Ep 657 | What the FBI Did to Trump, They'll Do to You
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
161.39851
Summary
In this episode, I give my reaction to the FBI raid of Donald Trump's home and why conservatives need to be okay with using the power that is at their disposal. I also touch on Stacey Abrams and her comments that she is pro-abortion because of her faith. And I share a personal story about a lack of courage and compassion from men in our culture.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Tuesday. We've got a lot to talk about today. I will give
00:00:05.520
my reaction to the FBI's raid of Donald Trump's home and why I say this is an indication that
00:00:14.000
conservatives need to be okay with using more power, the power that is at our disposal. I got
00:00:22.140
a lot of support for that statement on Twitter. I also got a lot of blowback. So I'm going to break
00:00:26.220
it down and tell you exactly what I mean and why I really do mean it. We are also going to talk just
00:00:32.800
a little bit about the spending bill, what has been not so affectionately dubbed the Inflation
00:00:39.140
Enhancement Act by many Republicans in Congress. I will also touch on Stacey Abrams and her comment
00:00:48.640
that she is pro-abortion because of her faith. What faith exactly is she talking about?
00:00:55.740
And then in the last part of this episode, I will tell you a personal story that I experienced
00:01:03.260
yesterday on the plane and the commentary I think it gives on the dire lack of strength,
00:01:09.680
of courage, and compassion, particularly from a subset of men in our culture. So we will get to
00:01:18.820
all of this and more today. This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers. Go to
00:01:24.800
ranchers.com slash Allie for American meat delivered. That's good ranchers.com slash Allie.
00:01:39.200
Okay. Now, before we get into it, let me tell you a little bit about my travels. So I went to Austin
00:01:45.740
on Friday. I went to Nashville yesterday. Yesterday, I was at Daily Wire. I was filming some stuff with
00:01:53.460
Michael Knowles of Daily Wire. We did a book club video that you guys are going to love. And then we
00:02:00.040
also filmed this like really fun game. So lots of good content coming out from yours truly and the
00:02:07.060
Daily Wire. That all will be out soon. And then on Friday in Austin, I spoke to two different groups,
00:02:14.600
Network of Enlightened Women. They're an awesome conservative female organization.
00:02:19.640
And then I also talked to Patriot Academy, another amazing student organization, and just talked to
00:02:26.140
them about the moment that we are in, the kind of courage, the kind of clarity that this moment in
00:02:32.920
our nation's history calls for, particularly when it comes to not just the courage that we show
00:02:39.320
and communicating and standing for that which is good and right and true, but also electing the right
00:02:45.480
people to represent and fight for these things. And I actually think that what I discussed there,
00:02:52.000
what we talked about there is very pertinent to this story of what happened to Donald Trump at
00:02:58.760
Mar-a-Lago with his home being raided. Look, we are at a very frightening in some ways,
00:03:06.420
a very heated, a very tense point in history where the powers that be are being weaponized against and
00:03:14.760
mobilized against political dissent. That happened when we saw the DOJ announced that they were going
00:03:21.800
to be going after concerned parents who confronted school board members by going to these school board
00:03:27.960
meetings. They basically categorized these parents as domestic terrorists and said the FBI is going to
00:03:35.480
be investigating these parents. I mean, that is a symptom of what is typically referred to
00:03:40.940
as the inherently unstable banana republic. It seems increasingly that that is the direction that
00:03:49.580
we are going, that these institutions that are dominated by progressive ideology are intolerant of
00:03:58.100
dissent. You see, leftists, many have this delusion that is constantly playing in their heads,
00:04:05.540
that they are the underdog, that they are the little guy, and that they are fighting on behalf
00:04:10.780
of the little guy, and that the real threat to democracy, the real threat to freedom are these
00:04:15.600
scary Christian nationalists, these scary, what they would call like Christo-fascist fundamentalists
00:04:23.760
who want to try to conform the country to their own image, who want to try to control the minds and
00:04:31.980
the lives of everyone who is not a right-wing Christian. Like, this is the fantasy that they
00:04:37.940
have going on in their heads 24-7. The reality is, is that every institution, every power that we have,
00:04:49.060
not just nationally, but almost globally as well, is dominated by left-wing ideology. So if you're
00:04:56.940
looking at the federal government, you're looking at our intelligence agencies, you're looking at the
00:05:01.160
leadership in our military, you're looking at our public education system, or academia, or the
00:05:07.100
mainstream media, or Hollywood, or big tech, all of these are dominated by, led by, have been
00:05:16.140
infiltrated by leftists. Institutional capture is very real, and the ideology that has captured all of
00:05:24.500
these institutions that wield all of the power, I think I forgot to mention maybe major corporations,
00:05:30.560
that wield a lot of power, they have been captured by leftism. And so we have seen the result of that.
00:05:39.020
We've seen the result of that in the degradation of our public school system, of academia, of crime
00:05:47.440
stopping and crime response in cities. We have seen public safety go out the window because of this
00:05:55.960
institutional capture by leftists. Progressive ideology is destructive. It is punitive. It is chaotic.
00:06:04.880
It is anarchistic in the consequences that it actually wages, but it is also extremely organized
00:06:14.260
in how it manifests its power. And I think one example of the manifestation of the dangerous
00:06:23.320
and ideological and weaponized power of the leftist state is this raiding of Trump's home
00:06:32.720
in Mar-a-Lago that occurred yesterday. So let me tell you a rundown of what occurred. So the FBI
00:06:40.980
raided Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago on August 8th. This is according to Daily Wire. Trump said this,
00:06:46.700
these are dark times for our nation as my beautiful home Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida is currently
00:06:52.300
under siege, raided and occupied by a large group of FBI agents. After working and cooperating with
00:06:57.980
the relevant government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.
00:07:02.900
Trump claims it was an attempt by the Democrats to weaponize the justice system to stop him
00:07:07.440
from running for president again in 2024 and to hurt Republicans in the midterms.
00:07:11.120
He says they even broke into my safe. It is political targeting at the highest level.
00:07:16.320
Last month, the Washington Post reported again, this is according to the Daily Wire,
00:07:20.640
that the DOJ's investigation into Trump was part of its criminal probe of efforts to overturn
00:07:25.640
the 2020 election results. And that DOJ was looking at areas that could end up ensnaring Trump,
00:07:31.980
including seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct a government proceeding.
00:07:36.720
Here's what the New York Post is reporting. Any search of a private residence would have to be
00:07:41.700
approved by a judge after law enforcement demonstrated probable cause that a search
00:07:45.560
was justified. But in this case, experts said it would have had to come from the highest levels.
00:07:50.920
So this raid is surely one of the most significant the FBI has ever undertaken.
00:07:55.440
Jonathan Schaub, a former attorney advisor in the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department
00:07:59.100
of Justice, told the Miami Herald, it would likely have been approved at the highest levels of the FBI
00:08:03.960
and Justice Department. Schaub, who now works at the University of Kentucky's Rosenberg College of Law,
00:08:08.580
added the raid comes as the Justice Department is examining the actions of Trump in his criminal
00:08:13.120
investigation in the efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Apparently,
00:08:20.720
this also has to do with documents that he brought to his Mar-a-Lago home,
00:08:25.940
but weren't supposed to actually leave the White House. New York Post says federal law
00:08:31.940
bars the removal of classified documents to unauthorized locations, though it is possible
00:08:35.840
that Trump could try to argue that as president he was the ultimate declassification authority.
00:08:40.720
The Washington Post also reported on this and said that like among the things that he took into
00:08:46.000
his home, it was like a cocktail napkin and a dinner menu and a couple other things. But it's
00:08:53.340
interesting that the Washington Post didn't include like what would have been, I guess,
00:08:58.880
serious documents that would have solicited a raid by the FBI. You would think that we would have had
00:09:05.340
some information on that. You would think that the FBI, that the Justice Department would want
00:09:09.820
people to know very quickly that this was a totally legitimate raid. But we still don't know what were
00:09:16.400
the documents that apparently justified them coming into his house and breaking into his safe.
00:09:24.020
It's interesting. We still don't know that. So right now, this looks like a political payback.
00:09:31.420
Like this looks like their attempt to try to inhibit or prohibit Trump from running next term,
00:09:39.940
running in the 2024 election. Now, I hope that's not the case legitimately. While obviously I don't
00:09:46.300
want Trump to be indicted, I don't want him to go to jail. I don't think that that's a good thing.
00:09:51.180
I would rather this be an actually legitimate search and seizure than have to face the fact,
00:10:00.560
which I think is the more likely case, face the fact that our DOJ is basically just the political
00:10:06.920
arm of Democrats and is playing politics with people's lives and with people's freedoms. Now,
00:10:15.360
again, I think that that is the far more likely case considering some of the statements and actions
00:10:21.300
of the head of the DOJ, which is Merrick Garland, particularly against people like you and me,
00:10:27.760
people like those who are going to school board meetings. So based on his actions, based on his
00:10:34.460
ideology, I think it is very likely that the FBI and the DOJ is being weaponized against Donald Trump.
00:10:40.240
I think that also perhaps gives us some clarity into why every Democrat just voted to add 87,000
00:10:48.960
IRS agents to the IRS. Like, what do you think they're going to do with that power? You think
00:10:54.980
they're just going to go after billionaires and millionaires? They're just going to go after the
00:10:59.720
people in charge? No, those IRS agents are very likely for people like you and me. It's probably
00:11:06.000
for political purposes. And so obviously, obviously, the left is not afraid to use the power that they
00:11:16.260
have at their disposal to accomplish the political purposes that they have. Now, the Wall Street Journal
00:11:22.720
is also reporting on this and is trying to kind of enlighten us as to the context of what is really
00:11:30.180
going on here. All right, here's what the Wall Street Journal says about this. Legal historians
00:11:44.800
said they couldn't remember a case in recent history in which the FBI searched the home of
00:11:48.240
a former president. So that's why people are freaking out about this. That sentence right there.
00:11:52.160
That's why it's unprecedented. It's not that there is no possibility whatsoever that a crime has been
00:11:57.020
committed. Of course, there are all kinds of possibilities in any case. And in all cases,
00:12:01.900
of course, we don't believe that anyone should be above the law. We believe that justice should be
00:12:05.660
executed. But again, based on the history of the FBI and the DOJ in general, but specifically of this
00:12:12.080
FBI and DOJ, like there is reason to worry. And because this is the first time that something like
00:12:18.420
this has happened to a former president, this former president happens to be one of the most maligned
00:12:23.500
presidents by Democrats in history. I just don't think that that's a coincidence. That's my personal
00:12:28.740
take. The Wall Street Journal says the search marked an escalation of the Justice Department's
00:12:33.180
investigation into aspects of Mr. Trump's final days in office and is expected to ripple through
00:12:37.620
the run up to November's midterm elections. Again, convenient. Officials can face up to five years in
00:12:42.940
prison for removing classified materials to an unauthorized location. The penalties for breaking other
00:12:47.720
laws related to the removal of official records also include disqualification from holding federal
00:12:54.900
office, including the presidency. Something that people are pointing out is that, OK, even if this
00:13:00.400
if this is the case, like even if there was classified material that had been taken by Donald Trump into
00:13:06.180
his home that justified a raid by the FBI, which like if that is the case, then of course, those materials
00:13:12.860
do need to be handed over. And that would be a breach of the law. And it's a good law. Like it's a good
00:13:18.500
law that those classified materials stay where they are supposed to stay. They are supposed to be
00:13:23.560
protected, of course, for reasons of national security. You don't want that kind of confidential
00:13:28.700
information to be leaving the place where it's protected, where it's supposed supposed to be. But a lot
00:13:34.060
of people are pointing out the obvious duplicity here that, OK, we've got Hunter Biden. We've got the crimes
00:13:42.060
that clearly the Clintons have been a part of. And as far as we know, these families have not been
00:13:48.840
treated with the same harshness, with the same viciousness, with the same severity that Donald
00:13:56.440
Trump has for possibly potentially taking some documents out of the White House. So I think that
00:14:03.180
alone worries people about the lopsided nature of these institutions, of these agencies. House Minority
00:14:10.020
Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican in California, warned that Attorney General Merrick Garland could
00:14:14.640
expect an investigation into the action should the GOP win control of the House in November's
00:14:19.960
midterm election. Will anything actually come of that? I don't know. Many Democrats have been urging
00:14:25.600
Mr. Garland to be more forceful in investigating the former president's actions. Mr. Garland has said a
00:14:30.740
little publicly about the probe, but told reporters recently when asked about the possibility of
00:14:36.180
charging a former president that no person is above the law in this country. Of course, I don't believe
00:14:40.840
any person is above the law, but it seems like what they mean is that no Republican is above the law.
00:14:46.300
It seems like what they mean is no conservative or no non-leftist is above the law. There are plenty of
00:14:51.700
people on the left that are above the law. And then this is a really interesting development, a troubling
00:14:57.280
development. And sorry to sound conspiratorial here, but this is what's being reported. So this is according to
00:15:02.980
New York Post. The judge who approved the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, uh, more Mar-a-Lago once linked to
00:15:11.200
Jeffrey Epstein. I'm sorry. Like this is just too much. It's too much. So this is according to the
00:15:18.640
article, the Florida federal investigation judge who signed off on a search warrant authorizing the
00:15:23.500
FBI raid of former president Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort left the local U.S. attorney's
00:15:28.800
office more than a decade ago to represent employees of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein,
00:15:34.980
who had received received immunity in the long running sex trafficking investigation of the
00:15:39.800
financier. Sources tell the Post that Judge Bruce Reinhardt approved the warrant that enabled federal
00:15:46.160
agents to converge on the palatial South Florida estate on Monday in what Trump called an unannounced
00:15:53.300
raid in my home. He was elevated to magistrate judge in March 2018. After 10 years,
00:15:58.500
in private practice that November, the Miami Herald reported that he had represented several of
00:16:03.720
Epstein's employees, including by Reinhardt's own admission to the outlet Epstein's pilots,
00:16:09.040
his scheduler, Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, who Epstein once reportedly described as his Yugoslavian
00:16:16.560
sex slave. So that's just weird. I have no idea if that is connected in any way here, but I think
00:16:24.080
that's an interesting point that people are going to look at. Of course, when it comes to this, I mean,
00:16:31.020
we hear all the time about these right-wing conspiracy theories, but there seems to be
00:16:36.620
repeatedly, consistently stories that come out that at least affirm parts of what are typically referred
00:16:44.220
to as conspiracy theories. So how is this going to play out? I don't know. But we obviously have a
00:16:52.060
crisis of trust, a crisis of credibility, and we have for a very long time. And it's interesting,
00:16:57.740
the realignment when it comes to the perspective on intelligence agencies and what is often referred
00:17:03.260
to as the security state, the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ, because it used to be classic liberals who were
00:17:12.800
skeptical of the growth of the security state and who were very protective of individuals' civil
00:17:20.620
liberties. And now that skepticism has switched. I mean, Republicans and conservatives have traditionally
00:17:27.720
been the side of law and order. And we still are, of course, in many ways. We believe that the
00:17:35.740
progressive tolerance of crime and murder and recidivism is immoral and wrong and leads to
00:17:42.660
chaos in local cities. But when it comes to the federal government, when it comes to the executive
00:17:47.400
branch, and when it comes to the politicization and the weaponization of our intelligence community
00:17:54.680
and of our security state, it's actually the right now who is calling for the dismantling of these
00:18:01.900
agencies, who is calling for them to be broken up, who is calling for them to be reined in, who is calling
00:18:07.440
for them to have accountability. It's now the right who is skeptical of the FBI and the CIA. That's
00:18:14.240
really switched. And now it's the left who are applauding these agencies and who want these agencies,
00:18:20.660
including the IRS, to have more power. So it's really interesting how this is realigned. And it goes
00:18:27.840
back to that fantasy that I was saying really plays out in the heads of so many leftists, that they are the
00:18:34.600
underdog, that they are the ones without any power, that they're the little guy. No, no, no, no. Like
00:18:40.700
the Democratic Party is the party of the bully, is the party of the security state, is the party of the
00:18:47.580
administrative state, is the party of the wedding of corporate and government power, is the party of a
00:18:54.360
form of fascism, even as they say they are anti-fascist. And what's funny is that I tweeted yesterday
00:19:02.260
in response to all of this. And while I agree, we got to wait for the facts. And maybe we find out
00:19:09.320
things about Trump's guilt or alleged guilt that will surprise us all. I'm still not sure that it
00:19:15.520
justifies the raid that went on. Actually, I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. I think that we can
00:19:20.480
say pretty confidently that politics at least played a part of that. And that alone is scary. So I think
00:19:26.260
that my reaction, even as we wait for all of the facts to come out, is justified when I say that,
00:19:32.220
look, we're not playing games anymore, okay? Like the old Republican way of just sitting on our hands
00:19:41.620
and sitting back and saying, well, we don't play this game that Democrats are playing of using our
00:19:49.520
power for political purposes. And the free market in the next election, they're just going to fix all
00:19:56.680
of this. Kind of like the laissez-faire, sit back, let things happen. Republican Party, we don't want
00:20:03.540
to interfere. We don't want to do anything. All we want to do is lower the corporate tax rate. That GOP,
00:20:10.900
well, the need for that GOP is dead and gone. And therefore, that kind of GOP needs to expire.
00:20:17.860
Look, conservatives are going to have to get more comfortable with electing people
00:20:24.800
that are willing to exercise more power than conservatives have traditionally been okay with.
00:20:34.320
Now, what do I mean by that? Because a lot of people get freaked out when conservatives say that,
00:20:39.560
when Republicans say that. I do not mean the unfettered growth of the government. I don't mean that we
00:20:45.240
should add our own IRS agents. I don't mean that we should be growing the administrative state. I'm not
00:20:52.380
talking about weaponizing the central federal government. I am talking about using the powers
00:21:02.260
that are constitutionally available to you to try to dismantle the left-wing powers that are punishing
00:21:10.980
conservative and non-left-wing constituents. Does that make sense? So let me give you an example
00:21:17.820
because I think Ron DeSantis is a great representation of this. If you think about
00:21:24.520
the whole Disney fiasco and the whole parental rights and education bill that he signed into law
00:21:29.980
that said, hey, you can't teach sexuality and gender switching to kindergartners through third
00:21:34.180
graders that the left absolutely freaked out about. Still gross and creepy that they thought that was
00:21:40.300
bad. Disney came out and said, you know what? We're going to oppose this law and we are going to work
00:21:45.940
day and night to make sure that this law is overturned. So basically, this major corporation
00:21:50.560
said that they are going to set themselves against the will of the constituents of Florida,
00:21:54.280
who elected the representatives and duly elected the governor who created this bill and then signed
00:22:00.240
it into law. That in itself is anti-democratic. So in order to protect the democratic process,
00:22:06.560
in order to protect the wishes of the constituents that wanted this bill, rather than DeSantis saying
00:22:15.480
what Republicans typically do, which is, well, you know, the market will take care of it. Well,
00:22:20.780
you know, people will probably stop going to Disney World and that will be their punishment.
00:22:25.200
Let's just see what happens. Or rather than refusing to criticize Disney because Disney brings
00:22:30.760
in a lot of money to Florida, Ron DeSantis said, no, I'm going to do something about this. I am going
00:22:36.380
to use a tool that is constitutionally available to me, which is taking away the tax privileges of
00:22:42.660
Disney, who basically created themselves or set themselves up as an enemy to many constituents in
00:22:49.900
Florida. That's how you do it. That's what you do. Ron DeSantis also decided to remove a Soros-backed
00:22:56.580
prosecutor in the state of Florida that was refusing to prosecute crimes specifically related
00:23:01.740
to abortion. That is not typical of Republicans. Republicans don't typically make those moves. So
00:23:08.160
when I say that we need to elect Republicans who are willing to use the power and the tools that they
00:23:16.220
have to push good policy and to punish bad policy and to punish bad people, that's the kind of thing
00:23:24.860
I'm talking about. And then, of course, like using the powers that they have to dismantle and
00:23:33.100
reconfigure the security in the administrative state. Yes, absolutely. That's what I'm talking
00:23:39.240
about. And people on the left get so scared. And even some people on the right. When you say things
00:23:44.600
like that, when you talk about power, when you talk about like taking control and using your authority
00:23:49.480
to do something, Republicans and Democrats freak out about Republicans and conservatives advocating
00:23:55.740
for that. On the left, you say, oh, that's just fascism. Like Ali is saying that Republicans need to be
00:24:02.680
okay with exercising more authority and using more power than is traditionally used by conservatives.
00:24:10.480
That's fascism. That's hilarious. Because you, someone on the left, you support the party that is
00:24:17.960
exclusively responsible for any instance of actual fascism in the country today. Like you, as a
00:24:24.500
Democrat, continue to vote for people who are forging an inextricable relationship between powerful
00:24:31.760
corporations in and the government to then punish people who fall outside of the progressive zeitgeist.
00:24:38.720
Like they are they are the ones that are advocating for things like what happened in Canada when Trudeau
00:24:44.700
punished the truckers and the protesters by freezing the funds in their bank accounts. And that happens here with
00:24:50.560
PayPal. When there is an organization like Moms for Liberty that goes against progressivism, PayPal freezes their
00:24:57.900
funds. People on the left are okay with that. So people on the left are totally 100% supportive of actual
00:25:04.860
fascism and the capture of every single powerful institution in this country in order to not only push and
00:25:13.700
force their ideology on the people who are in the jurisdiction of those institutions, but also to
00:25:20.460
punish anyone who opposes their ideology. So when the left says, oh, I'm afraid of fascism, or I'm afraid of
00:25:28.060
theocracy, or I'm afraid of Christian nationalism, they're not actually afraid of theocracy. They're afraid of
00:25:36.300
dissent. They want their own theocracy. They want secular progressivism to be the state-sanctioned
00:25:43.380
religion and to characterize and dominate and tyrannize every institution that they're a part of. And it
00:25:50.760
freaks them out when dissent says, okay, fine, if that's the game you want to play, we are also going
00:25:57.720
to use the power and the tools that are constitutionally available to us to make sure that we are actually
00:26:02.960
the ones dominating the institutions, that we are the ones making the rules. We're going to shift the
00:26:07.340
Overton window over. Oh, you're going to censor good ideas on the right? You're going to punish good people and
00:26:14.340
good organizations over here? The pendulum is going to swing back, baby. It's going to happen. They get so freaked
00:26:20.480
out by that, not because they're afraid of power, but because they're afraid of their enemies using power. Should have
00:26:25.900
thought about that. You should have thought about that when you captured these institutions and then weaponized
00:26:30.540
them against the people that disagreed with you. You should have thought about that. You should have
00:26:35.000
thought about the fact that to every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. And look, as I said,
00:26:42.200
I don't want the unfettered growth of the federal government. I don't. Like, I don't want a political
00:26:48.640
weaponized DOJ, an FBI. I do think, though, that whoever gets in charge, if it's a Republican next,
00:26:55.700
needs to use their power to dismantle these agencies and recreate them, if necessary, in a way
00:27:02.820
that actually represents true and good definitions of impartial justice. So that's what I'm talking
00:27:10.880
about when I'm talking about the right using power. I am talking about the right using power for actual
00:27:16.480
good things, for actual justice, for actual liberty, for actual rights. I mean, not the absolutely
00:27:23.600
deluded and depraved agenda, subversive agenda that the left has when they exercise their power.
00:27:31.300
I think a lot of times, like, we're just moral relativists, especially on the right. Like,
00:27:37.000
we're unwilling to say that power can be used for good things versus power that is used for bad things.
00:27:45.520
Like, we often say, oh, well, no, we don't believe in any kind of indoctrination. We don't believe in
00:27:50.420
any kind of power. We don't believe in, like, any kind of philosophy that should be guiding law and
00:27:58.200
lawmaking. But that's just not possible. Like, nothing is neutral. There are bad ideas. There are
00:28:04.400
good ideas. There's good and there is evil. It's okay to say that the things that we want to do
00:28:10.980
using, like, government power or the curriculum that we want to push are the ideas that, like,
00:28:17.000
that we want to infiltrate these institutions and public schools or whatever are good and left-wing
00:28:22.200
ideas are bad. Like, we don't just have to pretend like we are pushing for neutrality. We're not.
00:28:29.740
Like, we believe that there are good ideas and there are bad ideas. There is a good definition of
00:28:34.460
justice. There's a convoluted definition of justice that's on the left. There's good. There is evil.
00:28:39.700
And I'm not saying that conservatives by any means or the right has, like, some kind of monopoly
00:28:44.640
on good and on justice. I'm saying that we should be unafraid, though, to use all the constitutional
00:28:51.460
tools available to us to push that which is good and right and true when it comes to policy
00:28:56.080
and when it comes to how our systems and agencies work in this country. The left understands that.
00:29:03.260
They understand that nothing is neutral. That's why they dominate every institution that they have
00:29:09.320
with their ideology. What does Oren McIntyre sometimes say? He's a guy that I follow on
00:29:15.000
Twitter. I'll probably, hopefully, have him on the show at some point. And I don't know if it's
00:29:19.040
his original quote, but I've seen him tweet it a lot, is that the side that wants to win will always
00:29:26.600
beat the side that wants to be left alone. So that's where we are. Like, we do have to understand what
00:29:32.620
time it is, right? Like, we have to understand kind of like the threats that we're facing. We
00:29:37.960
have to forsake nostalgia and realize that we as a country are not going to go back to like 1995 or
00:29:42.700
2004 whenever you thought this country was good. Like, whenever the only disagreements that we had
00:29:47.660
between Democrats and Republicans were how involved we should be in Iraq and like how high the corporate
00:29:52.720
tax rate will be. I mean, we're talking about very fundamental moral differences here.
00:29:57.480
Unfortunately, like, that is the battle. That is the division that we're facing.
00:30:01.300
And look, the left is playing ball all while telling you that if you step up to the plate,
00:30:06.760
you're a fascist. I think we just have to kind of recognize that. And we have to use,
00:30:12.380
as I've said a million times now, the tools that are available to us to push that which is good,
00:30:16.420
right? To push truth and to push actual justice and to dismantle the powers that be that are pushing
00:30:24.100
the opposite of that. That's all I'm talking about when I'm talking about Republicans using our power
00:30:30.000
and using the government and the tools that are at our disposal in the government to do that.
00:30:37.240
The left has been doing it for a very long time. That's why we are where we are.
00:30:41.800
All right. One last thing I'll say about that is that this actually helps Donald Trump
00:30:58.040
for Republicans anyway. Like this makes him shoo-in for the Republican nomination. Now,
00:31:06.840
the powers that be certainly are going to do everything to make sure that he is not only
00:31:12.740
not the nominee, but of course that he doesn't win the general election. I'm not saying whether
00:31:18.080
that's bad or good that this is going to basically automatically beat out all of the competition when
00:31:26.680
it comes to the Republican primary. I'm just saying what it is. Like now you are presenting him as like
00:31:32.800
a symbol. As my friend Steve Day said, he is a symbol of opposition to the administrative and
00:31:41.020
the security state that we understand is not just going after Donald Trump, but they're also going
00:31:48.620
after the supporters of Donald Trump. And so that's going to be his message. He's going to say,
00:31:54.880
look, I'm fighting for you because I got skin in this game. They're after me, but really they hate you.
00:32:00.760
They say they hate me, but it's really you you're after. They say they hate my values and what I'm
00:32:05.140
doing. Really what they're saying is hating you. And look, they've created this now. They've created
00:32:10.520
Donald Trump as a symbol when I think if they would have just kind of like let him be, he would have
00:32:15.420
fizzled out. We would have had another star rise up. We probably already have that. And that person
00:32:22.080
could have had a fighting chance in the primary. But if they keep doing this, if they keep basically in
00:32:28.500
some strange way, presenting them, presenting him as like a hair, a hero of opposition, then what
00:32:38.160
they're going to get is him running away with the nomination and possibly potentially if it's fair, the
00:32:43.900
election. So that that's where we are in that. And it's and I also think that this is going to mobilize
00:32:51.740
Republicans when it comes to the midterm elections. I do. I think this actually works in Republicans
00:32:57.560
favor because, look, this is scary. If this is actually like a political weapon against Donald
00:33:05.000
Trump because he's Donald Trump and against Republicans, that scares a lot of people who
00:33:10.400
maybe previously weren't scared, who still were under some delusion that like Joe Biden is going to
00:33:15.980
bring in moderation and unity. Remember that pitch? That's funny. We do know that that the progressive
00:33:24.300
powers are trying to crack down on any dissent. Of course, we've talked a lot about big tax censorship
00:33:32.460
and we experienced that here on this show. Just last week, we got an email from YouTube saying that
00:33:40.020
they totally randomly, without warning, removed my conversation with journalist Julie Kelly about
00:33:46.680
January 6th and the prisoners that are in solitary confinement and are incarcerated because of, in many
00:33:55.920
cases, nonviolent offenses on January 6th. And she talked to me about the corrupt system in place that
00:34:05.820
has unfairly come down on the people who were involved, again, often peacefully in the January 6th riots and
00:34:16.740
protests. Everything that she said was factual. She has backed it up by her own sourcing, her own
00:34:23.260
journalism, her own fact checking herself. And even if it wasn't, like even if it was just her opinion,
00:34:29.740
even if it was just her perspective, so what? There are a million different perspectives on YouTube.
00:34:35.800
A lot of them were straight up garbage and based on abject lies. But because this goes against the
00:34:43.740
approved narrative, we've gotten the episode, I think it's episode 630. Yep, episode 630. It has been
00:34:53.220
removed from YouTube. So I encourage you to go to Blaze TV. Watch it for yourself if you have not already.
00:35:00.500
We've got the link to the episode on Blaze TV in the description of this episode. You can also listen
00:35:08.540
to it on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever you listen while it's still available. So I would
00:35:14.980
hightail it over there right now and listen to that. It's very sinister. It's very sinister. Also,
00:35:21.740
I don't know if I've even talked about, speaking of censorship, I think I did maybe mention it last
00:35:26.480
week that our friend James Lindsay, who has been on here several times, he has been permanently
00:35:30.560
suspended from Twitter. Like we're not talking about a Christian conservative getting kicked off
00:35:36.180
for Christian conservative views, which is often what happens. I mean, we're talking about an agnostic,
00:35:41.420
a political independent who just happens to be against the grooming of children. He got kicked off of
00:35:47.720
Twitter for that. Interesting. I mean, they are, they're turning off the heat right now before
00:35:54.700
the midterms. It's very, very sinister and very, dare I say, in some cases, demonic. Speaking of demonic,
00:36:03.700
the IRS, as I mentioned a few minutes ago, they've added 87,000 employees, according to this Inflation
00:36:12.960
Reduction Act, so-called, that just passed the Senate that was completely partisan. No Republicans
00:36:19.060
voted for it. Only Democrats voted for it. The tiebreaker, of course, was Vice President Kamala
00:36:25.680
Harris. And so there's a lot to analyze in this particular bill. As Representative Thomas Massey
00:36:33.020
of Kentucky has said, it's actually an inflation enhancement bill, that it's going to make inflation
00:36:39.060
worse, of course, because it's spending. And so that's just what we know about what makes inflation
00:36:44.560
worse. They said it's for the climate. They said it's for the economy, that it's going to lower costs,
00:36:49.620
it's going to help inflation. It's actually probably going to do the opposite. And it's looking like
00:36:53.480
it's going to raise taxes on most severely and disproportionately the middle working class,
00:37:00.600
people who make more than $30,000 a year. And of course, Joe Biden is saying that he's only going
00:37:05.560
to tax the rich. I guess that's true if you consider someone who makes $35,000 a year rich.
00:37:12.060
And so unfortunately, even some of the Democrats that we consider to be moderate, they voted for
00:37:20.100
the bill. There were many amendments that Republicans tried to pass to add to the bill that Democrats
00:37:26.420
struck down. And so remember that when the pain gets worse, remember that when costs don't go down,
00:37:32.800
remember that when your taxes go up. Remember that when your small business is getting audited by
00:37:38.800
these new IRS agents. Remember that. Remember who forged this, who authored this, who voted for this,
00:37:46.400
and who didn't. And again, I will say it really matters who we elect in November. That really matters.
00:37:54.380
It can't just be someone with an R by their name. It's got to be people who are fighters. And I think that
00:37:59.800
we're doing that. I think actually the election of Carrie Lake, for example, as the Republican
00:38:07.980
candidate in Arizona, Blake Masters, Senate candidate in Arizona. We've also got J.D. Vance,
00:38:16.000
of course, Senate candidate in Ohio. And Joe Kent's, I think, representative candidate in Washington.
00:38:24.120
He just won the Republican primary. And so I do think that we have like a new crop of Republicans
00:38:31.860
who know what's at stake and who know what time it is and who aren't just going to vote no on these
00:38:37.260
bills, but hopefully are going to push really good legislation. So I just wanted to make sure
00:38:43.760
that we covered that briefly. There are some other things that I also just wanted to talk about.
00:38:51.300
First, let's let's stick with politics. And let's first talk about Stacey Abrams and her
00:38:57.060
recent comments about pro-choice being a part of her faith. So we're talking about electing good
00:39:04.100
people that are going to push good policy and that are going to fight for the values that you and I
00:39:08.920
hold dear. Let's look at the opposite end of the spectrum and look at someone like Stacey
00:39:13.600
Abrams. So this is according to TheBlaze.com. The headline is Stacey Abrams says being pro-choice is part
00:39:20.620
of her faith. And according to her faith, you protect the vulnerable and you wrap them up in
00:39:24.900
your love. Oh, the irony. Oh, the irony. So she says the decision to be pro-choice is exactly part of
00:39:33.300
my faith. I cannot strike down another person's rights simply because I don't agree. So it might
00:39:42.660
be a part of her faith. The question is, what does she worship? She doesn't worship the God of
00:39:46.720
Scripture, of course, who demanded the death penalty for child sacrifice, who says that he
00:39:52.420
made us in our mother's womb fearfully and wonderfully. She doesn't worship the God who
00:40:01.380
says, let the little children come to me for to such as these belong the kingdom of heaven.
00:40:06.220
She worships the God of self. The God of self has two supreme values, and that's autonomy and
00:40:12.440
authenticity. Autonomy and authenticity can be two very good things, very good values. But when they
00:40:19.240
are not submitted to a higher authority, the God of Scripture, they actually become idols that then
00:40:25.300
justify sin, that then justify us doing whatever we want to do, as long as it serves A, our autonomy,
00:40:33.540
our control over ourselves in our lives, and B, our authenticity, being ourselves. That's what abortion is.
00:40:40.200
It is serving the God of self and one of its subsidiaries, which is the idol of autonomy,
00:40:47.680
that you are even willing to sacrifice the life of another human being if that means that it is
00:40:54.320
serving the control that you want to have. And then, of course, how we see the idol of authenticity
00:40:59.920
show up is, well, I can be anyone that I want to be. I can be whatever I feel, even if that is
00:41:08.340
sacrificing your own body and sacrificing your reality on that altar. Autonomy and authenticity
00:41:15.560
can be two good values, but only when they are submitted to Christ. Only when they are submitted
00:41:20.880
to God's law. Only when they are submitted to what God says, the phrase that we say so often,
00:41:26.340
is good and right and true. So, this idea that she has to defend abortion according to her faith
00:41:33.140
might be true, but that is because she ascribes to not Christianity, but to secular humanism,
00:41:38.120
which has a God and the God is self. So, please don't vote for Stacey Abrams. Please do whatever
00:41:46.800
you can to make sure that she does not win. I don't think that she would. It would be a disaster for my
00:41:52.780
beloved state of Georgia. I love Georgia. I have a lot of family there, lived there, met my husband
00:41:58.440
there. It's a great place. It's got a lot of libs there, 100%. But let's make a better decision.
00:42:04.480
Let's not, let's not vote that silly woman in office.
00:42:17.880
All right. Let me tell you a little, a little story, a little, I just want to go on a little rant.
00:42:23.260
So, yesterday, I was flying home from Nashville. And there was a woman. She was an older lady. I
00:42:32.520
would guess she was probably 85. And she was using a cane to walk. And she was standing outside of
00:42:39.560
the bathroom, which was right next to my seat. And I saw that she was swaying. And she had a hard time
00:42:46.500
holding on to, holding on to the walls. And it was turbulent. And I saw that the flight attendants
00:42:53.620
were trying to talk to her. And they were telling her, hey, you really need to, you really need to
00:42:59.600
go sit down. It's going to be bumpy. But they were not getting up from their seats. And it was very
00:43:04.440
clear to me that she could not understand what they were saying. Turns out she could not speak
00:43:09.360
English. I don't know what language she was speaking, but she couldn't speak English. She was
00:43:12.820
clearly very confused. I'm not sure that she could see very well either. I mean, we're talking about a
00:43:17.700
very feeble older woman. I thought maybe she was trying to get into the bathroom, but the bathroom
00:43:23.240
wasn't occupied. And so, everyone was just like looking at this situation. And this has nothing to
00:43:29.600
do with me being valiant or anything. When I say that it caused me like zero inconvenience or sacrifice
00:43:36.560
whatsoever, I mean that. And this is not the point of the story. But I just stood up. I asked the
00:43:42.280
flight attendants like, what's going on here? Does she need help being stabilized while she's waiting
00:43:46.860
for the bathroom? And they were saying, oh, she needs to go back to her seat. She needs to go back
00:43:51.120
to her seat. And so, I was like, okay. Well, I don't really, I was thinking, I don't really understand
00:43:57.200
why no, like the flight attendants aren't doing anything about that. So, long story short, I led this
00:44:02.540
older lady back to her seat. She sat down. And on the way back, I had these men. It turns out I was
00:44:10.660
sitting around, like six adult, able-bodied men who had just been looking on with their mouths
00:44:16.100
hanging open. One of them gave me a fist bump. One of them was like, wow, that was so nice of you.
00:44:22.680
And I just thought, you know, I'm thankful to have done it. It was really easy. It took two seconds of
00:44:28.100
my life. It took like no, as I said, sacrifice whatsoever to do that. But why was it me? Why was it
00:44:36.080
me? Why did none of those adult, able-bodied men who are all standing there with their mouths open,
00:44:42.720
like a large mouth bass, why didn't they do anything? Like, why didn't they stand up and say,
00:44:47.880
you know, this is a feeble old lady and how society is ordered. Adult men, able-bodied men
00:44:54.940
are supposed to be the ones to first step up for the most vulnerable. They're supposed to be the ones
00:45:00.380
to step up on behalf of the weak, of the elderly, of the child, of the woman. Why are all these men
00:45:06.980
just sitting there while this woman is unable to stabilize herself? Why is it me? Why is it that,
00:45:14.580
why is it the young woman, the only person who was like, okay, maybe I can take my AirPods out and pay
00:45:19.260
attention to what's going on. I still don't even know why the flight attendants like didn't do the
00:45:23.340
same thing. Why are they just sitting there unwilling to like help this woman back to her seat? I don't
00:45:29.520
know. But it made me very sad for society. I don't think that I am better than any of the people
00:45:34.920
sitting around me. I think that I decided to tune in for a second to like pay attention to do something
00:45:40.140
that wasn't very difficult at all. But the fact of the matter is, is that most people, and I think
00:45:45.000
that includes men, and most disastrously that includes men, most people don't want to look up
00:45:53.040
from what they're doing. Most people don't want to even be slightly inconvenienced, or they have been
00:45:59.960
so trained to not involve themselves in the affairs and circumstances of other people that they would
00:46:06.220
literally watch an elderly woman like fall to the ground before they would get their butts out of
00:46:12.660
their seat and do something about it. And I really wanted to get on the intercom after I got like a fist
00:46:19.720
bump and a pep talk from one of the guys who was sitting around me and say, I don't want your fist
00:46:24.740
bumps. I don't want your pep talks. I want you to do something. Like I want you to be a man. I want you
00:46:30.820
to do what men are supposed to do, which is advocate on behalf of the most vulnerable. I'm happy to do it.
00:46:37.640
I think all able-bodied people should stand for the weak and should help people who need it. But if that
00:46:45.780
wasn't a commentary on the lack of masculinity in many cases and the lack of responsibility
00:46:52.900
in our society and the lack of compassion, I don't know what is. And look, you are not looking at a
00:46:59.140
man-hater. I am so thankful for healthy masculinity. I am so thankful for men. I am so thankful for male
00:47:07.440
leadership, male mentorship, and fatherhood. I think that that's absolutely integral to society,
00:47:14.720
which is exactly why I'm saying what I'm saying, is that you got a lot of soy boys out there,
00:47:19.840
a lot of weak men, a lot of scared people who can't be bothered, who don't really care about
00:47:27.220
the most vulnerable, and who don't see themselves as responsible for the people around them.
00:47:32.780
And this might have just been a small example, a small situation, but I do think it's a representation
00:47:38.380
of a problem that we have in general. And if you haven't listened to yesterday's episode
00:47:43.220
about the importance of the family structure and family formation, particularly the presence
00:47:47.900
of strong fathers, then you should go listen to that. Because that gives some statistical
00:47:54.040
backing to what I'm talking about. And it gives some data that I think supports this idea that we
00:48:03.520
are dealing with a crisis of a lack of masculinity and strong fathers and father figures and men as
00:48:10.360
strong examples in our society. And it also links to everything else that we're talking about.
00:48:16.280
That now, the moment of history that we're in, whether it's moral, theological, political,
00:48:24.800
cultural, social, it calls for strong, brave, courageous, and clear men. Yes, women too. Yes,
00:48:35.300
moms. I mean, I'm out here talking about these things. But, you know, I read in The Lion,
00:48:40.860
the Witch, and the Wardrobe the other day, I think it was, I think it's Father Christmas who says this,
00:48:46.220
not Aslan. Yes, it's Father Christmas. Father Christmas gives Lucy, the youngest daughter,
00:48:53.320
like a dagger and potion, healing potion, and says, you know, this is for anytime someone is hurt,
00:49:01.040
you can heal them. And she says, you know, I think that I'm brave enough to fight in a battle.
00:49:06.120
And Father Christmas says, that's not the point. The point is not whether you are brave enough. You
00:49:10.640
are not to fight in this battle because wars get ugly when women fight them. Ooh, that's politically
00:49:16.860
incorrect, but it is true. It is true. We need men to be on the front lines. We need men to be taking
00:49:23.540
that role. Yes, women can be courageous and we can have our roles. Absolutely. Obviously,
00:49:29.280
I believe that, but we cannot replace men. So men, first of all, thank you to those of you who do
00:49:35.020
step up every day. I respect you. I'm thankful for you. But those who don't, now's the time. Now's
00:49:41.040
the time. We need it. And also, by the way, I do think someone asked me about like Republicans
00:49:57.600
exercising power to push policies that are good and to do things that are good and just.
00:50:03.660
And this is someone on the left, of course, pronouns in the profile saying, is that really
00:50:08.160
Christ-like to amass power? Of course, what that person means is that it's Christ-like for Democrats
00:50:12.540
to amass power, but apparently not Republicans. And as I've already said, I don't believe in amassing
00:50:17.360
power for the sake of amassing power. I don't believe that. But yes, I do actually think that it is
00:50:25.080
representative of a Christian value system to go after bad things and to do good things and to
00:50:34.240
punish injustice and to promote justice and to be harsh against those who misuse their power to crush
00:50:42.660
those who are weak and to be soft and gentle towards those who are vulnerable and are being depressed
00:50:48.240
and who are without help. So the answer to that is yes. And of course, the opposite of that,
00:50:58.320
the opposite for advocating for the vulnerable and the oppressed is every value that the left-wing
00:51:05.120
ideology has, whether you are looking at the sacrifice of children and abortion or whether you
00:51:09.800
are looking at the sacrifice of children when it comes to gender ideology or when it comes to
00:51:17.740
the disproportionate effect of bad COVID policy and restrictions on both the elderly and children
00:51:23.720
and the poor, the exact opposite of a Christian value economy and the exact opposite of caring for
00:51:35.280
the oppressed is what Democrats and progressives continually put forward, which of course is why
00:51:40.500
I believe in pushing back against it with everything that we have. All right, that's all I've got time