Ep 88 | Dumb Decisions
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
179.48813
Summary
In this episode of Relatable, we talk about the recent shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand, and what the Christian response should be to it. We also talk about some of the ideas Elizabeth Warren has proposed to replace the Electoral College.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
What's up, guys? Welcome to Relatable. I hope everyone has had a great week so far.
00:00:04.860
It is Wednesday. We are halfway through the week. And guys, I am so happy that the weather has
00:00:12.600
changed down here in Texas. As I said, probably this time last year, because by the way,
00:00:18.140
we on Relatable are celebrating one year of this podcast. Started out one time a week,
00:00:23.720
moved to two times a week last summer by popular demand. And now it's three times a week. And I've
00:00:28.640
gotten really good feedback from you guys. That's just an aside. But as I said about this time last
00:00:33.300
year, I love the heat and I love the summer. And I cannot wait until it is that kind of day in Texas
00:00:41.000
where you go outside at 8 a.m. and you immediately start sweating where the pool water feels like a
00:00:46.360
bath. I cannot wait now. Just well, we'll see. We'll see what my Instagram stories are like in
00:00:54.080
July when I am miserable with a newborn child and I don't want to leave my refrigerator.
00:01:00.820
We'll see. But right now, I just cannot wait for summer. And the leaves are changing and the trees
00:01:08.620
are the leaves are changing in a good way. I mean, and the trees are blossoming and it's getting to be
00:01:14.800
like 70 degrees. And I am just really excited about that. If you are living somewhere where it's cold,
00:01:20.640
I'm really sorry. You can live vicariously through me. Just pretend like you're living down here in
00:01:26.800
Texas. OK, today we're not going to talk about the weather, although I probably could talk about
00:01:31.620
the weather for 30 minutes, but I'm not going to. I won't bore you in that regard. We're going to talk
00:01:37.420
about some of the stuff that's been going on in the news. As you guys know, Wednesday is going to be
00:01:42.080
our news day and we are going to cover some stuff that's been actually covered for a while now,
00:01:48.260
but is still in the news. So we're going to talk about some of the ideas that Democrats and
00:01:55.160
Democratic candidates have put forward, like lowering the voting age to 16. Is that something
00:01:59.300
that we really want to do? We are also going to talk about abolishing the Electoral College,
00:02:05.460
something that sweet Elizabeth Warren has put forth as a grand idea. But we're also going to talk about
00:02:10.660
the big story, something that happened last week, and that is the shooting in Christchurch,
00:02:15.300
New Zealand. Now on that, I know that you guys have probably already heard everything about that
00:02:20.280
shooting. Like I said, it happened almost a week ago now. People have been covering it,
00:02:25.780
analyzing it, arguing about it, going back and forth for a long time. The last thing that I want
00:02:30.360
to do is rehash old information that you guys already know. I want to add value to this conversation.
00:02:36.360
And so we are going to talk briefly about what happened. We're going to talk about what the
00:02:40.680
Christian response should be, kind of what the right and the left has said, and the reality of
00:02:46.680
this kind of terrorism worldwide from a bigger picture perspective. And then we're going to move
00:02:51.160
on into the other stuff. Okay. Now we're going to talk about something that has made me lose sleep
00:02:56.080
and has probably made a lot of you lose sleep. And that is the tragic shooting that happened last
00:03:01.480
week in New Zealand. So just a brief rundown in case some of you have just been really busy and you
00:03:06.480
haven't been able to turn on the news and hear what's happened. I do not blame you for that,
00:03:10.980
by the way. Sometimes a whole week goes by and I realize that I haven't gotten updated on this very
00:03:17.100
important thing that happened just because I've been too overwhelmed by the details of it. So
00:03:20.980
I'm going to break it down in a simple way for those of you who don't know, or if you just need
00:03:24.960
a refresher. So there was a 28-year-old self-proclaimed white supremacist who opened fire on two mosques
00:03:32.120
in Christchurch, New Zealand last week. He had a camera on his helmet as he opened fire on these
00:03:40.000
people and he live streamed this attack. This video was shared on Facebook millions of times until
00:03:46.260
they took it down. I did not watch the video. I don't even know if it's available online. I
00:03:52.840
encourage you not to watch the video. I didn't want to contribute even in a small way to the attention
00:03:58.940
that this guy obviously was desperate for. Apparently the footage is absolutely horrific. I
00:04:05.480
mean, just gives you nightmares. I didn't need to have that visual in my mind to know that this attack
00:04:11.660
was superbly and profoundly evil. And you probably don't either. Don't feed your mind and don't feed
00:04:20.980
your soul with that kind of stuff. You can understand the severity of something without having to
00:04:26.980
experience it or see it for yourself. And again, that gives this guy the attention that he really
00:04:32.640
obviously craved. This was a very public attack and he made sure to make it that way. 50 people are now
00:04:40.220
dead. That count might go higher. It might go up because 40 people are still suffering in the
00:04:45.480
hospital. Proportionally, this is like their 9-11. Like what 9-11 was for us, that's kind of like what
00:04:52.440
this is for them. Proportionally, proportion to their population. New Zealand is a small country,
00:04:57.820
only about 4.7 million people. This guy, this sick, twisted, evil person wrote and posted a manifesto.
00:05:07.780
He claimed that he had a fear of displacement by immigrants. He expressed a hatred for Muslims and
00:05:14.680
really, and I know this word is a lot of times overused, but this is actually an appropriate place
00:05:20.860
to say the word xenophobic. This guy was extremely xenophobic. He was afraid and hateful toward
00:05:27.740
anyone who didn't look like him, anyone who didn't believe like him. He was angry at everyone who wasn't
00:05:33.920
white, who was what he saw as an affront to his European heritage. I'm not going to say his name.
00:05:42.340
I'm not going to quote the manifesto. I'm not going to give him any more airtime. I am certainly
00:05:47.260
not the first one to say this. I'm probably the millionth person to say this. There have been a
00:05:52.720
lot of conservatives and other people on the other side who have said, I'm not going to give this guy
00:05:58.980
the specific fame that he's looking for. So I'm not going to show his picture or anything like that.
00:06:03.660
I'm going to join the very wise people who have said, we are going to do as much as possible to try to
00:06:10.280
draw attention away from his identity. Now we still have to talk about it. We still have to talk about
00:06:16.180
him, but we can do what we can to keep him anonymous because that's exactly what he doesn't
00:06:21.860
want. He also said in his manifesto that he wants to start a kind of racial war or he wants to start
00:06:29.780
a divisive conversation between the left and the right, between the different cultures throughout
00:06:35.540
the world, specifically in the West. And unfortunately, that's exactly what has happened
00:06:39.900
because he listed some right wing personalities in his manifesto.
00:06:43.660
Um, the left is saying that he is echoing rhetoric of Donald Trump. And so you've got a lot of people
00:06:49.140
on the left saying, look, this is because of Donald Trump. This is because of conservatives.
00:06:55.160
And if they're not stopped, if they're not stopped, if they're not silenced, then this kind of stuff is
00:06:59.900
going to keep going. Of course, that is insanely stupid. This guy might have, uh, in some way been a
00:07:06.220
part of the right because he's basically a fascist and, uh, fascism is on the far right. If you're
00:07:12.540
looking at an ideological spectrum from, uh, right to left, fascism is on the far right. Communism is on
00:07:19.100
the far left. They're both equally evil by the way, but he's technically on the right, but being on the
00:07:24.440
right doesn't make you a conservative. It's not taking conservatism to the extreme. It's just a place
00:07:30.660
on an ideological spectrum. This guy wasn't a conservative. Uh, he didn't care about conserving
00:07:36.520
the constitution, uh, conserving human dignity and the rights that are inherent to men and women
00:07:41.820
because they were given to us by God. That is fundamentally what it means to be a conservative.
00:07:46.480
And of course he lives in New Zealand, so he's not expected to care about, uh, the American
00:07:50.820
constitution. But what I mean is the values, uh, that were placed in the constitution that say
00:07:55.680
that all men and women are created equal because they were endowed by their creator with certain
00:07:59.940
inalienable rights among them being life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That is not just
00:08:04.160
an American idea. That's supposed to be really a Western idea, but he says that, um, conservatives
00:08:10.940
aren't really conserving anything. Now, this is something that I've heard from a lot of people in
00:08:15.800
the alt-right. Some conservatives don't want to believe that the alt-right exists, that it was just a
00:08:19.640
word made up by Hillary Clinton. That's not true. The alt-right does exist. And this guy did say
00:08:25.220
some things that sound like some of the things that I've heard. Does that mean that this is the
00:08:29.020
alt-right's fault? No, it doesn't. Of course not. Does this mean that because he mimics the language
00:08:34.440
of some people on the right, that this is the fault of the right, or this is the fault of President
00:08:39.320
Trump? A lot of people are saying because President Trump calls, uh, what's happening at the border
00:08:43.760
an invasion. And this guy apparently used the word invasion that this is President Trump's fault.
00:08:48.620
That's absolutely absurd. As some other people have pointed out, the media did not blame
00:08:54.760
Bernie Sanders for when James Hodgkinson, uh, went to the, went to the baseball field in Virginia
00:09:01.100
and shot at Republican senators because he felt, or he thought that Republicans, uh, were evil for
00:09:08.800
supposedly kicking people off their healthcare and saying 24 million people are going to die.
00:09:13.440
He echoed the sentiments of Bernie Sanders. And yet did we blame Bernie Sanders for that? No. And I
00:09:20.020
don't think we should have blamed Bernie Sanders for that. A lot of people have pointed out the
00:09:22.820
hypocrisy of the hypocrisy of the media though, um, for blaming Donald Trump and blaming everyone
00:09:28.500
on the right for what happened in New Zealand, uh, with a white supremacist. And that is absolutely
00:09:36.300
absurd. So as, as a Christian, what should be our response? Not as someone on the left, not as someone
00:09:45.980
on the right, not from a political perspective, but from a biblical perspective, well, our response
00:09:53.280
should be really, it should be a natural response of profound sadness. I mean, these were people,
00:09:59.100
and this is something that really Christians, people who believe in the Bible can only understand
00:10:03.660
and comprehend is that these people were made in the image of God. They had value because they were
00:10:10.460
made in the image of God, not just because they were any old people, but because they bared the image
00:10:15.340
of God because they had souls. They have families now who are broken, who are devastated, whose lives
00:10:21.860
are completely marred by this, who are traumatized forever from what they saw from the people that
00:10:27.560
they lost in our hearts should break for them. Um, we should pray for these families. We should pray
00:10:33.500
that they would know and feel, uh, the God of peace that God would be with them. And we should pray that
00:10:39.240
they would come to know Christ in whom, uh, we find ultimate fulfillment, ultimate satisfaction,
00:10:44.800
and of course, uh, salvation. We should pray that they find the joy and the comfort and the peace
00:10:50.260
that can only come from them. We should be praying hard for them. We should be praying for the churches
00:10:55.620
in New Zealand, that they are mobilized to do the good work of Christ, that they go to these people.
00:11:00.260
They mourn with those who mourn. Of course, as we are also called to rejoice with those who rejoice,
00:11:05.300
we should pray for the church, uh, that they are able to help these people bear their burdens of
00:11:13.560
sadness and of sorrow, not seeking anything in return, uh, except just to love them and show the
00:11:19.180
unconditional love of Christ. That's what we should be praying for. However, a lot of people,
00:11:25.480
especially in America and especially on the left in America, some people on the right as well,
00:11:30.780
uh, disdain this idea of thoughts and prayers. You've got a lot of people saying,
00:11:34.380
I'm giving my thoughts and prayers to these people. Now, where I agree with that is that I,
00:11:40.540
I don't really understand what people say, what people mean when they say thoughts,
00:11:45.020
you are sending your thoughts. You could be thinking thoughts. You could be feeling things,
00:11:50.060
but all of those things are really, uh, they're trapped inside you. They don't actually do anything.
00:11:55.000
It's not actually possible to send good vibes. It's not actually possible to send love. It's not
00:12:00.280
possible to send thoughts. No one can read your thoughts. No one can feel your thoughts. Your
00:12:05.180
feelings enclosed in your body and closed in your mind don't actually have any effect.
00:12:10.260
So when people criticize the idea of thoughts, even though I don't think it's necessarily appropriate
00:12:16.240
right then, and I've made that mistake before of criticizing thoughts, don't mean anything in the
00:12:22.480
wake of something. And that was inappropriate. And I do think it's inappropriate when people are just
00:12:27.160
trying to sincerely respond to say your thoughts don't mean anything. But at this point, I think
00:12:31.940
it's fair to say, it's fair to point out that your thoughts don't, your thoughts don't actually do
00:12:37.980
anything. Your good vibes don't actually do anything. Your feeling of love doesn't actually
00:12:41.960
do anything that is doing something for you. It's not doing anything for other people, but what does
00:12:46.940
something, what does have power, what does have impact, what does have meaning, what can change things
00:12:53.820
and have a very real effect on the material world and on the hearts and souls and minds of real
00:13:01.400
physical people is prayer. Thoughts and prayers, in my opinion, shouldn't even be put in the same
00:13:08.140
sentence. Because what are thoughts except for things that you conceptualize in your head that,
00:13:13.200
like I said, have really no outside meaning unless they do spur action. But prayers, prayers are
00:13:20.000
different. Because you're not praying to yourself. It's not just a thought you have. You are praying
00:13:25.140
to the God of the universe. You are praying to the God who is in and through and who created everything.
00:13:32.740
James 5.16 says, the prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. Romans 8.26 says,
00:13:40.660
likewise, the spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought,
00:13:46.920
but the spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words. A lot of people
00:13:54.340
disdain this because the reality is, is that a lot of people who don't really understand the Bible,
00:14:00.540
who maybe aren't practicing Christians, or they're just not people who understand prayer and the power
00:14:07.460
of prayer, they don't understand the nature of God, disdain this because they think of prayers as
00:14:14.560
thoughts. They think of them as these blurbs that go on inside your head that don't actually
00:14:19.900
ever leave your head. They're not going to anything. They're just something to make you feel
00:14:23.380
better. So if you think of prayers as nothing more than sincere thoughts, then yeah, maybe you would
00:14:30.520
be angry about this. But that just goes to show the people who are angry about people saying that
00:14:35.580
they're praying don't really understand prayer. That's, that's a heart issue for them. AOC tweeted
00:14:43.300
out, what good are your thoughts and prayers when they don't even keep the pew safe? So this is
00:14:49.520
someone who fundamentally does not understand prayer. She's saying, why are you even praying? All of these
00:14:57.160
religious people are being attacked. Obviously that's not working. Now she didn't say that explicitly,
00:15:02.720
but that's the obvious implication from what she said. What good are your thoughts and prayers when
00:15:07.760
they don't even keep the pew safe? She's saying, obviously your prayers are insufficient. So she has
00:15:12.920
a very basic misunderstanding of theology. She doesn't understand the nature of God. She doesn't
00:15:17.720
understand the nature of prayer. She doesn't understand James 5, 16, doesn't understand Romans 8, 26.
00:15:23.360
When you pray in Jesus, there is something real that is happening. Even as a, even if you are the
00:15:32.660
staunchest Calvinist in the world who believes in the sovereignty of God, the Bible is still very
00:15:37.600
clear that our, we have a responsibility in our actions and our actions have consequences, even
00:15:42.680
though God is sovereign over it all. But you are praying for something real. You are praying for
00:15:49.640
something to manifest itself. Like I said, you are praying to the God who created everything.
00:15:53.360
God sees a thousand years from now, just as clearly as he sees the dawn of creation. He is suspended in
00:16:02.960
this eternal now. So that means that he's not surprised by anything. He wasn't thrown off by
00:16:07.920
this attack. Nothing throws him off. He's not wondering how we got to this place. He's not up
00:16:12.460
there shaking his head saying, wow, I did not see this coming. How'd you get yourselves into all this?
00:16:17.740
Okay. Well, I got to come clean it up. No, he is over all of it. He is bigger than all of it. He
00:16:23.440
doesn't go through our days. Like we do. He's not wondering what's going to happen tomorrow. He's not
00:16:28.380
having a hard time remembering what happened yesterday. He is suspended in the eternal. Now he
00:16:33.640
is just as present today as he will, as he is a thousand years ago. And as he, as he is a thousand
00:16:39.340
years from now, that means nothing gets past him. Uh, and even when it does not seem like it,
00:16:46.100
that means that he is in total control. Uh, the prayer of a Christian to his or her heavenly father
00:16:53.740
has great power because he is over everything and he is in control of everything. Now we don't
00:17:02.080
understand that. It's very easy to say that. And we don't understand it. We don't get why bad things
00:17:08.220
happen. Uh, we get, okay, we live in a fallen world. We get the garden of Eden. We understand that
00:17:14.360
there were consequences from that. Uh, we know people get sick and die, but when we really think
00:17:19.720
about it, you know, it's hard, it's hard for us to really comprehend if we're honest with ourselves,
00:17:24.720
evil like this, um, something so sick and twisted, something like the Holocaust, something like the
00:17:33.120
event in New Zealand. It's very hard for us to understand how a God who is both all good,
00:17:39.580
who is all powerful, who is all knowing, and who is all present, uh, to, for that. It's hard for us
00:17:50.680
to imagine a God like that with all of those characteristics, um, being sovereign over and
00:17:57.100
being in control over such horrific things that cause human suffering. It is hard to understand and
00:18:04.100
believe that a sovereign good God was, uh, in control or sovereign over 9-11. He was sovereign
00:18:11.100
over the Christ church shooting. Of course, I don't think that he, he, I know that he doesn't
00:18:17.760
want those things to happen in the sense that of course he doesn't want people to suffer. He doesn't
00:18:23.220
take joy from that, but it's also not theologically correct to say that he just sits back and allows
00:18:29.300
it to happen. That is taking away one characteristic of God that the Bible does not allow us to take
00:18:35.000
away. He doesn't remove his power. He doesn't say all of a sudden I'm not in control and whoops,
00:18:41.120
how did that happen? He is still in control. And that's the part that we don't really understand.
00:18:46.300
And I'm not sure that we are meant to understand that at all times, in all situations, in all evil
00:18:52.600
eras of history, God is just as in control as he is during the good times. Um, that means that
00:19:00.680
as hard as it is for us to comprehend that we cannot deny that God is in total control over tragedies,
00:19:09.340
um, as he is over joy, over things that bring us peace, uh, because to do so would say that he's
00:19:17.580
either not good to say that he's not knowing or that he's not present. And he is all three or that
00:19:22.460
he's not, uh, all powerful. And he is all of those things. Even if we don't get it, we're not meant
00:19:27.860
to, we are meant to trust that. Uh, and the hope for the Christian, the hope for the Christian is
00:19:33.560
not that one day we will totally be able to reconcile all of these parts of, of God's
00:19:38.200
character, which we just have to trust are true because the Bible says it is. And because the Bible
00:19:42.280
is God's word, and that's really the only source of truth that we have. And so we have to be able to
00:19:46.420
cling to it as fallible human beings. Uh, but the hope for the Christian is that one day
00:19:52.240
reconciliation will be complete, that there will be no more terrorism. There will be no more
00:19:59.140
shootings. There will be no more white supremacy. There will be no more death. There will be no more
00:20:04.400
mourning. There will be no more media. Thank goodness. Uh, there will only be fullness of joy
00:20:09.720
for all of those who have put their faith in Christ. There will be everlasting peace. This won't be
00:20:14.360
something that we have to worry about anymore. We're not going to be anxious anymore. We're not going to be
00:20:19.400
desperate anymore. We're not going to be depressed anymore. We're not going to be concerned with
00:20:24.060
anything except for worshiping Jesus. That's the hope that we have. And so our job now, as it always
00:20:30.240
is, is to preach the gospel, to serve others and to pray, tell people about Jesus, show them
00:20:35.860
hospitality and generosity and pray, pray for the souls of the people around you, of the souls and the
00:20:42.080
minds of those in power. Now, all of that said, it is still a fair question. Is there more that can be
00:20:50.660
done? Should we talk about gun legislation? Uh, after all I'm pro-life. I don't only pray that
00:20:58.760
abortion is ended. I should be praying that every day. I don't only pray that we end abortion. I all,
00:21:05.040
I also fight for ways to end abortion. So I, uh, volunteer, I help pro-life organizations. I
00:21:12.280
donate, I advocate and talk about legislation that would restrict access to abortion. And I also look
00:21:19.800
for ways to help women who are in crisis. I want abortion to be unthinkable. I do things in order to
00:21:26.620
manifest that just reality. And so it's a fair question for Christians and non-Christians alike to
00:21:33.320
say, is gun legislation something that we should look into? Now, uh, prime minister, the prime
00:21:41.120
minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Arden, uh, has pledged proposed legislation within the next week
00:21:46.880
that would dramatically change gun laws in that country. Uh, these are measures that could include
00:21:51.260
restricting military style, semi-automatic automatic weapons, uh, that were used in the attack last week.
00:21:57.060
Uh, according to the New York times to get a gun in New Zealand, it's already pretty hard. It's harder
00:22:01.620
than it is in the United States. Uh, the applicant has to first pass a background check, uh, that,
00:22:06.880
that considers criminal medical, mental health, domestic violence records, provide character
00:22:11.840
references, uh, subject themselves to government interviews, pass a home security inspection,
00:22:16.980
take a gun safety course, and then wait weeks or months for firearms license approval. Now, I think
00:22:22.920
that is way too strict. If someone is looking to defend themselves with a gun and if someone really
00:22:28.020
fears for their life, they have to wait weeks or months to be able to have the right to defend
00:22:32.220
themselves, I think that's way too much, but they've already got really strict laws in place.
00:22:37.080
Um, in 2017 though, even though it takes a long time, it's not extremely hard, uh, or they don't
00:22:43.960
typically deny people in 2017, uh, 43,509 firearms license applications were submitted in New Zealand.
00:22:51.960
Only 188 applications were declined. Uh, according to figures compiled by the university of Sydney,
00:22:59.260
New Zealand had 0.17 gun related homicides per a hundred thousand people in 2015. That's really low
00:23:05.800
in contrast to the United States, which had 11 deaths per a hundred thousand people in 2015,
00:23:10.880
according to a report from the U S centers for disease control and prevention. So what they're
00:23:16.440
trying to do now by enacting a gun restricting legislation or gun rights restricting legislation,
00:23:21.800
it's really an emotional decision. They are completely, um, they're completely in their
00:23:28.420
rights to be emotional and to be distraught over this. However, emotionalism doesn't usually lay a
00:23:37.640
good groundwork for legislation that restricts the rights of law abiding citizens. Um, the reality is
00:23:44.240
they don't really have a homicide problem. Uh, 1.2 million guns are in New Zealand, barely have any
00:23:51.600
deaths by guns every year. We have Kim Kardashian policy expert tweeting out, uh, just 24 hours after
00:23:59.980
the Christchurch shooting, New Zealand banned semi-automatic guns, America take note. Why can't
00:24:05.600
our elected officials put public safety over gun manufacturers profits? Well, this just points to
00:24:10.520
a profound misunderstanding of the right to bear arms in the second amendment in the United States
00:24:16.700
of America. It has nothing to do with gun manufacturers profits. It's the right of law
00:24:22.100
abiding citizens, uh, to bear arms. And the problem as we've seen in study after study is not law abiding
00:24:31.180
citizens who own their guns legally. It's people who get their guns illegally. It's people who break
00:24:36.140
the law in other ways. And we have not seen that gun legislation in this country has had a significantly
00:24:42.400
positive impact on a gun related deaths because it's not necessarily a legislation problem. It's
00:24:50.400
certainly not an NRA problem. And so we can look at somewhere like New Zealand, which is a completely
00:24:55.980
different country than us and say they enacted this legislation. But the question should be not is,
00:25:00.860
does this feel good to us after a tragic incident, but is this going to work? And I'm just not sure that
00:25:06.680
it is. Uh, the media, as we've already kind of discussed at the beginning is really grappling with who to
00:25:11.820
blame. Here's a guest on MSNBC saying that this is Fox news's fault. And to my mind, Fox news is the
00:25:19.640
single cause, singular cause of this kind of hate in discourse. And almost every liberal news outlet
00:25:28.020
has kind of gone down that same vein. Uh, Twitter has been ablaze for the past week with people blaming,
00:25:34.380
uh, conservative commentators like Ben Shapiro, like Candace Owens, or anyone who has ever criticized
00:25:40.820
Islam in their lives. It's completely absurd. Again, the same respect was disrespect was not shown
00:25:48.420
to Bernie Sanders after James Hodgkinson, um, shot and almost killed Steve Scalise, the Republican
00:25:55.020
Senator, um, Chelsea Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, you know, Democrat, you know, daughter of Bill and Hillary
00:26:02.180
Clinton. Uh, she is being blamed for criticizing Ilhan Omar for being an antisemite. Ilhan Omar
00:26:10.380
is the representative from Minnesota, freshman representative from Minnesota that we talked
00:26:14.880
about, I think last week, who is an antisemite. And she said very antisemite things multiple times.
00:26:19.180
Uh, so here, Chelsea Clinton is pregnant, Chelsea Clinton, uh, being harassed by people at a vigil
00:26:24.460
in New York. After all that you have done and all this, this right here is the result of a massacre
00:26:42.300
stoked by people like you and the word that you put out into the world. And I want you to know that.
00:26:47.400
And I want you to feel that deep inside. The 49 people died because of the rhetoric that you put
00:26:51.580
out there. I don't think, I don't think. What does, I'm sorry, you feel that we mean? What does that
00:26:59.120
mean? Uh, so the people who harassed her, these absolutely out of their minds, crazy people who
00:27:04.880
didn't even, uh, didn't even have an ability to make a logical argument, basically said that because
00:27:10.140
Chelsea Clinton cared about antisemitism and the antisemitism that was showed by Ilhan Omar,
00:27:14.200
um, that she spoke out in a very respectful way, uh, about that, that she somehow contributes
00:27:20.600
to what happened in New Zealand. Okay. So these people got space in Buzzfeed to write an op-ed
00:27:29.080
Buzzfeed gives a platform to these kinds of harassers. So here's a quote from that spread
00:27:33.600
on by professional bigots, anti-Muslim hate now permeates our culture and politics. And everyone
00:27:37.860
is a matter of urgency should consider the role they play in enabling it. That includes Chelsea Clinton.
00:27:42.400
Okay. Sure. I agree. We should assess in our hearts. If we hate people because of their religion,
00:27:48.460
if we hate people because of their skin color, if we are truly bigoted and racist and we have
00:27:53.620
deep seated hate in our hearts as Christians, uh, of course, we're told to do that. Jesus says
00:27:58.060
that if you hate someone in your heart, that is the same as murdering them. So of course Christians
00:28:04.680
and everyone, well, really not, but they say that they do really, everyone has a moral obligation
00:28:11.960
to assess in their hearts, whether or not they hate someone, especially in a particularly bigoted
00:28:16.620
anti-religious way, of course, but Chelsea Clinton didn't represent that. She hasn't demonstrated that.
00:28:22.740
And it is not true to say that anti-Muslim hate permeates our culture or permeates our media.
00:28:29.280
That is simply not true. The fact that these people are, uh, getting, are getting space on
00:28:35.700
buzzfeed.com shows the, shows the past that we give people who say that criticizing Islam in any way
00:28:44.980
or criticizing someone who is Muslim in any way is Islamophobic. I mean, Ilhan Omar, after her
00:28:50.780
anti-Semitic statements got to write an op-ed in the Washington post. And so we are totally fine
00:28:56.000
with giving people like Ilhan Omar and people who say that criticizing Islam is evil and, uh,
00:29:02.380
perpetuates white supremacy and terrorist attacks. We're totally fine with giving them a platform in
00:29:06.960
the media. So I'm not really sure what these people are complaining about. The media is extremely biased
00:29:12.900
when it comes to reporting like this. And the reason why they have covered this for so long is yes,
00:29:17.740
because it's tragic. Yes, because it should be talked about. Yes, because white supremacy should be
00:29:22.580
denounced. And by the way, Trump hasn't done, I don't think an explicit and a good enough job to
00:29:27.240
say that white supremacy is a problem and it is something that needs to be addressed and needs to
00:29:34.180
be condemned outright and is a terrorist ideology, just like any other extremist ideology. I think we
00:29:43.560
should talk about that, but that's really one of the only reasons why a lot of people in the media
00:29:47.960
have been harping on this for so long because it fits the narrative that the problem is everyone
00:29:52.480
on the right. The problem is president Trump, that we're the ones perpetuating extremism. Well,
00:29:58.560
that's obviously not true. The numbers don't even prove that more Muslims are killed by extremist
00:30:04.000
Muslims every year than they're killed by any other group. And you just don't hear them reporting on that.
00:30:09.400
You don't hear them reporting on the Christians who are martyred, who are killed every year in
00:30:15.680
Muslim majority countries. I'm not saying that now is the right time to necessarily report on that,
00:30:20.620
but we don't hear the media talking about that. Why? Because it doesn't fit the narrative. And
00:30:24.420
quite frankly, I think that's disgusting. If you really care about the loss of human life,
00:30:28.480
if you really care about anti-religious bigotry, which we should, bigotry against any religion,
00:30:34.120
then we need to be talking about that kind of stuff. For example, there is a story that I saw in
00:30:40.000
Christian Solidarity Worldwide, and this is from my friend Nick Pitts's daily briefing email,
00:30:44.340
and he reports at least 120 people have been killed in a series of alleged attacks by Fulani
00:30:48.940
militia on Christian communities and the Adara chiefdom of Southern Kaduna in Nigeria since
00:30:53.760
February, according to the nonprofit group Christian Solidarity Worldwide. Fulani is a Muslim nomadic
00:30:59.140
group in Africa. And I'm not saying that we need to focus on this or we need to say what aboutism.
00:31:04.460
All I'm saying, all I'm saying is that if the media really cared about the loss of life,
00:31:09.220
if the media really cared about anti-religious bigotry without the spinning of a narrative,
00:31:14.700
then they would talk about these things too. They would talk about the harassment of other
00:31:18.320
religions around the world, the harassment of Christians, the harassment of Jews on a wide scale,
00:31:24.000
because the fact of the matter is, according to Pew Research, Christians are the number one target
00:31:28.760
of anti-religious harassment everywhere throughout the world. We don't hear the media reporting on that.
00:31:34.120
All I'm saying is that we need reporting of all of this stuff. And I am guilty of this as well. I usually
00:31:40.560
just kind of jump on whatever the media is reporting on. And I don't jump on the persecution that's
00:31:44.720
happening of all Christians, or not just of all Christians, of all religions throughout the world.
00:31:49.400
And so we just need to be aware of the fact that a lot of the media, the only reason why they're
00:31:54.900
really focusing on this isn't because of the tragic loss of life, which is why they should be
00:31:59.040
focusing on it, but because it fits into their anti-right narrative. And that's really disgusting.
00:32:05.540
It's really disgusting to be politicizing something like this. We're all guilty of
00:32:09.740
politicizing things. We're all guilty of using something dramatic or tragic that happens to advance
00:32:16.680
our narrative. And we all need to get better at not doing that because that's exactly what this
00:32:21.280
shooter wanted. And he wanted to drive this kind of division. He wanted to drive this kind of wedge.
00:32:27.500
What we need to unite around, which we just can't do, is that people are evil, that evil exists in
00:32:33.880
the world, and that this is a matter of the heart. This is a soul sickness. And that doesn't mean that
00:32:39.320
legislation is never an option. That doesn't mean that there's never something to do. But primarily,
00:32:44.760
this is a problem of morality. This is a problem of the heart. But we're unwilling to get on that.
00:32:51.600
Instead, we just want the clicks. We just want to drive up the views. We just want the drama that
00:32:58.040
comes with good ratings. And so we politicize things to the point of blaming people that have
00:33:03.620
nothing to do with it. And we fail to report on other problems that are happening simply because
00:33:08.700
they don't fit into our narrative. And that's really sad. That's a horrible and truthless place to be.
00:33:15.620
And Christians, myself included, need to get better at removing ourselves from that and seeing the
00:33:20.240
bigger and more eternal picture. So I'm going to move on from that. I'm going to talk about two
00:33:24.940
other really stupid things. There's no other there's really no other way to say it. So there's
00:33:29.960
really two ridiculous things that I want everyone to take notice of that's happening in the Democratic
00:33:36.280
Party. Now, there's stupid stuff that happens in the Republican Party as well. There's stupid stuff
00:33:39.960
that happens on the right as well. But these two things happen to be perpetuated by the left.
00:33:44.740
And so we're going to talk about them really fast. Nancy Pelosi thinks that we should lower the
00:33:51.140
voting age to 16. Here she is suggesting that. Well, I disagree with the ACLU on this. In terms of
00:33:58.580
legislation, we couldn't be prouder than H.R.1. This is about reducing the role of big, dark, special
00:34:05.880
interest money in politics and empowering small donors. It's about ending voter suppression. It's about
00:34:13.600
making redistricting fair. It's it's it's really a source of joy and hope to so many people in the
00:34:21.000
country. I myself personally am not speaking for my caucus. I myself have always been for lowering
00:34:27.260
the voting age to succeed. I think it's really important to capture kids when they're in high
00:34:32.500
school, when they're interested in all of this, when they're learning about government to be able to
00:34:37.740
vote. That is that is not necessary. You know, in other words, some of the priorities in this bill
00:34:43.040
are that transparency and openness and accessibility and the rest. That's a subject of debate. But my view
00:34:51.620
is that I would welcome that. But I've been in that position for a long time.
00:34:55.920
OK, so here's the thing. When I was 16 years old, my parents were sweet enough to allow me to have a
00:35:06.400
car. Looking back like that probably wasn't the best idea. Now, would I have pitched a little bratty
00:35:14.200
15 year old fit if I hadn't been able to drive and get my driver's license and have a car? Yes,
00:35:20.500
I probably would have. Why? Because 16 year olds are stupid. They're mostly stupid. And it's not
00:35:25.920
even really our fault when we're 16. Like our brains just haven't developed yet. And we're so
00:35:30.500
full of hormones that we think that we're smarter than we are. We think that we make good decisions.
00:35:34.800
Why do you think our insurance is so high when we are 16 years old and driving? Because we are dumb.
00:35:40.980
And I am living proof of that. Thankfully, I'm still alive because I got in six fender
00:35:45.960
benders in the first six months of having a license when I was 16. Now, why the heck
00:35:50.380
my parents weren't like, yeah, I'm taking the keys away from you because they probably wanted
00:35:57.100
their independence and they were being nice and gracious to me. But oh, my gosh, I was an idiot.
00:36:03.340
I remember the first time I got in a fender bender. I was with my friends and we were listening to
00:36:06.860
Taylor Swift's Fearless album. That album bring brings back all these times in the Volvo that I
00:36:12.800
drove. We were listening to it and I was backing up my car. Didn't even look in the rearview mirror to
00:36:17.400
the person that was behind me backed into a car. There are so many other stupid stories
00:36:21.840
of me at 16 years old being an idiot. Why? Because 16 year olds are stupid. We're just not smart. We
00:36:30.840
just don't know anything. Now, we might be smart for our ages. And of course, we're valuable people
00:36:36.240
and we should be taken seriously. And that's all well and good. But should we be given a voice
00:36:42.180
in civic life? Should we be able to vote? Absolutely not. I actually think 18 is too low
00:36:47.220
because really the phenomenon that's been happening in our country for quite some time
00:36:51.740
is prolonged adolescence. People are younger for a lot longer. People put off a taking responsibility,
00:36:58.120
getting a job, moving out of their parents' house, paying off debt, getting married and having kids.
00:37:04.320
It's later than it has ever been. And we think adulting is something that you don't have to do until
00:37:09.780
you're 35. And so you just laugh it off and say, oh, it's still fun to get hung over on Sundays when
00:37:16.440
you are 27 years old because adulting is boring. Yeah, I just kind of think that maybe at 16 years
00:37:25.260
old, like when you haven't even your frontal lobe is just like this tiny thing that's barely pulsating
00:37:33.280
that you maybe shouldn't have an effect on the kind of taxes that I have to pay. Here's my theory
00:37:41.660
is that, you know, back in the day when America was just starting out, we said no taxation without
00:37:49.620
representation. Well, now it should be no representation without taxation. You have to pay
00:37:56.980
some kind of tax in order to vote, not sales tax. That doesn't work. And I've gone on and on with my
00:38:04.320
Twitter audience about this and how you would have to have some exemptions for the disabled.
00:38:09.160
You'd have to have some exemptions for retirees, but you have to be contributing in some way.
00:38:15.680
Most people in America, you have to be contributing taxes and not just sales tax in order to vote because
00:38:21.740
you should have some skin in the game like this should actually affect you. Why should a 16
00:38:26.920
year old who is still getting who is still getting their lunch money from their parents
00:38:34.760
determine how much I pay in taxes? Like, can you tell me that? I actually think we can eliminate
00:38:40.980
the age limit altogether. I'm fine with 16 year olds voting. If there is 16 year old that is working
00:38:47.020
and that is paying taxes, they have to provide for their family. I get that. That's hard. They're
00:38:50.960
actually affected by stuff and they don't have a say in anything. I don't think that's fair. I'm fine
00:38:55.240
with 16 year olds voting as long as they're paying taxes. I am not okay with people who are doing
00:39:01.280
nothing to contribute to society whatsoever, even though they can physically, mentally, they're able
00:39:06.380
to. They're not contributing to society. They're not paying taxes. And they get a say on how much I pay
00:39:14.080
in taxes, the things that affect my life that don't really affect theirs. No, I say no representation
00:39:21.620
without taxation. It is stupid, stupid to allow teenagers, most of whom really have no responsibility
00:39:29.660
and have zero skin in the game, have no idea how money works whatsoever to vote for policies that
00:39:37.660
affect me and you. It doesn't make any sense. But the Democrats want this because they know the young
00:39:42.440
people are Democrats because it's cool to be liberal. It's cool to care about social stuff.
00:39:48.300
The funny thing is they tout themselves as the educated intellectual party, but they know that
00:39:53.380
the only way that they're going to keep subsisting, the only way that they are going to survive is if
00:39:58.940
they have 16 year olds whose brains aren't developed yet to vote for them. Come on, come on. But you can
00:40:05.600
bet if that does happen, I'm going to be in every high school in America. Like I am going to be gathering
00:40:10.720
these people up and say, here's the Constitution, people. If you're going to vote, you need to know a
00:40:14.980
little bit about it. Now, I wish that we could also have a civics test before we voted, but I'm not
00:40:20.700
really totally sure that that's actually legal. I think that the Supreme Court said that that's not
00:40:25.400
that that's not constitutional. I would challenge that. I think that we should know something
00:40:30.960
just about physics, basic or physics. What? Wow. I would never be able to vote if we had to know
00:40:36.980
something about physics, civics in order to vote. But like I said, I'm not really sure that's going to
00:40:41.900
happen. OK, second thing that's going on that the left apparently thinks is a really good idea.
00:40:46.660
Some people, not everyone, some people on the left seem to think it's a good idea. I've seen this
00:40:51.480
perpetuated a lot that we should abolish the Electoral College. And here is sweet girl,
00:40:57.380
Chief Elizabeth Warren saying as much, you know, come a general election, presidential candidates
00:41:04.760
don't come to places like Mississippi. Yeah. They also don't come to places like California and
00:41:13.040
Massachusetts, right? Because we're not the battleground states. Well, my view is that every
00:41:21.160
vote matters. And the way we can make that happen
00:41:25.800
is that we can have national voting. And that means get rid of the Electoral College.
00:41:42.640
So, OK, we all kind of need a refresher on what the Electoral College does. There's actually a really
00:41:48.320
good PragerU video that I would encourage you to go watch about the Electoral College, just so we
00:41:53.780
understand what it is. But here's what would happen if we had no Electoral College. The popular vote
00:42:00.700
would obviously would obviously be the one who determines who determines who the president of
00:42:05.700
the United States is. So that means that Hillary Clinton would have won the presidency because she
00:42:10.240
won the popular vote. President Trump won the electoral vote. The reason why President Trump won
00:42:14.360
the electoral vote, if you look at a map, a voting map after the 2016 election, it's almost completely
00:42:20.260
red. The whole country is almost completely red. But you see in these big cities that Hillary Clinton
00:42:26.140
won the big cities. And so what you would have happening is that you would have people who live
00:42:31.900
in New York, people who New York City, people who live in San Francisco, people who live in even
00:42:36.820
places like Dallas, determining what happens for the rest of the country. People who know nothing
00:42:42.100
about farming, who know nothing about the issues that the middle of the country is facing,
00:42:46.400
would determine the fate for the rest of the country. That is why we have the Electoral College.
00:42:53.140
You would never have a candidate again going to the middle of the middle America. You would only
00:42:59.620
have them visiting the big cities because the big cities would be the only the only cities that
00:43:06.140
actually matter. You would have mob rule. There's a reason why the founders set up the Electoral
00:43:11.160
College. So everyone is evenly representative. You've represented you hear the same people
00:43:16.660
complaining that states with a lower population shouldn't have the same number of senators in
00:43:22.200
states with a higher population. Well, that's also idiotic. That's why we have the House of
00:43:28.140
Representatives. You have a certain number of representatives based on how many people are
00:43:31.980
in your state. But you have the same number of senators per state, no matter how many people you have
00:43:37.340
in your state. Yes, that's how it's supposed to work. And so it's not mob rule. So people in San
00:43:44.000
Francisco can't decide, can't decide all of the issues and all of the representation and all of the
00:43:52.880
leadership for the people in Bozeman, Montana, because they don't have the same issues. And of
00:43:56.220
course, you still have state and local politicians. But we are supposed to be represented on a federal
00:44:01.680
level in a way that corresponds with the issues that we're facing. And if you abolish something like
00:44:07.500
the Electoral College, if you say, OK, we're not going to have representation or even representation on
00:44:14.780
every state, we're only going to have representation based on population. And then, like I said, you have
00:44:19.080
urban and mob rule. So these are very, very dumb ideas. Lowering the voting age to 16, abolishing the
00:44:28.320
electoral college. It's really Democrats attempt to stay in power by violating the Constitution.
00:44:34.840
Lowering the age to 16 is not unconstitutional. But they really hate how the country is set up and how
00:44:41.480
it has resulted in Republicans winning. And quite frankly, I think they cannot for the life of them
00:44:46.720
understand how, with all of the tools and the money and the power that they have on their side and
00:44:52.920
the manipulative rhetoric that they've been able to wield, that people are still voting Republican.
00:44:58.640
They just don't get it. And so they're trying any means possible to make sure that they can get
00:45:03.440
power and stay in power. And we need to be smart enough to fight up against that and say something
00:45:08.160
about it. OK, that's all I have to say for today. On Friday, we're going to have a really fun and
00:45:12.120
laid back episode. I'm really excited about it. Who knows what we're going to talk about? I'm going to
00:45:16.100
answer some questions and talk about some trash people stuff. So I hope you have a great couple
00:45:20.080
days and I will see you here on Friday morning.