Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - June 07, 2023


Ep 818 | How LGBTQ Became Our State Religion | Guest: Auron MacIntyre


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 8 minutes

Words per Minute

185.04466

Word Count

12,713

Sentence Count

776

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

32


Summary

On today's episode of Relatable, our friend and Blaze TV colleague, Oren McIntyre, joins us to talk about the current state of the conservative movement and how we can fix it. Oren is a conservative commentator, writer, and podcaster. He is a frequent contributor to the New York Times, CNN, and the Los Angeles Times. He's also a regular contributor to Rolling Stone and the Daily Wire.


Transcript

00:00:00.180 America has a new state religion. It is the state religion of LGBTQ+.
00:00:07.120 Every public and private institution just about in the United States has been captured by this religion,
00:00:14.680 and the movement of the sexual revolution is not stopping.
00:00:20.380 It is breaking down every barrier that was once up to protect people from total and complete anarchy
00:00:28.660 and moral chaos. How did this happen? Why is it happening? Can this advancement be stopped at
00:00:36.200 all? And do people on the right even understand the moment that we're in? The answer to that is
00:00:43.060 probably no, but we do have some solutions to this major problem from our friend and my Blaze TV
00:00:50.260 colleague, Oren McIntyre. He is the host of the Oren McIntyre show on Blaze TV.
00:00:57.940 We are going to be talking about all the problems with Republican politicians and right-wing
00:01:03.800 movements and how we can rectify these things and actually harness power in a healthy and
00:01:11.840 productive way to push good policy and good culture in the United States. This episode is brought to
00:01:19.040 you by our friends at Good Ranchers. Go to GoodRanchers.com. Use code ALI at checkout. That's
00:01:24.080 GoToRanchers.com. Code ALI.
00:01:35.740 Oren, thanks so much for coming back on Relatable. I appreciate it.
00:01:39.220 Absolutely. Thanks for having me.
00:01:40.640 Okay. So I love to get your thoughts on everything and I'm glad that we kind of had a warm-up
00:01:44.720 conversation before we even started. I'm just, I really am fascinated by all of your takes on
00:01:50.040 everything that happens in our culture. So I want to get your thoughts on this. Yesterday,
00:01:54.980 and I'm going to talk about this more tomorrow. I'll dedicate at least a segment of my show to
00:01:58.700 this, but I had a Rolling Stones reporter reach out to me. Her name is E.J. Dixon. And she said that
00:02:05.640 she's going to include me and some other people in this article about transphobia. And she said,
00:02:12.080 wrongly, that I've only started talking about transgenderism in the past year and I'm doing it
00:02:17.020 because it's growing my audience or whatever. I had never looked into this person, but I started
00:02:24.780 to research some of her past articles and I found some really disturbing things. There's a theme. She
00:02:30.820 defends the Netflix show Cuties where you've got 11-year-olds twerking. She basically links concerns
00:02:37.780 about pedophilia and child sex trafficking with QAnon and conspiracy theories. And then I saw that she has
00:02:44.360 an article from 2014 and it's titled, could child sex robots, quote unquote, cure pedophilia? So-called
00:02:53.100 child sex robots don't exist yet, but here's why they're worth exploring further. She calls pedophilia
00:02:59.300 a sexual orientation. She also says, I've become convinced that we need to stop getting caught up
00:03:05.060 in our knee-jerk reactions to adults having sex with children. So I almost tagged you in this thread
00:03:10.960 that I posted yesterday because I wanted to get your insight. Why do we see this so much from
00:03:16.440 left-wing journalists, this kind of defensive pedophilia while at the same time trying to label
00:03:21.320 people like me who think that men can't become women extremists? Well, we've seen this pattern over
00:03:27.260 and over again, right? This is how the ratchet turns. It was the same thing with a gay marriage. Oh,
00:03:31.440 you know, how does this affect your relationship? Can't possibly be a big issue for you. Why do you care so
00:03:35.780 much about it? Now it's mandatory pride celebrations in all of your schools, all of your corporations.
00:03:40.580 Are you speaking out against this? Well, you can't get a job anywhere. You might not be able to bank
00:03:44.500 at your local bank. You know, this is the same thing. You know, they pretend it's not happening.
00:03:48.560 It's not going on. You're crazy. Why would you point this out? And then by the time they've
00:03:52.140 implemented all this stuff, the answer is, oh, how could you possibly be against this? This is a popular
00:03:56.820 consensus. Of course, it's always been like this. And this is kind of how we understand these
00:04:01.740 sexual mores are connected. These boundaries that we have in society are all interconnected.
00:04:06.840 The slippery slope is real. There's a reason that the religious right of the eighties and nineties
00:04:10.820 warned us about all this stuff and all of it became true. And they were mocked for doing it
00:04:15.520 the entire time. And then it all just happened. And everyone said, well, of course, this was always
00:04:19.280 the plan. You know, now they're, they're more than happy to talk about how this was always the way
00:04:23.120 things were going to go. But at the time, everyone was called crazy and reactionary and ridiculous for
00:04:27.800 calling these things out. Why are you obsessed with this? You must be someone like this,
00:04:31.100 right? Those are all the accusations that get leveled. And I think it's because the obsession
00:04:36.160 is to break down all these barriers. And when you move these things kind of out of the realm of
00:04:41.340 the, you know, the sacred, we say morality is not about evil. Morality is not about good versus bad.
00:04:47.460 Morality is not about the spiritual or of higher authority. It's all about medicine. Everybody is
00:04:52.340 sick. Everybody has a condition. It's all therapeutic. And so therapeutic answers are always the way that we
00:04:57.980 solve things. And so when you're looking in that direction, well, why not let a pedophile have some
00:05:03.080 kind of robot? How does it hurt you? How does it hurt your family? They're getting the therapy they
00:05:07.740 need to deal with their issue. And surely won't go any further, just like all these other things that
00:05:12.700 went further, but we totally pretend didn't.
00:05:14.040 Yeah. And there's also a very simplistic answer that you post about a lot. And what is that?
00:05:20.100 It's that it's not rocket science. They're evil and they want to diddle kids. Yeah. There's
00:05:24.500 unfortunately, and again, it's not everyone. The vast majority of people who support this stuff,
00:05:29.780 they think they're behind the next civil rights movement. They think that they're on the right
00:05:32.920 side of history, that they're pushing for this. Most people who are involved in this behavior
00:05:37.220 are not explicitly interested in predation of children. But by removing those barriers,
00:05:44.280 those essential moral societal barriers between children and sexuality, they are grooming children
00:05:51.680 for predation. Anyone who is interested in taking action like this, anyone who's trying to like
00:05:58.700 traffic children sexually at a young age, they know the first thing they do is expose children's
00:06:05.140 sexuality too young. And if you're doing that as part of your civil rights movement, as your part of
00:06:12.800 your project to make everything acceptable and everything okay, then that means you have to
00:06:18.000 expose children to sexuality, which is why we're talking to children about, you know, gender swapping
00:06:23.500 at three or five years old while we have elementary school teachers who think it's okay to teach children
00:06:28.160 about masturbation and things when they're in first grade. And what is that doing? Whether these
00:06:33.300 teachers are specifically going out of their way to prepare children for that or not, they will
00:06:39.200 eventually make children more likely to be accepting of this behavior. And that's incredibly dangerous.
00:06:45.340 Yeah. Megyn Kelly recently played some audio on her podcast because she's doing a deep dive into the
00:06:51.120 subway guy who ended up being a pedophile. And she played some audio of a conversation between him
00:06:58.280 and this woman who ended up being an undercover agent but was pretending to go along with, you know,
00:07:05.380 the thing that his plans to basically abuse these young girls. And one of the things that he told her
00:07:11.640 to do when you have these interactions with these young girls at school, make sure you bring up
00:07:16.720 conversations about sex. Oh, if they start, you know, having if they start talking about the opposite sex or
00:07:23.960 these sexual things or these kind of verboten things, then encourage that. And that is what you read from
00:07:31.160 psychologists, from everyone who is an expert in child sex abuse, pedophilia, this kind of predation. The first
00:07:37.780 thing that's done is to condition that child to start thinking about sex and to talk about sex. But they like
00:07:44.980 what they play this game on the left that they say, well, talking about gender switching, talking about
00:07:50.960 masturbation. Like you said, these very graphic pictures that we see available in these books that
00:07:57.260 are in elementary school libraries, that has nothing to do with real sex. That has nothing to do with
00:08:04.440 anything explicit. We're just trying to keep them safe. We're just trying to let them accept who they
00:08:09.160 are. And then they do what you said. You're so gross that you would even think that this is anything
00:08:13.900 inappropriate. So what do you what do you make of that kind of game that they play?
00:08:17.760 Again, I think it's just a repeating pattern. This is how the dialectic advances. This is how
00:08:22.660 the left has advanced almost all of its ratchets. You know, again, they pretend that this isn't
00:08:28.440 happening. It's not going on. You're paranoid. You're pushing things. It's for your profit,
00:08:33.240 your glorification, you're growing an audience, whatever, all this stuff. And then they go ahead
00:08:37.900 and move forward with it incrementally each time. And by the time all the things that were predicted
00:08:42.880 happen, it's too late. The culture's cultural opinion has already shifted. The truth is that
00:08:48.360 there are barriers that must exist that can not be discussed. They cannot be debated. There are hard
00:08:55.360 stops in our culture that have to exist because they protect something too precious. And no one is
00:09:00.380 allowed to get up to or across the line. And protecting children from sexualization has to be
00:09:05.600 one of those. There cannot be movement. There cannot be discussion. There cannot be debate. We don't need
00:09:10.720 to rationalize this. There's no reason that needs to be behind it, though there is obviously reason
00:09:15.380 behind it. The line has to be drawn in the sand and has to be unapproachable by anyone. There's a
00:09:20.600 reason we place taboos like this because they mean something and the cost of crossing them is too high.
00:09:25.700 Mm-hmm. We keep seeing these drag shows happening, especially this month, that are labeled
00:09:31.740 all ages or family-friendly. I saw one advertised by Drew Hernandez. He went to one in Arizona where he took a
00:09:39.760 video of these family-friendly all-ages pride festivals. I guess it's not a drag show, but there
00:09:45.660 are drag queens there. And I mean, it's sex. It's sex. It's not inclusivity. It's not acceptance.
00:09:52.320 It's sex. These parades that claim to be family-friendly. You see the kids and the infants in
00:09:57.420 the background and the parents just cheering on. Like, this is so great while they see a man in leather,
00:10:03.060 you know, chaps being whipped by another man. And they're like, yeah, this is family-friendly.
00:10:07.760 It's fine. You're such a weirdo for even thinking that there's anything wrong with this. I mean,
00:10:13.040 10 years ago, I think everyone would have said, yeah, that's okay. You know what? You adults,
00:10:18.220 you want to do that. You even want to go out on the street and celebrate that. That's fine.
00:10:22.520 Don't include children. I mean, why is there this absolutely relentless push to include children in
00:10:28.380 this stuff? And why does it seem like the right noticing and advertising it has not hindered it at all?
00:10:34.820 Well, I think it's because if you're going to create a level of tolerance for something that is
00:10:42.200 obviously a moral problem, then you have to start young. You have to indoctrinate people.
00:10:49.280 When you have a natural hierarchy, I think that people recognize of how families should behave and
00:10:56.040 what like a healthy family formation is. And when you see what's happening here, it's very clear that
00:11:01.720 it's important that this be pushed down on kids younger and younger. Everyone a few years ago,
00:11:07.320 like you're saying, understood that pride was like a Mardi Gras thing. It's a kind of a no holds bar
00:11:12.200 thing that was for adults. And maybe you thought that was okay and maybe you didn't, but you understood
00:11:17.080 at some level, at least it was adults involved and that's who it was for. But it's very clear now
00:11:22.540 that we're at the point where we're debating about what kind of pride should be allowed, how explicit a
00:11:28.560 pride event can be and still be labeled family friendly. You're even seeing conservatives do
00:11:33.220 this, right? Saying, oh yeah, we have to go return to the tradition of pride three years ago when it
00:11:39.160 wasn't leather daddies running around and exposing themselves to children. And it's just, again,
00:11:44.360 this complete lack and willingness of people to stand on principle and say, we understand where this
00:11:50.260 goes and we don't care how you're going to depict us and we don't care what names you're going to call
00:11:54.620 us. And we don't care what kind of list the SPLC is going to put you on. Either you care about your
00:11:59.680 children or you don't. Either you care about the future or you don't. And you got to make your stand
00:12:04.200 somewhere. And if this, if you can't stand up against this, the active destruction of the innocence
00:12:09.480 of children for all kinds of political and more deeply and dark gratification of a segment of our
00:12:17.520 society, then you can't stand up against anything.
00:12:20.020 Yeah. And you know, I just don't really have a whole lot of faith because of what you just said
00:12:25.920 that the right in general, however you want to define that, whatever parameters you want to put
00:12:29.740 around that are really up for this fight. Because as you said, they're like, let's, okay, let's just go
00:12:35.940 back to 2015. Let's just go back to celebrating Obergefell. Or maybe if they're crazy, let's go back to
00:12:43.380 like 2012 or 1995 or whenever they feel like the golden age of liberalism was where we all got along
00:12:49.680 and things like that. But they don't see, they really don't see the connection. Or if they
00:12:54.820 even do see the connection between breaking down all the boundaries that leads to breaking down of
00:13:01.500 the boundaries that we're seeing broken down now, they don't want to admit it. They might be okay
00:13:07.160 with being called a hate group for being anti-pedothelia. They might be okay with being linked
00:13:12.780 with QAnon for being anti-child sex trafficking. They may be okay with being called transphobic.
00:13:17.040 They're not okay with being called homophobic, which is why I think the strategy of the left
00:13:21.800 can be very effective. Even in the email that the Rolling Stones person put to me, at first,
00:13:26.280 she said, you're transphobic. And then she said, LGBTQ. So it's lumping all that in. And now I don't
00:13:33.060 care. Like, I'm like, well, I'm a Christian. Yes, I do believe that marriage is between a man and a
00:13:37.920 woman. I don't care what you call me. But most people on the right do not want to be seen as
00:13:43.240 anti-gay. And they're very, very scared to have a conversation about the entire alphabet.
00:13:49.400 Yeah, the Martin Bailey tactic is a classic one. You use something that's been made socially
00:13:54.560 acceptable, pretend that that is the thing that you are defending, but you use that to advance a
00:13:59.480 more radical position. And this is something that you said, once you have kind of made that group sacred,
00:14:04.800 once you've made that thing unacceptable to criticize, then it becomes your shield and advancement
00:14:10.040 for more radical portions of your agenda. And this is exactly what goes on. They say, oh, well,
00:14:15.980 you're attacking trans. Well, then you're attacking everything. And you see, it's kind of sad, because
00:14:21.360 I know people mean it. I see these people and they're like, LGB without the T. That's the new
00:14:26.580 conservative position. And this will stop it, because it shows that there's something different
00:14:31.680 here. And we support and protect all of these things. But this is the one step that's too far. And it's
00:14:37.240 like, oh, guys, you didn't pay attention to conservative movements for the last 30 years,
00:14:42.180 because they've done this at every step of the way. And the truth is, either you have a cohesive
00:14:47.080 moral vision, or you don't. And if you don't, you'll get picked apart by those who do. The left has a
00:14:53.600 moral vision. They have a way that they want to reorder society. And they are very sure about the
00:15:00.300 righteousness of their cause, and their need to move it forward. The right does not have that, which is
00:15:05.260 sad, because the right should have the truth of real religion. It should have the courage of
00:15:09.660 their convictions. They claim a holy book, they claim a church, but therefore more willing to
00:15:16.500 betray that than left is to betray its world vision that doesn't have a holy book and doesn't have a
00:15:22.120 church. And that's pretty sad.
00:15:36.840 I think it's a lot easier not to make excuses for the right. But as you have mentioned, the really
00:15:44.280 the progressive vision and crude terms is just to tear down all the boundaries without asking if these
00:15:49.880 boundaries were protecting us from something that's really dangerous. Let's just tear them
00:15:54.020 all down. You don't really have to agree with someone on how to demolish something. You take a
00:15:59.860 hammer, I'll take, you know, I don't know, something else, some other kind of tool, some kind of mallet,
00:16:06.940 and let's just tear down this wall. You don't have to agree on the tactic. You don't have to agree on the
00:16:11.400 tools. You don't even have to agree on the vision. The vision is demolition, period. But when your vision
00:16:16.740 is to build something, there's a lot of disagreement and discussion that has to go into that. Like,
00:16:22.040 what kind of materials are we going to use? What kind of tools are we going to use? How are we going
00:16:25.900 to lay the bricks? What's the foundation going to look like? That's really what we can't agree on.
00:16:30.060 And then, like, what is this going to look like? And what kind of structure will really hold?
00:16:34.920 So that's, I think, one reason why it's much more difficult to form coalitions on the right,
00:16:40.120 because we can't decide on how to build something. It's so much easier to just,
00:16:45.520 you know, get together with all kinds of people that you might really disagree with and just
00:16:50.380 destroy.
00:16:52.000 Yeah, that's exactly right. The left is really, at the end of the day, a mystery cult of power. It's a
00:16:56.420 coalition of people who benefit from the destruction of our current society. Each piece of traditional
00:17:04.100 morality, each piece of traditional hierarchy that gets dismantled releases political energy
00:17:09.180 and allows the left to punish their enemies and reward their friends with different benefits,
00:17:14.620 with different opportunities, with, you know, different sinecures. And that is something that
00:17:19.840 is easy to get everybody on board with. Hey, if you are on board with dismantling this thing,
00:17:24.080 we'll hand you a piece of the pie that we take from someone else. This is a really classic strategy
00:17:28.460 for any political coalition, really. Take the wealth of other people and hand it out to them. We've
00:17:33.220 heard this before. In this case, sometimes it's social capital alongside with the money,
00:17:38.400 but it's still the same strategy. And so I think you're right that that is very difficult. And the
00:17:43.700 right is also in a state of denial. We want to believe that we can go back to a neutral
00:17:50.120 civilization. We can return to some kind of mythical liberal consensus that existed maybe in the 1990s,
00:17:57.780 if you're, if you're kind of a, you were a moderate liberal and maybe the 1950s, if you're more
00:18:03.940 classic conservative, but we like to pretend that there was a moment at which like basically all of
00:18:09.360 our institutions were neutral and they didn't have any moral values and they just let everybody kind
00:18:13.260 of pick their own thing and do their own thing. But of course that was never true. And the attempt
00:18:18.080 to return back to that is hollow because the left has a moral vision. They have something that they
00:18:23.640 want to give to people that gives them meaning and purpose. Now I think it's a crude, ugly caricature
00:18:29.220 of a real moral vision, a real religion, but at least it offers a narrative that people can follow,
00:18:36.820 they can engage in, they can find meaning in. The right refuses to invest in any of these things.
00:18:41.460 We have a few people who say it has to be Christianity. We have a few people who says it
00:18:44.440 has to be like basically Barack Obama liberalism. We have a few people that like, no libertarians,
00:18:49.680 we can't have any of this stuff. And because there's this constant inability to coalesce around
00:18:55.740 one of those things, there's no way, like you said, to really move forward together. And until
00:19:00.760 people admit to themselves that we have to forge that, then you're not going to have a really
00:19:05.820 consistent movement, I don't think. Yeah. I think that the conversation about can you have,
00:19:11.760 can we promote LGB without the T, that conversation is really like a symptom of the greater problem
00:19:18.420 because I am sympathetic to that. I really am. And like, I appreciate a lot of work that is being done
00:19:25.500 especially like the so-called TERFs or the feminists who maybe identify as LGB and they're
00:19:33.140 like, you know, it's fundamentally different. I can sympathize with that. They would say they're
00:19:38.460 not denying reality. They're not pretending to be something that they're not. They're not trying
00:19:43.040 to enter into spaces that are not theirs. They're not violating other people's rights. I can sympathize
00:19:48.960 with that. And I can understand why people, other people are very sympathetic to that. But again,
00:19:55.240 it goes back to like, but what is our moral vision? What's the foundation for all of this? What is the
00:20:01.540 ideal that we are going to hold up? What is best for society? Like we actually have to agree on those
00:20:08.020 things. If you think that there is something unique about a man and a woman that doesn't just inform what
00:20:15.300 you think about gender and gender ideology, it's going to inform what you think about marriage and
00:20:20.180 parenting too. It's really like trans women are women is to me like the same exact math as love is
00:20:26.380 love. It's the same. It's the same thing. Basically you're saying men and women and all these people,
00:20:32.140 we're all just interchangeable. We're all just clumps of matter. Like there's nothing unique to you as a
00:20:37.120 man. There's nothing unique to me as a woman. There's nothing unique that I bring to the table as a mom
00:20:41.500 or as a wife, nothing unique that my husband as a dad and as a husband brings to the table that's
00:20:46.680 unique. And so it's, it's the same, it's the same fundamental premise that like we are our own
00:20:54.040 gods. We get to self-identify. We get to self-declare. We get to redefine marriage and family, how we see
00:20:59.400 fit. So even though I can really sympathize with like the separation at the end of the day,
00:21:04.900 it's all the same, in my opinion, faulty premise and you can't build a cohesive society on that.
00:21:12.980 Yeah. I mean, I hear you. These people at least are principled, right? If nothing else,
00:21:17.320 they're willing to stand on some kind of principle. But at the end of the day,
00:21:20.120 they're just revolutionaries who fell off the tip of the spear. The revolution finally got to
00:21:23.900 dismantling something they cared about. And all of a sudden the revolution had gone too far. But of
00:21:29.000 course it had been doing that beforehand. All of the principles that they're trying to rest their
00:21:33.280 identity on were already dismantled by the very movement that they're now decrying against,
00:21:38.300 even though they were on board with that revolution all the way up to this point. The truth is either
00:21:44.220 we are people who have limitations, who are, have purpose inside a tradition, inside an identity,
00:21:52.960 inside a hierarchy that is ordained and maintained by things that are beyond our control,
00:21:58.720 or we are just rearrangeable meat Legos, and we can just become whatever we want at any time.
00:22:07.280 And there's really no way to break that logic. You have to go one way or the other. Either nature
00:22:13.000 matters, either those things, the designs of things beyond our understanding or power to control
00:22:18.420 matter, and we have to honor them, or we don't. And that's the problem of kind of the rights
00:22:23.840 revolution. We are obsessed with rights, but rights have now gone far beyond what government
00:22:28.840 can't do to us, and it's become what we must do, what government must force for us to have our theory
00:22:35.760 of our own autonomy. And that's, I think, the break that a lot of people had. But the problem is,
00:22:41.020 again, that dismantling that got you there is the reason this is available now. It's all connected,
00:22:46.040 like you said.
00:22:46.580 Yeah. I always say it always goes back to the first chapter of the first book of the Bible,
00:22:51.340 God created the heavens and the earth. Because if you believe that, if God created it, then he's
00:22:56.020 the authority over all of it. He says what is and what isn't, what's right and what's wrong,
00:22:58.940 what's true and what's false, what's male and what's female. If you don't believe that, if you
00:23:02.040 don't believe in the God of Scripture, you will inevitably believe in the God of self, and you
00:23:06.500 will be self-defining, self-declaring. I mean, to me, that is like the fundamental disagreement that
00:23:11.700 everyone has, but even particularly on the right. Now, some people agree on that, but we disagree with how
00:23:17.980 it actually manifests itself in politics and culture and all of that. But I want to talk to
00:23:22.700 you about like this failure to be able to coalesce around any moral vision by looking at a tweet from
00:23:29.300 Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz, that people, at least on the left, and maybe a lot of people, Republicans
00:23:34.820 would say he's like the furthest right that you could possibly get. Some people would say that.
00:23:38.820 And he tweeted about, he quote tweeted the New York Times, the New York Times tweeted about this
00:23:44.920 Uganda law, which is a, they describe as a punitive anti-gay bill, which does public or punish
00:23:51.160 homosexual behavior, but issues the death penalty for homosexual child rapists, and also penalizes
00:23:59.300 like knowingly infecting someone with HIV. Ted Cruz quote tweets it, says this Uganda law is horrific
00:24:07.340 and wrong. Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for quote unquote
00:24:12.960 aggravated homosexuality is grotesque and an abomination. All civilized nations should join
00:24:18.580 together in condemning this human rights abuse. Hashtag LGBTQ. What does this mean? And why did Ted
00:24:28.140 Cruz of all the things of all the human rights atrocities in Uganda, by the way, which is why I'm
00:24:33.420 like, I'm not this law too. I'm like, there's so many human rights violations going on in Uganda.
00:24:39.280 Like why this to highlight of all the terrible, terrible things that go on there against all
00:24:44.900 different kinds of people. Why did he choose to highlight this law and not the others that are
00:24:49.620 clearly discriminatory against all different kinds of people in Uganda? Because Ted Cruz is the subject
00:24:54.960 of the media because we're in a media controlled state and the media told him to look, you can look
00:24:59.980 at Africa. And like you said, there's tons of horrific things happening there, but sub-Saharan
00:25:05.380 sodomy laws are not like the primary thing that you think you would be drawn to. I mean, like you
00:25:10.460 said, there's plenty of atrocities in Uganda itself that you could mention. There's also places like
00:25:14.140 South Africa that are trying to limit access to water based on race, but you'll never see Ted Cruz
00:25:19.660 talk about that. And we all know why. Yeah. And that's the thing.
00:25:22.820 Well, and let's just be specific in case people don't know. It's based on race. Like if you are
00:25:29.860 white, you get later access to utilities like water. So just so people know, it's not preferential
00:25:36.420 treatment toward white people. It's the other way around, which is why he wouldn't say anything.
00:25:40.080 Yeah. It's minorities in South Africa, but in South Africa, minorities are whites, but also other
00:25:47.640 races, other tribes that aren't the predominant. And yes, they're all getting lower treatment in many
00:25:54.780 areas. They're not allowed to hold specific positions in government. They're not allowed to have
00:25:58.700 enough people on different company boards. Like this is, they just have racial quotas on everything.
00:26:03.520 And the majority has to be in charge of all of it. And the minorities, including whites,
00:26:07.500 have to be at the bottom of it in a lot of these situations. But of course, Ted Cruz isn't going to
00:26:11.760 talk about any of that because the media is going to destroy him for talking about that. And they're
00:26:16.200 going to praise him for talking about what Uganda is doing over there. Right now, Ted Cruz lives in a
00:26:21.880 country that is currently trying to put a man in jail for 10 years for tweeting a meme about Hillary Clinton.
00:26:27.960 Yeah. Right. Ted Cruz lives in a country where people who go to the Capitol and protest and
00:26:34.100 admittedly, maybe some of them, you know, go in and they riot and deserve some kind of criminal penalty,
00:26:39.140 but go to jail for over a decade. Some of them for not even entering the building. Ted Cruz lives in a
00:26:45.040 country where all of this stuff is occurring, but his energy is spent on this issue. Why? Because he
00:26:52.900 knows that he'll get points. He knows that this is where he will be celebrated. And that's the sad
00:26:59.720 thing. He won't even be celebrated, right? Most of these people will still hate him the next minute
00:27:03.520 later. Most of them will just use his statement to sneer. Oh, look, the right's reacting to this.
00:27:08.440 They're such bad people. They'll even attack this guy who's the worst human in the world who happened
00:27:13.360 to say one true thing for a second, right? But he still does it because he feels that compulsion
00:27:18.580 to win those popular points. And that is very sad. Maybe Ted Cruz really does have a problem with
00:27:25.420 this law. Fine. But every time he spends the Capitol, that political Capitol, that communications
00:27:32.560 Capitol, he's making a choice as to like what he's going to acquiesce to. And it's very clear why he made
00:27:38.380 that choice here. Yeah. And, you know, I'm sure he would say his probably defense would be, look, I do
00:27:44.480 spend energy on all those other things. I can do multiple things at once. This was one of the things
00:27:49.560 that bothered me. But he would probably say, I spend time on a lot of the things that you're
00:27:53.940 talking about that are really important. But I just wanted to do this. Now, I think that's true. And I
00:27:58.940 appreciate Ted Cruz in a lot of ways. I appreciate a lot of the good, you know, strong legislation he's
00:28:04.740 put forth and all of that. So I don't want it to seem like I'm discounting that or, you know, I don't mean
00:28:09.900 any disrespect, but I just happen to agree with you that he might be doing some good things. But
00:28:15.500 this is to score points, especially and you pointed this out, which I thought was interesting,
00:28:20.320 especially the hashtag LGBTQ. Tell me the significance in your mind of him, including
00:28:26.040 that entire hashtag. Yeah, he totally could have just said, hey, I don't think that two consenting
00:28:31.440 adults should go to jail for this, or I don't think it's the state's business to do this. And you
00:28:36.000 probably shouldn't do that. And that would have still weird, like right now, it's a little bit
00:28:41.360 weird that he went out of his way to select that particular issue. But at least he could have just
00:28:45.900 said, I have a general principle that I don't think the state should do this. It could apply to
00:28:50.620 anything, not just this one particular thing. And so I'm just pointing this out. Fair enough,
00:28:55.680 right? Again, weird, that would be the go out of your way to do that. But that would at least be
00:29:00.480 consistent with his reasoning. But when you specifically include the hashtag, including the T,
00:29:05.280 right, including the queer and trans stuff, he is specifically including and accepting the left's
00:29:12.200 frame about the community that this creates, right? He's buying into the narrative that this is all
00:29:17.880 one thing, that it has to be connected. And maybe they're right, right? Maybe they are right. Maybe
00:29:23.400 these things are inexplicably separated, which is something that the right is really busy arguing
00:29:29.480 against people out of, something that they seem, for the most part, more than fine to include. But
00:29:33.540 either way, the point is, he's going out of his way to include what are supposed to be parts of the
00:29:38.120 community that the right is now opposing, right? In some way, shape, or form. And again, that just
00:29:43.460 gives the obvious point that he sees these things as inherently connected, and that he's trying to
00:29:49.980 appeal to this, that this eventually will be the way forward for the right. They will look for a way to
00:29:56.120 pander to this stuff. And that's a reason that he's going out of a way to include that hashtag
00:30:01.320 and see himself as signaling to that entire, quote unquote, community.
00:30:05.740 Yeah. I see the right doing this a lot. And you know, I probably was more guilty of it a few years
00:30:10.300 ago than I am today. I think a lot of people, myself included, have just gotten into the realm of
00:30:14.800 really not caring. But I see a lot of Christian conservatives say things like,
00:30:19.460 it's not transphobic to be against the maiming of children's bodies, or it's not racist to point
00:30:26.320 out statistics or whatever. And I'm like, it doesn't matter if it is. It doesn't matter if it
00:30:31.340 is. It's okay. I don't like, okay, maybe it is transphobic. Maybe it is transphobic to say that I
00:30:36.300 don't believe that men can become women. Maybe it is homophobic to say that I believe in traditional
00:30:41.520 marriage. Why do people even waste time defending themselves against those accusations? Because,
00:30:47.120 look, the left, whether you like it or not, the left has already claimed authority over defining
00:30:52.620 those words, most words, actually, but especially those words. Like, I don't see the point in trying
00:30:58.240 to reclaim them or redeem them or like redeem feminism. I see that a lot still on the right.
00:31:04.060 Let's reclaim feminism. Why? Why? I don't want to defend myself against being an anti-feminist. I don't
00:31:11.180 want to defend myself against being anti-transphobic. I want to spend all my energy on actually saying what
00:31:17.000 is true. And they're going to call you trans. That's the thing. They're going to call you
00:31:20.480 transphobic anyway. It doesn't matter. Even if you say like you, I don't know if you've seen the
00:31:26.300 whole Clayton Kershaw thing, the LA Dodgers pitcher who he issued, you know, this statement last week
00:31:33.960 about the sisters of perpetual indulgence, this horrible sacrilegious anti-Christian drag group that
00:31:40.580 sexualizes the crucifixion publicly. They were, they were honored or are going to be honored at the LA
00:31:46.880 Dodgers pride night. And basically as an outspoken Christian, he comes out and he says,
00:31:51.760 well, you know, I have a problem with this. Not because it has anything to do with the LGBTQ
00:31:56.640 community. It has nothing to do with that. It has nothing to do with that. It just, I don't think
00:32:01.080 making fun of a religion is nice. And then he's now come out and said, well, I'm still going to play
00:32:05.960 the game at which the sisters of perpetual indulgence that are making a sexual mockery of my faith
00:32:12.100 are going to be honored. And his reasoning was, well, we're called to love everyone. Well,
00:32:19.600 we're not going to make it or we're not going to make it. If that's like, if that's the stance of a
00:32:25.140 lot of people on the right. And I think that it is like to carve out the tiniest, like piece of
00:32:31.180 opposition that you can. So maybe you can stave off criticism of being called homophobic and you're
00:32:36.400 still going to be called homophobic, which is really my point or transphobic. Then like, we're
00:32:41.500 just, it's hopeless. It's totally hopeless. Yeah. The left thrives by dialectics and the right dies
00:32:47.120 by them. We don't understand how this works. What does that mean? It means that when you are,
00:32:52.920 when you have a standard that is unassailable and you are standing behind it, no matter what,
00:33:00.700 no matter what the consequences, no matter what the language being threatened, thrown at you,
00:33:04.420 that shows something to people. I know they may not always say that they respect it,
00:33:09.860 but when you are unwilling and unbending, you show leadership, you show a dynamic quality and a,
00:33:14.980 an understanding and a rooting in truth that means something to people. That's what I think the right
00:33:21.120 flourishes in the left flourishes in the dissolving of those things. The, like we talked about the ripping
00:33:27.860 apart of those standards, the breaking down of those things. And so every time they can get you into a,
00:33:32.940 a conversation, a debate over each little wedge of those things, they get to peel off a little bit
00:33:39.420 of it each time may not seem much at first, but by the time you're done with it, the whole thing is
00:33:43.860 dismantled. And so that's why it's so dangerous for the right to do things like engage with leftist
00:33:49.240 newspeak. Homophobia is not a word. Transphobia is not a word. These are not real things. These are
00:33:56.600 political. Why did they attach phobia to the things? Anyone remember Islamophobia? Remember people
00:34:01.900 literally blew up buildings, murdered thousands of people. And what's the first thing they slapped on the
00:34:07.180 side of that? Phobia. Should be, you be scared of being murdered when someone blows up a thousand or more
00:34:12.860 people? Yes, that's not phobia. That's rational assessment of danger. But the term became politicized. The
00:34:21.700 newspeak was adopted. And all of a sudden noticing a pattern of like, Hey, all these people blowing stuff up
00:34:27.500 seem to share a common thing was phobic. And you don't want to be phobic, right? That means you're
00:34:33.840 weak. You're scared. You're irrational. That's what these terms are. They're politically charged
00:34:39.820 newspeak created specifically to box people into something. So no, I'm not homophobic or transphobic.
00:34:48.280 I just agree with the Bible. I just agree with most people throughout American history and the morals
00:34:56.140 that they had. That's how people need to approach this stuff. But of course, if you're somebody who
00:35:01.600 doesn't have those things, and like we said, this is a problem with the right. So many people on the
00:35:05.500 right can't invest in those things because they don't really believe them because they're the part of
00:35:10.120 the coalition doesn't value any of that stuff. And so they need to find some kind of weird, wishy-washy
00:35:16.160 middle ground. They don't have a solid basis and root of natural and higher order on which to stand.
00:35:23.580 And so they have to come up with this stuff. And so what do they end up doing? Defending
00:35:26.960 themselves against all those little, you know, wishy-washy words, using all those statements,
00:35:31.360 hedging all of their bets. And in each one of those battles, they lose a little bit more ground
00:35:35.340 until eventually, you know, Ted Cruz is talking about whether or not it's illegal to, you know,
00:35:41.040 have sex with kids in Uganda.
00:35:53.580 I saw a tweet, I think it was from Logan Hall the other day that he was like, one of the
00:36:00.920 differences between the right and the left is that the left rewards their fringes and the right
00:36:05.500 punishes theirs. I don't think it's necessarily bad to on the right say, oh, that truly is a fringe
00:36:13.420 and most of the right doesn't believe that. But he was talking about Chesa Boudin in particular.
00:36:19.480 I think he was what he was the DA of San Francisco, completely soft on crime. His parents were deadly
00:36:25.700 terrorists. He's a radical progressive. And of course, his policies and refusing to actually
00:36:31.340 crack down on crime led to all kinds of murder and chaos, as it always does, because progressives
00:36:37.200 don't understand human nature. And now he is being rewarded with I forget the university, it's Yale or
00:36:43.840 one of these Ivy Leagues that he is now going to be a professor of criminal justice at this place.
00:36:49.680 Lori Lightfoot, the same thing. She scored a prestigious position at Harvard. There is no record of
00:36:57.240 success whatsoever from Lori Lightfoot as the mayor of Chicago. But this is what happens. They take care of
00:37:02.960 their own. You know that, you know, Katie Hobbs is I think it was the press secretary or someone who worked
00:37:08.760 for her, the governor of Arizona, who, you know, made a meme the day after those Nashville kids were
00:37:15.080 shot by the woman who identified as transgender. She made a meme shooting trans folks. And sure,
00:37:22.020 she was made to resign. She's going to get taken care of. She's not going to be excised. There's no
00:37:27.600 one on the left who is going to be like she's too radical to touch. This Rolling Stones reporter,
00:37:32.380 EJ Dixon. She is literally advocated for pedophiles and for, you know, trying to satisfy pedophilia with
00:37:42.260 child sex robots. She's a senior writer at Rolling Stones. She wrote that back in 2014. There's nothing
00:37:48.800 too radical, I think, that someone on the left can say that's going to stop them from getting new
00:37:53.720 opportunities. There are a lot of things on the right that you cannot say if you want to continue to be
00:37:59.480 friendly with mainstream conservatives. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, look at the weather
00:38:03.580 underground. They literally set bombs and tried to murder people and ended up all getting like
00:38:09.420 professorships. I think that was Chesapeake's parents.
00:38:11.840 Was she in the weather? Quite possibly. But I forget the guy who's Barack Obama, one of Barack
00:38:17.520 Obama's mentors, right, after being in the weather underground. So absolutely, these guys get
00:38:21.860 sinecures in universities. They get they become influential inside the Democratic Party. You can
00:38:27.180 literally become a terrorist and then get paid a ton of money and influence the next president of the
00:38:32.320 United States. That's how the left treats their radicals. The right understands the game, whether
00:38:38.340 they'll say it or not. You can't go beyond certain barriers. You can't go beyond certain things. And if
00:38:45.300 you do, you are destroyed forever. You're not just not in some little way and on some minor, oh, we'll get
00:38:50.800 you a job somewhere else. Don't worry. You are obliterated. You can't earn money. You can't do you can't
00:38:56.060 bank. No one in the right will talk to you. Everyone on the right understands that. And so
00:39:00.520 that means the left can go as crazy and insane and as far left all the way literally to terrorism if
00:39:05.880 they want. And that will only advance their careers in leftist politics. The right has to be careful
00:39:11.920 about saying anything at all, because at any moment they're going to get destroyed. And the thing is,
00:39:17.980 the right is really excited to aggressively police people on the right for the benefit of the left.
00:39:23.940 They love it. They love to, the people, you know, love to run out and go, oh, I'm not as bad as that
00:39:29.120 guy. See, now you can write a New York Times article about your strange new respect for me, right?
00:39:34.060 And that's what Ted Cruz did when he was going back and forth with Jenna Ellis. Like, you know,
00:39:37.900 that's what he was trying to do. See, I'm not her.
00:39:40.800 Yeah, absolutely. They know, again, at the end of the day, as the people who we paint as the craziest,
00:39:47.760 farthest right, or not that we paint, the media paints, as the craziest far right people like Ted Cruz
00:39:52.040 are really not at all. They're really not that far right. Look, look at Donald Trump. Donald Trump
00:39:56.560 is a blue dog Democrat, okay? Totally.
00:39:59.040 Yeah, he doesn't have almost any opinions that would have been considered, you know, right wing
00:40:04.020 just a few decades ago. You know, he's more radical than Barack Obama was on gay marriage
00:40:09.900 and pride acceptance, right? Yeah, totally.
00:40:11.880 And this guy is a crazy Nazi fascist, right? He's the farthest right anyone can have.
00:40:16.260 But we laugh at that, but the left understands what they're doing. They're anchoring
00:40:20.700 the political views in the United States. They're creating an Overton window that stops at Donald
00:40:25.260 Trump. The farthest right you can be is a blue dog Democrat from a few decades ago. That is the
00:40:30.360 craziest right wing position available. And no one could be beyond Trump because he's already a crazy
00:40:35.200 Nazi, right? And so if you went beyond Trump, then what would that make you? And so by establishing
00:40:40.340 those barriers by making sure that you can punish anyone beyond that, even on the right, where the
00:40:47.060 right is incentivized to do that, you ensure that we always move left. That's key.
00:40:51.840 I don't know if there's any true social conservatives on the federal level. Maybe Chip Roy. I really like
00:40:57.420 Chip Roy, the representative from Texas. But when it comes to Congress, like, are there any even
00:41:02.740 Republicans who are willing to say something that the vast majority of people in the United States
00:41:07.420 were saying just in 2015? I mean, 60 percent of Americans in 2015, right before Obergefell,
00:41:14.160 believed that homosexuality is something that shouldn't be mainstreamed or upheld in society.
00:41:18.900 Obviously, that has dramatically changed over the past few years. But there's not even any
00:41:25.180 Republicans that I can think of that are willing to stand up and say what most people were saying in
00:41:29.440 2015, that, you know what, consenting adults can do what they want to. But as far as what we're going
00:41:34.900 to build this foundation of or what is we're going to build our country on, as far as what we are going
00:41:39.880 to uphold, as far as what is right and biblical, it's marriage between a man and a woman. I don't
00:41:45.320 know that I know I can think of any Republicans that would stand up and say that today.
00:41:50.060 We have a serious mechanical problem, and it's that the left is built on its right to rule.
00:41:56.920 They are built on their right to expand government and control everything.
00:42:00.180 They have no hesitation to say this. They want to unify everything, they want to centralize power,
00:42:05.860 and they want to be able to dictate to everyone what the morality of the country will be.
00:42:10.760 On the right, we believe in subsidiarity, we believe in federalism, we believe that communities
00:42:16.020 best govern themselves, and the government shouldn't have an overarching role in controlling
00:42:21.180 everything. I think that's actually a better system in many ways. I don't think civilization
00:42:25.400 actually scales to the size of our now global empire that we call the United States.
00:42:30.180 And it would be better if we could find a way to devolve power back down to those things. But at
00:42:36.080 the moment, that doesn't matter because that's not the reality we face. The truth is we have a
00:42:41.500 Leviathan state. And the truth is that Leviathan state is wielded in a way which it enforces these
00:42:47.860 norms across the board. And if those massive institutions, which now dictate every aspect of human life,
00:42:54.620 are ordered towards your enemy's morality, that is what everyone will adopt.
00:43:00.520 And we just have a problem because that gives an out to every GOP congressman because they can
00:43:05.420 always say like, but we don't believe that. We don't believe that's the role of government. We
00:43:08.900 don't believe that's the role of state. Well, that's great, but you're not doing anything to
00:43:12.080 dismantle that. What's the libertarian record on dismantling the state? What's the conservative
00:43:16.460 record on dismantling the state? Utter failure. Just an unbroken string of complete devastating losses
00:43:24.080 while the left advances and centralizes the state and pushes all of this stuff because the right
00:43:29.620 implicitly says we won't take part in it. Do you think DeSantis is a break from that? Like,
00:43:34.660 do you think that he sees things a little differently than the average Republican as far as
00:43:38.440 using state power to fight back against what you would call the total state like Disney?
00:43:43.640 I think he's definitely a change in that in a good way. It's a positive thing that Ron DeSantis is
00:43:49.540 obviously willing to say, uh, we don't do that here. Uh, and where the state will tell you,
00:43:54.360 we don't do that here. Uh, I think that, um, while those are all positive advancements on Ron DeSantis,
00:44:00.240 I still don't think that even he is willing to say, or look at kind of the depth of kind of the
00:44:07.240 problem we have, uh, which isn't to say that, you know, the things he is doing and the actions he's
00:44:12.480 taking in Florida are not positive advancements. They actually, they absolutely are. But I think even he
00:44:17.660 is kind of, everything is couched in this limited government vision. Everything is couched in kind
00:44:23.040 of, uh, in a way that I think still perhaps limits for some people, but maybe those are steps that get
00:44:28.980 you to that understanding. We really are in a position again, where if Ron DeSantis was in the
00:44:35.760 white house tomorrow, I don't know that he could make the changes that even he wants to make because
00:44:40.100 the infrastructure that is kind of littered throughout the, uh, you know, the deep state as a lot of people
00:44:45.420 like to call it is so thoroughly progressive that even if he went in with the mindset to
00:44:50.940 completely use state power and completely shift the country in an opposite direction, uh, he would
00:44:56.260 be fighting, uh, the entire internal, uh, state apparatus the whole time, which we see what that
00:45:02.780 did to Donald Trump. I mean, Donald Trump literally just got lied to by his generals about what the
00:45:07.600 military is doing. He's the commander in chief. That's by all definitions, a coup and it happened. And we
00:45:13.280 just don't talk about it because then we'd have to think about what that means about the constitution.
00:45:17.080 Yeah. Yeah. That's interesting. I mean, I do think that it does seem to me that DeSantis would go into
00:45:23.680 the presidency with the thought that I'm going to rework all of this, just things that he's done
00:45:28.140 in Florida, like actually go after those prosecutors with power and say, no, you're, you're not going to
00:45:33.860 do this. These Soros backed prosecutors. I was very impressed by that move because I just don't see most
00:45:38.840 governors do do that. They kind of posture and they say, oh, this is so bad George Soros, but they
00:45:44.660 won't actually do anything about it. Now Republican governors have less of an excuse because you've got
00:45:50.560 someone like Ron DeSantis saying, no, I'm actually going to do this. And people like it. I think that
00:45:55.720 is a huge benefit to the things that he's doing, that it gives fewer excuses to other Republican
00:46:02.400 governors to do what they've always done, which is to sit on their hands and to say, yay, corporations
00:46:07.800 come here, which is kind of the tactic that like Nikki Haley is employing right now. Like she
00:46:12.380 actually had the audacity to say, oh, if I were in, you know, if she acts like she's like still
00:46:17.680 like something in South Carolina, but she will say, um, she said, you know, I, if, if Disney wants to
00:46:25.600 come here to South Carolina, yeah, I'm so sure that the people of Columbia, South Carolina would like
00:46:33.280 Disney and all of their policies to start coming in and infecting their schools with the different
00:46:39.080 kinds of curriculum that they were in Florida. Like to me, that just represents another level
00:46:44.640 of not getting it, of not understanding where in the world we are when it comes to the total state.
00:46:50.500 And I want you to talk more about the total state because that's what you talk about a lot.
00:46:54.160 What is it and why are so many people blind to it still?
00:46:56.940 Well, I think that all of us have noticed that government doesn't really work the way
00:47:02.480 that we had it explained to us in our high school civics class. I mean, we're supposed to have a
00:47:06.520 constitution, supposed to have a bill of rights, separation of powers, checks and balances, all
00:47:10.360 that great stuff from Baron de Montesquieu that got brought into the constitution that along with
00:47:15.520 our democratic will expressed through the popular sovereignty, electing our representatives,
00:47:20.500 all this stuff was supposed to check the power of the state, keep it controlled, make sure that it
00:47:24.060 only works for our liberty. It exists only to defend our rights and nothing else, right? This is all
00:47:28.100 the stuff that Thomas Jefferson was promising in the Declaration of Independence. But now we look at
00:47:33.680 our state and during COVID, they can just lock everybody inside and force everyone to wear masks
00:47:39.120 and demand that they get a injection if they want to work and close down all the churches and arrest
00:47:45.880 pastors. And by the way, abortion clinics are open, liquor stores are open, big stock retailers are open,
00:47:51.020 Amazon's making profits out the wazoo as they don't have to the democratic party. But all those
00:47:55.460 mid-level businesses that were keeping the republican party up, all of them had to close down. Who knew,
00:48:00.420 right? It seems like the power of the state, again, Douglas Mackey facing 10 years in jail for posting a
00:48:05.760 meme. Like, where is the first amendment, right? These are all supposed to be things that are defended,
00:48:10.520 but we clearly see that's not the case. And people are wondering what's going on, right? Why doesn't
00:48:16.800 constitution do that? And I think what we're noticing is the total state. You know, when we
00:48:21.940 lived, if we lived in Nazi Germany, or if we lived in Soviet Russia, we would understand why everything
00:48:29.460 speaks with one voice. Because those are totalitarian states. They have a explicit top-down government that
00:48:35.860 tells everybody what to believe and how businesses or organizations are going to run, what kind of
00:48:40.580 propaganda is going to be pushed. But in the United States, we don't have that. And yet our media,
00:48:44.660 our corporations, our private institutions, NGOs, our government, our education system,
00:48:51.300 all push the same thing at the same time. How does that happen if we don't have a Politburo? And I
00:48:56.400 think that's what the total state is. It's the fact that our Western liberal democracies
00:49:00.860 didn't defend us from this tendency of power the way we thought that they did.
00:49:14.660 I want to put up some examples, some pictures that if you're watching on YouTube, you'll be able to
00:49:24.160 see. And you have tweeted a lot of them out, just showing the total state. Obviously, we know all the
00:49:30.400 corporations that are pushing pride. I've actually been a little surprised. Some corporations I haven't
00:49:36.320 seen doing pride this year, which is interesting. I haven't gotten into my analysis of why that is.
00:49:41.160 Companies that I know are not Christian conservative, I haven't seen posting rainbows. But
00:49:45.840 it doesn't really matter because most major corporations certainly are. Target wasn't
00:49:51.040 scared at all to push tucking bathing suits that could fit children, partner with an open Satanist
00:49:56.720 to basically threaten people who believe that men can't become women. The Department of Agriculture
00:50:01.740 decided for some reason that they needed to light up their building in rainbow colors. And then they
00:50:07.940 also put the rainbow pride flag emoji and the transgender flag emoji. So again, we've connected
00:50:16.480 all of it. There's no like boundary or barrier there. The Department of Defense tweeted this pride
00:50:24.080 month, we honor the service commitment and sacrifice of the LGBTQ plus service members and personnel who
00:50:29.860 volunteer to defend our country. This was tweeted out by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin.
00:50:37.940 And then the Army and the Air Force official Twitter accounts retweeted his statement.
00:50:43.720 The Navy also issued its own statement. Remember, the Navy christened a ship, the US in as Harvey
00:50:52.520 Milk in 2021 in the San Francisco International Airport recently named a terminal after him. I'm pretty
00:50:57.540 sure that he's like a pedophile. So there we go. There we go. And then you've got the Veterans
00:51:05.220 Affairs Affair or the VA Health Hospital outside Des Moines, Iowa. They tweeted out a picture
00:51:12.060 posting of the flag in front of the VA, the trans and the pride flag put together. They're excited
00:51:22.060 about that. And then you also have the Secretary of Education, Miguel Cardona. He put up a picture of,
00:51:31.780 I guess, what's in front of their building, an American flag and then the trans pride flag
00:51:37.560 underneath it. So why is this the state religion? Even more than BLM, even more than some of the
00:51:46.340 other progressive tenets, it seems like sexual preference and gender confusion are the things
00:51:53.020 that they're hoisting up as like their idol, their emblem. Why is that?
00:51:57.080 Well, you know, we have separation of church and state in the United States, or at least
00:52:02.240 that's the kind of the modern idea is that there's this barrier between the state and
00:52:09.420 religion and the state can't adopt any form of religion in its official functions. And
00:52:14.680 whether we understand that or not, political restrictions eventually stretch down to our
00:52:19.700 private, you know, kind of interactions as well, which is why corporations and all these
00:52:24.020 things also basically banned all of those things from our public square. But humans are deeply
00:52:30.080 narrative creatures. We're deeply religious. We can talk a pretense about how we've moved beyond
00:52:35.260 this stuff, fairy stories, blah, blah, blah. It's such a lie. Like at our core, we know that there's
00:52:41.840 something beyond us and we have to interact with the world around us. We have to put things in a moral
00:52:46.660 framework that will be founded in some kind of religious narrative. And so when we banned
00:52:51.160 the use of Christianity or other traditions, traditional religions from our public square,
00:52:57.740 we created basically a bunch of selection pressures that would allow a system that can
00:53:03.420 circumvent those restrictions to kind of take hold. And so the great thing about wokeness or
00:53:09.500 progressivism, as I kind of prefer to call it, because wokeness has now become a term that's very,
00:53:13.860 very difficult for people to get a handle on. But progressivism doesn't have a whole official
00:53:17.980 holy book. It doesn't have an official church. And so because it's a ideology that does kind of
00:53:23.460 bind these things and create a moral narrative and create a kind of a spiritual framework, even though
00:53:28.860 it's a secular, you know, explicitly non-deistic framework, it is allowed into all those public
00:53:35.740 institutions. And because we are narrative creatures, there's this God-shaped hole that had
00:53:40.480 to get filled. These organizations do have to orient themselves towards some vision of the good.
00:53:44.620 And since all the Christian vision and all the other traditionally religious visions were banned
00:53:49.940 from those places, the only one that could fill that void was progressivism. And so now we've
00:53:55.340 slowly watched as progressivism, which has been the only thing that's been allowed to be promoted
00:53:59.900 in schools and in universities and government organizations and corporations, has basically pushed
00:54:06.320 all Christianity out of the public square. And this means that they need a new way to have identities,
00:54:12.680 a new way to bind things together. And we have made that advancement of kind of civil rights.
00:54:18.160 We've made that advancement of rights and kind of individual choice as like the key lodestone for
00:54:24.860 our religious narrative, the center part of this. And that's why all of these government organizations
00:54:31.420 are now oriented towards this because it became our de facto state religion because everything else was
00:54:36.520 banned. Yeah. Interesting. Romans 1 made manifest, I think. I saw that there was a tweet that said that
00:54:46.040 there are 50 plus, maybe it was 100, LGBTQ advocacy groups calling out Target for bowing, what they would
00:54:56.280 say, to right-wing extremists and moving some of their pride displays to the back of the store. And they're
00:55:02.800 demanding that they put their displays to the front of the store again, double down on their efforts to promote
00:55:09.540 the mutilation of people's bodies. And something that they said I thought was interesting. They said, there's no such
00:55:16.460 thing as neutrality, that you can't be neutral in this fight. The left understands something that most people
00:55:24.900 on the right don't. Like we were talking about, you know, liberals wanting to go back to 1995 or whenever they
00:55:30.820 believed that everything was neutral. No, that was just the time that we took, or maybe it's further
00:55:35.460 back than that, but took Christian values being ubiquitous for granted. We just didn't realize that
00:55:41.100 what was being upheld were Christian values because we thought it was just, well, it's always going to
00:55:45.060 be this way. But the left understands something that the right doesn't, that there's no neutrality.
00:55:50.660 It's just not going to happen. So I thought that that was interesting. Progressives get that.
00:55:55.040 Yeah, absolutely. We like to pretend that American values were just this organic thing that didn't
00:56:02.420 have any connection to, you know, religion or tradition. But of course, the only reason that
00:56:06.660 we thought these things could be neutral is they were all basically, you know, a version of the
00:56:11.540 Protestant Christian ethos. The reason that we thought we could have kind of this level of separation of
00:56:16.360 church and state and neutrality was that we just kind of assumed that everyone in the United States
00:56:19.980 would just be to figure out kind of like what branch or what division of the, you know,
00:56:24.480 Protestant Christian tradition they would be following. There were still serious disagreements,
00:56:28.740 but there was enough of a shared culture to make it feel like there was a neutral ground on which
00:56:33.420 everyone could stand. And that's kind of how communities work. Like there just is no way
00:56:38.340 for two existentially opposed moral visions to exist inside a polity. It cannot happen. One will
00:56:48.120 rule the other, one will separate from the other, or one will eliminate the other.
00:56:53.000 None of those are great options. All of those feel really icky for us, but there is a political
00:56:57.640 reality that's taking place here. And the left, like you said, is very aware of the stakes and
00:57:02.880 they're playing for keeps because they know what's happening here. The right is still in denial about
00:57:07.980 that fact. And the continued inability to understand the friend-enemy distinction, to understand the
00:57:14.900 process that is occurring inside the United States is something that is going to harm the right until
00:57:20.180 they put a grasp on it. So what do you think can turn things around then? It doesn't sound like
00:57:37.720 you're very hopeful. A lot of times I'm not either. Although, I mean, there are obviously good things
00:57:43.100 that have happened. I think the Supreme Court decision on Dobbs was the result of the efforts of
00:57:48.480 decades and decades of really just grassroots people pushing back against abortion that eventually led
00:57:56.200 to a law that made its way to the Supreme Court. But it took a really long time, a really long time,
00:58:02.640 the right basically serving up everything for politicians and begging them. They're saying,
00:58:09.200 we're saying, we want this. We'll make it as easy as possible for you. We'll write the law,
00:58:14.340 just like put it in front of the governor. And it still took almost 50 years for it to happen. But
00:58:21.760 that did happen. I do think some of DeSantis' moves and some other Republican states, you know,
00:58:28.240 banning drag queen shows for kids, banning, you know, bodily mutilation and puberty blockers for kids.
00:58:34.680 I do think some on the right are getting it. But then, of course, I get really discouraged when I see
00:58:39.860 people on the right, not understanding the moment that we're in or what sometimes people say, like,
00:58:45.620 what time it is. So where do we go from here? Like, do you have any hope? What does that hope
00:58:51.280 look like? I don't know. I'm just interested, like, to hear what do you think the next 10 years holds
00:58:57.920 for us? Well, I don't have any short-term good news, but I think I have long-term good news.
00:59:03.140 Okay, I'm ready. So what we're seeing here is an understanding of the actual situation. So for
00:59:09.500 instance, when you look at Dobbs, why does that work, right? Did that situation work because of
00:59:16.920 the large popular will expressed over time by the American electorate? No, it worked because the right
00:59:23.820 took very particular care to apply pressure to very particular groups and a group of elite people
00:59:31.080 gathered together around a particular cause, focused on it relentlessly, put pressure on the right
00:59:36.480 areas of American government, isolated those, and they achieved a significant outcome. And that is
00:59:43.120 something that I think the right needs to grasp. Sorry, but the popular argument is not what actually
00:59:48.480 drives politics. The popular argument follows. Exactly. California was voting against gay marriage
00:59:55.260 not that long ago. California. 2008. And now Republican senators can't imagine a
01:00:01.020 world in which they don't stand up to protect the sacred right. Right. You think Kevin McCarthy's
01:00:05.860 going to be like, I'm holding down the fort for the traditional family here in California. Even
01:00:10.220 though I think the people of Bakersfield would probably, as to your point, the people that he
01:00:14.540 represents probably would be great with him doing that. People in middle California are very
01:00:17.980 conservative, but it's not about majority opinion. Right. Culture is downstream from power.
01:00:23.680 Yeah. And when power told everybody, this is what we believe now and this is what the law
01:00:28.960 is, things shifted. Why are companies woke? Because they're legally required to be.
01:00:35.100 Yeah. Because they will get sued into oblivion and fined into oblivion by the government if they don't do
01:00:41.440 what they have to do. Republicans, the right conservatives need to grasp that. I think that
01:00:49.000 we're seeing that with the shifts of those laws you're talking about. We have a lot of people
01:00:54.360 complaining. Oh, I can't trans my kid. I'm leaving. Great. Fantastic. That's good news. No,
01:01:01.280 I'm serious. That's great news. We should sort. We should encourage the great sort. You don't want
01:01:07.760 to be in a place where you can't mutilate your children, move to one where you can. You don't
01:01:12.460 want to be in a place where they're mutilating children, move to one where they can't. And by
01:01:16.680 doing that, we can put people in communities where they can actually, once again, have solid,
01:01:22.820 coherent values. One of the main problems, we love our economic mobility, right? That's what we hear
01:01:27.900 all the time. Go out, you know, young guy, get a job, move across the country, leave your family,
01:01:32.660 find a job somewhere else. That's the American dream, you know, but there's a problem. You're
01:01:36.840 shattering communities. You're pulling out about apart people with similar values, similar
01:01:41.900 traditions, and you're scattering them across the country. And that's one of the big problems we
01:01:45.800 face is that we don't live next to people who agree with us anymore. Our, you know, our disagreements
01:01:52.540 are by zip code, not by state. And that means that it's hard for one state or another to have a coherent
01:01:58.920 moral philosophy. But if you have a situation where laws are basically, I mean, the left already
01:02:04.700 basically makes it illegal to be a conservative in many of the states in the United States.
01:02:09.160 So return the favor, make it impossible for people who want to do this stuff that are extreme
01:02:15.180 to be in your state. You know, you want to have a partial birth version? Well, don't live here.
01:02:19.920 You got to go, right? And by doing that kind of stuff, we put a scenario in place where people
01:02:26.400 like Ron DeSantis, strong governors who are willing to make those advancements can secure,
01:02:31.700 you know, conservative hedges that can create regional power. And I think that, and I love
01:02:37.080 Ron DeSantis, but this is why I encouraged him, you know, not that he's listening to me. I don't
01:02:41.360 have Ron DeSantis bat phone, but I said this many times, it's more effective for him to set a standard
01:02:46.580 for how power is assembled at the regional level and how to protect those things over time so that
01:02:52.640 we can have a solid example of how the right can protect and grow areas of the country that agree
01:02:58.900 with it rather than go to the federal level and just get ground into the dust by the deep state.
01:03:04.560 And so I think the good news, the short term is that there's no immediate solution, but the good
01:03:09.880 news is long-term we can create a scenario where these states become more self-sustaining, where
01:03:14.820 they become more, uh, they become more value homogenous, where we have people who actually have
01:03:20.400 the same tradition, have the same values, live in the same place and can create a society that has
01:03:25.200 one coherent moral vision that can actually oppose progressivism rather than being scattered across
01:03:30.080 the 50 states and dying piece by piece to the leftist attack. Yeah. Hmm. Okay. Well, I guess that
01:03:38.780 in some ways is positive, is positive news. Are you, are you worried or hopeful about the kind of
01:03:47.980 grassroots activism that we see on the right in the boycotts, in the pushing back against the drag
01:03:57.220 shows and the showing up to the school board meetings? The SPLC just dubbed Moms for Liberty a
01:04:04.520 hate group right next to the KKK. Um, and that's, I mean, the, it's just, the heat is going to get
01:04:11.220 hotter. Absolutely. But it does seem like there is a new fervor among the right to say no.
01:04:17.980 We're not tolerating this. Are you, are you happy about that? Or do you think it's kind of fruitless
01:04:24.400 in the short term? I think it's good. Not even fruitless, but counterproductive because they use
01:04:29.400 it to then say you're terrorists and you're really the problem. All these poor victims who are just
01:04:34.880 trying to twerk for children. Yeah, no, I think that it's good, but it has to be properly utilized.
01:04:41.440 So the popular energy is powerful. And if it's used and harnessed by a movement that understands
01:04:49.160 what it's doing, it can make lasting changes to institutions. And that is what makes a difference.
01:04:55.560 The left doesn't care about any one given election because it owns so many institutions that the
01:05:01.780 pendulum swing of democracy doesn't really matter because the leftist agenda is advanced through
01:05:07.220 education and media and NGOs and the deep state and all of these things, no matter who happens to
01:05:13.400 be in office, things can move further to the left while Trump is in office, even if he opposes those
01:05:17.640 things, because all of the leftist institutions are still pushing against it. The right can use this
01:05:22.760 popular energy to create meaningful changes. The kind of thing that we're talking about with Ron
01:05:27.380 DeSantis, things that actually do that actually obtain power, but obtaining power has to become
01:05:33.040 the goal, not just, you know, uh, making a company sad about their lost profits, those kinds of things,
01:05:39.920 but saying, how do we use this victory to then parlay this into legislation, into institutions,
01:05:47.460 into requirements that will make sure that we have additional power to then win the next thing.
01:05:54.340 If you just use it to be outraged and feel good in the moment to get that quick hit of victory,
01:06:00.900 but then it all subsides, then it becomes what you're talking about. The left can then swing it
01:06:05.880 and be clear. The left is going to do this anyway. The left is working to criminalize political dissent
01:06:10.360 in the United States. That's a difficult thing to say, but it's just the truth. The SPLC, the Southern
01:06:15.560 Poverty Law Center is doing what they're doing because they know they can pair with the FBI and the FBI
01:06:20.140 will use that to, uh, to attack and destroy the lives of people who don't want this stuff pushed
01:06:26.520 on their children. They are actively using a, the secret police of the United States to destroy
01:06:33.100 political opposition. Again, terrifying thing to say out loud. We've already seen it with pro-lifers
01:06:37.580 with Mark Hawk, that guy in Pennsylvania who was just defending his kid from this pro-abortion
01:06:42.180 harasser. I mean, he had the FBI not just come like, Hey, we just want to talk to you. What happened with
01:06:47.740 this incident? But the FBI came into his home while all of his young children were there and he was
01:06:53.560 arrested. So, I mean, that kind of thing is already happening even as the pro-abortion terrorists
01:06:59.860 basically go unscathed. So yeah, if they'll raid a president right before midterm election to rig the
01:07:05.320 election, they'll certainly do it to you. And so, so to be really clear, that's why the SPLC knows what
01:07:11.020 they're doing. Yeah. They know that it's a strategy specifically designed to, yeah, they know what
01:07:16.260 they're doing. They're specifically using this to wield the state. It's, it's not, it's not a
01:07:20.200 private organization doing goodwill thing. It's a, it's a, uh, it's a concerted effort to wield the
01:07:26.260 state to destroy their political enemies. And so they're going to do that no matter what. And so
01:07:30.700 that means that doesn't mean don't stand up. That doesn't mean don't take popular action. That
01:07:34.820 doesn't mean do nothing, but it means make sure it counts. Make sure you're winning something when you
01:07:38.660 do it. Make sure it's not just you, you people, the massive people will always be motivated by
01:07:43.820 something that's winning, feeling good, feeling that momentum. There's nothing wrong with that.
01:07:47.040 That's great. But we just have to have a political class and activist class, a movement that is
01:07:52.340 disciplined enough to say, okay, now that you are doing that, let's turn that into wins down the
01:07:56.320 road and not just a momentary thing that feels good, but then gets splashed back on us by our
01:08:00.360 enemies. And I do think we are seeing that with some of the legislation being passed by governors
01:08:04.640 when it comes to protecting children's bodies and children's rights, that wouldn't be happening if
01:08:08.820 they didn't feel the pressure of the power of parents who are saying, no, no more. They wouldn't
01:08:14.420 be doing that just to make a statement. They're doing that because they feel that the power has
01:08:19.600 shifted a little bit, at least on that issue. And I think hopefully that's a good sign.
01:08:24.860 Okay, Warren, where can people follow you, find you, listen to your show?
01:08:28.380 Of course, I've got the show on Blaze TV. You can subscribe to the Oren McIntyre podcast on all
01:08:32.440 your favorite podcast platforms. I've got a YouTube channel, Rumble Odyssey,
01:08:36.540 Oren McIntyre on Twitter and Gab, all of those things.
01:08:40.260 Okay, awesome. Thanks so much, Oren.
01:08:41.740 Thank you.