Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey - November 29, 2019


REPLAY： ＂Equality＂ Act


Episode Stats


Length

36 minutes

Words per minute

184.2814

Word count

6,706

Sentence count

387

Harmful content

Misogyny

23

sentences flagged

Toxicity

17

sentences flagged

Hate speech

30

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Missouri has passed a bill that expands the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. Is this a good or bad thing? And what role does the Bible have to play in this matter?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, what's up? Welcome to Relatable. Happy Wednesday. Wednesday is our news day,
00:00:06.420 as you guys know, and there's a lot of news to talk about. We could go over the abortion stuff
00:00:11.320 yet again, but we have spent what the past four or five episodes, at least over the past couple
00:00:18.500 of weeks, talking about everything that's going on with abortion legislation in Georgia and Alabama.
00:00:24.720 Uh, now Missouri is headed down that track as well. And the pushback and the vitriol that a lot 0.85
00:00:30.940 of you have gotten online or in the articles that you have seen in every day, it does seem like it
00:00:36.020 just gets crazier and crazier and more and more callous from the pro-choice side. I would say
00:00:41.940 that some of the posts that I've seen have made it extremely clear that many on the pro-choice side,
00:00:47.640 I definitely won't say all, but many on the pro-choice side are not in fact pro-choice,
00:00:53.340 but are pro-abortion. There is, uh, I don't know how else to say it except keep using this word,
00:00:58.800 which we know is biblical. We've talked about on this podcast, but a callousness that covers the 0.75
00:01:04.800 hearts of a lot of people on that side. And we know it's not just an abortion issue. It is a
00:01:10.600 spiritual issue that pervades, uh, all aspects of someone's life that robs them of any real direct
00:01:17.100 compassion and any real softness and vulnerability that allows us to love those
00:01:22.560 who are more vulnerable than we are. So I don't want to talk about all of that today. I want you
00:01:28.400 to know that I'm thinking about that and I would love to talk about that, but I want to give us some
00:01:32.960 kind of reprieve because there are other very important things that are going on. I won't say
00:01:38.200 more important, but they're very important and they all kind of work together. We've talked a lot
00:01:42.740 about the onslaught of progressivism and really how that is part and parcel with a lot of things
00:01:47.980 simply aren't true. I am not trying to cast everyone on the other side as bad or, um, not a
00:01:55.260 good Christian or something like that, but the values that we are seeing popularized by the left,
00:02:01.680 by the radical left, and by the socialist left are indeed morally wrong. They are untruthful according
00:02:08.760 to the Bible and we have to make sure to, uh, recognize that when we see it. And one, uh,
00:02:14.520 example of that, that has been in the news lately is this equality act. Uh, you've probably heard
00:02:20.400 about it. If you talk to someone on the left or probably even someone in the middle, uh, they will
00:02:24.600 say this is a monumental and necessary step for the protection of LGBTQ people. Uh, if you talk to
00:02:31.660 someone on the right, they will probably tell you that this is a major infringement on religious
00:02:36.300 liberty. The reality is that it's probably some of both and it can be both. It can be an infringement
00:02:43.060 on our religious individual liberty, and it can also be a so-called, uh, protection for LGBTQ people.
00:02:50.000 But the question is, um, which one is going to give in which one should give in the kind of
00:02:56.320 constitutional Republic that we live in right now. Uh, so the bill was passed on Friday in the house,
00:03:02.080 this equality act it's described as a piece of legislation that would prohibit discrimination
00:03:07.180 based on sexual orientation and gender identity. So that means that it expands on the civil rights
00:03:12.560 act of 1964 to do that. Uh, the civil rights act, you probably know it outlaws discrimination based
00:03:18.660 on race, color, religion, uh, sex, or national origin. Uh, it prohibits unequal application of
00:03:25.620 voter registration requirements, uh, racial segregation in schools, employment, public
00:03:31.780 accommodations. Now, a lot of States, 20 States, I think in particular already outlaw any kind of
00:03:38.120 LGBT discrimination, but this community is now seeking protection on the federal or the national
00:03:44.540 level. So that's what the equality act is about. Uh, according to the wall street journal, this act
00:03:50.360 provides protections in employment and housing and loan applications, education, and other areas. Now we
00:03:56.180 should ask ourselves, is this something that is happening or is this something that is extremely
00:04:01.360 pervasive or prevalent that LGBT, uh, people are being systemically discriminated against? I don't
00:04:08.580 think that there's any evidence to that. And in fact, there is a liberal professor that we'll quote a
00:04:13.260 little bit later who says the same thing, who says, this is probably not a widespread problem. Of course,
00:04:17.880 discrimination of all kinds happens. It does. We live in an imperfect country. We live in an imperfect
00:04:24.140 world. We are all sinful people and people unfortunately have biases against people of
00:04:31.020 certain races against women, against pregnant women, whatever it is. And that is simply going to
00:04:37.460 happen. But, uh, does the level of discrimination that we are seeing, uh, towards this community
00:04:44.200 necessitate the kind of legislation that, uh, the equality act act seeks to put in place. The answer is,
00:04:52.660 in my opinion, no, but this is even more than that to them. It's also symbolic. They want to be
00:04:59.400 protected and recognized and legitimized in a way that is federal in a way that is national. I think
00:05:05.780 that also gives some kind of, in their minds, uh, uh, a peace and assurance that they are being taken care
00:05:13.560 of. It's also a symbolic in that way, but this particular act actually goes further than the civil
00:05:19.800 rights act does. The bill says that individuals cannot be denied access to a locker room or a
00:05:26.300 dresser or a dressing room, no matter their gender identity. So that's been a very, uh, real point of
00:05:33.220 contention between Republicans, Democrats, conservatives, and liberals, uh, eight Republicans in the house
00:05:38.360 did vote. Yes. Along with all the Democrats that were present for the vote. Uh, now this bill probably
00:05:44.520 is not going to get past the Senate. You know, the Democrats control the house Republicans control the
00:05:49.840 Senate. Of course, Republican Susan Collins, uh, in the Senate is supporting the bill. She's trying to 0.80
00:05:55.720 get her Republican colleagues in the Senate to do the same. It's just a reminder of how truly
00:06:00.540 non-conservative Susan Collins, uh, Susan Collins is, uh, if it does get past the Senate, Trump said
00:06:05.980 he's going to veto it, but it's still important to talk about, even if it doesn't get past the Senate,
00:06:11.020 even if it goes to president Trump's desk, which is unlikely, and he does veto it, that's not the
00:06:16.000 end of the story. This is very clearly a piece of legislation that is going to be pushed for our
00:06:21.620 entire lifetimes, as well as the lifetimes of our children until it gets passed or until something
00:06:27.620 drastically changes in the United States. This is going to be a piece of legislation that is pushed
00:06:33.340 harder and harder. This is what the left sees as a requirement to legitimize, uh, transgenderism, 1.00
00:06:41.020 and the rights of the entire LGBT community by punishing anyone who refuses to hire them or
00:06:48.220 treat them how the federal government says that they should be treated. And now all of that to many
00:06:53.520 of you might sound okay. And I understand that maybe you're even a Christian and you're thinking,
00:06:58.300 well, okay, I don't personally agree with transgenderism or I, uh, you're, you might be saying,
00:07:04.840 I don't agree with the LGBT lifestyle, but I don't want them to be discriminated against.
00:07:10.740 I think it is wrong to discriminate it against them. You discriminate against them. You might be
00:07:14.900 saying, and maybe you think, okay, well I'm for this, you know, separation of church and state.
00:07:19.620 I think that this is all fine, uh, except what I would say, and this is what we're going to get into.
00:07:24.540 This is not actually separation of church and state. This is state involvement in churches and
00:07:30.500 religious organizations and parochial schools demanding that these organizations operate how
00:07:36.700 the government tells them to operate no matter their religious objections. Uh, what this really
00:07:43.120 is, what this act really is, is separation of church and all public life. So you hear a lot from the left
00:07:49.560 separation of church and state, which is a very, very misunderstood phrase. Of course, we know that
00:07:55.260 there is no establishment of a state religion in the United States. You are free or should be free
00:08:00.720 to worship who and how you see fit or to not worship any God at all. That is part of religious
00:08:08.160 liberty in the United States. But the left often takes this idea, the separation of church and state,
00:08:14.780 which is not of course in the constitution. It's more a principle that was actually found in a letter,
00:08:19.600 but that's kind of besides the point right now. They, they think that that means that your
00:08:25.020 faith should not dictate at all how you see laws or how you see legislation, how you, uh, see policy
00:08:32.880 whatsoever, that it shouldn't have any effect on your civic life. But of course it does. Any person
00:08:39.140 of faith understands that faith is the hub and the center of the wheel. And so without the hub and the
00:08:44.900 center of the wheel, all the spokes that are connected or supposed to be connected to a hub are just
00:08:49.500 going to be, they're going to be irrelevant. And one of the spokes in our life, uh, is the civic
00:08:55.800 government or is our civic involvement is our civic life. And so of course we see how the government
00:09:01.280 operates through the lens of Christians. That does not mean that we're advocating for a theocracy.
00:09:06.500 That does not mean I want to force you to, uh, worship God, how I want you to worship him. That
00:09:12.360 doesn't mean that I want to force you to live the life that I think that you should be living.
00:09:17.500 Now I might have religious opinions on that. I'm of course going to have biblical opinions on
00:09:22.200 sin and which lifestyle is better, but I am not going to enforce the government to force
00:09:28.700 you or ask the government to enforce laws that tell you to be a Christian. I'm not going to do that. 0.93
00:09:35.880 So that is a very, uh, that's a point of confusion. I think for a lot of people on the left that they
00:09:41.300 say that you shouldn't approach any kind of policy whatsoever, any form of public life with any 1.00
00:09:47.100 kind of religious perspective, well, that's stupid. Uh, civic life for the Christian is 1.00
00:09:52.940 downstream from your faith. It is always going to be now that doesn't exclude our promotion of
00:09:59.360 freedom. Of course not the founding fathers. Here's another myth. Uh, everyone says that the
00:10:03.840 founding fathers were just deists. They were all deists and they really had no relationship with God.
00:10:08.960 They didn't really care about Jesus at all. They just thought that God was this, uh, this guy who was
00:10:14.920 sitting back, looking over everything. Maybe, you know, he was providential in some ways, but not
00:10:20.180 directly involved in the aspects of our lives, but that's not true of all of the founding fathers.
00:10:25.980 Certainly not. It wasn't true of our first president. It wasn't true of George Washington. It was not
00:10:30.780 true of all of the founding fathers at all. Some of them had more deistic views, but a lot of them
00:10:36.600 were Christians. The, uh, American revolution was actually known as the Presbyterian rebellion. A lot of
00:10:42.560 them were Calvinists. This was a very religiously motivated rebellion from England to establish the
00:10:49.440 United States. Again, that doesn't mean that they established a theocracy, but it was through their
00:10:55.040 love for God and their love for Jesus Christ and their love for the Bible that they said, we want to
00:11:00.620 establish a country that is free. So all that to say, it is okay for us to approach this from a
00:11:09.380 Christian perspective, because that does not exclude freedom. What we actually see is that
00:11:14.440 the religion of progressivism is the religion that excludes freedom. The Christian religion doesn't do 1.00
00:11:20.700 that. Um, I'm talking on a, on a civic level. So anyway, this is not, this is not the separation of
00:11:28.900 church and state. That's not what the equality act is. This is an attempt to separate church from
00:11:34.540 all public life, from your job, from anything that affects the public sphere. And even we'll see in a
00:11:41.760 little bit, even some of the private sphere, uh, anything that's goes outside of just you praying
00:11:48.040 in silent in silence in your head at home, this equality act has something to say about it. So
00:11:54.580 when you hear people say on the left that, Oh, we just want separation of church and state. No,
00:11:58.800 they want separation of church in everything. They don't believe that the church should have
00:12:03.480 have any influence whatsoever. They don't believe that Christians should be able to insert their 1.00
00:12:07.620 opinions anywhere or live by their opinions. If they don't agree with it. That's why we always say
00:12:12.720 progressivism as a religion is extremely intolerant. And as a political view, it's extremely tyrannical.
00:12:20.960 So here are some of the implications, some of the consequences of the equality act. And you can go
00:12:26.460 online, you can read the equality act yourself. There are plenty of briefings, make sure that
00:12:30.600 you're getting it. You know, you can go on Vox and you could read that briefing. That's going to have
00:12:34.240 a certain, uh, bent to it. You can go on national review. That's going to maybe have another bent to
00:12:40.560 it. If you are on the left, so you can go and read all about this if you want to, but here's what
00:12:45.620 I've deduced from reading the act and reading several analyses of it. Uh, it makes irrelevant any
00:12:51.280 religious or conscience, uh, exemptions for doctors. So under this bill, a doctor is going to be
00:12:55.900 required to perform sex change surgery. If they are in that particular field and provide hormone
00:13:00.900 therapy, even to children. And we already know this is happening in other countries. Uh, now they
00:13:06.100 could maybe find protection under free exercise arguments or other conscience, uh, objection
00:13:10.620 legislation, but that's just unsure. So they just don't know, uh, religious schools are going to be
00:13:16.220 regulated under this act. Even if they take no funding from the federal government, uh, meaning that
00:13:21.600 they could, uh, they couldn't choose to not hire or fire a teacher, for example, who was in a gay 0.99
00:13:29.360 relationship or who was transitioning. Now you might be listening to this and say, well, good,
00:13:35.020 but, but even if you don't agree with these religious schools views, uh, Christian schools
00:13:41.020 operate under the Bible and they are free to operate under the Bible. And the Bible is clear
00:13:45.960 about marriage and gender. So by regulating these schools, by the federal government, regulating
00:13:50.220 these schools, they are forcing them to ignore and condone what the Bible says is sin. Uh, that is
00:13:55.860 the opposite of religious liberty. That doesn't, that's not good for anyone, whether you're religious
00:14:01.080 or not, you can still be a fan of freedom. Uh, that is tyranny. There is a Supreme court case
00:14:07.400 employment division V Smith, uh, that held that religious dissenters are subject to generally applicable
00:14:13.220 laws. It's probably not going to be overturned, uh, which means under the equality act, there would be
00:14:17.820 very little, there will be some, but very little recourse for religious people who object to these 0.99
00:14:22.720 kinds of laws. Uh, so under this act, this also means that athletic teams would be forced to allow
00:14:27.900 transgender boys and girls, uh, to compete on athlete on their athletic teams that correspond,
00:14:33.220 uh, with their gender identity rather than their biological sex. There could be some judicial
00:14:39.620 interpretation. I'm told that would rule in favor of objections to this, but in general, under this act,
00:14:45.260 they would have this right. Um, I saw Dan Crenshaw, who is a Republican representative
00:14:51.100 from Texas say that he just couldn't believe what his democratic colleagues were saying about, Oh,
00:14:56.860 Republicans and conservatives, they're just fear mongering. This is not that big of a deal
00:15:00.600 for a transgender girl. So a biological boy to play on a girl's soccer team, for example,
00:15:06.080 that's just fear mongering. That's not that big of a deal as if science doesn't exist or science doesn't
00:15:12.440 matter. I mean, we could go through, this is kind of a different episode for a different day. And we
00:15:16.360 have actually talked about this in the past. We talked about this on an episode when we talked
00:15:20.400 about, uh, women being drafted and how stupid that is because men and women are so different, but 0.99
00:15:25.900 men have a different biological makeup that even if they are on hormone therapy, even if they take 1.00
00:15:30.760 estrogen, even if they look like a woman that doesn't change their anaerobic capacity, which is better 0.99
00:15:35.880 than a woman's that doesn't change their bone density. That doesn't change their ability to gain muscle. 1.00
00:15:41.500 It might change it a little bit, but it doesn't completely take it away. They are still going to
00:15:45.540 be a man on the inside. And I don't care how bigoted that sounds. It's scientifically true.
00:15:50.620 They are biologically a man. And as a biological man, you are different. You know, I, this is a side
00:15:58.180 note, but I read something really interesting the other day. Y'all know I'm pregnant. And so I'm always
00:16:03.220 reading these different articles. Sorry if this is like just a tad bit inappropriate, but I don't think it
00:16:07.840 is. So you're reading this. I was reading this article about breastfeeding and there was this
00:16:11.180 really interesting point that I read that actually depending on what sex your baby is, the composition
00:16:17.140 of, of, okay, this is actually getting a little bit more graphic than I want. Uh, the composition
00:16:24.060 of breast milk was different for a boy versus a girl. And so you have more protein. If you are having
00:16:29.440 a boy, you have less protein and fat. If you are having a girl, all of that points to the fact that 0.99
00:16:34.940 there is a biological difference between boys and girls. There is going to be a different makeup 0.85
00:16:40.060 between boys and girls that is not going to be changed, uh, by sex change surgery or by hormone
00:16:45.780 therapy. Um, and so these Democrats that are saying, well, this is just fear mongering. This,
00:16:51.880 you know, this isn't really going to have any negative effect on women are lying to themselves. 1.00
00:16:56.960 They're completely lying to themselves, but this is what happens under the equality act where, uh,
00:17:02.400 gender identity actually completely obscure science and reality. Uh, according to national review, 0.92
00:17:08.560 under the guise of anti-discrimination, uh, protections, the bill redefined sex to include
00:17:14.120 gender identity undermines religious freedom, gives males who identify as females, the right to 1.00
00:17:19.080 women's spaces and sets a dangerous political precedent for the medicalization of gender confused 1.00
00:17:24.380 youth. That is a quote from national review. Now there are plenty of Republicans in the house who
00:17:29.640 have tried to add amendments to ensure some more freedom for organizations and, uh, for schools.
00:17:36.200 There is a representative, Tom McClintock. He's from California. He provided an amendment that
00:17:41.400 I would have said that the bill would not be construed to require a healthcare provider,
00:17:45.620 uh, to affirm the self-professed gender identity of a minor. So just of a minor,
00:17:50.940 not of an adult of a minor. So we're talking about someone, obviously a minor is under the age of 18,
00:17:56.140 but say you've got someone who comes in who is eight or nine, which are the cases that we have
00:18:00.200 heard both here and abroad. If you've got an eight or a nine year old who says, mommy, daddy,
00:18:04.460 I know that I was born a girl, but I really think I'm a boy. And who insists, maybe they've seen
00:18:09.240 something on YouTube. They insist that they transition, whatever it is, or maybe they've
00:18:12.820 got loony parents who say, you know what, we're just going to affirm you. They go to a doctor's
00:18:17.600 office, say that doctor is a Christian. And that doctor does not want to affirm the gender identity
00:18:22.680 and says, you know what? I'm sorry. I'm not going to be able to take this case. Good luck to you
00:18:27.720 under this bill. They apparently may not be able to do that. And I think that it is,
00:18:34.260 that is proven by the fact that Tom McClintock offered an amendment that would have made sure
00:18:39.200 the healthcare provider doesn't have to affirm the self-professed gender identity of a minor
00:18:44.420 and Democrats turned it down. So HR five, that's what this bill is, is a dangerous attempt. This is
00:18:51.260 what McClintock says by the Democrats to use the force of government to bend biology and human nature
00:18:56.920 to their ideological whims. He says, I'm not surprised that my amendment to ensure that
00:19:01.580 physicians cannot be sued for exercising their professional medical judgment towards minors
00:19:07.580 was rejected. Viewed along with the rejection of my colleague's amendment relating to protecting
00:19:13.420 parents from being sued for discrimination for the act of parenting, the Democrats radical agenda is
00:19:19.640 on full display in the house. And that is absolutely true. The fact that these amendments have been
00:19:24.900 turned down. So an amendment just saying, Hey, if a physician has a, an objection to affirming the
00:19:31.960 gender identity of a minor. So we're talking about a child or a young teenager who wants to get hormone 0.80
00:19:37.500 therapy, uh, that they would be protected from being sued by, by the parents or sued by whoever the
00:19:45.720 Democrats turn that down. That means that they think that a doctor should be sued. They should be free
00:19:51.820 to be sued. If they turn down this kind of therapy for a minor crazy, um, representative Greg Stoob,
00:19:59.800 I don't really know how to pronounce his last name. He's also Republican from Florida. Uh, he also,
00:20:04.980 he also proposed an amendment that would have, uh, ensured that the act would not be construed to
00:20:10.360 require a biological female to face competition from a biological male in any sporting event. That's 1.00
00:20:15.680 what we were just talking about. Democrats turn that down as well. And this is what, uh, he,
00:20:20.960 the representative had to say about that. I offered this amendment to ensure that our daughters are 1.00
00:20:25.140 provided an equal playing field in sports for generations to come and that female athletes 0.99
00:20:29.800 are not competing against male athletes for athletic scholarships and title nine funding.
00:20:34.060 I, for one, don't think it's fair or equal to make young biological women compete against 1.00
00:20:38.620 biological males. That's why I introduced this amendment in committee. And again, to the full house,
00:20:44.040 of course, of course, he's absolutely right for all of the reasons that we just listed.
00:20:48.040 Democrats say that that's fear mongering. That's basic. Isn't it crazy? I was just saying this to
00:20:52.680 someone the other day that the longer we have gone throughout history, the more science we know,
00:20:57.600 obviously the more scientific knowledge that we have, we know the differences, uh, between men and
00:21:02.280 women between boys and girls. We know that boys and girls brains actually start developing differently 0.86
00:21:07.020 inside the womb. Of course they do because boys and girls are inherently extremely different.
00:21:12.100 We just talked about that. Even, uh, how they feed and the food that they naturally eat right after
00:21:18.000 they're born is different. It's composed differently. Uh, their chromosomes are different and Democrats are
00:21:23.740 saying, no, no, no, in favor of identity, in favor of a feeling in favor of a dysphoria, we need to deny 0.93
00:21:32.040 all scientific reality. We need to, in essence, discriminate against girls who are competing in sports 1.00
00:21:38.200 because of this small minority of people who think that they're the opposite sex and they actually
00:21:43.340 are. That's insanity. That is insanity. Another representative Republican from Louisiana, Mike
00:21:49.680 Johnson, he proposed an amendment, uh, that said that the act would not be construed to deny a parent's
00:21:55.480 right to be involved in their minor child's medical care. Just think about how basic that is a
00:22:01.380 parent's right to be involved in, uh, their minor child's medical care. So again, we are talking
00:22:09.060 about children or we are talking about teenagers, high schoolers. Uh, the act was rejected by or the
00:22:16.080 amendment was rejected by Democrats. Uh, he replied with this, the so-called equality act would actually
00:22:22.240 eliminate sex-based protections for women by forcing rape crisis centers, ladies, locker rooms, female 0.98
00:22:27.560 prisons, women's sports leagues, and other sex-based organizations to admit biological males. Additionally,
00:22:32.660 this bill would eviscerate constitutionally protected rights by empowering the federal
00:22:36.860 government to voice a force, employers, uh, medical professionals, parents, business owners,
00:22:42.040 and all Americans to act in violation of their conscience. The federal government should not be able
00:22:46.440 to dictate a belief system. And that last line is absolutely right. The federal government should not
00:22:52.500 be able to dictate a belief system. I just want you to think about this, that under this act,
00:22:59.420 possibly parents could be, uh, sued. Parents could be sued for violating the civil rights of their child
00:23:07.540 by saying, look, Sally, you're not Johnny. And I am not going to take you to a gender identity affirming 1.00
00:23:15.280 doctor to change your sex. I'm not going to do that. I I'm sorry. I'm not going to do it. 1.00
00:23:21.900 We are going to pursue other methods. We are going to go to counseling. We love you.
00:23:27.080 And we want what's best for you. That is not what's best for you. Possibly, possibly parents
00:23:33.420 could be put in trouble because of this equality act, because now affirming one's identity is going
00:23:39.000 to be seen as a civil rights. And they would be saying that, uh, you know, a parent, uh, would be
00:23:45.560 violating their child's civil rights. We already saw this in Canada where a dad is getting charged for
00:23:51.380 violence, emotional violence against his child for not saying that his biologically female child,
00:23:58.820 uh, biologically. Yeah. Biologically female child is a male. He won't call her by, uh, her by male 0.89
00:24:06.080 pronouns because she is a girl. And now he is being found guilty in court, uh, of mistreating his
00:24:14.020 daughter. It's insane. And if you think that that's not coming to the United States, you should just
00:24:18.840 read this equality act. That's exactly what this would do. The fact that Democrats shot this
00:24:25.860 amendment down to give parents any discretion, any right to be involved in a minor child's medical care
00:24:32.020 tells you exactly what they think. They don't believe in parental rights. They don't. They believe
00:24:37.360 that you, that I, that our children should be agents of the state because apparently bureaucrats,
00:24:43.120 many of whom don't have any kids by the way, and don't really care about their families. Apparently,
00:24:48.900 well, I shouldn't make that judgment. I shouldn't say that. Don't care about our families. I will say
00:24:53.480 that don't care about our families think that they can parent better than we do that. That's what they
00:24:59.380 believe. They think that religion, they think that morality, they think that any kind of principle
00:25:05.000 that, uh, goes against what they think that it is, that it should be outlawed basically, or it should
00:25:12.280 be as outlawed as humanly possible. It should, your views should have to be kept as private as possible.
00:25:18.360 And then if they step outside of the tiny circle of what's allowed by the federal government,
00:25:22.720 the federal government is going to punish you. That's what this bill is about. And I want you to
00:25:29.620 think for a second, when you think about the fact that this bill could open up parents to being sued,
00:25:33.920 uh, for not going along with their child, who's a girl wanting to be a boy or vice versa. 1.00
00:25:40.000 Think about how stupid you were when you were young. Think about that. I'm thinking about it 1.00
00:25:45.460 myself. Think about how stupid you were. Think about how stupid you were when you were a teenager. 1.00
00:25:49.240 And when I was a teenager, we didn't even have all of this stuff. Like my husband and I talk about all 1.00
00:25:54.060 the time, all of the things that we're going to have to teach our daughter that we didn't have to be
00:25:58.080 taught that boys are boys and girls are girls. We didn't have to, we didn't have to be taught that.
00:26:02.880 It was just like, yeah, duh, obviously, obviously. Uh, but we're going to actually have to teach our
00:26:10.000 daughter that we're going to have to teach her. No, this is the only way that babies are made. 1.00
00:26:15.600 No, this is a boy has different biological, a different biological makeup than a girl does. 0.98
00:26:22.420 This has different implications. No, no, no, no. There are only two genders. I know this is all 1.00
00:26:27.760 confusing because you're learning all of these different things, but I was like, kids are already 0.99
00:26:33.500 really dumb in so many ways. They're just made like that. They're supposed to be dependent on 0.99
00:26:37.480 their parents. Their brains aren't fully developed. Our frontal lobe isn't fully developed until we're
00:26:41.740 25. Think about all the dumb stuff you believe. Like I remember, let me tell you a story just to tell 1.00
00:26:48.360 you a story about how dumb kids are. I, when I was eight years old, I went to the dentist and I was 0.99
00:26:55.380 getting sealants for the first time because I, uh, they found a cavity for the first time. So I get,
00:27:00.280 yeah, I was eight. And the lady told me, the lady told me we are going to put, um, stickers of, of
00:27:08.220 NSYNC or the Backstreet Boys on, on these sealants. They're going to be invisible, but they're going to
00:27:13.840 be on there. It was years before I realized that she was lying to me years. It was years before I realized
00:27:22.000 that she was just trying to get me to be excited about my first dental procedure and that I didn't
00:27:26.360 actually have invisible stickers of the Backstreet Boys on my molars. Like that's just, kids just
00:27:32.280 believe things. We believe in Santa Claus. We believe in the tooth fairy. We are not capable of
00:27:39.880 making decisions about our gender. And especially kids now that watch YouTube and get so much
00:27:44.480 misinformation from public schools and sometimes even private schools. And when you're a teenager,
00:27:49.900 you're dumb too. You think that you're going to marry the guy that you dated in high school. You 0.99
00:27:55.580 should not be free to make these monumental decisions, especially if you are seriously
00:28:00.180 suffering from gender dysphoria, which is a dysphoria. That is something that is wrong with 0.99
00:28:06.380 your brain. It should be treated with compassion, should be treated with love, but also should be 0.87
00:28:11.820 treated with counseling, not affirmation. And this bill is opening up parents who simply want
00:28:19.300 discretion and want discernment over their child's lives who don't even have developed brains yet,
00:28:25.160 opening them up to possibly being sued for not going along with their gender affirming therapy.
00:28:31.080 It's very sad. So obviously there are a lot of first amendment objections here. There are medical
00:28:35.880 objections. There are moral objections. There are objections also from a feminist perspective. I don't
00:28:43.500 consider myself a feminist, but I think it's interesting that this whole, the transgender 1.00
00:28:48.160 movement truly is eating the feminist movement because men are becoming better at being women than
00:28:54.180 women are. And so what happened to feminism? Transgenderism is really just a tool of the 1.00
00:28:59.280 patriarchy. When you think about it, there was an article titled why the equality act means a setback
00:29:05.380 for a woman. This is written by Mary Vaught. It points out that these protections of the equality act
00:29:11.140 actually are going to harm the access that women now have to various freedoms that they have 0.99
00:29:15.960 developed over time. She points out that there is a lot of harm in the language that the bill uses
00:29:21.740 when it defines gender, because the bill states that gender is all gender related identity.
00:29:27.240 It's appearance, it's mannerisms, or other gender related characteristics of an individual,
00:29:31.760 regardless of the individual's designated sex at birth. That means that a biological male,
00:29:36.920 even a guy who hasn't even started his transition, just a guy who looks like a guy,
00:29:41.160 is a man could say, Hey, I'm a female today. I want to compete against a woman in this wrestling 1.00
00:29:47.860 match. Now, do I think that's going to happen very often? No, I really don't. I don't think
00:29:52.220 that a lot of guys have that desire. And I think that's going to be very rare. The point is that that
00:29:57.540 still could happen. And the point is also just how ridiculous and fanciful this whole conversation 0.95
00:30:02.520 has become about sex and gender, that it's just something that you wake up and decide. 0.95
00:30:06.520 No, sex corresponds with gender. And there are only two biological sexes. That doesn't mean that
00:30:13.520 a biological male can't have more traits that are seen as feminine. That doesn't mean that he can't
00:30:19.080 like dance, that he can't, uh, be soft spoken, that he can't, you know, like things that women typically 1.00
00:30:27.040 like, or that he has to be, uh, this gun toting, mud slinging, four wheel driving football player.
00:30:33.780 That's not what it means to be a man. And it doesn't mean that biological women can't have 0.96
00:30:40.020 more traditionally masculine traits or like things that men do. That doesn't mean that in that sense,
00:30:45.460 sure. You could say that gender is fluid, but coming up with all of these different genders 1.00
00:30:50.120 that may or may not correspond to sex. That is when we get out of the realm of the nuanced conversation
00:30:57.260 that is actually based in reality. And we get into some kind of fairy tale where we base science
00:31:03.120 on people's feelings. And now we base legislation on people's feelings, which is really just crazy.
00:31:10.060 And so you've got all of these high school college women who have worked really hard in their sport to 1.00
00:31:15.460 be the best that they can be, maybe to get scholarships, uh, for women's sports. I mean, 0.96
00:31:20.060 we didn't even talk about that, that women who have been working hard for scholarships to, 1.00
00:31:24.760 to go to college, to play tennis, whatever it is, to play soccer, uh, now have to be also competing
00:31:30.200 against men for that. That's that really sucks. And I, I'm not an athlete. And so I can't empathize 0.97
00:31:36.960 exactly with that, but I can imagine working so hard to be the best in your field. I mean,
00:31:42.520 in order to get a scholarship, especially to like a D one school to play a sport is really hard. You
00:31:48.760 have to be the best of the best. And now the best of the best is going to be a completely
00:31:55.020 different scale because you're going to be competing against people that are always going
00:31:58.940 to be, if you're a woman biologically faster than you biologically stronger than you biologically 1.00
00:32:04.740 have a better anaerobic capacity than you do, um, is going to be able to endure a lot longer than you
00:32:12.000 can. It's going to be able to hit a lot harder than you can. And so it's not, it's not fair. And I
00:32:18.100 don't always believe in fairness as Democrats do, or as liberals do, they believe in equality of
00:32:23.860 outcomes, but I do believe in equality of opportunity. And this is no longer equality
00:32:28.660 of opportunity. You're obscuring opportunities for people who have worked hard simply because
00:32:32.800 they are what the left called cisgender. So you are punishing people who don't have gender dysphoria,
00:32:40.260 but that's exactly what cosmic justice and social justice always does. It uplifts who they believe
00:32:47.120 are oppressed always at the expense of who they believe are not oppressed. And we, I actually
00:32:52.300 have an episode on social justice coming out this summer that explains, uh, all of that really in
00:32:59.460 depth. So this is, as we've already talked about scary for parents, they could potentially be found
00:33:04.620 guilty of violating their children's civil rights. We already noted that, um, if they declined to consent
00:33:10.540 to sex transition surgery. So this is a violation of a lot of privacy. So the same people that,
00:33:16.600 uh, say that the constitution grants a right to privacy for women who want to get abortions
00:33:22.360 and who say, Hey, get the government out of my doctor's office, get the government out of my
00:33:26.520 healthcare now actually want the government directly involved in their healthcare directly
00:33:31.300 telling doctors what treatments they can and cannot give a child and what parents or what can,
00:33:39.140 what parents can do, uh, with their children as far as treatment goes. And so that's just another
00:33:44.300 example of how the whole privacy, how the whole, this is a doctor's choice argument that we hear
00:33:50.520 about abortion from the left is all it's all a lie. They don't really care about freedom. They've
00:33:56.360 never cared about autonomy. If your autonomy gets in the way of theirs, they don't care about any of
00:34:01.260 that. What they want is their agenda pushed at all costs. And you cannot have any kind of objection
00:34:06.660 to that whatsoever without being called a bigot. But this is what happens again. We've talked about
00:34:12.440 this so much. This is what happens when you exchange the God of scripture with the God of self. The God
00:34:19.620 of scripture is the giver of all truth. He is the giver of all wisdom. He defines, uh, what sex is. He
00:34:27.120 defines what is right and what is wrong. And even if you reject God, even if you say that you're not
00:34:33.200 a Christian, but you align with what the Bible says, uh, whether you know it or not, you are going to find
00:34:39.140 yourself in a place of truth, at least in, um, a temporal way. Uh, but on the other side of that,
00:34:46.240 you've got the God of self. You've got, you know what? The only value, the highest value that I have
00:34:51.780 is authenticity. The highest value that I have is individuality and being special. And everyone has to
00:34:57.960 bow down to the God of self. And the God of self that we are glorifying now is the kind that, uh,
00:35:05.740 the left sees is typically discriminated against typically oppressed. And all of us have to
00:35:10.740 sacrifice our freedoms, religious, moral, and otherwise on the altar to the God of self of
00:35:17.640 the people that they deem, uh, more worthy of protection than us. The reality is, is that the
00:35:23.340 left, many on the left don't see Christianity as, uh, any kind of legitimate objection to have,
00:35:29.700 or any religion as any objection to have. Um, they believe that it really shouldn't matter,
00:35:35.380 that we should embrace self secularism, that we should embrace their ideology. And in that way,
00:35:41.820 you see who the real tyrants are, who the real bigots are. So I just wanted to give you a brief
00:35:48.080 rundown on all of that. We didn't even touch all of the topics that we could have about the equality
00:35:52.300 act, but you need to know that this is happening. You need to be aware. If it does go to the Senate,
00:35:57.140 you need to look at who's actually voting for this stuff. And you need to uncover the headlines to
00:36:02.660 see what this really is. This is a violation of religious freedom. So that's all we're going to
00:36:08.160 get into today, but I will be back Friday. We are probably going to do a rundown of other stuff that
00:36:14.020 has happened this week on Friday, rather than an interview, just because there's a lot that I still
00:36:18.580 want to cover that happened this week. So I hope that you have a great few days and I will see you
00:36:22.820 back here on Friday.