RFK Jr. The Defender - June 29, 2022


Cell Phone Tumors with Hunter Lundy


Episode Stats

Length

36 minutes

Words per Minute

155.27167

Word Count

5,714

Sentence Count

410

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

Hunter Lundy, a well-known attorney from one of the leading plaintiff s attorneys in this country, from Lake Charles, Louisiana, is joining us to talk about a case that he and his client, Reverend Frank A. Walker, are bringing against the cell phone industry and the advocacy group, the Cellphone Lobby Group, in the D.C. Superior Court. They argue that cell phone radiation from cell phones should be linked to cancerous brain tumors, and that the industry should pay damages for the damage caused by the radiation they emit. In this episode, we talk about how the case came to be and the challenges facing the defendants in this case, and how they are fighting to get their case heard in court. We also talk about the challenges they are facing, and what they are doing to speed up the process of the case and get the case heard. We also hear from Dr. Chris Fortier, a world-renowned radiation and geneticist, who has been called in to testify in the case. Thanks to Dr. Fortier for his expert testimony, and for being willing to travel to the United States to join us on the case, we have a firm date for the case to be heard in the Court of Appeal. Thank you Dr.Fortier for coming on the show and for his courage in standing up for our client, Frank and his courage and perseverance in fighting for justice for his family and for standing up to the fight for his son, Reverend A.A. Walker. Thank you, Mr. Walker! and thank you, Reverend Aaron Walker, for your courageously fighting for his life and dignity and dignity, and fighting for the right to have a fair and fair hearing in court to have his voice heard in this important case. We appreciate you, and we are so much respect and respect, and respect for your dignity and respect and dignity. You are so brave, and your courage and respect. and we appreciate you for your time and your commitment to fight for justice and your time, and so much more. - Thank you for being a voice for our cause. His words and your support, you are so beautiful, and you are a wonderful human being, thank you for listening to our work, and supporting us in this podcast, and support us in the process, we are grateful for your words, we appreciate it, we will see you, we love you back, we'll see you back next week, we hear you.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody.
00:00:01.000 My uncle, Senator Edward Kennedy, died of a glioblastoma tumor.
00:00:05.000 Johnny Cochran, who I also knew well, also died of a so-called cell phone tumor, the same kind.
00:00:12.000 Today, there is an explosion of these kind of tumors in people all over the country, and plaintiffs have sued the cell phone industry and the Cell Phone Lobbying Association.
00:00:25.000 We're hiding the associations between cell phone radiation and the growth of these tumors.
00:00:32.000 The industry has adopted the tactics of the tobacco industry and delayed, delayed, delayed.
00:00:40.000 Many of these cases have been sitting in court for 20 years.
00:00:43.000 My guest today, Hunter Lundy, who is a well-known attorney from one of the leading plaintiff's attorneys in this country, From Lake Charles, Louisiana, is joining us to talk about a case that he and I are bringing on cell phone tumors.
00:01:02.000 We are representing specifically Reverend Frank Aaron Walker, who died of a cell phone tumor at age 49 in December of 2020.
00:01:13.000 And tell us about this case.
00:01:16.000 Hunter for not getting bogged down in the court, which is what has happened to every one of these other cell phone cases.
00:01:24.000 Well, the suits were filed in the D.C. Superior Court years ago, and many other cases were joined.
00:01:32.000 In 2013, we had a Fry hearing with a number of experts.
00:01:37.000 Fry means Which was the standard at the time to challenge the testimony of an expert and the court wanted to determine whether or not there was an association at that hearing between cell phone radiation and brain tumors.
00:01:52.000 So we went forward in 2013 with our proof with a number of experts and the cell phone manufacturers and the carriers all defended it with their experts.
00:02:07.000 And after weeks of hearing, we had what we called a favorable ruling from the judge at that time in D.C., allowing five of our experts to testify, which means that had he let the case go forward at that time, and an individual's case been chosen to be proved for the damages caused by the cell phone radiation, those witnesses would be permitted to testify in that individual case.
00:02:37.000 Well, the judge certified the case for appeal to the D.C. Court of Appeals.
00:02:43.000 And the Court of Appeals, we argued that case sometime later in the end of 2014-2015.
00:02:52.000 And the Court of Appeals ruled that they wanted to change the standard.
00:02:57.000 And so the standard went from Fry to what's called Daubert.
00:03:02.000 The French in Louisiana like to say Daubert.
00:03:05.000 But D-A-U-B-E-R-T, that was a national case.
00:03:09.000 It was a pharmaceutical case where the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals first in the Supreme Court, created a standard to test the reliability of an expert's opinion.
00:03:19.000 It was a little different than the Fry.
00:03:21.000 So D.C. courts decided we're going to switch to Daubert after 100-something years following Fry.
00:03:28.000 So they chose our case.
00:03:30.000 We went back.
00:03:32.000 And by the time we went back to the trial court level, there was a new judge.
00:03:36.000 And so the court said, well, we're going to allow you to rewrite the opinions, have your experts present their opinions at Daubert, and the defendants can challenge them one more time.
00:03:48.000 And then since that time, we've been through three district court judges, superior district court judges, and arguments have been made in what evidence can be put on and what cannot be put on.
00:04:02.000 It's taken years.
00:04:04.000 We've gone through COVID lockdowns.
00:04:07.000 Finally, now we have a firm date that we will believe that we will go forward on September the 12th of this year to prove our experts passed the Daubert standard.
00:04:18.000 We proved that they passed the Fry.
00:04:20.000 In the interim, another scientist came out with an opinion that is extremely compelling That says there clearly is a relationship between cell phone radiation and brain tumors.
00:04:34.000 And it's more than just what the IARC panel said in 2011.
00:04:39.000 It's not a possibility.
00:04:40.000 It's a probability.
00:04:42.000 It's probably a known carcinogen.
00:04:44.000 And his name is well known in the scientific community, Dr.
00:04:48.000 Chris Fortier.
00:04:50.000 The trial court has decided that we cannot add that opinion.
00:04:54.000 At this point in time, we will not be allowed to use that testimony of that witness.
00:05:00.000 So we have to rely on the witnesses that testified back in 2013.
00:05:05.000 And so that's where we are.
00:05:08.000 So not knowing when we would get a hearing finally due to COVID lockdowns and exclusions.
00:05:14.000 And these hearings, these witnesses, many of them are coming overseas.
00:05:18.000 We have a witness that's coming too from Austria.
00:05:23.000 We've got one from Greece.
00:05:24.000 We've got one who is, his first language is Russian, his second language is Swedish, his third language is English.
00:05:32.000 But he is a world-renowned geneticist, radiation physicist, and he will testify.
00:05:38.000 It's easier for people to understand than Hunter Lundy, the lawyer in this case.
00:05:44.000 So we have difficulty, we have language barriers, and we can't do these hearings by Zoom.
00:05:52.000 You know and I know that the right to confront a witness or put a witness on, the credibility of that witness is as important as you and I looking at each other right now, really better in the same room as opposed to doing it over television or Zoom or closed circuit.
00:06:10.000 And so that hearing's coming up.
00:06:12.000 In the absence of this time, we were hired by a widow from Reverend Walker that you just mentioned to the listeners.
00:06:20.000 And we filed her suit for the death of her husband along with her two sons who are heirs of Pastor Walker.
00:06:28.000 And he had tremendous cell phone exposures.
00:06:32.000 We had all of his phones, all of his data.
00:06:35.000 We have all the necessary elements to go prove the case.
00:06:39.000 The last phone that he used was a phone manufactured in China.
00:06:44.000 And so we've spent Over six months to almost a year trying to serve this Chinese corporation under the Hague Convention.
00:06:54.000 And they will be served.
00:06:56.000 And once that happens, we will move forward.
00:06:58.000 That suit is filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
00:07:04.000 And so we believe that we can push that case fast.
00:07:09.000 And that's our goal.
00:07:10.000 We don't know what's going to happen in D.C. We're on our fifth judge now.
00:07:16.000 D.C. Superior Court, but we know that if we get that trial date in Louisiana, We know who the judge is that's going to make the decisions.
00:07:23.000 And that recent study by Chris Portier.
00:07:26.000 Chris Portier was a key witness in our Monsanto case.
00:07:30.000 He was a former CDC official.
00:07:33.000 He was the head, the director of the National Toxicity Program.
00:07:37.000 He's one of the most respected toxicologists on the planet.
00:07:42.000 And the fact that he's now come out with this study is really devastating for the industry.
00:07:48.000 But as you said, at this point in the proceeding, we are not allowed to use that study in persuading the judge.
00:07:58.000 Let's go back a second.
00:07:59.000 The lawsuit alleges we're representing Frank Aaron Walker, who was a pastor, a teacher, a musician from Louisiana.
00:08:09.000 He used his cell phone for 25 years, and he was diagnosed with a glioblastoma brain cancer in January 2019.
00:08:18.000 Reverend Walker died on December 31, 2020, at the age of 49, after a two-year battle with this cancer.
00:08:26.000 Very, very similar story to my uncle, Ted Kennedy.
00:08:30.000 Our lawsuit, the defendants in the lawsuit are Motorola, AT&T Mobility, ZDE, E Corporation, Cricket Communications, and the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association, which is one of the worst villains in this lawsuit.
00:08:49.000 We will explain why in a second.
00:08:52.000 That is the telecommunications industry's lobbying arm.
00:08:56.000 The lawsuit alleges that the telecom industry downplayed, understated, and did not state the health hazards and risks associated with cell phones, which they knew about.
00:09:08.000 It also accuses the defendants of fraud, unfair trade practices, design defects, inadequate warning, and misrepresentation, among other things.
00:09:18.000 State and federal claims.
00:09:21.000 Now, I started having an interest in this issue back, I think, around 2015, and I was doing the TV show on Air America with Mike Papantonio.
00:09:34.000 And I had a guest repeatedly named George Carlow, Dr.
00:09:38.000 George Carlow.
00:09:39.000 Dr.
00:09:40.000 George Carlow was hired by an official, was the CEO of the lobbying association, Tom Wheeler.
00:09:50.000 And George Carlow was kind of a, I would describe him as Kind of a professional, almost an expert witness for industry.
00:09:59.000 We used to call people like that biostitutes.
00:10:02.000 They're people who the industry knows, they're reliable, and they're going to produce a report that exonerates the industry from any association with injuries.
00:10:14.000 They hired George Carlos to do this, and he was so horrified.
00:10:19.000 The scientific literature, the injuries that were being caused by cell phones that were undeniable, that he double-crossed the industry and he gave back the $25 million and he gave a press conference saying this is causing cancer.
00:10:39.000 And he destroyed his career in the process.
00:10:41.000 He ended up writing a very, very good book about it.
00:10:45.000 And I had him two or three times on to talk about it, but it was shocking what he found out.
00:10:50.000 The overwhelming mountain of literature that shows, that proves beyond any doubt that cell phones are causing these tumors in people's brains, along with DNA damage, mutations, all kinds of other problems.
00:11:06.000 Penetration of the blood-brain barrier.
00:11:08.000 Tell us who Tom Wheeler is, because he is a major figure in this saga, and he is one of the major villains.
00:11:18.000 Well, Tom, it's like you said, Tom Wheeler at the time, in the early years, was the CEO or Executive Director of the lobbying group that was lobbying for the wireless community, and he Wanted to disprove any theory that cell phone radiation could cause these brain tumors.
00:11:40.000 And just to interrupt you for a second, Hunter, he later, he was rewarded for his duplicity, his venal craven actions against Carlos and others by being appointed the head of the Federal Communications Commission.
00:11:56.000 That's correct.
00:11:57.000 President Obama appointed Wheeler head of the FCC. So he left the wireless lobbying firm where he, and I'm going to follow up what you said about George Carlow, because they hired an entity called WTR, the Wireless Technology Research Group, and they wanted to disprove that there was any connection.
00:12:20.000 And so the wireless technology group took about $3 million or so of that $25 million grant, and they did studies And those studies came back showing just the opposite of what Tom Wheeler wanted to prove.
00:12:35.000 And so, as you know, through history of battling with pharma and tobacco and everybody else, when they don't like the message, they try to kill the messenger.
00:12:45.000 And so that's what they tried to do to Dr.
00:12:48.000 Carlo.
00:12:48.000 Carlo, very well respected.
00:12:50.000 Yeah, he was on the defense or the industry side of most issues before this time, but now he's seeing the truth.
00:12:58.000 And they took people like Dr.
00:13:00.000 Henry Lye, one of the most well-respected scientists in the world, out of the state of Washington, who was doing studies and they came back and they showed that there was a break in the DNA. They showed that this radiation at these levels, and they call them non-radiation levels, I'm trying to think of the term that's used.
00:13:20.000 For non-heating, non-thermal is the word, non-thermal levels.
00:13:25.000 Of course, in reality, all radiation produces some heat, but at these levels, they called them non-thermal, and they tried to make the argument non-thermal radiation will never break the DNA bond, but it's simply not true.
00:13:40.000 It's not true.
00:13:41.000 And let me explain that to the listeners.
00:13:44.000 Of course, the subthermal injuries from this radiation, it's destroying your DNA. It's causing mutations.
00:13:51.000 It's causing tumors to sprout.
00:13:54.000 It is penetrating the blood-brain barrier.
00:13:57.000 It's causing all kinds of damage to your immune system.
00:14:02.000 And in order to destroy Dr.
00:14:05.000 Lay, as you point out, they actually began wargaming a strategy against him.
00:14:11.000 They call it wargaming.
00:14:13.000 They hired a PR firm and they said, how do we take this scientist who is so respected, so revered, and destroy not just his study, but destroy his entire reputation?
00:14:25.000 Well, that's what they did.
00:14:27.000 And they try to do it with everybody, the whole industry that reports.
00:14:33.000 There is causation between cell phone radiation and brain tumors.
00:14:36.000 We know there's causation between cell phone radiation and other problems, too.
00:14:41.000 We know there's neurological effects that are affecting people now.
00:14:45.000 We know that the radiation that's occurring in our environment today, and you know as well as anybody, Bobby, that this 5G technology and their way to get around zoning and Counties and cities and parishes in Louisiana and sticking these towers anywhere.
00:15:04.000 They're radiating the public.
00:15:07.000 So to accomplish a financial goal, and it's ridiculous.
00:15:12.000 I know we're getting off a little bit, but I'm just concerned about the whole industry.
00:15:16.000 But I'm really concerned about these people that hold that cell phone next to their brain.
00:15:21.000 And you know, and you described your Uncle Ted as having that tumor right here.
00:15:27.000 Which was probably on the temporal lobe.
00:15:30.000 And the temporal lobe is the lobe surrounding the side of the brain of the ear, which gets the most exposure.
00:15:37.000 You'll see some frontal lobe and you'll see some parateal lobes, but most of them are temporal lobe tumors.
00:15:44.000 And it's their ipsilateral on the side of the brain in which the cell phone is home.
00:15:49.000 So when those phones are tested on mannequins early and trying to get them put on the shelves for buyers to buy, They never test them in a manner in which people use them.
00:16:01.000 I mean, people don't hold them like this.
00:16:04.000 They hold them like this.
00:16:07.000 So we've had all these tumors happen because of it.
00:16:12.000 And yeah, I know today we have our young people are smart and that they're texting and that they're hopefully wearing their accessories, not Bluetooth, but accessory earpieces.
00:16:24.000 And they're holding their speaker in.
00:16:27.000 I mean, I know you and I and anybody else that we know today, we speak or we try to create, because distance is everything.
00:16:34.000 The closer you hold it to your head, the more dangerous, the more higher the exposure, the greater the energy is that's entering your brain.
00:16:43.000 So you're right.
00:16:44.000 It's not the same frequency as a microwave, but it's a little microwave and it's shooting right into your brain.
00:16:51.000 It's breaking the brain barrier, as you said, and so it's upsetting the DNA. And of course, years ago when they were trying to damage Dr.
00:16:59.000 Lai and others, They wanted to say, well, it doesn't break the DNA. Well, there are studies today that show it does break the DNA. There are studies that show that it affects the RNA, which is the repair mechanism.
00:17:13.000 And so your brain is always producing little cancer cells, but we clean them up.
00:17:20.000 The brain is created, and the cell structure is such that it's self-cleansing, and the RNA helps for the self-cleansing.
00:17:28.000 But if you damage the RNA, you're not self-cleansing.
00:17:31.000 So those tumors, those cancer cells can start forming and they can start growing.
00:17:36.000 And we know that the radiation has, you know, from the many cases you're involved in, has a genotoxic effect on people.
00:17:44.000 And that's the first beginning of the problem.
00:17:48.000 So we call them free radicals that are created from the overexposure of this radiation.
00:17:55.000 And proximity and use is everything.
00:17:58.000 So the science has shown the longer the use, the larger the propensity to get to cancer.
00:18:07.000 So back in 2011, they said, you know, if you had 10 years of use, 30 minutes a day, IARC said there's a probability of a twofold increase in getting a glioblastoma.
00:18:20.000 There's also a tumor called an acoustic neuroma.
00:18:23.000 Now, that's not malignant like the glio, but what it does, it forms on the nerve between the brain and the ear, and it grows, and people don't even know it's in there.
00:18:35.000 When people start getting symptoms of losing their hearing or getting headaches, they go and they get checked.
00:18:42.000 A CAT scan or brain scan shows they got a tumor.
00:18:45.000 And then what happens?
00:18:46.000 Well, that tumor has to be removed.
00:18:48.000 So when that tumor gets removed, and I'm calling it tumor, it's a benign tumor.
00:18:54.000 But anytime you go into the brain to remove a tumor, you're damaging it.
00:19:00.000 And of course, when you damage tissue in the brain, it has severe adverse effects.
00:19:04.000 So those benign tumors are just as serious.
00:19:08.000 I'm not going to say they're lethal like the glioblastoma.
00:19:12.000 And so we use the word glioblastoma.
00:19:14.000 That means it's at a stage four.
00:19:16.000 That's the worst that it can be.
00:19:18.000 The oleos and the astros, those are stages in which the tumors come out.
00:19:24.000 The glioblastoma is generally already in stage four.
00:19:27.000 It's already, I mean...
00:19:28.000 And generally, the life expectancy at best is five years.
00:19:34.000 Generally, sometimes it's six months or less before they know it.
00:19:37.000 And I know I've had a family member, too, that died with a glioblastoma.
00:19:42.000 So I know what they do and how they grow and how fast they move.
00:19:46.000 And these cell phones, they don't only initiate that tumor, they promote tumors.
00:19:52.000 Somebody can have a tumor that's never going to manifest.
00:19:55.000 But that cell phone use will promote the growth of that tumor expeditiously.
00:20:01.000 And so the science is pretty clear on that as well.
00:20:04.000 So you could have somebody that has a tumor because they, genetically, that it never manifests.
00:20:09.000 They could have it because they put their hands in some chemical.
00:20:12.000 We know that you watched the movie Aaron Brockovich.
00:20:15.000 Your listeners all know about Aaron Brockovich.
00:20:17.000 So those people were dipping their hands and They weren't dipping their hands.
00:20:22.000 They were actually drinking water that had been contaminated by hexavalent chromium.
00:20:28.000 You know, we called it chromium-6.
00:20:30.000 Chromium-6 will give you a brain tumor.
00:20:33.000 And so those are problems.
00:20:35.000 They know it.
00:20:36.000 The industry knows it.
00:20:37.000 We always have that saying, follow the money.
00:20:40.000 And going back to this Tom Wheeler thing, that's unconscionable where I come from to see somebody leave the lobby and industry and then become the FCC Chairman.
00:20:51.000 That's this world we live in, and you know, it's just not good, and I just pray that we get our day in court, and I pray that the courts find the causation.
00:21:02.000 I pray that we get our day in court on the Walker case, because you and I know that is a good case, and that is, if we get our chance to put on our evidence, we'll prevail.
00:21:12.000 I just want to mention one of the other scientific heroes in this, another person who has been defamed, marginalized, vilified, whose career was destroyed, Dr.
00:21:23.000 Jerry Phillips, PhD.
00:21:25.000 He was hired by Motorola to counter Dr.
00:21:30.000 Lay's study.
00:21:31.000 Instead, he confirmed it.
00:21:34.000 And Motorola, which funded this study, pressured him not to publish and threatened to withdraw his funding.
00:21:40.000 When Phillips refused to allow Motorola to spin his research, Motorola cut Phillips' funding and threatened to destroy him in the scientific community.
00:21:50.000 And as you say, they knew what they were doing.
00:21:54.000 They have a whole series of patents going back to the early 1990s.
00:21:59.000 In which they were patenting technology for protecting human tissue From the radiation that they knew was emanating from their cell phones and destroying human cells, mutating them and causing tumors.
00:22:15.000 The industry, Nokia and these other companies, developed dozens of patents or devices that would protect you from their cell phone radiation.
00:22:25.000 And many of these patents were cheap devices that were easy to use, but they would have cost money and they would have had to admit What they were doing, and so they just put the patents on the shelf.
00:22:37.000 That's part of the evidence in our case, is we have these little patents that show they knew exactly what was happening.
00:22:44.000 No question about it.
00:22:46.000 In the 90s, and you pointed out in my memory, and this is all evidence that was put in the Frey hearing.
00:22:52.000 This is a public record.
00:22:54.000 We're not talking out of school at all.
00:22:56.000 This is public record.
00:22:58.000 That Nokia, my memory, is their application to change their patent was to move the antenna.
00:23:05.000 They were all wanting to move the antenna because the antenna in the phone was the hotspot.
00:23:10.000 So when the signals going out are coming in, it's coming in right at the antenna.
00:23:14.000 And so the antennas were up here.
00:23:17.000 And so it was right in the ear.
00:23:20.000 They were trying to reposition the antenna because they know when you press send, that's when the radiation is going and that person passes received.
00:23:29.000 They're getting the highest exposure at that time.
00:23:32.000 And so they wanted to move the antenna.
00:23:34.000 And in my memory is that one of the applications said because of the report of glioblastomas.
00:23:41.000 And so they knew they had knowledge of what was being reported.
00:23:45.000 They were wanting to remove their antennas to make them safer.
00:23:49.000 And today, you know, we went through the last five to eight or ten years of cell phones.
00:23:55.000 They were selling the accessories with the phones.
00:23:58.000 They were encouraging people to use the accessories.
00:24:03.000 They tell you the speaker.
00:24:05.000 And, of course, they do it on a basis of a standard.
00:24:08.000 They claim that in order to meet the SAR standard, which is called the Specific Absorption Rate of the phone.
00:24:16.000 That's the amount of kilowatts per gram of body tissue in which radiation is going into the brain.
00:24:23.000 That's a standard that was not really built for the purposes of the cell phone.
00:24:28.000 And it was built way before the cell phones.
00:24:31.000 And that was the standard used by the FCC for the cell phone.
00:24:35.000 It came in it.
00:24:36.000 And I'm not challenging that standard because we know the phones don't meet the standard.
00:24:40.000 Assuming the standard was a valid standard, cell phones don't even meet them.
00:24:45.000 But they did that and they put that information in the phone packages themselves.
00:24:52.000 You know, we used to pick up an Apple phone and then we would dial, follow the instructions until we found the SAR. And it would tell you, hold it an inch away from your body.
00:25:04.000 Don't put it on your belt.
00:25:06.000 Don't put it in your pocket.
00:25:08.000 Hold it a certain distance from your head.
00:25:10.000 The old Blackberry said five-eighths of an inch to one inch.
00:25:13.000 How many people in the public knew that buried in their phone was an instruction to hold the phone away from your body a certain distance?
00:25:22.000 Nobody did.
00:25:23.000 And like I said, the problem is people hold it flush up their head.
00:25:28.000 So their attempt to give some kind of instruction, you know, was flawed.
00:25:33.000 And they want to give that instruction on the basis of the SAR standard.
00:25:38.000 But yet they were telling people, we know there's studies that show men that put the cell phones in their pocket have a reduction of sperm count.
00:25:48.000 I mean, there's peer-reviewed published studies that shows it affects them.
00:25:53.000 We know today that there's a study that's been done on women Nowadays, they make jogging brassieres, jogging bras with pockets in them.
00:26:04.000 So women that were putting their cell phones in their bra every day when they were exercising, jogging, they started showing up with tumors on the pattern of the cell phone.
00:26:15.000 So yes, our cases are brain tumors because Pastor Walker died from a brain tumor.
00:26:22.000 And these other people that we filed suits for in DC died of brain tumors.
00:26:26.000 But this is a much bigger issue.
00:26:29.000 And so until they step up to the plate and admit it, I'm just a firm believer just like you do.
00:26:36.000 Everybody should be held accountable.
00:26:38.000 Everybody.
00:26:39.000 Why should anybody get a break when they know the truth and there's consequences from their wrongful conduct?
00:26:47.000 And so I just, again, we hope and pray that we will get our day in court and we will approve a case.
00:26:55.000 It's coming.
00:26:56.000 You and I know sometimes it takes a long time.
00:26:58.000 Time for the truth to come out.
00:27:01.000 You and I will never put cell phones next to our heads.
00:27:05.000 So I use a cell phone all the time, but I hold a great distance from my body.
00:27:10.000 I always put it on speaker, even if there's other people around, even if they might think it's rude.
00:27:15.000 I try not to be rude, but I am not going to put that thing next to my head no matter what, because I know too much.
00:27:21.000 I've seen the studies.
00:27:22.000 I've read them.
00:27:24.000 I've seen the studies you're talking about, and this isn't part of our suit, but one of the things that we know is that the phone is transmitting this dangerous cancer carcinogenic radiation, even when you're not using it to make calls.
00:27:40.000 When you use your app, the more apps you have on your phone, the more radiation is being emitted.
00:27:45.000 Those apps are communicating with the tower all the time, and when they...
00:27:49.000 That's correct.
00:27:50.000 Looking for that tower, they are emitting that radiation.
00:27:53.000 If you put it in your front pocket, if you're a woman and it's near your ovaries or your breasts, you are really, really playing with fire.
00:28:03.000 My uncle, when he went in, he discovered he had a seizure and was unconscious for a while.
00:28:10.000 Then they diagnosed and they did the CAT scan, the MRI, and found out that he had this glioblastoma.
00:28:16.000 And as you know, it kind of looks like a spider web in your brain.
00:28:20.000 It's not a discrete tumor.
00:28:22.000 It's spread everywhere.
00:28:23.000 He was the chair for 50 years of the U.S. Senate Health Committee.
00:28:27.000 So he had access to the best doctors in America, and they kept him alive for another two years.
00:28:34.000 He went down to Duke in North Carolina and got surgery.
00:28:39.000 With that kind of tumor, it's interspersed all with different parts of your brain.
00:28:45.000 And it's not the kind of thing that you can just cut out.
00:28:49.000 And he had to go through surgery when he was conscious.
00:28:53.000 They took the top of his skull off and And the doctor was standing behind him, like in Silence of the Lambs, with a scalpel.
00:29:03.000 And the doctor would ask him to do certain problems while he had applied pressure.
00:29:09.000 The different parts of Teddy's brain.
00:29:12.000 And if Teddy could do the problem while he was holding that pressure against his brain, the doctor would then cut out that little piece of his cancer-ridden brain.
00:29:24.000 And if Teddy couldn't do it or if he couldn't use the speech correctly, then he would leave it alone.
00:29:29.000 And by doing that kind of, you know, really, he was completely conscious during the surgery while they were cutting pieces of his brain out.
00:29:37.000 And by doing that kind of really torturous experiment he gave, he bought him another two years of life.
00:29:43.000 But if he hadn't done that, Teddy would not have survived too much.
00:29:46.000 That's how deadly these tumor, these cell phone tumors are.
00:29:51.000 There's been a lot of people, especially like your uncle in public office, that, you know, they walked around with these big old box Motorola's for years when they first came out.
00:30:02.000 Not only was the cell phone emitting radiation, they were three watt phones.
00:30:07.000 Today, the phones are about a quarter of a watt.
00:30:10.000 They were hot.
00:30:11.000 They were probably getting radiated from the battery as well as from the radiation from the signal.
00:30:17.000 So they were getting hit hard.
00:30:19.000 And if you remember the old Motorola phones, box phones, you rode around in your car back in the 80s.
00:30:24.000 So I think people were getting high dose.
00:30:27.000 I mean, I know that I had to run back and forth from New Orleans for years.
00:30:32.000 Fortunately, I had my antenna and my trunk, and so the signet wasn't next to my head, and people, we were speaking, or we were using speakers on the car way back then.
00:30:43.000 These small phones that you're holding next to your head daily, and while we're talking, Bobby, I want to make sure any mom who's listening Do not let your child keep their phone next to their pillow or next to their bed.
00:30:58.000 Do not let them use it as a wake-up alarm underneath their bed.
00:31:03.000 Do not let them keep their iPads because they emit radiation too.
00:31:08.000 All these devices emit radiation and they're not healthy.
00:31:13.000 Pregnant moms do not keep iPads on your lap or computers or cell phones or whatever.
00:31:24.000 The Russians, as you know, there are literally tens of thousands of articles that show that it causes cancer, that it has all these other neurological effects, that it has tissue effects, etc.
00:31:39.000 Most of those of the best studies, the early ones, came from Russia, from the Soviet Union, because they were early innovators with microwave radiation.
00:31:50.000 We're looking at it as a weapon, communication, and for a lot of other reasons, but they did a lot of really good science on it.
00:31:58.000 And today, the standards in Russia Radiation exposure from cell phones are one one-thousandth of what we have in this country.
00:32:08.000 And in schools, in elementary schools, many of them ban the use of cell phones by kids because they know how dangerous it is for children.
00:32:17.000 And we just allow our kids and encourage them to play these games all day on their cell phone.
00:32:24.000 And, you know, they're just radiating themselves.
00:32:27.000 And the Israelis and the Europeans are way ahead of us.
00:32:31.000 You're right, Bobby.
00:32:32.000 I mean, you can't, unless you're 16 years old, in some of these countries, you can't have a cell phone.
00:32:37.000 You can't use a cell phone.
00:32:39.000 And we're giving it to five-year-olds to play with.
00:32:41.000 And so some of the European countries have banned the use of cell phones for teenagers.
00:32:46.000 Some of the South American countries have.
00:32:48.000 And here we are doing what we're doing and sticking our hands in the sand.
00:32:53.000 But again, it becomes, you know, it I'm sorry to say it, but it's a greed issue.
00:32:58.000 We cannot let corporate America harm our people.
00:33:03.000 There has to be a balance.
00:33:05.000 There has to be truth.
00:33:06.000 And the public is not being told the truth.
00:33:10.000 And you know better than I do, you've written about people that are in leadership positions that don't tell truth.
00:33:18.000 The adverse effects can have on people.
00:33:20.000 And this is one of them.
00:33:22.000 This is a big sort of one, and we could go down the list, and I really don't want to throw all the names out and the public figures.
00:33:29.000 You've chosen to talk about your uncle, and I appreciate that.
00:33:33.000 I knew your uncle.
00:33:34.000 He married a girl from Crowley, Louisiana, and a family that I know real well.
00:33:39.000 Reggie's daughter.
00:33:42.000 So I know him, and I knew Judge Reggie well.
00:33:47.000 He was a friend.
00:33:48.000 So anyway, I just think we have to keep doing what we're doing.
00:33:52.000 You have to keep doing what you're doing.
00:33:54.000 We have to get our day in court, and then we need to take advantage of it when we get it.
00:34:00.000 Well, now, we're not actually out looking for cases right now.
00:34:04.000 We have been registering cases for people who may run up against the statute of limitations.
00:34:13.000 Right.
00:34:13.000 People who have cell phone tumors and need to file in order to protect their rights under the statute of limitations.
00:34:21.000 For those kind of people, what should we advise them?
00:34:25.000 Should they call your office?
00:34:27.000 Should they contact you?
00:34:29.000 They can call our office.
00:34:31.000 They can get online and email us.
00:34:34.000 We get them every day.
00:34:35.000 We have a couple of lawyers in our office that are available.
00:34:38.000 Watching and observing, and we look at the literature to determine whether or not, first of all, if they have a case that has probability of success, then we'll take it.
00:34:48.000 We will not take a case that we think does not have probability of success.
00:34:53.000 And again, it has to do with exposure, the timing of it, the type of tumor, the location of the tumor, all of those play in to the decision-making.
00:35:03.000 And then there's a three-year statute, I think, in D.C. And the reason why D.C. is a catch-all location is because the lobbying firms were located there.
00:35:14.000 The nonprofits can be sued there.
00:35:16.000 And so you sue them there.
00:35:19.000 And so you keep them.
00:35:20.000 But we only do that if we have to.
00:35:23.000 Again, we're waiting on that opportunity because if God wills, you know, we get to do our discovery.
00:35:30.000 We will get a trial date within a year in the Western District of Louisiana.
00:35:34.000 You mentioned the company, the Chinese company, a while ago when you were looking at the defendants, that we're waiting on service and we're getting close when we get that service.
00:35:44.000 Then the court has had to grant extensions I mean, the court's ready to act on our case.
00:35:49.000 We're just waiting on that service because we don't want to leave one piece of the puzzle out.
00:35:55.000 When we go, we won't.
00:35:57.000 The manufacturer of the phone for Reverend Walker's last three years of use needs to be a party.
00:36:03.000 Okay, so I'm one of the attorneys on this case.
00:36:06.000 Hunter Lundy, who we're talking to right now, is the lead attorney on this case.
00:36:12.000 His firm, Lake Charles, Louisiana, is called Lundy Lundy Soilu and South.
00:36:18.000 Soilu is spelled S-O-I-L-E-A-U. But all you have to remember is Lundy Lundy, L-U-N-D-Y. Go to his website and...
00:36:28.000 If you think you have an issue, if you think you have a statute of limitations problem, once we win this lawsuit, we will then be inviting everybody in.
00:36:38.000 But until then, we need to see what happens in the D.C. court.
00:36:43.000 Thank you, Hunter.
00:36:45.000 Thank you, Bobby.
00:36:46.000 And keep up the good work.
00:36:48.000 Thanks.