Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - August 09, 2022


Ep 657 | What the FBI Did to Trump, They'll Do to You


Episode Stats

Length

51 minutes

Words per Minute

161.39851

Word Count

8,357

Sentence Count

495

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

In this episode, I give my reaction to the FBI raid of Donald Trump's home and why conservatives need to be okay with using the power that is at their disposal. I also touch on Stacey Abrams and her comments that she is pro-abortion because of her faith. And I share a personal story about a lack of courage and compassion from men in our culture.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Tuesday. We've got a lot to talk about today. I will give
00:00:05.520 my reaction to the FBI's raid of Donald Trump's home and why I say this is an indication that
00:00:14.000 conservatives need to be okay with using more power, the power that is at our disposal. I got
00:00:22.140 a lot of support for that statement on Twitter. I also got a lot of blowback. So I'm going to break
00:00:26.220 it down and tell you exactly what I mean and why I really do mean it. We are also going to talk just
00:00:32.800 a little bit about the spending bill, what has been not so affectionately dubbed the Inflation
00:00:39.140 Enhancement Act by many Republicans in Congress. I will also touch on Stacey Abrams and her comment
00:00:48.640 that she is pro-abortion because of her faith. What faith exactly is she talking about?
00:00:55.740 And then in the last part of this episode, I will tell you a personal story that I experienced
00:01:03.260 yesterday on the plane and the commentary I think it gives on the dire lack of strength,
00:01:09.680 of courage, and compassion, particularly from a subset of men in our culture. So we will get to
00:01:18.820 all of this and more today. This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers. Go to
00:01:24.800 ranchers.com slash Allie for American meat delivered. That's good ranchers.com slash Allie.
00:01:39.200 Okay. Now, before we get into it, let me tell you a little bit about my travels. So I went to Austin
00:01:45.740 on Friday. I went to Nashville yesterday. Yesterday, I was at Daily Wire. I was filming some stuff with
00:01:53.460 Michael Knowles of Daily Wire. We did a book club video that you guys are going to love. And then we
00:02:00.040 also filmed this like really fun game. So lots of good content coming out from yours truly and the
00:02:07.060 Daily Wire. That all will be out soon. And then on Friday in Austin, I spoke to two different groups,
00:02:14.600 Network of Enlightened Women. They're an awesome conservative female organization.
00:02:19.640 And then I also talked to Patriot Academy, another amazing student organization, and just talked to
00:02:26.140 them about the moment that we are in, the kind of courage, the kind of clarity that this moment in
00:02:32.920 our nation's history calls for, particularly when it comes to not just the courage that we show
00:02:39.320 and communicating and standing for that which is good and right and true, but also electing the right
00:02:45.480 people to represent and fight for these things. And I actually think that what I discussed there,
00:02:52.000 what we talked about there is very pertinent to this story of what happened to Donald Trump at
00:02:58.760 Mar-a-Lago with his home being raided. Look, we are at a very frightening in some ways,
00:03:06.420 a very heated, a very tense point in history where the powers that be are being weaponized against and
00:03:14.760 mobilized against political dissent. That happened when we saw the DOJ announced that they were going
00:03:21.800 to be going after concerned parents who confronted school board members by going to these school board
00:03:27.960 meetings. They basically categorized these parents as domestic terrorists and said the FBI is going to
00:03:35.480 be investigating these parents. I mean, that is a symptom of what is typically referred to
00:03:40.940 as the inherently unstable banana republic. It seems increasingly that that is the direction that
00:03:49.580 we are going, that these institutions that are dominated by progressive ideology are intolerant of
00:03:58.100 dissent. You see, leftists, many have this delusion that is constantly playing in their heads,
00:04:05.540 that they are the underdog, that they are the little guy, and that they are fighting on behalf
00:04:10.780 of the little guy, and that the real threat to democracy, the real threat to freedom are these
00:04:15.600 scary Christian nationalists, these scary, what they would call like Christo-fascist fundamentalists
00:04:23.760 who want to try to conform the country to their own image, who want to try to control the minds and
00:04:31.980 the lives of everyone who is not a right-wing Christian. Like, this is the fantasy that they
00:04:37.940 have going on in their heads 24-7. The reality is, is that every institution, every power that we have,
00:04:49.060 not just nationally, but almost globally as well, is dominated by left-wing ideology. So if you're
00:04:56.940 looking at the federal government, you're looking at our intelligence agencies, you're looking at the
00:05:01.160 leadership in our military, you're looking at our public education system, or academia, or the
00:05:07.100 mainstream media, or Hollywood, or big tech, all of these are dominated by, led by, have been
00:05:16.140 infiltrated by leftists. Institutional capture is very real, and the ideology that has captured all of
00:05:24.500 these institutions that wield all of the power, I think I forgot to mention maybe major corporations,
00:05:30.560 that wield a lot of power, they have been captured by leftism. And so we have seen the result of that.
00:05:39.020 We've seen the result of that in the degradation of our public school system, of academia, of crime
00:05:47.440 stopping and crime response in cities. We have seen public safety go out the window because of this
00:05:55.960 institutional capture by leftists. Progressive ideology is destructive. It is punitive. It is chaotic.
00:06:04.880 It is anarchistic in the consequences that it actually wages, but it is also extremely organized
00:06:14.260 in how it manifests its power. And I think one example of the manifestation of the dangerous
00:06:23.320 and ideological and weaponized power of the leftist state is this raiding of Trump's home
00:06:32.720 in Mar-a-Lago that occurred yesterday. So let me tell you a rundown of what occurred. So the FBI
00:06:40.980 raided Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago on August 8th. This is according to Daily Wire. Trump said this,
00:06:46.700 these are dark times for our nation as my beautiful home Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida is currently
00:06:52.300 under siege, raided and occupied by a large group of FBI agents. After working and cooperating with
00:06:57.980 the relevant government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.
00:07:02.900 Trump claims it was an attempt by the Democrats to weaponize the justice system to stop him
00:07:07.440 from running for president again in 2024 and to hurt Republicans in the midterms.
00:07:11.120 He says they even broke into my safe. It is political targeting at the highest level.
00:07:16.320 Last month, the Washington Post reported again, this is according to the Daily Wire,
00:07:20.640 that the DOJ's investigation into Trump was part of its criminal probe of efforts to overturn
00:07:25.640 the 2020 election results. And that DOJ was looking at areas that could end up ensnaring Trump,
00:07:31.980 including seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct a government proceeding.
00:07:36.720 Here's what the New York Post is reporting. Any search of a private residence would have to be
00:07:41.700 approved by a judge after law enforcement demonstrated probable cause that a search
00:07:45.560 was justified. But in this case, experts said it would have had to come from the highest levels.
00:07:50.920 So this raid is surely one of the most significant the FBI has ever undertaken.
00:07:55.440 Jonathan Schaub, a former attorney advisor in the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department
00:07:59.100 of Justice, told the Miami Herald, it would likely have been approved at the highest levels of the FBI
00:08:03.960 and Justice Department. Schaub, who now works at the University of Kentucky's Rosenberg College of Law,
00:08:08.580 added the raid comes as the Justice Department is examining the actions of Trump in his criminal
00:08:13.120 investigation in the efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Apparently,
00:08:20.720 this also has to do with documents that he brought to his Mar-a-Lago home,
00:08:25.940 but weren't supposed to actually leave the White House. New York Post says federal law
00:08:31.940 bars the removal of classified documents to unauthorized locations, though it is possible
00:08:35.840 that Trump could try to argue that as president he was the ultimate declassification authority.
00:08:40.720 The Washington Post also reported on this and said that like among the things that he took into
00:08:46.000 his home, it was like a cocktail napkin and a dinner menu and a couple other things. But it's
00:08:53.340 interesting that the Washington Post didn't include like what would have been, I guess,
00:08:58.880 serious documents that would have solicited a raid by the FBI. You would think that we would have had
00:09:05.340 some information on that. You would think that the FBI, that the Justice Department would want
00:09:09.820 people to know very quickly that this was a totally legitimate raid. But we still don't know what were
00:09:16.400 the documents that apparently justified them coming into his house and breaking into his safe.
00:09:24.020 It's interesting. We still don't know that. So right now, this looks like a political payback.
00:09:31.420 Like this looks like their attempt to try to inhibit or prohibit Trump from running next term,
00:09:39.940 running in the 2024 election. Now, I hope that's not the case legitimately. While obviously I don't
00:09:46.300 want Trump to be indicted, I don't want him to go to jail. I don't think that that's a good thing.
00:09:51.180 I would rather this be an actually legitimate search and seizure than have to face the fact,
00:10:00.560 which I think is the more likely case, face the fact that our DOJ is basically just the political
00:10:06.920 arm of Democrats and is playing politics with people's lives and with people's freedoms. Now,
00:10:15.360 again, I think that that is the far more likely case considering some of the statements and actions
00:10:21.300 of the head of the DOJ, which is Merrick Garland, particularly against people like you and me,
00:10:27.760 people like those who are going to school board meetings. So based on his actions, based on his
00:10:34.460 ideology, I think it is very likely that the FBI and the DOJ is being weaponized against Donald Trump.
00:10:40.240 I think that also perhaps gives us some clarity into why every Democrat just voted to add 87,000
00:10:48.960 IRS agents to the IRS. Like, what do you think they're going to do with that power? You think
00:10:54.980 they're just going to go after billionaires and millionaires? They're just going to go after the
00:10:59.720 people in charge? No, those IRS agents are very likely for people like you and me. It's probably
00:11:06.000 for political purposes. And so obviously, obviously, the left is not afraid to use the power that they
00:11:16.260 have at their disposal to accomplish the political purposes that they have. Now, the Wall Street Journal
00:11:22.720 is also reporting on this and is trying to kind of enlighten us as to the context of what is really
00:11:30.180 going on here. All right, here's what the Wall Street Journal says about this. Legal historians
00:11:44.800 said they couldn't remember a case in recent history in which the FBI searched the home of
00:11:48.240 a former president. So that's why people are freaking out about this. That sentence right there.
00:11:52.160 That's why it's unprecedented. It's not that there is no possibility whatsoever that a crime has been
00:11:57.020 committed. Of course, there are all kinds of possibilities in any case. And in all cases,
00:12:01.900 of course, we don't believe that anyone should be above the law. We believe that justice should be
00:12:05.660 executed. But again, based on the history of the FBI and the DOJ in general, but specifically of this
00:12:12.080 FBI and DOJ, like there is reason to worry. And because this is the first time that something like
00:12:18.420 this has happened to a former president, this former president happens to be one of the most maligned
00:12:23.500 presidents by Democrats in history. I just don't think that that's a coincidence. That's my personal
00:12:28.740 take. The Wall Street Journal says the search marked an escalation of the Justice Department's
00:12:33.180 investigation into aspects of Mr. Trump's final days in office and is expected to ripple through
00:12:37.620 the run up to November's midterm elections. Again, convenient. Officials can face up to five years in
00:12:42.940 prison for removing classified materials to an unauthorized location. The penalties for breaking other
00:12:47.720 laws related to the removal of official records also include disqualification from holding federal
00:12:54.900 office, including the presidency. Something that people are pointing out is that, OK, even if this
00:13:00.400 if this is the case, like even if there was classified material that had been taken by Donald Trump into
00:13:06.180 his home that justified a raid by the FBI, which like if that is the case, then of course, those materials
00:13:12.860 do need to be handed over. And that would be a breach of the law. And it's a good law. Like it's a good
00:13:18.500 law that those classified materials stay where they are supposed to stay. They are supposed to be
00:13:23.560 protected, of course, for reasons of national security. You don't want that kind of confidential
00:13:28.700 information to be leaving the place where it's protected, where it's supposed supposed to be. But a lot
00:13:34.060 of people are pointing out the obvious duplicity here that, OK, we've got Hunter Biden. We've got the crimes
00:13:42.060 that clearly the Clintons have been a part of. And as far as we know, these families have not been
00:13:48.840 treated with the same harshness, with the same viciousness, with the same severity that Donald
00:13:56.440 Trump has for possibly potentially taking some documents out of the White House. So I think that
00:14:03.180 alone worries people about the lopsided nature of these institutions, of these agencies. House Minority
00:14:10.020 Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican in California, warned that Attorney General Merrick Garland could
00:14:14.640 expect an investigation into the action should the GOP win control of the House in November's
00:14:19.960 midterm election. Will anything actually come of that? I don't know. Many Democrats have been urging
00:14:25.600 Mr. Garland to be more forceful in investigating the former president's actions. Mr. Garland has said a
00:14:30.740 little publicly about the probe, but told reporters recently when asked about the possibility of
00:14:36.180 charging a former president that no person is above the law in this country. Of course, I don't believe
00:14:40.840 any person is above the law, but it seems like what they mean is that no Republican is above the law.
00:14:46.300 It seems like what they mean is no conservative or no non-leftist is above the law. There are plenty of
00:14:51.700 people on the left that are above the law. And then this is a really interesting development, a troubling
00:14:57.280 development. And sorry to sound conspiratorial here, but this is what's being reported. So this is according to
00:15:02.980 New York Post. The judge who approved the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, uh, more Mar-a-Lago once linked to
00:15:11.200 Jeffrey Epstein. I'm sorry. Like this is just too much. It's too much. So this is according to the
00:15:18.640 article, the Florida federal investigation judge who signed off on a search warrant authorizing the
00:15:23.500 FBI raid of former president Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort left the local U.S. attorney's
00:15:28.800 office more than a decade ago to represent employees of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein,
00:15:34.980 who had received received immunity in the long running sex trafficking investigation of the
00:15:39.800 financier. Sources tell the Post that Judge Bruce Reinhardt approved the warrant that enabled federal
00:15:46.160 agents to converge on the palatial South Florida estate on Monday in what Trump called an unannounced
00:15:53.300 raid in my home. He was elevated to magistrate judge in March 2018. After 10 years,
00:15:58.500 in private practice that November, the Miami Herald reported that he had represented several of
00:16:03.720 Epstein's employees, including by Reinhardt's own admission to the outlet Epstein's pilots,
00:16:09.040 his scheduler, Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, who Epstein once reportedly described as his Yugoslavian
00:16:16.560 sex slave. So that's just weird. I have no idea if that is connected in any way here, but I think
00:16:24.080 that's an interesting point that people are going to look at. Of course, when it comes to this, I mean,
00:16:31.020 we hear all the time about these right-wing conspiracy theories, but there seems to be
00:16:36.620 repeatedly, consistently stories that come out that at least affirm parts of what are typically referred
00:16:44.220 to as conspiracy theories. So how is this going to play out? I don't know. But we obviously have a
00:16:52.060 crisis of trust, a crisis of credibility, and we have for a very long time. And it's interesting,
00:16:57.740 the realignment when it comes to the perspective on intelligence agencies and what is often referred
00:17:03.260 to as the security state, the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ, because it used to be classic liberals who were
00:17:12.800 skeptical of the growth of the security state and who were very protective of individuals' civil
00:17:20.620 liberties. And now that skepticism has switched. I mean, Republicans and conservatives have traditionally
00:17:27.720 been the side of law and order. And we still are, of course, in many ways. We believe that the
00:17:35.740 progressive tolerance of crime and murder and recidivism is immoral and wrong and leads to
00:17:42.660 chaos in local cities. But when it comes to the federal government, when it comes to the executive
00:17:47.400 branch, and when it comes to the politicization and the weaponization of our intelligence community
00:17:54.680 and of our security state, it's actually the right now who is calling for the dismantling of these
00:18:01.900 agencies, who is calling for them to be broken up, who is calling for them to be reined in, who is calling
00:18:07.440 for them to have accountability. It's now the right who is skeptical of the FBI and the CIA. That's
00:18:14.240 really switched. And now it's the left who are applauding these agencies and who want these agencies,
00:18:20.660 including the IRS, to have more power. So it's really interesting how this is realigned. And it goes
00:18:27.840 back to that fantasy that I was saying really plays out in the heads of so many leftists, that they are the
00:18:34.600 underdog, that they are the ones without any power, that they're the little guy. No, no, no, no. Like
00:18:40.700 the Democratic Party is the party of the bully, is the party of the security state, is the party of the
00:18:47.580 administrative state, is the party of the wedding of corporate and government power, is the party of a
00:18:54.360 form of fascism, even as they say they are anti-fascist. And what's funny is that I tweeted yesterday
00:19:02.260 in response to all of this. And while I agree, we got to wait for the facts. And maybe we find out
00:19:09.320 things about Trump's guilt or alleged guilt that will surprise us all. I'm still not sure that it
00:19:15.520 justifies the raid that went on. Actually, I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. I think that we can
00:19:20.480 say pretty confidently that politics at least played a part of that. And that alone is scary. So I think
00:19:26.260 that my reaction, even as we wait for all of the facts to come out, is justified when I say that,
00:19:32.220 look, we're not playing games anymore, okay? Like the old Republican way of just sitting on our hands
00:19:41.620 and sitting back and saying, well, we don't play this game that Democrats are playing of using our
00:19:49.520 power for political purposes. And the free market in the next election, they're just going to fix all
00:19:56.680 of this. Kind of like the laissez-faire, sit back, let things happen. Republican Party, we don't want
00:20:03.540 to interfere. We don't want to do anything. All we want to do is lower the corporate tax rate. That GOP,
00:20:10.900 well, the need for that GOP is dead and gone. And therefore, that kind of GOP needs to expire.
00:20:17.860 Look, conservatives are going to have to get more comfortable with electing people
00:20:24.800 that are willing to exercise more power than conservatives have traditionally been okay with.
00:20:34.320 Now, what do I mean by that? Because a lot of people get freaked out when conservatives say that,
00:20:39.560 when Republicans say that. I do not mean the unfettered growth of the government. I don't mean that we
00:20:45.240 should add our own IRS agents. I don't mean that we should be growing the administrative state. I'm not
00:20:52.380 talking about weaponizing the central federal government. I am talking about using the powers
00:21:02.260 that are constitutionally available to you to try to dismantle the left-wing powers that are punishing
00:21:10.980 conservative and non-left-wing constituents. Does that make sense? So let me give you an example
00:21:17.820 because I think Ron DeSantis is a great representation of this. If you think about
00:21:24.520 the whole Disney fiasco and the whole parental rights and education bill that he signed into law
00:21:29.980 that said, hey, you can't teach sexuality and gender switching to kindergartners through third
00:21:34.180 graders that the left absolutely freaked out about. Still gross and creepy that they thought that was
00:21:40.300 bad. Disney came out and said, you know what? We're going to oppose this law and we are going to work
00:21:45.940 day and night to make sure that this law is overturned. So basically, this major corporation
00:21:50.560 said that they are going to set themselves against the will of the constituents of Florida,
00:21:54.280 who elected the representatives and duly elected the governor who created this bill and then signed
00:22:00.240 it into law. That in itself is anti-democratic. So in order to protect the democratic process,
00:22:06.560 in order to protect the wishes of the constituents that wanted this bill, rather than DeSantis saying
00:22:15.480 what Republicans typically do, which is, well, you know, the market will take care of it. Well,
00:22:20.780 you know, people will probably stop going to Disney World and that will be their punishment.
00:22:25.200 Let's just see what happens. Or rather than refusing to criticize Disney because Disney brings
00:22:30.760 in a lot of money to Florida, Ron DeSantis said, no, I'm going to do something about this. I am going
00:22:36.380 to use a tool that is constitutionally available to me, which is taking away the tax privileges of
00:22:42.660 Disney, who basically created themselves or set themselves up as an enemy to many constituents in
00:22:49.900 Florida. That's how you do it. That's what you do. Ron DeSantis also decided to remove a Soros-backed
00:22:56.580 prosecutor in the state of Florida that was refusing to prosecute crimes specifically related
00:23:01.740 to abortion. That is not typical of Republicans. Republicans don't typically make those moves. So
00:23:08.160 when I say that we need to elect Republicans who are willing to use the power and the tools that they
00:23:16.220 have to push good policy and to punish bad policy and to punish bad people, that's the kind of thing
00:23:24.860 I'm talking about. And then, of course, like using the powers that they have to dismantle and
00:23:33.100 reconfigure the security in the administrative state. Yes, absolutely. That's what I'm talking
00:23:39.240 about. And people on the left get so scared. And even some people on the right. When you say things
00:23:44.600 like that, when you talk about power, when you talk about like taking control and using your authority
00:23:49.480 to do something, Republicans and Democrats freak out about Republicans and conservatives advocating
00:23:55.740 for that. On the left, you say, oh, that's just fascism. Like Ali is saying that Republicans need to be
00:24:02.680 okay with exercising more authority and using more power than is traditionally used by conservatives.
00:24:10.480 That's fascism. That's hilarious. Because you, someone on the left, you support the party that is
00:24:17.960 exclusively responsible for any instance of actual fascism in the country today. Like you, as a
00:24:24.500 Democrat, continue to vote for people who are forging an inextricable relationship between powerful
00:24:31.760 corporations in and the government to then punish people who fall outside of the progressive zeitgeist.
00:24:38.720 Like they are they are the ones that are advocating for things like what happened in Canada when Trudeau
00:24:44.700 punished the truckers and the protesters by freezing the funds in their bank accounts. And that happens here with
00:24:50.560 PayPal. When there is an organization like Moms for Liberty that goes against progressivism, PayPal freezes their
00:24:57.900 funds. People on the left are okay with that. So people on the left are totally 100% supportive of actual
00:25:04.860 fascism and the capture of every single powerful institution in this country in order to not only push and
00:25:13.700 force their ideology on the people who are in the jurisdiction of those institutions, but also to
00:25:20.460 punish anyone who opposes their ideology. So when the left says, oh, I'm afraid of fascism, or I'm afraid of
00:25:28.060 theocracy, or I'm afraid of Christian nationalism, they're not actually afraid of theocracy. They're afraid of
00:25:36.300 dissent. They want their own theocracy. They want secular progressivism to be the state-sanctioned
00:25:43.380 religion and to characterize and dominate and tyrannize every institution that they're a part of. And it
00:25:50.760 freaks them out when dissent says, okay, fine, if that's the game you want to play, we are also going
00:25:57.720 to use the power and the tools that are constitutionally available to us to make sure that we are actually
00:26:02.960 the ones dominating the institutions, that we are the ones making the rules. We're going to shift the
00:26:07.340 Overton window over. Oh, you're going to censor good ideas on the right? You're going to punish good people and
00:26:14.340 good organizations over here? The pendulum is going to swing back, baby. It's going to happen. They get so freaked
00:26:20.480 out by that, not because they're afraid of power, but because they're afraid of their enemies using power. Should have
00:26:25.900 thought about that. You should have thought about that when you captured these institutions and then weaponized
00:26:30.540 them against the people that disagreed with you. You should have thought about that. You should have
00:26:35.000 thought about the fact that to every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. And look, as I said,
00:26:42.200 I don't want the unfettered growth of the federal government. I don't. Like, I don't want a political
00:26:48.640 weaponized DOJ, an FBI. I do think, though, that whoever gets in charge, if it's a Republican next,
00:26:55.700 needs to use their power to dismantle these agencies and recreate them, if necessary, in a way
00:27:02.820 that actually represents true and good definitions of impartial justice. So that's what I'm talking
00:27:10.880 about when I'm talking about the right using power. I am talking about the right using power for actual
00:27:16.480 good things, for actual justice, for actual liberty, for actual rights. I mean, not the absolutely
00:27:23.600 deluded and depraved agenda, subversive agenda that the left has when they exercise their power.
00:27:31.300 I think a lot of times, like, we're just moral relativists, especially on the right. Like,
00:27:37.000 we're unwilling to say that power can be used for good things versus power that is used for bad things.
00:27:45.520 Like, we often say, oh, well, no, we don't believe in any kind of indoctrination. We don't believe in
00:27:50.420 any kind of power. We don't believe in, like, any kind of philosophy that should be guiding law and
00:27:58.200 lawmaking. But that's just not possible. Like, nothing is neutral. There are bad ideas. There are
00:28:04.400 good ideas. There's good and there is evil. It's okay to say that the things that we want to do
00:28:10.980 using, like, government power or the curriculum that we want to push are the ideas that, like,
00:28:17.000 that we want to infiltrate these institutions and public schools or whatever are good and left-wing
00:28:22.200 ideas are bad. Like, we don't just have to pretend like we are pushing for neutrality. We're not.
00:28:29.740 Like, we believe that there are good ideas and there are bad ideas. There is a good definition of
00:28:34.460 justice. There's a convoluted definition of justice that's on the left. There's good. There is evil.
00:28:39.700 And I'm not saying that conservatives by any means or the right has, like, some kind of monopoly
00:28:44.640 on good and on justice. I'm saying that we should be unafraid, though, to use all the constitutional
00:28:51.460 tools available to us to push that which is good and right and true when it comes to policy
00:28:56.080 and when it comes to how our systems and agencies work in this country. The left understands that.
00:29:03.260 They understand that nothing is neutral. That's why they dominate every institution that they have
00:29:09.320 with their ideology. What does Oren McIntyre sometimes say? He's a guy that I follow on
00:29:15.000 Twitter. I'll probably, hopefully, have him on the show at some point. And I don't know if it's
00:29:19.040 his original quote, but I've seen him tweet it a lot, is that the side that wants to win will always
00:29:26.600 beat the side that wants to be left alone. So that's where we are. Like, we do have to understand what
00:29:32.620 time it is, right? Like, we have to understand kind of like the threats that we're facing. We
00:29:37.960 have to forsake nostalgia and realize that we as a country are not going to go back to like 1995 or
00:29:42.700 2004 whenever you thought this country was good. Like, whenever the only disagreements that we had
00:29:47.660 between Democrats and Republicans were how involved we should be in Iraq and like how high the corporate
00:29:52.720 tax rate will be. I mean, we're talking about very fundamental moral differences here.
00:29:57.480 Unfortunately, like, that is the battle. That is the division that we're facing.
00:30:01.300 And look, the left is playing ball all while telling you that if you step up to the plate,
00:30:06.760 you're a fascist. I think we just have to kind of recognize that. And we have to use,
00:30:12.380 as I've said a million times now, the tools that are available to us to push that which is good,
00:30:16.420 right? To push truth and to push actual justice and to dismantle the powers that be that are pushing
00:30:24.100 the opposite of that. That's all I'm talking about when I'm talking about Republicans using our power
00:30:30.000 and using the government and the tools that are at our disposal in the government to do that.
00:30:37.240 The left has been doing it for a very long time. That's why we are where we are.
00:30:41.800 All right. One last thing I'll say about that is that this actually helps Donald Trump
00:30:58.040 for Republicans anyway. Like this makes him shoo-in for the Republican nomination. Now,
00:31:06.840 the powers that be certainly are going to do everything to make sure that he is not only
00:31:12.740 not the nominee, but of course that he doesn't win the general election. I'm not saying whether
00:31:18.080 that's bad or good that this is going to basically automatically beat out all of the competition when
00:31:26.680 it comes to the Republican primary. I'm just saying what it is. Like now you are presenting him as like
00:31:32.800 a symbol. As my friend Steve Day said, he is a symbol of opposition to the administrative and
00:31:41.020 the security state that we understand is not just going after Donald Trump, but they're also going
00:31:48.620 after the supporters of Donald Trump. And so that's going to be his message. He's going to say,
00:31:54.880 look, I'm fighting for you because I got skin in this game. They're after me, but really they hate you.
00:32:00.760 They say they hate me, but it's really you you're after. They say they hate my values and what I'm
00:32:05.140 doing. Really what they're saying is hating you. And look, they've created this now. They've created
00:32:10.520 Donald Trump as a symbol when I think if they would have just kind of like let him be, he would have
00:32:15.420 fizzled out. We would have had another star rise up. We probably already have that. And that person
00:32:22.080 could have had a fighting chance in the primary. But if they keep doing this, if they keep basically in
00:32:28.500 some strange way, presenting them, presenting him as like a hair, a hero of opposition, then what
00:32:38.160 they're going to get is him running away with the nomination and possibly potentially if it's fair, the
00:32:43.900 election. So that that's where we are in that. And it's and I also think that this is going to mobilize
00:32:51.740 Republicans when it comes to the midterm elections. I do. I think this actually works in Republicans
00:32:57.560 favor because, look, this is scary. If this is actually like a political weapon against Donald
00:33:05.000 Trump because he's Donald Trump and against Republicans, that scares a lot of people who
00:33:10.400 maybe previously weren't scared, who still were under some delusion that like Joe Biden is going to
00:33:15.980 bring in moderation and unity. Remember that pitch? That's funny. We do know that that the progressive
00:33:24.300 powers are trying to crack down on any dissent. Of course, we've talked a lot about big tax censorship
00:33:32.460 and we experienced that here on this show. Just last week, we got an email from YouTube saying that
00:33:40.020 they totally randomly, without warning, removed my conversation with journalist Julie Kelly about
00:33:46.680 January 6th and the prisoners that are in solitary confinement and are incarcerated because of, in many
00:33:55.920 cases, nonviolent offenses on January 6th. And she talked to me about the corrupt system in place that
00:34:05.820 has unfairly come down on the people who were involved, again, often peacefully in the January 6th riots and
00:34:16.740 protests. Everything that she said was factual. She has backed it up by her own sourcing, her own
00:34:23.260 journalism, her own fact checking herself. And even if it wasn't, like even if it was just her opinion,
00:34:29.740 even if it was just her perspective, so what? There are a million different perspectives on YouTube.
00:34:35.800 A lot of them were straight up garbage and based on abject lies. But because this goes against the
00:34:43.740 approved narrative, we've gotten the episode, I think it's episode 630. Yep, episode 630. It has been
00:34:53.220 removed from YouTube. So I encourage you to go to Blaze TV. Watch it for yourself if you have not already.
00:35:00.500 We've got the link to the episode on Blaze TV in the description of this episode. You can also listen
00:35:08.540 to it on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever you listen while it's still available. So I would
00:35:14.980 hightail it over there right now and listen to that. It's very sinister. It's very sinister. Also,
00:35:21.740 I don't know if I've even talked about, speaking of censorship, I think I did maybe mention it last
00:35:26.480 week that our friend James Lindsay, who has been on here several times, he has been permanently
00:35:30.560 suspended from Twitter. Like we're not talking about a Christian conservative getting kicked off
00:35:36.180 for Christian conservative views, which is often what happens. I mean, we're talking about an agnostic,
00:35:41.420 a political independent who just happens to be against the grooming of children. He got kicked off of
00:35:47.720 Twitter for that. Interesting. I mean, they are, they're turning off the heat right now before
00:35:54.700 the midterms. It's very, very sinister and very, dare I say, in some cases, demonic. Speaking of demonic,
00:36:03.700 the IRS, as I mentioned a few minutes ago, they've added 87,000 employees, according to this Inflation
00:36:12.960 Reduction Act, so-called, that just passed the Senate that was completely partisan. No Republicans
00:36:19.060 voted for it. Only Democrats voted for it. The tiebreaker, of course, was Vice President Kamala
00:36:25.680 Harris. And so there's a lot to analyze in this particular bill. As Representative Thomas Massey
00:36:33.020 of Kentucky has said, it's actually an inflation enhancement bill, that it's going to make inflation
00:36:39.060 worse, of course, because it's spending. And so that's just what we know about what makes inflation
00:36:44.560 worse. They said it's for the climate. They said it's for the economy, that it's going to lower costs,
00:36:49.620 it's going to help inflation. It's actually probably going to do the opposite. And it's looking like
00:36:53.480 it's going to raise taxes on most severely and disproportionately the middle working class,
00:37:00.600 people who make more than $30,000 a year. And of course, Joe Biden is saying that he's only going
00:37:05.560 to tax the rich. I guess that's true if you consider someone who makes $35,000 a year rich.
00:37:12.060 And so unfortunately, even some of the Democrats that we consider to be moderate, they voted for
00:37:20.100 the bill. There were many amendments that Republicans tried to pass to add to the bill that Democrats
00:37:26.420 struck down. And so remember that when the pain gets worse, remember that when costs don't go down,
00:37:32.800 remember that when your taxes go up. Remember that when your small business is getting audited by
00:37:38.800 these new IRS agents. Remember that. Remember who forged this, who authored this, who voted for this,
00:37:46.400 and who didn't. And again, I will say it really matters who we elect in November. That really matters.
00:37:54.380 It can't just be someone with an R by their name. It's got to be people who are fighters. And I think that
00:37:59.800 we're doing that. I think actually the election of Carrie Lake, for example, as the Republican
00:38:07.980 candidate in Arizona, Blake Masters, Senate candidate in Arizona. We've also got J.D. Vance,
00:38:16.000 of course, Senate candidate in Ohio. And Joe Kent's, I think, representative candidate in Washington.
00:38:24.120 He just won the Republican primary. And so I do think that we have like a new crop of Republicans
00:38:31.860 who know what's at stake and who know what time it is and who aren't just going to vote no on these
00:38:37.260 bills, but hopefully are going to push really good legislation. So I just wanted to make sure
00:38:43.760 that we covered that briefly. There are some other things that I also just wanted to talk about.
00:38:51.300 First, let's let's stick with politics. And let's first talk about Stacey Abrams and her
00:38:57.060 recent comments about pro-choice being a part of her faith. So we're talking about electing good
00:39:04.100 people that are going to push good policy and that are going to fight for the values that you and I
00:39:08.920 hold dear. Let's look at the opposite end of the spectrum and look at someone like Stacey
00:39:13.600 Abrams. So this is according to TheBlaze.com. The headline is Stacey Abrams says being pro-choice is part
00:39:20.620 of her faith. And according to her faith, you protect the vulnerable and you wrap them up in
00:39:24.900 your love. Oh, the irony. Oh, the irony. So she says the decision to be pro-choice is exactly part of
00:39:33.300 my faith. I cannot strike down another person's rights simply because I don't agree. So it might
00:39:42.660 be a part of her faith. The question is, what does she worship? She doesn't worship the God of
00:39:46.720 Scripture, of course, who demanded the death penalty for child sacrifice, who says that he
00:39:52.420 made us in our mother's womb fearfully and wonderfully. She doesn't worship the God who
00:40:01.380 says, let the little children come to me for to such as these belong the kingdom of heaven.
00:40:06.220 She worships the God of self. The God of self has two supreme values, and that's autonomy and
00:40:12.440 authenticity. Autonomy and authenticity can be two very good things, very good values. But when they
00:40:19.240 are not submitted to a higher authority, the God of Scripture, they actually become idols that then
00:40:25.300 justify sin, that then justify us doing whatever we want to do, as long as it serves A, our autonomy,
00:40:33.540 our control over ourselves in our lives, and B, our authenticity, being ourselves. That's what abortion is.
00:40:40.200 It is serving the God of self and one of its subsidiaries, which is the idol of autonomy,
00:40:47.680 that you are even willing to sacrifice the life of another human being if that means that it is
00:40:54.320 serving the control that you want to have. And then, of course, how we see the idol of authenticity
00:40:59.920 show up is, well, I can be anyone that I want to be. I can be whatever I feel, even if that is
00:41:08.340 sacrificing your own body and sacrificing your reality on that altar. Autonomy and authenticity
00:41:15.560 can be two good values, but only when they are submitted to Christ. Only when they are submitted
00:41:20.880 to God's law. Only when they are submitted to what God says, the phrase that we say so often,
00:41:26.340 is good and right and true. So, this idea that she has to defend abortion according to her faith
00:41:33.140 might be true, but that is because she ascribes to not Christianity, but to secular humanism,
00:41:38.120 which has a God and the God is self. So, please don't vote for Stacey Abrams. Please do whatever
00:41:46.800 you can to make sure that she does not win. I don't think that she would. It would be a disaster for my
00:41:52.780 beloved state of Georgia. I love Georgia. I have a lot of family there, lived there, met my husband
00:41:58.440 there. It's a great place. It's got a lot of libs there, 100%. But let's make a better decision.
00:42:04.480 Let's not, let's not vote that silly woman in office.
00:42:17.880 All right. Let me tell you a little, a little story, a little, I just want to go on a little rant.
00:42:23.260 So, yesterday, I was flying home from Nashville. And there was a woman. She was an older lady. I
00:42:32.520 would guess she was probably 85. And she was using a cane to walk. And she was standing outside of
00:42:39.560 the bathroom, which was right next to my seat. And I saw that she was swaying. And she had a hard time
00:42:46.500 holding on to, holding on to the walls. And it was turbulent. And I saw that the flight attendants
00:42:53.620 were trying to talk to her. And they were telling her, hey, you really need to, you really need to
00:42:59.600 go sit down. It's going to be bumpy. But they were not getting up from their seats. And it was very
00:43:04.440 clear to me that she could not understand what they were saying. Turns out she could not speak
00:43:09.360 English. I don't know what language she was speaking, but she couldn't speak English. She was
00:43:12.820 clearly very confused. I'm not sure that she could see very well either. I mean, we're talking about a
00:43:17.700 very feeble older woman. I thought maybe she was trying to get into the bathroom, but the bathroom
00:43:23.240 wasn't occupied. And so, everyone was just like looking at this situation. And this has nothing to
00:43:29.600 do with me being valiant or anything. When I say that it caused me like zero inconvenience or sacrifice
00:43:36.560 whatsoever, I mean that. And this is not the point of the story. But I just stood up. I asked the
00:43:42.280 flight attendants like, what's going on here? Does she need help being stabilized while she's waiting
00:43:46.860 for the bathroom? And they were saying, oh, she needs to go back to her seat. She needs to go back
00:43:51.120 to her seat. And so, I was like, okay. Well, I don't really, I was thinking, I don't really understand
00:43:57.200 why no, like the flight attendants aren't doing anything about that. So, long story short, I led this
00:44:02.540 older lady back to her seat. She sat down. And on the way back, I had these men. It turns out I was
00:44:10.660 sitting around, like six adult, able-bodied men who had just been looking on with their mouths
00:44:16.100 hanging open. One of them gave me a fist bump. One of them was like, wow, that was so nice of you.
00:44:22.680 And I just thought, you know, I'm thankful to have done it. It was really easy. It took two seconds of
00:44:28.100 my life. It took like no, as I said, sacrifice whatsoever to do that. But why was it me? Why was it
00:44:36.080 me? Why did none of those adult, able-bodied men who are all standing there with their mouths open,
00:44:42.720 like a large mouth bass, why didn't they do anything? Like, why didn't they stand up and say,
00:44:47.880 you know, this is a feeble old lady and how society is ordered. Adult men, able-bodied men
00:44:54.940 are supposed to be the ones to first step up for the most vulnerable. They're supposed to be the ones
00:45:00.380 to step up on behalf of the weak, of the elderly, of the child, of the woman. Why are all these men
00:45:06.980 just sitting there while this woman is unable to stabilize herself? Why is it me? Why is it that,
00:45:14.580 why is it the young woman, the only person who was like, okay, maybe I can take my AirPods out and pay
00:45:19.260 attention to what's going on. I still don't even know why the flight attendants like didn't do the
00:45:23.340 same thing. Why are they just sitting there unwilling to like help this woman back to her seat? I don't
00:45:29.520 know. But it made me very sad for society. I don't think that I am better than any of the people
00:45:34.920 sitting around me. I think that I decided to tune in for a second to like pay attention to do something
00:45:40.140 that wasn't very difficult at all. But the fact of the matter is, is that most people, and I think
00:45:45.000 that includes men, and most disastrously that includes men, most people don't want to look up
00:45:53.040 from what they're doing. Most people don't want to even be slightly inconvenienced, or they have been
00:45:59.960 so trained to not involve themselves in the affairs and circumstances of other people that they would
00:46:06.220 literally watch an elderly woman like fall to the ground before they would get their butts out of
00:46:12.660 their seat and do something about it. And I really wanted to get on the intercom after I got like a fist
00:46:19.720 bump and a pep talk from one of the guys who was sitting around me and say, I don't want your fist
00:46:24.740 bumps. I don't want your pep talks. I want you to do something. Like I want you to be a man. I want you
00:46:30.820 to do what men are supposed to do, which is advocate on behalf of the most vulnerable. I'm happy to do it.
00:46:37.640 I think all able-bodied people should stand for the weak and should help people who need it. But if that
00:46:45.780 wasn't a commentary on the lack of masculinity in many cases and the lack of responsibility
00:46:52.900 in our society and the lack of compassion, I don't know what is. And look, you are not looking at a
00:46:59.140 man-hater. I am so thankful for healthy masculinity. I am so thankful for men. I am so thankful for male
00:47:07.440 leadership, male mentorship, and fatherhood. I think that that's absolutely integral to society,
00:47:14.720 which is exactly why I'm saying what I'm saying, is that you got a lot of soy boys out there,
00:47:19.840 a lot of weak men, a lot of scared people who can't be bothered, who don't really care about
00:47:27.220 the most vulnerable, and who don't see themselves as responsible for the people around them.
00:47:32.780 And this might have just been a small example, a small situation, but I do think it's a representation
00:47:38.380 of a problem that we have in general. And if you haven't listened to yesterday's episode
00:47:43.220 about the importance of the family structure and family formation, particularly the presence
00:47:47.900 of strong fathers, then you should go listen to that. Because that gives some statistical
00:47:54.040 backing to what I'm talking about. And it gives some data that I think supports this idea that we
00:48:03.520 are dealing with a crisis of a lack of masculinity and strong fathers and father figures and men as
00:48:10.360 strong examples in our society. And it also links to everything else that we're talking about.
00:48:16.280 That now, the moment of history that we're in, whether it's moral, theological, political,
00:48:24.800 cultural, social, it calls for strong, brave, courageous, and clear men. Yes, women too. Yes,
00:48:35.300 moms. I mean, I'm out here talking about these things. But, you know, I read in The Lion,
00:48:40.860 the Witch, and the Wardrobe the other day, I think it was, I think it's Father Christmas who says this,
00:48:46.220 not Aslan. Yes, it's Father Christmas. Father Christmas gives Lucy, the youngest daughter,
00:48:53.320 like a dagger and potion, healing potion, and says, you know, this is for anytime someone is hurt,
00:49:01.040 you can heal them. And she says, you know, I think that I'm brave enough to fight in a battle.
00:49:06.120 And Father Christmas says, that's not the point. The point is not whether you are brave enough. You
00:49:10.640 are not to fight in this battle because wars get ugly when women fight them. Ooh, that's politically
00:49:16.860 incorrect, but it is true. It is true. We need men to be on the front lines. We need men to be taking
00:49:23.540 that role. Yes, women can be courageous and we can have our roles. Absolutely. Obviously,
00:49:29.280 I believe that, but we cannot replace men. So men, first of all, thank you to those of you who do
00:49:35.020 step up every day. I respect you. I'm thankful for you. But those who don't, now's the time. Now's
00:49:41.040 the time. We need it. And also, by the way, I do think someone asked me about like Republicans
00:49:57.600 exercising power to push policies that are good and to do things that are good and just.
00:50:03.660 And this is someone on the left, of course, pronouns in the profile saying, is that really
00:50:08.160 Christ-like to amass power? Of course, what that person means is that it's Christ-like for Democrats
00:50:12.540 to amass power, but apparently not Republicans. And as I've already said, I don't believe in amassing
00:50:17.360 power for the sake of amassing power. I don't believe that. But yes, I do actually think that it is
00:50:25.080 representative of a Christian value system to go after bad things and to do good things and to
00:50:34.240 punish injustice and to promote justice and to be harsh against those who misuse their power to crush
00:50:42.660 those who are weak and to be soft and gentle towards those who are vulnerable and are being depressed
00:50:48.240 and who are without help. So the answer to that is yes. And of course, the opposite of that,
00:50:58.320 the opposite for advocating for the vulnerable and the oppressed is every value that the left-wing
00:51:05.120 ideology has, whether you are looking at the sacrifice of children and abortion or whether you
00:51:09.800 are looking at the sacrifice of children when it comes to gender ideology or when it comes to
00:51:17.740 the disproportionate effect of bad COVID policy and restrictions on both the elderly and children
00:51:23.720 and the poor, the exact opposite of a Christian value economy and the exact opposite of caring for
00:51:35.280 the oppressed is what Democrats and progressives continually put forward, which of course is why
00:51:40.500 I believe in pushing back against it with everything that we have. All right, that's all I've got time
00:51:45.360 for today. We'll see you back here tomorrow.