Dr. Charles Hoff from Lytton, British Columbia, Canada is a First Nations doctor, scientist, researcher, and activist. He is one of the few people in the world who is willing to stand up to medical totalitarianism and fight for the rights of First Nations people. In this episode, Dr. Hoff shares his story of how he stood up to the medical establishment and fought for his patients, and how he became a hero to the people of his community. He is also the author of the book, "Vaccine Revolution: The Story of a Doctor Who Defied the Medical Cartel" and is a regular contributor to the New York Times and the Guardian, and has been featured in The Guardian, The Globe and Mail, and many other publications. He has been a member of the Canadian Medical Association, and was awarded the Order of Canada in 2018 for his courage in standing up for First Nations patients and fighting for their rights to access and access to vaccines and treatment of HIV/AIDS. This episode is part of a series we're doing on heroic physicians and doctors from all over the world, who have just said that they are willing to fight for their patients and speak out against the medical industry's totalitarianism, and stand up for what they believe is good medicine. against the tyranny that we should all be allowed to have access to. We hope you'll join us in our efforts to make a difference in the fight for human rights and human dignity. Thank you for listening and supporting our work. - we can't wait to do more of these amazing people like Dr. H Hoff's courage and courage! in the coming episodes. Thank you so much for being brave enough to share their stories and courageously fighting for our patients, courage, and courage, courageously speaking up for their truth and standing up against the truth and fighting to speak out for what matters. Peace, love, and respect, and hope that we can all have a voice for their voices heard everywhere, everywhere, no matter where they are heard. and everywhere they can be heard thank you, thank you for being heard and seen and understood, and we love you. Your support is so much more than we can do it. xoxo, your support will be so we can have a better day to help spread the word out there. Music: The Good Fight, by The Good Life Project by Joseph McDade - The GoodLife Project
00:01:47.000So how this all started, because I have never been...
00:01:52.000An activist or one that ever wanted to be in the limelight in any way.
00:01:56.000I've just been a country doctor quietly trying to get on with my job and look after my patients.
00:02:02.000So what happened was the Moderna vaccine was the one selected for our population group.
00:02:09.000Initially, it was given to a group of 900 First Nations people in our community, and that was in mid-January of this year, 2021.
00:02:18.000So then shortly after that, I actually went off to South Africa to go and visit my 89-year-old mother, who was in despair and terror over all the COVID. She kept watching the news and was absolutely terrified and was literally Losing her mind to some degree because she was, I think, just very afraid and very isolated.
00:02:39.000And fortunately, she was in her own home but couldn't have visitors and was in despair.
00:02:46.000So I went to South Africa and spent a month with her.
00:02:49.000And then I came back to Canada and I had to do some period of isolation and the usual things.
00:02:55.000And so I came back to work after a six-week gap.
00:02:58.000I'd been following the international scene with, you know, trying to keep up on research and trying to just find out as much as possible about COVID-19 and available options and these vaccines and all of that.
00:03:13.000Very shortly after my return to work, I became quite alarmed at the number of serious side effects that were being reported from Europe and from the U.S., And one of the basic principles of medical ethics is that if you're doing an experiment, which is what this is, I mean, this really is an experiment.
00:03:35.000This kind of DNA and RNA therapy has never been done on humans before.
00:04:03.000Hadn't gone through the usual scrutiny.
00:04:06.000And so when I started seeing all these reports of this, it raised concerns with me because there's a principle of medical ethics that if you're doing a clinical trial on some new treatment and In the course of that, you start seeing serious harm.
00:04:22.000Ethically, you're supposed to stop the clinical trial.
00:04:25.000You're supposed to stop it and investigate it and pause it and see what's going on.
00:04:30.000You're not just supposed to barrel on regardless.
00:04:33.000I then sent an email to a group of other healthcare providers in our area, and they were doctors, nurses and pharmacists.
00:04:42.000Basically posing the question, this is causing harm.
00:04:46.000Should we be pausing this just to take stock?
00:04:49.000Within literally two or three days, I had a telephone meeting with the local health authorities to tell me that I was causing vaccine hesitancy and that they were going to be reporting this to my licensing body, which is the College of Physicians and Surgeons, and that I was forbidden from saying anything negative about these vaccines in our health facility.
00:08:25.000Because these were previously well people who had none of these symptoms before.
00:08:29.000Was there an age group that you saw that was disproportionately injured?
00:08:35.000No, there was, well, I think, yeah, it was mostly in the older population, mainly because they were the ones who were told they needed the vaccine the most.
00:08:44.000But the youngest of these people is 38.
00:08:47.000So this is the lady who can't drive anymore because she's dizzy all the time.
00:09:00.000She just decided she wanted to get the shot.
00:09:04.000So what was the reaction of the government and the medical community?
00:09:09.000Yeah, well, so firstly, I sent a letter to...
00:09:12.000So the other thing, when I got my gag order, I was told that if I had any questions about this, I wasn't allowed to address them to my colleagues.
00:09:19.000They should be sent to the medical health officer responsible for our area.
00:09:25.000So I sent her a letter as these people started appearing.
00:10:41.000And at that point, there were only six that were vaccine injured with ongoing problems.
00:10:45.000And this was now about three months after their shot.
00:10:49.000And she insisted they were all coincidences.
00:10:51.000Either coincidences or being caused by poor vaccination technique.
00:10:56.000In other words, the shot was a bit too high up in the arm because there was one of the patients who had a weak hand and loss of feeling and swelling of the hand, sort of lymphatic edema.
00:11:05.000And she said, no, no, obviously they gave the shot in the wrong spot.
00:11:36.000One would think then that the local authorities would then come to speak to me about it, but nobody did.
00:11:43.000All they did was deny to the media that there was any harm and say that basically all that I was claiming was just the opinions of one man and had no basis in truth.
00:11:54.000I was just even more amazed that they basically said it was hard to investigate.
00:12:01.000But meanwhile, they never went to the source of the information.
00:12:04.000Nobody ever phoned me or my office to say, please, can you just tell us what's happening?
00:12:30.000In our country, we have a vaccine adverse event reporting system.
00:12:34.000So those at least would be reported, maybe.
00:12:38.000And then the question is, and this is something that never happens in our country, which is after you make that report, you would think that the company, some representative Yes.
00:13:03.000Well, so we also do have a vaccine injury reporting form, which is a nine-page document.
00:13:09.000Now, I'm what's called a fee-for-service doctor.
00:13:15.000And mostly my billings go to the government because we have a sort of a national health care system.
00:13:20.000But these nine page forms do not get, they take 20 to 30 minutes to fill out and there is no remuneration at all.
00:13:28.000In other words, it's working for free.
00:13:30.000I've now filled out, I don't know, I think 12 or 13.
00:13:34.000So you get paid absolutely nothing for that.
00:13:37.000And, you know, on top of all your other work, you just don't have time for it.
00:13:41.000And I really think that is an incentive for doctors to not bother because they've got so much other work and they'd rather do the work that actually puts bread on the table.
00:13:50.000And in my case, I had filled out these forms for the ones that I knew about at that time.
00:13:56.000And because we're in the small, predominantly First Nations community, there was no public health office.
00:14:02.000Normally, there's a public health office that you Send the forms to.
00:14:07.000So I sent the forms to the nurses who were doing the vaccine rollout in the hope that they had been told where they had to send these things.
00:14:16.000Anyway, they all just mysteriously disappeared.
00:14:21.000Because the authorities kept saying there was absolutely no evidence of any harm from these vaccines in Lytton, and that what I was saying was not true.
00:14:29.000So in other words, if there's a medical experiment, you're supposed to be monitoring your subjects.
00:14:35.000You're supposed to be literally week by week, they should be phoning these people to see if there are any problems.
00:14:41.000And in every one of these cases, I'd ask the people...
00:15:36.000And I think, I mean, the Nuremberg Code, yeah, the Nuremberg Code is something that was established after World War II at the Nuremberg Trials, where there were government officials or military people who did terrible things to innocent people in the form of medical experiments.
00:16:04.000Doctors were so deeply involved in atrocities in Germany that they had a separate trial just for the doctors.
00:16:14.000There was a trial for the government officials like Goering and Himmler and all of these officials who had orchestrated the Third Reich.
00:16:26.000But they also had a separate trial for the doctors who had been directly involved in these barbaric experiments, horrible, horrible experiments on human beings.
00:16:38.000And the Nuremberg Code came out of that.
00:16:41.000Yes, and the Nuremberg Code effectively says that if you do an experiment on someone, you have to have their informed consent.
00:16:50.000You're not allowed to experiment on people without telling them that they're being experimented on, and you're not allowed to experiment on people without informing them on the risks and benefits of whatever it is that you're trying out on them.
00:17:05.000And then the third thing is you're not allowed to coerce them into doing this by some kind of Even mild coercion is very specific.
00:17:20.000You can't threaten anybody with any denial of any right they have in order to compel them to participate in the experiment.
00:17:33.000And so my concern was that, firstly, the public has been coerced through fear to participate in an experiment that they don't, they're told is not an experiment.
00:17:45.000They're told that all the usual, I don't know how it is in the US, but in Canada, the government information is Assures people that all of the normal safety protocols have been followed and that this is an approved vaccine, and it is not approved.
00:18:01.000Neither the FDA nor Health Canada have approved these.
00:18:04.000They've been given emergency authorization in view of the pandemic, and they are not approved or licensed.
00:18:11.000This is an experimental treatment, which is all the more reason why they should be monitoring these people very closely and be very alert to any harms.
00:18:22.000So firstly, there's no informed consent.
00:18:24.000These people are being coerced by fear, and they're not monitoring the situation.
00:18:30.000And those are my personal experiences of this.
00:18:34.000What's been the impact on you and your life?
00:18:39.000Well, so I was told that I was not allowed to speak about this in our department.
00:18:50.000Our local health authorities, when they gave me my gag, that was my gag order, that I was not allowed to say anything negative about this.
00:18:58.000And I suppose even calling it an experiment could be construed as being negative about it.
00:19:03.000But, I mean, let's be honest, it is...
00:19:07.000About two weeks ago, I was informed that my clinical privileges, in other words, the authority that I have to work as an emergency room physician, have been revoked or been suspended, I should say.
00:19:20.000I am accused of having breached my gag order.
00:19:25.000And I'm still, so I'm now working with lawyers.
00:19:30.000I'm still allowed to work in my private doctor's office because I haven't had my medical license withdrawn, but I'm not allowed to work in the emergency room.
00:19:39.000And so I'm now going through a legal process of trying to figure out what actually they interpreted I mean, they're being very vague and very hedgy, and so this is an ongoing thing.
00:19:52.000But I've basically lost half of my income.
00:19:55.000This is also, of course, damaging to one's reputation because, you know, word goes through the community.
00:20:11.000Yeah, so that's an ongoing thing, and I can't give any details around it, but that's been the effect on me, is that I've lost half my income.
00:20:20.000Let me just ask you one kind of last question, which is, during the 1976 swine flu epidemic in the United States, there was 140 million vaccines given out, administered, and there were 33 reported deaths.
00:20:38.000And there was about 1,500 injuries, mainly Guillain-Barre, a neurological injury.
00:20:46.000And because of those injuries, that vaccine was pulled.
00:20:50.000These vaccines in the United States have been given to 220 million people.
00:21:16.000Why did that, why did we, why did FDA and the health agencies pull a vaccine because they were so alarmed because it caused 33 deaths.
00:21:26.000And here we have a vaccine that's caused 4,000 deaths, you know, that are reported under VAERS and VAERS. By the way, HHS's own study shows that VAERS captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.
00:21:40.000So the likelihood that there are many, many more deaths, you know, order of magnitudes more deaths, and order of magnitudes more injury is highly, highly likely, according to their own data, What do you think has changed?
00:21:56.000I've sometimes quipped to friends that there are three senses that are lost with COVID-19.
00:22:03.000The first is the sense of smell, and the second is the sense of taste, and the third is common sense, because this absolutely makes no sense at all.
00:22:14.000I think to put it in perspective, I mean, initially when this pandemic broke, we didn't know how dangerous COVID was.
00:22:21.000But we now know that for people under the age of 70, the risk of dying from COVID is less than the flu.
00:22:28.000And for people over the age of 70, it's a bit more than the flu.
00:22:32.000So in other words, it targets the elderly and those with serious medical conditions.
00:22:37.000So if this was a new experimental flu shot, which is effectively...
00:22:44.000If this was a new experimental flu shot, if there were 30 deaths, they would have stopped it.
00:22:51.000But as you say, there are 4,000 now in the US, and probably close to 10,000 in Europe, and who knows how many elsewhere, and they just barrel on regardless.
00:23:03.000From an ethical point of view, this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
00:23:09.000If this was Ebola virus or some absolutely lethal disease, then of course it's worth the risk of the vaccine because it's saving a lot of lives.
00:23:29.000You know, there was a Lancet article that came out last week.
00:23:33.000It looked at mortality rates from COVID per age group and that study found from all the data at the risk of people from four years old to 16 years old is the risk of death is about 1.6 deaths per million doses given.
00:23:55.000And it's hard to believe that the vaccine itself is not going to cause more deaths than that because the vaccine, according to all the data, wreaks the worst havoc on younger people, people with more robust immune systems.
00:24:11.000And, you know, we've seen such a wave of deaths among the elderly who were the first to receive it.
00:24:17.000You know, it's really irrational that we may be and we are highly likely giving a vaccine to these children that is going to cause more deaths than the disease that it is purported to prevent.
00:24:39.000I hear people on the radio talking about the incredible relief that they felt when they finally managed to get their COVID shot.
00:24:47.000You know, that they finally felt safe.
00:24:50.000I mean, the media have driven an agenda of fear, which is driving people to not think clearly and to not really examine the risks.
00:24:59.000And the fact that they would want to give this thing, which clearly causes harm, to children For whom COVID poses almost no risk.
00:25:09.000I mean, as you've said, they have a higher chance of getting struck by lightning than they do of dying from COVID. Oh, but the lifetime risk is, that's true.
00:25:19.000And the other thing is, firstly, we don't know what the long-term consequences of this are for people.
00:25:27.000And we do not know how long their protection will last.
00:25:30.000We know it does not give them immunity, which is why vaccinated people still have to wear masks and still have to keep away from one another.
00:25:40.000And the reason why they're not immune from a medical point of view is that their antibodies are in their blood, not in their respiratory system.
00:25:49.000The respiratory system is how you get COVID and how you spread it.
00:25:53.000And in order for somebody to be immune, the antibodies would need to be there at the portal of entry and at the portal of transmission.
00:26:00.000The antibodies measured by the researchers were in the people's blood, and that's why it only protects serious illness once the disease goes into the rest of your system.
00:26:10.000So the idea that this is an immunity is nonsense.
00:26:14.000They are not immune, which is why the whole idea of vaccine passports is absurd because vaccinated people aren't safe to others because they can still spread it.
00:26:25.000And the idea that children need to have the vaccine in order to protect their parents or their grandparents or their teacher or somebody else is nonsense because the vaccine doesn't stop you spreading it.
00:26:36.000And apart from that, children are not the main spreaders.
00:26:39.000Well, not only that, but there's now data that have come out in the last two weeks that have shown that children don't spread it at all.
00:26:48.000Apparently, this is a scientist who I actually have a podcast with, who's a top scientist at Yale, has talked about this week.
00:26:57.000Is that when children get COVID, they tend to internalize it.
00:27:01.000And it shows in mild headaches, it manifests in mild headaches, but not in respiratory illnesses.
00:27:09.000There is, in fact, according to him, no evidence of any single case of transmission from a child to an adult.
00:27:17.000There are many cases of adults spreading it to their children.
00:27:21.000None of a child spreading it to an adult.
00:27:25.000The justification, first of all, I believe that ethically you cannot force somebody to take a medical intervention to protect somebody else.
00:27:35.000So that rationale should be DOA from step one.
00:27:41.000Even if you could prove that a child taking this vaccine is going to protect his grandparents, you still can't do that to people.
00:27:48.000That is an ethical precept that we agreed to long, long, long ago that you cannot treat One patient and put them at risk to save another.
00:28:00.000You can't do that in a Western democracy and, you know, in an ethical culture.
00:28:06.000But in this case, there's absolutely no justification because giving that child the vaccine is not going to protect their grandparents or their parents.
00:28:18.000And not only that, even though they have a small degree of immunity, we have no idea how long that immunity will last.
00:28:27.000Whereas the immunity that they have from a natural COVID infection Which is no risk to them, but there's some fascinating research that Dr.
00:28:37.000Mike Yurden of Pfizer had made evident was that they had scientists last year tracked down people who had the first SARS virus infections.
00:28:53.000So the first SARS virus also came out of Wuhan in China in 2002 and 2003.
00:29:00.000It was much more dangerous than this, but much less infectious.
00:29:03.000And so through contact tracing and isolating people, they were able to stop it.
00:29:08.000So these scientists last year tracked down people who had that infection and who are still around and asked them if they could get blood from them.
00:29:16.000So they analyzed these people's blood to see if they were still immune to SARS. And they found that they were.
00:29:23.000These people still had strong immunity 18 years later to that first SARS virus.
00:29:30.000So then what they did was they checked to see whether that immunity covered COVID-19 as well.
00:29:37.000People that had had the first SARS virus were immune to COVID. And the important thing with that is that those two viruses are 20% different.
00:30:07.000Yerden, the most different that any of them is to the parent COVID virus is 0.3% difference.
00:30:15.000In other words, they're almost identical.
00:30:17.000There's a very, very minor difference.
00:30:20.000Cellular immunity or T-cell immunity can recognize a virus that was 20% different.
00:30:27.000It is not going to have any difficulty recognizing any variant that is less than 1% different.
00:30:33.000So the take-home message is this, that anyone who has had a natural COVID infection has good, robust, long-lasting immunity that will cover every variant.
00:30:44.000And they absolutely do not need the vaccine because they are immune.
00:30:49.000Let me ask you something about yourself, because you have a British accent, you're clearly from the UK, but you ended up in Canada somehow.
00:31:51.000I have had lots of Support in terms of people who have an ethical conscience and can see through the craziness of this have been very supportive to me.
00:32:03.000It is only the authorities that have not.
00:32:06.000So yeah, thank you for your kind thoughts and suggestions.
00:32:10.000If I can think of anything, I'll let you know.
00:32:13.000But as I say, I've taken a few hits, but I'm still in the battle.