Dr. Peter McCulloch is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist who has been the leader in the medical response to COVID-19. In August of 2020, Dr. McCulloch published a groundbreaking article that was the most downloaded article in the Journal of the American Medical Association over the past two years, and undoubtedly has saved many thousands of lives. He has testified on several occasions in the U.S. Senate and before several state senates and congressional committees. And now, the most important board of internal medicine has informed Dr. Michael Kier that his board certifications have been revoked and that he is no longer allowed to practice medicine in the United States. Dr. Kier has until November 18th to appeal that decision, but I think you'll agree, it's an incredible, mind-blowing reality. And it's up to the courts to decide whether or not they can do whatever they want to do or not, because they have this dictatorial power. They're exercising the power of the pharmaceutical companies rather than exercising the public health power, and they're exercising their power to promote the pandemic, rather than public health. It's an evolving reality, meaning, they no longer have any connection to a public health outcome, and it's all about pandemic pandemic. It's time to stop pandemic medicine, and we're going to have to live up to what we've been taught about vaccines and their impact on our bodies and our health. -- Robert Downey juries, or we'll have to pay the price for it in the court system, not the other way around it -- or not at all the way we're told it's going to pay for it, or not to pay our taxes, or get a chance to vote for our health care, or to get a say in the outcome of our choices, or a free shot at the outcome we get to choose what we get in the day we're all decide by the outcome they get, or it's not going to be a free choice, or they'll be pandemic? -- Dr. Ken Stoller's Lawerence Gergen, CHG's Lower Court Judge Michael Kier's ruling on this week on the case, and the appeals court says it doesn't matter, its not up to them, it doesn t matter, it does not matter, but it's completely up to us to decide that we can either give it to them or not -- not to us, not to them?
00:01:02.000He was one of the first physicians to be willing to come on to this show because, you know, my name had been so blackballed and tainted by the propaganda push by the medical cartel that I was really radioactive at that time.
00:01:19.000But he has a great deal of courage that I know comes from a very committed spiritual center from which all of the things that he does issue forth.
00:01:51.000McCulloch, which is loaded with credentials and licensure to practice medicine, cardiology, internal medicine, and all the other board certifications he has.
00:02:01.000But those medical boards are in the thrall of the pharmaceutical industry and the medical cartel and the pharmaceutical paradigm for a variety of reasons, including really dramatic financial entanglements that they share with those companies, the companies that make vaccines.
00:02:21.000And now the most important board of all, the American Board of Internal Medicine, has informed Dr.
00:02:29.000McCulloch, here is a guy who not only is an incredible clinician, who's a healer, and a man of total integrity and impeccable ethics, But as a scientist, he's accomplished more by the principal metric by which scientific accomplishment is measured than any other physician in his field in history.
00:02:53.000And the cartel is coming to try to de-license him because he told the truth to us about these vaccines.
00:03:03.000The American Board of Internal Medicine informed Dr.
00:03:07.000McCulloch In a recent letter, and listen to this, everybody, that McCulloch's statement is questioning COVID-19 vaccination for healthy people younger than the age 50.
00:03:17.000And his claim, his outrageous claim, that Americans have died after getting a COVID-19 vaccine triggered a review with this group of Charlinans, which led to a recommendation that McCulloch's board certifications be revoked.
00:03:36.000The ABIM's Credential and Certification Committee found that McCulloch had, quote, provided false and inaccurate medical information to the public, end quote.
00:03:45.000So that itself is false and inaccurate medical information.
00:03:50.000It is vaccine misinformation, technically.
00:03:53.000And here's what their major complaint is.
00:03:57.000Their indignation and their umbrage is that by casting doubt, On the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines with such seemingly authoritative statements made in various official forums and widely reported in various media, really not very widely reported in various media, but your statements pose serious concerns for patient safety.
00:04:21.000Moreover, they are inimical to the ethics and professionalism standards for board certification.
00:04:28.000And Peter was given until November 18th to appeal.
00:04:33.000And I know you are going to appeal that.
00:04:35.000But actually, as you have probably recently learned, and as I've known for a long time, because...
00:04:42.000I was involved, you know, we financed, CHG financed Ken Stoller's case, a number of other cases by physicians who are fighting de-licensure.
00:04:52.000The courts really give this incredible power to these groups to break, to violate law.
00:05:02.000In fact, the Geyer's Lower court found that the agency, the Maryland Medical Board that he platformed, Dr.
00:05:10.000Michael Kier, committed fraud and that they were taking money.
00:05:14.000And then the appeals court says it doesn't matter.
00:05:17.000They can still do it to you because they look at it as almost like a private company that can hire you or not, whatever they want.
00:05:24.000They can either give you the license or not, but it's not up to the courts.
00:05:48.000It's an incredible, mind-blowing reality.
00:05:51.000And as Americans have grown to know me, I'm a frequent contributor on Fox News, but many news channels, I've been asked to give my testimony under oath, meaning my best efforts to interpret what's going on in this rapidly evolving pandemic to Americans.
00:06:08.000So I've fulfilled my Duty as an American, when I've been called to serve, I've served.
00:06:15.000Steve Bannon, former White House advisor, is probably going to go to jail because he didn't show up to Congress and testify.
00:06:22.000I showed up to the U.S. Senate twice, multiple state senates, upon request, and I testified.
00:06:29.000And now I'm likely to be stripped of six years of my life.
00:06:34.000You know, there's three years of internal medicine residency, three years of cardiology fellowship.
00:06:39.000And the board's responsibility, the American board's responsibility is to make sure that I've completed those years and all the criteria, and that I've successfully done learning modules and passed exams.
00:06:50.000And for internal medicine, I've passed four of these exams spaced out every 10 years.
00:06:55.000I've passed three of them in cardiology.
00:06:57.000My clinical track record has no blemishes.
00:06:59.000I've been in practice, both internal medicine and cardiology.
00:07:14.000So what happened was, in September of 2021, the American Board of Internal Medicine announced that they're going to have a COVID-19 misinformation initiative.
00:07:25.000Without defining what misinformation is, without defining what doctors should say or not say, or What they thought were appropriate guardrails with no learning modules, nothing.
00:07:50.000And in 2018, misinformation was word of the year by Washington Post, that in fact, it was used in partisan politics so frequently that misinformation became part of, you know, the American colloquium, if you will.
00:08:03.000But misinformation has never been in medical textbooks.
00:08:06.000It was never on any of the board exams.
00:08:10.000There simply are scientific data, and then there's interpretive points of view.
00:08:14.000So ABM launches this in September of 2021, and then they go back in time.
00:08:20.000And then they review statements I made in the Texas Senate in March of 2021, and they declare that I have uttered misinformation.
00:08:29.000And that's what starts this investigation.
00:08:32.000Now, nowhere did the American Board of Internal Medicine say that they reviewed everybody, so there was nothing to suggest equal protection.
00:08:41.000In their process, in my view, they didn't offer due process because it turns out that when they made these allegations and then I responded to them with a very, very detailed 20-page document citing all the sources that I used in my testimony, and I was answering questions on the fly.
00:08:59.000And so, you know, to be able to support that with everything in the literature, which I did, Then they produced their evidence and said, aha, we think our evidence is this.
00:09:08.000So they didn't even engage in proper rules of evidence.
00:09:14.000Let me interrupt you because the evidence that they produced is essentially that CDC and WHO say the benefit of vaccines is greater than the cost.
00:09:32.000It's just these kind of absurd generalistic assurances that we've heard again and again that are these mantric tropes by these incredibly corrupt agencies that we know are captive by pharmaceutical interests and by China and the Gates Foundation.
00:09:51.000And they have an agenda, which is to get Gates' vaccines to every arm in the world.
00:09:56.000But because of these factors, so I have submitted an immediate request for dismissal based on procedural grounds, that this was ex post facto.
00:10:08.000There was nothing to suggest equal protection.
00:10:10.000There was nothing to suggest fair rules of handling evidence and asking for me to respond.
00:10:17.000And then lastly, there was an adequate due process.
00:10:20.000I asked to attend the meeting or see a transcript.
00:10:23.000And then I also asked for dismissal on substantive grounds.
00:10:26.000And that is that they actually declared a risk of the vaccine for mortality, a risk of, I'm sorry, risk of COVID, the illness, based on percentages of deaths in age group.
00:10:38.000And that's not even how the CDC defines that.
00:10:40.000The CDC defines it as the case fatality ratio, which I disclosed in my dismissal letter as being less than 1% in the groups that I So when I testified under oath that the risk of death due to COVID was negligible, I'm supported by the CDC and the CDC owns its own estimate on case fatality ratios.
00:10:58.000So what's going on here is I expect not to have the ABIM provide any courtesy in response, that I will submit an appeal which will lay the groundwork for a lawsuit.
00:11:09.000I will have to move forward with the lawsuit.
00:12:56.000I have so many personally, family members and friends who I believe their lives were saved because of your protocol, or if their lives weren't saved, their agonies were...
00:13:11.000I've shortened and made much more durable.
00:13:15.000I've probably, and this is without any exaggeration, but probably shared your protocol with several hundred people.
00:13:24.000You know, because people are calling me all the time saying, I got COVID, what do I do?
00:13:28.000And I just, I sent them your protocol and, you know, people call me again and again and say, thank you for sending me that.
00:13:49.000The mechanism by which people are hospitalized is because the symptoms become unbearable.
00:13:53.000Hospitalization is a tractable outcome.
00:13:55.000Virtually all the deaths occur in the hospital.
00:13:58.000If the hospital is avoided through that chain of logic and The data published by Proctor, by Zelenko, by Didier Rialt, I've been participatory in those papers, suggests that, in fact, we do.
00:14:11.000There's a paper by Guliaklis and colleagues that looked at all the early treatment studies, and he concluded by December of 2020, we had clear and convincing evidence that That means we had p-values less than 0.01 that early treatment was beneficial for patients.
00:14:29.000And so I think based on that analysis, we're on the right track and we're always on the right track with early treatment.
00:14:35.000I give broad credit to FLCC, Apircorium Palmeric, Didier Rialt in France, Vladimir Zelenko, myself, Proctor in Dallas.
00:14:43.000We all worked together in the end, separately, initially, came up with early treatment approaches.
00:14:48.000And you know what the broad estimate is?
00:14:49.000The broad estimate is that probably hundreds of millions of hospitalizations have been avoided and tens of millions of deaths have been avoided.
00:14:59.000Remember, the United States, we're at a million deaths and 10 million hospitalizations.
00:15:03.000Based on a learning curve, and when I gave in testimony at different points, my estimate is two-thirds retrospectively of both those numbers could have been avoided.
00:15:13.000Going forward, 95% or more can be avoided now with the skills that we have.
00:15:19.000So the early treatment, far and away, was the biggest advancement in COVID-19.
00:15:24.000In vitro diagnostics, vaccines, other social distancing, lockdowns, none of them really had any impact.
00:15:30.000It was all about early treatment, in my view.
00:15:33.000You know, I should know the answer to this question, but where does this board get its power?
00:15:38.000Is it because the license actually is state by state, you know, like a law license, right?
00:15:47.000Are they certified by the state legislature to issue licenses within the state?
00:15:52.000No, where they get their power is as a board offering specialty and subspecialty certification.
00:15:59.000There's another board, there's other colleges, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American College of Surgeons.
00:16:07.000As a doctor, I can't contract with insurances for my services without being board certified.
00:16:14.000That's actually part of the credentialing with insurances.
00:16:17.000I can't hold hospital privileges in hospitals.
00:16:20.000Now, there's been an attempt to have an alternative board arise, but that hasn't gotten enough traction to actually win insurance contracts or other things.
00:16:30.000Now, the state licensure is something different.
00:16:33.000In the state, you know, there's doctors and veterinarians and dentists and nurses have licenses, but those licenses simply say that the degrees have been awarded and the person is in good stead with the law.
00:16:46.000So the state licensure is different than the board certification.
00:16:50.000But as it goes forward right now, you know, this is what I think is going on.
00:16:56.000I think what's going on is that there are powerful forces that are influencing these boards.
00:17:01.000I don't think these boards are acting completely independently.
00:17:04.000Everything I see indicates outside influence.
00:17:07.000And by picking me, they're not actually going to succeed in silencing me, right?
00:17:13.000So if they end my career, what's the obvious response?
00:17:16.000I'm going to become even more visible, more vocal.
00:17:19.000But what they're doing is they're trying to send a message to the other Probably 300,000 doctors with their certification say, listen, this is what we did to Dr.
00:17:29.000This is a warning to anybody else who is going to speak up against the government narrative.
00:17:35.000Yeah, I mean, that's the same thing they did to Andrew Wakefield, because in that seminal 1998 paper, he never said that the MMR vaccine caused autism.
00:17:44.000He and the 12 other Co-authors who are all prominent doctors in England said, hey, of the 11 mothers of these children that we examined who had...
00:17:55.000Autism that was linked to gastrointestinal problems.
00:17:59.000And that was really the revelation of that study, is that, oh, we have a psychiatric disease that has a link to a physical gastrointestinal disorder.
00:18:10.000And that was why the Lancet published that study.
00:18:13.000But in it, they said, oh, by the way, our child got this problem right after the MMR vaccine.
00:18:20.000And they said, this should be examined.
00:18:23.000And then all hell broke loose, and the medical cartel, which is run by KlaxoSmithKline, which was making the vaccine over there, is all powerful in England.
00:18:33.000It runs the Welcome Trust, it runs the NHS, and it runs the university system.
00:19:10.000The Queen's Council said that the medical board had committed fraud and that, you know, this can never happen again.
00:19:19.000Well, by then, Wakefield had lost his license and moved to the United States.
00:19:23.000He couldn't sue because the insurance company wouldn't cover it.
00:19:26.000The other guy would and he won the lawsuit.
00:19:29.000But anyway, Wakefield was destroyed and he was used as an example.
00:19:33.000If you're a doctor, you better not talk about vaccines because that's what we're going to do.
00:19:38.000I'm going to just tell you one other story that you may not be aware of.
00:19:43.000I first found out about the power of these local medical boards when I was working on mercury issues before I ever got near vaccines.
00:19:52.000I was working on mercury and power plants, and I said, well, I saw all these studies that show that people who have mercury amalgam fillings Are much more likely to have neurologically injured children.
00:20:04.000There's like a direct correlation between the number of fillings during pregnancy and the chances that your kid is going to have low IQ and these neurological symptoms.
00:20:18.000And I learned at that point that Most states, dentist associations, have a rule that a dentist is not allowed to tell his patient about that risk.
00:21:25.000And Jeff Barkey, family physician, and Mark McDonald, really internationally famous child psychiatrist, are suing the state of California trying to stop that.
00:21:33.000But this idea of misinformation or this idea that a doctor...
00:21:39.000In any way could have their free speech impaired.
00:21:42.000It's such a threat to patients because what doctors will naturally do is not say anything.
00:22:19.000They don't give government narratives.
00:22:22.000And patients seek doctors for opinions and they seek second opinions.
00:22:26.000So we're hoping that there'll be some fairness that will prevail.
00:22:29.000I'm extremely worried, particularly this whole history of vaccines.
00:22:34.000You know, John Leake and I, who have our first book, Courage to Face COVID-19, it's about the suppression of early treatment.
00:22:40.000We think it was intentional to advance the COVID vaccines.
00:22:43.000We're writing a second book now on the vaccines, and John is an investigative reporter and historian.
00:22:49.000Basically, these vaccines are almost like a talisman.
00:22:52.000It's almost as if through the course of time, people felt like their bodies are frail and they needed some type of external biotechnology support for a human body to move forward.
00:23:03.000And now the Band-Aid has been ripped off the vaccines and now people are critically examining all the vaccines, myself included, and we're finding the absence of properly controlled trials.
00:23:13.000We're seeing vaccines being administered for easily treatable illnesses now, like diphtheria and pertussis.
00:23:19.000And we're seeing now an absolute assault.
00:23:24.000We're seeing children without question are receiving something like over 70 injections.
00:23:30.000When I was born and I was a small child, there's only three.
00:23:34.000And there's probably been inappropriate attribution of success.
00:23:38.000So even some of the early successes that were claimed to vaccines are probably more attributable to sanitation, other forms of medical care.
00:23:47.000So what's happening now is there used to be a rate of what's called vaccine hesitancy in the United States.
00:23:53.000That rate used to be roughly 2.5% of the population said, you know, I just don't want to do this or For other reasons I've talked to, I did a great interview with Dr.
00:24:01.000Sherry Tenpenny on my podcast, and it was interesting.
00:24:43.000And everything should undergo critical appraisal.
00:24:45.000And the COVID-19 vaccine disaster has ripped the Band-Aid off this.
00:24:50.000And now recent estimates are about 30% of parents now are very concerned about the entire vaccine schedule.
00:24:57.000Yeah, well, there's a couple of studies that you should know about, you know, as you look into this issue.
00:25:01.000One is There's a study that was done by Johns Hopkins and CDC. It's a CDC study, but they contracted out Johns Hopkins grantees to run it.
00:25:12.000And it's called GUIER, G-U-I-E-R, and it's a 2000 study published, I think, at Pediatrics.
00:25:20.000And it actually is really interesting because it looked at essentially 100 years of mortality and morbidity data for the CDC to see if If they could validate the idea that vaccines had saved millions of lives, which was, of course, the trope.
00:25:38.000And what they found is that the vaccines had almost nothing to do with or any medical interventions, whether vaccines or antibiotics, and not had a clear, in terms of limiting mortalities for infectious disease.
00:25:53.000And then there's another 1978 study called McKinley and McKinley that, you know, found the same thing and actually quantifies that it's less than 1% of the reduction of the 70% reduction in mortality since 1900 is attributable to vaccines.
00:26:12.000And the thing that you should know is that, first of all, there's a lot of crazy vaccines.
00:26:17.000I mean, why are we giving retrovirus vaccines, hepatitis B vaccines to infants?
00:26:22.000Of course, you can get hepatitis B from your mom.
00:26:26.000But every mother in every hospital is tested for hepatitis B in the maternal ward before she has a child.
00:26:33.000The hepatitis B vaccine was made for prostitutes and for promiscuous gay men, and Merck You know, CDC encouraged Merck to make it, and then they couldn't sell any.
00:26:46.000Those cohorts just were like, are you kidding?
00:28:37.000A vaccine that I pushed in my practice for years was a pneumococcal vaccine.
00:28:43.000And a paper by Amber Hassow and colleagues, published in JAMA, in JAMA 2022, published from 4 million people who took this pneumococcal vaccine, that the vaccine efficacy against hospitalized pneumococcal pneumonia was 9.4%.
00:29:04.000The confidence interval was 2.1 to 16.1, and the p-value was 0.01.
00:29:11.000Well, I can tell you what my interpretation is on this, and the doctor's interpretation in the end is the final court here.
00:29:19.000I interpret that as being clinically insignificant, meaning it's not worth it for a 9% vaccine efficacy.
00:29:28.000I'd want to see at least 50% protection before I'm going to expose anybody to the stochastic risk of a side effect.
00:29:35.00050% would be, you know, like flipping a coin.
00:29:38.000You want at least more than flipping a coin, right?
00:29:41.000You just used a word that I don't know.
00:31:08.000That the manufacturers have lost any control over stopping this, that it's not worth the stochastic risk or this random risk of having a side effect, a neurodegenerative side effect.
00:31:21.000You know, there's a whole variety of side effects, as you're well aware, of influenza vaccine.
00:31:26.000So a critical reappraisal of efficacy is changing my practice and should change the practice of evidence-based doctors.
00:31:34.000We should, for no therapy, take it on a faith that the products are safe and effective.
00:31:41.000What the American Board of Internal Medicine has done with me, if you read into their letter, they are assuming the COVID-19 vaccines are good.
00:31:49.000They're assuming they're safe and effective.
00:31:51.000And because I've made statements that just caused somebody to think about this, now they are prepared to professionally injure me permanently.
00:31:59.000So, and apparently you have not learned your lesson from this because the last couple of things you've said to me are just going to dig your hole deeper with this medical board.
00:32:12.000And now you're criticizing other vaccines too.
00:32:14.000They're going to really, you're a dangerous man to them.
00:32:18.000You're a dangerous guy because, you know, you're at the top of your field and you're not going along with the religion.
00:32:25.000You're not going along with the orthodoxy.
00:32:28.000The current times, I think, have called all rational doctors to...
00:32:33.000To really carefully evaluate what's going on.
00:32:36.000We are still under a COVID-19 national emergency extended by Biden now multiple times.
00:32:43.000We are currently under a monkeypox national emergency.
00:32:47.000Now I haven't heard a single doctor or nurse Comment that they felt like there's any emergency situation for either one of those for a long time.
00:32:56.000I honestly think the COVID emergency that I see in terms of hospital capacity, that was over with in January of 2021.
00:33:03.000It was largely because we got enough early treatment networks together to take that strain off the healthcare system.
00:33:10.000So there has been no emergency, and I think only doctors can declare emergencies, and we can't have We saw the World Health Organization actually try to get worldwide approval to have global control over declaring emergencies.
00:33:28.000So you could see what's going on here.
00:33:30.000If governments And world bodies can declare emergencies.
00:33:35.000Now they can begin to affect various public health policies and other strategies.
00:33:42.000And very importantly, open the doors of treasuries to drain them dry.
00:33:47.000And that money flows into this biopharmaceutical complex of which the suppliers, the vaccine manufacturers, others, they are the financial benefactors of this.
00:34:34.000The only thing people heard about was the Genios double-stranded monkeypox vaccine, which actually turns out to cause heart damage or myocarditis.
00:34:43.000We're right back to the We're good to go.
00:34:59.000Is there a quick fix for fixing these medical boards so that they cannot destroy the Hippocratic oath and the relationship between doctors and delicensed doctors for telling the truth to their patients when it's critical of a pharmaceutical product?
00:35:17.000What I would do is I would probably assign the Department of Justice or something that where we have under executive branch control and launch an investigation into the Federation of State Medical Boards, the underlying state medical boards and the major boards.
00:35:33.000And this would largely be analogous to what a state attorney general would do.
00:35:38.000And we'd look for people's human rights to be violated.
00:35:44.000I don't care if you're in the automobile club or anything else where we're going to violate human rights.
00:35:49.000Supreme Court has already upheld in 2018 that doctors have the right to free speech.
00:35:55.000And I can tell you, anybody listening to this, if a prominent doctor is called to testify under oath, And that brings a doctor into a situation of professional reprisal, ending his career.
00:36:08.000We ought to look at what type of country we're in right now.