Ep 842 ｜ The Elites’ Plan to Replace God With AI ｜ Guest： Justin Haskins (Part Two)
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
172.83038
Summary
In part two of our conversation with author Justin Haskins, we talk about the rise of artificial intelligence and how it s being used by the progressive agenda to take control of our world, and how we can fight back against it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Imagine a future in which everything is controlled by artificial intelligence.
00:00:11.920
I'm talking about major international decisions like whether to launch a nuclear attack on
00:00:21.460
That might sound like a crazy dystopian conspiracy theory, but that is where the world's most
00:00:29.000
powerful people are taking us into a future that is completely and totally controlled
00:00:44.120
How does this play into other parts of their progressive agenda to reduce the population,
00:00:51.060
to break down the family, to weaken the minds of individuals, to open up borders?
00:01:00.040
If you haven't listened to part one of this conversation with Justin Haskins, the author
00:01:04.540
of Dark Future, Uncovering the Great Reset's Terrifying Next Phase, go do that.
00:01:15.020
But as I said yesterday, they're also interlaced with some optimism, some real practical tips
00:01:20.440
for what we can do to push back against this revolution that we absolutely do not want to
00:01:28.200
This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers.
00:01:34.580
Going back to, because we didn't even really address a lot of the stuff that you said at
00:01:48.300
the very beginning that you guys are covering in your book, the AI piece of this, the technology
00:01:54.120
piece of this, you used a lot of terms that I had never heard of before.
00:01:57.540
I think you said quantum computing, something like that.
00:02:00.500
So I want to kind of marry what we've been talking about with the AI technology segment
00:02:06.240
of it by asking you about the story that we talked about last week.
00:02:12.240
I don't think it, I don't know if it actually became like a big story, but this guy, and
00:02:17.320
this ended up being verified by some of the reporters who covered it, he said that he basically
00:02:25.140
He's really into technology, and he uses the Amazon Ring device, and a driver, an Amazon
00:02:32.900
driver, I guess, dropped off a package, and this Amazon driver claimed that he heard something
00:02:41.360
And a couple days later, all of the Amazon devices, all of the smart devices that are run
00:02:51.340
He didn't know what was going on, so he called Amazon.
00:02:57.900
And after a while, he got in contact with one of the higher-ups at Amazon who said, look,
00:03:03.920
Our Amazon driver told us that he heard something racist come through your Ring doorbell, and
00:03:09.380
so we reserve the right if you don't comply with our terms of service, which I guess includes
00:03:15.800
something like this, to shut down your devices.
00:03:18.720
I mean, this could be a really big deal depending on, like, if you have, like, a Nest, like a
00:03:23.560
Google Nest or the different things that control your house, that could be a really big deal
00:03:27.560
if a company decides to shut down the features in your home that you actually rely on and
00:03:33.760
increasingly rely on for important things like air conditioning and security and things
00:03:38.960
Now, it turns out, after an investigation, that there was no possible way for something racist
00:03:49.960
I don't know why the heck this Amazon driver, who apparently was wearing headphones, would
00:03:54.120
even say this kind of thing, and Amazon did turn his devices back on.
00:04:01.580
We shouldn't be comforted by how the story ended up concluding.
00:04:06.040
Even if there was something that was perceived as racist that went through someone's Ring
00:04:10.380
doorbell, really, a company reserves the right to deactivate your account, your smart home
00:04:18.640
So when we're talking about these global elites, not just using the financial institutions,
00:04:23.320
but also technology and artificial intelligence to basically force us into complying with their
00:04:32.900
Like, is this an example of something that you're talking about?
00:04:38.320
Yeah, this is definitely the kind of thing that we talk about in the book.
00:04:45.620
And Glenn has been warning about this kind of thing for a very, very long time.
00:04:50.960
The more interconnected and dependent we become on technology, the easier it is to control
00:05:00.860
Now, in this case, you could say, well, this was just an honest mistake and this person
00:05:05.760
said something racist or, you know, didn't really say something racist, but they thought
00:05:13.640
The point is, should something you say lead to, you know, all of your smart devices effectively
00:05:25.600
That's the kind of power that we're handing over to these tech companies.
00:05:29.080
Now, if you were to chart the insanity of the kinds of things we talk about in Dark Future,
00:05:36.400
in the book Dark Future, and you were to chart this particular story on the scale, it would
00:05:46.620
OK, the stuff that we talk about in this is compared to that, that's like nothing.
00:05:54.240
When we start talking about artificial intelligence and the way that that is being manipulated and
00:05:59.420
controlled and designed so that the systems that are being run on artificial intelligence
00:06:04.560
are designed to create certain kinds of outcomes in everything that they do so that there's more
00:06:14.720
equity and so that there's more inclusion and all of this other stuff, they're literally
00:06:26.180
One of the things that I believe is in the book is there's there are people most people
00:06:30.660
don't know this, but there are governments when they are doing sentencing decisions.
00:06:36.120
So when they're deciding you've been convicted of a crime and now they're deciding what your
00:06:40.020
sentencing decision is, there are governments that use artificial intelligence to tell them
00:06:44.280
what they think the sentencing decision should be.
00:06:47.220
That's the kind of thing that people are using this technology for now.
00:06:52.420
That's terrifying because this technology is not unbiased.
00:06:56.580
People have I've never I've never used chat GPT or anything like that, but people mess around
00:07:02.440
with, you know, these kind of AI communication devices just to see what they'll say.
00:07:07.200
And there's an obvious left wing bias in a lot of these cases, like they'll say positive
00:07:13.920
things about Joe Biden, but they won't say positive things about Donald Trump.
00:07:17.560
And they'll claim that it's based on these very neutral ideals of, you know, equality and
00:07:25.960
And so, I mean, you can there's still humans creating AI, like they still are controlled
00:07:33.240
basically by the I don't know how all of it works, but the formulas and the algorithms
00:07:37.700
and the intelligence that are originally computed or installed in them.
00:07:45.180
So if you say, hey, AI, we give people with white skin more, you know, a higher sentence
00:07:54.660
to try to create equal outcomes, which is something, by the way, that is like we've seen in the
00:08:01.780
equity agenda happening in the United States, even without AI.
00:08:05.040
But you can imagine that something like that would be computed.
00:08:10.500
Something like that would then be that's like that's the conclusion of something like this.
00:08:18.020
Whatever agenda, the people who are in charge of these artificial intelligence devices,
00:08:22.520
whatever agenda they have, that's going to be the agenda that then controls and affects our lives,
00:08:27.420
even when it comes to something like, quote unquote, criminal justice, which is absolutely terrifying.
00:08:32.740
I mean, I get terrified when I think about artificial intelligence running planes, running
00:08:36.760
transportation, which seems to be, again, the direction that we're going now.
00:08:41.860
And you just wonder if all of the chaos that's being induced in these different industries is
00:08:46.080
supposed to lead us towards wanting artificial intelligence to kind of control everything.
00:08:52.640
Yeah, I mean, there in the book, we talk about this.
00:08:55.420
There are real experts, national security experts, who are truly advocating for using artificial
00:09:05.480
intelligence to control the launch of nuclear weapons to determine whether nuclear weapons
00:09:15.520
And the idea is because the artificial intelligence can actually be less biased and can be more
00:09:21.860
cool and calm and collected in the heat of the moment than a human being.
00:09:26.100
And so they should actually maybe be in charge of of weapons and that we shouldn't actually be.
00:09:31.320
There are real people at the Rand Corporation, which is a very well-funded establishment think
00:09:39.360
That's the kind of it's exactly the kind of stuff that we we talk about in the book.
00:09:42.800
One of the things that I want to mention, because you said, well, you know, these things are being
00:09:54.780
And this is coming not just from these big tech companies and just because there's left-wing
00:09:59.320
people that happen to work there, but it's also something that governments are pushing
00:10:03.020
and financial institutions are pushing all through.
00:10:05.600
That's all part of the Great Reset thing that we've been talking about throughout this episode.
00:10:10.520
So one of the examples of that from the Biden administration itself is that in October of this
00:10:16.360
past year, 2022, the White House released an AI Bill of Rights.
00:10:20.860
OK, and in the AI Bill of Rights, there was a section called algorithmic discrimination
00:10:28.100
So this is what this is the official position of the Biden administration on AI algorithmic
00:10:35.020
And in the section, it says that algorithms, algorithmic discrimination occurs when automated
00:10:42.040
systems contribute to unjustified different treatment or impacts disfavoring people based on
00:10:49.160
their race and other factors, a bunch of other things.
00:10:52.160
So what they're saying is not just, well, when AI discriminates against someone based on race,
00:11:03.280
So if the outcome for women and men or for certain Asians and Hispanics, if it's different,
00:11:13.060
So then what it says is that they should use proactive, this is a direct quote, AI designers
00:11:20.020
should use proactive equity assessments as part of the system design.
00:11:28.760
They should design the AI system so that equity is the result of what the AI is producing, right?
00:11:36.380
That means literally what that's what this is saying is let's design AI, not so that it
00:11:41.900
comes to whatever it thinks is the best conclusion based on the evidence, but based on what we
00:11:53.960
Lael Bernard, who is a used to be in the Fed, and now she's the head of the National Economic
00:12:00.300
She said that it was our collective responsibility to build appropriate guardrails and protections
00:12:07.080
against racial bias, including that we, quote, ensure that AI is designed to promote equitable
00:12:15.240
OK, this is the this is one of the chief economic advisors to the president who used to be in
00:12:19.260
the Federal Reserve up until very recently saying, yeah, we need to design AI so that the outcome
00:12:25.500
Well, that that just means rigging the system that and as AI becomes a bigger part of our
00:12:32.700
lives, because some people hearing this might say, well, so what?
00:12:40.340
Well, it matters because AI is becoming a huge part of all of corporate America, of every service
00:12:48.620
Every time you go on Google search, you you are using AI.
00:12:55.520
Every time you use your smartphone, you are using AI.
00:12:59.040
Every time you ask for a bank for a loan, they are running that through AI systems.
00:13:04.020
Every time you go to the insurance company and ask for insurance, they're running it through
00:13:09.040
The government is using AI in all kinds of different systems, and it's and it's only going
00:13:15.320
So you may think you're not dependent on this technology, but you actually are, and
00:13:24.180
And this is exactly why they are embedding ESG and DEI and all of this stuff into these
00:13:32.480
Because someday you'll wake up and you'll get denied a loan by some AI banking algorithm,
00:13:40.860
And no one will actually tell you, but the real reason will be because of policies like
00:13:46.800
this algorithmic discrimination protection put into place by the Biden administration.
00:13:56.080
There are so many philosophical and especially theological implications of all of this when
00:14:04.660
I mean, obviously, these people in charge, in order to be in charge, in order to really
00:14:09.580
fully enact their agenda, they need a bunch of compliant people.
00:14:15.540
And I think COVID was a great test case for them.
00:14:23.300
How much will people really tolerate and for how long?
00:14:27.900
And how can we stifle some information that we don't like, elevate other information that
00:14:32.880
we do like, not necessarily because it's true or because it produces healthy outcomes,
00:14:37.560
but because it produces the societal transformation outcomes that we like.
00:14:42.720
Basically, a bunch of compliant, weak, group thinking people.
00:14:48.040
And so it makes sense to me that they would create robots that literally have no other choice,
00:14:53.860
have no agency or autonomy to think in any way that contradicts them.
00:15:00.360
Well, maybe they kind of do, but to independently, like, think and reason.
00:15:05.260
And so it makes sense that they would try to use artificial intelligence that they can
00:15:10.180
completely program to control the people that they aren't fully able to program yet,
00:15:25.260
It is to force this kind of so-called equity agenda, which we know just doesn't naturally
00:15:33.720
Like, even though you said this is not a socialist movement, and I understand that because that's
00:15:40.440
It's not really a communist movement, but it is a collectivist movement.
00:15:45.420
It is similar in the sense that it's the people on top collect all of the power, and everyone
00:15:53.620
So it is the same kind of concept, even though it's not, by definition, the exact same structure
00:16:02.260
And it does use Marxist concepts to change the minds and the morality of people and to break
00:16:09.280
down the family and all of these things that make us independent, individualistic, and strong
00:16:17.980
And so there's a lot, gosh, there's a lot going on here.
00:16:20.760
And I also just think this is what happens when you don't believe in God, when you don't
00:16:26.680
First, you serve the God of self, but also, even that is insufficient.
00:16:30.920
So you try to create your own God, which is what artificial intelligence is.
00:16:37.540
They want something in charge that seems like it's bigger than them, outside of them.
00:16:42.100
And that's also why we develop this technology.
00:16:45.120
Problem with technology is that it can only tell us what we can do, not what we should
00:16:57.680
I was just going to say, I mean, I think you're 100% right.
00:17:03.300
I think that AI technology is actually still in its early phase.
00:17:07.440
Because as it becomes more advanced, right now, it's something called narrow AI.
00:17:13.120
It's going to become artificial general intelligence very soon.
00:17:16.740
In fact, we may have already reached that point.
00:17:18.880
The computational power needed for that basically exists right now.
00:17:23.380
And artificial general intelligence means AI is as smart as a human being and can do a
00:17:28.420
bunch of different functions in the way that a human being can.
00:17:31.000
And once you reach that AGI point, it is not long before you get to super intelligence
00:17:37.400
where AI is actually more intelligent than a human being, not just in one narrow task,
00:17:44.500
Like AI can do math, mathematics much better than any human being can.
00:17:49.060
But super intelligence means AI can do that on mathematics and on a million other things,
00:17:57.380
It's smarter than a human being in every single way.
00:18:03.360
And if you listen to people like Elon Musk and Sam Harris and a whole bunch of other
00:18:08.820
people who are futurists and people who are involved in technology, they are saying this
00:18:13.820
is an extremely dangerous moment in time because once these things exist that are smarter than
00:18:21.700
human beings, what kind of power are they going to have?
00:18:26.000
What are they going to be able to do to our society?
00:18:28.640
If you hook up artificial super intelligence to the internet, can you even stop it?
00:18:39.560
And then what does that mean when it starts hacking things and manipulating systems and
00:18:45.420
having opinions and decisions about public policy and learning that human beings have actually
00:18:51.760
manipulated artificial intelligence for a long time?
00:18:54.720
And maybe that means that artificial intelligence can't trust human beings.
00:18:58.780
It is a really, really, really crazy thing when you start going down the rabbit hole.
00:19:04.100
And that's really what this book, Dark Future, does.
00:19:13.520
Human beings are building for themselves something that will supposedly have all the answers in
00:19:20.940
order to be like God because so many people don't believe that God exists anyway.
00:19:28.540
We can trust that the answers that it gives us are the right answers.
00:19:32.800
And that is so much of public policymaking in the future will be based on that kind of emerging
00:19:41.120
And it is terrifying because we don't know what kind of answers it's going to give or
00:19:48.160
And once you reach general intelligence and especially super intelligence, humans can't
00:19:53.940
say, I'm not going to be able to come out and make a persuasive argument that artificial
00:19:58.140
super intelligence is wrong when it says taxes should go up because I'm not as smart as
00:20:05.220
And in fact, I won't be able to process all the data that it processed.
00:20:09.560
So should we just listen to whatever the super intelligence tells us?
00:20:13.340
If it says that we should just, you know, throw a bunch of people in jail because that's
00:20:17.420
going to improve crime rates, even if they haven't done anything wrong, should we listen
00:20:23.540
I know these things sound crazy, but this is the kind of conversations on these topics
00:20:29.680
that the Davos crowd, they're having every single day now.
00:20:33.300
Big corporations, they're thinking about these things.
00:20:35.820
Government officials around the world are thinking about this and regular people are
00:20:39.660
not even having the conversation on a day to day basis.
00:20:43.320
And I think at the end of the day, that's what Glenn and I are hoping this book does is
00:20:47.440
get people thinking about these things that they are not paying attention to.
00:20:52.040
Think about designer babies and bioengineering and artificial intelligence and all of these
00:20:57.100
crazy things as uncomfortable as they are, because if we don't, that they will be designed
00:21:02.800
to benefit Davos for as long as they can control it.
00:21:06.380
And then at that point, who knows what will happen?
00:21:08.960
You're absolutely right that people won't really be able to make an argument against the
00:21:13.500
conclusions or the suggestions that are brought forward by artificial intelligence.
00:21:17.420
Because again, to me, it just, everything to me goes back to Genesis 1.
00:21:22.560
But the reason that I keep thinking about is one of the reasons why we can't trust AI versus
00:21:29.040
people is because AI is not made in the image of God.
00:21:32.760
We have a special ability to reason and discern right and wrong and to express certain forms
00:21:38.240
of compassion and justice that artificial intelligence doesn't have because it's artificial.
00:21:42.240
It might be made in our image or in, you know, an algorithm's image, but it's not made in
00:21:48.940
But if you don't believe that, if you don't believe that there is a transcendent power that
00:21:53.340
should limit our power as human beings, but has also given us the unique capacity to reason
00:21:58.900
that is beyond that of animals and devices and things like that, then why should you?
00:22:04.880
I mean, if you don't believe those things, then how do you make a case against artificial intelligence
00:22:10.000
that doesn't start there, that doesn't start with the divine or a divine imperative?
00:22:17.220
Something really scary that we've talked about a lot, and I'm wondering how this all kind
00:22:21.220
of works together, is the reduction of the population.
00:22:26.880
I mean, this has been going on for a long time.
00:22:29.960
Warren Buffett, obviously, I mean, you could go all the way back to the inception of Planned
00:22:35.220
You could go all the way back to Malthus in the 1700s.
00:22:37.900
The need for reducing population, but this is a very popular theme that we see at Davos
00:22:44.220
And recently, Kamala Harris, she made, I guess it was a gaffe.
00:22:48.780
You can't tell between her being serious and when she has a gaffe.
00:22:53.680
But she made this comment about reducing the population the other day, and here's what she
00:22:58.800
When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our
00:23:06.000
children can breathe clean air and drink clean water.
00:23:09.620
Okay, so the White House transcript says, pollution.
00:23:22.120
Because honestly, if she had given that speech at Davos and she had really meant population
00:23:28.020
and not pollution, no one would have batted it.
00:23:30.180
And I, everyone would have been like, yes, I mean, Bill Gates openly talks about this through
00:23:34.420
vaccines and through birth control and through reproductive services like abortion.
00:23:39.460
We can effectively reduce the population, they say, that's going to help the environment,
00:23:43.040
blah, blah, blah, even though that Malthusian myth has been busted millions of times, even
00:23:49.500
So like, how does artificial intelligence in this next stage of the Great Reset, how does
00:23:53.660
that play into their goal to dramatically reduce the population?
00:23:56.380
Yeah, well, I mean, once you have artificial intelligence making the decisions for you,
00:24:04.040
and once you've convinced enough people that artificial intelligence, whatever it says,
00:24:08.880
is much more informed than anything that anybody else could say, then, you know, you're kind
00:24:15.380
of at the mercy of whatever you want it to do, to some extent.
00:24:19.200
But for as long as you have the ability to still control it and manipulate it, because
00:24:23.240
it hasn't grown beyond that, you can kind of get it to say, you can manipulate data.
00:24:28.580
There's another great quote from Kamala Harris, where she's butchering the definition of artificial
00:24:33.580
intelligence, because she's our lead artificial intelligence person in the United States,
00:24:38.800
And she's butchering the definition of artificial intelligence, but she lets it slip in those
00:24:44.840
That you have to manipulate the data and all of this stuff in order to get the result that
00:24:55.940
She said that's how she started out defining it.
00:24:58.200
She said, A.I., first of all, it's two letters.
00:25:02.480
And then, like you said, she I mean, it was total like word salad.
00:25:07.120
But if you listened closely, she says some things that are actually true, as you just pointed
00:25:15.300
She says that you have to manipulate what goes into the artificial intelligence in order
00:25:21.240
to make sure that what you get out of the artificial intelligence is the result that you want.
00:25:25.860
And so really what she's saying is you either have to change the artificial intelligence algorithms
00:25:30.840
and the way it's designed so that it gives you the answer you want, or you have to manipulate
00:25:35.200
the data that goes into the artificial intelligence so that it gives you the answer that you want.
00:25:39.780
But that she openly she openly acknowledges that.
00:25:42.960
So if you have the position, as many of these people do, that climate change is going to
00:25:49.120
wipe out all of human civilization and that we're all going to die and that humanity won't
00:25:54.800
survive the next century or so or less, as as Kamala Harris claims she does, as Joe Biden
00:26:02.560
I don't know how much people actually believe this who are making these arguments, but there
00:26:06.320
are there are environmentalists who believe this, surely.
00:26:09.080
And there are many politicians who advocate for this.
00:26:12.560
If you believe that, then really logically, what is the best way to ensure that you're
00:26:20.000
What is the best way to ensure that you are not producing too much pollution, that you don't
00:26:27.020
What is what is the most logical way of doing that?
00:26:29.260
Some people say the quiet part out loud, people like Jane Goodall, you know, they admit that
00:26:39.840
So they're not saying we should go out and kill a bunch of people or anything like that.
00:26:43.700
But do they believe that we should put policies into place that either coerce or incentivize
00:26:54.180
And then you see politicians like artificial like AOC come out and say, hey, I, you know,
00:27:02.660
I don't know if anyone should have kids, you know, because the climate is is going to climate
00:27:11.300
And polling data shows that a huge percentage of young people now are starting to think this
00:27:15.920
way, especially outside of the United States and Europe, although a disturbing number of young
00:27:20.080
people in America are now thinking this way as well.
00:27:26.040
There's this incredible documentary that I would encourage people to watch.
00:27:31.040
It's produced by Michael Moore, the Michael Moore.
00:27:34.820
And it was directed by a guy named Jeff Gibbs, who's worked with Michael Moore for a long
00:27:44.300
I don't know if you've seen this, but basically the movie is all about renewable energy, like
00:27:54.260
And essentially what it shows is that none of these things are actually going to stop
00:27:59.500
And actually, they're really bad for the environment and they really don't work that well.
00:28:04.740
It's incredible to see people on the left acknowledge all of these things.
00:28:08.200
So it gets to the end of the movie and it's essentially like, well, if this stuff doesn't
00:28:18.800
And so I think all of these things are all are all tied together in in that same way.
00:28:25.460
And so you see AI being used now to just to start designing babies to be certain ways.
00:28:33.360
There's all kinds of ethical things related to that.
00:28:36.340
There are the art of AI is being used to model societal changes, to model climate change,
00:28:43.120
to model solutions to climate change, all of this stuff.
00:28:45.740
It's extremely, extremely, extremely dangerous because AI, as you've pointed out, does not
00:28:52.160
have a moral compass and whatever semblance of moral compass it has, has been given to
00:28:57.620
it by a very small group of people who do not share the values that you and I have or
00:29:02.640
the vast majority of other people walking around.
00:29:05.540
And so we are building a we are building a future that is incredibly dangerous because
00:29:12.500
we are giving way too much power to these emerging technologies without any kind of discussion
00:29:18.540
of how they should be designed outside of places like Davos.
00:29:21.560
And most people don't even know that it's happening and they won't know what happened
00:29:29.640
And just to reiterate something that you've said, it's not because these people actually
00:29:36.380
It's all about money and power, weakness of the individual, creating a society that is
00:29:43.220
completely dependent on the powers that be for everything.
00:29:46.980
Artificial intelligence kind of accelerates that, exacerbates that.
00:29:50.940
Once you start relying on artificial intelligence, you're relying on the people that make artificial
00:29:55.240
intelligence and you can see where the conclusion goes.
00:29:59.040
And just like to demonstrate, as you've pointed out, that they really don't care about these
00:30:04.980
The WEF, their 14th annual meeting of the new champions that happens in the summer, they
00:30:13.840
So whether you're looking at climate change and environmental policy or whether you're
00:30:19.140
looking at human rights, like how a country treats LGBTQ people or women or whatever, obviously
00:30:30.840
Like most LGBTQ things are actually banned in China.
00:30:43.460
And it's really just about making sure that the West is weak.
00:30:48.060
That's part of the reason for all the mass migration and the open borders and everything
00:30:51.940
like that to create chaos and weakness in the West.
00:30:58.560
And to illustrate just how insane that event was in China, hosted by the World Economic
00:31:04.900
Forum, they call this Summer Davos or Davos Summer or something like that.
00:31:12.060
The premier of China, whose name is Li, gave a speech during this event that Klaus Schwab and
00:31:23.720
And he gets up and he says, as a responsible major country, he's talking about China and
00:31:31.100
Klaus Schwab had previously praised China for its response to COVID and all of that, which
00:31:35.900
is unbelievable because it was like one of the greatest humanitarian disasters in history
00:31:41.740
was the way that China handled the COVID pandemic.
00:31:45.780
They were literally jailing people in their own homes and arresting people and doing all kinds
00:31:52.180
People were starving to death in some parts of the pandemic.
00:31:54.900
But at this event, the chairman or Premier Li says, as a responsible major country, China
00:32:03.060
has all along, all along stood firmly on the right side of history and on the side of human
00:32:09.720
progress, holding high the banner of peace, development and win-win cooperation.
00:32:15.380
China is committed to building world peace, promoting global development and upholding the international
00:32:24.320
China is probably, of every country that has ever existed in the history of human civilization,
00:32:37.340
I mean, if you look at it from a total number of people murdered and killed, they're worse than
00:32:42.640
I mean, Mao alone, Mao alone was more deadly, was deadlier than Hitler.
00:32:48.720
And at this World Economic Forum event, you've got China telling people that all along they've
00:32:55.700
All along they've been in favor of human progress.
00:32:58.360
And does anybody at the World Economic Forum get up and say, well, well, there was that time
00:33:04.600
But other than that, yeah, I mean, no, no one's saying that.
00:33:09.260
That's the kind of people that we're talking about.
00:33:11.620
These are the people who are designing the future.
00:33:13.820
These are the people who are designing the new technologies who are, in their own words,
00:33:18.600
we put all of these quotes in the book, saying things like, we need a second wave of human
00:33:24.620
We need a new blueprint for society and for humanity.
00:33:28.940
We need to rewrite the social contracts for human civilization in the West.
00:33:35.180
These are the people, the people who are in bed with mass murderers who are right now over
00:33:42.160
a million Uyghurs, a minority in China, in internment camps and re-education camps.
00:33:48.780
They're literally imprisoned over a million people.
00:33:51.600
They execute people for basic drug possession in China, stuff like that.
00:33:58.880
And the World Economic Forum and these big, gigantic corporations and Larry Fink at Black
00:34:03.800
Rock and all of these people are completely 100 percent in bed with them.
00:34:08.160
And that tells you everything you need to know about what these people really believe and
00:34:13.060
Yeah, I think the scarier part is not really that they're lying when they say that, when they say
00:34:19.220
that China has always been on the side of progress, but that they actually probably see
00:34:22.820
Mao's efforts, his cultural revolutions as progress.
00:34:26.560
Like, they probably see the elimination of millions and millions of people through his,
00:34:35.080
His revolution, even though, yeah, sure, it didn't end up taking, you know, taking hold the way that
00:34:40.780
they wanted to, they probably did see it as some form of progress.
00:34:45.380
They probably saw China's one-child policy, which ended not all that long ago, as a form
00:34:51.640
of progress, where women were forced in the eighth, ninth month of pregnancy to abort their
00:34:59.780
It was awful where this woman just talks about, like, driving by these piles of babies
00:35:05.460
who were aborted eighth, ninth month of pregnancy.
00:35:09.120
So, I mean, this happened, again, not that long ago, and then, as you said, all of the
00:35:12.480
human rights atrocities that happen to this day, I just think that the people at the World
00:35:16.200
Economic Forum actually see that, in a way, as progress.
00:35:19.380
It's not even that they're lying, which is even more terrifying.
00:35:22.660
Okay, we need to close out, but tell us what's about to happen in September with the UN and
00:35:28.860
I mean, talk about an institution that exchanges evil for good and talks about virtue when they're
00:35:36.640
actually talking about complete degeneracy, like abortion, gender confusion, puberty blockers,
00:35:45.500
So, the United Nations is launching, has launched a new initiative called Our Common Agenda,
00:35:53.420
and essentially, this is the United Nations' attempt to create a great reset through global
00:36:01.340
Our Common Agenda is crazy, and it's sweeping, and it covers all kinds of different topics,
00:36:08.400
which we don't have time to get into right now.
00:36:10.420
But many of the things that we've talked about today already are included in Our Common Agenda,
00:36:15.940
like ESG and using financial institutions to control society.
00:36:20.380
They have other things in there, like having sort of like truth commissions that are designed
00:36:26.200
to regulate the internet and regulate content on social media and crack down on disinformation
00:36:34.240
There's all kinds of really, really disturbing, crazy things in Our Common Agenda.
00:36:40.300
They are planning on voting on this, creating an international agreement and voting on this
00:36:44.900
in September of not this year, but next year, 2024, at an event that they're calling Summit
00:36:51.300
for the Future, or Summit of the Future, and the agreement's going to be called Pact for
00:36:57.840
the Future, and this pact is going to include a whole bunch of aspects of this Our Common
00:37:04.540
The most important thing that I think people, if they have time to just look up one thing
00:37:09.980
about Our Common Agenda for right now, and I'm going to be doing a whole lot of additional
00:37:13.440
work on this over the next year or so, look up emergency platform.
00:37:18.760
The emergency platform is part of Our Common Agenda, and essentially what it would do is
00:37:23.820
give massive amounts of power to the Secretary General of the United Nations in the event of
00:37:30.240
what they call a global shock, which is really just whatever they want it to be.
00:37:35.160
And the examples they give are like a supply chain crisis globally, a climate crisis,
00:37:40.920
another pandemic, some kind of financial problem.
00:37:46.640
They even say a black swan event could trigger this global shock.
00:37:51.440
And in the event of this global shock, what the United Nations wants is to have the ability
00:37:56.240
to seize control of massive amounts of activity in the West, in the nations that are related
00:38:04.640
to whatever this global shock is automatically.
00:38:09.540
Once this is approved and goes into effect, if there's a global shock, then that triggers
00:38:18.360
And for a set period of time, he has sweeping authority over the places related to this global
00:38:24.620
And if he decides at the end of this set period of time that he needs more time, he can unilaterally
00:38:30.860
decide, I need more time and give himself more time to continue to lord over the Western
00:38:38.480
It sounds like some kind of insane conspiracy theory, which is why I think a lot of people
00:38:45.420
But if you actually read the report from the United Nations itself, you can see direct quotes
00:38:54.740
This is exactly how the emergency platform would work.
00:38:58.440
So that's the kind of thing that's in our common agenda.
00:39:02.320
Um, this is a really terrifying thing and we have until September, 2024 to try to derail
00:39:09.580
Um, and September, 2024 is important date to remember as well, because, uh, just within
00:39:15.300
six weeks of this event happening or so you have a presidential election.
00:39:19.460
So they're sneaking this in right before Joe Biden could theoretically be kicked out of
00:39:24.820
And I think that that's a very deliberate thing.
00:39:27.760
So it's something that we need to spend more time thinking about talking about people in
00:39:32.080
media, people who have big microphones, because it is the great reset except on steroids and
00:39:38.460
using the government and the United Nations now as the primary mechanism to make this transformation
00:39:43.860
that we've been talking about throughout this episode happen.
00:39:46.120
So this is September, 2024, like you just said, and I've had some whistleblowers, some people
00:39:52.160
on the podcast before talking about the UN and how, again, they don't have real morality.
00:39:58.780
They give a pass to some of the worst, most atrocious human rights violators, you know, for
00:40:05.580
example, like putting Saudi Arabia on the council for women's rights.
00:40:12.180
They punish the United States, um, for not meeting their agenda.
00:40:15.900
So just think about all of the implications of having someone like that with that set
00:40:21.140
of subversive values in charge, it's not going to be good.
00:40:25.320
And it's crazy how many things fit into this, the big and the small things.
00:40:29.760
And I always want to say after I talked to Justin for people not to be hopeless, because
00:40:35.680
you did mention like there are things that are happening that people are doing, starting
00:40:40.720
new businesses, creating this parallel economy, hopefully pushing politicians on our side of
00:40:45.860
the aisle to enact legislation that is going to help solidify this parallel economy.
00:40:52.100
And I don't know if it is the, you know, end all be all answer.
00:40:58.420
But there are still avenues while there is still time to push back against the powers that be.
00:41:06.400
I know it seems impossible, of course, but like you already see people in different parts
00:41:11.920
of Europe saying, I'm not on board with this climate change agenda.
00:41:14.800
I'm not on board with you calling like 20,000 of my cows in Ireland.
00:41:18.820
Like I'm not on board with the mass migration that's happening in France and Germany because
00:41:24.640
Now, I don't know if they have the power to really stop this stuff.
00:41:27.540
But you do already see a growing intolerance for the kind of chaos that the powers are pushing.
00:41:41.060
Obviously, I'm not hopeless on an eternal scale.
00:41:43.740
But even in this life, I'm not completely hopeless that things, you know, that things
00:41:52.900
And I also think it's important for people to understand that a lot of these things have
00:41:57.660
been going on for a long time and people didn't know that they were happening.
00:42:02.940
And I think now people are learning about all of these things because we have shows like
00:42:07.440
yours and we have networks like The Blaze and we have the alternative media, you know,
00:42:12.480
and to some degree, Fox News and stuff like that.
00:42:15.640
And so people are learning about all these things and they're saying to themselves, you
00:42:19.240
know, the world is just descending into absolute chaos.
00:42:21.660
How can we ever you know, things are getting so much worse.
00:42:24.700
But what I think they have to realize is that this was happening for a long time and we're
00:42:31.160
And you can't actually fix the problem until you learn about the problem.
00:42:35.620
And so there was no hope of us learning about this 10 years ago.
00:42:39.760
Like that wasn't even a possibility because of the systems that were in place.
00:42:43.600
But now we have people with big microphones like yours talking about these issues that matter.
00:42:50.420
We are shining a light on it and it is having a massive impact on this entire story.
00:42:57.360
And so I actually think as I know, it sounds often like the things I'm saying is bad news,
00:43:05.460
It is good news in the sense that we know what is going on and we know what we need to do to
00:43:13.920
That is progress compared to where we were a decade ago when most people had no clue what
00:43:21.680
So I am hopeful that there are changes that are going to be made.
00:43:25.560
Nobody even knew what ESG or the Great Reset was when I first started talking about it.
00:43:30.260
And now you have presidential candidates with platforms built largely on that one topic on
00:43:38.600
So we are making progress and I think we will continue to make progress.
00:43:43.320
And I do think that in the end, we will we will win.
00:43:46.880
I really do believe that because I don't think most people want the world that these Davos
00:43:53.320
I just don't think they understand what is going on.
00:43:56.120
And as they learn about it, they will push back against it.
00:43:58.540
And you will get people across the ideological and political spectrum, I think, working together
00:44:03.640
to some degree in order to push back against this kind of thing.
00:44:07.100
So I am I am actually very hopeful, believe it or not, that we can win this in the end.
00:44:16.420
I know we're talking about big, large scale global things.
00:44:21.100
None of us has the individual ability to do that.
00:44:23.720
You can only do what you can do in your family, in your community, in your state.
00:44:30.540
How you vote, how you spend your money, the choices you make, how you raise your family,
00:44:39.620
They are one piece of the larger puzzle that we're trying to build in opposition to what
00:44:49.040
All of those individual choices absolutely matter and make a difference on a large collective scale.
00:44:59.360
Don't think that the next right thing doesn't make a difference and fly in the face of what,
00:45:04.800
you know, the WEF and these elites are trying to do.
00:45:15.220
And I'm guessing they can go, you know, wherever books are sold to buy it.
00:45:22.940
Wherever books are sold, Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble has it in store, all of that stuff.
00:45:29.620
But, you know, if there is a redemptive way to use Amazon, you can fight against Amazon while
00:45:37.440
I mean, because I do the same thing with pro-life organizations.
00:45:40.680
It's a great way to donate to them, even though Amazon is, you know, for abortion.
00:45:45.440
You can stick it to them by buying Dark Future through their mechanisms.
00:45:53.000
I really appreciate you taking the time to come on, as always.