Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - Ep 638 ｜ The Suspicious '10-Year-Old Who Needs an Abortion' Story

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Wednesday. This episode is brought to you by our friends at

00:00:05.240 Good Ranchers. Go to GoodRanchers.com slash Allie for a discount on American Meat Delivered.

00:00:10.820 That's GoodRanchers.com slash Allie.

00:00:22.240 Okay, y'all, we've got a lot to talk about today. I'm just going to be real.

00:00:25.420 We had an interview that was scheduled for this morning that unfortunately had to be rescheduled

00:00:32.020 last minute. Hopefully it will be rescheduled soon. So we've kind of been scrambling the Relatable

00:00:36.980 team this morning trying to figure out what we are going to talk about. So we are going to be

00:00:42.080 talking about many stories today, lots of important stories. But just so you know, this has kind of

00:00:48.500 been thrown together just to give you a little insight into what is going on behind the scenes.

00:00:54.360 Thankfully, there's a lot going on that I knew that I wanted to talk about. So just FYI,

00:00:59.440 this is all extemporaneous commentary coming from yours truly. We're going to talk about that Ohio

00:01:04.200 story that has been circulating about the 10-year-old girl that allegedly is pregnant and was denied an

00:01:11.600 abortion and was made to travel to another state. And this is being hoisted up as an example by the

00:01:17.780 media of the draconian nature of abortion laws and why overturning Roe v. Wade was such a terrible,

00:01:25.580 terrible thing. Many of you have asked me about this story, what I think about it. We're going to go

00:01:30.540 through some questions that I have that this journalist has raised as well on Twitter about

00:01:38.440 that story and break down why maybe it's not the best example of the argument that the media is

00:01:45.140 trying to make. We're also going to talk about the story that was published by the star of One Tree Hill.

00:01:54.320 What's her name? Hillary Burton. She reported to the Hollywood Reporter that she had an abortion, 1.00

00:02:02.540 but what she says is not actually describing an abortion. And so I'm going to respond to that.

00:02:08.020 And then we are going to talk about the Ellen Page, Elliot Page controversy. Jordan Peterson got

00:02:15.200 kicked off Twitter for calling the person who is now calling herself Elliot Page, Ellen Page. And we're

00:02:22.580 also going to react to this awesome Macy Gray clip. She was on Pierce Morgan's show. You know Macy Gray

00:02:29.860 from that song in 2001 that all of us knew. And she has something to say about gender. So we're going

00:02:36.100 to try to get to all of that today. It's going to be fun. All right, let's talk about this terrible Ohio

00:02:53.200 story. So first of all, if a child, if a 10 year old is pregnant, then there is a high likelihood that

00:03:02.240 this is not just some kind of romantic interaction with a boy that is her age. This is very likely

00:03:09.920 that this child has been raped. And I've said this before. This is apparently a controversial 0.97

00:03:16.440 position. I do not believe that most crimes solicit the death penalty. I think that they that should be

00:03:26.140 reserved for the most heinous crimes like premeditated murder. But also, I think that the death penalty

00:03:33.400 should be issued for the rape of a child. And I won't caveat that I won't backtrack on that. I won't try to 0.88

00:03:42.380 soften that stance. I believe that if this child was raped, which it is very likely, as I said,

00:03:48.640 that she is that the person who raped her should get the death penalty. And so by me talking about 0.98

00:03:54.800 this story or being against abortion, that is not me minimizing the grotesque nature of this kind of 0.74

00:04:04.000 crime. Like there is there is really no greater evil than the sexual exploitation and the sexual abuse

00:04:11.580 of a child. So I don't want you to think that I don't take something like this very seriously. If

00:04:16.960 it were up to me, the person who did this would already be on death row. So I'll just start by

00:04:24.480 saying that. And that actually leads us into what is the very curious nature and the suspicious nature

00:04:31.100 of this story. You've read this story in a million different outlets at this point. You know all about

00:04:38.040 it that there is an Ohio girl, apparently 10 years old, who is pregnant, who couldn't get an abortion.

00:04:43.820 And you know what is strangely missing from these stories? Any talk about who actually impregnated her.

00:04:52.500 There is strangely very little talk about the crime and about the person who probably raped her.

00:05:00.660 There is very little talk about the responsibility on the other end of the person

00:05:06.820 who did this to her. Isn't that strange? Like, isn't that the great atrocity that we should all be

00:05:13.120 talking about here? Isn't that the first question that everyone should have? Not whether this child

00:05:20.240 is going to be able to get an abortion, but who did this to this child? Like, don't you think fair

00:05:26.420 and responsible reporting would highlight that? Like, wouldn't that be the lead? But as this journalist

00:05:32.960 on Twitter, whose name is Megan Fox, not that Megan Fox, the journalist Megan Fox, as she points out in

00:05:39.120 this long Twitter thread, the fact that that is not being talked about by these journalists who are

00:05:44.500 reporting on this story is our first of many red flags when it comes to this. So I'm going to read

00:05:49.880 you this thread, or at least part of this thread. It's a very long thread by this journalist Megan Fox,

00:05:55.420 who starts out her thread saying this,

00:05:57.380 The story about a 10-year-old pregnant girl who had to go from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion gives me

00:06:02.760 serious pause for a number of reasons. There are many red flags. I'm going to detail them here.

00:06:08.840 So she says this,

00:06:10.720 Number one, pregnant 10-year-old is evidence of a heinous crime against a child, but in every article,

00:06:16.380 there is no mention of a criminal investigation, no police involvement, not even a town where this

00:06:22.340 occurred. So there is a strange lack of specifics here.

00:06:25.200 Number two, second red flag, she says,

00:06:28.740 An unnamed child abuse doctor called Dr. Caitlin Bernard, so this supposed child abuse doctor,

00:06:37.820 called up Dr. Caitlin Bernard, who is an abortionist in Indiana, to ask for help, allegedly.

00:06:43.800 But any doctor, this reporter Megan Fox says, who knows of abuse is actually required to call law

00:06:50.040 enforcement. That's true. They are mandatory reporters. There should be a criminal investigation

00:06:55.180 involving Ohio Department of Family Services and police. And again, you would think that that

00:07:00.480 would be reported by the journalists who are talking about this story. Third red flag. The timing

00:07:05.340 is a little too on the nose. So right after Roe v. Wade happened, this is overturned. This becomes a

00:07:13.720 national news story that's really convenient for the people who have been trying to push the idea

00:07:19.040 that abortion is a necessary procedure that should be legalized through all nine months of pregnancy.

00:07:26.680 Fourth red flag, says Megan Fox. The article was first published in the Indy Star, but in record time

00:07:32.540 was picked up by huge international press. Fifth red flag, she says, immediately used. It was used as a

00:07:40.660 political weapon against Republican Governor Kristi Noem and will be used against other pro-life

00:07:46.480 politicians. She is referencing an interview that Governor Kristi Noem did on CNN with Dana Bash. 0.83

00:07:54.860 Governor Kristi Noem has also pushed pro-life legislation. She has pro-life herself. And so

00:08:00.340 Dana Bash on CNN was trying to push back on her on this and used this story as a political cudgel 0.99

00:08:07.960 against Kristi Noem. Again, it's a little bit too convenient. And then you've got the sixth possible

00:08:13.940 red flag. Dr. Caitlin Bernard is the only source and she has been in the New York Times participating

00:08:19.700 in an anti-Trump hit piece and is clearly an activist. She has monetary stake in preserving

00:08:25.820 abortion. Dr. Caitlin Bernard has been making her rounds in the media for a very long time. And again, 1.00

00:08:31.840 she is the only source when it comes to this story. So apparently all of these journalists are

00:08:37.220 relying on Dr. Caitlin Bernard, who is an abortionist in Indiana, who says that a child abuse doctor in

00:08:43.620 Ohio called her and told her about a 10-year-old girl who needed an abortion. That's the only source,

00:08:49.300 the only verification, the only substantiation that we have. And this Dr. Caitlin Bernard happens

00:08:56.220 to have a long history with the liberal media supporting so-called abortion rights.

00:09:03.260 As Megan Fox, as she explains that there is no way to verify Bernard's claim. She has doctor-patient

00:09:12.100 confidentiality and no one can FOIA her. Number eight red flag. Jennifer Rubin used this to batter 1.00

00:09:20.060 conservatives in the Washington Post and is a notorious tool for the left using the story

00:09:26.360 to harm pro-lifers. None of the lawmakers' ninth red flag, Megan Fox says, none of the lawmakers'

00:09:33.660 politicians, news people seem to care about the crime committed against the child. So kind of going

00:09:38.380 back to the beginning here, no one is demanding an investigation. And number 10, weird thing,

00:09:45.080 Dr. Bernard's first instinct was to call the media. Yes, I would say very strange, but also very fitting

00:09:52.920 of the profile of Dr. Caitlin Bernard as she has been in the media for a very long time supporting

00:10:00.680 a legislation that allows abortion or lacks abortion laws. The other strange thing here is that the Ohio

00:10:09.180 law that is currently in place, and that is a ban on abortion after six weeks. It passed in 2019,

00:10:16.520 but there was a pause on the law and recently a judge lifted the pause on the law after Roe v. Wade was

00:10:23.900 overturned a couple weeks ago. So now this six-week ban on abortion is in place. Well, here's what the

00:10:31.580 Ohio law says, specifically, quote, that if the abortion, here's the exception, I should say.

00:10:41.040 If it is necessary, the Ohio law says, if an abortion is necessary to prevent the death of the

00:10:46.780 pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major

00:10:53.820 bodily function of the pregnant woman, that's actually a pretty big exception because that can 0.99

00:11:00.400 be left up to the discretion of a doctor who could say that an abortion is necessary according to his

00:11:10.340 expertise because he thinks that it is going to injure the woman. And so the big gripe that I think

00:11:16.260 everyone understandably has is that pregnancy on a 10-year-old girl, a child would impair that child's

00:11:23.400 health, would impair that child's body. But the Ohio law has a specific exception for that, not just the

00:11:30.480 life of a mother. That's not the only exception. The other exception is that if the pregnancy would 0.59

00:11:38.420 pose a serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant

00:11:46.100 woman, it sounds to me like an abortionist in Ohio right now, even with this six-week ban,

00:11:52.740 could justify performing an abortion on this 10-year-old girl if this story is true. But

00:12:00.340 nowadays, journalists don't even ask that question. They don't even care if the story is true. And this

00:12:05.840 is also how we know that many of the activists and the journalists, but I repeat myself, many of the

00:12:12.360 people on CNN don't actually care about this girl. They don't actually care about her well-being.

00:12:18.620 They're apparently not concerned with the rapist who impregnated her. They're not concerned that

00:12:26.240 this person is brought to justice. They're not concerned with any sort of investigation into this

00:12:31.680 or what law enforcement is doing. This is the same media who takes every opportunity to try to criticize

00:12:37.320 the police where they can. Now, they're not even calling on the police to try to protect this girl or

00:12:43.000 other girls that could be raped by the same guy who probably raped this girl. So that means that

00:12:50.160 their motives are suspect. That means the entirety of this story is suspect. So I just think that we

00:12:57.360 need to be thinking a little harder. Unfortunately, we can't trust our media. They've got an agenda.

00:13:02.820 They've got a preconceived notion. They've got a preconceived conclusion. And they are going to

00:13:08.300 find stories, find anecdotes that will help them support that conclusion. Of course, that's not

00:13:15.640 what journalism is supposed to be. You're not supposed to have a preformed conclusion. You are

00:13:20.800 supposed to find the facts, allow the facts to lead you and go where they lead you. You don't even have

00:13:27.680 to form some sort of editorial conclusion. That's not supposed to be the job of a journalist. And it's

00:13:32.800 certainly not supposed to be the job of a journalist to be an activist and to try to change people's

00:13:38.640 opinion on a certain policy. That's not supposed to be their job, but it is, which means we have a

00:13:43.600 bigger responsibility to ask questions and to fact check. So I'm very thankful to this actual journalist,

00:13:50.480 Megan Fox, for asking these questions and for raising these red flags. This does not minimize the

00:13:56.220 possibility of this being real. It doesn't minimize the seriousness of rape,

00:14:00.480 but it does call into question the motives of the people who are reporting

00:14:04.660 on this, the veracity of this story, not just because we're not able to substantiate it at all

00:14:11.460 and we're relying on this sole source who has suspect motives herself, but also because none of these

00:14:17.400 stories are even talking about what the law says that would clearly make an exception for this young

00:14:24.280 girl. This is a tough situation. This is a tough hypothetical, of course, for pro-lifers to grapple

00:14:32.120 with. At the end of the day, we believe that the baby's life, no matter the circumstances surrounding

00:14:37.820 their conception and the mother's life, are equally valuable. We don't believe that the child's life is

00:14:44.460 more important and more valuable than the mother's life. And we don't believe that the mother's life is 0.98

00:14:49.180 more valuable than the child's life. We believe that they are equally valuable and that everything

00:14:54.500 should be done when possible to try to preserve the life of both the mother and the baby. There are

00:14:59.900 situations where that's not possible. Enectopic pregnancy is one of those situations. There are

00:15:06.620 situations in which the physical lives may be pitted against one another. And in that case, we believe

00:15:13.440 that both lives are equally valuable. But don't fall for this emotional manipulation that this story is

00:15:24.260 wrapped in. See it as the moral extortion that it is and just reject its premise. Another faulty part

00:15:31.760 of this is that no one who is pushing the story as a way to defend their views on abortion would be

00:15:38.680 willing to restrict abortion to cases like this. They're not interested in saying, okay, abortion

00:15:44.720 should be banned except for when a 10-year-old is raped and then they should be able to get an 1.00

00:15:49.980 abortion. They're just bringing this up to try to manipulate you. All of the activists that are

00:15:55.220 highlighting this case to try to extort you are interested in allowing abortion through all nine

00:16:01.820 months of pregnancy. And so it's a fallacious argument, again, to just try to trigger your

00:16:11.560 emotions into buying into their illogical and what I think is an inhumane position that it is okay to

00:16:18.500 purposely kill a human being just because they reside in the womb. 0.78

00:16:31.820 Okay, let's talk about this Hollywood Reporter story that I saw reported on. I saw the headline

00:16:40.120 on Twitter. So Hillary Burton, I think she was in One Tree Hill. She said this, having an abortion

00:16:47.520 after my fetus died allowed for my uterus to heal in a way that made it healthy enough to carry future

00:16:56.200 pregnancies. This is, once again, propaganda. How often have we seen this propaganda over the past two

00:17:04.340 weeks? A DNC that is performed after a miscarriage where your child naturally and tragically dies is not

00:17:12.480 an abortion. Yes, I know the medical coding and the coding for insurance is unfortunately billed as an abortion 0.89

00:17:19.780 and maybe you should try to lobby to change that in some kind of state legislation, but it's a spontaneous

00:17:25.900 abortion. Every single medical professional knows that there's a difference between an induced abortion

00:17:31.900 where you are purposely taking the life of an innocent human being inside the womb and a spontaneous 0.96

00:17:38.640 abortion in which your child dies inside the womb through no fault of your own. There was some kind of

00:17:45.280 complication, some kind of anomaly, something caused the child to die in the womb and then you have to

00:17:50.840 remove that child. Of course you have to remove the child. You're not purposely killing the child.

00:17:54.660 You are removing the child. And some people are saying, well, it's hard to get a miscarriage now

00:18:01.320 in certain states because of how these laws are written. Look, I can't verify all of the anecdotes

00:18:07.360 that you're seeing on social media, the women who are saying that they are unable to get the medication

00:18:11.820 that they need to expel their baby after a miscarriage because some of it is the same medication that is

00:18:19.160 used in an abortion. But I have read the laws on the books that are restricting abortion in states and

00:18:27.760 all of them explicitly say that care for a miscarriage or an ectopic pregnancy, the ones that I've read

00:18:37.740 explicitly say that care for a miscarriage or an ectopic pregnancy are not an abortion and they're not

00:18:44.480 restricted. So if those pharmacies or those hospitals, doctors or nurses are refusing to care for those

00:18:50.640 patients, to care for those women who have had miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies, it's not the fault of the

00:18:56.100 law. It might be the fault of lawyers. It might be the fault of the pharmacist. It might be the fault of the

00:19:02.740 hospitals. And that's really unfortunate. And I really hope they're not doing that to try to make some kind of

00:19:07.280 political point. I really hope that that is not the case. But it's not the fault of the laws, the ones

00:19:15.360 that explicitly say that, hey, care for a miscarriage or care for ectopic pregnancies. That does not fall

00:19:24.760 under any kind of ban or any kind of restriction on abortion. And people I've seen story after story

00:19:30.620 saying, oh, abortion saved my life. And then you read the story and they're actually talking about

00:19:36.400 just having a DNC after a miscarriage. No, police officers are not investigating the bodies of

00:19:43.380 women who are having miscarriages. That is not something that is a result of these laws. If it 1.00

00:19:48.680 is like I will be one of the first people to talk about it. If there is a law that is restricting

00:19:53.000 care for miscarriage for miscarriages or restricting care for ectopic pregnancies, I will also, as a pro-life

00:19:59.780 anti-abortion person, be standing up against that, calling my legislators and saying, look, you need to be

00:20:05.580 more specific. You need to be more explicit in these laws. I also don't want those consequences.

00:20:11.000 I do not want women to be mistreated or for women to die because they cannot get their miscarriage

00:20:17.060 or ectopic pregnancy treatment. I also don't want that. Pro-lifers have no interest in that

00:20:22.620 whatsoever. That's the opposite of what we want. So if you can point me to the specific laws that

00:20:28.480 are restricting the care of miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies, then I will fight with you

00:20:34.820 against that particular law or against a particular line of that law. But you never actually see the

00:20:41.380 specific citations from people who are claiming that the overturning of Roe v. Wade is leading to

00:20:49.380 the lack of care in these areas. You never see a specific citation of a specific piece of

00:20:54.040 legislation that is restricting this type of care. They never cite their facts. They just say,

00:20:59.360 well, this is happening. Well, show me the law that is causing this to happen. And again, I would say

00:21:04.200 the timing is a little bit suspect. Doctors and nurses in all kinds of states have had to deal with

00:21:09.520 some kind of restriction on abortion. So they have always had to distinguish between an induced abortion

00:21:15.940 and a miscarriage. They've always had some kind of limit to abortion, at least in most states,

00:21:22.840 and they've had to deal with that. So you're saying all of a sudden, these doctors don't know

00:21:28.080 how to distinguish between abortion procedures and caring for a miscarriage or ectopic pregnancies.

00:21:35.140 All of a sudden, they're confused about that. All of a sudden, these pharmacists are confused

00:21:40.200 and are worried about that. There have always been laws on the books, especially in red states,

00:21:46.040 restricting abortion and the kinds of procedures that you can do and at what stage. And we haven't seen

00:21:52.420 this slew of stories about how doctors are unable to treat women who are suffering from miscarriages.

00:22:00.440 So again, I just think it's very suspect. And the conflating of miscarriages and abortions is just

00:22:05.700 a form of propaganda. It's a form of propaganda. And there's celebrity after celebrity that's coming

00:22:11.660 out and that they're doing the same thing. So we have to think. Again, we have to be critical thinkers.

00:22:16.440 We have to ask questions. When you have friends that bring you stories like this,

00:22:20.000 before you respond, before you give your argument, ask them. Ask them to define their terms. Ask them,

00:22:26.440 what do you mean by abortion in this case? Why do you say abortion if the baby already died?

00:22:30.700 I also think, by the way, this is just an aside, that it's so sad when these celebrities like Hillary

00:22:38.720 Burton use the word fetus. You know they're only using the word fetus because they are talking

00:22:43.980 about abortion and because they are trying to dehumanize their baby. Like, you know that depending

00:22:50.140 on the stage of pregnancy, she already knew the gender of her baby. You know that she called this 0.93

00:22:56.440 baby a baby when she was probably originally talking about her miscarriage or when she was

00:23:01.020 originally talking about being pregnant. There is no difference between a fetus and a baby. A fetus is

00:23:06.940 just a stage of development. It's just a stage of life. It's just an age. Fetus is Latin for small

00:23:14.480 child, for baby. It's just another stage of human life. And so when people try to use that to try to

00:23:22.340 dehumanize a baby, you know that's just, again, a rhetorical trick to try to manipulate you.

00:23:27.320 So when you see these stories, ask questions. That's the biggest tool in your toolkit. Rather than

00:23:32.500 responding with an argument or feeling like you have to be on the offense, ask questions. Ask

00:23:38.800 questions. Make them define their terms and cite their sources and support their argument. Remember,

00:23:44.280 it is not radical to believe that it is unjust and wrong to kill an innocent human being just because

00:23:52.580 of their age and size and location. That's not radical. That's a very common sense and compassionate

00:23:57.420 position. It is radical to believe that it is okay, that it is justified, that it should be legal

00:24:04.660 to kill an innocent human being, a baby. That is the radical position. So they should be the ones 1.00

00:24:10.540 that have to defend their position first, primarily, not you.

00:24:14.420 Okay, so just real quickly, I want to touch on this story because everyone was talking about it

00:24:29.420 on Twitter. So Jordan Peterson, on June 22nd, he got kicked off Twitter because he was responding to

00:24:36.720 some story about the person who now refers to herself as Elliot Page. If you don't know, this is

00:24:47.020 the actress from Juno. And she first came out as, I think, bisexual, then she came out as a lesbian. 0.65

00:24:56.540 And then recently, she said that, oh, no, I'm actually a man. And she transitioned. And what I

00:25:01.080 mean by transition is that she had a double mastectomy. And she started, I guess, being on hormone

00:25:05.360 treatments to where her body is supposed to look masculine. And as a lot of people pointed out, 1.00

00:25:12.900 and I don't say this as like a zinger. I'm not trying to be mean in any way or dehumanizing because

00:25:18.740 I actually have like just a lot of sadness and compassion for this person. Like she does not

00:25:23.120 look well. And in case you're new here, I do use pronouns that match someone's biology. I don't go

00:25:29.460 along with that delusion. I do typically refer to the person like by their new name because that

00:25:35.760 doesn't force me to lie. There's some debates about that, though. Some people have brought up

00:25:41.060 some good points that you shouldn't even do that. But I'm okay. I'll call Ellen Elliot, but I'm not

00:25:46.360 going to call her he. Well, Jordan Peterson also committed this crime when he said, remember when

00:25:52.820 Pride was a sin and Ellen Page had just had her breasts removed by a criminal physician. Agree,

00:26:00.740 like we shouldn't be chopping up people's bodies for healthy breasts and like healthy sexual organs, 1.00

00:26:08.680 especially when people so often don't even know the risks and potential side effects of this kind

00:26:14.480 of thing. It's just I mean, it's really sad. And then Dave Rubin got kicked off Twitter on July 1st.

00:26:20.980 He tweeted a screenshot of the notification that Jordan Peterson got. Jordan Peterson got a

00:26:28.640 notification from Twitter saying, hey, you've been kicked off Twitter, suspended from Twitter

00:26:32.360 for hateful conduct and you got to delete it. And then you can we might, you know, let you back on.

00:26:40.320 And so Dave Rubin just posted a screenshot of that. And then Dave Rubin got kicked off Twitter,

00:26:44.540 suspended from Twitter for posting the screenshot like he didn't even say anything about it.

00:26:50.220 Well, OK, I guess this is why he said he he posted the screenshot and he said the insanity continues

00:26:56.780 at Twitter. Jordan Peterson has been suspended for this tweet about Ellen Page. He just told me he will

00:27:00.900 never delete the tweet paging Elon Musk. So this, I guess, goes against Twitter's rules for what they

00:27:08.660 call dead naming and dead naming is saying a transgender person's previous name. Like this is 0.98

00:27:16.160 so insanely Orwellian that someone's name that everyone knew them by, like a famous person like

00:27:22.660 we all saw her acting in Juno. You're not even allowed to acknowledge that that person

00:27:29.040 has been female, is still female, but identified as female forever and then transitioned.

00:27:34.860 So they simultaneously want to be called like transgender people to be a part of like the

00:27:39.580 marginalized class. But you're not even supposed to acknowledge that they transitioned from

00:27:44.380 anything like, oh, you're transgender. What does that mean? Oh, you can't say what that actually

00:27:49.640 means. Then you're not. OK, then you're just a straight white male. Then why are you getting all

00:27:54.520 of this press? Like, why do people even care? So they want the oppression points from being 0.74

00:27:58.980 transgender, but you can't even acknowledge that they transgendered or that they transitioned from

00:28:03.220 one thing to another. You can't even acknowledge that. Oh, yeah, this person used to go by

00:28:07.180 Ellen Page. This person is actually a biological female. I mean, you just have to shove that right 1.00

00:28:12.420 down the memory hole. And there's also another 1984 part of this. It's not just the memory hole

00:28:18.340 aspect, but the elimination of language so as to minimize our thought range. Like, again, because you

00:28:28.400 cannot dead name someone, because you cannot use the actual pronouns that correspond to that person's

00:28:35.140 DNA because you can't even refer to that person as what they are, you have such a limitation in your

00:28:43.300 communication and your ability to even to even comprehend reality. And so you think about how kids

00:28:51.500 are indoctrinated in this stuff, how they don't they're not even going to have the mental capacity

00:28:56.440 to understand what is and what is it. And that is actually all part of the plan. So Ben Shapiro

00:29:04.060 posts about Dave Rubin getting suspended. We are all waiting to see if he gets suspended by that

00:29:12.480 because Ben Shapiro says sarcastically that, you know, Dave Rubin that he he got kicked off. And then

00:29:20.580 he says, until five minutes ago, Elliot Page, who is very, very, very male, was a female actress named

00:29:26.800 Ellen Page. And then here's and then Dave Rubin had a statement about that. So I doubt that Ben Shapiro

00:29:34.300 will get kicked off. But I don't know. Jordan Peterson has a huge platform. And so does Dave Rubin

00:29:39.180 and they were kicked off. So that's interesting. All right. I've just got one final thing to react to

00:29:45.480 in talking about this whole transgender gender madness. It is so anti truth. If you want to know what 1.00

00:29:53.720 else I think about it, you can listen to the many episodes we've done in the past. We'll link some

00:29:57.240 of them as well as some abortion episodes if you're curious. But let me play this awesome clip

00:30:02.460 by Macy Gray. She was on Pierce Morgan's show and she had this to say about gender. 1.00

00:30:10.520 And I will say this and everybody's going to hate me. But as a woman, just because you go change your 1.00

00:30:15.860 parts doesn't make you a woman. Right. Sorry. You feel that? I know that for a fact. 0.89

00:30:21.500 I mean, that is only controversial and confusing to people who have replaced their brains with

00:30:30.540 oatmeal. I mean, come on. That's not even like it. That wouldn't even be worth playing

00:30:35.120 five years ago. Like try to explain to someone from 2010 or even like 2014 why this clip is

00:30:43.320 controversial and why she had to backtrack because she did. She was like, I've got nothing

00:30:48.300 but love for the LGBT plus community. Like, you know, basically saying that she's an ally and that

00:30:55.100 her comments were taken out of context or that they were misinterpreted, which is sad that she

00:31:00.980 even feels like she needs to make a statement. She's absolutely right. You don't just get to declare

00:31:05.380 that you are a different gender and all of a sudden you are that thing. Come on. Come on. 1.00

00:31:10.500 Of course, she's getting shellacked for that. But I say stand strong. Macy Gray, like you are on the

00:31:16.420 side of truth. What you said is true. And if it is true, it is worth saying. All right. I hope that

00:31:22.800 you liked that thrown together spontaneous episode that we had for you today. Tomorrow, we've got a lot

00:31:28.520 of good stuff coming for you. Thanks so much for tuning in. We'll see you guys back here then.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - July 06, 2022

Ep 638 ｜ The Suspicious '10-Year-Old Who Needs an Abortion' Story

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript