Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - Ep 842 ｜ The Elites’ Plan to Replace God With AI ｜ Guest： Justin Haskins (Part Two)

00:00:00.000 Imagine a future in which everything is controlled by artificial intelligence.

00:00:05.220 I'm not just talking about your smart home.

00:00:08.620 I am talking about our legal system.

00:00:11.920 I'm talking about major international decisions like whether to launch a nuclear attack on

00:00:20.240 another country.

00:00:21.460 That might sound like a crazy dystopian conspiracy theory, but that is where the world's most

00:00:29.000 powerful people are taking us into a future that is completely and totally controlled

00:00:36.020 by artificial intelligence.

00:00:38.900 Why in the world is this happening?

00:00:41.000 How is it happening?

00:00:42.280 What can we do to stop it?

00:00:44.120 How does this play into other parts of their progressive agenda to reduce the population,

00:00:51.060 to break down the family, to weaken the minds of individuals, to open up borders?

00:00:57.640 We're going to talk about all of this today.

00:01:00.040 If you haven't listened to part one of this conversation with Justin Haskins, the author

00:01:04.540 of Dark Future, Uncovering the Great Reset's Terrifying Next Phase, go do that.

00:01:09.020 That was yesterday's conversation.

00:01:10.460 Today is part two.

00:01:11.980 You don't want to miss either one of them.

00:01:13.560 They're so informative.

00:01:15.020 But as I said yesterday, they're also interlaced with some optimism, some real practical tips

00:01:20.440 for what we can do to push back against this revolution that we absolutely do not want to

00:01:27.180 succeed.

00:01:28.200 This episode is brought to you by our friends at Good Ranchers.

00:01:30.500 Go to GoodRanchers.com.

00:01:31.820 Use code Allie at checkout. 1.00

00:01:32.900 That's GoodRanchers.com.

00:01:34.000 Code Allie. 1.00

00:01:34.580 Going back to, because we didn't even really address a lot of the stuff that you said at

00:01:48.300 the very beginning that you guys are covering in your book, the AI piece of this, the technology

00:01:54.120 piece of this, you used a lot of terms that I had never heard of before.

00:01:57.540 I think you said quantum computing, something like that.

00:02:00.500 So I want to kind of marry what we've been talking about with the AI technology segment

00:02:06.240 of it by asking you about the story that we talked about last week.

00:02:09.720 I don't know if you saw it.

00:02:10.760 I saw it as just a Twitter thread.

00:02:12.240 I don't think it, I don't know if it actually became like a big story, but this guy, and

00:02:17.320 this ended up being verified by some of the reporters who covered it, he said that he basically

00:02:24.020 has a smart home.

00:02:25.140 He's really into technology, and he uses the Amazon Ring device, and a driver, an Amazon

00:02:32.900 driver, I guess, dropped off a package, and this Amazon driver claimed that he heard something

00:02:38.360 racist through the Ring doorbell.

00:02:41.360 And a couple days later, all of the Amazon devices, all of the smart devices that are run

00:02:47.680 by Amazon in this guy's house got shut down.

00:02:51.340 He didn't know what was going on, so he called Amazon.

00:02:53.740 He said, what's the deal?

00:02:55.180 Why is my stuff shut down?

00:02:57.900 And after a while, he got in contact with one of the higher-ups at Amazon who said, look,

00:03:03.060 here's the deal.

00:03:03.920 Our Amazon driver told us that he heard something racist come through your Ring doorbell, and

00:03:09.380 so we reserve the right if you don't comply with our terms of service, which I guess includes

00:03:15.800 something like this, to shut down your devices.

00:03:18.720 I mean, this could be a really big deal depending on, like, if you have, like, a Nest, like a

00:03:23.560 Google Nest or the different things that control your house, that could be a really big deal

00:03:27.560 if a company decides to shut down the features in your home that you actually rely on and

00:03:33.760 increasingly rely on for important things like air conditioning and security and things

00:03:38.540 like that.

00:03:38.960 Now, it turns out, after an investigation, that there was no possible way for something racist

00:03:45.920 to be conveyed through the Ring doorbell.

00:03:48.520 The guy wasn't at home.

00:03:49.960 I don't know why the heck this Amazon driver, who apparently was wearing headphones, would

00:03:54.120 even say this kind of thing, and Amazon did turn his devices back on.

00:03:59.520 But we should not be comforted by that.

00:04:01.580 We shouldn't be comforted by how the story ended up concluding.

00:04:06.040 Even if there was something that was perceived as racist that went through someone's Ring

00:04:10.380 doorbell, really, a company reserves the right to deactivate your account, your smart home

00:04:17.540 based on that?

00:04:18.640 So when we're talking about these global elites, not just using the financial institutions,

00:04:23.320 but also technology and artificial intelligence to basically force us into complying with their

00:04:29.660 new vision, their new moral tenets.

00:04:32.900 Like, is this an example of something that you're talking about?

00:04:38.320 Yeah, this is definitely the kind of thing that we talk about in the book.

00:04:43.040 I did see that story.

00:04:44.160 It is incredible.

00:04:45.620 And Glenn has been warning about this kind of thing for a very, very long time.

00:04:50.960 The more interconnected and dependent we become on technology, the easier it is to control

00:04:56.900 and manipulate people's behavior.

00:05:00.860 Now, in this case, you could say, well, this was just an honest mistake and this person

00:05:05.760 said something racist or, you know, didn't really say something racist, but they thought

00:05:10.680 that they said something racist.

00:05:11.980 But that's not the point, right?

00:05:13.640 The point is, should something you say lead to, you know, all of your smart devices effectively

00:05:20.500 turning off your home?

00:05:21.780 Right.

00:05:23.120 In your own home.

00:05:25.200 Right.

00:05:25.600 That's the kind of power that we're handing over to these tech companies.

00:05:29.080 Now, if you were to chart the insanity of the kinds of things we talk about in Dark Future,

00:05:36.400 in the book Dark Future, and you were to chart this particular story on the scale, it would

00:05:42.820 be on the extremely mild end of this issue.

00:05:46.620 OK, the stuff that we talk about in this is compared to that, that's like nothing.

00:05:54.240 When we start talking about artificial intelligence and the way that that is being manipulated and

00:05:59.420 controlled and designed so that the systems that are being run on artificial intelligence

00:06:04.560 are designed to create certain kinds of outcomes in everything that they do so that there's more

00:06:14.720 equity and so that there's more inclusion and all of this other stuff, they're literally

00:06:19.620 manipulating artificial intelligence.

00:06:22.100 And that's becoming a huge part of our lives.

00:06:26.180 One of the things that I believe is in the book is there's there are people most people

00:06:30.660 don't know this, but there are governments when they are doing sentencing decisions.

00:06:36.120 So when they're deciding you've been convicted of a crime and now they're deciding what your

00:06:40.020 sentencing decision is, there are governments that use artificial intelligence to tell them

00:06:44.280 what they think the sentencing decision should be.

00:06:47.220 That's the kind of thing that people are using this technology for now.

00:06:52.420 That's terrifying because this technology is not unbiased.

00:06:56.580 People have I've never I've never used chat GPT or anything like that, but people mess around

00:07:02.440 with, you know, these kind of AI communication devices just to see what they'll say.

00:07:07.200 And there's an obvious left wing bias in a lot of these cases, like they'll say positive

00:07:13.920 things about Joe Biden, but they won't say positive things about Donald Trump.

00:07:17.560 And they'll claim that it's based on these very neutral ideals of, you know, equality and

00:07:22.940 love and tolerance and all of these things.

00:07:25.960 And so, I mean, you can there's still humans creating AI, like they still are controlled

00:07:33.240 basically by the I don't know how all of it works, but the formulas and the algorithms

00:07:37.700 and the intelligence that are originally computed or installed in them.

00:07:43.120 And so there's still going to be a bias there.

00:07:45.180 So if you say, hey, AI, we give people with white skin more, you know, a higher sentence 0.98

00:07:54.660 to try to create equal outcomes, which is something, by the way, that is like we've seen in the

00:08:01.780 equity agenda happening in the United States, even without AI.

00:08:05.040 But you can imagine that something like that would be computed.

00:08:10.500 Something like that would then be that's like that's the conclusion of something like this.

00:08:18.020 Whatever agenda, the people who are in charge of these artificial intelligence devices,

00:08:22.520 whatever agenda they have, that's going to be the agenda that then controls and affects our lives,

00:08:27.420 even when it comes to something like, quote unquote, criminal justice, which is absolutely terrifying.

00:08:32.740 I mean, I get terrified when I think about artificial intelligence running planes, running

00:08:36.760 transportation, which seems to be, again, the direction that we're going now.

00:08:41.860 And you just wonder if all of the chaos that's being induced in these different industries is

00:08:46.080 supposed to lead us towards wanting artificial intelligence to kind of control everything.

00:08:52.640 Yeah, I mean, there in the book, we talk about this.

00:08:55.420 There are real experts, national security experts, who are truly advocating for using artificial

00:09:05.480 intelligence to control the launch of nuclear weapons to determine whether nuclear weapons

00:09:13.680 should be launched against enemies.

00:09:15.520 And the idea is because the artificial intelligence can actually be less biased and can be more

00:09:21.860 cool and calm and collected in the heat of the moment than a human being.

00:09:26.100 And so they should actually maybe be in charge of of weapons and that we shouldn't actually be.

00:09:31.320 There are real people at the Rand Corporation, which is a very well-funded establishment think

00:09:36.660 tank calling for that kind of thing.

00:09:39.360 That's the kind of it's exactly the kind of stuff that we we talk about in the book.

00:09:42.800 One of the things that I want to mention, because you said, well, you know, these things are being

00:09:46.880 designed with these kinds of biases in them.

00:09:50.040 You can see that there's no doubt about that.

00:09:51.580 That's part of the plan.

00:09:52.660 And the bias is only going to get worse.

00:09:54.780 And this is coming not just from these big tech companies and just because there's left-wing

00:09:59.320 people that happen to work there, but it's also something that governments are pushing

00:10:03.020 and financial institutions are pushing all through.

00:10:05.600 That's all part of the Great Reset thing that we've been talking about throughout this episode.

00:10:10.520 So one of the examples of that from the Biden administration itself is that in October of this

00:10:16.360 past year, 2022, the White House released an AI Bill of Rights.

00:10:20.860 OK, and in the AI Bill of Rights, there was a section called algorithmic discrimination

00:10:27.100 protections.

00:10:28.100 So this is what this is the official position of the Biden administration on AI algorithmic

00:10:33.720 discrimination protections.

00:10:35.020 And in the section, it says that algorithms, algorithmic discrimination occurs when automated

00:10:42.040 systems contribute to unjustified different treatment or impacts disfavoring people based on

00:10:49.160 their race and other factors, a bunch of other things.

00:10:52.160 So what they're saying is not just, well, when AI discriminates against someone based on race,

00:11:00.240 that's bad.

00:11:00.900 They're saying when the outcome is different.

00:11:03.280 So if the outcome for women and men or for certain Asians and Hispanics, if it's different,

00:11:10.380 then that is evidence of discrimination in AI.

00:11:13.060 So then what it says is that they should use proactive, this is a direct quote, AI designers

00:11:20.020 should use proactive equity assessments as part of the system design.

00:11:25.340 So they should design the system.

00:11:28.760 They should design the AI system so that equity is the result of what the AI is producing, right?

00:11:36.380 That means literally what that's what this is saying is let's design AI, not so that it

00:11:41.900 comes to whatever it thinks is the best conclusion based on the evidence, but based on what we

00:11:47.120 want the outcome to be.

00:11:49.620 And we've seen this.

00:11:51.140 We've seen this over and over and over again.

00:11:53.960 Lael Bernard, who is a used to be in the Fed, and now she's the head of the National Economic 0.95

00:11:58.900 Council for the Biden administration.

00:12:00.300 She said that it was our collective responsibility to build appropriate guardrails and protections

00:12:07.080 against racial bias, including that we, quote, ensure that AI is designed to promote equitable

00:12:13.840 outcomes.

00:12:15.240 OK, this is the this is one of the chief economic advisors to the president who used to be in

00:12:19.260 the Federal Reserve up until very recently saying, yeah, we need to design AI so that the outcome

00:12:24.280 is more equitable.

00:12:25.500 Well, that that just means rigging the system that and as AI becomes a bigger part of our

00:12:32.700 lives, because some people hearing this might say, well, so what?

00:12:36.040 You know, I don't use ChatGPT.

00:12:37.680 So, you know, what does any of this matter?

00:12:40.340 Well, it matters because AI is becoming a huge part of all of corporate America, of every service

00:12:47.320 and good that you use.

00:12:48.620 Every time you go on Google search, you you are using AI.

00:12:52.340 Every time you use Yelp, you are using AI.

00:12:55.520 Every time you use your smartphone, you are using AI.

00:12:59.040 Every time you ask for a bank for a loan, they are running that through AI systems.

00:13:04.020 Every time you go to the insurance company and ask for insurance, they're running it through

00:13:07.580 AI systems.

00:13:09.040 The government is using AI in all kinds of different systems, and it's and it's only going

00:13:13.340 to become a bigger part of our lives.

00:13:15.320 So you may think you're not dependent on this technology, but you actually are, and

00:13:21.880 it's only going to get worse as time goes by.

00:13:24.180 And this is exactly why they are embedding ESG and DEI and all of this stuff into these

00:13:31.580 technologies today.

00:13:32.480 Because someday you'll wake up and you'll get denied a loan by some AI banking algorithm,

00:13:37.260 and you won't know why.

00:13:39.260 And it won't make any sense to you.

00:13:40.860 And no one will actually tell you, but the real reason will be because of policies like

00:13:46.800 this algorithmic discrimination protection put into place by the Biden administration.

00:13:53.720 Gosh, my head is really right now.

00:13:56.080 There are so many philosophical and especially theological implications of all of this when

00:14:02.460 I'm thinking about how exactly we got here.

00:14:04.660 I mean, obviously, these people in charge, in order to be in charge, in order to really

00:14:09.580 fully enact their agenda, they need a bunch of compliant people.

00:14:13.860 They need groupthink.

00:14:15.540 And I think COVID was a great test case for them.

00:14:17.720 Like, what can we make people do?

00:14:19.760 What can we make people sacrifice?

00:14:21.480 How can we radically change society?

00:14:23.300 How much will people really tolerate and for how long?

00:14:27.900 And how can we stifle some information that we don't like, elevate other information that

00:14:32.880 we do like, not necessarily because it's true or because it produces healthy outcomes,

00:14:37.560 but because it produces the societal transformation outcomes that we like.

00:14:42.720 Basically, a bunch of compliant, weak, group thinking people.

00:14:48.040 And so it makes sense to me that they would create robots that literally have no other choice,

00:14:53.860 have no agency or autonomy to think in any way that contradicts them.

00:14:59.060 They don't really have the ability.

00:15:00.360 Well, maybe they kind of do, but to independently, like, think and reason.

00:15:05.260 And so it makes sense that they would try to use artificial intelligence that they can

00:15:10.180 completely program to control the people that they aren't fully able to program yet,

00:15:18.980 if that kind of makes sense.

00:15:21.040 And obviously, the long-term goal is control.

00:15:25.260 It is to force this kind of so-called equity agenda, which we know just doesn't naturally

00:15:33.160 work.

00:15:33.720 Like, even though you said this is not a socialist movement, and I understand that because that's

00:15:38.800 not really where it ends up.

00:15:40.440 It's not really a communist movement, but it is a collectivist movement.

00:15:45.420 It is similar in the sense that it's the people on top collect all of the power, and everyone

00:15:51.000 down here has the same amount of nothing.

00:15:53.620 So it is the same kind of concept, even though it's not, by definition, the exact same structure

00:16:00.600 or the exact same premise.

00:16:02.260 And it does use Marxist concepts to change the minds and the morality of people and to break

00:16:09.280 down the family and all of these things that make us independent, individualistic, and strong

00:16:15.080 so that they can control us.

00:16:17.980 And so there's a lot, gosh, there's a lot going on here.

00:16:20.760 And I also just think this is what happens when you don't believe in God, when you don't

00:16:24.500 believe that there is a higher power.

00:16:26.680 First, you serve the God of self, but also, even that is insufficient.

00:16:30.920 So you try to create your own God, which is what artificial intelligence is.

00:16:34.720 Like, people want to be told what to do.

00:16:37.540 They want something in charge that seems like it's bigger than them, outside of them.

00:16:42.100 And that's also why we develop this technology.

00:16:45.120 Problem with technology is that it can only tell us what we can do, not what we should

00:16:49.180 do.

00:16:49.660 So that's a whole problem.

00:16:51.620 Okay, within all that.

00:16:53.200 Yeah, totally.

00:16:54.660 Oh, go ahead.

00:16:55.260 Go ahead.

00:16:55.620 No, go ahead.

00:16:56.220 I have something else to ask.

00:16:57.640 No, no, no.

00:16:57.680 I was just going to say, I mean, I think you're 100% right.

00:17:03.300 I think that AI technology is actually still in its early phase.

00:17:07.440 Because as it becomes more advanced, right now, it's something called narrow AI.

00:17:13.120 It's going to become artificial general intelligence very soon.

00:17:16.740 In fact, we may have already reached that point.

00:17:18.880 The computational power needed for that basically exists right now.

00:17:23.380 And artificial general intelligence means AI is as smart as a human being and can do a

00:17:28.420 bunch of different functions in the way that a human being can.

00:17:31.000 And once you reach that AGI point, it is not long before you get to super intelligence

00:17:37.400 where AI is actually more intelligent than a human being, not just in one narrow task,

00:17:42.640 which is already the case.

00:17:44.500 Like AI can do math, mathematics much better than any human being can.

00:17:49.060 But super intelligence means AI can do that on mathematics and on a million other things,

00:17:56.360 basically everything.

00:17:57.380 It's smarter than a human being in every single way.

00:17:59.900 We are not that far off from that.

00:18:02.200 We are developing that.

00:18:03.360 And if you listen to people like Elon Musk and Sam Harris and a whole bunch of other

00:18:08.820 people who are futurists and people who are involved in technology, they are saying this

00:18:13.820 is an extremely dangerous moment in time because once these things exist that are smarter than

00:18:21.700 human beings, what kind of power are they going to have?

00:18:26.000 What are they going to be able to do to our society?

00:18:28.640 If you hook up artificial super intelligence to the internet, can you even stop it?

00:18:35.500 Can you even roll it back?

00:18:36.960 Can you even unplug it?

00:18:38.360 Probably not.

00:18:39.560 And then what does that mean when it starts hacking things and manipulating systems and

00:18:45.420 having opinions and decisions about public policy and learning that human beings have actually

00:18:51.760 manipulated artificial intelligence for a long time?

00:18:54.720 And maybe that means that artificial intelligence can't trust human beings.

00:18:58.780 It is a really, really, really crazy thing when you start going down the rabbit hole.

00:19:04.100 And that's really what this book, Dark Future, does.

00:19:07.900 But it is a tower of Babel. 0.81

00:19:12.180 Like, that's what it is.

00:19:13.520 Human beings are building for themselves something that will supposedly have all the answers in 0.77

00:19:20.940 order to be like God because so many people don't believe that God exists anyway.

00:19:26.320 So we can build this other thing.

00:19:28.540 We can trust that the answers that it gives us are the right answers.

00:19:32.800 And that is so much of public policymaking in the future will be based on that kind of emerging

00:19:40.060 technology.

00:19:41.120 And it is terrifying because we don't know what kind of answers it's going to give or

00:19:46.580 why it's going to give those answers.

00:19:48.160 And once you reach general intelligence and especially super intelligence, humans can't

00:19:53.940 say, I'm not going to be able to come out and make a persuasive argument that artificial

00:19:58.140 super intelligence is wrong when it says taxes should go up because I'm not as smart as

00:20:04.480 super intelligence.

00:20:05.220 And in fact, I won't be able to process all the data that it processed.

00:20:09.560 So should we just listen to whatever the super intelligence tells us?

00:20:13.340 If it says that we should just, you know, throw a bunch of people in jail because that's

00:20:17.420 going to improve crime rates, even if they haven't done anything wrong, should we listen

00:20:23.100 to it?

00:20:23.540 I know these things sound crazy, but this is the kind of conversations on these topics

00:20:29.680 that the Davos crowd, they're having every single day now.

00:20:33.300 Big corporations, they're thinking about these things.

00:20:35.820 Government officials around the world are thinking about this and regular people are

00:20:39.660 not even having the conversation on a day to day basis.

00:20:43.320 And I think at the end of the day, that's what Glenn and I are hoping this book does is

00:20:47.440 get people thinking about these things that they are not paying attention to.

00:20:52.040 Think about designer babies and bioengineering and artificial intelligence and all of these

00:20:57.100 crazy things as uncomfortable as they are, because if we don't, that they will be designed

00:21:02.800 to benefit Davos for as long as they can control it.

00:21:06.380 And then at that point, who knows what will happen?

00:21:08.960 You're absolutely right that people won't really be able to make an argument against the

00:21:13.500 conclusions or the suggestions that are brought forward by artificial intelligence.

00:21:17.420 Because again, to me, it just, everything to me goes back to Genesis 1.

00:21:22.560 But the reason that I keep thinking about is one of the reasons why we can't trust AI versus

00:21:29.040 people is because AI is not made in the image of God.

00:21:32.760 We have a special ability to reason and discern right and wrong and to express certain forms

00:21:38.240 of compassion and justice that artificial intelligence doesn't have because it's artificial.

00:21:42.240 It might be made in our image or in, you know, an algorithm's image, but it's not made in

00:21:48.180 the image of God.

00:21:48.940 But if you don't believe that, if you don't believe that there is a transcendent power that

00:21:53.340 should limit our power as human beings, but has also given us the unique capacity to reason

00:21:58.900 that is beyond that of animals and devices and things like that, then why should you?

00:22:04.880 I mean, if you don't believe those things, then how do you make a case against artificial intelligence

00:22:10.000 that doesn't start there, that doesn't start with the divine or a divine imperative?

00:22:17.220 Something really scary that we've talked about a lot, and I'm wondering how this all kind

00:22:21.220 of works together, is the reduction of the population.

00:22:26.880 I mean, this has been going on for a long time.

00:22:29.960 Warren Buffett, obviously, I mean, you could go all the way back to the inception of Planned

00:22:34.620 Parenthood.

00:22:35.220 You could go all the way back to Malthus in the 1700s.

00:22:37.900 The need for reducing population, but this is a very popular theme that we see at Davos

00:22:42.960 every year.

00:22:44.220 And recently, Kamala Harris, she made, I guess it was a gaffe. 0.97

00:22:48.780 You can't tell between her being serious and when she has a gaffe.

00:22:53.680 But she made this comment about reducing the population the other day, and here's what she

00:22:58.560 said.

00:22:58.800 When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our

00:23:06.000 children can breathe clean air and drink clean water.

00:23:09.620 Okay, so the White House transcript says, pollution.

00:23:15.940 She meant pollution.

00:23:17.440 But I'm not so sure.

00:23:19.580 I'm not so sure that was not a Freudian slip.

00:23:22.120 Because honestly, if she had given that speech at Davos and she had really meant population

00:23:28.020 and not pollution, no one would have batted it.

00:23:30.180 And I, everyone would have been like, yes, I mean, Bill Gates openly talks about this through

00:23:34.420 vaccines and through birth control and through reproductive services like abortion.

00:23:39.460 We can effectively reduce the population, they say, that's going to help the environment,

00:23:43.040 blah, blah, blah, even though that Malthusian myth has been busted millions of times, even

00:23:47.780 by people like Elon Musk.

00:23:49.500 So like, how does artificial intelligence in this next stage of the Great Reset, how does

00:23:53.660 that play into their goal to dramatically reduce the population?

00:23:56.380 Yeah, well, I mean, once you have artificial intelligence making the decisions for you,

00:24:04.040 and once you've convinced enough people that artificial intelligence, whatever it says,

00:24:08.880 is much more informed than anything that anybody else could say, then, you know, you're kind

00:24:15.380 of at the mercy of whatever you want it to do, to some extent.

00:24:19.200 But for as long as you have the ability to still control it and manipulate it, because

00:24:23.240 it hasn't grown beyond that, you can kind of get it to say, you can manipulate data.

00:24:28.580 There's another great quote from Kamala Harris, where she's butchering the definition of artificial 1.00

00:24:33.580 intelligence, because she's our lead artificial intelligence person in the United States,

00:24:37.600 believe it or not.

00:24:38.800 And she's butchering the definition of artificial intelligence, but she lets it slip in those

00:24:43.700 comments.

00:24:44.460 Yes.

00:24:44.840 That you have to manipulate the data and all of this stuff in order to get the result that

00:24:49.820 you want from artificial intelligence.

00:24:51.960 So she said, first of all, it's two letters.

00:24:55.940 She said that's how she started out defining it.

00:24:58.200 She said, A.I., first of all, it's two letters.

00:25:00.680 Good job.

00:25:01.620 Good job.

00:25:02.480 And then, like you said, she I mean, it was total like word salad.

00:25:07.120 But if you listened closely, she says some things that are actually true, as you just pointed

00:25:12.420 out.

00:25:12.800 Right.

00:25:15.080 Yeah.

00:25:15.300 She says that you have to manipulate what goes into the artificial intelligence in order

00:25:21.240 to make sure that what you get out of the artificial intelligence is the result that you want.

00:25:25.860 And so really what she's saying is you either have to change the artificial intelligence algorithms

00:25:30.840 and the way it's designed so that it gives you the answer you want, or you have to manipulate

00:25:35.200 the data that goes into the artificial intelligence so that it gives you the answer that you want.

00:25:39.780 But that she openly she openly acknowledges that.

00:25:42.960 So if you have the position, as many of these people do, that climate change is going to

00:25:49.120 wipe out all of human civilization and that we're all going to die and that humanity won't 0.57

00:25:54.800 survive the next century or so or less, as as Kamala Harris claims she does, as Joe Biden

00:26:01.460 claims he does.

00:26:02.560 I don't know how much people actually believe this who are making these arguments, but there

00:26:06.320 are there are environmentalists who believe this, surely.

00:26:09.080 And there are many politicians who advocate for this.

00:26:12.560 If you believe that, then really logically, what is the best way to ensure that you're

00:26:17.880 not using too many resources?

00:26:20.000 What is the best way to ensure that you are not producing too much pollution, that you don't

00:26:24.920 have too many CO2 emissions?

00:26:27.020 What is what is the most logical way of doing that?

00:26:29.260 Some people say the quiet part out loud, people like Jane Goodall, you know, they admit that

00:26:36.420 you have to have fewer people.

00:26:38.140 That's the only way to do that.

00:26:39.840 So they're not saying we should go out and kill a bunch of people or anything like that.

00:26:43.700 But do they believe that we should put policies into place that either coerce or incentivize

00:26:49.940 people not to have children?

00:26:51.880 Absolutely.

00:26:52.840 They've made comments like this.

00:26:54.180 And then you see politicians like artificial like AOC come out and say, hey, I, you know,

00:27:01.320 I don't even know if I want to have kids.

00:27:02.660 I don't know if anyone should have kids, you know, because the climate is is going to climate

00:27:07.300 change is going to potentially kill everybody.

00:27:09.260 And the world is this terrible place.

00:27:11.300 And polling data shows that a huge percentage of young people now are starting to think this

00:27:15.920 way, especially outside of the United States and Europe, although a disturbing number of young

00:27:20.080 people in America are now thinking this way as well.

00:27:22.160 And and so it all makes complete sense.

00:27:26.040 There's this incredible documentary that I would encourage people to watch.

00:27:31.040 It's produced by Michael Moore, the Michael Moore.

00:27:34.820 And it was directed by a guy named Jeff Gibbs, who's worked with Michael Moore for a long

00:27:39.720 time.

00:27:40.240 And it is done from a left wing perspective.

00:27:42.340 It's called Planet of the Humans.

00:27:44.300 I don't know if you've seen this, but basically the movie is all about renewable energy, like

00:27:49.700 solar panels and wind farms and all of this.

00:27:52.520 Most of the movie is about that.

00:27:54.260 And essentially what it shows is that none of these things are actually going to stop

00:27:58.700 the climate crisis.

00:27:59.500 And actually, they're really bad for the environment and they really don't work that well.

00:28:03.340 And they're not very reliable.

00:28:04.740 It's incredible to see people on the left acknowledge all of these things.

00:28:08.200 So it gets to the end of the movie and it's essentially like, well, if this stuff doesn't

00:28:12.560 work, then what do we do about climate change?

00:28:15.060 And the answer is we need less people.

00:28:17.640 That's the answer.

00:28:18.800 And so I think all of these things are all are all tied together in in that same way.

00:28:25.460 And so you see AI being used now to just to start designing babies to be certain ways.

00:28:33.360 There's all kinds of ethical things related to that.

00:28:36.340 There are the art of AI is being used to model societal changes, to model climate change,

00:28:43.120 to model solutions to climate change, all of this stuff.

00:28:45.740 It's extremely, extremely, extremely dangerous because AI, as you've pointed out, does not

00:28:52.160 have a moral compass and whatever semblance of moral compass it has, has been given to

00:28:57.620 it by a very small group of people who do not share the values that you and I have or

00:29:02.640 the vast majority of other people walking around.

00:29:05.540 And so we are building a we are building a future that is incredibly dangerous because

00:29:12.500 we are giving way too much power to these emerging technologies without any kind of discussion

00:29:18.540 of how they should be designed outside of places like Davos.

00:29:21.560 And most people don't even know that it's happening and they won't know what happened

00:29:26.360 until it's too late to fix the problem.

00:29:28.960 Yeah.

00:29:29.640 And just to reiterate something that you've said, it's not because these people actually

00:29:33.880 care about the values that they're espousing.

00:29:36.380 It's all about money and power, weakness of the individual, creating a society that is

00:29:43.220 completely dependent on the powers that be for everything.

00:29:46.980 Artificial intelligence kind of accelerates that, exacerbates that.

00:29:50.940 Once you start relying on artificial intelligence, you're relying on the people that make artificial

00:29:55.240 intelligence and you can see where the conclusion goes.

00:29:59.040 And just like to demonstrate, as you've pointed out, that they really don't care about these

00:30:04.160 things.

00:30:04.980 The WEF, their 14th annual meeting of the new champions that happens in the summer, they

00:30:11.540 praise the Chinese Communist Party.

00:30:13.840 So whether you're looking at climate change and environmental policy or whether you're

00:30:19.140 looking at human rights, like how a country treats LGBTQ people or women or whatever, obviously

00:30:28.040 China is not a champion of these things.

00:30:30.840 Like most LGBTQ things are actually banned in China.

00:30:34.380 They don't care about the environment at all.

00:30:36.300 And yet people like Klaus Schwab praise China.

00:30:40.180 And that's because China is powerful.

00:30:41.920 They're scared of China.

00:30:43.460 And it's really just about making sure that the West is weak.

00:30:48.060 That's part of the reason for all the mass migration and the open borders and everything

00:30:51.940 like that to create chaos and weakness in the West.

00:30:55.520 Right.

00:30:57.160 Yeah, absolutely.

00:30:58.560 And to illustrate just how insane that event was in China, hosted by the World Economic

00:31:04.900 Forum, they call this Summer Davos or Davos Summer or something like that.

00:31:09.040 They've been doing it now for many years.

00:31:12.060 The premier of China, whose name is Li, gave a speech during this event that Klaus Schwab and

00:31:21.900 the World Economic Forum are hosting.

00:31:23.580 Right.

00:31:23.720 And he gets up and he says, as a responsible major country, he's talking about China and

00:31:29.560 all these wonderful things about China.

00:31:31.100 Klaus Schwab had previously praised China for its response to COVID and all of that, which

00:31:35.900 is unbelievable because it was like one of the greatest humanitarian disasters in history

00:31:41.740 was the way that China handled the COVID pandemic.

00:31:45.780 They were literally jailing people in their own homes and arresting people and doing all kinds

00:31:51.240 of horrible things to people.

00:31:52.180 People were starving to death in some parts of the pandemic.

00:31:54.900 But at this event, the chairman or Premier Li says, as a responsible major country, China

00:32:03.060 has all along, all along stood firmly on the right side of history and on the side of human

00:32:09.720 progress, holding high the banner of peace, development and win-win cooperation.

00:32:15.380 China is committed to building world peace, promoting global development and upholding the international

00:32:20.200 order.

00:32:20.760 And he goes on and on and on.

00:32:22.580 I mean, think about that.

00:32:24.320 China is probably, of every country that has ever existed in the history of human civilization, 0.87

00:32:30.220 the greatest violator of human rights ever. 0.94

00:32:34.520 They're worse than that. 0.97

00:32:35.600 They're really worse than the Nazis. 0.95

00:32:37.340 I mean, if you look at it from a total number of people murdered and killed, they're worse than 0.94

00:32:42.200 the Nazis.

00:32:42.640 I mean, Mao alone, Mao alone was more deadly, was deadlier than Hitler.

00:32:48.020 Right.

00:32:48.720 And at this World Economic Forum event, you've got China telling people that all along they've

00:32:54.480 been on the right side of history.

00:32:55.700 All along they've been in favor of human progress.

00:32:58.360 And does anybody at the World Economic Forum get up and say, well, well, there was that time

00:33:02.160 that you guys killed like 100 million people.

00:33:04.600 But other than that, yeah, I mean, no, no one's saying that.

00:33:07.920 That's not happening.

00:33:09.260 That's the kind of people that we're talking about.

00:33:11.620 These are the people who are designing the future.

00:33:13.820 These are the people who are designing the new technologies who are, in their own words,

00:33:18.600 we put all of these quotes in the book, saying things like, we need a second wave of human

00:33:23.600 evolution.

00:33:24.620 We need a new blueprint for society and for humanity.

00:33:28.940 We need to rewrite the social contracts for human civilization in the West.

00:33:35.180 These are the people, the people who are in bed with mass murderers who are right now over

00:33:42.160 a million Uyghurs, a minority in China, in internment camps and re-education camps.

00:33:48.780 They're literally imprisoned over a million people.

00:33:51.600 They execute people for basic drug possession in China, stuff like that. 0.52

00:33:56.620 These are horrible human rights violators.

00:33:58.880 And the World Economic Forum and these big, gigantic corporations and Larry Fink at Black

00:34:03.800 Rock and all of these people are completely 100 percent in bed with them.

00:34:08.160 And that tells you everything you need to know about what these people really believe and

00:34:12.180 who they really are.

00:34:13.060 Yeah, I think the scarier part is not really that they're lying when they say that, when they say

00:34:19.220 that China has always been on the side of progress, but that they actually probably see

00:34:22.820 Mao's efforts, his cultural revolutions as progress.

00:34:26.560 Like, they probably see the elimination of millions and millions of people through his,

00:34:32.080 Mao's Great Reset as a good thing.

00:34:35.080 His revolution, even though, yeah, sure, it didn't end up taking, you know, taking hold the way that

00:34:40.780 they wanted to, they probably did see it as some form of progress.

00:34:45.380 They probably saw China's one-child policy, which ended not all that long ago, as a form

00:34:51.640 of progress, where women were forced in the eighth, ninth month of pregnancy to abort their

00:34:57.380 children.

00:34:57.900 There's a documentary about this.

00:34:59.780 It was awful where this woman just talks about, like, driving by these piles of babies 1.00

00:35:05.460 who were aborted eighth, ninth month of pregnancy.

00:35:09.120 So, I mean, this happened, again, not that long ago, and then, as you said, all of the

00:35:12.480 human rights atrocities that happen to this day, I just think that the people at the World

00:35:16.200 Economic Forum actually see that, in a way, as progress.

00:35:19.380 It's not even that they're lying, which is even more terrifying.

00:35:22.660 Okay, we need to close out, but tell us what's about to happen in September with the UN and

00:35:27.920 our common agenda.

00:35:28.860 I mean, talk about an institution that exchanges evil for good and talks about virtue when they're

00:35:36.640 actually talking about complete degeneracy, like abortion, gender confusion, puberty blockers,

00:35:41.640 all that stuff.

00:35:42.380 What's happening in September?

00:35:44.820 Right.

00:35:45.500 So, the United Nations is launching, has launched a new initiative called Our Common Agenda,

00:35:53.420 and essentially, this is the United Nations' attempt to create a great reset through global

00:35:58.600 governance.

00:35:59.080 This is what they're trying to do.

00:36:01.340 Our Common Agenda is crazy, and it's sweeping, and it covers all kinds of different topics,

00:36:08.400 which we don't have time to get into right now.

00:36:10.420 But many of the things that we've talked about today already are included in Our Common Agenda,

00:36:15.940 like ESG and using financial institutions to control society.

00:36:20.380 They have other things in there, like having sort of like truth commissions that are designed

00:36:26.200 to regulate the internet and regulate content on social media and crack down on disinformation

00:36:32.680 and misinformation.

00:36:34.240 There's all kinds of really, really disturbing, crazy things in Our Common Agenda.

00:36:40.300 They are planning on voting on this, creating an international agreement and voting on this

00:36:44.900 in September of not this year, but next year, 2024, at an event that they're calling Summit

00:36:51.300 for the Future, or Summit of the Future, and the agreement's going to be called Pact for

00:36:57.840 the Future, and this pact is going to include a whole bunch of aspects of this Our Common

00:37:03.440 Agenda thing.

00:37:04.540 The most important thing that I think people, if they have time to just look up one thing

00:37:09.980 about Our Common Agenda for right now, and I'm going to be doing a whole lot of additional

00:37:13.440 work on this over the next year or so, look up emergency platform.

00:37:18.760 The emergency platform is part of Our Common Agenda, and essentially what it would do is

00:37:23.820 give massive amounts of power to the Secretary General of the United Nations in the event of

00:37:30.240 what they call a global shock, which is really just whatever they want it to be.

00:37:35.160 And the examples they give are like a supply chain crisis globally, a climate crisis,

00:37:40.920 another pandemic, some kind of financial problem.

00:37:46.640 They even say a black swan event could trigger this global shock.

00:37:51.440 And in the event of this global shock, what the United Nations wants is to have the ability

00:37:56.240 to seize control of massive amounts of activity in the West, in the nations that are related

00:38:04.640 to whatever this global shock is automatically.

00:38:07.540 They don't need to have a new vote on it.

00:38:09.540 Once this is approved and goes into effect, if there's a global shock, then that triggers

00:38:13.580 this global emergency platform.

00:38:15.980 And the Secretary General steps in.

00:38:18.360 And for a set period of time, he has sweeping authority over the places related to this global

00:38:24.060 shock.

00:38:24.620 And if he decides at the end of this set period of time that he needs more time, he can unilaterally

00:38:30.860 decide, I need more time and give himself more time to continue to lord over the Western

00:38:36.480 world.

00:38:37.480 It sounds absolutely crazy.

00:38:38.480 It sounds like some kind of insane conspiracy theory, which is why I think a lot of people

00:38:43.400 haven't reported on it.

00:38:45.420 But if you actually read the report from the United Nations itself, you can see direct quotes

00:38:52.160 backing up every single thing that I'm saying.

00:38:54.740 This is exactly how the emergency platform would work.

00:38:58.440 So that's the kind of thing that's in our common agenda.

00:39:01.060 That's just one small part of it.

00:39:02.320 Um, this is a really terrifying thing and we have until September, 2024 to try to derail

00:39:08.900 it.

00:39:09.580 Um, and September, 2024 is important date to remember as well, because, uh, just within

00:39:15.300 six weeks of this event happening or so you have a presidential election.

00:39:19.460 So they're sneaking this in right before Joe Biden could theoretically be kicked out of

00:39:24.540 office.

00:39:24.820 And I think that that's a very deliberate thing.

00:39:27.760 So it's something that we need to spend more time thinking about talking about people in

00:39:32.080 media, people who have big microphones, because it is the great reset except on steroids and

00:39:38.460 using the government and the United Nations now as the primary mechanism to make this transformation

00:39:43.860 that we've been talking about throughout this episode happen.

00:39:46.120 So this is September, 2024, like you just said, and I've had some whistleblowers, some people

00:39:52.160 on the podcast before talking about the UN and how, again, they don't have real morality.

00:39:58.780 They give a pass to some of the worst, most atrocious human rights violators, you know, for

00:40:05.580 example, like putting Saudi Arabia on the council for women's rights.

00:40:09.420 They do that kind of stuff all the time.

00:40:11.000 And then they punish Israel.

00:40:12.180 They punish the United States, um, for not meeting their agenda.

00:40:15.900 So just think about all of the implications of having someone like that with that set

00:40:21.140 of subversive values in charge, it's not going to be good.

00:40:24.540 It's not going to be good.

00:40:25.320 And it's crazy how many things fit into this, the big and the small things.

00:40:29.760 And I always want to say after I talked to Justin for people not to be hopeless, because

00:40:35.680 you did mention like there are things that are happening that people are doing, starting

00:40:40.720 new businesses, creating this parallel economy, hopefully pushing politicians on our side of

00:40:45.860 the aisle to enact legislation that is going to help solidify this parallel economy.

00:40:52.100 And I don't know if it is the, you know, end all be all answer.

00:40:58.420 But there are still avenues while there is still time to push back against the powers that be.

00:41:06.400 I know it seems impossible, of course, but like you already see people in different parts

00:41:11.920 of Europe saying, I'm not on board with this climate change agenda.

00:41:14.800 I'm not on board with you calling like 20,000 of my cows in Ireland.

00:41:18.820 Like I'm not on board with the mass migration that's happening in France and Germany because

00:41:22.940 of the chaos that it's causing.

00:41:24.640 Now, I don't know if they have the power to really stop this stuff.

00:41:27.540 But you do already see a growing intolerance for the kind of chaos that the powers are pushing.

00:41:36.500 So we'll we'll see what happens.

00:41:38.860 I'm not completely hopeless.

00:41:41.060 Obviously, I'm not hopeless on an eternal scale.

00:41:43.740 But even in this life, I'm not completely hopeless that things, you know, that things

00:41:48.860 could change for the better.

00:41:51.260 Yeah, I think that's great.

00:41:52.900 And I also think it's important for people to understand that a lot of these things have

00:41:57.660 been going on for a long time and people didn't know that they were happening.

00:42:02.940 And I think now people are learning about all of these things because we have shows like

00:42:07.440 yours and we have networks like The Blaze and we have the alternative media, you know,

00:42:12.480 and to some degree, Fox News and stuff like that.

00:42:14.520 We didn't have that before.

00:42:15.640 And so people are learning about all these things and they're saying to themselves, you

00:42:19.240 know, the world is just descending into absolute chaos.

00:42:21.660 How can we ever you know, things are getting so much worse.

00:42:24.700 But what I think they have to realize is that this was happening for a long time and we're

00:42:29.540 just learning about it now.

00:42:31.160 And you can't actually fix the problem until you learn about the problem.

00:42:35.620 And so there was no hope of us learning about this 10 years ago.

00:42:39.760 Like that wasn't even a possibility because of the systems that were in place.

00:42:43.600 But now we have people with big microphones like yours talking about these issues that matter.

00:42:48.860 People are learning about them.

00:42:50.420 We are shining a light on it and it is having a massive impact on this entire story.

00:42:57.360 And so I actually think as I know, it sounds often like the things I'm saying is bad news,

00:43:02.560 but it is in a very real way.

00:43:05.460 It is good news in the sense that we know what is going on and we know what we need to do to

00:43:11.500 stop it.

00:43:12.080 It's just a matter of actually doing that.

00:43:13.920 That is progress compared to where we were a decade ago when most people had no clue what

00:43:19.520 was going on behind the scenes.

00:43:21.680 So I am hopeful that there are changes that are going to be made.

00:43:25.560 Nobody even knew what ESG or the Great Reset was when I first started talking about it.

00:43:30.260 And now you have presidential candidates with platforms built largely on that one topic on

00:43:37.320 ESG and stuff like that.

00:43:38.600 So we are making progress and I think we will continue to make progress.

00:43:43.320 And I do think that in the end, we will we will win.

00:43:46.880 I really do believe that because I don't think most people want the world that these Davos

00:43:51.960 elites are trying to build.

00:43:53.320 I just don't think they understand what is going on.

00:43:56.120 And as they learn about it, they will push back against it.

00:43:58.540 And you will get people across the ideological and political spectrum, I think, working together

00:44:03.640 to some degree in order to push back against this kind of thing.

00:44:07.100 So I am I am actually very hopeful, believe it or not, that we can win this in the end.

00:44:13.700 Yes.

00:44:14.120 And people just have to do what they can do.

00:44:16.420 I know we're talking about big, large scale global things.

00:44:19.420 Well, none of us can save the world.

00:44:21.100 None of us has the individual ability to do that.

00:44:23.720 You can only do what you can do in your family, in your community, in your state.

00:44:27.980 And those things really make a difference.

00:44:30.540 How you vote, how you spend your money, the choices you make, how you raise your family,

00:44:35.160 how you educate your children.

00:44:36.880 Don't think that those things don't matter.

00:44:39.620 They are one piece of the larger puzzle that we're trying to build in opposition to what

00:44:46.440 the Great Reset is trying to do.

00:44:49.040 All of those individual choices absolutely matter and make a difference on a large collective scale.

00:44:55.180 So I just want to encourage people in that.

00:44:56.760 Like we often say, do the next right thing.

00:44:59.360 Don't think that the next right thing doesn't make a difference and fly in the face of what,

00:45:04.800 you know, the WEF and these elites are trying to do.

00:45:08.020 So I just want to encourage people with that.

00:45:09.340 And also buy the book, buy Dark Future.

00:45:11.720 It's available everywhere.

00:45:12.920 It's going to be super popular.

00:45:14.320 It is super popular.

00:45:15.220 And I'm guessing they can go, you know, wherever books are sold to buy it.

00:45:22.260 Yep.

00:45:22.940 Wherever books are sold, Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble has it in store, all of that stuff.

00:45:27.500 We don't like Amazon.

00:45:29.620 But, you know, if there is a redemptive way to use Amazon, you can fight against Amazon while

00:45:36.140 you're using Amazon.

00:45:37.440 I mean, because I do the same thing with pro-life organizations.

00:45:40.680 It's a great way to donate to them, even though Amazon is, you know, for abortion. 0.53

00:45:45.440 You can stick it to them by buying Dark Future through their mechanisms.

00:45:51.740 Thanks so much, Justin.

00:45:53.000 I really appreciate you taking the time to come on, as always.

00:45:57.060 Thanks, Allie.

00:45:57.780 It's great, Spock.

00:45:58.320 It's great speaking with you.

00:45:59.720 And I look forward to our next conversation.

00:46:01.260 Thank you.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - July 20, 2023

Ep 842 ｜ The Elites’ Plan to Replace God With AI ｜ Guest： Justin Haskins (Part Two)

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript