Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - January 11, 2023


Ep 737 ｜ Jackie Hill Perry Renounces the Enneagram


Episode Stats

Length

45 minutes

Words per Minute

168.26299

Word Count

7,724

Sentence Count

625

Misogynist Sentences

29

Hate Speech Sentences

19


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Well, we've got a new Speaker of the House.
00:00:02.960 Democrats also have a new minority leader in the House who decided to take the Bible
00:00:08.700 out of context to support the Democratic platform.
00:00:12.620 We'll finally be talking about all of that.
00:00:14.800 Also, Jackie Hill Perry, author and evangelist, says that she is now against the Enneagram
00:00:24.500 because it is the wisdom of demons.
00:00:29.200 We've got a couple other things to talk about, a viral tweet by someone who says that he
00:00:33.680 hates, quote unquote, cis women.
00:00:35.780 Also, we'll be analyzing some outfits from the Golden Globes last night because why not?
00:00:41.560 So thanks for joining this episode of Relatable.
00:00:44.680 Here we go.
00:00:54.420 All right, guys, welcome to Relatable.
00:00:57.240 Happy Wednesday.
00:00:59.200 Yes, it's Wednesday, halfway through the week.
00:01:01.600 We're on our temporary set.
00:01:02.920 We were on our temporary set yesterday, but you might have noticed it was a little dark
00:01:07.000 on the set.
00:01:07.700 And now we have more light.
00:01:08.980 Doesn't it look so good?
00:01:10.640 All right.
00:01:11.560 We are going to get into some politics today.
00:01:14.520 I've avoided it for the past two days because I just haven't been ready.
00:01:19.080 My break over Christmas and New Year was like being in a warm bed of ignorance, not paying
00:01:24.500 attention to what was going on in Washington.
00:01:26.640 And now I've turned the lights on and I've gotten out of bed and I'm looking at this speaker race.
00:01:32.300 And I'm finally going to talk about it just a little bit.
00:01:34.600 And then we'll get on to all the like fun culture war type thing.
00:01:38.680 So let's just talk a little bit about the Speaker of the House.
00:01:41.820 And I want to react to a video that I saw going around on Twitter of the minority leader in
00:01:49.100 the House, Hakeem Jeffries, who is the leader of the Democrats, taking the Bible out of context
00:01:56.020 in just a ridiculous and I think very blasphemous in evil fashion.
00:01:59.140 But first, let me just summarize exactly what happened with Kevin McCarthy.
00:02:04.200 You can get a lot more in-depth analysis from other commentators who were following this
00:02:09.560 closely.
00:02:10.540 Really, if you just search for this on Twitter, you can see a lot of explanations for what was
00:02:15.380 happening and why.
00:02:16.760 But basically, Kevin McCarthy, he's a representative Republican from California and he was the nominee,
00:02:25.760 the person up for the job of Speaker of the House, because Republicans are in the majority
00:02:30.260 in the House.
00:02:30.880 So when you're in the majority in the House, you get to decide who the Speaker of the House,
00:02:36.060 who the leader of the House is.
00:02:38.340 And so this is let me just explain to you the process a little bit.
00:02:41.620 According to Voice of America, it's a state owned news network, international radio broadcaster
00:02:46.220 of the U.S., funded by the U.S. government.
00:02:49.080 So obviously, you always take that with a grain of salt.
00:02:51.600 But this is just an explanation of the process.
00:02:53.760 So in the weeks after an election, the Republican conference and the Democratic caucus hold an
00:02:58.700 informal vote among their members to decide who they want to nominate to lead their party
00:03:03.540 in January.
00:03:05.060 Representative Kevin McCarthy won the majority of the Republican vote in a closed-door November
00:03:09.740 meeting.
00:03:11.040 Weeks later, Democrats unanimously chose Representative Hakeem Jeffries to become their leader as the
00:03:17.680 party transitions into the minority.
00:03:19.880 Democrats were in the majority slightly in the House.
00:03:22.580 Then after November elections, now Republicans are in the majority in the House.
00:03:26.600 Once the House is in a quorum, meaning the minimum number of members are present to proceed,
00:03:31.360 the Speaker nominee from each party will be read aloud by the respective leaders before a roll
00:03:36.980 call vote to elect a new Speaker.
00:03:39.000 The clerk then appoints lawmakers from each party as tellers to tally the votes.
00:03:44.000 The candidate to become Speaker needs a majority of the votes from House members who are present
00:03:48.800 and voting. Historically, the magical number has been 218 out of the 435 members of the House.
00:03:55.600 But many previous speakers, including outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have ascended to the position
00:04:02.500 with fewer votes than that.
00:04:04.400 As some members voted present instead of calling out a name, every lawmaker voting present lowers
00:04:11.380 the overall tally needed to reach a majority.
00:04:15.100 So when it came to Kevin McCarthy, usually this is kind of a cut and dry process.
00:04:20.540 It happens pretty quickly.
00:04:21.760 But with Kevin McCarthy, this went through 15 rounds of votes to get him to that 218.
00:04:26.960 For 14 rounds of votes, McCarthy did not receive the backing of enough colleagues.
00:04:33.860 He received the backing of 203.
00:04:36.020 And yet there was a minority of Republicans who were saying, I don't want to vote for Kevin
00:04:40.500 McCarthy because they said, I don't think he's going to be conservative enough.
00:04:44.140 And look, we've got some demands before he can win our vote.
00:04:47.180 A lot of people said this was obstructionist and they were just getting in the way.
00:04:52.100 And I think they were even referred to in like very pejorative terms, like they were terrorizing
00:04:57.700 the House of Representatives by not simply supporting Kevin McCarthy.
00:05:01.880 Interestingly, Marjorie Taylor Greene was one of the loudest backers of Kevin McCarthy, which
00:05:08.100 typically she is kind of seen as an oppositional minority in the House trying to kind of pull
00:05:14.720 it in a more, I guess you would say conservative direction.
00:05:18.580 But she was a big backer of Kevin McCarthy.
00:05:20.480 But people like Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert and others were saying, you know what, I'm not
00:05:26.080 going to vote for him.
00:05:27.560 And people like Chip Roy, I have a lot of respect for Representative Chip Roy.
00:05:31.860 From Texas, he had some demands before he would vote for McCarthy.
00:05:36.460 Ultimately, McCarthy did get enough votes to become Speaker of the House.
00:05:41.820 The opposing members who said we're not going to vote for him unless some things are agreed
00:05:47.140 to by him.
00:05:48.420 They wanted to see less government spending, they said, more power to them, less power for
00:05:53.360 the Speaker.
00:05:54.800 There was also just some like mistrust and personality differences, says NPR.
00:05:59.780 There were some major concessions made by McCarthy to get the votes needed for him to become
00:06:05.320 Speaker of the House.
00:06:06.660 Here are some of those.
00:06:07.580 A promise for votes on a balanced budget amendment, term limits and a Texas border plan.
00:06:13.200 A new committee to investigate the government using the FBI against political rivals.
00:06:18.420 You've probably heard of like a church committee that has nothing to do with church, the religious
00:06:23.880 institution.
00:06:24.620 It has to do with the kind of committee going back several decades, looking into what the
00:06:28.940 FBI is actually doing.
00:06:31.780 How are they really doing their jobs or is the corruption just as deep as we think it
00:06:37.560 is?
00:06:38.440 More single subject bills.
00:06:40.780 So rather than these omnibus bills that these Congress people don't have time to read and
00:06:47.000 the American people certainly don't have time or the ability to read.
00:06:50.860 There should be more single subject bills.
00:06:53.740 I think that's a great idea.
00:06:55.280 A 72 hour window for representatives to read bills before voting.
00:06:59.640 Another great idea.
00:07:01.020 A promise to refuse any increase in the debt ceiling in the next federal budget.
00:07:06.260 Another concession was a bill to abolish the IRS and eliminate income tax.
00:07:11.320 So, I mean, obviously this does not mean that all of these bills will ultimately become
00:07:17.560 law because we don't have the majority in the Senate.
00:07:19.860 Obviously, we don't have a Republican in the White House.
00:07:22.840 But look, these Republicans in Congress are simply trying to put forth good legislation
00:07:29.900 or a promise that they will be able to put forth good legislation.
00:07:33.880 I think it tells you something.
00:07:35.620 Republicans versus Democrats.
00:07:36.940 Who looks for more transparency and less power to bureaucracy?
00:07:42.080 It's always Republicans.
00:07:43.300 I mean, how is it even a partisan issue, single issue bills?
00:07:48.540 You only want those omnibus bills if you're trying to get things through that you know
00:07:53.340 are going to be unpopular.
00:07:55.080 They might be good for you, but they're probably not good for your constituents.
00:07:59.340 Everyone benefits.
00:08:00.740 Well, the American people benefit anyway from single issue bills and the 72 hour window for
00:08:06.420 representatives to read the bills before voting.
00:08:09.040 So I know a lot of people had a problem with this so-called obstruction.
00:08:13.200 But if these were the concessions that were made by Kevin McCarthy to try to break down
00:08:18.600 that obstruction, then I would say that that was a really good strategy.
00:08:23.520 So there has been a positive development this week after all of that happened.
00:08:28.420 This is according to the New York Post.
00:08:30.240 And one of the new Republican House majority's first legislative moves on Monday, the body passed
00:08:34.820 a bill rescinding $72 billion in spending on 87,000 new IRS agents.
00:08:41.200 House Resolution 23, or the Family and Small Business Taxpayer Protection Act, passed the
00:08:45.900 lower chamber in a 221-210 vote-along party lines.
00:08:52.360 So we'll see what comes of that.
00:08:53.880 Obviously, we don't really have the numbers right now.
00:08:56.220 We don't have a majority in the Senate.
00:08:57.660 And like I said, we don't have the White House in order to pass all the laws that we want
00:09:01.260 to or pass all the bills that we want to since they become law.
00:09:04.100 However, it's good to see this kind of movement in the House under Kevin McCarthy's leadership.
00:09:10.480 Let's hope that they keep on moving the window over by pushing the kind of legislation that
00:09:15.400 actually represents the interest and the security of the American people.
00:09:19.540 What'll be interesting is how this House under Kevin McCarthy's leadership handles issues like
00:09:25.540 Ukraine.
00:09:26.880 He has been traditionally a pretty big supporter of supporting Ukraine financially.
00:09:32.680 Now, I just saw a clip this morning that Ukraine is apparently training their forces
00:09:37.420 in Oklahoma.
00:09:39.060 So we are spending lots and lots and lots and lots of resources on this country who most
00:09:45.860 that most people can't even point to on a map.
00:09:48.880 And a lot of people hadn't even heard of before last year.
00:09:53.140 However, while our own country is really struggling, certainly in the cities that are run by Democrats,
00:09:59.240 certainly at our own border.
00:10:01.720 It's interesting, again, that so many of our leaders are more interested in the sovereignty
00:10:07.300 and the security of a foreign country than they are of our own country.
00:10:11.080 And some people might say, well, you can do both.
00:10:13.180 Sure, you can.
00:10:13.740 But we're not.
00:10:14.780 That's that's the point.
00:10:15.700 We're not.
00:10:16.240 There is clearly a priority there.
00:10:18.260 So we'll see.
00:10:18.900 I hope that Kevin McCarthy's leadership is good.
00:10:21.820 I hope it's very conservative.
00:10:23.600 And I hope we can move forward in a way that actually benefits the American people.
00:10:29.280 All right.
00:10:29.760 I want to stay on this for a second.
00:10:31.780 I want to play this little clip of the minority leader of the Democrats, Hakeem Jeffries, using
00:10:36.280 the Bible to justify what Democrats stand for.
00:10:48.900 OK, so let me play this clip, the short clip from a speech by Hakeem Jeffries, again, Democratic
00:10:56.520 representative, very far left Democratic representative, by the way, who is now the House
00:11:01.120 minority leader.
00:11:02.420 Here's what he's got to say about the mission of the Democratic Party.
00:11:05.480 Now, the scripture says in Galatians, let us not become weary in doing good, for at the
00:11:13.960 proper time, we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.
00:11:20.420 Over the last two years, House Democrats, in partnership with President Biden and our
00:11:26.600 colleagues in the Senate, have been hard at work on behalf of the American people, getting
00:11:33.100 big things done.
00:11:35.960 President Biden gets the job done and the D in Democrat stands for deliver.
00:11:42.920 Now, this is very common.
00:11:44.840 This is something that you see from Democrats a lot.
00:11:47.960 This is something that you see from those who identify as progressive Christians or Democrat
00:11:53.300 Christians a lot, using the Bible for their political means, even as they are turning to
00:11:58.720 the right, pointing their finger and saying that we are Christian nationalists.
00:12:03.100 Because we have or are striving for a biblical worldview that informs our politics and our views
00:12:11.840 on culture.
00:12:12.540 Yet when they decontextualize Bible verses to support things like genital mutilation for
00:12:20.720 children who think that they're the opposite sex or the dismemberment of babies inside the
00:12:24.740 womb, apparently that's wholesome and that's well and good.
00:12:29.460 And that's a proper exegesis of scripture.
00:12:32.920 So he is using Galatians 6 there as Paul is speaking to the church at Galatia and admonishing
00:12:41.960 them to stay true to the true gospel.
00:12:44.860 And let me just give you a little context because I do think it's interesting.
00:12:48.780 So he quotes Galatians 6, 9.
00:12:51.260 But let me read you the verses surrounding that.
00:12:54.940 So this is starting in Galatians 6, verse 6.
00:12:58.800 Let the one who is taught the word share all good things with the one who teaches.
00:13:03.500 Do not be deceived.
00:13:05.360 God is not mocked.
00:13:08.520 For whatever one sows, that will he also reap.
00:13:13.280 Pay close attention now, y'all.
00:13:14.540 For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption.
00:13:20.880 But the one who sows to the spirit will from the spirit reap eternal life.
00:13:26.860 And let us not grow weary of doing good.
00:13:29.460 For in due season we will reap if we do not give up.
00:13:32.280 So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone and especially to those who
00:13:37.340 are of the household of faith.
00:13:40.300 So he's not primarily talking about politics here.
00:13:43.100 He's not talking about lawmakers.
00:13:45.660 I'm not saying that we can't apply Bible verses to politics or to these culture wars.
00:13:53.000 Of course, I do that often where it is appropriate to do.
00:13:56.760 But he is certainly not talking about what the Democratic Party stands for.
00:14:01.780 And that's not me to say that the Republican Party is the godly party and that Republicans
00:14:07.560 are all sincere Christians.
00:14:09.220 That's not what I'm trying to say.
00:14:11.900 But simply looking at the platform of the Democratic Party, what it stands for when it comes to
00:14:18.580 sex, sexuality, the family, gender, abortion, those things alone, which as I've said many
00:14:26.080 times are Genesis 1 issues, they go all the way back to the first chapter of the first book
00:14:32.920 of the Bible, the Democratic Party officially and systematically perverts the natural order
00:14:40.300 and breeds chaos and disorder everywhere they lead.
00:14:44.560 I mean, look at every single city that is run by Democrats.
00:14:48.840 You see chaos, you see disorder, you see misery, you see dirtiness, and you see people suffering
00:14:58.020 from the corruption and the bad and the misguided policies of progressivism.
00:15:05.760 I don't know how that qualifies in any sense, certainly not in any biblical sense, as good.
00:15:14.120 He says the Democrats are going to continue doing good.
00:15:17.940 Good for whom?
00:15:19.220 Good for the family.
00:15:20.720 Good for babies inside the womb.
00:15:22.880 Good for people living in border towns.
00:15:24.740 Good for people who become victims of the criminals who are continually let out of jail
00:15:32.620 because of progressive criminal justice policies in these cities that are run by Democrats.
00:15:39.180 Good for whom?
00:15:40.360 Certainly not good according to the God who created the very order that Democrats are constantly
00:15:47.140 at war against.
00:15:49.620 And so, I mean, I would love to have Representative Jeffries on this podcast,
00:15:53.700 and we can talk about that specifically.
00:15:56.580 But I'm not sure that we would be able to find kind of any form of commonality or agreement
00:16:04.820 because it seems like we are starting from a totally opposing premise of who God is and
00:16:11.400 who is in charge and what human beings are and why we matter and what the role of the state
00:16:17.200 is versus the role of the church and the role of the family.
00:16:21.560 The differences between the parties really are not just policy.
00:16:25.540 They come down to very fundamental ideas, again, of who made us, who is in charge, what
00:16:32.640 humans are, and why we are here.
00:16:36.320 And that is why we are continually polarized, not because our arguments or our differences
00:16:41.820 become more complex, but actually because they have become so fundamental.
00:16:46.380 And I thought his speech was a really good example of that.
00:16:49.100 It comes down to our definitions of what good is.
00:16:53.460 He says Democrats are going to continue doing good.
00:16:56.000 I haven't seen that good.
00:16:57.280 All right.
00:16:57.620 Before we get into our next story about this tweet that was going viral and my reaction
00:17:02.100 to it, I just wanted to take a little lighthearted break and look at some of the attire that was
00:17:07.620 worn at the Golden Globes last night.
00:17:09.960 Now, if you're like me, you don't really care about the celebrity world or anything that
00:17:14.300 they say and do, but come on, it's like a little fun.
00:17:17.160 I kind of like seeing what they have to wear.
00:17:20.200 So we're just going to look at some outfits.
00:17:22.520 I don't know if these are, I haven't seen them.
00:17:24.240 If they're outlandish outfits or if they're cool, if I'm supposed to rate them, I might
00:17:29.200 just give my commentary on them.
00:17:31.080 Brie picked it out or picked these outfits out.
00:17:33.600 So we're just going to take a look at them.
00:17:35.620 So you should probably watch this on YouTube so you can give your commentary too and let me
00:17:39.440 know if you like them or not.
00:17:40.540 All right, let's put up the first one.
00:17:43.680 Okay, I need some, I need some color, Brie.
00:17:46.660 Who is this?
00:17:48.560 Is it Claire Danes?
00:17:50.380 Yes.
00:17:51.020 She's an actress.
00:17:52.660 Yes.
00:17:53.140 From Romeo plus Juliet with Leonardo DiCaprio.
00:17:56.260 Yes.
00:17:58.060 And she was also in Homeland and I think she presented an award.
00:18:03.820 Okay, so why do we have this one?
00:18:05.780 What do you think about it?
00:18:07.420 I think it's atrocious.
00:18:09.140 You think it's atrocious?
00:18:10.540 You do.
00:18:11.000 Tell me.
00:18:12.800 Yeah, Dylan says it kind of looks like toilet paper.
00:18:16.060 It just, that bow, where is that coming from?
00:18:19.840 It, I don't know.
00:18:21.040 It kind of just looks like whipped cream on a dress.
00:18:24.580 It kind of looks like whipped cream.
00:18:27.460 She's very, she's like very beautiful and I think very classy.
00:18:31.760 I think the shape, like an empire waist is hard to do also if you're not pregnant.
00:18:38.540 Yeah.
00:18:39.380 Agreed.
00:18:40.540 Empire waist is hard.
00:18:41.780 So I agree.
00:18:43.100 I don't know.
00:18:43.700 I don't know if I would say atrocious.
00:18:46.080 Brie is a really harsh fashion judge.
00:18:50.260 But yeah, I wouldn't have picked this because she's like very beautiful.
00:18:54.100 And also the color is, that would be like a hard color for me because I'm blonde and I'm pale
00:18:59.460 right now and she's kind of fair too.
00:19:02.460 So, okay.
00:19:03.660 On the scale of pretty, we'll say pretty is a 10.
00:19:07.960 Atrocious is a one.
00:19:09.180 Brie says is a one.
00:19:10.540 No, I think it's a, I think it's a three.
00:19:13.140 Okay.
00:19:13.600 Yeah.
00:19:13.940 I would probably say three or four too.
00:19:16.120 All right.
00:19:16.960 Next one.
00:19:20.300 Okay.
00:19:20.780 I think, are these all ones that you did not like?
00:19:23.660 No, no, they're not.
00:19:24.860 Okay.
00:19:25.100 So what do you think about this?
00:19:27.120 But I don't like this one.
00:19:29.080 I don't like this one either.
00:19:30.580 It's a lot.
00:19:31.460 It's a lot.
00:19:32.840 Are you a ruffle person?
00:19:34.220 I'm not a ruffle person.
00:19:35.560 When they're, if they're tasteful, but this is just, this is just a lot.
00:19:40.820 Yeah.
00:19:41.320 Up top.
00:19:41.880 I think mostly up top.
00:19:43.440 Yeah.
00:19:44.300 Yeah.
00:19:44.860 Well, you can't see her body at all.
00:19:47.460 So Michelle Williams, also an actress.
00:19:49.840 She's the one who like bragged about her abortions.
00:19:52.820 Not that long ago.
00:19:53.440 Yeah.
00:19:53.560 She said, I wouldn't have won this award had I not.
00:19:56.300 Killed my child.
00:19:57.980 So awful.
00:19:59.020 So she just kind of has bad discernment all around.
00:20:01.420 Maybe.
00:20:01.880 Yeah.
00:20:02.520 Yeah.
00:20:02.700 Maybe.
00:20:03.220 And I do wonder what is with these like blonde, fair skinned women wearing beige.
00:20:08.480 I don't know.
00:20:09.380 I guess I've done it.
00:20:11.280 I can't see her shoes, but they look maybe like they're cute.
00:20:14.180 Maybe it redeems it.
00:20:15.980 Maybe.
00:20:17.960 Okay.
00:20:18.520 I would rate this a two.
00:20:19.980 I think this is worse than Claire Danes.
00:20:21.720 Yeah.
00:20:21.940 Agreed too.
00:20:23.360 Okay.
00:20:23.920 Does Dylan have any insight?
00:20:26.300 No.
00:20:27.820 Nothing nice to say.
00:20:29.500 Okay.
00:20:30.840 Number three.
00:20:35.760 You don't like this one either, do you, Bray?
00:20:38.380 It's just very costume.
00:20:41.140 It's like she's on.
00:20:42.120 I don't know.
00:20:42.800 It's like she's a.
00:20:44.100 I feel like you should wear a long dress for these kind of awards.
00:20:47.540 I mean, she's obviously beautiful.
00:20:49.020 She has great legs.
00:20:50.000 Yeah.
00:20:50.240 It's Heidi Klum.
00:20:50.980 She's great.
00:20:51.900 Yeah.
00:20:52.220 Um, yeah, no, don't like it at all.
00:20:54.680 I'm not really a feather person, but I guess kind of like ruffles that can be done well,
00:20:58.540 but I don't like this at all.
00:21:01.440 Yeah.
00:21:01.560 This is a one for me.
00:21:02.700 A one.
00:21:03.380 Okay.
00:21:03.780 I'll go.
00:21:04.280 Sure.
00:21:04.880 Solidarity.
00:21:05.200 Maybe I'll go with one.
00:21:06.420 All right.
00:21:06.820 Next one.
00:21:09.360 You don't like this one either.
00:21:11.140 Do you?
00:21:11.400 Well, okay.
00:21:11.700 So this just confused me a little bit.
00:21:13.420 This is Emma Darcy.
00:21:14.600 I don't know who that is.
00:21:15.520 She's in House of the Dragon.
00:21:17.720 I don't think that's the correct pronoun for her, but.
00:21:20.900 Oh, gosh.
00:21:23.040 And, well, yeah.
00:21:25.240 And I just didn't really know what was going on here.
00:21:28.520 So I included it.
00:21:29.200 Does this person always dress like this?
00:21:31.160 I don't know.
00:21:32.140 Yeah.
00:21:32.740 Yes.
00:21:33.160 Kayla says yes.
00:21:34.580 I mean, not in like black tuxedos, but yeah, they dress very ambiguous.
00:21:40.220 Yeah.
00:21:40.540 Ambiguous.
00:21:41.120 Okay.
00:21:41.520 Androgynous.
00:21:42.080 If people are just listening to this, it's like a suit.
00:21:47.060 I think it's a skirt, but it's also like a very oversized coat, and it looks like a purple
00:21:51.880 latex glove and a bow tie.
00:21:56.280 But sparkly shoes.
00:21:57.200 I like the shoes.
00:21:58.400 Sparkly shoes.
00:21:59.160 I mean, this is a one or a zero for me.
00:22:01.880 Does nothing.
00:22:03.100 I feel like this isn't even on the scale.
00:22:05.000 It's not even on the scale.
00:22:06.640 Yeah.
00:22:07.000 Probably just trying to make a statement.
00:22:09.100 Looks scary.
00:22:10.020 Looks like a villain in an 1850s movie.
00:22:13.280 It does.
00:22:14.780 Just saying.
00:22:15.640 A couple.
00:22:16.080 We have a couple more.
00:22:16.840 Okay.
00:22:17.840 I'm waiting for the one you like, Bree.
00:22:20.580 This is Julia Garner.
00:22:22.160 She's in Ozark.
00:22:23.220 Yes.
00:22:23.840 Yes.
00:22:24.200 I've seen her.
00:22:24.800 Um, you like this one?
00:22:26.440 I do.
00:22:27.820 You do.
00:22:30.080 Do you not?
00:22:31.060 No, I don't.
00:22:32.540 One, I don't think it's a good color on her.
00:22:36.600 Um, I would also dye her hair probably, maybe brown.
00:22:40.720 But, uh, I think it's a good like shape on her.
00:22:43.780 Like she looks very pretty, but no, I, and I don't, I don't like these ruffles at all.
00:22:49.380 Wow.
00:22:50.540 I love it.
00:22:51.540 I think it is really flattering.
00:22:53.120 It's so cute.
00:22:53.800 It is flattering.
00:22:54.780 I would give it an eight.
00:22:56.160 Wow.
00:22:56.720 Bree.
00:22:59.200 Wow.
00:22:59.820 No, I'm going to go.
00:23:01.900 I honestly maybe prefer a Claire Danes is to this.
00:23:05.500 I would say two or three probably.
00:23:08.520 Wow.
00:23:08.880 So do you think Bree that or Kayla or Dylan, when celebrities are picking out these outfits
00:23:15.580 that they are doing it, that they pick out outfits that they really like, or do they,
00:23:21.920 do you think that they pick out ones that are just like interesting or quirky or make
00:23:25.820 a statement?
00:23:27.360 I think they're picked for them.
00:23:29.720 Yeah.
00:23:30.220 It probably depends on the, on the celebrity, but I think a lot of times they're like matched
00:23:34.920 with a designer and the designer just puts them in whatever.
00:23:38.120 I'm sure they have a say, but yeah, I feel like a lot of times they just kind of wear
00:23:42.900 whatever they're given.
00:23:44.120 Hmm.
00:23:44.640 I think, I don't know.
00:23:45.860 I don't know either.
00:23:47.080 I don't know.
00:23:48.440 Okay.
00:23:48.980 Uh, do we have one more?
00:23:50.280 Yeah.
00:23:50.760 Okay.
00:23:52.020 No, I think we have two more.
00:23:53.580 This is Letitia Wright.
00:23:55.960 She's in Black Panther.
00:23:56.860 Oh my gosh.
00:23:56.880 She's so beautiful.
00:23:58.760 She's gorgeous.
00:23:59.500 She is so beautiful.
00:24:02.100 No, no, no, no.
00:24:05.520 I mean, she like could wear, I would say that she could wear like anything and that she would
00:24:10.400 look gorgeous, but this just doesn't look like it fits her.
00:24:13.040 It looks too big.
00:24:14.160 Yeah.
00:24:14.420 It's kind of potato sacky.
00:24:16.000 Dylan says she looks like a beer glass.
00:24:17.820 I think she looks like an enchilada.
00:24:19.580 Or an enchilada.
00:24:20.380 An enchilada.
00:24:21.540 It does.
00:24:22.040 So people who can't see it, it's like an orange.
00:24:25.760 I'm sure it's like an orange design, but it does look like an orange picture.
00:24:29.320 It kind of looks like those like funny shirts that people wear with like someone else's like
00:24:35.220 beer belly painted on it.
00:24:36.640 That's what it looks like.
00:24:38.380 I mean, she's so pretty.
00:24:39.840 She could have worn so many things that would look so pretty on her.
00:24:44.100 Yeah.
00:24:44.220 I just didn't think it was.
00:24:45.300 I don't think it's it fits very well.
00:24:46.720 Although I do like the shoes.
00:24:47.920 I can tell.
00:24:49.400 Yeah.
00:24:50.300 So, yeah, this is like all this is like a one for me.
00:24:53.280 I'm sorry, Letitia.
00:24:55.860 Okay.
00:24:56.220 We got Margot Robbie for number seven, who I think is beautiful always.
00:25:00.780 Yeah.
00:25:01.100 She's so beautiful.
00:25:03.560 This is okay.
00:25:05.480 I don't know.
00:25:06.880 Maybe five.
00:25:07.760 I think this was on theme with her movie Babylon, which I haven't seen, but she plays like a
00:25:12.760 flapper girl, I guess.
00:25:14.300 Oh, okay.
00:25:15.740 So that might be what this is.
00:25:17.260 But the fringe at the bottom just is a little too much.
00:25:20.260 Too much for you.
00:25:22.620 I think the shape of it is pretty.
00:25:26.160 It's like kind of like modest, which I'm sure she's not necessarily trying to do.
00:25:32.880 Yeah.
00:25:33.420 I think I would also prefer it to not have that fringe all the way to the bottom.
00:25:37.100 Yeah.
00:25:38.120 Yeah.
00:25:38.600 But I would still go to a four or five.
00:25:40.060 I also think she's so pretty.
00:25:41.440 Have we seen the Barbie movie?
00:25:42.640 Has it come out?
00:25:43.400 It hasn't come out yet, but I'm excited.
00:25:45.340 That's actually one of my favorite directors who's doing it.
00:25:47.460 So I'm excited.
00:25:48.280 Oh, really?
00:25:48.620 Yeah.
00:25:48.800 And Ryan Gosling.
00:25:50.200 Yeah.
00:25:50.880 Wow.
00:26:02.500 Okay.
00:26:02.960 So I wanted to talk about this Jackie Hill Perry video that she posted on her Instagram
00:26:08.380 stories.
00:26:08.880 Now, sadly, I did not get to see this Instagram story myself because Jackie Hill Perry blocked
00:26:14.220 me for reasons that I'm not really sure about.
00:26:16.600 She blocked me a while ago.
00:26:18.640 We do have some disagreements, and I'm pretty sure that she blocked me before I ever even
00:26:26.460 talked about any of these disagreements publicly.
00:26:30.160 But I do disagree with her when it comes to many of the statements that she has made
00:26:34.920 on social and so-called racial justice.
00:26:38.780 And I've talked about those disagreements on this podcast.
00:26:41.300 You can go back and listen to a couple of those episodes, or just you can probably deduce
00:26:45.200 based on the things that I have said and based on the things that she has said.
00:26:48.760 But I continue to respect her bringing of the gospel.
00:26:54.040 And I hope and pray that God continues to increase her ministry and that people come to know Christ
00:27:00.100 through her because of the Holy Spirit.
00:27:03.480 So I really don't feel any kind of personal resentment, animus at all towards her.
00:27:11.200 I don't know if she would say the same since she blocked me on social media.
00:27:14.420 But I hope the best for her.
00:27:21.620 And even though we do have some serious disagreements, I am thankful that she is publicly talking about
00:27:28.740 something that I have talked about for a few years.
00:27:32.200 And not just me, but many Christians have been talking about for several years.
00:27:35.920 And that is the potential pitfalls of the Enneagram.
00:27:40.200 She posted on her Instagram story.
00:27:45.040 She says, I'm going to say this.
00:27:48.140 And she said that I was really skeptical and have been for some years when people were saying
00:27:55.780 that the Enneagram was demonic because I do feel like sometimes people can be way too deep.
00:28:00.300 But the Lord prompted me to study that thing for a good two days.
00:28:03.780 Evil.
00:28:04.240 It ain't even funny.
00:28:05.580 Legitimately doctrines of demons.
00:28:07.300 Divination.
00:28:08.240 Witchcraft.
00:28:08.880 I had no idea.
00:28:09.880 No idea.
00:28:11.200 Okay.
00:28:11.560 So one of the dudes who is the originator of the contemporary understanding of the Enneagram
00:28:15.600 as we know it, he said that he got his information about it from an angelic visitation from a spirit
00:28:22.260 or divine being named Metatron, which we know is a demon.
00:28:26.620 And then the other guy who created the types, he said on YouTube that he got his understanding
00:28:31.780 of the wisdom of types through automatic writing, which is a form of channeling spirits where
00:28:36.840 a demon basically guides your hand or guides your mind to help you write down certain ideas.
00:28:42.300 So when we say, oh, I'm type one, type two, type three, whatever, we are literally applying
00:28:48.060 to our identity the quote unquote wisdom of demons.
00:28:51.700 It's literally that deep.
00:28:53.800 And I was telling my husband part of this.
00:28:56.320 I've talked about Enneagram on several occasions.
00:28:58.020 And so part of me feels a responsibility to renounce it publicly and to bring attention
00:29:02.080 to the demonic nature of it.
00:29:04.120 So I am very glad that she is talking about this.
00:29:07.240 I wrote about this in my book.
00:29:10.300 And this really does go all the way back to the 19th century when there was very much a
00:29:15.840 boom of psychology, psychiatry and new age beliefs and Eastern mysticism that eventually
00:29:24.940 moved its way to the West and has really stayed here and grown here, has paired itself with
00:29:30.880 capitalism and self-help and the prosperity gospel and has really just kind of grabbed
00:29:37.740 hold of the U.S.
00:29:39.460 And I would say especially women in a lot of ways.
00:29:42.220 And the Enneagram is a part of that.
00:29:45.140 The Enneagram, like she said, was created by someone who claims that he got the vision
00:29:50.360 of the Enneagram from a demon.
00:29:54.160 And the people who propagate it to this day, like Richard Rohr, who is a Franciscan friar, who
00:29:59.500 is not a Christian in any real sense of the word, he does not believe that Jesus is the
00:30:03.860 way, the truth and the life and that no one comes to the Father except through him.
00:30:07.720 Like he has talked about the kind of contemplative attributes of the Enneagram and how there is
00:30:18.760 kind of a spiritual side of it that really has nothing to do with Christian spirituality,
00:30:22.660 but is really more mystic and Gnostic and New Age spirituality.
00:30:28.240 Now, I know a lot of people will rebuff me.
00:30:32.340 I've been talking about this for a long time.
00:30:34.060 I was not the first person to talk about it, so I don't want it to seem like I'm claiming
00:30:37.360 that I was the first person to criticize the Enneagram.
00:30:39.960 I wasn't the first person to.
00:30:41.780 It has been several years, but there were people who for several years before me had been
00:30:46.220 talking about it and had received a lot of criticism for it.
00:30:50.400 And I still get a lot of pushback from people saying, well, it's helped me.
00:30:55.160 It's helped my marriage.
00:30:56.180 It helped me in my job.
00:30:57.340 It helped me under understand myself.
00:31:00.680 And you're taking it too seriously.
00:31:03.540 Jackie Hill Perry even said, like, I think people go too deep with stuff, which I agree.
00:31:08.800 I do think some people take some things too seriously and they see something.
00:31:13.180 They see it like something spiritual and things that are not necessarily evil or dark or something
00:31:20.780 like that.
00:31:22.140 However, when it comes to this and you really are talking about an inspiration from a demonic
00:31:29.460 vision, I do think that that should give Christians pause to say, well, like maybe this isn't the
00:31:37.700 wisdom that I'm really looking for, or maybe this isn't the place that I should go to who
00:31:42.900 discover who I am and how I tick.
00:31:45.760 I am not discounting the possibility that the Enneagram has helped you in some way, but I
00:31:54.460 am saying that it is not going to be the solution to your problems that you are looking for, just
00:32:01.320 like any other personality test.
00:32:03.840 Now, personality tests are not all demonic.
00:32:06.720 They don't all have the same kind of new age origin, but they do all have kind of the
00:32:13.080 same temptation, I would say.
00:32:15.600 The temptation to focus too much on ourselves, too much on our quirks, too much on our characteristics,
00:32:22.080 to try to say the things that are really sin and are really unholy and are really bad parts
00:32:28.280 of ourselves or just kind of quirky and unique parts of our personality that people just need
00:32:33.840 to kind of understand and adapt to.
00:32:36.340 I think it can make us focus less on being sanctified to become like Christ and to embody
00:32:43.040 the fruit of the spirit and more to become the best version of the one with the two wing or whatever
00:32:48.080 our Enneagram is or otter or INFG, whatever it is.
00:32:53.920 So I think that they can, some of these, without the demonic origin of them, although they do
00:33:01.080 all kind of have this like psychiatry, pseudo-spiritual innocence background, I think that they can possibly
00:33:13.580 be a tool to kind of help you understand what your strengths and weaknesses are and how God
00:33:18.800 made you, but they cannot be relied on for self-understanding.
00:33:23.740 They cannot be relied on for you to understand your spouse.
00:33:27.520 They cannot be relied on to understand your friends because all of us, whether you're a
00:33:32.300 one or a nine or an otter or a beaver, we are all called to be like Christ.
00:33:36.840 We are all called to embody love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, gentleness, goodness,
00:33:42.260 faithfulness, faithfulness, and self-control.
00:33:45.520 And you are not more called to those things if you are a naturally loyal and gentle person.
00:33:53.020 You are not less called to those things if you're a naturally boisterous person.
00:33:57.860 Yes, God has given us all unique capabilities and unique characteristics.
00:34:02.200 That's part of being the body of Christ.
00:34:05.140 That's part of being one member of the body of Christ.
00:34:08.000 I might be a hand of the body of Christ.
00:34:09.900 You might be a foot of the body of Christ, like we read about this in scripture, how all
00:34:15.760 members rely on each other.
00:34:17.780 We all need one another and we all have our specific capabilities and gifts that God has
00:34:22.960 given us.
00:34:23.840 Ephesians talks about this as well, that God has given us all our specific spiritual gifts
00:34:28.320 to serve the body of Christ.
00:34:30.240 It is not for the purpose simply of self-fulfillment and self-understanding and liberating your true
00:34:36.420 self because you finally understand your Enneagram type.
00:34:39.900 So that's why I think personality tests in general, no matter what their origin is, while
00:34:45.100 some of them can be useful tools, I think they can also become a distraction from focusing
00:34:51.720 on Christ.
00:34:53.060 We do not have a problem as a society with self-love and self-focus.
00:34:58.320 I know that we hear constantly that we do.
00:35:00.960 We hear constantly that if everyone just loved themselves more, if everyone just understood
00:35:05.100 themselves more, if everyone just thought about themselves more and pursued what they
00:35:09.560 want more and focused more on their own happiness and prioritize their well-being first, then
00:35:14.320 the world would be peaceful.
00:35:15.700 Everyone would have what they want.
00:35:17.100 Their relationships would be great.
00:35:18.500 But that's not true.
00:35:19.260 We do not have a deficit of self-love, self-affection, self-affirmation, self-understanding, self-seeking
00:35:27.140 in this country.
00:35:28.560 In fact, we have too much of those things.
00:35:31.400 Our problem is not that we lack self-love.
00:35:33.900 It's not that we don't like ourselves enough.
00:35:35.800 It's actually that we focus on ourselves way too much.
00:35:39.100 Way too much.
00:35:39.940 You know what kind of Disney princess you are.
00:35:42.100 You know what color matches your personality.
00:35:44.420 Like, I mean, all of our algorithms and all of our social media apps are perfectly tailored
00:35:49.860 to not every, not only every interest you have, but every interest you possibly could
00:35:54.380 have based on what you are thinking and what you looked at for a second too long on TikTok,
00:35:59.440 on Instagram.
00:36:00.580 Everything is oriented around the self.
00:36:04.140 I'm just not sure that Christians need to be adding one more thing to help us think about
00:36:10.700 ourselves and focus on ourselves more.
00:36:12.280 Like, what if really the exercise we need to be doing to help us cultivate joy is to focus
00:36:18.200 outside of ourselves, to understand who God is and why he made us, why we're here, who
00:36:24.900 we are as human beings.
00:36:27.860 Like, what if we should be looking outside of ourselves for the love and the joy and the
00:36:32.900 fulfillment that we're seeking?
00:36:34.640 What if it's actually a lot more simple than personality tests and the Enneagram tell us
00:36:40.060 that it is?
00:36:40.460 What if it's not so complicated to study in something like that with nine types?
00:36:44.840 Like, what if we already have the roadmap in Christ?
00:36:48.120 Like, what if we already have everything we need to understand human nature, to understand
00:36:52.520 ourselves and to understand other people in God, in scripture?
00:36:55.760 Again, there are good supplementary books, obviously, and good supplementary tools to all
00:37:01.040 of those things.
00:37:03.160 But are they necessary to knowing ourselves, if that's even a worthy goal?
00:37:07.920 Is it necessary to living a life of fulfillment and joy and working well with other people?
00:37:12.760 I don't think so.
00:37:14.520 And isn't that good news?
00:37:15.760 Like, that we don't have to figure out the next personality test or understand our type perfectly
00:37:21.700 or anything like that in order to really live well?
00:37:26.620 Maybe some of them can help.
00:37:28.720 But it's not necessary and sometimes can even be a distraction to actually living a fulfilling
00:37:36.240 life in who we are in Christ.
00:37:38.000 Because we already know, we already know that we are new creations in Christ if, indeed, by
00:37:44.080 grace through faith, we believe in Him.
00:37:47.080 And so we already know what our identity is and isn't that good news?
00:37:51.460 So maybe let's take a deep breath and stop focusing so much on ourselves because I actually
00:37:56.160 think that that self-obsession is making us more miserable rather than less.
00:38:12.080 Okay, I said that was our last sponsor.
00:38:13.700 It's not our last sponsor.
00:38:14.520 We've got one more sponsor in a little bit.
00:38:17.360 Okay, let me talk about this next story.
00:38:19.560 So there was this viral tweet that was going on.
00:38:22.800 It was originally tweeted, I saw by, let's see, is this the name of it?
00:38:29.820 I thought it was, yeah, it's Raw Egg Nationalist who originally tweeted this.
00:38:34.740 And he said, say what you want about Reddit, but it's an amazing tool for peering into people's
00:38:40.760 souls.
00:38:40.940 And here's what he means by that.
00:38:44.840 So this is a post on Reddit.
00:38:47.200 And I see a lot of these posts because I follow a lot of these accounts that repost these kinds
00:38:52.060 of things from Reddit onto Twitter.
00:38:54.520 And it really is an interesting look into especially the men who want to identify as women into their
00:39:01.260 psychology.
00:39:01.720 And it's actually like, it's very sad.
00:39:03.760 So this person says, holy expletive, I hate cis women.
00:39:09.920 So cis women, if you don't know, that means cis gender.
00:39:13.440 So that means women who are actually women, who were born women, you know, have the right chromosomes,
00:39:18.900 all of that.
00:39:20.320 There's no such thing, of course, as a cis woman, because there's no such thing as a trans woman.
00:39:25.780 You are either male or female.
00:39:27.500 That is determined at the point of conception based on your chromosomes.
00:39:30.780 Don't talk to me about intersex.
00:39:32.600 That is an anomaly and a disorder that does not rewrite the rule of sex.
00:39:37.640 And gender has nothing to do with transgender, actually.
00:39:40.020 So this person says, I'm at a restaurant right now, supposed to be a date.
00:39:45.060 But of expletive course, the cis woman I was speaking to, women, I think it means woman,
00:39:51.900 I was speaking to flaked on me once.
00:39:54.600 She learned I was trans, which happened, expletive, whatever.
00:39:58.980 But what's driving me expletive bonkers is the table next to me.
00:40:02.480 Three girls, all early 20s, slim, bubbly, sundresses, talking about nails and boyfriends
00:40:07.920 and sex, all just basking in the femininity that I've spent my life and my savings just trying
00:40:12.460 to get a taste of.
00:40:13.720 It's just salt on the wound after being stood up by one of their kind.
00:40:18.180 I expletive hate them so much and they don't even know it.
00:40:21.020 It's not fair.
00:40:22.140 They'll never, ever know the struggle women like us have to go through just to feel like
00:40:26.240 that.
00:40:26.540 So now I'm stuck here listening to them laughing and chatting about their perfect lives and
00:40:30.740 throwing back Bombay gin until I can drive home good and trashed.
00:40:34.300 Wow.
00:40:34.580 A lot of bad decisions.
00:40:36.660 A lot of bad decisions in this post.
00:40:39.080 I really hope that that person doesn't drive drunk and hurt himself or the other people
00:40:42.920 around him.
00:40:43.600 But this is really common.
00:40:46.660 I see this in a lot of I see this kind of thing in a lot of posts where you've got these
00:40:51.580 men who say that they want to be women who are really they say they're really jealous
00:40:55.740 and really resentful of actual women.
00:40:58.160 And they're like, oh, I'll never truly be like that.
00:41:00.460 So part of that is clear thinking that they understand that they will never fully be perceived
00:41:05.860 as women, which is true, and that that's just not going to happen because that's simply
00:41:12.000 not how they were born.
00:41:13.520 But the delusional part is that they think it's everyone else's fault, that everyone
00:41:17.700 should just perceive them as girls, as women, because that is simply what they want to be.
00:41:23.700 But human nature is like a beach ball.
00:41:25.720 It's going to keep popping back up.
00:41:27.340 The no matter how many times you try to push it under the water, you can use all of your
00:41:31.860 force and it's still going to come back up to the surface.
00:41:34.980 And that is the reality of male and female.
00:41:38.520 It's just it just cannot be ever fully or fundamentally diminished.
00:41:44.360 And that is what seems to torture these people.
00:41:47.000 However, I do think that this jealousy and this hatred of women actually probably predates
00:41:52.100 these people thinking that they are transgender, thinking that they are the opposite sex.
00:41:56.920 I would say that's probably actually what inspires some of it, that it probably actually came
00:42:02.120 from a place of resentment and bitterness and hatred and jealousy first.
00:42:06.700 And then maybe it was something like if you can't beat them, join them.
00:42:10.660 I think a lot of these guys probably dealt with confusion, some of them abuse, some of them
00:42:15.000 rejection.
00:42:16.800 And that kind of hurt probably led to this attempt to don a new identity to become a woman.
00:42:24.980 But I think a lot of the hatred for women that you see and a lot of the confusion also that
00:42:30.820 you see here is an addiction to porn.
00:42:33.140 Like as we've talked about several times with Genevieve Gluck, that this phenomenon of men,
00:42:39.300 of boys trying to become women, a lot of it is inspired by dark, dark crevices of the
00:42:45.360 pornography world.
00:42:46.480 And pornography also breeds the hatred and the objectification of women, demeaning and
00:42:55.000 degrading attitudes towards women.
00:42:56.980 That is what a lot of porn is.
00:42:59.840 And so that's where I think a lot of this comes from.
00:43:02.060 I think a lot of these young men, they hate women for a variety of reasons, one of them
00:43:06.580 being the depictions in pornography.
00:43:08.040 And that also is what kind of pushes them to try to take on these new identities, because
00:43:14.320 that is also depicted in dark crevices of pornography.
00:43:18.180 So, I mean, there is a reason why women say it's really important to stand up for our privacy
00:43:25.240 and for our rights and for our protection and why it is important to have sex exclusive
00:43:32.840 spaces.
00:43:33.820 And unfortunately, it's not going that direction in a lot of ways.
00:43:37.220 But when this is, again, a very common attitude and a very common post, I'm not saying all
00:43:42.600 men who identify as women feel like this, but this is very common.
00:43:46.360 And like that should scare people.
00:43:48.260 That should wake people up to say, OK, this is not just some innocent movement of people
00:43:52.980 trying to be included.
00:43:54.020 This is a lot of these people hate women.
00:43:56.900 They hate women.
00:43:57.980 They resent them.
00:43:58.900 They're bitter towards them.
00:44:00.520 And the result of that, of mixing that kind of person with women in private and vulnerable
00:44:07.900 spaces, I don't think it's good.
00:44:10.380 That's why you have the stories that you do of men in women's prisons who identify as
00:44:15.920 women, inflicting violence on them.
00:44:19.980 This is not a safe movement for women and for girls.
00:44:24.080 I think that we know that that's a that's a major understatement.
00:44:37.840 All right.
00:44:38.820 That's all we've got for today.
00:44:40.880 There were a few more things that we wanted to talk about, but we're already almost at
00:44:44.680 an hour.
00:44:45.320 And so we're out of time.
00:44:46.840 We've got a lot of good stuff that we're going to talk about tomorrow, too.
00:44:49.640 So lots to look forward to.
00:44:51.540 All right.
00:44:52.100 If you love this podcast, please share it with your friends.
00:44:54.420 That would mean so much to me.
00:44:55.760 Leave us a five star review wherever you listen.
00:44:58.840 Subscribe on YouTube.
00:45:00.180 That really that really helps us out.
00:45:03.180 And you know what I'm going to do?
00:45:04.560 I'm going to give you my the voicemail number for Relatable.
00:45:07.200 We'll take some voicemails and maybe we'll read them.
00:45:10.880 We'll read them in a maybe tomorrow or maybe next week as a segment.
00:45:15.260 I don't even know what I'm going to ask you to say, though.
00:45:17.440 682-503-1369.
00:45:19.800 682-503-1369.
00:45:21.540 Do you got a question for me?
00:45:22.780 A relationship question?
00:45:23.980 A life question?
00:45:25.020 Make it short.
00:45:25.700 Make it snappy.
00:45:26.560 Make it concise.
00:45:27.340 Or maybe you just have an interesting comment.
00:45:29.040 We can only get through a few.
00:45:30.540 And so we'll have to wade through the voicemails that you guys send and pick the ones that we
00:45:35.560 want to listen to on air.
00:45:37.460 But we will do that sometime next week.
00:45:39.460 682-503-1369.
00:45:42.660 Leave us a voicemail.
00:45:43.380 Ask a question.
00:45:44.400 Make a comment.
00:45:45.400 All right.
00:45:45.740 That's all we have time for today.
00:45:47.040 We will be back here tomorrow.
00:45:47.960 We'll be back here tomorrow.
00:45:51.540 We'll be back here tomorrow.
00:45:52.680 We'll be back here tomorrow.