Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - May 02, 2022


Ep 609 | Tim Keller’s Terrible Abortion Take


Episode Stats

Length

56 minutes

Words per Minute

174.28383

Word Count

9,864

Sentence Count

566

Misogynist Sentences

16

Hate Speech Sentences

35


Summary

Is Tim Keller okay? Is he a bad teacher? Does he have nothing good to contribute to the conversation about abortion? We talk about this and more in this week's Relatable Monday episode of Relatable. Thanks for listening and Happy Monday!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable.
00:00:01.840 Happy Monday.
00:00:03.380 This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers.
00:00:06.460 Go to goodranchers.com slash Allie for a discount.
00:00:09.380 That's goodranchers.com slash Allie.
00:00:21.000 Okay, y'all, I hope everyone had a wonderful weekend.
00:00:25.320 I hope that you are starting to ring in the summer wherever you are,
00:00:28.320 or if you're up north, maybe you're just now ringing in the spring,
00:00:32.620 which is always exciting when things get a little bit warmer.
00:00:35.720 We celebrated a one-year-old birthday party in my family this weekend.
00:00:40.860 I can't believe it's been one year since I gave birth to my last child.
00:00:44.920 It's just crazy.
00:00:46.080 The time really does go by so quickly, and I know that's cliche.
00:00:50.620 Everyone tells you that, but it's true.
00:00:53.040 It's true.
00:00:53.580 And so we made some precious memories this weekend,
00:00:56.720 and what else was I going to say?
00:01:01.020 Oh yeah, I was also going to tell you guys that I've kind of failed a little bit
00:01:04.920 on my whole healthy eating, working out endeavor that I committed to do with you
00:01:10.560 for 30 days a couple weeks ago.
00:01:13.560 Here's what happened.
00:01:14.580 I got a stomach bug, and that kind of derailed me because when you're recovering from a stomach
00:01:22.480 bug, you don't really want to eat just meat and vegetables.
00:01:25.400 You really need some carbs to refuel yourself, and that's what I did, and that kind of just
00:01:30.600 got me off track, and I also didn't want to work out.
00:01:33.040 I didn't want to expend that kind of energy when I was recovering from a stomach bug,
00:01:36.880 and then I was traveling, and so I've gotten off rails, but I'm back on, baby.
00:01:41.820 We're back on today, so if you've stayed committed for the past couple of weeks, good job.
00:01:47.560 I was not right there with you.
00:01:49.160 I was at first, then some things happened, but now I'm back on track.
00:01:52.700 So for the month of May, we're getting on track.
00:01:55.080 We're working out for at least 10 minutes every day, and we're going to cut out the junk food.
00:01:59.080 That's my commitment, and it's not about, I saw some comments when I was talking about
00:02:03.680 this a couple of weeks ago, resisting the Easter candy.
00:02:06.560 It's not about just like losing weight or being super strict about everything you eat.
00:02:12.540 It's not about that.
00:02:13.820 It is about discipline.
00:02:14.980 That's something I need in this area of my life, and so I am trying to re-implement that.
00:02:20.260 So if you want to start today or if you want to restart today, here we are.
00:02:24.360 We're going to restart.
00:02:25.460 All right.
00:02:26.220 Just wanted to get some personal stuff at the beginning before we get into our more serious
00:02:32.700 episode.
00:02:33.080 It's going to be a fun episode, but it's also going to be serious because we're talking
00:02:37.520 about Tim Keller and asking the question, is Tim Keller okay?
00:02:43.860 Is Tim Keller okay?
00:02:45.160 I'm not sure.
00:02:46.640 Based on this Twitter thread that he tweeted last week and then doubled down on and then
00:02:51.440 tripled down on over the weekend, we are going to try to answer this question.
00:02:55.700 Is Tim Keller, who I think is a brilliant theologian in a lot of ways, is he okay?
00:03:01.760 He tweeted this thread talking about his views on abortion and really tried to strike this,
00:03:10.480 what he would probably call a balance, what I would call moral relativism and a false equivalency
00:03:16.940 between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to abortion.
00:03:20.320 His argument was so terrible and that breaks my heart and breaks my brain as someone who
00:03:27.480 knows that Tim Keller is a very smart person.
00:03:30.920 Let me back up a little bit before we go through this thread and before I respond to this thread,
00:03:36.920 let me say that I really appreciate Tim Keller in a lot of ways.
00:03:41.540 Now, a lot of you out there, I know I can see the comments on YouTube now.
00:03:45.340 You're going to be saying, oh, Tim Keller, he has been a wolf in sheep's clothing for a long time.
00:03:50.240 He's been a communist Marxist for a long time.
00:03:52.780 We should never be reading Tim Keller.
00:03:54.320 We should have never read Tim Keller.
00:03:56.260 He is a false teacher.
00:03:57.500 He has nothing good to contribute to the Christian conversation.
00:03:59.760 There are definitely going to be people listening and watching you think that.
00:04:02.920 There's also going to be people listening and watching who are thinking, what?
00:04:06.820 Tim Keller is completely untouchable.
00:04:08.480 He is the modern day C.S. Lewis.
00:04:11.160 Maybe that's what you're thinking or you're thinking he is the best contribution to modern
00:04:16.200 Christianity that exists.
00:04:18.520 And there's nothing that he's ever said is wrong.
00:04:21.180 And if Tim Keller says it, then it must be right because he is so perfectly wise.
00:04:27.640 So I land in between, in between there.
00:04:31.700 I probably am closer to the latter description, actually,
00:04:35.380 because I have probably read more books from Tim Keller than I have from any other single author.
00:04:45.460 He has helped me a lot from the time that I really became a Christian in high school
00:04:50.480 to up until, I would say, a couple years ago.
00:04:54.980 His books, let's see, The Reason for God, Making Sense of God, The Freedom of Self-Forgetfulness.
00:05:04.420 The Freedom of Self-Forgetfulness was actually one inspiration for the book that I wrote a couple
00:05:09.020 years ago, You're Not Enough and That's Okay.
00:05:11.820 Every Good, Endeavor, Prodigal God.
00:05:15.680 I could go on.
00:05:16.520 And I'm sure that there are other books, there are, there are many other books that he's
00:05:20.020 written that I've read that I just can't think of.
00:05:21.860 Oh, The Meaning of Marriage was very instrumental for us.
00:05:24.920 That's what we read, my husband and I read when we were engaged.
00:05:28.280 And so I am not some Tim Keller hater.
00:05:31.820 I do think he's brilliant.
00:05:33.080 I do think he is really wise that he has had incredible contributions to the faith.
00:05:38.680 Just in my own thinking, in my apologetics, in my basic understanding of the Bible, I
00:05:44.120 will still recommend to you The Reason for God and Meaning of Marriage and Every Good
00:05:47.960 Endeavor.
00:05:48.700 Those are probably the three that I would recommend most.
00:05:52.220 I would still.
00:05:53.160 But over the past couple years, I've been really disappointed in what I see as not just
00:05:59.920 incorrect opinions about politics.
00:06:02.020 Yes, we can be free as Christians to disagree about some tertiary or even secondary things
00:06:07.780 when it comes to how we see these cultural and political issues.
00:06:12.360 But really, it seems to me a lack of critical thinking from Tim Keller when it comes to some
00:06:17.740 of these issues like abortion and abortion policy.
00:06:20.660 That's troubling to me because I know that he doesn't lack the capacity to think hard about
00:06:27.320 things and to think thoroughly about things.
00:06:29.320 And yet this tweet that we're about or this tweet thread that we're about to get into
00:06:33.040 shows exactly that or worse, it shows that he has thought about it and he doesn't want
00:06:39.920 to share his opinions publicly because he knows that conservatives will pounce on the fact
00:06:45.280 that he's probably a progressive when it comes to things like abortion.
00:06:50.440 All right, let's talk about our friend Tim Keller.
00:06:56.340 So he tweeted a few days ago, churches must not maintain unity at the expense of the gospel.
00:07:05.140 Churches should not destroy unity or fellowship over political differences.
00:07:10.880 So I always find that vague tweets like this aren't particularly helpful because they leave
00:07:16.380 the reader wondering, well, what are you talking about?
00:07:19.020 What kind of political differences?
00:07:21.060 Let's define our terms, which we have learned, especially over the past few years, how important
00:07:26.280 defining your terms is because as Christians or just as people in general, when one person
00:07:32.520 uses the word equity, they could mean something totally different than what someone on the
00:07:36.800 other side of the aisle means when they say equity or equality or justice or love or empathy.
00:07:44.980 And so it's always really important to define our terms.
00:07:47.700 And as Christians, we always ask the question, where are you getting that definition from?
00:07:52.640 Are you getting the definition of, for example, love from the Bible, or are you getting the
00:07:57.840 definition of love from the world?
00:07:59.720 If your definition of love means unconditional tolerance of someone's identity, self-stated
00:08:07.700 identity or someone's sin, well, then that's not biblical love because God is love and he is
00:08:14.640 also holy and intolerant of sin.
00:08:16.840 So anything that God says is wrong, we from love would also say is wrong.
00:08:22.040 And so as Christians, we not only define our terms, we use our critical thinking skills
00:08:26.340 to do that, to try to get on the same page as someone, but we also make sure that we
00:08:30.160 are going to scripture to define the terms that we're using.
00:08:33.200 So when Tim Keller says that we should not destroy unity or fellowship over political differences,
00:08:39.200 I tend to agree.
00:08:41.000 But it depends on what you mean by political differences.
00:08:45.540 If what you mean by political differences is that maybe we disagree on some welfare policy,
00:08:50.580 we disagree on how exactly to fix the immigration issue in our country or what kind of or whether
00:08:58.320 or not bail reform is a good change for so-called criminal justice or dealing with crime and
00:09:09.540 incarceration.
00:09:10.780 Yeah, those are some political differences that should not divide us as a church, even though
00:09:16.420 I might think that you are completely wrong on all of those things and we can have strong
00:09:21.180 opinions on them.
00:09:21.940 We can try to change each other's mind.
00:09:23.520 But at the end of the day, we don't have to leave the church over those things.
00:09:27.760 The Bible does, I think, speak to those issues, but perhaps not explicitly and in a way that
00:09:35.420 indicates someone's salvation, if that makes sense.
00:09:39.600 However, if by political differences, you are talking about something like abortion, you're
00:09:45.960 talking about something like, can a man change into a woman and become a woman and then be
00:09:52.720 accepted by people as a woman?
00:09:55.940 If you're talking about sexuality and the definition of marriage, if that's what you mean by political
00:10:01.880 differences, then yes, those things can and actually should divide a church.
00:10:07.180 Why?
00:10:08.100 Because for the Christian, those are not political differences.
00:10:12.360 Those are theological differences, deep foundational theological differences.
00:10:16.980 They actually go all the way back to Genesis 1.
00:10:19.940 And if you believe, for example, that abortion is okay, that it's something, maybe you think
00:10:26.960 of it as a necessary evil that you just have to keep legal, or maybe you think that it's
00:10:31.720 something that's fine, because the baby inside the womb is a potential human, as that side
00:10:38.060 says, which is so unscientific and ridiculous.
00:10:40.660 And you just think it's a matter of bodily autonomy, that a woman should be able to make
00:10:45.320 that choice.
00:10:45.820 Or if you believe that a man can become a woman, or that gender fluid or non-binary is a real
00:10:54.300 thing, or that a man should be able to, or that it's perfectly acceptable and not sinful
00:10:59.960 at all for a man to be able to marry another man, well, that goes back to what you actually
00:11:06.360 think about Genesis 1.1.
00:11:09.120 That goes back to whether you think God created the heavens and the earth.
00:11:12.520 If you believe that God created the heavens and the earth, which is the most controversial
00:11:16.100 statement in the entire Bible, then you also believe that God is the authority over
00:11:20.960 the heavens and the earth, and you define things as he defines them.
00:11:25.640 And God defines us as made in his image.
00:11:28.480 That covers whether or not abortion is wrong.
00:11:30.620 It is.
00:11:31.200 We're made from conception in his image.
00:11:34.240 He defines us male and female.
00:11:35.840 That covers the gender thing.
00:11:37.300 And then he defines marriage.
00:11:38.580 It's between one man and one woman.
00:11:40.960 So it really all goes back to Genesis 1.
00:11:43.500 Yes, those things have become political and cultural issues, but for the Christian, they're
00:11:48.280 pre-political.
00:11:49.280 They're pre-cultural.
00:11:50.220 They're pre-civilizational.
00:11:52.580 They are fundamentally theological, and they are theologically fundamental.
00:11:58.300 So if as a church you find yourself disagreeing on those things, really what it means to be
00:12:02.940 human and what it means to be made by God and what it means to submit to God's authority,
00:12:07.780 then yes, that should divide the church.
00:12:11.000 Now, Tim Keller then expounds upon it in a way that I think always comes across as very
00:12:15.580 exasperated.
00:12:16.460 So you see this a lot from—and I would classify Tim Keller in a lot of ways as woke, so I'm
00:12:23.120 just going to say that.
00:12:24.600 That you see this a lot from woke kind of social justice types.
00:12:29.240 And by the way, they always claim to be politically neutral, and they never actually are.
00:12:34.420 They just think that their progressive perspective on things is not political.
00:12:38.700 So he throws this vague thing out here.
00:12:43.220 This is what you see from people like him.
00:12:45.720 They throw a vague thing out there, and then they're so mad when the rubes don't understand
00:12:50.580 and ask for clarity and ask to define terms as if you should just read Tim Keller's brilliant
00:12:55.420 mind and know exactly what he's talking about.
00:12:57.420 So he does this thread, expounding upon this.
00:13:00.620 He says,
00:13:01.000 I recently wrote about how churches should not destroy unity or fellowship over political
00:13:04.880 differences.
00:13:05.480 The replies show that many American evangelicals have no coherent understanding of how to relate
00:13:10.060 to the Bible and politics.
00:13:11.700 Here's the original tweet, and then he quote tweets the tweet that I read to you.
00:13:14.780 So you see, it's your fault.
00:13:16.840 It's not that he sent out a vague tweet without any explanation at first of what the heck he was
00:13:20.820 talking about, what political differences he was referring to.
00:13:24.740 It's your fault.
00:13:26.660 It's the evangelical American's fault that you don't have any understanding.
00:13:30.440 So he says, here are two biblical moral norms.
00:13:33.020 One, it is a sin to worship idols or any other, or any God other than the true God.
00:13:39.300 True.
00:13:40.340 And two, do not murder.
00:13:41.540 If you ask evangelicals if we should be forbidden by law to worship any other God than the God
00:13:47.520 of the Bible, they'd say no.
00:13:48.820 We allow that terrible sin to be legal, but if you ask them if Americans can be forbidden
00:13:53.500 by law to abort a baby, they'd say yes.
00:13:56.300 Now, why make the first sin legal and never talk about it, and the second sin illegal at
00:14:02.320 a main moral political talking point?
00:14:05.080 At the very least, it shows a lack of knowing how to apply the Bible to politics.
00:14:09.340 Since we can't simply say if the Bible says it's sin, it should be illegal, how do we choose
00:14:14.660 which morals to politically champion?
00:14:16.520 Please don't say, I just want to see the Ten Commandments made law in society that's too
00:14:21.420 simplistic, and we don't do this already.
00:14:23.980 The Bible tells us that idolatry, abortion, and ignoring the poor are all grievous sins,
00:14:28.580 but it doesn't tell us exactly how we are to apply these norms to a pluralistic society.
00:14:35.540 We are to help the poor, but the Bible doesn't tell us which political strategy, high taxes
00:14:39.760 and government services versus low taxes and private charity to use.
00:14:42.420 The Bible binds my conscience to love the immigrant, but it doesn't tell me how many legal immigrants
00:14:46.340 to admit to the U.S. every year.
00:14:48.060 I know abortion is a sin, but the Bible doesn't tell me the best political policy to decrease
00:14:53.440 or end abortion in this country, nor which political or legal policies are most effective
00:14:59.800 to that end.
00:15:00.940 The current political parties will say that their policy most aligns morally with the Bible,
00:15:04.980 but we are allowed to debate that.
00:15:06.420 And so our churches should not have disunity over debatable political differences.
00:15:09.540 It is also why I've never publicly or privately told Christians who they should vote for.
00:15:15.840 I have also never told anyone they should vote for Democrat or Republican, depending on
00:15:20.160 the policy.
00:15:20.680 We can more or less find alignment with biblical morals.
00:15:22.980 I believe all Christians should be active in politics, but it is unwise to identify Christianity
00:15:26.440 with any particular party.
00:15:28.540 Sigh.
00:15:29.480 Sigh.
00:15:30.160 Once again, the exasperation with you idiot plebeians.
00:15:34.100 People are focusing on the example abortion is physical harm and not the principle.
00:15:38.060 You can do the same object lesson about gay marriage.
00:15:40.880 Why codify that moral in law and not others?
00:15:47.080 All right, let me respond to a little bit of this.
00:15:50.980 It's a long, it's a long thread.
00:15:52.960 And I think what we find is that he has actually thought about it, but I still think that he
00:15:57.440 is thinking about it wrongly.
00:15:58.720 I still think that this shows very superficial thinking about what a political difference
00:16:03.960 is versus what a theological difference is.
00:16:06.380 It also, to me, shows a misunderstanding of what the parties actually represent.
00:16:11.040 Like, what is the stance that they actually represent?
00:16:13.700 We do live in a pluralistic society.
00:16:15.900 We have a First Amendment.
00:16:17.020 So the state is not going to establish a religion.
00:16:19.320 So that is why we do not prohibit idolatry in this country.
00:16:25.320 That is why we do allow people to worship whatever god they want to worship.
00:16:30.020 We do, however, believe in outlawing murder because we don't believe in anarchy.
00:16:37.200 So, of course, there was some thought by the founders when they enshrined our Bill of Rights
00:16:41.740 into thinking what is going to be made illegal and what is not.
00:16:44.920 When they said in the Declaration of Independence that we are entitled to life, liberty, and the
00:16:51.620 pursuit of happiness.
00:16:52.860 What we see there, in principle, is that the most fundamental, the most basic responsibility of
00:16:59.120 even the smallest and most limited government is to protect the taking of innocent life.
00:17:04.980 And so it's not really hard to understand, okay, well, why don't we force people to only worship
00:17:11.840 the god of the Bible and not other gods, but then we don't apply the same principle to murder?
00:17:21.420 Because we don't live in a theocracy, but we also don't live in anarchy.
00:17:28.400 And so because of that, we believe that the government has a responsibility to protecting
00:17:32.660 the most vulnerable.
00:17:35.680 Now, of course, we look forward to the day when every knee bows and every tongue confesses that
00:17:41.760 Jesus Christ is Lord and that everyone will worship, that we all will worship the one true God.
00:17:49.920 And so we do, we absolutely do look forward to that day.
00:17:55.520 And that is the ideal.
00:17:57.760 But because we do live in a non-theocracy, because we do live in a pluralistic society,
00:18:03.160 we do have to decide how we care for the most vulnerable while also allowing the freedom of religion.
00:18:11.760 And so it's not really that complicated or that complex about why we should restrict murder the
00:18:18.400 way that we should and why we don't ban idolatry.
00:18:21.860 It's really not that complicated.
00:18:23.620 If you don't believe that the government should restrict murder, then you are pro-anarchy.
00:18:29.120 Christians understand that not every sin is going to be forbidden by law.
00:18:34.120 I don't think that's the argument that pro-lifers make.
00:18:37.000 I think that some sins should, obviously, like murder, like theft.
00:18:41.580 There are plenty of things that were sins first that are outlawed by law, and that's a good thing.
00:18:46.260 I just, I happen to believe that murder, including murder of a child inside the womb, should be outlawed.
00:18:52.740 But we understand not every single sin that the Bible calls sin is going to be outlawed by the state.
00:18:59.380 And we are okay with that.
00:19:00.660 The argument is not for pro-lifers that every single thing that the Bible calls sin is going
00:19:06.040 to be or even should be a matter of state restriction.
00:19:11.220 The argument is that this should.
00:19:13.760 This should.
00:19:14.840 Like abortion should be a matter of state protection and state restriction.
00:19:19.280 The argument isn't that everything should.
00:19:21.840 The argument is that this should.
00:19:23.440 Because we are talking, again, about the most fundamental and basic responsibility of the
00:19:28.360 government, which is to protect the right of an innocent person not to be murdered.
00:19:33.200 It's very simple.
00:19:35.120 I'm going to get into what I think is his gross misunderstanding of the positions of the
00:19:40.660 political parties on abortion in just one second.
00:19:43.060 All right, so Tim Keller says that we should debate.
00:19:50.480 We are debating between Republicans and Democrats how best to end abortion or how best to decrease
00:19:55.580 abortion.
00:19:56.140 He says that the Bible doesn't really talk about what is the policy to decrease or end abortion.
00:20:02.160 First of all, the Bible actually does speak to, like, if you're going to use that argument,
00:20:06.040 the Bible actually does say the best policy for murder, the best punishment for murder.
00:20:10.960 Here, Genesis 9-6 tells us this, before the creation of Israel, before civilization, before
00:20:16.800 he gives the law to Israel, and that is the death penalty.
00:20:19.700 So you can't say that the Bible doesn't speak to it.
00:20:21.940 You could say that you don't believe that that applies to our society today because of
00:20:26.580 kind of what we were talking about before.
00:20:28.080 We don't live in a theocracy.
00:20:29.300 You can make your argument for that.
00:20:30.640 But you can't say the Bible doesn't speak to it.
00:20:32.540 The Bible actually does speak exactly to the punishment that God sees fit for murder,
00:20:38.540 and that is the death penalty.
00:20:39.640 We've talked about this many times before.
00:20:42.340 Genesis 9-6, because it precedes and transcends the creation of Israel and all civilization,
00:20:48.780 it is still applicable even, well, I believe it's still applicable as a possible, as a just
00:20:57.100 punishment for murder, whether you live in Israel or not.
00:21:00.940 It's because the reason that God gives for the death penalty, not just for suggesting
00:21:05.040 it, for demanding the death penalty in the case of murder, is because we are made in
00:21:11.420 His image.
00:21:12.360 And we are still made in His image.
00:21:13.960 He doesn't say that, you know, I demand the death penalty in this time, in this place,
00:21:18.200 in this particular cultural moment.
00:21:19.680 He says, I demand the death penalty for murder because man is made in my image.
00:21:26.300 So because He values human life so much, because He loves us so much, because we are of incredible
00:21:35.380 worth and value as people made in His image, the only punishment severe enough to make a
00:21:44.820 payment for murder is the death penalty.
00:21:47.900 That's what Genesis 9-6 tells us.
00:21:49.840 And so, again, you can make your argument that that shouldn't apply here in America,
00:21:53.640 that we don't have the right system for that, that you don't want that to apply for abortion
00:21:56.860 here in the United States for whatever your reason is.
00:22:00.500 But that's not what Tim Keller says.
00:22:02.040 He says the Bible doesn't speak to the particular policy of how we should deal with abortion.
00:22:06.680 And that's not true.
00:22:07.840 That's simply not true.
00:22:09.140 And here's how I know that he doesn't understand the debate, really, about abortion and
00:22:14.700 abortion policy in the United States.
00:22:16.960 He says that we don't know what particular policy, like the Bible doesn't tell us the
00:22:24.360 best political policy to decrease or end abortion in this country.
00:22:29.760 See, this is an argument that I hear from the left a lot.
00:22:33.220 And again, this kind of shows his particular bias, whether he realizes it or not, that restricting
00:22:41.100 abortion isn't going to decrease abortion.
00:22:43.480 Restricting abortion is just going to make abortion more dangerous.
00:22:47.400 People are still going, women are still going to be getting abortion at the same rate.
00:22:50.780 They're just going to travel to a different state or they're going to try to do like some
00:22:55.260 sort of self-managed abortion.
00:22:57.880 And so don't restrict abortion.
00:22:59.960 Just take care of women and provide them with all this free stuff.
00:23:04.680 And then they won't get abortions.
00:23:06.460 And that will decrease abortion.
00:23:07.800 And then, as we've debunked many times before, they'll show these erroneous charts that are
00:23:13.260 the perfect, perfect example of the correlation causation fallacy.
00:23:18.840 And they'll show, look, when Democrats are president, the abortion rate goes down.
00:23:23.280 But as even the Guttmacher Institute will tell you, which is a pro-abortion research institute,
00:23:28.540 there really is no causal relationship between who the president is, Republican or Democrat,
00:23:34.560 and the abortion rate.
00:23:36.700 You have to look at the policies passed by state legislatures.
00:23:40.600 For example, when Obama was president, you saw the abortion rate lower than when some
00:23:46.600 other people were president, including Republican presidents.
00:23:49.780 And people conclude, oh, because Obama was president, women were having fewer abortions
00:23:53.700 because they had more resources.
00:23:54.940 But that's not true.
00:23:56.300 You know who dominated state legislatures who were in charge of abortion policy while Obama
00:24:01.260 was president, Republicans, Republicans passed more pro-life legislation when Obama was president
00:24:07.900 during his eight years than in any other time in history.
00:24:12.020 And Republicans dominated more state legislatures when Obama was president than I think any other
00:24:16.760 time since FDR.
00:24:18.200 And so if you want to try to say that there is a correlation between who is in power or causal
00:24:24.240 relationship between who is in power and the abortion rate, then you would have to look
00:24:28.380 at not who's president, but who is running the state legislatures.
00:24:31.640 Those are the people who are making the laws that actually impact abortion.
00:24:36.620 So that chart has always been dumb, and it's never actually corresponded to any kind of good
00:24:42.580 argument for Democrat policies.
00:24:44.560 There's no evidence whatsoever that Democrat policies are decreasing abortion.
00:24:49.220 And yet you will continue to hear that from the left, that it should be about decreasing
00:24:52.880 abortion.
00:24:53.860 Look, that is one goal of the pro-life movement, of the anti-abortion movement.
00:24:57.500 I'm fine with that too.
00:24:58.660 Pro-life is kind of, that term has been bastardized to include too many things, have nothing to
00:25:02.900 do with abortion.
00:25:03.720 The point of the anti-abortion movement is not just to decrease abortion, although I
00:25:08.800 think that that's a good goal.
00:25:10.600 We are committed to loving and taking care of women and their children and families, fathers
00:25:16.020 and their children before, during and after pregnancy.
00:25:21.960 Like that is the majority of anti-abortion work.
00:25:24.480 That whole, you're only pro-birth myth is just that.
00:25:28.980 It is a myth.
00:25:29.820 We dedicate so much of our time, our money, our energy into helping women after they give
00:25:36.560 birth, making sure that they are well taken care of.
00:25:39.660 And so we are all on board with decreasing abortions, decreasing the felt need.
00:25:46.380 I don't believe that there's a need, but a felt need for abortion, decreasing that desperation,
00:25:50.380 decreasing the loneliness and the destitution that might lead someone to have an abortion
00:25:55.380 to changing people's hearts so that they don't think that they need to sacrifice their child
00:26:00.160 for something superficial like a career or for travel or for just like autonomy and independence
00:26:06.180 of we are committed to all that.
00:26:07.800 But that is not what changing the law is primarily about.
00:26:11.200 Changing the law when it comes to abortion is recognizing the child's humanity, recognizing
00:26:19.540 that that life inside the womb is a human being and therefore they are entitled to human
00:26:23.740 rights.
00:26:25.200 They're a human being and therefore they are entitled to human rights, the most fundamental
00:26:30.260 being the right to not be murdered.
00:26:33.220 So changing the law is about recognizing the child in the womb as a human and as someone
00:26:42.040 who is entitled to the right to life.
00:26:45.200 It is not just about, even if abortion did not decrease at all because of the change in
00:26:49.240 the law, it would still be right to change the law because you recognize a child's right
00:26:55.740 to life.
00:26:56.020 Think about if we decided to not outlaw anything unless there was data proving that there's
00:27:03.220 that it decreased that thing.
00:27:05.260 I mean, you would you could possibly live in anarchy because there's all different kinds
00:27:09.980 of ways that you could use convoluted data to justify making something legal.
00:27:15.180 The law is definitely a deterrent, I think, including in abortion.
00:27:19.680 But say you couldn't make that argument at all.
00:27:22.320 Say that there was no proof that outlawing murder of someone outside of the womb decreased
00:27:28.780 the murder rate.
00:27:30.080 You could actually possibly prove that.
00:27:33.720 Especially right now.
00:27:35.320 But actually, no, you probably couldn't because I think the reason that murder rates are up
00:27:38.680 is because of bail reform and criminal justice reform and the lack of applying the law and
00:27:44.300 doling out just punishments.
00:27:46.280 And so anyway, but if you could make the argument, if you could make the argument that outlawing
00:27:52.360 murder of people outside of the womb doesn't actually decrease the number of murders, is that
00:27:57.280 the argument for not outlawing it?
00:27:59.380 Is that the argument for not putting people in jail?
00:28:02.840 No, of course not, because that's not the only reason.
00:28:06.960 Decreasing something is not the only reason that you make it illegal.
00:28:09.920 You make it illegal because it's the right thing to do, because it's not just about punishing
00:28:13.660 the criminal.
00:28:14.640 It's not just about punishing the person who perpetrated the crime.
00:28:17.880 It is about recognizing the legal right of the victim, the legal right of someone to not
00:28:23.800 be murdered, the legal right of someone to not be stolen from, the legal right of someone
00:28:27.640 not to be assaulted.
00:28:29.860 That is also what the law is about.
00:28:32.640 And Tim Keller, in all of his thoughtfulness, in all of his brilliance, doesn't seem to understand
00:28:36.640 that.
00:28:36.980 He thinks we're having a debate about how to decrease abortion.
00:28:39.980 That is not primarily the goal of the anti-abortion movement.
00:28:43.180 And newsflash, Tim Keller.
00:28:44.540 Here's the important part.
00:28:45.700 Now, no one on the Democratic side is talking about how to decrease abortion, okay?
00:28:53.200 This is not a debate in the United States, between the right and the left, about how to
00:28:57.260 decrease abortion.
00:28:58.180 The debate is about whether or not abortion is evil.
00:29:01.540 The left does not believe that abortion is something that needs to be decreased.
00:29:05.140 I'm sure there are some well-meaning people who profess to be Christians and Democrats who
00:29:09.780 would admit in hushed tones that abortion is something that is bad, that we shouldn't
00:29:15.680 celebrate, at least.
00:29:16.800 They might say, oh, no one is pro-abortion.
00:29:19.680 Oh, yes, they are.
00:29:20.860 Have you spent a little time on the interwebs, my friend?
00:29:24.420 Have you spent any time on Instagram, on TikTok, on Twitter?
00:29:28.540 There are thousands, if not millions, of people who identify as Democrats, certainly who identify
00:29:35.080 as people on the left, who are pro-abortion.
00:29:39.700 Shout Your Abortion, an organization that was touted by Oprah that I wrote about in my book,
00:29:45.680 they are absolutely committed to, quote, destigmatizing abortion.
00:29:52.060 And there is an entire movement, a large movement of people on the left.
00:29:55.760 I mean, you can read in the New Yorker, which is a very mainstream left-wing outlet, an article
00:30:01.500 titled, Abortion is a Moral Good.
00:30:04.160 You will not get a Democrat to say, or any kind of mainstream left-wing journalist, you
00:30:10.320 will not be able to get them to say that we should decrease abortion.
00:30:13.040 You will not be able to get them to say that abortion is not a good thing.
00:30:16.900 They celebrate abortion.
00:30:18.240 Abortion is a sacrament to the Democratic Party.
00:30:21.420 You have to be pro-abortion, basically without limits, in order to run and to win any statewide
00:30:29.840 office as a Democrat today.
00:30:31.920 There is no chance in heck that a Democrat would be able to run for senator, be able to
00:30:38.700 run for president, certainly no nationwide office.
00:30:44.220 You wouldn't be able to run for anything statewide or nationwide as a Democrat if you are anti-abortion
00:30:52.140 in any way, even just personally anti-abortion.
00:30:54.860 You wouldn't be able to do it.
00:30:56.260 You have to be pro-choice, pro-abortion through all nine months of pregnancy in order to be
00:31:04.220 an accepted Democrat.
00:31:05.940 Just a few years ago, the head of the DNC was saying there is no place for a pro-life
00:31:10.140 Democrat in the party.
00:31:11.760 That's who they are.
00:31:13.220 Do you don't see the legislation that's coming out of Maryland, that's coming out of New
00:31:16.620 Jersey, that's coming out of Colorado and California that is allowing the decriminalization
00:31:21.700 of perinatal deaths of infants, perinatal is up to 28 days after birth.
00:31:29.460 And they are taking away the criminalization of a baby's death at any point in that perinatal
00:31:37.840 period due to neglect.
00:31:40.960 So we're talking about not just abortion, which I think is a form of infanticide, but a post-birth
00:31:46.940 infanticide too.
00:31:47.980 And Tim Keller, you think the debate is actually between whether Republican policies or Democrat
00:31:55.320 policies decrease abortion?
00:31:56.820 That is not the argument that's being had.
00:31:59.260 That's not the debate.
00:32:00.480 That's not the topic of discussion.
00:32:03.220 Tim Keller is the perfect example of someone who does not understand what time it is, who
00:32:08.380 does not understand the battle that is being waged, which I agree is not primarily between
00:32:13.760 Republicans or Democrats, is not primarily between the right and the left.
00:32:17.300 There are a lot of lost people on the right.
00:32:19.600 There are a lot of immoral people on the right.
00:32:21.960 It is ultimately always for the Christian, no matter where you live, no matter what time
00:32:26.060 in history that you're in, between good and evil, darkness and light.
00:32:29.740 That is absolutely true.
00:32:30.940 And I am not saying that that perfectly falls along left and right lines.
00:32:35.600 I'm not.
00:32:36.200 Because like I said, there's a lot of darkness on the right too.
00:32:39.200 But leftism is exclusively dark.
00:32:42.060 Okay?
00:32:42.480 They're exclusively dark.
00:32:43.680 Everything that they promote, personally and policy-wise, is wicked.
00:32:48.180 Whether it's how they want to treat the poor through programs that say that they care for
00:32:54.160 the least of these, but actually just chain people to government dependence, take away
00:33:00.100 people's dignity by disincentivizing work.
00:33:02.720 Whether it is the catastrophic immigration policy that is actually incentivizing the deadly track
00:33:09.840 of migrants to our border, and then they're infiltrating the United States in a way that
00:33:14.760 harms both immigrants and citizens.
00:33:18.020 Whether it's their pro-abortion policy, in which they believe that abortion should be allowed
00:33:23.940 through nine months, should be subsidized, should be celebrated, should be destigmatized.
00:33:30.420 Whether it is the gender indoctrination and the body mutilation that they are promoting
00:33:37.720 toward children.
00:33:39.620 It doesn't matter what policy or what issue you look at when it comes to the left.
00:33:44.540 It is marked by this wicked, this dark ideology of progressivism.
00:33:51.700 That doesn't mean that everyone who is on the left is a bad person.
00:33:57.100 I don't believe that.
00:33:58.080 I think that they're misled in a lot of ways.
00:34:00.140 That doesn't mean that everyone on the left, that their intentions are wrong, even though
00:34:03.480 I think that they are wrong in general.
00:34:05.920 It doesn't mean that they have a bad heart.
00:34:09.640 Although I do think that their heart is misleading them.
00:34:14.640 I'm not trying to characterize everyone on the left as lost or bad, but the ideology that
00:34:20.560 drives that side is destructive and deadly.
00:34:22.560 That's the debate that we're having.
00:34:25.440 And that doesn't mean that everyone or everything or every issue or every perspective on the
00:34:29.760 right is right and full of light.
00:34:32.340 I'm seeing that there's more of a chance, though, and there's more of an alignment there
00:34:36.920 when it comes to conservative policies and conservative ideas about immigration, about abortion,
00:34:42.720 about how to actually help the poor and allow them the dignity that comes through work that
00:34:47.980 we see reflected in scripture.
00:34:49.820 Yeah, I think that there is more of an alignment there, absolutely, between what the Bible does
00:34:55.920 say about human beings and human rights and righteous and just policy and conservatism.
00:35:02.500 Of course, I believe that.
00:35:03.660 I wouldn't believe the things that I do about politics if I didn't believe that.
00:35:06.820 I don't see any alignment on the left.
00:35:09.200 I just don't.
00:35:10.020 And apparently Tim Keller simply doesn't see leftism and the current, the current agenda
00:35:18.700 and platform of the Democratic Party does not see it for what it is, especially when
00:35:23.560 it comes to abortion.
00:35:24.940 Just to reiterate, it is not a debate between the left and the right about how to decrease
00:35:29.480 abortion.
00:35:30.020 It is a debate over whether or not abortion is even wrong.
00:35:33.260 Most people on the right would say, yeah, it is.
00:35:36.000 Christians on the right especially would say, yeah, we need to do away with it.
00:35:38.860 Democrats would say it's not even wrong or they would at least say maybe the most like
00:35:45.960 tepid Democrat would say, well, it's at least necessary.
00:35:49.080 It's just necessary.
00:35:50.280 It's just something that we have to do.
00:35:52.040 And at the end of the day, they would probably admit that they just think that it's a matter
00:35:55.460 of bodily autonomy.
00:35:57.080 That's the debate that we're having.
00:35:58.800 It's not about right and left.
00:36:00.380 It's about right and wrong.
00:36:02.220 That's what it is.
00:36:03.800 And Tim Keller is too scared to admit that.
00:36:05.920 He's too scared to say that because at the end of the day, I think Tim Keller is a
00:36:08.820 progressive and he's not going to give any points to the conservative side about that.
00:36:12.500 That's the issue.
00:36:15.920 Now, I agree with Mr. Keller that God is not Republican or Democrat.
00:36:20.240 He's not.
00:36:21.200 He transcends America.
00:36:23.300 He transcends our politics.
00:36:24.600 He transcends our partisanship.
00:36:25.880 I'm very thankful that God is not in the Republican Party, that he is not our political
00:36:31.300 mascot.
00:36:31.820 Unlike people on the left who tried to paint Jesus as some kind of transgender, queer,
00:36:36.360 communist, feminist, Palestinian, BLM freedom fighter, I don't believe that Jesus is any
00:36:43.620 kind of political mascot.
00:36:45.720 He's not.
00:36:46.320 He transcends all of that.
00:36:47.740 He is king of kings.
00:36:49.420 I simply believe that that reality, that he is king of kings, should shape how we think
00:36:54.320 of policy.
00:36:54.980 It should shape our worldview.
00:36:56.380 I don't believe our worldview should be fragmented.
00:36:58.400 I believe that Christianity is going to inform what I think about justice and what I think
00:37:04.740 about policies.
00:37:06.480 And I believe that scripture is going to and should inform what the Christian thinks about
00:37:10.560 this.
00:37:11.080 And for anyone who says separation of church and state, that's not what separation of church
00:37:14.340 and state means.
00:37:15.520 Separation of church and state is not the same thing as separation of worldview and how one
00:37:19.020 sees policy or the separation of God and law.
00:37:21.800 Separation of church and state simply means that the state should not be interfering in the
00:37:25.020 church's affairs and the church and the state also can't establish any kind of church religion
00:37:31.100 or any kind of state religion, rather.
00:37:34.260 And so people think that separation of church and state means that Christians and only Christians
00:37:38.980 should have to check our worldview at the door and that we can't bring it into the public
00:37:43.140 square, even though progressives, with their pseudo-religion of progressivism, they get
00:37:48.060 to allow their worldview to color and influence everything they think about policy.
00:37:54.160 Apparently, Christians are the only ones who are not allowed to.
00:37:57.140 And I just call just junk on that.
00:38:01.380 That's a bad argument.
00:38:02.600 Everyone has a worldview.
00:38:04.160 Everyone is informed by their worldview, Christians included.
00:38:08.120 And we should because, by the way, the God that Christians serve created justice.
00:38:11.560 And his definition of justice did lay the foundation for the basic principles of the Bill of Rights.
00:38:18.740 And so it is good that we allow our worldview to influence what we think about the law and
00:38:25.540 what we think about these so-called political and cultural issues, especially the ones that
00:38:28.860 are pre-political and are actually theological, such as abortion.
00:38:32.640 So Tim Keller, he goes on, he goes on to double and triple down.
00:38:37.940 He says, healthy disagreement, not about biblical morals, but about how these morals are applied
00:38:44.460 to political policies is good, but not something to divide over.
00:38:48.580 No matter how much we yell at each other, Christians can disagree about political applications
00:38:52.220 of biblical morals, not the same.
00:38:55.580 Okay, so I agree that if you, my sister in Christ, you believe in, I don't know, some kind
00:39:07.220 of disagreements over, I'm trying to even think like what that agreement would actually look
00:39:13.760 like.
00:39:14.060 Maybe if there's a disagreement in incrementalism versus abolishing abortion altogether.
00:39:19.960 For example, some pro-lifers, they're okay with the restrictions.
00:39:24.580 So like, okay, there's a 20-week restriction.
00:39:26.980 That's good.
00:39:27.740 There's a 15-week restriction.
00:39:29.280 That's good.
00:39:29.820 Let's keep pushing it back.
00:39:30.700 There's a six-week restriction.
00:39:31.720 That's good.
00:39:32.220 Okay, let's go all the way back to zero-week restriction.
00:39:35.760 And so they believe that incrementally, a state could get more pro-life.
00:39:41.140 And so some pro-life advocates are for that.
00:39:43.680 And then you've got the abolish abortion side, which says no incrementalism whatsoever.
00:39:49.160 The only just law, the only kind of law worth celebrating would be abolishing abortion from
00:39:54.220 the point of conception.
00:39:56.620 And so there could be some disagreement there, definitely, between Christians about, you know,
00:40:02.900 what should be celebrated and what should be advocated for, or at least what is worth
00:40:08.120 our, like, our praise that at least more babies are going to be saved, even through
00:40:15.580 incrementalism.
00:40:17.100 But I do not think believers can, in good faith, disagree about whether or not abortion is wrong
00:40:23.520 and whether or not it should be legal, period.
00:40:26.380 I just don't.
00:40:27.580 If you are a Christian and you don't believe that the law should restrict murder, then I
00:40:34.460 have to wonder if you believe that human beings are made in the image of God.
00:40:37.700 What do you believe about babies inside the womb?
00:40:39.380 Why do you think that murder should be restricted of people outside of the womb and not babies
00:40:43.220 inside the womb?
00:40:44.560 Like, what do you see in Scripture that supports that kind of separation of dignity, that people
00:40:50.000 inside the womb have less dignity?
00:40:51.540 Why?
00:40:51.860 Because they're smaller?
00:40:52.900 Because they're more dependent?
00:40:53.860 Because of the location?
00:40:55.780 They're inside a woman's womb?
00:40:57.240 Like, why do you think the baby in the womb is worth less than the person outside of the
00:41:01.020 womb?
00:41:01.220 And therefore, it should be okay to murder them legally, but it shouldn't be okay to
00:41:04.720 murder the person outside of the womb?
00:41:05.940 I'm not really sure that we can disagree on that and find unity.
00:41:09.360 That doesn't mean that that person's not a Christian necessarily, because we have all
00:41:13.400 believed wrong things, I think, at some point in our Christian faith.
00:41:17.460 Sanctification doesn't happen overnight.
00:41:19.220 I think it takes time.
00:41:20.280 It takes wisdom.
00:41:21.300 It takes correction.
00:41:22.180 It takes admonition.
00:41:23.320 It takes rebuking.
00:41:24.460 There are plenty of things I believed when I started out as a Christian that are just
00:41:29.440 not true theologically, politically, culturally, and it just took time and the wisdom of other
00:41:34.560 people and reading and thinking to come to what I think are biblical conclusions.
00:41:39.020 There are plenty of things now that I probably think that I don't realize are erroneous that
00:41:42.800 I will grow and read and learn over time, and I will change my mind on those things, hopefully,
00:41:47.720 to conform closer to what scripture says.
00:41:50.480 So that doesn't mean that someone isn't a Christian, but I don't think I can maintain
00:41:54.740 unity.
00:41:56.140 If I were in a church and half of the church believed that abortion should be legal and
00:42:00.180 abortion should be okay and my pastor was split on that, I do not believe that I should
00:42:03.820 stay at that church.
00:42:04.860 Because again, we disagree on Genesis 1.
00:42:07.140 And if we as a church disagree on Genesis 1 and a pastor isn't able to say so clearly
00:42:12.020 what Genesis 1 means and the implications of that, yes, even policy-wise, then I'm not
00:42:17.460 so sure you're being shepherded well.
00:42:19.380 I believe that you have a divided flock that is actually being led in chaos.
00:42:23.640 And God is not a God of confusion.
00:42:25.300 He is a God of peace.
00:42:26.960 And I think that a pastor should reflect that peace and that clarity.
00:42:30.620 There are some secondary tertiary issues that I think we will disagree on as Christians.
00:42:35.000 I mentioned some of those earlier, and that we can maintain a lot of unity when it comes
00:42:40.360 to those things, even if we duke it out.
00:42:41.900 That's okay.
00:42:42.460 Like, I think it's good to argue and still maintain unity.
00:42:45.000 But on some things, on those Genesis 1 things, I don't think that we can agree.
00:42:49.520 We're going to have some disunity as a church if we disagree on those very, very fundamental
00:42:56.420 things.
00:42:57.600 This, of course, is not the first time that Tim Keller has said some of the things that
00:43:01.200 he has.
00:43:02.840 He's talked about Christians and the freedom of conscience.
00:43:05.000 And politics back in 2020.
00:43:08.480 And so he's kind of been big on this, even as he has supported the idea of left-wing racial
00:43:14.840 and social justice.
00:43:15.660 He's written about these things before.
00:43:18.260 I think he would probably consider himself a moderate.
00:43:21.000 And, you know, I've heard him say something to this effect.
00:43:23.940 And I've also heard, you know, people like the Anne campaign say, as Christians, we really
00:43:30.040 should have some positions that are left and some positions that are right.
00:43:33.480 We should have some positions that are more in alignment with the Democratic Party and
00:43:38.340 some positions that are more in alignment with the Republican Party.
00:43:40.820 We shouldn't be partisan.
00:43:42.760 No, I think that the Christian, if we look at the Bible and we apply the Bible, we are
00:43:48.200 going to be far more conservative, at least on the what are considered the culture war issues
00:43:54.740 than any than most Republicans.
00:43:56.640 It's not being nonpartisan as a Christian doesn't mean that you're in the middle.
00:44:01.840 It doesn't mean that you're a liberal on some things.
00:44:03.860 It is going to put you in a place where you are far more conservative than the average Republican
00:44:07.880 today.
00:44:08.740 That means because you're going to be very clear on what marriage is.
00:44:12.220 You're going to be very clear on what gender is.
00:44:14.180 And look, we've got the biggest conservative network, Fox News, that just hired someone who now
00:44:19.860 goes by the name of Caitlyn Jenner.
00:44:22.220 And so as a Christian, you're going to be a lot more conservative than Fox News on these
00:44:26.300 fundamental issues.
00:44:27.740 You're going to be a lot more conservative when it comes to abortion.
00:44:29.960 You're going to be a lot more conservative when it comes to marriage.
00:44:32.660 Yes, even if we disagree in some ways, in some ways on how this looks politically, when
00:44:38.620 it comes to what we believe, we're going to be far more conservative than either policy.
00:44:42.640 We're probably going to be far more conservative when it comes to even welfare policy, because
00:44:46.440 unlike a lot of people in the most people, if not all in the Democratic Party, and unlike
00:44:51.200 unfortunately, even a lot of people in the Republican Party, or some people in the Republican
00:44:54.960 Party, we believe that work is absolutely necessary to human dignity, that you must have it, that
00:45:01.800 you must incentivize it, that it is absolutely ungodly to create a society in which people
00:45:07.680 are dependent on the government rather than on themselves and their own families and own
00:45:13.160 communities for provision.
00:45:15.320 And so being a Christian and being nonpartisan as a Christian, which I do think is important
00:45:21.480 in a lot of ways, is not going to put you in the middle.
00:45:23.740 It's not.
00:45:24.180 There's going to be very few things that you agree with the Democratic Party on.
00:45:27.520 I'm not saying nothing, but there's going to be very few things if you apply scripture
00:45:30.840 to how you think about culture and politics.
00:45:33.860 There are plenty, however, of Christians who disagree with this.
00:45:37.080 Jackie Hill Perry also sent kind of a vague tweet over the weekend that people were talking
00:45:48.620 about, and this is something that kind of happens a lot.
00:45:52.000 She tweeted in response to President Biden and one of the comments that he made at the
00:46:03.780 White House Correspondents' Dinner, which is just a ridiculous affair where people who are
00:46:13.500 unnecessarily self-important come together to feel even more important and to pat each
00:46:20.520 other on the back for, I'm not really sure what, I don't know, supporting the regime without
00:46:27.700 any kind of criticism whatsoever.
00:46:30.140 That's typically what happens.
00:46:31.520 And there were some good zingers.
00:46:34.180 I actually thought Trevor Noah, he had some good zingers.
00:46:37.520 He kind of picked at both sides, which I think if all reporters and all comedians did
00:46:46.120 that more, picked at both sides, I think we'd actually be a lot healthier as a country.
00:46:50.140 So President Biden said, if you're at home watching this and are wondering how to get
00:46:53.980 vaccinated, just contact your favorite Fox News reporter.
00:46:56.580 They're all here, vaccinated and boosted, you know, basically saying that he is, um,
00:47:01.960 that Fox News is hypocritical for being sane, I guess, I guess he's saying that they say
00:47:08.060 that they're against the vaccine, but they're all vaccinated themselves, which is not true.
00:47:10.880 I know that not all Fox News employees are vaccinated.
00:47:14.440 Tucker Carlson has said that he is not vaccinated, even though the media has tried to say that
00:47:17.900 he is vaccinated.
00:47:19.400 And so Joe Biden is kind of picking on them, which whatever, good for Joe Biden for being
00:47:25.000 able to finish a complete paragraph without forgetting where he was.
00:47:28.460 Jackie Hope Perry quote tweeted that and said, the shade of it all, laughing face, crying face,
00:47:34.100 crying face.
00:47:35.440 And I think at this point, people are used to her kind of showing in vague ways, which
00:47:42.960 side politically that she's on.
00:47:45.700 I'm not saying that this was some kind of awful, tragic tweet that she sent.
00:47:49.760 You're absolutely allowed to laugh at things.
00:47:51.920 But I think people have noticed how slanted these kinds of reactions are when it comes
00:47:56.780 from her.
00:47:57.840 And then she will say that she's not political, that she's apolitical, that both sides are
00:48:02.320 bad.
00:48:02.620 She did the same thing about Ketanji Brown Jackson when she commented on a picture of
00:48:07.100 her daughter looking at Ketanji Brown Jackson and said, mood.
00:48:10.360 And then she got mad at all of these so-called white evangelicals in her DMs who were pointing
00:48:15.040 out that Ketanji Brown Jackson has a really terrible, terrible record, especially from the Christian
00:48:19.940 perspective.
00:48:21.040 And she, of course, offended herself and said, you know, it didn't have anything to do with
00:48:23.800 politics.
00:48:24.180 It just had to do with this cool picture of a mother and daughter, which I don't really
00:48:31.120 believe that.
00:48:32.000 I thought it was a cute picture, too.
00:48:33.880 But if I am going to infer some kind of support for someone, I'm going to make sure that they
00:48:39.460 don't have a background that is absolutely reprehensible, especially from my Christian
00:48:44.480 perspective.
00:48:46.120 And so this has kind of been typical for the past few years from Jackie Hill Perry.
00:48:51.380 She's been very critical of Donald Trump.
00:48:53.240 She, of course, is all on board, at least from what I can see and from what I have heard
00:48:57.660 with progressivism when it comes to the subjects of social and racial justice.
00:49:01.640 Those are the narratives that she is going to perpetuate.
00:49:04.540 She has also criticized the right for saying that they are pro-life but not acting in other
00:49:11.700 kinds of what she would consider pro-life ways, you know, recognizing what she might call something
00:49:19.220 like black dignity.
00:49:20.620 I obviously have a ton of disagreements there.
00:49:23.220 Unfortunately, people send me these screenshots.
00:49:25.420 I can't follow myself because even though I've never had any kind of interaction with Jackie
00:49:29.180 Hill Perry, except for the one time that I asked her to come on my show, she blocked
00:49:32.640 me on all social media, which is just kind of sad.
00:49:36.160 And I do think that she has a lot of wonderful things to say.
00:49:40.060 I really appreciate her testimony, but it's the same kind of deal.
00:49:45.400 You see this so much from progressives.
00:49:46.920 Let me put this like vague tweet out there, leave people guessing.
00:49:50.260 Then when people criticize me for it, I'll call them bullies and say that it's really
00:49:54.720 their problem for not understanding exactly what I was saying.
00:49:58.160 So I would say just be discerning there.
00:50:00.160 Be discerning with all people, of course, including me.
00:50:02.860 Um, but also don't be afraid to ask people to like, what do you mean?
00:50:07.720 What do you mean?
00:50:08.200 Can you define that term?
00:50:10.660 Let me tell, let me hear what shapes your perspective.
00:50:13.320 What are you actually trying to say with this particular statement or this particular tweet?
00:50:17.920 I think that's important, especially when it comes to the people who say that they're
00:50:21.160 apolitical, but clearly are leaning progressive.
00:50:24.400 That's important to me.
00:50:25.380 All right.
00:50:28.280 So I just want to react to one more, one more piece of, um, woke Christian commentary that
00:50:35.440 I thought was not surprising at this point because it's coming from Jen Hatmaker.
00:50:39.960 And I think Jen Hatmaker is a completely, in a completely different category, um, than
00:50:45.000 Tim Keller or even Jackie Ho Perry.
00:50:47.420 I totally different category.
00:50:49.140 In my opinion, someone who continually in all different ways, just spouts nonsense, including
00:50:55.860 about gender and sexuality.
00:50:58.100 And so she had, um, an interesting clip with some kind of, I don't know, author or something,
00:51:05.580 um, on her show that I want to play you a little bit of.
00:51:09.800 Obviously I don't need everyone to go on a 400 mile walking pilgrimage to the black Madonnas,
00:51:13.800 but I need people to go on a journey for themselves to find their own sacredness that we can all
00:51:19.220 start to actually treat each other as if we're sacred.
00:51:22.080 That's beautiful.
00:51:23.700 Yeah.
00:51:24.260 Right.
00:51:24.620 The tendrils of that effect would change everything.
00:51:29.120 It would change everything.
00:51:29.920 Oh yeah.
00:51:30.740 Yeah.
00:51:31.100 And if we had a world where like all women and all black people were truly sacred,
00:51:37.040 right.
00:51:38.580 That would dismantle literally every system that harmed us.
00:51:42.340 That's right.
00:51:42.640 That would, that would mean the whole earth would flourish.
00:51:46.900 Oh yeah.
00:51:47.740 So, um, it always feels so self-defeating that patriarchy and racism and all the isms are
00:51:59.560 so stubborn and want, because it's, it would truly be the liberation of earth.
00:52:04.980 If everybody was valued as divine, it would, it would, it'd be the liberation of the whole
00:52:12.060 earth, even the men, even the white men, like it would be for their flourishing too.
00:52:17.320 And so it.
00:52:19.560 Okay.
00:52:20.320 All right.
00:52:20.980 Um, so this is a form of, well, it's a form of liberation theology that comes all the way
00:52:27.760 from James Cone.
00:52:28.880 And even before that, now James Cone is someone who is cited very often, even by people who
00:52:33.520 consider themselves conservative, even evangelicals, um, who himself was not a Christian, even though
00:52:40.240 he claimed to be a Christian.
00:52:41.120 How do I know that it's not just because I disagreed at some points in his theology, but
00:52:44.880 he actually said that he accepted any religion as legitimate, who believes in liberation.
00:52:49.540 So that included Islam.
00:52:51.100 He was, if anything, he was a universalist.
00:52:53.280 He didn't believe in the exclusivity of Christianity.
00:52:55.960 He didn't believe that Jesus was the way, the truth, and the life.
00:52:58.140 He believed in Christianity as a vehicle for liberation from political and earthly oppression
00:53:06.040 only.
00:53:07.260 He was not really interested in like the salvation and the regeneration of someone's heart.
00:53:11.860 And that is why he would accept, you know, Malcolm X's faith or, um, any other kind of
00:53:17.720 racial activist faith, as long as he agreed with them politically about the so-called liberation
00:53:24.300 of black people.
00:53:25.060 And it always had to do with the growth of the government, um, to accomplish their purposes.
00:53:30.400 And so that's part of what they're talking about here.
00:53:32.060 Part of also of what they're talking about is some kind of new age self goddess stuff in
00:53:39.020 where you see everyone as divine.
00:53:41.800 That's different than made in the image of a God.
00:53:43.780 We are not all divine.
00:53:45.120 We are not all gods.
00:53:46.720 We are not all little G gods or big G gods.
00:53:49.900 There is one God.
00:53:50.940 We are made in his image and we have, um, that spark and that reflection, which does give
00:53:56.720 us amazing value far beyond any plant or animal or any other organism on earth.
00:54:04.360 However, we are not divine.
00:54:07.540 We are not divine.
00:54:08.620 That is different because we are not worthy of worship ourselves.
00:54:11.720 We are not worthy of adoration ourselves.
00:54:14.280 And that is, um, a very typical new age idea that if we all just worshiped ourselves and
00:54:20.920 each other as a part of the divine, whatever, again, defining our terms, what does that even
00:54:26.020 mean?
00:54:26.540 Then we would all be liberated from these so-called systems that are apparently all weighing us
00:54:31.580 down.
00:54:32.140 What does that mean?
00:54:33.300 Now, maybe you go listen to that episode with Jen Hatmaker.
00:54:36.780 You go watch it and you say, you know what?
00:54:38.520 The context made this so much better.
00:54:40.140 And now I understand what she's saying.
00:54:42.480 You should, you should go listen.
00:54:43.780 We didn't, we didn't have time to play the whole thing.
00:54:45.900 You should go listen to it or watch it if you want to.
00:54:48.720 But what does this even mean?
00:54:50.520 This kind of theology is so intangible and is so, um, I don't even want to say academic
00:54:57.900 because that almost has like positive connotations, but is so ethereal and beyond the reach or the
00:55:07.160 comprehension of like any kind of common sense or any kind of basic understanding that human
00:55:13.300 beings have.
00:55:14.100 And that is why it is perpetuated.
00:55:17.620 Because if you continue to say that what I believe or really what's going to liberate
00:55:25.120 the world and what is going to heal us of all this earthly oppression is so beyond reach
00:55:30.720 that you really need me.
00:55:32.340 You really need me, this expert, this very smart person, this person that has special
00:55:37.320 access to this liberating knowledge, um, in order to attain it.
00:55:41.340 Well, then that person stays in a position of power.
00:55:43.600 That person continues to get money, continues to get attention.
00:55:46.500 You continue to get people to need you because you have access to this special power of the
00:55:51.600 divine that is going to liberate the earth.
00:55:54.100 Those people don't really want to relieve the earth of any kind of oppression, um, because
00:55:59.960 then they would be out of the job.
00:56:01.720 I mean, that's true of race hustlers and all of this.
00:56:04.420 Um, they'd be out of the job if oppression was actually relieved.
00:56:08.380 And of course, we know that they don't actually care about real oppression because the only
00:56:11.800 true reliever of oppression is the gospel, is through the changing of hearts, which does,
00:56:17.820 yes, affect our politics, but it's not primarily political.
00:56:21.180 It is theological.
00:56:22.180 And that's kind of, I guess, the theme of this episode.
00:56:24.480 It's just a bad understanding of how the Bible applies to politics in a bunch of different ways.
00:56:30.740 All right.
00:56:31.420 I hope you enjoyed all that.
00:56:33.560 We will be back here tomorrow with more.