this in the conversation
00:01:44.500 that we are going to have that I just recorded,
00:01:47.120 is this assertion that she is innocent completely,
00:01:52.560 that there is no evidence of physical abuse of her child,
00:01:57.480 that she was just this loving, wonderful mother,
00:02:00.040 and that this crime actually never happened,
00:02:03.260 that it was just a tragedy.
00:02:04.480 And that is what the Innocence Project is saying.
00:02:09.180 She says that,
00:02:10.440 or the Innocence Project says that this was a tragedy,
00:02:14.740 that it was not a crime,
00:02:16.820 and that the judge excluded expert testimony
00:02:19.260 on the effects of trauma,
00:02:20.820 which deprived Melissa of a defense.
00:02:23.620 But as the appellate court later said,
00:02:25.840 that's actually not true.
00:02:27.800 That's not true that the expert testimony
00:02:29.500 that would have had any bearing whatsoever
00:02:31.400 on Melissa's defense was excluded.
00:02:34.240 So there have been two opportunities to appeal,
00:02:40.200 two efforts to appeal this case,
00:02:42.200 and the appellate courts have upheld the decision
00:02:45.320 and said, no, we actually think this trial was legitimate
00:02:48.020 and that the sentence was just.
00:02:50.060 However, the Innocence Project says this never happened.
00:02:53.640 This was a result,
00:02:54.760 the entire trial was a result of a series of injustices,
00:02:57.760 failures of the criminal legal system,
00:02:59.760 and generational trauma.
00:03:01.380 The state of Texas,
00:03:02.740 the Innocence Project says,
00:03:04.900 presented no physical evidence
00:03:06.640 that established Melissa had ever abused Mariah
00:03:09.200 or any of her children,
00:03:10.900 as you will hear me say in this interview,
00:03:13.220 that is absolutely false.
00:03:15.740 Vanessa Potkin of the Innocence Project
00:03:17.460 says that the conviction rests
00:03:19.580 on false and erroneous medical evidence
00:03:21.680 and that there's important new scientific evidence.
00:03:24.780 And Potkin also told USA Today
00:03:26.520 that there were no visible signs of injury
00:03:29.120 at the time that Mariah was found by the paramedics.
00:03:32.480 That is a blatant lie
00:03:34.380 based on not just what the defense attorney,
00:03:36.660 her defense attorney admitted to in court
00:03:39.000 that she was a negligent mother,
00:03:40.700 that she was an abusive mother.
00:03:43.900 She confessed to these things.
00:03:46.280 On tape, she confessed to abusing her daughter,
00:03:49.740 to hitting her daughter,
00:03:51.120 to smacking her daughter.
00:03:52.500 She said that she pinched her daughter's vagina.
00:03:54.660 She said that she bit her daughter twice on the back.
00:03:56.980 She admitted to these things.
00:03:58.640 The defense attorney owns up to the fact
00:04:00.640 that she admitted to these things.
00:04:03.100 Also, she has a long history with CPS,
00:04:05.440 going back to the mid-1990s.
00:04:08.280 She has several children,
00:04:09.660 I think 14 children at this point.
00:04:11.640 And from the mid-90s onward,
00:04:13.320 she had been found that she had been negligent
00:04:14.880 toward her children,
00:04:15.800 that she had abused her children.
00:04:17.400 In 2004, this, of course,
00:04:19.800 is when Mariah was a baby
00:04:21.100 before she was, I believe, murdered in 2007.
00:04:26.560 The CPS worker at the time,
00:04:28.440 she records in an affidavit
00:04:30.040 that all of her children were neglected,
00:04:32.140 that it was an insect-infested place.
00:04:35.060 We're not just talking about people living in poverty.
00:04:37.360 We're talking about little children
00:04:38.620 running around without any diapers,
00:04:40.160 without any underwear on,
00:04:41.580 apparently had dried feces all over them.
00:04:44.620 There were ants crawling all over the baby.
00:04:47.120 I mean, this is Melissa Lucio.
00:04:48.820 This is who we're talking about.
00:04:50.600 And so, again,
00:04:51.540 maybe you think that she is not guilty.
00:04:53.980 Maybe you think that she is not guilty of murder.
00:04:56.260 But to say,
00:04:57.100 as the Innocence Project is,
00:04:58.320 as the state representatives seem to be saying,
00:05:00.620 as the clemency petition is saying,
00:05:02.480 that she is completely innocent,
00:05:04.040 that there has been no troubling history,
00:05:06.320 no important context that we need to consider
00:05:08.860 when it comes to deciding
00:05:10.320 whether or not this person is guilty,
00:05:12.220 that is a blatant lie.
00:05:13.900 That is my problem with all of this,
00:05:15.600 that it seems like a lot of propaganda
00:05:17.740 and that we're not owning up to the fact
00:05:20.560 that she actually does have
00:05:21.860 a very troubling history of violence
00:05:24.720 and abuse and neglect,
00:05:26.500 not to mention the fact that
00:05:28.460 multiple times when CPS visited her,
00:05:30.780 she tested positive for cocaine use,
00:05:32.460 but also her children
00:05:33.500 tested positive for cocaine use.
00:05:36.360 Now, none of those things make her guilty
00:05:38.080 of the crime that she is said
00:05:40.280 to have committed in 2007,
00:05:41.860 but I do think it's important context.
00:05:43.540 So that is what we are going to be debating today.
00:05:46.240 We are going to be debating,
00:05:47.380 yes, the facts of the case,
00:05:48.340 but also how did the procedure go down?
00:05:51.020 Why does it seem like these organizations
00:05:52.760 are painting her as this loving mother
00:05:55.120 when it doesn't seem like the evidence proves that?
00:05:58.600 At the end of the day, though,
00:06:00.020 and this is why this conversation
00:06:02.760 is going to end well.
00:06:05.060 It might be intense at times.
00:06:06.260 Maybe you feel yourself kind of tensing up
00:06:08.480 because I believe,
00:06:11.140 at least when it comes to Representative Leach,
00:06:12.900 I can't speak for the Innocence Project.
00:06:14.720 You guys know I did a whole podcast
00:06:15.960 on Julius Jones
00:06:17.020 and how they lied about that case.
00:06:18.660 We can link it in the description of this episode.
00:06:20.820 I actually think that they are extremely deceitful
00:06:23.380 as an organization, unfortunately.
00:06:25.300 But when it comes to Representative Leach,
00:06:27.500 whose heart I trust
00:06:29.200 and whose motivations I believe are pure,
00:06:32.200 we both want justice.
00:06:33.820 Okay, we want justice.
00:06:34.960 We want God's definition
00:06:36.340 of what justice looks like.
00:06:38.500 I think we both believe in the truth.
00:06:41.220 And that's why it's so important, I think,
00:06:43.400 for us to hash this out,
00:06:46.100 for us to talk about this.
00:06:47.880 And so, yes, we do kind of disagree,
00:06:50.160 but you'll see in this conversation,
00:06:52.640 like, I learned some things.
00:06:54.500 And he certainly challenged me effectively.
00:06:58.860 Representative, thank you so much
00:07:00.560 for joining us in studio.
00:07:02.020 For those who don't know,
00:07:02.920 can you tell us who you are and what you do?
00:07:04.360 Sure, Allie, it's great to be with you.
00:07:05.980 And my name is State Representative Jeff Leach.
00:07:08.960 I'm in my fifth term serving in the Texas House,
00:07:11.300 part of Collin County,
00:07:12.520 just north of Dallas,
00:07:13.400 and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee
00:07:15.440 and chairman of the House Criminal Justice Reform Committee
00:07:19.020 as well.
00:07:20.020 And so I'm very proud to serve
00:07:21.360 200,000 constituents just north of Dallas
00:07:23.420 and Collin County
00:07:24.100 and strong conservative record.
00:07:25.880 And we've got a lot of important work ahead of us
00:07:27.740 to keep Texas strong and free.
00:07:30.060 Yes, I think some people may be surprised
00:07:32.240 to find a conservative Republican
00:07:34.580 kind of on the front lines of a story
00:07:37.720 that is in the news right now.
00:07:39.080 And that is about a woman on death row in Texas,
00:07:41.500 Melissa Lucio.
00:07:42.560 And you have fought really hard
00:07:44.980 against her death sentence
00:07:46.640 because from what you've said,
00:07:48.360 you believe her to be innocent
00:07:49.780 and you believe the system has failed her.
00:07:52.180 So can you talk about,
00:07:53.100 before we get into the ins and outs of the case,
00:07:55.000 can you talk about how you got involved
00:07:57.200 in this particular case?
00:07:59.460 Well, I think it's important for all Americans,
00:08:03.180 all Texans,
00:08:03.700 but really for conservatives
00:08:04.640 who care about life and liberty
00:08:06.460 and the rule of law and public safety
00:08:09.060 to care deeply about criminal justice reform.
00:08:12.240 So yes, this issue and issues relating
00:08:14.360 to the death penalty
00:08:15.180 and the way we, no pun intended,
00:08:18.600 execute the death penalty in Texas are important,
00:08:20.940 but so are all of these other
00:08:22.060 great criminal justice issues
00:08:23.320 that conservatives, in my opinion,
00:08:24.620 should be leading on.
00:08:25.680 We saw that in the Trump administration
00:08:27.100 with the Second Chance Act
00:08:29.220 and with getting people back in their homes
00:08:31.400 and out of prisons
00:08:32.200 who are no threat to society,
00:08:33.520 who've paid their debt
00:08:34.400 and back to being productive taxpaying citizens.
00:08:37.960 So that's what you mean
00:08:38.840 when you're talking about criminal justice reform,
00:08:40.500 because that's a wide umbrella
00:08:41.760 that could also include
00:08:43.140 some really disastrous policy
00:08:45.280 like bail reform,
00:08:46.760 like we've seen in Houston
00:08:47.860 that has been totally disastrous.
00:08:50.400 So when you're talking
00:08:52.500 about criminal justice reform,
00:08:53.980 specifically, what are you referring to?
00:08:56.180 Well, so I want a policy in Texas
00:08:58.200 that is tough on crime,
00:09:00.520 but smart on crime.
00:09:01.780 We've gotten really good in this country
00:09:03.200 and in this state
00:09:04.020 for locking people up
00:09:05.900 that we're just mad at
00:09:06.820 instead of those people
00:09:07.460 that we're scared of.
00:09:08.280 Now, when there are crimes
00:09:10.220 that are committed,
00:09:10.920 when people are harmed,
00:09:11.780 when there's property crimes,
00:09:12.700 when people commit a crime
00:09:14.380 and are convicted
00:09:14.940 by a jury of their peers,
00:09:16.020 they have to pay their consequences,
00:09:17.280 no doubt about it.
00:09:18.460 And we need a system
00:09:19.400 that protects that framework.
00:09:22.460 But at the end of the day,
00:09:23.700 if someone,
00:09:24.520 if there's a dad in prison
00:09:25.560 that is no threat to society,
00:09:27.120 that's paid his debt,
00:09:28.000 that's made his victim whole,
00:09:29.640 that can get back home
00:09:31.320 with his kids
00:09:32.060 who are being raised
00:09:33.020 in fatherless homes,
00:09:33.960 who could be a productive
00:09:34.740 taxpaying citizen,
00:09:35.680 who can just be part of society,
00:09:39.500 if we can do that,
00:09:40.260 we should do that.
00:09:41.220 And we've seen Republicans
00:09:42.340 and Democrats,
00:09:43.200 conservatives and liberals
00:09:43.940 come together on those issues.
00:09:45.700 Allie, of course,
00:09:46.280 there's a lot of issues
00:09:46.860 on which we disagree.
00:09:48.340 You know,
00:09:49.180 some of the efforts
00:09:50.080 to legalize drugs
00:09:51.960 across the nation,
00:09:52.940 I'm firmly against those efforts
00:09:54.660 and others that we could talk about.
00:09:56.700 But I think just conservatives
00:09:58.280 should be leading on this.
00:09:59.780 It's about freedom and liberty
00:10:01.320 and life and the rule of law
00:10:02.900 and making sure our streets
00:10:04.040 and our schools
00:10:04.900 and our communities are safe.
00:10:06.760 And so that's why I care about it.
00:10:08.300 I've cared about it for a long time.
00:10:09.560 And I think Republicans
00:10:10.720 have a unique opportunity
00:10:11.700 to lead on this issue.
00:10:13.300 I think it's difficult
00:10:13.980 because from the conservative perspective
00:10:16.160 and maybe just from the perspective
00:10:17.580 of the average person,
00:10:18.600 we're seeing crime rates go up
00:10:19.880 and the recidivism rate is so high.
00:10:21.720 And so often when we see
00:10:23.260 these violent criminals
00:10:24.140 that commit these heinous crimes,
00:10:26.660 well, they've been arrested
00:10:27.700 several times
00:10:28.560 or they had a progressive judge
00:10:30.140 or a progressive DA
00:10:31.260 not really do their jobs
00:10:33.240 in the name of criminal justice,
00:10:34.720 in the name of bail reform
00:10:35.840 or whatever it is.
00:10:36.880 I know that's not
00:10:37.560 what you're talking about,
00:10:38.760 but I think that it can be
00:10:40.320 a difficult issue
00:10:41.200 for conservatives
00:10:41.920 because yes, of course,
00:10:43.180 we believe in liberty.
00:10:44.100 I don't want anyone
00:10:44.880 doing time past what they should.
00:10:47.060 I want them to pay
00:10:47.680 their consequences
00:10:48.360 and like you said,
00:10:49.500 be redeemed and restored
00:10:50.480 back into society.
00:10:52.280 But it's a little bit hard
00:10:53.840 for me to balance
00:10:54.880 when every single crime
00:10:56.960 that we see in the news,
00:10:58.120 it's like, wow,
00:10:58.660 the system failed the victim,
00:11:00.860 not the criminal
00:11:01.720 in that particular case
00:11:05.620 in the name of social justice
00:11:07.300 or equity.
00:11:07.940 That person was let back out
00:11:09.000 on the streets.
00:11:09.480 They never should have been.
00:11:10.760 Yeah, and I'm not interested
00:11:11.420 in those efforts
00:11:12.120 and in fact have worked
00:11:13.200 strongly against those efforts.
00:11:14.640 So if you look at
00:11:15.280 some of the things
00:11:16.280 that I've led on
00:11:16.840 in the criminal justice reform area
00:11:18.860 in the Texas House,
00:11:19.740 it's protecting victims
00:11:20.800 of sexual assault,
00:11:21.720 of child abuse and neglect,
00:11:23.400 making sure that our laws
00:11:24.860 are strong
00:11:25.640 to hold those responsible.
00:11:27.220 Human trafficking,
00:11:27.880 I mean,
00:11:28.880 we have escalated penalties.
00:11:30.480 We have created new crimes.
00:11:33.360 Our penal code has grown.
00:11:35.060 It has not shrunk.
00:11:36.580 And so we need to make sure
00:11:37.940 that people who are a danger
00:11:39.360 to their families,
00:11:40.540 to their kids,
00:11:41.160 to anyone in society,
00:11:42.080 that they're off the streets,
00:11:43.620 that they can't get
00:11:45.540 out of prison early.
00:11:46.260 What's happened in Harris County
00:11:47.200 with bail reform
00:11:47.800 is a colossal disaster.
00:11:49.520 And we've worked hard
00:11:50.420 in Austin to correct that
00:11:52.020 and address it
00:11:52.720 and to hold local prosecutors
00:11:54.580 accountable
00:11:55.080 accountable
00:11:55.660 because we want to make sure
00:11:58.360 public safety is paramount,
00:11:59.640 supporting law enforcement
00:12:00.560 is paramount,
00:12:01.380 and we want to lock up
00:12:03.180 the bad guys.
00:12:03.820 There's no question about it.
00:12:04.940 A lot of people
00:12:05.360 who need to be in prison
00:12:06.240 and never need to be let out.
00:12:09.220 But at the same time,
00:12:10.520 at the same time,
00:12:11.400 we conservatives
00:12:12.060 who believe in second chances,
00:12:14.180 not for everybody,
00:12:15.460 but people who deserve
00:12:17.020 a second chance
00:12:17.640 and have proven
00:12:18.240 they've deserved a second chance
00:12:19.360 where they're no threat at all
00:12:20.460 and their victims are made whole.
00:12:22.060 I think that we ought
00:12:22.960 to not be afraid
00:12:23.820 of the conversation
00:12:24.680 as to how we can restore them,
00:12:27.360 not only for their own good,
00:12:28.540 but for the benefit of society
00:12:29.860 and for their own families.
00:12:30.980 And I just have not been afraid
00:12:32.120 to have those conversations.
00:12:34.080 And Melissa Lucio,
00:12:34.980 in your opinion,
00:12:36.280 is she someone
00:12:36.940 that deserves a second chance?
00:12:38.420 So I actually have not opined
00:12:40.720 on whether Melissa Lucio
00:12:42.420 is innocent or guilty.
00:12:43.560 I have not.
00:12:44.280 You won't find any public statement
00:12:45.580 from me that says
00:12:46.420 that she's innocent.
00:12:47.100 I do believe that the facts
00:12:48.660 that she deserves a new trial.
00:12:51.820 I do believe that there is
00:12:53.040 a multitude,
00:12:54.060 a mountain of exculpatory evidence
00:12:55.560 that was not heard
00:12:56.360 in the initial trial
00:12:57.140 that needs to be held.
00:12:58.560 I spent time with Melissa.
00:12:59.760 I've spent hours and hours,
00:13:01.160 days and days,
00:13:01.840 reviewing her case.
00:13:03.240 I believe strongly
00:13:03.920 that she was,
00:13:04.740 the system failed her,
00:13:06.100 Allie,
00:13:06.380 at every single turn
00:13:07.280 and failed not only her,
00:13:08.680 but Mariah,
00:13:09.680 who is the victim,
00:13:10.860 her daughter,
00:13:11.320 who's the victim
00:13:11.740 of this terrible tragedy.
00:13:13.260 But I am not the fact finder.
00:13:14.780 I'm a policymaker.
00:13:15.660 I'm a legislator.
00:13:16.520 I am not the judge
00:13:17.620 or the jury
00:13:18.160 or the prosecutor,
00:13:19.980 but I reviewed
00:13:21.020 what happened in her case
00:13:22.180 and in her trial
00:13:22.820 and believe so strongly
00:13:23.840 that the system failed her.
00:13:26.480 And, you know,
00:13:27.100 here we are just several days,
00:13:28.720 13 days away
00:13:29.360 from her scheduled execution date.
00:13:31.160 And let's not mince words.
00:13:32.600 The state is getting ready
00:13:33.500 to murder someone
00:13:34.760 who is potentially innocent.
00:13:36.760 And I believe very strongly
00:13:38.220 that she deserves a new trial.
00:13:40.200 Okay.
00:13:40.700 So you did say
00:13:41.520 that you have never seen
00:13:42.520 a case more troubling
00:13:43.480 than that of Melissa Lucio,
00:13:45.480 Rep. Jeff Leach said,
00:13:47.320 we got to use that voice
00:13:48.920 to save an innocent person.
00:13:51.440 So do you believe...
00:13:52.520 To save a potential...
00:13:53.560 I don't know what statement
00:13:54.280 you're reading.
00:13:54.720 To save a potentially
00:13:55.560 innocent person.
00:13:56.680 That's been the vast majority
00:13:59.200 of my statements
00:13:59.840 have not opined
00:14:00.620 on her innocence or guilt.
00:14:03.260 Now, if...
00:14:04.000 Now, you did tweet
00:14:04.860 that you believe
00:14:05.740 that this is a crime
00:14:06.600 that wasn't committed,
00:14:07.720 that it wasn't a murder.
00:14:09.080 That's also what
00:14:09.740 the Innocence Project
00:14:10.380 is saying,
00:14:11.080 that this is a tragedy.
00:14:11.900 There's evidence
00:14:12.280 that shows that it was not.
00:14:13.820 There's evidence
00:14:14.300 that was never admitted
00:14:15.080 into trial.
00:14:15.820 People who actually saw
00:14:16.780 what happened,
00:14:18.080 that she fell down the stairs,
00:14:21.700 that she was not pushed.
00:14:22.640 There's even evidence out there
00:14:23.660 that Melissa was not even there
00:14:24.740 at the time.
00:14:25.420 None of this made it
00:14:26.060 into the initial trial.
00:14:27.020 None of it.
00:14:27.940 And there's the interrogation,
00:14:31.100 the tactics that were used,
00:14:32.180 the coercion
00:14:32.860 is extremely troubling.
00:14:35.480 Her lack of adequate
00:14:37.720 defense counsel.
00:14:39.780 Look, every Texan
00:14:41.360 deserves a fair trial.
00:14:43.800 Every Texan deserves
00:14:44.800 a fair trial.
00:14:45.440 They have that constitutional right
00:14:46.840 to a fair trial
00:14:47.580 of their peers
00:14:48.420 in front of a jury
00:14:49.040 of their peers.
00:14:49.580 And I do not believe
00:14:50.360 that Melissa Lucio
00:14:51.900 got that,
00:14:53.820 that that was afforded to her.
00:14:54.800 In fact, I think the system
00:14:55.760 failed her multiple times
00:14:57.060 all throughout the process.
00:14:58.580 So even,
00:14:59.100 it was appealed twice,
00:15:00.400 2011,
00:15:01.800 they rejected the appeal.
00:15:03.840 On procedural.
00:15:04.480 And then in 2021,
00:15:07.220 they also upheld the sentence
00:15:08.860 and they went through,
00:15:09.920 and in 2016,
00:15:11.140 they also went through
00:15:11.760 every single argument
00:15:13.360 that the defense was making,
00:15:14.480 that the appellant was making.
00:15:16.300 And they,
00:15:17.720 the appellant,
00:15:18.940 gave the arguments
00:15:19.940 that you are giving
00:15:20.680 that, look,
00:15:21.780 they excluded some evidence.
00:15:23.080 They excluded the witnesses
00:15:24.000 that we wanted to.
00:15:24.920 And the court went through
00:15:26.460 every single one
00:15:27.420 of those arguments
00:15:28.060 and explained why,
00:15:29.940 no,
00:15:30.420 it actually was
00:15:31.340 a legitimate process.
00:15:32.320 So you think
00:15:33.360 the system failed,
00:15:34.080 not just in trial court,
00:15:35.600 but also we're talking about
00:15:37.120 in the Fifth Circuit
00:15:38.160 of Appeals as well.
00:15:39.040 You believe that
00:15:39.520 the whole process
00:15:40.160 was wrong,
00:15:41.900 corrupt or what?
00:15:42.560 Yes, I do.
00:15:43.220 Okay.
00:15:43.540 I do.
00:15:44.180 And I believe
00:15:45.120 that the facts
00:15:46.760 overwhelmingly show
00:15:47.800 that our federal courts,
00:15:49.480 the Fifth Circuit,
00:15:50.460 federal law
00:15:50.920 needs to be changed.
00:15:51.780 It is very hard,
00:15:52.620 very hard
00:15:53.020 to overturn a conviction
00:15:54.140 based on any singular
00:15:56.060 piece of new evidence,
00:15:57.020 even a collaboration
00:15:58.740 of new evidence,
00:15:59.560 like in Melissa's case.
00:16:00.520 Her appeals were denied
00:16:02.140 essentially on procedural grounds.
00:16:03.960 I agree with the Reagan appointee
00:16:05.680 on the Fifth Circuit,
00:16:06.360 Judge Higginbotham,
00:16:07.200 who is one of the strongest
00:16:08.860 conservative justices
00:16:10.000 we have anywhere
00:16:10.560 in this country,
00:16:11.180 who said that the system
00:16:12.680 absolutely failed Melissa,
00:16:14.100 that this is a miscarriage
00:16:15.060 of justice.
00:16:15.660 I think those were
00:16:16.160 his words,
00:16:17.900 but their hands
00:16:18.740 were tied procedurally.
00:16:20.220 And so all I'm asking for,
00:16:21.480 I am not opining
00:16:22.600 on her innocence or guilt.
00:16:23.880 All I'm asking for
00:16:24.720 is for us to push
00:16:25.440 the pause button
00:16:26.160 before she's executed
00:16:27.480 and for us to work hard
00:16:28.940 to get her a new trial.
00:16:30.460 And the vast majority
00:16:31.740 of death penalty supporters
00:16:33.420 and opponents,
00:16:34.340 Allie,
00:16:34.920 agree with that.
00:16:36.060 We've gotten over 90
00:16:37.300 state representatives,
00:16:38.620 conservatives and liberals,
00:16:39.760 death penalty opponents
00:16:40.620 and supporters
00:16:41.160 who've asked for a new trial
00:16:42.120 for her,
00:16:42.780 who've asked for the pause
00:16:43.540 button today.
00:16:44.560 20 state senators,
00:16:45.620 including the most Republican
00:16:46.680 state senators
00:16:47.720 and the most liberals
00:16:48.560 said,
00:16:49.220 look,
00:16:49.380 let's just push
00:16:49.880 the pause button here
00:16:50.740 to make sure
00:16:51.180 that we don't move forward
00:16:52.760 with this irreversible stain
00:16:54.160 on the Lone Star State,
00:16:55.260 and that's executing someone
00:16:56.220 who could be potentially
00:16:57.140 innocent.
00:16:58.140 So the letter that you signed
00:16:59.420 as well as you're included
00:17:00.720 in these 83 members
00:17:01.760 of the Texas House
00:17:02.520 of Representatives
00:17:03.240 and the clemency petition
00:17:04.500 that you had sent me.
00:17:05.980 So in the letter,
00:17:06.780 it said,
00:17:07.160 Mariah died after a tragic accident
00:17:09.040 rather than an intentional
00:17:10.180 capital murder,
00:17:11.360 Miss Lucio,
00:17:11.980 who had no documented history
00:17:13.440 of violence towards her children.
00:17:15.140 And the clemency petition says,
00:17:16.480 by all accounts,
00:17:17.120 Melissa was a loving mother
00:17:18.340 who never abused her children
00:17:20.220 as the children themselves
00:17:21.420 told the police.
00:17:22.200 So it actually does sound
00:17:23.320 like you are opining
00:17:24.520 on whether or not
00:17:25.260 she's innocent.
00:17:25.960 The statements that you have made,
00:17:27.700 at least to infer that
00:17:29.000 in the letter that you signed,
00:17:30.680 it says that she died
00:17:31.540 after a tragic accident
00:17:32.560 rather than intentional
00:17:33.540 capital murder.
00:17:34.320 So it sounds like you think
00:17:35.220 that she is innocent.
00:17:36.160 Oh, I definitely think
00:17:37.060 she's innocent,
00:17:37.640 but I'm not,
00:17:38.380 based on what I know,
00:17:40.000 but it's not my job
00:17:40.800 to declare her innocent.
00:17:42.080 Let me make that clarification.
00:17:43.500 I am not the judge or jury.
00:17:44.960 I cannot declare her,
00:17:46.340 nor can the Board of Pardons
00:17:48.140 and Paroles or Governor.
00:17:48.980 They could grant clemency
00:17:50.320 or commutation or a stay.
00:17:52.240 But what we're asking for,
00:17:53.660 this is about the process
00:17:54.680 more than it is
00:17:55.400 necessarily her conviction.
00:17:56.920 I believe the process
00:17:57.740 and the system has failed her
00:17:58.900 and she deserves a new trial.
00:18:00.040 If I was on the jury,
00:18:01.420 knowing what I know right now,
00:18:02.900 absolutely I would vote
00:18:03.820 for her innocence.
00:18:04.800 And there are five jurors,
00:18:06.060 five of the original jurors,
00:18:07.140 including the jury foreperson,
00:18:08.740 who felt like they were
00:18:09.560 misled by the prosecution,
00:18:11.380 that the process failed Melissa.
00:18:12.820 They regret not only convicting her,
00:18:15.580 but sentencing her to death.
00:18:17.000 They've said basically,
00:18:18.000 they've affirmed publicly,
00:18:18.900 that if they knew then
00:18:20.000 what they knew now,
00:18:20.620 there's no way they would have voted
00:18:21.600 the way they did.
00:18:22.740 And so I'm joining,
00:18:23.800 I'm joining the vast majority of folks
00:18:26.800 that I'm talking to,
00:18:27.700 conservatives and liberals,
00:18:28.880 death penalty opponents
00:18:29.720 and supporters,
00:18:30.360 like I've said,
00:18:30.880 who said, yeah,
00:18:31.500 there's a lot of evidence
00:18:32.440 that needs to be heard
00:18:33.280 that would lend support
00:18:34.580 to the fact that she's innocent.
00:18:39.980 And I am definitely open
00:18:41.660 to hearing that evidence
00:18:42.860 and those arguments.
00:18:44.140 What I have a really hard time with
00:18:46.180 is what the letter
00:18:48.160 from the state representatives
00:18:49.160 with the clemency petition
00:18:50.260 and then what the Innocence Project
00:18:51.480 is saying,
00:18:52.040 that there was no evidence of abuse,
00:18:54.020 that she seems to be,
00:18:55.640 she seems to be innocent
00:18:57.800 while seeming to exclude
00:19:00.140 a lot of evidence.
00:19:01.260 And I just want to read
00:19:02.120 just so people see,
00:19:03.300 this is the transcript
00:19:05.020 of the opinion of the judges
00:19:06.880 when the case was first appealed
00:19:09.600 and heard in 2011.
00:19:11.580 So one of the paramedics,
00:19:12.820 Mr. Nestor,
00:19:13.860 testified that when the paramedics entered,
00:19:15.640 and I'll definitely give you
00:19:16.780 a chance to respond to all of this,
00:19:18.620 entered their apartment,
00:19:19.660 they found Mariah unattended
00:19:20.900 and lying on her back
00:19:21.860 in the middle of the floor,
00:19:22.840 not breathing and with no pulse.
00:19:24.600 Nestor observed that the appellant's,
00:19:26.260 this is Lucio,
00:19:27.520 distant and not overly distressed behavior
00:19:29.460 was so far out of the ordinary
00:19:30.860 that he put it into the report.
00:19:32.660 He also testified that he noted
00:19:34.060 the fact that the appellant
00:19:35.000 was not even within arm's reach
00:19:36.800 of the child,
00:19:38.000 much less trying to grasp
00:19:39.560 or to hold her.
00:19:40.460 There were bruises
00:19:41.080 in various stages
00:19:42.060 of healing covering her body.
00:19:44.360 There were bite marks on her back.
00:19:46.320 One of her arms had been broken
00:19:47.600 probably two to seven weeks
00:19:48.920 before her death.
00:19:50.120 She was missing portions of her hair
00:19:51.460 where it had been pulled out
00:19:52.680 by the roots.
00:19:53.760 The emergency room physician,
00:19:55.460 Dr. Vargas,
00:19:56.840 testified that this was
00:19:58.300 the absolute worst case
00:19:59.560 of child abuse
00:20:00.260 that he had seen
00:20:00.940 in his 30 years of practice.
00:20:03.000 He also testified
00:20:03.880 that his emergency room visual
00:20:05.960 and manual inspection of Mariah
00:20:07.440 indicated that there may
00:20:09.460 or may not have been
00:20:10.680 a head injury.
00:20:11.540 But then the chief forensic pathologist
00:20:13.660 for Cameron and Hidalgo counties,
00:20:15.460 Dr. Farley,
00:20:16.580 who conducted the autopsy,
00:20:18.440 testified that Mariah's case
00:20:19.800 of death was blunt force head trauma,
00:20:23.000 that she had multiple contusions
00:20:24.240 to her head area,
00:20:25.520 and that blunt force head trauma
00:20:26.920 basically means beat about the head
00:20:28.560 with something,
00:20:29.240 an object,
00:20:30.380 a fist,
00:20:31.220 or slammed.
00:20:32.760 Appellant's recorded statement
00:20:33.860 reflects that she told
00:20:35.320 the police officers,
00:20:36.380 Texas Ranger Escalon,
00:20:37.860 that she and only she
00:20:39.140 had been spanking
00:20:39.960 or hitting Mariah
00:20:41.000 since sometime
00:20:42.020 after December 2006.
00:20:45.460 She said that she hit
00:20:46.680 or spanked her,
00:20:47.840 that she beat her
00:20:48.660 when she got angry,
00:20:50.580 and then she told a story
00:20:51.800 about how her other children
00:20:53.700 were jumping around.
00:20:54.580 She got frustrated.
00:20:55.560 She put her hand
00:20:56.320 over Mariah's mouth.
00:20:57.840 She bit her on the back
00:20:58.940 and dragged her teeth
00:21:00.180 down her back.
00:21:01.780 She testified,
00:21:02.900 recorded,
00:21:03.520 that she pinched
00:21:04.620 her daughter's vagina
00:21:05.840 and that she would sometimes
00:21:07.460 hit her daughter
00:21:08.500 or squeeze her arm
00:21:09.820 for no reason,
00:21:11.620 but the defense says,
00:21:13.800 the defense,
00:21:14.500 her defense attorney says,
00:21:16.140 yes,
00:21:16.420 she admitted to beating
00:21:17.200 her daughter.
00:21:18.000 Yes,
00:21:18.240 she admitted to biting
00:21:19.160 her daughter.
00:21:20.040 Yes,
00:21:20.300 she admitted to not being
00:21:21.220 a good mother.
00:21:22.180 Yes,
00:21:22.500 she admitted to neglecting
00:21:24.440 her mother,
00:21:25.080 but the defense simply said,
00:21:26.460 all I'm saying
00:21:27.320 was that she didn't
00:21:29.360 cause her daughter's death.
00:21:30.980 Now,
00:21:31.280 that is very different
00:21:32.620 than saying
00:21:33.860 what the Innocence Project
00:21:35.000 and what this letter
00:21:36.260 and the clemency petitions
00:21:37.460 is saying,
00:21:38.080 that she was a wonderful mother.
00:21:39.920 So,
00:21:40.360 what do I do
00:21:41.160 with all of that information?
00:21:43.560 Well,
00:21:44.200 all of that
00:21:46.080 has been contradicted
00:21:47.620 by contradictory
00:21:49.080 medical scientific evidence,
00:21:50.640 exculpatory evidence,
00:21:51.420 every single thing.
00:21:52.240 She admitted it on tape.
00:21:53.300 So,
00:21:53.620 again,
00:21:54.960 let's talk about the process,
00:21:56.240 okay?
00:21:56.580 They zoomed in
00:21:57.540 within two hours
00:21:58.560 of Mariah's death.
00:21:59.820 They zoomed in,
00:22:00.840 they zoned in
00:22:01.420 on Melissa
00:22:02.380 as the only suspect,
00:22:03.860 okay?
00:22:04.060 Within two hours,
00:22:05.220 she was being interrogated
00:22:06.360 by armed guards.
00:22:07.100 She had a history
00:22:07.680 of being abused as a child
00:22:08.960 and being sexually abused
00:22:10.000 and a victim
00:22:10.420 of domestic violence herself.
00:22:12.160 She was especially susceptible
00:22:14.160 to these coercive
00:22:15.360 interrogation tactics,
00:22:16.280 which today
00:22:16.940 in most states,
00:22:17.660 including Texas,
00:22:18.480 are outlawed.
00:22:19.700 Okay?
00:22:19.880 I've seen the video.
00:22:20.860 I've watched the video.
00:22:21.860 You had armed law enforcement
00:22:23.720 standing over her
00:22:25.060 for five hours.
00:22:26.280 She was pregnant
00:22:26.780 with twins at the time,
00:22:27.920 Allie,
00:22:28.520 deprived of food
00:22:29.380 and water.
00:22:31.240 Over 100 times,
00:22:32.680 she denied
00:22:33.400 having anything to do
00:22:34.280 with her daughter's death.
00:22:35.020 Over 100 times
00:22:35.940 in five hours,
00:22:37.520 they continued on.
00:22:39.160 They coerced her.
00:22:40.240 They said,
00:22:40.640 come on,
00:22:41.040 you know,
00:22:41.320 it's the most shocking
00:22:42.320 interrogation video
00:22:43.120 I've ever seen.
00:22:43.960 And when she said,
00:22:44.800 fine,
00:22:45.020 what do you want me to say?
00:22:45.680 I did it.
00:22:47.120 That's what they hung
00:22:47.920 the entire prosecution on.
00:22:49.280 So all of the evidence
00:22:50.240 that you just talked about,
00:22:51.260 all of the medical exams,
00:22:52.740 the pathology reports,
00:22:54.260 the Dr. Farley,
00:22:55.280 who works for the prosecutor's office
00:22:56.940 in Cameron County,
00:22:58.920 all of that was hinged on
00:23:00.700 their initial indictment
00:23:03.360 of Miss Lucio,
00:23:05.240 Melissa Lucio being
00:23:06.560 the only suspect.
00:23:07.780 It was all hinged
00:23:08.940 on that one statement
00:23:09.720 she made.
00:23:10.080 What do you want me to say?
00:23:10.720 I did it.
00:23:11.520 After a five-hour interrogation.
00:23:13.440 All of that
00:23:14.280 has been refuted
00:23:15.360 by the defense's medical
00:23:16.880 and its own pathology reports,
00:23:19.400 its own testimony.
00:23:20.100 We have multiple affidavits
00:23:22.120 from family members
00:23:23.340 and from other folks
00:23:24.180 who said that,
00:23:24.920 yeah, she wasn't a perfect mother,
00:23:26.860 but she wasn't violent
00:23:27.740 towards Mariah.
00:23:29.000 None of her kids
00:23:29.560 had ever seen her.
00:23:30.080 Why would her defense attorney,
00:23:31.600 a defense attorney?
00:23:32.540 She had a terrible defense attorney.
00:23:33.660 I mean, he.
00:23:34.300 Yeah, Alice,
00:23:34.540 she had a terrible defense attorney.
00:23:35.660 What do you want me to say?
00:23:36.200 He's terrible.
00:23:36.860 In my opinion,
00:23:37.360 he should be disbarred.
00:23:38.700 He absolutely should be disbarred.
00:23:39.880 I've read all the transcripts.
00:23:40.980 He's awful.
00:23:41.560 She was deprived.
00:23:42.760 It happens a lot
00:23:43.560 in death penalty cases
00:23:44.560 where folks who cannot afford counsel
00:23:46.860 or appointed counsel,
00:23:48.080 within days of her conviction
00:23:49.560 and her sentence
00:23:50.240 to death penalty,
00:23:50.940 her defense attorney
00:23:51.560 went to work
00:23:52.180 for the Cameron County prosecutor
00:23:53.660 who prosecuted the case
00:23:55.140 and who's now serving
00:23:56.020 13 years in federal prison
00:23:57.340 for corruption and bribery.
00:23:59.920 And so,
00:24:00.720 but all of the evidence,
00:24:02.340 a lot of the evidence
00:24:03.260 was just left out of the trial.
00:24:05.680 It was just left out.
00:24:06.760 The jury never heard it.
00:24:08.100 Like what evidence?
00:24:09.200 Contradictory medical evidence.
00:24:10.480 Like what?
00:24:10.720 Pathology reports
00:24:11.620 that say,
00:24:12.160 like for instance,
00:24:12.740 the bite marks
00:24:13.280 were completely refuted.
00:24:14.260 There were no bite marks.
00:24:15.280 None.
00:24:15.980 No bite marks.
00:24:16.920 No bite marks.
00:24:17.600 None.
00:24:17.780 So we think that the paramedics
00:24:20.740 and the person
00:24:22.420 who conducted the autopsy
00:24:23.840 and the emergency room physician
00:24:25.540 that they were all lying?
00:24:27.000 I think that they,
00:24:28.740 I don't want to say
00:24:30.280 that they were lying.
00:24:31.060 I think that they misled the jury.
00:24:32.840 It happens a lot
00:24:33.540 where they're going to
00:24:34.720 offer their opinions,
00:24:35.720 but defense is entitled to
00:24:37.080 in a fair trial
00:24:37.820 offer their contradictory opinions
00:24:40.160 as well.
00:24:40.480 So the bite marks were a lie.
00:24:41.100 The fact that her kidneys
00:24:42.320 were bruised
00:24:43.500 was a lie.
00:24:44.220 Her kidneys were not bruised.
00:24:45.700 She had a severe blood disorder.
00:24:48.840 She had a,
00:24:51.280 again,
00:24:52.080 when evidence is presented
00:24:53.100 in a jury
00:24:53.980 in a criminal case like this,
00:24:56.160 you present your evidence
00:24:57.160 and there's an ability
00:24:57.940 for cross-examination.
00:24:59.140 So the other side
00:24:59.700 gets to poke holes
00:25:00.560 in your testimony.
00:25:01.840 Then I get to present
00:25:02.540 my testimony,
00:25:03.440 my evidence,
00:25:04.120 and the prosecution
00:25:04.860 gets to poke holes in that.
00:25:06.420 And then the jury
00:25:07.040 takes all of that information
00:25:08.200 and makes an informed decision
00:25:09.320 as to what they think
00:25:10.100 actually happened.
00:25:11.480 And that did not happen
00:25:12.560 in this case.
00:25:14.060 And that fact alone
00:25:15.680 I believe
00:25:16.320 is evidence
00:25:17.320 and would support
00:25:18.400 our push for a new trial
00:25:19.420 for Melissa.
00:25:20.440 The five jurors
00:25:21.480 have said that.
00:25:22.100 They've reviewed
00:25:22.500 all of the evidence now
00:25:23.600 and they've said,
00:25:24.500 well,
00:25:24.560 we didn't hear any of this.
00:25:26.100 We weren't afforded
00:25:26.720 the opportunity
00:25:27.180 to hear any of this.
00:25:29.020 And so even the new DA,
00:25:31.620 Ali,
00:25:31.940 in Cameron County,
00:25:32.900 we had a hearing
00:25:33.500 the other day.
00:25:34.000 He appeared in front
00:25:34.580 of our committee.
00:25:35.060 Even the new DA
00:25:35.920 has said that,
00:25:36.940 you know what?
00:25:37.680 You're right.
00:25:38.500 You're right.
00:25:38.940 And if the Court
00:25:39.360 of Criminal Appeals
00:25:40.200 or the Governor
00:25:41.240 and the Board of Pardons
00:25:41.860 and Perils
00:25:42.180 don't step in
00:25:42.780 to stay this execution,
00:25:43.720 then the new Cameron County
00:25:44.920 District Attorney
00:25:45.500 Louise Sines
00:25:46.080 has said that
00:25:46.900 he will step in.
00:25:48.060 So the appellate court,
00:25:49.400 I know that you said
00:25:50.120 it was dismissed
00:25:50.940 on procedural grounds,
00:25:52.320 but they really go
00:25:53.420 through all of the arguments
00:25:54.840 and all of the evidence.
00:25:56.360 They don't say,
00:25:56.860 okay,
00:25:57.020 well,
00:25:57.240 on this technicality,
00:25:58.200 we're just going
00:25:58.720 to reject it.
00:25:59.780 I mean,
00:25:59.960 they really believe
00:26:01.200 that she is guilty
00:26:02.820 and that the trial
00:26:04.880 was conducted
00:26:05.680 in a way
00:26:06.280 that is legitimate.
00:26:07.600 So what you're saying,
00:26:08.800 again,
00:26:08.980 that it's not just
00:26:09.680 the trial court
00:26:10.420 that got it wrong.
00:26:11.120 It's not just
00:26:12.240 those witnesses
00:26:12.880 that were misleading
00:26:13.800 the jury,
00:26:14.440 but also that
00:26:15.640 the appellate courts
00:26:16.320 got it wrong as well.
00:26:17.520 Well,
00:26:17.620 remember,
00:26:18.120 there was a panel
00:26:18.620 on the Fifth Circuit
00:26:19.400 appellate court
00:26:20.220 that actually agreed
00:26:20.880 with Melissa's attorneys.
00:26:22.240 And then it was overturned
00:26:23.580 by the full Fifth Circuit
00:26:24.780 on procedural grounds.
00:26:26.380 And they,
00:26:26.700 well,
00:26:26.860 they explain why
00:26:28.180 they got that,
00:26:28.940 why they believe
00:26:29.740 that the partial panel
00:26:31.800 decided in error.
00:26:34.220 But they did not,
00:26:35.280 appellate courts
00:26:35.720 do not review evidence
00:26:36.760 like a jury does.
00:26:38.040 They don't review evidence
00:26:38.860 like a trial court does.
00:26:39.780 They have completely
00:26:40.460 different standards.
00:26:41.700 There's different burdens
00:26:42.400 that they,
00:26:42.860 that have to be met.
00:26:43.880 And,
00:26:44.380 and they were unable to
00:26:45.980 on procedural grounds
00:26:47.920 grant the appeal.
00:26:49.760 But what they were
00:26:50.340 trying to decide
00:26:51.280 was were the witnesses
00:26:53.060 because there were
00:26:53.820 two witnesses
00:26:54.420 that the defense says,
00:26:56.020 okay,
00:26:56.380 we weren't allowed
00:26:57.100 to bring these witnesses
00:26:57.920 forward.
00:26:58.360 And that's part
00:26:59.000 of the evidence,
00:26:59.920 the evidence that
00:27:00.760 they would say
00:27:01.360 would have helped
00:27:03.120 our case.
00:27:03.960 And so the appellate
00:27:05.180 court is deciding,
00:27:06.100 okay,
00:27:06.940 is that legit or not?
00:27:07.980 Is that a good contention?
00:27:08.960 The appellate court
00:27:09.520 decided,
00:27:10.340 no,
00:27:10.580 it's not.
00:27:11.100 And they give their
00:27:11.760 reasons why those
00:27:12.680 two witnesses
00:27:13.340 should have been
00:27:14.980 and were legitimately
00:27:16.100 excluded and that
00:27:17.160 that's not actually
00:27:18.160 grounds for an appeal.
00:27:19.980 And so,
00:27:20.580 yes,
00:27:20.800 they don't look
00:27:21.920 at the evidence
00:27:22.520 directly,
00:27:23.020 but they look at
00:27:24.060 whether or not
00:27:25.120 the trial was conducted
00:27:26.340 well or,
00:27:27.640 you know,
00:27:28.460 in a way that is
00:27:29.900 right,
00:27:30.520 legitimate,
00:27:30.960 valid.
00:27:31.800 And so,
00:27:32.840 obviously,
00:27:33.760 I guess you disagree
00:27:34.640 with that decision.
00:27:35.600 It's not about
00:27:36.300 whether or not
00:27:37.280 they were able
00:27:37.880 to review evidence,
00:27:38.960 but they think
00:27:39.580 that the evidence
00:27:40.160 that was included,
00:27:41.680 I guess,
00:27:41.960 was sufficient
00:27:42.500 and that it was.
00:27:44.000 She was afforded
00:27:44.680 due process.
00:27:45.780 Yeah.
00:27:46.100 So,
00:27:46.380 so on the habeas
00:27:47.680 corpus petition,
00:27:48.380 I mean,
00:27:48.560 we could get into
00:27:49.360 the details
00:27:49.780 and I'm happy
00:27:50.220 to do so,
00:27:50.900 but there are
00:27:51.540 a number of
00:27:51.940 justices on
00:27:52.420 the Fifth Circuit
00:27:52.920 who just strongly
00:27:53.600 disagreed with
00:27:54.180 the entire panel.
00:27:55.000 It was not
00:27:55.480 a resoundingly
00:27:56.820 unanimous decision
00:27:57.740 of the Fifth Circuit.
00:27:58.480 I believe
00:27:59.720 that federal law
00:28:00.260 needs to be changed
00:28:01.160 to allow
00:28:02.460 more of these,
00:28:04.420 more review
00:28:05.600 of cases
00:28:06.800 just like this
00:28:07.480 all across the country.
00:28:08.700 Absolutely,
00:28:09.260 I do.
00:28:09.580 I think they got it wrong.
00:28:11.000 And the good news
00:28:12.020 is that we have
00:28:12.700 the Board of Pardons
00:28:13.260 and Paroles.
00:28:13.940 We have the Court
00:28:14.420 of Criminal Appeals
00:28:15.080 and we've got
00:28:15.500 now the local DA
00:28:16.420 in Cameron County
00:28:17.120 who all disagree
00:28:18.160 with the Fifth Circuit's
00:28:19.020 decision.
00:28:20.120 The Board of Pardons
00:28:20.860 and Paroles
00:28:21.080 hasn't ruled yet
00:28:21.680 nor has the Court
00:28:22.200 of Criminal Appeals
00:28:22.800 but the DA has.
00:28:24.700 And so,
00:28:25.480 all we're asking for here
00:28:26.580 is to push
00:28:26.960 the pause button.
00:28:27.580 And I've watched
00:28:28.800 you enough
00:28:29.320 and I know
00:28:29.720 you enough
00:28:30.520 and your viewers
00:28:32.080 enough to know
00:28:32.820 your audience
00:28:33.460 that we conservatives
00:28:35.580 are naturally
00:28:36.180 distrustful of government.
00:28:38.160 We should be.
00:28:39.060 I mean,
00:28:39.200 right now
00:28:39.700 with what's happening
00:28:40.480 in Washington
00:28:41.600 with the White House,
00:28:42.500 the executive branch,
00:28:43.300 the legislative branch,
00:28:44.000 I don't trust
00:28:44.480 the Biden White House.
00:28:45.620 I don't trust Fauci.
00:28:46.940 I don't trust Nancy Pelosi.
00:28:48.340 And I don't trust
00:28:49.260 the progressive
00:28:49.900 radical prosecutor
00:28:51.300 in Cameron County
00:28:52.880 who's now behind bars.
00:28:54.660 I don't trust them.
00:28:56.120 And I think
00:28:56.480 they got it wrong.
00:28:57.520 And I think
00:28:57.780 Melissa is the victim
00:28:58.920 and ultimately
00:28:59.560 justice is prevented
00:29:00.540 from Mariah.
00:29:02.180 And all I'm asking for
00:29:03.620 is the pause button
00:29:04.380 to allow a new trial.
00:29:06.140 And I don't understand
00:29:07.900 when I hear folks
00:29:10.440 like who support
00:29:11.060 the death penalty
00:29:11.660 at all costs
00:29:12.300 and say that,
00:29:13.020 yeah,
00:29:13.660 this is a God-ordained
00:29:14.480 institution
00:29:15.060 and this is something
00:29:16.140 conservatives have
00:29:16.840 always supported
00:29:17.400 and I hear all the arguments
00:29:18.760 for the death penalty
00:29:19.660 and I'm a supporter
00:29:21.060 of the death penalty
00:29:21.800 in the most heinous cases.
00:29:23.920 But at the end of the day,
00:29:25.720 a God-ordained institution
00:29:26.800 can be messed up
00:29:28.020 by sinful man.
00:29:30.300 And we have an obligation,
00:29:32.260 I would say,
00:29:32.820 a strong obligation
00:29:33.680 and a duty
00:29:34.320 to do everything we can
00:29:36.540 to correct that
00:29:37.400 and to correct those injustices
00:29:38.920 and to speak up
00:29:39.700 for people who can't
00:29:40.440 speak for themselves
00:29:41.160 and to make sure
00:29:42.400 that a potentially
00:29:43.040 innocent Texan
00:29:43.720 isn't put to death
00:29:44.520 by the state
00:29:45.180 with your tax dollars
00:29:46.300 and my tax dollars
00:29:47.780 on our watch.
00:29:48.900 I definitely agree
00:29:50.400 with you
00:29:50.840 that I don't want
00:29:51.520 a potentially innocent person
00:29:53.120 to die
00:29:53.840 and I am pro-death penalty
00:29:55.340 in cases of capital murder
00:29:57.880 because I do think that,
00:29:59.140 I mean,
00:29:59.420 Genesis 9-6
00:30:00.280 explains exactly why
00:30:01.700 God demands
00:30:03.200 the death penalty
00:30:03.880 for those cases
00:30:04.580 because we are made
00:30:05.360 in the image of God.
00:30:05.780 Usually based on,
00:30:06.720 but there's other scripture
00:30:07.300 that says it has to be based
00:30:08.220 on two or three eyewitnesses.
00:30:09.440 Yes.
00:30:09.540 But we can have that conversation
00:30:10.400 another time.
00:30:11.140 Yes.
00:30:11.620 There were no eyewitnesses
00:30:12.700 of this crime.
00:30:13.920 I agree.
00:30:14.780 I agree with you.
00:30:16.100 I agree with you
00:30:18.660 that the death penalty
00:30:21.120 is legitimate in some cases
00:30:22.380 and not necessarily all cases
00:30:23.980 and of course we believe
00:30:25.120 in due process
00:30:25.840 and we absolutely should.
00:30:28.020 One of my issues
00:30:29.480 with all of this
00:30:30.220 is that those
00:30:31.520 who are making a defense
00:30:33.620 of her
00:30:34.200 seem to be
00:30:36.080 leaving out
00:30:37.500 really important
00:30:38.700 evidence
00:30:39.600 like the Innocence Project
00:30:41.000 who is saying
00:30:41.900 that she was just
00:30:42.940 a wonderful mother,
00:30:43.960 that there were no signs
00:30:45.120 of abuse,
00:30:45.560 there were no signs
00:30:46.560 of physical abuse
00:30:47.400 of Mariah.
00:30:47.940 Even if you think,
00:30:49.780 even if you think
00:30:50.760 that the emergency room physician
00:30:52.360 and the paramedic
00:30:53.440 that they were all
00:30:54.240 misleading the jury,
00:30:55.480 I mean,
00:30:55.700 you would have,
00:30:56.460 it would almost be
00:30:57.260 like a conspiracy theory
00:30:58.580 to believe that all
00:30:59.740 of those people
00:31:00.340 were lying
00:31:00.820 and not only that,
00:31:01.800 you would have to believe,
00:31:02.580 which, you know,
00:31:03.180 I don't trust CPS
00:31:04.340 all that much,
00:31:06.160 but I think that we should
00:31:07.340 take this into consideration.
00:31:08.660 There was an affidavit
00:31:09.540 in 2004.
00:31:11.340 This is by CPS caseworker
00:31:13.120 De La Garza.
00:31:13.920 She said that she made
00:31:15.900 several trips
00:31:16.900 to Lucio's home
00:31:18.680 throughout the 90s.
00:31:19.980 In the early 2000s,
00:31:21.560 she was typically found
00:31:22.720 guilty of neglect
00:31:24.880 of her children.
00:31:26.340 And then this particular case,
00:31:28.380 which was one of many cases
00:31:29.620 in which CPS
00:31:30.360 had to take her children
00:31:31.780 and make sure
00:31:32.940 that her children
00:31:33.580 were physically okay,
00:31:36.540 she wrote this,
00:31:37.560 that Robert,
00:31:38.200 four years old,
00:31:39.020 when she visited Lucio
00:31:40.160 in her home,
00:31:40.720 was observed
00:31:41.120 with a dime-sized bruise
00:31:42.140 on his stomach,
00:31:42.700 an old scratch
00:31:43.180 on his stomach,
00:31:44.200 insect bites
00:31:44.840 on his arms and legs.
00:31:45.940 She said that the entire home
00:31:47.360 was infested with ants,
00:31:48.520 including where the baby Mariah
00:31:50.940 was sleeping.
00:31:51.640 But we don't put people
00:31:52.320 to death for these things.
00:31:53.160 We don't put bad mothers
00:31:54.420 to death.
00:31:55.000 No, but this is relevant
00:31:58.960 because when you hear
00:31:59.900 the Innocence Project
00:32:00.720 and when you hear other people,
00:32:01.820 wow, there's no,
00:32:02.460 she's just this innocent woman.
00:32:04.280 I'm not saying that.
00:32:05.520 Well, you have said that,
00:32:06.940 but she's just this innocent woman
00:32:09.040 in the Innocence Project
00:32:09.960 saying that there was
00:32:11.160 no sign of abuse.
00:32:12.940 You read this affidavit
00:32:14.700 by the CPS.
00:32:16.300 Look, I mean,
00:32:16.920 not only was she
00:32:18.600 at least neglecting her children,
00:32:20.220 if not outright
00:32:20.980 abusing her children,
00:32:22.720 she and her children
00:32:23.680 also tested positive
00:32:25.940 for cocaine.
00:32:26.920 I mean, this was a problem
00:32:27.800 throughout her life.
00:32:28.640 We don't put people
00:32:29.960 to death for drug use.
00:32:30.960 I'm not saying that
00:32:31.120 this is what justifies
00:32:33.260 her execution.
00:32:34.540 I am saying
00:32:35.180 there's plenty of context
00:32:36.440 and plenty of history,
00:32:38.120 plenty of criminal history
00:32:39.260 with her to tell us
00:32:40.340 that it's probably
00:32:41.400 pretty likely
00:32:42.320 that she was abusing Mariah.
00:32:44.720 She admitted to abusing Mariah
00:32:46.200 in a variety of ways
00:32:47.600 on record
00:32:49.320 and that I don't think
00:32:52.180 that it's fair
00:32:52.820 or right to say
00:32:54.100 that she is probably innocent.
00:32:56.280 I think that we could say,
00:32:57.240 okay, you could say,
00:32:58.100 you know what?
00:32:58.440 She was abusing her.
00:32:59.400 She admitted to that.
00:33:00.180 She wasn't a good mother.
00:33:01.340 That's fine.
00:33:02.060 But look,
00:33:02.740 it's probably just manslaughter
00:33:04.180 or it just doesn't look like
00:33:05.840 she actually
00:33:06.800 gave the final blow
00:33:09.660 that killed Mariah.
00:33:10.540 That's one thing.
00:33:11.880 What I hate
00:33:12.660 is the propaganda
00:33:13.820 not from you
00:33:14.800 but that comes from
00:33:15.860 criminal justice reform advocates
00:33:17.600 like the Innocence Project
00:33:18.940 that I see
00:33:19.500 in this clemency petition
00:33:20.460 and I see somewhat
00:33:21.440 in the letter
00:33:22.280 that you signed
00:33:23.140 that paints her
00:33:23.940 in a picture
00:33:24.340 that is just not accurate
00:33:25.380 to me
00:33:25.840 that actually hurts your case.
00:33:27.840 I mean,
00:33:28.080 it hurts your side
00:33:29.020 because I'm looking
00:33:29.840 at all of this evidence
00:33:30.880 and all of these records
00:33:31.860 far before she was convicted
00:33:33.740 of capital murder
00:33:34.620 and it looks like
00:33:35.760 she abused her children serially
00:33:37.660 and yeah,
00:33:38.840 I think that context
00:33:39.720 is relevant
00:33:40.260 if we're looking
00:33:40.940 at whether or not
00:33:41.740 she is innocent.
00:33:42.780 We're talking about
00:33:43.880 a woman who's 13 days away
00:33:45.520 from being executed
00:33:46.360 by the state
00:33:47.100 for a crime
00:33:48.520 that I don't believe occurred
00:33:49.600 based on what I know right now
00:33:51.240 and for a crime
00:33:51.800 I don't believe she committed.
00:33:52.900 I'm not the judge
00:33:53.500 of the jury
00:33:53.940 and all of the things
00:33:56.460 that you just mentioned,
00:33:57.440 there's a number
00:33:58.200 of pieces of evidence
00:33:59.740 out there
00:34:00.040 that contradict
00:34:00.560 all of that as well
00:34:01.580 that the jury never heard
00:34:02.920 but let's keep this
00:34:03.760 about what the issue
00:34:04.780 is right now
00:34:05.360 and that's a woman
00:34:05.940 who's about to be murdered
00:34:06.900 by the state
00:34:07.640 and whether she should be.
00:34:09.520 Whether the system
00:34:10.620 succeeded
00:34:11.480 and is beyond reproach,
00:34:13.500 whether the system
00:34:14.100 can be trusted,
00:34:14.940 whether it was fair,
00:34:15.780 whether she was granted
00:34:16.560 her constitutional rights
00:34:17.840 or not
00:34:20.120 and I believe
00:34:21.220 the question,
00:34:22.020 the answer to all of those
00:34:22.920 is no,
00:34:23.580 she was not
00:34:24.120 and so all I'm asking for,
00:34:26.020 all we're pushing for
00:34:26.920 is the pause button here
00:34:28.240 so that we can get her
00:34:29.740 a new trial
00:34:30.220 so that a jury
00:34:31.560 can be reconvened,
00:34:33.700 she can be re-prosecuted
00:34:34.820 and so that all
00:34:35.840 of these facts,
00:34:36.780 the things you're talking about
00:34:37.800 and her defense
00:34:38.480 to all of those things
00:34:39.200 can be brought out
00:34:40.000 in a fair trial.
00:34:41.380 That's all I'm asking for
00:34:42.600 and until that's granted,
00:34:44.620 I believe it would be
00:34:45.440 an irreparable
00:34:46.160 and irreversible stain
00:34:47.300 on the state of Texas
00:34:48.180 for us to go forward
00:34:49.660 with her execution
00:34:50.400 and I don't agree
00:34:51.500 with the Innocence Project
00:34:52.380 on everything.
00:34:53.180 I don't.
00:34:53.700 They know that.
00:34:54.340 I know that.
00:34:54.880 I've said that publicly
00:34:55.680 but when you've got
00:34:57.280 in this country,
00:34:57.920 I don't know the exact stats
00:34:59.020 so don't hold me to this
00:34:59.920 but when you've got
00:35:00.560 I think for every
00:35:01.240 eight executions
00:35:02.140 you've got one exoneration
00:35:03.940 of a death row inmate.
00:35:05.680 For every eight executions
00:35:07.000 that take place
00:35:07.600 in this country,
00:35:08.140 Ali,
00:35:08.400 one is exonerated
00:35:09.380 in many cases
00:35:10.360 after having spent decades
00:35:11.520 on death row
00:35:12.200 and to me,
00:35:14.140 if I'm going to fly
00:35:15.100 on an airplane
00:35:15.720 and the airline company
00:35:18.000 is going to say,
00:35:18.480 look,
00:35:19.200 we land eight planes safely
00:35:20.640 but for every eight planes
00:35:21.740 we land safely,
00:35:22.640 there's one that doesn't,
00:35:23.840 you know,
00:35:24.160 that goes down.
00:35:25.200 Well,
00:35:25.340 I'm not getting on that airplane
00:35:26.340 and so the questions
00:35:29.260 that they're asking,
00:35:30.560 the tough questions
00:35:31.600 that we're all asking
00:35:32.380 about this case
00:35:33.100 and others,
00:35:33.600 I think are questions
00:35:34.260 that we shouldn't be afraid of
00:35:35.460 because it's going to,
00:35:36.920 what we're doing, Ali,
00:35:37.580 is not weakening the system,
00:35:38.700 it's strengthening the system
00:35:39.600 and I believe that
00:35:40.200 with all my heart.
00:35:45.600 I can't get on board
00:35:47.080 with the Innocence Project
00:35:48.040 especially considering
00:35:49.200 that almost every case
00:35:50.240 that they put forward
00:35:50.900 like the Julius Jones case,
00:35:52.220 they just purposely
00:35:53.300 leave out facts,
00:35:54.460 they leave out testimony,
00:35:55.860 they like to talk about,
00:35:57.000 oh,
00:35:57.120 it's just so one-sided.
00:35:58.680 Really,
00:35:59.240 they're an anti-death
00:36:00.340 penalty organization
00:36:01.460 that believes
00:36:02.140 that our criminal justice system
00:36:04.320 is racist
00:36:05.220 and so that's going to color
00:36:06.300 everything they do,
00:36:07.160 they're going to fund
00:36:07.760 the documentaries that they see,
00:36:09.020 they're going to have
00:36:09.540 Kim Kardashian come out
00:36:11.160 and they're going to have
00:36:12.260 all of these talking points
00:36:13.560 but what they're saying
00:36:14.860 simply isn't true
00:36:16.660 most of the time.
00:36:17.480 Now,
00:36:17.820 we can be on board
00:36:18.760 if you believe
00:36:19.400 that someone is innocent
00:36:20.240 or you believe
00:36:20.920 that a case wasn't fair
00:36:21.920 and say that they shouldn't
00:36:22.840 get the death penalty
00:36:23.760 but I don't think
00:36:25.180 it looks good
00:36:25.700 to link arms
00:36:26.360 with an organization
00:36:27.020 that is so extremely dishonest
00:36:29.160 and I think in a lot of ways
00:36:30.200 it's actually anti-justice
00:36:31.760 because they purposely
00:36:33.540 leave out the truth
00:36:34.460 to try to push propaganda
00:36:35.720 about this kind of thing.
00:36:37.040 Well,
00:36:37.180 then you can have
00:36:37.820 the Innocence Project
00:36:38.540 in here and talk to them
00:36:39.500 about that.
00:36:39.960 I'm not here to defend
00:36:40.600 the Innocence Project.
00:36:41.540 I'm here to ensure
00:36:43.500 that a potentially innocent
00:36:45.060 Texas woman
00:36:45.800 is not executed
00:36:46.560 by the state.
00:36:47.120 I wasn't really asking
00:36:47.140 your response on that.
00:36:48.160 I was just kind of
00:36:48.820 giving my thoughts
00:36:50.780 about the Innocence Project
00:36:51.680 and I've talked about it before.
00:36:53.020 There are conservative organizations.
00:36:54.180 There's plenty of,
00:36:55.000 you know,
00:36:55.320 hundreds of faith leaders
00:36:56.280 across the state of Texas
00:36:57.280 who've spoken up on this.
00:36:58.560 There's conservative legislators.
00:37:00.800 There's a number of groups
00:37:02.720 that are not
00:37:03.200 the Innocence Project.
00:37:05.500 Yes,
00:37:05.760 there are conservatives
00:37:06.340 against the death penalty.
00:37:07.880 No, no, no, no.
00:37:08.380 I'm saying conservatives
00:37:09.340 who are for the death penalty.
00:37:10.540 Who are against this particular, yes.
00:37:12.360 Who have said,
00:37:12.720 on this case,
00:37:13.420 we cannot go forward with this.
00:37:14.760 Yes,
00:37:14.980 I'm just saying
00:37:15.660 that the Innocence,
00:37:16.920 it's not just a left-wing position
00:37:18.300 actually just to be
00:37:19.320 against the death penalty.
00:37:20.200 But as you stated,
00:37:21.520 there are also
00:37:22.460 conservative politicians,
00:37:23.860 conservative people
00:37:24.580 who are for the death penalty
00:37:26.000 who have their problems
00:37:26.880 with this case.
00:37:27.420 So give us,
00:37:28.500 again,
00:37:29.060 just your final argument
00:37:31.540 for why you believe
00:37:32.860 she is innocent,
00:37:34.320 why you don't believe
00:37:35.720 that she really got
00:37:36.700 the fair trial.
00:37:37.880 Tell us a little bit
00:37:38.860 about the evidence
00:37:40.260 that you have referenced
00:37:41.300 multiple times
00:37:42.060 that you think contradicts
00:37:43.540 all of the testimony
00:37:44.980 that we heard
00:37:45.700 that really doesn't work
00:37:46.660 in her favor.
00:37:47.260 Well,
00:37:47.700 I've talked about
00:37:48.100 the interrogation
00:37:48.920 and those tactics
00:37:49.840 are now banned
00:37:50.460 in the vast majority
00:37:51.120 of states,
00:37:51.600 including Texas.
00:37:52.680 But do you think,
00:37:53.400 I just want to pause there
00:37:54.660 because I actually agree.
00:37:55.880 I saw some of the things,
00:37:56.960 I mean,
00:37:57.760 it just shouldn't be fair
00:37:58.680 that she is,
00:37:59.580 she was talking
00:38:00.900 without a lawyer.
00:38:01.880 It was late at night.
00:38:02.780 She didn't get food or water.
00:38:03.940 I agree with that.
00:38:05.000 And then they're saying things like,
00:38:06.400 how are you going to prove to us
00:38:07.480 that you're not
00:38:07.900 a cold-blooded killer?
00:38:09.120 Yeah,
00:38:09.520 I agree with that.
00:38:10.560 I think we can agree there.
00:38:11.720 Some of the things
00:38:12.440 that she admitted to,
00:38:13.500 though,
00:38:14.000 without any coercion,
00:38:15.820 without them pushing her
00:38:16.820 to admit,
00:38:17.380 like,
00:38:17.540 why would she make up
00:38:18.840 the fact that she
00:38:19.580 bit her daughter's back
00:38:20.460 or that she pinched
00:38:21.160 her daughter's vagina
00:38:21.980 or that she would
00:38:22.900 hurt her daughter
00:38:25.040 the way that she did,
00:38:25.860 that she would
00:38:26.260 repeatedly spank her daughter.
00:38:27.640 I mean,
00:38:27.820 her daughter had already
00:38:28.880 been taken away
00:38:29.620 from her by CPS
00:38:30.720 for a couple of years
00:38:31.720 because she tested
00:38:32.360 positive for cocaine.
00:38:33.420 So there's a whole thing there.
00:38:34.920 So I can agree with you
00:38:36.160 that maybe the interrogation
00:38:37.500 wasn't that great
00:38:38.240 and I think that it's good
00:38:39.240 that those strategies
00:38:39.980 are,
00:38:40.600 those methods
00:38:41.100 can be outlawed now,
00:38:42.080 but I don't think
00:38:42.820 that negates
00:38:43.440 her entire recorded
00:38:44.720 testimony there.
00:38:45.800 Well,
00:38:46.420 to my knowledge,
00:38:47.960 you know,
00:38:48.840 the bite mark testimonies
00:38:49.820 can have been
00:38:50.180 completely contradicted.
00:38:53.320 Bite mark,
00:38:54.520 bite mark data
00:38:56.020 in all states
00:38:57.220 has been,
00:38:57.880 we don't use that data
00:38:58.720 anymore.
00:38:59.320 And I think even
00:38:59.920 the prosecution
00:39:00.500 now would agree,
00:39:01.220 yeah,
00:39:01.480 that was kind of faulty.
00:39:02.800 In fact,
00:39:03.400 some of the prosecution
00:39:04.280 has said that
00:39:04.940 some of the medical
00:39:05.440 evidence they used,
00:39:07.120 Dr. Farley's initial report
00:39:08.380 was just completely
00:39:09.520 uninformed,
00:39:10.620 misinformed.
00:39:11.200 It all hinged on the fact
00:39:12.240 that they believe
00:39:12.860 Melissa committed this crime
00:39:14.420 and they were going
00:39:15.180 to prove it.
00:39:15.840 They were more interested
00:39:16.760 in Allie,
00:39:17.440 Allie in winning this case
00:39:19.040 than they were justice
00:39:19.900 for Mariah.
00:39:20.800 I believe that with all my heart.
00:39:21.800 I've said that publicly
00:39:22.560 and I'll say it here.
00:39:23.640 I mean,
00:39:23.800 the jury saw the photographs
00:39:25.140 of her.
00:39:25.820 And half of the jury
00:39:26.540 now regrets it.
00:39:27.820 But they saw the photographs
00:39:29.320 of her.
00:39:30.020 They saw,
00:39:30.520 but I'm saying,
00:39:31.640 her bruised body.
00:39:32.720 Yeah,
00:39:32.960 her bruised body.
00:39:34.040 Yeah,
00:39:34.060 but they weren't informed
00:39:36.220 of the fact that she had
00:39:37.020 a very rare blood disorder
00:39:38.480 that created
00:39:39.800 very extensive
00:39:42.620 bruising and bleeding.
00:39:43.620 She had bruising
00:39:44.360 and bleeding her whole life.
00:39:45.960 But it wasn't a result
00:39:46.700 of trauma.
00:39:47.240 It was a result
00:39:47.720 of her blood disorder.
00:39:48.560 So they could see the photos.
00:39:50.040 But when you leave out
00:39:50.760 the part that she has
00:39:51.820 a rare genetic blood disorder,
00:39:53.320 well,
00:39:53.520 that's a pretty important part.
00:39:54.620 Is that true?
00:39:55.160 Is that proven
00:39:56.040 that she had that very rare
00:39:57.240 blood disorder?
00:39:57.340 It absolutely is.
00:39:57.620 It absolutely is.
00:39:58.260 There is evidence
00:39:58.840 that absolutely there is.
00:40:00.440 And that's one
00:40:02.220 of the pieces of evidence
00:40:02.960 that was kept out
00:40:03.720 at the trial level.
00:40:04.520 And the defense attorney
00:40:07.220 would leave that out
00:40:07.840 just because he's bad
00:40:08.700 at his job?
00:40:09.240 He's terrible at his job.
00:40:10.660 He's,
00:40:11.120 yeah,
00:40:12.040 like I said,
00:40:12.740 he should be disbarred.
00:40:13.500 He was terrible.
00:40:14.240 I mean,
00:40:14.500 there's evidence
00:40:15.200 offered by siblings
00:40:17.580 of Mariah's
00:40:18.220 that said,
00:40:18.640 I mean,
00:40:18.780 there's one piece
00:40:20.620 of evidence,
00:40:21.080 one affidavit.
00:40:22.840 One of her sisters
00:40:23.580 pushed her down the stairs.
00:40:25.800 And the defense attorney
00:40:27.240 did not allow that,
00:40:28.400 didn't even call
00:40:29.020 that witness
00:40:29.460 because he was scared
00:40:30.340 of the impact
00:40:31.740 that being called
00:40:32.260 as a witness
00:40:32.620 would have
00:40:33.080 on a young girl.
00:40:34.480 Well,
00:40:34.800 that to me
00:40:35.160 is a pretty important
00:40:35.900 piece of evidence
00:40:36.480 that the jury
00:40:37.120 in a capital murder trial
00:40:38.520 should know
00:40:39.080 eyewitness testimony
00:40:41.120 and someone actually
00:40:42.160 admitting to doing this.
00:40:44.460 Yeah,
00:40:44.900 the court of appeals
00:40:45.580 looked at that
00:40:46.340 and they also didn't think
00:40:47.380 that was legitimate
00:40:48.040 because it didn't sound
00:40:49.060 like that was the testimony
00:40:50.000 that she was actually
00:40:50.800 about to give.
00:40:51.400 There were a few things
00:40:52.160 like that.
00:40:52.840 When they tried
00:40:53.400 to appeal the case,
00:40:54.320 they said,
00:40:54.680 oh,
00:40:54.960 you know,
00:40:55.260 this witness was excluded.
00:40:56.260 This witness was excluded.
00:40:57.240 This piece of evidence
00:40:57.920 was excluded.
00:40:58.720 The court of appeals
00:40:59.420 looked at all of those things
00:41:00.840 and really said,
00:41:01.740 okay,
00:41:01.900 what you're saying
00:41:02.920 those witnesses
00:41:04.600 would have said
00:41:05.620 they wouldn't have actually
00:41:08.060 said that.
00:41:09.340 Like,
00:41:09.480 they were trying
00:41:10.080 to call the defense,
00:41:11.120 thought about calling
00:41:11.760 this one psychologist
00:41:12.760 who said,
00:41:13.240 oh,
00:41:13.380 she had battered woman syndrome.
00:41:15.400 She was just going
00:41:15.940 to blame herself
00:41:16.860 because of that.
00:41:18.080 So she wasn't really
00:41:19.120 telling the truth
00:41:19.800 when she was saying
00:41:20.920 that she was abusing Mariah.
00:41:23.240 But then,
00:41:24.040 when you actually
00:41:24.740 look at the statement
00:41:26.200 that that psychologist
00:41:26.980 made that he was going
00:41:28.220 to give,
00:41:28.700 that's not actually
00:41:29.700 what he was going
00:41:30.400 to say at all.
00:41:31.860 And so,
00:41:32.620 I don't know.
00:41:33.080 I just have a hard time.
00:41:34.020 None of the new evidence,
00:41:35.020 Ali,
00:41:35.180 even by the court
00:41:35.780 of criminal appeals
00:41:36.340 has been reviewed.
00:41:37.320 None of it.
00:41:38.700 None of it.
00:41:39.400 So I understand
00:41:40.280 what you're saying
00:41:40.800 that the court
00:41:41.140 of criminal appeals
00:41:41.720 may have heard
00:41:42.340 about this evidence,
00:41:43.200 heard it.
00:41:43.600 They may have even
00:41:44.320 reviewed on their own
00:41:45.320 a couple of the affidavits
00:41:46.400 and reviewed
00:41:47.120 some of the pleadings,
00:41:47.920 but none of this
00:41:48.500 has been tried
00:41:49.140 in a court of law.
00:41:49.760 None of it.
00:41:50.300 There's been no
00:41:50.840 cross-examination
00:41:51.640 of the prosecution's evidence.
00:41:52.920 There's been very little
00:41:53.660 cross-examination
00:41:54.420 of any new evidence
00:41:56.280 that the defense
00:41:57.540 has found since then.
00:41:59.000 And so,
00:42:00.520 when you put
00:42:00.880 all of this together,
00:42:01.760 all of the new evidence,
00:42:02.600 the statements
00:42:03.040 of the jurors,
00:42:03.920 the interrogation tactics
00:42:05.520 that are now banned,
00:42:06.820 you put the fact
00:42:07.800 that she had
00:42:08.600 severe,
00:42:09.580 severe childhood
00:42:11.180 and sexual abuse.
00:42:12.460 She was a victim
00:42:13.600 of domestic violence.
00:42:14.760 There was another
00:42:15.520 co-conspirator
00:42:16.480 that they convicted.
00:42:18.600 And that was her husband,
00:42:19.480 Alvarez,
00:42:19.840 at the time.
00:42:20.200 He got four years.
00:42:21.760 Yeah,
00:42:22.020 because at the time
00:42:23.200 that she died,
00:42:25.200 Lucio was the primary
00:42:26.400 caregiver,
00:42:27.520 not Alvarez.
00:42:28.520 And she actually said,
00:42:30.460 well,
00:42:30.680 a police officer
00:42:31.460 testified that she said,
00:42:33.500 not only in the
00:42:34.640 recorded statement,
00:42:35.460 but testified that she said
00:42:36.580 on the phone,
00:42:37.480 in the cop car,
00:42:38.740 don't blame Robert,
00:42:39.720 don't blame Robert,
00:42:40.660 it was me.
00:42:41.220 She was a victim
00:42:41.860 of domestic violence,
00:42:42.920 Allie.
00:42:43.360 You know very well
00:42:45.140 that someone being
00:42:46.560 a victim of domestic
00:42:47.940 violence does not mean,
00:42:49.680 one,
00:42:49.900 that they are going
00:42:50.420 to go on to abuse
00:42:51.440 or that they...
00:42:53.200 make up lies like this.
00:42:55.180 but don't you think
00:42:55.880 that the jury should hear
00:42:57.260 when you present evidence
00:42:58.680 of some things
00:42:59.200 that she admitted to,
00:43:00.120 whether it's the interrogation
00:43:01.440 or in her phone calls
00:43:02.480 with police or with friends,
00:43:04.120 don't you think
00:43:04.700 that the jury should hear
00:43:05.740 and understand
00:43:06.400 maybe the motivation
00:43:07.400 for a woman
00:43:08.160 for saying certain things
00:43:10.240 is that she's afraid
00:43:11.980 of the system,
00:43:13.180 she is afraid of men,
00:43:14.800 of law enforcement,
00:43:15.760 she has been abandoned,
00:43:16.860 she's been abused
00:43:17.320 all her life.
00:43:18.340 That is common
00:43:19.400 criminal law procedure
00:43:20.500 for those things
00:43:21.400 to make it
00:43:21.860 in front of a jury.
00:43:22.500 The jury had
00:43:23.600 no evidence whatsoever,
00:43:25.000 none,
00:43:25.540 of her childhood sexual abuse,
00:43:27.480 of her current sexual abuse,
00:43:29.080 of her victimhood
00:43:30.440 as a domestic violence victim.
00:43:32.140 The jury had no knowledge
00:43:33.320 of any of that.
00:43:34.740 And so in a new trial,
00:43:37.120 if Melissa is granted
00:43:38.120 a new trial
00:43:38.680 if we're able
00:43:39.020 to get her execution stayed
00:43:40.280 and get her a new day in court,
00:43:41.960 all of that can come out
00:43:43.040 and all of it should come out.
00:43:44.700 And if it does
00:43:45.540 and a new jury's convened
00:43:46.760 and decides that
00:43:47.560 they want to side
00:43:48.280 with the prosecution
00:43:49.060 and convict her again
00:43:49.960 of capital murder
00:43:50.660 and sentence her to death,
00:43:51.720 then the process
00:43:52.940 will have worked.
00:43:53.720 I just don't believe,
00:43:55.080 based on what I know
00:43:55.720 at this point, Allie,
00:43:56.480 that that would be
00:43:57.080 likely to happen.
00:43:58.100 Yeah.
00:43:58.480 And well,
00:43:59.240 one thing that the appellate
00:44:00.260 court said
00:44:00.780 when this was appealed
00:44:03.720 in 2011
00:44:04.380 is that there was
00:44:05.700 some conflict
00:44:06.220 because she did talk
00:44:07.340 to another psychologist
00:44:08.360 with the last name
00:44:09.420 of Juarez
00:44:09.940 and she told them
00:44:11.420 that she was not
00:44:12.320 sexually abused,
00:44:13.120 that she was never
00:44:13.620 sexually abused.
00:44:14.320 Then she told a psychologist
00:44:15.280 later on
00:44:15.920 that she was sexually abused.
00:44:17.320 They asked the psychologist,
00:44:18.200 is it possible,
00:44:19.260 which I don't know,
00:44:19.820 I'm not saying this is true,
00:44:20.760 is it possible
00:44:21.280 that she would change
00:44:21.960 her story
00:44:22.360 because she thought
00:44:23.120 that it would help her
00:44:23.880 later in trial
00:44:24.960 and that psychologist,
00:44:26.700 which was called
00:44:27.500 by the defense,
00:44:28.180 said yes.
00:44:28.760 So I spent time
00:44:29.440 with Melissa Lucio
00:44:30.100 just a few days ago
00:44:30.940 on death row,
00:44:31.960 okay?
00:44:32.440 I sat closer to her
00:44:33.640 than you and I
00:44:34.100 are sitting right now.
00:44:36.060 Melissa's been there
00:44:36.680 for 15 years
00:44:37.380 in solitary confinement
00:44:38.460 for 23 and a half hours a day.
00:44:40.460 She has had no physical contact
00:44:41.780 in 15 years.
00:44:42.800 Which I think is wrong
00:44:43.700 in general.
00:44:44.260 I think that's cruel
00:44:44.960 and unusual punishment
00:44:45.880 no matter what.
00:44:46.400 That's the way
00:44:47.180 we do things in Texas
00:44:48.160 and there's a reason
00:44:48.840 that death row
00:44:49.360 is not in the middle
00:44:49.940 of Dallas or Frisco
00:44:50.840 or Houston.
00:44:51.520 It's because if people
00:44:52.100 saw this
00:44:52.700 and saw the conditions,
00:44:53.920 they might be
00:44:54.460 a little more eager
00:44:55.640 to ask questions
00:44:57.060 about whether this is
00:44:57.880 the way we want
00:44:58.300 to do things in Texas.
00:44:59.240 That may be another
00:44:59.960 conversation for another day.
00:45:01.660 But I had these
00:45:02.640 same conversations
00:45:03.280 with Melissa
00:45:03.900 and I can tell you
00:45:05.220 right now,
00:45:05.740 Melissa is a victim
00:45:06.580 of severe childhood
00:45:08.640 and adult sexual
00:45:10.120 and physical abuse.
00:45:11.680 We had this conversation
00:45:12.840 on death row
00:45:13.800 just a few days ago
00:45:15.400 and there's no question
00:45:17.480 to me
00:45:18.040 that she ought
00:45:20.640 to get a new trial.
00:45:21.400 That this stuff
00:45:21.860 ought to be in front
00:45:22.520 of a jury.
00:45:23.700 And again,
00:45:24.560 I'm not the judge.
00:45:25.260 I'm not the fact finder here.
00:45:26.480 That's not my role.
00:45:27.400 It's not your role
00:45:28.100 unless you're called
00:45:28.780 on a jury.
00:45:30.280 But I looked at her
00:45:31.680 in the eyes
00:45:32.140 with seven of my other
00:45:33.240 legislative colleagues
00:45:34.080 as well,
00:45:34.580 conservatives and liberals
00:45:35.780 and we believe
00:45:37.060 with all of our heart
00:45:37.780 before we met with her
00:45:38.860 but since we met with her
00:45:39.820 that we cannot execute
00:45:41.200 this woman.
00:45:41.940 We cannot.
00:45:42.560 There's just too much
00:45:43.340 contradictory information
00:45:44.940 out there
00:45:45.260 that the jury
00:45:45.700 needs to hear
00:45:46.280 before we go forward.
00:45:47.680 And there's no harm.
00:45:50.260 What's the harm
00:45:50.980 in us pushing
00:45:51.740 the pause button?
00:45:52.860 What's the harm
00:45:53.500 to the criminal justice system?
00:45:55.580 I would say none at all.
00:45:57.300 There's great harm
00:45:57.920 in us going forward
00:45:58.620 with it,
00:45:59.220 us rushing to it.
00:46:00.720 There's no harm
00:46:01.500 to anybody else.
00:46:02.240 She's going to remain
00:46:02.880 on death row.
00:46:04.340 She's not going to be
00:46:05.140 let free.
00:46:05.880 She's going to remain
00:46:06.660 incarcerated
00:46:07.520 in solitary confinement
00:46:09.380 for nearly 24 hours a day
00:46:10.860 while her case
00:46:11.580 is retried.
00:46:12.220 There's no harm
00:46:13.320 at all
00:46:13.760 in us pushing
00:46:14.640 the pause button
00:46:15.360 and I actually think
00:46:16.420 the benefit
00:46:16.920 to the system
00:46:17.720 is so great.
00:46:19.760 And I'll just say this
00:46:20.880 to kind of wrap up
00:46:21.640 my thoughts on this
00:46:22.520 is what we want
00:46:24.020 more than anything,
00:46:24.800 what we should want
00:46:25.440 more than anything
00:46:26.180 is a government
00:46:27.540 that we can trust,
00:46:29.180 that is fair,
00:46:30.440 that's transparent.
00:46:31.660 We might disagree
00:46:32.520 on some of the issues
00:46:33.600 but I want more
00:46:35.540 than anything
00:46:35.920 a government
00:46:36.340 that's trustworthy
00:46:37.060 even when I disagree
00:46:39.180 with them.
00:46:39.560 And this to me
00:46:40.660 just reeks
00:46:41.340 of a system
00:46:42.000 that is broken
00:46:42.700 and that cannot
00:46:43.720 be trusted
00:46:44.320 in this case
00:46:45.620 and that's why
00:46:46.460 I think she deserves
00:46:47.120 a new trial.
00:46:48.400 Okay, well thank you
00:46:49.160 so much representative.
00:46:50.200 I really appreciate
00:46:51.480 you taking the time
00:46:52.200 to come on.
00:46:52.700 I think people are
00:46:53.220 going to get a lot
00:46:53.840 out of this,
00:46:54.600 a lot to chew on
00:46:55.560 so thank you.
00:46:56.840 Allie, thanks.
00:46:57.420 Thanks for all your work
00:46:58.260 and your voice.
00:46:59.380 You do a great job.
00:47:00.280 Thank you.
00:47:00.720 You know I'm a big fan
00:47:01.180 of yours.
00:47:01.620 Thank you very much.
00:47:02.220 I appreciate it.
00:47:03.220 Thank you.
00:47:03.620 Thanks.
00:47:03.900 Thanks.
00:47:03.940 Thanks.
00:47:03.980 Thanks.
00:47:04.480 Thanks.
00:47:04.980 Thanks.
00:47:05.480 Thanks.
00:47:05.980 Thanks.
00:47:06.480 Thanks.
00:47:06.980 Thanks.
00:47:07.980 Thanks.