RFK Jr. The Defender - July 21, 2022


Media on Russia and Ukraine with Vladimir Golstein


Episode Stats

Length

26 minutes

Words per Minute

158.15773

Word Count

4,178

Sentence Count

303

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

22


Summary

Vladimir Goldstein, a professor at Brown University, joins me to discuss his views on the Ukraine crisis and the censorship of alternative voices in the pro-Western media. Professor Goldstein has been an outspoken critic of the propaganda barrage and censorship aimed at delegitimizing the opposition to the Putin regime in Ukraine, and he shares his misgivings with me about the role of the media and its role in creating a "Black or White" narrative about the situation in Ukraine. He also shares his thoughts on the current state of relations between the United States and Russia, and why he thinks Putin should be seen as an enemy of the West, not a friend, not as a partner, and a threat to the West as a bulwark against the West's interests in the face of Russia's influence in Ukraine and its annexation of the Crimea region of Ukraine. This episode was produced and edited by Alex Blumberg. Additional audio mixing and mastering was done by Matthew Boll. The show was mixed and produced by Patrick Muldowney. It was mixed, edited, and mixed by Evan Handyside. Our theme music was made by Micah Vellian and our ad music was provided by Mark Phillips and our mixing engineer, Matthew Boll, and our mastering and mastering assistance by Matthew Keyser, and additional editing was made in part by Ben Koppel, with additional engineering assistance from Matthew Boll and Matthew Kuchta, and Andrew Kucht, and some additional mixing and editing by Patrick McElroy, and music production by Matthew Coughlan, and Alex Blomberg. Music: "The Good, the Bad Vibes" by Ian McKirdy and Matthew McElveen Art: "Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Goldstein" -- "The Bad, the Good, The Bad, The Evil, The Beautiful, the Beautiful, The Great, the Great, The Good, and the Beautiful" -- by Kevin McElvington -- is a production of the Electric Light Orchestra -- "Good, the Evil, the Wrong, The Wrong, the White, The Dark, The Purple, The White, the Purple, the Blue, The Green, The Black, the Green, the Red, the Black, The Blue, the Brown, The Red, The Brown, the Dark, the Pink, The Pink, the Gray, the Deep, the Gold, The Gold, the Blues, The Deep, and The Purple and the Purple


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, my guest today is Vladimir Goldstein, who is a professor at Brown University.
00:00:07.000 Professor Goldstein grew up in Moscow.
00:00:10.000 He got a master's degree from the Moscow Institute of Management.
00:00:14.000 He got a BA In philosophy from Columbia University and a PhD in the Slavic language and literature from Yale University, Professor Goldstein has taught at Oberlin College at Yale University and at Brown, where he teaches a wide range of graduate and undergraduate courses that explore Western and Russian literary traditions he has written.
00:00:41.000 Numerous books and articles on 19th and early 20th century Russian authors, including Pushkin, Gogol, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Chekhov, and others.
00:00:54.000 And he regularly appears or publishes on popular news sites, including Al Jazeera, Nation, Forbes, etc.
00:01:03.000 I wanted to have Professor Goldstein on this show because he's been an outspoken I would say, I guess, critic of the propaganda barrage and the censorship of information about the Ukraine Russian conflict.
00:01:25.000 And I've shared your misgivings just about that aspect of it without taking any position because I'm not really an expert on Ukraine or on Putin.
00:01:37.000 But I feel a deja vu that I, from 2001 to 2003, during the roll-up to the Iraq War, when it became impermissible To express any kind of ambiguity about whether or not we should be going to war with Saddam Hussein,
00:01:59.000 who had nothing to do with the anthrax attacks in 2001, who had nothing to do with 9-11, and who was not a sponsor of one of the rare countries in the Middle East that were not actively sponsoring external terrorism.
00:02:17.000 And yet, it seemed that a lot of our oil, somehow, God put it underneath his country and the neighboring country of Kuwait in a great act of mischief, and that a lot of the propaganda was directed towards creating, justifying a war that certain sectors of our society wanted.
00:02:40.000 And there was really no debate on that.
00:02:44.000 Is that how you feel about what's happening here?
00:02:47.000 Yeah, absolutely.
00:02:48.000 I felt it even before in the late 90s when there was again something similar vis-a-vis dismantling Yugoslavia and, you know, the bombing campaign of Serbia.
00:03:02.000 These are all complicated issues, complicated countries, you know, Yugoslavia, all these republics, all this complicated history, all sort of, you know, kind of mixed loyalties.
00:03:12.000 However, out of the blue, it was decided that Serbs are bad and we have to sort of organize NATO campaign.
00:03:19.000 And it was before 58 days, Belgrade was bombed and Serbia was bombed.
00:03:25.000 And, you know, again, alternative voices.
00:03:27.000 You know, I remember I was at Yale then, and once in a while, somebody will try to say something.
00:03:33.000 Somebody will try to organize something.
00:03:35.000 But mostly, I remember I was not very happy with what was going on.
00:03:38.000 I sent articles or papers, letters here and there.
00:03:41.000 It was silence.
00:03:42.000 Just one thing, you know, bad guys, good guys, we're always on the side of good guys.
00:03:48.000 Americans like the story that there is a bad Goliath, Serbia, good Davids, and we always support Davids.
00:03:54.000 The same thing was like some kind of, you know, freedom fighters in all this kind of, you know, Middle Eastern countries.
00:04:00.000 We have to support them.
00:04:02.000 Who are these freedom fighters?
00:04:04.000 We don't know.
00:04:05.000 We supported these in Afghanistan versus the Soviet Union.
00:04:09.000 Turned out one of those guys who had been Laden, who sort of then turned against us.
00:04:14.000 The same thing with Ukraine.
00:04:16.000 It's a very complicated story.
00:04:17.000 I kind of know some of it.
00:04:19.000 I know history.
00:04:20.000 I know people.
00:04:20.000 I've been there.
00:04:21.000 But it's a complicated story.
00:04:23.000 What I resent the most is the simplification.
00:04:25.000 Bad guys, good guys.
00:04:27.000 We're on the side of good guys.
00:04:28.000 Russia, Putin are bad.
00:04:30.000 Ukrainians are good.
00:04:31.000 We do all know from our own experience, nothing is that black and white.
00:04:36.000 And yet this black and white narrative is imposed upon us.
00:04:39.000 And I find it very disturbing.
00:04:41.000 So that's why I sort of, you know, I wrote an article.
00:04:44.000 I was giving interviews.
00:04:46.000 I was on TV shows just to say that things are much more complicated.
00:04:49.000 And I think we as the United States, working into this very complicated situation, making commitments, which are very frequently anti-US interests.
00:05:00.000 They're just getting us more and more involved.
00:05:02.000 Maybe some people in some people's interests, maybe military-industrial complex interests, they are selling more weapons.
00:05:08.000 But is it in a good interest in the long run?
00:05:11.000 Do we really, as a country, United States need to sort of always have Russia as an adversary?
00:05:17.000 I'm not sure.
00:05:18.000 What do you think Putin's intentions were in the Ukraine?
00:05:24.000 Well, you know, this is returning to this complex situation.
00:05:28.000 Ukraine is, if you want to sort of, you know, your audience have to understand it.
00:05:32.000 It's not a unified country.
00:05:34.000 It's like a quilt.
00:05:35.000 You know, it's like on some level, just imagine the United States.
00:05:39.000 We have here people from all over the world, you know, including a few natives who are left.
00:05:44.000 We have people from, you know, Latin America.
00:05:47.000 And out of the blue, if somebody in the United States would say, no, we're only Anglos.
00:05:52.000 No, we're only, you know, Mexicans.
00:05:54.000 It's going to be disturbing.
00:05:56.000 So there in Ukraine, there are a fair amount of Russian speakers, ethnic Russians, primarily located in the East, people who kind of feel loyalty to sort of old Soviet Union, to Russia, to Russian language.
00:06:09.000 They grew up with language.
00:06:10.000 I remember I was traveling through Crimea, through Odessa.
00:06:13.000 They were complaining that why are they forcing us to speak Ukrainian, where Russians want to speak Russian.
00:06:18.000 So this population in Ukraine have their relatives, friends, they came from Russia.
00:06:25.000 So Putin has tremendous pressure to support and protect these people.
00:06:29.000 As any politician, he has to do something.
00:06:32.000 Had he been just washing his hands out of this sizable minority, big group of people in Ukraine who are just being ostracized, second-rated, mistreated, there will be real agitation against him in Russia.
00:06:48.000 He probably could have lost his position.
00:06:51.000 So he basically, as any politician, feels obliged to respond.
00:06:55.000 So there's his pressure.
00:06:57.000 Somehow, you know, he feels that these people in the East, you know, Russian speakers, ethnic Russians, are mistreated.
00:07:05.000 And since 2014, they've been mistreated in a sort of very, very big way.
00:07:11.000 Bombarded, shelled, misplaced, about one million people.
00:07:15.000 We now talk about...
00:07:16.000 Refugees, which produced about 5 million people.
00:07:19.000 But from 2014 till now, there was about 1 million people in so-called Donbass, this area in eastern Ukraine, which were misplaced.
00:07:27.000 Some of them went to Ukraine, some of them went to Russia.
00:07:30.000 And these people are agitating.
00:07:32.000 These people actually, some of them have their Russian passport.
00:07:35.000 So they are putting the pressure on the government to do something about it.
00:07:39.000 So he was like not dragging his feet, dragging his feet.
00:07:42.000 Eventually he felt that there was a need to do something.
00:07:45.000 So one thing I really want to say...
00:07:48.000 Let me interrupt you for a second.
00:07:50.000 Since 2014, would you say that the coup that happened was a change and transition in government that happened in 2014?
00:07:57.000 A lot of people believe, and there's strong evidence, that that was a CIA-driven coup that occurred in the Ukraine.
00:08:08.000 Let me just get a quick impression of that.
00:08:11.000 Is that your assessment as well?
00:08:13.000 I mean, it was definitely a coup.
00:08:15.000 I really don't know the details.
00:08:17.000 There are various theories.
00:08:18.000 Some people say that those who were, like, shooting, they were provocateurs, they were organized.
00:08:22.000 But the fact is, it was a legal coup, because legally elected president, Yanukovych, was immediately kicked out, and some kind of a government, you know, very rapidly was patched in, and this government, which was patched in, was organized by Victoria Newland, who was, at that moment, very big shot in the State Department, American ambassador in Ukraine, and there's a recording of them talking and saying, once we sort of got rid of Yanukovych, we'll put these people sort of in place.
00:08:51.000 Okay, at that moment...
00:08:53.000 Okay, and so let me then interrupt you again.
00:08:56.000 So you have Victoria Nuland, who is a very solid member of what we call the neocons.
00:09:04.000 And she is, following the coup, a very pro-Western government It is erected in the Ukraine, and that triggers what I would say is a kind of a civil war in Donbass,
00:09:23.000 where the ethnic Russians immediately feel that one of the first acts of the new government is to attack the Russian language and go from a double-language country to a single-language country.
00:09:37.000 And take a number of other very public steps that were anti-Russian.
00:09:41.000 The Russians in Dumbass have peaceful protests.
00:09:46.000 And it's the beginning of what essentially is a civil war in which 14,000 ethnic Russians are killed.
00:09:56.000 And correct me if I'm wrong.
00:09:59.000 And Putin says the reason that he went into Ukraine Was to stop a genocide against the ethnic Russians.
00:10:08.000 Is that correct?
00:10:09.000 I wouldn't call it genocide, but it's like for, I agree with you, there was like, that's estimation, 40,000 people killed, shelled, displaced, about 1 million displaced.
00:10:20.000 So this was just a real mistreatment, and, you know, not genocide, but definitely some kind of, you know, racist attitude toward Russians.
00:10:27.000 Language is banned, and so on.
00:10:30.000 And what I should be stressed, and this is like I'm referring to Western studies, I've got a presentation by some professor from Colombia, that up until 2014, people in Donbass actually wanted to be part of Ukraine.
00:10:43.000 After this coup, when Yanukovych, who comes from Donbass, from this area, is overthrown, we have different pro-Western government, but this government not only pro-Western in terms of the West, United States, and France, it's pro-Western like it supports Western Ukraine against Eastern Ukraine, against Donbass.
00:11:00.000 It starts sort of banning the language, starts mistreating them.
00:11:04.000 They think that Donbass is still very much in Russian hands, and they turn against them.
00:11:09.000 And immediately, if you follow the public polling in Donbass, their mood goes kind of east, if you wish.
00:11:16.000 They used to want to be part of Ukraine.
00:11:18.000 Now they are declared second raiders.
00:11:21.000 They declare separatists.
00:11:22.000 They declare Russian terrorists.
00:11:24.000 They are being violated.
00:11:27.000 Then people in Odessa are being violated and killed and destroyed and burned.
00:11:30.000 Again, first, by the way, if you listen to Ukrainians, when they burn people, they say, they're all Russian separatists.
00:11:36.000 Turn out.
00:11:37.000 Each of them lived in Odessa.
00:11:39.000 They just wanted to protest peacefully.
00:11:41.000 They were burned down.
00:11:42.000 So the mood of the Donbas goes absolutely opposite direction.
00:11:46.000 And they say, we don't want to be part of you.
00:11:49.000 We don't want to be part of this kind of new conglomeration where we declared second rate.
00:11:54.000 And they began protest first peacefully, then violently.
00:11:58.000 At that moment, Putin feels that he needs to kind of support them.
00:12:01.000 He supports them with arms.
00:12:02.000 He supports it this way.
00:12:03.000 The war continued.
00:12:04.000 So eventually he said, I have to be much more proactive than I used to be.
00:12:08.000 So that's kind of his reasoning.
00:12:10.000 What are you seeing now?
00:12:12.000 Do you have any feeling about where this is going?
00:12:15.000 The consensus in the present in this country is that Putin is losing this war.
00:12:21.000 No, that's absolutely sort of based what, again, what troubles me a great deal.
00:12:27.000 You know, every time I turn on NPR, listen to BBC, they basically ask questions from people in Kiev, from people in Lviv, which are very frequently removed from the actual battlefield, and they just play their interpretation.
00:12:42.000 They're spinning.
00:12:43.000 So, you know, Ukrainians are spinning, then BBC has additional spinning, and they keep on saying that, you know, yeah, Rush, what we know for sure, It's a long campaign.
00:12:53.000 Russians probably expected to move quickly and Ukraine will collapse.
00:12:58.000 It did.
00:12:58.000 So it's a long-lasting war.
00:13:01.000 Russians are definitely losing a fair amount of people for the simple reason they don't want to actually have a scorched earth policy.
00:13:09.000 They're trying.
00:13:10.000 They still think that Eastern Ukraine should be kind of theirs voluntarily.
00:13:14.000 So they don't want to...
00:13:16.000 They turn people against them.
00:13:18.000 They don't want to indiscriminately bomb.
00:13:20.000 So they subject their soldiers to, like, door-to-door fighting.
00:13:24.000 As a result, a lot of Russian soldiers are dying, are being killed, besides Ukrainians being killed, too.
00:13:30.000 But what we see is that Russia is advancing.
00:13:33.000 And once they advance, the local population, those who survived all this, they still remember how poorly they were treated by Ukrainian government.
00:13:43.000 By Ukrainian propaganda.
00:13:45.000 By Ukrainian soldiers.
00:13:46.000 Some of them belong to these very nasty organizations.
00:13:50.000 Alternationalists, Azov, who are mistreating them, shooting them, raping them, doing all of this.
00:13:55.000 So I think Donbass is not going back.
00:13:57.000 Either they will be independent or Russia will just integrate them into Russia.
00:14:02.000 So that's one thing.
00:14:03.000 And Russia definitely is not going to give back Mariupol because this area of the south, eastern Ukraine, will connect Russia to Crimea.
00:14:12.000 Because for a while there was Crimea, it was Russian, then Russia on the other side.
00:14:17.000 Between them was the territory of Ukraine.
00:14:19.000 Now Russians have grabbed it.
00:14:21.000 People, local population there, mostly are pro-Russian.
00:14:24.000 And I think Russians are not going to back.
00:14:26.000 I'm not sure they have enough energy, strength, desire to go where they are not liked, like in Kiev.
00:14:34.000 So I don't think they're going to go to Kyiv.
00:14:36.000 I don't think they have enough strength to capture Kharkov, which is in the middle.
00:14:41.000 Half of the population are pro-Russian, half are pro-Ukrainian.
00:14:44.000 But they definitely will try to move as far as possible to the Black Sea, including Odessa and Nikolai.
00:14:50.000 I think that's where they will stop.
00:14:52.000 Maybe they would use this Black Sea access as a bargaining chip to put an end to that, but they're not backing off from Donbass, Lugansk, this area, and they're not backing off from this corridor between Russia and Crimea.
00:15:06.000 I think it's for all intents and purposes it's going to stay Russian.
00:15:09.000 When people try to tell this part of the story on the American news media, it's called fakeness, and it is fact-checked, and it is debunked.
00:15:20.000 What is your reaction to that?
00:15:23.000 Basically, we see people, you know, there is an endless amount of interviews.
00:15:27.000 I have friends all over the country, and they report to me.
00:15:30.000 Some actually were so much traumatized by war, by bombardment, they say, we just don't care Under whom we live, under Ukraine, under Russia.
00:15:39.000 We just want bombing to stop.
00:15:40.000 But many people are more or less happy.
00:15:43.000 Finally, these eight years of shelling and bombing, which people in Donbass experience, will be over.
00:15:49.000 So I think that's the reality.
00:15:51.000 And if you look at the map slowly, including even those who kind of begrudgingly don't want to agree with it, They look at the map, and the Russians are making advancements.
00:15:59.000 Mariupol was a central city on Azov Sea, which gave access to Ukraine, to all these trade routes, and so on.
00:16:08.000 Now it's Russia.
00:16:08.000 Now nobody denies it.
00:16:10.000 So I think people shouldn't dismiss unpleasant facts as fake news.
00:16:16.000 It's not in anybody's interest.
00:16:17.000 This is a gruesome, brutal war.
00:16:20.000 It should have been avoided had Ukrainian leaders, American leaders, Russian leaders sat down, said, No NATO in Ukraine, and Donbass can be autonomous.
00:16:31.000 We would have saved so much money, so much lives, just only because Americans couldn't enter any compromise and wanted to present Putin as some kind of Hitler of today.
00:16:43.000 Because of that, how much lives, property, and things are destroyed and will be destroyed?
00:16:48.000 We're witnessing now total explosion of inflation.
00:16:52.000 Economists predict very, very serious downturn in general economy without Russian oil, Russian gas.
00:16:59.000 You know, this is a total mess only because diplomacy somehow was sent sort of down the drain.
00:17:06.000 What do you think, in terms of the stability of the region and the relationships with China, What is this war doing to those important considerations?
00:17:20.000 China is very important here, because I think ultimately, if you ask, like you refer to neocons here on Washington, they They have pretty good intelligence.
00:17:30.000 They know that Russia, strong as it is, rich as it is, it's probably not a match to the United States, at least not economically.
00:17:38.000 Maybe they're a match in terms of amount of nuclear warheads, but that's about it.
00:17:44.000 While China is totally different to the ballgame.
00:17:46.000 China is a powerhouse, and basically Neocon's target is somehow The ability to reign in China.
00:17:54.000 So Russia is just a stepping stone.
00:17:56.000 And China, of course, knows it.
00:17:58.000 They're watching it, and it's their interest that Russia will be there, because psychologically and even militarily, Russia will be some kind of a buffer between China and the United States.
00:18:08.000 So China will do all it can to keep Russia afloat, to work as a kind of guarantor of peace and negotiator.
00:18:17.000 I'm sure they would support Russia economically, They will support Ukraine economically because they want to be like the top dog in this area and use all their kind of connections, economic connections and so on, as a sort of bulwark against the United States.
00:18:33.000 Because people talk about Ukraine being a proxy war between Russia and the United States, but I think it's also a proxy war ultimately between the United States and China.
00:18:44.000 So China is very important there because they kind of felt that if Russia falls, collapses with this war, China will be next.
00:18:51.000 What do you think about the reports that Putin is very sick and maybe dying?
00:18:58.000 I would say there was some extra activity on the part of Putin before this military operation, this war started.
00:19:10.000 He was trying to talk to all European leaders.
00:19:13.000 Lavrov was flying all over.
00:19:15.000 Somehow I wonder what provoked this agitation, whether he felt that his health is not good, And, you know, we know, look at sort of Soviet Union history, once Brezhnev and others began to die, then the whole country collapsed.
00:19:31.000 Then, you know, Gorbachev was pushed out.
00:19:33.000 So each new successor starts from the position of weakness.
00:19:38.000 So I suspect Putin, if he sensed that A, he's aging, B, his health is not good, he probably wanted to negotiate the best possible way to provide stability in the region.
00:19:50.000 So I wouldn't discount the fact that he was thinking about his own mortality, if you wish, and wanted to And this festering wound, because for eight years, this was a festering wound.
00:20:02.000 What we witness here in the United States in terms of propaganda, watching Ukraine being, you know, bombarded by Russia, Russians for eight years were watching this news about Donbas, day in, day out.
00:20:15.000 Shelling, shelling.
00:20:16.000 So he had to solve it somehow.
00:20:18.000 So he tried to do that, whether it was connected with his actual health or just ideas that sooner or later he has to retire.
00:20:25.000 A new person might be a little bit weak.
00:20:27.000 So at least he now, Putin, has good control of military, of KGB, of media.
00:20:33.000 So he has to make sure that this is a stable region.
00:20:37.000 So that's, I think, what provokes him into action at that moment.
00:20:42.000 And how is his popularity in Russia?
00:20:47.000 You know, that's another kind of naive idea of the West.
00:20:50.000 If we impose sanctions on Russian people, so if Russians cannot travel, if Russians cannot draw dollars from their accounts and pay for some goods from Amazon, they will turn against Putin.
00:21:07.000 This actually shows unbelievable ignorance about human psychology in general and Russian psychology in particular.
00:21:15.000 When he started it, his popularity was in the area of 65%.
00:21:20.000 Now it's like pushing 80%.
00:21:22.000 Because Russians, every Russian, and I read, I have a lot of friends in Russia who were not sympathetic to the war, to this kind of violence, to bloodshed.
00:21:33.000 But now they say, oh, we now realize that Putin might have a point.
00:21:37.000 West is actually against us.
00:21:39.000 West is against us as Russians, not against Putin, against us.
00:21:43.000 So if West is against us, We better get together around our leader and push back.
00:21:48.000 That's the result.
00:21:49.000 So Russians feel kind of under pressure.
00:21:52.000 Many, many of them now, every poll say that about 80% or he gets support.
00:21:57.000 So of course, you know, there isn't any normal country.
00:22:00.000 People have the right to think differently.
00:22:02.000 There are some people who are very well vested in the West.
00:22:06.000 Academics, artists who travel, and now they cannot travel.
00:22:10.000 So they can be vocal and express their anger.
00:22:13.000 That's fine.
00:22:13.000 But a lot of people whom I talk to, we're behind it.
00:22:17.000 We're behind it.
00:22:18.000 Enough of Radio West bullying us.
00:22:19.000 We should be aware, you know, that, let's say, we talk about United States, country of immigrants.
00:22:26.000 People come here with American dream.
00:22:28.000 You can make it.
00:22:29.000 Russia has a different dream.
00:22:31.000 Russian dream is, you know what Russian dream is?
00:22:34.000 Every now and then, Westerners invade us, and we have to push them back.
00:22:40.000 That's what happened under Poland in the 16th century, Swedes in 17th century, French in 18th century, Germans in 20th century.
00:22:48.000 Every time, we push them back.
00:22:51.000 So they're not going to bully us as much.
00:22:53.000 Now, if America wants to bully us, we're going to push them back.
00:22:56.000 So that's a Russian kind of mentality.
00:22:58.000 And if the West wants to provoke this Russian anger at the West, that's what they're getting.
00:23:04.000 Have you suffered censorship or retribution for speaking out about these issues?
00:23:10.000 Your question about now?
00:23:12.000 Yeah.
00:23:12.000 I don't experience censorship.
00:23:15.000 It was interesting, like, you know, when the whole 2014, for example, war started, I was approached by Al Jazeera to write my kind of different take.
00:23:24.000 But then at a certain moment, I suspect Al Jazeera got a phone call.
00:23:30.000 And no more articles.
00:23:32.000 I'm sending them one article.
00:23:33.000 No, no, we're not interested.
00:23:35.000 No, no, no, we're interested.
00:23:36.000 So, okay, it's not working.
00:23:38.000 I sort of publish once in a while in alternative publications.
00:23:41.000 I give interviews to Chinese CGTNs, you know, their major station.
00:23:46.000 I give interviews to RT. Whoever asks me, I will be able to publish and write.
00:23:51.000 But at that time, I think, like, thanks, but no thanks.
00:23:54.000 How about CNN or Fox?
00:23:56.000 Oh, forget it.
00:23:57.000 I don't know.
00:23:57.000 They probably have their own sort of, you know, vision.
00:24:00.000 And I try to, again, there was like some website called Alternet.
00:24:06.000 They published several of my articles.
00:24:08.000 Then again, as hard as I try to send more, No, thank you.
00:24:12.000 Thank you.
00:24:13.000 So, for some reason, there is some kind of a pressure to present a unified view.
00:24:18.000 And if you don't argue it, if you try to sort of widen the horizon, if you try to humanize somebody whom we try to demonize, this is a no-go.
00:24:30.000 How about at the faculty lounge at Brown University?
00:24:34.000 I mean, what I have to give a credit to Brown, and I'm really sort of happy about it, whatever.
00:24:40.000 Once in a while, I remember I gave an interview to England, I think, as they have Channel 4.
00:24:45.000 It's kind of more or less like CNN. And I, after Zelenskyy addressed Parliament, they asked me and I said, this is propaganda.
00:24:54.000 The same unanimity of English Parliament was in 1914 before they embarked on the most idiotic, self-destructive First World War.
00:25:04.000 So unanimity of the Parliament doesn't tell me anything.
00:25:07.000 It's just destructive.
00:25:09.000 So right away, I would get emails addressed to me and to Brown University administration.
00:25:16.000 Just, how dare you tolerate this obnoxious person?
00:25:19.000 He is channeling Kremlin.
00:25:22.000 He is channeling Putin.
00:25:24.000 And I actually, one person I try to answer, and then I get a note from the dean, don't get engaged.
00:25:30.000 We support freedom of speech.
00:25:32.000 Don't argue.
00:25:33.000 This is your opinion.
00:25:34.000 So that's fine.
00:25:36.000 They're not giving me a voice, but they're not trying to harass the press or anything.
00:25:42.000 But even the faculty, we have several people in our department.
00:25:45.000 Some people think like me.
00:25:46.000 Some people think, no, no, no, Vladimir, you're absolutely wrong.
00:25:50.000 There's one clear victim and one clear aggressor.
00:25:53.000 And your attempt to complicate the story is not correct.
00:25:57.000 But in a way, Remain, you know, kind of friendly.
00:26:01.000 So I don't think, thank God, you know, I don't feel that much sort of pressure from the faculty.
00:26:06.000 But I imagine I'm also lucky to have tenure and so on, because, you know, otherwise it'd be much more complicated.
00:26:14.000 Vladimir Goldstein, thank you very, very much for joining us and educating us about this important issue.
00:26:20.000 All right.
00:26:21.000 Thank you, Bob.
00:26:21.000 I enjoyed it, and I hope the audience would like it, too.
00:26:24.000 I mean, they will.